Fuller Park, Chicago Demographics, Housing & Census Data

Fuller Park, Chicago Census and ACS demographic tables: population, race, age, income, poverty, rent, housing types, single-family homes, commute, education, internet access, health insurance, and disability.

Fuller Park, Chicago

Fuller Park
Chicago
Population
2,345
Overlapping council wards Overlap means that a council ward contains part of this neighborhood.
3, 20
Population Density
3,285 /sq mi
Average Geographic Mismatch Error : 0.42 p.p. Geographic mismatch error comes from Census geographic boundaries not perfectly aligning with community area boundaries. We can test how much mismatch error skews community area statistics for a subset of variables. For this community area , the average error is 0.42 percentage points. More detail is available on the community area geography page , and the methodology page explains geographic mismatch error in more detail.
One-page summary

Fuller Park at a Glance

Time period?Historical estimates use this profile's current boundaries, held constant across periods; they do not reflect the boundaries that were in effect at the time. Comparing
Values as
Show as
Add to every table
Showing Chart vs. Chicago ± Margin of error

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category Fuller Park
Hispanic 8.4% ±4.6 pp197 ±109
White 2.5% ±1.8 pp58 ±41
Black 77.3% ±13.1 pp1,812 ±306
Asian 1.7% ±0.8 pp40 ±19
Other or Multi-racial 10.2% ±7.1 pp238 ±165
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Hispanic 8.4%±4.6 pp197±109 29.7%±0.2 pp805,318±5,785 ▼ -21.3% 52/77
White 2.5%±1.8 pp58±41 32.1%±0.2 pp870,127±5,557 ▼ -29.6% 63/77
Black 77.3%±13.1 pp1,812±306 27.4%±0.2 pp743,710±6,047 ▲ +49.8% 19/77
Asian 1.7%±0.8 pp40±19 7.2%±0.2 pp196,435±4,370 ▼ -5.5% 41/77
Other or Multi-racial 10.2%±7.1 pp238±165 3.5%±0.1 pp95,636±3,778 ▲ +6.6% 1/77
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Age Distribution

Category Fuller Park
Under 5 3.3% ±2.3 pp78 ±54
5-17 18.7% ±5.9 pp439 ±138
18-24 8.1% ±5.0 pp190 ±118
25-44 24.0% ±5.7 pp563 ±134
45-64 23.1% ±4.9 pp542 ±116
65-74 15.5% ±5.7 pp364 ±133
75-84 5.9% ±3.2 pp139 ±74
85+ 1.3% ±1.4 pp30 ±34
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Under 5 3.3%±2.3 pp78±54 5.3%±0.1 pp144,044±3,867 ▼ -2.0% 67/77
5-17 18.7%±5.9 pp439±138 14.1%±0.2 pp381,582±5,548 ▲ +4.6% 20/77
18-24 8.1%±5.0 pp190±118 9.6%±0.2 pp260,942±4,900 ▼ -1.5% 44/77
25-44 24.0%±5.7 pp563±134 34.3%±0.3 pp929,946±6,988 ▼ -10.3% 68/77
45-64 23.1%±4.9 pp542±116 22.9%±0.2 pp620,047±5,644 ▲ +0.2% 51/77
65-74 15.5%±5.7 pp364±133 8.2%±0.1 pp221,932±3,711 ▲ +7.3% 3/77
75-84 5.9%±3.2 pp139±74 4.0%±0.1 pp107,625±2,694 ▲ +2.0% 12/77
85+ 1.3%±1.4 pp30±34 1.7%±0.1 pp45,108±1,921 ▼ -0.4% 55/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category Fuller Park
No High School Diploma 22.7% ±9.3 pp370 ±152
High School Diploma or GED 28.0% ±5.8 pp458 ±94
Some College or Associate's Degree 36.2% ±9.4 pp591 ±154
Bachelor's Degree 7.7% ±4.7 pp125 ±76
