Residents Who Work in a Disadvantaged Area by Community Area — Chicago

Map and ranking of Residents Who Work in a Disadvantaged Area across Chicago's 77 neighborhoods. Highest: East Side (24.8%). Lowest: Lake View (3.2%). Chicago avg: 9.4%. Data: 2023.
All 4 City Policy tables

Residents Who Work in a Disadvantaged Area · all 77 Chicago neighborhoods · 2023

Show
Year

Earlier releases not shown — comparable LODES historical data are unavailable. Current data: 2023.

Citywide overview
All neighborhoods
Chicago citywide · Residents Who Work in a Disadvantaged Area 9.4%
Highest community area East Side: 24.8%
Lowest community area Lake View: 3.2%
RogersParkWestRidgeUptownLincolnSquareNorthCenterLakeViewLincolnParkNear NorthSideEdisonParkNorwoodParkJeffersonParkForestGlenNorthParkAlbanyParkPortageParkIrvingParkDunningMontclareBelmontCraginHermosaAvondaleLoganSquareHumboldtParkWestTownAustinWest GarfieldParkEast GarfieldParkNear WestSideNorthLawndaleSouthLawndaleLower WestSideLoopNear SouthSideArmourSquareDouglasOaklandFullerParkGrandBoulevardKenwoodWashingtonParkHydeParkWoodlawnSouthShoreChathamAvalonParkSouthChicagoBurnsideCalumetHeightsRoselandPullmanSouthDeeringEastSideWestPullmanRiverdaleHegewischGarfieldRidgeArcherHeightsBrightonParkMcKinleyParkBridgeportNew City(Back of the Yards)WestElsdonGageParkClearingWestLawnChicagoLawnWestEnglewoodEnglewoodGreater GrandCrossingAshburnAuburnGreshamBeverlyWashingtonHeightsMountGreenwoodMorganParkO'HareEdgewater

Note: Mayor Johnson’s proposed 2027 budget would charge employers with 125 or more qualifying employees $25 a month per employee working in Chicago, and rebate it in full for jobs in the City’s socioeconomically disadvantaged areas. Jobs are defined as private-sector jobs paying more than $1,250 a month, as that best approximates the head tax proposal’s earnings threshold of $4,300 per quarter. The data is not detailed enough to identify other dimensions that could exempt a resident from the head tax: residents of each community area who work outside a disadvantaged area could be exempt from the head tax for another reason, like working at a small firm. Community-area figures apply the method from our analysis Who Would Mayor Johnson’s Head Tax Rebate Reach? (October 2026), which reported wards.

Universe: Land area; private-sector jobs located here; residents with private-sector jobs in Chicago · Geography: Census Block (jobs and residents); area and disadvantaged-area boundaries (land area) · Source: Census LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics, 2023; City of Chicago, Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Areas (retrieved October 21, 2026)

Community Area distribution Hover or click any dot to inspect
Min 3% 25th pct 6% Median 14% 75th pct 19% Max 25%

Community Area ranking: Residents Who Work in a Disadvantaged Area

#1 East Side 24.8%+15.5 pts
#2 Riverdale 24.7%+15.4 pts
#3 Hegewisch 23.4%+14.1 pts
#4 Armour Square 22.9%+13.5 pts
#5 South Deering 22.4%+13.1 pts
#6 Fuller Park 22.1%+12.7 pts
#7 South Lawndale 21.9%+12.5 pts
#8 Gage Park 20.9%+11.6 pts
#9 Chicago Lawn 20.8%+11.5 pts
#10 Englewood 20.1%+10.8 pts
#11 West Englewood 20%+10.6 pts
#12 West Pullman 19.7%+10.4 pts
#13 South Chicago 19.3%+9.9 pts
#14 North Lawndale 19.2%+9.9 pts
#15 Greater Grand Crossing 19.1%+9.8 pts
#16 Pullman 19%+9.7 pts
#17 Roseland 19%+9.6 pts
#18 Brighton Park 18.9%+9.6 pts
#19 West Garfield Park 18.9%+9.5 pts
#20 Auburn Gresham 18.8%+9.5 pts
#21 West Lawn 18.1%+8.8 pts
#22 Washington Park 18.1%+8.7 pts
#23 McKinley Park 18%+8.6 pts
#24 New City (Back of the Yards) 17.7%+8.4 pts
#25 Ashburn 17.6%+8.2 pts
#26 Avalon Park 17.2%+7.8 pts
#27 Calumet Heights 17.1%+7.8 pts
#28 East Garfield Park 17%+7.7 pts
#29 South Shore 17%+7.6 pts
#30 Austin 17%+7.6 pts
#31 West Elsdon 16.8%+7.4 pts
#32 Bridgeport 16.8%+7.4 pts
#33 Archer Heights 16.5%+7.1 pts
#34 Chatham 16.5%+7.1 pts
#35 Washington Heights 16.4%+7.1 pts
#36 Burnside 15.9%+6.5 pts
#37 Oakland 14.6%+5.2 pts
#38 Garfield Ridge 13.8%+4.5 pts
#39 Morgan Park 13.8%+4.5 pts
#40 Woodlawn 13.6%+4.2 pts
#41 Grand Boulevard 13.1%+3.7 pts
#42 Clearing 13%+3.6 pts
#43 Humboldt Park 13%+3.6 pts
#44 Douglas 12.1%+2.7 pts
#45 Mount Greenwood 11.9%+2.5 pts
#46 Hermosa 11.1%+1.7 pts
#47 Kenwood 10.8%+1.4 pts
#48 Lower West Side 10.7%+1.4 pts
#49 Beverly 9.7%+0.3 pts
#50 Belmont Cragin 9.2%-0.2 pts
#51 Montclare 8.7%-0.6 pts
#52 Near West Side 8.3%-1.1 pts
#53 Hyde Park 6.6%-2.7 pts
#54 Dunning 6.4%-3 pts
#55 Forest Glen 6.4%-3 pts
#56 Avondale 6.3%-3 pts
#57 Near South Side 6.2%-3.2 pts
#58 West Ridge 6.2%-3.2 pts
#59 North Park 6.1%-3.3 pts
#60 Portage Park 5.9%-3.4 pts
#61 Jefferson Park 5.7%-3.7 pts
#62 Logan Square 5.6%-3.7 pts
#63 Albany Park 5.6%-3.8 pts
#64 West Town 5.3%-4 pts
#65 Irving Park 5.3%-4.1 pts
#66 O'Hare 5.2%-4.1 pts
#67 Norwood Park 5.2%-4.2 pts
#68 Rogers Park 4.4%-4.9 pts
#69 North Center 4.3%-5 pts
#70 Loop 4.1%-5.3 pts
#71 Lincoln Square 4%-5.4 pts
#72 Uptown 3.9%-5.4 pts
#73 Edgewater 3.8%-5.5 pts
#74 Edison Park 3.8%-5.6 pts
#75 Near North Side 3.3%-6 pts
#76 Lincoln Park 3.3%-6 pts
#77 Lake View 3.2%-6.2 pts
All 430 neighborhood maps

Basic Demographics

Households & Families

Immigration

Country of Birth

Language

Household Income

Poverty

Material Hardship

Employment

Occupation

Industry

Work & Earnings

Economic Mobility

Local Jobs and Businesses

Industry of Local Jobs

Students

Owners & Renters

Overall Housing Costs

Renter Housing Costs

Homeowner Housing Costs

Federal Housing Assistance

Housing Stock

Mobility

Environment

Transportation

Technology Access

Health Insurance & Disability

Health

City Policy