Brighton Park, Chicago Demographics, Housing & Census Data

Brighton Park, Chicago Census and ACS demographic tables: population, race, age, income, poverty, rent, housing types, single-family homes, commute, education, internet access, health insurance, and disability.

Brighton Park, Chicago

Brighton Park
Chicago
Population
42,994
Overlapping council wards Overlap means that a council ward contains part of this neighborhood.
12, 14, 15
Population Density
15,805 /sq mi

Brighton Park at a Glance

Time period?Historical estimates use this profile's current boundaries, held constant across periods; they do not reflect the boundaries that were in effect at the time. Comparing
Values as
Show as
Add to every table
Showing Chart vs. Chicago ± Margin of error

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category Brighton Park
Hispanic 78.8% ±3.8 pp33,872 ±1,641
White 6.4% ±1.8 pp2,772 ±756
Black 2.2% ±1.6 pp933 ±681
Asian 11.8% ±2.4 pp5,090 ±1,049
Other or Multi-racial 0.8% ±0.4 pp327 ±190
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Hispanic 78.8%±3.8 pp33,872±1,641 29.7%±0.2 pp805,318±5,785 ▲ +49.1% 8/77
White 6.4%±1.8 pp2,772±756 32.1%±0.2 pp870,127±5,557 ▼ -25.6% 52/77
Black 2.2%±1.6 pp933±681 27.4%±0.2 pp743,710±6,047 ▼ -25.3% 70/77
Asian 11.8%±2.4 pp5,090±1,049 7.2%±0.2 pp196,435±4,370 ▲ +4.6% 17/77
Other or Multi-racial 0.8%±0.4 pp327±190 3.5%±0.1 pp95,636±3,778 ▼ -2.8% 67/77
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Age Distribution

Category Brighton Park
Under 5 5.2% ±1.4 pp2,224 ±583
5-17 17.8% ±2.0 pp7,669 ±858
18-24 11.5% ±1.5 pp4,942 ±641
25-44 28.2% ±1.8 pp12,114 ±762
45-64 27.2% ±1.5 pp11,697 ±637
65-74 6.4% ±0.9 pp2,762 ±382
75-84 3.0% ±0.7 pp1,277 ±322
85+ 0.7% ±0.3 pp309 ±143
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Under 5 5.2%±1.4 pp2,224±583 5.3%±0.1 pp144,044±3,867 ▼ -0.1% 41/77
5-17 17.8%±2.0 pp7,669±858 14.1%±0.2 pp381,582±5,548 ▲ +3.8% 26/77
18-24 11.5%±1.5 pp4,942±641 9.6%±0.2 pp260,942±4,900 ▲ +1.9% 13/77
25-44 28.2%±1.8 pp12,114±762 34.3%±0.3 pp929,946±6,988 ▼ -6.1% 38/77
45-64 27.2%±1.5 pp11,697±637 22.9%±0.2 pp620,047±5,644 ▲ +4.3% 8/77
65-74 6.4%±0.9 pp2,762±382 8.2%±0.1 pp221,932±3,711 ▼ -1.8% 64/77
75-84 3.0%±0.7 pp1,277±322 4.0%±0.1 pp107,625±2,694 ▼ -1.0% 63/77
85+ 0.7%±0.3 pp309±143 1.7%±0.1 pp45,108±1,921 ▼ -0.9% 74/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category Brighton Park
No High School Diploma 30.9% ±3.0 pp8,692 ±853
High School Diploma or GED 32.8% ±3.0 pp9,229 ±856
Some College or Associate's Degree 20.2% ±2.3 pp5,688 ±652
Bachelor's Degree 11.5% ±1.9 pp3,251 ±528
Graduate Degree 4.6% ±1.3 pp1,299 ±371
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
No High School Diploma 30.9%±3.0 pp8,692±853 12.8%±0.2 pp246,015±4,778 ▲ +18.1% 4/77
High School Diploma or GED 32.8%±3.0 pp9,229±856 21.1%±0.3 pp405,248±5,752 ▲ +11.7% 17/77
Some College or Associate's Degree 20.2%±2.3 pp5,688±652 21.8%±0.3 pp419,911±5,550 ▼ -1.6% 53/77
Bachelor's Degree 11.5%±1.9 pp3,251±528 25.4%±0.3 pp488,467±5,708 ▼ -13.8% 58/77
Graduate Degree 4.6%±1.3 pp1,299±371 19.0%±0.3 pp365,017±5,186 ▼ -14.4% 68/77
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category Brighton Park
Total Population 42,994 ±2,792
Total Households 13,564 ±612
Population Density 15,805 ±1,026 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park Average Neighborhood Difference
Total Population 42,994 35,210 ▲ +7,784
Total Households 13,564 15,067 ▼ −1,503
Population Density 15,805 people/sq mi 13,045 people/sq mi ▲ +2,760
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average neighborhood rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large neighborhoods. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category 2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19 Difference Rank
Total Population 44,130 ±1,772 44,156 ±1,843 42,994 ±2,792 ▼ −1,136 ±3,307▼ −1,162 ±3,345▲ +26 ±2,557 ▲ +8,900▲ +8,970▲ +7,784 22/7721/7721/77
Average Neighborhood 35,230 35,186 35,210 ▼ −20▲ +24▼ −43
Total Households 11,984 ±316 12,581 ±336 13,564 ±612 ▲ +1,580 ±689▲ +983 ±698▲ +597 ±461 ▼ −1,377▼ −1,273▼ −1,503 34/7734/7734/77
Average Neighborhood 13,361 13,854 15,067 ▲ +1,706▲ +1,213▲ +493
Population Density (per sq mi) 16,223 ±651 16,232 ±677 15,805 ±1,026 ▼ −418▼ −427▲ +10 ▲ +3,234▲ +3,204▲ +2,760 23/7725/7725/77
Average Neighborhood Density 12,989 13,028 13,045 ▲ +56▲ +17▲ +39

Household Size

Category Brighton Park
Average Household Size 3.17±0.20
1-Person Households 18.6% ±2.6 pp2,522 ±348
2-Person Households 24.0% ±3.4 pp3,250 ±465
3-Person Households 17.8% ±3.3 pp2,420 ±449
4+ Person Households 39.6% ±4.0 pp5,372 ±542
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Average Household Size 3.17±0.20 2.29±0.02 ▲ +0.88 6/77
1-Person Households 18.6%±2.6 pp2,522±348 39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,783 ▼ -21.1% 77/77
2-Person Households 24.0%±3.4 pp3,250±465 29.5%±0.4 pp342,235±5,166 ▼ -5.5% 59/77
3-Person Households 17.8%±3.3 pp2,420±449 12.9%±0.4 pp149,291±4,184 ▲ +5.0% 7/77
4+ Person Households 39.6%±4.0 pp5,372±542 18.0%±0.5 pp208,411±5,419 ▲ +21.6% 3/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category Brighton Park
Never Married 45.8% ±2.8 pp15,785 ±958
Married 42.9% ±1.0 pp14,791 ±356
Separated 2.1% ±0.8 pp730 ±293
Divorced 4.9% ±1.0 pp1,677 ±348
Widowed 4.4% ±1.0 pp1,511 ±333
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Never Married 45.8%±2.8 pp15,785±958 49.6%±0.3 pp1,130,286±6,623 ▼ -3.9% 45/77
Married 42.9%±1.0 pp14,791±356 35.5%±0.3 pp807,294±6,077 ▲ +7.4% 22/77
Separated 2.1%±0.8 pp730±293 2.2%±0.1 pp49,430±2,379 ▼ -0.1% 45/77
Divorced 4.9%±1.0 pp1,677±348 7.9%±0.2 pp180,700±3,966 ▼ -3.1% 75/77
Widowed 4.4%±1.0 pp1,511±333 4.8%±0.1 pp109,357±2,738 ▼ -0.4% 50/77
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category Brighton Park
Speak English Only 18.5% ±2.7 pp7,540 ±1,089
Spanish 69.2% ±3.7 pp28,194 ±1,507
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese) 9.9% ±2.4 pp4,048 ±993
Other Languages 2.4% ±1.3 pp988 ±513
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Speak English Only 18.5%±2.7 pp7,540±1,089 64.6%±0.3 pp1,659,069±8,218 ▼ -46.1% 76/77
Spanish 69.2%±3.7 pp28,194±1,507 23.7%±0.2 pp607,865±6,166 ▲ +45.5% 6/77
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese) 9.9%±2.4 pp4,048±993 2.0%±0.1 pp52,032±2,783 ▲ +7.9% 4/23
Other Languages 2.4%±1.3 pp988±513 1.0%±0.1 pp25,292±2,452 ▲ +1.4% 35/77
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show
Category Brighton Park
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 59.4% ±2.6 pp59.4%±2.6 pp24,231 ±1,040
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 18.0% ±2.1 pp18.0%±2.1 pp7,333 ±846
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 15.3% ±1.9 pp85.1%±4.2 pp6,243 ±783
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 7.3% ±1.3 pp40.4%±5.4 pp2,963 ±525
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 40.6% ±2.4 pp225.5%±29.3 pp16,539 ±982
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 59.4%±2.6 pp59.4%±2.6 pp24,231±1,040 85.4%±0.5 pp85.4%±0.5 pp2,192,778±11,961 ▼ -26.0%▼ -26.0% 75/77
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 18.0%±2.1 pp18.0%±2.1 pp7,333±846 7.1%±0.2 pp7.1%±0.2 pp183,252±4,686 ▲ +10.8%▲ +10.8% 4/77
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 15.3%±1.9 pp85.1%±4.2 pp6,243±783 5.2%±0.2 pp72.7%±1.1 pp133,269±3,923 ▲ +10.1%▲ +12.4% 5/7724/76
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 7.3%±1.3 pp40.4%±5.4 pp2,963±525 2.3%±0.1 pp31.6%±1.4 pp57,883±2,982 ▲ +5.0%▲ +8.8% 4/7718/76
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 40.6%±2.4 pp225.5%±29.3 pp16,539±982 14.6%±0.3 pp204.3%±6.4 pp374,404±6,794 ▲ +26.0%▲ +21.2% 3/7721/76
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category Brighton Park
Married-Couple Households 48.2% ±3.9 pp6,536 ±535
Unmarried-Couple Households 7.1% ±2.4 pp968 ±325
One-Person Households 18.6% ±3.1 pp2,522 ±423
Other Household Types 26.1% ±7.5 pp3,538 ±1,011
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Married-Couple Households 48.2%±3.9 pp6,536±535 30.9%±0.3 pp358,432±3,598 ▲ +17.3% 11/77
Unmarried-Couple Households 7.1%±2.4 pp968±325 8.3%±0.2 pp96,220±2,797 ▼ -1.2% 32/77
One-Person Households 18.6%±3.1 pp2,522±423 39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,729 ▼ -21.1% 77/77
Other Household Types 26.1%±7.5 pp3,538±1,011 21.1%±0.7 pp245,285±8,514 ▲ +4.9% 34/77
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category Brighton Park
Children in Married-Couple Households 61.7% ±5.7 pp6,101 ±566
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 13.0% ±5.5 pp1,289 ±548
Children in Single-Mother Households 22.9% ±8.4 pp2,261 ±826
Children in Single-Father Households 2.4% ±1.4 pp242 ±143
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households 61.7%±5.7 pp6,101±566 56.0%±0.8 pp293,542±4,257 ▲ +5.7% 35/77
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 13.0%±5.5 pp1,289±548 8.8%±0.6 pp45,960±3,208 ▲ +4.3% 13/77
Children in Single-Mother Households 22.9%±8.4 pp2,261±826 30.6%±0.9 pp160,535±4,521 ▼ -7.8% 45/77
Children in Single-Father Households 2.4%±1.4 pp242±143 4.6%±0.4 pp24,133±2,006 ▼ -2.2% 64/77
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show
Category Brighton Park
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 1.5% ±0.5 pp1.5%±0.5 pp494 ±177
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 51.6% ±21.6 pp0.8%±0.3 pp255 ±107
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 2.2% ±13.7 pp0.0%±0.2 pp11 ±68
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 25.7% ±22.5 pp0.4%±0.3 pp127 ±111
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 0.0% ±13.8 pp0.0%0
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 20.4% ±26.3 pp0.3%±0.4 pp101 ±130
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 1.5%±0.5 pp1.5%±0.5 pp494±177 2.8%±0.1 pp2.8%±0.1 pp60,766±2,397 ▼ -1.3%▼ -1.3% 71/77
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 51.6%±21.6 pp0.8%±0.3 pp255±107 26.8%±1.8 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,267±1,067 ▲ +24.8%0% 6/7730/77
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 2.2%±13.7 pp0.0%±0.2 pp11±68 12.9%±1.0 pp0.4%±0.0 pp7,830±579 ▼ -10.7%▼ -0.3% 70/7772/77
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 25.7%±22.5 pp0.4%±0.3 pp127±111 28.8%±1.4 pp0.8%±0.0 pp17,525±846 ▼ -3.1%▼ -0.4% 49/7767/77
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 0.0%±13.8 pp0.0%0 4.9%±0.7 pp0.1%±0.0 pp2,995±441 ▼ -4.9%▼ -0.1% 62/7762/77
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 20.4%±26.3 pp0.3%±0.4 pp101±130 26.6%±1.5 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,149±916 ▼ -6.1%▼ -0.4% 50/7766/77
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show
Category Brighton Park
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 56.5% ±3.5 pp56.5%±3.5 pp24,294 ±1,494
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 43.5% ±2.4 pp43.5%±2.4 pp18,700 ±1,028
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 22.3% ±2.3 pp51.2%±4.4 pp9,572 ±979
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 21.2% ±2.1 pp48.8%±4.1 pp9,128 ±914
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 56.5%±3.5 pp56.5%±3.5 pp24,294±1,494 79.1%±0.3 pp79.1%±0.3 pp2,144,343±7,926 ▼ -22.6%▼ -22.6% 74/77
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 43.5%±2.4 pp43.5%±2.4 pp18,700±1,028 20.9%±0.3 pp20.9%±0.3 pp566,883±7,968 ▲ +22.6%▲ +22.6% 4/77
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 22.3%±2.3 pp51.2%±4.4 pp9,572±979 10.0%±0.2 pp47.7%±0.5 pp270,551±4,603 ▲ +12.3%▲ +3.5% 5/7732/77
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 21.2%±2.1 pp48.8%±4.1 pp9,128±914 10.9%±0.2 pp52.3%±0.9 pp296,332±6,504 ▲ +10.3%▼ -3.5% 8/7746/77
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show
Category Brighton Park
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 31.0%±2.1 pp71.2%±7.7 pp13,320±917
Born in China / Hong Kong (of foreign-born residents) 8.2%±2.0 pp18.8%±4.3 pp3,508±847
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 4.3%9.8%1,835
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park Chicago Difference Rank
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 31.0% ±2.1 pp71.2%±7.7 pp13,320 8.2% ±0.2 pp39.3%222,978 ▲ +22.8%▲ +31.9% 5/7717/77
Born in China / Hong Kong (of foreign-born residents) 8.2% ±2.0 pp18.8%±4.3 pp3,508 1.4% ±0.1 pp6.7%38,255 ▲ +6.7%▲ +12.0% 4/776/77
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 4.3%9.8%1,835 ——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show
Category Brighton Park
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 8.7% ±2.2 pp20.0%±5.1 pp3,747 ±967
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 8.8% ±1.4 pp20.1%±3.2 pp3,765 ±621
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 10.2% ±1.5 pp23.4%±3.2 pp4,382 ±634
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 15.8% ±1.6 pp36.4%±3.3 pp6,806 ±708
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 8.7%±2.2 pp20.0%±5.1 pp3,747±967 5.9%±0.2 pp852.7%±52.7 pp159,447±5,557 ▲ +2.8%▼ -832.6% 15/7754/77
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 8.8%±1.4 pp20.1%±3.2 pp3,765±621 4.5%±0.1 pp651.9%±39.7 pp121,912±4,035 ▲ +4.3%▼ -631.8% 7/7741/77
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 10.2%±1.5 pp23.4%±3.2 pp4,382±634 4.6%±0.1 pp662.3%±39.7 pp123,849±3,901 ▲ +5.6%▼ -638.9% 4/7726/77
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 15.8%±1.6 pp36.4%±3.3 pp6,806±708 6.0%±0.1 pp864.6%±47.9 pp161,675±3,491 ▲ +9.9%▼ -828.2% 4/7721/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later 1.7% ±0.8 pp734 ±346 4.4% ±1.0 pp1,933 ±438 8.7% ±2.2 pp3,747 ±967 ▲ +7.1 pp▲ +3,013▲ +4.3 pp▲ +1,814▲ +2.7 pp▲ +1,199
Chicago citywide 1.4% ±0.1 pp36,978 ±2,235 3.7% ±0.1 pp99,118 ±3,198 5.9% ±0.2 pp159,447 ±5,568 ▲ +4.5 pp▲ +122,469▲ +2.2 pp▲ +60,329▲ +2.3 pp▲ +62,140
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 11.5% ±1.6 pp5,053 ±711 11.7% ±1.5 pp5,160 ±665 8.8% ±1.4 pp3,765 ±621 ▼ −2.7 pp▼ −1,288▼ −2.9 pp▼ −1,395▲ +0.2 pp▲ +107
Chicago citywide 5.9% ±0.1 pp161,331 ±3,896 4.9% ±0.1 pp131,658 ±3,182 4.5% ±0.1 pp121,912 ±4,044 ▼ −1.5 pp▼ −39,419▼ −0.4 pp▼ −9,746▼ −1.1 pp▼ −29,673
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 15.3% ±1.6 pp6,741 ±688 12.2% ±1.2 pp5,390 ±532 10.2% ±1.5 pp4,382 ±634 ▼ −5.1 pp▼ −2,359▼ −2.0 pp▼ −1,008▼ −3.1 pp▼ −1,351
Chicago citywide 6.1% ±0.1 pp165,077 ±3,717 5.3% ±0.1 pp142,413 ±3,015 4.6% ±0.1 pp123,849 ±3,911 ▼ −1.5 pp▼ −41,228▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,564▼ −0.8 pp▼ −22,664
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 17.7% ±1.4 pp7,806 ±616 14.5% ±1.3 pp6,391 ±584 15.8% ±1.6 pp6,806 ±708 ▼ −1.9 pp▼ −1,000▲ +1.4 pp▲ +415▼ −3.2 pp▼ −1,415
Chicago citywide 7.5% ±0.1 pp204,169 ±3,469 6.9% ±0.1 pp186,050 ±3,114 6.0% ±0.1 pp161,675 ±3,509 ▼ −1.6 pp▼ −42,494▼ −0.9 pp▼ −24,375▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,119
Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category Brighton Park
Average Household Income $83,980±$6,066
Per Capita Income $26,470±$1,396
10th Percentile Household Income $19,506±$3,988
25th Percentile Household Income $36,217±$2,953
Median Household Income $66,071±$5,287
75th Percentile Household Income $108,410±$8,558
90th Percentile Household Income $176,596±$13,642
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $83,980±$6,066 $116,016±$1,263 ▼ −$32,036 41/77
Per Capita Income $26,470±$1,396 $50,086±$581 ▼ −$23,617 59/77
10th Percentile Household Income $19,506±$3,988 $12,933±$271 ▲ +$6,572 24/77
25th Percentile Household Income $36,217±$2,953 $34,575±$649 ▲ +$1,642 30/77
Median Household Income $66,071±$5,287 $77,902±$907 ▼ −$11,831 42/77
75th Percentile Household Income $108,410±$8,558 $144,150±$1,210 ▼ −$35,739 47/77
90th Percentile Household Income $176,596±$13,642 Over $200,000 ▼ −$23,404+ 47/77
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $58,857 ±2,485 $70,252 ±4,046 $83,980 ±6,066 ▲ +$25,123▲ +$13,728▲ +$11,395
Chicago citywide $95,689 ±910 $111,304 ±1,075 $116,016 ±1,263 ▲ +$20,327▲ +$4,712▲ +$15,615
Average Household Income (nominal dollars) $44,418 ±1,875 $57,255 ±3,297 $83,980 ±6,066 ▲ +$39,561▲ +$26,724▲ +$12,837
Chicago citywide $72,215 ±687 $90,713 ±876 $116,016 ±1,263 ▲ +$43,801▲ +$25,303▲ +$18,498
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $17,201 ±589 $21,337 ±1,066 $26,470 ±1,396 ▲ +$9,269▲ +$5,133▲ +$4,136
Chicago citywide $37,927 ±351 $45,525 ±412 $50,086 ±581 ▲ +$12,160▲ +$4,562▲ +$7,598
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars) $12,981 ±445 $17,389 ±869 $26,470 ±1,396 ▲ +$13,489▲ +$9,080▲ +$4,409
Chicago citywide $28,623 ±265 $37,103 ±336 $50,086 ±581 ▲ +$21,464▲ +$12,984▲ +$8,480
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $15,525 ±1,582 $19,348 ±1,681 $19,506 ±3,988 ▲ +$3,981▲ +$158▲ +$3,824
Chicago citywide $11,828 ±190 $13,281 ±277 $12,933 ±271 ▲ +$1,105▼ −$348▲ +$1,453
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $11,716 ±1,194 $15,769 ±1,370 $19,506 ±3,988 ▲ +$7,790▲ +$3,737▲ +$4,053
Chicago citywide $8,927 ±144 $10,824 ±225 $12,933 ±271 ▲ +$4,007▲ +$2,109▲ +$1,898
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $29,151 ±2,083 $29,732 ±1,706 $36,217 ±2,953 ▲ +$7,066▲ +$6,485▲ +$580
Chicago citywide $28,727 ±321 $31,597 ±462 $34,575 ±649 ▲ +$5,848▲ +$2,979▲ +$2,869
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $22,000 ±1,572 $24,231 ±1,391 $36,217 ±2,953 ▲ +$14,217▲ +$11,986▲ +$2,231
Chicago citywide $21,680 ±242 $25,751 ±376 $34,575 ±649 ▲ +$12,895▲ +$8,824▲ +$4,071
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $47,376 ±2,535 $51,104 ±2,665 $66,071 ±5,287 ▲ +$18,695▲ +$14,966▲ +$3,728
Chicago citywide $63,379 ±591 $71,469 ±723 $77,902 ±907 ▲ +$14,523▲ +$6,433▲ +$8,090
Median Household Income (nominal dollars) $35,754 ±1,913 $41,650 ±2,172 $66,071 ±5,287 ▲ +$30,317▲ +$24,421▲ +$5,896
Chicago citywide $47,831 ±446 $58,247 ±589 $77,902 ±907 ▲ +$30,071▲ +$19,655▲ +$10,416
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $76,224 ±4,191 $88,698 ±5,343 $108,410 ±8,558 ▲ +$32,186▲ +$19,712▲ +$12,474
Chicago citywide $122,019 ±806 $139,501 ±1,057 $144,150 ±1,210 ▲ +$22,131▲ +$4,648▲ +$17,482
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $57,525 ±3,163 $72,289 ±4,355 $108,410 ±8,558 ▲ +$50,885▲ +$36,121▲ +$14,764
Chicago citywide $92,086 ±608 $113,694 ±862 $144,150 ±1,210 ▲ +$52,064▲ +$30,456▲ +$21,608
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $119,099 ±7,234 $138,250 ±8,568 $176,596 ±13,642 ▲ +$57,497▲ +$38,346▲ +$19,151
Chicago citywide $202,601 ±2,442 $235,390 ±1,636 — ——▲ +$32,790
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $89,882 ±5,460 $112,674 ±6,983 $176,596 ±13,642 ▲ +$86,714▲ +$63,922▲ +$22,792
Chicago citywide $152,899 ±1,843 $191,844 ±1,333 — ——▲ +$38,944

