Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Hispanic	7.2% ±3.2 pp2,109 ±931
White	1.5% ±0.7 pp427 ±192
Black	88.1% ±3.7 pp25,673 ±1,065
Asian	0.7% ±0.7 pp212 ±197
Other or Multi-racial	2.5% ±1.1 pp722 ±311
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Hispanic	7.2%±3.2 pp2,109±931	29.7%±0.2 pp805,318±5,785	▼ -22.5%	60/77
White	1.5%±0.7 pp427±192	32.1%±0.2 pp870,127±5,557	▼ -30.6%	66/77
Black	88.1%±3.7 pp25,673±1,065	27.4%±0.2 pp743,710±6,047	▲ +60.7%	13/77
Asian	0.7%±0.7 pp212±197	7.2%±0.2 pp196,435±4,370	▼ -6.5%	55/77
Other or Multi-racial	2.5%±1.1 pp722±311	3.5%±0.1 pp95,636±3,778	▼ -1.0%	50/77
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Age Distribution

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Under 5	6.4% ±1.8 pp1,858 ±533
5-17	16.2% ±2.1 pp4,711 ±619
18-24	6.9% ±1.6 pp2,007 ±472
25-44	27.9% ±2.7 pp8,128 ±781
45-64	24.5% ±2.1 pp7,142 ±616
65-74	11.2% ±1.5 pp3,251 ±430
75-84	4.5% ±1.0 pp1,314 ±278
85+	2.5% ±0.7 pp732 ±206
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Under 5	6.4%±1.8 pp1,858±533	5.3%±0.1 pp144,044±3,867	▲ +1.1%	18/77
5-17	16.2%±2.1 pp4,711±619	14.1%±0.2 pp381,582±5,548	▲ +2.1%	39/77
18-24	6.9%±1.6 pp2,007±472	9.6%±0.2 pp260,942±4,900	▼ -2.7%	63/77
25-44	27.9%±2.7 pp8,128±781	34.3%±0.3 pp929,946±6,988	▼ -6.4%	41/77
45-64	24.5%±2.1 pp7,142±616	22.9%±0.2 pp620,047±5,644	▲ +1.6%	38/77
65-74	11.2%±1.5 pp3,251±430	8.2%±0.1 pp221,932±3,711	▲ +3.0%	12/77
75-84	4.5%±1.0 pp1,314±278	4.0%±0.1 pp107,625±2,694	▲ +0.5%	30/77
85+	2.5%±0.7 pp732±206	1.7%±0.1 pp45,108±1,921	▲ +0.8%	16/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
No High School Diploma	15.0% ±3.0 pp3,088 ±623
High School Diploma or GED	31.5% ±3.2 pp6,477 ±649
Some College or Associate's Degree	32.9% ±3.0 pp6,771 ±611
Bachelor's Degree	15.0% ±2.5 pp3,078 ±509
Graduate Degree	5.6% ±1.4 pp1,153 ±298
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
No High School Diploma	15.0%±3.0 pp3,088±623	12.8%±0.2 pp246,015±4,778	▲ +2.2%	32/77
High School Diploma or GED	31.5%±3.2 pp6,477±649	21.1%±0.3 pp405,248±5,752	▲ +10.4%	24/77
Some College or Associate's Degree	32.9%±3.0 pp6,771±611	21.8%±0.3 pp419,911±5,550	▲ +11.1%	19/77
Bachelor's Degree	15.0%±2.5 pp3,078±509	25.4%±0.3 pp488,467±5,708	▼ -10.4%	48/77
Graduate Degree	5.6%±1.4 pp1,153±298	19.0%±0.3 pp365,017±5,186	▼ -13.4%	61/77
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Total Population	29,143 ±1,803
Total Households	12,857 ±579
Population Density	8,225 ±509 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	Average Neighborhood	Difference
Total Population	29,143	35,210	▼ −6,067
Total Households	12,857	15,067	▼ −2,210
Population Density	8,225 people/sq mi	13,045 people/sq mi	▼ −4,820
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average neighborhood rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large neighborhoods. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19	Difference	Rank
Total Population	32,849 ±1,419	30,149 ±1,395	29,143 ±1,803	▼ −3,706 ±2,294▼ −1,006 ±2,279▼ −2,700 ±1,990	▼ −2,381▼ −5,037▼ −6,067	36/7738/7740/77
Average Neighborhood	35,230	35,186	35,210	▼ −20▲ +24▼ −43
Total Households	12,032 ±346	12,134 ±365	12,857 ±579	▲ +825 ±674▲ +723 ±684▲ +102 ±502	▼ −1,329▼ −1,720▼ −2,210	33/7737/7736/77
Average Neighborhood	13,361	13,854	15,067	▲ +1,706▲ +1,213▲ +493
Population Density (per sq mi)	9,271 ±401	8,509 ±394	8,225 ±509	▼ −1,046▼ −284▼ −762	▼ −3,718▼ −4,519▼ −4,820	51/7755/7757/77
Average Neighborhood Density	12,989	13,028	13,045	▲ +56▲ +17▲ +39

Household Size

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Average Household Size	2.22±0.15
1-Person Households	44.1% ±3.0 pp5,673 ±388
2-Person Households	26.4% ±3.4 pp3,398 ±434
3-Person Households	16.1% ±3.4 pp2,064 ±439
4+ Person Households	13.4% ±2.7 pp1,722 ±351
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Size	2.22±0.15	2.29±0.02	▼ −0.07	54/77
1-Person Households	44.1%±3.0 pp5,673±388	39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,783	▲ +4.5%	23/77
2-Person Households	26.4%±3.4 pp3,398±434	29.5%±0.4 pp342,235±5,166	▼ -3.1%	44/77
3-Person Households	16.1%±3.4 pp2,064±439	12.9%±0.4 pp149,291±4,184	▲ +3.2%	16/77
4+ Person Households	13.4%±2.7 pp1,722±351	18.0%±0.5 pp208,411±5,419	▼ -4.6%	59/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Never Married	60.9% ±3.9 pp14,667 ±946
Married	15.8% ±1.9 pp3,812 ±461
Separated	2.7% ±0.9 pp646 ±218
Divorced	12.6% ±1.9 pp3,021 ±455
Widowed	8.0% ±1.5 pp1,923 ±357
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Never Married	60.9%±3.9 pp14,667±946	49.6%±0.3 pp1,130,286±6,623	▲ +11.3%	10/77
Married	15.8%±1.9 pp3,812±461	35.5%±0.3 pp807,294±6,077	▼ -19.6%	75/77
Separated	2.7%±0.9 pp646±218	2.2%±0.1 pp49,430±2,379	▲ +0.5%	28/77
Divorced	12.6%±1.9 pp3,021±455	7.9%±0.2 pp180,700±3,966	▲ +4.6%	8/77
Widowed	8.0%±1.5 pp1,923±357	4.8%±0.1 pp109,357±2,738	▲ +3.2%	15/77
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Speak English Only	90.4% ±2.8 pp24,677 ±766
Spanish	7.6% ±3.2 pp2,068 ±884
Other Languages	2.0% ±1.1 pp540 ±299
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Speak English Only	90.4%±2.8 pp24,677±766	64.6%±0.3 pp1,659,069±8,218	▲ +25.8%	19/77
Spanish	7.6%±3.2 pp2,068±884	23.7%±0.2 pp607,865±6,166	▼ -16.1%	44/77
Other Languages	2.0%±1.1 pp540±299	1.0%±0.1 pp25,292±2,452	▲ +1.0%	45/77
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	95.9% ±1.7 pp95.9%±1.7 pp26,174 ±471
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+)	1.2% ±0.7 pp1.2%±0.7 pp335 ±203
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	0.9% ±0.9 pp73.4%±55.6 pp246 ±239
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	1.9% ±1.5 pp158.2%±80.5 pp530 ±419
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	4.1% ±1.9 pp331.6%±254.1 pp1,111 ±521
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	95.9%±1.7 pp95.9%±1.7 pp26,174±471	85.4%±0.5 pp85.4%±0.5 pp2,192,778±11,961	▲ +10.5%▲ +10.5%	25/77
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+)	1.2%±0.7 pp1.2%±0.7 pp335±203	7.1%±0.2 pp7.1%±0.2 pp183,252±4,686	▼ -5.9%▼ -5.9%	66/77
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	0.9%±0.9 pp73.4%±55.6 pp246±239	5.2%±0.2 pp72.7%±1.1 pp133,269±3,923	▼ -4.3%▲ +0.7%	56/7726/76
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	1.9%±1.5 pp158.2%±80.5 pp530±419	2.3%±0.1 pp31.6%±1.4 pp57,883±2,982	▼ -0.3%▲ +126.6%	30/773/76
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	4.1%±1.9 pp331.6%±254.1 pp1,111±521	14.6%±0.3 pp204.3%±6.4 pp374,404±6,794	▼ -10.5%▲ +127.3%	53/774/76
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Married-Couple Households	11.3% ±2.3 pp1,456 ±294
Unmarried-Couple Households	8.5% ±2.7 pp1,088 ±349
One-Person Households	44.1% ±4.6 pp5,673 ±591
Other Household Types	36.1% ±7.5 pp4,640 ±960
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Married-Couple Households	11.3%±2.3 pp1,456±294	30.9%±0.3 pp358,432±3,598	▼ -19.6%	74/77
Unmarried-Couple Households	8.5%±2.7 pp1,088±349	8.3%±0.2 pp96,220±2,797	▲ +0.2%	22/77
One-Person Households	44.1%±4.6 pp5,673±591	39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,729	▲ +4.5%	23/77
Other Household Types	36.1%±7.5 pp4,640±960	21.1%±0.7 pp245,285±8,514	▲ +14.9%	13/77
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Children in Married-Couple Households	17.0% ±6.0 pp1,105 ±393
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	15.2% ±6.7 pp990 ±435
Children in Single-Mother Households	64.2% ±8.0 pp4,177 ±521
Children in Single-Father Households	3.6% ±2.4 pp236 ±159
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households	17.0%±6.0 pp1,105±393	56.0%±0.8 pp293,542±4,257	▼ -39.0%	73/77
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	15.2%±6.7 pp990±435	8.8%±0.6 pp45,960±3,208	▲ +6.4%	6/77
Children in Single-Mother Households	64.2%±8.0 pp4,177±521	30.6%±0.9 pp160,535±4,521	▲ +33.6%	7/77
Children in Single-Father Households	3.6%±2.4 pp236±159	4.6%±0.4 pp24,133±2,006	▼ -1.0%	47/77
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	5.3% ±1.3 pp5.3%±1.3 pp1,199 ±304
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	12.0% ±9.5 pp0.6%±0.5 pp144 ±114
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	16.4% ±12.2 pp0.9%±0.6 pp197 ±146
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	42.3% ±16.9 pp2.2%±0.9 pp507 ±203
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	1.3% ±5.3 pp0.1%±0.3 pp16 ±63
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	27.9% ±9.5 pp1.5%±0.5 pp335 ±114
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	5.3%±1.3 pp5.3%±1.3 pp1,199±304	2.8%±0.1 pp2.8%±0.1 pp60,766±2,397	▲ +2.5%▲ +2.5%	5/77
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	12.0%±9.5 pp0.6%±0.5 pp144±114	26.8%±1.8 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,267±1,067	▼ -14.8%▼ -0.1%	64/7744/77
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	16.4%±12.2 pp0.9%±0.6 pp197±146	12.9%±1.0 pp0.4%±0.0 pp7,830±579	▲ +3.5%▲ +0.5%	22/7712/77
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	42.3%±16.9 pp2.2%±0.9 pp507±203	28.8%±1.4 pp0.8%±0.0 pp17,525±846	▲ +13.4%▲ +1.4%	9/774/77
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	1.3%±5.3 pp0.1%±0.3 pp16±63	4.9%±0.7 pp0.1%±0.0 pp2,995±441	▼ -3.6%▼ -0.1%	56/7749/77
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	27.9%±9.5 pp1.5%±0.5 pp335±114	26.6%±1.5 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,149±916	▲ +1.4%▲ +0.7%	27/7711/77
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	95.4% ±1.7 pp95.4%±1.7 pp27,792 ±484
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	4.6% ±2.0 pp4.6%±2.0 pp1,351 ±572
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	1.3% ±0.6 pp27.2%±6.1 pp368 ±176
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	3.4% ±1.9 pp72.8%±26.3 pp983 ±547
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	95.4%±1.7 pp95.4%±1.7 pp27,792±484	79.1%±0.3 pp79.1%±0.3 pp2,144,343±7,926	▲ +16.3%▲ +16.3%	16/77
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	4.6%±2.0 pp4.6%±2.0 pp1,351±572	20.9%±0.3 pp20.9%±0.3 pp566,883±7,968	▼ -16.3%▼ -16.3%	62/77
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	1.3%±0.6 pp27.2%±6.1 pp368±176	10.0%±0.2 pp47.7%±0.5 pp270,551±4,603	▼ -8.7%▼ -20.5%	69/7770/77
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	3.4%±1.9 pp72.8%±26.3 pp983±547	10.9%±0.2 pp52.3%±0.9 pp296,332±6,504	▼ -7.6%▲ +20.5%	61/778/77
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	1.9%±1.3 pp41.2%±22.2 pp556±379
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	2.7%58.0%783
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	Chicago	Difference	Rank
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	1.9% ±1.3 pp41.2%±22.2 pp556	8.2% ±0.2 pp39.3%222,978	▼ -6.3%▲ +1.8%	42/7733/77
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	2.7%58.0%783	——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	3.0% ±1.7 pp63.7%±25.3 pp860 ±492
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	0.8% ±0.4 pp17.2%±4.7 pp232 ±114
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	0.1% ±0.2 pp3.0%±3.8 pp40 ±54
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	0.8% ±0.4 pp16.2%±5.2 pp219 ±114
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	3.0%±1.7 pp63.7%±25.3 pp860±492	5.9%±0.2 pp11802.1%±4868.4 pp159,447±5,557	▼ -2.9%▼ -11738.5%	54/776/77
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	0.8%±0.4 pp17.2%±4.7 pp232±114	4.5%±0.1 pp9023.8%±3721.0 pp121,912±4,035	▼ -3.7%▼ -9006.7%	65/7756/77
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	0.1%±0.2 pp3.0%±3.8 pp40±54	4.6%±0.1 pp9167.2%±3779.0 pp123,849±3,901	▼ -4.4%▼ -9164.2%	75/7775/77
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	0.8%±0.4 pp16.2%±5.2 pp219±114	6.0%±0.1 pp11967.1%±4925.6 pp161,675±3,491	▼ -5.2%▼ -11950.9%	68/7763/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later	0.1% ±0.3 pp39 ±103	0.3% ±0.3 pp80 ±82	3.0% ±1.7 pp860 ±492	▲ +2.8 pp▲ +821▲ +2.7 pp▲ +780▲ +0.1 pp▲ +41
Chicago citywide	1.4% ±0.1 pp36,978 ±2,235	3.7% ±0.1 pp99,118 ±3,198	5.9% ±0.2 pp159,447 ±5,568	▲ +4.5 pp▲ +122,469▲ +2.2 pp▲ +60,329▲ +2.3 pp▲ +62,140
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009	0.7% ±0.6 pp215 ±202	0.1% ±0.1 pp26 ±43	0.8% ±0.4 pp232 ±114	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +17▲ +0.7 pp▲ +206▼ −0.6 pp▼ −189
Chicago citywide	5.9% ±0.1 pp161,331 ±3,896	4.9% ±0.1 pp131,658 ±3,182	4.5% ±0.1 pp121,912 ±4,044	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −39,419▼ −0.4 pp▼ −9,746▼ −1.1 pp▼ −29,673
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999	0.2% ±0.3 pp61 ±103	0.5% ±0.4 pp136 ±106	0.1% ±0.2 pp40 ±54	– 0.0 pp▼ −21▼ −0.3 pp▼ −96▲ +0.3 pp▲ +75
Chicago citywide	6.1% ±0.1 pp165,077 ±3,717	5.3% ±0.1 pp142,413 ±3,015	4.6% ±0.1 pp123,849 ±3,911	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −41,228▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,564▼ −0.8 pp▼ −22,664
Entered the U.S. Before 1990	0.5% ±0.4 pp165 ±121	0.8% ±0.4 pp253 ±135	0.8% ±0.4 pp219 ±114	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +54▼ −0.1 pp▼ −34▲ +0.3 pp▲ +88
Chicago citywide	7.5% ±0.1 pp204,169 ±3,469	6.9% ±0.1 pp186,050 ±3,114	6.0% ±0.1 pp161,675 ±3,509	▼ −1.6 pp▼ −42,494▼ −0.9 pp▼ −24,375▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,119

Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Average Household Income	$56,600±$4,705
Per Capita Income	$25,868±$1,797
10th Percentile Household Income	$6,624±$1,274
25th Percentile Household Income	$17,523±$2,835
Median Household Income	$37,962±$3,600
75th Percentile Household Income	$83,496±$8,511
90th Percentile Household Income	$130,177±$9,167
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$56,600±$4,705	$116,016±$1,263	▼ −$59,416	72/77
Per Capita Income	$25,868±$1,797	$50,086±$581	▼ −$24,218	60/77
10th Percentile Household Income	$6,624±$1,274	$12,933±$271	▼ −$6,310	70/77
25th Percentile Household Income	$17,523±$2,835	$34,575±$649	▼ −$17,053	64/77
Median Household Income	$37,962±$3,600	$77,902±$907	▼ −$39,940	71/77
75th Percentile Household Income	$83,496±$8,511	$144,150±$1,210	▼ −$60,653	68/77
90th Percentile Household Income	$130,177±$9,167	Over $200,000	▼ −$69,823+	69/77
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$54,121 ±3,257	$52,688 ±2,843	$56,600 ±4,705	▲ +$2,479▲ +$3,912▼ −$1,433
Chicago citywide	$95,689 ±910	$111,304 ±1,075	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$20,327▲ +$4,712▲ +$15,615
Average Household Income (nominal dollars)	$40,844 ±2,458	$42,941 ±2,317	$56,600 ±4,705	▲ +$15,756▲ +$13,659▲ +$2,097
Chicago citywide	$72,215 ±687	$90,713 ±876	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$43,801▲ +$25,303▲ +$18,498
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$21,631 ±1,199	$22,872 ±948	$25,868 ±1,797	▲ +$4,237▲ +$2,996▲ +$1,242
Chicago citywide	$37,927 ±351	$45,525 ±412	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$12,160▲ +$4,562▲ +$7,598
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars)	$16,324 ±905	$18,641 ±772	$25,868 ±1,797	▲ +$9,544▲ +$7,227▲ +$2,317
Chicago citywide	$28,623 ±265	$37,103 ±336	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$21,464▲ +$12,984▲ +$8,480
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$6,494 ±652	$5,698 ±603	$6,624 ±1,274	▲ +$130▲ +$926▼ −$796
Chicago citywide	$11,828 ±190	$13,281 ±277	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$1,105▼ −$348▲ +$1,453
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$4,901 ±492	$4,644 ±491	$6,624 ±1,274	▲ +$1,723▲ +$1,980▼ −$257
Chicago citywide	$8,927 ±144	$10,824 ±225	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$4,007▲ +$2,109▲ +$1,898
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$16,516 ±1,518	$15,059 ±1,909	$17,523 ±2,835	▲ +$1,007▲ +$2,464▼ −$1,457
Chicago citywide	$28,727 ±321	$31,597 ±462	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$5,848▲ +$2,979▲ +$2,869
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$12,464 ±1,146	$12,273 ±1,556	$17,523 ±2,835	▲ +$5,058▲ +$5,250▼ −$191
Chicago citywide	$21,680 ±242	$25,751 ±376	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$12,895▲ +$8,824▲ +$4,071
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$34,553 ±2,554	$36,376 ±3,216	$37,962 ±3,600	▲ +$3,409▲ +$1,585▲ +$1,823
Chicago citywide	$63,379 ±591	$71,469 ±723	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$14,523▲ +$6,433▲ +$8,090
Median Household Income (nominal dollars)	$26,077 ±1,927	$29,647 ±2,621	$37,962 ±3,600	▲ +$11,885▲ +$8,315▲ +$3,570
Chicago citywide	$47,831 ±446	$58,247 ±589	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$30,071▲ +$19,655▲ +$10,416
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$73,039 ±4,462	$75,078 ±5,678	$83,496 ±8,511	▲ +$10,457▲ +$8,419▲ +$2,038
Chicago citywide	$122,019 ±806	$139,501 ±1,057	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$22,131▲ +$4,648▲ +$17,482
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$55,122 ±3,367	$61,188 ±4,627	$83,496 ±8,511	▲ +$28,375▲ +$22,308▲ +$6,067
Chicago citywide	$92,086 ±608	$113,694 ±862	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$52,064▲ +$30,456▲ +$21,608
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$117,595 ±7,571	$120,096 ±7,508	$130,177 ±9,167	▲ +$12,582▲ +$10,081▲ +$2,502
Chicago citywide	$202,601 ±2,442	$235,390 ±1,636	—	——▲ +$32,790
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$88,747 ±5,713	$97,879 ±6,119	$130,177 ±9,167	▲ +$41,430▲ +$32,298▲ +$9,132
Chicago citywide	$152,899 ±1,843	$191,844 ±1,333	—	——▲ +$38,944

