Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category	Ashburn
Hispanic	46.5% ±3.1 pp19,542 ±1,318
White	8.2% ±1.5 pp3,435 ±648
Black	42.6% ±3.4 pp17,909 ±1,445
Asian	1.0% ±0.5 pp419 ±222
Other or Multi-racial	1.7% ±0.7 pp702 ±314
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Hispanic	46.5%±3.1 pp19,542±1,318	29.7%±0.2 pp805,318±5,785	▲ +16.8%	20/77
White	8.2%±1.5 pp3,435±648	32.1%±0.2 pp870,127±5,557	▼ -23.9%	50/77
Black	42.6%±3.4 pp17,909±1,445	27.4%±0.2 pp743,710±6,047	▲ +15.2%	29/77
Asian	1.0%±0.5 pp419±222	7.2%±0.2 pp196,435±4,370	▼ -6.2%	48/77
Other or Multi-racial	1.7%±0.7 pp702±314	3.5%±0.1 pp95,636±3,778	▼ -1.9%	59/77
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Age Distribution

Category	Ashburn
Under 5	4.8% ±1.1 pp2,014 ±447
5-17	19.5% ±1.8 pp8,207 ±768
18-24	9.3% ±1.1 pp3,907 ±470
25-44	27.7% ±2.0 pp11,649 ±830
45-64	25.5% ±1.5 pp10,726 ±612
65-74	8.6% ±1.1 pp3,596 ±443
75-84	2.8% ±0.5 pp1,177 ±221
85+	1.7% ±0.4 pp731 ±172
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Under 5	4.8%±1.1 pp2,014±447	5.3%±0.1 pp144,044±3,867	▼ -0.5%	50/77
5-17	19.5%±1.8 pp8,207±768	14.1%±0.2 pp381,582±5,548	▲ +5.5%	13/77
18-24	9.3%±1.1 pp3,907±470	9.6%±0.2 pp260,942±4,900	▼ -0.3%	31/77
25-44	27.7%±2.0 pp11,649±830	34.3%±0.3 pp929,946±6,988	▼ -6.6%	42/77
45-64	25.5%±1.5 pp10,726±612	22.9%±0.2 pp620,047±5,644	▲ +2.7%	22/77
65-74	8.6%±1.1 pp3,596±443	8.2%±0.1 pp221,932±3,711	▲ +0.4%	44/77
75-84	2.8%±0.5 pp1,177±221	4.0%±0.1 pp107,625±2,694	▼ -1.2%	65/77
85+	1.7%±0.4 pp731±172	1.7%±0.1 pp45,108±1,921	▲ +0.1%	38/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category	Ashburn
No High School Diploma	18.2% ±2.2 pp5,076 ±608
High School Diploma or GED	32.2% ±3.0 pp8,969 ±845
Some College or Associate's Degree	27.7% ±2.4 pp7,736 ±677
Bachelor's Degree	13.3% ±2.1 pp3,701 ±575
Graduate Degree	8.6% ±1.5 pp2,397 ±411
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
No High School Diploma	18.2%±2.2 pp5,076±608	12.8%±0.2 pp246,015±4,778	▲ +5.4%	21/77
High School Diploma or GED	32.2%±3.0 pp8,969±845	21.1%±0.3 pp405,248±5,752	▲ +11.1%	20/77
Some College or Associate's Degree	27.7%±2.4 pp7,736±677	21.8%±0.3 pp419,911±5,550	▲ +5.9%	31/77
Bachelor's Degree	13.3%±2.1 pp3,701±575	25.4%±0.3 pp488,467±5,708	▼ -12.1%	53/77
Graduate Degree	8.6%±1.5 pp2,397±411	19.0%±0.3 pp365,017±5,186	▼ -10.4%	51/77
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category	Ashburn
Total Population	42,007 ±2,401
Total Households	13,014 ±616
Population Density	8,652 ±495 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	Average Neighborhood	Difference
Total Population	42,007	35,210	▲ +6,797
Total Households	13,014	15,067	▼ −2,053
Population Density	8,652 people/sq mi	13,045 people/sq mi	▼ −4,393
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average neighborhood rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large neighborhoods. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19	Difference	Rank
Total Population	42,809 ±1,467	43,356 ±1,408	42,007 ±2,401	▼ −802 ±2,814▼ −1,349 ±2,784▲ +547 ±2,034	▲ +7,579▲ +8,170▲ +6,797	24/7723/7723/77
Average Neighborhood	35,230	35,186	35,210	▼ −20▲ +24▼ −43
Total Households	12,722 ±234	13,124 ±228	13,014 ±616	▲ +292 ±659▼ −110 ±657▲ +402 ±327	▼ −639▼ −730▼ −2,053	29/7731/7735/77
Average Neighborhood	13,361	13,854	15,067	▲ +1,706▲ +1,213▲ +493
Population Density (per sq mi)	8,817 ±302	8,929 ±290	8,652 ±495	▼ −165▼ −278▲ +113	▼ −4,172▼ −4,099▼ −4,393	55/7752/7754/77
Average Neighborhood Density	12,989	13,028	13,045	▲ +56▲ +17▲ +39

Household Size

Category	Ashburn
Average Household Size	3.18±0.20
1-Person Households	21.4% ±3.0 pp2,791 ±396
2-Person Households	25.3% ±3.1 pp3,290 ±410
3-Person Households	16.1% ±2.4 pp2,090 ±313
4+ Person Households	37.2% ±3.8 pp4,843 ±491
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Size	3.18±0.20	2.29±0.02	▲ +0.89	4/77
1-Person Households	21.4%±3.0 pp2,791±396	39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,783	▼ -18.2%	73/77
2-Person Households	25.3%±3.1 pp3,290±410	29.5%±0.4 pp342,235±5,166	▼ -4.2%	52/77
3-Person Households	16.1%±2.4 pp2,090±313	12.9%±0.4 pp149,291±4,184	▲ +3.2%	15/77
4+ Person Households	37.2%±3.8 pp4,843±491	18.0%±0.5 pp208,411±5,419	▲ +19.3%	6/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category	Ashburn
Never Married	44.7% ±2.8 pp15,134 ±932
Married	40.3% ±1.2 pp13,646 ±417
Separated	2.4% ±1.0 pp801 ±345
Divorced	7.5% ±1.2 pp2,527 ±405
Widowed	5.2% ±0.9 pp1,774 ±313
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Never Married	44.7%±2.8 pp15,134±932	49.6%±0.3 pp1,130,286±6,623	▼ -5.0%	47/77
Married	40.3%±1.2 pp13,646±417	35.5%±0.3 pp807,294±6,077	▲ +4.8%	30/77
Separated	2.4%±1.0 pp801±345	2.2%±0.1 pp49,430±2,379	▲ +0.2%	37/77
Divorced	7.5%±1.2 pp2,527±405	7.9%±0.2 pp180,700±3,966	▼ -0.5%	49/77
Widowed	5.2%±0.9 pp1,774±313	4.8%±0.1 pp109,357±2,738	▲ +0.4%	40/77
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category	Ashburn
Speak English Only	57.9% ±2.9 pp23,154 ±1,177
Spanish	39.1% ±3.2 pp15,640 ±1,291
Other Languages	2.0% ±0.8 pp791 ±328
Other Indo-European	1.0% ±0.8 pp408 ±319
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Speak English Only	57.9%±2.9 pp23,154±1,177	64.6%±0.3 pp1,659,069±8,218	▼ -6.7%	50/77
Spanish	39.1%±3.2 pp15,640±1,291	23.7%±0.2 pp607,865±6,166	▲ +15.4%	18/77
Other Languages	2.0%±0.8 pp791±328	1.0%±0.1 pp25,292±2,452	▲ +1.0%	46/77
Other Indo-European	1.0%±0.8 pp408±319	2.4%±0.1 pp61,672±3,192	▼ -1.4%	36/36
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show

Category	Ashburn
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	84.9% ±0.9 pp84.9%±0.9 pp33,958 ±348
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+)	8.4% ±1.4 pp8.4%±1.4 pp3,364 ±541
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	4.8% ±0.9 pp57.4%±6.3 pp1,930 ±375
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	1.9% ±0.8 pp22.0%±8.3 pp741 ±303
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	15.1% ±1.7 pp179.4%±35.2 pp6,035 ±678
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	84.9%±0.9 pp84.9%±0.9 pp33,958±348	85.4%±0.5 pp85.4%±0.5 pp2,192,778±11,961	▼ -0.5%▼ -0.5%	49/77
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+)	8.4%±1.4 pp8.4%±1.4 pp3,364±541	7.1%±0.2 pp7.1%±0.2 pp183,252±4,686	▲ +1.3%▲ +1.3%	27/77
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	4.8%±0.9 pp57.4%±6.3 pp1,930±375	5.2%±0.2 pp72.7%±1.1 pp133,269±3,923	▼ -0.4%▼ -15.4%	30/7744/76
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	1.9%±0.8 pp22.0%±8.3 pp741±303	2.3%±0.1 pp31.6%±1.4 pp57,883±2,982	▼ -0.4%▼ -9.6%	31/7736/76
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	15.1%±1.7 pp179.4%±35.2 pp6,035±678	14.6%±0.3 pp204.3%±6.4 pp374,404±6,794	▲ +0.5%▼ -24.9%	29/7741/76
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category	Ashburn
Married-Couple Households	48.4% ±3.7 pp6,293 ±478
Unmarried-Couple Households	3.6% ±1.2 pp463 ±155
One-Person Households	21.4% ±3.7 pp2,791 ±486
Other Household Types	26.6% ±7.5 pp3,467 ±974
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Married-Couple Households	48.4%±3.7 pp6,293±478	30.9%±0.3 pp358,432±3,598	▲ +17.5%	10/77
Unmarried-Couple Households	3.6%±1.2 pp463±155	8.3%±0.2 pp96,220±2,797	▼ -4.7%	66/77
One-Person Households	21.4%±3.7 pp2,791±486	39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,729	▼ -18.2%	73/77
Other Household Types	26.6%±7.5 pp3,467±974	21.1%±0.7 pp245,285±8,514	▲ +5.5%	28/77
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category	Ashburn
Children in Married-Couple Households	58.7% ±5.7 pp5,997 ±586
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	5.7% ±3.0 pp582 ±306
Children in Single-Mother Households	30.2% ±8.6 pp3,084 ±879
Children in Single-Father Households	5.5% ±3.5 pp558 ±361
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households	58.7%±5.7 pp5,997±586	56.0%±0.8 pp293,542±4,257	▲ +2.7%	39/77
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	5.7%±3.0 pp582±306	8.8%±0.6 pp45,960±3,208	▼ -3.1%	47/77
Children in Single-Mother Households	30.2%±8.6 pp3,084±879	30.6%±0.9 pp160,535±4,521	▼ -0.5%	36/77
Children in Single-Father Households	5.5%±3.5 pp558±361	4.6%±0.4 pp24,133±2,006	▲ +0.9%	26/77
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Ashburn
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	3.4% ±0.8 pp3.4%±0.8 pp1,082 ±242
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	12.5% ±10.2 pp0.4%±0.3 pp135 ±110
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	10.3% ±8.9 pp0.3%±0.3 pp111 ±96
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	32.1% ±12.4 pp1.1%±0.4 pp347 ±134
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	5.8% ±6.4 pp0.2%±0.2 pp63 ±69
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	39.4% ±14.7 pp1.3%±0.5 pp426 ±159
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	3.4%±0.8 pp3.4%±0.8 pp1,082±242	2.8%±0.1 pp2.8%±0.1 pp60,766±2,397	▲ +0.6%▲ +0.6%	34/77
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	12.5%±10.2 pp0.4%±0.3 pp135±110	26.8%±1.8 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,267±1,067	▼ -14.3%▼ -0.3%	62/7762/77
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	10.3%±8.9 pp0.3%±0.3 pp111±96	12.9%±1.0 pp0.4%±0.0 pp7,830±579	▼ -2.6%0%	42/7735/77
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	32.1%±12.4 pp1.1%±0.4 pp347±134	28.8%±1.4 pp0.8%±0.0 pp17,525±846	▲ +3.2%▲ +0.3%	30/7731/77
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	5.8%±6.4 pp0.2%±0.2 pp63±69	4.9%±0.7 pp0.1%±0.0 pp2,995±441	▲ +0.9%▲ +0.1%	25/7724/77
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	39.4%±14.7 pp1.3%±0.5 pp426±159	26.6%±1.5 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,149±916	▲ +12.8%▲ +0.6%	9/7714/77
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show

Category	Ashburn
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	82.7% ±2.3 pp82.7%±2.3 pp34,744 ±967
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	17.3% ±2.1 pp17.3%±2.1 pp7,263 ±870
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	7.3% ±1.3 pp42.4%±5.5 pp3,082 ±542
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	10.0% ±1.8 pp57.6%±7.5 pp4,181 ±740
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	82.7%±2.3 pp82.7%±2.3 pp34,744±967	79.1%±0.3 pp79.1%±0.3 pp2,144,343±7,926	▲ +3.6%▲ +3.6%	37/77
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	17.3%±2.1 pp17.3%±2.1 pp7,263±870	20.9%±0.3 pp20.9%±0.3 pp566,883±7,968	▼ -3.6%▼ -3.6%	41/77
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	7.3%±1.3 pp42.4%±5.5 pp3,082±542	10.0%±0.2 pp47.7%±0.5 pp270,551±4,603	▼ -2.6%▼ -5.3%	39/7749/77
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	10.0%±1.8 pp57.6%±7.5 pp4,181±740	10.9%±0.2 pp52.3%±0.9 pp296,332±6,504	▼ -1.0%▲ +5.3%	34/7729/77
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show

Category	Ashburn
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	14.6%±2.0 pp84.3%±16.3 pp6,121±826
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	2.5%14.6%1,064
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	Chicago	Difference	Rank
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	14.6% ±2.0 pp84.3%±16.3 pp6,121	8.2% ±0.2 pp39.3%222,978	▲ +6.3%▲ +44.9%	16/777/77
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	2.5%14.6%1,064	——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show

Category	Ashburn
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	3.4% ±1.3 pp19.5%±7.2 pp1,415 ±551
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	4.2% ±1.1 pp24.5%±5.6 pp1,782 ±463
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	5.4% ±1.1 pp31.0%±4.8 pp2,252 ±447
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	4.3% ±0.8 pp25.0%±3.5 pp1,814 ±343
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	3.4%±1.3 pp19.5%±7.2 pp1,415±551	5.9%±0.2 pp2195.3%±286.9 pp159,447±5,557	▼ -2.5%▼ -2175.9%	42/7758/77
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	4.2%±1.1 pp24.5%±5.6 pp1,782±463	4.5%±0.1 pp1678.5%±218.6 pp121,912±4,035	▼ -0.3%▼ -1654.0%	34/7718/77
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	5.4%±1.1 pp31.0%±4.8 pp2,252±447	4.6%±0.1 pp1705.2%±221.4 pp123,849±3,901	▲ +0.8%▼ -1674.2%	29/777/77
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	4.3%±0.8 pp25.0%±3.5 pp1,814±343	6.0%±0.1 pp2226.0%±284.5 pp161,675±3,491	▼ -1.6%▼ -2201.0%	39/7745/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later	0.4% ±0.3 pp151 ±129	1.2% ±0.6 pp503 ±269	3.4% ±1.3 pp1,415 ±551	▲ +3.0 pp▲ +1,264▲ +2.2 pp▲ +912▲ +0.8 pp▲ +352
Chicago citywide	1.4% ±0.1 pp36,978 ±2,235	3.7% ±0.1 pp99,118 ±3,198	5.9% ±0.2 pp159,447 ±5,568	▲ +4.5 pp▲ +122,469▲ +2.2 pp▲ +60,329▲ +2.3 pp▲ +62,140
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009	2.4% ±0.7 pp1,038 ±315	4.0% ±1.0 pp1,729 ±421	4.2% ±1.1 pp1,782 ±463	▲ +1.8 pp▲ +744▲ +0.3 pp▲ +53▲ +1.6 pp▲ +691
Chicago citywide	5.9% ±0.1 pp161,331 ±3,896	4.9% ±0.1 pp131,658 ±3,182	4.5% ±0.1 pp121,912 ±4,044	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −39,419▼ −0.4 pp▼ −9,746▼ −1.1 pp▼ −29,673
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999	6.3% ±1.6 pp2,682 ±666	5.8% ±0.9 pp2,536 ±411	5.4% ±1.1 pp2,252 ±447	▼ −0.9 pp▼ −430▼ −0.5 pp▼ −284▼ −0.4 pp▼ −146
Chicago citywide	6.1% ±0.1 pp165,077 ±3,717	5.3% ±0.1 pp142,413 ±3,015	4.6% ±0.1 pp123,849 ±3,911	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −41,228▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,564▼ −0.8 pp▼ −22,664
Entered the U.S. Before 1990	6.9% ±1.1 pp2,955 ±450	7.1% ±0.8 pp3,074 ±360	4.3% ±0.8 pp1,814 ±343	▼ −2.6 pp▼ −1,141▼ −2.8 pp▼ −1,260▲ +0.2 pp▲ +119
Chicago citywide	7.5% ±0.1 pp204,169 ±3,469	6.9% ±0.1 pp186,050 ±3,114	6.0% ±0.1 pp161,675 ±3,509	▼ −1.6 pp▼ −42,494▼ −0.9 pp▼ −24,375▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,119

Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category	Ashburn
Average Household Income	$97,490±$5,720
Per Capita Income	$30,808±$1,387
10th Percentile Household Income	$19,937±$5,888
25th Percentile Household Income	$43,929±$5,987
Median Household Income	$82,235±$6,855
75th Percentile Household Income	$127,581±$8,709
90th Percentile Household Income	$187,833±$7,398
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$97,490±$5,720	$116,016±$1,263	▼ −$18,526	33/77
Per Capita Income	$30,808±$1,387	$50,086±$581	▼ −$19,278	48/77
10th Percentile Household Income	$19,937±$5,888	$12,933±$271	▲ +$7,004	21/77
25th Percentile Household Income	$43,929±$5,987	$34,575±$649	▲ +$9,353	21/77
Median Household Income	$82,235±$6,855	$77,902±$907	▲ +$4,333	24/77
75th Percentile Household Income	$127,581±$8,709	$144,150±$1,210	▼ −$16,569	33/77
90th Percentile Household Income	$187,833±$7,398	Over $200,000	▼ −$12,167+	38/77
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$98,733 ±4,678	$97,191 ±3,595	$97,490 ±5,720	▼ −$1,244▲ +$299▼ −$1,542
Chicago citywide	$95,689 ±910	$111,304 ±1,075	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$20,327▲ +$4,712▲ +$15,615
Average Household Income (nominal dollars)	$74,512 ±3,530	$79,211 ±2,930	$97,490 ±5,720	▲ +$22,977▲ +$18,279▲ +$4,698
Chicago citywide	$72,215 ±687	$90,713 ±876	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$43,801▲ +$25,303▲ +$18,498
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$31,011 ±1,158	$31,239 ±790	$30,808 ±1,387	▼ −$202▼ −$430▲ +$228
Chicago citywide	$37,927 ±351	$45,525 ±412	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$12,160▲ +$4,562▲ +$7,598
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars)	$23,403 ±874	$25,460 ±643	$30,808 ±1,387	▲ +$7,405▲ +$5,349▲ +$2,056
Chicago citywide	$28,623 ±265	$37,103 ±336	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$21,464▲ +$12,984▲ +$8,480
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$24,771 ±2,747	$20,248 ±2,478	$19,937 ±5,888	▼ −$4,834▼ −$311▼ −$4,523
Chicago citywide	$11,828 ±190	$13,281 ±277	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$1,105▼ −$348▲ +$1,453
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$18,695 ±2,073	$16,502 ±2,019	$19,937 ±5,888	▲ +$1,242▲ +$3,435▼ −$2,192
Chicago citywide	$8,927 ±144	$10,824 ±225	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$4,007▲ +$2,109▲ +$1,898
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$45,841 ±3,916	$43,018 ±4,828	$43,929 ±5,987	▼ −$1,913▲ +$910▼ −$2,823
Chicago citywide	$28,727 ±321	$31,597 ±462	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$5,848▲ +$2,979▲ +$2,869
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$34,596 ±2,955	$35,060 ±3,935	$43,929 ±5,987	▲ +$9,333▲ +$8,869▲ +$464
Chicago citywide	$21,680 ±242	$25,751 ±376	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$12,895▲ +$8,824▲ +$4,071
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$87,478 ±4,911	$86,163 ±4,254	$82,235 ±6,855	▼ −$5,242▼ −$3,928▼ −$1,314
Chicago citywide	$63,379 ±591	$71,469 ±723	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$14,523▲ +$6,433▲ +$8,090
Median Household Income (nominal dollars)	$66,018 ±3,706	$70,223 ±3,467	$82,235 ±6,855	▲ +$16,217▲ +$12,012▲ +$4,205
Chicago citywide	$47,831 ±446	$58,247 ±589	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$30,071▲ +$19,655▲ +$10,416
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$134,346 ±6,168	$136,971 ±6,481	$127,581 ±8,709	▼ −$6,765▼ −$9,390▲ +$2,625
Chicago citywide	$122,019 ±806	$139,501 ±1,057	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$22,131▲ +$4,648▲ +$17,482
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$101,389 ±4,655	$111,631 ±5,282	$127,581 ±8,709	▲ +$26,192▲ +$15,949▲ +$10,243
Chicago citywide	$92,086 ±608	$113,694 ±862	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$52,064▲ +$30,456▲ +$21,608
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$185,844 ±8,871	$192,670 ±10,597	$187,833 ±7,398	▲ +$1,989▼ −$4,838▲ +$6,826
Chicago citywide	$202,601 ±2,442	$235,390 ±1,636	—	——▲ +$32,790
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$140,253 ±6,695	$157,027 ±8,637	$187,833 ±7,398	▲ +$47,579▲ +$30,806▲ +$16,773
Chicago citywide	$152,899 ±1,843	$191,844 ±1,333	—	——▲ +$38,944

