McKinley Park, Chicago Demographics, Housing & Census Data

McKinley Park, Chicago Census and ACS demographic tables: population, race, age, income, poverty, rent, housing types, single-family homes, commute, education, internet access, health insurance, and disability.

McKinley Park, Chicago

McKinley Park
Chicago
Population
14,854
Overlapping council wards Overlap means that a council ward contains part of this neighborhood.
11, 12
Population Density
10,510 /sq mi
Average Geographic Mismatch Error : 0.00 p.p. Geographic mismatch error comes from Census geographic boundaries not perfectly aligning with community area boundaries. We can test how much mismatch error skews community area statistics for a subset of variables. For this community area , the average error is 0.00 percentage points. More detail is available on the community area geography page , and the methodology page explains geographic mismatch error in more detail.
One-page summary

McKinley Park at a Glance

Time period?Historical estimates use this profile's current boundaries, held constant across periods; they do not reflect the boundaries that were in effect at the time. Comparing
Values as
Show as
Add to every table
Showing Chart vs. Chicago ± Margin of error

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category McKinley Park
Hispanic 57.0% ±6.7 pp8,461 ±1,001
White 13.5% ±2.5 pp2,008 ±367
Black 3.2% ±1.8 pp482 ±266
Asian 23.8% ±3.2 pp3,534 ±482
Other or Multi-racial 2.5% ±1.2 pp369 ±178
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Hispanic 57.0%±6.7 pp8,461±1,001 29.7%±0.2 pp805,318±5,785 ▲ +27.3% 16/77
White 13.5%±2.5 pp2,008±367 32.1%±0.2 pp870,127±5,557 ▼ -18.6% 37/77
Black 3.2%±1.8 pp482±266 27.4%±0.2 pp743,710±6,047 ▼ -24.2% 59/77
Asian 23.8%±3.2 pp3,534±482 7.2%±0.2 pp196,435±4,370 ▲ +16.5% 5/77
Other or Multi-racial 2.5%±1.2 pp369±178 3.5%±0.1 pp95,636±3,778 ▼ -1.0% 49/77
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Age Distribution

Category McKinley Park
Under 5 4.0% ±1.1 pp587 ±161
5-17 14.7% ±2.3 pp2,184 ±345
18-24 6.6% ±1.9 pp981 ±276
25-44 28.9% ±2.4 pp4,297 ±350
45-64 29.9% ±3.1 pp4,445 ±468
65-74 10.4% ±1.6 pp1,548 ±237
75-84 3.8% ±1.1 pp568 ±158
85+ 1.6% ±0.7 pp244 ±100
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Under 5 4.0%±1.1 pp587±161 5.3%±0.1 pp144,044±3,867 ▼ -1.4% 64/77
5-17 14.7%±2.3 pp2,184±345 14.1%±0.2 pp381,582±5,548 ▲ +0.6% 53/77
18-24 6.6%±1.9 pp981±276 9.6%±0.2 pp260,942±4,900 ▼ -3.0% 65/77
25-44 28.9%±2.4 pp4,297±350 34.3%±0.3 pp929,946±6,988 ▼ -5.4% 32/77
45-64 29.9%±3.1 pp4,445±468 22.9%±0.2 pp620,047±5,644 ▲ +7.1% 3/77
65-74 10.4%±1.6 pp1,548±237 8.2%±0.1 pp221,932±3,711 ▲ +2.2% 19/77
75-84 3.8%±1.1 pp568±158 4.0%±0.1 pp107,625±2,694 ▼ -0.1% 46/77
85+ 1.6%±0.7 pp244±100 1.7%±0.1 pp45,108±1,921 0% 41/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category McKinley Park
No High School Diploma 21.3% ±2.9 pp2,367 ±326
High School Diploma or GED 23.4% ±3.7 pp2,601 ±406
Some College or Associate's Degree 22.9% ±4.1 pp2,539 ±453
Bachelor's Degree 18.0% ±2.5 pp1,998 ±279
Graduate Degree 14.4% ±3.7 pp1,597 ±415
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
No High School Diploma 21.3%±2.9 pp2,367±326 12.8%±0.2 pp246,015±4,778 ▲ +8.5% 19/77
High School Diploma or GED 23.4%±3.7 pp2,601±406 21.1%±0.3 pp405,248±5,752 ▲ +2.4% 43/77
Some College or Associate's Degree 22.9%±4.1 pp2,539±453 21.8%±0.3 pp419,911±5,550 ▲ +1.1% 46/77
Bachelor's Degree 18.0%±2.5 pp1,998±279 25.4%±0.3 pp488,467±5,708 ▼ -7.4% 39/77
Graduate Degree 14.4%±3.7 pp1,597±415 19.0%±0.3 pp365,017±5,186 ▼ -4.6% 37/77
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category McKinley Park
Total Population 14,854 ±1,191
Total Households 5,686 ±434
Population Density 10,510 ±843 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park Average Neighborhood Difference
Total Population 14,854 35,210 ▼ −20,356
Total Households 5,686 15,067 ▼ −9,381
Population Density 10,510 people/sq mi 13,045 people/sq mi ▼ −2,535
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average neighborhood rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large neighborhoods. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category 2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19 Difference Rank
Total Population 16,449 ±829 15,177 ±771 14,854 ±1,191 ▼ −1,595 ±1,451▼ −323 ±1,419▼ −1,272 ±1,132 ▼ −18,781▼ −20,009▼ −20,356 62/7763/7762/77
Average Neighborhood 35,230 35,186 35,210 ▼ −20▲ +24▼ −43
Total Households 5,135 ±154 5,175 ±170 5,686 ±434 ▲ +551 ±460▲ +511 ±466▲ +40 ±229 ▼ −8,226▼ −8,679▼ −9,381 64/7766/7763/77
Average Neighborhood 13,361 13,854 15,067 ▲ +1,706▲ +1,213▲ +493
Population Density (per sq mi) 11,638 ±586 10,738 ±546 10,510 ±843 ▼ −1,129▼ −229▼ −900 ▼ −1,351▼ −2,290▼ −2,535 38/7744/7746/77
Average Neighborhood Density 12,989 13,028 13,045 ▲ +56▲ +17▲ +39

Household Size

Category McKinley Park
Average Household Size 2.60±0.23
1-Person Households 26.5% ±4.4 pp1,506 ±252
2-Person Households 25.9% ±5.0 pp1,471 ±282
3-Person Households 21.2% ±4.9 pp1,205 ±280
4+ Person Households 26.5% ±3.9 pp1,504 ±221
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Average Household Size 2.60±0.23 2.29±0.02 ▲ +0.31 27/77
1-Person Households 26.5%±4.4 pp1,506±252 39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,783 ▼ -13.2% 64/77
2-Person Households 25.9%±5.0 pp1,471±282 29.5%±0.4 pp342,235±5,166 ▼ -3.6% 48/77
3-Person Households 21.2%±4.9 pp1,205±280 12.9%±0.4 pp149,291±4,184 ▲ +8.3% 2/77
4+ Person Households 26.5%±3.9 pp1,504±221 18.0%±0.5 pp208,411±5,419 ▲ +8.5% 21/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category McKinley Park
Never Married 39.9% ±3.4 pp5,085 ±435
Married 46.4% ±1.0 pp5,914 ±125
Separated 1.1% ±0.6 pp142 ±75
Divorced 9.9% ±2.2 pp1,256 ±276
Widowed 2.8% ±0.9 pp352 ±117
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Never Married 39.9%±3.4 pp5,085±435 49.6%±0.3 pp1,130,286±6,623 ▼ -9.8% 58/77
Married 46.4%±1.0 pp5,914±125 35.5%±0.3 pp807,294±6,077 ▲ +10.9% 13/77
Separated 1.1%±0.6 pp142±75 2.2%±0.1 pp49,430±2,379 ▼ -1.1% 66/77
Divorced 9.9%±2.2 pp1,256±276 7.9%±0.2 pp180,700±3,966 ▲ +1.9% 25/77
Widowed 2.8%±0.9 pp352±117 4.8%±0.1 pp109,357±2,738 ▼ -2.0% 69/77
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category McKinley Park
Speak English Only 31.3% ±3.7 pp4,460 ±530
Spanish 47.9% ±6.8 pp6,831 ±970
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese) 18.6% ±2.9 pp2,660 ±410
Other Languages 2.2% ±1.3 pp316 ±192
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Speak English Only 31.3%±3.7 pp4,460±530 64.6%±0.3 pp1,659,069±8,218 ▼ -33.4% 68/77
Spanish 47.9%±6.8 pp6,831±970 23.7%±0.2 pp607,865±6,166 ▲ +24.2% 14/77
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese) 18.6%±2.9 pp2,660±410 2.0%±0.1 pp52,032±2,783 ▲ +16.6% 3/23
Other Languages 2.2%±1.3 pp316±192 1.0%±0.1 pp25,292±2,452 ▲ +1.2% 41/77
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show
Category McKinley Park
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 71.3% ±4.4 pp71.3%±4.4 pp10,168 ±631
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 13.8% ±2.8 pp13.8%±2.8 pp1,970 ±402
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 10.0% ±2.0 pp72.2%±20.5 pp1,422 ±280
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 5.0% ±1.4 pp35.9%±7.5 pp707 ±206
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 28.7% ±3.2 pp208.1%±48.4 pp4,099 ±459
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 71.3%±4.4 pp71.3%±4.4 pp10,168±631 85.4%±0.5 pp85.4%±0.5 pp2,192,778±11,961 ▼ -14.1%▼ -14.1% 65/77
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 13.8%±2.8 pp13.8%±2.8 pp1,970±402 7.1%±0.2 pp7.1%±0.2 pp183,252±4,686 ▲ +6.7%▲ +6.7% 13/77
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 10.0%±2.0 pp72.2%±20.5 pp1,422±280 5.2%±0.2 pp72.7%±1.1 pp133,269±3,923 ▲ +4.8%▼ -0.5% 12/7728/76
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 5.0%±1.4 pp35.9%±7.5 pp707±206 2.3%±0.1 pp31.6%±1.4 pp57,883±2,982 ▲ +2.7%▲ +4.3% 11/7723/76
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 28.7%±3.2 pp208.1%±48.4 pp4,099±459 14.6%±0.3 pp204.3%±6.4 pp374,404±6,794 ▲ +14.1%▲ +3.8% 13/7727/76
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category McKinley Park
Married-Couple Households 46.3% ±5.3 pp2,632 ±302
Unmarried-Couple Households 6.6% ±3.8 pp378 ±214
One-Person Households 26.5% ±5.3 pp1,506 ±300
Other Household Types 20.6% ±12.0 pp1,170 ±680
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Married-Couple Households 46.3%±5.3 pp2,632±302 30.9%±0.3 pp358,432±3,598 ▲ +15.4% 14/77
Unmarried-Couple Households 6.6%±3.8 pp378±214 8.3%±0.2 pp96,220±2,797 ▼ -1.6% 38/77
One-Person Households 26.5%±5.3 pp1,506±300 39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,729 ▼ -13.2% 64/77
Other Household Types 20.6%±12.0 pp1,170±680 21.1%±0.7 pp245,285±8,514 ▼ -0.6% 48/77
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category McKinley Park
Children in Married-Couple Households 66.9% ±8.4 pp1,854 ±233
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 5.3% ±4.1 pp147 ±113
Children in Single-Mother Households 23.3% ±8.8 pp645 ±244
Children in Single-Father Households 4.5% ±3.6 pp125 ±100
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households 66.9%±8.4 pp1,854±233 56.0%±0.8 pp293,542±4,257 ▲ +10.9% 22/77
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 5.3%±4.1 pp147±113 8.8%±0.6 pp45,960±3,208 ▼ -3.5% 51/77
Children in Single-Mother Households 23.3%±8.8 pp645±244 30.6%±0.9 pp160,535±4,521 ▼ -7.3% 44/77
Children in Single-Father Households 4.5%±3.6 pp125±100 4.6%±0.4 pp24,133±2,006 ▼ -0.1% 33/77
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show
Category McKinley Park
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 3.0% ±1.0 pp3.0%±1.0 pp358 ±124
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 22.1% ±19.9 pp0.7%±0.6 pp79 ±71
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 8.9% ±17.2 pp0.3%±0.5 pp32 ±62
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 38.3% ±19.9 pp1.1%±0.6 pp137 ±71
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 2.5% ±11.7 pp0.1%±0.3 pp9 ±42
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 28.2% ±22.6 pp0.8%±0.7 pp101 ±81
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 3.0%±1.0 pp3.0%±1.0 pp358±124 2.8%±0.1 pp2.8%±0.1 pp60,766±2,397 ▲ +0.2%▲ +0.2% 41/77
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 22.1%±19.9 pp0.7%±0.6 pp79±71 26.8%±1.8 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,267±1,067 ▼ -4.7%▼ -0.1% 46/7740/77
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 8.9%±17.2 pp0.3%±0.5 pp32±62 12.9%±1.0 pp0.4%±0.0 pp7,830±579 ▼ -3.9%▼ -0.1% 51/7744/77
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 38.3%±19.9 pp1.1%±0.6 pp137±71 28.8%±1.4 pp0.8%±0.0 pp17,525±846 ▲ +9.4%▲ +0.3% 16/7729/77
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 2.5%±11.7 pp0.1%±0.3 pp9±42 4.9%±0.7 pp0.1%±0.0 pp2,995±441 ▼ -2.4%▼ -0.1% 50/7748/77
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 28.2%±22.6 pp0.8%±0.7 pp101±81 26.6%±1.5 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,149±916 ▲ +1.6%▲ +0.1% 25/7734/77
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show
Category McKinley Park
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 61.9% ±3.5 pp61.9%±3.5 pp9,202 ±521
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 38.1% ±3.6 pp38.1%±3.6 pp5,652 ±540
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 24.9% ±3.3 pp65.3%±6.1 pp3,692 ±493
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 13.2% ±2.5 pp34.7%±5.8 pp1,960 ±377
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 61.9%±3.5 pp61.9%±3.5 pp9,202±521 79.1%±0.3 pp79.1%±0.3 pp2,144,343±7,926 ▼ -17.1%▼ -17.1% 69/77
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 38.1%±3.6 pp38.1%±3.6 pp5,652±540 20.9%±0.3 pp20.9%±0.3 pp566,883±7,968 ▲ +17.1%▲ +17.1% 9/77
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 24.9%±3.3 pp65.3%±6.1 pp3,692±493 10.0%±0.2 pp47.7%±0.5 pp270,551±4,603 ▲ +14.9%▲ +17.6% 4/779/77
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 13.2%±2.5 pp34.7%±5.8 pp1,960±377 10.9%±0.2 pp52.3%±0.9 pp296,332±6,504 ▲ +2.3%▼ -17.6% 25/7769/77
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show
Category McKinley Park
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 19.7%±3.7 pp51.8%±7.0 pp2,928±544
Born in China / Hong Kong (of foreign-born residents) 13.4%±2.2 pp35.3%±3.6 pp1,993±323
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 4.9%12.9%731
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park Chicago Difference Rank
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 19.7% ±3.7 pp51.8%±7.0 pp2,928 8.2% ±0.2 pp39.3%222,978 ▲ +11.5%▲ +12.5% 14/7725/77
Born in China / Hong Kong (of foreign-born residents) 13.4% ±2.2 pp35.3%±3.6 pp1,993 1.4% ±0.1 pp6.7%38,255 ▲ +12.0%▲ +28.5% 3/773/77
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 4.9%12.9%731 ——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show
Category McKinley Park
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 6.7% ±2.0 pp17.5%±5.0 pp990 ±301
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 7.3% ±1.9 pp19.3%±4.5 pp1,089 ±276
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 7.9% ±1.9 pp20.6%±4.4 pp1,167 ±275
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 16.2% ±2.8 pp42.6%±6.1 pp2,406 ±416
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 6.7%±2.0 pp17.5%±5.0 pp990±301 5.9%±0.2 pp2821.1%±293.9 pp159,447±5,557 ▲ +0.8%▼ -2803.6% 23/7760/77
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 7.3%±1.9 pp19.3%±4.5 pp1,089±276 4.5%±0.1 pp2157.0%±223.5 pp121,912±4,035 ▲ +2.8%▼ -2137.7% 15/7747/77
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 7.9%±1.9 pp20.6%±4.4 pp1,167±275 4.6%±0.1 pp2191.2%±225.9 pp123,849±3,901 ▲ +3.3%▼ -2170.6% 12/7740/77
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 16.2%±2.8 pp42.6%±6.1 pp2,406±416 6.0%±0.1 pp2860.5%±287.5 pp161,675±3,491 ▲ +10.2%▼ -2817.9% 2/7711/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later 1.5% ±1.1 pp247 ±175 4.6% ±1.3 pp692 ±204 6.7% ±2.0 pp990 ±301 ▲ +5.2 pp▲ +743▲ +2.1 pp▲ +298▲ +3.1 pp▲ +445
Chicago citywide 1.4% ±0.1 pp36,978 ±2,235 3.7% ±0.1 pp99,118 ±3,198 5.9% ±0.2 pp159,447 ±5,568 ▲ +4.5 pp▲ +122,469▲ +2.2 pp▲ +60,329▲ +2.3 pp▲ +62,140
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 9.1% ±2.0 pp1,501 ±322 9.9% ±2.1 pp1,495 ±312 7.3% ±1.9 pp1,089 ±276 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −412▼ −2.5 pp▼ −406▲ +0.7 pp▼ −6
Chicago citywide 5.9% ±0.1 pp161,331 ±3,896 4.9% ±0.1 pp131,658 ±3,182 4.5% ±0.1 pp121,912 ±4,044 ▼ −1.5 pp▼ −39,419▼ −0.4 pp▼ −9,746▼ −1.1 pp▼ −29,673
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 11.5% ±1.9 pp1,896 ±320 8.7% ±1.8 pp1,327 ±268 7.9% ±1.9 pp1,167 ±275 ▼ −3.7 pp▼ −729▼ −0.9 pp▼ −160▼ −2.8 pp▼ −569
Chicago citywide 6.1% ±0.1 pp165,077 ±3,717 5.3% ±0.1 pp142,413 ±3,015 4.6% ±0.1 pp123,849 ±3,911 ▼ −1.5 pp▼ −41,228▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,564▼ −0.8 pp▼ −22,664
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 15.0% ±2.0 pp2,464 ±322 13.1% ±1.9 pp1,991 ±286 16.2% ±2.8 pp2,406 ±416 ▲ +1.2 pp▼ −58▲ +3.1 pp▲ +415▼ −1.9 pp▼ −473
Chicago citywide 7.5% ±0.1 pp204,169 ±3,469 6.9% ±0.1 pp186,050 ±3,114 6.0% ±0.1 pp161,675 ±3,509 ▼ −1.6 pp▼ −42,494▼ −0.9 pp▼ −24,375▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,119
Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category McKinley Park
Average Household Income $102,378±$10,627
Per Capita Income $38,237±$3,609
10th Percentile Household Income $12,136±$6,416
25th Percentile Household Income $38,911±$4,771
Median Household Income $79,960±$16,031
75th Percentile Household Income $152,570±$18,119
90th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $102,378±$10,627 $116,016±$1,263 ▼ −$13,638 27/77
Per Capita Income $38,237±$3,609 $50,086±$581 ▼ −$11,849 35/77
10th Percentile Household Income $12,136±$6,416 $12,933±$271 ▼ −$798 46/77
25th Percentile Household Income $38,911±$4,771 $34,575±$649 ▲ +$4,335 27/77
Median Household Income $79,960±$16,031 $77,902±$907 ▲ +$2,058 26/77
75th Percentile Household Income $152,570±$18,119 $144,150±$1,210 ▲ +$8,420 19/77
90th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000 Over $200,000 — 1/77
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $68,986 ±3,863 $77,464 ±5,155 $102,378 ±10,627 ▲ +$33,392▲ +$24,914▲ +$8,478
Chicago citywide $95,689 ±910 $111,304 ±1,075 $116,016 ±1,263 ▲ +$20,327▲ +$4,712▲ +$15,615
Average Household Income (nominal dollars) $52,062 ±2,916 $63,133 ±4,202 $102,378 ±10,627 ▲ +$50,315▲ +$39,245▲ +$11,071
Chicago citywide $72,215 ±687 $90,713 ±876 $116,016 ±1,263 ▲ +$43,801▲ +$25,303▲ +$18,498
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $23,022 ±939 $27,876 ±1,456 $38,237 ±3,609 ▲ +$15,215▲ +$10,361▲ +$4,854
Chicago citywide $37,927 ±351 $45,525 ±412 $50,086 ±581 ▲ +$12,160▲ +$4,562▲ +$7,598
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars) $17,374 ±709 $22,719 ±1,187 $38,237 ±3,609 ▲ +$20,863▲ +$15,518▲ +$5,345
Chicago citywide $28,623 ±265 $37,103 ±336 $50,086 ±581 ▲ +$21,464▲ +$12,984▲ +$8,480
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $13,060 ±2,991 $16,587 ±2,892 $12,136 ±6,416 ▼ −$924▼ −$4,451▲ +$3,527
Chicago citywide $11,828 ±190 $13,281 ±277 $12,933 ±271 ▲ +$1,105▼ −$348▲ +$1,453
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $9,856 ±2,257 $13,518 ±2,357 $12,136 ±6,416 ▲ +$2,280▼ −$1,382▲ +$3,662
Chicago citywide $8,927 ±144 $10,824 ±225 $12,933 ±271 ▲ +$4,007▲ +$2,109▲ +$1,898
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $28,640 ±3,645 $33,471 ±4,530 $38,911 ±4,771 ▲ +$10,271▲ +$5,440▲ +$4,831
Chicago citywide $28,727 ±321 $31,597 ±462 $34,575 ±649 ▲ +$5,848▲ +$2,979▲ +$2,869
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $21,614 ±2,751 $27,279 ±3,692 $38,911 ±4,771 ▲ +$17,297▲ +$11,632▲ +$5,665
Chicago citywide $21,680 ±242 $25,751 ±376 $34,575 ±649 ▲ +$12,895▲ +$8,824▲ +$4,071
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $56,295 ±5,514 $60,905 ±5,266 $79,960 ±16,031 ▲ +$23,665▲ +$19,055▲ +$4,610
Chicago citywide $63,379 ±591 $71,469 ±723 $77,902 ±907 ▲ +$14,523▲ +$6,433▲ +$8,090
Median Household Income (nominal dollars) $42,485 ±4,162 $49,638 ±4,292 $79,960 ±16,031 ▲ +$37,475▲ +$30,322▲ +$7,153
Chicago citywide $47,831 ±446 $58,247 ±589 $77,902 ±907 ▲ +$30,071▲ +$19,655▲ +$10,416
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $93,506 ±5,462 $108,824 ±8,883 $152,570 ±18,119 ▲ +$59,063▲ +$43,745▲ +$15,318
Chicago citywide $122,019 ±806 $139,501 ±1,057 $144,150 ±1,210 ▲ +$22,131▲ +$4,648▲ +$17,482
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $70,568 ±4,122 $88,692 ±7,240 $152,570 ±18,119 ▲ +$82,002▲ +$63,878▲ +$18,124
Chicago citywide $92,086 ±608 $113,694 ±862 $144,150 ±1,210 ▲ +$52,064▲ +$30,456▲ +$21,608
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $140,945 ±14,153 $162,576 ±16,209 — ——▲ +$21,631
Chicago citywide $202,601 ±2,442 $235,390 ±1,636 — ——▲ +$32,790
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $106,369 ±10,681 $132,500 ±13,211 — ——▲ +$26,131
Chicago citywide $152,899 ±1,843 $191,844 ±1,333 — ——▲ +$38,944

