Loop, Chicago Demographics, Housing & Census Data

Loop, Chicago Census and ACS demographic tables: population, race, age, income, poverty, rent, housing types, single-family homes, commute, education, internet access, health insurance, and disability.

Loop, Chicago

Loop
Chicago
Population
42,550
Overlapping council wards Overlap means that a council ward contains part of this neighborhood.
4, 34, 42
Population Density
25,620 /sq mi
Average Geographic Mismatch Error : 0.00 p.p. Geographic mismatch error comes from Census geographic boundaries not perfectly aligning with community area boundaries. We can test how much mismatch error skews community area statistics for a subset of variables. For this community area , the average error is 0.00 percentage points. More detail is available on the community area geography page , and the methodology page explains geographic mismatch error in more detail.
One-page summary

Loop at a Glance

Time period?Historical estimates use this profile's current boundaries, held constant across periods; they do not reflect the boundaries that were in effect at the time. Comparing
Values as
Show as
Add to every table
Showing Chart vs. Chicago ± Margin of error

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category Loop
Hispanic 10.5% ±2.5 pp4,488 ±1,067
White 49.9% ±3.1 pp21,242 ±1,318
Black 11.0% ±1.9 pp4,661 ±820
Asian 24.3% ±4.0 pp10,327 ±1,693
Other or Multi-racial 4.3% ±1.2 pp1,832 ±512
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Hispanic 10.5%±2.5 pp4,488±1,067 29.7%±0.2 pp805,318±5,785 ▼ -19.2% 47/77
White 49.9%±3.1 pp21,242±1,318 32.1%±0.2 pp870,127±5,557 ▲ +17.8% 18/77
Black 11.0%±1.9 pp4,661±820 27.4%±0.2 pp743,710±6,047 ▼ -16.5% 43/77
Asian 24.3%±4.0 pp10,327±1,693 7.2%±0.2 pp196,435±4,370 ▲ +17.0% 4/77
Other or Multi-racial 4.3%±1.2 pp1,832±512 3.5%±0.1 pp95,636±3,778 ▲ +0.8% 24/77
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Age Distribution

Category Loop
Under 5 2.7% ±1.1 pp1,152 ±472
5-17 3.0% ±1.0 pp1,294 ±408
18-24 18.8% ±2.4 pp7,997 ±1,001
25-44 50.5% ±3.7 pp21,507 ±1,556
45-64 15.3% ±2.2 pp6,497 ±950
65-74 6.8% ±1.5 pp2,876 ±631
75-84 2.3% ±0.9 pp969 ±394
85+ 0.6% ±0.4 pp258 ±181
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Under 5 2.7%±1.1 pp1,152±472 5.3%±0.1 pp144,044±3,867 ▼ -2.6% 76/77
5-17 3.0%±1.0 pp1,294±408 14.1%±0.2 pp381,582±5,548 ▼ -11.0% 77/77
18-24 18.8%±2.4 pp7,997±1,001 9.6%±0.2 pp260,942±4,900 ▲ +9.2% 2/77
25-44 50.5%±3.7 pp21,507±1,556 34.3%±0.3 pp929,946±6,988 ▲ +16.2% 5/77
45-64 15.3%±2.2 pp6,497±950 22.9%±0.2 pp620,047±5,644 ▼ -7.6% 76/77
65-74 6.8%±1.5 pp2,876±631 8.2%±0.1 pp221,932±3,711 ▼ -1.4% 61/77
75-84 2.3%±0.9 pp969±394 4.0%±0.1 pp107,625±2,694 ▼ -1.7% 71/77
85+ 0.6%±0.4 pp258±181 1.7%±0.1 pp45,108±1,921 ▼ -1.1% 76/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category Loop
No High School Diploma 3.3% ±1.9 pp1,075 ±618
High School Diploma or GED 3.2% ±1.1 pp1,031 ±349
Some College or Associate's Degree 9.6% ±2.1 pp3,091 ±683
Bachelor's Degree 39.5% ±3.7 pp12,684 ±1,203
Graduate Degree 44.3% ±4.0 pp14,226 ±1,298
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
No High School Diploma 3.3%±1.9 pp1,075±618 12.8%±0.2 pp246,015±4,778 ▼ -9.4% 69/77
High School Diploma or GED 3.2%±1.1 pp1,031±349 21.1%±0.3 pp405,248±5,752 ▼ -17.8% 77/77
Some College or Associate's Degree 9.6%±2.1 pp3,091±683 21.8%±0.3 pp419,911±5,550 ▼ -12.2% 75/77
Bachelor's Degree 39.5%±3.7 pp12,684±1,203 25.4%±0.3 pp488,467±5,708 ▲ +14.1% 8/77
Graduate Degree 44.3%±4.0 pp14,226±1,298 19.0%±0.3 pp365,017±5,186 ▲ +25.3% 2/77
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category Loop
Total Population 42,550 ±2,086
Total Households 24,974 ±1,059
Population Density 25,620 ±1,256 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop Average Neighborhood Difference
Total Population 42,550 35,210 ▲ +7,340
Total Households 24,974 15,067 ▲ +9,907
Population Density 25,620 people/sq mi 13,045 people/sq mi ▲ +12,575
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average neighborhood rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large neighborhoods. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category 2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19 Difference Rank
Total Population 30,642 ±1,383 38,655 ±1,391 42,550 ±2,086 ▲ +11,908 ±2,503▲ +3,895 ±2,507▲ +8,013 ±1,962 ▼ −4,588▲ +3,469▲ +7,340 39/7727/7722/77
Average Neighborhood 35,230 35,186 35,210 ▼ −20▲ +24▼ −43
Total Households 16,694 ±595 20,723 ±676 24,974 ±1,059 ▲ +8,280 ±1,214▲ +4,251 ±1,256▲ +4,029 ±900 ▲ +3,333▲ +6,869▲ +9,907 19/7715/7713/77
Average Neighborhood 13,361 13,854 15,067 ▲ +1,706▲ +1,213▲ +493
Population Density (per sq mi) 18,450 ±833 23,275 ±838 25,620 ±1,256 ▲ +7,170▲ +2,345▲ +4,825 ▲ +5,461▲ +10,247▲ +12,575 14/777/775/77
Average Neighborhood Density 12,989 13,028 13,045 ▲ +56▲ +17▲ +39

Household Size

Category Loop
Average Household Size 1.54±0.09
1-Person Households 57.4% ±3.3 pp14,344 ±829
2-Person Households 34.5% ±3.3 pp8,627 ±836
3-Person Households 5.7% ±1.9 pp1,419 ±463
4+ Person Households 2.3% ±1.2 pp584 ±309
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Average Household Size 1.54±0.09 2.29±0.02 ▼ −0.75 76/77
1-Person Households 57.4%±3.3 pp14,344±829 39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,783 ▲ +17.8% 2/77
2-Person Households 34.5%±3.3 pp8,627±836 29.5%±0.4 pp342,235±5,166 ▲ +5.0% 6/77
3-Person Households 5.7%±1.9 pp1,419±463 12.9%±0.4 pp149,291±4,184 ▼ -7.2% 76/77
4+ Person Households 2.3%±1.2 pp584±309 18.0%±0.5 pp208,411±5,419 ▼ -15.6% 77/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category Loop
Never Married 57.9% ±3.7 pp23,402 ±1,488
Married 33.4% ±2.8 pp13,509 ±1,136
Separated 0.6% ±0.4 pp238 ±164
Divorced 5.0% ±1.3 pp2,020 ±542
Widowed 3.0% ±1.3 pp1,228 ±533
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Never Married 57.9%±3.7 pp23,402±1,488 49.6%±0.3 pp1,130,286±6,623 ▲ +8.3% 14/77
Married 33.4%±2.8 pp13,509±1,136 35.5%±0.3 pp807,294±6,077 ▼ -2.0% 43/77
Separated 0.6%±0.4 pp238±164 2.2%±0.1 pp49,430±2,379 ▼ -1.6% 74/77
Divorced 5.0%±1.3 pp2,020±542 7.9%±0.2 pp180,700±3,966 ▼ -2.9% 74/77
Widowed 3.0%±1.3 pp1,228±533 4.8%±0.1 pp109,357±2,738 ▼ -1.8% 65/77
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category Loop
Speak English Only 65.9% ±3.3 pp27,290 ±1,378
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese) 9.7% ±3.1 pp4,035 ±1,286
Spanish 6.9% ±1.9 pp2,867 ±784
Other Indo-European 6.9% ±1.6 pp2,843 ±681
Other Languages 3.2% ±1.5 pp1,323 ±623
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic 2.1% ±1.1 pp871 ±454
Other Asian and Pacific Island 1.8% ±1.1 pp755 ±455
French, Haitian, or Cajun 1.4% ±0.7 pp559 ±309
Tagalog (incl. Filipino) 1.1% ±0.9 pp441 ±365
Korean 1.0% ±0.7 pp414 ±274
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Speak English Only 65.9%±3.3 pp27,290±1,378 64.6%±0.3 pp1,659,069±8,218 ▲ +1.3% 47/77
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese) 9.7%±3.1 pp4,035±1,286 2.0%±0.1 pp52,032±2,783 ▲ +7.7% 5/23
Spanish 6.9%±1.9 pp2,867±784 23.7%±0.2 pp607,865±6,166 ▼ -16.8% 48/77
Other Indo-European 6.9%±1.6 pp2,843±681 2.4%±0.1 pp61,672±3,192 ▲ +4.5% 5/36
Other Languages 3.2%±1.5 pp1,323±623 1.0%±0.1 pp25,292±2,452 ▲ +2.2% 26/77
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic 2.1%±1.1 pp871±454 2.6%±0.1 pp67,932±3,529 ▼ -0.5% 28/35
Other Asian and Pacific Island 1.8%±1.1 pp755±455 0.9%±0.1 pp22,472±2,251 ▲ +0.9% 14/21
French, Haitian, or Cajun 1.4%±0.7 pp559±309 0.6%±0.1 pp15,490±1,595 ▲ +0.7% 9/15
Tagalog (incl. Filipino) 1.1%±0.9 pp441±365 0.8%±0.1 pp20,222±1,843 ▲ +0.3% 16/16
Korean 1.0%±0.7 pp414±274 0.3%±0.0 pp8,044±1,187 ▲ +0.7% 4/4
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show
Category Loop
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 95.2% ±4.0 pp95.2%±4.0 pp39,418 ±1,653
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 3.4% ±1.1 pp3.4%±1.1 pp1,423 ±468
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 0.8% ±0.7 pp22.4%±18.7 pp319 ±286
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 0.6% ±0.9 pp16.7%±26.1 pp238 ±379
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 4.8% ±1.6 pp139.1%±9.1 pp1,980 ±664
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 95.2%±4.0 pp95.2%±4.0 pp39,418±1,653 85.4%±0.5 pp85.4%±0.5 pp2,192,778±11,961 ▲ +9.8%▲ +9.8% 29/77
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 3.4%±1.1 pp3.4%±1.1 pp1,423±468 7.1%±0.2 pp7.1%±0.2 pp183,252±4,686 ▼ -3.7%▼ -3.7% 48/77
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 0.8%±0.7 pp22.4%±18.7 pp319±286 5.2%±0.2 pp72.7%±1.1 pp133,269±3,923 ▼ -4.4%▼ -50.3% 61/7767/76
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 0.6%±0.9 pp16.7%±26.1 pp238±379 2.3%±0.1 pp31.6%±1.4 pp57,883±2,982 ▼ -1.7%▼ -14.9% 50/7747/76
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 4.8%±1.6 pp139.1%±9.1 pp1,980±664 14.6%±0.3 pp204.3%±6.4 pp374,404±6,794 ▼ -9.8%▼ -65.2% 49/7766/76
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category Loop
Married-Couple Households 24.5% ±3.3 pp6,127 ±819
Unmarried-Couple Households 8.4% ±2.0 pp2,097 ±512
One-Person Households 57.4% ±6.0 pp14,344 ±1,492
Other Household Types 9.6% ±8.7 pp2,406 ±2,171
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Married-Couple Households 24.5%±3.3 pp6,127±819 30.9%±0.3 pp358,432±3,598 ▼ -6.4% 48/77
Unmarried-Couple Households 8.4%±2.0 pp2,097±512 8.3%±0.2 pp96,220±2,797 ▲ +0.1% 23/77
One-Person Households 57.4%±6.0 pp14,344±1,492 39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,729 ▲ +17.8% 2/77
Other Household Types 9.6%±8.7 pp2,406±2,171 21.1%±0.7 pp245,285±8,514 ▼ -11.5% 74/77
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category Loop
Children in Married-Couple Households 75.6% ±16.1 pp1,827 ±390
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 5.1% ±4.8 pp124 ±116
Children in Single-Mother Households 17.1% ±9.3 pp414 ±224
Children in Single-Father Households 2.1% ±3.7 pp51 ±90
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households 75.6%±16.1 pp1,827±390 56.0%±0.8 pp293,542±4,257 ▲ +19.6% 16/77