Poverty Status

Category	Ashburn
Below Poverty Line	11.1% ±2.5 pp4,682 ±1,066
Below 200% Poverty Line	33.2% ±5.0 pp13,966 ±2,086
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	5.7% ±1.8 pp2,374 ±746
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Below Poverty Line	11.1%±2.5 pp4,682±1,066	16.8%±0.4 pp456,194±11,330	▼ -5.7%	52/77
Below 200% Poverty Line	33.2%±5.0 pp13,966±2,086	33.4%±0.6 pp905,794±16,660	▼ -0.2%	41/77
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	5.7%±1.8 pp2,374±746	8.3%±0.3 pp226,117±7,649	▼ -2.7%	51/77
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Category	Ashburn
Food Insecurity	30.4%9,822
Housing Insecurity	24.8%8,026
Transportation Barriers	13.7%4,421
Threatened Utility Shutoff	14.2%4,597
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Food Insecurity	30.4%9,822	24.4%509,385	▲ +6.0%	33/77
Housing Insecurity	24.8%8,026	19.7%411,266	▲ +5.1%	32/77
Transportation Barriers	13.7%4,421	11.6%242,167	▲ +2.1%	33/77
Threatened Utility Shutoff	14.2%4,597	11.9%248,430	▲ +2.3%	31/77
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category	Ashburn
In Labor Force	83.4% ±3.5 pp14,097 ±587
↳ Employed	76.8% ±3.9 pp12,986 ±659
↳ Unemployed	6.5% ±1.9 pp1,100 ±316
↳ Unemployment Rate	7.8% ±2.2 pp—
Not in Labor Force	16.6% ±10.1 pp2,806 ±1,702
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
In Labor Force	83.4%±3.5 pp14,097±587	85.6%±0.3 pp1,069,076±3,868	▼ -2.2%	41/77
↳ Employed	76.8%±3.9 pp12,986±659	79.6%±0.3 pp994,466±4,326	▼ -2.8%	37/77
↳ Unemployed	6.5%±1.9 pp1,100±316	5.9%±0.2 pp73,968±2,788	▲ +0.6%	37/77
↳ Unemployment Rate	7.8%±2.2 pp—	6.9%±0.3 pp86,502±3,342	▲ +0.9%	38/77
Not in Labor Force	16.6%±10.1 pp2,806±1,702	14.4%±1.1 pp180,399±14,344	▲ +2.2%	37/77
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category	Ashburn
Management, Business, Science & Arts	31.7% ±4.0 pp6,035 ±759
↳ Management Occupations	8.6% ±2.3 pp1,630 ±435
↳ Business & Financial Operations	5.6% ±1.6 pp1,069 ±299
↳ Computer & Mathematical	2.0% ±0.8 pp387 ±144
↳ Architecture & Engineering	0.5% ±0.5 pp103 ±92
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	0.1% ±0.3 pp12 ±66
↳ Community & Social Service	2.4% ±1.0 pp464 ±188
↳ Legal Occupations	0.6% ±0.5 pp122 ±97
↳ Education, Training & Library	7.4% ±1.7 pp1,403 ±321
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	1.0% ±0.7 pp191 ±130
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	1.8% ±0.7 pp336 ±126
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	1.7% ±0.9 pp318 ±163
Service	20.7% ±2.8 pp3,943 ±541
↳ Healthcare Support	4.3% ±1.2 pp817 ±233
↳ Protective Service	3.9% ±1.2 pp748 ±221
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	5.4% ±1.3 pp1,033 ±244
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	4.4% ±1.4 pp835 ±271
↳ Personal Care & Service	2.7% ±1.2 pp510 ±229
Sales & Office	19.8% ±3.0 pp3,767 ±574
↳ Sales & Related	7.0% ±1.8 pp1,337 ±351
↳ Office & Administrative Support	12.8% ±2.3 pp2,430 ±439
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	6.7% ±1.9 pp1,285 ±372
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.0% ±0.3 pp0
↳ Construction & Extraction	4.1% ±1.5 pp775 ±293
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	2.7% ±1.2 pp510 ±233
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	21.1% ±3.0 pp4,023 ±566
↳ Production Occupations	6.3% ±1.7 pp1,202 ±323
↳ Transportation Occupations	7.6% ±2.2 pp1,456 ±421
↳ Material Moving Occupations	7.2% ±1.6 pp1,365 ±302
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts	31.7%±4.0 pp6,035±759	49.2%±0.4 pp686,743±5,710	▼ -17.5%	54/77
↳ Management Occupations	8.6%±2.3 pp1,630±435	12.3%±0.3 pp172,182±3,807	▼ -3.8%	47/77
↳ Business & Financial Operations	5.6%±1.6 pp1,069±299	9.1%±0.2 pp127,081±3,358	▼ -3.5%	42/77
↳ Computer & Mathematical	2.0%±0.8 pp387±144	4.9%±0.2 pp68,921±2,690	▼ -2.9%	53/77
↳ Architecture & Engineering	0.5%±0.5 pp103±92	1.6%±0.1 pp22,779±1,380	▼ -1.1%	60/77
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	0.1%±0.3 pp12±66	1.4%±0.1 pp19,126±1,340	▼ -1.3%	67/77
↳ Community & Social Service	2.4%±1.0 pp464±188	1.9%±0.1 pp26,973±1,500	▲ +0.5%	24/77
↳ Legal Occupations	0.6%±0.5 pp122±97	2.3%±0.1 pp31,629±1,814	▼ -1.6%	51/77
↳ Education, Training & Library	7.4%±1.7 pp1,403±321	6.6%±0.2 pp92,316±2,697	▲ +0.8%	28/77
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	1.0%±0.7 pp191±130	3.1%±0.1 pp43,879±1,786	▼ -2.1%	59/77
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	1.8%±0.7 pp336±126	4.6%±0.2 pp63,551±2,652	▼ -2.8%	64/77
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	1.7%±0.9 pp318±163	1.3%±0.1 pp18,306±1,387	▲ +0.4%	25/77
Service	20.7%±2.8 pp3,943±541	16.9%±0.3 pp235,977±4,217	▲ +3.8%	37/77
↳ Healthcare Support	4.3%±1.2 pp817±233	3.4%±0.2 pp46,792±2,107	▲ +0.9%	32/77
↳ Protective Service	3.9%±1.2 pp748±221	2.8%±0.1 pp39,146±1,734	▲ +1.1%	32/77
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	5.4%±1.3 pp1,033±244	5.1%±0.2 pp70,514±2,393	▲ +0.4%	31/77
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	4.4%±1.4 pp835±271	3.0%±0.1 pp41,783±1,967	▲ +1.4%	33/77
↳ Personal Care & Service	2.7%±1.2 pp510±229	2.7%±0.1 pp37,742±1,657	0%	37/77
Sales & Office	19.8%±3.0 pp3,767±574	17.4%±0.3 pp243,580±4,754	▲ +2.3%	30/77
↳ Sales & Related	7.0%±1.8 pp1,337±351	8.1%±0.2 pp113,073±3,174	▼ -1.1%	53/77
↳ Office & Administrative Support	12.8%±2.3 pp2,430±439	9.3%±0.3 pp130,507±3,591	▲ +3.4%	19/77
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	6.7%±1.9 pp1,285±372	4.6%±0.2 pp64,338±2,929	▲ +2.1%	25/77
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.0%±0.3 pp0	0.1%±0.0 pp1,506±406	▼ -0.1%	42/77
↳ Construction & Extraction	4.1%±1.5 pp775±293	2.8%±0.1 pp39,432±2,062	▲ +1.2%	25/77
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	2.7%±1.2 pp510±233	1.7%±0.1 pp23,400±1,722	▲ +1.0%	26/77
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	21.1%±3.0 pp4,023±566	11.8%±0.3 pp165,261±3,629	▲ +9.3%	14/77
↳ Production Occupations	6.3%±1.7 pp1,202±323	4.2%±0.2 pp57,989±2,275	▲ +2.2%	25/77
↳ Transportation Occupations	7.6%±2.2 pp1,456±421	3.9%±0.2 pp54,099±2,118	▲ +3.8%	8/77
↳ Material Moving Occupations	7.2%±1.6 pp1,365±302	3.8%±0.2 pp53,173±2,312	▲ +3.4%	17/77
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category	Ashburn
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0% ±0.3 pp0
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.0% ±0.3 pp0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0% ±0.3 pp0
Construction	4.7% ±1.6 pp896 ±311
Manufacturing	9.2% ±1.9 pp1,749 ±356
Wholesale Trade	2.1% ±0.9 pp391 ±169
Retail Trade	10.2% ±2.0 pp1,942 ±376
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	12.1% ±2.8 pp2,302 ±528
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	11.3% ±2.8 pp2,147 ±530
↳ Utilities	0.8% ±0.6 pp155 ±113
Information	0.8% ±0.6 pp144 ±118
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	7.0% ±1.8 pp1,335 ±339
↳ Finance & Insurance	4.7% ±1.5 pp886 ±280
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	2.4% ±1.1 pp449 ±209
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	8.9% ±1.8 pp1,697 ±346
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	3.8% ±1.2 pp726 ±221
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.1% ±0.4 pp19 ±69
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	5.0% ±1.5 pp952 ±280
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	25.4% ±2.8 pp4,834 ±528
↳ Educational Services	13.8% ±2.5 pp2,634 ±480
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	11.5% ±1.9 pp2,200 ±359
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	8.9% ±1.9 pp1,699 ±358
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	1.7% ±1.0 pp333 ±190
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	7.2% ±1.6 pp1,366 ±308
Other Services	3.7% ±1.1 pp713 ±207
Public Administration	7.1% ±1.5 pp1,351 ±285
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%±0.3 pp0	0.2%±0.0 pp—	▼ -0.2%	59/77
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.0%±0.3 pp0	0.2%±0.0 pp—	▼ -0.2%	55/77
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%±0.3 pp0	0.0%±0.0 pp—	0%	18/77
Construction	4.7%±1.6 pp896±311	3.8%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.9%	26/77
Manufacturing	9.2%±1.9 pp1,749±356	7.7%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.5%	21/77
Wholesale Trade	2.1%±0.9 pp391±169	2.0%±0.1 pp—	0%	32/77
Retail Trade	10.2%±2.0 pp1,942±376	8.2%±0.2 pp—	▲ +2.0%	26/77
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	12.1%±2.8 pp2,302±528	7.1%±0.2 pp—	▲ +5.0%	17/77
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	11.3%±2.8 pp2,147±530	6.5%±0.2 pp—	▲ +4.7%	16/77
↳ Utilities	0.8%±0.6 pp155±113	0.5%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.3%	21/77
Information	0.8%±0.6 pp144±118	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▼ -1.4%	64/77
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	7.0%±1.8 pp1,335±339	8.8%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.8%	36/77
↳ Finance & Insurance	4.7%±1.5 pp886±280	6.7%±0.2 pp—	▼ -2.0%	40/77
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	2.4%±1.1 pp449±209	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.2%	23/77
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	8.9%±1.8 pp1,697±346	18.2%±0.4 pp—	▼ -9.3%	73/77
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	3.8%±1.2 pp726±221	13.4%±0.3 pp—	▼ -9.6%	66/77
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.1%±0.4 pp19±69	0.1%±0.0 pp—	0%	27/77
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	5.0%±1.5 pp952±280	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.4%	39/77
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	25.4%±2.8 pp4,834±528	24.2%±0.4 pp—	▲ +1.2%	40/77
↳ Educational Services	13.8%±2.5 pp2,634±480	10.5%±0.2 pp—	▲ +3.3%	15/77
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	11.5%±1.9 pp2,200±359	13.7%±0.3 pp—	▼ -2.1%	58/77
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	8.9%±1.9 pp1,699±358	9.1%±0.2 pp—	▼ -0.2%	36/77
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	1.7%±1.0 pp333±190	2.2%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.5%	45/77
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	7.2%±1.6 pp1,366±308	6.9%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.2%	33/77
Other Services	3.7%±1.1 pp713±207	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▼ -0.8%	54/77
Public Administration	7.1%±1.5 pp1,351±285	4.0%±0.2 pp—	▲ +3.1%	16/77
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category	Ashburn
Private Company Employee	59.7% ±1.8 pp11,380 ±343
Self-Employed	9.7% ±2.5 pp1,843 ±483
Nonprofit	10.8% ±2.6 pp2,057 ±500
Government	19.6% ±2.4 pp3,741 ±457
Unpaid Family Worker	0.2% ±0.4 pp32 ±73
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Private Company Employee	59.7%±1.8 pp11,380±343	67.9%±0.4 pp947,845±5,822	▼ -8.2%	58/77
Self-Employed	9.7%±2.5 pp1,843±483	8.3%±0.2 pp115,690±2,989	▲ +1.4%	16/77
Nonprofit	10.8%±2.6 pp2,057±500	12.1%±0.3 pp169,124±4,035	▼ -1.3%	46/77
Government	19.6%±2.4 pp3,741±457	12.9%±0.3 pp179,945±4,021	▲ +6.7%	21/77
Unpaid Family Worker	0.2%±0.4 pp32±73	0.2%±0.0 pp2,312±408	0%	26/77
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category	Ashburn
Full-Time, Year-Round	61.5% ±1.8 pp13,077 ±391
Part-Time or Part-Year	38.5% ±4.2 pp8,178 ±886
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round	61.5%±1.8 pp13,077±391	67.0%±0.3 pp1,025,726±3,875	▼ -5.5%	55/77
Part-Time or Part-Year	38.5%±4.2 pp8,178±886	33.0%±0.3 pp504,210±4,897	▲ +5.5%	23/77
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category	Ashburn
Average FT Earnings	$61,331±$2,348
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$20,857±$3,573
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$33,457±$2,254
Median FT Earnings	$52,681±$3,225
75th Percentile FT Earnings	$78,694±$5,326
90th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Average FT Earnings	$61,331±$2,348	$96,214±$968	▼ −$34,884	49/76
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$20,857±$3,573	$29,008±$387	▼ −$8,151	66/77
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$33,457±$2,254	$43,011±$345	▼ −$9,554	61/77
Median FT Earnings	$52,681±$3,225	$69,663±$530	▼ −$16,982	49/77
75th Percentile FT Earnings	$78,694±$5,326	Over $100,000	▼ −$21,306+	52/77
90th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000	Over $100,000	—	1/77
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$67,556 ±2,928	$66,292 ±1,572	$61,331 ±2,348	▼ −$6,225▼ −$4,961▼ −$1,264
Chicago citywide	$83,170 ±714	$91,467 ±682	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$13,044▲ +$4,747▲ +$8,297
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$50,984 ±2,210	$54,028 ±1,282	$61,331 ±2,348	▲ +$10,347▲ +$7,303▲ +$3,044
Chicago citywide	$62,767 ±539	$74,546 ±556	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$33,447▲ +$21,669▲ +$11,778
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$27,088 ±2,586	$27,012 ±1,674	$20,857 ±3,573	▼ −$6,231▼ −$6,154▼ −$77
Chicago citywide	$24,209 ±243	$26,113 ±152	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$4,799▲ +$2,895▲ +$1,904
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$20,443 ±1,951	$22,015 ±1,364	$20,857 ±3,573	▲ +$414▼ −$1,157▲ +$1,572
Chicago citywide	$18,270 ±183	$21,282 ±124	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$10,738▲ +$7,726▲ +$3,012
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$36,769 ±1,862	$37,583 ±1,572	$33,457 ±2,254	▼ −$3,312▼ −$4,126▲ +$814
Chicago citywide	$37,393 ±278	$39,415 ±229	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$5,618▲ +$3,597▲ +$2,021
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$27,749 ±1,405	$30,630 ±1,281	$33,457 ±2,254	▲ +$5,708▲ +$2,827▲ +$2,882
Chicago citywide	$28,220 ±210	$32,123 ±187	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$14,791▲ +$10,888▲ +$3,903
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$57,288 ±3,277	$56,881 ±2,772	$52,681 ±3,225	▼ −$4,608▼ −$4,200▼ −$407
Chicago citywide	$60,575 ±496	$64,628 ±327	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,034▲ +$4,054
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$43,235 ±2,473	$46,358 ±2,259	$52,681 ±3,225	▲ +$9,446▲ +$6,322▲ +$3,123
Chicago citywide	$45,715 ±374	$52,672 ±266	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$23,948▲ +$16,991▲ +$6,957
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$88,442 ±4,577	$86,124 ±5,455	$78,694 ±5,326	▼ −$9,748▼ −$7,430▼ −$2,318
Chicago citywide	$98,274 ±615	$108,202 ±616	—	——▲ +$9,928
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$66,745 ±3,454	$70,191 ±4,446	$78,694 ±5,326	▲ +$11,948▲ +$8,503▲ +$3,445
Chicago citywide	$74,166 ±464	$88,185 ±502	—	——▲ +$14,019
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$121,731 ±3,791	$120,441 ±2,973	—	——▼ −$1,290
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$91,868 ±2,861	$98,160 ±2,423	—	——▲ +$6,291
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category	Ashburn
Average PT Earnings	$25,470±$2,314
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$2,417±$845
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$7,326±$2,398
Median PT Earnings	$17,549±$2,745
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$32,760±$3,778
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$61,773±$14,235
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Average PT Earnings	$25,470±$2,314	$33,575±$750	▼ −$8,105	44/76
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$2,417±$845	$2,183±$87	▲ +$233	23/77
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$7,326±$2,398	$7,222±$206	▲ +$104	32/77
Median PT Earnings	$17,549±$2,745	$19,180±$393	▼ −$1,631	36/77
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$32,760±$3,778	$38,498±$681	▼ −$5,738	44/77
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$61,773±$14,235	$73,776±$1,391	▼ −$12,003	40/77
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$24,159 ±2,399	$22,361 ±1,918	$25,470 ±2,314	▲ +$1,312▲ +$3,109▼ −$1,797
Chicago citywide	$27,076 ±473	$31,236 ±676	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$6,500▲ +$2,340▲ +$4,160
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$18,232 ±1,810	$18,224 ±1,563	$25,470 ±2,314	▲ +$7,238▲ +$7,246▼ −$8
Chicago citywide	$20,433 ±357	$25,457 ±551	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$13,142▲ +$8,118▲ +$5,024
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,241 ±471	$1,799 ±332	$2,417 ±845	▲ +$175▲ +$618▼ −$443
Chicago citywide	$2,230 ±48	$2,283 ±59	$2,183 ±87	▼ −$47▼ −$100▲ +$53
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$1,691 ±355	$1,466 ±270	$2,417 ±845	▲ +$725▲ +$951▼ −$226
Chicago citywide	$1,683 ±36	$1,861 ±48	$2,183 ±87	▲ +$500▲ +$322▲ +$178
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$5,792 ±862	$5,216 ±937	$7,326 ±2,398	▲ +$1,534▲ +$2,110▼ −$576
Chicago citywide	$6,390 ±123	$6,841 ±156	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$832▲ +$381▲ +$451
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$4,371 ±650	$4,251 ±764	$7,326 ±2,398	▲ +$2,955▲ +$3,075▼ −$120
Chicago citywide	$4,822 ±93	$5,575 ±127	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$2,399▲ +$1,646▲ +$753
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$15,169 ±1,888	$13,928 ±1,498	$17,549 ±2,745	▲ +$2,380▲ +$3,621▼ −$1,242
Chicago citywide	$15,461 ±166	$17,025 ±275	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$3,719▲ +$2,155▲ +$1,563
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$11,448 ±1,425	$11,351 ±1,220	$17,549 ±2,745	▲ +$6,101▲ +$6,198▼ −$97
Chicago citywide	$11,668 ±125	$13,875 ±224	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$7,512▲ +$5,305▲ +$2,207
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$29,419 ±4,290	$31,118 ±4,438	$32,760 ±3,778	▲ +$3,342▲ +$1,642▲ +$1,700
Chicago citywide	$30,795 ±619	$34,779 ±505	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$7,703▲ +$3,719▲ +$3,984
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$22,202 ±3,238	$25,362 ±3,617	$32,760 ±3,778	▲ +$10,558▲ +$7,399▲ +$3,160
Chicago citywide	$23,241 ±468	$28,345 ±412	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$15,257▲ +$10,153▲ +$5,104
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$61,019 ±11,681	$53,050 ±7,154	$61,773 ±14,235	▲ +$754▲ +$8,722▼ −$7,968
Chicago citywide	$61,207 ±1,249	$68,040 ±1,298	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$12,570▲ +$5,737▲ +$6,833
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$46,050 ±8,816	$43,236 ±5,831	$61,773 ±14,235	▲ +$15,723▲ +$18,537▼ −$2,814
Chicago citywide	$46,192 ±942	$55,452 ±1,058	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$27,585▲ +$18,324▲ +$9,261

Earnings of All Workers

Category	Ashburn
Average Earnings	$47,533±$798
10th Percentile Earnings	$6,574±$1,966
25th Percentile Earnings	$18,541±$2,402
Median Earnings	$37,318±$2,263
75th Percentile Earnings	$66,778±$3,507
90th Percentile Earnings	Over $100,000
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Average Earnings	$47,533±$798	$75,571±$768	▼ −$28,038	47/76
10th Percentile Earnings	$6,574±$1,966	$8,529±$272	▼ −$1,955	48/77
25th Percentile Earnings	$18,541±$2,402	$25,183±$358	▼ −$6,642	56/77
Median Earnings	$37,318±$2,263	$51,367±$471	▼ −$14,049	54/77
75th Percentile Earnings	$66,778±$3,507	$93,324±$598	▼ −$26,545	47/77
90th Percentile Earnings	Over $100,000	Over $100,000	—	1/77
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$51,824 ±2,206	$50,184 ±1,585	$47,533 ±798	▼ −$4,290▼ −$2,651▼ −$1,639
Chicago citywide	$62,453 ±534	$71,626 ±551	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$13,118▲ +$3,945▲ +$9,173
Average Earnings (nominal dollars)	$39,111 ±1,665	$40,900 ±1,291	$47,533 ±798	▲ +$8,423▲ +$6,633▲ +$1,790
Chicago citywide	$47,133 ±403	$58,375 ±449	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$28,438▲ +$17,196▲ +$11,243
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$6,307 ±1,060	$5,686 ±1,162	$6,574 ±1,966	▲ +$267▲ +$888▼ −$621
Chicago citywide	$6,858 ±139	$8,358 ±164	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$1,671▲ +$171▲ +$1,500
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$4,760 ±800	$4,634 ±947	$6,574 ±1,966	▲ +$1,814▲ +$1,940▼ −$126
Chicago citywide	$5,176 ±105	$6,812 ±134	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$3,354▲ +$1,717▲ +$1,636
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$20,041 ±1,785	$19,458 ±2,355	$18,541 ±2,402	▼ −$1,500▼ −$917▼ −$583
Chicago citywide	$19,598 ±241	$23,173 ±290	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$5,585▲ +$2,010▲ +$3,576
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$15,124 ±1,347	$15,858 ±1,919	$18,541 ±2,402	▲ +$3,416▲ +$2,682▲ +$734
Chicago citywide	$14,790 ±182	$18,886 ±236	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$10,393▲ +$6,297▲ +$4,096
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$41,376 ±2,211	$40,613 ±1,560	$37,318 ±2,263	▼ −$4,058▼ −$3,295▼ −$763
Chicago citywide	$42,365 ±293	$47,195 ±370	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$9,002▲ +$4,172▲ +$4,830
Median Earnings (nominal dollars)	$31,226 ±1,668	$33,100 ±1,272	$37,318 ±2,263	▲ +$6,092▲ +$4,218▲ +$1,874
Chicago citywide	$31,972 ±221	$38,464 ±302	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$19,395▲ +$12,903▲ +$6,492
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$74,058 ±3,721	$68,984 ±3,421	$66,778 ±3,507	▼ −$7,280▼ −$2,205▼ −$5,075
Chicago citywide	$78,784 ±555	$87,853 ±597	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$14,540▲ +$5,471▲ +$9,069
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$55,891 ±2,808	$56,222 ±2,788	$66,778 ±3,507	▲ +$10,888▲ +$10,556▲ +$331
Chicago citywide	$59,457 ±418	$71,600 ±486	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$33,867▲ +$21,723▲ +$12,144
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$111,723 ±4,302	$109,681 ±3,922	—	——▼ −$2,042
Chicago citywide	$128,659 ±682	—	—	———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$84,316 ±3,247	$89,390 ±3,196	—	——▲ +$5,075
Chicago citywide	$97,097 ±515	—	—	———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ashburn, Chicago

Category	Ashburn
Household income at age 35	$53,480 ±$894
Household income percentile rank	48.1 ±0.54 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	17.6% ±0.75 pp
Individual income at age 35	$40,352 ±$651
Fraction married	33.3% ±0.91 pp
Employment rate	79.1% ±0.80 pp
Incarceration rate	1.75% ±0.29 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Ashburn, Chicago. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Ashburn, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$53,480 ±$894	$43,090 ±$109	+$10,390
Household income percentile rank	48.1 ±0.54 pp	40.9 ±0.07 pp	+7.2 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	17.6% ±0.75 pp	11.4% ±0.08 pp	+6.2 pp
Individual income at age 35	$40,352 ±$651	$33,545 ±$85	+$6,808
Fraction married	33.3% ±0.91 pp	26.4% ±0.12 pp	+7.0 pp
Employment rate	79.1% ±0.80 pp	74.4% ±0.12 pp	+4.7 pp
Incarceration rate	1.75% ±0.29 pp	2.87% ±0.06 pp	−1.1 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Ashburn, Chicago. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Ashburn, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ashburn, Chicago in Lower-Income Families

