Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category	Armour Square
Hispanic	4.7% ±2.4 pp650 ±338
White	13.2% ±2.6 pp1,831 ±359
Black	11.7% ±3.7 pp1,630 ±520
Asian	66.4% ±5.7 pp9,220 ±788
Other or Multi-racial	4.0% ±1.7 pp554 ±238
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Hispanic	4.7%±2.4 pp650±338	29.7%±0.2 pp805,318±5,785	▼ -25.0%	67/77
White	13.2%±2.6 pp1,831±359	32.1%±0.2 pp870,127±5,557	▼ -18.9%	40/77
Black	11.7%±3.7 pp1,630±520	27.4%±0.2 pp743,710±6,047	▼ -15.7%	41/77
Asian	66.4%±5.7 pp9,220±788	7.2%±0.2 pp196,435±4,370	▲ +59.2%	1/77
Other or Multi-racial	4.0%±1.7 pp554±238	3.5%±0.1 pp95,636±3,778	▲ +0.5%	31/77
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Age Distribution

Category	Armour Square
Under 5	4.2% ±1.5 pp576 ±209
5-17	12.5% ±2.8 pp1,733 ±384
18-24	8.7% ±2.1 pp1,210 ±286
25-44	25.6% ±2.9 pp3,555 ±405
45-64	26.6% ±3.4 pp3,689 ±472
65-74	11.6% ±2.6 pp1,615 ±359
75-84	6.7% ±2.0 pp926 ±277
85+	4.2% ±1.6 pp581 ±218
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Under 5	4.2%±1.5 pp576±209	5.3%±0.1 pp144,044±3,867	▼ -1.2%	62/77
5-17	12.5%±2.8 pp1,733±384	14.1%±0.2 pp381,582±5,548	▼ -1.6%	62/77
18-24	8.7%±2.1 pp1,210±286	9.6%±0.2 pp260,942±4,900	▼ -0.9%	40/77
25-44	25.6%±2.9 pp3,555±405	34.3%±0.3 pp929,946±6,988	▼ -8.7%	58/77
45-64	26.6%±3.4 pp3,689±472	22.9%±0.2 pp620,047±5,644	▲ +3.7%	13/77
65-74	11.6%±2.6 pp1,615±359	8.2%±0.1 pp221,932±3,711	▲ +3.4%	6/77
75-84	6.7%±2.0 pp926±277	4.0%±0.1 pp107,625±2,694	▲ +2.7%	5/77
85+	4.2%±1.6 pp581±218	1.7%±0.1 pp45,108±1,921	▲ +2.5%	4/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category	Armour Square
No High School Diploma	29.3% ±5.0 pp3,041 ±515
High School Diploma or GED	24.7% ±4.1 pp2,558 ±427
Some College or Associate's Degree	16.3% ±4.0 pp1,685 ±417
Bachelor's Degree	17.3% ±3.7 pp1,798 ±382
Graduate Degree	12.4% ±3.0 pp1,284 ±312
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
No High School Diploma	29.3%±5.0 pp3,041±515	12.8%±0.2 pp246,015±4,778	▲ +16.6%	7/77
High School Diploma or GED	24.7%±4.1 pp2,558±427	21.1%±0.3 pp405,248±5,752	▲ +3.6%	39/77
Some College or Associate's Degree	16.3%±4.0 pp1,685±417	21.8%±0.3 pp419,911±5,550	▼ -5.6%	65/77
Bachelor's Degree	17.3%±3.7 pp1,798±382	25.4%±0.3 pp488,467±5,708	▼ -8.0%	42/77
Graduate Degree	12.4%±3.0 pp1,284±312	19.0%±0.3 pp365,017±5,186	▼ -6.6%	40/77
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category	Armour Square
Total Population	13,885 ±1,180
Total Households	5,795 ±342
Population Density	13,952 ±1,186 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	Average Neighborhood	Difference
Total Population	13,885	35,210	▼ −21,325
Total Households	5,795	15,067	▼ −9,272
Population Density	13,952 people/sq mi	13,045 people/sq mi	▲ +907
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average neighborhood rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large neighborhoods. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19	Difference	Rank
Total Population	13,897 ±745	13,588 ±836	13,885 ±1,180	▼ −12 ±1,396▲ +297 ±1,447▼ −309 ±1,120	▼ −21,333▼ −21,598▼ −21,325	66/7766/7765/77
Average Neighborhood	35,230	35,186	35,210	▼ −20▲ +24▼ −43
Total Households	5,167 ±183	5,412 ±199	5,795 ±342	▲ +628 ±388▲ +383 ±396▲ +245 ±270	▼ −8,194▼ −8,442▼ −9,272	63/7761/7762/77
Average Neighborhood	13,361	13,854	15,067	▲ +1,706▲ +1,213▲ +493
Population Density (per sq mi)	13,964 ±748	13,653 ±840	13,952 ±1,186	▼ −12▲ +298▼ −310	▲ +975▲ +625▲ +907	30/7731/7732/77
Average Neighborhood Density	12,989	13,028	13,045	▲ +56▲ +17▲ +39

Household Size

Category	Armour Square
Average Household Size	2.40±0.22
1-Person Households	35.5% ±4.8 pp2,058 ±281
2-Person Households	26.5% ±4.6 pp1,538 ±268
3-Person Households	17.9% ±4.6 pp1,036 ±266
4+ Person Households	20.1% ±5.0 pp1,163 ±290
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Size	2.40±0.22	2.29±0.02	▲ +0.11	44/77
1-Person Households	35.5%±4.8 pp2,058±281	39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,783	▼ -4.2%	38/77
2-Person Households	26.5%±4.6 pp1,538±268	29.5%±0.4 pp342,235±5,166	▼ -3.0%	42/77
3-Person Households	17.9%±4.6 pp1,036±266	12.9%±0.4 pp149,291±4,184	▲ +5.0%	6/77
4+ Person Households	20.1%±5.0 pp1,163±290	18.0%±0.5 pp208,411±5,419	▲ +2.1%	42/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category	Armour Square
Never Married	35.9% ±4.0 pp4,300 ±483
Married	47.7% ±3.5 pp5,711 ±417
Separated	1.3% ±1.0 pp152 ±121
Divorced	5.5% ±1.9 pp662 ±225
Widowed	9.5% ±2.3 pp1,137 ±271
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Never Married	35.9%±4.0 pp4,300±483	49.6%±0.3 pp1,130,286±6,623	▼ -13.7%	69/77
Married	47.7%±3.5 pp5,711±417	35.5%±0.3 pp807,294±6,077	▲ +12.3%	12/77
Separated	1.3%±1.0 pp152±121	2.2%±0.1 pp49,430±2,379	▼ -0.9%	62/77
Divorced	5.5%±1.9 pp662±225	7.9%±0.2 pp180,700±3,966	▼ -2.4%	69/77
Widowed	9.5%±2.3 pp1,137±271	4.8%±0.1 pp109,357±2,738	▲ +4.7%	6/77
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category	Armour Square
Speak English Only	34.3% ±4.7 pp4,563 ±630
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese)	58.3% ±6.2 pp7,765 ±822
Other Languages	3.3% ±1.8 pp435 ±236
Spanish	2.4% ±1.4 pp321 ±186
Other Indo-European	1.7% ±0.9 pp227 ±116
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Speak English Only	34.3%±4.7 pp4,563±630	64.6%±0.3 pp1,659,069±8,218	▼ -30.3%	67/77
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese)	58.3%±6.2 pp7,765±822	2.0%±0.1 pp52,032±2,783	▲ +56.3%	1/23
Other Languages	3.3%±1.8 pp435±236	1.0%±0.1 pp25,292±2,452	▲ +2.3%	24/77
Spanish	2.4%±1.4 pp321±186	23.7%±0.2 pp607,865±6,166	▼ -21.3%	73/77
Other Indo-European	1.7%±0.9 pp227±116	2.4%±0.1 pp61,672±3,192	▼ -0.7%	29/36
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show

Category	Armour Square
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	49.5% ±4.6 pp49.5%±4.6 pp6,591 ±618
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+)	14.2% ±3.2 pp14.2%±3.2 pp1,894 ±421
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	15.9% ±3.2 pp111.9%±33.6 pp2,120 ±428
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	20.3% ±3.7 pp142.8%±41.1 pp2,704 ±495
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	50.5% ±4.7 pp354.6%±85.5 pp6,717 ±628
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	49.5%±4.6 pp49.5%±4.6 pp6,591±618	85.4%±0.5 pp85.4%±0.5 pp2,192,778±11,961	▼ -35.9%▼ -35.9%	77/77
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+)	14.2%±3.2 pp14.2%±3.2 pp1,894±421	7.1%±0.2 pp7.1%±0.2 pp183,252±4,686	▲ +7.1%▲ +7.1%	11/77
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	15.9%±3.2 pp111.9%±33.6 pp2,120±428	5.2%±0.2 pp72.7%±1.1 pp133,269±3,923	▲ +10.7%▲ +39.2%	4/777/76
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	20.3%±3.7 pp142.8%±41.1 pp2,704±495	2.3%±0.1 pp31.6%±1.4 pp57,883±2,982	▲ +18.1%▲ +111.2%	1/774/76
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	50.5%±4.7 pp354.6%±85.5 pp6,717±628	14.6%±0.3 pp204.3%±6.4 pp374,404±6,794	▲ +35.9%▲ +150.3%	1/773/76
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category	Armour Square
Married-Couple Households	39.5% ±5.9 pp2,292 ±344
Unmarried-Couple Households	5.1% ±2.4 pp296 ±137
One-Person Households	35.5% ±6.2 pp2,058 ±361
Other Household Types	19.8% ±11.1 pp1,150 ±643
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Married-Couple Households	39.5%±5.9 pp2,292±344	30.9%±0.3 pp358,432±3,598	▲ +8.7%	27/77
Unmarried-Couple Households	5.1%±2.4 pp296±137	8.3%±0.2 pp96,220±2,797	▼ -3.2%	52/77
One-Person Households	35.5%±6.2 pp2,058±361	39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,729	▼ -4.2%	38/77
Other Household Types	19.8%±11.1 pp1,150±643	21.1%±0.7 pp245,285±8,514	▼ -1.3%	50/77
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category	Armour Square
Children in Married-Couple Households	53.2% ±11.9 pp1,229 ±274
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	4.7% ±4.7 pp109 ±110
Children in Single-Mother Households	38.9% ±14.5 pp900 ±334
Children in Single-Father Households	3.2% ±2.9 pp73 ±66
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households	53.2%±11.9 pp1,229±274	56.0%±0.8 pp293,542±4,257	▼ -2.8%	47/77
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	4.7%±4.7 pp109±110	8.8%±0.6 pp45,960±3,208	▼ -4.0%	55/77
Children in Single-Mother Households	38.9%±14.5 pp900±334	30.6%±0.9 pp160,535±4,521	▲ +8.3%	28/77
Children in Single-Father Households	3.2%±2.9 pp73±66	4.6%±0.4 pp24,133±2,006	▼ -1.4%	55/77
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Armour Square
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	0.6% ±0.4 pp0.6%±0.4 pp71 ±50
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	14.1% ±69.0 pp0.1%±0.4 pp10 ±49
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	0.0% ±63.0 pp0.0%0
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	71.8% ±77.9 pp0.4%±0.5 pp51 ±55
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	14.1% ±63.1 pp0.1%±0.4 pp10 ±45
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	0.0% ±99.6 pp0.0%0
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	0.6%±0.4 pp0.6%±0.4 pp71±50	2.8%±0.1 pp2.8%±0.1 pp60,766±2,397	▼ -2.2%▼ -2.2%	77/77
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	14.1%±69.0 pp0.1%±0.4 pp10±49	26.8%±1.8 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,267±1,067	▼ -12.7%▼ -0.7%	59/7776/77
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	0.0%±63.0 pp0.0%0	12.9%±1.0 pp0.4%±0.0 pp7,830±579	▼ -12.9%▼ -0.4%	73/7773/77
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	71.8%±77.9 pp0.4%±0.5 pp51±55	28.8%±1.4 pp0.8%±0.0 pp17,525±846	▲ +43.0%▼ -0.4%	1/7762/77
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	14.1%±63.1 pp0.1%±0.4 pp10±45	4.9%±0.7 pp0.1%±0.0 pp2,995±441	▲ +9.2%▼ -0.1%	5/7745/77
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	0.0%±99.6 pp0.0%0	26.6%±1.5 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,149±916	▼ -26.6%▼ -0.7%	77/7777/77
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show

Category	Armour Square
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	49.9% ±4.7 pp49.9%±4.7 pp6,930 ±658
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	50.1% ±4.6 pp50.1%±4.6 pp6,955 ±640
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	27.3% ±3.4 pp54.6%±4.5 pp3,796 ±471
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	22.8% ±4.3 pp45.4%±7.6 pp3,159 ±602
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	49.9%±4.7 pp49.9%±4.7 pp6,930±658	79.1%±0.3 pp79.1%±0.3 pp2,144,343±7,926	▼ -29.2%▼ -29.2%	76/77
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	50.1%±4.6 pp50.1%±4.6 pp6,955±640	20.9%±0.3 pp20.9%±0.3 pp566,883±7,968	▲ +29.2%▲ +29.2%	2/77
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	27.3%±3.4 pp54.6%±4.5 pp3,796±471	10.0%±0.2 pp47.7%±0.5 pp270,551±4,603	▲ +17.4%▲ +6.9%	3/7725/77
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	22.8%±4.3 pp45.4%±7.6 pp3,159±602	10.9%±0.2 pp52.3%±0.9 pp296,332±6,504	▲ +11.8%▼ -6.9%	5/7753/77
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show

Category	Armour Square
Born in China / Hong Kong (of foreign-born residents)	44.6%±4.4 pp89.0%±14.0 pp6,189±616
Born in Vietnam (of foreign-born residents)	1.3%±1.1 pp2.6%±2.3 pp184±159
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	4.2%8.4%582
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	Chicago	Difference	Rank
Born in China / Hong Kong (of foreign-born residents)	44.6% ±4.4 pp89.0%±14.0 pp6,189	1.4% ±0.1 pp6.7%38,255	▲ +43.2%▲ +82.2%	1/771/77
Born in Vietnam (of foreign-born residents)	1.3% ±1.1 pp2.6%±2.3 pp184	0.2% ±0.0 pp1.2%6,676	▲ +1.1%▲ +1.5%	3/7710/77
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	4.2%8.4%582	——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show