Poverty Status

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Below Poverty Line	29.5% ±4.5 pp8,601 ±1,313
Below 200% Poverty Line	53.0% ±6.0 pp15,450 ±1,755
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	15.4% ±3.4 pp4,477 ±978
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Below Poverty Line	29.5%±4.5 pp8,601±1,313	16.8%±0.4 pp456,194±11,330	▲ +12.7%	13/77
Below 200% Poverty Line	53.0%±6.0 pp15,450±1,755	33.4%±0.6 pp905,794±16,660	▲ +19.6%	12/77
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	15.4%±3.4 pp4,477±978	8.3%±0.3 pp226,117±7,649	▲ +7.0%	13/77
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Food Insecurity	40.0%8,985
Housing Insecurity	31.8%7,132
Transportation Barriers	19.0%4,261
Threatened Utility Shutoff	22.4%5,016
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Food Insecurity	40.0%8,985	24.4%509,385	▲ +15.6%	14/77
Housing Insecurity	31.8%7,132	19.7%411,266	▲ +12.1%	11/77
Transportation Barriers	19.0%4,261	11.6%242,167	▲ +7.4%	14/77
Threatened Utility Shutoff	22.4%5,016	11.9%248,430	▲ +10.5%	12/77
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
In Labor Force	77.5% ±4.2 pp8,721 ±473
↳ Employed	65.5% ±4.9 pp7,366 ±547
↳ Unemployed	12.0% ±3.0 pp1,355 ±335
↳ Unemployment Rate	15.5% ±3.7 pp—
Not in Labor Force	22.5% ±12.5 pp2,526 ±1,410
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
In Labor Force	77.5%±4.2 pp8,721±473	85.6%±0.3 pp1,069,076±3,868	▼ -8.0%	61/77
↳ Employed	65.5%±4.9 pp7,366±547	79.6%±0.3 pp994,466±4,326	▼ -14.1%	63/77
↳ Unemployed	12.0%±3.0 pp1,355±335	5.9%±0.2 pp73,968±2,788	▲ +6.1%	10/77
↳ Unemployment Rate	15.5%±3.7 pp—	6.9%±0.3 pp86,502±3,342	▲ +8.6%	9/77
Not in Labor Force	22.5%±12.5 pp2,526±1,410	14.4%±1.1 pp180,399±14,344	▲ +8.0%	17/77
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Management, Business, Science & Arts	25.9% ±4.2 pp2,903 ±466
↳ Management Occupations	7.5% ±2.4 pp843 ±272
↳ Business & Financial Operations	3.5% ±1.8 pp395 ±198
↳ Computer & Mathematical	1.2% ±1.1 pp134 ±126
↳ Architecture & Engineering	0.9% ±1.0 pp99 ±108
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	0.9% ±1.1 pp104 ±119
↳ Community & Social Service	1.4% ±0.9 pp156 ±106
↳ Legal Occupations	1.1% ±0.9 pp120 ±101
↳ Education, Training & Library	5.7% ±2.0 pp643 ±228
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	1.2% ±0.9 pp135 ±105
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	0.9% ±0.8 pp96 ±93
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	1.6% ±1.2 pp178 ±133
Service	30.7% ±5.6 pp3,441 ±630
↳ Healthcare Support	10.0% ±2.8 pp1,120 ±318
↳ Protective Service	4.5% ±2.0 pp504 ±227
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	4.8% ±2.4 pp540 ±273
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	6.3% ±2.3 pp710 ±260
↳ Personal Care & Service	5.1% ±2.3 pp567 ±253
Sales & Office	21.7% ±4.7 pp2,434 ±524
↳ Sales & Related	7.2% ±2.7 pp801 ±299
↳ Office & Administrative Support	14.6% ±3.9 pp1,633 ±436
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	5.0% ±2.5 pp563 ±275
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.0% ±0.6 pp0
↳ Construction & Extraction	3.9% ±2.3 pp439 ±260
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	1.1% ±1.0 pp124 ±113
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	16.6% ±3.6 pp1,854 ±403
↳ Production Occupations	2.4% ±1.4 pp269 ±154
↳ Transportation Occupations	6.8% ±2.1 pp757 ±238
↳ Material Moving Occupations	7.4% ±3.0 pp828 ±333
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts	25.9%±4.2 pp2,903±466	49.2%±0.4 pp686,743±5,710	▼ -23.3%	64/77
↳ Management Occupations	7.5%±2.4 pp843±272	12.3%±0.3 pp172,182±3,807	▼ -4.8%	53/77
↳ Business & Financial Operations	3.5%±1.8 pp395±198	9.1%±0.2 pp127,081±3,358	▼ -5.6%	61/77
↳ Computer & Mathematical	1.2%±1.1 pp134±126	4.9%±0.2 pp68,921±2,690	▼ -3.7%	68/77
↳ Architecture & Engineering	0.9%±1.0 pp99±108	1.6%±0.1 pp22,779±1,380	▼ -0.7%	47/77
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	0.9%±1.1 pp104±119	1.4%±0.1 pp19,126±1,340	▼ -0.4%	35/77
↳ Community & Social Service	1.4%±0.9 pp156±106	1.9%±0.1 pp26,973±1,500	▼ -0.5%	56/77
↳ Legal Occupations	1.1%±0.9 pp120±101	2.3%±0.1 pp31,629±1,814	▼ -1.2%	38/77
↳ Education, Training & Library	5.7%±2.0 pp643±228	6.6%±0.2 pp92,316±2,697	▼ -0.9%	50/77
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	1.2%±0.9 pp135±105	3.1%±0.1 pp43,879±1,786	▼ -1.9%	55/77
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	0.9%±0.8 pp96±93	4.6%±0.2 pp63,551±2,652	▼ -3.7%	71/77
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	1.6%±1.2 pp178±133	1.3%±0.1 pp18,306±1,387	▲ +0.3%	32/77
Service	30.7%±5.6 pp3,441±630	16.9%±0.3 pp235,977±4,217	▲ +13.8%	5/77
↳ Healthcare Support	10.0%±2.8 pp1,120±318	3.4%±0.2 pp46,792±2,107	▲ +6.7%	6/77
↳ Protective Service	4.5%±2.0 pp504±227	2.8%±0.1 pp39,146±1,734	▲ +1.7%	28/77
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	4.8%±2.4 pp540±273	5.1%±0.2 pp70,514±2,393	▼ -0.2%	44/77
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	6.3%±2.3 pp710±260	3.0%±0.1 pp41,783±1,967	▲ +3.3%	9/77
↳ Personal Care & Service	5.1%±2.3 pp567±253	2.7%±0.1 pp37,742±1,657	▲ +2.4%	7/77
Sales & Office	21.7%±4.7 pp2,434±524	17.4%±0.3 pp243,580±4,754	▲ +4.3%	10/77
↳ Sales & Related	7.2%±2.7 pp801±299	8.1%±0.2 pp113,073±3,174	▼ -0.9%	51/77
↳ Office & Administrative Support	14.6%±3.9 pp1,633±436	9.3%±0.3 pp130,507±3,591	▲ +5.2%	11/77
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	5.0%±2.5 pp563±275	4.6%±0.2 pp64,338±2,929	▲ +0.4%	36/77
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.0%±0.6 pp0	0.1%±0.0 pp1,506±406	▼ -0.1%	42/77
↳ Construction & Extraction	3.9%±2.3 pp439±260	2.8%±0.1 pp39,432±2,062	▲ +1.1%	27/77
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	1.1%±1.0 pp124±113	1.7%±0.1 pp23,400±1,722	▼ -0.6%	53/77
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	16.6%±3.6 pp1,854±403	11.8%±0.3 pp165,261±3,629	▲ +4.7%	32/77
↳ Production Occupations	2.4%±1.4 pp269±154	4.2%±0.2 pp57,989±2,275	▼ -1.8%	60/77
↳ Transportation Occupations	6.8%±2.1 pp757±238	3.9%±0.2 pp54,099±2,118	▲ +2.9%	16/77
↳ Material Moving Occupations	7.4%±3.0 pp828±333	3.8%±0.2 pp53,173±2,312	▲ +3.6%	14/77
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0% ±0.6 pp0
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.0% ±0.6 pp0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0% ±0.6 pp0
Construction	3.9% ±2.3 pp434 ±257
Manufacturing	6.4% ±2.5 pp711 ±280
Wholesale Trade	1.2% ±0.8 pp131 ±92
Retail Trade	10.1% ±2.9 pp1,131 ±326
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	14.9% ±3.1 pp1,667 ±351
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	13.7% ±3.1 pp1,538 ±342
↳ Utilities	1.2% ±1.1 pp129 ±123
Information	1.2% ±1.0 pp129 ±117
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	5.9% ±2.7 pp660 ±305
↳ Finance & Insurance	3.4% ±2.5 pp379 ±277
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	2.5% ±1.4 pp281 ±152
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	12.1% ±2.9 pp1,357 ±324
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	4.5% ±2.0 pp507 ±220
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0% ±0.6 pp0
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	7.6% ±2.3 pp850 ±258
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	27.1% ±3.7 pp3,031 ±414
↳ Educational Services	8.0% ±2.2 pp891 ±246
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	19.1% ±3.3 pp2,140 ±372
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	9.4% ±3.0 pp1,052 ±333
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	2.8% ±1.9 pp310 ±215
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	6.6% ±2.7 pp742 ±300
Other Services	4.4% ±1.8 pp487 ±206
Public Administration	3.6% ±1.6 pp405 ±177
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%±0.6 pp0	0.2%±0.0 pp—	▼ -0.2%	59/77
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.0%±0.6 pp0	0.2%±0.0 pp—	▼ -0.2%	55/77
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%±0.6 pp0	0.0%±0.0 pp—	0%	18/77
Construction	3.9%±2.3 pp434±257	3.8%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.1%	35/77
Manufacturing	6.4%±2.5 pp711±280	7.7%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.3%	45/77
Wholesale Trade	1.2%±0.8 pp131±92	2.0%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.9%	60/77
Retail Trade	10.1%±2.9 pp1,131±326	8.2%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.9%	29/77
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	14.9%±3.1 pp1,667±351	7.1%±0.2 pp—	▲ +7.8%	7/77
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	13.7%±3.1 pp1,538±342	6.5%±0.2 pp—	▲ +7.2%	9/77
↳ Utilities	1.2%±1.1 pp129±123	0.5%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.6%	10/77
Information	1.2%±1.0 pp129±117	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▼ -1.0%	50/77
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	5.9%±2.7 pp660±305	8.8%±0.2 pp—	▼ -2.9%	52/77
↳ Finance & Insurance	3.4%±2.5 pp379±277	6.7%±0.2 pp—	▼ -3.3%	64/77
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	2.5%±1.4 pp281±152	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.4%	19/77
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	12.1%±2.9 pp1,357±324	18.2%±0.4 pp—	▼ -6.1%	48/77
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	4.5%±2.0 pp507±220	13.4%±0.3 pp—	▼ -8.9%	59/77
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%±0.6 pp0	0.1%±0.0 pp—	▼ -0.1%	35/77
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	7.6%±2.3 pp850±258	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▲ +3.0%	14/77
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	27.1%±3.7 pp3,031±414	24.2%±0.4 pp—	▲ +2.9%	31/77
↳ Educational Services	8.0%±2.2 pp891±246	10.5%±0.2 pp—	▼ -2.5%	59/77
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	19.1%±3.3 pp2,140±372	13.7%±0.3 pp—	▲ +5.4%	14/77
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	9.4%±3.0 pp1,052±333	9.1%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.3%	32/77
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	2.8%±1.9 pp310±215	2.2%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.6%	18/77
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	6.6%±2.7 pp742±300	6.9%±0.2 pp—	▼ -0.3%	37/77
Other Services	4.4%±1.8 pp487±206	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▼ -0.2%	40/77
Public Administration	3.6%±1.6 pp405±177	4.0%±0.2 pp—	▼ -0.4%	46/77
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Private Company Employee	63.6% ±4.7 pp7,121 ±524
Self-Employed	6.5% ±2.4 pp733 ±268
Nonprofit	8.3% ±2.3 pp927 ±259
Government	21.0% ±4.0 pp2,353 ±447
Unpaid Family Worker	0.5% ±0.8 pp61 ±89
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Private Company Employee	63.6%±4.7 pp7,121±524	67.9%±0.4 pp947,845±5,822	▼ -4.3%	40/77
Self-Employed	6.5%±2.4 pp733±268	8.3%±0.2 pp115,690±2,989	▼ -1.7%	58/77
Nonprofit	8.3%±2.3 pp927±259	12.1%±0.3 pp169,124±4,035	▼ -3.8%	61/77
Government	21.0%±4.0 pp2,353±447	12.9%±0.3 pp179,945±4,021	▲ +8.1%	19/77
Unpaid Family Worker	0.5%±0.8 pp61±89	0.2%±0.0 pp2,312±408	▲ +0.4%	4/77
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Full-Time, Year-Round	55.2% ±3.9 pp6,963 ±498
Part-Time or Part-Year	44.8% ±4.5 pp5,644 ±567
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round	55.2%±3.9 pp6,963±498	67.0%±0.3 pp1,025,726±3,875	▼ -11.8%	70/77
Part-Time or Part-Year	44.8%±4.5 pp5,644±567	33.0%±0.3 pp504,210±4,897	▲ +11.8%	8/77
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Average FT Earnings	$58,416±$5,589
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$18,428±$5,757
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$33,224±$3,387
Median FT Earnings	$49,407±$3,899
75th Percentile FT Earnings	$70,905±$8,142
90th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Average FT Earnings	$58,416±$5,589	$96,214±$968	▼ −$37,799	55/76
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$18,428±$5,757	$29,008±$387	▼ −$10,580	75/77
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$33,224±$3,387	$43,011±$345	▼ −$9,787	62/77
Median FT Earnings	$49,407±$3,899	$69,663±$530	▼ −$20,255	57/77
75th Percentile FT Earnings	$70,905±$8,142	Over $100,000	▼ −$29,095+	64/77
90th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000	Over $100,000	—	1/77
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$58,007 ±4,035	$52,966 ±2,380	$58,416 ±5,589	▲ +$409▲ +$5,450▼ −$5,041
Chicago citywide	$83,170 ±714	$91,467 ±682	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$13,044▲ +$4,747▲ +$8,297
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$43,777 ±3,046	$43,167 ±1,940	$58,416 ±5,589	▲ +$14,639▲ +$15,249▼ −$610
Chicago citywide	$62,767 ±539	$74,546 ±556	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$33,447▲ +$21,669▲ +$11,778
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$19,482 ±2,492	$17,648 ±2,041	$18,428 ±5,757	▼ −$1,053▲ +$781▼ −$1,834
Chicago citywide	$24,209 ±243	$26,113 ±152	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$4,799▲ +$2,895▲ +$1,904
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$14,702 ±1,881	$14,383 ±1,664	$18,428 ±5,757	▲ +$3,726▲ +$4,045▼ −$320
Chicago citywide	$18,270 ±183	$21,282 ±124	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$10,738▲ +$7,726▲ +$3,012
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$31,121 ±2,545	$28,569 ±2,699	$33,224 ±3,387	▲ +$2,103▲ +$4,656▼ −$2,553
Chicago citywide	$37,393 ±278	$39,415 ±229	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$5,618▲ +$3,597▲ +$2,021
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$23,487 ±1,921	$23,283 ±2,200	$33,224 ±3,387	▲ +$9,738▲ +$9,941▼ −$203
Chicago citywide	$28,220 ±210	$32,123 ±187	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$14,791▲ +$10,888▲ +$3,903
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$47,292 ±2,807	$45,215 ±3,279	$49,407 ±3,899	▲ +$2,115▲ +$4,193▼ −$2,077
Chicago citywide	$60,575 ±496	$64,628 ±327	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,034▲ +$4,054
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$35,691 ±2,118	$36,850 ±2,673	$49,407 ±3,899	▲ +$13,717▲ +$12,557▲ +$1,160
Chicago citywide	$45,715 ±374	$52,672 ±266	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$23,948▲ +$16,991▲ +$6,957
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$71,139 ±4,753	$66,733 ±5,109	$70,905 ±8,142	▼ −$234▲ +$4,172▼ −$4,406
Chicago citywide	$98,274 ±615	$108,202 ±616	—	——▲ +$9,928
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$53,687 ±3,587	$54,387 ±4,164	$70,905 ±8,142	▲ +$17,218▲ +$16,518▲ +$700
Chicago citywide	$74,166 ±464	$88,185 ±502	—	——▲ +$14,019
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$102,965 ±8,733	$102,509 ±10,006	—	——▼ −$457
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$77,706 ±6,591	$83,545 ±8,155	—	——▲ +$5,838
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Average PT Earnings	$22,288±$2,327
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$1,999±$902
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$6,819±$1,588
Median PT Earnings	$15,819±$2,225
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$30,516±$6,535
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$52,531±$8,410
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Average PT Earnings	$22,288±$2,327	$33,575±$750	▼ −$11,287	59/76
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$1,999±$902	$2,183±$87	▼ −$185	46/77
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$6,819±$1,588	$7,222±$206	▼ −$402	41/77
Median PT Earnings	$15,819±$2,225	$19,180±$393	▼ −$3,361	48/77
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$30,516±$6,535	$38,498±$681	▼ −$7,982	51/77
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$52,531±$8,410	$73,776±$1,391	▼ −$21,245	48/77
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$20,715 ±2,244	$21,415 ±3,294	$22,288 ±2,327	▲ +$1,573▲ +$873▲ +$700
Chicago citywide	$27,076 ±473	$31,236 ±676	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$6,500▲ +$2,340▲ +$4,160
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$15,633 ±1,694	$17,453 ±2,685	$22,288 ±2,327	▲ +$6,655▲ +$4,835▲ +$1,820
Chicago citywide	$20,433 ±357	$25,457 ±551	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$13,142▲ +$8,118▲ +$5,024
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,939 ±361	$1,703 ±378	$1,999 ±902	▲ +$60▲ +$296▼ −$236
Chicago citywide	$2,230 ±48	$2,283 ±59	$2,183 ±87	▼ −$47▼ −$100▲ +$53
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$1,463 ±272	$1,388 ±308	$1,999 ±902	▲ +$536▲ +$611▼ −$76
Chicago citywide	$1,683 ±36	$1,861 ±48	$2,183 ±87	▲ +$500▲ +$322▲ +$178
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$5,366 ±868	$4,945 ±1,101	$6,819 ±1,588	▲ +$1,453▲ +$1,874▼ −$421
Chicago citywide	$6,390 ±123	$6,841 ±156	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$832▲ +$381▲ +$451
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$4,050 ±655	$4,030 ±897	$6,819 ±1,588	▲ +$2,769▲ +$2,789▼ −$20
Chicago citywide	$4,822 ±93	$5,575 ±127	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$2,399▲ +$1,646▲ +$753
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$12,787 ±1,388	$12,996 ±1,704	$15,819 ±2,225	▲ +$3,032▲ +$2,823▲ +$209
Chicago citywide	$15,461 ±166	$17,025 ±275	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$3,719▲ +$2,155▲ +$1,563
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$9,650 ±1,047	$10,592 ±1,389	$15,819 ±2,225	▲ +$6,169▲ +$5,227▲ +$942
Chicago citywide	$11,668 ±125	$13,875 ±224	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$7,512▲ +$5,305▲ +$2,207
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$22,924 ±2,006	$24,703 ±2,727	$30,516 ±6,535	▲ +$7,592▲ +$5,813▲ +$1,779
Chicago citywide	$30,795 ±619	$34,779 ±505	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$7,703▲ +$3,719▲ +$3,984
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$17,300 ±1,514	$20,133 ±2,222	$30,516 ±6,535	▲ +$13,216▲ +$10,383▲ +$2,833
Chicago citywide	$23,241 ±468	$28,345 ±412	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$15,257▲ +$10,153▲ +$5,104
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$45,329 ±13,101	$38,874 ±11,525	$52,531 ±8,410	▲ +$7,202▲ +$13,658▼ −$6,456
Chicago citywide	$61,207 ±1,249	$68,040 ±1,298	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$12,570▲ +$5,737▲ +$6,833
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$34,209 ±9,887	$31,682 ±9,393	$52,531 ±8,410	▲ +$18,322▲ +$20,849▼ −$2,527
Chicago citywide	$46,192 ±942	$55,452 ±1,058	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$27,585▲ +$18,324▲ +$9,261

Earnings of All Workers

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Average Earnings	$42,242±$3,385
10th Percentile Earnings	$5,794±$1,433
25th Percentile Earnings	$14,627±$2,394
Median Earnings	$34,707±$3,465
75th Percentile Earnings	$56,137±$3,821
90th Percentile Earnings	$89,955±$7,634
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Average Earnings	$42,242±$3,385	$75,571±$768	▼ −$33,329	65/76
10th Percentile Earnings	$5,794±$1,433	$8,529±$272	▼ −$2,735	52/77
25th Percentile Earnings	$14,627±$2,394	$25,183±$358	▼ −$10,556	66/77
Median Earnings	$34,707±$3,465	$51,367±$471	▼ −$16,660	66/77
75th Percentile Earnings	$56,137±$3,821	$93,324±$598	▼ −$37,187	67/77
90th Percentile Earnings	$89,955±$7,634	Over $100,000	▼ −$10,045+	66/77
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$40,338 ±2,471	$39,649 ±2,414	$42,242 ±3,385	▲ +$1,904▲ +$2,593▼ −$689
Chicago citywide	$62,453 ±534	$71,626 ±551	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$13,118▲ +$3,945▲ +$9,173
Average Earnings (nominal dollars)	$30,442 ±1,865	$32,314 ±1,967	$42,242 ±3,385	▲ +$11,800▲ +$9,928▲ +$1,872
Chicago citywide	$47,133 ±403	$58,375 ±449	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$28,438▲ +$17,196▲ +$11,243
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$4,275 ±859	$4,385 ±1,164	$5,794 ±1,433	▲ +$1,520▲ +$1,409▲ +$111
Chicago citywide	$6,858 ±139	$8,358 ±164	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$1,671▲ +$171▲ +$1,500
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$3,226 ±648	$3,574 ±949	$5,794 ±1,433	▲ +$2,569▲ +$2,221▲ +$348
Chicago citywide	$5,176 ±105	$6,812 ±134	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$3,354▲ +$1,717▲ +$1,636
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$12,567 ±1,364	$13,869 ±1,522	$14,627 ±2,394	▲ +$2,060▲ +$758▲ +$1,302
Chicago citywide	$19,598 ±241	$23,173 ±290	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$5,585▲ +$2,010▲ +$3,576
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$9,484 ±1,029	$11,303 ±1,240	$14,627 ±2,394	▲ +$5,143▲ +$3,324▲ +$1,819
Chicago citywide	$14,790 ±182	$18,886 ±236	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$10,393▲ +$6,297▲ +$4,096
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$28,262 ±2,560	$29,343 ±2,470	$34,707 ±3,465	▲ +$6,445▲ +$5,363▲ +$1,082
Chicago citywide	$42,365 ±293	$47,195 ±370	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$9,002▲ +$4,172▲ +$4,830
Median Earnings (nominal dollars)	$21,329 ±1,932	$23,915 ±2,013	$34,707 ±3,465	▲ +$13,378▲ +$10,792▲ +$2,586
Chicago citywide	$31,972 ±221	$38,464 ±302	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$19,395▲ +$12,903▲ +$6,492
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$54,445 ±3,133	$54,361 ±3,347	$56,137 ±3,821	▲ +$1,692▲ +$1,776▼ −$83
Chicago citywide	$78,784 ±555	$87,853 ±597	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$14,540▲ +$5,471▲ +$9,069
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$41,088 ±2,364	$44,305 ±2,727	$56,137 ±3,821	▲ +$15,049▲ +$11,832▲ +$3,216
Chicago citywide	$59,457 ±418	$71,600 ±486	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$33,867▲ +$21,723▲ +$12,144
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$89,444 ±5,667	$86,344 ±8,909	$89,955 ±7,634	▲ +$510▲ +$3,610▼ −$3,100
Chicago citywide	$128,659 ±682	—	—	———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$67,502 ±4,277	$70,371 ±7,261	$89,955 ±7,634	▲ +$22,452▲ +$19,584▲ +$2,869
Chicago citywide	$97,097 ±515	—	—	———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Household income at age 35	$27,598 ±$625
Household income percentile rank	30.3 ±0.46 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	3.38% ±0.38 pp
Individual income at age 35	$25,638 ±$631
Fraction married	9.63% ±0.64 pp
Employment rate	72.1% ±1.00 pp
Incarceration rate	4.73% ±0.58 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$27,598 ±$625	$43,090 ±$109	−$15,491
Household income percentile rank	30.3 ±0.46 pp	40.9 ±0.07 pp	−10.6 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	3.38% ±0.38 pp	11.4% ±0.08 pp	−8.0 pp
Individual income at age 35	$25,638 ±$631	$33,545 ±$85	−$7,907
Fraction married	9.63% ±0.64 pp	26.4% ±0.12 pp	−16.7 pp
Employment rate	72.1% ±1.00 pp	74.4% ±0.12 pp	−2.3 pp
Incarceration rate	4.73% ±0.58 pp	2.87% ±0.06 pp	+1.9 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago in Lower-Income Families