Category	Ashburn
Household income at age 35	$36,644 ±$1,246
Household income percentile rank	36.8 ±0.88 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	6.67% ±1.08 pp
Individual income at age 35	$30,072 ±$1,062
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Ashburn, Chicago with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Ashburn, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$36,644 ±$1,246	$34,712 ±$133	+$1,932
Household income percentile rank	36.8 ±0.88 pp	35.3 ±0.09 pp	+1.5 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	6.67% ±1.08 pp	6.31% ±0.10 pp	+0.4 pp
Individual income at age 35	$30,072 ±$1,062	$28,717 ±$114	+$1,356
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Ashburn, Chicago with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Ashburn, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Ashburn, Chicago

Category	Ashburn
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	81.1% ±0.78 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	23.5% ±0.85 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Ashburn, Chicago. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Ashburn, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	81.1% ±0.78 pp	78.1% ±0.12 pp	+3.0 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	23.5% ±0.85 pp	22.9% ±0.12 pp	+0.7 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Ashburn, Chicago. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Ashburn, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Ashburn

Category	Ashburn
All jobs located in ashburn	4,311
Ashburn jobs held by Ashburn residents	7.0%
Ashburn jobs held by non-Ashburn residents	93.0%
Employed residents working in Ashburn	1.6%
Employed residents working outside Ashburn	98.4%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ashburn	Chicago neighborhood median	Difference	Rank
All jobs located in ashburn	4,311	5,320	▼ −1,009	45/77
Ashburn jobs held by Ashburn residents	7.0%	5.8%	▲ +1.2 pp	30/77
Ashburn jobs held by non-Ashburn residents	93.0%	94.2%	▼ −1.2 pp	48/77
Employed residents working in Ashburn	1.6%	2.6%	▼ −1.0 pp	60/77
Employed residents working outside Ashburn	98.4%	97.4%	▲ +1.0 pp	18/77
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in ashburn	5,494	4,565	4,311	▼ −1,183▼ −254▼ −929
Chicago citywide	5,236	5,698	5,320	▲ +84▼ −378▲ +462
Ashburn jobs held by Ashburn residents	5.0%254	5.4%224	7.0%277	▲ +2.0 pp▲ +23▲ +1.6 pp▲ +53▲ +0.4 pp▼ −30
Chicago citywide	5.5%246	5.6%306	5.8%279	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +33▲ +0.1 pp▼ −27▲ +0.2 pp▲ +60
Ashburn jobs held by non-Ashburn residents	95.0%4,810	94.6%3,932	93.0%3,699	▼ −2.0 pp▼ −1,111▼ −1.6 pp▼ −233▼ −0.4 pp▼ −878
Chicago citywide	94.5%4,320	94.4%4,646	94.2%4,657	▼ −0.3 pp▲ +337▼ −0.1 pp▲ +11▼ −0.2 pp▲ +326
Employed residents working in Ashburn	1.6%254	1.3%224	1.6%277	– 0.0 pp▲ +23▲ +0.3 pp▲ +53▼ −0.3 pp▼ −30
Chicago citywide	2.5%246	2.7%306	2.6%279	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +33▼ −0.1 pp▼ −27▲ +0.1 pp▲ +60
Employed residents working outside Ashburn	98.4%15,650	98.7%16,802	98.4%16,724	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,074▼ −0.3 pp▼ −78▲ +0.3 pp▲ +1,152
Chicago citywide	97.5%9,791	97.3%10,346	97.4%10,385	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +594▲ +0.1 pp▲ +39▼ −0.1 pp▲ +555

Industry of Jobs in Ashburn

Category	Ashburn
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0
Construction	2.3%99
Manufacturing	10.4%449
Wholesale Trade	0.7%30
Retail Trade	17.7%764
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	22.0%950
↳ Utilities	17.7%764
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	4.3%186
Information	0.2%8
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	3.1%132
↳ Finance & Insurance	1.5%63
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.6%69
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	4.2%179
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	2.3%99
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%0
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	1.9%80
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	22.5%968
↳ Educational Services	4.9%212
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	17.5%756
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	9.6%415
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	0.4%16
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	9.3%399
Other Services	7.4%317
Public Administration	0.0%0
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0	0.0%423	0%	25/77
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0	0.0%36	0%	9/77
Construction	2.3%99	1.9%27,207	▲ +0.4%	45/77
Manufacturing	10.4%449	4.4%64,747	▲ +6.0%	24/77
Wholesale Trade	0.7%30	2.8%41,460	▼ -2.1%	62/77
Retail Trade	17.7%764	6.6%96,413	▲ +11.1%	20/77
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	22.0%950	6.0%87,817	▲ +16.0%	8/77
↳ Utilities	17.7%764	0.3%5,012	▲ +17.4%	2/77
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	4.3%186	5.7%82,805	▼ -1.3%	22/77
Information	0.2%8	3.5%51,095	▼ -3.3%	53/77
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	3.1%132	10.8%157,520	▼ -7.7%	51/77
↳ Finance & Insurance	1.5%63	8.6%125,824	▼ -7.1%	43/77
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.6%69	2.2%31,696	▼ -0.6%	36/77
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	4.2%179	23.2%339,220	▼ -19.0%	63/77
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	2.3%99	14.2%207,444	▼ -11.9%	50/77
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%0	1.2%16,872	▼ -1.2%	36/77
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	1.9%80	7.9%114,904	▼ -6.0%	62/77
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	22.5%968	23.0%336,089	▼ -0.5%	36/77
↳ Educational Services	4.9%212	9.2%134,671	▼ -4.3%	31/77
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	17.5%756	13.8%201,418	▲ +3.8%	36/77
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	9.6%415	10.3%151,055	▼ -0.7%	35/77
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	0.4%16	1.9%27,339	▼ -1.5%	40/77
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	9.3%399	8.5%123,716	▲ +0.8%	35/77
Other Services	7.4%317	4.0%59,136	▲ +3.3%	17/77
Public Administration	0.0%0	3.5%51,418	▼ -3.5%	19/77
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.0%181	0.0%569	0.0%423	– 0.0 pp▲ +242– 0.0 pp▼ −146– 0.0 pp▲ +388
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.0%140	0.0%374	0.0%36	– 0.0 pp▼ −104– 0.0 pp▼ −338– 0.0 pp▲ +234
Construction	2.8%153	4.4%203	2.3%99	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −54▼ −2.2 pp▼ −104▲ +1.7 pp▲ +50
Chicago citywide	1.6%20,789	1.8%26,012	1.9%27,207	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,418– 0.0 pp▲ +1,195▲ +0.3 pp▲ +5,223
Manufacturing	4.9%268	9.9%453	10.4%449	▲ +5.5 pp▲ +181▲ +0.5 pp▼ −4▲ +5.0 pp▲ +185
Chicago citywide	4.6%61,066	4.5%63,597	4.4%64,747	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,681▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,150▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,531
Wholesale Trade	5.4%294	0.9%41	0.7%30	▼ −4.7 pp▼ −264▼ −0.2 pp▼ −11▼ −4.5 pp▼ −253
Chicago citywide	3.0%39,431	2.9%41,789	2.8%41,460	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,029▼ −0.1 pp▼ −329▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,358
Retail Trade	21.9%1,205	17.9%816	17.7%764	▼ −4.2 pp▼ −441▼ −0.2 pp▼ −52▼ −4.1 pp▼ −389
Chicago citywide	7.4%97,262	6.9%97,836	6.6%96,413	▼ −0.8 pp▼ −849▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,423▼ −0.5 pp▲ +574
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	18.0%990	20.2%924	22.0%950	▲ +4.0 pp▼ −40▲ +1.8 pp▲ +26▲ +2.2 pp▼ −66
Chicago citywide	5.4%71,320	5.6%79,303	6.0%87,817	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +16,497▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,514▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,983
Utilities	14.4%791	17.0%774	17.7%764	▲ +3.3 pp▼ −27▲ +0.8 pp▼ −10▲ +2.6 pp▼ −17
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,383	0.3%4,956	0.3%5,012	– 0.0 pp▲ +629– 0.0 pp▲ +56– 0.0 pp▲ +573
Transportation & Warehousing	3.6%199	3.3%150	4.3%186	▲ +0.7 pp▼ −13▲ +1.0 pp▲ +36▼ −0.3 pp▼ −49
Chicago citywide	5.1%66,937	5.2%74,347	5.7%82,805	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +15,868▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,458▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,410
Information	0.1%4	0.2%8	0.2%8	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4– 0.0 pp– 0▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4
Chicago citywide	3.1%40,514	3.4%48,135	3.5%51,095	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +10,581▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,960▲ +0.3 pp▲ +7,621
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	5.5%303	4.6%208	3.1%132	▼ −2.5 pp▼ −171▼ −1.5 pp▼ −76▼ −1.0 pp▼ −95
Chicago citywide	10.5%138,287	10.6%150,163	10.8%157,520	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +19,233▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,357▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,876
Finance & Insurance	2.3%128	2.1%96	1.5%63	▼ −0.9 pp▼ −65▼ −0.6 pp▼ −33▼ −0.2 pp▼ −32
Chicago citywide	8.5%111,307	8.4%119,147	8.6%125,824	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14,517▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,677▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7,840
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	3.2%175	2.5%112	1.6%69	▼ −1.6 pp▼ −106▼ −0.9 pp▼ −43▼ −0.7 pp▼ −63
Chicago citywide	2.1%26,980	2.2%31,016	2.2%31,696	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,716– 0.0 pp▲ +680▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,036
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	9.4%515	4.9%225	4.2%179	▼ −5.2 pp▼ −336▼ −0.8 pp▼ −46▼ −4.4 pp▼ −290
Chicago citywide	21.2%278,928	22.6%319,744	23.2%339,220	▲ +2.0 pp▲ +60,292▲ +0.6 pp▲ +19,476▲ +1.3 pp▲ +40,816
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	2.8%155	2.5%112	2.3%99	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −56▼ −0.2 pp▼ −13▼ −0.4 pp▼ −43
Chicago citywide	11.8%155,200	12.9%182,462	14.2%207,444	▲ +2.4 pp▲ +52,244▲ +1.3 pp▲ +24,982▲ +1.1 pp▲ +27,262
Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	1.0%13,619	1.2%16,600	1.2%16,872	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,253– 0.0 pp▲ +272▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,981
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	6.6%360	2.5%113	1.9%80	▼ −4.7 pp▼ −280▼ −0.6 pp▼ −33▼ −4.1 pp▼ −247
Chicago citywide	8.4%110,109	8.5%120,682	7.9%114,904	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +4,795▼ −0.7 pp▼ −5,778▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,573
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	19.4%1,064	22.9%1,044	22.5%968	▲ +3.1 pp▼ −96▼ −0.4 pp▼ −76▲ +3.5 pp▼ −20
Chicago citywide	23.5%308,633	22.1%313,540	23.0%336,089	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +27,456▲ +0.8 pp▲ +22,549▼ −1.4 pp▲ +4,907
Educational Services	2.3%127	4.6%210	4.9%212	▲ +2.6 pp▲ +85▲ +0.3 pp▲ +2▲ +2.3 pp▲ +83
Chicago citywide	10.1%132,909	9.0%128,169	9.2%134,671	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +1,762▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,502▼ −1.1 pp▼ −4,740
Health Care & Social Assistance	17.1%937	18.3%834	17.5%756	▲ +0.5 pp▼ −181▼ −0.7 pp▼ −78▲ +1.2 pp▼ −103
Chicago citywide	13.4%175,724	13.1%185,371	13.8%201,418	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +25,694▲ +0.7 pp▲ +16,047▼ −0.3 pp▲ +9,647
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	7.7%422	9.2%419	9.6%415	▲ +1.9 pp▼ −7▲ +0.4 pp▼ −4▲ +1.5 pp▼ −3
Chicago citywide	10.9%143,753	11.5%162,749	10.3%151,055	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,302▼ −1.2 pp▼ −11,694▲ +0.5 pp▲ +18,996
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	0.3%17	0.4%16	0.4%16	▲ +0.1 pp▼ −1– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▼ −1
Chicago citywide	1.7%22,179	2.1%30,178	1.9%27,339	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +5,160▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,839▲ +0.4 pp▲ +7,999
Accommodation & Food Services	7.4%405	8.8%403	9.3%399	▲ +1.9 pp▼ −6▲ +0.4 pp▼ −4▲ +1.5 pp▼ −2
Chicago citywide	9.3%121,574	9.4%132,571	8.5%123,716	▼ −0.8 pp▲ +2,142▼ −0.9 pp▼ −8,855▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,997
Other Services	4.4%242	4.9%224	7.4%317	▲ +2.9 pp▲ +75▲ +2.4 pp▲ +93▲ +0.5 pp▼ −18
Chicago citywide	4.5%59,098	4.4%61,698	4.0%59,136	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +38▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,562▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,600
Public Administration	0.6%34	0.0%0	0.0%0	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −34– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.6 pp▼ −34
Chicago citywide	4.2%54,814	3.6%51,684	3.5%51,418	▼ −0.7 pp▼ −3,396▼ −0.1 pp▼ −266▼ −0.5 pp▼ −3,130

Earnings of Jobs in Ashburn

Category	Ashburn
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	17.7%761
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	32.0%1,381
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	50.3%2,169
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	17.7%761	12.7%185,293	▲ +5.0%	43/77
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	32.0%1,381	20.5%299,468	▲ +11.6%	40/77
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	50.3%2,169	66.9%978,839	▼ -16.6%	33/77
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	34.0%1,868	23.4%1,068	17.7%761	▼ −16.3 pp▼ −1,107▼ −5.7 pp▼ −307▼ −10.6 pp▼ −800
Chicago citywide	21.3%280,137	16.8%238,135	12.7%185,293	▼ −8.7 pp▼ −94,844▼ −4.1 pp▼ −52,842▼ −4.5 pp▼ −42,002
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	36.9%2,026	36.8%1,681	32.0%1,381	▼ −4.8 pp▼ −645▼ −4.8 pp▼ −300▼ −0.1 pp▼ −345
Chicago citywide	30.7%403,220	26.7%378,530	20.5%299,468	▼ −10.2 pp▼ −103,752▼ −6.3 pp▼ −79,062▼ −4.0 pp▼ −24,690
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	29.1%1,600	39.8%1,816	50.3%2,169	▲ +21.2 pp▲ +569▲ +10.5 pp▲ +353▲ +10.7 pp▲ +216
Chicago citywide	48.0%630,719	56.5%800,154	66.9%978,839	▲ +18.9 pp▲ +348,120▲ +10.4 pp▲ +178,685▲ +8.5 pp▲ +169,435