Poverty Status

Category McKinley Park
Below Poverty Line 13.9% ±3.4 pp2,063 ±509
Below 200% Poverty Line 32.7% ±5.0 pp4,864 ±739
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 6.6% ±2.4 pp977 ±358
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Below Poverty Line 13.9%±3.4 pp2,063±509 16.8%±0.4 pp456,194±11,330 ▼ -2.9% 48/77
Below 200% Poverty Line 32.7%±5.0 pp4,864±739 33.4%±0.6 pp905,794±16,660 ▼ -0.7% 44/77
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 6.6%±2.4 pp977±358 8.3%±0.3 pp226,117±7,649 ▼ -1.8% 46/77
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Category McKinley Park
Food Insecurity 26.1%2,984
Housing Insecurity 19.5%2,233
Transportation Barriers 11.0%1,255
Threatened Utility Shutoff 9.5%1,088
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Food Insecurity 26.1%2,984 24.4%509,385 ▲ +1.7% 41/77
Housing Insecurity 19.5%2,233 19.7%411,266 ▼ -0.2% 42/77
Transportation Barriers 11.0%1,255 11.6%242,167 ▼ -0.6% 44/77
Threatened Utility Shutoff 9.5%1,088 11.9%248,430 ▼ -2.4% 46/77
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category McKinley Park
In Labor Force 89.0% ±3.8 pp5,862 ±250
↳ Employed 81.7% ±4.8 pp5,381 ±316
↳ Unemployed 7.3% ±2.6 pp481 ±170
↳ Unemployment Rate 8.2% ±2.9 pp—
Not in Labor Force 11.0% ±14.0 pp721 ±922
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
In Labor Force 89.0%±3.8 pp5,862±250 85.6%±0.3 pp1,069,076±3,868 ▲ +3.5% 21/77
↳ Employed 81.7%±4.8 pp5,381±316 79.6%±0.3 pp994,466±4,326 ▲ +2.2% 31/77
↳ Unemployed 7.3%±2.6 pp481±170 5.9%±0.2 pp73,968±2,788 ▲ +1.4% 35/77
↳ Unemployment Rate 8.2%±2.9 pp— 6.9%±0.3 pp86,502±3,342 ▲ +1.3% 35/77
Not in Labor Force 11.0%±14.0 pp721±922 14.4%±1.1 pp180,399±14,344 ▼ -3.5% 57/77
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category McKinley Park
Management, Business, Science & Arts 43.0% ±6.1 pp3,261 ±465
↳ Management Occupations 8.4% ±3.0 pp640 ±229
↳ Business & Financial Operations 6.6% ±2.3 pp504 ±174
↳ Computer & Mathematical 3.5% ±1.5 pp269 ±112
↳ Architecture & Engineering 1.2% ±0.8 pp90 ±61
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 2.4% ±2.6 pp181 ±194
↳ Community & Social Service 4.2% ±3.5 pp315 ±268
↳ Legal Occupations 0.7% ±0.7 pp50 ±57
↳ Education, Training & Library 9.7% ±3.3 pp735 ±249
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 2.9% ±1.4 pp218 ±103
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 2.1% ±1.2 pp157 ±88
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 1.3% ±1.4 pp102 ±107
Service 18.4% ±3.7 pp1,398 ±284
↳ Healthcare Support 3.7% ±1.4 pp278 ±105
↳ Protective Service 0.9% ±0.8 pp65 ±63
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 7.2% ±2.1 pp546 ±158
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 3.9% ±1.9 pp298 ±145
↳ Personal Care & Service 2.8% ±1.4 pp211 ±108
Sales & Office 16.7% ±3.5 pp1,265 ±262
↳ Sales & Related 6.7% ±2.4 pp506 ±182
↳ Office & Administrative Support 10.0% ±2.5 pp759 ±192
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 6.8% ±2.1 pp513 ±159
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.0% ±0.5 pp0
↳ Construction & Extraction 3.1% ±1.6 pp237 ±118
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 3.6% ±1.6 pp276 ±122
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 15.2% ±4.0 pp1,152 ±304
↳ Production Occupations 8.4% ±3.6 pp638 ±273
↳ Transportation Occupations 3.0% ±1.3 pp224 ±96
↳ Material Moving Occupations 3.8% ±1.5 pp290 ±111
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts 43.0%±6.1 pp3,261±465 49.2%±0.4 pp686,743±5,710 ▼ -6.2% 33/77
↳ Management Occupations 8.4%±3.0 pp640±229 12.3%±0.3 pp172,182±3,807 ▼ -3.9% 48/77
↳ Business & Financial Operations 6.6%±2.3 pp504±174 9.1%±0.2 pp127,081±3,358 ▼ -2.5% 31/77
↳ Computer & Mathematical 3.5%±1.5 pp269±112 4.9%±0.2 pp68,921±2,690 ▼ -1.4% 31/77
↳ Architecture & Engineering 1.2%±0.8 pp90±61 1.6%±0.1 pp22,779±1,380 ▼ -0.4% 38/77
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 2.4%±2.6 pp181±194 1.4%±0.1 pp19,126±1,340 ▲ +1.0% 12/77
↳ Community & Social Service 4.2%±3.5 pp315±268 1.9%±0.1 pp26,973±1,500 ▲ +2.2% 4/77
↳ Legal Occupations 0.7%±0.7 pp50±57 2.3%±0.1 pp31,629±1,814 ▼ -1.6% 50/77
↳ Education, Training & Library 9.7%±3.3 pp735±249 6.6%±0.2 pp92,316±2,697 ▲ +3.1% 13/77
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 2.9%±1.4 pp218±103 3.1%±0.1 pp43,879±1,786 ▼ -0.3% 25/77
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 2.1%±1.2 pp157±88 4.6%±0.2 pp63,551±2,652 ▼ -2.5% 56/77
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 1.3%±1.4 pp102±107 1.3%±0.1 pp18,306±1,387 0% 39/77
Service 18.4%±3.7 pp1,398±284 16.9%±0.3 pp235,977±4,217 ▲ +1.5% 52/77
↳ Healthcare Support 3.7%±1.4 pp278±105 3.4%±0.2 pp46,792±2,107 ▲ +0.3% 41/77
↳ Protective Service 0.9%±0.8 pp65±63 2.8%±0.1 pp39,146±1,734 ▼ -1.9% 69/77
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 7.2%±2.1 pp546±158 5.1%±0.2 pp70,514±2,393 ▲ +2.1% 15/77
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 3.9%±1.9 pp298±145 3.0%±0.1 pp41,783±1,967 ▲ +0.9% 41/77
↳ Personal Care & Service 2.8%±1.4 pp211±108 2.7%±0.1 pp37,742±1,657 ▲ +0.1% 34/77
Sales & Office 16.7%±3.5 pp1,265±262 17.4%±0.3 pp243,580±4,754 ▼ -0.8% 54/77
↳ Sales & Related 6.7%±2.4 pp506±182 8.1%±0.2 pp113,073±3,174 ▼ -1.4% 58/77
↳ Office & Administrative Support 10.0%±2.5 pp759±192 9.3%±0.3 pp130,507±3,591 ▲ +0.7% 43/77
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 6.8%±2.1 pp513±159 4.6%±0.2 pp64,338±2,929 ▲ +2.2% 24/77
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.0%±0.5 pp0 0.1%±0.0 pp1,506±406 ▼ -0.1% 42/77
↳ Construction & Extraction 3.1%±1.6 pp237±118 2.8%±0.1 pp39,432±2,062 ▲ +0.3% 34/77
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 3.6%±1.6 pp276±122 1.7%±0.1 pp23,400±1,722 ▲ +2.0% 13/77
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 15.2%±4.0 pp1,152±304 11.8%±0.3 pp165,261±3,629 ▲ +3.3% 34/77
↳ Production Occupations 8.4%±3.6 pp638±273 4.2%±0.2 pp57,989±2,275 ▲ +4.3% 11/77
↳ Transportation Occupations 3.0%±1.3 pp224±96 3.9%±0.2 pp54,099±2,118 ▼ -0.9% 55/77
↳ Material Moving Occupations 3.8%±1.5 pp290±111 3.8%±0.2 pp53,173±2,312 0% 43/77
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category McKinley Park
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0% ±0.5 pp0
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.0% ±0.5 pp0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0% ±0.5 pp0
Construction 5.5% ±2.0 pp420 ±149
Manufacturing 12.5% ±3.7 pp948 ±277
Wholesale Trade 3.7% ±2.0 pp284 ±148
Retail Trade 8.1% ±3.6 pp612 ±270
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 5.0% ±1.6 pp379 ±121
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 4.5% ±1.6 pp345 ±118
↳ Utilities 0.4% ±0.6 pp34 ±47
Information 1.4% ±1.1 pp107 ±86
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 4.1% ±1.4 pp313 ±108
↳ Finance & Insurance 3.9% ±1.4 pp293 ±105
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.3% ±0.6 pp20 ±45
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 10.3% ±2.1 pp784 ±160
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 5.9% ±1.7 pp446 ±128
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.2% ±0.5 pp14 ±41
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 4.3% ±1.5 pp324 ±117
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 22.7% ±3.6 pp1,725 ±273
↳ Educational Services 11.4% ±3.2 pp867 ±239
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 11.3% ±2.5 pp858 ±188
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 11.5% ±2.2 pp874 ±167
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 2.5% ±1.1 pp186 ±87
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 9.1% ±2.0 pp688 ±152
Other Services 9.9% ±3.7 pp755 ±280
Public Administration 5.1% ±3.0 pp388 ±229
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%±0.5 pp0 0.2%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.2% 59/77
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.0%±0.5 pp0 0.2%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.2% 55/77
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%±0.5 pp0 0.0%±0.0 pp— 0% 18/77
Construction 5.5%±2.0 pp420±149 3.8%±0.2 pp— ▲ +1.8% 23/77
Manufacturing 12.5%±3.7 pp948±277 7.7%±0.2 pp— ▲ +4.8% 11/77
Wholesale Trade 3.7%±2.0 pp284±148 2.0%±0.1 pp— ▲ +1.7% 6/77
Retail Trade 8.1%±3.6 pp612±270 8.2%±0.2 pp— ▼ -0.2% 49/77
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 5.0%±1.6 pp379±121 7.1%±0.2 pp— ▼ -2.1% 61/77
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 4.5%±1.6 pp345±118 6.5%±0.2 pp— ▼ -2.0% 58/77
↳ Utilities 0.4%±0.6 pp34±47 0.5%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.1% 39/77
Information 1.4%±1.1 pp107±86 2.1%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.7% 40/77
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 4.1%±1.4 pp313±108 8.8%±0.2 pp— ▼ -4.7% 67/77
↳ Finance & Insurance 3.9%±1.4 pp293±105 6.7%±0.2 pp— ▼ -2.8% 55/77
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.3%±0.6 pp20±45 2.1%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.9% 75/77
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 10.3%±2.1 pp784±160 18.2%±0.4 pp— ▼ -7.9% 66/77
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 5.9%±1.7 pp446±128 13.4%±0.3 pp— ▼ -7.6% 47/77
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.2%±0.5 pp14±41 0.1%±0.0 pp— ▲ +0.1% 18/77
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 4.3%±1.5 pp324±117 4.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -0.4% 47/77
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 22.7%±3.6 pp1,725±273 24.2%±0.4 pp— ▼ -1.4% 51/77
↳ Educational Services 11.4%±3.2 pp867±239 10.5%±0.2 pp— ▲ +0.9% 31/77
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 11.3%±2.5 pp858±188 13.7%±0.3 pp— ▼ -2.4% 61/77
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 11.5%±2.2 pp874±167 9.1%±0.2 pp— ▲ +2.4% 20/77
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 2.5%±1.1 pp186±87 2.2%±0.1 pp— ▲ +0.3% 26/77
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 9.1%±2.0 pp688±152 6.9%±0.2 pp— ▲ +2.1% 21/77
Other Services 9.9%±3.7 pp755±280 4.6%±0.2 pp— ▲ +5.4% 3/77
Public Administration 5.1%±3.0 pp388±229 4.0%±0.2 pp— ▲ +1.1% 29/77
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category McKinley Park
Private Company Employee 64.5% ±2.1 pp4,898 ±161
Self-Employed 8.4% ±2.2 pp635 ±166