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Household income at age 35	$24,981 ±$817
Household income percentile rank	28.3 ±0.60 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	2.30% ±0.51 pp
Individual income at age 35	$23,899 ±$766
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$24,981 ±$817	$34,712 ±$133	−$9,731
Household income percentile rank	28.3 ±0.60 pp	35.3 ±0.09 pp	−7.0 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	2.30% ±0.51 pp	6.31% ±0.10 pp	−4.0 pp
Individual income at age 35	$23,899 ±$766	$28,717 ±$114	−$4,817
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	71.3% ±1.04 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	18.4% ±0.87 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	71.3% ±1.04 pp	78.1% ±0.12 pp	−6.8 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	18.4% ±0.87 pp	22.9% ±0.12 pp	−4.5 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Greater Grand Crossing

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
All jobs located in greater grand crossing	3,049
Greater Grand Crossing jobs held by Greater Grand Crossing residents	5.8%
Greater Grand Crossing jobs held by non-Greater Grand Crossing residents	94.2%
Employed residents working in Greater Grand Crossing	1.6%
Employed residents working outside Greater Grand Crossing	98.4%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	Chicago neighborhood median	Difference	Rank
All jobs located in greater grand crossing	3,049	5,320	▼ −2,271	58/77
Greater Grand Crossing jobs held by Greater Grand Crossing residents	5.8%	5.8%	▲ +0.1 pp	38/77
Greater Grand Crossing jobs held by non-Greater Grand Crossing residents	94.2%	94.2%	▼ −0.1 pp	40/77
Employed residents working in Greater Grand Crossing	1.6%	2.6%	▼ −1.0 pp	58/77
Employed residents working outside Greater Grand Crossing	98.4%	97.4%	▲ +1.0 pp	20/77
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in greater grand crossing	3,865	3,427	3,049	▼ −816▼ −378▼ −438
Chicago citywide	5,236	5,698	5,320	▲ +84▼ −378▲ +462
Greater Grand Crossing jobs held by Greater Grand Crossing residents	4.3%148	4.9%150	5.8%156	▲ +1.5 pp▲ +8▲ +0.9 pp▲ +6▲ +0.6 pp▲ +2
Chicago citywide	5.5%246	5.6%306	5.8%279	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +33▲ +0.1 pp▼ −27▲ +0.2 pp▲ +60
Greater Grand Crossing jobs held by non-Greater Grand Crossing residents	95.7%3,259	95.1%2,900	94.2%2,515	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −744▼ −0.9 pp▼ −385▼ −0.6 pp▼ −359
Chicago citywide	94.5%4,320	94.4%4,646	94.2%4,657	▼ −0.3 pp▲ +337▼ −0.1 pp▲ +11▼ −0.2 pp▲ +326
Employed residents working in Greater Grand Crossing	1.6%148	1.6%150	1.6%156	– 0.0 pp▲ +8▲ +0.1 pp▲ +6▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2
Chicago citywide	2.5%246	2.7%306	2.6%279	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +33▼ −0.1 pp▼ −27▲ +0.1 pp▲ +60
Employed residents working outside Greater Grand Crossing	98.4%8,946	98.4%9,365	98.4%9,363	– 0.0 pp▲ +417▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2▲ +0.1 pp▲ +419
Chicago citywide	97.5%9,791	97.3%10,346	97.4%10,385	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +594▲ +0.1 pp▲ +39▼ −0.1 pp▲ +555

Industry of Jobs in Greater Grand Crossing

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0
Construction	3.4%103
Manufacturing	8.1%246
Wholesale Trade	5.4%166
Retail Trade	9.8%300
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	0.4%12
↳ Utilities	0.0%0
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	0.4%12
Information	2.0%61
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	3.1%93
↳ Finance & Insurance	1.2%38
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.8%55
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	2.9%87
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	0.7%20
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%0
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	2.2%67
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	43.7%1,332
↳ Educational Services	18.1%553
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	25.5%779
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	7.3%223
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	1.2%37
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	6.1%186
Other Services	14.0%426
Public Administration	0.0%0
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0	0.0%423	0%	25/77
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0	0.0%36	0%	9/77
Construction	3.4%103	1.9%27,207	▲ +1.5%	31/77
Manufacturing	8.1%246	4.4%64,747	▲ +3.6%	29/77
Wholesale Trade	5.4%166	2.8%41,460	▲ +2.6%	18/77
Retail Trade	9.8%300	6.6%96,413	▲ +3.3%	48/77
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	0.4%12	6.0%87,817	▼ -5.6%	61/77
↳ Utilities	0.0%0	0.3%5,012	▼ -0.3%	21/77
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	0.4%12	5.7%82,805	▼ -5.3%	61/77
Information	2.0%61	3.5%51,095	▼ -1.5%	13/77
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	3.1%93	10.8%157,520	▼ -7.7%	52/77
↳ Finance & Insurance	1.2%38	8.6%125,824	▼ -7.4%	51/77
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.8%55	2.2%31,696	▼ -0.4%	31/77
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	2.9%87	23.2%339,220	▼ -20.3%	70/77
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	0.7%20	14.2%207,444	▼ -13.5%	66/77
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%0	1.2%16,872	▼ -1.2%	36/77
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	2.2%67	7.9%114,904	▼ -5.7%	58/77
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	43.7%1,332	23.0%336,089	▲ +20.7%	17/77
↳ Educational Services	18.1%553	9.2%134,671	▲ +8.9%	8/77
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	25.5%779	13.8%201,418	▲ +11.8%	22/77
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	7.3%223	10.3%151,055	▼ -3.0%	55/77
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	1.2%37	1.9%27,339	▼ -0.7%	23/77
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	6.1%186	8.5%123,716	▼ -2.4%	57/77
Other Services	14.0%426	4.0%59,136	▲ +9.9%	3/77
Public Administration	0.0%0	3.5%51,418	▼ -3.5%	19/77
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.0%181	0.0%569	0.0%423	– 0.0 pp▲ +242– 0.0 pp▼ −146– 0.0 pp▲ +388
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.0%140	0.0%374	0.0%36	– 0.0 pp▼ −104– 0.0 pp▼ −338– 0.0 pp▲ +234
Construction	2.2%86	4.1%139	3.4%103	▲ +1.2 pp▲ +17▼ −0.7 pp▼ −36▲ +1.8 pp▲ +53
Chicago citywide	1.6%20,789	1.8%26,012	1.9%27,207	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,418– 0.0 pp▲ +1,195▲ +0.3 pp▲ +5,223
Manufacturing	3.6%139	5.2%178	8.1%246	▲ +4.5 pp▲ +107▲ +2.9 pp▲ +68▲ +1.6 pp▲ +39
Chicago citywide	4.6%61,066	4.5%63,597	4.4%64,747	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,681▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,150▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,531
Wholesale Trade	7.8%301	9.2%315	5.4%166	▼ −2.3 pp▼ −135▼ −3.7 pp▼ −149▲ +1.4 pp▲ +14
Chicago citywide	3.0%39,431	2.9%41,789	2.8%41,460	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,029▼ −0.1 pp▼ −329▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,358
Retail Trade	9.1%350	10.5%361	9.8%300	▲ +0.8 pp▼ −50▼ −0.7 pp▼ −61▲ +1.5 pp▲ +11
Chicago citywide	7.4%97,262	6.9%97,836	6.6%96,413	▼ −0.8 pp▼ −849▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,423▼ −0.5 pp▲ +574
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	0.7%27	0.4%15	0.4%12	▼ −0.3 pp▼ −15– 0.0 pp▼ −3▼ −0.3 pp▼ −12
Chicago citywide	5.4%71,320	5.6%79,303	6.0%87,817	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +16,497▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,514▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,983
Utilities	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,383	0.3%4,956	0.3%5,012	– 0.0 pp▲ +629– 0.0 pp▲ +56– 0.0 pp▲ +573
Transportation & Warehousing	0.7%27	0.4%15	0.4%12	▼ −0.3 pp▼ −15– 0.0 pp▼ −3▼ −0.3 pp▼ −12
Chicago citywide	5.1%66,937	5.2%74,347	5.7%82,805	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +15,868▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,458▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,410
Information	4.1%158	2.7%93	2.0%61	▼ −2.1 pp▼ −97▼ −0.7 pp▼ −32▼ −1.4 pp▼ −65
Chicago citywide	3.1%40,514	3.4%48,135	3.5%51,095	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +10,581▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,960▲ +0.3 pp▲ +7,621
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	3.0%117	2.9%99	3.1%93	– 0.0 pp▼ −24▲ +0.2 pp▼ −6▼ −0.1 pp▼ −18
Chicago citywide	10.5%138,287	10.6%150,163	10.8%157,520	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +19,233▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,357▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,876
Finance & Insurance	1.0%39	1.4%49	1.2%38	▲ +0.2 pp▼ −1▼ −0.2 pp▼ −11▲ +0.4 pp▲ +10
Chicago citywide	8.5%111,307	8.4%119,147	8.6%125,824	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14,517▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,677▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7,840
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	2.0%78	1.5%50	1.8%55	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −23▲ +0.3 pp▲ +5▼ −0.6 pp▼ −28
Chicago citywide	2.1%26,980	2.2%31,016	2.2%31,696	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,716– 0.0 pp▲ +680▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,036
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	8.4%325	6.5%223	2.9%87	▼ −5.6 pp▼ −238▼ −3.7 pp▼ −136▼ −1.9 pp▼ −102
Chicago citywide	21.2%278,928	22.6%319,744	23.2%339,220	▲ +2.0 pp▲ +60,292▲ +0.6 pp▲ +19,476▲ +1.3 pp▲ +40,816
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	0.7%26	0.6%20	0.7%20	– 0.0 pp▼ −6▲ +0.1 pp– 0▼ −0.1 pp▼ −6
Chicago citywide	11.8%155,200	12.9%182,462	14.2%207,444	▲ +2.4 pp▲ +52,244▲ +1.3 pp▲ +24,982▲ +1.1 pp▲ +27,262
Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.1%3	0.0%0	0.0%0	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −3– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.1 pp▼ −3
Chicago citywide	1.0%13,619	1.2%16,600	1.2%16,872	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,253– 0.0 pp▲ +272▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,981
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	7.7%296	5.9%203	2.2%67	▼ −5.5 pp▼ −229▼ −3.7 pp▼ −136▼ −1.7 pp▼ −93
Chicago citywide	8.4%110,109	8.5%120,682	7.9%114,904	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +4,795▼ −0.7 pp▼ −5,778▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,573
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	46.4%1,792	41.7%1,428	43.7%1,332	▼ −2.7 pp▼ −460▲ +2.0 pp▼ −96▼ −4.7 pp▼ −364
Chicago citywide	23.5%308,633	22.1%313,540	23.0%336,089	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +27,456▲ +0.8 pp▲ +22,549▼ −1.4 pp▲ +4,907
Educational Services	24.3%939	18.4%629	18.1%553	▼ −6.2 pp▼ −386▼ −0.2 pp▼ −76▼ −5.9 pp▼ −310
Chicago citywide	10.1%132,909	9.0%128,169	9.2%134,671	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +1,762▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,502▼ −1.1 pp▼ −4,740
Health Care & Social Assistance	22.1%853	23.3%799	25.5%779	▲ +3.5 pp▼ −74▲ +2.2 pp▼ −20▲ +1.2 pp▼ −54
Chicago citywide	13.4%175,724	13.1%185,371	13.8%201,418	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +25,694▲ +0.7 pp▲ +16,047▼ −0.3 pp▲ +9,647
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	10.0%387	8.0%274	7.3%223	▼ −2.7 pp▼ −164▼ −0.7 pp▼ −51▼ −2.0 pp▼ −113
Chicago citywide	10.9%143,753	11.5%162,749	10.3%151,055	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,302▼ −1.2 pp▼ −11,694▲ +0.5 pp▲ +18,996
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	1.0%37	0.9%30	1.2%37	▲ +0.3 pp– 0▲ +0.3 pp▲ +7▼ −0.1 pp▼ −7
Chicago citywide	1.7%22,179	2.1%30,178	1.9%27,339	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +5,160▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,839▲ +0.4 pp▲ +7,999
Accommodation & Food Services	9.1%350	7.1%244	6.1%186	▼ −3.0 pp▼ −164▼ −1.0 pp▼ −58▼ −1.9 pp▼ −106
Chicago citywide	9.3%121,574	9.4%132,571	8.5%123,716	▼ −0.8 pp▲ +2,142▼ −0.9 pp▼ −8,855▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,997
Other Services	4.6%176	8.8%302	14.0%426	▲ +9.4 pp▲ +250▲ +5.2 pp▲ +124▲ +4.3 pp▲ +126
Chicago citywide	4.5%59,098	4.4%61,698	4.0%59,136	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +38▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,562▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,600
Public Administration	0.2%7	0.0%0	0.0%0	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −7– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.2 pp▼ −7
Chicago citywide	4.2%54,814	3.6%51,684	3.5%51,418	▼ −0.7 pp▼ −3,396▼ −0.1 pp▼ −266▼ −0.5 pp▼ −3,130

Earnings of Jobs in Greater Grand Crossing

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	21.5%656
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	35.2%1,072
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	43.3%1,321
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	21.5%656	12.7%185,293	▲ +8.9%	17/77
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	35.2%1,072	20.5%299,468	▲ +14.7%	24/77
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	43.3%1,321	66.9%978,839	▼ -23.6%	60/77
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	29.8%1,153	26.0%892	21.5%656	▼ −8.3 pp▼ −497▼ −4.5 pp▼ −236▼ −3.8 pp▼ −261
Chicago citywide	21.3%280,137	16.8%238,135	12.7%185,293	▼ −8.7 pp▼ −94,844▼ −4.1 pp▼ −52,842▼ −4.5 pp▼ −42,002
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	40.6%1,571	40.5%1,387	35.2%1,072	▼ −5.5 pp▼ −499▼ −5.3 pp▼ −315▼ −0.2 pp▼ −184
Chicago citywide	30.7%403,220	26.7%378,530	20.5%299,468	▼ −10.2 pp▼ −103,752▼ −6.3 pp▼ −79,062▼ −4.0 pp▼ −24,690
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	29.5%1,141	33.5%1,148	43.3%1,321	▲ +13.8 pp▲ +180▲ +9.8 pp▲ +173▲ +4.0 pp▲ +7
Chicago citywide	48.0%630,719	56.5%800,154	66.9%978,839	▲ +18.9 pp▲ +348,120▲ +10.4 pp▲ +178,685▲ +8.5 pp▲ +169,435

Jobs in Greater Grand Crossing by Firm Age

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Firm age: 0–1 years	3.4%91
Firm age: 2–3 years	2.2%58
Firm age: 4–5 years	4.1%108
Firm age: 6–10 years	14.4%381
Firm age: 11 or more years	75.9%2,013
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years	3.4%91	2.8%37,293	▲ +0.6%	35/77
Firm age: 2–3 years	2.2%58	2.8%37,154	▼ -0.6%	53/77
Firm age: 4–5 years	4.1%108	3.2%41,869	▲ +0.9%	29/77
Firm age: 6–10 years	14.4%381	7.8%102,353	▲ +6.6%	7/77
Firm age: 11 or more years	75.9%2,013	83.4%1,098,220	▼ -7.5%	48/77
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years	4.3%135	2.4%71	3.4%91	▼ −0.8 pp▼ −44▲ +1.0 pp▲ +20▼ −1.9 pp▼ −64
Chicago citywide	2.9%33,224	2.6%33,244	2.8%37,293	– 0.0 pp▲ +4,069▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,049▼ −0.2 pp▲ +20
Firm age: 2–3 years	2.4%77	5.9%174	2.2%58	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −19▼ −3.7 pp▼ −116▲ +3.5 pp▲ +97
Chicago citywide	4.0%46,935	3.3%42,284	2.8%37,154	▼ −1.2 pp▼ −9,781▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,130▼ −0.7 pp▼ −4,651
Firm age: 4–5 years	5.0%158	7.7%228	4.1%108	▼ −0.9 pp▼ −50▼ −3.7 pp▼ −120▲ +2.8 pp▲ +70
Chicago citywide	3.7%42,688	3.6%46,058	3.2%41,869	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −819▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,189▼ −0.1 pp▲ +3,370
Firm age: 6–10 years	6.6%210	5.8%171	14.4%381	▲ +7.7 pp▲ +171▲ +8.6 pp▲ +210▼ −0.8 pp▼ −39
Chicago citywide	8.2%94,955	8.6%109,934	7.8%102,353	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +7,398▼ −0.9 pp▼ −7,581▲ +0.5 pp▲ +14,979
Firm age: 11 or more years	81.7%2,585	78.1%2,298	75.9%2,013	▼ −5.7 pp▼ −572▼ −2.2 pp▼ −285▼ −3.6 pp▼ −287
Chicago citywide	81.3%946,801	81.8%1,043,037	83.4%1,098,220	▲ +2.1 pp▲ +151,419▲ +1.6 pp▲ +55,183▲ +0.5 pp▲ +96,236