Jobs in Ashburn by Firm Age

Category	Ashburn
Firm age: 0–1 years	5.7%244
Firm age: 2–3 years	2.7%115
Firm age: 4–5 years	3.3%141
Firm age: 6–10 years	7.6%326
Firm age: 11 or more years	80.8%3,483
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years	5.7%244	2.8%37,293	▲ +2.8%	20/77
Firm age: 2–3 years	2.7%115	2.8%37,154	▼ -0.2%	49/77
Firm age: 4–5 years	3.3%141	3.2%41,869	▲ +0.1%	42/77
Firm age: 6–10 years	7.6%326	7.8%102,353	▼ -0.2%	46/77
Firm age: 11 or more years	80.8%3,483	83.4%1,098,220	▼ -2.6%	38/77
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years	1.7%94	2.8%127	5.7%244	▲ +3.9 pp▲ +150▲ +2.9 pp▲ +117▲ +1.1 pp▲ +33
Chicago citywide	2.9%33,224	2.6%33,244	2.8%37,293	– 0.0 pp▲ +4,069▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,049▼ −0.2 pp▲ +20
Firm age: 2–3 years	1.9%103	1.4%63	2.7%115	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +12▲ +1.3 pp▲ +52▼ −0.5 pp▼ −40
Chicago citywide	4.0%46,935	3.3%42,284	2.8%37,154	▼ −1.2 pp▼ −9,781▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,130▼ −0.7 pp▼ −4,651
Firm age: 4–5 years	5.5%303	6.0%275	3.3%141	▼ −2.3 pp▼ −162▼ −2.8 pp▼ −134▲ +0.5 pp▼ −28
Chicago citywide	3.7%42,688	3.6%46,058	3.2%41,869	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −819▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,189▼ −0.1 pp▲ +3,370
Firm age: 6–10 years	10.7%586	5.6%254	7.6%326	▼ −3.2 pp▼ −260▲ +2.0 pp▲ +72▼ −5.2 pp▼ −332
Chicago citywide	8.2%94,955	8.6%109,934	7.8%102,353	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +7,398▼ −0.9 pp▼ −7,581▲ +0.5 pp▲ +14,979
Firm age: 11 or more years	80.1%4,374	84.2%3,846	80.8%3,483	▲ +0.7 pp▼ −891▼ −3.4 pp▼ −363▲ +4.1 pp▼ −528
Chicago citywide	81.3%946,801	81.8%1,043,037	83.4%1,098,220	▲ +2.1 pp▲ +151,419▲ +1.6 pp▲ +55,183▲ +0.5 pp▲ +96,236

Jobs in Ashburn by Firm Size

Category	Ashburn
Firm size: 0–19 employees	24.9%1,074
Firm size: 20–49 employees	9.0%386
Firm size: 50–249 employees	19.6%846
Firm size: 250–499 employees	7.7%330
Firm size: 500 or more employees	38.8%1,673
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees	24.9%1,074	12.8%168,975	▲ +12.1%	36/77
Firm size: 20–49 employees	9.0%386	7.3%96,404	▲ +1.6%	47/77
Firm size: 50–249 employees	19.6%846	13.8%181,123	▲ +5.9%	29/77
Firm size: 250–499 employees	7.7%330	5.7%74,787	▲ +2.0%	20/77
Firm size: 500 or more employees	38.8%1,673	60.4%795,600	▼ -21.6%	46/77
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees	18.4%1,004	24.9%1,136	24.9%1,074	▲ +6.5 pp▲ +70– 0.0 pp▼ −62▲ +6.5 pp▲ +132
Chicago citywide	13.9%162,248	13.3%169,949	12.8%168,975	▼ −1.1 pp▲ +6,727▼ −0.5 pp▼ −974▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,701
Firm size: 20–49 employees	9.9%541	7.9%359	9.0%386	▼ −1.0 pp▼ −155▲ +1.1 pp▲ +27▼ −2.0 pp▼ −182
Chicago citywide	8.4%97,503	8.2%103,945	7.3%96,404	▼ −1.1 pp▼ −1,099▼ −0.8 pp▼ −7,541▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,442
Firm size: 50–249 employees	24.2%1,324	20.5%934	19.6%846	▼ −4.6 pp▼ −478▼ −0.8 pp▼ −88▼ −3.8 pp▼ −390
Chicago citywide	15.7%183,275	14.9%189,930	13.8%181,123	▼ −2.0 pp▼ −2,152▼ −1.1 pp▼ −8,807▼ −0.8 pp▲ +6,655
Firm size: 250–499 employees	4.0%218	7.1%326	7.7%330	▲ +3.7 pp▲ +112▲ +0.5 pp▲ +4▲ +3.1 pp▲ +108
Chicago citywide	6.3%72,992	5.9%74,603	5.7%74,787	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,795▼ −0.2 pp▲ +184▼ −0.4 pp▲ +1,611
Firm size: 500 or more employees	43.5%2,373	39.6%1,810	38.8%1,673	▼ −4.6 pp▼ −700▼ −0.8 pp▼ −137▼ −3.8 pp▼ −563
Chicago citywide	55.7%648,585	57.8%736,130	60.4%795,600	▲ +4.7 pp▲ +147,015▲ +2.7 pp▲ +59,470▲ +2.1 pp▲ +87,545

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Ashburn
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	18.4% ±1.8 pp18.4%±1.8 pp7,739 ±761
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	90.4% ±3.4 pp16.7%±0.6 pp6,998 ±261
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	9.6% ±3.3 pp1.8%±0.6 pp741 ±257
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	18.4%±1.8 pp18.4%±1.8 pp7,739±761	13.5%±0.2 pp13.5%±0.2 pp365,577±5,480	▲ +4.9%▲ +4.9%	16/77
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	90.4%±3.4 pp16.7%±0.6 pp6,998±261	83.0%±0.5 pp11.2%±0.1 pp303,520±1,897	▲ +7.4%▲ +5.5%	21/7715/77
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	9.6%±3.3 pp1.8%±0.6 pp741±257	17.0%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.1 pp62,057±2,247	▼ -7.4%▼ -0.5%	57/7745/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Ashburn
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	7.0% ±1.0 pp7.0%±1.0 pp2,923 ±425
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	60.8% ±6.5 pp4.2%±0.5 pp1,776 ±189
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	39.2% ±8.6 pp2.7%±0.6 pp1,147 ±252
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	77.2% ±7.5 pp5.4%±0.5 pp2,258 ±220
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	22.8% ±7.4 pp1.6%±0.5 pp665 ±217
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	7.0%±1.0 pp7.0%±1.0 pp2,923±425	7.4%±0.1 pp7.4%±0.1 pp201,851±4,036	▼ -0.5%▼ -0.5%	24/77
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	60.8%±6.5 pp4.2%±0.5 pp1,776±189	52.4%±0.7 pp3.9%±0.1 pp105,720±1,511	▲ +8.4%▲ +0.3%	40/7723/77
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	39.2%±8.6 pp2.7%±0.6 pp1,147±252	47.6%±1.2 pp3.5%±0.1 pp96,131±2,437	▼ -8.4%▼ -0.8%	38/7727/77
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	77.2%±7.5 pp5.4%±0.5 pp2,258±220	67.0%±1.0 pp5.0%±0.1 pp135,301±1,945	▲ +10.2%▲ +0.4%	32/7721/77
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	22.8%±7.4 pp1.6%±0.5 pp665±217	33.0%±1.2 pp2.5%±0.1 pp66,550±2,459	▼ -10.2%▼ -0.9%	46/7734/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category	Ashburn
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	6.0% ±2.8 pp531 ±245
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	4.0% ±2.7 pp118 ±79
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	6.0%±2.8 pp531±245	5.9%±0.5 pp—	▲ +0.1%	29/77
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	4.0%±2.7 pp118±79	5.4%±0.6 pp—	▼ -1.4%	44/77
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category	Ashburn
Owner-Occupied Households	84.3% ±2.9 pp10,967 ±376
Renter-Occupied Households	15.7% ±3.6 pp2,047 ±473
Owner-Occupied Residents	87.2% ±3.4 pp36,113 ±1,393
Renter-Occupied Residents	12.8% ±3.4 pp5,305 ±1,398
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Owner-Occupied Households	84.3%±2.9 pp10,967±376	46.0%±0.4 pp534,012±4,939	▲ +38.2%	4/77
Renter-Occupied Households	15.7%±3.6 pp2,047±473	54.0%±0.4 pp626,193±5,183	▼ -38.2%	74/77
Owner-Occupied Residents	87.2%±3.4 pp36,113±1,393	51.8%±0.5 pp1,377,219±13,574	▲ +35.4%	5/77
Renter-Occupied Residents	12.8%±3.4 pp5,305±1,398	48.2%±0.5 pp1,280,665±13,500	▼ -35.4%	73/77
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category	Ashburn
Median Year Moved In	2007±1.3 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later	1.2% ±1.0 pp159 ±126
Moved in 2020 to 2022	7.6% ±2.0 pp990 ±261
Moved in 2010 to 2019	33.1% ±4.2 pp4,302 ±544
Moved in 2000 to 2009	26.4% ±3.6 pp3,437 ±463
Moved in 1990 to 1999	21.5% ±3.3 pp2,800 ±426
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	10.2% ±2.0 pp1,326 ±256
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Moved In	2007±1.3 yr	2015±1.0 yr	▼ −8	70/77
Moved in 2023 or Later	1.2%±1.0 pp159±126	5.9%±0.2 pp68,884±2,742	▼ -4.7%	73/77
Moved in 2020 to 2022	7.6%±2.0 pp990±261	24.1%±0.4 pp279,417±5,059	▼ -16.5%	76/77
Moved in 2010 to 2019	33.1%±4.2 pp4,302±544	39.2%±0.5 pp455,125±5,772	▼ -6.2%	68/77
Moved in 2000 to 2009	26.4%±3.6 pp3,437±463	13.8%±0.3 pp160,353±3,324	▲ +12.6%	3/77
Moved in 1990 to 1999	21.5%±3.3 pp2,800±426	8.2%±0.2 pp95,243±2,390	▲ +13.3%	1/77
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	10.2%±2.0 pp1,326±256	8.7%±0.2 pp101,183±2,362	▲ +1.5%	36/77
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show

Category	Ashburn
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	4.1% ±1.4 pp4.1%±1.4 pp1,702 ±581
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	2.9% ±1.3 pp71.3%±19.4 pp1,214 ±530
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.0% ±0.1 pp0.0%0
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	0.9% ±0.5 pp22.6%±10.7 pp384 ±225
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	0.2% ±0.2 pp6.1%±4.8 pp104 ±89
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	4.1%±1.4 pp4.1%±1.4 pp1,702±581	14.0%±0.3 pp14.0%±0.3 pp375,475±8,289	▼ -9.9%▼ -9.9%	73/77
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	2.9%±1.3 pp71.3%±19.4 pp1,214±530	9.8%±0.3 pp69.9%±1.0 pp262,365±6,953	▼ -6.9%▲ +1.5%	75/7750/77
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.0%±0.1 pp0.0%0	0.8%±0.1 pp5.5%±0.4 pp20,552±1,626	▼ -0.8%▼ -5.5%	69/7769/77
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	0.9%±0.5 pp22.6%±10.7 pp384±225	2.5%±0.1 pp17.6%±0.7 pp65,936±2,918	▼ -1.5%▲ +5.0%	37/779/77
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	0.2%±0.2 pp6.1%±4.8 pp104±89	1.0%±0.1 pp7.1%±0.8 pp26,622±3,040	▼ -0.7%▼ -1.0%	52/7735/77
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Ashburn
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	3.0% ±1.5 pp3.0%±1.5 pp407 ±197
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	1.0% ±0.9 pp31.9%±26.2 pp130 ±124
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.5% ±0.6 pp15.7%±17.6 pp64 ±78
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.0% ±0.3 pp0.0%0
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	1.6% ±1.3 pp52.3%±33.2 pp213 ±170
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	5.9% ±5.5 pp5.9%±5.5 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	0.6% ±0.7 pp0.6%±0.7 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	3.0%±1.5 pp3.0%±1.5 pp407±197	9.1%±0.2 pp9.1%±0.2 pp116,849±2,682	▼ -6.1%▼ -6.1%	74/77
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	1.0%±0.9 pp31.9%±26.2 pp130±124	2.5%±0.1 pp27.1%±1.4 pp31,723±1,796	▼ -1.5%▲ +4.8%	59/7723/77
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.5%±0.6 pp15.7%±17.6 pp64±78	0.6%±0.1 pp6.0%±0.7 pp7,037±795	▼ -0.1%▲ +9.7%	32/7710/77
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.0%±0.3 pp0.0%0	0.2%±0.0 pp2.4%±0.5 pp2,831±587	▼ -0.2%▼ -2.4%	38/7738/77
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	1.6%±1.3 pp52.3%±33.2 pp213±170	5.9%±0.3 pp64.4%±2.5 pp75,258±3,387	▼ -4.3%▼ -12.1%	74/7763/77
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	5.9%±5.5 pp5.9%±5.5 pp—	4.8%±0.3 pp4.8%±0.3 pp—	▲ +1.1%▲ +1.1%	25/77
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	0.6%±0.7 pp0.6%±0.7 pp—	1.3%±0.1 pp1.3%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.7%▼ -0.7%	55/77
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category	Ashburn
Median Year Built	1956±1 yr
Pre-1940	6.4% ±2.4 pp855 ±318
1940-2009	92.5% ±5.1 pp12,420 ±678
2010+	1.1% ±0.9 pp146 ±121
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Built	1956±1 yr	1953±1 yr	▲ +3 yrs	18/77
Pre-1940	6.4%±2.4 pp855±318	38.8%±0.4 pp495,715±4,678	▼ -32.4%	76/77
1940-2009	92.5%±5.1 pp12,420±678	54.9%±0.6 pp700,698±7,435	▲ +37.7%	2/77
2010+	1.1%±0.9 pp146±121	6.3%±0.2 pp80,641±2,725	▼ -5.2%	65/77
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category	Ashburn
Population Density	8,652 /sq mi±495/sq mi
Single-Family Homes	88.8% ±2.5 pp11,913 ±331
Buildings With 2–4 Units	5.6% ±2.7 pp749 ±368
Buildings With 5–19 Units	5.1% ±1.7 pp679 ±233
Buildings With 20 or More Units	0.6% ±0.8 pp80 ±106
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Population Density	8,652 /sq mi±495/sq mi	11,748 /sq mi±26/sq mi	▼ −3,096 /sq mi	54/77
Single-Family Homes	88.8%±2.5 pp11,913±331	29.2%±0.3 pp372,679±3,989	▲ +59.6%	1/77
Buildings With 2–4 Units	5.6%±2.7 pp749±368	27.4%±0.4 pp349,976±4,957	▼ -21.8%	72/77
Buildings With 5–19 Units	5.1%±1.7 pp679±233	16.2%±0.3 pp206,420±4,124	▼ -11.1%	59/77
Buildings With 20 or More Units	0.6%±0.8 pp80±106	27.0%±0.3 pp344,543±4,438	▼ -26.4%	74/77
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category	Ashburn
Studio	0.4% ±0.5 pp53 ±67
1 Bedroom	3.8% ±2.2 pp514 ±291
2 Bedrooms	16.8% ±2.6 pp2,249 ±350
3 Bedrooms	49.0% ±3.6 pp6,582 ±487
4 Bedrooms	21.5% ±3.1 pp2,890 ±420
5 or More Bedrooms	8.4% ±1.9 pp1,133 ±251
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Studio	0.4%±0.5 pp53±67	7.5%±0.3 pp95,749±3,205	▼ -7.1%	74/77
1 Bedroom	3.8%±2.2 pp514±291	20.1%±0.4 pp257,271±4,939	▼ -16.3%	75/77
2 Bedrooms	16.8%±2.6 pp2,249±350	33.1%±0.3 pp422,866±4,221	▼ -16.4%	77/77
3 Bedrooms	49.0%±3.6 pp6,582±487	26.1%±0.3 pp333,682±4,061	▲ +22.9%	5/77
4 Bedrooms	21.5%±3.1 pp2,890±420	9.0%±0.2 pp115,453±2,426	▲ +12.5%	6/77
5 or More Bedrooms	8.4%±1.9 pp1,133±251	4.1%±0.2 pp52,033±2,072	▲ +4.4%	11/77
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show