Graduate Degree 5.4% ±4.2 pp89 ±69
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
No High School Diploma 22.7%±9.3 pp370±152 12.8%±0.2 pp246,015±4,778 ▲ +9.9% 14/77
High School Diploma or GED 28.0%±5.8 pp458±94 21.1%±0.3 pp405,248±5,752 ▲ +7.0% 33/77
Some College or Associate's Degree 36.2%±9.4 pp591±154 21.8%±0.3 pp419,911±5,550 ▲ +14.4% 6/77
Bachelor's Degree 7.7%±4.7 pp125±76 25.4%±0.3 pp488,467±5,708 ▼ -17.7% 75/77
Graduate Degree 5.4%±4.2 pp89±69 19.0%±0.3 pp365,017±5,186 ▼ -13.5% 64/77
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category Fuller Park
Total Population 2,345 ±452
Total Households 1,048 ±168
Population Density 3,285 ±634 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park Average Neighborhood Difference
Total Population 2,345 35,210 ▼ −32,865
Total Households 1,048 15,067 ▼ −14,019
Population Density 3,285 people/sq mi 13,045 people/sq mi ▼ −9,760
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average neighborhood rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large neighborhoods. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category 2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19 Difference Rank
Total Population 2,635 ±296 2,406 ±290 2,345 ±452 ▼ −290 ±541▼ −61 ±537▼ −229 ±414 ▼ −32,595▼ −32,780▼ −32,865 76/7776/7776/77
Average Neighborhood 35,230 35,186 35,210 ▼ −20▲ +24▼ −43
Total Households 1,131 ±95 1,151 ±86 1,048 ±168 ▼ −83 ±193▼ −103 ±189▲ +20 ±128 ▼ −12,230▼ −12,703▼ −14,019 76/7776/7776/77
Average Neighborhood 13,361 13,854 15,067 ▲ +1,706▲ +1,213▲ +493
Population Density (per sq mi) 3,691 ±415 3,370 ±406 3,285 ±634 ▼ −406▼ −85▼ −321 ▼ −9,298▼ −9,658▼ −9,760 72/7771/7772/77
Average Neighborhood Density 12,989 13,028 13,045 ▲ +56▲ +17▲ +39

Household Size

Category Fuller Park
Average Household Size 2.23±0.48
1-Person Households 49.0% ±9.1 pp513 ±96
2-Person Households 20.7% ±8.7 pp217 ±92
3-Person Households 8.7% ±4.5 pp91 ±47
4+ Person Households 21.6% ±8.6 pp227 ±90
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Average Household Size 2.23±0.48 2.29±0.02 ▼ −0.06 52/77
1-Person Households 49.0%±9.1 pp513±96 39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,783 ▲ +9.3% 16/77
2-Person Households 20.7%±8.7 pp217±92 29.5%±0.4 pp342,235±5,166 ▼ -8.8% 75/77
3-Person Households 8.7%±4.5 pp91±47 12.9%±0.4 pp149,291±4,184 ▼ -4.2% 72/77
4+ Person Households 21.6%±8.6 pp227±90 18.0%±0.5 pp208,411±5,419 ▲ +3.7% 37/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category Fuller Park
Never Married 62.5% ±10.7 pp1,216 ±208
Married 17.6% ±4.8 pp343 ±93
Separated 1.5% ±1.8 pp30 ±34
Divorced 11.0% ±4.0 pp213 ±77
Widowed 7.3% ±3.8 pp143 ±73
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Never Married 62.5%±10.7 pp1,216±208 49.6%±0.3 pp1,130,286±6,623 ▲ +12.9% 5/77
Married 17.6%±4.8 pp343±93 35.5%±0.3 pp807,294±6,077 ▼ -17.8% 71/77
Separated 1.5%±1.8 pp30±34 2.2%±0.1 pp49,430±2,379 ▼ -0.6% 54/77
Divorced 11.0%±4.0 pp213±77 7.9%±0.2 pp180,700±3,966 ▲ +3.0% 16/77