Nonprofit 10.1% ±3.4 pp767 ±261
Government 17.0% ±4.5 pp1,289 ±342
Unpaid Family Worker 0.0% ±0.5 pp0
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Private Company Employee 64.5%±2.1 pp4,898±161 67.9%±0.4 pp947,845±5,822 ▼ -3.4% 37/77
Self-Employed 8.4%±2.2 pp635±166 8.3%±0.2 pp115,690±2,989 ▲ +0.1% 27/77
Nonprofit 10.1%±3.4 pp767±261 12.1%±0.3 pp169,124±4,035 ▼ -2.0% 51/77
Government 17.0%±4.5 pp1,289±342 12.9%±0.3 pp179,945±4,021 ▲ +4.1% 32/77
Unpaid Family Worker 0.0%±0.5 pp0 0.2%±0.0 pp2,312±408 ▼ -0.2% 45/77
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category McKinley Park
Full-Time, Year-Round 63.9% ±4.7 pp5,360 ±393
Part-Time or Part-Year 36.1% ±3.6 pp3,031 ±304
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round 63.9%±4.7 pp5,360±393 67.0%±0.3 pp1,025,726±3,875 ▼ -3.2% 44/77
Part-Time or Part-Year 36.1%±3.6 pp3,031±304 33.0%±0.3 pp504,210±4,897 ▲ +3.2% 34/77
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category McKinley Park
Average FT Earnings $71,349±$6,382
10th Percentile FT Earnings $26,075±$3,502
25th Percentile FT Earnings $38,945±$3,964
Median FT Earnings $62,717±$7,225
75th Percentile FT Earnings $93,241±$6,155
90th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Average FT Earnings $71,349±$6,382 $96,214±$968 ▼ −$24,865 39/76
10th Percentile FT Earnings $26,075±$3,502 $29,008±$387 ▼ −$2,934 45/77
25th Percentile FT Earnings $38,945±$3,964 $43,011±$345 ▼ −$4,067 40/77
Median FT Earnings $62,717±$7,225 $69,663±$530 ▼ −$6,946 33/77
75th Percentile FT Earnings $93,241±$6,155 Over $100,000 ▼ −$6,759+ 36/77
90th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/77
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $56,014 ±2,153 $55,902 ±2,742 $71,349 ±6,382 ▲ +$15,335▲ +$15,447▼ −$112
Chicago citywide $83,170 ±714 $91,467 ±682 $96,214 ±968 ▲ +$13,044▲ +$4,747▲ +$8,297
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $42,273 ±1,625 $45,560 ±2,235 $71,349 ±6,382 ▲ +$29,076▲ +$25,789▲ +$3,288
Chicago citywide $62,767 ±539 $74,546 ±556 $96,214 ±968 ▲ +$33,447▲ +$21,669▲ +$11,778
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $23,032 ±2,088 $18,564 ±2,502 $26,075 ±3,502 ▲ +$3,043▲ +$7,510▼ −$4,468
Chicago citywide $24,209 ±243 $26,113 ±152 $29,008 ±387 ▲ +$4,799▲ +$2,895▲ +$1,904
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $17,382 ±1,576 $15,130 ±2,039 $26,075 ±3,502 ▲ +$8,693▲ +$10,945▼ −$2,252
Chicago citywide $18,270 ±183 $21,282 ±124 $29,008 ±387 ▲ +$10,738▲ +$7,726▲ +$3,012
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $32,437 ±2,116 $29,751 ±3,210 $38,945 ±3,964 ▲ +$6,508▲ +$9,194▼ −$2,686
Chicago citywide $37,393 ±278 $39,415 ±229 $43,011 ±345 ▲ +$5,618▲ +$3,597▲ +$2,021
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $24,480 ±1,597 $24,247 ±2,616 $38,945 ±3,964 ▲ +$14,465▲ +$14,698▼ −$233
Chicago citywide $28,220 ±210 $32,123 ±187 $43,011 ±345 ▲ +$14,791▲ +$10,888▲ +$3,903
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $46,399 ±2,811 $46,581 ±3,805 $62,717 ±7,225 ▲ +$16,318▲ +$16,136▲ +$182
Chicago citywide $60,575 ±496 $64,628 ±327 $69,663 ±530 ▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,034▲ +$4,054
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $35,017 ±2,122 $37,963 ±3,101 $62,717 ±7,225 ▲ +$27,700▲ +$24,753▲ +$2,947
Chicago citywide $45,715 ±374 $52,672 ±266 $69,663 ±530 ▲ +$23,948▲ +$16,991▲ +$6,957
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $70,092 ±5,451 $72,600 ±5,523 $93,241 ±6,155 ▲ +$23,150▲ +$20,642▲ +$2,508
Chicago citywide $98,274 ±615 $108,202 ±616 — ——▲ +$9,928
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $52,897 ±4,114 $59,169 ±4,501 $93,241 ±6,155 ▲ +$40,344▲ +$34,072▲ +$6,272
Chicago citywide $74,166 ±464 $88,185 ±502 — ——▲ +$14,019
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $105,895 ±7,467 $106,820 ±8,794 — ——▲ +$925
Chicago citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $79,918 ±5,635 $87,059 ±7,167 — ——▲ +$7,141
Chicago citywide — — — ———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category McKinley Park
Average PT Earnings $25,307±$4,046
10th Percentile PT Earnings $2,099±$937
25th Percentile PT Earnings $7,050±$1,578
Median PT Earnings $15,785±$3,641
75th Percentile PT Earnings $34,311±$6,862
90th Percentile PT Earnings $54,763±$9,662
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Average PT Earnings $25,307±$4,046 $33,575±$750 ▼ −$8,268 46/76
10th Percentile PT Earnings $2,099±$937 $2,183±$87 ▼ −$84 41/77
25th Percentile PT Earnings $7,050±$1,578 $7,222±$206 ▼ −$171 37/77
Median PT Earnings $15,785±$3,641 $19,180±$393 ▼ −$3,394 49/77
75th Percentile PT Earnings $34,311±$6,862 $38,498±$681 ▼ −$4,187 34/77
90th Percentile PT Earnings $54,763±$9,662 $73,776±$1,391 ▼ −$19,013 46/77
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $18,769 ±1,862 $24,752 ±3,890 $25,307 ±4,046 ▲ +$6,537▲ +$554▲ +$5,983
Chicago citywide $27,076 ±473 $31,236 ±676 $33,575 ±750 ▲ +$6,500▲ +$2,340▲ +$4,160
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $14,165 ±1,405 $20,173 ±3,170 $25,307 ±4,046 ▲ +$11,142▲ +$5,134▲ +$6,008
Chicago citywide $20,433 ±357 $25,457 ±551 $33,575 ±750 ▲ +$13,142▲ +$8,118▲ +$5,024
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,118 ±559 $2,428 ±793 $2,099 ±937 ▼ −$19▼ −$329▲ +$310
Chicago citywide $2,230 ±48 $2,283 ±59 $2,183 ±87 ▼ −$47▼ −$100▲ +$53
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $1,599 ±422 $1,979 ±646 $2,099 ±937 ▲ +$501▲ +$120▲ +$381
Chicago citywide $1,683 ±36 $1,861 ±48 $2,183 ±87 ▲ +$500▲ +$322▲ +$178
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $5,842 ±1,187 $8,041 ±1,963 $7,050 ±1,578 ▲ +$1,208▼ −$991▲ +$2,199
Chicago citywide $6,390 ±123 $6,841 ±156 $7,222 ±206 ▲ +$832▲ +$381▲ +$451
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $4,409 ±896 $6,554 ±1,600 $7,050 ±1,578 ▲ +$2,641▲ +$497▲ +$2,145
Chicago citywide $4,822 ±93 $5,575 ±127 $7,222 ±206 ▲ +$2,399▲ +$1,646▲ +$753
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $13,765 ±1,728 $15,226 ±2,160 $15,785 ±3,641 ▲ +$2,021▲ +$559▲ +$1,462
Chicago citywide $15,461 ±166 $17,025 ±275 $19,180 ±393 ▲ +$3,719▲ +$2,155▲ +$1,563
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $10,388 ±1,304 $12,409 ±1,761 $15,785 ±3,641 ▲ +$5,397▲ +$3,376▲ +$2,022
Chicago citywide $11,668 ±125 $13,875 ±224 $19,180 ±393 ▲ +$7,512▲ +$5,305▲ +$2,207
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $24,983 ±2,901 $27,043 ±4,748 $34,311 ±6,862 ▲ +$9,328▲ +$7,268▲ +$2,060
Chicago citywide $30,795 ±619 $34,779 ±505 $38,498 ±681 ▲ +$7,703▲ +$3,719▲ +$3,984
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $18,854 ±2,189 $22,040 ±3,869 $34,311 ±6,862 ▲ +$15,457▲ +$12,271▲ +$3,186
Chicago citywide $23,241 ±468 $28,345 ±412 $38,498 ±681 ▲ +$15,257▲ +$10,153▲ +$5,104
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $41,584 ±6,025 $56,655 ±13,805 $54,763 ±9,662 ▲ +$13,180▼ −$1,892▲ +$15,071
Chicago citywide $61,207 ±1,249 $68,040 ±1,298 $73,776 ±1,391 ▲ +$12,570▲ +$5,737▲ +$6,833
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $31,383 ±4,547 $46,174 ±11,251 $54,763 ±9,662 ▲ +$23,381▲ +$8,589▲ +$14,791
Chicago citywide $46,192 ±942 $55,452 ±1,058 $73,776 ±1,391 ▲ +$27,585▲ +$18,324▲ +$9,261

Earnings of All Workers

Category McKinley Park
Average Earnings $54,718±$3,520
10th Percentile Earnings $7,021±$1,493
25th Percentile Earnings $21,806±$3,574
Median Earnings $45,153±$4,900
75th Percentile Earnings $77,327±$7,069
90th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Average Earnings $54,718±$3,520 $75,571±$768 ▼ −$20,853 37/76
10th Percentile Earnings $7,021±$1,493 $8,529±$272 ▼ −$1,508 41/77
25th Percentile Earnings $21,806±$3,574 $25,183±$358 ▼ −$3,376 36/77
Median Earnings $45,153±$4,900 $51,367±$471 ▼ −$6,214 38/77
75th Percentile Earnings $77,327±$7,069 $93,324±$598 ▼ −$15,996 36/77
90th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/77
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $39,917 ±1,693 $44,240 ±2,386 $54,718 ±3,520 ▲ +$14,801▲ +$10,477▲ +$4,324
Chicago citywide $62,453 ±534 $71,626 ±551 $75,571 ±768 ▲ +$13,118▲ +$3,945▲ +$9,173
Average Earnings (nominal dollars) $30,124 ±1,278 $36,056 ±1,945 $54,718 ±3,520 ▲ +$24,593▲ +$18,662▲ +$5,932
Chicago citywide $47,133 ±403 $58,375 ±449 $75,571 ±768 ▲ +$28,438▲ +$17,196▲ +$11,243
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $5,276 ±1,258 $8,514 ±1,737 $7,021 ±1,493 ▲ +$1,745▼ −$1,493▲ +$3,238
Chicago citywide $6,858 ±139 $8,358 ±164 $8,529 ±272 ▲ +$1,671▲ +$171▲ +$1,500
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $3,982 ±949 $6,939 ±1,415 $7,021 ±1,493 ▲ +$3,040▲ +$82▲ +$2,957
Chicago citywide $5,176 ±105 $6,812 ±134 $8,529 ±272 ▲ +$3,354▲ +$1,717▲ +$1,636
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $15,208 ±2,048 $17,056 ±1,922 $21,806 ±3,574 ▲ +$6,598▲ +$4,750▲ +$1,848
Chicago citywide $19,598 ±241 $23,173 ±290 $25,183 ±358 ▲ +$5,585▲ +$2,010▲ +$3,576
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $11,477 ±1,546 $13,901 ±1,567 $21,806 ±3,574 ▲ +$10,329▲ +$7,905▲ +$2,424
Chicago citywide $14,790 ±182 $18,886 ±236 $25,183 ±358 ▲ +$10,393▲ +$6,297▲ +$4,096
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $32,332 ±2,569 $35,147 ±3,616 $45,153 ±4,900 ▲ +$12,821▲ +$10,006▲ +$2,815
Chicago citywide $42,365 ±293 $47,195 ±370 $51,367 ±471 ▲ +$9,002▲ +$4,172▲ +$4,830
Median Earnings (nominal dollars) $24,400 ±1,939 $28,645 ±2,947 $45,153 ±4,900 ▲ +$20,753▲ +$16,508▲ +$4,244
Chicago citywide $31,972 ±221 $38,464 ±302 $51,367 ±471 ▲ +$19,395▲ +$12,903▲ +$6,492
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $53,055 ±4,039 $61,220 ±4,604 $77,327 ±7,069 ▲ +$24,272▲ +$16,107▲ +$8,165
Chicago citywide $78,784 ±555 $87,853 ±597 $93,324 ±598 ▲ +$14,540▲ +$5,471▲ +$9,069
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $40,040 ±3,048 $49,894 ±3,753 $77,327 ±7,069 ▲ +$37,287▲ +$27,433▲ +$9,854
Chicago citywide $59,457 ±418 $71,600 ±486 $93,324 ±598 ▲ +$33,867▲ +$21,723▲ +$12,144
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $88,569 ±7,001 $91,697 ±6,936 — ——▲ +$3,128
Chicago citywide $128,659 ±682 — — ———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $66,842 ±5,284 $74,733 ±5,653 — ——▲ +$7,891
Chicago citywide $97,097 ±515 — — ———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in McKinley Park, Chicago

