Civic Data Atlas

• Home
• More

Rogers Park, Chicago Demographics, Housing & Census Data

Rogers Park, Chicago Census and ACS demographic tables: population, race, age, income, poverty, rent, housing types, single-family homes, commute, education, internet access, health insurance, and disability.

Rogers Park, Chicago

Rogers Park

Chicago

Population

54,173

Overlapping council wards Overlap means that a council ward contains part of this neighborhood.

40, 49

Population Density

29,485 /sq mi

Average Geographic Mismatch Error : 0.00 p.p. Geographic mismatch error comes from Census geographic boundaries not perfectly aligning with community area boundaries. We can test how much mismatch error skews community area statistics for a subset of variables. For this community area , the average error is 0.00 percentage points. More detail is available on the community area geography page , and the methodology page explains geographic mismatch error in more detail.

One-page summary

Rogers Park at a Glance

Median Household Income

$60,916±$4.0k

Rogers Park

$60,916±$4.0k

Chicago

$77,902±$907

Workers Who Commute by Public Transit

32.9%±3.0 pp

Rogers Park

32.9%±3.0 pp

Chicago

22.4%±0.4 pp

Renter Households

71.8%±2.7 pp

Rogers Park

71.8%±2.7 pp

Chicago

54.0%±0.4 pp

Adults With a Disability

16.1%±1.8 pp

Rogers Park

16.1%±1.8 pp

Chicago

14.0%±0.2 pp

Time period?Historical estimates use this profile's current boundaries, held constant across periods; they do not reflect the boundaries that were in effect at the time. Comparing

Values as

Show as

Add to every table

Showing Chart vs. Chicago ± Margin of error

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category	Rogers Park
Hispanic	22.6% ±2.9 pp12,245 ±1,581
White	44.6% ±2.4 pp24,150 ±1,327
Black	21.7% ±3.1 pp11,729 ±1,699
Asian	6.3% ±1.2 pp3,389 ±656
Other or Multi-racial	4.9% ±1.0 pp2,660 ±542
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Hispanic	22.6%±2.9 pp12,245±1,581	29.7%±0.2 pp805,318±5,785	▼ -7.1%	31/77
White	44.6%±2.4 pp24,150±1,327	32.1%±0.2 pp870,127±5,557	▲ +12.5%	22/77
Black	21.7%±3.1 pp11,729±1,699	27.4%±0.2 pp743,710±6,047	▼ -5.8%	36/77
Asian	6.3%±1.2 pp3,389±656	7.2%±0.2 pp196,435±4,370	▼ -1.0%	25/77
Other or Multi-racial	4.9%±1.0 pp2,660±542	3.5%±0.1 pp95,636±3,778	▲ +1.4%	17/77
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Age Distribution

Category	Rogers Park
Under 5	4.5% ±1.2 pp2,455 ±650
5-17	7.8% ±1.2 pp4,232 ±639
18-24	16.0% ±1.6 pp8,647 ±881
25-44	34.0% ±1.6 pp18,404 ±890
45-64	25.1% ±1.9 pp13,594 ±1,022
65-74	8.3% ±1.0 pp4,502 ±532
75-84	3.4% ±0.6 pp1,842 ±329
85+	0.9% ±0.3 pp497 ±165
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Under 5	4.5%±1.2 pp2,455±650	5.3%±0.1 pp144,044±3,867	▼ -0.8%	54/77
5-17	7.8%±1.2 pp4,232±639	14.1%±0.2 pp381,582±5,548	▼ -6.3%	69/77
18-24	16.0%±1.6 pp8,647±881	9.6%±0.2 pp260,942±4,900	▲ +6.3%	4/77
25-44	34.0%±1.6 pp18,404±890	34.3%±0.3 pp929,946±6,988	▼ -0.3%	19/77
45-64	25.1%±1.9 pp13,594±1,022	22.9%±0.2 pp620,047±5,644	▲ +2.2%	27/77
65-74	8.3%±1.0 pp4,502±532	8.2%±0.1 pp221,932±3,711	▲ +0.1%	50/77
75-84	3.4%±0.6 pp1,842±329	4.0%±0.1 pp107,625±2,694	▼ -0.6%	55/77
85+	0.9%±0.3 pp497±165	1.7%±0.1 pp45,108±1,921	▼ -0.7%	68/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category	Rogers Park
No High School Diploma	11.6% ±1.9 pp4,514 ±743
High School Diploma or GED	15.5% ±1.9 pp6,016 ±750
Some College or Associate's Degree	20.4% ±2.3 pp7,936 ±897
Bachelor's Degree	31.1% ±2.2 pp12,078 ±858
Graduate Degree	21.4% ±1.9 pp8,295 ±746
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
No High School Diploma	11.6%±1.9 pp4,514±743	12.8%±0.2 pp246,015±4,778	▼ -1.2%	43/77
High School Diploma or GED	15.5%±1.9 pp6,016±750	21.1%±0.3 pp405,248±5,752	▼ -5.6%	61/77
Some College or Associate's Degree	20.4%±2.3 pp7,936±897	21.8%±0.3 pp419,911±5,550	▼ -1.4%	51/77
Bachelor's Degree	31.1%±2.2 pp12,078±858	25.4%±0.3 pp488,467±5,708	▲ +5.7%	16/77
Graduate Degree	21.4%±1.9 pp8,295±746	19.0%±0.3 pp365,017±5,186	▲ +2.4%	18/77
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category	Rogers Park
Total Population	54,173 ±2,560
Total Households	26,186 ±918
Population Density	29,485 ±1,393 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	Average Neighborhood	Difference
Total Population	54,173	35,210	▲ +18,963
Total Households	26,186	15,067	▲ +11,119
Population Density	29,485 people/sq mi	13,045 people/sq mi	▲ +16,440
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average neighborhood rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large neighborhoods. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19	Difference	Rank
Total Population	55,053 ±2,065	55,475 ±1,733	54,173 ±2,560	▼ −880 ±3,289▼ −1,302 ±3,091▲ +422 ±2,696	▲ +19,823▲ +20,289▲ +18,963	15/7714/7716/77
Average Neighborhood	35,230	35,186	35,210	▼ −20▲ +24▼ −43
Total Households	23,487 ±506	24,832 ±482	26,186 ±918	▲ +2,699 ±1,048▲ +1,354 ±1,037▲ +1,345 ±699	▲ +10,126▲ +10,978▲ +11,119	11/7711/7712/77
Average Neighborhood	13,361	13,854	15,067	▲ +1,706▲ +1,213▲ +493
Population Density (per sq mi)	29,964 ±1,124	30,193 ±943	29,485 ±1,393	▼ −479▼ −709▲ +230	▲ +16,975▲ +17,165▲ +16,440	4/774/774/77
Average Neighborhood Density	12,989	13,028	13,045	▲ +56▲ +17▲ +39

Household Size

Category	Rogers Park
Average Household Size	1.93±0.10
1-Person Households	47.8% ±2.1 pp12,515 ±558
2-Person Households	30.5% ±2.3 pp7,984 ±605
3-Person Households	11.5% ±2.3 pp3,012 ±590
4+ Person Households	10.2% ±1.8 pp2,675 ±483
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Size	1.93±0.10	2.29±0.02	▼ −0.36	66/77
1-Person Households	47.8%±2.1 pp12,515±558	39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,783	▲ +8.1%	17/77
2-Person Households	30.5%±2.3 pp7,984±605	29.5%±0.4 pp342,235±5,166	▲ +1.0%	24/77
3-Person Households	11.5%±2.3 pp3,012±590	12.9%±0.4 pp149,291±4,184	▼ -1.4%	64/77
4+ Person Households	10.2%±1.8 pp2,675±483	18.0%±0.5 pp208,411±5,419	▼ -7.7%	64/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category	Rogers Park
Never Married	56.6% ±1.9 pp27,361 ±919
Married	30.9% ±1.9 pp14,928 ±942
Separated	1.9% ±0.7 pp924 ±355
Divorced	7.6% ±1.2 pp3,675 ±573
Widowed	3.0% ±0.7 pp1,473 ±337
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Never Married	56.6%±1.9 pp27,361±919	49.6%±0.3 pp1,130,286±6,623	▲ +6.9%	17/77
Married	30.9%±1.9 pp14,928±942	35.5%±0.3 pp807,294±6,077	▼ -4.6%	48/77
Separated	1.9%±0.7 pp924±355	2.2%±0.1 pp49,430±2,379	▼ -0.3%	47/77
Divorced	7.6%±1.2 pp3,675±573	7.9%±0.2 pp180,700±3,966	▼ -0.3%	46/77
Widowed	3.0%±0.7 pp1,473±337	4.8%±0.1 pp109,357±2,738	▼ -1.8%	64/77
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category	Rogers Park
Speak English Only	65.5% ±2.3 pp33,876 ±1,172
Spanish	19.1% ±2.7 pp9,868 ±1,418
Other Languages	7.4% ±1.9 pp3,817 ±1,000
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic	2.7% ±1.3 pp1,398 ±657
Other Indo-European	2.3% ±0.7 pp1,201 ±367
French, Haitian, or Cajun	1.9% ±0.9 pp1,002 ±476
Other Asian and Pacific Island	1.1% ±0.6 pp556 ±289
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Speak English Only	65.5%±2.3 pp33,876±1,172	64.6%±0.3 pp1,659,069±8,218	▲ +0.9%	48/77
Spanish	19.1%±2.7 pp9,868±1,418	23.7%±0.2 pp607,865±6,166	▼ -4.6%	29/77
Other Languages	7.4%±1.9 pp3,817±1,000	1.0%±0.1 pp25,292±2,452	▲ +6.4%	4/77
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic	2.7%±1.3 pp1,398±657	2.6%±0.1 pp67,932±3,529	▲ +0.1%	23/35
Other Indo-European	2.3%±0.7 pp1,201±367	2.4%±0.1 pp61,672±3,192	▼ -0.1%	22/36
French, Haitian, or Cajun	1.9%±0.9 pp1,002±476	0.6%±0.1 pp15,490±1,595	▲ +1.3%	5/15
Other Asian and Pacific Island	1.1%±0.6 pp556±289	0.9%±0.1 pp22,472±2,251	▲ +0.2%	19/21
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show

Category	Rogers Park
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	84.1% ±2.0 pp84.1%±2.0 pp43,488 ±1,057
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+)	7.5% ±1.4 pp7.5%±1.4 pp3,886 ±720
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	6.4% ±1.4 pp85.4%±9.1 pp3,320 ±710
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	2.0% ±0.7 pp26.4%±7.5 pp1,024 ±347
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	15.9% ±2.0 pp211.8%±47.4 pp8,230 ±1,030
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	84.1%±2.0 pp84.1%±2.0 pp43,488±1,057	85.4%±0.5 pp85.4%±0.5 pp2,192,778±11,961	▼ -1.3%▼ -1.3%	50/77
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+)	7.5%±1.4 pp7.5%±1.4 pp3,886±720	7.1%±0.2 pp7.1%±0.2 pp183,252±4,686	▲ +0.4%▲ +0.4%	30/77
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	6.4%±1.4 pp85.4%±9.1 pp3,320±710	5.2%±0.2 pp72.7%±1.1 pp133,269±3,923	▲ +1.2%▲ +12.7%	28/7723/76
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	2.0%±0.7 pp26.4%±7.5 pp1,024±347	2.3%±0.1 pp31.6%±1.4 pp57,883±2,982	▼ -0.3%▼ -5.2%	28/7733/76
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	15.9%±2.0 pp211.8%±47.4 pp8,230±1,030	14.6%±0.3 pp204.3%±6.4 pp374,404±6,794	▲ +1.3%▲ +7.5%	28/7726/76
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category	Rogers Park
Married-Couple Households	25.2% ±2.7 pp6,611 ±698
Unmarried-Couple Households	9.9% ±1.7 pp2,597 ±451
One-Person Households	47.8% ±3.4 pp12,515 ±896
Other Household Types	17.0% ±6.1 pp4,463 ±1,602
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Married-Couple Households	25.2%±2.7 pp6,611±698	30.9%±0.3 pp358,432±3,598	▼ -5.6%	45/77
Unmarried-Couple Households	9.9%±1.7 pp2,597±451	8.3%±0.2 pp96,220±2,797	▲ +1.6%	13/77
One-Person Households	47.8%±3.4 pp12,515±896	39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,729	▲ +8.1%	17/77
Other Household Types	17.0%±6.1 pp4,463±1,602	21.1%±0.7 pp245,285±8,514	▼ -4.1%	59/77
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category	Rogers Park
Children in Married-Couple Households	65.9% ±11.8 pp4,389 ±783
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	16.0% ±8.0 pp1,064 ±533
Children in Single-Mother Households	15.4% ±5.9 pp1,027 ±390
Children in Single-Father Households	2.7% ±2.3 pp177 ±150
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households	65.9%±11.8 pp4,389±783	56.0%±0.8 pp293,542±4,257	▲ +9.9%	25/77
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	16.0%±8.0 pp1,064±533	8.8%±0.6 pp45,960±3,208	▲ +7.2%	5/77
Children in Single-Mother Households	15.4%±5.9 pp1,027±390	30.6%±0.9 pp160,535±4,521	▼ -15.2%	61/77
Children in Single-Father Households	2.7%±2.3 pp177±150	4.6%±0.4 pp24,133±2,006	▼ -1.9%	62/77
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Rogers Park
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	2.4% ±0.7 pp2.4%±0.7 pp1,137 ±324
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	31.8% ±18.8 pp0.8%±0.4 pp361 ±213
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	7.3% ±7.4 pp0.2%±0.2 pp83 ±84
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	38.4% ±12.3 pp0.9%±0.3 pp437 ±140
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	1.7% ±6.1 pp0.0%±0.1 pp19 ±69
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	20.8% ±14.3 pp0.5%±0.3 pp237 ±163
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	2.4%±0.7 pp2.4%±0.7 pp1,137±324	2.8%±0.1 pp2.8%±0.1 pp60,766±2,397	▼ -0.4%▼ -0.4%	50/77
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	31.8%±18.8 pp0.8%±0.4 pp361±213	26.8%±1.8 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,267±1,067	▲ +5.0%0%	28/7732/77
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	7.3%±7.4 pp0.2%±0.2 pp83±84	12.9%±1.0 pp0.4%±0.0 pp7,830±579	▼ -5.6%▼ -0.2%	57/7757/77
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	38.4%±12.3 pp0.9%±0.3 pp437±140	28.8%±1.4 pp0.8%±0.0 pp17,525±846	▲ +9.6%▲ +0.1%	15/7741/77
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	1.7%±6.1 pp0.0%±0.1 pp19±69	4.9%±0.7 pp0.1%±0.0 pp2,995±441	▼ -3.3%▼ -0.1%	55/7755/77
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	20.8%±14.3 pp0.5%±0.3 pp237±163	26.6%±1.5 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,149±916	▼ -5.7%▼ -0.2%	49/7748/77
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show

Category	Rogers Park
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	74.5% ±2.3 pp74.5%±2.3 pp40,346 ±1,220
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	25.5% ±2.5 pp25.5%±2.5 pp13,827 ±1,353
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	9.6% ±1.5 pp37.6%±4.4 pp5,201 ±791
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	15.9% ±2.2 pp62.4%±6.0 pp8,626 ±1,186
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	74.5%±2.3 pp74.5%±2.3 pp40,346±1,220	79.1%±0.3 pp79.1%±0.3 pp2,144,343±7,926	▼ -4.6%▼ -4.6%	52/77
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	25.5%±2.5 pp25.5%±2.5 pp13,827±1,353	20.9%±0.3 pp20.9%±0.3 pp566,883±7,968	▲ +4.6%▲ +4.6%	26/77
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	9.6%±1.5 pp37.6%±4.4 pp5,201±791	10.0%±0.2 pp47.7%±0.5 pp270,551±4,603	▼ -0.4%▼ -10.1%	32/7754/77
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	15.9%±2.2 pp62.4%±6.0 pp8,626±1,186	10.9%±0.2 pp52.3%±0.9 pp296,332±6,504	▲ +5.0%▲ +10.1%	18/7724/77
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show