Widowed 7.3%±3.8 pp143±73 4.8%±0.1 pp109,357±2,738 ▲ +2.5% 18/77
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category Fuller Park
Speak English Only 91.1% ±5.8 pp2,071 ±132
Spanish 4.4% ±2.6 pp100 ±59
Tagalog (incl. Filipino) 2.6% ±3.7 pp58 ±84
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese) 1.0% ±0.8 pp24 ±19
Other Languages 0.9% ±2.5 pp21 ±59
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Speak English Only 91.1%±5.8 pp2,071±132 64.6%±0.3 pp1,659,069±8,218 ▲ +26.5% 15/77
Spanish 4.4%±2.6 pp100±59 23.7%±0.2 pp607,865±6,166 ▼ -19.3% 64/77
Tagalog (incl. Filipino) 2.6%±3.7 pp58±84 0.8%±0.1 pp20,222±1,843 ▲ +1.8% 8/16
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese) 1.0%±0.8 pp24±19 2.0%±0.1 pp52,032±2,783 ▼ -1.0% 23/23
Other Languages 0.9%±2.5 pp21±59 NA%±0.3 pp— — -
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show
Category Fuller Park
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 97.0% ±24.4 pp97.0%±24.4 pp2,198 ±553
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 1.5% ±3.0 pp1.5%±3.0 pp34 ±68
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 1.5% ±3.0 pp100.0%±28.0 pp34 ±69
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 0.0% ±2.8 pp2.9%±222.3 pp1 ±76
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 3.0% ±5.1 pp200.0%±524.1 pp68 ±115
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 97.0%±24.4 pp97.0%±24.4 pp2,198±553 85.4%±0.5 pp85.4%±0.5 pp2,192,778±11,961 ▲ +11.6%▲ +11.6% 15/77
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 1.5%±3.0 pp1.5%±3.0 pp34±68 7.1%±0.2 pp7.1%±0.2 pp183,252±4,686 ▼ -5.7%▼ -5.7% 62/77
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 1.5%±3.0 pp100.0%±28.0 pp34±69 5.2%±0.2 pp72.7%±1.1 pp133,269±3,923 ▼ -3.7%▲ +27.3% 48/7713/76
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 0.0%±2.8 pp2.9%±222.3 pp1±76 2.3%±0.1 pp31.6%±1.4 pp57,883±2,982 ▼ -2.2%▼ -28.6% 68/7768/76
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 3.0%±5.1 pp200.0%±524.1 pp68±115 14.6%±0.3 pp204.3%±6.4 pp374,404±6,794 ▼ -11.6%▼ -4.3% 63/7731/76
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category Fuller Park
Married-Couple Households 12.1% ±5.4 pp127 ±56
Unmarried-Couple Households 1.7% ±2.3 pp18 ±24
One-Person Households 49.0% ±12.6 pp513 ±132
Other Household Types 37.2% ±21.9 pp390 ±229
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Married-Couple Households 12.1%±5.4 pp127±56 30.9%±0.3 pp358,432±3,598 ▼ -18.8% 73/77
Unmarried-Couple Households 1.7%±2.3 pp18±24 8.3%±0.2 pp96,220±2,797 ▼ -6.6% 76/77
One-Person Households 49.0%±12.6 pp513±132 39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,729 ▲ +9.3% 16/77
Other Household Types 37.2%±21.9 pp390±229 21.1%±0.7 pp245,285±8,514 ▲ +16.1% 11/77
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category Fuller Park
Children in Married-Couple Households 39.0% ±25.1 pp203 ±131
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 0.5% ±3.6 pp2 ±19
Children in Single-Mother Households 51.4% ±23.0 pp268 ±120