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 5.1%±4.8 pp124±116 8.8%±0.6 pp45,960±3,208 ▼ -3.6% 52/77
Children in Single-Mother Households 17.1%±9.3 pp414±224 30.6%±0.9 pp160,535±4,521 ▼ -13.5% 57/77
Children in Single-Father Households 2.1%±3.7 pp51±90 4.6%±0.4 pp24,133±2,006 ▼ -2.5% 69/77
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show
Category Loop
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 2.5% ±0.9 pp2.5%±0.9 pp986 ±348
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 52.1% ±14.5 pp1.3%±0.4 pp514 ±143
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 1.7% ±6.6 pp0.0%±0.2 pp17 ±65
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 27.9% ±19.7 pp0.7%±0.5 pp275 ±194
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 11.0% ±12.7 pp0.3%±0.3 pp108 ±126
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 7.3% ±11.3 pp0.2%±0.3 pp72 ±111
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 2.5%±0.9 pp2.5%±0.9 pp986±348 2.8%±0.1 pp2.8%±0.1 pp60,766±2,397 ▼ -0.3%▼ -0.3% 48/77
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 52.1%±14.5 pp1.3%±0.4 pp514±143 26.8%±1.8 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,267±1,067 ▲ +25.4%▲ +0.5% 5/778/77
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 1.7%±6.6 pp0.0%±0.2 pp17±65 12.9%±1.0 pp0.4%±0.0 pp7,830±579 ▼ -11.2%▼ -0.3% 72/7771/77
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 27.9%±19.7 pp0.7%±0.5 pp275±194 28.8%±1.4 pp0.8%±0.0 pp17,525±846 ▼ -0.9%▼ -0.1% 42/7749/77
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 11.0%±12.7 pp0.3%±0.3 pp108±126 4.9%±0.7 pp0.1%±0.0 pp2,995±441 ▲ +6.0%▲ +0.1% 7/7717/77
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 7.3%±11.3 pp0.2%±0.3 pp72±111 26.6%±1.5 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,149±916 ▼ -19.3%▼ -0.6% 72/7771/77
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show
Category Loop
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 72.6% ±2.8 pp72.6%±2.8 pp30,899 ±1,192
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 27.4% ±3.5 pp27.4%±3.5 pp11,651 ±1,502
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 9.9% ±2.2 pp36.0%±6.5 pp4,199 ±932
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 17.5% ±2.9 pp64.0%±6.7 pp7,452 ±1,239
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 72.6%±2.8 pp72.6%±2.8 pp30,899±1,192 79.1%±0.3 pp79.1%±0.3 pp2,144,343±7,926 ▼ -6.5%▼ -6.5% 55/77
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 27.4%±3.5 pp27.4%±3.5 pp11,651±1,502 20.9%±0.3 pp20.9%±0.3 pp566,883±7,968 ▲ +6.5%▲ +6.5% 23/77
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 9.9%±2.2 pp36.0%±6.5 pp4,199±932 10.0%±0.2 pp47.7%±0.5 pp270,551±4,603 ▼ -0.1%▼ -11.7% 31/7757/77
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 17.5%±2.9 pp64.0%±6.7 pp7,452±1,239 10.9%±0.2 pp52.3%±0.9 pp296,332±6,504 ▲ +6.6%▲ +11.7% 16/7721/77
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show
Category Loop
Born in China / Hong Kong (of foreign-born residents) 6.6%±2.4 pp24.1%±7.9 pp2,810±1,008
Born in India (of foreign-born residents) 4.5%±1.4 pp16.5%±4.6 pp1,919±603
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 1.8%±1.0 pp6.5%±3.6 pp754±434
Born in United Kingdom (of foreign-born residents) 1.2%±0.9 pp4.2%±3.2 pp493±377
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 13.0%47.4%5,519
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop Chicago Difference Rank
Born in China / Hong Kong (of foreign-born residents) 6.6% ±2.4 pp24.1%±7.9 pp2,810 1.4% ±0.1 pp6.7%38,255 ▲ +5.2%▲ +17.4% 5/775/77
Born in India (of foreign-born residents) 4.5% ±1.4 pp16.5%±4.6 pp1,919 1.0% ±0.1 pp5.0%28,235 ▲ +3.5%▲ +11.5% 5/777/77
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 1.8% ±1.0 pp6.5%±3.6 pp754 8.2% ±0.2 pp39.3%222,978 ▼ -6.5%▼ -32.9% 44/7768/77
Born in United Kingdom (of foreign-born residents) 1.2% ±0.9 pp4.2%±3.2 pp493 0.2% ±0.0 pp0.9%4,999 ▲ +1.0%▲ +3.3% 1/775/77
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 13.0%47.4%5,519 ——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show
Category Loop
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 16.0% ±2.8 pp58.4%±6.8 pp6,804 ±1,206
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 5.5% ±1.8 pp20.0%±6.0 pp2,327 ±767
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 2.8% ±1.0 pp10.2%±3.5 pp1,192 ±442
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 3.1% ±1.0 pp11.4%±3.3 pp1,328 ±427
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 16.0%±2.8 pp58.4%±6.8 pp6,804±1,206 5.9%±0.2 pp1368.5%±189.8 pp159,447±5,557 ▲ +10.1%▼ -1310.1% 3/778/77
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 5.5%±1.8 pp20.0%±6.0 pp2,327±767 4.5%±0.1 pp1046.4%±144.6 pp121,912±4,035 ▲ +1.0%▼ -1026.4% 25/7742/77
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 2.8%±1.0 pp10.2%±3.5 pp1,192±442 4.6%±0.1 pp1063.0%±146.5 pp123,849±3,901 ▼ -1.8%▼ -1052.8% 47/7769/77
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 3.1%±1.0 pp11.4%±3.3 pp1,328±427 6.0%±0.1 pp1387.6%±188.6 pp161,675±3,491 ▼ -2.8%▼ -1376.3% 46/7770/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later 5.0% ±1.3 pp1,534 ±397 14.0% ±2.1 pp5,416 ±822 16.0% ±2.8 pp6,804 ±1,206 ▲ +11.0 pp▲ +5,270▲ +2.0 pp▲ +1,388▲ +9.0 pp▲ +3,882
Chicago citywide 1.4% ±0.1 pp36,978 ±2,235 3.7% ±0.1 pp99,118 ±3,198 5.9% ±0.2 pp159,447 ±5,568 ▲ +4.5 pp▲ +122,469▲ +2.2 pp▲ +60,329▲ +2.3 pp▲ +62,140
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 7.8% ±1.3 pp2,378 ±401 4.3% ±0.8 pp1,648 ±310 5.5% ±1.8 pp2,327 ±767 ▼ −2.3 pp▼ −51▲ +1.2 pp▲ +679▼ −3.5 pp▼ −730
Chicago citywide 5.9% ±0.1 pp161,331 ±3,896 4.9% ±0.1 pp131,658 ±3,182 4.5% ±0.1 pp121,912 ±4,044 ▼ −1.5 pp▼ −39,419▼ −0.4 pp▼ −9,746▼ −1.1 pp▼ −29,673
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 3.4% ±0.9 pp1,027 ±275 4.8% ±1.3 pp1,846 ±486 2.8% ±1.0 pp1,192 ±442 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +165▼ −2.0 pp▼ −654▲ +1.4 pp▲ +819
Chicago citywide 6.1% ±0.1 pp165,077 ±3,717 5.3% ±0.1 pp142,413 ±3,015 4.6% ±0.1 pp123,849 ±3,911 ▼ −1.5 pp▼ −41,228▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,564▼ −0.8 pp▼ −22,664
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 4.8% ±1.0 pp1,472 ±299 3.6% ±0.9 pp1,382 ±342 3.1% ±1.0 pp1,328 ±427 ▼ −1.7 pp▼ −144▼ −0.5 pp▼ −54▼ −1.2 pp▼ −90
Chicago citywide 7.5% ±0.1 pp204,169 ±3,469 6.9% ±0.1 pp186,050 ±3,114 6.0% ±0.1 pp161,675 ±3,509 ▼ −1.6 pp▼ −42,494▼ −0.9 pp▼ −24,375▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,119
Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category Loop
Average Household Income $167,432±$18,435
Per Capita Income $99,109±$10,564
10th Percentile Household Income $19,211±$8,502
25th Percentile Household Income $61,420±$13,615
Median Household Income $119,471±$8,113
75th Percentile Household Income $187,421±$11,870
90th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $167,432±$18,435 $116,016±$1,263 ▲ +$51,416 6/77
Per Capita Income $99,109±$10,564 $50,086±$581 ▲ +$49,023 3/77
10th Percentile Household Income $19,211±$8,502 $12,933±$271 ▲ +$6,278 26/77
25th Percentile Household Income $61,420±$13,615 $34,575±$649 ▲ +$26,845 10/77
Median Household Income $119,471±$8,113 $77,902±$907 ▲ +$41,569 8/77
75th Percentile Household Income $187,421±$11,870 $144,150±$1,210 ▲ +$43,271 12/77
90th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000 Over $200,000 — 1/77
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $165,407 ±16,872 $194,859 ±17,077 $167,432 ±18,435 ▲ +$2,025▼ −$27,427▲ +$29,452
Chicago citywide $95,689 ±910 $111,304 ±1,075 $116,016 ±1,263 ▲ +$20,327▲ +$4,712▲ +$15,615
Average Household Income (nominal dollars) $124,830 ±12,733 $158,810 ±13,918 $167,432 ±18,435 ▲ +$42,602▲ +$8,622▲ +$33,980
Chicago citywide $72,215 ±687 $90,713 ±876 $116,016 ±1,263 ▲ +$43,801▲ +$25,303▲ +$18,498
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $91,583 ±8,771 $104,712 ±8,500 $99,109 ±10,564 ▲ +$7,526▼ −$5,603▲ +$13,129
Chicago citywide $37,927 ±351 $45,525 ±412 $50,086 ±581 ▲ +$12,160▲ +$4,562▲ +$7,598
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars) $69,116 ±6,619 $85,341 ±6,928 $99,109 ±10,564 ▲ +$29,993▲ +$13,769▲ +$16,224
Chicago citywide $28,623 ±265 $37,103 ±336 $50,086 ±581 ▲ +$21,464▲ +$12,984▲ +$8,480
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $14,538 ±2,909 $21,500 ±5,764 $19,211 ±8,502 ▲ +$4,673▼ −$2,289▲ +$6,962
Chicago citywide $11,828 ±190 $13,281 ±277 $12,933 ±271 ▲ +$1,105▼ −$348▲ +$1,453
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $10,972 ±2,195 $17,523 ±4,697 $19,211 ±8,502 ▲ +$8,240▲ +$1,689▲ +$6,551
Chicago citywide $8,927 ±144 $10,824 ±225 $12,933 ±271 ▲ +$4,007▲ +$2,109▲ +$1,898
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $58,250 ±7,297 $73,218 ±8,858 $61,420 ±13,615 ▲ +$3,170▼ −$11,798▲ +$14,968
Chicago citywide $28,727 ±321 $31,597 ±462 $34,575 ±649 ▲ +$5,848▲ +$2,979▲ +$2,869
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $43,960 ±5,507 $59,673 ±7,219 $61,420 ±13,615 ▲ +$17,460▲ +$1,747▲ +$15,713
Chicago citywide $21,680 ±242 $25,751 ±376 $34,575 ±649 ▲ +$12,895▲ +$8,824▲ +$4,071
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $119,833 ±7,648 $133,344 ±7,363 $119,471 ±8,113 ▼ −$362▼ −$13,873▲ +$13,511
Chicago citywide $63,379 ±591 $71,469 ±723 $77,902 ±907 ▲ +$14,523▲ +$6,433▲ +$8,090
Median Household Income (nominal dollars) $90,436 ±5,772 $108,676 ±6,001 $119,471 ±8,113 ▲ +$29,035▲ +$10,795▲ +$18,240
Chicago citywide $47,831 ±446 $58,247 ±589 $77,902 ±907 ▲ +$30,071▲ +$19,655▲ +$10,416
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $202,585 ±14,446 $226,002 ±11,469 $187,421 ±11,870 ▼ −$15,164▼ −$38,581▲ +$23,417
Chicago citywide $122,019 ±806 $139,501 ±1,057 $144,150 ±1,210 ▲ +$22,131▲ +$4,648▲ +$17,482
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $152,888 ±10,903 $184,192 ±9,347 $187,421 ±11,870 ▲ +$34,533▲ +$3,229▲ +$31,304
Chicago citywide $92,086 ±608 $113,694 ±862 $144,150 ±1,210 ▲ +$52,064▲ +$30,456▲ +$21,608
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide $202,601 ±2,442 $235,390 ±1,636 — ——▲ +$32,790
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide $152,899 ±1,843 $191,844 ±1,333 — ——▲ +$38,944