Category	Rogers Park
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	7.0%±1.5 pp27.3%±5.3 pp3,777±837
Born in Nigeria (of foreign-born residents)	2.2%±1.2 pp8.6%±4.4 pp1,194±628
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	15.1%59.1%8,175
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	Chicago	Difference	Rank
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	7.0% ±1.5 pp27.3%±5.3 pp3,777	8.2% ±0.2 pp39.3%222,978	▼ -1.3%▼ -12.0%	27/7739/77
Born in Nigeria (of foreign-born residents)	2.2% ±1.2 pp8.6%±4.4 pp1,194	0.3% ±0.0 pp1.6%9,223	▲ +1.9%▲ +7.0%	3/7712/77
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	15.1%59.1%8,175	——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show

Category	Rogers Park
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	11.1% ±2.2 pp43.3%±7.4 pp5,993 ±1,179
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	4.8% ±0.9 pp18.7%±3.2 pp2,582 ±510
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	4.9% ±1.2 pp19.3%±4.3 pp2,671 ±648
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	4.8% ±0.8 pp18.7%±2.7 pp2,581 ±453
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	11.1%±2.2 pp43.3%±7.4 pp5,993±1,179	5.9%±0.2 pp1153.2%±120.9 pp159,447±5,557	▲ +5.2%▼ -1109.8%	8/7715/77
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	4.8%±0.9 pp18.7%±3.2 pp2,582±510	4.5%±0.1 pp881.7%±91.9 pp121,912±4,035	▲ +0.3%▼ -863.0%	32/7749/77
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	4.9%±1.2 pp19.3%±4.3 pp2,671±648	4.6%±0.1 pp895.7%±92.9 pp123,849±3,901	▲ +0.4%▼ -876.4%	32/7746/77
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	4.8%±0.8 pp18.7%±2.7 pp2,581±453	6.0%±0.1 pp1169.3%±118.3 pp161,675±3,491	▼ -1.2%▼ -1150.6%	38/7756/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later	3.0% ±1.1 pp1,649 ±591	8.5% ±1.7 pp4,702 ±928	11.1% ±2.2 pp5,993 ±1,179	▲ +8.1 pp▲ +4,344▲ +2.6 pp▲ +1,291▲ +5.5 pp▲ +3,053
Chicago citywide	1.4% ±0.1 pp36,978 ±2,235	3.7% ±0.1 pp99,118 ±3,198	5.9% ±0.2 pp159,447 ±5,568	▲ +4.5 pp▲ +122,469▲ +2.2 pp▲ +60,329▲ +2.3 pp▲ +62,140
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009	11.7% ±1.9 pp6,432 ±1,059	7.4% ±1.1 pp4,086 ±620	4.8% ±0.9 pp2,582 ±510	▼ −6.9 pp▼ −3,850▼ −2.6 pp▼ −1,504▼ −4.3 pp▼ −2,346
Chicago citywide	5.9% ±0.1 pp161,331 ±3,896	4.9% ±0.1 pp131,658 ±3,182	4.5% ±0.1 pp121,912 ±4,044	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −39,419▼ −0.4 pp▼ −9,746▼ −1.1 pp▼ −29,673
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999	6.7% ±1.2 pp3,681 ±636	6.3% ±1.0 pp3,521 ±530	4.9% ±1.2 pp2,671 ±648	▼ −1.8 pp▼ −1,010▼ −1.4 pp▼ −850▼ −0.3 pp▼ −160
Chicago citywide	6.1% ±0.1 pp165,077 ±3,717	5.3% ±0.1 pp142,413 ±3,015	4.6% ±0.1 pp123,849 ±3,911	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −41,228▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,564▼ −0.8 pp▼ −22,664
Entered the U.S. Before 1990	7.4% ±1.0 pp4,100 ±575	4.8% ±0.7 pp2,642 ±410	4.8% ±0.8 pp2,581 ±453	▼ −2.7 pp▼ −1,519– 0.0 pp▼ −61▼ −2.7 pp▼ −1,458
Chicago citywide	7.5% ±0.1 pp204,169 ±3,469	6.9% ±0.1 pp186,050 ±3,114	6.0% ±0.1 pp161,675 ±3,509	▼ −1.6 pp▼ −42,494▼ −0.9 pp▼ −24,375▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,119

Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category	Rogers Park
Average Household Income	$81,077±$5,394
Per Capita Income	$40,137±$2,282
10th Percentile Household Income	$14,089±$1,704
25th Percentile Household Income	$33,716±$3,377
Median Household Income	$60,916±$4,002
75th Percentile Household Income	$104,486±$5,634
90th Percentile Household Income	$161,511±$13,729
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$81,077±$5,394	$116,016±$1,263	▼ −$34,939	46/77
Per Capita Income	$40,137±$2,282	$50,086±$581	▼ −$9,949	31/77
10th Percentile Household Income	$14,089±$1,704	$12,933±$271	▲ +$1,156	38/77
25th Percentile Household Income	$33,716±$3,377	$34,575±$649	▼ −$859	36/77
Median Household Income	$60,916±$4,002	$77,902±$907	▼ −$16,986	49/77
75th Percentile Household Income	$104,486±$5,634	$144,150±$1,210	▼ −$39,663	53/77
90th Percentile Household Income	$161,511±$13,729	Over $200,000	▼ −$38,489+	53/77
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$71,802 ±3,162	$73,758 ±3,045	$81,077 ±5,394	▲ +$9,275▲ +$7,319▲ +$1,956
Chicago citywide	$95,689 ±910	$111,304 ±1,075	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$20,327▲ +$4,712▲ +$15,615
Average Household Income (nominal dollars)	$54,188 ±2,387	$60,113 ±2,482	$81,077 ±5,394	▲ +$26,889▲ +$20,964▲ +$5,925
Chicago citywide	$72,215 ±687	$90,713 ±876	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$43,801▲ +$25,303▲ +$18,498
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$32,229 ±991	$34,419 ±1,121	$40,137 ±2,282	▲ +$7,908▲ +$5,718▲ +$2,190
Chicago citywide	$37,927 ±351	$45,525 ±412	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$12,160▲ +$4,562▲ +$7,598
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars)	$24,323 ±748	$28,052 ±914	$40,137 ±2,282	▲ +$15,815▲ +$12,086▲ +$3,729
Chicago citywide	$28,623 ±265	$37,103 ±336	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$21,464▲ +$12,984▲ +$8,480
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$10,564 ±1,350	$9,883 ±1,235	$14,089 ±1,704	▲ +$3,525▲ +$4,206▼ −$681
Chicago citywide	$11,828 ±190	$13,281 ±277	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$1,105▼ −$348▲ +$1,453
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$7,973 ±1,019	$8,054 ±1,007	$14,089 ±1,704	▲ +$6,117▲ +$6,035▲ +$82
Chicago citywide	$8,927 ±144	$10,824 ±225	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$4,007▲ +$2,109▲ +$1,898
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$23,959 ±1,613	$25,717 ±2,136	$33,716 ±3,377	▲ +$9,758▲ +$7,999▲ +$1,758
Chicago citywide	$28,727 ±321	$31,597 ±462	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$5,848▲ +$2,979▲ +$2,869
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$18,081 ±1,217	$20,959 ±1,741	$33,716 ±3,377	▲ +$15,635▲ +$12,757▲ +$2,878
Chicago citywide	$21,680 ±242	$25,751 ±376	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$12,895▲ +$8,824▲ +$4,071
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$50,262 ±2,606	$52,978 ±2,907	$60,916 ±4,002	▲ +$10,653▲ +$7,938▲ +$2,716
Chicago citywide	$63,379 ±591	$71,469 ±723	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$14,523▲ +$6,433▲ +$8,090
Median Household Income (nominal dollars)	$37,932 ±1,967	$43,177 ±2,369	$60,916 ±4,002	▲ +$22,984▲ +$17,739▲ +$5,245
Chicago citywide	$47,831 ±446	$58,247 ±589	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$30,071▲ +$19,655▲ +$10,416
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$95,362 ±4,450	$99,349 ±5,669	$104,486 ±5,634	▲ +$9,124▲ +$5,137▲ +$3,987
Chicago citywide	$122,019 ±806	$139,501 ±1,057	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$22,131▲ +$4,648▲ +$17,482
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$71,968 ±3,358	$80,969 ±4,620	$104,486 ±5,634	▲ +$32,518▲ +$23,517▲ +$9,001
Chicago citywide	$92,086 ±608	$113,694 ±862	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$52,064▲ +$30,456▲ +$21,608
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$160,453 ±8,041	$152,466 ±8,096	$161,511 ±13,729	▲ +$1,058▲ +$9,046▼ −$7,988
Chicago citywide	$202,601 ±2,442	$235,390 ±1,636	—	——▲ +$32,790
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$121,092 ±6,069	$124,260 ±6,598	$161,511 ±13,729	▲ +$40,420▲ +$37,252▲ +$3,168
Chicago citywide	$152,899 ±1,843	$191,844 ±1,333	—	——▲ +$38,944