Category	Armour Square
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	14.4% ±3.6 pp28.7%±6.7 pp1,997 ±497
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	17.3% ±4.1 pp34.6%±7.6 pp2,409 ±568
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	6.1% ±1.9 pp12.1%±3.6 pp843 ±262
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	12.3% ±2.7 pp24.5%±5.0 pp1,707 ±381
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	14.4%±3.6 pp28.7%±6.7 pp1,997±497	5.9%±0.2 pp2292.2%±216.7 pp159,447±5,557	▲ +8.5%▼ -2263.5%	4/7733/77
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	17.3%±4.1 pp34.6%±7.6 pp2,409±568	4.5%±0.1 pp1752.6%±164.6 pp121,912±4,035	▲ +12.9%▼ -1718.0%	1/773/77
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	6.1%±1.9 pp12.1%±3.6 pp843±262	4.6%±0.1 pp1780.5%±166.2 pp123,849±3,901	▲ +1.5%▼ -1768.3%	25/7765/77
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	12.3%±2.7 pp24.5%±5.0 pp1,707±381	6.0%±0.1 pp2324.3%±210.3 pp161,675±3,491	▲ +6.3%▼ -2299.7%	10/7746/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later	8.1% ±3.1 pp1,119 ±427	12.6% ±3.3 pp1,709 ±451	14.4% ±3.6 pp1,997 ±497	▲ +6.3 pp▲ +878▲ +1.8 pp▲ +288▲ +4.5 pp▲ +590
Chicago citywide	1.4% ±0.1 pp36,978 ±2,235	3.7% ±0.1 pp99,118 ±3,198	5.9% ±0.2 pp159,447 ±5,568	▲ +4.5 pp▲ +122,469▲ +2.2 pp▲ +60,329▲ +2.3 pp▲ +62,140
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009	18.4% ±3.2 pp2,560 ±444	15.0% ±2.3 pp2,036 ±316	17.3% ±4.1 pp2,409 ±568	▼ −1.1 pp▼ −151▲ +2.4 pp▲ +373▼ −3.4 pp▼ −524
Chicago citywide	5.9% ±0.1 pp161,331 ±3,896	4.9% ±0.1 pp131,658 ±3,182	4.5% ±0.1 pp121,912 ±4,044	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −39,419▼ −0.4 pp▼ −9,746▼ −1.1 pp▼ −29,673
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999	13.4% ±2.6 pp1,855 ±367	8.2% ±2.6 pp1,120 ±353	6.1% ±1.9 pp843 ±262	▼ −7.3 pp▼ −1,012▼ −2.2 pp▼ −277▼ −5.1 pp▼ −735
Chicago citywide	6.1% ±0.1 pp165,077 ±3,717	5.3% ±0.1 pp142,413 ±3,015	4.6% ±0.1 pp123,849 ±3,911	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −41,228▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,564▼ −0.8 pp▼ −22,664
Entered the U.S. Before 1990	16.8% ±3.3 pp2,340 ±456	21.6% ±3.1 pp2,938 ±414	12.3% ±2.7 pp1,707 ±381	▼ −4.6 pp▼ −633▼ −9.3 pp▼ −1,231▲ +4.8 pp▲ +598
Chicago citywide	7.5% ±0.1 pp204,169 ±3,469	6.9% ±0.1 pp186,050 ±3,114	6.0% ±0.1 pp161,675 ±3,509	▼ −1.6 pp▼ −42,494▼ −0.9 pp▼ −24,375▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,119

Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category	Armour Square
Average Household Income	$71,625±$7,461
Per Capita Income	$30,368±$2,613
10th Percentile Household Income	$11,263±$1,449
25th Percentile Household Income	$18,692±$3,783
Median Household Income	$45,340±$10,069
75th Percentile Household Income	$97,777±$12,468
90th Percentile Household Income	$166,343±$26,589
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$71,625±$7,461	$116,016±$1,263	▼ −$44,391	56/77
Per Capita Income	$30,368±$2,613	$50,086±$581	▼ −$19,718	49/77
10th Percentile Household Income	$11,263±$1,449	$12,933±$271	▼ −$1,670	48/77
25th Percentile Household Income	$18,692±$3,783	$34,575±$649	▼ −$15,883	61/77
Median Household Income	$45,340±$10,069	$77,902±$907	▼ −$32,562	62/77
75th Percentile Household Income	$97,777±$12,468	$144,150±$1,210	▼ −$46,373	56/77
90th Percentile Household Income	$166,343±$26,589	Over $200,000	▼ −$33,657+	51/77
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$53,673 ±5,241	$63,412 ±7,632	$71,625 ±7,461	▲ +$17,952▲ +$8,212▲ +$9,739
Chicago citywide	$95,689 ±910	$111,304 ±1,075	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$20,327▲ +$4,712▲ +$15,615
Average Household Income (nominal dollars)	$40,506 ±3,955	$51,681 ±6,220	$71,625 ±7,461	▲ +$31,118▲ +$19,943▲ +$11,175
Chicago citywide	$72,215 ±687	$90,713 ±876	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$43,801▲ +$25,303▲ +$18,498
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$21,061 ±1,886	$26,805 ±3,141	$30,368 ±2,613	▲ +$9,306▲ +$3,563▲ +$5,743
Chicago citywide	$37,927 ±351	$45,525 ±412	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$12,160▲ +$4,562▲ +$7,598
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars)	$15,895 ±1,423	$21,846 ±2,560	$30,368 ±2,613	▲ +$14,473▲ +$8,522▲ +$5,951
Chicago citywide	$28,623 ±265	$37,103 ±336	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$21,464▲ +$12,984▲ +$8,480
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$5,210 ±716	$6,563 ±1,383	$11,263 ±1,449	▲ +$6,053▲ +$4,700▲ +$1,353
Chicago citywide	$11,828 ±190	$13,281 ±277	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$1,105▼ −$348▲ +$1,453
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$3,932 ±540	$5,349 ±1,127	$11,263 ±1,449	▲ +$7,331▲ +$5,914▲ +$1,417
Chicago citywide	$8,927 ±144	$10,824 ±225	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$4,007▲ +$2,109▲ +$1,898
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$13,026 ±1,726	$15,934 ±2,432	$18,692 ±3,783	▲ +$5,666▲ +$2,759▲ +$2,908
Chicago citywide	$28,727 ±321	$31,597 ±462	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$5,848▲ +$2,979▲ +$2,869
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$9,831 ±1,302	$12,986 ±1,982	$18,692 ±3,783	▲ +$8,862▲ +$5,706▲ +$3,155
Chicago citywide	$21,680 ±242	$25,751 ±376	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$12,895▲ +$8,824▲ +$4,071
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$31,557 ±4,138	$38,845 ±7,138	$45,340 ±10,069	▲ +$13,783▲ +$6,496▲ +$7,288
Chicago citywide	$63,379 ±591	$71,469 ±723	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$14,523▲ +$6,433▲ +$8,090
Median Household Income (nominal dollars)	$23,816 ±3,123	$31,658 ±5,818	$45,340 ±10,069	▲ +$21,525▲ +$13,682▲ +$7,843
Chicago citywide	$47,831 ±446	$58,247 ±589	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$30,071▲ +$19,655▲ +$10,416
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$74,848 ±9,786	$89,358 ±12,661	$97,777 ±12,468	▲ +$22,928▲ +$8,419▲ +$14,509
Chicago citywide	$122,019 ±806	$139,501 ±1,057	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$22,131▲ +$4,648▲ +$17,482
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$56,487 ±7,386	$72,827 ±10,319	$97,777 ±12,468	▲ +$41,290▲ +$24,950▲ +$16,340
Chicago citywide	$92,086 ±608	$113,694 ±862	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$52,064▲ +$30,456▲ +$21,608
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$133,899 ±19,071	$158,328 ±29,037	$166,343 ±26,589	▲ +$32,444▲ +$8,014▲ +$24,429
Chicago citywide	$202,601 ±2,442	$235,390 ±1,636	—	——▲ +$32,790
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$101,051 ±14,393	$129,038 ±23,665	$166,343 ±26,589	▲ +$65,291▲ +$37,305▲ +$27,986
Chicago citywide	$152,899 ±1,843	$191,844 ±1,333	—	——▲ +$38,944