Poverty Status

Category Loop
Below Poverty Line 11.1% ±2.4 pp4,708 ±1,024
Below 200% Poverty Line 19.3% ±3.3 pp8,196 ±1,407
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 8.9% ±2.3 pp3,783 ±961
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Below Poverty Line 11.1%±2.4 pp4,708±1,024 16.8%±0.4 pp456,194±11,330 ▼ -5.8% 53/77
Below 200% Poverty Line 19.3%±3.3 pp8,196±1,407 33.4%±0.6 pp905,794±16,660 ▼ -14.1% 65/77
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 8.9%±2.3 pp3,783±961 8.3%±0.3 pp226,117±7,649 ▲ +0.6% 33/77
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Category Loop
Food Insecurity 9.5%3,119
Housing Insecurity 8.5%2,801
Transportation Barriers 5.6%1,838
Threatened Utility Shutoff 4.7%1,535
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Food Insecurity 9.5%3,119 24.4%509,385 ▼ -14.9% 70/77
Housing Insecurity 8.5%2,801 19.7%411,266 ▼ -11.2% 71/77
Transportation Barriers 5.6%1,838 11.6%242,167 ▼ -6.0% 70/77
Threatened Utility Shutoff 4.7%1,535 11.9%248,430 ▼ -7.2% 71/77
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category Loop
In Labor Force 88.7% ±2.9 pp21,588 ±709
↳ Employed 85.3% ±3.1 pp20,768 ±763
↳ Unemployed 3.4% ±1.7 pp820 ±410
↳ Unemployment Rate 3.8% ±1.9 pp—
Not in Labor Force 11.3% ±11.1 pp2,755 ±2,702
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
In Labor Force 88.7%±2.9 pp21,588±709 85.6%±0.3 pp1,069,076±3,868 ▲ +3.1% 23/77
↳ Employed 85.3%±3.1 pp20,768±763 79.6%±0.3 pp994,466±4,326 ▲ +5.7% 17/77
↳ Unemployed 3.4%±1.7 pp820±410 5.9%±0.2 pp73,968±2,788 ▼ -2.6% 66/77
↳ Unemployment Rate 3.8%±1.9 pp— 6.9%±0.3 pp86,502±3,342 ▼ -3.1% 65/77
Not in Labor Force 11.3%±11.1 pp2,755±2,702 14.4%±1.1 pp180,399±14,344 ▼ -3.1% 55/77
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category Loop
Management, Business, Science & Arts 76.3% ±5.6 pp21,664 ±1,600
↳ Management Occupations 15.6% ±3.4 pp4,421 ±961
↳ Business & Financial Operations 17.3% ±3.0 pp4,924 ±840
↳ Computer & Mathematical 13.9% ±2.6 pp3,945 ±744
↳ Architecture & Engineering 2.8% ±1.0 pp798 ±297
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 3.7% ±1.8 pp1,044 ±498
↳ Community & Social Service 1.1% ±0.8 pp306 ±220
↳ Legal Occupations 3.3% ±1.3 pp936 ±369
↳ Education, Training & Library 4.9% ±1.6 pp1,391 ±457
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 4.3% ±1.4 pp1,226 ±400
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 8.5% ±2.4 pp2,418 ±695
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 0.9% ±0.7 pp255 ±201
Service 9.9% ±2.6 pp2,809 ±740
↳ Healthcare Support 0.3% ±0.5 pp76 ±143
↳ Protective Service 1.5% ±0.9 pp427 ±262
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 5.1% ±2.0 pp1,437 ±554
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 0.8% ±1.1 pp239 ±309
↳ Personal Care & Service 2.2% ±1.1 pp630 ±317
Sales & Office 10.2% ±2.6 pp2,893 ±729
↳ Sales & Related 6.7% ±2.1 pp1,889 ±604
↳ Office & Administrative Support 3.5% ±1.4 pp1,004 ±386
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 1.1% ±0.8 pp311 ±217
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.2% ±0.3 pp44 ±94
↳ Construction & Extraction 0.3% ±0.4 pp97 ±119
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 0.6% ±0.6 pp170 ±166
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 2.6% ±1.4 pp727 ±405
↳ Production Occupations 0.7% ±0.6 pp206 ±174
↳ Transportation Occupations 0.8% ±0.5 pp219 ±148
↳ Material Moving Occupations 1.1% ±1.2 pp302 ±343
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts 76.3%±5.6 pp21,664±1,600 49.2%±0.4 pp686,743±5,710 ▲ +27.1% 3/77
↳ Management Occupations 15.6%±3.4 pp4,421±961 12.3%±0.3 pp172,182±3,807 ▲ +3.2% 11/77
↳ Business & Financial Operations 17.3%±3.0 pp4,924±840 9.1%±0.2 pp127,081±3,358 ▲ +8.2% 3/77
↳ Computer & Mathematical 13.9%±2.6 pp3,945±744 4.9%±0.2 pp68,921±2,690 ▲ +9.0% 1/77
↳ Architecture & Engineering 2.8%±1.0 pp798±297 1.6%±0.1 pp22,779±1,380 ▲ +1.2% 5/77
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 3.7%±1.8 pp1,044±498 1.4%±0.1 pp19,126±1,340 ▲ +2.3% 3/77
↳ Community & Social Service 1.1%±0.8 pp306±220 1.9%±0.1 pp26,973±1,500 ▼ -0.9% 64/77
↳ Legal Occupations 3.3%±1.3 pp936±369 2.3%±0.1 pp31,629±1,814 ▲ +1.0% 10/77
↳ Education, Training & Library 4.9%±1.6 pp1,391±457 6.6%±0.2 pp92,316±2,697 ▼ -1.7% 61/77
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 4.3%±1.4 pp1,226±400 3.1%±0.1 pp43,879±1,786 ▲ +1.2% 13/77
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 8.5%±2.4 pp2,418±695 4.6%±0.2 pp63,551±2,652 ▲ +4.0% 5/77
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 0.9%±0.7 pp255±201 1.3%±0.1 pp18,306±1,387 ▼ -0.4% 61/77
Service 9.9%±2.6 pp2,809±740 16.9%±0.3 pp235,977±4,217 ▼ -7.0% 70/77
↳ Healthcare Support 0.3%±0.5 pp76±143 3.4%±0.2 pp46,792±2,107 ▼ -3.1% 76/77
↳ Protective Service 1.5%±0.9 pp427±262 2.8%±0.1 pp39,146±1,734 ▼ -1.3% 58/77
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 5.1%±2.0 pp1,437±554 5.1%±0.2 pp70,514±2,393 0% 37/77
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 0.8%±1.1 pp239±309 3.0%±0.1 pp41,783±1,967 ▼ -2.2% 70/77
↳ Personal Care & Service 2.2%±1.1 pp630±317 2.7%±0.1 pp37,742±1,657 ▼ -0.5% 53/77
Sales & Office 10.2%±2.6 pp2,893±729 17.4%±0.3 pp243,580±4,754 ▼ -7.3% 77/77
↳ Sales & Related 6.7%±2.1 pp1,889±604 8.1%±0.2 pp113,073±3,174 ▼ -1.4% 59/77
↳ Office & Administrative Support 3.5%±1.4 pp1,004±386 9.3%±0.3 pp130,507±3,591 ▼ -5.8% 77/77
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 1.1%±0.8 pp311±217 4.6%±0.2 pp64,338±2,929 ▼ -3.5% 70/77
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.2%±0.3 pp44±94 0.1%±0.0 pp1,506±406 0% 19/77
↳ Construction & Extraction 0.3%±0.4 pp97±119 2.8%±0.1 pp39,432±2,062 ▼ -2.5% 72/77
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 0.6%±0.6 pp170±166 1.7%±0.1 pp23,400±1,722 ▼ -1.1% 63/77
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 2.6%±1.4 pp727±405 11.8%±0.3 pp165,261±3,629 ▼ -9.3% 75/77
↳ Production Occupations 0.7%±0.6 pp206±174 4.2%±0.2 pp57,989±2,275 ▼ -3.4% 75/77
↳ Transportation Occupations 0.8%±0.5 pp219±148 3.9%±0.2 pp54,099±2,118 ▼ -3.1% 74/77
↳ Material Moving Occupations 1.1%±1.2 pp302±343 3.8%±0.2 pp53,173±2,312 ▼ -2.7% 68/77
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category Loop
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.3% ±0.4 pp84 ±116
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.3% ±0.4 pp84 ±116
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0% ±0.2 pp0
Construction 1.3% ±0.8 pp358 ±216
Manufacturing 4.8% ±1.8 pp1,361 ±512
Wholesale Trade 0.4% ±0.4 pp101 ±114
Retail Trade 4.2% ±1.8 pp1,191 ±499
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 5.2% ±1.9 pp1,484 ±529
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 5.0% ±1.8 pp1,406 ±516
↳ Utilities 0.3% ±0.4 pp78 ±109
Information 3.1% ±1.2 pp872 ±334
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 13.4% ±2.3 pp3,792 ±667
↳ Finance & Insurance 11.9% ±2.3 pp3,371 ±653
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.5% ±0.8 pp421 ±226
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 30.1% ±3.9 pp8,556 ±1,097
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 27.3% ±3.7 pp7,743 ±1,062
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0% ±0.2 pp14 ±63
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 2.8% ±1.2 pp799 ±346
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 22.8% ±3.4 pp6,467 ±959
↳ Educational Services 11.4% ±2.5 pp3,225 ±699
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 11.4% ±2.6 pp3,242 ±751
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 9.0% ±2.3 pp2,566 ±665
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 2.8% ±1.3 pp798 ±364
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 6.2% ±2.0 pp1,768 ±574
Other Services 2.9% ±1.8 pp829 ±519
Public Administration 2.6% ±1.1 pp743 ±320
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.3%±0.4 pp84±116 0.2%±0.0 pp— ▲ +0.1% 19/77
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.3%±0.4 pp84±116 0.2%±0.0 pp— ▲ +0.1% 17/77
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%±0.2 pp0 0.0%±0.0 pp— 0% 18/77
Construction 1.3%±0.8 pp358±216 3.8%±0.2 pp— ▼ -2.5% 67/77
Manufacturing 4.8%±1.8 pp1,361±512 7.7%±0.2 pp— ▼ -2.9% 62/77
Wholesale Trade 0.4%±0.4 pp101±114 2.0%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.7% 69/77
Retail Trade 4.2%±1.8 pp1,191±499 8.2%±0.2 pp— ▼ -4.0% 74/77
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 5.2%±1.9 pp1,484±529 7.1%±0.2 pp— ▼ -1.9% 57/77
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 5.0%±1.8 pp1,406±516 6.5%±0.2 pp— ▼ -1.6% 53/77
↳ Utilities 0.3%±0.4 pp78±109 0.5%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.3% 49/77
Information 3.1%±1.2 pp872±334 2.1%±0.1 pp— ▲ +0.9% 10/77
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 13.4%±2.3 pp3,792±667 8.8%±0.2 pp— ▲ +4.5% 6/77
↳ Finance & Insurance 11.9%±2.3 pp3,371±653 6.7%±0.2 pp— ▲ +5.2% 4/77
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.5%±0.8 pp421±226 2.1%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.7% 52/77
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 30.1%±3.9 pp8,556±1,097 18.2%±0.4 pp— ▲ +11.9% 4/77
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 27.3%±3.7 pp7,743±1,062 13.4%±0.3 pp— ▲ +13.8% 4/77
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%±0.2 pp14±63 0.1%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.1% 33/77
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 2.8%±1.2 pp799±346 4.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -1.8% 65/77
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 22.8%±3.4 pp6,467±959 24.2%±0.4 pp— ▼ -1.4% 50/77
↳ Educational Services 11.4%±2.5 pp3,225±699 10.5%±0.2 pp— ▲ +0.9% 32/77
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 11.4%±2.6 pp3,242±751 13.7%±0.3 pp— ▼ -2.3% 60/77
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 9.0%±2.3 pp2,566±665 9.1%±0.2 pp— ▼ -0.1% 35/77
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 2.8%±1.3 pp798±364 2.2%±0.1 pp— ▲ +0.6% 16/77
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 6.2%±2.0 pp1,768±574 6.9%±0.2 pp— ▼ -0.7% 43/77
Other Services 2.9%±1.8 pp829±519 4.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -1.7% 71/77
Public Administration 2.6%±1.1 pp743±320 4.0%±0.2 pp— ▼ -1.4% 62/77
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category Loop
Private Company Employee 68.5% ±4.4 pp19,461 ±1,259
Self-Employed 7.8% ±2.0 pp2,221 ±569
Nonprofit 13.6% ±2.7 pp3,858 ±773
Government 10.1% ±2.7 pp2,864 ±761
Unpaid Family Worker 0.0% ±0.2 pp0
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Private Company Employee 68.5%±4.4 pp19,461±1,259 67.9%±0.4 pp947,845±5,822 ▲ +0.6% 26/77
Self-Employed 7.8%±2.0 pp2,221±569 8.3%±0.2 pp115,690±2,989 ▼ -0.5% 37/77
Nonprofit 13.6%±2.7 pp3,858±773 12.1%±0.3 pp169,124±4,035 ▲ +1.5% 26/77
Government 10.1%±2.7 pp2,864±761 12.9%±0.3 pp179,945±4,021 ▼ -2.8% 62/77
Unpaid Family Worker 0.0%±0.2 pp0 0.2%±0.0 pp2,312±408 ▼ -0.2% 45/77
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category Loop
Full-Time, Year-Round 68.0% ±3.0 pp21,666 ±950
Part-Time or Part-Year 32.0% ±3.1 pp10,213 ±984
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round 68.0%±3.0 pp21,666±950 67.0%±0.3 pp1,025,726±3,875 ▲ +0.9% 27/77
Part-Time or Part-Year 32.0%±3.1 pp10,213±984 33.0%±0.3 pp504,210±4,897 ▼ -0.9% 51/77
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category Loop
Average FT Earnings $142,737±$12,251
10th Percentile FT Earnings $45,108±$6,081
25th Percentile FT Earnings $75,626±$5,375
Median FT Earnings Over $100,000
75th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000
90th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Average FT Earnings $142,737±$12,251 $96,214±$968 ▲ +$46,522 4/76
10th Percentile FT Earnings $45,108±$6,081 $29,008±$387 ▲ +$16,100 4/77
25th Percentile FT Earnings $75,626±$5,375 $43,011±$345 ▲ +$32,615 2/77
Median FT Earnings Over $100,000 $69,663±$530 ▲ +$30,337+ 1/77
75th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/77
90th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/77
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $145,468 ±10,670 $160,855 ±10,988 $142,737 ±12,251 ▼ −$2,731▼ −$18,118▲ +$15,387
Chicago citywide $83,170 ±714 $91,467 ±682 $96,214 ±968 ▲ +$13,044▲ +$4,747▲ +$8,297
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $109,782 ±8,053 $131,097 ±8,955 $142,737 ±12,251 ▲ +$32,954▲ +$11,640▲ +$21,314
Chicago citywide $62,767 ±539 $74,546 ±556 $96,214 ±968 ▲ +$33,447▲ +$21,669▲ +$11,778
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $47,982 ±3,846 $50,789 ±2,862 $45,108 ±6,081 ▼ −$2,875▼ −$5,681▲ +$2,807
Chicago citywide $24,209 ±243 $26,113 ±152 $29,008 ±387 ▲ +$4,799▲ +$2,895▲ +$1,904
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $36,212 ±2,903 $41,393 ±2,333 $45,108 ±6,081 ▲ +$8,896▲ +$3,715▲ +$5,182
Chicago citywide $18,270 ±183 $21,282 ±124 $29,008 ±387 ▲ +$10,738▲ +$7,726▲ +$3,012
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $69,770 ±2,890 $73,601 ±3,440 $75,626 ±5,375 ▲ +$5,856▲ +$2,025▲ +$3,831
Chicago citywide $37,393 ±278 $39,415 ±229 $43,011 ±345 ▲ +$5,618▲ +$3,597▲ +$2,021
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $52,654 ±2,181 $59,985 ±2,804 $75,626 ±5,375 ▲ +$22,972▲ +$15,641▲ +$7,331
Chicago citywide $28,220 ±210 $32,123 ±187 $43,011 ±345 ▲ +$14,791▲ +$10,888▲ +$3,903
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $105,893 ±5,985 $114,550 ±5,140 — ——▲ +$8,656
Chicago citywide $60,575 ±496 $64,628 ±327 $69,663 ±530 ▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,034▲ +$4,054
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $79,916 ±4,517 $93,358 ±4,189 — ——▲ +$13,442
Chicago citywide $45,715 ±374 $52,672 ±266 $69,663 ±530 ▲ +$23,948▲ +$16,991▲ +$6,957
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide $98,274 ±615 $108,202 ±616 — ——▲ +$9,928
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide $74,166 ±464 $88,185 ±502 — ——▲ +$14,019
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide — — — ———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category Loop
Average PT Earnings $39,129±$5,489
10th Percentile PT Earnings $1,932±$811
25th Percentile PT Earnings $5,682±$1,214
Median PT Earnings $19,328±$4,824
75th Percentile PT Earnings $52,699±$11,573
90th Percentile PT Earnings $96,475±$8,333
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Average PT Earnings $39,129±$5,489 $33,575±$750 ▲ +$5,554 14/76
10th Percentile PT Earnings $1,932±$811 $2,183±$87 ▼ −$252 48/77
25th Percentile PT Earnings $5,682±$1,214 $7,222±$206 ▼ −$1,539 54/77
Median PT Earnings $19,328±$4,824 $19,180±$393 ▲ +$148 29/77
75th Percentile PT Earnings $52,699±$11,573 $38,498±$681 ▲ +$14,201 11/77
90th Percentile PT Earnings $96,475±$8,333 $73,776±$1,391 ▲ +$22,699 13/77
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $32,562 ±3,241 $43,985 ±8,107 $39,129 ±5,489 ▲ +$6,567▼ −$4,856▲ +$11,422
Chicago citywide $27,076 ±473 $31,236 ±676 $33,575 ±750 ▲ +$6,500▲ +$2,340▲ +$4,160
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $24,574 ±2,446 $35,848 ±6,608 $39,129 ±5,489 ▲ +$14,555▲ +$3,282▲ +$11,273
Chicago citywide $20,433 ±357 $25,457 ±551 $33,575 ±750 ▲ +$13,142▲ +$8,118▲ +$5,024
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,403 ±277 $1,519 ±309 $1,932 ±811 ▲ +$528▲ +$413▲ +$116
Chicago citywide $2,230 ±48 $2,283 ±59 $2,183 ±87 ▼ −$47▼ −$100▲ +$53
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $1,059 ±209 $1,238 ±252 $1,932 ±811 ▲ +$873▲ +$694▲ +$179
Chicago citywide $1,683 ±36 $1,861 ±48 $2,183 ±87 ▲ +$500▲ +$322▲ +$178
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,699 ±1,056 $4,288 ±1,062 $5,682 ±1,214 ▲ +$1,983▲ +$1,394▲ +$590
Chicago citywide $6,390 ±123 $6,841 ±156 $7,222 ±206 ▲ +$832▲ +$381▲ +$451
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $2,792 ±797 $3,495 ±866 $5,682 ±1,214 ▲ +$2,891▲ +$2,187▲ +$704
Chicago citywide $4,822 ±93 $5,575 ±127 $7,222 ±206 ▲ +$2,399▲ +$1,646▲ +$753
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $14,141 ±2,425 $14,973 ±2,691 $19,328 ±4,824 ▲ +$5,188▲ +$4,355▲ +$833
Chicago citywide $15,461 ±166 $17,025 ±275 $19,180 ±393 ▲ +$3,719▲ +$2,155▲ +$1,563
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $10,672 ±1,830 $12,203 ±2,193 $19,328 ±4,824 ▲ +$8,657▲ +$7,125▲ +$1,532
Chicago citywide $11,668 ±125 $13,875 ±224 $19,180 ±393 ▲ +$7,512▲ +$5,305▲ +$2,207
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $46,157 ±5,128 $41,902 ±9,841 $52,699 ±11,573 ▲ +$6,542▲ +$10,796▼ −$4,254
Chicago citywide $30,795 ±619 $34,779 ±505 $38,498 ±681 ▲ +$7,703▲ +$3,719▲ +$3,984
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $34,834 ±3,870 $34,150 ±8,020 $52,699 ±11,573 ▲ +$17,865▲ +$18,548▼ −$683
Chicago citywide $23,241 ±468 $28,345 ±412 $38,498 ±681 ▲ +$15,257▲ +$10,153▲ +$5,104
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $85,624 ±15,200 $89,300 ±16,351 $96,475 ±8,333 ▲ +$10,851▲ +$7,176▲ +$3,675
Chicago citywide $61,207 ±1,249 $68,040 ±1,298 $73,776 ±1,391 ▲ +$12,570▲ +$5,737▲ +$6,833
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $64,619 ±11,471 $72,780 ±13,326 $96,475 ±8,333 ▲ +$31,856▲ +$23,696▲ +$8,160
Chicago citywide $46,192 ±942 $55,452 ±1,058 $73,776 ±1,391 ▲ +$27,585▲ +$18,324▲ +$9,261