Jobs in Greater Grand Crossing by Firm Size

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Firm size: 0–19 employees	33.1%877
Firm size: 20–49 employees	13.3%352
Firm size: 50–249 employees	30.7%813
Firm size: 250–499 employees	2.8%75
Firm size: 500 or more employees	20.1%534
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees	33.1%877	12.8%168,975	▲ +20.3%	12/77
Firm size: 20–49 employees	13.3%352	7.3%96,404	▲ +6.0%	18/77
Firm size: 50–249 employees	30.7%813	13.8%181,123	▲ +16.9%	6/77
Firm size: 250–499 employees	2.8%75	5.7%74,787	▼ -2.8%	44/77
Firm size: 500 or more employees	20.1%534	60.4%795,600	▼ -40.3%	73/77
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees	26.9%852	27.7%814	33.1%877	▲ +6.2 pp▲ +25▲ +5.4 pp▲ +63▲ +0.7 pp▼ −38
Chicago citywide	13.9%162,248	13.3%169,949	12.8%168,975	▼ −1.1 pp▲ +6,727▼ −0.5 pp▼ −974▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,701
Firm size: 20–49 employees	9.3%294	18.7%551	13.3%352	▲ +4.0 pp▲ +58▼ −5.5 pp▼ −199▲ +9.4 pp▲ +257
Chicago citywide	8.4%97,503	8.2%103,945	7.3%96,404	▼ −1.1 pp▼ −1,099▼ −0.8 pp▼ −7,541▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,442
Firm size: 50–249 employees	24.5%775	26.8%787	30.7%813	▲ +6.2 pp▲ +38▲ +3.9 pp▲ +26▲ +2.3 pp▲ +12
Chicago citywide	15.7%183,275	14.9%189,930	13.8%181,123	▼ −2.0 pp▼ −2,152▼ −1.1 pp▼ −8,807▼ −0.8 pp▲ +6,655
Firm size: 250–499 employees	7.1%226	2.2%64	2.8%75	▼ −4.3 pp▼ −151▲ +0.7 pp▲ +11▼ −5.0 pp▼ −162
Chicago citywide	6.3%72,992	5.9%74,603	5.7%74,787	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,795▼ −0.2 pp▲ +184▼ −0.4 pp▲ +1,611
Firm size: 500 or more employees	32.2%1,018	24.7%726	20.1%534	▼ −12.0 pp▼ −484▼ −4.5 pp▼ −192▼ −7.5 pp▼ −292
Chicago citywide	55.7%648,585	57.8%736,130	60.4%795,600	▲ +4.7 pp▲ +147,015▲ +2.7 pp▲ +59,470▲ +2.1 pp▲ +87,545

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	15.1% ±2.1 pp15.1%±2.1 pp4,397 ±624
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	88.7% ±3.8 pp13.4%±0.6 pp3,902 ±167
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	11.3% ±5.8 pp1.7%±0.9 pp495 ±254
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	15.1%±2.1 pp15.1%±2.1 pp4,397±624	13.5%±0.2 pp13.5%±0.2 pp365,577±5,480	▲ +1.6%▲ +1.6%	43/77
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	88.7%±3.8 pp13.4%±0.6 pp3,902±167	83.0%±0.5 pp11.2%±0.1 pp303,520±1,897	▲ +5.7%▲ +2.2%	32/7735/77
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	11.3%±5.8 pp1.7%±0.9 pp495±254	17.0%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.1 pp62,057±2,247	▼ -5.7%▼ -0.6%	46/7747/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	2.8% ±0.9 pp2.8%±0.9 pp819 ±273
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	60.1% ±9.7 pp1.7%±0.3 pp492 ±79
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	39.9% ±21.4 pp1.1%±0.6 pp327 ±175
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	86.2% ±40.5 pp2.4%±1.1 pp706 ±332
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	13.8% ±14.6 pp0.4%±0.4 pp113 ±119
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	2.8%±0.9 pp2.8%±0.9 pp819±273	7.4%±0.1 pp7.4%±0.1 pp201,851±4,036	▼ -4.6%▼ -4.6%	77/77
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	60.1%±9.7 pp1.7%±0.3 pp492±79	52.4%±0.7 pp3.9%±0.1 pp105,720±1,511	▲ +7.7%▼ -2.2%	42/7775/77
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	39.9%±21.4 pp1.1%±0.6 pp327±175	47.6%±1.2 pp3.5%±0.1 pp96,131±2,437	▼ -7.7%▼ -2.4%	36/7767/77
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	86.2%±40.5 pp2.4%±1.1 pp706±332	67.0%±1.0 pp5.0%±0.1 pp135,301±1,945	▲ +19.2%▼ -2.6%	11/7774/77
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	13.8%±14.6 pp0.4%±0.4 pp113±119	33.0%±1.2 pp2.5%±0.1 pp66,550±2,459	▼ -19.2%▼ -2.1%	67/7775/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	3.2% ±2.7 pp149 ±127
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	7.9% ±8.5 pp65 ±69
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	3.2%±2.7 pp149±127	5.9%±0.5 pp—	▼ -2.7%	49/77
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	7.9%±8.5 pp65±69	5.4%±0.6 pp—	▲ +2.5%	10/77
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Owner-Occupied Households	36.3% ±3.7 pp4,670 ±476
Renter-Occupied Households	63.7% ±3.8 pp8,187 ±491
Owner-Occupied Residents	37.0% ±4.2 pp10,562 ±1,201
Renter-Occupied Residents	63.0% ±4.2 pp18,015 ±1,205
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Owner-Occupied Households	36.3%±3.7 pp4,670±476	46.0%±0.4 pp534,012±4,939	▼ -9.7%	59/77
Renter-Occupied Households	63.7%±3.8 pp8,187±491	54.0%±0.4 pp626,193±5,183	▲ +9.7%	19/77
Owner-Occupied Residents	37.0%±4.2 pp10,562±1,201	51.8%±0.5 pp1,377,219±13,574	▼ -14.9%	62/77
Renter-Occupied Residents	63.0%±4.2 pp18,015±1,205	48.2%±0.5 pp1,280,665±13,500	▲ +14.9%	16/77
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Median Year Moved In	2013±1.1 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later	4.5% ±1.7 pp582 ±222
Moved in 2020 to 2022	20.1% ±3.8 pp2,588 ±491
Moved in 2010 to 2019	39.1% ±4.3 pp5,025 ±550
Moved in 2000 to 2009	12.6% ±2.9 pp1,616 ±368
Moved in 1990 to 1999	8.2% ±2.2 pp1,048 ±287
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	15.5% ±2.7 pp1,998 ±342
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Moved In	2013±1.1 yr	2015±1.0 yr	▼ −2	33/77
Moved in 2023 or Later	4.5%±1.7 pp582±222	5.9%±0.2 pp68,884±2,742	▼ -1.4%	32/77
Moved in 2020 to 2022	20.1%±3.8 pp2,588±491	24.1%±0.4 pp279,417±5,059	▼ -4.0%	30/77
Moved in 2010 to 2019	39.1%±4.3 pp5,025±550	39.2%±0.5 pp455,125±5,772	▼ -0.1%	41/77
Moved in 2000 to 2009	12.6%±2.9 pp1,616±368	13.8%±0.3 pp160,353±3,324	▼ -1.3%	59/77
Moved in 1990 to 1999	8.2%±2.2 pp1,048±287	8.2%±0.2 pp95,243±2,390	▼ -0.1%	41/77
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	15.5%±2.7 pp1,998±342	8.7%±0.2 pp101,183±2,362	▲ +6.8%	20/77
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	10.4% ±2.7 pp10.4%±2.7 pp3,000 ±780
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	8.9% ±2.3 pp85.7%±31.4 pp2,572 ±664
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.1% ±0.2 pp1.3%±1.7 pp38 ±52
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	0.3% ±0.2 pp2.4%±2.2 pp73 ±70
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	1.1% ±1.4 pp10.6%±13.4 pp317 ±412
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	10.4%±2.7 pp10.4%±2.7 pp3,000±780	14.0%±0.3 pp14.0%±0.3 pp375,475±8,289	▼ -3.6%▼ -3.6%	35/77
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	8.9%±2.3 pp85.7%±31.4 pp2,572±664	9.8%±0.3 pp69.9%±1.0 pp262,365±6,953	▼ -0.9%▲ +15.9%	32/7718/77
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.1%±0.2 pp1.3%±1.7 pp38±52	0.8%±0.1 pp5.5%±0.4 pp20,552±1,626	▼ -0.6%▼ -4.2%	58/7761/77
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	0.3%±0.2 pp2.4%±2.2 pp73±70	2.5%±0.1 pp17.6%±0.7 pp65,936±2,918	▼ -2.2%▼ -15.1%	64/7769/77
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	1.1%±1.4 pp10.6%±13.4 pp317±412	1.0%±0.1 pp7.1%±0.8 pp26,622±3,040	▲ +0.1%▲ +3.5%	25/7720/77
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	17.7% ±2.2 pp17.7%±2.2 pp2,763 ±343
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	3.3% ±1.0 pp18.7%±5.4 pp516 ±161
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.4% ±0.4 pp2.3%±2.5 pp64 ±69
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.1% ±0.3 pp0.3%±1.7 pp9 ±46
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	13.9% ±2.0 pp78.7%±5.5 pp2,174 ±310
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	5.9% ±1.8 pp5.9%±1.8 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	1.3% ±1.5 pp1.3%±1.5 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	17.7%±2.2 pp17.7%±2.2 pp2,763±343	9.1%±0.2 pp9.1%±0.2 pp116,849±2,682	▲ +8.5%▲ +8.5%	10/77
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	3.3%±1.0 pp18.7%±5.4 pp516±161	2.5%±0.1 pp27.1%±1.4 pp31,723±1,796	▲ +0.8%▼ -8.5%	18/7749/77
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.4%±0.4 pp2.3%±2.5 pp64±69	0.6%±0.1 pp6.0%±0.7 pp7,037±795	▼ -0.1%▼ -3.7%	39/7759/77
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.1%±0.3 pp0.3%±1.7 pp9±46	0.2%±0.0 pp2.4%±0.5 pp2,831±587	▼ -0.2%▼ -2.1%	35/7737/77
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	13.9%±2.0 pp78.7%±5.5 pp2,174±310	5.9%±0.3 pp64.4%±2.5 pp75,258±3,387	▲ +8.0%▲ +14.3%	8/7716/77
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	5.9%±1.8 pp5.9%±1.8 pp—	4.8%±0.3 pp4.8%±0.3 pp—	▲ +1.1%▲ +1.1%	27/77
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	1.3%±1.5 pp1.3%±1.5 pp—	1.3%±0.1 pp1.3%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.1%▲ +0.1%	25/77
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Median Year Built	1944±2 yr
Pre-1940	53.2% ±3.4 pp8,305 ±533
1940-2009	44.4% ±4.4 pp6,936 ±687
2010+	2.4% ±1.0 pp379 ±155
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Built	1944±2 yr	1953±1 yr	▼ −9 yrs	55/77
Pre-1940	53.2%±3.4 pp8,305±533	38.8%±0.4 pp495,715±4,678	▲ +14.4%	17/77
1940-2009	44.4%±4.4 pp6,936±687	54.9%±0.6 pp700,698±7,435	▼ -10.5%	58/77
2010+	2.4%±1.0 pp379±155	6.3%±0.2 pp80,641±2,725	▼ -3.9%	44/77
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Population Density	8,225 /sq mi±509/sq mi
Single-Family Homes	31.3% ±3.1 pp4,896 ±486
Buildings With 2–4 Units	39.9% ±3.7 pp6,235 ±578
Buildings With 5–19 Units	21.3% ±3.4 pp3,323 ±533
Buildings With 20 or More Units	7.0% ±1.7 pp1,099 ±271
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Population Density	8,225 /sq mi±509/sq mi	11,748 /sq mi±26/sq mi	▼ −3,523 /sq mi	57/77
Single-Family Homes	31.3%±3.1 pp4,896±486	29.2%±0.3 pp372,679±3,989	▲ +2.2%	42/77
Buildings With 2–4 Units	39.9%±3.7 pp6,235±578	27.4%±0.4 pp349,976±4,957	▲ +12.5%	22/77
Buildings With 5–19 Units	21.3%±3.4 pp3,323±533	16.2%±0.3 pp206,420±4,124	▲ +5.1%	19/77
Buildings With 20 or More Units	7.0%±1.7 pp1,099±271	27.0%±0.3 pp344,543±4,438	▼ -19.9%	39/77
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Studio	4.4% ±1.7 pp685 ±264
1 Bedroom	13.1% ±2.2 pp2,052 ±347
2 Bedrooms	36.6% ±3.7 pp5,721 ±585
3 Bedrooms	31.9% ±3.3 pp4,979 ±520
4 Bedrooms	10.3% ±1.9 pp1,613 ±290
5 or More Bedrooms	3.6% ±1.3 pp570 ±201
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Studio	4.4%±1.7 pp685±264	7.5%±0.3 pp95,749±3,205	▼ -3.1%	31/77
1 Bedroom	13.1%±2.2 pp2,052±347	20.1%±0.4 pp257,271±4,939	▼ -7.0%	45/77
2 Bedrooms	36.6%±3.7 pp5,721±585	33.1%±0.3 pp422,866±4,221	▲ +3.5%	17/77
3 Bedrooms	31.9%±3.3 pp4,979±520	26.1%±0.3 pp333,682±4,061	▲ +5.7%	39/77
4 Bedrooms	10.3%±1.9 pp1,613±290	9.0%±0.2 pp115,453±2,426	▲ +1.3%	36/77
5 or More Bedrooms	3.6%±1.3 pp570±201	4.1%±0.2 pp52,033±2,072	▼ -0.4%	46/77
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	2.0% ±1.4 pp2.0%±1.4 pp261 ±184
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	0.7% ±0.8 pp35.2%±31.8 pp92 ±105
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	1.3% ±1.2 pp64.8%±35.6 pp169 ±151
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	2.0%±1.4 pp2.0%±1.4 pp261±184	3.4%±0.2 pp3.4%±0.2 pp39,979±1,996	▼ -1.4%▼ -1.4%	54/77
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	0.7%±0.8 pp35.2%±31.8 pp92±105	2.0%±0.1 pp58.2%±2.3 pp23,276±1,493	▼ -1.3%▼ -23.0%	61/7765/76
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	1.3%±1.2 pp64.8%±35.6 pp169±151	1.4%±0.1 pp41.8%±2.6 pp16,703±1,328	▼ -0.1%▲ +23.0%	30/7712/76
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Natural Gas Heat	82.5% ±3.4 pp10,613 ±440
Electric Heat	10.6% ±2.8 pp1,368 ±363
Other Heating Source	6.8% ±2.3 pp876 ±294
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Natural Gas Heat	82.5%±3.4 pp10,613±440	77.5%±0.3 pp899,660±3,501	▲ +5.0%	47/77
Electric Heat	10.6%±2.8 pp1,368±363	18.0%±0.3 pp208,937±3,864	▼ -7.4%	36/77
Other Heating Source	6.8%±2.3 pp876±294	4.4%±0.2 pp51,603±2,173	▲ +2.4%	11/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	29.5% ±4.0 pp3,797 ±516
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	18.7% ±3.4 pp2,408 ±431
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	51.7% ±4.1 pp6,652 ±521
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	29.9% ±3.5 pp3,846 ±449
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	20.9% ±4.8 pp1,504 ±345
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	19.8% ±4.5 pp1,426 ±323
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	59.4% ±5.1 pp4,282 ±366
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	33.7% ±4.6 pp2,427 ±330
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	43.4% ±6.8 pp1,960 ±307
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	17.1% ±4.9 pp771 ±222
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	39.6% ±6.2 pp1,787 ±280
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	23.9% ±5.2 pp1,082 ±235
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	31.5% ±7.9 pp871 ±219
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	24.0% ±6.8 pp663 ±189
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	44.6% ±8.1 pp1,234 ±225
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	28.2% ±7.1 pp780 ±196
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	62.2% ±10.8 pp1,089 ±189
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	6.2% ±6.1 pp108 ±108
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	31.6% ±9.5 pp553 ±166
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	17.3% ±7.2 pp302 ±126
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	29.5%±4.0 pp3,797±516	24.9%±0.5 pp289,047±6,215	▲ +4.6%	63/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	18.7%±3.4 pp2,408±431	23.8%±0.5 pp276,514±5,809	▼ -5.1%	60/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	51.7%±4.1 pp6,652±521	45.6%±0.6 pp529,378±6,577	▲ +6.1%	9/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	29.9%±3.5 pp3,846±449	24.0%±0.5 pp278,684±5,306	▲ +5.9%	11/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	20.9%±4.8 pp1,504±345	26.4%±0.5 pp156,016±3,135	▼ -5.5%	56/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	19.8%±4.5 pp1,426±323	25.3%±0.5 pp149,232±2,940	▼ -5.5%	52/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	59.4%±5.1 pp4,282±366	48.3%±0.7 pp285,666±4,223	▲ +11.0%	23/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	33.7%±4.6 pp2,427±330	25.5%±0.6 pp150,396±3,556	▲ +8.2%	27/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	43.4%±6.8 pp1,960±307	51.6%±0.6 pp272,313±2,905	▼ -8.2%	70/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	17.1%±4.9 pp771±222	19.6%±0.5 pp103,679±2,760	▼ -2.6%	56/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	39.6%±6.2 pp1,787±280	28.8%±0.6 pp152,025±3,034	▲ +10.8%	3/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	23.9%±5.2 pp1,082±235	13.8%±0.4 pp73,065±2,234	▲ +10.1%	2/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	31.5%±7.9 pp871±219	42.8%±0.7 pp146,237±2,365	▼ -11.3%	68/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	24.0%±6.8 pp663±189	23.9%±0.7 pp81,678±2,408	▲ +0.1%	39/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	44.6%±8.1 pp1,234±225	33.3%±0.8 pp113,910±2,596	▲ +11.3%	8/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	28.2%±7.1 pp780±196	15.4%±0.5 pp52,647±1,874	▲ +12.8%	4/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	62.2%±10.8 pp1,089±189	67.7%±0.9 pp126,078±1,613	▼ -5.5%	63/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	6.2%±6.1 pp108±108	11.8%±0.7 pp22,001±1,275	▼ -5.6%	67/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	31.6%±9.5 pp553±166	20.5%±0.8 pp38,115±1,492	▲ +11.1%	5/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	17.3%±7.2 pp302±126	11.0%±0.6 pp20,417±1,203	▲ +6.3%	4/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$362±$55
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$743±$85
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,143±$46
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,495±$67
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,991±$102
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$362±$55	$594±$11	▼ −$233	65/77
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$743±$85	$1,011±$8	▼ −$268	58/77
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,143±$46	$1,560±$10	▼ −$417	60/77
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,495±$67	$2,329±$13	▼ −$834	65/77
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,991±$102	Over $3,000	▼ −$1,009+	65/77
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$377 ±44	$472 ±59	$362 ±55	▼ −$16▼ −$110▲ +$95
Chicago citywide	$609 ±7	$606 ±7	$594 ±11	▼ −$15▼ −$12▼ −$2
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$285 ±33	$385 ±48	$362 ±55	▲ +$77▼ −$23▲ +$100
Chicago citywide	$459 ±6	$494 ±6	$594 ±11	▲ +$135▲ +$100▲ +$35
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$800 ±40	$790 ±44	$743 ±85	▼ −$57▼ −$47▼ −$10
Chicago citywide	$992 ±5	$1,001 ±5	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$19▲ +$10▲ +$9
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$604 ±30	$644 ±36	$743 ±85	▲ +$139▲ +$99▲ +$40
Chicago citywide	$748 ±3	$816 ±4	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$262▲ +$195▲ +$67
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,143 ±35	$1,127 ±33	$1,143 ±46	– $0▲ +$16▼ −$16
Chicago citywide	$1,493 ±8	$1,523 ±6	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$67▲ +$37▲ +$29
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$863 ±26	$918 ±27	$1,143 ±46	▲ +$280▲ +$225▲ +$56
Chicago citywide	$1,127 ±6	$1,241 ±5	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$433▲ +$319▲ +$114
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,663 ±58	$1,592 ±44	$1,495 ±67	▼ −$168▼ −$96▼ −$71
Chicago citywide	$2,333 ±12	$2,326 ±10	$2,329 ±13	▼ −$4▲ +$3▼ −$7
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,255 ±44	$1,297 ±36	$1,495 ±67	▲ +$240▲ +$198▲ +$42
Chicago citywide	$1,761 ±9	$1,896 ±8	$2,329 ±13	▲ +$569▲ +$434▲ +$135
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,274 ±104	$2,047 ±89	$1,991 ±102	▼ −$283▼ −$56▼ −$227
Chicago citywide	—	$3,316 ±20	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,716 ±79	$1,669 ±73	$1,991 ±102	▲ +$275▲ +$323▼ −$48
Chicago citywide	—	$2,703 ±16	—	———