Category McKinley Park
Household income at age 35 $51,206 ±$1,485
Household income percentile rank 46.9 ±0.95 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 14.1% ±1.20 pp
Individual income at age 35 $38,083 ±$1,115
Fraction married 36.1% ±1.69 pp
Employment rate 75.6% ±1.51 pp
Incarceration rate 0.87% ±0.36 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in McKinley Park, Chicago. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in McKinley Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category McKinley Park City Difference
Household income at age 35 $51,206 ±$1,485 $43,090 ±$109 +$8,116
Household income percentile rank 46.9 ±0.95 pp 40.9 ±0.07 pp +6.1 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 14.1% ±1.20 pp 11.4% ±0.08 pp +2.7 pp
Individual income at age 35 $38,083 ±$1,115 $33,545 ±$85 +$4,538
Fraction married 36.1% ±1.69 pp 26.4% ±0.12 pp +9.8 pp
Employment rate 75.6% ±1.51 pp 74.4% ±0.12 pp +1.2 pp
Incarceration rate 0.87% ±0.36 pp 2.87% ±0.06 pp −2.0 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in McKinley Park, Chicago. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in McKinley Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in McKinley Park, Chicago in Lower-Income Families

Category McKinley Park
Household income at age 35 $45,931 ±$1,985
Household income percentile rank 43.4 ±1.33 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 11.3% ±1.72 pp
Individual income at age 35 $34,068 ±$1,552
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in McKinley Park, Chicago with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in McKinley Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category McKinley Park City Difference
Household income at age 35 $45,931 ±$1,985 $34,712 ±$133 +$11,219
Household income percentile rank 43.4 ±1.33 pp 35.3 ±0.09 pp +8.1 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 11.3% ±1.72 pp 6.31% ±0.10 pp +5.0 pp
Individual income at age 35 $34,068 ±$1,552 $28,717 ±$114 +$5,352
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in McKinley Park, Chicago with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in McKinley Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in McKinley Park, Chicago

Category McKinley Park
Stayed in the greater Chicago area 85.3% ±1.26 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 30.5% ±1.65 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in McKinley Park, Chicago. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in McKinley Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category McKinley Park City Difference
Stayed in the greater Chicago area 85.3% ±1.26 pp 78.1% ±0.12 pp +7.2 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 30.5% ±1.65 pp 22.9% ±0.12 pp +7.6 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in McKinley Park, Chicago. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in McKinley Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in McKinley Park

Category McKinley Park
All jobs located in mckinley park 6,825
McKinley Park jobs held by McKinley Park residents 2.4%
McKinley Park jobs held by non-McKinley Park residents 97.6%
Employed residents working in McKinley Park 2.5%
Employed residents working outside McKinley Park 97.5%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category McKinley Park Chicago neighborhood median Difference Rank
All jobs located in mckinley park 6,825 5,320 ▲ +1,505 33/77
McKinley Park jobs held by McKinley Park residents 2.4% 5.8% ▼ −3.4 pp 65/77
McKinley Park jobs held by non-McKinley Park residents 97.6% 94.2% ▲ +3.4 pp 13/77
Employed residents working in McKinley Park 2.5% 2.6% ▼ −0.1 pp 40/77
Employed residents working outside McKinley Park 97.5% 97.4% ▲ +0.1 pp 38/77
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in mckinley park 5,645 5,698 6,825 ▲ +1,180▲ +1,127▲ +53
Chicago citywide 5,236 5,698 5,320 ▲ +84▼ −378▲ +462
McKinley Park jobs held by McKinley Park residents 2.7%133 3.2%163 2.4%149 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +16▼ −0.8 pp▼ −14▲ +0.5 pp▲ +30
Chicago citywide 5.5%246 5.6%306 5.8%279 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +33▲ +0.1 pp▼ −27▲ +0.2 pp▲ +60
McKinley Park jobs held by non-McKinley Park residents 97.3%4,885 96.8%4,981 97.6%6,067 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +1,182▲ +0.8 pp▲ +1,086▼ −0.5 pp▲ +96
Chicago citywide 94.5%4,320 94.4%4,646 94.2%4,657 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +337▼ −0.1 pp▲ +11▼ −0.2 pp▲ +326
Employed residents working in McKinley Park 2.4%133 2.7%163 2.5%149 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +16▼ −0.2 pp▼ −14▲ +0.3 pp▲ +30
Chicago citywide 2.5%246 2.7%306 2.6%279 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +33▼ −0.1 pp▼ −27▲ +0.1 pp▲ +60
Employed residents working outside McKinley Park 97.6%5,436 97.3%5,863 97.5%5,759 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +323▲ +0.2 pp▼ −104▼ −0.3 pp▲ +427
Chicago citywide 97.5%9,791 97.3%10,346 97.4%10,385 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +594▲ +0.1 pp▲ +39▼ −0.1 pp▲ +555

Industry of Jobs in McKinley Park

Category McKinley Park
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0
Construction 2.2%150
Manufacturing 7.8%529
Wholesale Trade 25.2%1,718
Retail Trade 13.9%946
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 12.4%844
↳ Utilities 0.1%8
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 12.2%836
Information 0.2%11
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 0.9%62
↳ Finance & Insurance 0.7%46
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.2%16
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 28.8%1,963
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 1.9%132
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%0
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 26.8%1,831
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 2.9%196
↳ Educational Services 1.5%100
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 1.4%96
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 4.2%285
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.0%0
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 4.2%285
Other Services 1.8%121
Public Administration 0.0%0
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%0 0.0%423 0% 25/77
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0 0.0%36 0% 9/77
Construction 2.2%150 1.9%27,207 ▲ +0.3% 47/77
Manufacturing 7.8%529 4.4%64,747 ▲ +3.3% 31/77
Wholesale Trade 25.2%1,718 2.8%41,460 ▲ +22.3% 1/77
Retail Trade 13.9%946 6.6%96,413 ▲ +7.3% 28/77
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 12.4%844 6.0%87,817 ▲ +6.4% 12/77
↳ Utilities 0.1%8 0.3%5,012 ▼ -0.2% 9/77
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 12.2%836 5.7%82,805 ▲ +6.6% 10/77
Information 0.2%11 3.5%51,095 ▼ -3.3% 57/77
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 0.9%62 10.8%157,520 ▼ -9.9% 72/77
↳ Finance & Insurance 0.7%46 8.6%125,824 ▼ -7.9% 66/77
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.2%16 2.2%31,696 ▼ -1.9% 73/77
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 28.8%1,963 23.2%339,220 ▲ +5.6% 5/77
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 1.9%132 14.2%207,444 ▼ -12.2% 54/77
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%0 1.2%16,872 ▼ -1.2% 36/77
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 26.8%1,831 7.9%114,904 ▲ +19.0% 5/77
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 2.9%196 23.0%336,089 ▼ -20.1% 75/77
↳ Educational Services 1.5%100 9.2%134,671 ▼ -7.7% 59/77
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 1.4%96 13.8%201,418 ▼ -12.4% 75/77
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 4.2%285 10.3%151,055 ▼ -6.1% 65/77
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.0%0 1.9%27,339 ▼ -1.9% 65/77
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 4.2%285 8.5%123,716 ▼ -4.3% 62/77
Other Services 1.8%121 4.0%59,136 ▼ -2.3% 67/77
Public Administration 0.0%0 3.5%51,418 ▼ -3.5% 19/77
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.3%15 0.0%0 0.0%0 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −15– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.3 pp▼ −15
Chicago citywide 0.0%181 0.0%569 0.0%423 – 0.0 pp▲ +242– 0.0 pp▼ −146– 0.0 pp▲ +388
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 0.0%140 0.0%374 0.0%36 – 0.0 pp▼ −104– 0.0 pp▼ −338– 0.0 pp▲ +234
Construction 1.5%87 4.6%263 2.2%150 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +63▼ −2.4 pp▼ −113▲ +3.1 pp▲ +176
Chicago citywide 1.6%20,789 1.8%26,012 1.9%27,207 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,418– 0.0 pp▲ +1,195▲ +0.3 pp▲ +5,223
Manufacturing 9.1%516 9.9%562 7.8%529 ▼ −1.4 pp▲ +13▼ −2.1 pp▼ −33▲ +0.7 pp▲ +46
Chicago citywide 4.6%61,066 4.5%63,597 4.4%64,747 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,681▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,150▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,531
Wholesale Trade 13.0%734 15.1%863 25.2%1,718 ▲ +12.2 pp▲ +984▲ +10.0 pp▲ +855▲ +2.1 pp▲ +129
Chicago citywide 3.0%39,431 2.9%41,789 2.8%41,460 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,029▼ −0.1 pp▼ −329▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,358
Retail Trade 14.2%803 15.3%873 13.9%946 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +143▼ −1.5 pp▲ +73▲ +1.1 pp▲ +70
Chicago citywide 7.4%97,262 6.9%97,836 6.6%96,413 ▼ −0.8 pp▼ −849▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,423▼ −0.5 pp▲ +574
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 5.8%330 3.2%183 12.4%844 ▲ +6.5 pp▲ +514▲ +9.2 pp▲ +661▼ −2.6 pp▼ −147
Chicago citywide 5.4%71,320 5.6%79,303 6.0%87,817 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +16,497▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,514▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,983
Utilities 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.1%8 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 0.3%4,383 0.3%4,956 0.3%5,012 – 0.0 pp▲ +629– 0.0 pp▲ +56– 0.0 pp▲ +573
Transportation & Warehousing 5.8%330 3.2%183 12.2%836 ▲ +6.4 pp▲ +506▲ +9.0 pp▲ +653▼ −2.6 pp▼ −147
Chicago citywide 5.1%66,937 5.2%74,347 5.7%82,805 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +15,868▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,458▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,410
Information 0.3%18 0.4%23 0.2%11 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −7▼ −0.2 pp▼ −12▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5
Chicago citywide 3.1%40,514 3.4%48,135 3.5%51,095 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +10,581▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,960▲ +0.3 pp▲ +7,621
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 3.3%188 3.1%175 0.9%62 ▼ −2.4 pp▼ −126▼ −2.2 pp▼ −113▼ −0.3 pp▼ −13
Chicago citywide 10.5%138,287 10.6%150,163 10.8%157,520 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +19,233▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,357▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,876
Finance & Insurance 3.2%178 2.8%160 0.7%46 ▼ −2.5 pp▼ −132▼ −2.1 pp▼ −114▼ −0.3 pp▼ −18
Chicago citywide 8.5%111,307 8.4%119,147 8.6%125,824 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14,517▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,677▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7,840
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.2%10 0.3%15 0.2%16 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +6– 0.0 pp▲ +1▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5
Chicago citywide 2.1%26,980 2.2%31,016 2.2%31,696 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,716– 0.0 pp▲ +680▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,036
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 41.3%2,332 37.8%2,153 28.8%1,963 ▼ −12.5 pp▼ −369▼ −9.0 pp▼ −190▼ −3.5 pp▼ −179
Chicago citywide 21.2%278,928 22.6%319,744 23.2%339,220 ▲ +2.0 pp▲ +60,292▲ +0.6 pp▲ +19,476▲ +1.3 pp▲ +40,816
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 3.7%207 2.5%145 1.9%132 ▼ −1.7 pp▼ −75▼ −0.6 pp▼ −13▼ −1.1 pp▼ −62
Chicago citywide 11.8%155,200 12.9%182,462 14.2%207,444 ▲ +2.4 pp▲ +52,244▲ +1.3 pp▲ +24,982▲ +1.1 pp▲ +27,262
Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%2 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp▼ −2– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▼ −2
Chicago citywide 1.0%13,619 1.2%16,600 1.2%16,872 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,253– 0.0 pp▲ +272▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,981
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 37.6%2,123 35.2%2,008 26.8%1,831 ▼ −10.8 pp▼ −292▼ −8.4 pp▼ −177▼ −2.4 pp▼ −115
Chicago citywide 8.4%110,109 8.5%120,682 7.9%114,904 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +4,795▼ −0.7 pp▼ −5,778▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,573
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 2.6%146 2.7%155 2.9%196 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +50▲ +0.2 pp▲ +41▲ +0.1 pp▲ +9
Chicago citywide 23.5%308,633 22.1%313,540 23.0%336,089 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +27,456▲ +0.8 pp▲ +22,549▼ −1.4 pp▲ +4,907
Educational Services 1.1%64 1.0%56 1.5%100 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +36▲ +0.5 pp▲ +44▼ −0.2 pp▼ −8
Chicago citywide 10.1%132,909 9.0%128,169 9.2%134,671 ▼ −0.9 pp▲ +1,762▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,502▼ −1.1 pp▼ −4,740
Health Care & Social Assistance 1.5%82 1.7%99 1.4%96 – 0.0 pp▲ +14▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3▲ +0.3 pp▲ +17
Chicago citywide 13.4%175,724 13.1%185,371 13.8%201,418 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +25,694▲ +0.7 pp▲ +16,047▼ −0.3 pp▲ +9,647
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 6.0%339 5.7%322 4.2%285 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −54▼ −1.5 pp▼ −37▼ −0.4 pp▼ −17
Chicago citywide 10.9%143,753 11.5%162,749 10.3%151,055 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,302▼ −1.2 pp▼ −11,694▲ +0.5 pp▲ +18,996
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.4%21 0.0%1 0.0%0 ▼ −0.4 pp▼ −21– 0.0 pp▼ −1▼ −0.4 pp▼ −20
Chicago citywide 1.7%22,179 2.1%30,178 1.9%27,339 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +5,160▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,839▲ +0.4 pp▲ +7,999
Accommodation & Food Services 5.6%318 5.6%321 4.2%285 ▼ −1.5 pp▼ −33▼ −1.5 pp▼ −36– 0.0 pp▲ +3
Chicago citywide 9.3%121,574 9.4%132,571 8.5%123,716 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +2,142▼ −0.9 pp▼ −8,855▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,997
Other Services 2.0%114 1.9%110 1.8%121 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +7▼ −0.2 pp▲ +11▼ −0.1 pp▼ −4
Chicago citywide 4.5%59,098 4.4%61,698 4.0%59,136 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +38▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,562▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,600
Public Administration 0.4%23 0.3%16 0.0%0 ▼ −0.4 pp▼ −23▼ −0.3 pp▼ −16▼ −0.1 pp▼ −7
Chicago citywide 4.2%54,814 3.6%51,684 3.5%51,418 ▼ −0.7 pp▼ −3,396▼ −0.1 pp▼ −266▼ −0.5 pp▼ −3,130