Children in Single-Father Households 9.2% ±12.8 pp48 ±67
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households 39.0%±25.1 pp203±131 56.0%±0.8 pp293,542±4,257 ▼ -17.0% 54/77
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 0.5%±3.6 pp2±19 8.8%±0.6 pp45,960±3,208 ▼ -8.3% 76/77
Children in Single-Mother Households 51.4%±23.0 pp268±120 30.6%±0.9 pp160,535±4,521 ▲ +20.8% 18/77
Children in Single-Father Households 9.2%±12.8 pp48±67 4.6%±0.4 pp24,133±2,006 ▲ +4.6% 9/77
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show
Category Fuller Park
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 6.7% ±4.2 pp6.7%±4.2 pp122 ±76
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 4.9% ±25.1 pp0.3%±1.7 pp6 ±31
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 0.0% ±21.4 pp0.0%0
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 47.7% ±25.9 pp3.2%±1.7 pp58 ±31
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 0.0% ±21.4 pp0.0%0
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 47.4% ±43.2 pp3.2%±2.9 pp58 ±53
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 6.7%±4.2 pp6.7%±4.2 pp122±76 2.8%±0.1 pp2.8%±0.1 pp60,766±2,397 ▲ +3.9%▲ +3.9% 3/77
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 4.9%±25.1 pp0.3%±1.7 pp6±31 26.8%±1.8 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,267±1,067 ▼ -21.8%▼ -0.4% 76/7769/77
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 0.0%±21.4 pp0.0%0 12.9%±1.0 pp0.4%±0.0 pp7,830±579 ▼ -12.9%▼ -0.4% 73/7773/77
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 47.7%±25.9 pp3.2%±1.7 pp58±31 28.8%±1.4 pp0.8%±0.0 pp17,525±846 ▲ +18.8%▲ +2.4% 4/772/77
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 0.0%±21.4 pp0.0%0 4.9%±0.7 pp0.1%±0.0 pp2,995±441 ▼ -4.9%▼ -0.1% 62/7762/77
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 47.4%±43.2 pp3.2%±2.9 pp58±53 26.6%±1.5 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,149±916 ▲ +20.8%▲ +2.4% 4/771/77
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show
Category Fuller Park
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 91.1% ±5.7 pp91.1%±5.7 pp2,135 ±133
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 8.9% ±3.9 pp8.9%±3.9 pp210 ±91
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 5.4% ±3.3 pp61.0%±26.5 pp128 ±78
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 3.5% ±2.3 pp39.0%±18.9 pp82 ±53
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 91.1%±5.7 pp91.1%±5.7 pp2,135±133 79.1%±0.3 pp79.1%±0.3 pp2,144,343±7,926 ▲ +12.0%▲ +12.0% 23/77
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 8.9%±3.9 pp8.9%±3.9 pp210±91 20.9%±0.3 pp20.9%±0.3 pp566,883±7,968 ▼ -12.0%▼ -12.0% 55/77
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 5.4%±3.3 pp61.0%±26.5 pp128±78 10.0%±0.2 pp47.7%±0.5 pp270,551±4,603 ▼ -4.5%▲ +13.2% 51/7716/77
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 3.5%±2.3 pp39.0%±18.9 pp82±53 10.9%±0.2 pp52.3%±0.9 pp296,332±6,504 ▼ -7.4%▼ -13.2% 59/7762/77