Poverty Status

Category	Armour Square
Below Poverty Line	24.4% ±6.3 pp3,384 ±871
Below 200% Poverty Line	52.0% ±8.7 pp7,215 ±1,203
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	7.6% ±2.3 pp1,053 ±326
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Below Poverty Line	24.4%±6.3 pp3,384±871	16.8%±0.4 pp456,194±11,330	▲ +7.5%	23/77
Below 200% Poverty Line	52.0%±8.7 pp7,215±1,203	33.4%±0.6 pp905,794±16,660	▲ +18.6%	14/77
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	7.6%±2.3 pp1,053±326	8.3%±0.3 pp226,117±7,649	▼ -0.8%	41/77
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Category	Armour Square
Food Insecurity	30.9%3,308
Housing Insecurity	17.2%1,844
Transportation Barriers	12.1%1,294
Threatened Utility Shutoff	9.7%1,034
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Food Insecurity	30.9%3,308	24.4%509,385	▲ +6.5%	32/77
Housing Insecurity	17.2%1,844	19.7%411,266	▼ -2.5%	49/77
Transportation Barriers	12.1%1,294	11.6%242,167	▲ +0.5%	38/77
Threatened Utility Shutoff	9.7%1,034	11.9%248,430	▼ -2.2%	45/77
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category	Armour Square
In Labor Force	87.5% ±4.1 pp4,635 ±218
↳ Employed	76.9% ±5.0 pp4,072 ±263
↳ Unemployed	9.2% ±4.1 pp487 ±218
↳ Unemployment Rate	10.7% ±4.7 pp—
Not in Labor Force	12.5% ±16.3 pp664 ±862
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
In Labor Force	87.5%±4.1 pp4,635±218	85.6%±0.3 pp1,069,076±3,868	▲ +1.9%	29/77
↳ Employed	76.9%±5.0 pp4,072±263	79.6%±0.3 pp994,466±4,326	▼ -2.7%	36/77
↳ Unemployed	9.2%±4.1 pp487±218	5.9%±0.2 pp73,968±2,788	▲ +3.3%	26/77
↳ Unemployment Rate	10.7%±4.7 pp—	6.9%±0.3 pp86,502±3,342	▲ +3.8%	28/77
Not in Labor Force	12.5%±16.3 pp664±862	14.4%±1.1 pp180,399±14,344	▼ -1.9%	49/77
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category	Armour Square
Management, Business, Science & Arts	40.2% ±6.7 pp2,549 ±422
↳ Management Occupations	7.1% ±3.3 pp449 ±206
↳ Business & Financial Operations	5.4% ±2.1 pp340 ±133
↳ Computer & Mathematical	3.9% ±1.6 pp246 ±100
↳ Architecture & Engineering	3.6% ±1.9 pp227 ±119
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	0.8% ±0.9 pp52 ±57
↳ Community & Social Service	2.0% ±1.7 pp127 ±107
↳ Legal Occupations	1.8% ±2.8 pp112 ±175
↳ Education, Training & Library	9.9% ±3.7 pp629 ±237
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	0.3% ±0.7 pp19 ±46
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	3.4% ±2.3 pp217 ±146
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	2.1% ±1.5 pp130 ±94
Service	26.7% ±5.6 pp1,694 ±355
↳ Healthcare Support	4.2% ±2.0 pp263 ±130
↳ Protective Service	0.5% ±0.8 pp33 ±48
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	15.4% ±4.8 pp974 ±302
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	2.5% ±2.0 pp156 ±126
↳ Personal Care & Service	4.2% ±2.0 pp268 ±128
Sales & Office	17.3% ±4.7 pp1,098 ±296
↳ Sales & Related	8.0% ±3.5 pp508 ±219
↳ Office & Administrative Support	9.3% ±3.0 pp590 ±188
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	2.6% ±2.2 pp168 ±142
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.0% ±0.7 pp0
↳ Construction & Extraction	1.7% ±1.9 pp106 ±123
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	1.0% ±1.4 pp61 ±88
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	13.1% ±4.6 pp832 ±293
↳ Production Occupations	5.5% ±2.3 pp350 ±145
↳ Transportation Occupations	3.3% ±2.4 pp211 ±153
↳ Material Moving Occupations	4.3% ±3.3 pp271 ±210
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts	40.2%±6.7 pp2,549±422	49.2%±0.4 pp686,743±5,710	▼ -9.0%	39/77
↳ Management Occupations	7.1%±3.3 pp449±206	12.3%±0.3 pp172,182±3,807	▼ -5.2%	55/77
↳ Business & Financial Operations	5.4%±2.1 pp340±133	9.1%±0.2 pp127,081±3,358	▼ -3.7%	47/77
↳ Computer & Mathematical	3.9%±1.6 pp246±100	4.9%±0.2 pp68,921±2,690	▼ -1.1%	29/77
↳ Architecture & Engineering	3.6%±1.9 pp227±119	1.6%±0.1 pp22,779±1,380	▲ +1.9%	2/77
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	0.8%±0.9 pp52±57	1.4%±0.1 pp19,126±1,340	▼ -0.5%	40/77
↳ Community & Social Service	2.0%±1.7 pp127±107	1.9%±0.1 pp26,973±1,500	▲ +0.1%	36/77
↳ Legal Occupations	1.8%±2.8 pp112±175	2.3%±0.1 pp31,629±1,814	▼ -0.5%	23/77
↳ Education, Training & Library	9.9%±3.7 pp629±237	6.6%±0.2 pp92,316±2,697	▲ +3.3%	12/77
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	0.3%±0.7 pp19±46	3.1%±0.1 pp43,879±1,786	▼ -2.8%	74/77
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	3.4%±2.3 pp217±146	4.6%±0.2 pp63,551±2,652	▼ -1.1%	37/77
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	2.1%±1.5 pp130±94	1.3%±0.1 pp18,306±1,387	▲ +0.7%	20/77
Service	26.7%±5.6 pp1,694±355	16.9%±0.3 pp235,977±4,217	▲ +9.8%	14/77
↳ Healthcare Support	4.2%±2.0 pp263±130	3.4%±0.2 pp46,792±2,107	▲ +0.8%	35/77
↳ Protective Service	0.5%±0.8 pp33±48	2.8%±0.1 pp39,146±1,734	▼ -2.3%	73/77
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	15.4%±4.8 pp974±302	5.1%±0.2 pp70,514±2,393	▲ +10.3%	1/77
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	2.5%±2.0 pp156±126	3.0%±0.1 pp41,783±1,967	▼ -0.5%	55/77
↳ Personal Care & Service	4.2%±2.0 pp268±128	2.7%±0.1 pp37,742±1,657	▲ +1.5%	12/77
Sales & Office	17.3%±4.7 pp1,098±296	17.4%±0.3 pp243,580±4,754	▼ -0.1%	44/77
↳ Sales & Related	8.0%±3.5 pp508±219	8.1%±0.2 pp113,073±3,174	▼ -0.1%	35/77
↳ Office & Administrative Support	9.3%±3.0 pp590±188	9.3%±0.3 pp130,507±3,591	0%	49/77
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	2.6%±2.2 pp168±142	4.6%±0.2 pp64,338±2,929	▼ -2.0%	59/77
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.0%±0.7 pp0	0.1%±0.0 pp1,506±406	▼ -0.1%	42/77
↳ Construction & Extraction	1.7%±1.9 pp106±123	2.8%±0.1 pp39,432±2,062	▼ -1.1%	54/77
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	1.0%±1.4 pp61±88	1.7%±0.1 pp23,400±1,722	▼ -0.7%	57/77
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	13.1%±4.6 pp832±293	11.8%±0.3 pp165,261±3,629	▲ +1.3%	41/77
↳ Production Occupations	5.5%±2.3 pp350±145	4.2%±0.2 pp57,989±2,275	▲ +1.4%	30/77
↳ Transportation Occupations	3.3%±2.4 pp211±153	3.9%±0.2 pp54,099±2,118	▼ -0.5%	52/77
↳ Material Moving Occupations	4.3%±3.3 pp271±210	3.8%±0.2 pp53,173±2,312	▲ +0.5%	37/77
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category	Armour Square
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0% ±0.7 pp0
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.0% ±0.7 pp0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0% ±0.7 pp0
Construction	3.3% ±2.6 pp208 ±164
Manufacturing	6.8% ±2.8 pp429 ±176
Wholesale Trade	2.3% ±2.1 pp149 ±135
Retail Trade	6.6% ±3.0 pp421 ±189
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	4.5% ±1.7 pp285 ±111
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	3.3% ±1.6 pp209 ±102
↳ Utilities	1.2% ±1.0 pp76 ±65
Information	0.1% ±0.7 pp5 ±44
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	9.5% ±3.5 pp603 ±225
↳ Finance & Insurance	8.5% ±3.5 pp540 ±222
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.0% ±1.0 pp63 ±64
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	11.6% ±3.9 pp734 ±248
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	8.2% ±3.6 pp518 ±230
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0% ±0.7 pp0
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	3.4% ±2.3 pp216 ±146
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	26.0% ±5.0 pp1,651 ±316
↳ Educational Services	11.8% ±3.0 pp746 ±189
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	14.3% ±4.7 pp905 ±299
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	19.7% ±5.5 pp1,247 ±348
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	2.8% ±1.5 pp175 ±96
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	16.9% ±5.4 pp1,072 ±344
Other Services	5.8% ±2.3 pp366 ±147
Public Administration	3.8% ±1.8 pp242 ±117
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%±0.7 pp0	0.2%±0.0 pp—	▼ -0.2%	59/77
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.0%±0.7 pp0	0.2%±0.0 pp—	▼ -0.2%	55/77
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%±0.7 pp0	0.0%±0.0 pp—	0%	18/77
Construction	3.3%±2.6 pp208±164	3.8%±0.2 pp—	▼ -0.5%	43/77
Manufacturing	6.8%±2.8 pp429±176	7.7%±0.2 pp—	▼ -0.9%	41/77
Wholesale Trade	2.3%±2.1 pp149±135	2.0%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.3%	19/77
Retail Trade	6.6%±3.0 pp421±189	8.2%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.6%	56/77
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	4.5%±1.7 pp285±111	7.1%±0.2 pp—	▼ -2.6%	64/77
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	3.3%±1.6 pp209±102	6.5%±0.2 pp—	▼ -3.3%	67/77
↳ Utilities	1.2%±1.0 pp76±65	0.5%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.7%	9/77
Information	0.1%±0.7 pp5±44	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▼ -2.0%	76/77
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	9.5%±3.5 pp603±225	8.8%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.7%	16/77
↳ Finance & Insurance	8.5%±3.5 pp540±222	6.7%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.8%	11/77
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.0%±1.0 pp63±64	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▼ -1.1%	68/77
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	11.6%±3.9 pp734±248	18.2%±0.4 pp—	▼ -6.6%	55/77
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	8.2%±3.6 pp518±230	13.4%±0.3 pp—	▼ -5.3%	34/77
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%±0.7 pp0	0.1%±0.0 pp—	▼ -0.1%	35/77
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	3.4%±2.3 pp216±146	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.2%	55/77
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	26.0%±5.0 pp1,651±316	24.2%±0.4 pp—	▲ +1.9%	37/77
↳ Educational Services	11.8%±3.0 pp746±189	10.5%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.3%	27/77
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	14.3%±4.7 pp905±299	13.7%±0.3 pp—	▲ +0.6%	35/77
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	19.7%±5.5 pp1,247±348	9.1%±0.2 pp—	▲ +10.5%	1/77
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	2.8%±1.5 pp175±96	2.2%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.6%	19/77
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	16.9%±5.4 pp1,072±344	6.9%±0.2 pp—	▲ +10.0%	1/77
Other Services	5.8%±2.3 pp366±147	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.2%	16/77
Public Administration	3.8%±1.8 pp242±117	4.0%±0.2 pp—	▼ -0.2%	43/77
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category	Armour Square
Private Company Employee	68.6% ±4.1 pp4,351 ±259
Self-Employed	6.0% ±3.1 pp382 ±199
Nonprofit	7.8% ±2.6 pp494 ±164
Government	17.2% ±4.5 pp1,092 ±285
Unpaid Family Worker	0.3% ±0.8 pp22 ±53
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Private Company Employee	68.6%±4.1 pp4,351±259	67.9%±0.4 pp947,845±5,822	▲ +0.7%	25/77
Self-Employed	6.0%±3.1 pp382±199	8.3%±0.2 pp115,690±2,989	▼ -2.3%	64/77
Nonprofit	7.8%±2.6 pp494±164	12.1%±0.3 pp169,124±4,035	▼ -4.3%	65/77
Government	17.2%±4.5 pp1,092±285	12.9%±0.3 pp179,945±4,021	▲ +4.3%	30/77
Unpaid Family Worker	0.3%±0.8 pp22±53	0.2%±0.0 pp2,312±408	▲ +0.2%	14/77
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category	Armour Square
Full-Time, Year-Round	50.2% ±3.7 pp3,668 ±272
Part-Time or Part-Year	49.8% ±5.8 pp3,638 ±427
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round	50.2%±3.7 pp3,668±272	67.0%±0.3 pp1,025,726±3,875	▼ -16.8%	74/77
Part-Time or Part-Year	49.8%±5.8 pp3,638±427	33.0%±0.3 pp504,210±4,897	▲ +16.8%	4/77
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category	Armour Square
Average FT Earnings	$65,774±$5,853
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$19,604±$6,852
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$36,918±$4,976
Median FT Earnings	$56,391±$7,048
75th Percentile FT Earnings	$92,399±$8,472
90th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Average FT Earnings	$65,774±$5,853	$96,214±$968	▼ −$30,440	44/76
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$19,604±$6,852	$29,008±$387	▼ −$9,404	74/77
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$36,918±$4,976	$43,011±$345	▼ −$6,093	46/77
Median FT Earnings	$56,391±$7,048	$69,663±$530	▼ −$13,272	44/77
75th Percentile FT Earnings	$92,399±$8,472	Over $100,000	▼ −$7,601+	39/77
90th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000	Over $100,000	—	1/77
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$52,705 ±3,319	$61,250 ±6,639	$65,774 ±5,853	▲ +$13,069▲ +$4,524▲ +$8,544
Chicago citywide	$83,170 ±714	$91,467 ±682	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$13,044▲ +$4,747▲ +$8,297
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$39,776 ±2,505	$49,918 ±5,411	$65,774 ±5,853	▲ +$25,998▲ +$15,856▲ +$10,143
Chicago citywide	$62,767 ±539	$74,546 ±556	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$33,447▲ +$21,669▲ +$11,778
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$13,598 ±1,617	$19,667 ±4,789	$19,604 ±6,852	▲ +$6,006▼ −$64▲ +$6,070
Chicago citywide	$24,209 ±243	$26,113 ±152	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$4,799▲ +$2,895▲ +$1,904
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$10,262 ±1,221	$16,029 ±3,903	$19,604 ±6,852	▲ +$9,342▲ +$3,575▲ +$5,767
Chicago citywide	$18,270 ±183	$21,282 ±124	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$10,738▲ +$7,726▲ +$3,012
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$23,471 ±4,119	$29,843 ±3,015	$36,918 ±4,976	▲ +$13,448▲ +$7,075▲ +$6,373
Chicago citywide	$37,393 ±278	$39,415 ±229	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$5,618▲ +$3,597▲ +$2,021
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$17,713 ±3,108	$24,322 ±2,458	$36,918 ±4,976	▲ +$19,206▲ +$12,596▲ +$6,609
Chicago citywide	$28,220 ±210	$32,123 ±187	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$14,791▲ +$10,888▲ +$3,903
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$40,041 ±5,890	$47,072 ±7,496	$56,391 ±7,048	▲ +$16,350▲ +$9,319▲ +$7,031
Chicago citywide	$60,575 ±496	$64,628 ±327	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,034▲ +$4,054
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$30,219 ±4,445	$38,364 ±6,109	$56,391 ±7,048	▲ +$26,173▲ +$18,027▲ +$8,145
Chicago citywide	$45,715 ±374	$52,672 ±266	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$23,948▲ +$16,991▲ +$6,957
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$69,666 ±7,843	$78,327 ±12,737	$92,399 ±8,472	▲ +$22,733▲ +$14,072▲ +$8,661
Chicago citywide	$98,274 ±615	$108,202 ±616	—	——▲ +$9,928
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$52,576 ±5,919	$63,837 ±10,380	$92,399 ±8,472	▲ +$39,823▲ +$28,563▲ +$11,261
Chicago citywide	$74,166 ±464	$88,185 ±502	—	——▲ +$14,019
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$114,042 ±14,623	—	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$86,066 ±11,036	—	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category	Armour Square
Average PT Earnings	$26,676±$5,017
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$2,764±$1,606
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$7,629±$2,401
Median PT Earnings	$15,285±$2,426
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$26,327±$11,170
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$65,884±$17,445
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Average PT Earnings	$26,676±$5,017	$33,575±$750	▼ −$6,899	39/76
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$2,764±$1,606	$2,183±$87	▲ +$580	19/77
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$7,629±$2,401	$7,222±$206	▲ +$407	30/77
Median PT Earnings	$15,285±$2,426	$19,180±$393	▼ −$3,895	55/77
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$26,327±$11,170	$38,498±$681	▼ −$12,171	66/77
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$65,884±$17,445	$73,776±$1,391	▼ −$7,893	35/77
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$18,615 ±3,624	$21,876 ±5,798	$26,676 ±5,017	▲ +$8,061▲ +$4,800▲ +$3,261
Chicago citywide	$27,076 ±473	$31,236 ±676	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$6,500▲ +$2,340▲ +$4,160
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$14,049 ±2,735	$17,829 ±4,726	$26,676 ±5,017	▲ +$12,627▲ +$8,847▲ +$3,780
Chicago citywide	$20,433 ±357	$25,457 ±551	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$13,142▲ +$8,118▲ +$5,024
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,695 ±456	$1,707 ±602	$2,764 ±1,606	▲ +$1,069▲ +$1,057▲ +$12
Chicago citywide	$2,230 ±48	$2,283 ±59	$2,183 ±87	▼ −$47▼ −$100▲ +$53
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$1,279 ±344	$1,391 ±490	$2,764 ±1,606	▲ +$1,484▲ +$1,373▲ +$112
Chicago citywide	$1,683 ±36	$1,861 ±48	$2,183 ±87	▲ +$500▲ +$322▲ +$178
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$4,605 ±1,247	$6,462 ±2,213	$7,629 ±2,401	▲ +$3,024▲ +$1,167▲ +$1,857
Chicago citywide	$6,390 ±123	$6,841 ±156	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$832▲ +$381▲ +$451
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$3,476 ±941	$5,267 ±1,804	$7,629 ±2,401	▲ +$4,153▲ +$2,362▲ +$1,791
Chicago citywide	$4,822 ±93	$5,575 ±127	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$2,399▲ +$1,646▲ +$753
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$10,096 ±1,931	$13,180 ±1,590	$15,285 ±2,426	▲ +$5,189▲ +$2,105▲ +$3,084
Chicago citywide	$15,461 ±166	$17,025 ±275	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$3,719▲ +$2,155▲ +$1,563
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$7,619 ±1,458	$10,742 ±1,296	$15,285 ±2,426	▲ +$7,666▲ +$4,543▲ +$3,123
Chicago citywide	$11,668 ±125	$13,875 ±224	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$7,512▲ +$5,305▲ +$2,207
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$19,251 ±3,613	$25,559 ±5,640	$26,327 ±11,170	▲ +$7,076▲ +$769▲ +$6,307
Chicago citywide	$30,795 ±619	$34,779 ±505	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$7,703▲ +$3,719▲ +$3,984
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$14,529 ±2,727	$20,830 ±4,597	$26,327 ±11,170	▲ +$11,799▲ +$5,497▲ +$6,302
Chicago citywide	$23,241 ±468	$28,345 ±412	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$15,257▲ +$10,153▲ +$5,104
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$44,032 ±10,916	$49,068 ±13,674	$65,884 ±17,445	▲ +$21,852▲ +$16,815▲ +$5,037
Chicago citywide	$61,207 ±1,249	$68,040 ±1,298	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$12,570▲ +$5,737▲ +$6,833
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$33,230 ±8,238	$39,991 ±11,145	$65,884 ±17,445	▲ +$32,654▲ +$25,893▲ +$6,761
Chicago citywide	$46,192 ±942	$55,452 ±1,058	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$27,585▲ +$18,324▲ +$9,261

Earnings of All Workers

Category	Armour Square
Average Earnings	$46,314±$2,598
10th Percentile Earnings	$5,633±$1,377
25th Percentile Earnings	$12,657±$2,340
Median Earnings	$34,703±$7,204
75th Percentile Earnings	$67,490±$9,754
90th Percentile Earnings	Over $100,000
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Average Earnings	$46,314±$2,598	$75,571±$768	▼ −$29,257	51/76
10th Percentile Earnings	$5,633±$1,377	$8,529±$272	▼ −$2,896	54/77
25th Percentile Earnings	$12,657±$2,340	$25,183±$358	▼ −$12,526	72/77
Median Earnings	$34,703±$7,204	$51,367±$471	▼ −$16,664	67/77
75th Percentile Earnings	$67,490±$9,754	$93,324±$598	▼ −$25,833	46/77
90th Percentile Earnings	Over $100,000	Over $100,000	—	1/77
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$36,231 ±2,813	$45,493 ±5,243	$46,314 ±2,598	▲ +$10,083▲ +$822▲ +$9,261
Chicago citywide	$62,453 ±534	$71,626 ±551	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$13,118▲ +$3,945▲ +$9,173
Average Earnings (nominal dollars)	$27,343 ±2,123	$37,077 ±4,273	$46,314 ±2,598	▲ +$18,971▲ +$9,238▲ +$9,733
Chicago citywide	$47,133 ±403	$58,375 ±449	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$28,438▲ +$17,196▲ +$11,243
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$3,359 ±925	$6,406 ±2,003	$5,633 ±1,377	▲ +$2,274▼ −$773▲ +$3,047
Chicago citywide	$6,858 ±139	$8,358 ±164	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$1,671▲ +$171▲ +$1,500
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$2,535 ±698	$5,221 ±1,633	$5,633 ±1,377	▲ +$3,098▲ +$412▲ +$2,686
Chicago citywide	$5,176 ±105	$6,812 ±134	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$3,354▲ +$1,717▲ +$1,636
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$9,666 ±1,573	$14,249 ±1,895	$12,657 ±2,340	▲ +$2,991▼ −$1,592▲ +$4,583
Chicago citywide	$19,598 ±241	$23,173 ±290	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$5,585▲ +$2,010▲ +$3,576
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$7,295 ±1,187	$11,613 ±1,544	$12,657 ±2,340	▲ +$5,362▲ +$1,044▲ +$4,318
Chicago citywide	$14,790 ±182	$18,886 ±236	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$10,393▲ +$6,297▲ +$4,096
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$22,344 ±3,473	$31,918 ±4,156	$34,703 ±7,204	▲ +$12,359▲ +$2,786▲ +$9,574
Chicago citywide	$42,365 ±293	$47,195 ±370	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$9,002▲ +$4,172▲ +$4,830
Median Earnings (nominal dollars)	$16,863 ±2,621	$26,013 ±3,387	$34,703 ±7,204	▲ +$17,841▲ +$8,691▲ +$9,150
Chicago citywide	$31,972 ±221	$38,464 ±302	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$19,395▲ +$12,903▲ +$6,492
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$49,201 ±4,342	$61,707 ±6,992	$67,490 ±9,754	▲ +$18,289▲ +$5,784▲ +$12,505
Chicago citywide	$78,784 ±555	$87,853 ±597	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$14,540▲ +$5,471▲ +$9,069
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$37,132 ±3,276	$50,291 ±5,699	$67,490 ±9,754	▲ +$30,359▲ +$17,199▲ +$13,159
Chicago citywide	$59,457 ±418	$71,600 ±486	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$33,867▲ +$21,723▲ +$12,144
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$89,324 ±10,526	$109,999 ±14,962	—	——▲ +$20,674
Chicago citywide	$128,659 ±682	—	—	———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$67,411 ±7,944	$89,649 ±12,194	—	——▲ +$22,238
Chicago citywide	$97,097 ±515	—	—	———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Armour Square, Chicago

Category	Armour Square
Household income at age 35	$52,387 ±$2,293
Household income percentile rank	46.9 ±1.32 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	19.3% ±1.80 pp
Individual income at age 35	$39,831 ±$1,603
Fraction married	31.8% ±2.14 pp
Employment rate	78.2% ±2.06 pp
Incarceration rate	2.46% ±1.00 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Armour Square, Chicago. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Armour Square, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$52,387 ±$2,293	$43,090 ±$109	+$9,297
Household income percentile rank	46.9 ±1.32 pp	40.9 ±0.07 pp	+6.1 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	19.3% ±1.80 pp	11.4% ±0.08 pp	+7.9 pp
Individual income at age 35	$39,831 ±$1,603	$33,545 ±$85	+$6,286
Fraction married	31.8% ±2.14 pp	26.4% ±0.12 pp	+5.4 pp
Employment rate	78.2% ±2.06 pp	74.4% ±0.12 pp	+3.8 pp
Incarceration rate	2.46% ±1.00 pp	2.87% ±0.06 pp	−0.4 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Armour Square, Chicago. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Armour Square, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Armour Square, Chicago in Lower-Income Families

