Land in Disadvantaged Areas by Community Area — Chicago

Map and ranking of Land in Disadvantaged Areas across Chicago's 77 neighborhoods. Highest: West Garfield Park (100%). Lowest: Lincoln Square (0%). Chicago avg: 32.8%. Data: 2023.
All 4 City Policy tables

Land in Disadvantaged Areas · all 77 Chicago neighborhoods · 2023

Show
Year

Earlier releases not shown — comparable LODES historical data are unavailable. Current data: 2023.

Citywide overview
All neighborhoods
Chicago citywide · Land in Disadvantaged Areas 32.8%
Highest community area West Garfield Park: 100%
Lowest community area Lincoln Square: 0%
RogersParkWestRidgeUptownLincolnSquareNorthCenterLakeViewLincolnParkNear NorthSideEdisonParkNorwoodParkJeffersonParkForestGlenNorthParkAlbanyParkPortageParkIrvingParkDunningMontclareBelmontCraginHermosaAvondaleLoganSquareHumboldtParkWestTownAustinWest GarfieldParkEast GarfieldParkNear WestSideNorthLawndaleSouthLawndaleLower WestSideLoopNear SouthSideArmourSquareDouglasOaklandFullerParkGrandBoulevardKenwoodWashingtonParkHydeParkWoodlawnSouthShoreChathamAvalonParkSouthChicagoBurnsideCalumetHeightsRoselandPullmanSouthDeeringEastSideWestPullmanRiverdaleHegewischGarfieldRidgeArcherHeightsBrightonParkMcKinleyParkBridgeportNew City(Back of the Yards)WestElsdonGageParkClearingWestLawnChicagoLawnWestEnglewoodEnglewoodGreater GrandCrossingAshburnAuburnGreshamBeverlyWashingtonHeightsMountGreenwoodMorganParkO'HareEdgewater

Note: Mayor Johnson’s proposed 2027 budget would charge employers with 125 or more qualifying employees $25 a month per employee working in Chicago, and rebate it in full for jobs in the City’s socioeconomically disadvantaged areas. Jobs are defined as private-sector jobs paying more than $1,250 a month, as that best approximates the head tax proposal’s earnings threshold of $4,300 per quarter. The data is not detailed enough to identify other dimensions that could exempt a resident from the head tax: residents of each community area who work outside a disadvantaged area could be exempt from the head tax for another reason, like working at a small firm. Community-area figures apply the method from our analysis Who Would Mayor Johnson’s Head Tax Rebate Reach? (October 2026), which reported wards.

Universe: Land area; private-sector jobs located here; residents with private-sector jobs in Chicago · Geography: Census Block (jobs and residents); area and disadvantaged-area boundaries (land area) · Source: Census LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics, 2023; City of Chicago, Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Areas (retrieved October 21, 2026)

Community Area distribution Hover or click any dot to inspect
Min 0% Median 6% 75th pct 68% Max 100%

Community Area ranking: Land in Disadvantaged Areas

#1 West Garfield Park 100%+67.2 pts
#2 Englewood 100%+67.2 pts
#3 East Garfield Park 100%+67.2 pts
#4 Oakland 99.9%+67.2 pts
#5 Gage Park 99.8%+67 pts
#6 South Deering 99.7%+66.9 pts
#7 Riverdale 99.5%+66.7 pts
#8 Fuller Park 98.9%+66.2 pts
#9 West Englewood 96.1%+63.3 pts
#10 North Lawndale 93.2%+60.4 pts
#11 South Lawndale 91.1%+58.3 pts
#12 Washington Park 88%+55.2 pts
#13 Greater Grand Crossing 85.8%+53.1 pts
#14 Chicago Lawn 85.7%+52.9 pts
#15 Armour Square 79.2%+46.4 pts
#16 Humboldt Park 77.4%+44.6 pts
#17 South Chicago 77.4%+44.6 pts
#18 Austin 75.5%+42.8 pts
#19 New City (Back of the Yards) 68%+35.2 pts
#20 Auburn Gresham 67.7%+34.9 pts
#21 Brighton Park 61.8%+29 pts
#22 South Shore 61.8%+29 pts
#23 Woodlawn 51.9%+19.1 pts
#24 Pullman 51.6%+18.9 pts
#25 Grand Boulevard 37.9%+5.1 pts
#26 Roseland 37.6%+4.8 pts
#27 West Pullman 35.2%+2.4 pts
#28 Near West Side 28%-4.8 pts
#29 East Side 27.7%-5.1 pts
#30 West Lawn 27.2%-5.6 pts
#31 Chatham 25.8%-7 pts
#32 Douglas 24.5%-8.3 pts
#33 Kenwood 24.3%-8.5 pts
#34 Washington Heights 22.3%-10.5 pts
#35 West Ridge 15.5%-17.3 pts
#36 Bridgeport 15.4%-17.3 pts
#37 Avondale 14.3%-18.5 pts
#38 Hermosa 13.6%-19.2 pts
#39 Hyde Park 6.4%-26.3 pts
#40 Garfield Ridge 5.9%-26.8 pts
#41 Rogers Park 4.1%-28.7 pts
#42 Uptown 2.7%-30.1 pts
#43 Lower West Side 2.4%-30.4 pts
#44 Archer Heights 0.6%-32.2 pts
#45 Hegewisch 0.2%-32.6 pts
#46 Avalon Park 0.2%-32.6 pts
#47 Belmont Cragin 0.2%-32.6 pts
#48 Ashburn 0.1%-32.6 pts
#49 McKinley Park 0.1%-32.7 pts
#50 Clearing 0.1%-32.7 pts
#51 West Town 0.1%-32.7 pts
#52 Near South Side 0%-32.7 pts
#53 West Elsdon 0%-32.7 pts
#54 Burnside 0%-32.7 pts
#55 Beverly 0%-32.8 pts
#56 Calumet Heights 0%-32.8 pts
#57 Edgewater 0%-32.8 pts
#58 Irving Park 0%-32.8 pts
#59 Logan Square 0%-32.8 pts
#60 Lincoln Square 0%-32.8 pts
#61 North Center 0%-32.8 pts
#62 Lake View 0%-32.8 pts
#63 Lincoln Park 0%-32.8 pts
#64 Near North Side 0%-32.8 pts
#65 Edison Park 0%-32.8 pts
#66 Norwood Park 0%-32.8 pts
#67 Jefferson Park 0%-32.8 pts
#68 Forest Glen 0%-32.8 pts
#69 North Park 0%-32.8 pts
#70 Albany Park 0%-32.8 pts
#71 Portage Park 0%-32.8 pts
#72 Dunning 0%-32.8 pts
#73 Montclare 0%-32.8 pts
#74 Loop 0%-32.8 pts
#75 Mount Greenwood 0%-32.8 pts
#76 Morgan Park 0%-32.8 pts
#77 O'Hare 0%-32.8 pts
All 430 neighborhood maps

Basic Demographics

Households & Families

Immigration

Country of Birth

Language

Household Income

Poverty

Material Hardship

Employment

Occupation

Industry

Work & Earnings

Economic Mobility

Local Jobs and Businesses

Industry of Local Jobs

Students

Owners & Renters

Overall Housing Costs

Renter Housing Costs

Homeowner Housing Costs

Federal Housing Assistance

Housing Stock

Mobility

Environment

Transportation

Technology Access

Health Insurance & Disability

Health

City Policy