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show
Category Fuller Park
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 4.2%±2.8 pp46.6%±19.9 pp98±67
Born in Poland (of foreign-born residents) 2.5%±3.6 pp27.6%±37.3 pp58±84
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 2.3%25.7%54
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park Chicago Difference Rank
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 4.2% ±2.8 pp46.6%±19.9 pp98 8.2% ±0.2 pp39.3%222,978 ▼ -4.1%▲ +7.2% 33/7728/77
Born in Poland (of foreign-born residents) 2.5% ±3.6 pp27.6%±37.3 pp58 1.0% ±0.1 pp4.6%26,188 ▲ +1.5%▲ +22.9% 11/773/77
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 2.3%25.7%54 ——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show
Category Fuller Park
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 2.6% ±1.6 pp29.0%±10.0 pp61 ±37
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 1.3% ±1.3 pp14.3%±12.7 pp30 ±30
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 4.1% ±3.0 pp46.7%±24.6 pp98 ±71
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 0.9% ±1.0 pp10.5%±9.5 pp22 ±23
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 2.6%±1.6 pp29.0%±10.0 pp61±37 5.9%±0.2 pp75927.1%±37715.0 pp159,447±5,557 ▼ -3.3%▼ -75898.1% 55/7732/77
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 1.3%±1.3 pp14.3%±12.7 pp30±30 4.5%±0.1 pp58053.3%±28829.7 pp121,912±4,035 ▼ -3.2%▼ -58039.0% 58/7765/77
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 4.1%±3.0 pp46.7%±24.6 pp98±71 4.6%±0.1 pp58975.7%±29281.6 pp123,849±3,901 ▼ -0.4%▼ -58929.0% 36/771/77
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 0.9%±1.0 pp10.5%±9.5 pp22±23 6.0%±0.1 pp76988.1%±38184.0 pp161,675±3,491 ▼ -5.0%▼ -76977.6% 61/7772/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later 0.0% ±1.6 pp1 ±41 0.5% ±0.9 pp13 ±23 2.6% ±1.6 pp61 ±37 ▲ +2.6 pp▲ +60▲ +2.0 pp▲ +48▲ +0.5 pp▲ +12
Chicago citywide 1.4% ±0.1 pp36,978 ±2,235 3.7% ±0.1 pp99,118 ±3,198 5.9% ±0.2 pp159,447 ±5,568 ▲ +4.5 pp▲ +122,469▲ +2.2 pp▲ +60,329▲ +2.3 pp▲ +62,140
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 2.3% ±2.5 pp60 ±67 1.8% ±1.0 pp42 ±23 1.3% ±1.3 pp30 ±30 ▼ −1.0 pp▼ −30▼ −0.5 pp▼ −12▼ −0.5 pp▼ −18
Chicago citywide 5.9% ±0.1 pp161,331 ±3,896 4.9% ±0.1 pp131,658 ±3,182 4.5% ±0.1 pp121,912 ±4,044 ▼ −1.5 pp▼ −39,419▼ −0.4 pp▼ −9,746▼ −1.1 pp▼ −29,673
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 1.4% ±2.0 pp37 ±52 1.4% ±0.8 pp33 ±18 4.1% ±3.0 pp98 ±71 ▲ +2.8 pp▲ +61▲ +2.8 pp▲ +65– 0.0 pp▼ −4
Chicago citywide 6.1% ±0.1 pp165,077 ±3,717 5.3% ±0.1 pp142,413 ±3,015 4.6% ±0.1 pp123,849 ±3,911 ▼ −1.5 pp▼ −41,228▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,564▼ −0.8 pp▼ −22,664
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 0.4% ±1.5 pp11 ±39 1.4% ±1.2 pp33 ±29 0.9% ±1.0 pp22 ±23 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +11▼ −0.4 pp▼ −11▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22