Poverty Status

Category Brighton Park
Below Poverty Line 17.9% ±3.6 pp7,683 ±1,565
Below 200% Poverty Line 40.0% ±4.9 pp17,213 ±2,117
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 8.2% ±2.4 pp3,513 ±1,034
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Below Poverty Line 17.9%±3.6 pp7,683±1,565 16.8%±0.4 pp456,194±11,330 ▲ +1.0% 36/77
Below 200% Poverty Line 40.0%±4.9 pp17,213±2,117 33.4%±0.6 pp905,794±16,660 ▲ +6.6% 31/77
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 8.2%±2.4 pp3,513±1,034 8.3%±0.3 pp226,117±7,649 ▼ -0.2% 37/77
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Category Brighton Park
Food Insecurity 35.7%11,804
Housing Insecurity 27.2%9,016
Transportation Barriers 15.0%4,951
Threatened Utility Shutoff 13.6%4,499
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Food Insecurity 35.7%11,804 24.4%509,385 ▲ +11.3% 25/77
Housing Insecurity 27.2%9,016 19.7%411,266 ▲ +7.5% 27/77
Transportation Barriers 15.0%4,951 11.6%242,167 ▲ +3.4% 27/77
Threatened Utility Shutoff 13.6%4,499 11.9%248,430 ▲ +1.7% 32/77
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category Brighton Park
In Labor Force 80.2% ±3.0 pp14,463 ±550
↳ Employed 73.7% ±3.3 pp13,293 ±594
↳ Unemployed 6.5% ±2.0 pp1,170 ±362
↳ Unemployment Rate 8.1% ±2.5 pp—
Not in Labor Force 19.8% ±9.6 pp3,566 ±1,732
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
In Labor Force 80.2%±3.0 pp14,463±550 85.6%±0.3 pp1,069,076±3,868 ▼ -5.3% 50/77
↳ Employed 73.7%±3.3 pp13,293±594 79.6%±0.3 pp994,466±4,326 ▼ -5.9% 49/77
↳ Unemployed 6.5%±2.0 pp1,170±362 5.9%±0.2 pp73,968±2,788 ▲ +0.6% 38/77
↳ Unemployment Rate 8.1%±2.5 pp— 6.9%±0.3 pp86,502±3,342 ▲ +1.2% 37/77
Not in Labor Force 19.8%±9.6 pp3,566±1,732 14.4%±1.1 pp180,399±14,344 ▲ +5.3% 28/77
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category Brighton Park
Management, Business, Science & Arts 22.3% ±2.9 pp4,518 ±579
↳ Management Occupations 5.2% ±1.3 pp1,051 ±263
↳ Business & Financial Operations 2.8% ±1.1 pp560 ±215
↳ Computer & Mathematical 3.1% ±1.3 pp628 ±254
↳ Architecture & Engineering 1.1% ±0.8 pp230 ±155
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 0.9% ±0.8 pp189 ±160
↳ Community & Social Service 1.8% ±0.8 pp375 ±168
↳ Legal Occupations 0.1% ±0.3 pp20 ±69
↳ Education, Training & Library 3.3% ±1.1 pp674 ±214
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 1.7% ±0.8 pp354 ±166
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 0.9% ±0.5 pp192 ±112
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 1.2% ±0.8 pp245 ±168
Service 21.4% ±3.0 pp4,342 ±607
↳ Healthcare Support 3.7% ±1.4 pp748 ±282
↳ Protective Service 1.2% ±0.8 pp250 ±154
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 8.8% ±1.9 pp1,784 ±384
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 5.4% ±1.5 pp1,104 ±306
↳ Personal Care & Service 2.2% ±1.0 pp456 ±193
Sales & Office 18.8% ±3.0 pp3,820 ±608
↳ Sales & Related 7.9% ±2.0 pp1,609 ±396
↳ Office & Administrative Support 10.9% ±2.1 pp2,211 ±427
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 12.3% ±3.0 pp2,485 ±612
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.8% ±1.2 pp172 ±240
↳ Construction & Extraction 7.7% ±2.1 pp1,556 ±417
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 3.7% ±1.9 pp757 ±391
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 25.2% ±3.5 pp5,117 ±703
↳ Production Occupations 10.3% ±2.5 pp2,087 ±509
↳ Transportation Occupations 5.6% ±1.4 pp1,137 ±291
↳ Material Moving Occupations 9.3% ±2.0 pp1,893 ±403
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts 22.3%±2.9 pp4,518±579 49.2%±0.4 pp686,743±5,710 ▼ -26.9% 72/77
↳ Management Occupations 5.2%±1.3 pp1,051±263 12.3%±0.3 pp172,182±3,807 ▼ -7.2% 71/77
↳ Business & Financial Operations 2.8%±1.1 pp560±215 9.1%±0.2 pp127,081±3,358 ▼ -6.3% 73/77
↳ Computer & Mathematical 3.1%±1.3 pp628±254 4.9%±0.2 pp68,921±2,690 ▼ -1.8% 38/77
↳ Architecture & Engineering 1.1%±0.8 pp230±155 1.6%±0.1 pp22,779±1,380 ▼ -0.5% 39/77
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 0.9%±0.8 pp189±160 1.4%±0.1 pp19,126±1,340 ▼ -0.4% 34/77
↳ Community & Social Service 1.8%±0.8 pp375±168 1.9%±0.1 pp26,973±1,500 ▼ -0.1% 45/77
↳ Legal Occupations 0.1%±0.3 pp20±69 2.3%±0.1 pp31,629±1,814 ▼ -2.2% 71/77
↳ Education, Training & Library 3.3%±1.1 pp674±214 6.6%±0.2 pp92,316±2,697 ▼ -3.3% 74/77
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 1.7%±0.8 pp354±166 3.1%±0.1 pp43,879±1,786 ▼ -1.4% 40/77
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 0.9%±0.5 pp192±112 4.6%±0.2 pp63,551±2,652 ▼ -3.6% 70/77
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 1.2%±0.8 pp245±168 1.3%±0.1 pp18,306±1,387 ▼ -0.1% 48/77
Service 21.4%±3.0 pp4,342±607 16.9%±0.3 pp235,977±4,217 ▲ +4.5% 32/77
↳ Healthcare Support 3.7%±1.4 pp748±282 3.4%±0.2 pp46,792±2,107 ▲ +0.3% 40/77
↳ Protective Service 1.2%±0.8 pp250±154 2.8%±0.1 pp39,146±1,734 ▼ -1.6% 61/77
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 8.8%±1.9 pp1,784±384 5.1%±0.2 pp70,514±2,393 ▲ +3.7% 7/77
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 5.4%±1.5 pp1,104±306 3.0%±0.1 pp41,783±1,967 ▲ +2.4% 17/77
↳ Personal Care & Service 2.2%±1.0 pp456±193 2.7%±0.1 pp37,742±1,657 ▼ -0.5% 52/77
Sales & Office 18.8%±3.0 pp3,820±608 17.4%±0.3 pp243,580±4,754 ▲ +1.4% 34/77
↳ Sales & Related 7.9%±2.0 pp1,609±396 8.1%±0.2 pp113,073±3,174 ▼ -0.2% 38/77
↳ Office & Administrative Support 10.9%±2.1 pp2,211±427 9.3%±0.3 pp130,507±3,591 ▲ +1.6% 29/77
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 12.3%±3.0 pp2,485±612 4.6%±0.2 pp64,338±2,929 ▲ +7.6% 7/77
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.8%±1.2 pp172±240 0.1%±0.0 pp1,506±406 ▲ +0.7% 2/77
↳ Construction & Extraction 7.7%±2.1 pp1,556±417 2.8%±0.1 pp39,432±2,062 ▲ +4.8% 6/77
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 3.7%±1.9 pp757±391 1.7%±0.1 pp23,400±1,722 ▲ +2.1% 12/77
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 25.2%±3.5 pp5,117±703 11.8%±0.3 pp165,261±3,629 ▲ +13.4% 3/77
↳ Production Occupations 10.3%±2.5 pp2,087±509 4.2%±0.2 pp57,989±2,275 ▲ +6.1% 4/77
↳ Transportation Occupations 5.6%±1.4 pp1,137±291 3.9%±0.2 pp54,099±2,118 ▲ +1.7% 33/77
↳ Material Moving Occupations 9.3%±2.0 pp1,893±403 3.8%±0.2 pp53,173±2,312 ▲ +5.5% 5/77
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category Brighton Park
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.1% ±0.4 pp26 ±73
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.1% ±0.4 pp26 ±73
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0% ±0.3 pp0
Construction 8.2% ±2.1 pp1,656 ±419
Manufacturing 14.7% ±2.6 pp2,976 ±534
Wholesale Trade 3.8% ±1.5 pp772 ±307
Retail Trade 10.5% ±2.2 pp2,138 ±446
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 7.0% ±1.6 pp1,426 ±326
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 6.8% ±1.6 pp1,383 ±323
↳ Utilities 0.2% ±0.4 pp43 ±80
Information 0.5% ±0.5 pp111 ±111
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 3.7% ±1.2 pp753 ±246
↳ Finance & Insurance 2.2% ±1.0 pp447 ±200
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.5% ±0.8 pp306 ±158
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 13.4% ±2.2 pp2,709 ±439
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 6.2% ±1.5 pp1,258 ±303
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.1% ±0.3 pp13 ±71
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 7.1% ±1.6 pp1,438 ±324
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 15.8% ±2.3 pp3,207 ±466
↳ Educational Services 6.5% ±1.5 pp1,325 ±311
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 9.3% ±1.9 pp1,882 ±386
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 13.7% ±2.2 pp2,774 ±449
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 2.3% ±1.0 pp458 ±197
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 11.4% ±2.0 pp2,316 ±412
Other Services 5.1% ±2.0 pp1,031 ±415
Public Administration 3.5% ±1.3 pp703 ±271
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.1%±0.4 pp26±73 0.2%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.1% 43/77
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.1%±0.4 pp26±73 0.2%±0.0 pp— 0% 34/77
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%±0.3 pp0 0.0%±0.0 pp— 0% 18/77
Construction 8.2%±2.1 pp1,656±419 3.8%±0.2 pp— ▲ +4.4% 6/77
Manufacturing 14.7%±2.6 pp2,976±534 7.7%±0.2 pp— ▲ +7.0% 3/77
Wholesale Trade 3.8%±1.5 pp772±307 2.0%±0.1 pp— ▲ +1.8% 5/77
Retail Trade 10.5%±2.2 pp2,138±446 8.2%±0.2 pp— ▲ +2.3% 19/77
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 7.0%±1.6 pp1,426±326 7.1%±0.2 pp— ▼ -0.1% 46/77
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 6.8%±1.6 pp1,383±323 6.5%±0.2 pp— ▲ +0.3% 45/77
↳ Utilities 0.2%±0.4 pp43±80 0.5%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.3% 57/77
Information 0.5%±0.5 pp111±111 2.1%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.6% 67/77
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 3.7%±1.2 pp753±246 8.8%±0.2 pp— ▼ -5.1% 73/77
↳ Finance & Insurance 2.2%±1.0 pp447±200 6.7%±0.2 pp— ▼ -4.5% 71/77
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.5%±0.8 pp306±158 2.1%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.6% 51/77
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 13.4%±2.2 pp2,709±439 18.2%±0.4 pp— ▼ -4.8% 38/77
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 6.2%±1.5 pp1,258±303 13.4%±0.3 pp— ▼ -7.2% 43/77
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.1%±0.3 pp13±71 0.1%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.1% 31/77
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 7.1%±1.6 pp1,438±324 4.6%±0.2 pp— ▲ +2.5% 18/77
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 15.8%±2.3 pp3,207±466 24.2%±0.4 pp— ▼ -8.3% 76/77
↳ Educational Services 6.5%±1.5 pp1,325±311 10.5%±0.2 pp— ▼ -3.9% 70/77
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 9.3%±1.9 pp1,882±386 13.7%±0.3 pp— ▼ -4.4% 74/77
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 13.7%±2.2 pp2,774±449 9.1%±0.2 pp— ▲ +4.5% 7/77
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 2.3%±1.0 pp458±197 2.2%±0.1 pp— ▲ +0.1% 31/77
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 11.4%±2.0 pp2,316±412 6.9%±0.2 pp— ▲ +4.5% 9/77
Other Services 5.1%±2.0 pp1,031±415 4.6%±0.2 pp— ▲ +0.5% 29/77
Public Administration 3.5%±1.3 pp703±271 4.0%±0.2 pp— ▼ -0.5% 48/77
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category Brighton Park
Private Company Employee 70.4% ±3.4 pp14,272 ±690
Self-Employed 9.6% ±2.0 pp1,949 ±405
Nonprofit 9.1% ±1.9 pp1,838 ±390