Rent

Rent measure

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,182±$65
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$393±$55
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$781±$114
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,094±$47
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,391±$64
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,798±$81
⚠ 12% of the population in this district had suppressed census data for this variable. Estimate may not be representative.
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,182±$65	$1,613±$12	▼ −$431	58/77
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$393±$55	$696±$20	▼ −$303	61/77
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$781±$114	$1,043±$8	▼ −$262	65/77
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,094±$47	$1,440±$10	▼ −$346	62/77
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,391±$64	$2,021±$21	▼ −$630	64/77
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,798±$81	$2,738±$29	▼ −$940	63/77
⚠ 12% of the population in this district had suppressed census data for this variable. Estimate may not be representative.
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Average Rent	$884±$34
10th Percentile Rent	$258±$76
25th Percentile Rent	$621±$90
Median Rent	$892±$55
75th Percentile Rent	$1,183±$44
90th Percentile Rent	$1,436±$59
⚠ 12% of the population in this district had suppressed census data for this variable. Estimate may not be representative.
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent	$884±$34	$1,452±$11	▼ −$568	69/77
10th Percentile Rent	$258±$76	$564±$21	▼ −$306	64/77
25th Percentile Rent	$621±$90	$913±$7	▼ −$292	64/77
Median Rent	$892±$55	$1,262±$12	▼ −$370	68/77
75th Percentile Rent	$1,183±$44	$1,868±$13	▼ −$685	61/77
90th Percentile Rent	$1,436±$59	$2,528±$38	▼ −$1,093	63/77
⚠ 12% of the population in this district had suppressed census data for this variable. Estimate may not be representative.
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,641±$130
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,033±$103
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,276±$95
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,672±$132
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,179±$180
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,760±$284
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,641±$130	$2,734±$24	▼ −$1,092	64/77
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,033±$103	$1,270±$14	▼ −$237	60/77
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,276±$95	$1,697±$14	▼ −$421	64/77
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,672±$132	$2,339±$17	▼ −$667	63/77
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,179±$180	$3,269±$31	▼ −$1,090	58/77
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,760±$284	Over $4,000	▼ −$1,240+	58/77
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,987 ±69	$1,775 ±101	$1,641 ±130	▼ −$345▼ −$133▼ −$212
Chicago citywide	$2,855 ±19	$2,793 ±23	$2,734 ±24	▼ −$121▼ −$60▼ −$61
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,499 ±52	$1,446 ±83	$1,641 ±130	▲ +$142▲ +$195▼ −$53
Chicago citywide	$2,154 ±14	$2,277 ±19	$2,734 ±24	▲ +$579▲ +$457▲ +$122
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,193 ±136	$1,093 ±165	$1,033 ±103	▼ −$160▼ −$60▼ −$100
Chicago citywide	$1,403 ±11	$1,356 ±11	$1,270 ±14	▼ −$133▼ −$86▼ −$47
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$900 ±103	$891 ±134	$1,033 ±103	▲ +$133▲ +$142▼ −$9
Chicago citywide	$1,059 ±8	$1,105 ±9	$1,270 ±14	▲ +$212▲ +$165▲ +$46
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,444 ±72	$1,396 ±98	$1,276 ±95	▼ −$167▼ −$119▼ −$48
Chicago citywide	$1,874 ±12	$1,800 ±12	$1,697 ±14	▼ −$177▼ −$103▼ −$74
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,089 ±54	$1,137 ±80	$1,276 ±95	▲ +$187▲ +$139▲ +$48
Chicago citywide	$1,414 ±9	$1,467 ±10	$1,697 ±14	▲ +$283▲ +$230▲ +$53
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,906 ±121	$1,738 ±71	$1,672 ±132	▼ −$234▼ −$66▼ −$168
Chicago citywide	$2,526 ±13	$2,422 ±13	$2,339 ±17	▼ −$187▼ −$83▼ −$103
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,439 ±91	$1,417 ±58	$1,672 ±132	▲ +$233▲ +$256▼ −$22
Chicago citywide	$1,906 ±10	$1,974 ±11	$2,339 ±17	▲ +$433▲ +$365▲ +$68
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,496 ±104	$2,201 ±115	$2,179 ±180	▼ −$317▼ −$22▼ −$295
Chicago citywide	$3,447 ±25	$3,343 ±25	$3,269 ±31	▼ −$178▼ −$74▼ −$104
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,884 ±78	$1,794 ±94	$2,179 ±180	▲ +$295▲ +$385▼ −$90
Chicago citywide	$2,601 ±19	$2,724 ±20	$3,269 ±31	▲ +$668▲ +$544▲ +$123
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$3,031 ±137	$2,708 ±294	$2,760 ±284	▼ −$271▲ +$52▼ −$323
Chicago citywide	—	$4,578 ±59	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$2,288 ±103	$2,207 ±239	$2,760 ±284	▲ +$472▲ +$553▼ −$80
Chicago citywide	—	$3,731 ±48	—	———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$793±$96
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$294±$90
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$541±$89
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$786±$117
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,032±$135
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,278±$119
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$793±$96	$1,078±$22	▼ −$285	48/77
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$294±$90	$418±$8	▼ −$124	72/77
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$541±$89	$601±$8	▼ −$60	51/77
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$786±$117	$859±$10	▼ −$73	39/77
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,032±$135	$1,197±$18	▼ −$165	38/77
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,278±$119	Over $1,500	▼ −$222+	37/77
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$666 ±53	$769 ±71	$793 ±96	▲ +$127▲ +$24▲ +$103
Chicago citywide	$957 ±15	$1,028 ±10	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$121▲ +$50▲ +$71
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$502 ±40	$626 ±58	$793 ±96	▲ +$290▲ +$166▲ +$124
Chicago citywide	$722 ±11	$838 ±8	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$355▲ +$240▲ +$116
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$339 ±47	$463 ±71	$294 ±90	▼ −$45▼ −$169▲ +$124
Chicago citywide	$429 ±6	$469 ±7	$418 ±8	▼ −$11▼ −$51▲ +$40
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$256 ±35	$377 ±58	$294 ±90	▲ +$38▼ −$83▲ +$122
Chicago citywide	$324 ±5	$382 ±5	$418 ±8	▲ +$95▲ +$36▲ +$59
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$474 ±65	$559 ±35	$541 ±89	▲ +$67▼ −$18▲ +$86
Chicago citywide	$586 ±6	$629 ±6	$601 ±8	▲ +$14▼ −$28▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$357 ±49	$456 ±29	$541 ±89	▲ +$183▲ +$85▲ +$98
Chicago citywide	$442 ±4	$513 ±5	$601 ±8	▲ +$158▲ +$88▲ +$70
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$641 ±53	$712 ±69	$786 ±117	▲ +$145▲ +$74▲ +$71
Chicago citywide	$815 ±9	$860 ±7	$859 ±10	▲ +$44▼ −$1▲ +$45
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$484 ±40	$580 ±56	$786 ±117	▲ +$302▲ +$206▲ +$96
Chicago citywide	$615 ±7	$701 ±6	$859 ±10	▲ +$244▲ +$158▲ +$86
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$868 ±73	$981 ±88	$1,032 ±135	▲ +$164▲ +$51▲ +$113
Chicago citywide	—	$1,206 ±14	$1,197 ±18	—▼ −$9—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$655 ±55	$800 ±72	$1,032 ±135	▲ +$377▲ +$232▲ +$144
Chicago citywide	—	$983 ±12	$1,197 ±18	—▲ +$214—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$1,249 ±193	$1,278 ±119	—▲ +$29—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,767 ±35	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$1,018 ±157	$1,278 ±119	—▲ +$260—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,440 ±28	—	———