Category	Armour Square
Household income at age 35	$47,687 ±$2,871
Household income percentile rank	43.9 ±1.73 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	16.6% ±2.50 pp
Individual income at age 35	$37,029 ±$2,062
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Armour Square, Chicago with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Armour Square, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$47,687 ±$2,871	$34,712 ±$133	+$12,975
Household income percentile rank	43.9 ±1.73 pp	35.3 ±0.09 pp	+8.5 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	16.6% ±2.50 pp	6.31% ±0.10 pp	+10.3 pp
Individual income at age 35	$37,029 ±$2,062	$28,717 ±$114	+$8,313
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Armour Square, Chicago with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Armour Square, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Armour Square, Chicago

Category	Armour Square
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	82.5% ±1.86 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	28.2% ±2.19 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Armour Square, Chicago. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Armour Square, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	82.5% ±1.86 pp	78.1% ±0.12 pp	+4.4 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	28.2% ±2.19 pp	22.9% ±0.12 pp	+5.3 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Armour Square, Chicago. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Armour Square, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Armour Square

Category	Armour Square
All jobs located in armour square	6,546
Armour Square jobs held by Armour Square residents	11.8%
Armour Square jobs held by non-Armour Square residents	88.2%
Employed residents working in Armour Square	12.3%
Employed residents working outside Armour Square	87.7%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Armour Square	Chicago neighborhood median	Difference	Rank
All jobs located in armour square	6,546	5,320	▲ +1,226	35/77
Armour Square jobs held by Armour Square residents	11.8%	5.8%	▲ +6.1 pp	4/77
Armour Square jobs held by non-Armour Square residents	88.2%	94.2%	▼ −6.1 pp	74/77
Employed residents working in Armour Square	12.3%	2.6%	▲ +9.7 pp	5/77
Employed residents working outside Armour Square	87.7%	97.4%	▼ −9.7 pp	73/77
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in armour square	5,869	6,126	6,546	▲ +677▲ +420▲ +257
Chicago citywide	5,236	5,698	5,320	▲ +84▼ −378▲ +462
Armour Square jobs held by Armour Square residents	12.0%589	12.9%652	11.8%626	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +37▼ −1.1 pp▼ −26▲ +0.9 pp▲ +63
Chicago citywide	5.5%246	5.6%306	5.8%279	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +33▲ +0.1 pp▼ −27▲ +0.2 pp▲ +60
Armour Square jobs held by non-Armour Square residents	88.0%4,320	87.1%4,386	88.2%4,657	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +337▲ +1.1 pp▲ +271▼ −0.9 pp▲ +66
Chicago citywide	94.5%4,320	94.4%4,646	94.2%4,657	▼ −0.3 pp▲ +337▼ −0.1 pp▲ +11▼ −0.2 pp▲ +326
Employed residents working in Armour Square	12.5%589	12.5%652	12.3%626	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +37▼ −0.2 pp▼ −26– 0.0 pp▲ +63
Chicago citywide	2.5%246	2.7%306	2.6%279	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +33▼ −0.1 pp▼ −27▲ +0.1 pp▲ +60
Employed residents working outside Armour Square	87.5%4,124	87.5%4,579	87.7%4,474	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +350▲ +0.2 pp▼ −105– 0.0 pp▲ +455
Chicago citywide	97.5%9,791	97.3%10,346	97.4%10,385	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +594▲ +0.1 pp▲ +39▼ −0.1 pp▲ +555

Industry of Jobs in Armour Square

Category	Armour Square
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0
Construction	2.7%174
Manufacturing	2.9%188
Wholesale Trade	1.1%71
Retail Trade	5.8%379
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	0.1%8
↳ Utilities	0.0%0
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	0.1%8
Information	0.2%16
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	2.9%190
↳ Finance & Insurance	2.0%129
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	0.9%61
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	16.2%1,058
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	2.3%148
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%0
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	13.9%910
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	18.0%1,176
↳ Educational Services	2.3%152
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	15.6%1,024
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	47.6%3,114
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	4.7%306
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	42.9%2,808
Other Services	2.6%172
Public Administration	0.0%0
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0	0.0%423	0%	25/77
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0	0.0%36	0%	9/77
Construction	2.7%174	1.9%27,207	▲ +0.8%	40/77
Manufacturing	2.9%188	4.4%64,747	▼ -1.6%	52/77
Wholesale Trade	1.1%71	2.8%41,460	▼ -1.7%	56/77
Retail Trade	5.8%379	6.6%96,413	▼ -0.8%	63/77
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	0.1%8	6.0%87,817	▼ -5.9%	68/77
↳ Utilities	0.0%0	0.3%5,012	▼ -0.3%	21/77
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	0.1%8	5.7%82,805	▼ -5.5%	68/77
Information	0.2%16	3.5%51,095	▼ -3.2%	46/77
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	2.9%190	10.8%157,520	▼ -7.9%	54/77
↳ Finance & Insurance	2.0%129	8.6%125,824	▼ -6.6%	31/77
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	0.9%61	2.2%31,696	▼ -1.2%	54/77
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	16.2%1,058	23.2%339,220	▼ -7.0%	24/77
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	2.3%148	14.2%207,444	▼ -11.9%	52/77
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%0	1.2%16,872	▼ -1.2%	36/77
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	13.9%910	7.9%114,904	▲ +6.1%	13/77
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	18.0%1,176	23.0%336,089	▼ -5.0%	45/77
↳ Educational Services	2.3%152	9.2%134,671	▼ -6.9%	47/77
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	15.6%1,024	13.8%201,418	▲ +1.9%	40/77
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	47.6%3,114	10.3%151,055	▲ +37.3%	1/77
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	4.7%306	1.9%27,339	▲ +2.8%	6/77
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	42.9%2,808	8.5%123,716	▲ +34.4%	1/77
Other Services	2.6%172	4.0%59,136	▼ -1.4%	65/77
Public Administration	0.0%0	3.5%51,418	▼ -3.5%	19/77
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.0%181	0.0%569	0.0%423	– 0.0 pp▲ +242– 0.0 pp▼ −146– 0.0 pp▲ +388
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.0%140	0.0%374	0.0%36	– 0.0 pp▼ −104– 0.0 pp▼ −338– 0.0 pp▲ +234
Construction	0.5%31	1.7%105	2.7%174	▲ +2.1 pp▲ +143▲ +0.9 pp▲ +69▲ +1.2 pp▲ +74
Chicago citywide	1.6%20,789	1.8%26,012	1.9%27,207	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,418– 0.0 pp▲ +1,195▲ +0.3 pp▲ +5,223
Manufacturing	3.4%198	2.9%175	2.9%188	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −10– 0.0 pp▲ +13▼ −0.5 pp▼ −23
Chicago citywide	4.6%61,066	4.5%63,597	4.4%64,747	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,681▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,150▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,531
Wholesale Trade	1.6%96	1.2%76	1.1%71	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −25▼ −0.2 pp▼ −5▼ −0.4 pp▼ −20
Chicago citywide	3.0%39,431	2.9%41,789	2.8%41,460	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,029▼ −0.1 pp▼ −329▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,358
Retail Trade	6.6%386	7.0%427	5.8%379	▼ −0.8 pp▼ −7▼ −1.2 pp▼ −48▲ +0.4 pp▲ +41
Chicago citywide	7.4%97,262	6.9%97,836	6.6%96,413	▼ −0.8 pp▼ −849▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,423▼ −0.5 pp▲ +574
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	0.9%51	0.2%14	0.1%8	▼ −0.7 pp▼ −43▼ −0.1 pp▼ −6▼ −0.6 pp▼ −37
Chicago citywide	5.4%71,320	5.6%79,303	6.0%87,817	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +16,497▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,514▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,983
Utilities	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,383	0.3%4,956	0.3%5,012	– 0.0 pp▲ +629– 0.0 pp▲ +56– 0.0 pp▲ +573
Transportation & Warehousing	0.9%51	0.2%14	0.1%8	▼ −0.7 pp▼ −43▼ −0.1 pp▼ −6▼ −0.6 pp▼ −37
Chicago citywide	5.1%66,937	5.2%74,347	5.7%82,805	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +15,868▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,458▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,410
Information	3.5%206	0.2%12	0.2%16	▼ −3.3 pp▼ −190– 0.0 pp▲ +4▼ −3.3 pp▼ −194
Chicago citywide	3.1%40,514	3.4%48,135	3.5%51,095	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +10,581▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,960▲ +0.3 pp▲ +7,621
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	4.5%262	3.1%192	2.9%190	▼ −1.6 pp▼ −72▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2▼ −1.3 pp▼ −70
Chicago citywide	10.5%138,287	10.6%150,163	10.8%157,520	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +19,233▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,357▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,876
Finance & Insurance	2.9%169	2.2%133	2.0%129	▼ −0.9 pp▼ −40▼ −0.2 pp▼ −4▼ −0.7 pp▼ −36
Chicago citywide	8.5%111,307	8.4%119,147	8.6%125,824	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14,517▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,677▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7,840
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.6%93	1.0%59	0.9%61	▼ −0.7 pp▼ −32– 0.0 pp▲ +2▼ −0.6 pp▼ −34
Chicago citywide	2.1%26,980	2.2%31,016	2.2%31,696	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,716– 0.0 pp▲ +680▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,036
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	19.1%1,119	25.1%1,539	16.2%1,058	▼ −2.9 pp▼ −61▼ −9.0 pp▼ −481▲ +6.1 pp▲ +420
Chicago citywide	21.2%278,928	22.6%319,744	23.2%339,220	▲ +2.0 pp▲ +60,292▲ +0.6 pp▲ +19,476▲ +1.3 pp▲ +40,816
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	1.5%87	1.6%101	2.3%148	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +61▲ +0.6 pp▲ +47▲ +0.2 pp▲ +14
Chicago citywide	11.8%155,200	12.9%182,462	14.2%207,444	▲ +2.4 pp▲ +52,244▲ +1.3 pp▲ +24,982▲ +1.1 pp▲ +27,262
Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.3%15	0.3%17	0.0%0	▼ −0.3 pp▼ −15▼ −0.3 pp▼ −17– 0.0 pp▲ +2
Chicago citywide	1.0%13,619	1.2%16,600	1.2%16,872	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,253– 0.0 pp▲ +272▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,981
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	17.3%1,017	23.2%1,421	13.9%910	▼ −3.4 pp▼ −107▼ −9.3 pp▼ −511▲ +5.9 pp▲ +404
Chicago citywide	8.4%110,109	8.5%120,682	7.9%114,904	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +4,795▼ −0.7 pp▼ −5,778▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,573
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	13.1%766	13.9%853	18.0%1,176	▲ +4.9 pp▲ +410▲ +4.0 pp▲ +323▲ +0.9 pp▲ +87
Chicago citywide	23.5%308,633	22.1%313,540	23.0%336,089	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +27,456▲ +0.8 pp▲ +22,549▼ −1.4 pp▲ +4,907
Educational Services	1.8%108	3.1%189	2.3%152	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +44▼ −0.8 pp▼ −37▲ +1.2 pp▲ +81
Chicago citywide	10.1%132,909	9.0%128,169	9.2%134,671	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +1,762▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,502▼ −1.1 pp▼ −4,740
Health Care & Social Assistance	11.2%658	10.8%664	15.6%1,024	▲ +4.4 pp▲ +366▲ +4.8 pp▲ +360▼ −0.4 pp▲ +6
Chicago citywide	13.4%175,724	13.1%185,371	13.8%201,418	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +25,694▲ +0.7 pp▲ +16,047▼ −0.3 pp▲ +9,647
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	43.6%2,558	42.2%2,586	47.6%3,114	▲ +4.0 pp▲ +556▲ +5.4 pp▲ +528▼ −1.4 pp▲ +28
Chicago citywide	10.9%143,753	11.5%162,749	10.3%151,055	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,302▼ −1.2 pp▼ −11,694▲ +0.5 pp▲ +18,996
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	13.1%766	5.6%343	4.7%306	▼ −8.4 pp▼ −460▼ −0.9 pp▼ −37▼ −7.5 pp▼ −423
Chicago citywide	1.7%22,179	2.1%30,178	1.9%27,339	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +5,160▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,839▲ +0.4 pp▲ +7,999
Accommodation & Food Services	30.5%1,792	36.6%2,243	42.9%2,808	▲ +12.4 pp▲ +1,016▲ +6.3 pp▲ +565▲ +6.1 pp▲ +451
Chicago citywide	9.3%121,574	9.4%132,571	8.5%123,716	▼ −0.8 pp▲ +2,142▼ −0.9 pp▼ −8,855▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,997
Other Services	3.2%186	2.4%147	2.6%172	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −14▲ +0.2 pp▲ +25▼ −0.8 pp▼ −39
Chicago citywide	4.5%59,098	4.4%61,698	4.0%59,136	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +38▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,562▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,600
Public Administration	0.2%10	0.0%0	0.0%0	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −10– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.2 pp▼ −10
Chicago citywide	4.2%54,814	3.6%51,684	3.5%51,418	▼ −0.7 pp▼ −3,396▼ −0.1 pp▼ −266▼ −0.5 pp▼ −3,130

Earnings of Jobs in Armour Square

Category	Armour Square
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	37.9%2,479
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	36.6%2,393
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	25.6%1,674
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	37.9%2,479	12.7%185,293	▲ +25.2%	1/77
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	36.6%2,393	20.5%299,468	▲ +16.1%	15/77
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	25.6%1,674	66.9%978,839	▼ -41.3%	77/77
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	47.6%2,795	51.9%3,182	37.9%2,479	▼ −9.8 pp▼ −316▼ −14.1 pp▼ −703▲ +4.3 pp▲ +387
Chicago citywide	21.3%280,137	16.8%238,135	12.7%185,293	▼ −8.7 pp▼ −94,844▼ −4.1 pp▼ −52,842▼ −4.5 pp▼ −42,002
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	33.1%1,940	32.1%1,964	36.6%2,393	▲ +3.5 pp▲ +453▲ +4.5 pp▲ +429▼ −1.0 pp▲ +24
Chicago citywide	30.7%403,220	26.7%378,530	20.5%299,468	▼ −10.2 pp▼ −103,752▼ −6.3 pp▼ −79,062▼ −4.0 pp▼ −24,690
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	19.3%1,134	16.0%980	25.6%1,674	▲ +6.3 pp▲ +540▲ +9.6 pp▲ +694▼ −3.3 pp▼ −154
Chicago citywide	48.0%630,719	56.5%800,154	66.9%978,839	▲ +18.9 pp▲ +348,120▲ +10.4 pp▲ +178,685▲ +8.5 pp▲ +169,435