Government 10.2% ±2.0 pp2,076 ±401
Unpaid Family Worker 0.7% ±0.6 pp147 ±116
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Private Company Employee 70.4%±3.4 pp14,272±690 67.9%±0.4 pp947,845±5,822 ▲ +2.5% 19/77
Self-Employed 9.6%±2.0 pp1,949±405 8.3%±0.2 pp115,690±2,989 ▲ +1.3% 18/77
Nonprofit 9.1%±1.9 pp1,838±390 12.1%±0.3 pp169,124±4,035 ▼ -3.1% 56/77
Government 10.2%±2.0 pp2,076±401 12.9%±0.3 pp179,945±4,021 ▼ -2.7% 60/77
Unpaid Family Worker 0.7%±0.6 pp147±116 0.2%±0.0 pp2,312±408 ▲ +0.6% 2/77
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category Brighton Park
Full-Time, Year-Round 64.2% ±2.8 pp14,279 ±613
Part-Time or Part-Year 35.8% ±3.4 pp7,964 ±760
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round 64.2%±2.8 pp14,279±613 67.0%±0.3 pp1,025,726±3,875 ▼ -2.8% 42/77
Part-Time or Part-Year 35.8%±3.4 pp7,964±760 33.0%±0.3 pp504,210±4,897 ▲ +2.8% 36/77
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category Brighton Park
Average FT Earnings $54,800±$2,685
10th Percentile FT Earnings $23,369±$1,953
25th Percentile FT Earnings $33,619±$1,524
Median FT Earnings $47,399±$2,284
75th Percentile FT Earnings $65,790±$3,670
90th Percentile FT Earnings $95,053±$4,967
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Average FT Earnings $54,800±$2,685 $96,214±$968 ▼ −$41,414 61/76
10th Percentile FT Earnings $23,369±$1,953 $29,008±$387 ▼ −$5,639 55/77
25th Percentile FT Earnings $33,619±$1,524 $43,011±$345 ▼ −$9,392 58/77
Median FT Earnings $47,399±$2,284 $69,663±$530 ▼ −$22,264 60/77
75th Percentile FT Earnings $65,790±$3,670 Over $100,000 ▼ −$34,210+ 71/77
90th Percentile FT Earnings $95,053±$4,967 Over $100,000 ▼ −$4,947+ 70/77
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $42,875 ±1,483 $47,795 ±2,360 $54,800 ±2,685 ▲ +$11,925▲ +$7,005▲ +$4,920
Chicago citywide $83,170 ±714 $91,467 ±682 $96,214 ±968 ▲ +$13,044▲ +$4,747▲ +$8,297
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $32,357 ±1,119 $38,953 ±1,923 $54,800 ±2,685 ▲ +$22,443▲ +$15,847▲ +$6,596
Chicago citywide $62,767 ±539 $74,546 ±556 $96,214 ±968 ▲ +$33,447▲ +$21,669▲ +$11,778
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $19,812 ±1,000 $21,186 ±1,131 $23,369 ±1,953 ▲ +$3,557▲ +$2,183▲ +$1,374
Chicago citywide $24,209 ±243 $26,113 ±152 $29,008 ±387 ▲ +$4,799▲ +$2,895▲ +$1,904
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $14,952 ±755 $17,267 ±921 $23,369 ±1,953 ▲ +$8,418▲ +$6,102▲ +$2,315
Chicago citywide $18,270 ±183 $21,282 ±124 $29,008 ±387 ▲ +$10,738▲ +$7,726▲ +$3,012
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $25,804 ±1,528 $28,491 ±1,256 $33,619 ±1,524 ▲ +$7,815▲ +$5,128▲ +$2,687
Chicago citywide $37,393 ±278 $39,415 ±229 $43,011 ±345 ▲ +$5,618▲ +$3,597▲ +$2,021
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $19,474 ±1,153 $23,221 ±1,023 $33,619 ±1,524 ▲ +$14,145▲ +$10,398▲ +$3,747
Chicago citywide $28,220 ±210 $32,123 ±187 $43,011 ±345 ▲ +$14,791▲ +$10,888▲ +$3,903
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $37,200 ±1,460 $39,661 ±1,207 $47,399 ±2,284 ▲ +$10,199▲ +$7,738▲ +$2,461
Chicago citywide $60,575 ±496 $64,628 ±327 $69,663 ±530 ▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,034▲ +$4,054
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $28,074 ±1,102 $32,324 ±984 $47,399 ±2,284 ▲ +$19,325▲ +$15,075▲ +$4,250
Chicago citywide $45,715 ±374 $52,672 ±266 $69,663 ±530 ▲ +$23,948▲ +$16,991▲ +$6,957
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $52,871 ±2,320 $55,159 ±2,745 $65,790 ±3,670 ▲ +$12,919▲ +$10,630▲ +$2,288
Chicago citywide $98,274 ±615 $108,202 ±616 — ——▲ +$9,928
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $39,901 ±1,751 $44,955 ±2,237 $65,790 ±3,670 ▲ +$25,889▲ +$20,835▲ +$5,054
Chicago citywide $74,166 ±464 $88,185 ±502 — ——▲ +$14,019
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $72,248 ±4,173 $78,837 ±5,000 $95,053 ±4,967 ▲ +$22,805▲ +$16,216▲ +$6,589
Chicago citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $54,524 ±3,149 $64,252 ±4,075 $95,053 ±4,967 ▲ +$40,529▲ +$30,801▲ +$9,728
Chicago citywide — — — ———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category Brighton Park
Average PT Earnings $25,067±$4,401
10th Percentile PT Earnings $2,973±$1,155
25th Percentile PT Earnings $8,367±$1,724
Median PT Earnings $17,830±$2,764
75th Percentile PT Earnings $28,239±$2,370
90th Percentile PT Earnings $41,434±$12,288
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Average PT Earnings $25,067±$4,401 $33,575±$750 ▼ −$8,508 47/76
10th Percentile PT Earnings $2,973±$1,155 $2,183±$87 ▲ +$790 16/77
25th Percentile PT Earnings $8,367±$1,724 $7,222±$206 ▲ +$1,145 22/77
Median PT Earnings $17,830±$2,764 $19,180±$393 ▼ −$1,350 33/77
75th Percentile PT Earnings $28,239±$2,370 $38,498±$681 ▼ −$10,259 62/77
90th Percentile PT Earnings $41,434±$12,288 $73,776±$1,391 ▼ −$32,342 72/77
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $18,582 ±1,288 $20,489 ±2,044 $25,067 ±4,401 ▲ +$6,485▲ +$4,578▲ +$1,906
Chicago citywide $27,076 ±473 $31,236 ±676 $33,575 ±750 ▲ +$6,500▲ +$2,340▲ +$4,160
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $14,024 ±972 $16,698 ±1,665 $25,067 ±4,401 ▲ +$11,043▲ +$8,369▲ +$2,675
Chicago citywide $20,433 ±357 $25,457 ±551 $33,575 ±750 ▲ +$13,142▲ +$8,118▲ +$5,024
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,009 ±353 $1,820 ±352 $2,973 ±1,155 ▲ +$964▲ +$1,154▼ −$189
Chicago citywide $2,230 ±48 $2,283 ±59 $2,183 ±87 ▼ −$47▼ −$100▲ +$53
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $1,516 ±267 $1,483 ±287 $2,973 ±1,155 ▲ +$1,457▲ +$1,490▼ −$33
Chicago citywide $1,683 ±36 $1,861 ±48 $2,183 ±87 ▲ +$500▲ +$322▲ +$178
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $6,446 ±1,037 $5,899 ±1,111 $8,367 ±1,724 ▲ +$1,921▲ +$2,468▼ −$547
Chicago citywide $6,390 ±123 $6,841 ±156 $7,222 ±206 ▲ +$832▲ +$381▲ +$451
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $4,865 ±783 $4,808 ±905 $8,367 ±1,724 ▲ +$3,502▲ +$3,559▼ −$57
Chicago citywide $4,822 ±93 $5,575 ±127 $7,222 ±206 ▲ +$2,399▲ +$1,646▲ +$753
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $14,212 ±918 $14,223 ±936 $17,830 ±2,764 ▲ +$3,618▲ +$3,607▲ +$11
Chicago citywide $15,461 ±166 $17,025 ±275 $19,180 ±393 ▲ +$3,719▲ +$2,155▲ +$1,563
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $10,726 ±693 $11,592 ±763 $17,830 ±2,764 ▲ +$7,104▲ +$6,238▲ +$866
Chicago citywide $11,668 ±125 $13,875 ±224 $19,180 ±393 ▲ +$7,512▲ +$5,305▲ +$2,207
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $23,246 ±2,193 $25,781 ±2,277 $28,239 ±2,370 ▲ +$4,993▲ +$2,458▲ +$2,535
Chicago citywide $30,795 ±619 $34,779 ±505 $38,498 ±681 ▲ +$7,703▲ +$3,719▲ +$3,984
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $17,544 ±1,655 $21,012 ±1,856 $28,239 ±2,370 ▲ +$10,696▲ +$7,227▲ +$3,468
Chicago citywide $23,241 ±468 $28,345 ±412 $38,498 ±681 ▲ +$15,257▲ +$10,153▲ +$5,104
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $39,877 ±5,043 $42,324 ±5,680 $41,434 ±12,288 ▲ +$1,558▼ −$890▲ +$2,448
Chicago citywide $61,207 ±1,249 $68,040 ±1,298 $73,776 ±1,391 ▲ +$12,570▲ +$5,737▲ +$6,833
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $30,094 ±3,806 $34,494 ±4,629 $41,434 ±12,288 ▲ +$11,340▲ +$6,940▲ +$4,400
Chicago citywide $46,192 ±942 $55,452 ±1,058 $73,776 ±1,391 ▲ +$27,585▲ +$18,324▲ +$9,261

Earnings of All Workers

Category Brighton Park
Average Earnings $44,154±$2,300
10th Percentile Earnings $8,523±$1,628
25th Percentile Earnings $21,084±$1,635
Median Earnings $36,006±$1,871
75th Percentile Earnings $57,307±$3,246
90th Percentile Earnings $87,578±$5,986
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Average Earnings $44,154±$2,300 $75,571±$768 ▼ −$31,417 58/76
10th Percentile Earnings $8,523±$1,628 $8,529±$272 ▼ −$7 32/77
25th Percentile Earnings $21,084±$1,635 $25,183±$358 ▼ −$4,099 44/77
Median Earnings $36,006±$1,871 $51,367±$471 ▼ −$15,361 61/77
75th Percentile Earnings $57,307±$3,246 $93,324±$598 ▼ −$36,016 64/77
90th Percentile Earnings $87,578±$5,986 Over $100,000 ▼ −$12,422+ 67/77
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $32,692 ±980 $38,559 ±1,669 $44,154 ±2,300 ▲ +$11,462▲ +$5,595▲ +$5,867
Chicago citywide $62,453 ±534 $71,626 ±551 $75,571 ±768 ▲ +$13,118▲ +$3,945▲ +$9,173
Average Earnings (nominal dollars) $24,672 ±740 $31,426 ±1,360 $44,154 ±2,300 ▲ +$19,482▲ +$12,728▲ +$6,754
Chicago citywide $47,133 ±403 $58,375 ±449 $75,571 ±768 ▲ +$28,438▲ +$17,196▲ +$11,243
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $5,953 ±1,097 $7,191 ±1,112 $8,523 ±1,628 ▲ +$2,570▲ +$1,332▲ +$1,238
Chicago citywide $6,858 ±139 $8,358 ±164 $8,529 ±272 ▲ +$1,671▲ +$171▲ +$1,500
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $4,493 ±828 $5,861 ±906 $8,523 ±1,628 ▲ +$4,030▲ +$2,662▲ +$1,368
Chicago citywide $5,176 ±105 $6,812 ±134 $8,529 ±272 ▲ +$3,354▲ +$1,717▲ +$1,636
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $15,226 ±902 $19,371 ±865 $21,084 ±1,635 ▲ +$5,858▲ +$1,713▲ +$4,145
Chicago citywide $19,598 ±241 $23,173 ±290 $25,183 ±358 ▲ +$5,585▲ +$2,010▲ +$3,576
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $11,491 ±681 $15,787 ±705 $21,084 ±1,635 ▲ +$9,594▲ +$5,297▲ +$4,296
Chicago citywide $14,790 ±182 $18,886 ±236 $25,183 ±358 ▲ +$10,393▲ +$6,297▲ +$4,096
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $27,399 ±1,259 $32,574 ±1,285 $36,006 ±1,871 ▲ +$8,607▲ +$3,432▲ +$5,175
Chicago citywide $42,365 ±293 $47,195 ±370 $51,367 ±471 ▲ +$9,002▲ +$4,172▲ +$4,830
Median Earnings (nominal dollars) $20,678 ±950 $26,548 ±1,047 $36,006 ±1,871 ▲ +$15,329▲ +$9,458▲ +$5,870
Chicago citywide $31,972 ±221 $38,464 ±302 $51,367 ±471 ▲ +$19,395▲ +$12,903▲ +$6,492
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $43,889 ±1,640 $48,341 ±1,860 $57,307 ±3,246 ▲ +$13,418▲ +$8,966▲ +$4,452
Chicago citywide $78,784 ±555 $87,853 ±597 $93,324 ±598 ▲ +$14,540▲ +$5,471▲ +$9,069
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $33,122 ±1,238 $39,398 ±1,516 $57,307 ±3,246 ▲ +$24,185▲ +$17,909▲ +$6,276
Chicago citywide $59,457 ±418 $71,600 ±486 $93,324 ±598 ▲ +$33,867▲ +$21,723▲ +$12,144
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $63,892 ±3,839 $72,552 ±3,603 $87,578 ±5,986 ▲ +$23,686▲ +$15,026▲ +$8,659
Chicago citywide $128,659 ±682 — — ———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $48,219 ±2,897 $59,130 ±2,936 $87,578 ±5,986 ▲ +$39,359▲ +$28,448▲ +$10,911
Chicago citywide $97,097 ±515 — — ———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Brighton Park, Chicago