Home Values

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Average Home Value	$195,507±$19,957
10th Percentile Home Value	$70,000±$12,921
25th Percentile Home Value	$126,109±$15,167
Median Home Value	$192,083±$19,854
75th Percentile Home Value	$275,820±$23,652
90th Percentile Home Value	$368,476±$30,665
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Average Home Value	$195,507±$19,957	$437,638±$7,358	▼ −$242,131	66/77
10th Percentile Home Value	$70,000±$12,921	$129,150±$3,756	▼ −$59,150	68/77
25th Percentile Home Value	$126,109±$15,167	$217,800±$1,804	▼ −$91,691	66/77
Median Home Value	$192,083±$19,854	$334,100±$2,424	▼ −$142,017	67/77
75th Percentile Home Value	$275,820±$23,652	$497,700±$3,730	▼ −$221,880	64/77
90th Percentile Home Value	$368,476±$30,665	$809,159±$15,691	▼ −$440,683	62/77
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$178,666 ±13,368	$208,339 ±24,995	$195,507 ±19,957	▲ +$16,841▼ −$12,833▲ +$29,674
Chicago citywide	$386,614 ±5,106	$424,380 ±4,754	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$51,024▲ +$13,258▲ +$37,766
Average Home Value (nominal dollars)	$134,836 ±10,089	$169,797 ±20,371	$195,507 ±19,957	▲ +$60,671▲ +$25,710▲ +$34,961
Chicago citywide	$291,771 ±3,853	$345,871 ±3,874	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$145,867▲ +$91,768▲ +$54,099
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$72,067 ±12,241	$89,271 ±17,553	$70,000 ±12,921	▼ −$2,067▼ −$19,271▲ +$17,204
Chicago citywide	$115,330 ±1,421	$124,313 ±1,339	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$13,821▲ +$4,838▲ +$8,983
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$54,388 ±9,238	$72,756 ±14,306	$70,000 ±12,921	▲ +$15,612▼ −$2,756▲ +$18,368
Chicago citywide	$87,037 ±1,072	$101,315 ±1,091	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$42,113▲ +$27,835▲ +$14,278
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$105,497 ±9,866	$124,989 ±9,258	$126,109 ±15,167	▲ +$20,612▲ +$1,120▲ +$19,492
Chicago citywide	$190,543 ±2,400	$199,018 ±1,255	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$27,257▲ +$18,782▲ +$8,475
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$79,617 ±7,446	$101,866 ±7,545	$126,109 ±15,167	▲ +$46,492▲ +$24,243▲ +$22,249
Chicago citywide	$143,800 ±1,811	$162,200 ±1,023	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$74,000▲ +$55,600▲ +$18,400
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$165,006 ±13,478	$189,145 ±10,020	$192,083 ±19,854	▲ +$27,077▲ +$2,938▲ +$24,139
Chicago citywide	$299,066 ±2,120	$316,564 ±2,118	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$35,034▲ +$17,536▲ +$17,498
Median Home Value (nominal dollars)	$124,527 ±10,171	$154,154 ±8,166	$192,083 ±19,854	▲ +$67,556▲ +$37,930▲ +$29,626
Chicago citywide	$225,700 ±1,600	$258,000 ±1,726	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$108,400▲ +$76,100▲ +$32,300
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$242,274 ±8,755	$242,415 ±15,984	$275,820 ±23,652	▲ +$33,547▲ +$33,405▲ +$141
Chicago citywide	$466,951 ±3,138	$490,797 ±3,892	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$30,749▲ +$6,903▲ +$23,846
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$182,840 ±6,607	$197,569 ±13,027	$275,820 ±23,652	▲ +$92,980▲ +$78,252▲ +$14,729
Chicago citywide	$352,400 ±2,368	$400,000 ±3,172	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$145,300▲ +$97,700▲ +$47,600
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$307,348 ±22,708	$321,794 ±29,421	$368,476 ±30,665	▲ +$61,128▲ +$46,682▲ +$14,447
Chicago citywide	$739,174 ±12,945	$835,769 ±9,047	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$69,986▼ −$26,610▲ +$96,595
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$231,950 ±17,138	$262,263 ±23,978	$368,476 ±30,665	▲ +$136,526▲ +$106,213▲ +$30,312
Chicago citywide	$557,842 ±9,770	$681,153 ±7,373	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$251,317▲ +$128,006▲ +$123,311

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	21.9%21.9%3,416
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	12.4%56.7%1,936
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.9%4.1%139
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	8.3%37.8%1,292
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.3%1.4%49
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	21.9%21.9%3,416	8.3%8.3%106,578	▲ +13.5%▲ +13.5%	13/77
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	12.4%56.7%1,936	4.8%57.2%60,910	▲ +7.6%▼ -0.5%	12/7753/77
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.9%4.1%139	1.1%13.8%14,721	▼ -0.3%▼ -9.7%	20/7751/77
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	8.3%37.8%1,292	2.1%25.7%27,383	▲ +6.1%▲ +12.1%	6/7711/77
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.3%1.4%49	0.3%3.3%3,564	0%▼ -1.9%	25/7734/77
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units	20.3%3,191	21.1%3,306	21.9%3,416	▲ +1.6 pp▲ +225▲ +0.8 pp▲ +110▲ +0.8 pp▲ +115
Chicago citywide	8.8%104,550	8.5%103,479	8.3%106,578	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,028▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,099▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,071
Housing Choice Vouchers	11.5%1,817	12.4%1,943	12.4%1,936	▲ +0.9 pp▲ +119– 0.0 pp▼ −7▲ +0.8 pp▲ +126
Chicago citywide	4.3%51,601	4.6%55,987	4.8%60,910	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +9,309▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,923▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,386
Public Housing	0.1%14	0.1%16	0.9%139	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +125▲ +0.8 pp▲ +123– 0.0 pp▲ +2
Chicago citywide	1.8%21,159	1.3%16,094	1.2%14,721	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −6,438▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,373▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,065
Project-Based Section 8	8.3%1,312	8.3%1,299	8.3%1,292	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −20– 0.0 pp▼ −7▼ −0.1 pp▼ −13
Chicago citywide	2.2%25,940	2.2%26,951	2.1%27,383	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,443▼ −0.1 pp▲ +432– 0.0 pp▲ +1,011
Other Project-Based Programs	0.3%48	0.3%48	0.3%49	– 0.0 pp▲ +1– 0.0 pp▲ +1– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,850	0.4%4,447	0.3%3,564	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,286▼ −0.1 pp▼ −883▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,403

Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Average Household Income	$14,490
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$376
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,434
Below 30% of Area Median Income	85.3%2,563
With Children	47.1%1,415
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	27.6%829
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$14,490	$17,032	▼ -$2,542	73/75
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$376	$425	▼ -$49	67/75
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,434	$1,389	▲ +$45	16/75
Below 30% of Area Median Income	85.3%2,563	83.0%77,427	▲ +2.3 pp	12/75
With Children	47.1%1,415	31.0%28,919	▲ +16.1 pp	15/75
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	27.6%829	32.0%29,852	▼ -4.4 pp	59/75
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income	$10,828	$11,900	$14,476	▲ +$3,648▲ +$2,576▲ +$1,072
Chicago citywide	$12,156	$13,665	$17,032	▲ +$4,876▲ +$3,367▲ +$1,509
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$287	$301	$376	▲ +$88▲ +$75▲ +$14
Chicago citywide	$310	$340	$425	▲ +$115▲ +$85▲ +$30
Average Monthly Government Spending	$941	$991	$1,436	▲ +$495▲ +$445▲ +$51
Chicago citywide	$916	$1,017	$1,389	▲ +$473▲ +$372▲ +$101
Below 30% of Area Median Income	83.6%—	83.4%—	85.3%—	▲ +1.7 pp—▲ +1.9 pp—▼ −0.2 pp—
Chicago citywide	80.0%—	81.0%—	83.0%—	▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +2.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children	—	—	47.2%—	——————
Chicago citywide	—	—	31.0%—	——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	24.4%—	25.2%—	27.5%—	▲ +3.1 pp—▲ +2.3 pp—▲ +0.8 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Total Tree Canopy	19.4%440 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	60.4%1,370 acres
Natural Open Surfaces	20.2%457 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Total Tree Canopy	19.4%440 acres	18.4%25,934 acres	▲ +1.1%	31/77
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	60.4%1,370 acres	60.2%84,955 acres	▲ +0.3%	49/77
Natural Open Surfaces	20.2%457 acres	21.5%30,331 acres	▼ -1.3%	31/77
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	14.8% ±3.9 pp4,317 ±1,125
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	43.0% ±4.8 pp12,544 ±1,389
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	42.1% ±4.7 pp12,282 ±1,366
Homes Without Air Conditioning	6.6%1,922
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	14.8%±3.9 pp4,317±1,125	26.1%±0.5 pp707,660±13,869	▼ -11.3%	74/77
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	43.0%±4.8 pp12,544±1,389	44.1%±0.6 pp1,195,950±15,462	▼ -1.1%	41/77
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	42.1%±4.7 pp12,282±1,366	29.8%±0.5 pp807,615±13,763	▲ +12.4%	11/77
Homes Without Air Conditioning	6.6%1,922	4.2%114,494	▲ +2.4%	13/77
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Drove Alone	54.7% ±5.3 pp5,294 ±515
Carpooled	9.4% ±3.0 pp912 ±292
Public Transit	28.7% ±4.4 pp2,775 ±430
Walked	2.2% ±1.5 pp217 ±147
Bikes	0.5% ±0.7 pp50 ±72
Other Commute Mode	1.6% ±1.5 pp151 ±142
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Drove Alone	54.7%±5.3 pp5,294±515	56.6%±0.4 pp772,696±5,998	▼ -1.9%	58/77
Carpooled	9.4%±3.0 pp912±292	9.3%±0.3 pp126,918±3,980	▲ +0.1%	38/77
Public Transit	28.7%±4.4 pp2,775±430	22.4%±0.4 pp305,691±6,011	▲ +6.3%	12/77
Walked	2.2%±1.5 pp217±147	7.3%±0.3 pp100,269±3,456	▼ -5.1%	48/77
Bikes	0.5%±0.7 pp50±72	1.8%±0.1 pp24,441±1,693	▼ -1.3%	40/77
Other Commute Mode	1.6%±1.5 pp151±142	2.5%±0.1 pp34,356±1,772	▼ -1.0%	26/77
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Average Commute Time (minutes)	38 min±2.4 min
Less Than 15 Minutes	8.2% ±3.2 pp789 ±314
15–29 Minutes	31.1% ±4.4 pp3,010 ±423
30–44 Minutes	24.4% ±4.5 pp2,357 ±440
45–59 Minutes	16.0% ±3.2 pp1,545 ±309
60 Minutes or More	20.4% ±4.1 pp1,975 ±392
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes)	38 min±2.4 min	33 min±0.2 min	▲ +5 min	11/76
Less Than 15 Minutes	8.2%±3.2 pp789±314	13.0%±0.3 pp140,252±3,438	▼ -4.9%	69/77
15–29 Minutes	31.1%±4.4 pp3,010±423	29.9%±0.5 pp322,586±5,056	▲ +1.2%	22/77
30–44 Minutes	24.4%±4.5 pp2,357±440	29.6%±0.4 pp318,782±4,584	▼ -5.2%	71/77
45–59 Minutes	16.0%±3.2 pp1,545±309	14.0%±0.3 pp151,451±3,075	▲ +1.9%	29/77
60 Minutes or More	20.4%±4.1 pp1,975±392	13.4%±0.3 pp144,940±3,715	▲ +7.0%	13/77
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Average Vehicles per Household	0.83±0.09
Households With No Vehicle	41.0% ±4.3 pp5,276 ±553
Households With 1 Vehicle	41.4% ±4.6 pp5,327 ±588
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	17.5% ±3.0 pp2,254 ±388
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Average Vehicles per Household	0.83±0.09	1.12±0.01	▼ −0.29	65/77
Households With No Vehicle	41.0%±4.3 pp5,276±553	26.6%±0.4 pp308,497±5,087	▲ +14.4%	8/77
Households With 1 Vehicle	41.4%±4.6 pp5,327±588	45.2%±0.4 pp524,900±5,145	▼ -3.8%	51/77
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	17.5%±3.0 pp2,254±388	28.2%±0.4 pp326,808±4,200	▼ -10.6%	65/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Greater Grand Crossing Residents Work

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Loop	20.3%2,159
Near North Side	8.6%910
Near West Side	6.0%637
Hyde Park	2.0%212
Greater Grand Crossing	1.6%174
All other city neighborhoods	28.1%2,977
Outside the city	33.4%3,541
↳ Bedford Park village, IL	0.9%99
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	0.8%87
↳ Downers Grove village, IL	0.8%85
↳ Schaumburg village, IL	0.8%84
↳ Joliet city, IL	0.8%80
↳ All other Illinois locations	27.2%2,890
Out of state	2.0%216
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 69 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Loop	20.3%2,159
Near North Side	8.6%910
Near West Side	6.0%637
Hyde Park	2.0%212
Greater Grand Crossing	1.6%174
All other city neighborhoods	28.1%2,977
Outside the city	33.4%3,541
↳ Bedford Park village, IL	0.9%99
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	0.8%87
↳ Downers Grove village, IL	0.8%85
↳ Schaumburg village, IL	0.8%84
↳ Joliet city, IL	0.8%80
↳ All other Illinois locations	27.2%2,890
Out of state	2.0%216
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 69 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Loop	18.8%1,883	19.4%2,041	20.3%2,159	▲ +1.5 pp▲ +276▲ +0.9 pp▲ +118▲ +0.6 pp▲ +158
Chicago citywide	20.0%224,635	21.0%252,791	21.5%259,167	▲ +1.5 pp▲ +34,532▲ +0.5 pp▲ +6,376▲ +1.0 pp▲ +28,156
Near North Side	7.7%767	8.8%919	8.6%910	▲ +0.9 pp▲ +143▼ −0.2 pp▼ −9▲ +1.1 pp▲ +152
Chicago citywide	8.2%92,143	9.4%112,859	9.1%109,333	▲ +0.9 pp▲ +17,190▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3,526▲ +1.2 pp▲ +20,716
Near West Side	7.1%714	6.0%628	6.0%637	▼ −1.1 pp▼ −77– 0.0 pp▲ +9▼ −1.2 pp▼ −86
Chicago citywide	6.2%69,083	6.6%79,757	6.7%80,118	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +11,035– 0.0 pp▲ +361▲ +0.5 pp▲ +10,674
Hyde Park	2.4%243	2.1%224	2.0%212	▼ −0.4 pp▼ −31▼ −0.1 pp▼ −12▼ −0.3 pp▼ −19
Chicago citywide	1.5%16,641	1.4%16,773	1.6%18,756	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,115▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,983▼ −0.1 pp▲ +132
Greater Grand Crossing	1.6%165	1.6%170	1.6%174	– 0.0 pp▲ +9– 0.0 pp▲ +4– 0.0 pp▲ +5
Chicago citywide	0.2%2,529	0.2%2,239	0.2%1,963	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −566– 0.0 pp▼ −276– 0.0 pp▼ −290
All other city neighborhoods	29.8%2,980	29.5%3,097	28.1%2,977	▼ −1.7 pp▼ −3▼ −1.5 pp▼ −120▼ −0.3 pp▲ +117
Chicago citywide	22.5%252,499	21.1%253,775	20.7%248,736	▼ −1.8 pp▼ −3,763▼ −0.4 pp▼ −5,039▼ −1.4 pp▲ +1,276
Outside the city	32.2%3,224	32.5%3,416	33.4%3,541	▲ +1.2 pp▲ +317▲ +0.8 pp▲ +125▲ +0.3 pp▲ +192
Chicago citywide	36.8%412,807	35.7%430,134	35.9%432,355	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +19,548▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,221▼ −1.0 pp▲ +17,327
Bedford Park village, IL	1.1%113	0.8%83	0.9%99	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −14▲ +0.1 pp▲ +16▼ −0.3 pp▼ −30
Chicago citywide	0.8%8,547	0.7%8,008	0.6%6,897	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,650▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,111▼ −0.1 pp▼ −539
Oak Lawn village, IL	1.1%106	0.9%97	0.8%87	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −19▼ −0.1 pp▼ −10▼ −0.1 pp▼ −9
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,230	0.5%5,563	0.4%5,394	– 0.0 pp▲ +164– 0.0 pp▼ −169– 0.0 pp▲ +333
Downers Grove village, IL	0.3%28	0.3%34	0.8%85	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +57▲ +0.5 pp▲ +51– 0.0 pp▲ +6
Chicago citywide	0.4%4,905	0.5%5,933	0.6%7,305	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,400▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,372▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,028
Schaumburg village, IL	0.9%89	0.9%92	0.8%84	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −5▼ −0.1 pp▼ −8– 0.0 pp▲ +3
Chicago citywide	1.1%11,817	1.0%11,930	0.9%10,376	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,441▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,554▼ −0.1 pp▲ +113
Joliet city, IL	0.2%21	0.4%45	0.8%80	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +59▲ +0.3 pp▲ +35▲ +0.2 pp▲ +24
Chicago citywide	0.2%2,318	0.3%3,240	0.3%3,549	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,231– 0.0 pp▲ +309▲ +0.1 pp▲ +922
All other Illinois locations	25.7%2,576	26.0%2,724	27.2%2,890	▲ +1.5 pp▲ +314▲ +1.3 pp▲ +166▲ +0.2 pp▲ +148
Chicago citywide	27.9%312,992	27.0%324,805	27.3%329,050	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +16,058▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,245▼ −0.9 pp▲ +11,813
Out of state	2.2%221	2.5%260	2.0%216	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −5▼ −0.4 pp▼ −44▲ +0.3 pp▲ +39
Chicago citywide	2.2%24,577	2.3%27,198	2.2%26,136	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,559▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,062▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,621