Category	Ashburn
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	3.0% ±1.2 pp3.0%±1.2 pp384 ±161
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	2.4% ±0.9 pp80.5%±46.5 pp309 ±123
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	0.6% ±0.8 pp19.5%±26.0 pp75 ±105
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	3.0%±1.2 pp3.0%±1.2 pp384±161	3.4%±0.2 pp3.4%±0.2 pp39,979±1,996	▼ -0.5%▼ -0.5%	40/77
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	2.4%±0.9 pp80.5%±46.5 pp309±123	2.0%±0.1 pp58.2%±2.3 pp23,276±1,493	▲ +0.4%▲ +22.2%	33/7717/76
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	0.6%±0.8 pp19.5%±26.0 pp75±105	1.4%±0.1 pp41.8%±2.6 pp16,703±1,328	▼ -0.9%▼ -22.2%	62/7760/76
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category	Ashburn
Natural Gas Heat	90.2% ±2.4 pp11,740 ±318
Electric Heat	8.1% ±1.8 pp1,049 ±236
Other Heating Source	1.7% ±1.3 pp225 ±171
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Natural Gas Heat	90.2%±2.4 pp11,740±318	77.5%±0.3 pp899,660±3,501	▲ +12.7%	19/77
Electric Heat	8.1%±1.8 pp1,049±236	18.0%±0.3 pp208,937±3,864	▼ -9.9%	50/77
Other Heating Source	1.7%±1.3 pp225±171	4.4%±0.2 pp51,603±2,173	▼ -2.7%	68/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show

Category	Ashburn
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	47.2% ±3.7 pp6,144 ±479
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	17.5% ±3.1 pp2,273 ±406
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	35.3% ±3.9 pp4,597 ±506
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	19.4% ±3.3 pp2,519 ±433
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	25.9% ±13.2 pp504 ±258
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	12.1% ±8.4 pp235 ±164
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	62.0% ±9.5 pp1,208 ±185
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	45.5% ±10.9 pp886 ±212
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	51.0% ±3.7 pp5,578 ±408
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	18.4% ±3.4 pp2,015 ±369
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	30.6% ±3.9 pp3,343 ±422
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	14.7% ±3.0 pp1,608 ±333
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	35.2% ±4.5 pp2,512 ±323
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	23.4% ±4.7 pp1,673 ±339
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	41.4% ±5.0 pp2,957 ±354
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	17.8% ±4.0 pp1,274 ±288
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	80.8% ±4.9 pp3,066 ±186
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	9.0% ±3.4 pp342 ±129
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	10.2% ±4.8 pp386 ±181
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	8.8% ±4.2 pp334 ±161
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	47.2%±3.7 pp6,144±479	24.9%±0.5 pp289,047±6,215	▲ +22.3%	13/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	17.5%±3.1 pp2,273±406	23.8%±0.5 pp276,514±5,809	▼ -6.4%	69/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	35.3%±3.9 pp4,597±506	45.6%±0.6 pp529,378±6,577	▼ -10.3%	50/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	19.4%±3.3 pp2,519±433	24.0%±0.5 pp278,684±5,306	▼ -4.7%	41/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	25.9%±13.2 pp504±258	26.4%±0.5 pp156,016±3,135	▼ -0.5%	36/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	12.1%±8.4 pp235±164	25.3%±0.5 pp149,232±2,940	▼ -13.2%	74/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	62.0%±9.5 pp1,208±185	48.3%±0.7 pp285,666±4,223	▲ +13.7%	15/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	45.5%±10.9 pp886±212	25.5%±0.6 pp150,396±3,556	▲ +20.1%	5/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	51.0%±3.7 pp5,578±408	51.6%±0.6 pp272,313±2,905	▼ -0.6%	36/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	18.4%±3.4 pp2,015±369	19.6%±0.5 pp103,679±2,760	▼ -1.2%	46/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	30.6%±3.9 pp3,343±422	28.8%±0.6 pp152,025±3,034	▲ +1.8%	32/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	14.7%±3.0 pp1,608±333	13.8%±0.4 pp73,065±2,234	▲ +0.9%	38/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	35.2%±4.5 pp2,512±323	42.8%±0.7 pp146,237±2,365	▼ -7.6%	62/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	23.4%±4.7 pp1,673±339	23.9%±0.7 pp81,678±2,408	▼ -0.5%	43/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	41.4%±5.0 pp2,957±354	33.3%±0.8 pp113,910±2,596	▲ +8.1%	17/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	17.8%±4.0 pp1,274±288	15.4%±0.5 pp52,647±1,874	▲ +2.4%	31/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	80.8%±4.9 pp3,066±186	67.7%±0.9 pp126,078±1,613	▲ +13.1%	5/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	9.0%±3.4 pp342±129	11.8%±0.7 pp22,001±1,275	▼ -2.8%	56/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	10.2%±4.8 pp386±181	20.5%±0.8 pp38,115±1,492	▼ -10.3%	76/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	8.8%±4.2 pp334±161	11.0%±0.6 pp20,417±1,203	▼ -2.2%	55/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category	Ashburn
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$578±$43
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$836±$70
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,423±$84
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,891±$52
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,340±$88
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$578±$43	$594±$11	▼ −$16	35/77
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$836±$70	$1,011±$8	▼ −$175	46/77
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,423±$84	$1,560±$10	▼ −$137	28/77
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,891±$52	$2,329±$13	▼ −$439	38/77
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,340±$88	Over $3,000	▼ −$660+	46/77
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$620 ±48	$612 ±37	$578 ±43	▼ −$42▼ −$33▼ −$8
Chicago citywide	$609 ±7	$606 ±7	$594 ±11	▼ −$15▼ −$12▼ −$2
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$468 ±37	$499 ±30	$578 ±43	▲ +$110▲ +$80▲ +$31
Chicago citywide	$459 ±6	$494 ±6	$594 ±11	▲ +$135▲ +$100▲ +$35
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,185 ±99	$1,028 ±103	$836 ±70	▼ −$349▼ −$192▼ −$157
Chicago citywide	$992 ±5	$1,001 ±5	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$19▲ +$10▲ +$9
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$894 ±75	$838 ±84	$836 ±70	▼ −$58▼ −$1▼ −$56
Chicago citywide	$748 ±3	$816 ±4	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$262▲ +$195▲ +$67
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,794 ±56	$1,631 ±50	$1,423 ±84	▼ −$371▼ −$208▼ −$163
Chicago citywide	$1,493 ±8	$1,523 ±6	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$67▲ +$37▲ +$29
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,354 ±42	$1,329 ±41	$1,423 ±84	▲ +$69▲ +$93▼ −$24
Chicago citywide	$1,127 ±6	$1,241 ±5	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$433▲ +$319▲ +$114
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,381 ±49	$2,152 ±41	$1,891 ±52	▼ −$491▼ −$261▼ −$230
Chicago citywide	$2,333 ±12	$2,326 ±10	$2,329 ±13	▼ −$4▲ +$3▼ −$7
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,797 ±37	$1,754 ±33	$1,891 ±52	▲ +$93▲ +$137▼ −$44
Chicago citywide	$1,761 ±9	$1,896 ±8	$2,329 ±13	▲ +$569▲ +$434▲ +$135
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$2,502 ±89	$2,340 ±88	—▼ −$162—
Chicago citywide	—	$3,316 ±20	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$2,039 ±72	$2,340 ±88	—▲ +$301—
Chicago citywide	—	$2,703 ±16	—	———

Rent

Rent measure

Category	Ashburn
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,360±$105
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$801±$290
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,048±$143
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,373±$172
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,723±$142
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,935±$102
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,360±$105	$1,613±$12	▼ −$253	35/77
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$801±$290	$696±$20	▲ +$105	31/77
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,048±$143	$1,043±$8	▲ +$6	30/77
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,373±$172	$1,440±$10	▼ −$67	25/77
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,723±$142	$2,021±$21	▼ −$298	37/77
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,935±$102	$2,738±$29	▼ −$804	49/77
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn
Average Rent	$1,078±$54
10th Percentile Rent	$750±$331
25th Percentile Rent	$884±$88
Median Rent	$1,118±$146
75th Percentile Rent	$1,381±$95
90th Percentile Rent	$1,602±$200
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent	$1,078±$54	$1,452±$11	▼ −$374	44/77
10th Percentile Rent	$750±$331	$564±$21	▲ +$186	29/77
25th Percentile Rent	$884±$88	$913±$7	▼ −$29	35/77
Median Rent	$1,118±$146	$1,262±$12	▼ −$144	39/77
75th Percentile Rent	$1,381±$95	$1,868±$13	▼ −$487	42/77
90th Percentile Rent	$1,602±$200	$2,528±$38	▼ −$926	46/77
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category	Ashburn
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,889±$109
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,236±$84
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,469±$59
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,783±$52
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,166±$97
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,511±$182
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,889±$109	$2,734±$24	▼ −$844	50/77
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,236±$84	$1,270±$14	▼ −$35	37/77
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,469±$59	$1,697±$14	▼ −$229	50/77
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,783±$52	$2,339±$17	▼ −$556	54/77
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,166±$97	$3,269±$31	▼ −$1,103	59/77
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,511±$182	Over $4,000	▼ −$1,489+	65/77
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,167 ±47	$1,977 ±47	$1,889 ±109	▼ −$278▼ −$88▼ −$189
Chicago citywide	$2,855 ±19	$2,793 ±23	$2,734 ±24	▼ −$121▼ −$60▼ −$61
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,635 ±36	$1,612 ±38	$1,889 ±109	▲ +$254▲ +$278▼ −$24
Chicago citywide	$2,154 ±14	$2,277 ±19	$2,734 ±24	▲ +$579▲ +$457▲ +$122
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,395 ±46	$1,297 ±47	$1,236 ±84	▼ −$160▼ −$61▼ −$98
Chicago citywide	$1,403 ±11	$1,356 ±11	$1,270 ±14	▼ −$133▼ −$86▼ −$47
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,053 ±35	$1,057 ±38	$1,236 ±84	▲ +$183▲ +$179▲ +$4
Chicago citywide	$1,059 ±8	$1,105 ±9	$1,270 ±14	▲ +$212▲ +$165▲ +$46
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,718 ±42	$1,596 ±36	$1,469 ±59	▼ −$249▼ −$127▼ −$122
Chicago citywide	$1,874 ±12	$1,800 ±12	$1,697 ±14	▼ −$177▼ −$103▼ −$74
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,297 ±32	$1,301 ±29	$1,469 ±59	▲ +$172▲ +$168▲ +$4
Chicago citywide	$1,414 ±9	$1,467 ±10	$1,697 ±14	▲ +$283▲ +$230▲ +$53
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,105 ±57	$1,910 ±54	$1,783 ±52	▼ −$323▼ −$127▼ −$196
Chicago citywide	$2,526 ±13	$2,422 ±13	$2,339 ±17	▼ −$187▼ −$83▼ −$103
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,589 ±43	$1,557 ±44	$1,783 ±52	▲ +$194▲ +$226▼ −$32
Chicago citywide	$1,906 ±10	$1,974 ±11	$2,339 ±17	▲ +$433▲ +$365▲ +$68
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,550 ±49	$2,297 ±39	$2,166 ±97	▼ −$384▼ −$131▼ −$253
Chicago citywide	$3,447 ±25	$3,343 ±25	$3,269 ±31	▼ −$178▼ −$74▼ −$104
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,924 ±37	$1,872 ±32	$2,166 ±97	▲ +$241▲ +$294▼ −$52
Chicago citywide	$2,601 ±19	$2,724 ±20	$3,269 ±31	▲ +$668▲ +$544▲ +$123
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$3,108 ±89	$2,728 ±102	$2,511 ±182	▼ −$597▼ −$217▼ −$380
Chicago citywide	—	$4,578 ±59	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$2,346 ±67	$2,223 ±83	$2,511 ±182	▲ +$165▲ +$288▼ −$123
Chicago citywide	—	$3,731 ±48	—	———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category	Ashburn
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$711±$41
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$348±$71
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$553±$44
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$678±$26
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$851±$56
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,018±$49
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$711±$41	$1,078±$22	▼ −$367	62/77
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$348±$71	$418±$8	▼ −$71	62/77
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$553±$44	$601±$8	▼ −$48	47/77
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$678±$26	$859±$10	▼ −$181	58/77
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$851±$56	$1,197±$18	▼ −$346	61/77
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,018±$49	Over $1,500	▼ −$482+	65/77
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$655 ±41	$691 ±28	$711 ±41	▲ +$56▲ +$20▲ +$36
Chicago citywide	$957 ±15	$1,028 ±10	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$121▲ +$50▲ +$71
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$494 ±31	$563 ±23	$711 ±41	▲ +$216▲ +$148▲ +$69
Chicago citywide	$722 ±11	$838 ±8	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$355▲ +$240▲ +$116
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$341 ±36	$415 ±36	$348 ±71	▲ +$7▼ −$67▲ +$74
Chicago citywide	$429 ±6	$469 ±7	$418 ±8	▼ −$11▼ −$51▲ +$40
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$257 ±27	$338 ±29	$348 ±71	▲ +$91▲ +$10▲ +$81
Chicago citywide	$324 ±5	$382 ±5	$418 ±8	▲ +$95▲ +$36▲ +$59
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$466 ±40	$525 ±28	$553 ±44	▲ +$87▲ +$28▲ +$59
Chicago citywide	$586 ±6	$629 ±6	$601 ±8	▲ +$14▼ −$28▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$352 ±30	$428 ±23	$553 ±44	▲ +$201▲ +$125▲ +$76
Chicago citywide	$442 ±4	$513 ±5	$601 ±8	▲ +$158▲ +$88▲ +$70
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$607 ±34	$657 ±28	$678 ±26	▲ +$71▲ +$22▲ +$50
Chicago citywide	$815 ±9	$860 ±7	$859 ±10	▲ +$44▼ −$1▲ +$45
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$458 ±25	$535 ±23	$678 ±26	▲ +$220▲ +$143▲ +$77
Chicago citywide	$615 ±7	$701 ±6	$859 ±10	▲ +$244▲ +$158▲ +$86
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$762 ±37	$807 ±39	$851 ±56	▲ +$89▲ +$45▲ +$44
Chicago citywide	—	$1,206 ±14	$1,197 ±18	—▼ −$9—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$575 ±28	$657 ±31	$851 ±56	▲ +$276▲ +$194▲ +$82
Chicago citywide	—	$983 ±12	$1,197 ±18	—▲ +$214—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$957 ±72	$1,018 ±49	—▲ +$61—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,767 ±35	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$780 ±58	$1,018 ±49	—▲ +$238—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,440 ±28	—	———