Category Brighton Park
Household income at age 35 $47,713 ±$803
Household income percentile rank 44.6 ±0.54 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 11.6% ±0.65 pp
Individual income at age 35 $36,055 ±$645
Fraction married 35.8% ±0.99 pp
Employment rate 74.9% ±0.89 pp
Incarceration rate 1.09% ±0.24 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Brighton Park, Chicago. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Brighton Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Brighton Park City Difference
Household income at age 35 $47,713 ±$803 $43,090 ±$109 +$4,623
Household income percentile rank 44.6 ±0.54 pp 40.9 ±0.07 pp +3.7 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 11.6% ±0.65 pp 11.4% ±0.08 pp +0.2 pp
Individual income at age 35 $36,055 ±$645 $33,545 ±$85 +$2,511
Fraction married 35.8% ±0.99 pp 26.4% ±0.12 pp +9.4 pp
Employment rate 74.9% ±0.89 pp 74.4% ±0.12 pp +0.5 pp
Incarceration rate 1.09% ±0.24 pp 2.87% ±0.06 pp −1.8 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Brighton Park, Chicago. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Brighton Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Brighton Park, Chicago in Lower-Income Families

Category Brighton Park
Household income at age 35 $42,101 ±$1,044
Household income percentile rank 40.7 ±0.73 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 8.42% ±0.85 pp
Individual income at age 35 $32,319 ±$863
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Brighton Park, Chicago with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Brighton Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Brighton Park City Difference
Household income at age 35 $42,101 ±$1,044 $34,712 ±$133 +$7,389
Household income percentile rank 40.7 ±0.73 pp 35.3 ±0.09 pp +5.4 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 8.42% ±0.85 pp 6.31% ±0.10 pp +2.1 pp
Individual income at age 35 $32,319 ±$863 $28,717 ±$114 +$3,602
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Brighton Park, Chicago with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Brighton Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Brighton Park, Chicago

Category Brighton Park
Stayed in the greater Chicago area 85.7% ±0.75 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 29.4% ±0.96 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Brighton Park, Chicago. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Brighton Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Brighton Park City Difference
Stayed in the greater Chicago area 85.7% ±0.75 pp 78.1% ±0.12 pp +7.6 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 29.4% ±0.96 pp 22.9% ±0.12 pp +6.6 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Brighton Park, Chicago. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Brighton Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Brighton Park

Category Brighton Park
All jobs located in brighton park 6,666
Brighton Park jobs held by Brighton Park residents 7.8%
Brighton Park jobs held by non-Brighton Park residents 92.2%
Employed residents working in Brighton Park 3.6%
Employed residents working outside Brighton Park 96.4%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Brighton Park Chicago neighborhood median Difference Rank
All jobs located in brighton park 6,666 5,320 ▲ +1,346 34/77
Brighton Park jobs held by Brighton Park residents 7.8% 5.8% ▲ +2.1 pp 22/77
Brighton Park jobs held by non-Brighton Park residents 92.2% 94.2% ▼ −2.1 pp 56/77
Employed residents working in Brighton Park 3.6% 2.6% ▲ +1.0 pp 26/77
Employed residents working outside Brighton Park 96.4% 97.4% ▼ −1.0 pp 52/77
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in brighton park 4,817 6,262 6,666 ▲ +1,849▲ +404▲ +1,445
Chicago citywide 5,236 5,698 5,320 ▲ +84▼ −378▲ +462
Brighton Park jobs held by Brighton Park residents 9.4%414 10.2%573 7.8%465 ▼ −1.5 pp▲ +51▼ −2.3 pp▼ −108▲ +0.8 pp▲ +159
Chicago citywide 5.5%246 5.6%306 5.8%279 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +33▲ +0.1 pp▼ −27▲ +0.2 pp▲ +60
Brighton Park jobs held by non-Brighton Park residents 90.6%4,013 89.8%5,056 92.2%5,470 ▲ +1.5 pp▲ +1,457▲ +2.3 pp▲ +414▼ −0.8 pp▲ +1,043
Chicago citywide 94.5%4,320 94.4%4,646 94.2%4,657 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +337▼ −0.1 pp▲ +11▼ −0.2 pp▲ +326
Employed residents working in Brighton Park 3.4%414 4.3%573 3.6%465 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +51▼ −0.7 pp▼ −108▲ +0.9 pp▲ +159
Chicago citywide 2.5%246 2.7%306 2.6%279 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +33▼ −0.1 pp▼ −27▲ +0.1 pp▲ +60
Employed residents working outside Brighton Park 96.6%11,846 95.7%12,895 96.4%12,533 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +687▲ +0.7 pp▼ −362▼ −0.9 pp▲ +1,049
Chicago citywide 97.5%9,791 97.3%10,346 97.4%10,385 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +594▲ +0.1 pp▲ +39▼ −0.1 pp▲ +555

Industry of Jobs in Brighton Park

Category Brighton Park
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.1%9
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0
Construction 1.3%87
Manufacturing 22.9%1,528
Wholesale Trade 6.2%411
Retail Trade 13.3%888
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 5.0%334
↳ Utilities 0.0%0
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 5.0%334
Information 0.2%12
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 3.8%253
↳ Finance & Insurance 1.6%106
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 2.2%147
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 19.9%1,324
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 1.0%68
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%0
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 18.8%1,256
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 5.5%365
↳ Educational Services 2.6%174
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 2.9%191
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 9.6%642
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.1%4
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 9.6%638
Other Services 12.2%813
Public Administration 0.0%0
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.1%9 0.0%423 ▲ +0.1% 8/77
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0 0.0%36 0% 9/77
Construction 1.3%87 1.9%27,207 ▼ -0.6% 57/77
Manufacturing 22.9%1,528 4.4%64,747 ▲ +18.5% 11/77
Wholesale Trade 6.2%411 2.8%41,460 ▲ +3.3% 16/77
Retail Trade 13.3%888 6.6%96,413 ▲ +6.7% 31/77
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 5.0%334 6.0%87,817 ▼ -1.0% 23/77
↳ Utilities 0.0%0 0.3%5,012 ▼ -0.3% 21/77
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 5.0%334 5.7%82,805 ▼ -0.6% 21/77
Information 0.2%12 3.5%51,095 ▼ -3.3% 55/77
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 3.8%253 10.8%157,520 ▼ -7.0% 40/77
↳ Finance & Insurance 1.6%106 8.6%125,824 ▼ -7.0% 41/77
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 2.2%147 2.2%31,696 0% 27/77
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 19.9%1,324 23.2%339,220 ▼ -3.3% 14/77
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 1.0%68 14.2%207,444 ▼ -13.2% 65/77
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%0 1.2%16,872 ▼ -1.2% 36/77
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 18.8%1,256 7.9%114,904 ▲ +11.0% 7/77
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 5.5%365 23.0%336,089 ▼ -17.5% 71/77
↳ Educational Services 2.6%174 9.2%134,671 ▼ -6.6% 44/77
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 2.9%191 13.8%201,418 ▼ -10.9% 73/77
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 9.6%642 10.3%151,055 ▼ -0.7% 34/77
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.1%4 1.9%27,339 ▼ -1.8% 58/77
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 9.6%638 8.5%123,716 ▲ +1.1% 28/77
Other Services 12.2%813 4.0%59,136 ▲ +8.2% 4/77
Public Administration 0.0%0 3.5%51,418 ▼ -3.5% 19/77
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%1 0.0%1 0.1%9 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 0.0%181 0.0%569 0.0%423 – 0.0 pp▲ +242– 0.0 pp▼ −146– 0.0 pp▲ +388
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%1 0.0%1 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp▼ −1– 0.0 pp▼ −1– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 0.0%140 0.0%374 0.0%36 – 0.0 pp▼ −104– 0.0 pp▼ −338– 0.0 pp▲ +234
Construction 2.0%94 2.1%132 1.3%87 ▼ −0.6 pp▼ −7▼ −0.8 pp▼ −45▲ +0.2 pp▲ +38
Chicago citywide 1.6%20,789 1.8%26,012 1.9%27,207 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,418– 0.0 pp▲ +1,195▲ +0.3 pp▲ +5,223
Manufacturing 29.5%1,419 24.2%1,516 22.9%1,528 ▼ −6.5 pp▲ +109▼ −1.3 pp▲ +12▼ −5.2 pp▲ +97
Chicago citywide 4.6%61,066 4.5%63,597 4.4%64,747 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,681▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,150▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,531
Wholesale Trade 14.0%673 6.1%380 6.2%411 ▼ −7.8 pp▼ −262▲ +0.1 pp▲ +31▼ −7.9 pp▼ −293
Chicago citywide 3.0%39,431 2.9%41,789 2.8%41,460 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,029▼ −0.1 pp▼ −329▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,358
Retail Trade 18.3%883 14.4%900 13.3%888 ▼ −5.0 pp▲ +5▼ −1.1 pp▼ −12▼ −4.0 pp▲ +17
Chicago citywide 7.4%97,262 6.9%97,836 6.6%96,413 ▼ −0.8 pp▼ −849▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,423▼ −0.5 pp▲ +574
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 7.4%357 4.1%256 5.0%334 ▼ −2.4 pp▼ −23▲ +0.9 pp▲ +78▼ −3.3 pp▼ −101
Chicago citywide 5.4%71,320 5.6%79,303 6.0%87,817 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +16,497▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,514▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,983
Utilities 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 0.3%4,383 0.3%4,956 0.3%5,012 – 0.0 pp▲ +629– 0.0 pp▲ +56– 0.0 pp▲ +573
Transportation & Warehousing 7.4%357 4.1%256 5.0%334 ▼ −2.4 pp▼ −23▲ +0.9 pp▲ +78▼ −3.3 pp▼ −101
Chicago citywide 5.1%66,937 5.2%74,347 5.7%82,805 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +15,868▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,458▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,410
Information 0.1%4 0.1%5 0.2%12 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8▲ +0.1 pp▲ +7– 0.0 pp▲ +1
Chicago citywide 3.1%40,514 3.4%48,135 3.5%51,095 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +10,581▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,960▲ +0.3 pp▲ +7,621
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 4.9%236 3.7%234 3.8%253 ▼ −1.1 pp▲ +17▲ +0.1 pp▲ +19▼ −1.2 pp▼ −2
Chicago citywide 10.5%138,287 10.6%150,163 10.8%157,520 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +19,233▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,357▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,876
Finance & Insurance 3.2%156 1.8%113 1.6%106 ▼ −1.6 pp▼ −50▼ −0.2 pp▼ −7▼ −1.4 pp▼ −43
Chicago citywide 8.5%111,307 8.4%119,147 8.6%125,824 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14,517▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,677▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7,840
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.7%80 1.9%121 2.2%147 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +67▲ +0.3 pp▲ +26▲ +0.3 pp▲ +41
Chicago citywide 2.1%26,980 2.2%31,016 2.2%31,696 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,716– 0.0 pp▲ +680▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,036
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 4.9%236 18.5%1,160 19.9%1,324 ▲ +15.0 pp▲ +1,088▲ +1.3 pp▲ +164▲ +13.6 pp▲ +924
Chicago citywide 21.2%278,928 22.6%319,744 23.2%339,220 ▲ +2.0 pp▲ +60,292▲ +0.6 pp▲ +19,476▲ +1.3 pp▲ +40,816
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 2.8%136 1.0%64 1.0%68 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −68– 0.0 pp▲ +4▼ −1.8 pp▼ −72
Chicago citywide 11.8%155,200 12.9%182,462 14.2%207,444 ▲ +2.4 pp▲ +52,244▲ +1.3 pp▲ +24,982▲ +1.1 pp▲ +27,262
Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.2%8 0.0%0 0.0%0 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −8– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.2 pp▼ −8
Chicago citywide 1.0%13,619 1.2%16,600 1.2%16,872 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,253– 0.0 pp▲ +272▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,981
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 1.9%92 17.5%1,096 18.8%1,256 ▲ +16.9 pp▲ +1,164▲ +1.3 pp▲ +160▲ +15.6 pp▲ +1,004
Chicago citywide 8.4%110,109 8.5%120,682 7.9%114,904 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +4,795▼ −0.7 pp▼ −5,778▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,573
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 5.4%258 6.0%378 5.5%365 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +107▼ −0.6 pp▼ −13▲ +0.7 pp▲ +120
Chicago citywide 23.5%308,633 22.1%313,540 23.0%336,089 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +27,456▲ +0.8 pp▲ +22,549▼ −1.4 pp▲ +4,907
Educational Services 1.3%63 3.0%186 2.6%174 ▲ +1.3 pp▲ +111▼ −0.4 pp▼ −12▲ +1.7 pp▲ +123
Chicago citywide 10.1%132,909 9.0%128,169 9.2%134,671 ▼ −0.9 pp▲ +1,762▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,502▼ −1.1 pp▼ −4,740
Health Care & Social Assistance 4.0%195 3.1%192 2.9%191 ▼ −1.2 pp▼ −4▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1▼ −1.0 pp▼ −3
Chicago citywide 13.4%175,724 13.1%185,371 13.8%201,418 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +25,694▲ +0.7 pp▲ +16,047▼ −0.3 pp▲ +9,647
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 8.8%426 9.8%616 9.6%642 ▲ +0.8 pp▲ +216▼ −0.2 pp▲ +26▲ +1.0 pp▲ +190
Chicago citywide 10.9%143,753 11.5%162,749 10.3%151,055 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,302▼ −1.2 pp▼ −11,694▲ +0.5 pp▲ +18,996
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.1%6 0.1%8 0.1%4 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2▼ −0.1 pp▼ −4– 0.0 pp▲ +2
Chicago citywide 1.7%22,179 2.1%30,178 1.9%27,339 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +5,160▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,839▲ +0.4 pp▲ +7,999
Accommodation & Food Services 8.7%420 9.7%608 9.6%638 ▲ +0.9 pp▲ +218▼ −0.1 pp▲ +30▲ +1.0 pp▲ +188
Chicago citywide 9.3%121,574 9.4%132,571 8.5%123,716 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +2,142▼ −0.9 pp▼ −8,855▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,997
Other Services 4.7%228 10.9%684 12.2%813 ▲ +7.5 pp▲ +585▲ +1.3 pp▲ +129▲ +6.2 pp▲ +456
Chicago citywide 4.5%59,098 4.4%61,698 4.0%59,136 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +38▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,562▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,600
Public Administration 0.0%2 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp▼ −2– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▼ −2
Chicago citywide 4.2%54,814 3.6%51,684 3.5%51,418 ▼ −0.7 pp▼ −3,396▼ −0.1 pp▼ −266▼ −0.5 pp▼ −3,130