Poverty Status

Category	Rogers Park
Below Poverty Line	17.9% ±2.5 pp9,720 ±1,366
Below 200% Poverty Line	35.1% ±3.8 pp19,030 ±2,079
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	8.7% ±1.6 pp4,737 ±857
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Below Poverty Line	17.9%±2.5 pp9,720±1,366	16.8%±0.4 pp456,194±11,330	▲ +1.1%	35/77
Below 200% Poverty Line	35.1%±3.8 pp19,030±2,079	33.4%±0.6 pp905,794±16,660	▲ +1.7%	38/77
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	8.7%±1.6 pp4,737±857	8.3%±0.3 pp226,117±7,649	▲ +0.4%	36/77
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Category	Rogers Park
Food Insecurity	21.4%8,932
Housing Insecurity	17.6%7,345
Transportation Barriers	10.7%4,475
Threatened Utility Shutoff	10.8%4,509
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Food Insecurity	21.4%8,932	24.4%509,385	▼ -3.0%	50/77
Housing Insecurity	17.6%7,345	19.7%411,266	▼ -2.1%	48/77
Transportation Barriers	10.7%4,475	11.6%242,167	▼ -0.9%	45/77
Threatened Utility Shutoff	10.8%4,509	11.9%248,430	▼ -1.1%	43/77
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category	Rogers Park
In Labor Force	87.6% ±2.0 pp21,693 ±487
↳ Employed	81.9% ±2.3 pp20,281 ±579
↳ Unemployed	5.5% ±1.6 pp1,371 ±392
↳ Unemployment Rate	6.3% ±1.8 pp—
Not in Labor Force	12.4% ±8.2 pp3,080 ±2,032
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
In Labor Force	87.6%±2.0 pp21,693±487	85.6%±0.3 pp1,069,076±3,868	▲ +2.0%	28/77
↳ Employed	81.9%±2.3 pp20,281±579	79.6%±0.3 pp994,466±4,326	▲ +2.3%	29/77
↳ Unemployed	5.5%±1.6 pp1,371±392	5.9%±0.2 pp73,968±2,788	▼ -0.4%	44/77
↳ Unemployment Rate	6.3%±1.8 pp—	6.9%±0.3 pp86,502±3,342	▼ -0.6%	45/77
Not in Labor Force	12.4%±8.2 pp3,080±2,032	14.4%±1.1 pp180,399±14,344	▼ -2.0%	50/77
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category	Rogers Park
Management, Business, Science & Arts	47.8% ±3.4 pp15,116 ±1,079
↳ Management Occupations	10.2% ±1.5 pp3,227 ±489
↳ Business & Financial Operations	6.0% ±1.3 pp1,895 ±404
↳ Computer & Mathematical	5.2% ±1.3 pp1,650 ±425
↳ Architecture & Engineering	1.2% ±0.7 pp385 ±208
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	2.7% ±0.8 pp850 ±251
↳ Community & Social Service	2.4% ±0.9 pp755 ±272
↳ Legal Occupations	1.7% ±0.9 pp532 ±273
↳ Education, Training & Library	9.1% ±1.5 pp2,868 ±482
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	4.4% ±1.0 pp1,408 ±324
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	3.3% ±1.1 pp1,036 ±349
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	1.6% ±0.7 pp510 ±211
Service	19.5% ±2.5 pp6,166 ±794
↳ Healthcare Support	3.8% ±1.1 pp1,194 ±361
↳ Protective Service	1.0% ±0.6 pp311 ±174
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	6.8% ±1.5 pp2,158 ±490
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	4.0% ±1.4 pp1,275 ±428
↳ Personal Care & Service	3.9% ±1.1 pp1,228 ±335
Sales & Office	18.5% ±2.3 pp5,859 ±739
↳ Sales & Related	8.8% ±1.7 pp2,788 ±522
↳ Office & Administrative Support	9.7% ±1.6 pp3,071 ±503
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	3.2% ±1.0 pp1,024 ±324
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.1% ±0.2 pp25 ±75
↳ Construction & Extraction	1.7% ±0.8 pp553 ±251
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	1.4% ±0.7 pp446 ±214
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	11.0% ±2.2 pp3,478 ±705
↳ Production Occupations	4.1% ±1.5 pp1,298 ±474
↳ Transportation Occupations	3.4% ±1.0 pp1,062 ±310
↳ Material Moving Occupations	3.5% ±1.3 pp1,118 ±409
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts	47.8%±3.4 pp15,116±1,079	49.2%±0.4 pp686,743±5,710	▼ -1.4%	24/77
↳ Management Occupations	10.2%±1.5 pp3,227±489	12.3%±0.3 pp172,182±3,807	▼ -2.1%	34/77
↳ Business & Financial Operations	6.0%±1.3 pp1,895±404	9.1%±0.2 pp127,081±3,358	▼ -3.1%	38/77
↳ Computer & Mathematical	5.2%±1.3 pp1,650±425	4.9%±0.2 pp68,921±2,690	▲ +0.3%	19/77
↳ Architecture & Engineering	1.2%±0.7 pp385±208	1.6%±0.1 pp22,779±1,380	▼ -0.4%	37/77
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	2.7%±0.8 pp850±251	1.4%±0.1 pp19,126±1,340	▲ +1.3%	6/77
↳ Community & Social Service	2.4%±0.9 pp755±272	1.9%±0.1 pp26,973±1,500	▲ +0.5%	26/77
↳ Legal Occupations	1.7%±0.9 pp532±273	2.3%±0.1 pp31,629±1,814	▼ -0.6%	25/77
↳ Education, Training & Library	9.1%±1.5 pp2,868±482	6.6%±0.2 pp92,316±2,697	▲ +2.5%	14/77
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	4.4%±1.0 pp1,408±324	3.1%±0.1 pp43,879±1,786	▲ +1.3%	12/77
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	3.3%±1.1 pp1,036±349	4.6%±0.2 pp63,551±2,652	▼ -1.3%	40/77
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	1.6%±0.7 pp510±211	1.3%±0.1 pp18,306±1,387	▲ +0.3%	29/77
Service	19.5%±2.5 pp6,166±794	16.9%±0.3 pp235,977±4,217	▲ +2.6%	42/77
↳ Healthcare Support	3.8%±1.1 pp1,194±361	3.4%±0.2 pp46,792±2,107	▲ +0.4%	39/77
↳ Protective Service	1.0%±0.6 pp311±174	2.8%±0.1 pp39,146±1,734	▼ -1.8%	67/77
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	6.8%±1.5 pp2,158±490	5.1%±0.2 pp70,514±2,393	▲ +1.8%	19/77
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	4.0%±1.4 pp1,275±428	3.0%±0.1 pp41,783±1,967	▲ +1.0%	39/77
↳ Personal Care & Service	3.9%±1.1 pp1,228±335	2.7%±0.1 pp37,742±1,657	▲ +1.2%	16/77
Sales & Office	18.5%±2.3 pp5,859±739	17.4%±0.3 pp243,580±4,754	▲ +1.1%	38/77
↳ Sales & Related	8.8%±1.7 pp2,788±522	8.1%±0.2 pp113,073±3,174	▲ +0.7%	23/77
↳ Office & Administrative Support	9.7%±1.6 pp3,071±503	9.3%±0.3 pp130,507±3,591	▲ +0.4%	46/77
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	3.2%±1.0 pp1,024±324	4.6%±0.2 pp64,338±2,929	▼ -1.4%	52/77
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.1%±0.2 pp25±75	0.1%±0.0 pp1,506±406	0%	28/77
↳ Construction & Extraction	1.7%±0.8 pp553±251	2.8%±0.1 pp39,432±2,062	▼ -1.1%	51/77
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	1.4%±0.7 pp446±214	1.7%±0.1 pp23,400±1,722	▼ -0.3%	47/77
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	11.0%±2.2 pp3,478±705	11.8%±0.3 pp165,261±3,629	▼ -0.8%	50/77
↳ Production Occupations	4.1%±1.5 pp1,298±474	4.2%±0.2 pp57,989±2,275	▼ -0.1%	43/77
↳ Transportation Occupations	3.4%±1.0 pp1,062±310	3.9%±0.2 pp54,099±2,118	▼ -0.5%	51/77
↳ Material Moving Occupations	3.5%±1.3 pp1,118±409	3.8%±0.2 pp53,173±2,312	▼ -0.3%	44/77
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category	Rogers Park
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.2% ±0.3 pp68 ±87
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.2% ±0.3 pp68 ±87
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0% ±0.2 pp0
Construction	2.3% ±0.9 pp737 ±278
Manufacturing	5.7% ±1.2 pp1,815 ±387
Wholesale Trade	2.0% ±0.9 pp624 ±278
Retail Trade	9.9% ±1.6 pp3,131 ±512
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	3.7% ±0.9 pp1,167 ±295
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	3.5% ±0.9 pp1,100 ±293
↳ Utilities	0.2% ±0.3 pp67 ±89
Information	2.2% ±0.8 pp696 ±247
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	5.8% ±1.1 pp1,850 ±353
↳ Finance & Insurance	4.2% ±1.0 pp1,344 ±309
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.6% ±0.6 pp506 ±188
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	17.9% ±2.5 pp5,665 ±789
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	12.0% ±1.9 pp3,808 ±597
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0% ±0.2 pp0
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	5.9% ±1.8 pp1,857 ±557
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	30.4% ±2.4 pp9,630 ±748
↳ Educational Services	14.4% ±1.7 pp4,563 ±543
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	16.0% ±2.0 pp5,067 ±638
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	12.1% ±1.9 pp3,840 ±597
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	3.5% ±0.9 pp1,109 ±287
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	8.6% ±1.7 pp2,731 ±542
Other Services	5.5% ±1.2 pp1,744 ±369
Public Administration	2.1% ±0.7 pp676 ±237
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.2%±0.3 pp68±87	0.2%±0.0 pp—	0%	27/77
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.2%±0.3 pp68±87	0.2%±0.0 pp—	0%	25/77
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%±0.2 pp0	0.0%±0.0 pp—	0%	18/77
Construction	2.3%±0.9 pp737±278	3.8%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.4%	54/77
Manufacturing	5.7%±1.2 pp1,815±387	7.7%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.9%	52/77
Wholesale Trade	2.0%±0.9 pp624±278	2.0%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.1%	37/77
Retail Trade	9.9%±1.6 pp3,131±512	8.2%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.7%	35/77
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	3.7%±0.9 pp1,167±295	7.1%±0.2 pp—	▼ -3.4%	69/77
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	3.5%±0.9 pp1,100±293	6.5%±0.2 pp—	▼ -3.1%	64/77
↳ Utilities	0.2%±0.3 pp67±89	0.5%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.3%	58/77
Information	2.2%±0.8 pp696±247	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.1%	22/77
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	5.8%±1.1 pp1,850±353	8.8%±0.2 pp—	▼ -3.0%	53/77
↳ Finance & Insurance	4.2%±1.0 pp1,344±309	6.7%±0.2 pp—	▼ -2.4%	48/77
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.6%±0.6 pp506±188	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.5%	47/77
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	17.9%±2.5 pp5,665±789	18.2%±0.4 pp—	▼ -0.3%	18/77
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	12.0%±1.9 pp3,808±597	13.4%±0.3 pp—	▼ -1.4%	20/77
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%±0.2 pp0	0.1%±0.0 pp—	▼ -0.1%	35/77
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	5.9%±1.8 pp1,857±557	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.2%	27/77
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	30.4%±2.4 pp9,630±748	24.2%±0.4 pp—	▲ +6.3%	18/77
↳ Educational Services	14.4%±1.7 pp4,563±543	10.5%±0.2 pp—	▲ +3.9%	11/77
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	16.0%±2.0 pp5,067±638	13.7%±0.3 pp—	▲ +2.3%	29/77
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	12.1%±1.9 pp3,840±597	9.1%±0.2 pp—	▲ +3.0%	14/77
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	3.5%±0.9 pp1,109±287	2.2%±0.1 pp—	▲ +1.3%	5/77
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	8.6%±1.7 pp2,731±542	6.9%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.7%	26/77
Other Services	5.5%±1.2 pp1,744±369	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.9%	22/77
Public Administration	2.1%±0.7 pp676±237	4.0%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.9%	69/77
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category	Rogers Park
Private Company Employee	64.8% ±2.8 pp20,499 ±891
Self-Employed	8.2% ±1.4 pp2,579 ±437
Nonprofit	18.2% ±2.0 pp5,750 ±635
Government	8.9% ±1.6 pp2,815 ±509
Unpaid Family Worker	0.0% ±0.2 pp0
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Private Company Employee	64.8%±2.8 pp20,499±891	67.9%±0.4 pp947,845±5,822	▼ -3.1%	35/77
Self-Employed	8.2%±1.4 pp2,579±437	8.3%±0.2 pp115,690±2,989	▼ -0.1%	31/77
Nonprofit	18.2%±2.0 pp5,750±635	12.1%±0.3 pp169,124±4,035	▲ +6.1%	5/77
Government	8.9%±1.6 pp2,815±509	12.9%±0.3 pp179,945±4,021	▼ -4.0%	69/77
Unpaid Family Worker	0.0%±0.2 pp0	0.2%±0.0 pp2,312±408	▼ -0.2%	45/77
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category	Rogers Park
Full-Time, Year-Round	57.7% ±2.0 pp20,382 ±689
Part-Time or Part-Year	42.3% ±3.0 pp14,916 ±1,047
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round	57.7%±2.0 pp20,382±689	67.0%±0.3 pp1,025,726±3,875	▼ -9.3%	67/77
Part-Time or Part-Year	42.3%±3.0 pp14,916±1,047	33.0%±0.3 pp504,210±4,897	▲ +9.3%	11/77
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category	Rogers Park
Average FT Earnings	$72,757±$5,580
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$31,026±$1,666
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$40,856±$1,678
Median FT Earnings	$57,291±$2,636
75th Percentile FT Earnings	$88,053±$3,959
90th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Average FT Earnings	$72,757±$5,580	$96,214±$968	▼ −$23,457	35/76
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$31,026±$1,666	$29,008±$387	▲ +$2,017	22/77
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$40,856±$1,678	$43,011±$345	▼ −$2,155	35/77
Median FT Earnings	$57,291±$2,636	$69,663±$530	▼ −$12,372	40/77
75th Percentile FT Earnings	$88,053±$3,959	Over $100,000	▼ −$11,947+	43/77
90th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000	Over $100,000	—	1/77
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$64,143 ±2,052	$69,569 ±2,397	$72,757 ±5,580	▲ +$8,614▲ +$3,188▲ +$5,427
Chicago citywide	$83,170 ±714	$91,467 ±682	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$13,044▲ +$4,747▲ +$8,297
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$48,407 ±1,548	$56,699 ±1,954	$72,757 ±5,580	▲ +$24,349▲ +$16,058▲ +$8,292
Chicago citywide	$62,767 ±539	$74,546 ±556	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$33,447▲ +$21,669▲ +$11,778
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$22,328 ±1,098	$26,960 ±1,374	$31,026 ±1,666	▲ +$8,697▲ +$4,065▲ +$4,632
Chicago citywide	$24,209 ±243	$26,113 ±152	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$4,799▲ +$2,895▲ +$1,904
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$16,851 ±829	$21,972 ±1,120	$31,026 ±1,666	▲ +$14,175▲ +$9,053▲ +$5,122
Chicago citywide	$18,270 ±183	$21,282 ±124	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$10,738▲ +$7,726▲ +$3,012
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$31,072 ±1,665	$38,107 ±1,135	$40,856 ±1,678	▲ +$9,784▲ +$2,749▲ +$7,035
Chicago citywide	$37,393 ±278	$39,415 ±229	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$5,618▲ +$3,597▲ +$2,021
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$23,449 ±1,256	$31,058 ±925	$40,856 ±1,678	▲ +$17,407▲ +$9,799▲ +$7,608
Chicago citywide	$28,220 ±210	$32,123 ±187	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$14,791▲ +$10,888▲ +$3,903
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$49,498 ±2,297	$54,426 ±2,205	$57,291 ±2,636	▲ +$7,793▲ +$2,866▲ +$4,928
Chicago citywide	$60,575 ±496	$64,628 ±327	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,034▲ +$4,054
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$37,355 ±1,733	$44,357 ±1,797	$57,291 ±2,636	▲ +$19,936▲ +$12,934▲ +$7,002
Chicago citywide	$45,715 ±374	$52,672 ±266	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$23,948▲ +$16,991▲ +$6,957
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$82,286 ±4,151	$86,072 ±3,596	$88,053 ±3,959	▲ +$5,767▲ +$1,981▲ +$3,786
Chicago citywide	$98,274 ±615	$108,202 ±616	—	——▲ +$9,928
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$62,100 ±3,133	$70,149 ±2,931	$88,053 ±3,959	▲ +$25,953▲ +$17,905▲ +$8,049
Chicago citywide	$74,166 ±464	$88,185 ±502	—	——▲ +$14,019
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$122,621 ±4,339	—	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$92,540 ±3,275	—	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category	Rogers Park
Average PT Earnings	$25,416±$2,297
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$1,834±$453
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$6,403±$1,568
Median PT Earnings	$15,974±$1,828
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$33,272±$2,666
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$58,355±$6,997
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Average PT Earnings	$25,416±$2,297	$33,575±$750	▼ −$8,159	45/76
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$1,834±$453	$2,183±$87	▼ −$350	54/77
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$6,403±$1,568	$7,222±$206	▼ −$819	48/77
Median PT Earnings	$15,974±$1,828	$19,180±$393	▼ −$3,206	47/77
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$33,272±$2,666	$38,498±$681	▼ −$5,226	38/77
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$58,355±$6,997	$73,776±$1,391	▼ −$15,422	44/77
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$22,252 ±1,389	$22,809 ±1,412	$25,416 ±2,297	▲ +$3,165▲ +$2,608▲ +$557
Chicago citywide	$27,076 ±473	$31,236 ±676	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$6,500▲ +$2,340▲ +$4,160
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$16,793 ±1,048	$18,589 ±1,151	$25,416 ±2,297	▲ +$8,623▲ +$6,827▲ +$1,796
Chicago citywide	$20,433 ±357	$25,457 ±551	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$13,142▲ +$8,118▲ +$5,024
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,786 ±297	$2,413 ±430	$1,834 ±453	▲ +$48▼ −$580▲ +$627
Chicago citywide	$2,230 ±48	$2,283 ±59	$2,183 ±87	▼ −$47▼ −$100▲ +$53
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$1,348 ±224	$1,967 ±351	$1,834 ±453	▲ +$486▼ −$133▲ +$619
Chicago citywide	$1,683 ±36	$1,861 ±48	$2,183 ±87	▲ +$500▲ +$322▲ +$178
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$5,295 ±949	$6,353 ±898	$6,403 ±1,568	▲ +$1,108▲ +$50▲ +$1,058
Chicago citywide	$6,390 ±123	$6,841 ±156	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$832▲ +$381▲ +$451
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$3,996 ±716	$5,178 ±732	$6,403 ±1,568	▲ +$2,407▲ +$1,225▲ +$1,182
Chicago citywide	$4,822 ±93	$5,575 ±127	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$2,399▲ +$1,646▲ +$753
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$14,576 ±1,669	$15,086 ±1,277	$15,974 ±1,828	▲ +$1,399▲ +$888▲ +$510
Chicago citywide	$15,461 ±166	$17,025 ±275	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$3,719▲ +$2,155▲ +$1,563
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$11,000 ±1,259	$12,295 ±1,041	$15,974 ±1,828	▲ +$4,974▲ +$3,679▲ +$1,295
Chicago citywide	$11,668 ±125	$13,875 ±224	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$7,512▲ +$5,305▲ +$2,207
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$28,891 ±1,874	$31,279 ±2,952	$33,272 ±2,666	▲ +$4,380▲ +$1,992▲ +$2,388
Chicago citywide	$30,795 ±619	$34,779 ±505	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$7,703▲ +$3,719▲ +$3,984
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$21,804 ±1,415	$25,493 ±2,406	$33,272 ±2,666	▲ +$11,468▲ +$7,779▲ +$3,689
Chicago citywide	$23,241 ±468	$28,345 ±412	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$15,257▲ +$10,153▲ +$5,104
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$52,159 ±7,550	$50,315 ±4,288	$58,355 ±6,997	▲ +$6,195▲ +$8,040▼ −$1,845
Chicago citywide	$61,207 ±1,249	$68,040 ±1,298	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$12,570▲ +$5,737▲ +$6,833
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$39,364 ±5,698	$41,006 ±3,495	$58,355 ±6,997	▲ +$18,991▲ +$17,348▲ +$1,643
Chicago citywide	$46,192 ±942	$55,452 ±1,058	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$27,585▲ +$18,324▲ +$9,261