Earnings of Jobs in McKinley Park

Category McKinley Park
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 17.3%1,182
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 34.3%2,342
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 48.4%3,301
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 17.3%1,182 12.7%185,293 ▲ +4.7% 48/77
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 34.3%2,342 20.5%299,468 ▲ +13.9% 29/77
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 48.4%3,301 66.9%978,839 ▼ -18.5% 43/77
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 33.2%1,876 25.3%1,441 17.3%1,182 ▼ −15.9 pp▼ −694▼ −8.0 pp▼ −259▼ −7.9 pp▼ −435
Chicago citywide 21.3%280,137 16.8%238,135 12.7%185,293 ▼ −8.7 pp▼ −94,844▼ −4.1 pp▼ −52,842▼ −4.5 pp▼ −42,002
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 37.2%2,098 43.5%2,478 34.3%2,342 ▼ −2.9 pp▲ +244▼ −9.2 pp▼ −136▲ +6.3 pp▲ +380
Chicago citywide 30.7%403,220 26.7%378,530 20.5%299,468 ▼ −10.2 pp▼ −103,752▼ −6.3 pp▼ −79,062▼ −4.0 pp▼ −24,690
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 29.6%1,671 31.2%1,779 48.4%3,301 ▲ +18.8 pp▲ +1,630▲ +17.1 pp▲ +1,522▲ +1.6 pp▲ +108
Chicago citywide 48.0%630,719 56.5%800,154 66.9%978,839 ▲ +18.9 pp▲ +348,120▲ +10.4 pp▲ +178,685▲ +8.5 pp▲ +169,435

Jobs in McKinley Park by Firm Age

Category McKinley Park
Firm age: 0–1 years 4.4%298
Firm age: 2–3 years 19.2%1,313
Firm age: 4–5 years 2.0%134
Firm age: 6–10 years 4.1%279
Firm age: 11 or more years 70.3%4,801
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years 4.4%298 2.8%37,293 ▲ +1.5% 26/77
Firm age: 2–3 years 19.2%1,313 2.8%37,154 ▲ +16.4% 1/77
Firm age: 4–5 years 2.0%134 3.2%41,869 ▼ -1.2% 56/77
Firm age: 6–10 years 4.1%279 7.8%102,353 ▼ -3.7% 68/77
Firm age: 11 or more years 70.3%4,801 83.4%1,098,220 ▼ -13.1% 64/77
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years 1.5%82 1.9%107 4.4%298 ▲ +2.9 pp▲ +216▲ +2.5 pp▲ +191▲ +0.4 pp▲ +25
Chicago citywide 2.9%33,224 2.6%33,244 2.8%37,293 – 0.0 pp▲ +4,069▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,049▼ −0.2 pp▲ +20
Firm age: 2–3 years 1.4%76 2.5%141 19.2%1,313 ▲ +17.9 pp▲ +1,237▲ +16.8 pp▲ +1,172▲ +1.1 pp▲ +65
Chicago citywide 4.0%46,935 3.3%42,284 2.8%37,154 ▼ −1.2 pp▼ −9,781▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,130▼ −0.7 pp▼ −4,651
Firm age: 4–5 years 2.5%140 2.6%146 2.0%134 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −6▼ −0.6 pp▼ −12▲ +0.1 pp▲ +6
Chicago citywide 3.7%42,688 3.6%46,058 3.2%41,869 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −819▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,189▼ −0.1 pp▲ +3,370
Firm age: 6–10 years 4.2%238 6.1%348 4.1%279 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +41▼ −2.0 pp▼ −69▲ +1.9 pp▲ +110
Chicago citywide 8.2%94,955 8.6%109,934 7.8%102,353 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +7,398▼ −0.9 pp▼ −7,581▲ +0.5 pp▲ +14,979
Firm age: 11 or more years 90.5%5,086 86.9%4,940 70.3%4,801 ▼ −20.1 pp▼ −285▼ −16.6 pp▼ −139▼ −3.5 pp▼ −146
Chicago citywide 81.3%946,801 81.8%1,043,037 83.4%1,098,220 ▲ +2.1 pp▲ +151,419▲ +1.6 pp▲ +55,183▲ +0.5 pp▲ +96,236

Jobs in McKinley Park by Firm Size

Category McKinley Park
Firm size: 0–19 employees 10.3%705
Firm size: 20–49 employees 7.0%477
Firm size: 50–249 employees 6.5%441
Firm size: 250–499 employees 5.8%398
Firm size: 500 or more employees 70.4%4,804
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees 10.3%705 12.8%168,975 ▼ -2.5% 68/77
Firm size: 20–49 employees 7.0%477 7.3%96,404 ▼ -0.3% 56/77
Firm size: 50–249 employees 6.5%441 13.8%181,123 ▼ -7.3% 70/77
Firm size: 250–499 employees 5.8%398 5.7%74,787 ▲ +0.2% 27/77
Firm size: 500 or more employees 70.4%4,804 60.4%795,600 ▲ +10.0% 8/77
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees 14.5%815 13.3%756 10.3%705 ▼ −4.2 pp▼ −110▼ −3.0 pp▼ −51▼ −1.2 pp▼ −59
Chicago citywide 13.9%162,248 13.3%169,949 12.8%168,975 ▼ −1.1 pp▲ +6,727▼ −0.5 pp▼ −974▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,701
Firm size: 20–49 employees 7.9%446 10.3%583 7.0%477 ▼ −0.9 pp▲ +31▼ −3.3 pp▼ −106▲ +2.3 pp▲ +137
Chicago citywide 8.4%97,503 8.2%103,945 7.3%96,404 ▼ −1.1 pp▼ −1,099▼ −0.8 pp▼ −7,541▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,442
Firm size: 50–249 employees 12.5%700 7.0%398 6.5%441 ▼ −6.0 pp▼ −259▼ −0.5 pp▲ +43▼ −5.4 pp▼ −302
Chicago citywide 15.7%183,275 14.9%189,930 13.8%181,123 ▼ −2.0 pp▼ −2,152▼ −1.1 pp▼ −8,807▼ −0.8 pp▲ +6,655
Firm size: 250–499 employees 12.0%675 1.3%76 5.8%398 ▼ −6.2 pp▼ −277▲ +4.5 pp▲ +322▼ −10.7 pp▼ −599
Chicago citywide 6.3%72,992 5.9%74,603 5.7%74,787 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,795▼ −0.2 pp▲ +184▼ −0.4 pp▲ +1,611
Firm size: 500 or more employees 53.1%2,986 68.1%3,869 70.4%4,804 ▲ +17.3 pp▲ +1,818▲ +2.3 pp▲ +935▲ +15.0 pp▲ +883
Chicago citywide 55.7%648,585 57.8%736,130 60.4%795,600 ▲ +4.7 pp▲ +147,015▲ +2.7 pp▲ +59,470▲ +2.1 pp▲ +87,545

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category McKinley Park
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 13.8% ±2.4 pp13.8%±2.4 pp2,048 ±353
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 82.5% ±2.0 pp11.4%±0.3 pp1,690 ±40
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 17.5% ±10.0 pp2.4%±1.4 pp358 ±205
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 13.8%±2.4 pp13.8%±2.4 pp2,048±353 13.5%±0.2 pp13.5%±0.2 pp365,577±5,480 ▲ +0.3%▲ +0.3% 54/77
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 82.5%±2.0 pp11.4%±0.3 pp1,690±40 83.0%±0.5 pp11.2%±0.1 pp303,520±1,897 ▼ -0.5%▲ +0.2% 46/7751/77
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 17.5%±10.0 pp2.4%±1.4 pp358±205 17.0%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.1 pp62,057±2,247 ▲ +0.5%▲ +0.1% 32/7726/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category McKinley Park
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 6.0% ±1.3 pp6.0%±1.3 pp894 ±192
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 58.9% ±11.4 pp3.5%±0.7 pp527 ±101
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 41.1% ±11.2 pp2.5%±0.7 pp367 ±100
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 78.5% ±13.8 pp4.7%±0.8 pp702 ±124
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 21.5% ±7.7 pp1.3%±0.5 pp192 ±69
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 6.0%±1.3 pp6.0%±1.3 pp894±192 7.4%±0.1 pp7.4%±0.1 pp201,851±4,036 ▼ -1.4%▼ -1.4% 37/77
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 58.9%±11.4 pp3.5%±0.7 pp527±101 52.4%±0.7 pp3.9%±0.1 pp105,720±1,511 ▲ +6.6%▼ -0.4% 45/7746/77
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 41.1%±11.2 pp2.5%±0.7 pp367±100 47.6%±1.2 pp3.5%±0.1 pp96,131±2,437 ▼ -6.6%▼ -1.1% 33/7735/77
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 78.5%±13.8 pp4.7%±0.8 pp702±124 67.0%±1.0 pp5.0%±0.1 pp135,301±1,945 ▲ +11.5%▼ -0.3% 28/7728/77
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 21.5%±7.7 pp1.3%±0.5 pp192±69 33.0%±1.2 pp2.5%±0.1 pp66,550±2,459 ▼ -11.5%▼ -1.2% 50/7739/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category McKinley Park
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 1.1% ±2.6 pp26 ±63
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 5.1% ±6.4 pp46 ±58
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 1.1%±2.6 pp26±63 5.9%±0.5 pp— ▼ -4.8% 65/77
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 5.1%±6.4 pp46±58 5.4%±0.6 pp— ▼ -0.3% 31/77
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category McKinley Park
Owner-Occupied Households 70.2% ±5.8 pp3,989 ±332
Renter-Occupied Households 29.8% ±4.1 pp1,697 ±235
Owner-Occupied Residents 76.9% ±5.6 pp11,390 ±828
Renter-Occupied Residents 23.1% ±3.9 pp3,425 ±578
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Owner-Occupied Households 70.2%±5.8 pp3,989±332 46.0%±0.4 pp534,012±4,939 ▲ +24.1% 15/77
Renter-Occupied Households 29.8%±4.1 pp1,697±235 54.0%±0.4 pp626,193±5,183 ▼ -24.1% 63/77
Owner-Occupied Residents 76.9%±5.6 pp11,390±828 51.8%±0.5 pp1,377,219±13,574 ▲ +25.1% 9/77
Renter-Occupied Residents 23.1%±3.9 pp3,425±578 48.2%±0.5 pp1,280,665±13,500 ▼ -25.1% 69/77
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category McKinley Park
Median Year Moved In 2010±1.5 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later 1.5% ±1.3 pp84 ±73
Moved in 2020 to 2022 13.8% ±3.3 pp786 ±189
Moved in 2010 to 2019 36.4% ±5.3 pp2,070 ±303
Moved in 2000 to 2009 25.5% ±6.8 pp1,448 ±389
Moved in 1990 to 1999 9.9% ±2.6 pp565 ±146
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 12.9% ±2.8 pp733 ±159
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Median Year Moved In 2010±1.5 yr 2015±1.0 yr ▼ −5 54/77
Moved in 2023 or Later 1.5%±1.3 pp84±73 5.9%±0.2 pp68,884±2,742 ▼ -4.5% 70/77
Moved in 2020 to 2022 13.8%±3.3 pp786±189 24.1%±0.4 pp279,417±5,059 ▼ -10.3% 53/77
Moved in 2010 to 2019 36.4%±5.3 pp2,070±303 39.2%±0.5 pp455,125±5,772 ▼ -2.8% 50/77
Moved in 2000 to 2009 25.5%±6.8 pp1,448±389 13.8%±0.3 pp160,353±3,324 ▲ +11.6% 4/77
Moved in 1990 to 1999 9.9%±2.6 pp565±146 8.2%±0.2 pp95,243±2,390 ▲ +1.7% 28/77
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 12.9%±2.8 pp733±159 8.7%±0.2 pp101,183±2,362 ▲ +4.2% 29/77
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show
Category McKinley Park
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 4.6% ±1.7 pp4.6%±1.7 pp680 ±249
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers) 3.9% ±1.5 pp83.8%±11.6 pp570 ±223
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers) 0.0% ±0.2 pp0.0%0
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 0.6% ±0.7 pp12.5%±13.9 pp85 ±99
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 0.2% ±0.3 pp3.7%±7.0 pp25 ±49
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 4.6%±1.7 pp4.6%±1.7 pp680±249 14.0%±0.3 pp14.0%±0.3 pp375,475±8,289 ▼ -9.4%▼ -9.4% 69/77
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers) 3.9%±1.5 pp83.8%±11.6 pp570±223 9.8%±0.3 pp69.9%±1.0 pp262,365±6,953 ▼ -5.9%▲ +13.9% 70/7720/77
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers) 0.0%±0.2 pp0.0%0 0.8%±0.1 pp5.5%±0.4 pp20,552±1,626 ▼ -0.8%▼ -5.5% 69/7769/77
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 0.6%±0.7 pp12.5%±13.9 pp85±99 2.5%±0.1 pp17.6%±0.7 pp65,936±2,918 ▼ -1.9%▼ -5.1% 50/7729/77
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 0.2%±0.3 pp3.7%±7.0 pp25±49 1.0%±0.1 pp7.1%±0.8 pp26,622±3,040 ▼ -0.8%▼ -3.4% 59/7748/77
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show
Category McKinley Park
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 9.0% ±2.3 pp9.0%±2.3 pp563 ±143
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 2.4% ±1.2 pp27.2%±11.7 pp153 ±77
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.0% ±0.5 pp0.0%0
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.6% ±1.0 pp6.2%±10.5 pp35 ±60
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 6.0% ±2.2 pp66.6%±17.4 pp375 ±136
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 8.3% ±4.0 pp8.3%±4.0 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 0.0% ±0.7 pp0.0%±0.7 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 9.0%±2.3 pp9.0%±2.3 pp563±143 9.1%±0.2 pp9.1%±0.2 pp116,849±2,682 ▼ -0.1%▼ -0.1% 33/77
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 2.4%±1.2 pp27.2%±11.7 pp153±77 2.5%±0.1 pp27.1%±1.4 pp31,723±1,796 0%0% 30/7732/77
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.0%±0.5 pp0.0%0 0.6%±0.1 pp6.0%±0.7 pp7,037±795 ▼ -0.6%▼ -6.0% 66/7766/77
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.6%±1.0 pp6.2%±10.5 pp35±60 0.2%±0.0 pp2.4%±0.5 pp2,831±587 ▲ +0.3%▲ +3.8% 9/7711/77
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 6.0%±2.2 pp66.6%±17.4 pp375±136 5.9%±0.3 pp64.4%±2.5 pp75,258±3,387 ▲ +0.1%▲ +2.2% 28/7739/77
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 8.3%±4.0 pp8.3%±4.0 pp— 4.8%±0.3 pp4.8%±0.3 pp— ▲ +3.5%▲ +3.5% 7/77
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 0.0%±0.7 pp0.0%±0.7 pp— 1.3%±0.1 pp1.3%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.3%▼ -1.3% 66/77
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category McKinley Park
Median Year Built 1938±0 yr
Pre-1940 62.8% ±5.1 pp3,922 ±321
1940-2009 31.6% ±5.3 pp1,975 ±331
2010+ 5.6% ±2.5 pp352 ±154
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Median Year Built 1938±0 yr 1953±1 yr ▼ −15 yrs 76/77
Pre-1940 62.8%±5.1 pp3,922±321 38.8%±0.4 pp495,715±4,678 ▲ +23.9% 3/77
1940-2009 31.6%±5.3 pp1,975±331 54.9%±0.6 pp700,698±7,435 ▼ -23.3% 75/77
2010+ 5.6%±2.5 pp352±154 6.3%±0.2 pp80,641±2,725 ▼ -0.7% 20/77
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category McKinley Park
Population Density 10,510 /sq mi±843/sq mi
Single-Family Homes 43.4% ±5.3 pp2,715 ±330
Buildings With 2–4 Units 49.1% ±6.2 pp3,071 ±389
Buildings With 5–19 Units 6.2% ±3.2 pp387 ±201
Buildings With 20 or More Units 1.0% ±1.4 pp63 ±90
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Population Density 10,510 /sq mi±843/sq mi 11,748 /sq mi±26/sq mi ▼ −1,238 /sq mi 46/77
Single-Family Homes 43.4%±5.3 pp2,715±330 29.2%±0.3 pp372,679±3,989 ▲ +14.3% 32/77
Buildings With 2–4 Units 49.1%±6.2 pp3,071±389 27.4%±0.4 pp349,976±4,957 ▲ +21.7% 11/77
Buildings With 5–19 Units 6.2%±3.2 pp387±201 16.2%±0.3 pp206,420±4,124 ▼ -10.0% 56/77
Buildings With 20 or More Units 1.0%±1.4 pp63±90 27.0%±0.3 pp344,543±4,438 ▼ -26.0% 72/77
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category McKinley Park
Studio 3.1% ±2.0 pp193 ±122
1 Bedroom 5.2% ±2.1 pp326 ±134
2 Bedrooms 35.9% ±4.3 pp2,245 ±272
3 Bedrooms 37.0% ±5.1 pp2,311 ±321
4 Bedrooms 7.8% ±2.5 pp489 ±159
5 or More Bedrooms 11.0% ±4.7 pp685 ±291
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Studio 3.1%±2.0 pp193±122 7.5%±0.3 pp95,749±3,205 ▼ -4.4% 41/77
1 Bedroom 5.2%±2.1 pp326±134 20.1%±0.4 pp257,271±4,939 ▼ -14.9% 71/77
2 Bedrooms 35.9%±4.3 pp2,245±272 33.1%±0.3 pp422,866±4,221 ▲ +2.8% 19/77
3 Bedrooms 37.0%±5.1 pp2,311±321 26.1%±0.3 pp333,682±4,061 ▲ +10.9% 23/77
4 Bedrooms 7.8%±2.5 pp489±159 9.0%±0.2 pp115,453±2,426 ▼ -1.2% 57/77
5 or More Bedrooms 11.0%±4.7 pp685±291 4.1%±0.2 pp52,033±2,072 ▲ +6.9% 2/77
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show
Category McKinley Park
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 2.7% ±1.7 pp2.7%±1.7 pp154 ±99
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 1.5% ±1.2 pp55.8%±27.5 pp86 ±70
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 1.2% ±1.2 pp44.2%±36.0 pp68 ±71
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 2.7%±1.7 pp2.7%±1.7 pp154±99 3.4%±0.2 pp3.4%±0.2 pp39,979±1,996 ▼ -0.7%▼ -0.7% 43/77
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 1.5%±1.2 pp55.8%±27.5 pp86±70 2.0%±0.1 pp58.2%±2.3 pp23,276±1,493 ▼ -0.5%▼ -2.4% 43/7752/76
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 1.2%±1.2 pp44.2%±36.0 pp68±71 1.4%±0.1 pp41.8%±2.6 pp16,703±1,328 ▼ -0.2%▲ +2.4% 33/7725/76
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category McKinley Park
Natural Gas Heat 92.9% ±2.6 pp5,285 ±146
Electric Heat 3.8% ±1.8 pp218 ±105
Other Heating Source 3.2% ±2.8 pp183 ±159
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Natural Gas Heat 92.9%±2.6 pp5,285±146 77.5%±0.3 pp899,660±3,501 ▲ +15.4% 5/77
Electric Heat 3.8%±1.8 pp218±105 18.0%±0.3 pp208,937±3,864 ▼ -14.2% 75/77
Other Heating Source 3.2%±2.8 pp183±159 4.4%±0.2 pp51,603±2,173 ▼ -1.2% 46/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show
Category McKinley Park
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 55.0% ±6.5 pp3,126 ±372
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 11.6% ±2.9 pp659 ±167
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 33.4% ±4.2 pp1,901 ±238
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 17.6% ±3.4 pp998 ±196
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 55.0%±6.5 pp3,126±372 24.9%±0.5 pp289,047±6,215 ▲ +30.1% 3/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 11.6%±2.9 pp659±167 23.8%±0.5 pp276,514±5,809 ▼ -12.2% 77/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 33.4%±4.2 pp1,901±238 45.6%±0.6 pp529,378±6,577 ▼ -12.2% 60/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 17.6%±3.4 pp998±196 24.0%±0.5 pp278,684±5,306 ▼ -6.5% 49/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category McKinley Park
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $579±$54
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $788±$76
Median Monthly Housing Costs $1,280±$95
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,865±$127
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $2,470±$161
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $579±$54 $594±$11 ▼ −$15 34/77
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $788±$76 $1,011±$8 ▼ −$223 52/77
Median Monthly Housing Costs $1,280±$95 $1,560±$10 ▼ −$280 43/77
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,865±$127 $2,329±$13 ▼ −$464 39/77
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $2,470±$161 Over $3,000 ▼ −$530+ 40/77
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $641 ±71 $625 ±58 $579 ±54 ▼ −$62▼ −$46▼ −$16
Chicago citywide $609 ±7 $606 ±7 $594 ±11 ▼ −$15▼ −$12▼ −$2
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $484 ±54 $509 ±47 $579 ±54 ▲ +$95▲ +$70▲ +$25
Chicago citywide $459 ±6 $494 ±6 $594 ±11 ▲ +$135▲ +$100▲ +$35
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $911 ±40 $867 ±54 $788 ±76 ▼ −$123▼ −$79▼ −$44
Chicago citywide $992 ±5 $1,001 ±5 $1,011 ±8 ▲ +$19▲ +$10▲ +$9
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $687 ±31 $706 ±44 $788 ±76 ▲ +$100▲ +$81▲ +$19
Chicago citywide $748 ±3 $816 ±4 $1,011 ±8 ▲ +$262▲ +$195▲ +$67
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,241 ±68 $1,211 ±68 $1,280 ±95 ▲ +$39▲ +$70▼ −$30
Chicago citywide $1,493 ±8 $1,523 ±6 $1,560 ±10 ▲ +$67▲ +$37▲ +$29
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $937 ±51 $987 ±55 $1,280 ±95 ▲ +$344▲ +$294▲ +$50
Chicago citywide $1,127 ±6 $1,241 ±5 $1,560 ±10 ▲ +$433▲ +$319▲ +$114
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,055 ±132 $1,837 ±104 $1,865 ±127 ▼ −$190▲ +$28▼ −$218
Chicago citywide $2,333 ±12 $2,326 ±10 $2,329 ±13 ▼ −$4▲ +$3▼ −$7
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,551 ±100 $1,497 ±85 $1,865 ±127 ▲ +$314▲ +$368▼ −$54
Chicago citywide $1,761 ±9 $1,896 ±8 $2,329 ±13 ▲ +$569▲ +$434▲ +$135
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $2,397 ±95 $2,470 ±161 —▲ +$74—
Chicago citywide — $3,316 ±20 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) — $1,953 ±78 $2,470 ±161 —▲ +$517—
Chicago citywide — $2,703 ±16 — ———