Home Values

Category	Ashburn
Average Home Value	$254,291±$23,028
10th Percentile Home Value	$120,321±$38,476
25th Percentile Home Value	$197,514±$8,721
Median Home Value	$251,766±$7,415
75th Percentile Home Value	$302,150±$11,010
90th Percentile Home Value	$371,154±$8,398
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Average Home Value	$254,291±$23,028	$437,638±$7,358	▼ −$183,348	53/77
10th Percentile Home Value	$120,321±$38,476	$129,150±$3,756	▼ −$8,829	41/77
25th Percentile Home Value	$197,514±$8,721	$217,800±$1,804	▼ −$20,286	43/77
Median Home Value	$251,766±$7,415	$334,100±$2,424	▼ −$82,334	49/77
75th Percentile Home Value	$302,150±$11,010	$497,700±$3,730	▼ −$195,550	58/77
90th Percentile Home Value	$371,154±$8,398	$809,159±$15,691	▼ −$438,006	60/77
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$215,566 ±6,933	$233,914 ±20,532	$254,291 ±23,028	▲ +$38,724▲ +$20,377▲ +$18,348
Chicago citywide	$386,614 ±5,106	$424,380 ±4,754	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$51,024▲ +$13,258▲ +$37,766
Average Home Value (nominal dollars)	$162,685 ±5,232	$190,640 ±16,734	$254,291 ±23,028	▲ +$91,606▲ +$63,650▲ +$27,956
Chicago citywide	$291,771 ±3,853	$345,871 ±3,874	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$145,867▲ +$91,768▲ +$54,099
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$114,664 ±6,753	$130,200 ±6,228	$120,321 ±38,476	▲ +$5,657▼ −$9,880▲ +$15,537
Chicago citywide	$115,330 ±1,421	$124,313 ±1,339	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$13,821▲ +$4,838▲ +$8,983
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$86,535 ±5,096	$106,114 ±5,076	$120,321 ±38,476	▲ +$33,786▲ +$14,207▲ +$19,579
Chicago citywide	$87,037 ±1,072	$101,315 ±1,091	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$42,113▲ +$27,835▲ +$14,278
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$151,903 ±5,618	$175,436 ±7,762	$197,514 ±8,721	▲ +$45,610▲ +$22,078▲ +$23,533
Chicago citywide	$190,543 ±2,400	$199,018 ±1,255	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$27,257▲ +$18,782▲ +$8,475
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$114,639 ±4,240	$142,981 ±6,326	$197,514 ±8,721	▲ +$82,875▲ +$54,533▲ +$28,341
Chicago citywide	$143,800 ±1,811	$162,200 ±1,023	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$74,000▲ +$55,600▲ +$18,400
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$213,672 ±5,080	$216,365 ±4,790	$251,766 ±7,415	▲ +$38,094▲ +$35,401▲ +$2,693
Chicago citywide	$299,066 ±2,120	$316,564 ±2,118	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$35,034▲ +$17,536▲ +$17,498
Median Home Value (nominal dollars)	$161,255 ±3,834	$176,338 ±3,904	$251,766 ±7,415	▲ +$90,511▲ +$75,428▲ +$15,083
Chicago citywide	$225,700 ±1,600	$258,000 ±1,726	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$108,400▲ +$76,100▲ +$32,300
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$265,608 ±8,861	$269,098 ±7,047	$302,150 ±11,010	▲ +$36,541▲ +$33,051▲ +$3,490
Chicago citywide	$466,951 ±3,138	$490,797 ±3,892	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$30,749▲ +$6,903▲ +$23,846
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$200,450 ±6,688	$219,316 ±5,743	$302,150 ±11,010	▲ +$101,699▲ +$82,834▲ +$18,865
Chicago citywide	$352,400 ±2,368	$400,000 ±3,172	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$145,300▲ +$97,700▲ +$47,600
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$334,729 ±16,897	$325,890 ±12,976	$371,154 ±8,398	▲ +$36,424▲ +$45,263▼ −$8,839
Chicago citywide	$739,174 ±12,945	$835,769 ±9,047	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$69,986▼ −$26,610▲ +$96,595
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$252,615 ±12,752	$265,601 ±10,576	$371,154 ±8,398	▲ +$118,539▲ +$105,552▲ +$12,986
Chicago citywide	$557,842 ±9,770	$681,153 ±7,373	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$251,317▲ +$128,006▲ +$123,311

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show

Category	Ashburn
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	6.0%6.0%810
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	5.9%98.1%795
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.1%1.6%13
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.0%0.0%0
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.0%0.2%2
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	6.0%6.0%810	8.3%8.3%106,578	▼ -2.3%▼ -2.3%	37/77
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	5.9%98.1%795	4.8%57.2%60,910	▲ +1.2%▲ +41.0%	30/778/77
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.1%1.6%13	1.1%13.8%14,721	▼ -1.0%▼ -12.2%	53/7758/77
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.0%0.0%0	2.1%25.7%27,383	▼ -2.1%▼ -25.7%	58/7758/77
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.0%0.2%2	0.3%3.3%3,564	▼ -0.3%▼ -3.1%	43/7745/77
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units	4.1%558	4.4%599	6.0%810	▲ +1.9 pp▲ +252▲ +1.7 pp▲ +211▲ +0.2 pp▲ +41
Chicago citywide	8.8%104,550	8.5%103,479	8.3%106,578	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,028▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,099▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,071
Housing Choice Vouchers	4.0%540	4.2%580	5.9%795	▲ +1.9 pp▲ +255▲ +1.7 pp▲ +215▲ +0.2 pp▲ +40
Chicago citywide	4.3%51,601	4.6%55,987	4.8%60,910	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +9,309▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,923▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,386
Public Housing	0.1%17	0.1%18	0.1%13	– 0.0 pp▼ −4– 0.0 pp▼ −5– 0.0 pp▲ +1
Chicago citywide	1.8%21,159	1.3%16,094	1.2%14,721	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −6,438▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,373▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,065
Project-Based Section 8	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	2.2%25,940	2.2%26,951	2.1%27,383	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,443▼ −0.1 pp▲ +432– 0.0 pp▲ +1,011
Other Project-Based Programs	0.0%1	0.0%1	0.0%2	– 0.0 pp▲ +1– 0.0 pp▲ +1– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,850	0.4%4,447	0.3%3,564	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,286▼ −0.1 pp▼ −883▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,403

Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category	Ashburn
Average Household Income	$22,738
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$570
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,278
Below 30% of Area Median Income	71.6%498
With Children	50.5%351
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	26.7%186
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$22,738	$17,032	▲ +$5,706	3/75
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$570	$425	▲ +$145	4/75
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,278	$1,389	▼ -$111	57/75
Below 30% of Area Median Income	71.6%498	83.0%77,427	▼ -11.4 pp	73/75
With Children	50.5%351	31.0%28,919	▲ +19.5 pp	11/75
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	26.7%186	32.0%29,852	▼ -5.3 pp	63/75
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income	$14,469	$17,235	$22,738	▲ +$8,269▲ +$5,503▲ +$2,766
Chicago citywide	$12,156	$13,665	$17,032	▲ +$4,876▲ +$3,367▲ +$1,509
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$415	$424	$570	▲ +$155▲ +$146▲ +$10
Chicago citywide	$310	$340	$425	▲ +$115▲ +$85▲ +$30
Average Monthly Government Spending	$857	$892	$1,278	▲ +$422▲ +$387▲ +$35
Chicago citywide	$916	$1,017	$1,389	▲ +$473▲ +$372▲ +$101
Below 30% of Area Median Income	73.4%—	71.6%—	71.6%—	▼ −1.8 pp—▲ +0.1 pp—▼ −1.9 pp—
Chicago citywide	80.0%—	81.0%—	83.0%—	▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +2.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children	—	—	50.5%—	——————
Chicago citywide	—	—	31.0%—	——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	30.5%—	27.9%—	26.7%—	▼ −3.8 pp—▼ −1.2 pp—▼ −2.6 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category	Ashburn
Total Tree Canopy	13.6%422 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	63.7%1,977 acres
Natural Open Surfaces	22.7%706 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Total Tree Canopy	13.6%422 acres	18.4%25,934 acres	▼ -4.8%	59/77
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	63.7%1,977 acres	60.2%84,955 acres	▲ +3.5%	38/77
Natural Open Surfaces	22.7%706 acres	21.5%30,331 acres	▲ +1.3%	22/77
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category	Ashburn
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	24.6% ±4.1 pp10,324 ±1,733
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	48.1% ±4.9 pp20,224 ±2,069
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	27.3% ±4.6 pp11,459 ±1,945
Homes Without Air Conditioning	0.9%366
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	24.6%±4.1 pp10,324±1,733	26.1%±0.5 pp707,660±13,869	▼ -1.5%	32/77
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	48.1%±4.9 pp20,224±2,069	44.1%±0.6 pp1,195,950±15,462	▲ +4.0%	11/77
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	27.3%±4.6 pp11,459±1,945	29.8%±0.5 pp807,615±13,763	▼ -2.5%	51/77
Homes Without Air Conditioning	0.9%366	4.2%114,494	▼ -3.4%	74/77
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category	Ashburn
Drove Alone	75.9% ±3.4 pp12,878 ±576
Carpooled	11.4% ±2.8 pp1,933 ±469
Public Transit	9.7% ±2.2 pp1,643 ±376
Walked	0.6% ±0.5 pp107 ±77
Bikes	0.2% ±0.3 pp34 ±55
Other Commute Mode	1.4% ±0.9 pp236 ±157
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Drove Alone	75.9%±3.4 pp12,878±576	56.6%±0.4 pp772,696±5,998	▲ +19.3%	7/77
Carpooled	11.4%±2.8 pp1,933±469	9.3%±0.3 pp126,918±3,980	▲ +2.1%	26/77
Public Transit	9.7%±2.2 pp1,643±376	22.4%±0.4 pp305,691±6,011	▼ -12.7%	68/77
Walked	0.6%±0.5 pp107±77	7.3%±0.3 pp100,269±3,456	▼ -6.7%	71/77
Bikes	0.2%±0.3 pp34±55	1.8%±0.1 pp24,441±1,693	▼ -1.6%	56/77
Other Commute Mode	1.4%±0.9 pp236±157	2.5%±0.1 pp34,356±1,772	▼ -1.1%	33/77
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category	Ashburn
Average Commute Time (minutes)	39 min±3.9 min
Less Than 15 Minutes	10.1% ±1.7 pp1,719 ±291
15–29 Minutes	28.5% ±3.5 pp4,841 ±587
30–44 Minutes	24.4% ±2.5 pp4,135 ±429
45–59 Minutes	16.4% ±2.7 pp2,791 ±451
60 Minutes or More	20.5% ±3.2 pp3,481 ±540
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes)	39 min±3.9 min	33 min±0.2 min	▲ +6 min	2/76
Less Than 15 Minutes	10.1%±1.7 pp1,719±291	13.0%±0.3 pp140,252±3,438	▼ -2.9%	53/77
15–29 Minutes	28.5%±3.5 pp4,841±587	29.9%±0.5 pp322,586±5,056	▼ -1.4%	30/77
30–44 Minutes	24.4%±2.5 pp4,135±429	29.6%±0.4 pp318,782±4,584	▼ -5.2%	70/77
45–59 Minutes	16.4%±2.7 pp2,791±451	14.0%±0.3 pp151,451±3,075	▲ +2.4%	21/77
60 Minutes or More	20.5%±3.2 pp3,481±540	13.4%±0.3 pp144,940±3,715	▲ +7.1%	12/77
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category	Ashburn
Average Vehicles per Household	1.88±0.14
Households With No Vehicle	7.9% ±2.0 pp1,024 ±267
Households With 1 Vehicle	31.7% ±3.3 pp4,129 ±428
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	60.4% ±5.3 pp7,861 ±688
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Average Vehicles per Household	1.88±0.14	1.12±0.01	▲ +0.76	1/77
Households With No Vehicle	7.9%±2.0 pp1,024±267	26.6%±0.4 pp308,497±5,087	▼ -18.7%	69/77
Households With 1 Vehicle	31.7%±3.3 pp4,129±428	45.2%±0.4 pp524,900±5,145	▼ -13.5%	76/77
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	60.4%±5.3 pp7,861±688	28.2%±0.4 pp326,808±4,200	▲ +32.2%	3/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Ashburn Residents Work

Category	Ashburn
Loop	21.4%3,928
Near West Side	4.9%902
Near North Side	4.8%880
Ashburn	1.7%306
Lower West Side	1.6%285
All other city neighborhoods	22.3%4,091
Outside the city	43.5%7,994
↳ Bedford Park village, IL	2.1%384
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	1.7%313
↳ Alsip village, IL	1.0%185
↳ Bridgeview village, IL	0.9%172
↳ Hodgkins village, IL	0.8%154
↳ All other Illinois locations	34.1%6,270
Out of state	2.8%516
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 70 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ashburn
Loop	21.4%3,928
Near West Side	4.9%902
Near North Side	4.8%880
Ashburn	1.7%306
Lower West Side	1.6%285
All other city neighborhoods	22.3%4,091
Outside the city	43.5%7,994
↳ Bedford Park village, IL	2.1%384
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	1.7%313
↳ Alsip village, IL	1.0%185
↳ Bridgeview village, IL	0.9%172
↳ Hodgkins village, IL	0.8%154
↳ All other Illinois locations	34.1%6,270
Out of state	2.8%516
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 70 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Loop	22.4%3,853	21.2%3,897	21.4%3,928	▼ −1.0 pp▲ +75▲ +0.2 pp▲ +31▼ −1.2 pp▲ +44
Chicago citywide	20.0%224,635	21.0%252,791	21.5%259,167	▲ +1.5 pp▲ +34,532▲ +0.5 pp▲ +6,376▲ +1.0 pp▲ +28,156
Near West Side	6.0%1,037	5.3%978	4.9%902	▼ −1.1 pp▼ −135▼ −0.4 pp▼ −76▼ −0.7 pp▼ −59
Chicago citywide	6.2%69,083	6.6%79,757	6.7%80,118	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +11,035– 0.0 pp▲ +361▲ +0.5 pp▲ +10,674
Near North Side	5.1%873	5.2%965	4.8%880	▼ −0.3 pp▲ +7▼ −0.5 pp▼ −85▲ +0.2 pp▲ +92
Chicago citywide	8.2%92,143	9.4%112,859	9.1%109,333	▲ +0.9 pp▲ +17,190▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3,526▲ +1.2 pp▲ +20,716
Ashburn	1.7%297	1.4%251	1.7%306	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +9▲ +0.3 pp▲ +55▼ −0.4 pp▼ −46
Chicago citywide	0.2%2,605	0.2%2,010	0.2%1,956	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −649– 0.0 pp▼ −54▼ −0.1 pp▼ −595
Lower West Side	1.5%250	1.2%217	1.6%285	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +35▲ +0.4 pp▲ +68▼ −0.3 pp▼ −33
Chicago citywide	0.9%9,585	0.8%9,912	1.0%12,477	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,892▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,565– 0.0 pp▲ +327
All other city neighborhoods	22.2%3,822	22.2%4,083	22.3%4,091	– 0.0 pp▲ +269▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8– 0.0 pp▲ +261
Chicago citywide	22.5%252,499	21.1%253,775	20.7%248,736	▼ −1.8 pp▼ −3,763▼ −0.4 pp▼ −5,039▼ −1.4 pp▲ +1,276
Outside the city	41.1%7,062	43.4%7,976	43.5%7,994	▲ +2.4 pp▲ +932▲ +0.1 pp▲ +18▲ +2.3 pp▲ +914
Chicago citywide	36.8%412,807	35.7%430,134	35.9%432,355	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +19,548▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,221▼ −1.0 pp▲ +17,327
Bedford Park village, IL	2.2%377	2.5%454	2.1%384	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7▼ −0.4 pp▼ −70▲ +0.3 pp▲ +77
Chicago citywide	0.8%8,547	0.7%8,008	0.6%6,897	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,650▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,111▼ −0.1 pp▼ −539
Oak Lawn village, IL	1.8%309	1.7%309	1.7%313	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +4– 0.0 pp▲ +4▼ −0.1 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,230	0.5%5,563	0.4%5,394	– 0.0 pp▲ +164– 0.0 pp▼ −169– 0.0 pp▲ +333
Alsip village, IL	0.9%149	1.0%181	1.0%185	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +36– 0.0 pp▲ +4▲ +0.1 pp▲ +32
Chicago citywide	0.3%3,503	0.4%4,279	0.3%3,598	– 0.0 pp▲ +95▼ −0.1 pp▼ −681– 0.0 pp▲ +776
Bridgeview village, IL	0.7%124	1.0%183	0.9%172	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +48▼ −0.1 pp▼ −11▲ +0.3 pp▲ +59
Chicago citywide	0.3%3,113	0.3%3,251	0.3%3,024	– 0.0 pp▼ −89– 0.0 pp▼ −227– 0.0 pp▲ +138
Hodgkins village, IL	0.5%84	0.7%132	0.8%154	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +70▲ +0.1 pp▲ +22▲ +0.2 pp▲ +48
Chicago citywide	0.2%2,389	0.2%2,893	0.3%3,379	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +990– 0.0 pp▲ +486– 0.0 pp▲ +504
All other Illinois locations	31.5%5,424	33.3%6,129	34.1%6,270	▲ +2.6 pp▲ +846▲ +0.8 pp▲ +141▲ +1.8 pp▲ +705
Chicago citywide	27.9%312,992	27.0%324,805	27.3%329,050	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +16,058▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,245▼ −0.9 pp▲ +11,813
Out of state	3.0%518	3.1%564	2.8%516	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2▼ −0.3 pp▼ −48▲ +0.1 pp▲ +46
Chicago citywide	2.2%24,577	2.3%27,198	2.2%26,136	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,559▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,062▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,621