Earnings of All Workers

Category	Rogers Park
Average Earnings	$52,752±$3,369
10th Percentile Earnings	$5,495±$1,445
25th Percentile Earnings	$18,449±$2,522
Median Earnings	$41,570±$1,884
75th Percentile Earnings	$68,412±$4,100
90th Percentile Earnings	Over $100,000
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Average Earnings	$52,752±$3,369	$75,571±$768	▼ −$22,819	42/76
10th Percentile Earnings	$5,495±$1,445	$8,529±$272	▼ −$3,034	55/77
25th Percentile Earnings	$18,449±$2,522	$25,183±$358	▼ −$6,733	57/77
Median Earnings	$41,570±$1,884	$51,367±$471	▼ −$9,797	40/77
75th Percentile Earnings	$68,412±$4,100	$93,324±$598	▼ −$24,912	45/77
90th Percentile Earnings	Over $100,000	Over $100,000	—	1/77
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$47,952 ±1,535	$51,451 ±1,927	$52,752 ±3,369	▲ +$4,800▲ +$1,301▲ +$3,499
Chicago citywide	$62,453 ±534	$71,626 ±551	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$13,118▲ +$3,945▲ +$9,173
Average Earnings (nominal dollars)	$36,189 ±1,159	$41,933 ±1,571	$52,752 ±3,369	▲ +$16,563▲ +$10,819▲ +$5,744
Chicago citywide	$47,133 ±403	$58,375 ±449	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$28,438▲ +$17,196▲ +$11,243
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$5,349 ±1,016	$6,390 ±935	$5,495 ±1,445	▲ +$146▼ −$895▲ +$1,041
Chicago citywide	$6,858 ±139	$8,358 ±164	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$1,671▲ +$171▲ +$1,500
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$4,037 ±767	$5,208 ±762	$5,495 ±1,445	▲ +$1,458▲ +$287▲ +$1,171
Chicago citywide	$5,176 ±105	$6,812 ±134	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$3,354▲ +$1,717▲ +$1,636
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$18,196 ±1,774	$19,502 ±1,564	$18,449 ±2,522	▲ +$254▼ −$1,053▲ +$1,307
Chicago citywide	$19,598 ±241	$23,173 ±290	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$5,585▲ +$2,010▲ +$3,576
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$13,732 ±1,339	$15,895 ±1,274	$18,449 ±2,522	▲ +$4,717▲ +$2,555▲ +$2,163
Chicago citywide	$14,790 ±182	$18,886 ±236	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$10,393▲ +$6,297▲ +$4,096
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$34,523 ±1,716	$39,724 ±1,229	$41,570 ±1,884	▲ +$7,047▲ +$1,846▲ +$5,201
Chicago citywide	$42,365 ±293	$47,195 ±370	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$9,002▲ +$4,172▲ +$4,830
Median Earnings (nominal dollars)	$26,054 ±1,295	$32,375 ±1,002	$41,570 ±1,884	▲ +$15,516▲ +$9,195▲ +$6,321
Chicago citywide	$31,972 ±221	$38,464 ±302	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$19,395▲ +$12,903▲ +$6,492
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$64,554 ±3,629	$65,798 ±2,850	$68,412 ±4,100	▲ +$3,858▲ +$2,613▲ +$1,244
Chicago citywide	$78,784 ±555	$87,853 ±597	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$14,540▲ +$5,471▲ +$9,069
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$48,718 ±2,739	$53,626 ±2,323	$68,412 ±4,100	▲ +$19,694▲ +$14,786▲ +$4,908
Chicago citywide	$59,457 ±418	$71,600 ±486	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$33,867▲ +$21,723▲ +$12,144
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$104,969 ±5,439	$110,580 ±4,648	—	——▲ +$5,610
Chicago citywide	$128,659 ±682	—	—	———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$79,219 ±4,105	$90,123 ±3,788	—	——▲ +$10,904
Chicago citywide	$97,097 ±515	—	—	———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Rogers Park, Chicago

Category	Rogers Park
Household income at age 35	$40,416 ±$732
Household income percentile rank	39.5 ±0.51 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	11.1% ±0.60 pp
Individual income at age 35	$32,277 ±$607
Fraction married	26.1% ±0.84 pp
Employment rate	73.8% ±0.83 pp
Incarceration rate	3.05% ±0.38 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Rogers Park, Chicago. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Rogers Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$40,416 ±$732	$43,090 ±$109	−$2,674
Household income percentile rank	39.5 ±0.51 pp	40.9 ±0.07 pp	−1.4 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	11.1% ±0.60 pp	11.4% ±0.08 pp	−0.3 pp
Individual income at age 35	$32,277 ±$607	$33,545 ±$85	−$1,267
Fraction married	26.1% ±0.84 pp	26.4% ±0.12 pp	−0.3 pp
Employment rate	73.8% ±0.83 pp	74.4% ±0.12 pp	−0.6 pp
Incarceration rate	3.05% ±0.38 pp	2.87% ±0.06 pp	+0.2 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Rogers Park, Chicago. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Rogers Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Rogers Park, Chicago in Lower-Income Families

Category	Rogers Park
Household income at age 35	$35,963 ±$845
Household income percentile rank	36.3 ±0.60 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	7.62% ±0.73 pp
Individual income at age 35	$29,473 ±$751
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Rogers Park, Chicago with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Rogers Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$35,963 ±$845	$34,712 ±$133	+$1,251
Household income percentile rank	36.3 ±0.60 pp	35.3 ±0.09 pp	+1.0 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	7.62% ±0.73 pp	6.31% ±0.10 pp	+1.3 pp
Individual income at age 35	$29,473 ±$751	$28,717 ±$114	+$756
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Rogers Park, Chicago with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Rogers Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Rogers Park, Chicago

Category	Rogers Park
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	73.4% ±0.85 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	16.3% ±0.72 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Rogers Park, Chicago. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Rogers Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	73.4% ±0.85 pp	78.1% ±0.12 pp	−4.7 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	16.3% ±0.72 pp	22.9% ±0.12 pp	−6.6 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Rogers Park, Chicago. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Rogers Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Rogers Park

Category	Rogers Park
All jobs located in rogers park	13,617
Rogers Park jobs held by Rogers Park residents	9.2%
Rogers Park jobs held by non-Rogers Park residents	90.8%
Employed residents working in Rogers Park	4.6%
Employed residents working outside Rogers Park	95.4%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Rogers Park	Chicago neighborhood median	Difference	Rank
All jobs located in rogers park	13,617	5,320	▲ +8,297	15/77
Rogers Park jobs held by Rogers Park residents	9.2%	5.8%	▲ +3.4 pp	16/77
Rogers Park jobs held by non-Rogers Park residents	90.8%	94.2%	▼ −3.4 pp	62/77
Employed residents working in Rogers Park	4.6%	2.6%	▲ +2.0 pp	13/77
Employed residents working outside Rogers Park	95.4%	97.4%	▼ −2.0 pp	65/77
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in rogers park	12,310	12,766	13,617	▲ +1,307▲ +851▲ +456
Chicago citywide	5,236	5,698	5,320	▲ +84▼ −378▲ +462
Rogers Park jobs held by Rogers Park residents	10.3%1,057	10.6%1,092	9.2%1,044	▼ −1.1 pp▼ −13▼ −1.5 pp▼ −48▲ +0.3 pp▲ +35
Chicago citywide	5.5%246	5.6%306	5.8%279	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +33▲ +0.1 pp▼ −27▲ +0.2 pp▲ +60
Rogers Park jobs held by non-Rogers Park residents	89.7%9,203	89.4%9,167	90.8%10,331	▲ +1.1 pp▲ +1,128▲ +1.5 pp▲ +1,164▼ −0.3 pp▼ −36
Chicago citywide	94.5%4,320	94.4%4,646	94.2%4,657	▼ −0.3 pp▲ +337▼ −0.1 pp▲ +11▼ −0.2 pp▲ +326
Employed residents working in Rogers Park	4.8%1,057	4.7%1,092	4.6%1,044	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −13▼ −0.1 pp▼ −48▼ −0.1 pp▲ +35
Chicago citywide	2.5%246	2.7%306	2.6%279	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +33▼ −0.1 pp▼ −27▲ +0.1 pp▲ +60
Employed residents working outside Rogers Park	95.2%20,928	95.3%21,954	95.4%21,526	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +598▲ +0.1 pp▼ −428▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,026
Chicago citywide	97.5%9,791	97.3%10,346	97.4%10,385	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +594▲ +0.1 pp▲ +39▼ −0.1 pp▲ +555

Industry of Jobs in Rogers Park

Category	Rogers Park
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0
Construction	0.4%60
Manufacturing	19.5%2,653
Wholesale Trade	0.2%34
Retail Trade	4.8%651
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	0.1%9
↳ Utilities	0.0%0
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	0.1%9
Information	0.6%82
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	3.7%501
↳ Finance & Insurance	3.0%404
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	0.7%97
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	3.4%459
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	2.5%341
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%0
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	0.9%118
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	55.4%7,548
↳ Educational Services	29.3%3,989
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	26.1%3,559
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	10.2%1,391
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	0.6%80
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	9.6%1,311
Other Services	1.7%229
Public Administration	0.0%0
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0	0.0%423	0%	25/77
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0	0.0%36	0%	9/77
Construction	0.4%60	1.9%27,207	▼ -1.4%	66/77
Manufacturing	19.5%2,653	4.4%64,747	▲ +15.1%	12/77
Wholesale Trade	0.2%34	2.8%41,460	▼ -2.6%	68/77
Retail Trade	4.8%651	6.6%96,413	▼ -1.8%	65/77
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	0.1%9	6.0%87,817	▼ -5.9%	70/77
↳ Utilities	0.0%0	0.3%5,012	▼ -0.3%	21/77
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	0.1%9	5.7%82,805	▼ -5.6%	70/77
Information	0.6%82	3.5%51,095	▼ -2.9%	37/77
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	3.7%501	10.8%157,520	▼ -7.1%	42/77
↳ Finance & Insurance	3.0%404	8.6%125,824	▼ -5.6%	24/77
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	0.7%97	2.2%31,696	▼ -1.5%	63/77
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	3.4%459	23.2%339,220	▼ -19.8%	66/77
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	2.5%341	14.2%207,444	▼ -11.7%	46/77
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%0	1.2%16,872	▼ -1.2%	36/77
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	0.9%118	7.9%114,904	▼ -7.0%	70/77
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	55.4%7,548	23.0%336,089	▲ +32.5%	7/77
↳ Educational Services	29.3%3,989	9.2%134,671	▲ +20.1%	4/77
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	26.1%3,559	13.8%201,418	▲ +12.4%	21/77
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	10.2%1,391	10.3%151,055	▼ -0.1%	30/77
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	0.6%80	1.9%27,339	▼ -1.3%	32/77
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	9.6%1,311	8.5%123,716	▲ +1.2%	27/77
Other Services	1.7%229	4.0%59,136	▼ -2.4%	69/77
Public Administration	0.0%0	3.5%51,418	▼ -3.5%	19/77
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.0%181	0.0%569	0.0%423	– 0.0 pp▲ +242– 0.0 pp▼ −146– 0.0 pp▲ +388
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.0%140	0.0%374	0.0%36	– 0.0 pp▼ −104– 0.0 pp▼ −338– 0.0 pp▲ +234
Construction	0.4%46	0.4%55	0.4%60	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14– 0.0 pp▲ +5▲ +0.1 pp▲ +9
Chicago citywide	1.6%20,789	1.8%26,012	1.9%27,207	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,418– 0.0 pp▲ +1,195▲ +0.3 pp▲ +5,223
Manufacturing	13.4%1,655	14.7%1,882	19.5%2,653	▲ +6.0 pp▲ +998▲ +4.7 pp▲ +771▲ +1.3 pp▲ +227
Chicago citywide	4.6%61,066	4.5%63,597	4.4%64,747	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,681▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,150▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,531
Wholesale Trade	0.6%74	0.4%45	0.2%34	▼ −0.4 pp▼ −40▼ −0.1 pp▼ −11▼ −0.2 pp▼ −29
Chicago citywide	3.0%39,431	2.9%41,789	2.8%41,460	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,029▼ −0.1 pp▼ −329▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,358
Retail Trade	5.5%683	5.0%643	4.8%651	▼ −0.8 pp▼ −32▼ −0.3 pp▲ +8▼ −0.5 pp▼ −40
Chicago citywide	7.4%97,262	6.9%97,836	6.6%96,413	▼ −0.8 pp▼ −849▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,423▼ −0.5 pp▲ +574
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	0.3%41	0.1%13	0.1%9	▼ −0.3 pp▼ −32– 0.0 pp▼ −4▼ −0.2 pp▼ −28
Chicago citywide	5.4%71,320	5.6%79,303	6.0%87,817	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +16,497▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,514▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,983
Utilities	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,383	0.3%4,956	0.3%5,012	– 0.0 pp▲ +629– 0.0 pp▲ +56– 0.0 pp▲ +573
Transportation & Warehousing	0.3%41	0.1%13	0.1%9	▼ −0.3 pp▼ −32– 0.0 pp▼ −4▼ −0.2 pp▼ −28
Chicago citywide	5.1%66,937	5.2%74,347	5.7%82,805	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +15,868▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,458▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,410
Information	0.4%49	0.5%63	0.6%82	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +33▲ +0.1 pp▲ +19▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14
Chicago citywide	3.1%40,514	3.4%48,135	3.5%51,095	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +10,581▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,960▲ +0.3 pp▲ +7,621
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	1.6%192	1.9%245	3.7%501	▲ +2.1 pp▲ +309▲ +1.8 pp▲ +256▲ +0.4 pp▲ +53
Chicago citywide	10.5%138,287	10.6%150,163	10.8%157,520	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +19,233▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,357▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,876
Finance & Insurance	0.9%108	0.7%90	3.0%404	▲ +2.1 pp▲ +296▲ +2.3 pp▲ +314▼ −0.2 pp▼ −18
Chicago citywide	8.5%111,307	8.4%119,147	8.6%125,824	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14,517▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,677▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7,840
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	0.7%84	1.2%155	0.7%97	– 0.0 pp▲ +13▼ −0.5 pp▼ −58▲ +0.5 pp▲ +71
Chicago citywide	2.1%26,980	2.2%31,016	2.2%31,696	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,716– 0.0 pp▲ +680▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,036
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	2.7%332	1.9%242	3.4%459	▲ +0.7 pp▲ +127▲ +1.5 pp▲ +217▼ −0.8 pp▼ −90
Chicago citywide	21.2%278,928	22.6%319,744	23.2%339,220	▲ +2.0 pp▲ +60,292▲ +0.6 pp▲ +19,476▲ +1.3 pp▲ +40,816
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	1.6%198	0.8%105	2.5%341	▲ +0.9 pp▲ +143▲ +1.7 pp▲ +236▼ −0.8 pp▼ −93
Chicago citywide	11.8%155,200	12.9%182,462	14.2%207,444	▲ +2.4 pp▲ +52,244▲ +1.3 pp▲ +24,982▲ +1.1 pp▲ +27,262
Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.1%7	0.0%0	0.0%0	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −7– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.1 pp▼ −7
Chicago citywide	1.0%13,619	1.2%16,600	1.2%16,872	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,253– 0.0 pp▲ +272▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,981
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	1.0%127	1.1%137	0.9%118	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −9▼ −0.2 pp▼ −19– 0.0 pp▲ +10
Chicago citywide	8.4%110,109	8.5%120,682	7.9%114,904	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +4,795▼ −0.7 pp▼ −5,778▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,573
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	53.9%6,632	63.4%8,098	55.4%7,548	▲ +1.6 pp▲ +916▼ −8.0 pp▼ −550▲ +9.6 pp▲ +1,466
Chicago citywide	23.5%308,633	22.1%313,540	23.0%336,089	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +27,456▲ +0.8 pp▲ +22,549▼ −1.4 pp▲ +4,907
Educational Services	37.4%4,607	39.2%5,003	29.3%3,989	▼ −8.1 pp▼ −618▼ −9.9 pp▼ −1,014▲ +1.8 pp▲ +396
Chicago citywide	10.1%132,909	9.0%128,169	9.2%134,671	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +1,762▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,502▼ −1.1 pp▼ −4,740
Health Care & Social Assistance	16.5%2,025	24.2%3,095	26.1%3,559	▲ +9.7 pp▲ +1,534▲ +1.9 pp▲ +464▲ +7.8 pp▲ +1,070
Chicago citywide	13.4%175,724	13.1%185,371	13.8%201,418	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +25,694▲ +0.7 pp▲ +16,047▼ −0.3 pp▲ +9,647
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	8.0%982	10.1%1,291	10.2%1,391	▲ +2.2 pp▲ +409▲ +0.1 pp▲ +100▲ +2.1 pp▲ +309
Chicago citywide	10.9%143,753	11.5%162,749	10.3%151,055	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,302▼ −1.2 pp▼ −11,694▲ +0.5 pp▲ +18,996
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	1.0%124	0.7%88	0.6%80	▼ −0.4 pp▼ −44▼ −0.1 pp▼ −8▼ −0.3 pp▼ −36
Chicago citywide	1.7%22,179	2.1%30,178	1.9%27,339	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +5,160▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,839▲ +0.4 pp▲ +7,999
Accommodation & Food Services	7.0%858	9.4%1,203	9.6%1,311	▲ +2.7 pp▲ +453▲ +0.2 pp▲ +108▲ +2.5 pp▲ +345
Chicago citywide	9.3%121,574	9.4%132,571	8.5%123,716	▼ −0.8 pp▲ +2,142▼ −0.9 pp▼ −8,855▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,997
Other Services	13.0%1,604	1.5%189	1.7%229	▼ −11.3 pp▼ −1,375▲ +0.2 pp▲ +40▼ −11.5 pp▼ −1,415
Chicago citywide	4.5%59,098	4.4%61,698	4.0%59,136	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +38▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,562▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,600
Public Administration	0.2%20	0.0%0	0.0%0	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −20– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.2 pp▼ −20
Chicago citywide	4.2%54,814	3.6%51,684	3.5%51,418	▼ −0.7 pp▼ −3,396▼ −0.1 pp▼ −266▼ −0.5 pp▼ −3,130