Rent

Rent measure
Category McKinley Park
Average Rent Plus Utilities $1,281±$74
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $733±$106
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,005±$103
Median Rent Plus Utilities $1,225±$85
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,614±$128
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,908±$84
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities $1,281±$74 $1,613±$12 ▼ −$332 44/77
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $733±$106 $696±$20 ▲ +$37 38/77
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,005±$103 $1,043±$8 ▼ −$38 37/77
Median Rent Plus Utilities $1,225±$85 $1,440±$10 ▼ −$215 46/77
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,614±$128 $2,021±$21 ▼ −$407 43/77
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,908±$84 $2,738±$29 ▼ −$831 52/77
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park
Average Rent $1,110±$66
10th Percentile Rent $593±$82
25th Percentile Rent $878±$140
Median Rent $1,119±$55
75th Percentile Rent $1,318±$84
90th Percentile Rent $1,588±$206
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Average Rent $1,110±$66 $1,452±$11 ▼ −$342 40/77
10th Percentile Rent $593±$82 $564±$21 ▲ +$29 40/77
25th Percentile Rent $878±$140 $913±$7 ▼ −$35 36/77
Median Rent $1,119±$55 $1,262±$12 ▼ −$143 37/77
75th Percentile Rent $1,318±$84 $1,868±$13 ▼ −$550 47/77
90th Percentile Rent $1,588±$206 $2,528±$38 ▼ −$940 47/77
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category McKinley Park
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,129±$53
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,188±$157
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,513±$150
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,959±$158
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,494±$188
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,137±$251
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,129±$53 $2,734±$24 ▼ −$605 41/77
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,188±$157 $1,270±$14 ▼ −$82 41/77
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,513±$150 $1,697±$14 ▼ −$184 42/77
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,959±$158 $2,339±$17 ▼ −$380 42/77
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,494±$188 $3,269±$31 ▼ −$775 43/77
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,137±$251 Over $4,000 ▼ −$863+ 43/77
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,348 ±117 $2,068 ±71 $2,129 ±53 ▼ −$220▲ +$61▼ −$281
Chicago citywide $2,855 ±19 $2,793 ±23 $2,734 ±24 ▼ −$121▼ −$60▼ −$61
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,772 ±88 $1,685 ±58 $2,129 ±53 ▲ +$356▲ +$443▼ −$87
Chicago citywide $2,154 ±14 $2,277 ±19 $2,734 ±24 ▲ +$579▲ +$457▲ +$122
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,213 ±214 $1,201 ±140 $1,188 ±157 ▼ −$25▼ −$13▼ −$12
Chicago citywide $1,403 ±11 $1,356 ±11 $1,270 ±14 ▼ −$133▼ −$86▼ −$47
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $916 ±161 $979 ±114 $1,188 ±157 ▲ +$273▲ +$209▲ +$63
Chicago citywide $1,059 ±8 $1,105 ±9 $1,270 ±14 ▲ +$212▲ +$165▲ +$46
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,697 ±146 $1,632 ±100 $1,513 ±150 ▼ −$183▼ −$119▼ −$65
Chicago citywide $1,874 ±12 $1,800 ±12 $1,697 ±14 ▼ −$177▼ −$103▼ −$74
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,281 ±110 $1,330 ±81 $1,513 ±150 ▲ +$233▲ +$183▲ +$50
Chicago citywide $1,414 ±9 $1,467 ±10 $1,697 ±14 ▲ +$283▲ +$230▲ +$53
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,271 ±121 $2,035 ±87 $1,959 ±158 ▼ −$312▼ −$77▼ −$235
Chicago citywide $2,526 ±13 $2,422 ±13 $2,339 ±17 ▼ −$187▼ −$83▼ −$103
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,714 ±91 $1,659 ±71 $1,959 ±158 ▲ +$245▲ +$300▼ −$55
Chicago citywide $1,906 ±10 $1,974 ±11 $2,339 ±17 ▲ +$433▲ +$365▲ +$68
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,910 ±168 $2,416 ±113 $2,494 ±188 ▼ −$416▲ +$77▼ −$493
Chicago citywide $3,447 ±25 $3,343 ±25 $3,269 ±31 ▼ −$178▼ −$74▼ −$104
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,196 ±127 $1,969 ±92 $2,494 ±188 ▲ +$298▲ +$524▼ −$227
Chicago citywide $2,601 ±19 $2,724 ±20 $3,269 ±31 ▲ +$668▲ +$544▲ +$123
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,865 ±349 $2,986 ±203 $3,137 ±251 ▼ −$728▲ +$151▼ −$879
Chicago citywide — $4,578 ±59 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,917 ±263 $2,434 ±165 $3,137 ±251 ▲ +$220▲ +$703▼ −$483
Chicago citywide — $3,731 ±48 — ———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category McKinley Park
Average Monthly Owner Costs $800±$65
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $438±$57
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $559±$59
Median Monthly Owner Costs $734±$36
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $916±$99
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,192±$91
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs $800±$65 $1,078±$22 ▼ −$277 45/77
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $438±$57 $418±$8 ▲ +$20 35/77
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $559±$59 $601±$8 ▼ −$41 45/77
Median Monthly Owner Costs $734±$36 $859±$10 ▼ −$125 50/77
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $916±$99 $1,197±$18 ▼ −$281 54/77
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,192±$91 Over $1,500 ▼ −$308+ 46/77
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $720 ±43 $820 ±43 $800 ±65 ▲ +$80▼ −$20▲ +$99
Chicago citywide $957 ±15 $1,028 ±10 $1,078 ±22 ▲ +$121▲ +$50▲ +$71
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $544 ±32 $668 ±35 $800 ±65 ▲ +$256▲ +$132▲ +$124
Chicago citywide $722 ±11 $838 ±8 $1,078 ±22 ▲ +$355▲ +$240▲ +$116
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $390 ±55 $466 ±67 $438 ±57 ▲ +$48▼ −$28▲ +$76
Chicago citywide $429 ±6 $469 ±7 $418 ±8 ▼ −$11▼ −$51▲ +$40
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $294 ±42 $379 ±54 $438 ±57 ▲ +$144▲ +$58▲ +$85
Chicago citywide $324 ±5 $382 ±5 $418 ±8 ▲ +$95▲ +$36▲ +$59
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $518 ±56 $627 ±56 $559 ±59 ▲ +$41▼ −$68▲ +$109
Chicago citywide $586 ±6 $629 ±6 $601 ±8 ▲ +$14▼ −$28▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $391 ±42 $511 ±45 $559 ±59 ▲ +$168▲ +$48▲ +$120
Chicago citywide $442 ±4 $513 ±5 $601 ±8 ▲ +$158▲ +$88▲ +$70
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $705 ±48 $789 ±43 $734 ±36 ▲ +$29▼ −$55▲ +$83
Chicago citywide $815 ±9 $860 ±7 $859 ±10 ▲ +$44▼ −$1▲ +$45
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $532 ±36 $643 ±35 $734 ±36 ▲ +$202▲ +$91▲ +$110
Chicago citywide $615 ±7 $701 ±6 $859 ±10 ▲ +$244▲ +$158▲ +$86
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $899 ±54 $976 ±74 $916 ±99 ▲ +$17▼ −$60▲ +$77
Chicago citywide — $1,206 ±14 $1,197 ±18 —▼ −$9—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $678 ±41 $795 ±60 $916 ±99 ▲ +$238▲ +$121▲ +$117
Chicago citywide — $983 ±12 $1,197 ±18 —▲ +$214—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $1,240 ±117 $1,192 ±91 —▼ −$48—
Chicago citywide — $1,767 ±35 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — $1,011 ±96 $1,192 ±91 —▲ +$182—
Chicago citywide — $1,440 ±28 — ———