Jobs in Armour Square by Firm Age

Category	Armour Square
Firm age: 0–1 years	3.3%216
Firm age: 2–3 years	4.4%290
Firm age: 4–5 years	6.6%430
Firm age: 6–10 years	10.3%674
Firm age: 11 or more years	75.4%4,930
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years	3.3%216	2.8%37,293	▲ +0.5%	38/77
Firm age: 2–3 years	4.4%290	2.8%37,154	▲ +1.6%	26/77
Firm age: 4–5 years	6.6%430	3.2%41,869	▲ +3.4%	7/77
Firm age: 6–10 years	10.3%674	7.8%102,353	▲ +2.5%	26/77
Firm age: 11 or more years	75.4%4,930	83.4%1,098,220	▼ -8.0%	51/77
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years	2.8%164	4.1%251	3.3%216	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +52▼ −0.8 pp▼ −35▲ +1.3 pp▲ +87
Chicago citywide	2.9%33,224	2.6%33,244	2.8%37,293	– 0.0 pp▲ +4,069▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,049▼ −0.2 pp▲ +20
Firm age: 2–3 years	8.6%503	5.2%317	4.4%290	▼ −4.2 pp▼ −213▼ −0.7 pp▼ −27▼ −3.4 pp▼ −186
Chicago citywide	4.0%46,935	3.3%42,284	2.8%37,154	▼ −1.2 pp▼ −9,781▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,130▼ −0.7 pp▼ −4,651
Firm age: 4–5 years	4.2%248	4.9%298	6.6%430	▲ +2.3 pp▲ +182▲ +1.7 pp▲ +132▲ +0.6 pp▲ +50
Chicago citywide	3.7%42,688	3.6%46,058	3.2%41,869	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −819▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,189▼ −0.1 pp▲ +3,370
Firm age: 6–10 years	8.0%466	7.7%474	10.3%674	▲ +2.3 pp▲ +208▲ +2.6 pp▲ +200▼ −0.2 pp▲ +8
Chicago citywide	8.2%94,955	8.6%109,934	7.8%102,353	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +7,398▼ −0.9 pp▼ −7,581▲ +0.5 pp▲ +14,979
Firm age: 11 or more years	76.4%4,472	78.1%4,778	75.4%4,930	▼ −1.0 pp▲ +458▼ −2.7 pp▲ +152▲ +1.7 pp▲ +306
Chicago citywide	81.3%946,801	81.8%1,043,037	83.4%1,098,220	▲ +2.1 pp▲ +151,419▲ +1.6 pp▲ +55,183▲ +0.5 pp▲ +96,236

Jobs in Armour Square by Firm Size

Category	Armour Square
Firm size: 0–19 employees	25.5%1,669
Firm size: 20–49 employees	13.5%882
Firm size: 50–249 employees	13.3%872
Firm size: 250–499 employees	6.2%408
Firm size: 500 or more employees	41.4%2,709
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees	25.5%1,669	12.8%168,975	▲ +12.7%	31/77
Firm size: 20–49 employees	13.5%882	7.3%96,404	▲ +6.2%	16/77
Firm size: 50–249 employees	13.3%872	13.8%181,123	▼ -0.4%	56/77
Firm size: 250–499 employees	6.2%408	5.7%74,787	▲ +0.6%	24/77
Firm size: 500 or more employees	41.4%2,709	60.4%795,600	▼ -19.0%	39/77
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees	24.5%1,433	25.8%1,576	25.5%1,669	▲ +1.0 pp▲ +236▼ −0.2 pp▲ +93▲ +1.3 pp▲ +143
Chicago citywide	13.9%162,248	13.3%169,949	12.8%168,975	▼ −1.1 pp▲ +6,727▼ −0.5 pp▼ −974▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,701
Firm size: 20–49 employees	12.4%725	13.7%839	13.5%882	▲ +1.1 pp▲ +157▼ −0.2 pp▲ +43▲ +1.3 pp▲ +114
Chicago citywide	8.4%97,503	8.2%103,945	7.3%96,404	▼ −1.1 pp▼ −1,099▼ −0.8 pp▼ −7,541▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,442
Firm size: 50–249 employees	12.2%715	10.6%650	13.3%872	▲ +1.1 pp▲ +157▲ +2.7 pp▲ +222▼ −1.6 pp▼ −65
Chicago citywide	15.7%183,275	14.9%189,930	13.8%181,123	▼ −2.0 pp▼ −2,152▼ −1.1 pp▼ −8,807▼ −0.8 pp▲ +6,655
Firm size: 250–499 employees	12.4%723	5.6%341	6.2%408	▼ −6.1 pp▼ −315▲ +0.7 pp▲ +67▼ −6.8 pp▼ −382
Chicago citywide	6.3%72,992	5.9%74,603	5.7%74,787	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,795▼ −0.2 pp▲ +184▼ −0.4 pp▲ +1,611
Firm size: 500 or more employees	38.6%2,257	44.3%2,712	41.4%2,709	▲ +2.9 pp▲ +452▼ −2.9 pp▼ −3▲ +5.8 pp▲ +455
Chicago citywide	55.7%648,585	57.8%736,130	60.4%795,600	▲ +4.7 pp▲ +147,015▲ +2.7 pp▲ +59,470▲ +2.1 pp▲ +87,545

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Armour Square
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	11.9% ±2.8 pp11.9%±2.8 pp1,655 ±387
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	94.5% ±5.5 pp11.3%±0.7 pp1,565 ±90
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	5.5% ±5.8 pp0.7%±0.7 pp91 ±97
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	11.9%±2.8 pp11.9%±2.8 pp1,655±387	13.5%±0.2 pp13.5%±0.2 pp365,577±5,480	▼ -1.6%▼ -1.6%	62/77
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	94.5%±5.5 pp11.3%±0.7 pp1,565±90	83.0%±0.5 pp11.2%±0.1 pp303,520±1,897	▲ +11.5%▲ +0.1%	9/7752/77
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	5.5%±5.8 pp0.7%±0.7 pp91±97	17.0%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.1 pp62,057±2,247	▼ -11.5%▼ -1.6%	69/7776/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Armour Square
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	8.5% ±2.5 pp8.5%±2.5 pp1,186 ±350
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	51.6% ±19.4 pp4.4%±1.7 pp611 ±230
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	48.4% ±9.8 pp4.1%±0.8 pp574 ±116
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	50.1% ±17.9 pp4.3%±1.5 pp595 ±213
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	49.9% ±14.6 pp4.3%±1.2 pp591 ±173
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	8.5%±2.5 pp8.5%±2.5 pp1,186±350	7.4%±0.1 pp7.4%±0.1 pp201,851±4,036	▲ +1.1%▲ +1.1%	12/77
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	51.6%±19.4 pp4.4%±1.7 pp611±230	52.4%±0.7 pp3.9%±0.1 pp105,720±1,511	▼ -0.8%▲ +0.5%	54/7716/77
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	48.4%±9.8 pp4.1%±0.8 pp574±116	47.6%±1.2 pp3.5%±0.1 pp96,131±2,437	▲ +0.8%▲ +0.6%	24/7715/77
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	50.1%±17.9 pp4.3%±1.5 pp595±213	67.0%±1.0 pp5.0%±0.1 pp135,301±1,945	▼ -16.9%▼ -0.7%	70/7743/77
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	49.9%±14.6 pp4.3%±1.2 pp591±173	33.0%±1.2 pp2.5%±0.1 pp66,550±2,459	▲ +16.9%▲ +1.8%	8/779/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category	Armour Square
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	3.9% ±5.8 pp74 ±108
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	1.4% ±3.2 pp17 ±38
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	3.9%±5.8 pp74±108	5.9%±0.5 pp—	▼ -1.9%	43/77
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	1.4%±3.2 pp17±38	5.4%±0.6 pp—	▼ -4.0%	57/77
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category	Armour Square
Owner-Occupied Households	38.2% ±5.9 pp2,212 ±340
Renter-Occupied Households	61.8% ±5.6 pp3,584 ±325
Owner-Occupied Residents	42.8% ±6.8 pp5,941 ±937
Renter-Occupied Residents	57.2% ±6.7 pp7,929 ±933
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Owner-Occupied Households	38.2%±5.9 pp2,212±340	46.0%±0.4 pp534,012±4,939	▼ -7.9%	54/77
Renter-Occupied Households	61.8%±5.6 pp3,584±325	54.0%±0.4 pp626,193±5,183	▲ +7.9%	24/77
Owner-Occupied Residents	42.8%±6.8 pp5,941±937	51.8%±0.5 pp1,377,219±13,574	▼ -9.0%	54/77
Renter-Occupied Residents	57.2%±6.7 pp7,929±933	48.2%±0.5 pp1,280,665±13,500	▲ +9.0%	24/77
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category	Armour Square
Median Year Moved In	2013±1.5 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later	2.9% ±1.4 pp169 ±83
Moved in 2020 to 2022	22.0% ±4.9 pp1,278 ±283
Moved in 2010 to 2019	38.0% ±6.7 pp2,202 ±388
Moved in 2000 to 2009	21.0% ±4.4 pp1,215 ±253
Moved in 1990 to 1999	7.5% ±3.2 pp435 ±183
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	8.6% ±3.5 pp496 ±204
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Moved In	2013±1.5 yr	2015±1.0 yr	▼ −2	33/77
Moved in 2023 or Later	2.9%±1.4 pp169±83	5.9%±0.2 pp68,884±2,742	▼ -3.0%	51/77
Moved in 2020 to 2022	22.0%±4.9 pp1,278±283	24.1%±0.4 pp279,417±5,059	▼ -2.0%	25/77
Moved in 2010 to 2019	38.0%±6.7 pp2,202±388	39.2%±0.5 pp455,125±5,772	▼ -1.2%	45/77
Moved in 2000 to 2009	21.0%±4.4 pp1,215±253	13.8%±0.3 pp160,353±3,324	▲ +7.1%	14/77
Moved in 1990 to 1999	7.5%±3.2 pp435±183	8.2%±0.2 pp95,243±2,390	▼ -0.7%	46/77
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	8.6%±3.5 pp496±204	8.7%±0.2 pp101,183±2,362	▼ -0.2%	43/77
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show

Category	Armour Square
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	14.3% ±4.6 pp14.3%±4.6 pp1,967 ±635
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	9.5% ±4.1 pp66.8%±19.1 pp1,313 ±567
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.5% ±0.5 pp3.3%±3.1 pp65 ±65
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	2.4% ±1.7 pp17.1%±10.4 pp337 ±233
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	1.8% ±1.4 pp12.8%±9.0 pp252 ±195
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	14.3%±4.6 pp14.3%±4.6 pp1,967±635	14.0%±0.3 pp14.0%±0.3 pp375,475±8,289	▲ +0.3%▲ +0.3%	20/77
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	9.5%±4.1 pp66.8%±19.1 pp1,313±567	9.8%±0.3 pp69.9%±1.0 pp262,365±6,953	▼ -0.3%▼ -3.1%	27/7764/77
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.5%±0.5 pp3.3%±3.1 pp65±65	0.8%±0.1 pp5.5%±0.4 pp20,552±1,626	▼ -0.3%▼ -2.2%	35/7745/77
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	2.4%±1.7 pp17.1%±10.4 pp337±233	2.5%±0.1 pp17.6%±0.7 pp65,936±2,918	0%▼ -0.4%	18/7722/77
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	1.8%±1.4 pp12.8%±9.0 pp252±195	1.0%±0.1 pp7.1%±0.8 pp26,622±3,040	▲ +0.8%▲ +5.7%	10/7714/77
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Armour Square
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	5.4% ±2.2 pp5.4%±2.2 pp332 ±135
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	2.8% ±1.5 pp51.5%±16.6 pp171 ±89
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.0% ±0.5 pp0.0%0
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.8% ±1.0 pp14.5%±16.5 pp48 ±58
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	1.8% ±1.9 pp34.0%±33.1 pp113 ±119
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	4.6% ±2.3 pp4.6%±2.3 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	0.0% ±1.4 pp0.0%±1.4 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	5.4%±2.2 pp5.4%±2.2 pp332±135	9.1%±0.2 pp9.1%±0.2 pp116,849±2,682	▼ -3.7%▼ -3.7%	66/77
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	2.8%±1.5 pp51.5%±16.6 pp171±89	2.5%±0.1 pp27.1%±1.4 pp31,723±1,796	▲ +0.3%▲ +24.4%	24/775/77
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.0%±0.5 pp0.0%0	0.6%±0.1 pp6.0%±0.7 pp7,037±795	▼ -0.6%▼ -6.0%	66/7766/77
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.8%±1.0 pp14.5%±16.5 pp48±58	0.2%±0.0 pp2.4%±0.5 pp2,831±587	▲ +0.6%▲ +12.0%	7/773/77
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	1.8%±1.9 pp34.0%±33.1 pp113±119	5.9%±0.3 pp64.4%±2.5 pp75,258±3,387	▼ -4.1%▼ -30.4%	72/7775/77
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	4.6%±2.3 pp4.6%±2.3 pp—	4.8%±0.3 pp4.8%±0.3 pp—	▼ -0.2%▼ -0.2%	37/77
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	0.0%±1.4 pp0.0%±1.4 pp—	1.3%±0.1 pp1.3%±0.1 pp—	▼ -1.3%▼ -1.3%	66/77
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category	Armour Square
Median Year Built	1966±5 yr
Pre-1940	28.7% ±5.1 pp1,760 ±315
1940-2009	66.1% ±8.2 pp4,049 ±504
2010+	5.2% ±2.0 pp316 ±124
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Built	1966±5 yr	1953±1 yr	▲ +13 yrs	10/77
Pre-1940	28.7%±5.1 pp1,760±315	38.8%±0.4 pp495,715±4,678	▼ -10.1%	54/77
1940-2009	66.1%±8.2 pp4,049±504	54.9%±0.6 pp700,698±7,435	▲ +11.2%	24/77
2010+	5.2%±2.0 pp316±124	6.3%±0.2 pp80,641±2,725	▼ -1.2%	22/77
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category	Armour Square
Population Density	13,952 /sq mi±1,186/sq mi
Single-Family Homes	25.8% ±5.4 pp1,578 ±332
Buildings With 2–4 Units	28.7% ±5.2 pp1,760 ±318
Buildings With 5–19 Units	19.7% ±4.1 pp1,204 ±254
Buildings With 20 or More Units	25.4% ±4.8 pp1,556 ±296
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Population Density	13,952 /sq mi±1,186/sq mi	11,748 /sq mi±26/sq mi	▲ +2,204 /sq mi	32/77
Single-Family Homes	25.8%±5.4 pp1,578±332	29.2%±0.3 pp372,679±3,989	▼ -3.4%	48/77
Buildings With 2–4 Units	28.7%±5.2 pp1,760±318	27.4%±0.4 pp349,976±4,957	▲ +1.3%	35/77
Buildings With 5–19 Units	19.7%±4.1 pp1,204±254	16.2%±0.3 pp206,420±4,124	▲ +3.5%	23/77
Buildings With 20 or More Units	25.4%±4.8 pp1,556±296	27.0%±0.3 pp344,543±4,438	▼ -1.6%	18/77
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category	Armour Square
Studio	3.8% ±3.1 pp232 ±189
1 Bedroom	23.3% ±5.4 pp1,430 ±334
2 Bedrooms	27.7% ±4.8 pp1,696 ±295
3 Bedrooms	38.6% ±6.1 pp2,363 ±376
4 Bedrooms	3.9% ±1.7 pp236 ±101
5 or More Bedrooms	2.8% ±1.6 pp169 ±98
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Studio	3.8%±3.1 pp232±189	7.5%±0.3 pp95,749±3,205	▼ -3.7%	34/77
1 Bedroom	23.3%±5.4 pp1,430±334	20.1%±0.4 pp257,271±4,939	▲ +3.2%	21/77
2 Bedrooms	27.7%±4.8 pp1,696±295	33.1%±0.3 pp422,866±4,221	▼ -5.4%	62/77
3 Bedrooms	38.6%±6.1 pp2,363±376	26.1%±0.3 pp333,682±4,061	▲ +12.4%	19/77
4 Bedrooms	3.9%±1.7 pp236±101	9.0%±0.2 pp115,453±2,426	▼ -5.2%	71/77
5 or More Bedrooms	2.8%±1.6 pp169±98	4.1%±0.2 pp52,033±2,072	▼ -1.3%	59/77
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show