Earnings of Jobs in Rogers Park

Category	Rogers Park
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	15.9%2,165
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	26.5%3,610
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	57.6%7,842
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	15.9%2,165	12.7%185,293	▲ +3.2%	53/77
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	26.5%3,610	20.5%299,468	▲ +6.0%	63/77
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	57.6%7,842	66.9%978,839	▼ -9.3%	16/77
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	28.4%3,492	21.7%2,768	15.9%2,165	▼ −12.5 pp▼ −1,327▼ −5.8 pp▼ −603▼ −6.7 pp▼ −724
Chicago citywide	21.3%280,137	16.8%238,135	12.7%185,293	▼ −8.7 pp▼ −94,844▼ −4.1 pp▼ −52,842▼ −4.5 pp▼ −42,002
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	35.4%4,358	31.6%4,030	26.5%3,610	▼ −8.9 pp▼ −748▼ −5.1 pp▼ −420▼ −3.8 pp▼ −328
Chicago citywide	30.7%403,220	26.7%378,530	20.5%299,468	▼ −10.2 pp▼ −103,752▼ −6.3 pp▼ −79,062▼ −4.0 pp▼ −24,690
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	36.2%4,460	46.7%5,968	57.6%7,842	▲ +21.4 pp▲ +3,382▲ +10.8 pp▲ +1,874▲ +10.5 pp▲ +1,508
Chicago citywide	48.0%630,719	56.5%800,154	66.9%978,839	▲ +18.9 pp▲ +348,120▲ +10.4 pp▲ +178,685▲ +8.5 pp▲ +169,435

Jobs in Rogers Park by Firm Age

Category	Rogers Park
Firm age: 0–1 years	2.4%327
Firm age: 2–3 years	1.5%210
Firm age: 4–5 years	2.2%298
Firm age: 6–10 years	4.6%624
Firm age: 11 or more years	89.3%12,157
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years	2.4%327	2.8%37,293	▼ -0.4%	58/77
Firm age: 2–3 years	1.5%210	2.8%37,154	▼ -1.3%	67/77
Firm age: 4–5 years	2.2%298	3.2%41,869	▼ -1.0%	52/77
Firm age: 6–10 years	4.6%624	7.8%102,353	▼ -3.2%	67/77
Firm age: 11 or more years	89.3%12,157	83.4%1,098,220	▲ +5.9%	10/77
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years	1.8%225	1.7%216	2.4%327	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +102▲ +0.7 pp▲ +111▼ −0.1 pp▼ −9
Chicago citywide	2.9%33,224	2.6%33,244	2.8%37,293	– 0.0 pp▲ +4,069▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,049▼ −0.2 pp▲ +20
Firm age: 2–3 years	3.5%424	4.0%511	1.5%210	▼ −1.9 pp▼ −214▼ −2.5 pp▼ −301▲ +0.6 pp▲ +87
Chicago citywide	4.0%46,935	3.3%42,284	2.8%37,154	▼ −1.2 pp▼ −9,781▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,130▼ −0.7 pp▼ −4,651
Firm age: 4–5 years	1.9%238	0.9%120	2.2%298	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +60▲ +1.2 pp▲ +178▼ −1.0 pp▼ −118
Chicago citywide	3.7%42,688	3.6%46,058	3.2%41,869	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −819▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,189▼ −0.1 pp▲ +3,370
Firm age: 6–10 years	2.8%342	5.1%652	4.6%624	▲ +1.8 pp▲ +282▼ −0.5 pp▼ −28▲ +2.3 pp▲ +310
Chicago citywide	8.2%94,955	8.6%109,934	7.8%102,353	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +7,398▼ −0.9 pp▼ −7,581▲ +0.5 pp▲ +14,979
Firm age: 11 or more years	90.0%11,059	88.3%11,259	89.3%12,157	▼ −0.7 pp▲ +1,098▲ +1.0 pp▲ +898▼ −1.7 pp▲ +200
Chicago citywide	81.3%946,801	81.8%1,043,037	83.4%1,098,220	▲ +2.1 pp▲ +151,419▲ +1.6 pp▲ +55,183▲ +0.5 pp▲ +96,236

Jobs in Rogers Park by Firm Size

Category	Rogers Park
Firm size: 0–19 employees	10.8%1,468
Firm size: 20–49 employees	3.1%425
Firm size: 50–249 employees	11.7%1,598
Firm size: 250–499 employees	0.5%69
Firm size: 500 or more employees	73.9%10,056
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees	10.8%1,468	12.8%168,975	▼ -2.0%	67/77
Firm size: 20–49 employees	3.1%425	7.3%96,404	▼ -4.2%	73/77
Firm size: 50–249 employees	11.7%1,598	13.8%181,123	▼ -2.0%	62/77
Firm size: 250–499 employees	0.5%69	5.7%74,787	▼ -5.2%	66/77
Firm size: 500 or more employees	73.9%10,056	60.4%795,600	▲ +13.4%	5/77
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees	10.7%1,311	9.8%1,250	10.8%1,468	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +157▲ +1.0 pp▲ +218▼ −0.9 pp▼ −61
Chicago citywide	13.9%162,248	13.3%169,949	12.8%168,975	▼ −1.1 pp▲ +6,727▼ −0.5 pp▼ −974▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,701
Firm size: 20–49 employees	15.5%1,904	11.2%1,430	3.1%425	▼ −12.4 pp▼ −1,479▼ −8.1 pp▼ −1,005▼ −4.3 pp▼ −474
Chicago citywide	8.4%97,503	8.2%103,945	7.3%96,404	▼ −1.1 pp▼ −1,099▼ −0.8 pp▼ −7,541▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,442
Firm size: 50–249 employees	16.0%1,963	14.7%1,880	11.7%1,598	▼ −4.2 pp▼ −365▼ −3.0 pp▼ −282▼ −1.2 pp▼ −83
Chicago citywide	15.7%183,275	14.9%189,930	13.8%181,123	▼ −2.0 pp▼ −2,152▼ −1.1 pp▼ −8,807▼ −0.8 pp▲ +6,655
Firm size: 250–499 employees	3.0%364	4.6%591	0.5%69	▼ −2.5 pp▼ −295▼ −4.1 pp▼ −522▲ +1.7 pp▲ +227
Chicago citywide	6.3%72,992	5.9%74,603	5.7%74,787	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,795▼ −0.2 pp▲ +184▼ −0.4 pp▲ +1,611
Firm size: 500 or more employees	54.9%6,746	59.6%7,607	73.9%10,056	▲ +19.0 pp▲ +3,310▲ +14.2 pp▲ +2,449▲ +4.7 pp▲ +861
Chicago citywide	55.7%648,585	57.8%736,130	60.4%795,600	▲ +4.7 pp▲ +147,015▲ +2.7 pp▲ +59,470▲ +2.1 pp▲ +87,545

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Rogers Park
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	7.4% ±1.2 pp7.4%±1.2 pp3,993 ±629
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	87.6% ±5.7 pp6.5%±0.4 pp3,499 ±229
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	12.4% ±5.1 pp0.9%±0.4 pp494 ±203
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	7.4%±1.2 pp7.4%±1.2 pp3,993±629	13.5%±0.2 pp13.5%±0.2 pp365,577±5,480	▼ -6.1%▼ -6.1%	69/77
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	87.6%±5.7 pp6.5%±0.4 pp3,499±229	83.0%±0.5 pp11.2%±0.1 pp303,520±1,897	▲ +4.6%▼ -4.7%	34/7767/77
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	12.4%±5.1 pp0.9%±0.4 pp494±203	17.0%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.1 pp62,057±2,247	▼ -4.6%▼ -1.4%	44/7769/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Rogers Park
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	14.3% ±1.5 pp14.3%±1.5 pp7,750 ±834
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	33.5% ±6.2 pp4.8%±0.9 pp2,599 ±477
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	66.5% ±4.9 pp9.5%±0.7 pp5,151 ±378
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	72.8% ±5.3 pp10.4%±0.8 pp5,642 ±407
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	27.2% ±4.2 pp3.9%±0.6 pp2,108 ±329
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	14.3%±1.5 pp14.3%±1.5 pp7,750±834	7.4%±0.1 pp7.4%±0.1 pp201,851±4,036	▲ +6.9%▲ +6.9%	5/77
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	33.5%±6.2 pp4.8%±0.9 pp2,599±477	52.4%±0.7 pp3.9%±0.1 pp105,720±1,511	▼ -18.8%▲ +0.9%	70/7710/77
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	66.5%±4.9 pp9.5%±0.7 pp5,151±378	47.6%±1.2 pp3.5%±0.1 pp96,131±2,437	▲ +18.8%▲ +6.0%	8/775/77
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	72.8%±5.3 pp10.4%±0.8 pp5,642±407	67.0%±1.0 pp5.0%±0.1 pp135,301±1,945	▲ +5.8%▲ +5.4%	45/774/77
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	27.2%±4.2 pp3.9%±0.6 pp2,108±329	33.0%±1.2 pp2.5%±0.1 pp66,550±2,459	▼ -5.8%▲ +1.4%	33/7710/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category	Rogers Park
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	3.2% ±3.4 pp147 ±161
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	7.5% ±4.1 pp459 ±249
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	3.2%±3.4 pp147±161	5.9%±0.5 pp—	▼ -2.7%	50/77
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	7.5%±4.1 pp459±249	5.4%±0.6 pp—	▲ +2.1%	11/77
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category	Rogers Park
Owner-Occupied Households	28.2% ±2.4 pp7,372 ±617
Renter-Occupied Households	71.8% ±2.7 pp18,814 ±713
Owner-Occupied Residents	28.7% ±3.2 pp14,521 ±1,605
Renter-Occupied Residents	71.3% ±3.6 pp36,136 ±1,828
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Owner-Occupied Households	28.2%±2.4 pp7,372±617	46.0%±0.4 pp534,012±4,939	▼ -17.9%	70/77
Renter-Occupied Households	71.8%±2.7 pp18,814±713	54.0%±0.4 pp626,193±5,183	▲ +17.9%	8/77
Owner-Occupied Residents	28.7%±3.2 pp14,521±1,605	51.8%±0.5 pp1,377,219±13,574	▼ -23.2%	71/77
Renter-Occupied Residents	71.3%±3.6 pp36,136±1,828	48.2%±0.5 pp1,280,665±13,500	▲ +23.2%	7/77
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category	Rogers Park
Median Year Moved In	2017±0.7 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later	7.5% ±1.6 pp1,957 ±421
Moved in 2020 to 2022	32.2% ±2.5 pp8,424 ±659
Moved in 2010 to 2019	39.8% ±3.2 pp10,418 ±835
Moved in 2000 to 2009	11.2% ±2.0 pp2,923 ±513
Moved in 1990 to 1999	5.9% ±1.9 pp1,532 ±497
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	3.6% ±1.2 pp932 ±319
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Moved In	2017±0.7 yr	2015±1.0 yr	▲ +2	11/77
Moved in 2023 or Later	7.5%±1.6 pp1,957±421	5.9%±0.2 pp68,884±2,742	▲ +1.5%	11/77
Moved in 2020 to 2022	32.2%±2.5 pp8,424±659	24.1%±0.4 pp279,417±5,059	▲ +8.1%	9/77
Moved in 2010 to 2019	39.8%±3.2 pp10,418±835	39.2%±0.5 pp455,125±5,772	▲ +0.6%	38/77
Moved in 2000 to 2009	11.2%±2.0 pp2,923±513	13.8%±0.3 pp160,353±3,324	▼ -2.7%	66/77
Moved in 1990 to 1999	5.9%±1.9 pp1,532±497	8.2%±0.2 pp95,243±2,390	▼ -2.4%	61/77
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	3.6%±1.2 pp932±319	8.7%±0.2 pp101,183±2,362	▼ -5.2%	67/77
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show

Category	Rogers Park
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	21.6% ±2.5 pp21.6%±2.5 pp11,572 ±1,316
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	14.5% ±2.2 pp67.2%±7.0 pp7,773 ±1,200
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	1.6% ±0.5 pp7.4%±2.0 pp852 ±251
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	4.0% ±0.8 pp18.6%±3.3 pp2,155 ±454
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	1.5% ±0.8 pp6.8%±3.5 pp792 ±413
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	21.6%±2.5 pp21.6%±2.5 pp11,572±1,316	14.0%±0.3 pp14.0%±0.3 pp375,475±8,289	▲ +7.6%▲ +7.6%	10/77
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	14.5%±2.2 pp67.2%±7.0 pp7,773±1,200	9.8%±0.3 pp69.9%±1.0 pp262,365±6,953	▲ +4.7%▼ -2.7%	9/7763/77
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	1.6%±0.5 pp7.4%±2.0 pp852±251	0.8%±0.1 pp5.5%±0.4 pp20,552±1,626	▲ +0.8%▲ +1.9%	5/7716/77
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	4.0%±0.8 pp18.6%±3.3 pp2,155±454	2.5%±0.1 pp17.6%±0.7 pp65,936±2,918	▲ +1.6%▲ +1.1%	9/7718/77
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	1.5%±0.8 pp6.8%±3.5 pp792±413	1.0%±0.1 pp7.1%±0.8 pp26,622±3,040	▲ +0.5%▼ -0.2%	17/7732/77
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Rogers Park
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	9.5% ±1.7 pp9.5%±1.7 pp2,758 ±480
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	4.6% ±1.2 pp47.9%±9.0 pp1,320 ±338
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.3% ±0.3 pp2.6%±2.7 pp73 ±76
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.5% ±0.5 pp5.4%±4.7 pp149 ±133
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	4.2% ±1.3 pp44.1%±11.8 pp1,216 ±387
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	6.5% ±1.6 pp6.5%±1.6 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	1.0% ±1.0 pp1.0%±1.0 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	9.5%±1.7 pp9.5%±1.7 pp2,758±480	9.1%±0.2 pp9.1%±0.2 pp116,849±2,682	▲ +0.4%▲ +0.4%	26/77
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	4.6%±1.2 pp47.9%±9.0 pp1,320±338	2.5%±0.1 pp27.1%±1.4 pp31,723±1,796	▲ +2.1%▲ +20.7%	5/777/77
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.3%±0.3 pp2.6%±2.7 pp73±76	0.6%±0.1 pp6.0%±0.7 pp7,037±795	▼ -0.3%▼ -3.4%	55/7758/77
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.5%±0.5 pp5.4%±4.7 pp149±133	0.2%±0.0 pp2.4%±0.5 pp2,831±587	▲ +0.3%▲ +3.0%	10/7712/77
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	4.2%±1.3 pp44.1%±11.8 pp1,216±387	5.9%±0.3 pp64.4%±2.5 pp75,258±3,387	▼ -1.7%▼ -20.3%	49/7770/77
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	6.5%±1.6 pp6.5%±1.6 pp—	4.8%±0.3 pp4.8%±0.3 pp—	▲ +1.7%▲ +1.7%	17/77
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	1.0%±1.0 pp1.0%±1.0 pp—	1.3%±0.1 pp1.3%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.3%▼ -0.3%	42/77
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category	Rogers Park
Median Year Built	1944±2 yr
Pre-1940	48.5% ±3.0 pp14,047 ±854
1940-2009	48.2% ±3.5 pp13,962 ±1,022
2010+	3.2% ±0.9 pp935 ±275
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Built	1944±2 yr	1953±1 yr	▼ −9 yrs	57/77
Pre-1940	48.5%±3.0 pp14,047±854	38.8%±0.4 pp495,715±4,678	▲ +9.7%	24/77
1940-2009	48.2%±3.5 pp13,962±1,022	54.9%±0.6 pp700,698±7,435	▼ -6.6%	53/77
2010+	3.2%±0.9 pp935±275	6.3%±0.2 pp80,641±2,725	▼ -3.1%	33/77
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category	Rogers Park
Population Density	29,485 /sq mi±1,393/sq mi
Single-Family Homes	7.5% ±1.2 pp2,175 ±342
Buildings With 2–4 Units	13.1% ±2.1 pp3,805 ±620
Buildings With 5–19 Units	36.5% ±2.8 pp10,560 ±803
Buildings With 20 or More Units	42.4% ±3.0 pp12,262 ±874
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Population Density	29,485 /sq mi±1,393/sq mi	11,748 /sq mi±26/sq mi	▲ +17,737 /sq mi	4/77
Single-Family Homes	7.5%±1.2 pp2,175±342	29.2%±0.3 pp372,679±3,989	▼ -21.7%	73/77
Buildings With 2–4 Units	13.1%±2.1 pp3,805±620	27.4%±0.4 pp349,976±4,957	▼ -14.3%	59/77
Buildings With 5–19 Units	36.5%±2.8 pp10,560±803	16.2%±0.3 pp206,420±4,124	▲ +20.3%	2/77
Buildings With 20 or More Units	42.4%±3.0 pp12,262±874	27.0%±0.3 pp344,543±4,438	▲ +15.4%	12/77
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category	Rogers Park
Studio	15.4% ±2.0 pp4,451 ±569
1 Bedroom	32.2% ±2.9 pp9,324 ±828
2 Bedrooms	33.9% ±2.6 pp9,811 ±739
3 Bedrooms	14.4% ±1.8 pp4,157 ±516
4 Bedrooms	3.1% ±0.9 pp885 ±266
5 or More Bedrooms	1.1% ±0.5 pp316 ±144
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Studio	15.4%±2.0 pp4,451±569	7.5%±0.3 pp95,749±3,205	▲ +7.9%	6/77
1 Bedroom	32.2%±2.9 pp9,324±828	20.1%±0.4 pp257,271±4,939	▲ +12.1%	9/77
2 Bedrooms	33.9%±2.6 pp9,811±739	33.1%±0.3 pp422,866±4,221	▲ +0.8%	31/77
3 Bedrooms	14.4%±1.8 pp4,157±516	26.1%±0.3 pp333,682±4,061	▼ -11.8%	70/77
4 Bedrooms	3.1%±0.9 pp885±266	9.0%±0.2 pp115,453±2,426	▼ -6.0%	72/77
5 or More Bedrooms	1.1%±0.5 pp316±144	4.1%±0.2 pp52,033±2,072	▼ -3.0%	69/77
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show