Earnings of All Workers

Category Loop
Average Earnings $109,544±$9,862
10th Percentile Earnings $6,897±$2,325
25th Percentile Earnings $36,931±$6,730
Median Earnings $85,496±$5,591
75th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000
90th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Average Earnings $109,544±$9,862 $75,571±$768 ▲ +$33,973 8/76
10th Percentile Earnings $6,897±$2,325 $8,529±$272 ▼ −$1,632 45/77
25th Percentile Earnings $36,931±$6,730 $25,183±$358 ▲ +$11,748 9/77
Median Earnings $85,496±$5,591 $51,367±$471 ▲ +$34,129 6/77
75th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000 $93,324±$598 ▲ +$6,676+ 1/77
90th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/77
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $103,624 ±7,042 $122,730 ±8,397 $109,544 ±9,862 ▲ +$5,920▼ −$13,186▲ +$19,106
Chicago citywide $62,453 ±534 $71,626 ±551 $75,571 ±768 ▲ +$13,118▲ +$3,945▲ +$9,173
Average Earnings (nominal dollars) $78,203 ±5,315 $100,025 ±6,844 $109,544 ±9,862 ▲ +$31,341▲ +$9,519▲ +$21,822
Chicago citywide $47,133 ±403 $58,375 ±449 $75,571 ±768 ▲ +$28,438▲ +$17,196▲ +$11,243
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $4,157 ±1,247 $5,728 ±1,610 $6,897 ±2,325 ▲ +$2,740▲ +$1,169▲ +$1,571
Chicago citywide $6,858 ±139 $8,358 ±164 $8,529 ±272 ▲ +$1,671▲ +$171▲ +$1,500
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $3,137 ±941 $4,669 ±1,312 $6,897 ±2,325 ▲ +$3,759▲ +$2,228▲ +$1,531
Chicago citywide $5,176 ±105 $6,812 ±134 $8,529 ±272 ▲ +$3,354▲ +$1,717▲ +$1,636
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $25,479 ±7,622 $33,506 ±6,367 $36,931 ±6,730 ▲ +$11,452▲ +$3,425▲ +$8,027
Chicago citywide $19,598 ±241 $23,173 ±290 $25,183 ±358 ▲ +$5,585▲ +$2,010▲ +$3,576
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $19,228 ±5,753 $27,307 ±5,189 $36,931 ±6,730 ▲ +$17,702▲ +$9,624▲ +$8,079
Chicago citywide $14,790 ±182 $18,886 ±236 $25,183 ±358 ▲ +$10,393▲ +$6,297▲ +$4,096
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $72,918 ±4,370 $82,217 ±4,886 $85,496 ±5,591 ▲ +$12,578▲ +$3,279▲ +$9,299
Chicago citywide $42,365 ±293 $47,195 ±370 $51,367 ±471 ▲ +$9,002▲ +$4,172▲ +$4,830
Median Earnings (nominal dollars) $55,030 ±3,298 $67,007 ±3,982 $85,496 ±5,591 ▲ +$30,466▲ +$18,489▲ +$11,977
Chicago citywide $31,972 ±221 $38,464 ±302 $51,367 ±471 ▲ +$19,395▲ +$12,903▲ +$6,492
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $129,491 ±4,296 — — ———
Chicago citywide $78,784 ±555 $87,853 ±597 $93,324 ±598 ▲ +$14,540▲ +$5,471▲ +$9,069
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $97,724 ±3,242 — — ———
Chicago citywide $59,457 ±418 $71,600 ±486 $93,324 ±598 ▲ +$33,867▲ +$21,723▲ +$12,144
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide $128,659 ±682 — — ———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide $97,097 ±515 — — ———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Loop, Chicago

Category Loop
Household income at age 35 $62,220 ±$2,256
Household income percentile rank 53.5 ±1.27 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 28.2% ±1.73 pp
Individual income at age 35 $43,883 ±$1,510
Fraction married 40.3% ±2.00 pp
Employment rate 70.6% ±1.86 pp
Incarceration rate 1.58% ±0.70 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Loop, Chicago. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Loop, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Loop City Difference
Household income at age 35 $62,220 ±$2,256 $43,090 ±$109 +$19,130
Household income percentile rank 53.5 ±1.27 pp 40.9 ±0.07 pp +12.6 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 28.2% ±1.73 pp 11.4% ±0.08 pp +16.7 pp
Individual income at age 35 $43,883 ±$1,510 $33,545 ±$85 +$10,338
Fraction married 40.3% ±2.00 pp 26.4% ±0.12 pp +14.0 pp
Employment rate 70.6% ±1.86 pp 74.4% ±0.12 pp −3.8 pp
Incarceration rate 1.58% ±0.70 pp 2.87% ±0.06 pp −1.3 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Loop, Chicago. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Loop, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Loop, Chicago in Lower-Income Families

Category Loop
Household income at age 35 $38,929 ±$3,621
Household income percentile rank 38.5 ±2.52 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 11.3% ±3.32 pp
Individual income at age 35 $30,915 ±$2,904
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Loop, Chicago with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Loop, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Loop City Difference
Household income at age 35 $38,929 ±$3,621 $34,712 ±$133 +$4,217
Household income percentile rank 38.5 ±2.52 pp 35.3 ±0.09 pp +3.1 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 11.3% ±3.32 pp 6.31% ±0.10 pp +5.0 pp
Individual income at age 35 $30,915 ±$2,904 $28,717 ±$114 +$2,199
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Loop, Chicago with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Loop, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Loop, Chicago

Category Loop
Stayed in the greater Chicago area 59.8% ±2.04 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 11.1% ±1.28 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Loop, Chicago. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Loop, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Loop City Difference
Stayed in the greater Chicago area 59.8% ±2.04 pp 78.1% ±0.12 pp −18.4 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 11.1% ±1.28 pp 22.9% ±0.12 pp −11.7 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Loop, Chicago. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Loop, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Loop

Category Loop
All jobs located in loop 486,204
Loop jobs held by Loop residents 1.7%
Loop jobs held by non-Loop residents 98.3%
Employed residents working in Loop 38.6%
Employed residents working outside Loop 61.4%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Loop Chicago neighborhood median Difference Rank
All jobs located in loop 486,204 5,320 ▲ +480,884 1/77
Loop jobs held by Loop residents 1.7% 5.8% ▼ −4.0 pp 70/77
Loop jobs held by non-Loop residents 98.3% 94.2% ▲ +4.0 pp 8/77
Employed residents working in Loop 38.6% 2.6% ▲ +36.0 pp 1/77
Employed residents working outside Loop 61.4% 97.4% ▼ −36.0 pp 77/77
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in loop 408,345 457,960 486,204 ▲ +77,859▲ +28,244▲ +49,615
Chicago citywide 5,236 5,698 5,320 ▲ +84▼ −378▲ +462
Loop jobs held by Loop residents 1.5%5,816 1.8%8,101 1.7%8,143 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +2,327▼ −0.1 pp▲ +42▲ +0.4 pp▲ +2,285
Chicago citywide 5.5%246 5.6%306 5.8%279 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +33▲ +0.1 pp▼ −27▲ +0.2 pp▲ +60
Loop jobs held by non-Loop residents 98.5%386,950 98.2%430,705 98.3%457,865 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +70,915▲ +0.1 pp▲ +27,160▼ −0.4 pp▲ +43,755
Chicago citywide 94.5%4,320 94.4%4,646 94.2%4,657 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +337▼ −0.1 pp▲ +11▼ −0.2 pp▲ +326
Employed residents working in Loop 38.1%5,816 41.4%8,101 38.6%8,143 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +2,327▼ −2.8 pp▲ +42▲ +3.3 pp▲ +2,285
Chicago citywide 2.5%246 2.7%306 2.6%279 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +33▼ −0.1 pp▼ −27▲ +0.1 pp▲ +60
Employed residents working outside Loop 61.9%9,440 58.6%11,469 61.4%12,937 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +3,497▲ +2.8 pp▲ +1,468▼ −3.3 pp▲ +2,029
Chicago citywide 97.5%9,791 97.3%10,346 97.4%10,385 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +594▲ +0.1 pp▲ +39▼ −0.1 pp▲ +555

Industry of Jobs in Loop

Category Loop
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%81
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%18
Construction 0.5%2,416
Manufacturing 0.7%3,222
Wholesale Trade 1.4%6,836
Retail Trade 1.1%5,330
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 1.9%9,470
↳ Utilities 0.4%1,834
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 1.6%7,636
Information 3.9%18,723
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 19.2%93,568
↳ Finance & Insurance 17.9%86,945
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.4%6,623
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 32.8%159,437
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 24.4%118,726
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 1.6%7,944
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 6.7%32,767
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 21.7%105,639
↳ Educational Services 13.9%67,771
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 7.8%37,868
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 4.3%21,034
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 1.4%6,758
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 2.9%14,276
Other Services 2.7%13,046
Public Administration 9.7%47,402
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%81 0.0%423 0% 19/77
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%18 0.0%36 0% 7/77
Construction 0.5%2,416 1.9%27,207 ▼ -1.4% 65/77
Manufacturing 0.7%3,222 4.4%64,747 ▼ -3.8% 69/77
Wholesale Trade 1.4%6,836 2.8%41,460 ▼ -1.4% 51/77
Retail Trade 1.1%5,330 6.6%96,413 ▼ -5.5% 76/77
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 1.9%9,470 6.0%87,817 ▼ -4.1% 43/77
↳ Utilities 0.4%1,834 0.3%5,012 0% 6/77
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 1.6%7,636 5.7%82,805 ▼ -4.1% 44/77
Information 3.9%18,723 3.5%51,095 ▲ +0.4% 7/77
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 19.2%93,568 10.8%157,520 ▲ +8.5% 1/77
↳ Finance & Insurance 17.9%86,945 8.6%125,824 ▲ +9.3% 1/77
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.4%6,623 2.2%31,696 ▼ -0.8% 46/77
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 32.8%159,437 23.2%339,220 ▲ +9.6% 3/77
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 24.4%118,726 14.2%207,444 ▲ +10.2% 1/77
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 1.6%7,944 1.2%16,872 ▲ +0.5% 6/77
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 6.7%32,767 7.9%114,904 ▼ -1.1% 28/77
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 21.7%105,639 23.0%336,089 ▼ -1.2% 38/77
↳ Educational Services 13.9%67,771 9.2%134,671 ▲ +4.7% 10/77
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 7.8%37,868 13.8%201,418 ▼ -6.0% 61/77
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 4.3%21,034 10.3%151,055 ▼ -6.0% 64/77
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 1.4%6,758 1.9%27,339 ▼ -0.5% 18/77
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 2.9%14,276 8.5%123,716 ▼ -5.5% 69/77
Other Services 2.7%13,046 4.0%59,136 ▼ -1.4% 64/77
Public Administration 9.7%47,402 3.5%51,418 ▲ +6.2% 1/77
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%123 0.1%342 0.0%81 – 0.0 pp▼ −42▼ −0.1 pp▼ −261– 0.0 pp▲ +219
Chicago citywide 0.0%181 0.0%569 0.0%423 – 0.0 pp▲ +242– 0.0 pp▼ −146– 0.0 pp▲ +388
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%116 0.1%340 0.0%18 – 0.0 pp▼ −98▼ −0.1 pp▼ −322– 0.0 pp▲ +224
Chicago citywide 0.0%140 0.0%374 0.0%36 – 0.0 pp▼ −104– 0.0 pp▼ −338– 0.0 pp▲ +234
Construction 0.6%2,478 0.5%2,459 0.5%2,416 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −62– 0.0 pp▼ −43▼ −0.1 pp▼ −19
Chicago citywide 1.6%20,789 1.8%26,012 1.9%27,207 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,418– 0.0 pp▲ +1,195▲ +0.3 pp▲ +5,223
Manufacturing 0.4%1,615 0.6%2,738 0.7%3,222 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +1,607▲ +0.1 pp▲ +484▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,123
Chicago citywide 4.6%61,066 4.5%63,597 4.4%64,747 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,681▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,150▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,531
Wholesale Trade 1.2%4,832 1.3%5,829 1.4%6,836 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,004▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,007▲ +0.1 pp▲ +997
Chicago citywide 3.0%39,431 2.9%41,789 2.8%41,460 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,029▼ −0.1 pp▼ −329▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,358
Retail Trade 1.5%6,134 1.5%7,087 1.1%5,330 ▼ −0.4 pp▼ −804▼ −0.5 pp▼ −1,757– 0.0 pp▲ +953
Chicago citywide 7.4%97,262 6.9%97,836 6.6%96,413 ▼ −0.8 pp▼ −849▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,423▼ −0.5 pp▲ +574
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 0.2%1,003 2.0%9,350 1.9%9,470 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +8,467▼ −0.1 pp▲ +120▲ +1.8 pp▲ +8,347
Chicago citywide 5.4%71,320 5.6%79,303 6.0%87,817 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +16,497▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,514▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,983
Utilities 0.1%439 0.5%2,247 0.4%1,834 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +1,395▼ −0.1 pp▼ −413▲ +0.4 pp▲ +1,808
Chicago citywide 0.3%4,383 0.3%4,956 0.3%5,012 – 0.0 pp▲ +629– 0.0 pp▲ +56– 0.0 pp▲ +573
Transportation & Warehousing 0.1%564 1.6%7,103 1.6%7,636 ▲ +1.4 pp▲ +7,072– 0.0 pp▲ +533▲ +1.4 pp▲ +6,539
Chicago citywide 5.1%66,937 5.2%74,347 5.7%82,805 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +15,868▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,458▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,410
Information 3.3%13,518 3.5%15,865 3.9%18,723 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +5,205▲ +0.4 pp▲ +2,858▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,347
Chicago citywide 3.1%40,514 3.4%48,135 3.5%51,095 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +10,581▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,960▲ +0.3 pp▲ +7,621
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 18.7%76,278 18.9%86,742 19.2%93,568 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +17,290▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,826▲ +0.3 pp▲ +10,464
Chicago citywide 10.5%138,287 10.6%150,163 10.8%157,520 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +19,233▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,357▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,876
Finance & Insurance 17.0%69,381 17.3%79,162 17.9%86,945 ▲ +0.9 pp▲ +17,564▲ +0.6 pp▲ +7,783▲ +0.3 pp▲ +9,781
Chicago citywide 8.5%111,307 8.4%119,147 8.6%125,824 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14,517▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,677▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7,840
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.7%6,897 1.7%7,580 1.4%6,623 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −274▼ −0.3 pp▼ −957– 0.0 pp▲ +683
Chicago citywide 2.1%26,980 2.2%31,016 2.2%31,696 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,716– 0.0 pp▲ +680▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,036
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 33.1%135,280 32.5%148,715 32.8%159,437 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +24,157▲ +0.3 pp▲ +10,722▼ −0.7 pp▲ +13,435
Chicago citywide 21.2%278,928 22.6%319,744 23.2%339,220 ▲ +2.0 pp▲ +60,292▲ +0.6 pp▲ +19,476▲ +1.3 pp▲ +40,816
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 23.1%94,213 23.1%105,696 24.4%118,726 ▲ +1.3 pp▲ +24,513▲ +1.3 pp▲ +13,030– 0.0 pp▲ +11,483
Chicago citywide 11.8%155,200 12.9%182,462 14.2%207,444 ▲ +2.4 pp▲ +52,244▲ +1.3 pp▲ +24,982▲ +1.1 pp▲ +27,262
Management of Companies & Enterprises 1.6%6,569 1.5%6,700 1.6%7,944 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,375▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,244▼ −0.1 pp▲ +131
Chicago citywide 1.0%13,619 1.2%16,600 1.2%16,872 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,253– 0.0 pp▲ +272▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,981
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 8.4%34,498 7.9%36,319 6.7%32,767 ▼ −1.7 pp▼ −1,731▼ −1.2 pp▼ −3,552▼ −0.5 pp▲ +1,821
Chicago citywide 8.4%110,109 8.5%120,682 7.9%114,904 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +4,795▼ −0.7 pp▼ −5,778▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,573
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 20.4%83,128 19.9%91,353 21.7%105,639 ▲ +1.4 pp▲ +22,511▲ +1.8 pp▲ +14,286▼ −0.4 pp▲ +8,225
Chicago citywide 23.5%308,633 22.1%313,540 23.0%336,089 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +27,456▲ +0.8 pp▲ +22,549▼ −1.4 pp▲ +4,907
Educational Services 15.8%64,547 13.0%59,432 13.9%67,771 ▼ −1.9 pp▲ +3,224▲ +1.0 pp▲ +8,339▼ −2.8 pp▼ −5,115
Chicago citywide 10.1%132,909 9.0%128,169 9.2%134,671 ▼ −0.9 pp▲ +1,762▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,502▼ −1.1 pp▼ −4,740
Health Care & Social Assistance 4.6%18,581 7.0%31,921 7.8%37,868 ▲ +3.2 pp▲ +19,287▲ +0.8 pp▲ +5,947▲ +2.4 pp▲ +13,340
Chicago citywide 13.4%175,724 13.1%185,371 13.8%201,418 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +25,694▲ +0.7 pp▲ +16,047▼ −0.3 pp▲ +9,647
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 5.6%22,860 5.3%24,295 4.3%21,034 ▼ −1.3 pp▼ −1,826▼ −1.0 pp▼ −3,261▼ −0.3 pp▲ +1,435
Chicago citywide 10.9%143,753 11.5%162,749 10.3%151,055 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,302▼ −1.2 pp▼ −11,694▲ +0.5 pp▲ +18,996
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 1.3%5,205 1.5%6,990 1.4%6,758 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,553▼ −0.1 pp▼ −232▲ +0.3 pp▲ +1,785
Chicago citywide 1.7%22,179 2.1%30,178 1.9%27,339 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +5,160▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,839▲ +0.4 pp▲ +7,999
Accommodation & Food Services 4.3%17,655 3.8%17,305 2.9%14,276 ▼ −1.4 pp▼ −3,379▼ −0.8 pp▼ −3,029▼ −0.5 pp▼ −350
Chicago citywide 9.3%121,574 9.4%132,571 8.5%123,716 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +2,142▼ −0.9 pp▼ −8,855▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,997
Other Services 3.3%13,346 3.1%14,253 2.7%13,046 ▼ −0.6 pp▼ −300▼ −0.4 pp▼ −1,207▼ −0.2 pp▲ +907
Chicago citywide 4.5%59,098 4.4%61,698 4.0%59,136 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +38▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,562▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,600
Public Administration 11.7%47,750 10.7%48,932 9.7%47,402 ▼ −1.9 pp▼ −348▼ −0.9 pp▼ −1,530▼ −1.0 pp▲ +1,182
Chicago citywide 4.2%54,814 3.6%51,684 3.5%51,418 ▼ −0.7 pp▼ −3,396▼ −0.1 pp▼ −266▼ −0.5 pp▼ −3,130