Home Values

Category McKinley Park
Average Home Value $312,415±$13,401
10th Percentile Home Value $170,182±$13,536
25th Percentile Home Value $221,565±$20,722
Median Home Value $303,496±$20,830
75th Percentile Home Value $391,748±$20,754
90th Percentile Home Value $489,083±$40,536
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Average Home Value $312,415±$13,401 $437,638±$7,358 ▼ −$125,223 41/77
10th Percentile Home Value $170,182±$13,536 $129,150±$3,756 ▲ +$41,031 30/77
25th Percentile Home Value $221,565±$20,722 $217,800±$1,804 ▲ +$3,765 35/77
Median Home Value $303,496±$20,830 $334,100±$2,424 ▼ −$30,604 39/77
75th Percentile Home Value $391,748±$20,754 $497,700±$3,730 ▼ −$105,952 37/77
90th Percentile Home Value $489,083±$40,536 $809,159±$15,691 ▼ −$320,077 41/77
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $269,860 ±16,861 $303,732 ±30,061 $312,415 ±13,401 ▲ +$42,555▲ +$8,683▲ +$33,872
Chicago citywide $386,614 ±5,106 $424,380 ±4,754 $437,638 ±7,358 ▲ +$51,024▲ +$13,258▲ +$37,766
Average Home Value (nominal dollars) $203,659 ±12,725 $247,542 ±24,500 $312,415 ±13,401 ▲ +$108,756▲ +$64,873▲ +$43,883
Chicago citywide $291,771 ±3,853 $345,871 ±3,874 $437,638 ±7,358 ▲ +$145,867▲ +$91,768▲ +$54,099
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $109,544 ±20,315 $147,176 ±15,667 $170,182 ±13,536 ▲ +$60,638▲ +$23,006▲ +$37,632
Chicago citywide $115,330 ±1,421 $124,313 ±1,339 $129,150 ±3,756 ▲ +$13,821▲ +$4,838▲ +$8,983
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $82,671 ±15,332 $119,949 ±12,769 $170,182 ±13,536 ▲ +$87,511▲ +$50,233▲ +$37,278
Chicago citywide $87,037 ±1,072 $101,315 ±1,091 $129,150 ±3,756 ▲ +$42,113▲ +$27,835▲ +$14,278
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $196,251 ±26,080 $208,034 ±13,046 $221,565 ±20,722 ▲ +$25,313▲ +$13,530▲ +$11,783
Chicago citywide $190,543 ±2,400 $199,018 ±1,255 $217,800 ±1,804 ▲ +$27,257▲ +$18,782▲ +$8,475
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $148,108 ±19,682 $169,548 ±10,633 $221,565 ±20,722 ▲ +$73,457▲ +$52,016▲ +$21,440
Chicago citywide $143,800 ±1,811 $162,200 ±1,023 $217,800 ±1,804 ▲ +$74,000▲ +$55,600▲ +$18,400
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $269,664 ±16,512 $277,119 ±13,032 $303,496 ±20,830 ▲ +$33,832▲ +$26,377▲ +$7,455
Chicago citywide $299,066 ±2,120 $316,564 ±2,118 $334,100 ±2,424 ▲ +$35,034▲ +$17,536▲ +$17,498
Median Home Value (nominal dollars) $203,511 ±12,461 $225,852 ±10,621 $303,496 ±20,830 ▲ +$99,985▲ +$77,643▲ +$22,341
Chicago citywide $225,700 ±1,600 $258,000 ±1,726 $334,100 ±2,424 ▲ +$108,400▲ +$76,100▲ +$32,300
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $364,609 ±21,720 $355,433 ±15,729 $391,748 ±20,754 ▲ +$27,139▲ +$36,315▼ −$9,176
Chicago citywide $466,951 ±3,138 $490,797 ±3,892 $497,700 ±3,730 ▲ +$30,749▲ +$6,903▲ +$23,846
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $275,164 ±16,392 $289,678 ±12,820 $391,748 ±20,754 ▲ +$116,583▲ +$102,070▲ +$14,514
Chicago citywide $352,400 ±2,368 $400,000 ±3,172 $497,700 ±3,730 ▲ +$145,300▲ +$97,700▲ +$47,600
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $476,312 ±22,639 $461,102 ±21,639 $489,083 ±40,536 ▲ +$12,771▲ +$27,981▼ −$15,210
Chicago citywide $739,174 ±12,945 $835,769 ±9,047 $809,159 ±15,691 ▲ +$69,986▼ −$26,610▲ +$96,595
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $359,465 ±17,085 $375,799 ±17,636 $489,083 ±40,536 ▲ +$129,618▲ +$113,284▲ +$16,334
Chicago citywide $557,842 ±9,770 $681,153 ±7,373 $809,159 ±15,691 ▲ +$251,317▲ +$128,006▲ +$123,311

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show
Category McKinley Park
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 1.0%1.0%64
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.9%87.5%56
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.1%12.5%8
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 1.0%1.0%64 8.3%8.3%106,578 ▼ -7.3%▼ -7.3% 70/77
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.9%87.5%56 4.8%57.2%60,910 ▼ -3.9%▲ +30.3% 68/7721/77
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.1%12.5%8 1.1%13.8%14,721 ▼ -1.0%▼ -1.3% 47/7725/77
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0 2.1%25.7%27,383 ▼ -2.1%▼ -25.7% 58/7758/77
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0 0.3%3.3%3,564 ▼ -0.3%▼ -3.3% 47/7747/77
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units 0.8%46 0.7%41 1.0%64 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +18▲ +0.3 pp▲ +23▼ −0.1 pp▼ −5
Chicago citywide 8.8%104,550 8.5%103,479 8.3%106,578 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,028▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,099▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,071
Housing Choice Vouchers 0.6%36 0.5%30 0.9%56 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +20▲ +0.4 pp▲ +26▼ −0.1 pp▼ −6
Chicago citywide 4.3%51,601 4.6%55,987 4.8%60,910 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +9,309▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,923▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,386
Public Housing 0.2%10 0.2%11 0.1%8 – 0.0 pp▼ −2▼ −0.1 pp▼ −3– 0.0 pp▲ +1
Chicago citywide 1.8%21,159 1.3%16,094 1.2%14,721 ▼ −0.6 pp▼ −6,438▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,373▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,065
Project-Based Section 8 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 2.2%25,940 2.2%26,951 2.1%27,383 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,443▼ −0.1 pp▲ +432– 0.0 pp▲ +1,011
Other Project-Based Programs 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 0.5%5,850 0.4%4,447 0.3%3,564 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,286▼ −0.1 pp▼ −883▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,403
Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category McKinley Park
Average Household Income $19,064
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $462
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,308
Below 30% of Area Median Income 75.8%28
With Children 56.8%21
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 18.5%7
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $19,064 $17,032 ▲ +$2,032 17/75
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $462 $425 ▲ +$37 22/75
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,308 $1,389 ▼ -$81 38/75
Below 30% of Area Median Income 75.8%28 83.0%77,427 ▼ -7.2 pp 67/75
With Children 56.8%21 31.0%28,919 ▲ +25.8 pp 5/75
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 18.5%7 32.0%29,852 ▼ -13.5 pp 73/75
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income $9,633 $12,846 $19,064 ▲ +$9,431▲ +$6,218▲ +$3,213
Chicago citywide $12,156 $13,665 $17,032 ▲ +$4,876▲ +$3,367▲ +$1,509
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $256 $292 $462 ▲ +$206▲ +$170▲ +$36
Chicago citywide $310 $340 $425 ▲ +$115▲ +$85▲ +$30
Average Monthly Government Spending $915 $1,059 $1,308 ▲ +$393▲ +$249▲ +$144
Chicago citywide $916 $1,017 $1,389 ▲ +$473▲ +$372▲ +$101
Below 30% of Area Median Income 92.0%— 92.0%— 75.8%— ▼ −16.2 pp—▼ −16.2 pp—– 0.0 pp—
Chicago citywide 80.0%— 81.0%— 83.0%— ▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +2.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children — — 56.8%— ——————
Chicago citywide — — 31.0%— ——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability — 46.0%— 18.5%— ——▼ −27.5 pp———

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category McKinley Park
Total Tree Canopy 13.2%119 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 74.7%675 acres
Natural Open Surfaces 12.1%109 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Total Tree Canopy 13.2%119 acres 18.4%25,934 acres ▼ -5.2% 62/77
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 74.7%675 acres 60.2%84,955 acres ▲ +14.6% 10/77
Natural Open Surfaces 12.1%109 acres 21.5%30,331 acres ▼ -9.4% 62/77
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category McKinley Park
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 20.1% ±5.9 pp2,989 ±880
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 47.0% ±6.7 pp6,982 ±994
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 32.9% ±5.9 pp4,883 ±877
Homes Without Air Conditioning 2.3%348
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 20.1%±5.9 pp2,989±880 26.1%±0.5 pp707,660±13,869 ▼ -6.0% 48/77
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 47.0%±6.7 pp6,982±994 44.1%±0.6 pp1,195,950±15,462 ▲ +2.9% 20/77
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 32.9%±5.9 pp4,883±877 29.8%±0.5 pp807,615±13,763 ▲ +3.1% 35/77
Homes Without Air Conditioning 2.3%348 4.2%114,494 ▼ -1.9% 62/77
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category McKinley Park
Drove Alone 63.2% ±3.0 pp4,114 ±197
Carpooled 14.5% ±6.9 pp943 ±448
Public Transit 18.4% ±4.7 pp1,198 ±304
Walked 2.1% ±1.2 pp138 ±78
Bikes 1.0% ±1.0 pp65 ±68
Other Commute Mode 0.6% ±0.8 pp38 ±55
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Drove Alone 63.2%±3.0 pp4,114±197 56.6%±0.4 pp772,696±5,998 ▲ +6.6% 34/77
Carpooled 14.5%±6.9 pp943±448 9.3%±0.3 pp126,918±3,980 ▲ +5.2% 14/77
Public Transit 18.4%±4.7 pp1,198±304 22.4%±0.4 pp305,691±6,011 ▼ -4.0% 45/77
Walked 2.1%±1.2 pp138±78 7.3%±0.3 pp100,269±3,456 ▼ -5.2% 50/77
Bikes 1.0%±1.0 pp65±68 1.8%±0.1 pp24,441±1,693 ▼ -0.8% 29/77
Other Commute Mode 0.6%±0.8 pp38±55 2.5%±0.1 pp34,356±1,772 ▼ -1.9% 65/77
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category McKinley Park
Average Commute Time (minutes) 31 min±1.7 min
Less Than 15 Minutes 17.0% ±3.8 pp1,104 ±247
15–29 Minutes 31.8% ±5.5 pp2,067 ±360
30–44 Minutes 27.0% ±4.4 pp1,757 ±284
45–59 Minutes 12.0% ±2.9 pp778 ±188
60 Minutes or More 12.4% ±3.2 pp804 ±211
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes) 31 min±1.7 min 33 min±0.2 min ▼ −2 min 58/76
Less Than 15 Minutes 17.0%±3.8 pp1,104±247 13.0%±0.3 pp140,252±3,438 ▲ +3.9% 15/77
15–29 Minutes 31.8%±5.5 pp2,067±360 29.9%±0.5 pp322,586±5,056 ▲ +1.8% 19/77
30–44 Minutes 27.0%±4.4 pp1,757±284 29.6%±0.4 pp318,782±4,584 ▼ -2.6% 57/77
45–59 Minutes 12.0%±2.9 pp778±188 14.0%±0.3 pp151,451±3,075 ▼ -2.1% 57/77
60 Minutes or More 12.4%±3.2 pp804±211 13.4%±0.3 pp144,940±3,715 ▼ -1.1% 47/77
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category McKinley Park
Average Vehicles per Household 1.43±0.14
Households With No Vehicle 13.6% ±3.5 pp775 ±197
Households With 1 Vehicle 42.3% ±4.5 pp2,404 ±256
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 44.1% ±6.8 pp2,507 ±384
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Average Vehicles per Household 1.43±0.14 1.12±0.01 ▲ +0.31 23/77
Households With No Vehicle 13.6%±3.5 pp775±197 26.6%±0.4 pp308,497±5,087 ▼ -13.0% 55/77
Households With 1 Vehicle 42.3%±4.5 pp2,404±256 45.2%±0.4 pp524,900±5,145 ▼ -3.0% 46/77
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 44.1%±6.8 pp2,507±384 28.2%±0.4 pp326,808±4,200 ▲ +15.9% 21/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where McKinley Park Residents Work

Category McKinley Park
Loop 18.5%1,208
Near North Side 7.4%481
Near West Side 6.2%407
Armour Square 5.4%355
Lower West Side 3.3%218
All other city neighborhoods 27.1%1,774
Outside the city 32.0%2,094
↳ Bedford Park village, IL 1.0%67
↳ Morton Grove village, IL 1.0%67
↳ Cicero town, IL 0.9%60
↳ Schaumburg village, IL 0.7%46
↳ Naperville city, IL 0.7%43
↳ All other Illinois locations 25.6%1,676
Out of state 2.1%135
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 59 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category McKinley Park
Loop 18.5%1,208
Near North Side 7.4%481
Near West Side 6.2%407
Armour Square 5.4%355
Lower West Side 3.3%218
All other city neighborhoods 27.1%1,774
Outside the city 32.0%2,094
↳ Bedford Park village, IL 1.0%67
↳ Morton Grove village, IL 1.0%67
↳ Cicero town, IL 0.9%60
↳ Schaumburg village, IL 0.7%46
↳ Naperville city, IL 0.7%43
↳ All other Illinois locations 25.6%1,676
Out of state 2.1%135
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 59 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Loop 18.8%1,155 18.8%1,246 18.5%1,208 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +53▼ −0.3 pp▼ −38– 0.0 pp▲ +91
Chicago citywide 20.0%224,635 21.0%252,791 21.5%259,167 ▲ +1.5 pp▲ +34,532▲ +0.5 pp▲ +6,376▲ +1.0 pp▲ +28,156
Near North Side 7.3%451 7.7%511 7.4%481 – 0.0 pp▲ +30▼ −0.4 pp▼ −30▲ +0.4 pp▲ +60
Chicago citywide 8.2%92,143 9.4%112,859 9.1%109,333 ▲ +0.9 pp▲ +17,190▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3,526▲ +1.2 pp▲ +20,716
Near West Side 6.9%422 6.8%449 6.2%407 ▼ −0.6 pp▼ −15▼ −0.6 pp▼ −42▼ −0.1 pp▲ +27
Chicago citywide 6.2%69,083 6.6%79,757 6.7%80,118 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +11,035– 0.0 pp▲ +361▲ +0.5 pp▲ +10,674
Armour Square 4.0%247 4.0%263 5.4%355 ▲ +1.4 pp▲ +108▲ +1.5 pp▲ +92– 0.0 pp▲ +16
Chicago citywide 0.4%4,268 0.4%4,703 0.4%5,023 – 0.0 pp▲ +755– 0.0 pp▲ +320– 0.0 pp▲ +435
Lower West Side 3.0%182 3.5%229 3.3%218 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +36▼ −0.1 pp▼ −11▲ +0.5 pp▲ +47
Chicago citywide 0.9%9,585 0.8%9,912 1.0%12,477 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,892▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,565– 0.0 pp▲ +327
All other city neighborhoods 29.3%1,804 28.3%1,877 27.1%1,774 ▼ −2.2 pp▼ −30▼ −1.2 pp▼ −103▼ −1.0 pp▲ +73
Chicago citywide 22.5%252,499 21.1%253,775 20.7%248,736 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −3,763▼ −0.4 pp▼ −5,039▼ −1.4 pp▲ +1,276
Outside the city 30.6%1,883 30.9%2,047 32.0%2,094 ▲ +1.4 pp▲ +211▲ +1.1 pp▲ +47▲ +0.3 pp▲ +164
Chicago citywide 36.8%412,807 35.7%430,134 35.9%432,355 ▼ −0.9 pp▲ +19,548▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,221▼ −1.0 pp▲ +17,327
Bedford Park village, IL 0.8%51 1.0%69 1.0%67 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +16– 0.0 pp▼ −2▲ +0.2 pp▲ +18
Chicago citywide 0.8%8,547 0.7%8,008 0.6%6,897 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,650▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,111▼ −0.1 pp▼ −539
Morton Grove village, IL 0.1%7 0.3%19 1.0%67 ▲ +0.9 pp▲ +60▲ +0.7 pp▲ +48▲ +0.2 pp▲ +12
Chicago citywide 0.2%2,316 0.2%2,644 0.3%3,510 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,194▲ +0.1 pp▲ +866– 0.0 pp▲ +328
Cicero town, IL 0.7%42 0.6%40 0.9%60 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +18▲ +0.3 pp▲ +20▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2
Chicago citywide 0.5%5,256 0.5%6,120 0.5%6,087 – 0.0 pp▲ +831– 0.0 pp▼ −33– 0.0 pp▲ +864
Schaumburg village, IL 0.9%55 0.6%41 0.7%46 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −9▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5▼ −0.3 pp▼ −14
Chicago citywide 1.1%11,817 1.0%11,930 0.9%10,376 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,441▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,554▼ −0.1 pp▲ +113
Naperville city, IL 0.5%32 0.6%40 0.7%43 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8
Chicago citywide 0.5%5,765 0.5%6,098 0.6%6,926 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,161▲ +0.1 pp▲ +828– 0.0 pp▲ +333
Oak Lawn village, IL 0.4%24 0.6%37 0.7%43 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +19▲ +0.1 pp▲ +6▲ +0.2 pp▲ +13
Chicago citywide 0.5%5,230 0.5%5,563 0.4%5,394 – 0.0 pp▲ +164– 0.0 pp▼ −169– 0.0 pp▲ +333
All other Illinois locations 24.7%1,516 24.9%1,649 25.6%1,676 ▲ +1.0 pp▲ +160▲ +0.7 pp▲ +27▲ +0.3 pp▲ +133
Chicago citywide 27.9%312,992 27.0%324,805 27.3%329,050 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +16,058▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,245▼ −0.9 pp▲ +11,813
Out of state 2.2%138 2.4%158 2.1%135 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −3▼ −0.3 pp▼ −23▲ +0.1 pp▲ +20
Chicago citywide 2.2%24,577 2.3%27,198 2.2%26,136 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,559▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,062▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,621