Category	Rogers Park
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	4.7% ±1.7 pp4.7%±1.7 pp1,242 ±433
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	2.7% ±1.3 pp56.0%±20.0 pp695 ±347
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	2.1% ±1.0 pp44.0%±14.4 pp547 ±261
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	4.7%±1.7 pp4.7%±1.7 pp1,242±433	3.4%±0.2 pp3.4%±0.2 pp39,979±1,996	▲ +1.3%▲ +1.3%	21/77
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	2.7%±1.3 pp56.0%±20.0 pp695±347	2.0%±0.1 pp58.2%±2.3 pp23,276±1,493	▲ +0.6%▼ -2.3%	27/7751/76
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	2.1%±1.0 pp44.0%±14.4 pp547±261	1.4%±0.1 pp41.8%±2.6 pp16,703±1,328	▲ +0.6%▲ +2.3%	17/7726/76
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category	Rogers Park
Natural Gas Heat	77.3% ±2.6 pp20,251 ±686
Electric Heat	16.2% ±2.1 pp4,251 ±545
Other Heating Source	6.4% ±1.5 pp1,684 ±383
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Natural Gas Heat	77.3%±2.6 pp20,251±686	77.5%±0.3 pp899,660±3,501	▼ -0.2%	58/77
Electric Heat	16.2%±2.1 pp4,251±545	18.0%±0.3 pp208,937±3,864	▼ -1.8%	24/77
Other Heating Source	6.4%±1.5 pp1,684±383	4.4%±0.2 pp51,603±2,173	▲ +2.0%	15/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show

Category	Rogers Park
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	29.4% ±2.5 pp7,691 ±664
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	28.4% ±2.5 pp7,448 ±656
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	42.2% ±3.2 pp11,047 ±838
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	20.4% ±2.7 pp5,351 ±715
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	29.4%±2.5 pp7,691±664	24.9%±0.5 pp289,047±6,215	▲ +4.5%	64/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	28.4%±2.5 pp7,448±656	23.8%±0.5 pp276,514±5,809	▲ +4.6%	3/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	42.2%±3.2 pp11,047±838	45.6%±0.6 pp529,378±6,577	▼ -3.4%	29/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	20.4%±2.7 pp5,351±715	24.0%±0.5 pp278,684±5,306	▼ -3.6%	35/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category	Rogers Park
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$747±$79
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,047±$34
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,380±$33
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,846±$44
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,414±$77
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$747±$79	$594±$11	▲ +$153	19/77
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,047±$34	$1,011±$8	▲ +$36	19/77
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,380±$33	$1,560±$10	▼ −$180	36/77
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,846±$44	$2,329±$13	▼ −$484	41/77
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,414±$77	Over $3,000	▼ −$586+	43/77
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$798 ±33	$707 ±71	$747 ±79	▼ −$51▲ +$40▼ −$91
Chicago citywide	$609 ±7	$606 ±7	$594 ±11	▼ −$15▼ −$12▼ −$2
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$602 ±25	$576 ±58	$747 ±79	▲ +$145▲ +$171▼ −$26
Chicago citywide	$459 ±6	$494 ±6	$594 ±11	▲ +$135▲ +$100▲ +$35
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$991 ±24	$1,027 ±25	$1,047 ±34	▲ +$56▲ +$20▲ +$36
Chicago citywide	$992 ±5	$1,001 ±5	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$19▲ +$10▲ +$9
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$748 ±18	$837 ±20	$1,047 ±34	▲ +$299▲ +$210▲ +$89
Chicago citywide	$748 ±3	$816 ±4	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$262▲ +$195▲ +$67
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,262 ±28	$1,342 ±34	$1,380 ±33	▲ +$118▲ +$37▲ +$81
Chicago citywide	$1,493 ±8	$1,523 ±6	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$67▲ +$37▲ +$29
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$952 ±21	$1,094 ±28	$1,380 ±33	▲ +$428▲ +$286▲ +$142
Chicago citywide	$1,127 ±6	$1,241 ±5	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$433▲ +$319▲ +$114
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,831 ±42	$1,776 ±31	$1,846 ±44	▲ +$15▲ +$70▼ −$55
Chicago citywide	$2,333 ±12	$2,326 ±10	$2,329 ±13	▼ −$4▲ +$3▼ −$7
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,382 ±32	$1,447 ±25	$1,846 ±44	▲ +$464▲ +$398▲ +$65
Chicago citywide	$1,761 ±9	$1,896 ±8	$2,329 ±13	▲ +$569▲ +$434▲ +$135
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,530 ±68	$2,403 ±65	$2,414 ±77	▼ −$116▲ +$11▼ −$127
Chicago citywide	—	$3,316 ±20	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,910 ±52	$1,959 ±53	$2,414 ±77	▲ +$504▲ +$455▲ +$49
Chicago citywide	—	$2,703 ±16	—	———

Rent

Rent measure

Category	Rogers Park
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,386±$26
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$854±$81
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,054±$36
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,338±$36
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,720±$51
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$2,078±$92
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,386±$26	$1,613±$12	▼ −$226	32/77
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$854±$81	$696±$20	▲ +$158	27/77
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,054±$36	$1,043±$8	▲ +$12	28/77
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,338±$36	$1,440±$10	▼ −$102	32/77
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,720±$51	$2,021±$21	▼ −$301	38/77
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$2,078±$92	$2,738±$29	▼ −$661	34/77
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park
Average Rent	$1,289±$23
10th Percentile Rent	$777±$93
25th Percentile Rent	$990±$33
Median Rent	$1,248±$37
75th Percentile Rent	$1,578±$66
90th Percentile Rent	$1,923±$40
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent	$1,289±$23	$1,452±$11	▼ −$163	28/77
10th Percentile Rent	$777±$93	$564±$21	▲ +$213	24/77
25th Percentile Rent	$990±$33	$913±$7	▲ +$77	20/77
Median Rent	$1,248±$37	$1,262±$12	▼ −$14	24/77
75th Percentile Rent	$1,578±$66	$1,868±$13	▼ −$290	26/77
90th Percentile Rent	$1,923±$40	$2,528±$38	▼ −$605	31/77
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category	Rogers Park
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,240±$197
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,224±$100
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,508±$83
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,969±$121
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,714±$148
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$3,342±$246
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,240±$197	$2,734±$24	▼ −$494	35/77
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,224±$100	$1,270±$14	▼ −$47	38/77
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,508±$83	$1,697±$14	▼ −$190	45/77
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,969±$121	$2,339±$17	▼ −$370	41/77
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,714±$148	$3,269±$31	▼ −$554	36/77
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$3,342±$246	Over $4,000	▼ −$658+	40/77
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,552 ±96	$2,204 ±107	$2,240 ±197	▼ −$312▲ +$36▼ −$347
Chicago citywide	$2,855 ±19	$2,793 ±23	$2,734 ±24	▼ −$121▼ −$60▼ −$61
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,926 ±73	$1,796 ±87	$2,240 ±197	▲ +$314▲ +$443▼ −$129
Chicago citywide	$2,154 ±14	$2,277 ±19	$2,734 ±24	▲ +$579▲ +$457▲ +$122
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,344 ±99	$1,226 ±132	$1,224 ±100	▼ −$120▼ −$2▼ −$118
Chicago citywide	$1,403 ±11	$1,356 ±11	$1,270 ±14	▼ −$133▼ −$86▼ −$47
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,014 ±75	$999 ±108	$1,224 ±100	▲ +$209▲ +$225▼ −$15
Chicago citywide	$1,059 ±8	$1,105 ±9	$1,270 ±14	▲ +$212▲ +$165▲ +$46
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,786 ±78	$1,534 ±100	$1,508 ±83	▼ −$278▼ −$26▼ −$253
Chicago citywide	$1,874 ±12	$1,800 ±12	$1,697 ±14	▼ −$177▼ −$103▼ −$74
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,348 ±59	$1,250 ±82	$1,508 ±83	▲ +$160▲ +$258▼ −$98
Chicago citywide	$1,414 ±9	$1,467 ±10	$1,697 ±14	▲ +$283▲ +$230▲ +$53
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,312 ±87	$2,130 ±92	$1,969 ±121	▼ −$343▼ −$161▼ −$183
Chicago citywide	$2,526 ±13	$2,422 ±13	$2,339 ±17	▼ −$187▼ −$83▼ −$103
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,745 ±66	$1,736 ±75	$1,969 ±121	▲ +$224▲ +$233▼ −$9
Chicago citywide	$1,906 ±10	$1,974 ±11	$2,339 ±17	▲ +$433▲ +$365▲ +$68
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$3,042 ±139	$2,838 ±154	$2,714 ±148	▼ −$328▼ −$123▼ −$204
Chicago citywide	$3,447 ±25	$3,343 ±25	$3,269 ±31	▼ −$178▼ −$74▼ −$104
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$2,296 ±105	$2,313 ±126	$2,714 ±148	▲ +$419▲ +$402▲ +$17
Chicago citywide	$2,601 ±19	$2,724 ±20	$3,269 ±31	▲ +$668▲ +$544▲ +$123
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$3,909 ±254	$3,342 ±246	—▼ −$567—
Chicago citywide	—	$4,578 ±59	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	—	$3,186 ±207	$3,342 ±246	—▲ +$156—
Chicago citywide	—	$3,731 ±48	—	———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category	Rogers Park
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$876±$51
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$421±$78
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$580±$82
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$836±$116
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,078±$76
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,428±$138
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$876±$51	$1,078±$22	▼ −$202	34/77
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$421±$78	$418±$8	▲ +$2	41/77
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$580±$82	$601±$8	▼ −$20	40/77
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$836±$116	$859±$10	▼ −$23	34/77
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,078±$76	$1,197±$18	▼ −$120	31/77
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,428±$138	Over $1,500	▼ −$72+	30/77
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$891 ±52	$911 ±92	$876 ±51	▼ −$15▼ −$35▲ +$20
Chicago citywide	$957 ±15	$1,028 ±10	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$121▲ +$50▲ +$71
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$673 ±39	$742 ±75	$876 ±51	▲ +$203▲ +$134▲ +$70
Chicago citywide	$722 ±11	$838 ±8	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$355▲ +$240▲ +$116
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$439 ±182	$500 ±123	$421 ±78	▼ −$19▼ −$80▲ +$61
Chicago citywide	$429 ±6	$469 ±7	$418 ±8	▼ −$11▼ −$51▲ +$40
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$332 ±137	$408 ±100	$421 ±78	▲ +$89▲ +$13▲ +$76
Chicago citywide	$324 ±5	$382 ±5	$418 ±8	▲ +$95▲ +$36▲ +$59
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$702 ±96	$615 ±59	$580 ±82	▼ −$122▼ −$35▼ −$87
Chicago citywide	$586 ±6	$629 ±6	$601 ±8	▲ +$14▼ −$28▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$530 ±73	$501 ±48	$580 ±82	▲ +$51▲ +$79▼ −$29
Chicago citywide	$442 ±4	$513 ±5	$601 ±8	▲ +$158▲ +$88▲ +$70
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$889 ±50	$866 ±87	$836 ±116	▼ −$53▼ −$30▼ −$23
Chicago citywide	$815 ±9	$860 ±7	$859 ±10	▲ +$44▼ −$1▲ +$45
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$671 ±38	$706 ±71	$836 ±116	▲ +$165▲ +$130▲ +$35
Chicago citywide	$615 ±7	$701 ±6	$859 ±10	▲ +$244▲ +$158▲ +$86
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$1,175 ±136	$1,078 ±76	—▼ −$97—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,206 ±14	$1,197 ±18	—▼ −$9—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$957 ±111	$1,078 ±76	—▲ +$120—
Chicago citywide	—	$983 ±12	$1,197 ±18	—▲ +$214—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$1,460 ±182	$1,428 ±138	—▼ −$32—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,767 ±35	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$1,190 ±148	$1,428 ±138	—▲ +$238—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,440 ±28	—	———