Earnings of Jobs in Loop

Category Loop
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 8.3%40,578
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 11.8%57,602
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 79.8%388,024
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 8.3%40,578 12.7%185,293 ▼ -4.3% 73/77
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 11.8%57,602 20.5%299,468 ▼ -8.6% 76/77
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 79.8%388,024 66.9%978,839 ▲ +12.9% 3/77
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 16.0%65,343 11.3%51,940 8.3%40,578 ▼ −7.7 pp▼ −24,765▼ −3.0 pp▼ −11,362▼ −4.7 pp▼ −13,403
Chicago citywide 21.3%280,137 16.8%238,135 12.7%185,293 ▼ −8.7 pp▼ −94,844▼ −4.1 pp▼ −52,842▼ −4.5 pp▼ −42,002
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 22.0%89,880 16.5%75,650 11.8%57,602 ▼ −10.2 pp▼ −32,278▼ −4.7 pp▼ −18,048▼ −5.5 pp▼ −14,230
Chicago citywide 30.7%403,220 26.7%378,530 20.5%299,468 ▼ −10.2 pp▼ −103,752▼ −6.3 pp▼ −79,062▼ −4.0 pp▼ −24,690
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 62.0%253,122 72.1%330,370 79.8%388,024 ▲ +17.8 pp▲ +134,902▲ +7.7 pp▲ +57,654▲ +10.2 pp▲ +77,248
Chicago citywide 48.0%630,719 56.5%800,154 66.9%978,839 ▲ +18.9 pp▲ +348,120▲ +10.4 pp▲ +178,685▲ +8.5 pp▲ +169,435

Jobs in Loop by Firm Age

Category Loop
Firm age: 0–1 years 1.6%6,151
Firm age: 2–3 years 1.7%6,473
Firm age: 4–5 years 1.6%6,306
Firm age: 6–10 years 5.4%20,558
Firm age: 11 or more years 89.7%343,337
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years 1.6%6,151 2.8%37,293 ▼ -1.2% 63/77
Firm age: 2–3 years 1.7%6,473 2.8%37,154 ▼ -1.1% 64/77
Firm age: 4–5 years 1.6%6,306 3.2%41,869 ▼ -1.5% 64/77
Firm age: 6–10 years 5.4%20,558 7.8%102,353 ▼ -2.4% 65/77
Firm age: 11 or more years 89.7%343,337 83.4%1,098,220 ▲ +6.3% 9/77
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years 1.8%5,638 1.6%5,589 1.6%6,151 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +513▲ +0.1 pp▲ +562▼ −0.3 pp▼ −49
Chicago citywide 2.9%33,224 2.6%33,244 2.8%37,293 – 0.0 pp▲ +4,069▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,049▼ −0.2 pp▲ +20
Firm age: 2–3 years 2.5%7,751 2.1%7,629 1.7%6,473 ▼ −0.8 pp▼ −1,278▼ −0.4 pp▼ −1,156▼ −0.4 pp▼ −122
Chicago citywide 4.0%46,935 3.3%42,284 2.8%37,154 ▼ −1.2 pp▼ −9,781▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,130▼ −0.7 pp▼ −4,651
Firm age: 4–5 years 2.4%7,316 2.8%10,138 1.6%6,306 ▼ −0.7 pp▼ −1,010▼ −1.2 pp▼ −3,832▲ +0.4 pp▲ +2,822
Chicago citywide 3.7%42,688 3.6%46,058 3.2%41,869 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −819▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,189▼ −0.1 pp▲ +3,370
Firm age: 6–10 years 7.6%23,202 6.3%22,797 5.4%20,558 ▼ −2.2 pp▼ −2,644▼ −1.0 pp▼ −2,239▼ −1.2 pp▼ −405
Chicago citywide 8.2%94,955 8.6%109,934 7.8%102,353 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +7,398▼ −0.9 pp▼ −7,581▲ +0.5 pp▲ +14,979
Firm age: 11 or more years 85.7%263,214 87.2%313,470 89.7%343,337 ▲ +4.0 pp▲ +80,123▲ +2.5 pp▲ +29,867▲ +1.5 pp▲ +50,256
Chicago citywide 81.3%946,801 81.8%1,043,037 83.4%1,098,220 ▲ +2.1 pp▲ +151,419▲ +1.6 pp▲ +55,183▲ +0.5 pp▲ +96,236

Jobs in Loop by Firm Size

Category Loop
Firm size: 0–19 employees 6.2%23,670
Firm size: 20–49 employees 4.5%17,360
Firm size: 50–249 employees 10.4%39,825
Firm size: 250–499 employees 5.4%20,519
Firm size: 500 or more employees 73.5%281,451
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees 6.2%23,670 12.8%168,975 ▼ -6.6% 74/77
Firm size: 20–49 employees 4.5%17,360 7.3%96,404 ▼ -2.8% 69/77
Firm size: 50–249 employees 10.4%39,825 13.8%181,123 ▼ -3.4% 64/77
Firm size: 250–499 employees 5.4%20,519 5.7%74,787 ▼ -0.3% 31/77
Firm size: 500 or more employees 73.5%281,451 60.4%795,600 ▲ +13.1% 6/77
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees 8.8%27,063 7.3%26,303 6.2%23,670 ▼ −2.6 pp▼ −3,393▼ −1.1 pp▼ −2,633▼ −1.5 pp▼ −760
Chicago citywide 13.9%162,248 13.3%169,949 12.8%168,975 ▼ −1.1 pp▲ +6,727▼ −0.5 pp▼ −974▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,701
Firm size: 20–49 employees 5.4%16,731 5.2%18,637 4.5%17,360 ▼ −0.9 pp▲ +629▼ −0.6 pp▼ −1,277▼ −0.3 pp▲ +1,906
Chicago citywide 8.4%97,503 8.2%103,945 7.3%96,404 ▼ −1.1 pp▼ −1,099▼ −0.8 pp▼ −7,541▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,442
Firm size: 50–249 employees 13.4%41,301 11.9%42,812 10.4%39,825 ▼ −3.0 pp▼ −1,476▼ −1.5 pp▼ −2,987▼ −1.5 pp▲ +1,511
Chicago citywide 15.7%183,275 14.9%189,930 13.8%181,123 ▼ −2.0 pp▼ −2,152▼ −1.1 pp▼ −8,807▼ −0.8 pp▲ +6,655
Firm size: 250–499 employees 6.6%20,375 6.1%22,033 5.4%20,519 ▼ −1.3 pp▲ +144▼ −0.8 pp▼ −1,514▼ −0.5 pp▲ +1,658
Chicago citywide 6.3%72,992 5.9%74,603 5.7%74,787 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,795▼ −0.2 pp▲ +184▼ −0.4 pp▲ +1,611
Firm size: 500 or more employees 65.7%201,651 69.5%249,838 73.5%281,451 ▲ +7.9 pp▲ +79,800▲ +4.0 pp▲ +31,613▲ +3.8 pp▲ +48,187
Chicago citywide 55.7%648,585 57.8%736,130 60.4%795,600 ▲ +4.7 pp▲ +147,015▲ +2.7 pp▲ +59,470▲ +2.1 pp▲ +87,545