Chicago citywide 7.5% ±0.1 pp204,169 ±3,469 6.9% ±0.1 pp186,050 ±3,114 6.0% ±0.1 pp161,675 ±3,509 ▼ −1.6 pp▼ −42,494▼ −0.9 pp▼ −24,375▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,119
Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category Fuller Park
Average Household Income $36,480±$6,448
Per Capita Income $16,779±$2,165
10th Percentile Household Income $3,995±$1,608
25th Percentile Household Income $9,988±$2,338
Median Household Income $20,240±$5,598
75th Percentile Household Income $43,634±$19,610
90th Percentile Household Income $117,708±$31,525
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $36,480±$6,448 $116,016±$1,263 ▼ −$79,536 77/77
Per Capita Income $16,779±$2,165 $50,086±$581 ▼ −$33,307 76/77
10th Percentile Household Income $3,995±$1,608 $12,933±$271 ▼ −$8,938 76/77
25th Percentile Household Income $9,988±$2,338 $34,575±$649 ▼ −$24,587 76/77
Median Household Income $20,240±$5,598 $77,902±$907 ▼ −$57,662 76/77
75th Percentile Household Income $43,634±$19,610 $144,150±$1,210 ▼ −$100,515 77/77
90th Percentile Household Income $117,708±$31,525 Over $200,000 ▼ −$82,292+ 74/77
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $44,157 ±8,172 $40,126 ±4,792 $36,480 ±6,448 ▼ −$7,677▼ −$3,646▼ −$4,032
Chicago citywide $95,689 ±910 $111,304 ±1,075 $116,016 ±1,263 ▲ +$20,327▲ +$4,712▲ +$15,615
Average Household Income (nominal dollars) $33,325 ±6,167 $32,702 ±3,906 $36,480 ±6,448 ▲ +$3,155▲ +$3,777▼ −$622
Chicago citywide $72,215 ±687 $90,713 ±876 $116,016 ±1,263 ▲ +$43,801▲ +$25,303▲ +$18,498
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $21,275 ±4,447 $20,363 ±1,256 $16,779 ±2,165 ▼ −$4,496▼ −$3,584▼ −$912
Chicago citywide $37,927 ±351 $45,525 ±412 $50,086 ±581 ▲ +$12,160▲ +$4,562▲ +$7,598
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars) $16,056 ±3,356 $16,596 ±1,024 $16,779 ±2,165 ▲ +$723▲ +$183▲ +$540
Chicago citywide $28,623 ±265 $37,103 ±336 $50,086 ±581 ▲ +$21,464▲ +$12,984▲ +$8,480
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $4,029 ±747 $5,759 ±1,636 $3,995 ±1,608 ▼ −$34▼ −$1,764▲ +$1,730
Chicago citywide $11,828 ±190 $13,281 ±277 $12,933 ±271 ▲ +$1,105▼ −$348▲ +$1,453
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $3,041 ±564 $4,693 ±1,333 $3,995 ±1,608 ▲ +$955▼ −$698▲ +$1,653
Chicago citywide $8,927 ±144 $10,824 ±225 $12,933 ±271 ▲ +$4,007▲ +$2,109▲ +$1,898
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $10,073 ±1,908 $14,308 ±3,180 $9,988 ±2,338 ▼ −$84▼ −$4,319▲ +$4,235
Chicago citywide $28,727 ±321 $31,597 ±462 $34,575 ±649 ▲ +$5,848▲ +$2,979▲ +$2,869
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $7,602 ±1,440 $11,661 ±2,592 $9,988 ±2,338 ▲ +$2,387▼ −$1,672▲ +$4,059
Chicago citywide $21,680 ±242 $25,751 ±376 $34,575 ±649 ▲ +$12,895▲ +$8,824▲ +$4,071
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $22,813 ±4,372 $28,404 ±3,914 $20,240 ±5,598 ▼ −$2,574▼ −$8,165▲ +$5,591
Chicago citywide $63,379 ±591 $71,469 ±723 $77,902 ±907 ▲ +$14,523▲ +$6,433▲ +$8,090
Median Household Income (nominal dollars) $17,217 ±3,299 $23,149 ±3,190 $20,240 ±5,598 ▲ +$3,023▼ −$2,910▲ +$5,933