Home Values

Category	Rogers Park
Average Home Value	$402,390±$129,359
10th Percentile Home Value	$130,500±$16,942
25th Percentile Home Value	$185,773±$14,902
Median Home Value	$274,267±$27,317
75th Percentile Home Value	$453,333±$36,862
90th Percentile Home Value	$664,952±$45,734
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Average Home Value	$402,390±$129,359	$437,638±$7,358	▼ −$35,248	29/77
10th Percentile Home Value	$130,500±$16,942	$129,150±$3,756	▲ +$1,350	37/77
25th Percentile Home Value	$185,773±$14,902	$217,800±$1,804	▼ −$32,027	46/77
Median Home Value	$274,267±$27,317	$334,100±$2,424	▼ −$59,833	42/77
75th Percentile Home Value	$453,333±$36,862	$497,700±$3,730	▼ −$44,367	32/77
90th Percentile Home Value	$664,952±$45,734	$809,159±$15,691	▼ −$144,207	34/77
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$308,612 ±17,235	$318,530 ±45,449	$402,390 ±129,359	▲ +$93,779▲ +$83,860▲ +$9,919
Chicago citywide	$386,614 ±5,106	$424,380 ±4,754	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$51,024▲ +$13,258▲ +$37,766
Average Home Value (nominal dollars)	$232,904 ±13,007	$259,603 ±37,041	$402,390 ±129,359	▲ +$169,486▲ +$142,788▲ +$26,699
Chicago citywide	$291,771 ±3,853	$345,871 ±3,874	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$145,867▲ +$91,768▲ +$54,099
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$116,852 ±7,503	$127,641 ±14,578	$130,500 ±16,942	▲ +$13,648▲ +$2,859▲ +$10,789
Chicago citywide	$115,330 ±1,421	$124,313 ±1,339	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$13,821▲ +$4,838▲ +$8,983
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$88,186 ±5,662	$104,028 ±11,881	$130,500 ±16,942	▲ +$42,314▲ +$26,472▲ +$15,841
Chicago citywide	$87,037 ±1,072	$101,315 ±1,091	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$42,113▲ +$27,835▲ +$14,278
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$178,382 ±17,308	$183,157 ±12,319	$185,773 ±14,902	▲ +$7,391▲ +$2,617▲ +$4,774
Chicago citywide	$190,543 ±2,400	$199,018 ±1,255	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$27,257▲ +$18,782▲ +$8,475
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$134,622 ±13,062	$149,273 ±10,040	$185,773 ±14,902	▲ +$51,151▲ +$36,501▲ +$14,651
Chicago citywide	$143,800 ±1,811	$162,200 ±1,023	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$74,000▲ +$55,600▲ +$18,400
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$257,122 ±14,136	$257,418 ±15,148	$274,267 ±27,317	▲ +$17,145▲ +$16,849▲ +$296
Chicago citywide	$299,066 ±2,120	$316,564 ±2,118	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$35,034▲ +$17,536▲ +$17,498
Median Home Value (nominal dollars)	$194,046 ±10,668	$209,796 ±12,346	$274,267 ±27,317	▲ +$80,221▲ +$64,471▲ +$15,751
Chicago citywide	$225,700 ±1,600	$258,000 ±1,726	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$108,400▲ +$76,100▲ +$32,300
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$385,251 ±28,707	$394,978 ±34,523	$453,333 ±36,862	▲ +$68,083▲ +$58,355▲ +$9,728
Chicago citywide	$466,951 ±3,138	$490,797 ±3,892	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$30,749▲ +$6,903▲ +$23,846
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$290,742 ±21,665	$321,908 ±28,136	$453,333 ±36,862	▲ +$162,591▲ +$131,425▲ +$31,166
Chicago citywide	$352,400 ±2,368	$400,000 ±3,172	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$145,300▲ +$97,700▲ +$47,600
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$602,592 ±47,204	$590,749 ±49,940	$664,952 ±45,734	▲ +$62,360▲ +$74,204▼ −$11,843
Chicago citywide	$739,174 ±12,945	$835,769 ±9,047	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$69,986▼ −$26,610▲ +$96,595
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$454,766 ±35,624	$481,461 ±40,702	$664,952 ±45,734	▲ +$210,186▲ +$183,491▲ +$26,695
Chicago citywide	$557,842 ±9,770	$681,153 ±7,373	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$251,317▲ +$128,006▲ +$123,311

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show

Category	Rogers Park
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	7.3%7.3%2,119
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	4.8%64.9%1,375
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.4%5.0%107
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	2.1%29.1%617
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.1%0.9%20
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	7.3%7.3%2,119	8.3%8.3%106,578	▼ -1.0%▼ -1.0%	33/77
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	4.8%64.9%1,375	4.8%57.2%60,910	0%▲ +7.7%	34/7747/77
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.4%5.0%107	1.1%13.8%14,721	▼ -0.8%▼ -8.8%	31/7747/77
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	2.1%29.1%617	2.1%25.7%27,383	0%▲ +3.4%	24/7720/77
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.1%0.9%20	0.3%3.3%3,564	▼ -0.2%▼ -2.4%	36/7738/77
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units	6.9%1,893	7.5%2,083	7.3%2,119	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +226▼ −0.2 pp▲ +36▲ +0.6 pp▲ +190
Chicago citywide	8.8%104,550	8.5%103,479	8.3%106,578	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,028▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,099▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,071
Housing Choice Vouchers	2.6%715	4.8%1,335	4.8%1,375	▲ +2.2 pp▲ +660▼ −0.1 pp▲ +40▲ +2.2 pp▲ +620
Chicago citywide	4.3%51,601	4.6%55,987	4.8%60,910	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +9,309▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,923▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,386
Public Housing	1.8%507	0.4%107	0.4%107	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −400– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −1.5 pp▼ −400
Chicago citywide	1.8%21,159	1.3%16,094	1.2%14,721	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −6,438▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,373▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,065
Project-Based Section 8	2.3%625	2.2%621	2.1%617	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −8▼ −0.1 pp▼ −4– 0.0 pp▼ −4
Chicago citywide	2.2%25,940	2.2%26,951	2.1%27,383	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,443▼ −0.1 pp▲ +432– 0.0 pp▲ +1,011
Other Project-Based Programs	0.2%46	0.1%20	0.1%20	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −26– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.1 pp▼ −26
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,850	0.4%4,447	0.3%3,564	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,286▼ −0.1 pp▼ −883▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,403

Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category	Rogers Park
Average Household Income	$16,219
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$390
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,300
Below 30% of Area Median Income	84.9%1,601
With Children	19.3%364
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	36.4%687
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$16,219	$17,032	▼ -$813	56/75
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$390	$425	▼ -$34	63/75
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,300	$1,389	▼ -$89	42/75
Below 30% of Area Median Income	84.9%1,601	83.0%77,427	▲ +1.9 pp	16/75
With Children	19.3%364	31.0%28,919	▼ -11.7 pp	64/75
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	36.4%687	32.0%29,852	▲ +4.4 pp	23/75
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income	$11,352	$12,977	$16,217	▲ +$4,865▲ +$3,240▲ +$1,625
Chicago citywide	$12,156	$13,665	$17,032	▲ +$4,876▲ +$3,367▲ +$1,509
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$280	$313	$390	▲ +$110▲ +$78▲ +$33
Chicago citywide	$310	$340	$425	▲ +$115▲ +$85▲ +$30
Average Monthly Government Spending	$882	$915	$1,301	▲ +$419▲ +$385▲ +$34
Chicago citywide	$916	$1,017	$1,389	▲ +$473▲ +$372▲ +$101
Below 30% of Area Median Income	83.7%—	84.2%—	84.9%—	▲ +1.2 pp—▲ +0.6 pp—▲ +0.6 pp—
Chicago citywide	80.0%—	81.0%—	83.0%—	▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +2.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children	—	—	19.4%—	——————
Chicago citywide	—	—	31.0%—	——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	42.7%—	42.4%—	36.3%—	▼ −6.4 pp—▼ −6.1 pp—▼ −0.3 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category	Rogers Park
Total Tree Canopy	24.4%282 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	66.7%770 acres
Natural Open Surfaces	8.9%103 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Total Tree Canopy	24.4%282 acres	18.4%25,934 acres	▲ +6.0%	12/77
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	66.7%770 acres	60.2%84,955 acres	▲ +6.5%	32/77
Natural Open Surfaces	8.9%103 acres	21.5%30,331 acres	▼ -12.6%	72/77
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category	Rogers Park
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	23.6% ±3.9 pp12,784 ±2,094
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	47.2% ±4.2 pp25,582 ±2,264
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	29.2% ±3.7 pp15,807 ±2,011
Homes Without Air Conditioning	6.9%3,739
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	23.6%±3.9 pp12,784±2,094	26.1%±0.5 pp707,660±13,869	▼ -2.5%	36/77
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	47.2%±4.2 pp25,582±2,264	44.1%±0.6 pp1,195,950±15,462	▲ +3.1%	16/77
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	29.2%±3.7 pp15,807±2,011	29.8%±0.5 pp807,615±13,763	▼ -0.6%	43/77
Homes Without Air Conditioning	6.9%3,739	4.2%114,494	▲ +2.7%	11/77
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category	Rogers Park
Drove Alone	49.1% ±3.3 pp11,851 ±809
Carpooled	5.7% ±1.6 pp1,376 ±392
Public Transit	32.9% ±3.0 pp7,941 ±724
Walked	7.4% ±1.8 pp1,791 ±439
Bikes	2.5% ±1.0 pp605 ±245
Other Commute Mode	1.2% ±0.7 pp281 ±172
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Drove Alone	49.1%±3.3 pp11,851±809	56.6%±0.4 pp772,696±5,998	▼ -7.5%	67/77
Carpooled	5.7%±1.6 pp1,376±392	9.3%±0.3 pp126,918±3,980	▼ -3.6%	63/77
Public Transit	32.9%±3.0 pp7,941±724	22.4%±0.4 pp305,691±6,011	▲ +10.5%	5/77
Walked	7.4%±1.8 pp1,791±439	7.3%±0.3 pp100,269±3,456	▲ +0.1%	12/77
Bikes	2.5%±1.0 pp605±245	1.8%±0.1 pp24,441±1,693	▲ +0.7%	17/77
Other Commute Mode	1.2%±0.7 pp281±172	2.5%±0.1 pp34,356±1,772	▼ -1.4%	43/77
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category	Rogers Park
Average Commute Time (minutes)	36 min±1.2 min
Less Than 15 Minutes	10.5% ±2.2 pp2,544 ±521
15–29 Minutes	26.3% ±2.9 pp6,348 ±698
30–44 Minutes	28.2% ±3.3 pp6,806 ±797
45–59 Minutes	16.9% ±2.6 pp4,069 ±633
60 Minutes or More	18.1% ±2.3 pp4,376 ±559
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes)	36 min±1.2 min	33 min±0.2 min	▲ +3 min	20/76
Less Than 15 Minutes	10.5%±2.2 pp2,544±521	13.0%±0.3 pp140,252±3,438	▼ -2.5%	45/77
15–29 Minutes	26.3%±2.9 pp6,348±698	29.9%±0.5 pp322,586±5,056	▼ -3.6%	48/77
30–44 Minutes	28.2%±3.3 pp6,806±797	29.6%±0.4 pp318,782±4,584	▼ -1.4%	49/77
45–59 Minutes	16.9%±2.6 pp4,069±633	14.0%±0.3 pp151,451±3,075	▲ +2.8%	19/77
60 Minutes or More	18.1%±2.3 pp4,376±559	13.4%±0.3 pp144,940±3,715	▲ +4.7%	19/77
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category	Rogers Park
Average Vehicles per Household	0.83±0.05
Households With No Vehicle	36.8% ±3.0 pp9,627 ±786
Households With 1 Vehicle	45.6% ±2.9 pp11,928 ±755
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	17.7% ±2.4 pp4,631 ±630
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Average Vehicles per Household	0.83±0.05	1.12±0.01	▼ −0.29	65/77
Households With No Vehicle	36.8%±3.0 pp9,627±786	26.6%±0.4 pp308,497±5,087	▲ +10.2%	15/77
Households With 1 Vehicle	45.6%±2.9 pp11,928±755	45.2%±0.4 pp524,900±5,145	▲ +0.3%	33/77
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	17.7%±2.4 pp4,631±630	28.2%±0.4 pp326,808±4,200	▼ -10.5%	63/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Rogers Park Residents Work

Category	Rogers Park
Loop	16.7%4,152
Near North Side	10.2%2,525
Near West Side	5.2%1,294
Rogers Park	4.9%1,207
Lake View	2.2%545
All other city neighborhoods	21.1%5,242
Outside the city	39.8%9,908
↳ Evanston city, IL	6.5%1,623
↳ Skokie village, IL	3.4%845
↳ Northbrook village, IL	1.2%288
↳ Schaumburg village, IL	1.0%259
↳ Lincolnwood village, IL	1.0%251
↳ All other Illinois locations	24.4%6,073
Out of state	2.3%569
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 1 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Rogers Park
Loop	16.7%4,152
Near North Side	10.2%2,525
Near West Side	5.2%1,294
Rogers Park	4.9%1,207
Lake View	2.2%545
All other city neighborhoods	21.1%5,242
Outside the city	39.8%9,908
↳ Evanston city, IL	6.5%1,623
↳ Skokie village, IL	3.4%845
↳ Northbrook village, IL	1.2%288
↳ Schaumburg village, IL	1.0%259
↳ Lincolnwood village, IL	1.0%251
↳ All other Illinois locations	24.4%6,073
Out of state	2.3%569
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 1 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Loop	16.0%3,848	16.7%4,280	16.7%4,152	▲ +0.7 pp▲ +304– 0.0 pp▼ −128▲ +0.7 pp▲ +432
Chicago citywide	20.0%224,635	21.0%252,791	21.5%259,167	▲ +1.5 pp▲ +34,532▲ +0.5 pp▲ +6,376▲ +1.0 pp▲ +28,156
Near North Side	10.2%2,467	10.4%2,655	10.2%2,525	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +58▼ −0.2 pp▼ −130▲ +0.1 pp▲ +188
Chicago citywide	8.2%92,143	9.4%112,859	9.1%109,333	▲ +0.9 pp▲ +17,190▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3,526▲ +1.2 pp▲ +20,716
Near West Side	4.8%1,146	5.3%1,352	5.2%1,294	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +148▼ −0.1 pp▼ −58▲ +0.5 pp▲ +206
Chicago citywide	6.2%69,083	6.6%79,757	6.7%80,118	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +11,035– 0.0 pp▲ +361▲ +0.5 pp▲ +10,674
Rogers Park	5.1%1,237	5.1%1,305	4.9%1,207	▼ −0.3 pp▼ −30▼ −0.2 pp▼ −98– 0.0 pp▲ +68
Chicago citywide	0.6%6,788	0.6%7,067	0.6%7,133	– 0.0 pp▲ +345– 0.0 pp▲ +66– 0.0 pp▲ +279
Lake View	1.9%469	2.6%662	2.2%545	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +76▼ −0.4 pp▼ −117▲ +0.6 pp▲ +193
Chicago citywide	1.4%15,246	1.6%19,005	1.4%17,186	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,940▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,819▲ +0.2 pp▲ +3,759
All other city neighborhoods	22.1%5,339	21.0%5,390	21.1%5,242	▼ −1.1 pp▼ −97▲ +0.1 pp▼ −148▼ −1.1 pp▲ +51
Chicago citywide	22.5%252,499	21.1%253,775	20.7%248,736	▼ −1.8 pp▼ −3,763▼ −0.4 pp▼ −5,039▼ −1.4 pp▲ +1,276
Outside the city	39.4%9,505	39.0%10,000	39.8%9,908	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +403▲ +0.8 pp▼ −92▼ −0.4 pp▲ +495
Chicago citywide	36.8%412,807	35.7%430,134	35.9%432,355	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +19,548▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,221▼ −1.0 pp▲ +17,327
Evanston city, IL	7.4%1,791	7.3%1,861	6.5%1,623	▼ −0.9 pp▼ −168▼ −0.7 pp▼ −238▼ −0.2 pp▲ +70
Chicago citywide	1.6%17,922	1.6%18,922	1.5%17,546	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −376▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,376– 0.0 pp▲ +1,000
Skokie village, IL	3.0%726	3.2%825	3.4%845	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +119▲ +0.2 pp▲ +20▲ +0.2 pp▲ +99
Chicago citywide	1.1%12,426	1.1%12,900	1.3%15,777	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +3,351▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,877– 0.0 pp▲ +474
Northbrook village, IL	0.9%222	1.2%311	1.2%288	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +66▼ −0.1 pp▼ −23▲ +0.3 pp▲ +89
Chicago citywide	0.6%7,091	0.6%7,489	0.6%7,517	– 0.0 pp▲ +426– 0.0 pp▲ +28– 0.0 pp▲ +398
Schaumburg village, IL	1.1%261	1.0%265	1.0%259	– 0.0 pp▼ −2– 0.0 pp▼ −6– 0.0 pp▲ +4
Chicago citywide	1.1%11,817	1.0%11,930	0.9%10,376	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,441▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,554▼ −0.1 pp▲ +113
Lincolnwood village, IL	0.6%152	0.9%226	1.0%251	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +99▲ +0.1 pp▲ +25▲ +0.3 pp▲ +74
Chicago citywide	0.3%3,718	0.4%4,392	0.4%4,923	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,205– 0.0 pp▲ +531– 0.0 pp▲ +674
All other Illinois locations	23.5%5,665	23.0%5,903	24.4%6,073	▲ +0.9 pp▲ +408▲ +1.4 pp▲ +170▼ −0.5 pp▲ +238
Chicago citywide	27.9%312,992	27.0%324,805	27.3%329,050	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +16,058▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,245▼ −0.9 pp▲ +11,813
Out of state	2.1%502	2.2%556	2.3%569	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +67▲ +0.1 pp▲ +13▲ +0.1 pp▲ +54
Chicago citywide	2.2%24,577	2.3%27,198	2.2%26,136	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,559▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,062▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,621