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Loop
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 2.9% ±1.0 pp2.9%±1.0 pp1,221 ±414
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 46.8% ±14.9 pp1.3%±0.4 pp572 ±182
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 53.2% ±19.1 pp1.5%±0.5 pp649 ±233
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 2.9%±1.0 pp2.9%±1.0 pp1,221±414 13.5%±0.2 pp13.5%±0.2 pp365,577±5,480 ▼ -10.6%▼ -10.6% 77/77
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 46.8%±14.9 pp1.3%±0.4 pp572±182 83.0%±0.5 pp11.2%±0.1 pp303,520±1,897 ▼ -36.2%▼ -9.9% 76/7777/77
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 53.2%±19.1 pp1.5%±0.5 pp649±233 17.0%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.1 pp62,057±2,247 ▲ +36.2%▼ -0.8% 2/7753/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Loop
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 19.6% ±2.3 pp19.6%±2.3 pp8,361 ±978
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 24.6% ±6.0 pp4.8%±1.2 pp2,057 ±499
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 75.4% ±4.9 pp14.8%±1.0 pp6,304 ±410
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 61.5% ±5.6 pp12.1%±1.1 pp5,140 ±465
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 38.5% ±6.8 pp7.6%±1.3 pp3,221 ±565
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 19.6%±2.3 pp19.6%±2.3 pp8,361±978 7.4%±0.1 pp7.4%±0.1 pp201,851±4,036 ▲ +12.2%▲ +12.2% 2/77
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 24.6%±6.0 pp4.8%±1.2 pp2,057±499 52.4%±0.7 pp3.9%±0.1 pp105,720±1,511 ▼ -27.8%▲ +0.9% 75/778/77
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 75.4%±4.9 pp14.8%±1.0 pp6,304±410 47.6%±1.2 pp3.5%±0.1 pp96,131±2,437 ▲ +27.8%▲ +11.3% 3/772/77
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 61.5%±5.6 pp12.1%±1.1 pp5,140±465 67.0%±1.0 pp5.0%±0.1 pp135,301±1,945 ▼ -5.6%▲ +7.1% 59/772/77
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 38.5%±6.8 pp7.6%±1.3 pp3,221±565 33.0%±1.2 pp2.5%±0.1 pp66,550±2,459 ▲ +5.6%▲ +5.1% 19/772/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category Loop
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 0.0% ±4.9 pp0
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 23.8% ±11.3 pp1,189 ±567
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 0.0%±4.9 pp0 5.9%±0.5 pp— ▼ -5.9% 72/77
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 23.8%±11.3 pp1,189±567 5.4%±0.6 pp— ▲ +18.4% 1/77
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category Loop
Owner-Occupied Households 32.3% ±3.3 pp8,061 ±828
Renter-Occupied Households 67.7% ±3.6 pp16,913 ±895
Owner-Occupied Residents 35.3% ±3.9 pp13,596 ±1,488
Renter-Occupied Residents 64.7% ±3.4 pp24,866 ±1,303
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Owner-Occupied Households 32.3%±3.3 pp8,061±828 46.0%±0.4 pp534,012±4,939 ▼ -13.7% 63/77
Renter-Occupied Households 67.7%±3.6 pp16,913±895 54.0%±0.4 pp626,193±5,183 ▲ +13.7% 15/77
Owner-Occupied Residents 35.3%±3.9 pp13,596±1,488 51.8%±0.5 pp1,377,219±13,574 ▼ -16.5% 65/77
Renter-Occupied Residents 64.7%±3.4 pp24,866±1,303 48.2%±0.5 pp1,280,665±13,500 ▲ +16.5% 13/77
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category Loop
Median Year Moved In 2020±0.8 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later 12.6% ±2.6 pp3,159 ±651
Moved in 2020 to 2022 43.3% ±4.5 pp10,816 ±1,125
Moved in 2010 to 2019 32.7% ±4.3 pp8,159 ±1,071
Moved in 2000 to 2009 7.1% ±1.8 pp1,767 ±450
Moved in 1990 to 1999 3.1% ±1.8 pp780 ±443
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 1.2% ±0.8 pp293 ±209
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Median Year Moved In 2020±0.8 yr 2015±1.0 yr ▲ +5 1/77
Moved in 2023 or Later 12.6%±2.6 pp3,159±651 5.9%±0.2 pp68,884±2,742 ▲ +6.7% 1/77
Moved in 2020 to 2022 43.3%±4.5 pp10,816±1,125 24.1%±0.4 pp279,417±5,059 ▲ +19.2% 1/77
Moved in 2010 to 2019 32.7%±4.3 pp8,159±1,071 39.2%±0.5 pp455,125±5,772 ▼ -6.6% 69/77
Moved in 2000 to 2009 7.1%±1.8 pp1,767±450 13.8%±0.3 pp160,353±3,324 ▼ -6.7% 77/77
Moved in 1990 to 1999 3.1%±1.8 pp780±443 8.2%±0.2 pp95,243±2,390 ▼ -5.1% 76/77
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 1.2%±0.8 pp293±209 8.7%±0.2 pp101,183±2,362 ▼ -7.5% 76/77
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show
Category Loop
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 35.7% ±4.3 pp35.7%±4.3 pp15,019 ±1,812
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers) 13.9% ±3.1 pp39.0%±7.3 pp5,858 ±1,311
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers) 4.9% ±1.4 pp13.7%±3.7 pp2,053 ±609
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 13.3% ±2.5 pp37.4%±5.3 pp5,620 ±1,044
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 3.5% ±1.6 pp9.9%±4.3 pp1,488 ±675
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 35.7%±4.3 pp35.7%±4.3 pp15,019±1,812 14.0%±0.3 pp14.0%±0.3 pp375,475±8,289 ▲ +21.7%▲ +21.7% 1/77
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers) 13.9%±3.1 pp39.0%±7.3 pp5,858±1,311 9.8%±0.3 pp69.9%±1.0 pp262,365±6,953 ▲ +4.1%▼ -30.9% 10/7777/77
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers) 4.9%±1.4 pp13.7%±3.7 pp2,053±609 0.8%±0.1 pp5.5%±0.4 pp20,552±1,626 ▲ +4.1%▲ +8.2% 1/772/77
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 13.3%±2.5 pp37.4%±5.3 pp5,620±1,044 2.5%±0.1 pp17.6%±0.7 pp65,936±2,918 ▲ +10.9%▲ +19.9% 1/773/77
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 3.5%±1.6 pp9.9%±4.3 pp1,488±675 1.0%±0.1 pp7.1%±0.8 pp26,622±3,040 ▲ +2.5%▲ +2.8% 2/7723/77
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show
Category Loop
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 10.7% ±2.5 pp10.7%±2.5 pp2,981 ±694
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 6.2% ±2.1 pp58.0%±13.7 pp1,729 ±574
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.3% ±0.3 pp2.9%±3.2 pp87 ±97
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.2% ±0.2 pp1.5%±2.2 pp46 ±66
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 4.0% ±1.6 pp37.5%±12.4 pp1,119 ±453
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 9.1% ±3.0 pp9.1%±3.0 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 1.1% ±1.2 pp1.1%±1.2 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 10.7%±2.5 pp10.7%±2.5 pp2,981±694 9.1%±0.2 pp9.1%±0.2 pp116,849±2,682 ▲ +1.5%▲ +1.5% 22/77
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 6.2%±2.1 pp58.0%±13.7 pp1,729±574 2.5%±0.1 pp27.1%±1.4 pp31,723±1,796 ▲ +3.7%▲ +30.9% 1/774/77
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.3%±0.3 pp2.9%±3.2 pp87±97 0.6%±0.1 pp6.0%±0.7 pp7,037±795 ▼ -0.2%▼ -3.1% 52/7753/77
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.2%±0.2 pp1.5%±2.2 pp46±66 0.2%±0.0 pp2.4%±0.5 pp2,831±587 ▼ -0.1%▼ -0.9% 23/7721/77
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 4.0%±1.6 pp37.5%±12.4 pp1,119±453 5.9%±0.3 pp64.4%±2.5 pp75,258±3,387 ▼ -1.9%▼ -26.9% 51/7772/77
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 9.1%±3.0 pp9.1%±3.0 pp— 4.8%±0.3 pp4.8%±0.3 pp— ▲ +4.3%▲ +4.3% 3/77
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 1.1%±1.2 pp1.1%±1.2 pp— 1.3%±0.1 pp1.3%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.2%▼ -0.2% 38/77
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category Loop
Median Year Built 2000±4 yr
Pre-1940 16.2% ±2.6 pp4,533 ±722
1940-2009 57.7% ±5.3 pp16,140 ±1,493
2010+ 26.0% ±3.8 pp7,282 ±1,053
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Median Year Built 2000±4 yr 1953±1 yr ▲ +47 yrs 2/77
Pre-1940 16.2%±2.6 pp4,533±722 38.8%±0.4 pp495,715±4,678 ▼ -22.6% 67/77
1940-2009 57.7%±5.3 pp16,140±1,493 54.9%±0.6 pp700,698±7,435 ▲ +2.9% 39/77
2010+ 26.0%±3.8 pp7,282±1,053 6.3%±0.2 pp80,641±2,725 ▲ +19.7% 1/77
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category Loop
Population Density 25,620 /sq mi±1,256/sq mi
Single-Family Homes 2.1% ±1.0 pp582 ±266
Buildings With 2–4 Units 0.5% ±0.4 pp133 ±122
Buildings With 5–19 Units 1.2% ±1.2 pp341 ±326
Buildings With 20 or More Units 96.2% ±2.8 pp26,899 ±797
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Population Density 25,620 /sq mi±1,256/sq mi 11,748 /sq mi±26/sq mi ▲ +13,872 /sq mi 5/77
Single-Family Homes 2.1%±1.0 pp582±266 29.2%±0.3 pp372,679±3,989 ▼ -27.1% 77/77
Buildings With 2–4 Units 0.5%±0.4 pp133±122 27.4%±0.4 pp349,976±4,957 ▼ -26.9% 77/77
Buildings With 5–19 Units 1.2%±1.2 pp341±326 16.2%±0.3 pp206,420±4,124 ▼ -14.9% 75/77
Buildings With 20 or More Units 96.2%±2.8 pp26,899±797 27.0%±0.3 pp344,543±4,438 ▲ +69.2% 1/77
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category Loop
Studio 21.2% ±4.0 pp5,936 ±1,123
1 Bedroom 38.5% ±3.6 pp10,766 ±1,007
2 Bedrooms 30.8% ±3.4 pp8,623 ±954
3 Bedrooms 8.5% ±2.2 pp2,383 ±618
4 Bedrooms 0.6% ±0.6 pp163 ±155
5 or More Bedrooms 0.3% ±0.4 pp84 ±113
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Studio 21.2%±4.0 pp5,936±1,123 7.5%±0.3 pp95,749±3,205 ▲ +13.7% 1/77
1 Bedroom 38.5%±3.6 pp10,766±1,007 20.1%±0.4 pp257,271±4,939 ▲ +18.4% 2/77
2 Bedrooms 30.8%±3.4 pp8,623±954 33.1%±0.3 pp422,866±4,221 ▼ -2.3% 44/77
3 Bedrooms 8.5%±2.2 pp2,383±618 26.1%±0.3 pp333,682±4,061 ▼ -17.6% 77/77
4 Bedrooms 0.6%±0.6 pp163±155 9.0%±0.2 pp115,453±2,426 ▼ -8.5% 77/77
5 or More Bedrooms 0.3%±0.4 pp84±113 4.1%±0.2 pp52,033±2,072 ▼ -3.8% 75/77
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show
Category Loop
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 3.1% ±1.5 pp3.1%±1.5 pp780 ±375
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 0.5% ±0.5 pp16.5%±15.6 pp129 ±137
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 2.6% ±1.4 pp83.5%±19.9 pp651 ±349
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 3.1%±1.5 pp3.1%±1.5 pp780±375 3.4%±0.2 pp3.4%±0.2 pp39,979±1,996 ▼ -0.3%▼ -0.3% 37/77
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 0.5%±0.5 pp16.5%±15.6 pp129±137 2.0%±0.1 pp58.2%±2.3 pp23,276±1,493 ▼ -1.5%▼ -41.7% 68/7774/76
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 2.6%±1.4 pp83.5%±19.9 pp651±349 1.4%±0.1 pp41.8%±2.6 pp16,703±1,328 ▲ +1.2%▲ +41.7% 11/773/76
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category Loop
Natural Gas Heat 38.7% ±3.7 pp9,666 ±913
Electric Heat 58.6% ±3.5 pp14,646 ±881
Other Heating Source 2.7% ±1.1 pp662 ±279
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Natural Gas Heat 38.7%±3.7 pp9,666±913 77.5%±0.3 pp899,660±3,501 ▼ -38.8% 77/77
Electric Heat 58.6%±3.5 pp14,646±881 18.0%±0.3 pp208,937±3,864 ▲ +40.6% 1/77
Other Heating Source 2.7%±1.1 pp662±279 4.4%±0.2 pp51,603±2,173 ▼ -1.8% 54/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show
Category Loop
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 33.9% ±3.9 pp8,467 ±972
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 24.5% ±3.5 pp6,128 ±866
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 41.6% ±4.5 pp10,379 ±1,133
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 20.7% ±4.2 pp5,174 ±1,053
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 33.9%±3.9 pp8,467±972 24.9%±0.5 pp289,047±6,215 ▲ +9.0% 54/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 24.5%±3.5 pp6,128±866 23.8%±0.5 pp276,514±5,809 ▲ +0.7% 15/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 41.6%±4.5 pp10,379±1,133 45.6%±0.6 pp529,378±6,577 ▼ -4.1% 33/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 20.7%±4.2 pp5,174±1,053 24.0%±0.5 pp278,684±5,306 ▼ -3.3% 34/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category Loop
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,503±$116
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,973±$85
Median Monthly Housing Costs $2,451±$70
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,503±$116 $594±$11 ▲ +$909 1/77
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,973±$85 $1,011±$8 ▲ +$962 1/77
Median Monthly Housing Costs $2,451±$70 $1,560±$10 ▲ +$891 3/77
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000 $2,329±$13 ▲ +$671+ 1/77
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000 Over $3,000 — 1/77
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,043 ±282 $1,375 ±87 $1,503 ±116 ▲ +$459▲ +$128▲ +$331
Chicago citywide $609 ±7 $606 ±7 $594 ±11 ▼ −$15▼ −$12▼ −$2
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $787 ±213 $1,120 ±71 $1,503 ±116 ▲ +$715▲ +$382▲ +$333
Chicago citywide $459 ±6 $494 ±6 $594 ±11 ▲ +$135▲ +$100▲ +$35
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,782 ±95 $2,015 ±66 $1,973 ±85 ▲ +$191▼ −$41▲ +$233
Chicago citywide $992 ±5 $1,001 ±5 $1,011 ±8 ▲ +$19▲ +$10▲ +$9
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,345 ±72 $1,642 ±54 $1,973 ±85 ▲ +$628▲ +$331▲ +$297
Chicago citywide $748 ±3 $816 ±4 $1,011 ±8 ▲ +$262▲ +$195▲ +$67
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,462 ±65 $2,666 ±55 $2,451 ±70 ▼ −$11▼ −$215▲ +$204
Chicago citywide $1,493 ±8 $1,523 ±6 $1,560 ±10 ▲ +$67▲ +$37▲ +$29
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,858 ±49 $2,173 ±45 $2,451 ±70 ▲ +$593▲ +$278▲ +$315
Chicago citywide $1,127 ±6 $1,241 ±5 $1,560 ±10 ▲ +$433▲ +$319▲ +$114
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $3,418 ±101 — ———
Chicago citywide $2,333 ±12 $2,326 ±10 $2,329 ±13 ▼ −$4▲ +$3▼ −$7
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) — $2,785 ±82 — ———
Chicago citywide $1,761 ±9 $1,896 ±8 $2,329 ±13 ▲ +$569▲ +$434▲ +$135
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide — $3,316 ±20 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide — $2,703 ±16 — ———

Rent

Rent measure
Category Loop
Average Rent Plus Utilities $2,576±$101
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,595±$113
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,049±$76
Median Rent Plus Utilities $2,430±$71
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,944±$93
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities Over $3,500
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities $2,576±$101 $1,613±$12 ▲ +$963 1/77
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,595±$113 $696±$20 ▲ +$899 1/77
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,049±$76 $1,043±$8 ▲ +$1,006 1/77
Median Rent Plus Utilities $2,430±$71 $1,440±$10 ▲ +$990 1/77
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,944±$93 $2,021±$21 ▲ +$923 2/77
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities Over $3,500 $2,738±$29 ▲ +$762+ 1/77
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop
Average Rent $2,491±$96
10th Percentile Rent $1,572±$122
25th Percentile Rent $1,998±$89
Median Rent $2,350±$61
75th Percentile Rent $2,837±$84
90th Percentile Rent Over $3,500
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Average Rent $2,491±$96 $1,452±$11 ▲ +$1,039 1/77
10th Percentile Rent $1,572±$122 $564±$21 ▲ +$1,008 1/77
25th Percentile Rent $1,998±$89 $913±$7 ▲ +$1,085 1/77
Median Rent $2,350±$61 $1,262±$12 ▲ +$1,088 1/77
75th Percentile Rent $2,837±$84 $1,868±$13 ▲ +$969 2/77
90th Percentile Rent Over $3,500 $2,528±$38 ▲ +$972+ 1/77
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category Loop
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,316±$156
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,780±$138
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,211±$202
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,897±$215
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,762±$230
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,316±$156 $2,734±$24 ▲ +$582 8/77
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,780±$138 $1,270±$14 ▲ +$510 9/77
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,211±$202 $1,697±$14 ▲ +$514 11/77
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,897±$215 $2,339±$17 ▲ +$558 11/77
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,762±$230 $3,269±$31 ▲ +$493 14/77
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000 Over $4,000 — 1/77
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,790 ±283 $3,778 ±357 $3,316 ±156 ▼ −$475▼ −$462▼ −$13
Chicago citywide $2,855 ±19 $2,793 ±23 $2,734 ±24 ▼ −$121▼ −$60▼ −$61
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,861 ±214 $3,079 ±291 $3,316 ±156 ▲ +$455▲ +$237▲ +$218
Chicago citywide $2,154 ±14 $2,277 ±19 $2,734 ±24 ▲ +$579▲ +$457▲ +$122
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,866 ±148 $1,700 ±185 $1,780 ±138 ▼ −$86▲ +$80▼ −$166
Chicago citywide $1,403 ±11 $1,356 ±11 $1,270 ±14 ▼ −$133▼ −$86▼ −$47
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,408 ±112 $1,386 ±151 $1,780 ±138 ▲ +$372▲ +$394▼ −$23
Chicago citywide $1,059 ±8 $1,105 ±9 $1,270 ±14 ▲ +$212▲ +$165▲ +$46
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,391 ±145 $2,318 ±214 $2,211 ±202 ▼ −$179▼ −$106▼ −$73
Chicago citywide $1,874 ±12 $1,800 ±12 $1,697 ±14 ▼ −$177▼ −$103▼ −$74
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,804 ±109 $1,889 ±174 $2,211 ±202 ▲ +$407▲ +$322▲ +$85
Chicago citywide $1,414 ±9 $1,467 ±10 $1,697 ±14 ▲ +$283▲ +$230▲ +$53
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,335 ±231 $3,303 ±240 $2,897 ±215 ▼ −$438▼ −$406▼ −$32
Chicago citywide $2,526 ±13 $2,422 ±13 $2,339 ±17 ▼ −$187▼ −$83▼ −$103
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,517 ±174 $2,692 ±196 $2,897 ±215 ▲ +$380▲ +$205▲ +$175
Chicago citywide $1,906 ±10 $1,974 ±11 $2,339 ±17 ▲ +$433▲ +$365▲ +$68
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $4,575 ±300 $3,762 ±230 —▼ −$813—
Chicago citywide $3,447 ±25 $3,343 ±25 $3,269 ±31 ▼ −$178▼ −$74▼ −$104
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) — $3,728 ±245 $3,762 ±230 —▲ +$34—
Chicago citywide $2,601 ±19 $2,724 ±20 $3,269 ±31 ▲ +$668▲ +$544▲ +$123
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide — $4,578 ±59 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide — $3,731 ±48 — ———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category Loop
Average Monthly Owner Costs $2,202±$501
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,008±$379
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,206±$128
Median Monthly Owner Costs Over $1,500
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs Over $1,500
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs Over $1,500
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs $2,202±$501 $1,078±$22 ▲ +$1,124 3/77
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,008±$379 $418±$8 ▲ +$590 1/77
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,206±$128 $601±$8 ▲ +$605 2/77
Median Monthly Owner Costs Over $1,500 $859±$10 ▲ +$641+ 1/77
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs Over $1,500 $1,197±$18 ▲ +$303+ 1/77
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs Over $1,500 Over $1,500 — 1/77
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,549 ±152 $2,025 ±185 $2,202 ±501 ▲ +$653▲ +$177▲ +$476
Chicago citywide $957 ±15 $1,028 ±10 $1,078 ±22 ▲ +$121▲ +$50▲ +$71
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $1,169 ±115 $1,650 ±151 $2,202 ±501 ▲ +$1,033▲ +$551▲ +$481
Chicago citywide $722 ±11 $838 ±8 $1,078 ±22 ▲ +$355▲ +$240▲ +$116
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $783 ±117 $1,110 ±178 $1,008 ±379 ▲ +$225▼ −$102▲ +$327
Chicago citywide $429 ±6 $469 ±7 $418 ±8 ▼ −$11▼ −$51▲ +$40
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $591 ±88 $905 ±145 $1,008 ±379 ▲ +$417▲ +$103▲ +$314
Chicago citywide $324 ±5 $382 ±5 $418 ±8 ▲ +$95▲ +$36▲ +$59
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $1,361 ±121 $1,206 ±128 —▼ −$155—
Chicago citywide $586 ±6 $629 ±6 $601 ±8 ▲ +$14▼ −$28▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — $1,109 ±99 $1,206 ±128 —▲ +$96—
Chicago citywide $442 ±4 $513 ±5 $601 ±8 ▲ +$158▲ +$88▲ +$70
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $1,807 ±130 — ———
Chicago citywide $815 ±9 $860 ±7 $859 ±10 ▲ +$44▼ −$1▲ +$45
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — $1,472 ±106 — ———
Chicago citywide $615 ±7 $701 ±6 $859 ±10 ▲ +$244▲ +$158▲ +$86
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide — $1,206 ±14 $1,197 ±18 —▼ −$9—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide — $983 ±12 $1,197 ±18 —▲ +$214—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide — $1,767 ±35 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide — $1,440 ±28 — ———