Chicago citywide $47,831 ±446 $58,247 ±589 $77,902 ±907 ▲ +$30,071▲ +$19,655▲ +$10,416
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $55,342 ±10,723 $52,808 ±7,908 $43,634 ±19,610 ▼ −$11,708▼ −$9,174▼ −$2,533
Chicago citywide $122,019 ±806 $139,501 ±1,057 $144,150 ±1,210 ▲ +$22,131▲ +$4,648▲ +$17,482
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $41,766 ±8,092 $43,039 ±6,445 $43,634 ±19,610 ▲ +$1,868▲ +$595▲ +$1,273
Chicago citywide $92,086 ±608 $113,694 ±862 $144,150 ±1,210 ▲ +$52,064▲ +$30,456▲ +$21,608
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $112,095 ±24,205 $85,230 ±28,405 $117,708 ±31,525 ▲ +$5,613▲ +$32,478▼ −$26,865
Chicago citywide $202,601 ±2,442 $235,390 ±1,636 — ——▲ +$32,790
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $84,596 ±18,267 $69,463 ±23,150 $117,708 ±31,525 ▲ +$33,112▲ +$48,245▼ −$15,134
Chicago citywide $152,899 ±1,843 $191,844 ±1,333 — ——▲ +$38,944

Poverty Status

Category Fuller Park
Below Poverty Line 56.1% ±14.5 pp1,315 ±339
Below 200% Poverty Line 71.8% ±14.8 pp1,684 ±347
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 22.1% ±7.8 pp519 ±183
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Below Poverty Line 56.1%±14.5 pp1,315±339 16.8%±0.4 pp456,194±11,330 ▲ +39.2% 2/77
Below 200% Poverty Line 71.8%±14.8 pp1,684±347 33.4%±0.6 pp905,794±16,660 ▲ +38.4% 2/77
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 22.1%±7.8 pp519±183 8.3%±0.3 pp226,117±7,649 ▲ +13.8% 4/77
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Category Fuller Park
Food Insecurity 56.8%1,026
Housing Insecurity 40.6%734
Transportation Barriers 27.9%503
Threatened Utility Shutoff 32.2%581
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Food Insecurity 56.8%1,026 24.4%509,385 ▲ +32.4% 2/77
Housing Insecurity 40.6%734 19.7%411,266 ▲ +20.9% 2/77
Transportation Barriers 27.9%503 11.6%242,167 ▲ +16.3% 2/77
Threatened Utility Shutoff 32.2%581 11.9%248,430 ▲ +20.3% 2/77
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category Fuller Park
In Labor Force 66.3% ±11.5 pp560 ±98
↳ Employed 58.8% ±10.9 pp497 ±92
↳ Unemployed 7.5% ±10.8 pp63 ±91
↳ Unemployment Rate 11.3% ±16.1 pp—
Not in Labor Force 33.7% ±32.6 pp285 ±275
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
In Labor Force 66.3%±11.5 pp560±98 85.6%±0.3 pp1,069,076±3,868 ▼ -19.3% 75/77
↳ Employed 58.8%±10.9 pp497±92 79.6%±0.3 pp994,466±4,326 ▼ -20.8% 74/77
↳ Unemployed 7.5%±10.8 pp63±91 5.9%±0.2 pp73,968±2,788 ▲ +1.6% 33/77
↳ Unemployment Rate 11.3%±16.1 pp— 6.9%±0.3 pp86,502±3,342 ▲ +4.4% 24/77
Not in Labor Force 33.7%±32.6 pp285±275 14.4%±1.1 pp180,399±14,344 ▲ +19.3% 3/77
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category Fuller Park
Management, Business, Science & Arts 34.7% ±15.0 pp253 ±109
↳ Management Occupations 10.5% ±6.7 pp76 ±49
↳ Business & Financial Operations 7.3% ±6.4 pp53 ±47
↳ Computer & Mathematical 8.4% ±10.3 pp61 ±75
↳ Architecture & Engineering 0.0% ±3.6 pp0