Earnings of Jobs in Brighton Park

Category Brighton Park
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 17.9%1,194
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 38.8%2,586
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 43.3%2,886
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 17.9%1,194 12.7%185,293 ▲ +5.3% 38/77
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 38.8%2,586 20.5%299,468 ▲ +18.3% 8/77
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 43.3%2,886 66.9%978,839 ▼ -23.6% 61/77
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 22.2%1,067 24.2%1,513 17.9%1,194 ▼ −4.2 pp▲ +127▼ −6.2 pp▼ −319▲ +2.0 pp▲ +446
Chicago citywide 21.3%280,137 16.8%238,135 12.7%185,293 ▼ −8.7 pp▼ −94,844▼ −4.1 pp▼ −52,842▼ −4.5 pp▼ −42,002
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 48.4%2,332 45.9%2,875 38.8%2,586 ▼ −9.6 pp▲ +254▼ −7.1 pp▼ −289▼ −2.5 pp▲ +543
Chicago citywide 30.7%403,220 26.7%378,530 20.5%299,468 ▼ −10.2 pp▼ −103,752▼ −6.3 pp▼ −79,062▼ −4.0 pp▼ −24,690
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 29.4%1,418 29.9%1,874 43.3%2,886 ▲ +13.9 pp▲ +1,468▲ +13.4 pp▲ +1,012▲ +0.5 pp▲ +456
Chicago citywide 48.0%630,719 56.5%800,154 66.9%978,839 ▲ +18.9 pp▲ +348,120▲ +10.4 pp▲ +178,685▲ +8.5 pp▲ +169,435

Jobs in Brighton Park by Firm Age

Category Brighton Park
Firm age: 0–1 years 7.4%492
Firm age: 2–3 years 1.8%122
Firm age: 4–5 years 18.5%1,232
Firm age: 6–10 years 11.3%753
Firm age: 11 or more years 61.0%4,066
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years 7.4%492 2.8%37,293 ▲ +4.5% 12/77
Firm age: 2–3 years 1.8%122 2.8%37,154 ▼ -1.0% 62/77
Firm age: 4–5 years 18.5%1,232 3.2%41,869 ▲ +15.3% 1/77
Firm age: 6–10 years 11.3%753 7.8%102,353 ▲ +3.5% 19/77
Firm age: 11 or more years 61.0%4,066 83.4%1,098,220 ▼ -22.4% 75/77
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years 4.5%216 17.8%1,114 7.4%492 ▲ +2.9 pp▲ +276▼ −10.4 pp▼ −622▲ +13.3 pp▲ +898
Chicago citywide 2.9%33,224 2.6%33,244 2.8%37,293 – 0.0 pp▲ +4,069▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,049▼ −0.2 pp▲ +20
Firm age: 2–3 years 4.4%210 7.6%474 1.8%122 ▼ −2.5 pp▼ −88▼ −5.7 pp▼ −352▲ +3.2 pp▲ +264
Chicago citywide 4.0%46,935 3.3%42,284 2.8%37,154 ▼ −1.2 pp▼ −9,781▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,130▼ −0.7 pp▼ −4,651
Firm age: 4–5 years 2.4%117 1.8%113 18.5%1,232 ▲ +16.1 pp▲ +1,115▲ +16.7 pp▲ +1,119▼ −0.6 pp▼ −4
Chicago citywide 3.7%42,688 3.6%46,058 3.2%41,869 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −819▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,189▼ −0.1 pp▲ +3,370
Firm age: 6–10 years 21.2%1,022 6.7%417 11.3%753 ▼ −9.9 pp▼ −269▲ +4.6 pp▲ +336▼ −14.6 pp▼ −605
Chicago citywide 8.2%94,955 8.6%109,934 7.8%102,353 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +7,398▼ −0.9 pp▼ −7,581▲ +0.5 pp▲ +14,979
Firm age: 11 or more years 67.5%3,250 66.2%4,144 61.0%4,066 ▼ −6.5 pp▲ +816▼ −5.2 pp▼ −78▼ −1.3 pp▲ +894
Chicago citywide 81.3%946,801 81.8%1,043,037 83.4%1,098,220 ▲ +2.1 pp▲ +151,419▲ +1.6 pp▲ +55,183▲ +0.5 pp▲ +96,236

Jobs in Brighton Park by Firm Size

Category Brighton Park
Firm size: 0–19 employees 22.8%1,518
Firm size: 20–49 employees 8.0%536
Firm size: 50–249 employees 18.0%1,199
Firm size: 250–499 employees 16.7%1,113
Firm size: 500 or more employees 34.5%2,299
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees 22.8%1,518 12.8%168,975 ▲ +9.9% 42/77
Firm size: 20–49 employees 8.0%536 7.3%96,404 ▲ +0.7% 52/77
Firm size: 50–249 employees 18.0%1,199 13.8%181,123 ▲ +4.2% 37/77
Firm size: 250–499 employees 16.7%1,113 5.7%74,787 ▲ +11.0% 6/77
Firm size: 500 or more employees 34.5%2,299 60.4%795,600 ▼ -25.9% 55/77
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees 28.9%1,391 23.8%1,492 22.8%1,518 ▼ −6.1 pp▲ +127▼ −1.1 pp▲ +26▼ −5.1 pp▲ +101
Chicago citywide 13.9%162,248 13.3%169,949 12.8%168,975 ▼ −1.1 pp▲ +6,727▼ −0.5 pp▼ −974▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,701
Firm size: 20–49 employees 20.4%981 9.6%601 8.0%536 ▼ −12.3 pp▼ −445▼ −1.6 pp▼ −65▼ −10.8 pp▼ −380
Chicago citywide 8.4%97,503 8.2%103,945 7.3%96,404 ▼ −1.1 pp▼ −1,099▼ −0.8 pp▼ −7,541▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,442
Firm size: 50–249 employees 17.5%841 17.0%1,064 18.0%1,199 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +358▲ +1.0 pp▲ +135▼ −0.5 pp▲ +223
Chicago citywide 15.7%183,275 14.9%189,930 13.8%181,123 ▼ −2.0 pp▼ −2,152▼ −1.1 pp▼ −8,807▼ −0.8 pp▲ +6,655
Firm size: 250–499 employees 10.5%507 14.8%925 16.7%1,113 ▲ +6.2 pp▲ +606▲ +1.9 pp▲ +188▲ +4.2 pp▲ +418
Chicago citywide 6.3%72,992 5.9%74,603 5.7%74,787 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,795▼ −0.2 pp▲ +184▼ −0.4 pp▲ +1,611
Firm size: 500 or more employees 22.7%1,095 34.8%2,180 34.5%2,299 ▲ +11.8 pp▲ +1,204▼ −0.3 pp▲ +119▲ +12.1 pp▲ +1,085
Chicago citywide 55.7%648,585 57.8%736,130 60.4%795,600 ▲ +4.7 pp▲ +147,015▲ +2.7 pp▲ +59,470▲ +2.1 pp▲ +87,545

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Brighton Park
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 17.4% ±2.0 pp17.4%±2.0 pp7,480 ±865
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 94.4% ±3.4 pp16.4%±0.6 pp7,062 ±256
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 5.6% ±2.6 pp1.0%±0.5 pp418 ±196
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 17.4%±2.0 pp17.4%±2.0 pp7,480±865 13.5%±0.2 pp13.5%±0.2 pp365,577±5,480 ▲ +3.9%▲ +3.9% 24/77
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 94.4%±3.4 pp16.4%±0.6 pp7,062±256 83.0%±0.5 pp11.2%±0.1 pp303,520±1,897 ▲ +11.4%▲ +5.2% 11/7717/77
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 5.6%±2.6 pp1.0%±0.5 pp418±196 17.0%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.1 pp62,057±2,247 ▼ -11.4%▼ -1.3% 67/7767/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Brighton Park
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 6.4% ±1.0 pp6.4%±1.0 pp2,773 ±432
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 78.7% ±7.3 pp5.1%±0.5 pp2,183 ±202
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 21.3% ±6.5 pp1.4%±0.4 pp590 ±181
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 82.5% ±2.3 pp5.3%±0.1 pp2,288 ±63
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 17.5% ±6.2 pp1.1%±0.4 pp485 ±172
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 6.4%±1.0 pp6.4%±1.0 pp2,773±432 7.4%±0.1 pp7.4%±0.1 pp201,851±4,036 ▼ -1.0%▼ -1.0% 30/77
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 78.7%±7.3 pp5.1%±0.5 pp2,183±202 52.4%±0.7 pp3.9%±0.1 pp105,720±1,511 ▲ +26.3%▲ +1.2% 10/776/77
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 21.3%±6.5 pp1.4%±0.4 pp590±181 47.6%±1.2 pp3.5%±0.1 pp96,131±2,437 ▼ -26.3%▼ -2.2% 68/7759/77
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 82.5%±2.3 pp5.3%±0.1 pp2,288±63 67.0%±1.0 pp5.0%±0.1 pp135,301±1,945 ▲ +15.5%▲ +0.3% 19/7722/77
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 17.5%±6.2 pp1.1%±0.4 pp485±172 33.0%±1.2 pp2.5%±0.1 pp66,550±2,459 ▼ -15.5%▼ -1.3% 59/7748/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category Brighton Park
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 11.9% ±4.4 pp985 ±365
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 2.3% ±3.9 pp64 ±109
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 11.9%±4.4 pp985±365 5.9%±0.5 pp— ▲ +6.1% 8/77
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 2.3%±3.9 pp64±109 5.4%±0.6 pp— ▼ -3.1% 53/77
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category Brighton Park
Owner-Occupied Households 56.4% ±3.8 pp7,645 ±513
Renter-Occupied Households 43.6% ±4.3 pp5,919 ±585
Owner-Occupied Residents 57.6% ±4.0 pp24,752 ±1,738
Renter-Occupied Residents 42.4% ±5.1 pp18,230 ±2,212
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Owner-Occupied Households 56.4%±3.8 pp7,645±513 46.0%±0.4 pp534,012±4,939 ▲ +10.3% 26/77
Renter-Occupied Households 43.6%±4.3 pp5,919±585 54.0%±0.4 pp626,193±5,183 ▼ -10.3% 52/77
Owner-Occupied Residents 57.6%±4.0 pp24,752±1,738 51.8%±0.5 pp1,377,219±13,574 ▲ +5.8% 29/77
Renter-Occupied Residents 42.4%±5.1 pp18,230±2,212 48.2%±0.5 pp1,280,665±13,500 ▼ -5.8% 49/77
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category Brighton Park
Median Year Moved In 2011±1.2 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later 1.9% ±1.1 pp251 ±153
Moved in 2020 to 2022 13.8% ±3.0 pp1,875 ±405
Moved in 2010 to 2019 39.2% ±4.7 pp5,321 ±644
Moved in 2000 to 2009 20.3% ±3.6 pp2,752 ±487
Moved in 1990 to 1999 18.3% ±3.3 pp2,483 ±445
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 6.5% ±1.5 pp882 ±208
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Median Year Moved In 2011±1.2 yr 2015±1.0 yr ▼ −4 49/77
Moved in 2023 or Later 1.9%±1.1 pp251±153 5.9%±0.2 pp68,884±2,742 ▼ -4.1% 66/77
Moved in 2020 to 2022 13.8%±3.0 pp1,875±405 24.1%±0.4 pp279,417±5,059 ▼ -10.3% 54/77
Moved in 2010 to 2019 39.2%±4.7 pp5,321±644 39.2%±0.5 pp455,125±5,772 0% 40/77
Moved in 2000 to 2009 20.3%±3.6 pp2,752±487 13.8%±0.3 pp160,353±3,324 ▲ +6.5% 16/77
Moved in 1990 to 1999 18.3%±3.3 pp2,483±445 8.2%±0.2 pp95,243±2,390 ▲ +10.1% 4/77
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 6.5%±1.5 pp882±208 8.7%±0.2 pp101,183±2,362 ▼ -2.2% 53/77
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show
Category Brighton Park
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 4.0% ±1.1 pp4.0%±1.1 pp1,707 ±485
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers) 3.6% ±1.1 pp91.0%±9.4 pp1,554 ±470
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers) 0.0% ±0.1 pp0.1%±2.7 pp1 ±46
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 0.2% ±0.2 pp4.0%±4.4 pp69 ±78
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 0.2% ±0.2 pp4.9%±5.2 pp83 ±93
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 4.0%±1.1 pp4.0%±1.1 pp1,707±485 14.0%±0.3 pp14.0%±0.3 pp375,475±8,289 ▼ -10.0%▼ -10.0% 74/77
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers) 3.6%±1.1 pp91.0%±9.4 pp1,554±470 9.8%±0.3 pp69.9%±1.0 pp262,365±6,953 ▼ -6.1%▲ +21.2% 72/777/77
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers) 0.0%±0.1 pp0.1%±2.7 pp1±46 0.8%±0.1 pp5.5%±0.4 pp20,552±1,626 ▼ -0.8%▼ -5.4% 68/7768/77
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 0.2%±0.2 pp4.0%±4.4 pp69±78 2.5%±0.1 pp17.6%±0.7 pp65,936±2,918 ▼ -2.3%▼ -13.5% 71/7762/77
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 0.2%±0.2 pp4.9%±5.2 pp83±93 1.0%±0.1 pp7.1%±0.8 pp26,622±3,040 ▼ -0.8%▼ -2.2% 57/7743/77
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show
Category Brighton Park
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 6.4% ±1.5 pp6.4%±1.5 pp933 ±218
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 0.5% ±0.5 pp8.4%±7.9 pp78 ±76
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.8% ±0.6 pp12.8%±8.8 pp119 ±87
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.1% ±0.3 pp1.4%±5.4 pp13 ±50
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 5.0% ±1.5 pp77.5%±13.4 pp723 ±211
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 1.3% ±1.3 pp1.3%±1.3 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 1.5% ±1.1 pp1.5%±1.1 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 6.4%±1.5 pp6.4%±1.5 pp933±218 9.1%±0.2 pp9.1%±0.2 pp116,849±2,682 ▼ -2.7%▼ -2.7% 54/77
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 0.5%±0.5 pp8.4%±7.9 pp78±76 2.5%±0.1 pp27.1%±1.4 pp31,723±1,796 ▼ -1.9%▼ -18.8% 69/7767/77
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.8%±0.6 pp12.8%±8.8 pp119±87 0.6%±0.1 pp6.0%±0.7 pp7,037±795 ▲ +0.3%▲ +6.7% 20/7713/77
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.1%±0.3 pp1.4%±5.4 pp13±50 0.2%±0.0 pp2.4%±0.5 pp2,831±587 ▼ -0.1%▼ -1.0% 29/7724/77
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 5.0%±1.5 pp77.5%±13.4 pp723±211 5.9%±0.3 pp64.4%±2.5 pp75,258±3,387 ▼ -0.9%▲ +13.1% 37/7722/77
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 1.3%±1.3 pp1.3%±1.3 pp— 4.8%±0.3 pp4.8%±0.3 pp— ▼ -3.5%▼ -3.5% 69/77
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 1.5%±1.1 pp1.5%±1.1 pp— 1.3%±0.1 pp1.3%±0.1 pp— ▲ +0.2%▲ +0.2% 24/77
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category Brighton Park
Median Year Built 1941±2 yr
Pre-1940 55.0% ±3.7 pp7,967 ±539
1940-2009 43.3% ±4.7 pp6,277 ±684
2010+ 1.7% ±0.9 pp253 ±131
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Median Year Built 1941±2 yr 1953±1 yr ▼ −12 yrs 69/77
Pre-1940 55.0%±3.7 pp7,967±539 38.8%±0.4 pp495,715±4,678 ▲ +16.1% 12/77
1940-2009 43.3%±4.7 pp6,277±684 54.9%±0.6 pp700,698±7,435 ▼ -11.6% 60/77
2010+ 1.7%±0.9 pp253±131 6.3%±0.2 pp80,641±2,725 ▼ -4.6% 53/77
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category Brighton Park
Population Density 15,805 /sq mi±1,026/sq mi
Single-Family Homes 31.4% ±3.5 pp4,546 ±504
Buildings With 2–4 Units 63.3% ±4.7 pp9,174 ±687
Buildings With 5–19 Units 4.0% ±1.6 pp587 ±226
Buildings With 20 or More Units 0.9% ±0.9 pp128 ±126
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Population Density 15,805 /sq mi±1,026/sq mi 11,748 /sq mi±26/sq mi ▲ +4,057 /sq mi 25/77
Single-Family Homes 31.4%±3.5 pp4,546±504 29.2%±0.3 pp372,679±3,989 ▲ +2.2% 40/77
Buildings With 2–4 Units 63.3%±4.7 pp9,174±687 27.4%±0.4 pp349,976±4,957 ▲ +35.9% 2/77
Buildings With 5–19 Units 4.0%±1.6 pp587±226 16.2%±0.3 pp206,420±4,124 ▼ -12.1% 67/77
Buildings With 20 or More Units 0.9%±0.9 pp128±126 27.0%±0.3 pp344,543±4,438 ▼ -26.1% 73/77
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category Brighton Park
Studio 2.8% ±1.2 pp400 ±167
1 Bedroom 8.5% ±2.1 pp1,226 ±300
2 Bedrooms 42.1% ±3.7 pp6,097 ±540
3 Bedrooms 28.9% ±3.9 pp4,185 ±560
4 Bedrooms 11.4% ±2.3 pp1,652 ±330
5 or More Bedrooms 6.5% ±2.0 pp937 ±294
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Studio 2.8%±1.2 pp400±167 7.5%±0.3 pp95,749±3,205 ▼ -4.7% 47/77
1 Bedroom 8.5%±2.1 pp1,226±300 20.1%±0.4 pp257,271±4,939 ▼ -11.7% 59/77
2 Bedrooms 42.1%±3.7 pp6,097±540 33.1%±0.3 pp422,866±4,221 ▲ +8.9% 6/77
3 Bedrooms 28.9%±3.9 pp4,185±560 26.1%±0.3 pp333,682±4,061 ▲ +2.7% 42/77
4 Bedrooms 11.4%±2.3 pp1,652±330 9.0%±0.2 pp115,453±2,426 ▲ +2.4% 27/77
5 or More Bedrooms 6.5%±2.0 pp937±294 4.1%±0.2 pp52,033±2,072 ▲ +2.4% 23/77
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show
Category Brighton Park
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 8.5% ±2.3 pp8.5%±2.3 pp1,152 ±308
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 4.8% ±1.7 pp56.7%±13.5 pp653 ±234
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 3.7% ±1.5 pp43.3%±13.4 pp499 ±204
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 8.5%±2.3 pp8.5%±2.3 pp1,152±308 3.4%±0.2 pp3.4%±0.2 pp39,979±1,996 ▲ +5.0%▲ +5.0% 5/77
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 4.8%±1.7 pp56.7%±13.5 pp653±234 2.0%±0.1 pp58.2%±2.3 pp23,276±1,493 ▲ +2.8%▼ -1.5% 9/7750/76
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 3.7%±1.5 pp43.3%±13.4 pp499±204 1.4%±0.1 pp41.8%±2.6 pp16,703±1,328 ▲ +2.2%▲ +1.5% 2/7727/76
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category Brighton Park
Natural Gas Heat 93.0% ±2.3 pp12,609 ±313
Electric Heat 6.3% ±2.1 pp852 ±281
Other Heating Source 0.8% ±1.0 pp103 ±140
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Natural Gas Heat 93.0%±2.3 pp12,609±313 77.5%±0.3 pp899,660±3,501 ▲ +15.4% 4/77
Electric Heat 6.3%±2.1 pp852±281 18.0%±0.3 pp208,937±3,864 ▼ -11.7% 65/77
Other Heating Source 0.8%±1.0 pp103±140 4.4%±0.2 pp51,603±2,173 ▼ -3.7% 75/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show
Category Brighton Park
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 46.0% ±4.4 pp6,235 ±603
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 19.9% ±3.2 pp2,704 ±435
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 34.1% ±3.9 pp4,625 ±524
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 19.5% ±3.3 pp2,650 ±454
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 46.0%±4.4 pp6,235±603 24.9%±0.5 pp289,047±6,215 ▲ +21.1% 16/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 19.9%±3.2 pp2,704±435 23.8%±0.5 pp276,514±5,809 ▼ -3.9% 47/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 34.1%±3.9 pp4,625±524 45.6%±0.6 pp529,378±6,577 ▼ -11.5% 57/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 19.5%±3.3 pp2,650±454 24.0%±0.5 pp278,684±5,306 ▼ -4.5% 39/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category Brighton Park
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $557±$41
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $815±$41
Median Monthly Housing Costs $1,185±$48
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,632±$103
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $2,210±$136
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $557±$41 $594±$11 ▼ −$37 38/77
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $815±$41 $1,011±$8 ▼ −$196 49/77
Median Monthly Housing Costs $1,185±$48 $1,560±$10 ▼ −$375 54/77
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,632±$103 $2,329±$13 ▼ −$697 57/77
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $2,210±$136 Over $3,000 ▼ −$790+ 54/77
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $625 ±43 $583 ±38 $557 ±41 ▼ −$68▼ −$26▼ −$42
Chicago citywide $609 ±7 $606 ±7 $594 ±11 ▼ −$15▼ −$12▼ −$2
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $471 ±33 $475 ±31 $557 ±41 ▲ +$85▲ +$82▲ +$4
Chicago citywide $459 ±6 $494 ±6 $594 ±11 ▲ +$135▲ +$100▲ +$35
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $884 ±27 $817 ±32 $815 ±41 ▼ −$70▼ −$3▼ −$67
Chicago citywide $992 ±5 $1,001 ±5 $1,011 ±8 ▲ +$19▲ +$10▲ +$9
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $667 ±21 $666 ±26 $815 ±41 ▲ +$147▲ +$149▼ −$1
Chicago citywide $748 ±3 $816 ±4 $1,011 ±8 ▲ +$262▲ +$195▲ +$67
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,148 ±28 $1,119 ±37 $1,185 ±48 ▲ +$37▲ +$66▼ −$29
Chicago citywide $1,493 ±8 $1,523 ±6 $1,560 ±10 ▲ +$67▲ +$37▲ +$29
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $866 ±21 $912 ±30 $1,185 ±48 ▲ +$319▲ +$273▲ +$46
Chicago citywide $1,127 ±6 $1,241 ±5 $1,560 ±10 ▲ +$433▲ +$319▲ +$114
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,825 ±74 $1,679 ±59 $1,632 ±103 ▼ −$193▼ −$47▼ −$146
Chicago citywide $2,333 ±12 $2,326 ±10 $2,329 ±13 ▼ −$4▲ +$3▼ −$7
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,377 ±56 $1,368 ±48 $1,632 ±103 ▲ +$255▲ +$264▼ −$9
Chicago citywide $1,761 ±9 $1,896 ±8 $2,329 ±13 ▲ +$569▲ +$434▲ +$135
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,498 ±72 $2,293 ±79 $2,210 ±136 ▼ −$288▼ −$83▼ −$205
Chicago citywide — $3,316 ±20 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,885 ±54 $1,869 ±64 $2,210 ±136 ▲ +$325▲ +$342▼ −$17
Chicago citywide — $2,703 ±16 — ———