Home Values

Category Loop
Average Home Value $570,125±$66,571
10th Percentile Home Value $227,955±$32,851
25th Percentile Home Value $310,971±$28,237
Median Home Value $439,805±$38,114
75th Percentile Home Value $656,217±$53,474
90th Percentile Home Value $998,462±$315,523
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Average Home Value $570,125±$66,571 $437,638±$7,358 ▲ +$132,486 9/77
10th Percentile Home Value $227,955±$32,851 $129,150±$3,756 ▲ +$98,805 11/77
25th Percentile Home Value $310,971±$28,237 $217,800±$1,804 ▲ +$93,171 15/77
Median Home Value $439,805±$38,114 $334,100±$2,424 ▲ +$105,705 13/77
75th Percentile Home Value $656,217±$53,474 $497,700±$3,730 ▲ +$158,517 14/77
90th Percentile Home Value $998,462±$315,523 $809,159±$15,691 ▲ +$189,303 9/77
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $603,592 ±99,059 $766,458 ±167,146 $570,125 ±66,571 ▼ −$33,467▼ −$196,334▲ +$162,866
Chicago citywide $386,614 ±5,106 $424,380 ±4,754 $437,638 ±7,358 ▲ +$51,024▲ +$13,258▲ +$37,766
Average Home Value (nominal dollars) $455,521 ±74,758 $624,665 ±136,225 $570,125 ±66,571 ▲ +$114,604▼ −$54,540▲ +$169,144
Chicago citywide $291,771 ±3,853 $345,871 ±3,874 $437,638 ±7,358 ▲ +$145,867▲ +$91,768▲ +$54,099
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $215,085 ±28,338 $262,256 ±22,807 $227,955 ±32,851 ▲ +$12,871▼ −$34,300▲ +$47,171
Chicago citywide $115,330 ±1,421 $124,313 ±1,339 $129,150 ±3,756 ▲ +$13,821▲ +$4,838▲ +$8,983
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $162,321 ±21,386 $213,739 ±18,587 $227,955 ±32,851 ▲ +$65,634▲ +$14,217▲ +$51,418
Chicago citywide $87,037 ±1,072 $101,315 ±1,091 $129,150 ±3,756 ▲ +$42,113▲ +$27,835▲ +$14,278
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $312,901 ±21,687 $368,320 ±26,721 $310,971 ±28,237 ▼ −$1,931▼ −$57,349▲ +$55,418
Chicago citywide $190,543 ±2,400 $199,018 ±1,255 $217,800 ±1,804 ▲ +$27,257▲ +$18,782▲ +$8,475
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $236,142 ±16,367 $300,181 ±21,778 $310,971 ±28,237 ▲ +$74,829▲ +$10,790▲ +$64,039
Chicago citywide $143,800 ±1,811 $162,200 ±1,023 $217,800 ±1,804 ▲ +$74,000▲ +$55,600▲ +$18,400
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $453,629 ±26,489 $495,453 ±31,493 $439,805 ±38,114 ▼ −$13,824▼ −$55,648▲ +$41,824
Chicago citywide $299,066 ±2,120 $316,564 ±2,118 $334,100 ±2,424 ▲ +$35,034▲ +$17,536▲ +$17,498
Median Home Value (nominal dollars) $342,347 ±19,991 $403,795 ±25,666 $439,805 ±38,114 ▲ +$97,459▲ +$36,010▲ +$61,448
Chicago citywide $225,700 ±1,600 $258,000 ±1,726 $334,100 ±2,424 ▲ +$108,400▲ +$76,100▲ +$32,300
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $689,184 ±74,812 $786,006 ±98,557 $656,217 ±53,474 ▼ −$32,967▼ −$129,789▲ +$96,823
Chicago citywide $466,951 ±3,138 $490,797 ±3,892 $497,700 ±3,730 ▲ +$30,749▲ +$6,903▲ +$23,846
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $520,116 ±56,459 $640,596 ±80,324 $656,217 ±53,474 ▲ +$136,101▲ +$15,621▲ +$120,481
Chicago citywide $352,400 ±2,368 $400,000 ±3,172 $497,700 ±3,730 ▲ +$145,300▲ +$97,700▲ +$47,600
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,142,796 ±172,191 $1,221,671 ±233,194 $998,462 ±315,523 ▼ −$144,333▼ −$223,209▲ +$78,876
Chicago citywide $739,174 ±12,945 $835,769 ±9,047 $809,159 ±15,691 ▲ +$69,986▼ −$26,610▲ +$96,595
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $862,449 ±129,950 $995,664 ±190,053 $998,462 ±315,523 ▲ +$136,013▲ +$2,798▲ +$133,215
Chicago citywide $557,842 ±9,770 $681,153 ±7,373 $809,159 ±15,691 ▲ +$251,317▲ +$128,006▲ +$123,311

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show
Category Loop
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 1.9%1.9%543
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 1.3%64.6%351
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.7%35.4%192
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
Category Loop City Difference Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 1.9%1.9%543 8.3%8.3%106,578 ▼ -6.4%▼ -6.4% 60/77
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 1.3%64.6%351 4.8%57.2%60,910 ▼ -3.5%▲ +7.5% 58/7746/77
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0 1.1%13.8%14,721 ▼ -1.1%▼ -13.8% 71/7771/77
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.7%35.4%192 2.1%25.7%27,383 ▼ -1.5%▲ +9.7% 40/7714/77
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0 0.3%3.3%3,564 ▼ -0.3%▼ -3.3% 47/7747/77
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units 2.1%430 1.2%308 1.9%543 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +113▲ +0.7 pp▲ +235▼ −0.9 pp▼ −122
Chicago citywide 8.8%104,550 8.5%103,479 8.3%106,578 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,028▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,099▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,071
Housing Choice Vouchers 0.8%165 0.5%115 1.3%351 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +186▲ +0.8 pp▲ +236▼ −0.3 pp▼ −50
Chicago citywide 4.3%51,601 4.6%55,987 4.8%60,910 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +9,309▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,923▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,386
Public Housing 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 1.8%21,159 1.3%16,094 1.2%14,721 ▼ −0.6 pp▼ −6,438▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,373▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,065
Project-Based Section 8 1.3%265 0.8%193 0.7%192 ▼ −0.6 pp▼ −73▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1▼ −0.5 pp▼ −72
Chicago citywide 2.2%25,940 2.2%26,951 2.1%27,383 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,443▼ −0.1 pp▲ +432– 0.0 pp▲ +1,011
Other Project-Based Programs 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 0.5%5,850 0.4%4,447 0.3%3,564 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,286▼ −0.1 pp▼ −883▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,403
Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category Loop
Average Household Income $15,701
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $403
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,664
Below 30% of Area Median Income 83.8%411
With Children 10.8%53
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 25.4%125
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $15,701 $17,032 ▼ -$1,331 63/75
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $403 $425 ▼ -$22 57/75
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,664 $1,389 ▲ +$276 3/75
Below 30% of Area Median Income 83.8%411 83.0%77,427 ▲ +0.8 pp 20/75
With Children 10.8%53 31.0%28,919 ▼ -20.2 pp 71/75
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 25.4%125 32.0%29,852 ▼ -6.6 pp 69/75
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income $11,974 $10,549 $15,703 ▲ +$3,730▲ +$5,154▼ −$1,425
Chicago citywide $12,156 $13,665 $17,032 ▲ +$4,876▲ +$3,367▲ +$1,509
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $279 $255 $403 ▲ +$124▲ +$148▼ −$24
Chicago citywide $310 $340 $425 ▲ +$115▲ +$85▲ +$30
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,130 $1,469 $1,667 ▲ +$536▲ +$198▲ +$338
Chicago citywide $916 $1,017 $1,389 ▲ +$473▲ +$372▲ +$101
Below 30% of Area Median Income 75.4%— 90.8%— 83.9%— ▲ +8.4 pp—▼ −6.9 pp—▲ +15.4 pp—
Chicago citywide 80.0%— 81.0%— 83.0%— ▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +2.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children — — 10.8%— ——————
Chicago citywide — — 31.0%— ——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 25.0%— 19.2%— 25.3%— ▲ +0.4 pp—▲ +6.1 pp—▼ −5.8 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category Loop
Total Tree Canopy 14.4%143 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 72.9%725 acres
Natural Open Surfaces 12.7%126 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Total Tree Canopy 14.4%143 acres 18.4%25,934 acres ▼ -4.0% 55/77
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 72.9%725 acres 60.2%84,955 acres ▲ +12.7% 17/77
Natural Open Surfaces 12.7%126 acres 21.5%30,331 acres ▼ -8.8% 59/77
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category Loop
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 26.9% ±6.3 pp11,439 ±2,690
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 48.0% ±6.5 pp20,418 ±2,783
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 25.1% ±5.3 pp10,693 ±2,276
Homes Without Air Conditioning 2.8%1,211
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates
Category Loop City Difference Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 26.9%±6.3 pp11,439±2,690 26.1%±0.5 pp707,660±13,869 ▲ +0.8% 24/77
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 48.0%±6.5 pp20,418±2,783 44.1%±0.6 pp1,195,950±15,462 ▲ +3.9% 12/77
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 25.1%±5.3 pp10,693±2,276 29.8%±0.5 pp807,615±13,763 ▼ -4.7% 57/77
Homes Without Air Conditioning 2.8%1,211 4.2%114,494 ▼ -1.4% 56/77
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category Loop
Drove Alone 28.1% ±4.5 pp5,315 ±843
Carpooled 1.9% ±0.9 pp356 ±168
Public Transit 21.9% ±3.9 pp4,147 ±731
Walked 42.5% ±4.6 pp8,042 ±876
Bikes 2.1% ±1.4 pp401 ±262
Other Commute Mode 3.0% ±1.5 pp568 ±275
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Drove Alone 28.1%±4.5 pp5,315±843 56.6%±0.4 pp772,696±5,998 ▼ -28.6% 76/77
Carpooled 1.9%±0.9 pp356±168 9.3%±0.3 pp126,918±3,980 ▼ -7.4% 76/77
Public Transit 21.9%±3.9 pp4,147±731 22.4%±0.4 pp305,691±6,011 ▼ -0.5% 34/77
Walked 42.5%±4.6 pp8,042±876 7.3%±0.3 pp100,269±3,456 ▲ +35.1% 1/77
Bikes 2.1%±1.4 pp401±262 1.8%±0.1 pp24,441±1,693 ▲ +0.3% 20/77
Other Commute Mode 3.0%±1.5 pp568±275 2.5%±0.1 pp34,356±1,772 ▲ +0.5% 6/77
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category Loop
Average Commute Time (minutes) 25 min±2.0 min
Less Than 15 Minutes 19.7% ±3.5 pp3,726 ±660
15–29 Minutes 49.6% ±6.0 pp9,391 ±1,131
30–44 Minutes 17.2% ±3.2 pp3,247 ±609
45–59 Minutes 5.4% ±1.8 pp1,017 ±338
60 Minutes or More 8.2% ±3.0 pp1,549 ±567
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes) 25 min±2.0 min 33 min±0.2 min ▼ −8 min 73/76
Less Than 15 Minutes 19.7%±3.5 pp3,726±660 13.0%±0.3 pp140,252±3,438 ▲ +6.7% 9/77
15–29 Minutes 49.6%±6.0 pp9,391±1,131 29.9%±0.5 pp322,586±5,056 ▲ +19.7% 1/77
30–44 Minutes 17.2%±3.2 pp3,247±609 29.6%±0.4 pp318,782±4,584 ▼ -12.4% 77/77
45–59 Minutes 5.4%±1.8 pp1,017±338 14.0%±0.3 pp151,451±3,075 ▼ -8.7% 77/77
60 Minutes or More 8.2%±3.0 pp1,549±567 13.4%±0.3 pp144,940±3,715 ▼ -5.3% 69/77
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category Loop
Average Vehicles per Household 0.58±0.06
Households With No Vehicle 49.9% ±4.4 pp12,461 ±1,088
Households With 1 Vehicle 42.6% ±3.6 pp10,640 ±901
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 7.5% ±2.2 pp1,873 ±547
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Average Vehicles per Household 0.58±0.06 1.12±0.01 ▼ −0.54 77/77
Households With No Vehicle 49.9%±4.4 pp12,461±1,088 26.6%±0.4 pp308,497±5,087 ▲ +23.3% 2/77
Households With 1 Vehicle 42.6%±3.6 pp10,640±901 45.2%±0.4 pp524,900±5,145 ▼ -2.6% 44/77
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 7.5%±2.2 pp1,873±547 28.2%±0.4 pp326,808±4,200 ▼ -20.7% 76/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Loop Residents Work

Category Loop
Loop 37.9%8,400
Near North Side 11.1%2,469
Near West Side 10.1%2,236
Hyde Park 3.0%669
O'Hare 1.5%324
All other city neighborhoods 10.7%2,379
Outside the city 25.7%5,695
↳ Evanston city, IL 1.1%245
↳ Schaumburg village, IL 0.9%192
↳ Skokie village, IL 0.8%178
↳ Oak Brook village, IL 0.8%170
↳ Naperville city, IL 0.7%151
↳ All other Illinois locations 19.0%4,221
Out of state 2.4%538
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 32 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Loop
Loop 37.9%8,400
Near North Side 11.1%2,469
Near West Side 10.1%2,236
Hyde Park 3.0%669
O'Hare 1.5%324
All other city neighborhoods 10.7%2,379
Outside the city 25.7%5,695
↳ Evanston city, IL 1.1%245
↳ Schaumburg village, IL 0.9%192
↳ Skokie village, IL 0.8%178
↳ Oak Brook village, IL 0.8%170
↳ Naperville city, IL 0.7%151
↳ All other Illinois locations 19.0%4,221
Out of state 2.4%538
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 32 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Loop 37.4%5,973 40.6%8,324 37.9%8,400 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +2,427▼ −2.7 pp▲ +76▲ +3.2 pp▲ +2,351
Chicago citywide 20.0%224,635 21.0%252,791 21.5%259,167 ▲ +1.5 pp▲ +34,532▲ +0.5 pp▲ +6,376▲ +1.0 pp▲ +28,156
Near North Side 9.7%1,545 10.7%2,188 11.1%2,469 ▲ +1.5 pp▲ +924▲ +0.5 pp▲ +281▲ +1.0 pp▲ +643
Chicago citywide 8.2%92,143 9.4%112,859 9.1%109,333 ▲ +0.9 pp▲ +17,190▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3,526▲ +1.2 pp▲ +20,716
Near West Side 8.7%1,393 9.3%1,909 10.1%2,236 ▲ +1.4 pp▲ +843▲ +0.8 pp▲ +327▲ +0.6 pp▲ +516
Chicago citywide 6.2%69,083 6.6%79,757 6.7%80,118 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +11,035– 0.0 pp▲ +361▲ +0.5 pp▲ +10,674
Hyde Park 2.9%469 2.9%594 3.0%669 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +200▲ +0.1 pp▲ +75– 0.0 pp▲ +125
Chicago citywide 1.5%16,641 1.4%16,773 1.6%18,756 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,115▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,983▼ −0.1 pp▲ +132
O'Hare 1.6%256 2.3%471 1.5%324 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +68▼ −0.8 pp▼ −147▲ +0.7 pp▲ +215
Chicago citywide 1.4%15,963 1.3%15,631 1.3%16,140 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +177– 0.0 pp▲ +509▼ −0.1 pp▼ −332
All other city neighborhoods 11.7%1,868 9.8%2,018 10.7%2,379 ▼ −1.0 pp▲ +511▲ +0.9 pp▲ +361▼ −1.9 pp▲ +150
Chicago citywide 22.5%252,499 21.1%253,775 20.7%248,736 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −3,763▼ −0.4 pp▼ −5,039▼ −1.4 pp▲ +1,276
Outside the city 28.0%4,469 24.4%5,000 25.7%5,695 ▼ −2.3 pp▲ +1,226▲ +1.3 pp▲ +695▼ −3.6 pp▲ +531
Chicago citywide 36.8%412,807 35.7%430,134 35.9%432,355 ▼ −0.9 pp▲ +19,548▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,221▼ −1.0 pp▲ +17,327
Evanston city, IL 1.6%258 1.2%249 1.1%245 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −13▼ −0.1 pp▼ −4▼ −0.4 pp▼ −9
Chicago citywide 1.6%17,922 1.6%18,922 1.5%17,546 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −376▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,376– 0.0 pp▲ +1,000
Schaumburg village, IL 1.1%178 0.9%191 0.9%192 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +14▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1▼ −0.2 pp▲ +13
Chicago citywide 1.1%11,817 1.0%11,930 0.9%10,376 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,441▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,554▼ −0.1 pp▲ +113
Skokie village, IL 0.5%76 0.4%78 0.8%178 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +102▲ +0.4 pp▲ +100▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2
Chicago citywide 1.1%12,426 1.1%12,900 1.3%15,777 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +3,351▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,877– 0.0 pp▲ +474
Oak Brook village, IL 0.8%126 0.6%119 0.8%170 – 0.0 pp▲ +44▲ +0.2 pp▲ +51▼ −0.2 pp▼ −7
Chicago citywide 0.7%7,408 0.6%7,560 0.7%8,055 – 0.0 pp▲ +647– 0.0 pp▲ +495– 0.0 pp▲ +152
Naperville city, IL 0.8%121 0.5%111 0.7%151 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +30▲ +0.1 pp▲ +40▼ −0.2 pp▼ −10
Chicago citywide 0.5%5,765 0.5%6,098 0.6%6,926 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,161▲ +0.1 pp▲ +828– 0.0 pp▲ +333
All other Illinois locations 20.9%3,342 18.1%3,706 19.0%4,221 ▼ −1.9 pp▲ +879▲ +1.0 pp▲ +515▼ −2.8 pp▲ +364
Chicago citywide 27.9%312,992 27.0%324,805 27.3%329,050 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +16,058▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,245▼ −0.9 pp▲ +11,813
Out of state 2.2%353 2.4%498 2.4%538 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +185– 0.0 pp▲ +40▲ +0.2 pp▲ +145
Chicago citywide 2.2%24,577 2.3%27,198 2.2%26,136 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,559▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,062▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,621