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Ashburn

Category	Ashburn
Ashburn	7.1%306
Chicago Lawn	3.1%135
Auburn Gresham	2.4%104
West Lawn	1.4%62
Brighton Park	1.4%59
All other city neighborhoods	29.9%1,290
Outside the city	54.6%2,355
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	2.7%116
↳ Orland Park village, IL	1.4%59
↳ Cicero town, IL	1.3%57
↳ Tinley Park village, IL	1.3%55
↳ Burbank city, IL	1.3%54
↳ All other Illinois locations	42.9%1,848
Out of state	3.9%166
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 70; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ashburn
Ashburn	7.1%306
Chicago Lawn	3.1%135
Auburn Gresham	2.4%104
West Lawn	1.4%62
Brighton Park	1.4%59
All other city neighborhoods	29.9%1,290
Outside the city	54.6%2,355
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	2.7%116
↳ Orland Park village, IL	1.4%59
↳ Cicero town, IL	1.3%57
↳ Tinley Park village, IL	1.3%55
↳ Burbank city, IL	1.3%54
↳ All other Illinois locations	42.9%1,848
Out of state	3.9%166
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 70; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Ashburn	5.4%297	5.5%251	7.1%306	▲ +1.7 pp▲ +9▲ +1.6 pp▲ +55▲ +0.1 pp▼ −46
Chicago citywide	0.8%10,132	0.7%10,418	0.7%10,392	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +260– 0.0 pp▼ −26– 0.0 pp▲ +286
Chicago Lawn	3.0%163	2.6%117	3.1%135	▲ +0.2 pp▼ −28▲ +0.6 pp▲ +18▼ −0.4 pp▼ −46
Chicago citywide	0.7%9,855	0.8%10,666	0.7%10,607	– 0.0 pp▲ +752– 0.0 pp▼ −59– 0.0 pp▲ +811
Auburn Gresham	3.2%177	2.6%119	2.4%104	▼ −0.8 pp▼ −73▼ −0.2 pp▼ −15▼ −0.6 pp▼ −58
Chicago citywide	0.8%10,351	0.8%10,742	0.7%10,618	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +267– 0.0 pp▼ −124– 0.0 pp▲ +391
West Lawn	1.2%64	1.4%64	1.4%62	▲ +0.3 pp▼ −2– 0.0 pp▼ −2▲ +0.2 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.5%6,893	0.5%7,619	0.5%7,352	– 0.0 pp▲ +459– 0.0 pp▼ −267– 0.0 pp▲ +726
Brighton Park	0.8%46	1.0%47	1.4%59	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +13▲ +0.3 pp▲ +12▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1
Chicago citywide	0.6%8,222	0.7%9,275	0.6%9,100	– 0.0 pp▲ +878– 0.0 pp▼ −175– 0.0 pp▲ +1,053
All other city neighborhoods	32.1%1,766	30.6%1,395	29.9%1,290	▼ −2.2 pp▼ −476▼ −0.6 pp▼ −105▼ −1.6 pp▼ −371
Chicago citywide	38.0%499,784	37.9%537,334	36.8%539,030	▼ −1.2 pp▲ +39,246▼ −1.1 pp▲ +1,696▼ −0.1 pp▲ +37,550
Outside the city	52.6%2,889	56.0%2,555	54.6%2,355	▲ +2.0 pp▼ −534▼ −1.3 pp▼ −200▲ +3.4 pp▼ −334
Chicago citywide	45.9%603,720	45.4%642,891	47.2%691,545	▲ +1.3 pp▲ +87,825▲ +1.9 pp▲ +48,654▼ −0.6 pp▲ +39,171
Oak Lawn village, IL	2.3%129	3.0%138	2.7%116	▲ +0.3 pp▼ −13▼ −0.3 pp▼ −22▲ +0.7 pp▲ +9
Chicago citywide	0.7%9,277	0.7%9,503	0.7%9,767	– 0.0 pp▲ +490– 0.0 pp▲ +264– 0.0 pp▲ +226
Orland Park village, IL	1.3%74	1.5%69	1.4%59	– 0.0 pp▼ −15▼ −0.1 pp▼ −10▲ +0.2 pp▼ −5
Chicago citywide	0.4%5,430	0.4%6,262	0.4%6,467	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,037– 0.0 pp▲ +205– 0.0 pp▲ +832
Cicero town, IL	1.2%65	1.3%59	1.3%57	▲ +0.1 pp▼ −8– 0.0 pp▼ −2▲ +0.1 pp▼ −6
Chicago citywide	0.8%9,934	0.8%11,086	0.8%10,993	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,059– 0.0 pp▼ −93– 0.0 pp▲ +1,152
Tinley Park village, IL	0.9%48	1.0%46	1.3%55	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +7▲ +0.3 pp▲ +9▲ +0.1 pp▼ −2
Chicago citywide	0.4%5,559	0.4%5,763	0.4%5,689	– 0.0 pp▲ +130– 0.0 pp▼ −74– 0.0 pp▲ +204
Burbank city, IL	1.0%57	1.1%48	1.3%54	▲ +0.2 pp▼ −3▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6– 0.0 pp▼ −9
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,102	0.3%4,109	0.3%4,444	– 0.0 pp▲ +342– 0.0 pp▲ +335– 0.0 pp▲ +7
All other Illinois locations	42.7%2,345	43.6%1,992	42.9%1,848	▲ +0.2 pp▼ −497▼ −0.8 pp▼ −144▲ +1.0 pp▼ −353
Chicago citywide	35.5%467,052	35.1%497,107	36.9%540,317	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +73,265▲ +1.8 pp▲ +43,210▼ −0.5 pp▲ +30,055
Out of state	2.8%154	3.8%172	3.9%166	▲ +1.0 pp▲ +12▲ +0.1 pp▼ −6▲ +1.0 pp▲ +18
Chicago citywide	4.9%63,785	4.8%68,287	4.9%72,123	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8,338▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,836– 0.0 pp▲ +4,502

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category	Ashburn
No Computer or Smartphone	5.4% ±1.8 pp707 ±229
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	9.2% ±2.5 pp1,193 ±331
Desktop or Laptop Available	77.6% ±3.9 pp10,097 ±508
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
No Computer or Smartphone	5.4%±1.8 pp707±229	5.1%±0.2 pp58,709±2,246	▲ +0.4%	44/77
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	9.2%±2.5 pp1,193±331	10.4%±0.3 pp120,218±3,642	▼ -1.2%	49/77
Desktop or Laptop Available	77.6%±3.9 pp10,097±508	79.7%±0.4 pp924,956±4,919	▼ -2.1%	35/77
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category	Ashburn
Has Internet Access	93.1% ±2.5 pp12,117 ±329
Cellular Data Plan Only	15.3% ±2.9 pp1,990 ±375
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	1.8% ±0.8 pp230 ±106
No Internet Access	6.9% ±2.2 pp897 ±292
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Has Internet Access	93.1%±2.5 pp12,117±329	93.1%±0.3 pp1,080,419±3,310	0%	32/77
Cellular Data Plan Only	15.3%±2.9 pp1,990±375	12.5%±0.3 pp145,219±3,463	▲ +2.8%	33/77
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	1.8%±0.8 pp230±106	3.9%±0.2 pp45,350±1,940	▼ -2.1%	62/77
No Internet Access	6.9%±2.2 pp897±292	6.9%±0.2 pp79,786±2,730	0%	46/77
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category	Ashburn
Uninsured Residents	12.5% ±2.0 pp5,231 ±829
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	5.5% ±2.3 pp2,321 ±963
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	17.5% ±3.1 pp7,365 ±1,295
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	1.9% ±1.4 pp780 ±603
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Uninsured Residents	12.5%±2.0 pp5,231±829	9.8%±0.2 pp264,391±5,709	▲ +2.7%	19/77
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	5.5%±2.3 pp2,321±963	3.9%±0.3 pp104,687±8,934	▲ +1.7%	15/77
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	17.5%±3.1 pp7,365±1,295	13.3%±0.3 pp361,430±8,516	▲ +4.2%	19/77
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	1.9%±1.4 pp780±603	1.7%±0.3 pp46,718±7,265	▲ +0.1%	25/77
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category	Ashburn
Insured (Any Coverage)	87.5% ±2.0 pp36,317 ±818
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	47.3% ±2.3 pp19,601 ±972
Direct-Purchase Insurance	6.9% ±1.3 pp2,872 ±538
Medicare	12.0% ±1.3 pp4,965 ±558
Medicaid	23.9% ±2.7 pp9,928 ±1,119
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.1% ±0.3 pp22 ±129
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	5.8% ±1.2 pp2,400 ±497
Uninsured	12.5% ±2.0 pp5,166 ±818
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Insured (Any Coverage)	87.5%±2.0 pp36,317±818	90.2%±0.2 pp2,424,871±5,689	▼ -2.7%	59/77
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	47.3%±2.3 pp19,601±972	51.2%±0.4 pp1,376,912±9,468	▼ -4.0%	37/77
Direct-Purchase Insurance	6.9%±1.3 pp2,872±538	8.5%±0.2 pp227,424±5,112	▼ -1.5%	45/77
Medicare	12.0%±1.3 pp4,965±558	12.6%±0.2 pp339,804±4,911	▼ -0.7%	53/77
Medicaid	23.9%±2.7 pp9,928±1,119	22.2%±0.3 pp596,931±7,773	▲ +1.7%	38/77
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.1%±0.3 pp22±129	0.3%±0.0 pp7,201±787	▼ -0.2%	66/77
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	5.8%±1.2 pp2,400±497	3.8%±0.1 pp102,777±3,544	▲ +2.0%	17/77
Uninsured	12.5%±2.0 pp5,166±818	9.8%±0.2 pp262,018±5,689	▲ +2.7%	19/77
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category	Ashburn
Adults With at Least One Disability	15.0% ±1.8 pp4,675 ±569
Mobility Disability	7.6% ±1.1 pp2,384 ±353
Hearing Disability	2.6% ±0.8 pp822 ±254
Vision Disability	4.3% ±1.2 pp1,347 ±378
Cognitive Disability	5.0% ±1.1 pp1,577 ±330
Self-Care Disability	3.1% ±0.9 pp956 ±287
Independent Living Disability	5.9% ±1.0 pp1,833 ±309
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability	15.0%±1.8 pp4,675±569	14.0%±0.2 pp303,665±4,797	▲ +0.9%	37/77
Mobility Disability	7.6%±1.1 pp2,384±353	7.6%±0.2 pp163,666±3,398	▲ +0.1%	38/77
Hearing Disability	2.6%±0.8 pp822±254	2.8%±0.1 pp61,430±2,337	▼ -0.2%	51/77
Vision Disability	4.3%±1.2 pp1,347±378	3.0%±0.1 pp64,544±2,269	▲ +1.3%	19/77
Cognitive Disability	5.0%±1.1 pp1,577±330	5.2%±0.1 pp112,824±2,939	▼ -0.2%	40/77
Self-Care Disability	3.1%±0.9 pp956±287	2.7%±0.1 pp57,758±2,261	▲ +0.4%	33/77
Independent Living Disability	5.9%±1.0 pp1,833±309	5.7%±0.2 pp123,651±3,247	▲ +0.1%	39/77
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category	Ashburn
Arthritis	22.4%7,231
High Blood Pressure	35.0%11,307
Cancer	4.9%1,593
Current Asthma	10.8%3,482
Coronary Heart Disease	5.6%1,800
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	6.3%2,039
Diabetes	14.9%4,817
High Cholesterol	33.6%10,881
Obesity	37.2%12,030
Stroke	4.0%1,290
Lost All Natural Teeth	2.6%852
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Arthritis	22.4%7,231	19.6%409,178	▲ +2.8%	35/77
High Blood Pressure	35.0%11,307	29.7%620,030	▲ +5.3%	30/77
Cancer	4.9%1,593	5.0%104,382	▼ -0.1%	39/77
Current Asthma	10.8%3,482	10.2%212,940	▲ +0.6%	30/77
Coronary Heart Disease	5.6%1,800	4.8%100,207	▲ +0.8%	34/77
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	6.3%2,039	5.5%114,820	▲ +0.8%	33/77
Diabetes	14.9%4,817	12.0%250,517	▲ +2.9%	30/77
High Cholesterol	33.6%10,881	31.6%659,696	▲ +2.0%	35/77
Obesity	37.2%12,030	32.6%680,572	▲ +4.6%	30/77
Stroke	4.0%1,290	3.3%68,892	▲ +0.7%	31/77
Lost All Natural Teeth	2.6%852	2.5%52,249	▲ +0.1%	39/77
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category	Ashburn
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	16.5%5,343
Current Cigarette Smoking	13.1%4,252
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	29.6%9,571
Short Sleep Duration	41.0%13,249
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	16.5%5,343	19.0%396,652	▼ -2.5%	47/77
Current Cigarette Smoking	13.1%4,252	11.9%248,430	▲ +1.2%	30/77
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	29.6%9,571	24.7%515,648	▲ +4.9%	35/77
Short Sleep Duration	41.0%13,249	37.8%789,129	▲ +3.2%	30/77
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category	Ashburn
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	25.5%8,258
Frequent Physical Distress	13.6%4,402
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	25.5%8,258	21.1%440,493	▲ +4.4%	33/77
Frequent Physical Distress	13.6%4,402	11.8%246,342	▲ +1.8%	33/77
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category	Ashburn
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	74.7%24,172
Routine Checkup in Past Year	77.8%25,174
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	86.8%28,067
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	54.7%17,708
Dental Visit in Past Year	54.7%17,697
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	74.9%24,229
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	74.7%24,172	72.5%1,513,542	▲ +2.2%	30/77
Routine Checkup in Past Year	77.8%25,174	76.2%1,590,785	▲ +1.6%	35/77
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	86.8%28,067	86.2%1,799,549	▲ +0.6%	35/77
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	54.7%17,708	55.8%1,164,905	▼ -1.1%	44/77
Dental Visit in Past Year	54.7%17,697	58.4%1,219,184	▼ -3.7%	40/77
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	74.9%24,229	74.2%1,549,032	▲ +0.7%	30/77
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category	Ashburn
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	17.5%5,655
Frequent Mental Distress	16.4%5,300
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	31.9%10,307
Loneliness	37.5%12,133
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ashburn	City	Difference	Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	17.5%5,655	19.1%398,740	▼ -1.6%	62/77
Frequent Mental Distress	16.4%5,300	16.0%334,023	▲ +0.4%	30/77
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	31.9%10,307	28.2%588,716	▲ +3.7%	30/77
Loneliness	37.5%12,133	35.8%747,377	▲ +1.7%	33/77
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Compare All Neighborhoods

Ashburn, Chicago

Ashburn at a Glance

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Age Distribution

Educational Attainment

Population

Household Size

Marital Status

Language Spoken at Home

English Proficiency

Household Composition

Children by Household Type

Veteran Status

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Poverty Status

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Occupation

Industry of Employment

Class of Worker

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Earnings of All Workers

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ashburn, Chicago

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ashburn, Chicago in Lower-Income Families

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Ashburn, Chicago

Local Businesses

Jobs in Ashburn

Industry of Jobs in Ashburn

Earnings of Jobs in Ashburn

Jobs in Ashburn by Firm Age

Jobs in Ashburn by Firm Size

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

College Enrollment

Student Digital Access

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Year Moved Into Current Home

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Housing Vacancy Status

Housing Age

Housing Units by Building Size

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Overcrowded Housing

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Monthly Housing Costs

Rent

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Home Values

Federal Housing Assistance

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Commute Time

Household Vehicle Access

Where Ashburn Residents Work

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Ashburn

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Household Internet Access

Health

Health Insurance

Health Insurance Coverage Types