Rent

Rent measure
Category Brighton Park
Average Rent Plus Utilities $1,150±$56
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $753±$85
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $938±$57
Median Rent Plus Utilities $1,137±$41
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,355±$58
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,608±$153
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities $1,150±$56 $1,613±$12 ▼ −$462 62/77
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $753±$85 $696±$20 ▲ +$57 36/77
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $938±$57 $1,043±$8 ▼ −$104 42/77
Median Rent Plus Utilities $1,137±$41 $1,440±$10 ▼ −$303 59/77
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,355±$58 $2,021±$21 ▼ −$666 66/77
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,608±$153 $2,738±$29 ▼ −$1,130 71/77
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park
Average Rent $949±$41
10th Percentile Rent $641±$66
25th Percentile Rent $815±$30
Median Rent $929±$30
75th Percentile Rent $1,111±$51
90th Percentile Rent $1,303±$109
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Average Rent $949±$41 $1,452±$11 ▼ −$503 59/77
10th Percentile Rent $641±$66 $564±$21 ▲ +$77 35/77
25th Percentile Rent $815±$30 $913±$7 ▼ −$98 42/77
Median Rent $929±$30 $1,262±$12 ▼ −$333 61/77
75th Percentile Rent $1,111±$51 $1,868±$13 ▼ −$757 67/77
90th Percentile Rent $1,303±$109 $2,528±$38 ▼ −$1,225 70/77
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category Brighton Park
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,935±$94
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,108±$148
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,492±$137
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,850±$95
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,304±$116
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,826±$256
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,935±$94 $2,734±$24 ▼ −$799 47/77
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,108±$148 $1,270±$14 ▼ −$162 46/77
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,492±$137 $1,697±$14 ▼ −$206 47/77
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,850±$95 $2,339±$17 ▼ −$489 52/77
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,304±$116 $3,269±$31 ▼ −$964 53/77
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,826±$256 Over $4,000 ▼ −$1,174+ 53/77
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,212 ±85 $2,089 ±86 $1,935 ±94 ▼ −$278▼ −$154▼ −$123
Chicago citywide $2,855 ±19 $2,793 ±23 $2,734 ±24 ▼ −$121▼ −$60▼ −$61
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,670 ±64 $1,702 ±70 $1,935 ±94 ▲ +$265▲ +$232▲ +$33
Chicago citywide $2,154 ±14 $2,277 ±19 $2,734 ±24 ▲ +$579▲ +$457▲ +$122
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,393 ±91 $1,372 ±91 $1,108 ±148 ▼ −$285▼ −$264▼ −$21
Chicago citywide $1,403 ±11 $1,356 ±11 $1,270 ±14 ▼ −$133▼ −$86▼ −$47
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,051 ±69 $1,118 ±74 $1,108 ±148 ▲ +$57▼ −$10▲ +$67
Chicago citywide $1,059 ±8 $1,105 ±9 $1,270 ±14 ▲ +$212▲ +$165▲ +$46
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,732 ±62 $1,663 ±61 $1,492 ±137 ▼ −$241▼ −$172▼ −$69
Chicago citywide $1,874 ±12 $1,800 ±12 $1,697 ±14 ▼ −$177▼ −$103▼ −$74
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,307 ±46 $1,355 ±49 $1,492 ±137 ▲ +$184▲ +$136▲ +$48
Chicago citywide $1,414 ±9 $1,467 ±10 $1,697 ±14 ▲ +$283▲ +$230▲ +$53
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,141 ±77 $2,037 ±76 $1,850 ±95 ▼ −$291▼ −$186▼ −$105
Chicago citywide $2,526 ±13 $2,422 ±13 $2,339 ±17 ▼ −$187▼ −$83▼ −$103
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,616 ±58 $1,660 ±62 $1,850 ±95 ▲ +$234▲ +$190▲ +$44
Chicago citywide $1,906 ±10 $1,974 ±11 $2,339 ±17 ▲ +$433▲ +$365▲ +$68
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,579 ±69 $2,429 ±100 $2,304 ±116 ▼ −$275▼ −$125▼ −$150
Chicago citywide $3,447 ±25 $3,343 ±25 $3,269 ±31 ▼ −$178▼ −$74▼ −$104
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,947 ±52 $1,980 ±82 $2,304 ±116 ▲ +$358▲ +$325▲ +$33
Chicago citywide $2,601 ±19 $2,724 ±20 $3,269 ±31 ▲ +$668▲ +$544▲ +$123
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,178 ±136 $2,923 ±105 $2,826 ±256 ▼ −$352▼ −$97▼ −$255
Chicago citywide — $4,578 ±59 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,398 ±103 $2,382 ±86 $2,826 ±256 ▲ +$428▲ +$444▼ −$16
Chicago citywide — $3,731 ±48 — ———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category Brighton Park
Average Monthly Owner Costs $708±$48
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $421±$39
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $535±$38
Median Monthly Owner Costs $703±$41
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $850±$45
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,044±$113
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs $708±$48 $1,078±$22 ▼ −$370 63/77
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $421±$39 $418±$8 ▲ +$2 42/77
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $535±$38 $601±$8 ▼ −$66 52/77
Median Monthly Owner Costs $703±$41 $859±$10 ▼ −$156 54/77
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $850±$45 $1,197±$18 ▼ −$347 62/77
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,044±$113 Over $1,500 ▼ −$456+ 64/77
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $726 ±50 $716 ±24 $708 ±48 ▼ −$18▼ −$9▼ −$9
Chicago citywide $957 ±15 $1,028 ±10 $1,078 ±22 ▲ +$121▲ +$50▲ +$71
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $548 ±37 $584 ±20 $708 ±48 ▲ +$160▲ +$124▲ +$36
Chicago citywide $722 ±11 $838 ±8 $1,078 ±22 ▲ +$355▲ +$240▲ +$116
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $412 ±58 $458 ±63 $421 ±39 ▲ +$9▼ −$38▲ +$46
Chicago citywide $429 ±6 $469 ±7 $418 ±8 ▼ −$11▼ −$51▲ +$40
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $311 ±43 $373 ±51 $421 ±39 ▲ +$110▲ +$47▲ +$63
Chicago citywide $324 ±5 $382 ±5 $418 ±8 ▲ +$95▲ +$36▲ +$59
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $548 ±42 $567 ±36 $535 ±38 ▼ −$13▼ −$32▲ +$19
Chicago citywide $586 ±6 $629 ±6 $601 ±8 ▲ +$14▼ −$28▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $413 ±31 $462 ±29 $535 ±38 ▲ +$122▲ +$73▲ +$49
Chicago citywide $442 ±4 $513 ±5 $601 ±8 ▲ +$158▲ +$88▲ +$70
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $706 ±41 $696 ±27 $703 ±41 ▼ −$3▲ +$7▼ −$10
Chicago citywide $815 ±9 $860 ±7 $859 ±10 ▲ +$44▼ −$1▲ +$45
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $533 ±31 $568 ±22 $703 ±41 ▲ +$170▲ +$136▲ +$35
Chicago citywide $615 ±7 $701 ±6 $859 ±10 ▲ +$244▲ +$158▲ +$86
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $883 ±42 $818 ±26 $850 ±45 ▼ −$34▲ +$32▼ −$66
Chicago citywide — $1,206 ±14 $1,197 ±18 —▼ −$9—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $667 ±31 $666 ±21 $850 ±45 ▲ +$183▲ +$184– $0
Chicago citywide — $983 ±12 $1,197 ±18 —▲ +$214—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $978 ±105 $1,044 ±113 —▲ +$65—
Chicago citywide — $1,767 ±35 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — $797 ±86 $1,044 ±113 —▲ +$246—
Chicago citywide — $1,440 ±28 — ———