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in McKinley Park

Category McKinley Park
McKinley Park 2.5%170
New City (Back of the Yards) 1.8%126
Bridgeport 1.7%116
Brighton Park 1.7%115
Chicago Lawn 1.7%115
All other city neighborhoods 37.4%2,550
Outside the city 53.2%3,633
↳ Aurora city, IL 1.5%102
↳ Cicero town, IL 1.5%100
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL 1.3%89
↳ Joliet city, IL 1.2%82
↳ Berwyn city, IL 1.0%65
↳ All other Illinois locations 39.9%2,725
Out of state 6.9%470
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 59; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category McKinley Park
McKinley Park 2.5%170
New City (Back of the Yards) 1.8%126
Bridgeport 1.7%116
Brighton Park 1.7%115
Chicago Lawn 1.7%115
All other city neighborhoods 37.4%2,550
Outside the city 53.2%3,633
↳ Aurora city, IL 1.5%102
↳ Cicero town, IL 1.5%100
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL 1.3%89
↳ Joliet city, IL 1.2%82
↳ Berwyn city, IL 1.0%65
↳ All other Illinois locations 39.9%2,725
Out of state 6.9%470
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 59; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
McKinley Park 2.7%152 3.2%184 2.5%170 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +18▼ −0.7 pp▼ −14▲ +0.5 pp▲ +32
Chicago citywide 0.3%4,267 0.3%4,575 0.3%4,443 – 0.0 pp▲ +176– 0.0 pp▼ −132– 0.0 pp▲ +308
New City (Back of the Yards) 2.3%130 2.1%121 1.8%126 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −4▼ −0.3 pp▲ +5▼ −0.2 pp▼ −9
Chicago citywide 0.6%8,047 0.6%8,424 0.6%8,500 – 0.0 pp▲ +453– 0.0 pp▲ +76– 0.0 pp▲ +377
Bridgeport 2.7%150 2.1%122 1.7%116 ▼ −1.0 pp▼ −34▼ −0.4 pp▼ −6▼ −0.5 pp▼ −28
Chicago citywide 0.7%9,815 0.8%10,783 0.7%10,850 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,035– 0.0 pp▲ +67– 0.0 pp▲ +968
Brighton Park 2.5%141 3.2%185 1.7%115 ▼ −0.8 pp▼ −26▼ −1.6 pp▼ −70▲ +0.7 pp▲ +44
Chicago citywide 0.6%8,222 0.7%9,275 0.6%9,100 – 0.0 pp▲ +878– 0.0 pp▼ −175– 0.0 pp▲ +1,053
Chicago Lawn 2.0%111 2.7%153 1.7%115 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +4▼ −1.0 pp▼ −38▲ +0.7 pp▲ +42
Chicago citywide 0.7%9,855 0.8%10,666 0.7%10,607 – 0.0 pp▲ +752– 0.0 pp▼ −59– 0.0 pp▲ +811
All other city neighborhoods 37.6%2,124 41.5%2,366 37.4%2,550 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +426▼ −4.2 pp▲ +184▲ +3.9 pp▲ +242
Chicago citywide 38.0%499,784 37.9%537,334 36.8%539,030 ▼ −1.2 pp▲ +39,246▼ −1.1 pp▲ +1,696▼ −0.1 pp▲ +37,550
Outside the city 50.3%2,837 45.1%2,567 53.2%3,633 ▲ +3.0 pp▲ +796▲ +8.2 pp▲ +1,066▼ −5.2 pp▼ −270
Chicago citywide 45.9%603,720 45.4%642,891 47.2%691,545 ▲ +1.3 pp▲ +87,825▲ +1.9 pp▲ +48,654▼ −0.6 pp▲ +39,171
Aurora city, IL 0.8%46 1.0%57 1.5%102 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +56▲ +0.5 pp▲ +45▲ +0.2 pp▲ +11
Chicago citywide 0.7%9,006 0.7%10,248 0.7%10,879 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,873– 0.0 pp▲ +631– 0.0 pp▲ +1,242
Cicero town, IL 2.0%111 1.8%101 1.5%100 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −11▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1▼ −0.2 pp▼ −10
Chicago citywide 0.8%9,934 0.8%11,086 0.8%10,993 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,059– 0.0 pp▼ −93– 0.0 pp▲ +1,152
Oak Lawn village, IL 1.7%94 0.9%52 1.3%89 ▼ −0.4 pp▼ −5▲ +0.4 pp▲ +37▼ −0.8 pp▼ −42
Chicago citywide 0.7%9,277 0.7%9,503 0.7%9,767 – 0.0 pp▲ +490– 0.0 pp▲ +264– 0.0 pp▲ +226
Joliet city, IL 1.3%74 1.0%58 1.2%82 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +8▲ +0.2 pp▲ +24▼ −0.3 pp▼ −16
Chicago citywide 0.6%7,328 0.6%8,297 0.6%9,068 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,740– 0.0 pp▲ +771– 0.0 pp▲ +969
Berwyn city, IL 1.1%63 0.7%40 1.0%65 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2▲ +0.3 pp▲ +25▼ −0.4 pp▼ −23
Chicago citywide 0.7%8,732 0.7%9,219 0.6%9,497 – 0.0 pp▲ +765– 0.0 pp▲ +278– 0.0 pp▲ +487
All other Illinois locations 36.5%2,058 34.5%1,965 39.9%2,725 ▲ +3.5 pp▲ +667▲ +5.4 pp▲ +760▼ −2.0 pp▼ −93
Chicago citywide 35.5%467,052 35.1%497,107 36.9%540,317 ▲ +1.4 pp▲ +73,265▲ +1.8 pp▲ +43,210▼ −0.5 pp▲ +30,055
Out of state 6.9%390 5.1%293 6.9%470 – 0.0 pp▲ +80▲ +1.7 pp▲ +177▼ −1.8 pp▼ −97
Chicago citywide 4.9%63,785 4.8%68,287 4.9%72,123 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8,338▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,836– 0.0 pp▲ +4,502

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category McKinley Park
No Computer or Smartphone 5.5% ±2.2 pp314 ±126
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 7.0% ±2.3 pp400 ±133
Desktop or Laptop Available 84.3% ±4.2 pp4,791 ±240
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
No Computer or Smartphone 5.5%±2.2 pp314±126 5.1%±0.2 pp58,709±2,246 ▲ +0.5% 43/77
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 7.0%±2.3 pp400±133 10.4%±0.3 pp120,218±3,642 ▼ -3.3% 58/77
Desktop or Laptop Available 84.3%±4.2 pp4,791±240 79.7%±0.4 pp924,956±4,919 ▲ +4.5% 20/77
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category McKinley Park
Has Internet Access 90.6% ±3.7 pp5,153 ±212
Cellular Data Plan Only 12.8% ±4.5 pp728 ±257
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 2.2% ±1.6 pp127 ±91
No Internet Access 9.4% ±2.9 pp533 ±168
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Has Internet Access 90.6%±3.7 pp5,153±212 93.1%±0.3 pp1,080,419±3,310 ▼ -2.5% 45/77
Cellular Data Plan Only 12.8%±4.5 pp728±257 12.5%±0.3 pp145,219±3,463 ▲ +0.3% 46/77
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 2.2%±1.6 pp127±91 3.9%±0.2 pp45,350±1,940 ▼ -1.7% 50/77
No Internet Access 9.4%±2.9 pp533±168 6.9%±0.2 pp79,786±2,730 ▲ +2.5% 33/77
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category McKinley Park
Uninsured Residents 11.5% ±2.2 pp1,701 ±324
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 3.2% ±2.1 pp479 ±316
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 15.7% ±3.2 pp2,330 ±473
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 5.1% ±3.4 pp755 ±502
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Uninsured Residents 11.5%±2.2 pp1,701±324 9.8%±0.2 pp264,391±5,709 ▲ +1.7% 25/77
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 3.2%±2.1 pp479±316 3.9%±0.3 pp104,687±8,934 ▼ -0.6% 38/77
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 15.7%±3.2 pp2,330±473 13.3%±0.3 pp361,430±8,516 ▲ +2.4% 24/77
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 5.1%±3.4 pp755±502 1.7%±0.3 pp46,718±7,265 ▲ +3.4% 5/77
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category McKinley Park
Insured (Any Coverage) 88.5% ±2.2 pp13,153 ±324
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 48.7% ±4.7 pp7,231 ±699
Direct-Purchase Insurance 9.4% ±1.7 pp1,393 ±254
Medicare 13.6% ±2.0 pp2,027 ±298
Medicaid 20.2% ±2.6 pp2,997 ±385
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.2% ±0.6 pp37 ±89
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 4.6% ±1.4 pp683 ±202
Uninsured 11.5% ±2.2 pp1,701 ±324
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Insured (Any Coverage) 88.5%±2.2 pp13,153±324 90.2%±0.2 pp2,424,871±5,689 ▼ -1.7% 53/77
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 48.7%±4.7 pp7,231±699 51.2%±0.4 pp1,376,912±9,468 ▼ -2.6% 35/77
Direct-Purchase Insurance 9.4%±1.7 pp1,393±254 8.5%±0.2 pp227,424±5,112 ▲ +0.9% 24/77
Medicare 13.6%±2.0 pp2,027±298 12.6%±0.2 pp339,804±4,911 ▲ +1.0% 40/77
Medicaid 20.2%±2.6 pp2,997±385 22.2%±0.3 pp596,931±7,773 ▼ -2.0% 46/77
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.2%±0.6 pp37±89 0.3%±0.0 pp7,201±787 0% 32/77
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 4.6%±1.4 pp683±202 3.8%±0.1 pp102,777±3,544 ▲ +0.8% 33/77
Uninsured 11.5%±2.2 pp1,701±324 9.8%±0.2 pp262,018±5,689 ▲ +1.7% 25/77
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category McKinley Park
Adults With at Least One Disability 13.3% ±2.5 pp1,611 ±307
Mobility Disability 6.6% ±1.5 pp798 ±185
Hearing Disability 3.6% ±1.9 pp435 ±227
Vision Disability 3.8% ±1.9 pp455 ±226
Cognitive Disability 3.4% ±1.5 pp414 ±181
Self-Care Disability 1.5% ±0.9 pp183 ±114
Independent Living Disability 3.8% ±1.5 pp463 ±181
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability 13.3%±2.5 pp1,611±307 14.0%±0.2 pp303,665±4,797 ▼ -0.7% 42/77
Mobility Disability 6.6%±1.5 pp798±185 7.6%±0.2 pp163,666±3,398 ▼ -1.0% 49/77
Hearing Disability 3.6%±1.9 pp435±227 2.8%±0.1 pp61,430±2,337 ▲ +0.8% 23/77
Vision Disability 3.8%±1.9 pp455±226 3.0%±0.1 pp64,544±2,269 ▲ +0.8% 25/77
Cognitive Disability 3.4%±1.5 pp414±181 5.2%±0.1 pp112,824±2,939 ▼ -1.8% 65/77
Self-Care Disability 1.5%±0.9 pp183±114 2.7%±0.1 pp57,758±2,261 ▼ -1.2% 67/77
Independent Living Disability 3.8%±1.5 pp463±181 5.7%±0.2 pp123,651±3,247 ▼ -1.9% 67/77
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category McKinley Park
Arthritis 17.2%1,963
High Blood Pressure 26.9%3,081
Cancer 4.2%480
Current Asthma 8.3%952
Coronary Heart Disease 4.7%533
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 4.8%545
Diabetes 12.8%1,466
High Cholesterol 34.3%3,925
Obesity 28.9%3,303
Stroke 2.8%315
Lost All Natural Teeth 2.6%294
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Arthritis 17.2%1,963 19.6%409,178 ▼ -2.4% 61/77
High Blood Pressure 26.9%3,081 29.7%620,030 ▼ -2.8% 57/77
Cancer 4.2%480 5.0%104,382 ▼ -0.8% 60/77
Current Asthma 8.3%952 10.2%212,940 ▼ -1.9% 76/77
Coronary Heart Disease 4.7%533 4.8%100,207 ▼ -0.1% 55/77
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 4.8%545 5.5%114,820 ▼ -0.7% 57/77
Diabetes 12.8%1,466 12.0%250,517 ▲ +0.8% 42/77
High Cholesterol 34.3%3,925 31.6%659,696 ▲ +2.7% 30/77
Obesity 28.9%3,303 32.6%680,572 ▼ -3.7% 55/77
Stroke 2.8%315 3.3%68,892 ▼ -0.5% 52/77
Lost All Natural Teeth 2.6%294 2.5%52,249 ▲ +0.1% 43/77
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category McKinley Park
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 17.3%1,980
Current Cigarette Smoking 11.6%1,327
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 28.7%3,282
Short Sleep Duration 37.5%4,286
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 17.3%1,980 19.0%396,652 ▼ -1.7% 41/77
Current Cigarette Smoking 11.6%1,327 11.9%248,430 ▼ -0.3% 42/77
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 28.7%3,282 24.7%515,648 ▲ +4.0% 36/77
Short Sleep Duration 37.5%4,286 37.8%789,129 ▼ -0.3% 41/77
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category McKinley Park
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 22.8%2,603
Frequent Physical Distress 12.2%1,399
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 22.8%2,603 21.1%440,493 ▲ +1.7% 40/77
Frequent Physical Distress 12.2%1,399 11.8%246,342 ▲ +0.4% 45/77
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category McKinley Park
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 70.8%8,096
Routine Checkup in Past Year 74.1%8,474
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 85.0%9,723
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 48.5%5,551
Dental Visit in Past Year 53.1%6,072
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 72.0%8,240
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 70.8%8,096 72.5%1,513,542 ▼ -1.7% 49/77
Routine Checkup in Past Year 74.1%8,474 76.2%1,590,785 ▼ -2.1% 58/77
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 85.0%9,723 86.2%1,799,549 ▼ -1.2% 53/77
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 48.5%5,551 55.8%1,164,905 ▼ -7.3% 67/77
Dental Visit in Past Year 53.1%6,072 58.4%1,219,184 ▼ -5.3% 44/77
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 72.0%8,240 74.2%1,549,032 ▼ -2.2% 56/77
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category McKinley Park
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 16.5%1,885
Frequent Mental Distress 14.5%1,659
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 30.5%3,494
Loneliness 36.2%4,135
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category McKinley Park City Difference Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 16.5%1,885 19.1%398,740 ▼ -2.6% 73/77
Frequent Mental Distress 14.5%1,659 16.0%334,023 ▼ -1.5% 61/77
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 30.5%3,494 28.2%588,716 ▲ +2.3% 37/77
Loneliness 36.2%4,135 35.8%747,377 ▲ +0.4% 40/77
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Compare All Neighborhoods