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Greater Grand Crossing

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Greater Grand Crossing	5.7%174
South Shore	4.0%122
Auburn Gresham	3.8%117
Englewood	3.1%95
Chatham	3.0%92
All other city neighborhoods	44.7%1,363
Outside the city	35.6%1,086
↳ Calumet City city, IL	1.8%54
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	1.1%35
↳ Lansing village, IL	0.9%26
↳ Orland Park village, IL	0.8%25
↳ South Holland village, IL	0.8%23
↳ All other Illinois locations	25.2%767
Out of state	5.1%156
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 69; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Greater Grand Crossing	5.7%174
South Shore	4.0%122
Auburn Gresham	3.8%117
Englewood	3.1%95
Chatham	3.0%92
All other city neighborhoods	44.7%1,363
Outside the city	35.6%1,086
↳ Calumet City city, IL	1.8%54
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	1.1%35
↳ Lansing village, IL	0.9%26
↳ Orland Park village, IL	0.8%25
↳ South Holland village, IL	0.8%23
↳ All other Illinois locations	25.2%767
Out of state	5.1%156
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 69; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Greater Grand Crossing	4.3%165	5.0%170	5.7%174	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +9▲ +0.7 pp▲ +4▲ +0.7 pp▲ +5
Chicago citywide	0.5%6,782	0.5%7,079	0.5%7,069	– 0.0 pp▲ +287– 0.0 pp▼ −10– 0.0 pp▲ +297
South Shore	4.2%164	4.0%136	4.0%122	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −42– 0.0 pp▼ −14▼ −0.3 pp▼ −28
Chicago citywide	0.9%11,525	0.9%12,639	0.8%12,185	– 0.0 pp▲ +660▼ −0.1 pp▼ −454– 0.0 pp▲ +1,114
Auburn Gresham	3.5%136	3.9%133	3.8%117	▲ +0.3 pp▼ −19– 0.0 pp▼ −16▲ +0.4 pp▼ −3
Chicago citywide	0.8%10,351	0.8%10,742	0.7%10,618	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +267– 0.0 pp▼ −124– 0.0 pp▲ +391
Englewood	2.1%83	2.0%69	3.1%95	▲ +1.0 pp▲ +12▲ +1.1 pp▲ +26▼ −0.1 pp▼ −14
Chicago citywide	0.4%4,834	0.3%4,890	0.3%4,874	– 0.0 pp▲ +40– 0.0 pp▼ −16– 0.0 pp▲ +56
Chatham	4.1%157	3.9%134	3.0%92	▼ −1.0 pp▼ −65▼ −0.9 pp▼ −42▼ −0.2 pp▼ −23
Chicago citywide	0.6%7,693	0.6%7,974	0.5%7,780	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +87– 0.0 pp▼ −194– 0.0 pp▲ +281
All other city neighborhoods	46.4%1,794	46.4%1,590	44.7%1,363	▼ −1.7 pp▼ −431▼ −1.7 pp▼ −227– 0.0 pp▼ −204
Chicago citywide	38.0%499,784	37.9%537,334	36.8%539,030	▼ −1.2 pp▲ +39,246▼ −1.1 pp▲ +1,696▼ −0.1 pp▲ +37,550
Outside the city	34.6%1,336	34.7%1,188	35.6%1,086	▲ +1.1 pp▼ −250▲ +1.0 pp▼ −102▲ +0.1 pp▼ −148
Chicago citywide	45.9%603,720	45.4%642,891	47.2%691,545	▲ +1.3 pp▲ +87,825▲ +1.9 pp▲ +48,654▼ −0.6 pp▲ +39,171
Calumet City city, IL	0.9%33	1.0%35	1.8%54	▲ +0.9 pp▲ +21▲ +0.7 pp▲ +19▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,281	0.3%4,579	0.3%4,802	– 0.0 pp▲ +521– 0.0 pp▲ +223– 0.0 pp▲ +298
Oak Lawn village, IL	0.7%27	1.1%39	1.1%35	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8– 0.0 pp▼ −4▲ +0.4 pp▲ +12
Chicago citywide	0.7%9,277	0.7%9,503	0.7%9,767	– 0.0 pp▲ +490– 0.0 pp▲ +264– 0.0 pp▲ +226
Lansing village, IL	0.7%26	0.7%25	0.9%26	▲ +0.2 pp– 0▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1▲ +0.1 pp▼ −1
Chicago citywide	0.2%3,156	0.2%3,077	0.2%3,486	– 0.0 pp▲ +330– 0.0 pp▲ +409– 0.0 pp▼ −79
Orland Park village, IL	0.6%22	0.5%16	0.8%25	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +3▲ +0.4 pp▲ +9▼ −0.1 pp▼ −6
Chicago citywide	0.4%5,430	0.4%6,262	0.4%6,467	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,037– 0.0 pp▲ +205– 0.0 pp▲ +832
South Holland village, IL	0.8%31	0.7%25	0.8%23	– 0.0 pp▼ −8– 0.0 pp▼ −2▼ −0.1 pp▼ −6
Chicago citywide	0.2%2,615	0.2%2,689	0.2%2,892	– 0.0 pp▲ +277– 0.0 pp▲ +203– 0.0 pp▲ +74
All other Illinois locations	25.8%997	24.9%855	25.2%767	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −230▲ +0.2 pp▼ −88▼ −0.8 pp▼ −142
Chicago citywide	35.5%467,052	35.1%497,107	36.9%540,317	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +73,265▲ +1.8 pp▲ +43,210▼ −0.5 pp▲ +30,055
Out of state	4.8%187	5.0%170	5.1%156	▲ +0.3 pp▼ −31▲ +0.2 pp▼ −14▲ +0.1 pp▼ −17
Chicago citywide	4.9%63,785	4.8%68,287	4.9%72,123	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8,338▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,836– 0.0 pp▲ +4,502

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
No Computer or Smartphone	8.9% ±2.2 pp1,143 ±283
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	24.4% ±3.8 pp3,142 ±485
Desktop or Laptop Available	57.3% ±4.1 pp7,362 ±525
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
No Computer or Smartphone	8.9%±2.2 pp1,143±283	5.1%±0.2 pp58,709±2,246	▲ +3.8%	13/77
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	24.4%±3.8 pp3,142±485	10.4%±0.3 pp120,218±3,642	▲ +14.1%	3/77
Desktop or Laptop Available	57.3%±4.1 pp7,362±525	79.7%±0.4 pp924,956±4,919	▼ -22.5%	75/77
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Has Internet Access	87.7% ±3.4 pp11,282 ±443
Cellular Data Plan Only	20.3% ±3.5 pp2,606 ±445
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	3.4% ±2.0 pp433 ±259
No Internet Access	12.3% ±2.7 pp1,575 ±342
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Has Internet Access	87.7%±3.4 pp11,282±443	93.1%±0.3 pp1,080,419±3,310	▼ -5.4%	62/77
Cellular Data Plan Only	20.3%±3.5 pp2,606±445	12.5%±0.3 pp145,219±3,463	▲ +7.8%	8/77
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	3.4%±2.0 pp433±259	3.9%±0.2 pp45,350±1,940	▼ -0.5%	34/77
No Internet Access	12.3%±2.7 pp1,575±342	6.9%±0.2 pp79,786±2,730	▲ +5.4%	16/77
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Uninsured Residents	10.0% ±2.0 pp2,914 ±591
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	3.1% ±2.1 pp915 ±601
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	15.3% ±3.3 pp4,462 ±964
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	1.4% ±1.2 pp396 ±341
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Uninsured Residents	10.0%±2.0 pp2,914±591	9.8%±0.2 pp264,391±5,709	▲ +0.2%	30/77
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	3.1%±2.1 pp915±601	3.9%±0.3 pp104,687±8,934	▼ -0.7%	39/77
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	15.3%±3.3 pp4,462±964	13.3%±0.3 pp361,430±8,516	▲ +2.0%	27/77
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	1.4%±1.2 pp396±341	1.7%±0.3 pp46,718±7,265	▼ -0.4%	36/77
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Insured (Any Coverage)	90.0% ±2.0 pp25,853 ±583
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	27.5% ±2.5 pp7,912 ±717
Direct-Purchase Insurance	4.6% ±1.3 pp1,323 ±366
Medicare	17.2% ±2.0 pp4,954 ±587
Medicaid	44.2% ±3.4 pp12,696 ±975
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.1% ±0.5 pp40 ±132
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	7.5% ±1.6 pp2,154 ±469
Uninsured	10.0% ±2.0 pp2,872 ±583
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Insured (Any Coverage)	90.0%±2.0 pp25,853±583	90.2%±0.2 pp2,424,871±5,689	▼ -0.2%	48/77
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	27.5%±2.5 pp7,912±717	51.2%±0.4 pp1,376,912±9,468	▼ -23.7%	72/77
Direct-Purchase Insurance	4.6%±1.3 pp1,323±366	8.5%±0.2 pp227,424±5,112	▼ -3.9%	69/77
Medicare	17.2%±2.0 pp4,954±587	12.6%±0.2 pp339,804±4,911	▲ +4.6%	13/77
Medicaid	44.2%±3.4 pp12,696±975	22.2%±0.3 pp596,931±7,773	▲ +22.0%	7/77
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.1%±0.5 pp40±132	0.3%±0.0 pp7,201±787	▼ -0.1%	54/77
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	7.5%±1.6 pp2,154±469	3.8%±0.1 pp102,777±3,544	▲ +3.7%	5/77
Uninsured	10.0%±2.0 pp2,872±583	9.8%±0.2 pp262,018±5,689	▲ +0.2%	30/77
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Adults With at Least One Disability	26.4% ±2.7 pp5,846 ±593
Mobility Disability	17.2% ±2.3 pp3,808 ±518
Hearing Disability	4.2% ±1.5 pp922 ±325
Vision Disability	5.4% ±1.4 pp1,198 ±300
Cognitive Disability	7.6% ±1.6 pp1,689 ±352
Self-Care Disability	5.5% ±1.5 pp1,226 ±340
Independent Living Disability	11.8% ±2.0 pp2,609 ±441
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability	26.4%±2.7 pp5,846±593	14.0%±0.2 pp303,665±4,797	▲ +12.3%	4/77
Mobility Disability	17.2%±2.3 pp3,808±518	7.6%±0.2 pp163,666±3,398	▲ +9.6%	5/77
Hearing Disability	4.2%±1.5 pp922±325	2.8%±0.1 pp61,430±2,337	▲ +1.3%	12/77
Vision Disability	5.4%±1.4 pp1,198±300	3.0%±0.1 pp64,544±2,269	▲ +2.4%	10/77
Cognitive Disability	7.6%±1.6 pp1,689±352	5.2%±0.1 pp112,824±2,939	▲ +2.4%	17/77
Self-Care Disability	5.5%±1.5 pp1,226±340	2.7%±0.1 pp57,758±2,261	▲ +2.9%	6/77
Independent Living Disability	11.8%±2.0 pp2,609±441	5.7%±0.2 pp123,651±3,247	▲ +6.0%	5/77
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Arthritis	26.7%5,981
High Blood Pressure	44.3%9,946
Cancer	4.6%1,042
Current Asthma	13.4%2,996
Coronary Heart Disease	6.7%1,496
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	8.7%1,948
Diabetes	18.6%4,184
High Cholesterol	33.4%7,501
Obesity	43.8%9,839
Stroke	5.7%1,278
Lost All Natural Teeth	5.7%1,280
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Arthritis	26.7%5,981	19.6%409,178	▲ +7.1%	16/77
High Blood Pressure	44.3%9,946	29.7%620,030	▲ +14.6%	12/77
Cancer	4.6%1,042	5.0%104,382	▼ -0.4%	47/77
Current Asthma	13.4%2,996	10.2%212,940	▲ +3.2%	9/77
Coronary Heart Disease	6.7%1,496	4.8%100,207	▲ +1.9%	16/77
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	8.7%1,948	5.5%114,820	▲ +3.2%	17/77
Diabetes	18.6%4,184	12.0%250,517	▲ +6.6%	14/77
High Cholesterol	33.4%7,501	31.6%659,696	▲ +1.8%	40/77
Obesity	43.8%9,839	32.6%680,572	▲ +11.2%	12/77
Stroke	5.7%1,278	3.3%68,892	▲ +2.4%	12/77
Lost All Natural Teeth	5.7%1,280	2.5%52,249	▲ +3.2%	9/77
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	13.1%2,934
Current Cigarette Smoking	17.5%3,938
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	33.1%7,429
Short Sleep Duration	47.7%10,696
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	13.1%2,934	19.0%396,652	▼ -5.9%	63/77
Current Cigarette Smoking	17.5%3,938	11.9%248,430	▲ +5.6%	10/77
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	33.1%7,429	24.7%515,648	▲ +8.4%	22/77
Short Sleep Duration	47.7%10,696	37.8%789,129	▲ +9.9%	9/77
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	29.8%6,684
Frequent Physical Distress	15.0%3,359
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	29.8%6,684	21.1%440,493	▲ +8.7%	19/77
Frequent Physical Distress	15.0%3,359	11.8%246,342	▲ +3.2%	19/77
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	77.7%17,431
Routine Checkup in Past Year	82.3%18,466
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	87.3%19,579
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	56.9%12,766
Dental Visit in Past Year	48.4%10,853
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	76.4%17,134
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	77.7%17,431	72.5%1,513,542	▲ +5.2%	15/77
Routine Checkup in Past Year	82.3%18,466	76.2%1,590,785	▲ +6.1%	12/77
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	87.3%19,579	86.2%1,799,549	▲ +1.1%	31/77
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	56.9%12,766	55.8%1,164,905	▲ +1.1%	35/77
Dental Visit in Past Year	48.4%10,853	58.4%1,219,184	▼ -10.0%	59/77
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	76.4%17,134	74.2%1,549,032	▲ +2.2%	22/77
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category	Greater Grand Crossing
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	18.3%4,100
Frequent Mental Distress	19.3%4,326
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	35.9%8,047
Loneliness	40.2%9,026
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Greater Grand Crossing	City	Difference	Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	18.3%4,100	19.1%398,740	▼ -0.8%	45/77
Frequent Mental Distress	19.3%4,326	16.0%334,023	▲ +3.3%	10/77
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	35.9%8,047	28.2%588,716	▲ +7.7%	9/77
Loneliness	40.2%9,026	35.8%747,377	▲ +4.4%	8/77
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Compare All Neighborhoods

Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago

Greater Grand Crossing at a Glance

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Age Distribution

Educational Attainment

Population

Household Size

Marital Status

Language Spoken at Home

English Proficiency

Household Composition

Children by Household Type

Veteran Status

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Poverty Status

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Occupation

Industry of Employment

Class of Worker

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Earnings of All Workers

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago in Lower-Income Families

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago

Local Businesses

Jobs in Greater Grand Crossing

Industry of Jobs in Greater Grand Crossing

Earnings of Jobs in Greater Grand Crossing

Jobs in Greater Grand Crossing by Firm Age

Jobs in Greater Grand Crossing by Firm Size

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

College Enrollment

Student Digital Access

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Year Moved Into Current Home

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Housing Vacancy Status

Housing Age

Housing Units by Building Size

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Overcrowded Housing

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Monthly Housing Costs

Rent

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Home Values

Federal Housing Assistance

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Commute Time

Household Vehicle Access

Where Greater Grand Crossing Residents Work

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Greater Grand Crossing

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Household Internet Access

Health

Health Insurance

Health Insurance Coverage Types