Home Values

Category Brighton Park
Average Home Value $259,265±$11,337
10th Percentile Home Value $108,237±$34,559
25th Percentile Home Value $182,284±$14,807
Median Home Value $248,048±$13,469
75th Percentile Home Value $342,762±$21,255
90th Percentile Home Value $441,644±$30,929
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Average Home Value $259,265±$11,337 $437,638±$7,358 ▼ −$178,373 51/77
10th Percentile Home Value $108,237±$34,559 $129,150±$3,756 ▼ −$20,913 47/77
25th Percentile Home Value $182,284±$14,807 $217,800±$1,804 ▼ −$35,516 48/77
Median Home Value $248,048±$13,469 $334,100±$2,424 ▼ −$86,052 50/77
75th Percentile Home Value $342,762±$21,255 $497,700±$3,730 ▼ −$154,938 50/77
90th Percentile Home Value $441,644±$30,929 $809,159±$15,691 ▼ −$367,515 51/77
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $221,486 ±8,021 $244,211 ±11,992 $259,265 ±11,337 ▲ +$37,779▲ +$15,054▲ +$22,725
Chicago citywide $386,614 ±5,106 $424,380 ±4,754 $437,638 ±7,358 ▲ +$51,024▲ +$13,258▲ +$37,766
Average Home Value (nominal dollars) $167,152 ±6,053 $199,033 ±9,773 $259,265 ±11,337 ▲ +$92,113▲ +$60,232▲ +$31,880
Chicago citywide $291,771 ±3,853 $345,871 ±3,874 $437,638 ±7,358 ▲ +$145,867▲ +$91,768▲ +$54,099
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $111,437 ±11,076 $117,388 ±16,850 $108,237 ±34,559 ▼ −$3,200▼ −$9,151▲ +$5,951
Chicago citywide $115,330 ±1,421 $124,313 ±1,339 $129,150 ±3,756 ▲ +$13,821▲ +$4,838▲ +$8,983
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $84,100 ±8,359 $95,672 ±13,733 $108,237 ±34,559 ▲ +$24,137▲ +$12,566▲ +$11,572
Chicago citywide $87,037 ±1,072 $101,315 ±1,091 $129,150 ±3,756 ▲ +$42,113▲ +$27,835▲ +$14,278
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $156,886 ±7,806 $171,412 ±14,990 $182,284 ±14,807 ▲ +$25,397▲ +$10,872▲ +$14,526
Chicago citywide $190,543 ±2,400 $199,018 ±1,255 $217,800 ±1,804 ▲ +$27,257▲ +$18,782▲ +$8,475
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $118,400 ±5,891 $139,701 ±12,217 $182,284 ±14,807 ▲ +$63,884▲ +$42,583▲ +$21,301
Chicago citywide $143,800 ±1,811 $162,200 ±1,023 $217,800 ±1,804 ▲ +$74,000▲ +$55,600▲ +$18,400
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $222,341 ±7,747 $229,663 ±14,936 $248,048 ±13,469 ▲ +$25,707▲ +$18,385▲ +$7,322
Chicago citywide $299,066 ±2,120 $316,564 ±2,118 $334,100 ±2,424 ▲ +$35,034▲ +$17,536▲ +$17,498
Median Home Value (nominal dollars) $167,797 ±5,846 $187,176 ±12,173 $248,048 ±13,469 ▲ +$80,251▲ +$60,872▲ +$19,379
Chicago citywide $225,700 ±1,600 $258,000 ±1,726 $334,100 ±2,424 ▲ +$108,400▲ +$76,100▲ +$32,300
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $297,107 ±11,964 $299,332 ±9,909 $342,762 ±21,255 ▲ +$45,655▲ +$43,430▲ +$2,225
Chicago citywide $466,951 ±3,138 $490,797 ±3,892 $497,700 ±3,730 ▲ +$30,749▲ +$6,903▲ +$23,846
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $224,222 ±9,029 $243,956 ±8,076 $342,762 ±21,255 ▲ +$118,540▲ +$98,806▲ +$19,734
Chicago citywide $352,400 ±2,368 $400,000 ±3,172 $497,700 ±3,730 ▲ +$145,300▲ +$97,700▲ +$47,600
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $371,745 ±15,314 $375,349 ±29,021 $441,644 ±30,929 ▲ +$69,899▲ +$66,295▲ +$3,604
Chicago citywide $739,174 ±12,945 $835,769 ±9,047 $809,159 ±15,691 ▲ +$69,986▼ −$26,610▲ +$96,595
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $280,550 ±11,557 $305,910 ±23,653 $441,644 ±30,929 ▲ +$161,094▲ +$135,734▲ +$25,360
Chicago citywide $557,842 ±9,770 $681,153 ±7,373 $809,159 ±15,691 ▲ +$251,317▲ +$128,006▲ +$123,311

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show
Category Brighton Park
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 0.7%0.7%95
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.5%83.2%79
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.1%15.8%15
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%1.1%1
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 0.7%0.7%95 8.3%8.3%106,578 ▼ -7.7%▼ -7.7% 75/77
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.5%83.2%79 4.8%57.2%60,910 ▼ -4.2%▲ +26.0% 74/7728/77
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.1%15.8%15 1.1%13.8%14,721 ▼ -1.0%▲ +2.0% 53/7723/77
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%1.1%1 2.1%25.7%27,383 ▼ -2.1%▼ -24.6% 51/7748/77
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0 0.3%3.3%3,564 ▼ -0.3%▼ -3.3% 47/7747/77
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units 0.8%117 0.7%101 0.7%95 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −22▼ −0.1 pp▼ −6▼ −0.1 pp▼ −16
Chicago citywide 8.8%104,550 8.5%103,479 8.3%106,578 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,028▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,099▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,071
Housing Choice Vouchers 0.7%101 0.6%85 0.5%79 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −22▼ −0.1 pp▼ −6▼ −0.1 pp▼ −16
Chicago citywide 4.3%51,601 4.6%55,987 4.8%60,910 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +9,309▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,923▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,386
Public Housing 0.1%16 0.1%15 0.1%15 – 0.0 pp▼ −1– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▼ −1
Chicago citywide 1.8%21,159 1.3%16,094 1.2%14,721 ▼ −0.6 pp▼ −6,438▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,373▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,065
Project-Based Section 8 0.0%0 0.0%1 0.0%1 – 0.0 pp▲ +1– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▲ +1
Chicago citywide 2.2%25,940 2.2%26,951 2.1%27,383 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,443▼ −0.1 pp▲ +432– 0.0 pp▲ +1,011
Other Project-Based Programs 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 0.5%5,850 0.4%4,447 0.3%3,564 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,286▼ −0.1 pp▼ −883▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,403
Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category Brighton Park
Average Household Income $18,888
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $485
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,272
Below 30% of Area Median Income 78.2%25
With Children 31.3%10
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 49.9%16
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $18,888 $17,032 ▲ +$1,856 20/75
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $485 $425 ▲ +$60 15/75
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,272 $1,389 ▼ -$117 63/75
Below 30% of Area Median Income 78.2%25 83.0%77,427 ▼ -4.8 pp 61/75
With Children 31.3%10 31.0%28,919 ▲ +0.3 pp 39/75
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 49.9%16 32.0%29,852 ▲ +17.9 pp 3/75
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income $14,119 $15,187 $18,888 ▲ +$4,769▲ +$3,701▲ +$1,068
Chicago citywide $12,156 $13,665 $17,032 ▲ +$4,876▲ +$3,367▲ +$1,509
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $400 $399 $485 ▲ +$85▲ +$86▼ −$1
Chicago citywide $310 $340 $425 ▲ +$115▲ +$85▲ +$30
Average Monthly Government Spending $869 $1,058 $1,272 ▲ +$403▲ +$214▲ +$189
Chicago citywide $916 $1,017 $1,389 ▲ +$473▲ +$372▲ +$101
Below 30% of Area Median Income 77.8%— 69.4%— 78.2%— ▲ +0.4 pp—▲ +8.8 pp—▼ −8.4 pp—
Chicago citywide 80.0%— 81.0%— 83.0%— ▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +2.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children — — 31.3%— ——————
Chicago citywide — — 31.0%— ——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 38.2%— 20.0%— 49.9%— ▲ +11.7 pp—▲ +29.9 pp—▼ −18.2 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category Brighton Park
Total Tree Canopy 10.5%181 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 80.4%1,394 acres
Natural Open Surfaces 9.1%158 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Total Tree Canopy 10.5%181 acres 18.4%25,934 acres ▼ -7.9% 71/77
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 80.4%1,394 acres 60.2%84,955 acres ▲ +20.3% 2/77
Natural Open Surfaces 9.1%158 acres 21.5%30,331 acres ▼ -12.4% 71/77
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category Brighton Park
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 18.8% ±4.2 pp8,077 ±1,795
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 52.8% ±4.9 pp22,718 ±2,097
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 28.4% ±4.4 pp12,200 ±1,874
Homes Without Air Conditioning 3.2%1,368
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 18.8%±4.2 pp8,077±1,795 26.1%±0.5 pp707,660±13,869 ▼ -7.3% 57/77
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 52.8%±4.9 pp22,718±2,097 44.1%±0.6 pp1,195,950±15,462 ▲ +8.7% 5/77
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 28.4%±4.4 pp12,200±1,874 29.8%±0.5 pp807,615±13,763 ▼ -1.4% 45/77
Homes Without Air Conditioning 3.2%1,368 4.2%114,494 ▼ -1.0% 50/77
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category Brighton Park
Drove Alone 63.7% ±3.1 pp11,224 ±546
Carpooled 17.2% ±3.4 pp3,038 ±607
Public Transit 13.6% ±2.8 pp2,398 ±487
Walked 3.1% ±1.2 pp548 ±215
Bikes 0.9% ±0.7 pp151 ±130
Other Commute Mode 0.9% ±0.7 pp161 ±120
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Drove Alone 63.7%±3.1 pp11,224±546 56.6%±0.4 pp772,696±5,998 ▲ +7.1% 30/77
Carpooled 17.2%±3.4 pp3,038±607 9.3%±0.3 pp126,918±3,980 ▲ +7.9% 6/77
Public Transit 13.6%±2.8 pp2,398±487 22.4%±0.4 pp305,691±6,011 ▼ -8.8% 58/77
Walked 3.1%±1.2 pp548±215 7.3%±0.3 pp100,269±3,456 ▼ -4.2% 35/77
Bikes 0.9%±0.7 pp151±130 1.8%±0.1 pp24,441±1,693 ▼ -0.9% 32/77
Other Commute Mode 0.9%±0.7 pp161±120 2.5%±0.1 pp34,356±1,772 ▼ -1.6% 55/77
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category Brighton Park
Average Commute Time (minutes) 31 min±1.3 min
Less Than 15 Minutes 14.3% ±2.8 pp2,528 ±496
15–29 Minutes 26.9% ±3.4 pp4,744 ±599
30–44 Minutes 32.3% ±3.8 pp5,697 ±677
45–59 Minutes 15.6% ±2.2 pp2,749 ±392
60 Minutes or More 10.8% ±2.8 pp1,906 ±494
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes) 31 min±1.3 min 33 min±0.2 min ▼ −2 min 56/76
Less Than 15 Minutes 14.3%±2.8 pp2,528±496 13.0%±0.3 pp140,252±3,438 ▲ +1.3% 21/77
15–29 Minutes 26.9%±3.4 pp4,744±599 29.9%±0.5 pp322,586±5,056 ▼ -3.0% 43/77
30–44 Minutes 32.3%±3.8 pp5,697±677 29.6%±0.4 pp318,782±4,584 ▲ +2.8% 22/77
45–59 Minutes 15.6%±2.2 pp2,749±392 14.0%±0.3 pp151,451±3,075 ▲ +1.5% 31/77
60 Minutes or More 10.8%±2.8 pp1,906±494 13.4%±0.3 pp144,940±3,715 ▼ -2.6% 58/77
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category Brighton Park
Average Vehicles per Household 1.58±0.12
Households With No Vehicle 11.7% ±2.4 pp1,582 ±331
Households With 1 Vehicle 41.1% ±4.3 pp5,576 ±588
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 47.2% ±4.7 pp6,406 ±635
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Average Vehicles per Household 1.58±0.12 1.12±0.01 ▲ +0.46 14/77
Households With No Vehicle 11.7%±2.4 pp1,582±331 26.6%±0.4 pp308,497±5,087 ▼ -14.9% 59/77
Households With 1 Vehicle 41.1%±4.3 pp5,576±588 45.2%±0.4 pp524,900±5,145 ▼ -4.1% 53/77
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 47.2%±4.7 pp6,406±635 28.2%±0.4 pp326,808±4,200 ▲ +19.1% 14/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Brighton Park Residents Work

Category Brighton Park
Loop 14.1%2,022
Near North Side 6.5%939
Near West Side 5.8%832
Brighton Park 3.7%524
Lower West Side 3.2%453
All other city neighborhoods 30.2%4,330
Outside the city 36.5%5,236
↳ Bedford Park village, IL 1.4%202
↳ Cicero town, IL 1.2%170
↳ Morton Grove village, IL 0.9%122
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL 0.8%115
↳ Alsip village, IL 0.7%99
↳ All other Illinois locations 29.8%4,272
Out of state 1.8%256
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 58 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Brighton Park
Loop 14.1%2,022
Near North Side 6.5%939
Near West Side 5.8%832
Brighton Park 3.7%524
Lower West Side 3.2%453
All other city neighborhoods 30.2%4,330
Outside the city 36.5%5,236
↳ Bedford Park village, IL 1.4%202
↳ Cicero town, IL 1.2%170
↳ Morton Grove village, IL 0.9%122
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL 0.8%115
↳ Alsip village, IL 0.7%99
↳ All other Illinois locations 29.8%4,272
Out of state 1.8%256
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 58 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Loop 12.1%1,621 12.2%1,798 14.1%2,022 ▲ +2.0 pp▲ +401▲ +1.9 pp▲ +224▲ +0.1 pp▲ +177
Chicago citywide 20.0%224,635 21.0%252,791 21.5%259,167 ▲ +1.5 pp▲ +34,532▲ +0.5 pp▲ +6,376▲ +1.0 pp▲ +28,156
Near North Side 5.6%756 6.8%998 6.5%939 ▲ +0.9 pp▲ +183▼ −0.2 pp▼ −59▲ +1.1 pp▲ +242
Chicago citywide 8.2%92,143 9.4%112,859 9.1%109,333 ▲ +0.9 pp▲ +17,190▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3,526▲ +1.2 pp▲ +20,716
Near West Side 5.2%697 6.4%948 5.8%832 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +135▼ −0.6 pp▼ −116▲ +1.2 pp▲ +251
Chicago citywide 6.2%69,083 6.6%79,757 6.7%80,118 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +11,035– 0.0 pp▲ +361▲ +0.5 pp▲ +10,674
Brighton Park 3.4%450 4.2%622 3.7%524 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +74▼ −0.6 pp▼ −98▲ +0.9 pp▲ +172
Chicago citywide 0.2%2,589 0.3%3,582 0.3%3,530 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +941– 0.0 pp▼ −52▲ +0.1 pp▲ +993
Lower West Side 2.5%340 2.7%400 3.2%453 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +113▲ +0.4 pp▲ +53▲ +0.2 pp▲ +60
Chicago citywide 0.9%9,585 0.8%9,912 1.0%12,477 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,892▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,565– 0.0 pp▲ +327
All other city neighborhoods 31.9%4,286 30.6%4,509 30.2%4,330 ▼ −1.7 pp▲ +44▼ −0.4 pp▼ −179▼ −1.3 pp▲ +223
Chicago citywide 22.5%252,499 21.1%253,775 20.7%248,736 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −3,763▼ −0.4 pp▼ −5,039▼ −1.4 pp▲ +1,276
Outside the city 38.8%5,206 37.1%5,460 36.5%5,236 ▼ −2.2 pp▲ +30▼ −0.5 pp▼ −224▼ −1.7 pp▲ +254
Chicago citywide 36.8%412,807 35.7%430,134 35.9%432,355 ▼ −0.9 pp▲ +19,548▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,221▼ −1.0 pp▲ +17,327
Bedford Park village, IL 1.9%258 1.5%218 1.4%202 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −56▼ −0.1 pp▼ −16▼ −0.4 pp▼ −40
Chicago citywide 0.8%8,547 0.7%8,008 0.6%6,897 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,650▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,111▼ −0.1 pp▼ −539
Cicero town, IL 1.4%183 1.3%188 1.2%170 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −13▼ −0.1 pp▼ −18▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5
Chicago citywide 0.5%5,256 0.5%6,120 0.5%6,087 – 0.0 pp▲ +831– 0.0 pp▼ −33– 0.0 pp▲ +864
Morton Grove village, IL 0.2%29 0.2%34 0.9%122 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +93▲ +0.6 pp▲ +88– 0.0 pp▲ +5
Chicago citywide 0.2%2,316 0.2%2,644 0.3%3,510 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,194▲ +0.1 pp▲ +866– 0.0 pp▲ +328
Oak Lawn village, IL 0.5%72 0.7%107 0.8%115 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +43▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8▲ +0.2 pp▲ +35
Chicago citywide 0.5%5,230 0.5%5,563 0.4%5,394 – 0.0 pp▲ +164– 0.0 pp▼ −169– 0.0 pp▲ +333
Alsip village, IL 0.6%80 0.8%122 0.7%99 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +19▼ −0.1 pp▼ −23▲ +0.2 pp▲ +42
Chicago citywide 0.3%3,503 0.4%4,279 0.3%3,598 – 0.0 pp▲ +95▼ −0.1 pp▼ −681– 0.0 pp▲ +776
All other Illinois locations 30.9%4,149 29.7%4,378 29.8%4,272 ▼ −1.1 pp▲ +123▲ +0.1 pp▼ −106▼ −1.2 pp▲ +229
Chicago citywide 27.9%312,992 27.0%324,805 27.3%329,050 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +16,058▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,245▼ −0.9 pp▲ +11,813
Out of state 2.1%279 2.2%322 1.8%256 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −23▼ −0.4 pp▼ −66▲ +0.1 pp▲ +43
Chicago citywide 2.2%24,577 2.3%27,198 2.2%26,136 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,559▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,062▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,621