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Loop

Category Loop
Lake View 3.7%18,097
Near North Side 3.7%18,066
West Town 2.5%12,394
Lincoln Park 2.3%11,329
Near West Side 1.9%9,250
All other city neighborhoods 39.1%190,031
Outside the city 46.7%227,037
↳ Naperville city, IL 1.2%5,671
↳ Oak Park village, IL 1.0%4,844
↳ Evanston city, IL 0.9%4,262
↳ Aurora city, IL 0.8%3,891
↳ Skokie village, IL 0.7%3,233
↳ All other Illinois locations 37.5%182,254
Out of state 4.7%22,882
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 32; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Loop
Lake View 3.7%18,097
Near North Side 3.7%18,066
West Town 2.5%12,394
Lincoln Park 2.3%11,329
Near West Side 1.9%9,250
All other city neighborhoods 39.1%190,031
Outside the city 46.7%227,037
↳ Naperville city, IL 1.2%5,671
↳ Oak Park village, IL 1.0%4,844
↳ Evanston city, IL 0.9%4,262
↳ Aurora city, IL 0.8%3,891
↳ Skokie village, IL 0.7%3,233
↳ All other Illinois locations 37.5%182,254
Out of state 4.7%22,882
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 32; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Lake View 4.1%16,572 4.0%18,308 3.7%18,097 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +1,525▼ −0.3 pp▼ −211▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,736
Chicago citywide 3.2%41,851 3.2%45,855 3.1%44,775 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,924▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,080▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,004
Near North Side 3.4%13,898 4.0%18,224 3.7%18,066 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,168▼ −0.3 pp▼ −158▲ +0.6 pp▲ +4,326
Chicago citywide 2.4%32,132 2.9%40,974 2.8%40,551 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +8,419▼ −0.1 pp▼ −423▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,842
West Town 2.5%10,345 2.7%12,206 2.5%12,394 – 0.0 pp▲ +2,049▼ −0.1 pp▲ +188▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,861
Chicago citywide 2.5%32,371 2.6%36,193 2.5%36,343 – 0.0 pp▲ +3,972▼ −0.1 pp▲ +150▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,822
Lincoln Park 2.5%10,084 2.5%11,286 2.3%11,329 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,245▼ −0.1 pp▲ +43– 0.0 pp▲ +1,202
Chicago citywide 1.8%23,720 1.9%26,727 1.8%26,271 – 0.0 pp▲ +2,551▼ −0.1 pp▼ −456▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,007
Near West Side 1.8%7,491 2.0%9,160 1.9%9,250 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,759▼ −0.1 pp▲ +90▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,669
Chicago citywide 1.5%19,348 1.6%23,248 1.7%24,201 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,853– 0.0 pp▲ +953▲ +0.2 pp▲ +3,900
All other city neighborhoods 40.7%166,245 40.1%183,607 39.1%190,031 ▼ −1.6 pp▲ +23,786▼ −1.0 pp▲ +6,424▼ −0.6 pp▲ +17,362
Chicago citywide 38.0%499,784 37.9%537,334 36.8%539,030 ▼ −1.2 pp▲ +39,246▼ −1.1 pp▲ +1,696▼ −0.1 pp▲ +37,550
Outside the city 45.0%183,710 44.8%205,169 46.7%227,037 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +43,327▲ +1.9 pp▲ +21,868▼ −0.2 pp▲ +21,459
Chicago citywide 45.9%603,720 45.4%642,891 47.2%691,545 ▲ +1.3 pp▲ +87,825▲ +1.9 pp▲ +48,654▼ −0.6 pp▲ +39,171
Naperville city, IL 1.0%4,061 1.0%4,748 1.2%5,671 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,610▲ +0.1 pp▲ +923– 0.0 pp▲ +687
Chicago citywide 0.8%10,439 0.8%11,676 0.9%13,352 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,913▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,676– 0.0 pp▲ +1,237
Oak Park village, IL 1.1%4,497 1.0%4,661 1.0%4,844 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +347– 0.0 pp▲ +183▼ −0.1 pp▲ +164
Chicago citywide 1.0%12,512 0.9%13,154 0.9%13,459 – 0.0 pp▲ +947– 0.0 pp▲ +305– 0.0 pp▲ +642
Evanston city, IL 1.0%3,978 1.0%4,436 0.9%4,262 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +284▼ −0.1 pp▼ −174– 0.0 pp▲ +458
Chicago citywide 0.9%12,386 0.9%13,410 0.9%13,044 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +658▼ −0.1 pp▼ −366– 0.0 pp▲ +1,024
Aurora city, IL 0.7%2,997 0.7%3,277 0.8%3,891 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +894▲ +0.1 pp▲ +614– 0.0 pp▲ +280
Chicago citywide 0.7%9,006 0.7%10,248 0.7%10,879 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,873– 0.0 pp▲ +631– 0.0 pp▲ +1,242
Skokie village, IL 0.7%2,778 0.7%3,115 0.7%3,233 – 0.0 pp▲ +455– 0.0 pp▲ +118– 0.0 pp▲ +337
Chicago citywide 0.9%12,309 0.9%12,525 0.9%12,545 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +236– 0.0 pp▲ +20▼ −0.1 pp▲ +216
All other Illinois locations 36.1%147,214 35.7%163,596 37.5%182,254 ▲ +1.4 pp▲ +35,040▲ +1.8 pp▲ +18,658▼ −0.3 pp▲ +16,382
Chicago citywide 35.5%467,052 35.1%497,107 36.9%540,317 ▲ +1.4 pp▲ +73,265▲ +1.8 pp▲ +43,210▼ −0.5 pp▲ +30,055
Out of state 4.5%18,185 4.7%21,336 4.7%22,882 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,697– 0.0 pp▲ +1,546▲ +0.2 pp▲ +3,151
Chicago citywide 4.9%63,785 4.8%68,287 4.9%72,123 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8,338▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,836– 0.0 pp▲ +4,502

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category Loop
No Computer or Smartphone 0.5% ±0.5 pp135 ±122
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 1.1% ±0.8 pp273 ±195
Desktop or Laptop Available 97.0% ±1.2 pp24,217 ±306
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
No Computer or Smartphone 0.5%±0.5 pp135±122 5.1%±0.2 pp58,709±2,246 ▼ -4.5% 77/77
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 1.1%±0.8 pp273±195 10.4%±0.3 pp120,218±3,642 ▼ -9.3% 77/77
Desktop or Laptop Available 97.0%±1.2 pp24,217±306 79.7%±0.4 pp924,956±4,919 ▲ +17.2% 1/77
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category Loop
Has Internet Access 99.3% ±2.8 pp24,791 ±704
Cellular Data Plan Only 3.9% ±1.9 pp976 ±466
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 10.6% ±2.6 pp2,642 ±640
No Internet Access 0.7% ±0.6 pp183 ±142
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Has Internet Access 99.3%±2.8 pp24,791±704 93.1%±0.3 pp1,080,419±3,310 ▲ +6.1% 1/77
Cellular Data Plan Only 3.9%±1.9 pp976±466 12.5%±0.3 pp145,219±3,463 ▼ -8.6% 77/77
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 10.6%±2.6 pp2,642±640 3.9%±0.2 pp45,350±1,940 ▲ +6.7% 1/77
No Internet Access 0.7%±0.6 pp183±142 6.9%±0.2 pp79,786±2,730 ▼ -6.1% 77/77
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category Loop
Uninsured Residents 5.1% ±1.3 pp2,165 ±557
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 6.9% ±2.5 pp2,954 ±1,065
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 5.5% ±1.5 pp2,350 ±656
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 0.0% ±1.1 pp0
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Uninsured Residents 5.1%±1.3 pp2,165±557 9.8%±0.2 pp264,391±5,709 ▼ -4.7% 63/77
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 6.9%±2.5 pp2,954±1,065 3.9%±0.3 pp104,687±8,934 ▲ +3.1% 7/77
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 5.5%±1.5 pp2,350±656 13.3%±0.3 pp361,430±8,516 ▼ -7.8% 65/77
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 0.0%±1.1 pp0 1.7%±0.3 pp46,718±7,265 ▼ -1.7% 73/77
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category Loop
Insured (Any Coverage) 94.9% ±1.3 pp39,716 ±548
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 71.6% ±4.1 pp29,943 ±1,727
Direct-Purchase Insurance 16.2% ±2.4 pp6,780 ±1,024
Medicare 8.3% ±1.7 pp3,470 ±717
Medicaid 4.7% ±1.9 pp1,984 ±802
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.0% ±0.3 pp18 ±124
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 2.6% ±0.9 pp1,075 ±367
Uninsured 5.1% ±1.3 pp2,129 ±548
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Insured (Any Coverage) 94.9%±1.3 pp39,716±548 90.2%±0.2 pp2,424,871±5,689 ▲ +4.7% 15/77
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 71.6%±4.1 pp29,943±1,727 51.2%±0.4 pp1,376,912±9,468 ▲ +20.3% 9/77
Direct-Purchase Insurance 16.2%±2.4 pp6,780±1,024 8.5%±0.2 pp227,424±5,112 ▲ +7.7% 1/77
Medicare 8.3%±1.7 pp3,470±717 12.6%±0.2 pp339,804±4,911 ▼ -4.4% 73/77
Medicaid 4.7%±1.9 pp1,984±802 22.2%±0.3 pp596,931±7,773 ▼ -17.5% 73/77
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.0%±0.3 pp18±124 0.3%±0.0 pp7,201±787 ▼ -0.2% 67/77
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 2.6%±0.9 pp1,075±367 3.8%±0.1 pp102,777±3,544 ▼ -1.3% 62/77
Uninsured 5.1%±1.3 pp2,129±548 9.8%±0.2 pp262,018±5,689 ▼ -4.7% 63/77
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category Loop
Adults With at Least One Disability 7.3% ±1.6 pp2,860 ±615
Mobility Disability 2.2% ±0.9 pp875 ±358
Hearing Disability 1.2% ±0.6 pp458 ±244
Vision Disability 0.7% ±0.5 pp285 ±191
Cognitive Disability 2.9% ±1.0 pp1,153 ±397
Self-Care Disability 0.9% ±0.6 pp364 ±227
Independent Living Disability 2.4% ±1.0 pp950 ±406
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability 7.3%±1.6 pp2,860±615 14.0%±0.2 pp303,665±4,797 ▼ -6.8% 74/77
Mobility Disability 2.2%±0.9 pp875±358 7.6%±0.2 pp163,666±3,398 ▼ -5.4% 76/77
Hearing Disability 1.2%±0.6 pp458±244 2.8%±0.1 pp61,430±2,337 ▼ -1.7% 76/77
Vision Disability 0.7%±0.5 pp285±191 3.0%±0.1 pp64,544±2,269 ▼ -2.3% 77/77
Cognitive Disability 2.9%±1.0 pp1,153±397 5.2%±0.1 pp112,824±2,939 ▼ -2.3% 70/77
Self-Care Disability 0.9%±0.6 pp364±227 2.7%±0.1 pp57,758±2,261 ▼ -1.7% 75/77
Independent Living Disability 2.4%±1.0 pp950±406 5.7%±0.2 pp123,651±3,247 ▼ -3.3% 74/77
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category Loop
Arthritis 12.9%4,239
High Blood Pressure 18.9%6,196
Cancer 4.6%1,502
Current Asthma 8.9%2,906
Coronary Heart Disease 2.6%857
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 2.7%879
Diabetes 5.6%1,822
High Cholesterol 26.3%8,632
Obesity 22.8%7,457
Stroke 1.5%483
Lost All Natural Teeth 0.5%172
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Arthritis 12.9%4,239 19.6%409,178 ▼ -6.7% 74/77
High Blood Pressure 18.9%6,196 29.7%620,030 ▼ -10.8% 74/77
Cancer 4.6%1,502 5.0%104,382 ▼ -0.4% 49/77
Current Asthma 8.9%2,906 10.2%212,940 ▼ -1.3% 70/77
Coronary Heart Disease 2.6%857 4.8%100,207 ▼ -2.2% 73/77
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 2.7%879 5.5%114,820 ▼ -2.8% 73/77
Diabetes 5.6%1,822 12.0%250,517 ▼ -6.4% 73/77
High Cholesterol 26.3%8,632 31.6%659,696 ▼ -5.3% 72/77
Obesity 22.8%7,457 32.6%680,572 ▼ -9.8% 77/77
Stroke 1.5%483 3.3%68,892 ▼ -1.8% 73/77
Lost All Natural Teeth 0.5%172 2.5%52,249 ▼ -2.0% 74/77
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category Loop
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 23.0%7,542
Current Cigarette Smoking 6.2%2,029
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 13.1%4,308
Short Sleep Duration 32.0%10,469
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 23.0%7,542 19.0%396,652 ▲ +4.0% 6/77
Current Cigarette Smoking 6.2%2,029 11.9%248,430 ▼ -5.7% 74/77
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 13.1%4,308 24.7%515,648 ▼ -11.6% 73/77
Short Sleep Duration 32.0%10,469 37.8%789,129 ▼ -5.8% 70/77
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category Loop
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 10.0%3,283
Frequent Physical Distress 7.0%2,294
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 10.0%3,283 21.1%440,493 ▼ -11.1% 73/77
Frequent Physical Distress 7.0%2,294 11.8%246,342 ▼ -4.8% 75/77
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category Loop
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 63.2%20,691
Routine Checkup in Past Year 73.5%24,091
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 86.4%28,298
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 63.0%20,646
Dental Visit in Past Year 70.7%23,179
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 77.0%25,222
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 63.2%20,691 72.5%1,513,542 ▼ -9.3% 72/77
Routine Checkup in Past Year 73.5%24,091 76.2%1,590,785 ▼ -2.7% 62/77
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 86.4%28,298 86.2%1,799,549 ▲ +0.2% 39/77
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 63.0%20,646 55.8%1,164,905 ▲ +7.2% 8/77
Dental Visit in Past Year 70.7%23,179 58.4%1,219,184 ▲ +12.3% 8/77
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 77.0%25,222 74.2%1,549,032 ▲ +2.8% 18/77
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category Loop
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 19.6%6,422
Frequent Mental Distress 13.9%4,554
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 23.2%7,614
Loneliness 34.0%11,154
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Loop City Difference Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 19.6%6,422 19.1%398,740 ▲ +0.5% 23/77
Frequent Mental Distress 13.9%4,554 16.0%334,023 ▼ -2.1% 69/77
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 23.2%7,614 28.2%588,716 ▼ -5.0% 67/77
Loneliness 34.0%11,154 35.8%747,377 ▼ -1.8% 56/77
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Compare All Neighborhoods