Category	Armour Square
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	7.4% ±3.6 pp7.4%±3.6 pp431 ±209
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	5.2% ±3.2 pp69.4%±26.6 pp299 ±185
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	2.3% ±1.7 pp30.6%±17.5 pp132 ±99
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	7.4%±3.6 pp7.4%±3.6 pp431±209	3.4%±0.2 pp3.4%±0.2 pp39,979±1,996	▲ +4.0%▲ +4.0%	9/77
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	5.2%±3.2 pp69.4%±26.6 pp299±185	2.0%±0.1 pp58.2%±2.3 pp23,276±1,493	▲ +3.2%▲ +11.2%	8/7734/76
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	2.3%±1.7 pp30.6%±17.5 pp132±99	1.4%±0.1 pp41.8%±2.6 pp16,703±1,328	▲ +0.8%▼ -11.2%	15/7743/76
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category	Armour Square
Natural Gas Heat	79.6% ±6.3 pp4,613 ±368
Electric Heat	16.5% ±3.8 pp957 ±222
Other Heating Source	3.9% ±3.6 pp224 ±208
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Natural Gas Heat	79.6%±6.3 pp4,613±368	77.5%±0.3 pp899,660±3,501	▲ +2.1%	52/77
Electric Heat	16.5%±3.8 pp957±222	18.0%±0.3 pp208,937±3,864	▼ -1.5%	22/77
Other Heating Source	3.9%±3.6 pp224±208	4.4%±0.2 pp51,603±2,173	▼ -0.6%	38/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show

Category	Armour Square
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	31.3% ±5.1 pp1,815 ±297
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	23.5% ±5.2 pp1,360 ±303
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	45.2% ±5.6 pp2,620 ±327
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	19.4% ±4.1 pp1,122 ±240
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	27.2% ±6.8 pp910 ±227
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	23.5% ±6.2 pp787 ±206
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	49.4% ±6.9 pp1,654 ±230
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	20.0% ±4.0 pp671 ±135
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	37.6% ±7.5 pp835 ±167
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	23.4% ±9.2 pp520 ±205
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	38.9% ±9.6 pp864 ±214
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	18.4% ±8.4 pp408 ±186
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	27.8% ±13.9 pp253 ±126
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	18.3% ±12.2 pp166 ±111
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	53.9% ±14.1 pp490 ±128
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	20.3% ±12.2 pp184 ±111
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	44.4% ±8.0 pp583 ±106
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	27.0% ±13.1 pp354 ±172
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	28.6% ±12.4 pp375 ±162
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	17.1% ±11.4 pp224 ±150
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	31.3%±5.1 pp1,815±297	24.9%±0.5 pp289,047±6,215	▲ +6.4%	61/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	23.5%±5.2 pp1,360±303	23.8%±0.5 pp276,514±5,809	▼ -0.4%	22/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	45.2%±5.6 pp2,620±327	45.6%±0.6 pp529,378±6,577	▼ -0.4%	22/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	19.4%±4.1 pp1,122±240	24.0%±0.5 pp278,684±5,306	▼ -4.7%	40/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	27.2%±6.8 pp910±227	26.4%±0.5 pp156,016±3,135	▲ +0.8%	32/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	23.5%±6.2 pp787±206	25.3%±0.5 pp149,232±2,940	▼ -1.8%	32/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	49.4%±6.9 pp1,654±230	48.3%±0.7 pp285,666±4,223	▲ +1.0%	45/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	20.0%±4.0 pp671±135	25.5%±0.6 pp150,396±3,556	▼ -5.4%	59/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	37.6%±7.5 pp835±167	51.6%±0.6 pp272,313±2,905	▼ -13.9%	76/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	23.4%±9.2 pp520±205	19.6%±0.5 pp103,679±2,760	▲ +3.8%	14/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	38.9%±9.6 pp864±214	28.8%±0.6 pp152,025±3,034	▲ +10.2%	4/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	18.4%±8.4 pp408±186	13.8%±0.4 pp73,065±2,234	▲ +4.6%	10/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	27.8%±13.9 pp253±126	42.8%±0.7 pp146,237±2,365	▼ -15.0%	77/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	18.3%±12.2 pp166±111	23.9%±0.7 pp81,678±2,408	▼ -5.6%	63/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	53.9%±14.1 pp490±128	33.3%±0.8 pp113,910±2,596	▲ +20.6%	2/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	20.3%±12.2 pp184±111	15.4%±0.5 pp52,647±1,874	▲ +4.9%	19/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	44.4%±8.0 pp583±106	67.7%±0.9 pp126,078±1,613	▼ -23.3%	77/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	27.0%±13.1 pp354±172	11.8%±0.7 pp22,001±1,275	▲ +15.2%	1/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	28.6%±12.4 pp375±162	20.5%±0.8 pp38,115±1,492	▲ +8.1%	7/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	17.1%±11.4 pp224±150	11.0%±0.6 pp20,417±1,203	▲ +6.1%	5/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category	Armour Square
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$266±$48
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$560±$143
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,129±$128
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,785±$133
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,453±$226
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$266±$48	$594±$11	▼ −$328	74/77
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$560±$143	$1,011±$8	▼ −$451	72/77
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,129±$128	$1,560±$10	▼ −$431	61/77
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,785±$133	$2,329±$13	▼ −$544	45/77
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,453±$226	Over $3,000	▼ −$547+	41/77
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$194 ±39	$247 ±54	$266 ±48	▲ +$73▲ +$19▲ +$54
Chicago citywide	$609 ±7	$606 ±7	$594 ±11	▼ −$15▼ −$12▼ −$2
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$146 ±29	$202 ±44	$266 ±48	▲ +$120▲ +$65▲ +$56
Chicago citywide	$459 ±6	$494 ±6	$594 ±11	▲ +$135▲ +$100▲ +$35
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$475 ±77	$489 ±116	$560 ±143	▲ +$85▲ +$71▲ +$14
Chicago citywide	$992 ±5	$1,001 ±5	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$19▲ +$10▲ +$9
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$358 ±58	$398 ±95	$560 ±143	▲ +$202▲ +$162▲ +$40
Chicago citywide	$748 ±3	$816 ±4	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$262▲ +$195▲ +$67
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$991 ±79	$989 ±56	$1,129 ±128	▲ +$138▲ +$140▼ −$3
Chicago citywide	$1,493 ±8	$1,523 ±6	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$67▲ +$37▲ +$29
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$748 ±60	$806 ±46	$1,129 ±128	▲ +$381▲ +$323▲ +$58
Chicago citywide	$1,127 ±6	$1,241 ±5	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$433▲ +$319▲ +$114
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,631 ±133	$1,452 ±159	$1,785 ±133	▲ +$154▲ +$333▼ −$179
Chicago citywide	$2,333 ±12	$2,326 ±10	$2,329 ±13	▼ −$4▲ +$3▼ −$7
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,231 ±100	$1,183 ±130	$1,785 ±133	▲ +$554▲ +$602▼ −$48
Chicago citywide	$1,761 ±9	$1,896 ±8	$2,329 ±13	▲ +$569▲ +$434▲ +$135
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,441 ±191	$2,197 ±182	$2,453 ±226	▲ +$11▲ +$255▼ −$244
Chicago citywide	—	$3,316 ±20	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,842 ±144	$1,791 ±148	$2,453 ±226	▲ +$610▲ +$662▼ −$52
Chicago citywide	—	$2,703 ±16	—	———

Rent

Rent measure

Category	Armour Square
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,124±$140
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$253±$37
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$385±$73
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,028±$198
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,741±$158
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$2,281±$296
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,124±$140	$1,613±$12	▼ −$489	64/77
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$253±$37	$696±$20	▼ −$443	75/77
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$385±$73	$1,043±$8	▼ −$657	74/77
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,028±$198	$1,440±$10	▼ −$412	71/77
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,741±$158	$2,021±$21	▼ −$281	33/77
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$2,281±$296	$2,738±$29	▼ −$457	23/77
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square
Average Rent	$958±$124
10th Percentile Rent	$214±$12
25th Percentile Rent	$306±$81
Median Rent	$915±$171
75th Percentile Rent	$1,435±$201
90th Percentile Rent	$2,044±$227
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent	$958±$124	$1,452±$11	▼ −$494	57/77
10th Percentile Rent	$214±$12	$564±$21	▼ −$351	72/77
25th Percentile Rent	$306±$81	$913±$7	▼ −$607	74/77
Median Rent	$915±$171	$1,262±$12	▼ −$347	65/77
75th Percentile Rent	$1,435±$201	$1,868±$13	▼ −$433	37/77
90th Percentile Rent	$2,044±$227	$2,528±$38	▼ −$484	22/77
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category	Armour Square
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,334±$833
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,314±$318
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,511±$207
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,123±$315
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,845±$372
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$3,489±$339
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,334±$833	$2,734±$24	▼ −$399	32/77
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,314±$318	$1,270±$14	▲ +$44	34/77
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,511±$207	$1,697±$14	▼ −$186	44/77
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,123±$315	$2,339±$17	▼ −$216	36/77
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,845±$372	$3,269±$31	▼ −$424	32/77
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$3,489±$339	Over $4,000	▼ −$511+	37/77
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,481 ±663	$2,804 ±481	$2,334 ±833	▼ −$147▼ −$469▲ +$322
Chicago citywide	$2,855 ±19	$2,793 ±23	$2,734 ±24	▼ −$121▼ −$60▼ −$61
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,873 ±500	$2,285 ±392	$2,334 ±833	▲ +$462▲ +$49▲ +$412
Chicago citywide	$2,154 ±14	$2,277 ±19	$2,734 ±24	▲ +$579▲ +$457▲ +$122
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,189 ±350	$1,049 ±254	$1,314 ±318	▲ +$125▲ +$265▼ −$141
Chicago citywide	$1,403 ±11	$1,356 ±11	$1,270 ±14	▼ −$133▼ −$86▼ −$47
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$898 ±264	$855 ±207	$1,314 ±318	▲ +$417▲ +$460▼ −$43
Chicago citywide	$1,059 ±8	$1,105 ±9	$1,270 ±14	▲ +$212▲ +$165▲ +$46
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,784 ±224	$1,599 ±360	$1,511 ±207	▼ −$273▼ −$88▼ −$185
Chicago citywide	$1,874 ±12	$1,800 ±12	$1,697 ±14	▼ −$177▼ −$103▼ −$74
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,346 ±169	$1,303 ±293	$1,511 ±207	▲ +$165▲ +$208▼ −$43
Chicago citywide	$1,414 ±9	$1,467 ±10	$1,697 ±14	▲ +$283▲ +$230▲ +$53
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,234 ±208	$2,210 ±354	$2,123 ±315	▼ −$112▼ −$88▼ −$24
Chicago citywide	$2,526 ±13	$2,422 ±13	$2,339 ±17	▼ −$187▼ −$83▼ −$103
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,686 ±157	$1,801 ±288	$2,123 ±315	▲ +$436▲ +$321▲ +$115
Chicago citywide	$1,906 ±10	$1,974 ±11	$2,339 ±17	▲ +$433▲ +$365▲ +$68
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$3,121 ±481	$3,480 ±931	$2,845 ±372	▼ −$276▼ −$636▲ +$359
Chicago citywide	$3,447 ±25	$3,343 ±25	$3,269 ±31	▼ −$178▼ −$74▼ −$104
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$2,355 ±363	$2,836 ±759	$2,845 ±372	▲ +$489▲ +$8▲ +$481
Chicago citywide	$2,601 ±19	$2,724 ±20	$3,269 ±31	▲ +$668▲ +$544▲ +$123
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$3,967 ±182	—	$3,489 ±339	▼ −$479——
Chicago citywide	—	$4,578 ±59	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$2,994 ±138	—	$3,489 ±339	▲ +$495——
Chicago citywide	—	$3,731 ±48	—	———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category	Armour Square
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$989±$157
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$605±$109
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$721±$84
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$941±$130
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,195±$170
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	Over $1,500
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$989±$157	$1,078±$22	▼ −$88	24/77
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$605±$109	$418±$8	▲ +$187	9/77
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$721±$84	$601±$8	▲ +$121	22/77
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$941±$130	$859±$10	▲ +$82	25/77
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,195±$170	$1,197±$18	▼ −$3	24/77
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	Over $1,500	Over $1,500	—	1/77
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$811 ±70	$935 ±65	$989 ±157	▲ +$179▲ +$55▲ +$124
Chicago citywide	$957 ±15	$1,028 ±10	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$121▲ +$50▲ +$71
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$612 ±53	$762 ±53	$989 ±157	▲ +$377▲ +$227▲ +$150
Chicago citywide	$722 ±11	$838 ±8	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$355▲ +$240▲ +$116
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$414 ±160	$569 ±110	$605 ±109	▲ +$192▲ +$36▲ +$155
Chicago citywide	$429 ±6	$469 ±7	$418 ±8	▼ −$11▼ −$51▲ +$40
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$312 ±120	$464 ±90	$605 ±109	▲ +$293▲ +$142▲ +$151
Chicago citywide	$324 ±5	$382 ±5	$418 ±8	▲ +$95▲ +$36▲ +$59
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$582 ±70	$741 ±73	$721 ±84	▲ +$139▼ −$20▲ +$159
Chicago citywide	$586 ±6	$629 ±6	$601 ±8	▲ +$14▼ −$28▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$439 ±53	$604 ±60	$721 ±84	▲ +$282▲ +$117▲ +$165
Chicago citywide	$442 ±4	$513 ±5	$601 ±8	▲ +$158▲ +$88▲ +$70
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$742 ±65	$938 ±84	$941 ±130	▲ +$199▲ +$2▲ +$196
Chicago citywide	$815 ±9	$860 ±7	$859 ±10	▲ +$44▼ −$1▲ +$45
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$560 ±49	$765 ±69	$941 ±130	▲ +$381▲ +$176▲ +$205
Chicago citywide	$615 ±7	$701 ±6	$859 ±10	▲ +$244▲ +$158▲ +$86
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$1,126 ±51	$1,195 ±170	—▲ +$68—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,206 ±14	$1,197 ±18	—▼ −$9—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$918 ±42	$1,195 ±170	—▲ +$277—
Chicago citywide	—	$983 ±12	$1,197 ±18	—▲ +$214—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$1,217 ±131	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	$1,767 ±35	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$992 ±107	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	$1,440 ±28	—	———