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Brighton Park

Category Brighton Park
Brighton Park 7.9%524
Gage Park 3.8%253
Chicago Lawn 3.2%213
South Lawndale 2.4%163
New City (Back of the Yards) 2.3%153
All other city neighborhoods 33.4%2,224
Outside the city 47.0%3,136
↳ Cicero town, IL 2.9%194
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL 1.7%115
↳ Burbank city, IL 1.3%84
↳ Berwyn city, IL 1.1%72
↳ Orland Park village, IL 0.9%62
↳ All other Illinois locations 32.7%2,181
Out of state 6.4%428
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 58; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Brighton Park
Brighton Park 7.9%524
Gage Park 3.8%253
Chicago Lawn 3.2%213
South Lawndale 2.4%163
New City (Back of the Yards) 2.3%153
All other city neighborhoods 33.4%2,224
Outside the city 47.0%3,136
↳ Cicero town, IL 2.9%194
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL 1.7%115
↳ Burbank city, IL 1.3%84
↳ Berwyn city, IL 1.1%72
↳ Orland Park village, IL 0.9%62
↳ All other Illinois locations 32.7%2,181
Out of state 6.4%428
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 58; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Brighton Park 9.3%450 9.9%622 7.9%524 ▼ −1.5 pp▲ +74▼ −2.1 pp▼ −98▲ +0.6 pp▲ +172
Chicago citywide 0.6%8,222 0.7%9,275 0.6%9,100 – 0.0 pp▲ +878– 0.0 pp▼ −175– 0.0 pp▲ +1,053
Gage Park 2.9%142 3.7%230 3.8%253 ▲ +0.8 pp▲ +111▲ +0.1 pp▲ +23▲ +0.7 pp▲ +88
Chicago citywide 0.5%6,461 0.5%7,304 0.5%6,922 – 0.0 pp▲ +461– 0.0 pp▼ −382– 0.0 pp▲ +843
Chicago Lawn 1.5%72 2.7%166 3.2%213 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +141▲ +0.5 pp▲ +47▲ +1.2 pp▲ +94
Chicago citywide 0.7%9,855 0.8%10,666 0.7%10,607 – 0.0 pp▲ +752– 0.0 pp▼ −59– 0.0 pp▲ +811
South Lawndale 2.9%138 3.3%205 2.4%163 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +25▼ −0.8 pp▼ −42▲ +0.4 pp▲ +67
Chicago citywide 0.8%10,222 0.8%10,681 0.7%10,541 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +319– 0.0 pp▼ −140– 0.0 pp▲ +459
New City (Back of the Yards) 2.0%94 2.2%139 2.3%153 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +59▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14▲ +0.3 pp▲ +45
Chicago citywide 0.6%8,047 0.6%8,424 0.6%8,500 – 0.0 pp▲ +453– 0.0 pp▲ +76– 0.0 pp▲ +377
All other city neighborhoods 34.4%1,657 35.5%2,220 33.4%2,224 ▼ −1.0 pp▲ +567▼ −2.1 pp▲ +4▲ +1.1 pp▲ +563
Chicago citywide 38.0%499,784 37.9%537,334 36.8%539,030 ▼ −1.2 pp▲ +39,246▼ −1.1 pp▲ +1,696▼ −0.1 pp▲ +37,550
Outside the city 46.3%2,228 42.8%2,680 47.0%3,136 ▲ +0.8 pp▲ +908▲ +4.2 pp▲ +456▼ −3.5 pp▲ +452
Chicago citywide 45.9%603,720 45.4%642,891 47.2%691,545 ▲ +1.3 pp▲ +87,825▲ +1.9 pp▲ +48,654▼ −0.6 pp▲ +39,171
Cicero town, IL 2.7%128 3.0%188 2.9%194 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +66▼ −0.1 pp▲ +6▲ +0.3 pp▲ +60
Chicago citywide 0.8%9,934 0.8%11,086 0.8%10,993 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,059– 0.0 pp▼ −93– 0.0 pp▲ +1,152
Oak Lawn village, IL 2.1%101 1.5%96 1.7%115 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +14▲ +0.2 pp▲ +19▼ −0.6 pp▼ −5
Chicago citywide 0.7%9,277 0.7%9,503 0.7%9,767 – 0.0 pp▲ +490– 0.0 pp▲ +264– 0.0 pp▲ +226
Burbank city, IL 1.2%60 1.0%61 1.3%84 – 0.0 pp▲ +24▲ +0.3 pp▲ +23▼ −0.3 pp▲ +1
Chicago citywide 0.3%4,102 0.3%4,109 0.3%4,444 – 0.0 pp▲ +342– 0.0 pp▲ +335– 0.0 pp▲ +7
Berwyn city, IL 1.3%63 1.3%80 1.1%72 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +9▼ −0.2 pp▼ −8– 0.0 pp▲ +17
Chicago citywide 0.7%8,732 0.7%9,219 0.6%9,497 – 0.0 pp▲ +765– 0.0 pp▲ +278– 0.0 pp▲ +487
Orland Park village, IL 0.8%40 0.7%46 0.9%62 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +22▲ +0.2 pp▲ +16▼ −0.1 pp▲ +6
Chicago citywide 0.4%5,430 0.4%6,262 0.4%6,467 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,037– 0.0 pp▲ +205– 0.0 pp▲ +832
All other Illinois locations 33.2%1,597 30.2%1,890 32.7%2,181 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +584▲ +2.5 pp▲ +291▼ −3.0 pp▲ +293
Chicago citywide 35.5%467,052 35.1%497,107 36.9%540,317 ▲ +1.4 pp▲ +73,265▲ +1.8 pp▲ +43,210▼ −0.5 pp▲ +30,055
Out of state 4.9%238 5.1%319 6.4%428 ▲ +1.5 pp▲ +190▲ +1.3 pp▲ +109▲ +0.2 pp▲ +81
Chicago citywide 4.9%63,785 4.8%68,287 4.9%72,123 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8,338▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,836– 0.0 pp▲ +4,502

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category Brighton Park
No Computer or Smartphone 6.1% ±1.9 pp822 ±261
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 12.7% ±3.0 pp1,721 ±402
Desktop or Laptop Available 72.4% ±3.7 pp9,824 ±498
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
No Computer or Smartphone 6.1%±1.9 pp822±261 5.1%±0.2 pp58,709±2,246 ▲ +1.0% 38/77
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 12.7%±3.0 pp1,721±402 10.4%±0.3 pp120,218±3,642 ▲ +2.3% 31/77
Desktop or Laptop Available 72.4%±3.7 pp9,824±498 79.7%±0.4 pp924,956±4,919 ▼ -7.3% 46/77
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category Brighton Park
Has Internet Access 90.1% ±3.5 pp12,220 ±476
Cellular Data Plan Only 15.1% ±3.0 pp2,049 ±402
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 3.8% ±1.9 pp517 ±256
No Internet Access 9.9% ±2.5 pp1,344 ±334
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Has Internet Access 90.1%±3.5 pp12,220±476 93.1%±0.3 pp1,080,419±3,310 ▼ -3.0% 48/77
Cellular Data Plan Only 15.1%±3.0 pp2,049±402 12.5%±0.3 pp145,219±3,463 ▲ +2.6% 35/77
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 3.8%±1.9 pp517±256 3.9%±0.2 pp45,350±1,940 ▼ -0.1% 29/77
No Internet Access 9.9%±2.5 pp1,344±334 6.9%±0.2 pp79,786±2,730 ▲ +3.0% 30/77
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category Brighton Park
Uninsured Residents 16.8% ±2.0 pp7,217 ±857
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 4.5% ±2.8 pp1,933 ±1,215
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 23.4% ±3.0 pp10,082 ±1,270
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 4.3% ±2.6 pp1,859 ±1,135
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Uninsured Residents 16.8%±2.0 pp7,217±857 9.8%±0.2 pp264,391±5,709 ▲ +7.0% 9/77
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 4.5%±2.8 pp1,933±1,215 3.9%±0.3 pp104,687±8,934 ▲ +0.6% 22/77
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 23.4%±3.0 pp10,082±1,270 13.3%±0.3 pp361,430±8,516 ▲ +10.1% 10/77
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 4.3%±2.6 pp1,859±1,135 1.7%±0.3 pp46,718±7,265 ▲ +2.6% 6/77
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category Brighton Park
Insured (Any Coverage) 83.2% ±2.0 pp35,761 ±856
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 35.2% ±2.1 pp15,143 ±920
Direct-Purchase Insurance 9.6% ±1.5 pp4,113 ±654
Medicare 10.4% ±1.6 pp4,485 ±703
Medicaid 32.1% ±3.2 pp13,779 ±1,382
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.3% ±0.4 pp125 ±156
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 3.0% ±0.9 pp1,288 ±407
Uninsured 16.8% ±2.0 pp7,214 ±856
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Insured (Any Coverage) 83.2%±2.0 pp35,761±856 90.2%±0.2 pp2,424,871±5,689 ▼ -7.0% 69/77
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 35.2%±2.1 pp15,143±920 51.2%±0.4 pp1,376,912±9,468 ▼ -16.0% 58/77
Direct-Purchase Insurance 9.6%±1.5 pp4,113±654 8.5%±0.2 pp227,424±5,112 ▲ +1.1% 22/77
Medicare 10.4%±1.6 pp4,485±703 12.6%±0.2 pp339,804±4,911 ▼ -2.2% 64/77
Medicaid 32.1%±3.2 pp13,779±1,382 22.2%±0.3 pp596,931±7,773 ▲ +9.8% 25/77
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.3%±0.4 pp125±156 0.3%±0.0 pp7,201±787 0% 28/77
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 3.0%±0.9 pp1,288±407 3.8%±0.1 pp102,777±3,544 ▼ -0.8% 57/77
Uninsured 16.8%±2.0 pp7,214±856 9.8%±0.2 pp262,018±5,689 ▲ +7.0% 9/77
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category Brighton Park
Adults With at Least One Disability 13.6% ±2.0 pp4,505 ±649
Mobility Disability 6.5% ±1.4 pp2,161 ±458
Hearing Disability 3.4% ±1.0 pp1,117 ±315
Vision Disability 3.2% ±0.9 pp1,055 ±290
Cognitive Disability 3.1% ±0.9 pp1,022 ±304
Self-Care Disability 2.0% ±0.9 pp653 ±297
Independent Living Disability 5.0% ±1.4 pp1,666 ±458
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability 13.6%±2.0 pp4,505±649 14.0%±0.2 pp303,665±4,797 ▼ -0.4% 41/77
Mobility Disability 6.5%±1.4 pp2,161±458 7.6%±0.2 pp163,666±3,398 ▼ -1.0% 51/77
Hearing Disability 3.4%±1.0 pp1,117±315 2.8%±0.1 pp61,430±2,337 ▲ +0.5% 27/77
Vision Disability 3.2%±0.9 pp1,055±290 3.0%±0.1 pp64,544±2,269 ▲ +0.2% 34/77
Cognitive Disability 3.1%±0.9 pp1,022±304 5.2%±0.1 pp112,824±2,939 ▼ -2.1% 69/77
Self-Care Disability 2.0%±0.9 pp653±297 2.7%±0.1 pp57,758±2,261 ▼ -0.7% 55/77
Independent Living Disability 5.0%±1.4 pp1,666±458 5.7%±0.2 pp123,651±3,247 ▼ -0.7% 51/77
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category Brighton Park
Arthritis 17.2%5,696
High Blood Pressure 27.6%9,138
Cancer 3.7%1,214
Current Asthma 8.7%2,871
Coronary Heart Disease 5.0%1,671
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 5.2%1,720
Diabetes 14.2%4,702
High Cholesterol 33.5%11,083
Obesity 34.1%11,281
Stroke 3.0%988
Lost All Natural Teeth 2.3%769
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Arthritis 17.2%5,696 19.6%409,178 ▼ -2.4% 60/77
High Blood Pressure 27.6%9,138 29.7%620,030 ▼ -2.1% 50/77
Cancer 3.7%1,214 5.0%104,382 ▼ -1.3% 72/77
Current Asthma 8.7%2,871 10.2%212,940 ▼ -1.5% 73/77
Coronary Heart Disease 5.0%1,671 4.8%100,207 ▲ +0.2% 45/77
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 5.2%1,720 5.5%114,820 ▼ -0.3% 48/77
Diabetes 14.2%4,702 12.0%250,517 ▲ +2.2% 35/77
High Cholesterol 33.5%11,083 31.6%659,696 ▲ +1.9% 37/77
Obesity 34.1%11,281 32.6%680,572 ▲ +1.5% 40/77
Stroke 3.0%988 3.3%68,892 ▼ -0.3% 45/77
Lost All Natural Teeth 2.3%769 2.5%52,249 ▼ -0.2% 47/77
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category Brighton Park
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 17.9%5,941
Current Cigarette Smoking 13.4%4,425
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 34.4%11,390
Short Sleep Duration 39.0%12,907
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 17.9%5,941 19.0%396,652 ▼ -1.1% 39/77
Current Cigarette Smoking 13.4%4,425 11.9%248,430 ▲ +1.5% 29/77
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 34.4%11,390 24.7%515,648 ▲ +9.7% 20/77
Short Sleep Duration 39.0%12,907 37.8%789,129 ▲ +1.2% 35/77
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category Brighton Park
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 28.8%9,522
Frequent Physical Distress 14.5%4,791
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 28.8%9,522 21.1%440,493 ▲ +7.7% 25/77
Frequent Physical Distress 14.5%4,791 11.8%246,342 ▲ +2.7% 27/77
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category Brighton Park
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 69.0%22,841
Routine Checkup in Past Year 72.2%23,911
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 82.4%27,293
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 44.6%14,777
Dental Visit in Past Year 46.9%15,526
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 68.4%22,655
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 69.0%22,841 72.5%1,513,542 ▼ -3.5% 59/77
Routine Checkup in Past Year 72.2%23,911 76.2%1,590,785 ▼ -4.0% 70/77
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 82.4%27,293 86.2%1,799,549 ▼ -3.8% 73/77
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 44.6%14,777 55.8%1,164,905 ▼ -11.2% 74/77
Dental Visit in Past Year 46.9%15,526 58.4%1,219,184 ▼ -11.5% 63/77
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 68.4%22,655 74.2%1,549,032 ▼ -5.8% 73/77
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category Brighton Park
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 17.3%5,743
Frequent Mental Distress 16.2%5,367
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 32.0%10,579
Loneliness 37.7%12,481
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Brighton Park City Difference Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 17.3%5,743 19.1%398,740 ▼ -1.8% 67/77
Frequent Mental Distress 16.2%5,367 16.0%334,023 ▲ +0.2% 34/77
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 32.0%10,579 28.2%588,716 ▲ +3.8% 29/77
Loneliness 37.7%12,481 35.8%747,377 ▲ +1.9% 30/77
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error


Compare All Neighborhoods