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Rogers Park

Category	Rogers Park
Rogers Park	8.9%1,207
West Ridge	5.4%742
Edgewater	3.8%517
Uptown	2.4%322
Lake View	2.2%306
All other city neighborhoods	29.7%4,039
Outside the city	47.6%6,484
↳ Skokie village, IL	4.2%566
↳ Evanston city, IL	2.8%383
↳ Des Plaines city, IL	1.4%190
↳ Oak Park village, IL	1.4%189
↳ Niles village, IL	1.3%183
↳ All other Illinois locations	34.1%4,641
Out of state	2.4%332
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 1; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Rogers Park
Rogers Park	8.9%1,207
West Ridge	5.4%742
Edgewater	3.8%517
Uptown	2.4%322
Lake View	2.2%306
All other city neighborhoods	29.7%4,039
Outside the city	47.6%6,484
↳ Skokie village, IL	4.2%566
↳ Evanston city, IL	2.8%383
↳ Des Plaines city, IL	1.4%190
↳ Oak Park village, IL	1.4%189
↳ Niles village, IL	1.3%183
↳ All other Illinois locations	34.1%4,641
Out of state	2.4%332
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 1; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Rogers Park	10.0%1,237	10.2%1,305	8.9%1,207	▼ −1.2 pp▼ −30▼ −1.4 pp▼ −98▲ +0.2 pp▲ +68
Chicago citywide	1.1%14,602	1.1%15,644	1.0%14,965	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +363▼ −0.1 pp▼ −679– 0.0 pp▲ +1,042
West Ridge	6.8%842	5.7%733	5.4%742	▼ −1.4 pp▼ −100▼ −0.3 pp▲ +9▼ −1.1 pp▼ −109
Chicago citywide	1.2%15,893	1.2%16,926	1.1%16,381	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +488▼ −0.1 pp▼ −545– 0.0 pp▲ +1,033
Edgewater	4.8%588	4.8%612	3.8%517	▼ −1.0 pp▼ −71▼ −1.0 pp▼ −95– 0.0 pp▲ +24
Chicago citywide	1.4%18,970	1.4%19,919	1.3%19,317	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +347▼ −0.1 pp▼ −602– 0.0 pp▲ +949
Uptown	2.6%316	2.6%326	2.4%322	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6▼ −0.2 pp▼ −4– 0.0 pp▲ +10
Chicago citywide	1.5%19,418	1.5%21,736	1.4%21,153	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,735▼ −0.1 pp▼ −583▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,318
Lake View	2.5%309	2.5%324	2.2%306	▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3▼ −0.3 pp▼ −18– 0.0 pp▲ +15
Chicago citywide	3.2%41,851	3.2%45,855	3.1%44,775	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,924▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,080▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,004
All other city neighborhoods	28.4%3,496	29.5%3,767	29.7%4,039	▲ +1.3 pp▲ +543▲ +0.2 pp▲ +272▲ +1.1 pp▲ +271
Chicago citywide	38.0%499,784	37.9%537,334	36.8%539,030	▼ −1.2 pp▲ +39,246▼ −1.1 pp▲ +1,696▼ −0.1 pp▲ +37,550
Outside the city	44.9%5,522	44.6%5,699	47.6%6,484	▲ +2.8 pp▲ +962▲ +3.0 pp▲ +785▼ −0.2 pp▲ +177
Chicago citywide	45.9%603,720	45.4%642,891	47.2%691,545	▲ +1.3 pp▲ +87,825▲ +1.9 pp▲ +48,654▼ −0.6 pp▲ +39,171
Skokie village, IL	5.6%688	4.1%520	4.2%566	▼ −1.4 pp▼ −122▲ +0.1 pp▲ +46▼ −1.5 pp▼ −168
Chicago citywide	0.9%12,309	0.9%12,525	0.9%12,545	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +236– 0.0 pp▲ +20▼ −0.1 pp▲ +216
Evanston city, IL	3.7%459	3.7%468	2.8%383	▼ −0.9 pp▼ −76▼ −0.9 pp▼ −85▼ −0.1 pp▲ +9
Chicago citywide	0.9%12,386	0.9%13,410	0.9%13,044	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +658▼ −0.1 pp▼ −366– 0.0 pp▲ +1,024
Des Plaines city, IL	0.8%97	1.0%127	1.4%190	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +93▲ +0.4 pp▲ +63▲ +0.2 pp▲ +30
Chicago citywide	0.5%6,820	0.5%7,586	0.6%8,039	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,219– 0.0 pp▲ +453– 0.0 pp▲ +766
Oak Park village, IL	1.6%195	1.8%224	1.4%189	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −6▼ −0.4 pp▼ −35▲ +0.2 pp▲ +29
Chicago citywide	1.0%12,512	0.9%13,154	0.9%13,459	– 0.0 pp▲ +947– 0.0 pp▲ +305– 0.0 pp▲ +642
Niles village, IL	1.6%191	1.1%143	1.3%183	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −8▲ +0.2 pp▲ +40▼ −0.4 pp▼ −48
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,058	0.3%4,432	0.3%4,639	– 0.0 pp▲ +581– 0.0 pp▲ +207– 0.0 pp▲ +374
All other Illinois locations	28.6%3,522	30.6%3,912	34.1%4,641	▲ +5.5 pp▲ +1,119▲ +3.4 pp▲ +729▲ +2.0 pp▲ +390
Chicago citywide	35.5%467,052	35.1%497,107	36.9%540,317	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +73,265▲ +1.8 pp▲ +43,210▼ −0.5 pp▲ +30,055
Out of state	2.6%315	2.3%293	2.4%332	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +17▲ +0.1 pp▲ +39▼ −0.3 pp▼ −22
Chicago citywide	4.9%63,785	4.8%68,287	4.9%72,123	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8,338▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,836– 0.0 pp▲ +4,502

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category	Rogers Park
No Computer or Smartphone	3.5% ±1.8 pp909 ±466
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	10.0% ±1.9 pp2,615 ±497
Desktop or Laptop Available	83.7% ±1.9 pp21,924 ±494
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
No Computer or Smartphone	3.5%±1.8 pp909±466	5.1%±0.2 pp58,709±2,246	▼ -1.6%	58/77
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	10.0%±1.9 pp2,615±497	10.4%±0.3 pp120,218±3,642	▼ -0.4%	46/77
Desktop or Laptop Available	83.7%±1.9 pp21,924±494	79.7%±0.4 pp924,956±4,919	▲ +4.0%	23/77
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category	Rogers Park
Has Internet Access	94.7% ±1.5 pp24,806 ±398
Cellular Data Plan Only	12.1% ±2.0 pp3,172 ±519
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	4.2% ±1.2 pp1,112 ±321
No Internet Access	5.3% ±1.9 pp1,380 ±485
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Has Internet Access	94.7%±1.5 pp24,806±398	93.1%±0.3 pp1,080,419±3,310	▲ +1.6%	19/77
Cellular Data Plan Only	12.1%±2.0 pp3,172±519	12.5%±0.3 pp145,219±3,463	▼ -0.4%	51/77
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	4.2%±1.2 pp1,112±321	3.9%±0.2 pp45,350±1,940	▲ +0.3%	23/77
No Internet Access	5.3%±1.9 pp1,380±485	6.9%±0.2 pp79,786±2,730	▼ -1.6%	59/77
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category	Rogers Park
Uninsured Residents	13.6% ±1.9 pp7,343 ±1,049
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	5.5% ±3.0 pp2,986 ±1,624
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	16.3% ±2.4 pp8,848 ±1,299
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	5.8% ±5.7 pp3,132 ±3,109
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Uninsured Residents	13.6%±1.9 pp7,343±1,049	9.8%±0.2 pp264,391±5,709	▲ +3.8%	17/77
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	5.5%±3.0 pp2,986±1,624	3.9%±0.3 pp104,687±8,934	▲ +1.7%	16/77
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	16.3%±2.4 pp8,848±1,299	13.3%±0.3 pp361,430±8,516	▲ +3.0%	21/77
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	5.8%±5.7 pp3,132±3,109	1.7%±0.3 pp46,718±7,265	▲ +4.1%	2/77
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category	Rogers Park
Insured (Any Coverage)	86.4% ±1.9 pp45,460 ±1,019
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	50.8% ±2.4 pp26,710 ±1,248
Direct-Purchase Insurance	10.1% ±1.3 pp5,286 ±682
Medicare	10.8% ±1.3 pp5,683 ±679
Medicaid	19.2% ±2.0 pp10,085 ±1,050
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.1% ±0.3 pp30 ±142
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	3.5% ±1.1 pp1,859 ±561
Uninsured	13.6% ±1.9 pp7,128 ±1,019
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Insured (Any Coverage)	86.4%±1.9 pp45,460±1,019	90.2%±0.2 pp2,424,871±5,689	▼ -3.8%	61/77
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	50.8%±2.4 pp26,710±1,248	51.2%±0.4 pp1,376,912±9,468	▼ -0.5%	33/77
Direct-Purchase Insurance	10.1%±1.3 pp5,286±682	8.5%±0.2 pp227,424±5,112	▲ +1.6%	17/77
Medicare	10.8%±1.3 pp5,683±679	12.6%±0.2 pp339,804±4,911	▼ -1.8%	60/77
Medicaid	19.2%±2.0 pp10,085±1,050	22.2%±0.3 pp596,931±7,773	▼ -3.0%	51/77
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.1%±0.3 pp30±142	0.3%±0.0 pp7,201±787	▼ -0.2%	63/77
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	3.5%±1.1 pp1,859±561	3.8%±0.1 pp102,777±3,544	▼ -0.3%	53/77
Uninsured	13.6%±1.9 pp7,128±1,019	9.8%±0.2 pp262,018±5,689	▲ +3.8%	17/77
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category	Rogers Park
Adults With at Least One Disability	16.1% ±1.8 pp7,394 ±815
Mobility Disability	5.7% ±1.0 pp2,619 ±473
Hearing Disability	1.6% ±0.5 pp738 ±231
Vision Disability	2.9% ±0.8 pp1,320 ±380
Cognitive Disability	9.1% ±1.5 pp4,174 ±677
Self-Care Disability	1.6% ±0.6 pp741 ±257
Independent Living Disability	4.4% ±0.8 pp2,032 ±356
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability	16.1%±1.8 pp7,394±815	14.0%±0.2 pp303,665±4,797	▲ +2.1%	32/77
Mobility Disability	5.7%±1.0 pp2,619±473	7.6%±0.2 pp163,666±3,398	▼ -1.9%	57/77
Hearing Disability	1.6%±0.5 pp738±231	2.8%±0.1 pp61,430±2,337	▼ -1.2%	73/77
Vision Disability	2.9%±0.8 pp1,320±380	3.0%±0.1 pp64,544±2,269	▼ -0.1%	42/77
Cognitive Disability	9.1%±1.5 pp4,174±677	5.2%±0.1 pp112,824±2,939	▲ +3.9%	7/77
Self-Care Disability	1.6%±0.6 pp741±257	2.7%±0.1 pp57,758±2,261	▼ -1.1%	65/77
Independent Living Disability	4.4%±0.8 pp2,032±356	5.7%±0.2 pp123,651±3,247	▼ -1.3%	63/77
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category	Rogers Park
Arthritis	18.6%7,745
High Blood Pressure	28.1%11,703
Cancer	4.9%2,065
Current Asthma	10.4%4,319
Coronary Heart Disease	4.5%1,860
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	5.3%2,229
Diabetes	10.5%4,378
High Cholesterol	30.6%12,772
Obesity	32.1%13,402
Stroke	2.8%1,172
Lost All Natural Teeth	1.8%761
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Arthritis	18.6%7,745	19.6%409,178	▼ -1.0%	51/77
High Blood Pressure	28.1%11,703	29.7%620,030	▼ -1.6%	46/77
Cancer	4.9%2,065	5.0%104,382	▼ -0.1%	38/77
Current Asthma	10.4%4,319	10.2%212,940	▲ +0.2%	32/77
Coronary Heart Disease	4.5%1,860	4.8%100,207	▼ -0.3%	61/77
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	5.3%2,229	5.5%114,820	▼ -0.2%	45/77
Diabetes	10.5%4,378	12.0%250,517	▼ -1.5%	53/77
High Cholesterol	30.6%12,772	31.6%659,696	▼ -1.0%	63/77
Obesity	32.1%13,402	32.6%680,572	▼ -0.5%	43/77
Stroke	2.8%1,172	3.3%68,892	▼ -0.5%	51/77
Lost All Natural Teeth	1.8%761	2.5%52,249	▼ -0.7%	54/77
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category	Rogers Park
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	19.9%8,321
Current Cigarette Smoking	11.9%4,984
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	22.2%9,269
Short Sleep Duration	37.6%15,695
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	19.9%8,321	19.0%396,652	▲ +0.9%	20/77
Current Cigarette Smoking	11.9%4,984	11.9%248,430	0%	41/77
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	22.2%9,269	24.7%515,648	▼ -2.5%	55/77
Short Sleep Duration	37.6%15,695	37.8%789,129	▼ -0.2%	39/77
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category	Rogers Park
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	19.1%7,968
Frequent Physical Distress	11.2%4,690
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	19.1%7,968	21.1%440,493	▼ -2.0%	52/77
Frequent Physical Distress	11.2%4,690	11.8%246,342	▼ -0.6%	54/77
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category	Rogers Park
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	69.3%28,928
Routine Checkup in Past Year	75.5%31,480
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	85.4%35,637
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	55.2%23,023
Dental Visit in Past Year	58.6%24,442
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	73.3%30,572
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	69.3%28,928	72.5%1,513,542	▼ -3.2%	55/77
Routine Checkup in Past Year	75.5%31,480	76.2%1,590,785	▼ -0.7%	46/77
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	85.4%35,637	86.2%1,799,549	▼ -0.8%	48/77
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	55.2%23,023	55.8%1,164,905	▼ -0.6%	42/77
Dental Visit in Past Year	58.6%24,442	58.4%1,219,184	▲ +0.2%	31/77
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	73.3%30,572	74.2%1,549,032	▼ -0.9%	44/77
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category	Rogers Park
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	20.6%8,609
Frequent Mental Distress	16.7%6,971
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	26.8%11,173
Loneliness	35.2%14,700
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Rogers Park	City	Difference	Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	20.6%8,609	19.1%398,740	▲ +1.5%	8/77
Frequent Mental Distress	16.7%6,971	16.0%334,023	▲ +0.7%	28/77
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	26.8%11,173	28.2%588,716	▼ -1.4%	52/77
Loneliness	35.2%14,700	35.8%747,377	▼ -0.6%	50/77
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

---

Compare All Neighborhoods