Home Values

Category	Armour Square
Average Home Value	$435,351±$72,369
10th Percentile Home Value	$231,443±$47,931
25th Percentile Home Value	$295,849±$27,703
Median Home Value	$382,413±$30,424
75th Percentile Home Value	$533,595±$81,645
90th Percentile Home Value	$750,203±$214,814
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Average Home Value	$435,351±$72,369	$437,638±$7,358	▼ −$2,287	21/77
10th Percentile Home Value	$231,443±$47,931	$129,150±$3,756	▲ +$102,293	10/77
25th Percentile Home Value	$295,849±$27,703	$217,800±$1,804	▲ +$78,049	21/77
Median Home Value	$382,413±$30,424	$334,100±$2,424	▲ +$48,313	22/77
75th Percentile Home Value	$533,595±$81,645	$497,700±$3,730	▲ +$35,895	20/77
90th Percentile Home Value	$750,203±$214,814	$809,159±$15,691	▼ −$58,956	22/77
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$398,129 ±39,803	$374,945 ±32,523	$435,351 ±72,369	▲ +$37,222▲ +$60,405▼ −$23,184
Chicago citywide	$386,614 ±5,106	$424,380 ±4,754	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$51,024▲ +$13,258▲ +$37,766
Average Home Value (nominal dollars)	$300,462 ±30,039	$305,581 ±26,506	$435,351 ±72,369	▲ +$134,889▲ +$129,770▲ +$5,120
Chicago citywide	$291,771 ±3,853	$345,871 ±3,874	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$145,867▲ +$91,768▲ +$54,099
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$193,077 ±50,707	$148,252 ±70,077	$231,443 ±47,931	▲ +$38,366▲ +$83,191▼ −$44,825
Chicago citywide	$115,330 ±1,421	$124,313 ±1,339	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$13,821▲ +$4,838▲ +$8,983
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$145,712 ±38,268	$120,826 ±57,113	$231,443 ±47,931	▲ +$85,731▲ +$110,617▼ −$24,886
Chicago citywide	$87,037 ±1,072	$101,315 ±1,091	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$42,113▲ +$27,835▲ +$14,278
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$272,295 ±31,920	$282,412 ±20,279	$295,849 ±27,703	▲ +$23,554▲ +$13,437▲ +$10,117
Chicago citywide	$190,543 ±2,400	$199,018 ±1,255	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$27,257▲ +$18,782▲ +$8,475
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$205,496 ±24,090	$230,166 ±16,527	$295,849 ±27,703	▲ +$90,353▲ +$65,683▲ +$24,670
Chicago citywide	$143,800 ±1,811	$162,200 ±1,023	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$74,000▲ +$55,600▲ +$18,400
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$368,533 ±29,093	$356,968 ±24,811	$382,413 ±30,424	▲ +$13,879▲ +$25,444▼ −$11,565
Chicago citywide	$299,066 ±2,120	$316,564 ±2,118	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$35,034▲ +$17,536▲ +$17,498
Median Home Value (nominal dollars)	$278,126 ±21,956	$290,930 ±20,221	$382,413 ±30,424	▲ +$104,287▲ +$91,483▲ +$12,804
Chicago citywide	$225,700 ±1,600	$258,000 ±1,726	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$108,400▲ +$76,100▲ +$32,300
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$497,482 ±31,351	$486,658 ±43,329	$533,595 ±81,645	▲ +$36,112▲ +$46,936▼ −$10,824
Chicago citywide	$466,951 ±3,138	$490,797 ±3,892	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$30,749▲ +$6,903▲ +$23,846
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$375,442 ±23,660	$396,627 ±35,313	$533,595 ±81,645	▲ +$158,153▲ +$136,967▲ +$21,186
Chicago citywide	$352,400 ±2,368	$400,000 ±3,172	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$145,300▲ +$97,700▲ +$47,600
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$712,222 ±117,411	$609,606 ±96,219	$750,203 ±214,814	▲ +$37,982▲ +$140,598▼ −$102,616
Chicago citywide	$739,174 ±12,945	$835,769 ±9,047	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$69,986▼ −$26,610▲ +$96,595
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$537,502 ±88,608	$496,830 ±78,418	$750,203 ±214,814	▲ +$212,701▲ +$253,374▼ −$40,673
Chicago citywide	$557,842 ±9,770	$681,153 ±7,373	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$251,317▲ +$128,006▲ +$123,311

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show

Category	Armour Square
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	21.6%21.6%1,326
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	2.7%12.7%168
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	11.1%51.4%681
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	6.3%29.0%385
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	1.5%6.9%92
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	21.6%21.6%1,326	8.3%8.3%106,578	▲ +13.3%▲ +13.3%	14/77
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	2.7%12.7%168	4.8%57.2%60,910	▼ -2.0%▼ -44.5%	44/7775/77
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	11.1%51.4%681	1.1%13.8%14,721	▲ +10.0%▲ +37.5%	3/773/77
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	6.3%29.0%385	2.1%25.7%27,383	▲ +4.1%▲ +3.3%	10/7721/77
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	1.5%6.9%92	0.3%3.3%3,564	▲ +1.2%▲ +3.6%	6/7710/77
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units	24.0%1,360	22.5%1,301	21.6%1,326	▼ −2.4 pp▼ −34▼ −0.8 pp▲ +25▼ −1.6 pp▼ −59
Chicago citywide	8.8%104,550	8.5%103,479	8.3%106,578	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,028▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,099▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,071
Housing Choice Vouchers	0.1%5	2.7%159	2.7%168	▲ +2.7 pp▲ +163– 0.0 pp▲ +9▲ +2.7 pp▲ +154
Chicago citywide	4.3%51,601	4.6%55,987	4.8%60,910	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +9,309▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,923▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,386
Public Housing	15.5%875	11.5%669	11.1%681	▼ −4.3 pp▼ −194▼ −0.4 pp▲ +12▼ −3.9 pp▼ −206
Chicago citywide	1.8%21,159	1.3%16,094	1.2%14,721	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −6,438▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,373▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,065
Project-Based Section 8	6.9%389	6.6%381	6.3%385	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −4▼ −0.3 pp▲ +4▼ −0.3 pp▼ −8
Chicago citywide	2.2%25,940	2.2%26,951	2.1%27,383	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,443▼ −0.1 pp▲ +432– 0.0 pp▲ +1,011
Other Project-Based Programs	1.6%91	1.6%92	1.5%92	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1▼ −0.1 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▲ +1
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,850	0.4%4,447	0.3%3,564	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,286▼ −0.1 pp▼ −883▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,403

Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category	Armour Square
Average Household Income	$14,422
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$347
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,567
Below 30% of Area Median Income	93.3%1,134
With Children	10.3%125
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	34.3%417
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$14,422	$17,032	▼ -$2,610	75/75
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$347	$425	▼ -$78	75/75
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,567	$1,389	▲ +$178	10/75
Below 30% of Area Median Income	93.3%1,134	83.0%77,427	▲ +10.3 pp	1/75
With Children	10.3%125	31.0%28,919	▼ -20.7 pp	73/75
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	34.3%417	32.0%29,852	▲ +2.3 pp	30/75
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income	$10,712	$11,101	$14,419	▲ +$3,707▲ +$3,319▲ +$389
Chicago citywide	$12,156	$13,665	$17,032	▲ +$4,876▲ +$3,367▲ +$1,509
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$243	$262	$347	▲ +$105▲ +$85▲ +$20
Chicago citywide	$310	$340	$425	▲ +$115▲ +$85▲ +$30
Average Monthly Government Spending	$982	$1,161	$1,567	▲ +$585▲ +$406▲ +$179
Chicago citywide	$916	$1,017	$1,389	▲ +$473▲ +$372▲ +$101
Below 30% of Area Median Income	88.8%—	92.3%—	93.3%—	▲ +4.5 pp—▲ +0.9 pp—▲ +3.5 pp—
Chicago citywide	80.0%—	81.0%—	83.0%—	▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +2.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children	—	—	10.3%—	——————
Chicago citywide	—	—	31.0%—	——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	32.2%—	18.4%—	34.3%—	▲ +2.2 pp—▲ +16.0 pp—▼ −13.8 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category	Armour Square
Total Tree Canopy	10.5%67 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	78.8%504 acres
Natural Open Surfaces	10.7%68 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Total Tree Canopy	10.5%67 acres	18.4%25,934 acres	▼ -7.9%	70/77
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	78.8%504 acres	60.2%84,955 acres	▲ +18.7%	4/77
Natural Open Surfaces	10.7%68 acres	21.5%30,331 acres	▼ -10.8%	67/77
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category	Armour Square
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	18.6% ±7.1 pp2,582 ±980
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	42.7% ±7.9 pp5,925 ±1,101
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	38.7% ±7.2 pp5,378 ±1,005
Homes Without Air Conditioning	3.8%525
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	18.6%±7.1 pp2,582±980	26.1%±0.5 pp707,660±13,869	▼ -7.5%	59/77
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	42.7%±7.9 pp5,925±1,101	44.1%±0.6 pp1,195,950±15,462	▼ -1.4%	43/77
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	38.7%±7.2 pp5,378±1,005	29.8%±0.5 pp807,615±13,763	▲ +8.9%	21/77
Homes Without Air Conditioning	3.8%525	4.2%114,494	▼ -0.4%	44/77
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category	Armour Square
Drove Alone	48.1% ±5.2 pp2,584 ±277
Carpooled	22.5% ±5.6 pp1,210 ±300
Public Transit	12.0% ±4.6 pp644 ±244
Walked	13.8% ±6.2 pp739 ±332
Bikes	2.0% ±1.8 pp106 ±95
Other Commute Mode	0.8% ±0.7 pp42 ±38
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Drove Alone	48.1%±5.2 pp2,584±277	56.6%±0.4 pp772,696±5,998	▼ -8.5%	68/77
Carpooled	22.5%±5.6 pp1,210±300	9.3%±0.3 pp126,918±3,980	▲ +13.2%	2/77
Public Transit	12.0%±4.6 pp644±244	22.4%±0.4 pp305,691±6,011	▼ -10.4%	63/77
Walked	13.8%±6.2 pp739±332	7.3%±0.3 pp100,269±3,456	▲ +6.4%	6/77
Bikes	2.0%±1.8 pp106±95	1.8%±0.1 pp24,441±1,693	▲ +0.2%	22/77
Other Commute Mode	0.8%±0.7 pp42±38	2.5%±0.1 pp34,356±1,772	▼ -1.7%	61/77
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category	Armour Square
Average Commute Time (minutes)	27 min±2.7 min
Less Than 15 Minutes	20.6% ±5.2 pp1,104 ±280
15–29 Minutes	31.2% ±5.4 pp1,675 ±292
30–44 Minutes	34.3% ±5.9 pp1,841 ±317
45–59 Minutes	7.8% ±3.6 pp421 ±193
60 Minutes or More	6.1% ±2.9 pp328 ±155
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes)	27 min±2.7 min	33 min±0.2 min	▼ −6 min	71/76
Less Than 15 Minutes	20.6%±5.2 pp1,104±280	13.0%±0.3 pp140,252±3,438	▲ +7.6%	4/77
15–29 Minutes	31.2%±5.4 pp1,675±292	29.9%±0.5 pp322,586±5,056	▲ +1.3%	21/77
30–44 Minutes	34.3%±5.9 pp1,841±317	29.6%±0.4 pp318,782±4,584	▲ +4.7%	14/77
45–59 Minutes	7.8%±3.6 pp421±193	14.0%±0.3 pp151,451±3,075	▼ -6.2%	71/77
60 Minutes or More	6.1%±2.9 pp328±155	13.4%±0.3 pp144,940±3,715	▼ -7.3%	77/77
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category	Armour Square
Average Vehicles per Household	0.91±0.11
Households With No Vehicle	35.2% ±6.1 pp2,042 ±354
Households With 1 Vehicle	44.2% ±5.8 pp2,564 ±338
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	20.5% ±4.4 pp1,190 ±256
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Average Vehicles per Household	0.91±0.11	1.12±0.01	▼ −0.21	58/77
Households With No Vehicle	35.2%±6.1 pp2,042±354	26.6%±0.4 pp308,497±5,087	▲ +8.6%	18/77
Households With 1 Vehicle	44.2%±5.8 pp2,564±338	45.2%±0.4 pp524,900±5,145	▼ -1.0%	37/77
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	20.5%±4.4 pp1,190±256	28.2%±0.4 pp326,808±4,200	▼ -7.6%	57/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Armour Square Residents Work

Category	Armour Square
Loop	18.6%1,084
Armour Square	12.7%741
Near North Side	6.5%376
Near West Side	4.4%255
Lower West Side	2.3%136
All other city neighborhoods	21.6%1,257
Outside the city	33.9%1,976
↳ Morton Grove village, IL	2.7%155
↳ Naperville city, IL	1.0%60
↳ Des Plaines city, IL	0.7%40
↳ Skokie village, IL	0.7%40
↳ Bedford Park village, IL	0.7%39
↳ All other Illinois locations	25.8%1,502
Out of state	2.4%140
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 34 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Armour Square
Loop	18.6%1,084
Armour Square	12.7%741
Near North Side	6.5%376
Near West Side	4.4%255
Lower West Side	2.3%136
All other city neighborhoods	21.6%1,257
Outside the city	33.9%1,976
↳ Morton Grove village, IL	2.7%155
↳ Naperville city, IL	1.0%60
↳ Des Plaines city, IL	0.7%40
↳ Skokie village, IL	0.7%40
↳ Bedford Park village, IL	0.7%39
↳ All other Illinois locations	25.8%1,502
Out of state	2.4%140
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 34 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Loop	18.0%947	16.9%992	18.6%1,084	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +137▲ +1.7 pp▲ +92▼ −1.1 pp▲ +45
Chicago citywide	20.0%224,635	21.0%252,791	21.5%259,167	▲ +1.5 pp▲ +34,532▲ +0.5 pp▲ +6,376▲ +1.0 pp▲ +28,156
Armour Square	12.7%666	12.6%741	12.7%741	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +75▲ +0.1 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▲ +75
Chicago citywide	0.4%4,268	0.4%4,703	0.4%5,023	– 0.0 pp▲ +755– 0.0 pp▲ +320– 0.0 pp▲ +435
Near North Side	5.9%313	6.7%394	6.5%376	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +63▼ −0.2 pp▼ −18▲ +0.8 pp▲ +81
Chicago citywide	8.2%92,143	9.4%112,859	9.1%109,333	▲ +0.9 pp▲ +17,190▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3,526▲ +1.2 pp▲ +20,716
Near West Side	5.4%283	4.9%287	4.4%255	▼ −1.0 pp▼ −28▼ −0.5 pp▼ −32▼ −0.5 pp▲ +4
Chicago citywide	6.2%69,083	6.6%79,757	6.7%80,118	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +11,035– 0.0 pp▲ +361▲ +0.5 pp▲ +10,674
Lower West Side	1.5%80	1.8%103	2.3%136	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +56▲ +0.6 pp▲ +33▲ +0.2 pp▲ +23
Chicago citywide	0.9%9,585	0.8%9,912	1.0%12,477	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,892▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,565– 0.0 pp▲ +327
All other city neighborhoods	23.6%1,243	22.6%1,326	21.6%1,257	▼ −2.0 pp▲ +14▼ −1.0 pp▼ −69▼ −1.1 pp▲ +83
Chicago citywide	22.5%252,499	21.1%253,775	20.7%248,736	▼ −1.8 pp▼ −3,763▼ −0.4 pp▼ −5,039▼ −1.4 pp▲ +1,276
Outside the city	32.4%1,704	34.2%2,010	33.9%1,976	▲ +1.6 pp▲ +272▼ −0.3 pp▼ −34▲ +1.8 pp▲ +306
Chicago citywide	36.8%412,807	35.7%430,134	35.9%432,355	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +19,548▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,221▼ −1.0 pp▲ +17,327
Morton Grove village, IL	0.2%11	0.6%33	2.7%155	▲ +2.5 pp▲ +144▲ +2.1 pp▲ +122▲ +0.4 pp▲ +22
Chicago citywide	0.2%2,316	0.2%2,644	0.3%3,510	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,194▲ +0.1 pp▲ +866– 0.0 pp▲ +328
Naperville city, IL	0.8%40	1.0%57	1.0%60	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +20▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3▲ +0.2 pp▲ +17
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,765	0.5%6,098	0.6%6,926	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,161▲ +0.1 pp▲ +828– 0.0 pp▲ +333
Des Plaines city, IL	1.1%60	0.7%44	0.7%40	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −20▼ −0.1 pp▼ −4▼ −0.4 pp▼ −16
Chicago citywide	0.8%9,241	0.8%9,141	0.8%9,268	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +27– 0.0 pp▲ +127▼ −0.1 pp▼ −100
Skokie village, IL	0.4%21	0.5%29	0.7%40	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +19▲ +0.2 pp▲ +11▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8
Chicago citywide	1.1%12,426	1.1%12,900	1.3%15,777	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +3,351▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,877– 0.0 pp▲ +474
Bedford Park village, IL	0.4%20	0.7%41	0.7%39	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +19– 0.0 pp▼ −2▲ +0.3 pp▲ +21
Chicago citywide	0.8%8,547	0.7%8,008	0.6%6,897	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,650▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,111▼ −0.1 pp▼ −539
Evanston city, IL	0.8%43	0.7%40	0.7%39	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −4– 0.0 pp▼ −1▼ −0.1 pp▼ −3
Chicago citywide	1.6%17,922	1.6%18,922	1.5%17,546	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −376▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,376– 0.0 pp▲ +1,000
All other Illinois locations	25.6%1,346	27.0%1,586	25.8%1,502	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +156▼ −1.2 pp▼ −84▲ +1.4 pp▲ +240
Chicago citywide	27.9%312,992	27.0%324,805	27.3%329,050	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +16,058▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,245▼ −0.9 pp▲ +11,813
Out of state	2.6%136	3.2%186	2.4%140	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +4▼ −0.8 pp▼ −46▲ +0.6 pp▲ +50
Chicago citywide	2.2%24,577	2.3%27,198	2.2%26,136	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,559▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,062▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,621

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Armour Square

Category	Armour Square
Bridgeport	14.0%916
Armour Square	11.3%741
Brighton Park	6.1%402
McKinley Park	5.4%355
New City (Back of the Yards)	2.4%157
All other city neighborhoods	37.5%2,452
Outside the city	23.3%1,523
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	0.8%55
↳ Skokie village, IL	0.6%41
↳ Cicero town, IL	0.6%38
↳ Naperville city, IL	0.5%33
↳ Oak Park village, IL	0.5%32
↳ All other Illinois locations	17.5%1,144
Out of state	2.7%180
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 34; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Armour Square
Bridgeport	14.0%916
Armour Square	11.3%741
Brighton Park	6.1%402
McKinley Park	5.4%355
New City (Back of the Yards)	2.4%157
All other city neighborhoods	37.5%2,452
Outside the city	23.3%1,523
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	0.8%55
↳ Skokie village, IL	0.6%41
↳ Cicero town, IL	0.6%38
↳ Naperville city, IL	0.5%33
↳ Oak Park village, IL	0.5%32
↳ All other Illinois locations	17.5%1,144
Out of state	2.7%180
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 34; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Bridgeport	12.9%760	13.9%854	14.0%916	▲ +1.0 pp▲ +156▲ +0.1 pp▲ +62▲ +1.0 pp▲ +94
Chicago citywide	0.7%9,815	0.8%10,783	0.7%10,850	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,035– 0.0 pp▲ +67– 0.0 pp▲ +968
Armour Square	11.3%666	12.1%741	11.3%741	– 0.0 pp▲ +75▼ −0.8 pp– 0▲ +0.7 pp▲ +75
Chicago citywide	0.3%3,560	0.3%3,870	0.3%3,849	– 0.0 pp▲ +289– 0.0 pp▼ −21– 0.0 pp▲ +310
Brighton Park	4.6%268	5.1%315	6.1%402	▲ +1.6 pp▲ +134▲ +1.0 pp▲ +87▲ +0.6 pp▲ +47
Chicago citywide	0.6%8,222	0.7%9,275	0.6%9,100	– 0.0 pp▲ +878– 0.0 pp▼ −175– 0.0 pp▲ +1,053
McKinley Park	4.2%247	4.3%263	5.4%355	▲ +1.2 pp▲ +108▲ +1.1 pp▲ +92▲ +0.1 pp▲ +16
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,267	0.3%4,575	0.3%4,443	– 0.0 pp▲ +176– 0.0 pp▼ −132– 0.0 pp▲ +308
New City (Back of the Yards)	1.9%110	2.7%165	2.4%157	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +47▼ −0.3 pp▼ −8▲ +0.8 pp▲ +55
Chicago citywide	0.6%8,047	0.6%8,424	0.6%8,500	– 0.0 pp▲ +453– 0.0 pp▲ +76– 0.0 pp▲ +377
All other city neighborhoods	37.8%2,217	38.6%2,365	37.5%2,452	▼ −0.3 pp▲ +235▼ −1.1 pp▲ +87▲ +0.8 pp▲ +148
Chicago citywide	38.0%499,784	37.9%537,334	36.8%539,030	▼ −1.2 pp▲ +39,246▼ −1.1 pp▲ +1,696▼ −0.1 pp▲ +37,550
Outside the city	27.3%1,601	23.2%1,423	23.3%1,523	▼ −4.0 pp▼ −78– 0.0 pp▲ +100▼ −4.1 pp▼ −178
Chicago citywide	45.9%603,720	45.4%642,891	47.2%691,545	▲ +1.3 pp▲ +87,825▲ +1.9 pp▲ +48,654▼ −0.6 pp▲ +39,171
Oak Lawn village, IL	1.2%73	0.8%47	0.8%55	▼ −0.4 pp▼ −18▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8▼ −0.5 pp▼ −26
Chicago citywide	0.7%9,277	0.7%9,503	0.7%9,767	– 0.0 pp▲ +490– 0.0 pp▲ +264– 0.0 pp▲ +226
Skokie village, IL	0.7%41	0.4%27	0.6%41	▼ −0.1 pp– 0▲ +0.2 pp▲ +14▼ −0.3 pp▼ −14
Chicago citywide	0.9%12,309	0.9%12,525	0.9%12,545	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +236– 0.0 pp▲ +20▼ −0.1 pp▲ +216
Cicero town, IL	0.6%34	0.7%41	0.6%38	– 0.0 pp▲ +4▼ −0.1 pp▼ −3▲ +0.1 pp▲ +7
Chicago citywide	0.8%9,934	0.8%11,086	0.8%10,993	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,059– 0.0 pp▼ −93– 0.0 pp▲ +1,152
Naperville city, IL	0.4%23	0.6%35	0.5%33	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2▲ +0.2 pp▲ +12
Chicago citywide	0.8%10,439	0.8%11,676	0.9%13,352	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,913▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,676– 0.0 pp▲ +1,237
Oak Park village, IL	0.4%26	0.5%30	0.5%32	– 0.0 pp▲ +6– 0.0 pp▲ +2– 0.0 pp▲ +4
Chicago citywide	1.0%12,512	0.9%13,154	0.9%13,459	– 0.0 pp▲ +947– 0.0 pp▲ +305– 0.0 pp▲ +642
All other Illinois locations	20.6%1,210	17.8%1,091	17.5%1,144	▼ −3.1 pp▼ −66▼ −0.3 pp▲ +53▼ −2.8 pp▼ −119
Chicago citywide	35.5%467,052	35.1%497,107	36.9%540,317	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +73,265▲ +1.8 pp▲ +43,210▼ −0.5 pp▲ +30,055
Out of state	3.0%174	2.4%144	2.7%180	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6▲ +0.4 pp▲ +36▼ −0.6 pp▼ −30
Chicago citywide	4.9%63,785	4.8%68,287	4.9%72,123	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8,338▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,836– 0.0 pp▲ +4,502

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category	Armour Square
No Computer or Smartphone	7.8% ±2.6 pp454 ±154
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	24.7% ±6.3 pp1,434 ±363
Desktop or Laptop Available	62.9% ±5.5 pp3,647 ±318
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
No Computer or Smartphone	7.8%±2.6 pp454±154	5.1%±0.2 pp58,709±2,246	▲ +2.8%	22/77
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	24.7%±6.3 pp1,434±363	10.4%±0.3 pp120,218±3,642	▲ +14.4%	2/77
Desktop or Laptop Available	62.9%±5.5 pp3,647±318	79.7%±0.4 pp924,956±4,919	▼ -16.8%	69/77
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category	Armour Square
Has Internet Access	86.4% ±5.1 pp5,004 ±295
Cellular Data Plan Only	20.5% ±5.8 pp1,186 ±335
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	2.1% ±2.0 pp122 ±115
No Internet Access	13.6% ±4.4 pp791 ±255
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Has Internet Access	86.4%±5.1 pp5,004±295	93.1%±0.3 pp1,080,419±3,310	▼ -6.8%	67/77
Cellular Data Plan Only	20.5%±5.8 pp1,186±335	12.5%±0.3 pp145,219±3,463	▲ +7.9%	6/77
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	2.1%±2.0 pp122±115	3.9%±0.2 pp45,350±1,940	▼ -1.8%	56/77
No Internet Access	13.6%±4.4 pp791±255	6.9%±0.2 pp79,786±2,730	▲ +6.8%	11/77
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category	Armour Square
Uninsured Residents	9.4% ±2.7 pp1,307 ±378
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	3.4% ±4.3 pp475 ±604
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	12.4% ±3.8 pp1,717 ±526
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	6.4% ±5.7 pp890 ±799
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Uninsured Residents	9.4%±2.7 pp1,307±378	9.8%±0.2 pp264,391±5,709	▼ -0.3%	34/77
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	3.4%±4.3 pp475±604	3.9%±0.3 pp104,687±8,934	▼ -0.4%	35/77
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	12.4%±3.8 pp1,717±526	13.3%±0.3 pp361,430±8,516	▼ -1.0%	45/77
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	6.4%±5.7 pp890±799	1.7%±0.3 pp46,718±7,265	▲ +4.7%	1/77
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category	Armour Square
Insured (Any Coverage)	90.6% ±2.7 pp12,509 ±376
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	33.9% ±4.2 pp4,687 ±577
Direct-Purchase Insurance	11.6% ±2.7 pp1,609 ±376
Medicare	20.0% ±3.4 pp2,757 ±466
Medicaid	35.7% ±5.1 pp4,934 ±699
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.0% ±0.6 pp1 ±88
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	5.0% ±2.0 pp694 ±280
Uninsured	9.4% ±2.7 pp1,299 ±375
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Insured (Any Coverage)	90.6%±2.7 pp12,509±376	90.2%±0.2 pp2,424,871±5,689	▲ +0.3%	44/77
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	33.9%±4.2 pp4,687±577	51.2%±0.4 pp1,376,912±9,468	▼ -17.3%	60/77
Direct-Purchase Insurance	11.6%±2.7 pp1,609±376	8.5%±0.2 pp227,424±5,112	▲ +3.2%	7/77
Medicare	20.0%±3.4 pp2,757±466	12.6%±0.2 pp339,804±4,911	▲ +7.3%	3/77
Medicaid	35.7%±5.1 pp4,934±699	22.2%±0.3 pp596,931±7,773	▲ +13.5%	20/77
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.0%±0.6 pp1±88	0.3%±0.0 pp7,201±787	▼ -0.3%	69/77
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	5.0%±2.0 pp694±280	3.8%±0.1 pp102,777±3,544	▲ +1.2%	23/77
Uninsured	9.4%±2.7 pp1,299±375	9.8%±0.2 pp262,018±5,689	▼ -0.3%	34/77
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category	Armour Square
Adults With at Least One Disability	17.8% ±3.5 pp2,041 ±398
Mobility Disability	9.2% ±2.6 pp1,058 ±298
Hearing Disability	5.4% ±2.3 pp616 ±264
Vision Disability	3.0% ±1.4 pp344 ±159
Cognitive Disability	5.2% ±1.9 pp603 ±223
Self-Care Disability	3.5% ±1.7 pp407 ±192
Independent Living Disability	8.5% ±2.7 pp976 ±312
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability	17.8%±3.5 pp2,041±398	14.0%±0.2 pp303,665±4,797	▲ +3.7%	27/77
Mobility Disability	9.2%±2.6 pp1,058±298	7.6%±0.2 pp163,666±3,398	▲ +1.6%	30/77
Hearing Disability	5.4%±2.3 pp616±264	2.8%±0.1 pp61,430±2,337	▲ +2.5%	6/77
Vision Disability	3.0%±1.4 pp344±159	3.0%±0.1 pp64,544±2,269	0%	40/77
Cognitive Disability	5.2%±1.9 pp603±223	5.2%±0.1 pp112,824±2,939	0%	38/77
Self-Care Disability	3.5%±1.7 pp407±192	2.7%±0.1 pp57,758±2,261	▲ +0.9%	26/77
Independent Living Disability	8.5%±2.7 pp976±312	5.7%±0.2 pp123,651±3,247	▲ +2.8%	22/77
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category	Armour Square
Arthritis	22.5%2,408
High Blood Pressure	36.3%3,881
Cancer	4.8%509
Current Asthma	8.2%880
Coronary Heart Disease	7.5%800
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	7.9%847
Diabetes	19.3%2,067
High Cholesterol	41.9%4,479
Obesity	23.1%2,467
Stroke	4.6%494
Lost All Natural Teeth	4.4%474
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Arthritis	22.5%2,408	19.6%409,178	▲ +2.9%	33/77
High Blood Pressure	36.3%3,881	29.7%620,030	▲ +6.6%	28/77
Cancer	4.8%509	5.0%104,382	▼ -0.2%	42/77
Current Asthma	8.2%880	10.2%212,940	▼ -2.0%	77/77
Coronary Heart Disease	7.5%800	4.8%100,207	▲ +2.7%	8/77
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	7.9%847	5.5%114,820	▲ +2.4%	21/77
Diabetes	19.3%2,067	12.0%250,517	▲ +7.3%	11/77
High Cholesterol	41.9%4,479	31.6%659,696	▲ +10.3%	1/77
Obesity	23.1%2,467	32.6%680,572	▼ -9.5%	75/77
Stroke	4.6%494	3.3%68,892	▲ +1.3%	26/77
Lost All Natural Teeth	4.4%474	2.5%52,249	▲ +1.9%	18/77
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category	Armour Square
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	10.5%1,119
Current Cigarette Smoking	15.0%1,600
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	36.3%3,884
Short Sleep Duration	39.1%4,185
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	10.5%1,119	19.0%396,652	▼ -8.5%	77/77
Current Cigarette Smoking	15.0%1,600	11.9%248,430	▲ +3.1%	24/77
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	36.3%3,884	24.7%515,648	▲ +11.6%	9/77
Short Sleep Duration	39.1%4,185	37.8%789,129	▲ +1.3%	34/77
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category	Armour Square
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	27.2%2,913
Frequent Physical Distress	13.8%1,473
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	27.2%2,913	21.1%440,493	▲ +6.1%	30/77
Frequent Physical Distress	13.8%1,473	11.8%246,342	▲ +2.0%	32/77
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category	Armour Square
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	79.6%8,509
Routine Checkup in Past Year	78.7%8,415
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	85.3%9,114
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	48.6%5,193
Dental Visit in Past Year	46.8%5,003
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	66.5%7,114
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	79.6%8,509	72.5%1,513,542	▲ +7.1%	9/77
Routine Checkup in Past Year	78.7%8,415	76.2%1,590,785	▲ +2.5%	31/77
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	85.3%9,114	86.2%1,799,549	▼ -0.9%	49/77
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	48.6%5,193	55.8%1,164,905	▼ -7.2%	66/77
Dental Visit in Past Year	46.8%5,003	58.4%1,219,184	▼ -11.6%	64/77
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	66.5%7,114	74.2%1,549,032	▼ -7.7%	77/77
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category	Armour Square
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	14.2%1,520
Frequent Mental Distress	13.9%1,487
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	35.7%3,815
Loneliness	38.3%4,093
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Armour Square	City	Difference	Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	14.2%1,520	19.1%398,740	▼ -4.9%	77/77
Frequent Mental Distress	13.9%1,487	16.0%334,023	▼ -2.1%	68/77
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	35.7%3,815	28.2%588,716	▲ +7.5%	12/77
Loneliness	38.3%4,093	35.8%747,377	▲ +2.5%	27/77
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Compare All Neighborhoods

Armour Square, Chicago

Armour Square at a Glance

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Age Distribution

Educational Attainment

Population

Household Size

Marital Status

Language Spoken at Home

English Proficiency

Household Composition

Children by Household Type

Veteran Status

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Poverty Status

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Occupation

Industry of Employment

Class of Worker

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Earnings of All Workers

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Armour Square, Chicago

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Armour Square, Chicago in Lower-Income Families

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Armour Square, Chicago

Local Businesses

Jobs in Armour Square

Industry of Jobs in Armour Square

Earnings of Jobs in Armour Square

Jobs in Armour Square by Firm Age

Jobs in Armour Square by Firm Size

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

College Enrollment

Student Digital Access

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Year Moved Into Current Home

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Housing Vacancy Status

Housing Age

Housing Units by Building Size

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Overcrowded Housing

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Monthly Housing Costs

Rent

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Home Values

Federal Housing Assistance

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Commute Time

Household Vehicle Access

Where Armour Square Residents Work

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Armour Square

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Household Internet Access

Health

Health Insurance

Health Insurance Coverage Types