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 0.0% ±3.6 pp0
↳ Community & Social Service 0.0% ±3.6 pp0
↳ Legal Occupations 0.2% ±3.6 pp1 ±26
↳ Education, Training & Library 6.7% ±6.7 pp49 ±49
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 0.0% ±3.6 pp0
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 0.6% ±3.8 pp5 ±28
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 1.0% ±3.4 pp7 ±25
Service 31.1% ±11.7 pp226 ±85
↳ Healthcare Support 4.8% ±6.0 pp35 ±43
↳ Protective Service 4.9% ±4.5 pp35 ±33
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 4.6% ±5.5 pp34 ±40
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 8.2% ±7.5 pp60 ±55
↳ Personal Care & Service 8.7% ±5.8 pp63 ±42
Sales & Office 21.7% ±11.3 pp158 ±82
↳ Sales & Related 12.6% ±8.6 pp92 ±62
↳ Office & Administrative Support 9.1% ±7.5 pp66 ±54
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 4.2% ±5.3 pp30 ±38
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.0% ±3.6 pp0
↳ Construction & Extraction 4.0% ±5.3 pp29 ±38
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 0.1% ±3.6 pp1 ±26
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 8.3% ±6.7 pp60 ±49
↳ Production Occupations 0.8% ±3.3 pp6 ±24
↳ Transportation Occupations 3.0% ±5.6 pp22 ±41
↳ Material Moving Occupations 4.5% ±4.7 pp33 ±34
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts 34.7%±15.0 pp253±109 49.2%±0.4 pp686,743±5,710 ▼ -14.5% 46/77
↳ Management Occupations 10.5%±6.7 pp76±49 12.3%±0.3 pp172,182±3,807 ▼ -1.9% 33/77
↳ Business & Financial Operations 7.3%±6.4 pp53±47 9.1%±0.2 pp127,081±3,358 ▼ -1.8% 23/77
↳ Computer & Mathematical 8.4%±10.3 pp61±75 4.9%±0.2 pp68,921±2,690 ▲ +3.5% 4/77
↳ Architecture & Engineering 0.0%±3.6 pp0 1.6%±0.1 pp22,779±1,380 ▼ -1.6% 74/77
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 0.0%±3.6 pp0 1.4%±0.1 pp19,126±1,340 ▼ -1.4% 68/77
↳ Community & Social Service 0.0%±3.6 pp0 1.9%±0.1 pp26,973±1,500 ▼ -1.9% 75/77
↳ Legal Occupations 0.2%±3.6 pp1±26 2.3%±0.1 pp31,629±1,814 ▼ -2.1% 69/77
↳ Education, Training & Library 6.7%±6.7 pp49±49 6.6%±0.2 pp92,316±2,697 ▲ +0.1% 34/77
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 0.0%±3.6 pp0 3.1%±0.1 pp43,879±1,786 ▼ -3.1% 75/77
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 0.6%±3.8 pp5±28 4.6%±0.2 pp63,551±2,652 ▼ -3.9% 75/77
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 1.0%±3.4 pp7±25 1.3%±0.1 pp18,306±1,387 ▼ -0.3% 58/77
Service 31.1%±11.7 pp226±85 16.9%±0.3 pp235,977±4,217 ▲ +14.2% 3/77
↳ Healthcare Support 4.8%±6.0 pp35±43 3.4%±0.2 pp46,792±2,107 ▲ +1.4% 25/77
↳ Protective Service 4.9%±4.5 pp35±33 2.8%±0.1 pp39,146±1,734 ▲ +2.0% 25/77
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 4.6%±5.5 pp34±40 5.1%±0.2 pp70,514±2,393 ▼ -0.4% 47/77
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 8.2%±7.5 pp60±55 3.0%±0.1 pp41,783±1,967 ▲ +5.2% 5/77
↳ Personal Care & Service 8.7%±5.8 pp63±42 2.7%±0.1 pp37,742±1,657 ▲ +6.0% 1/77
Sales & Office 21.7%±11.3 pp158±82 17.4%±0.3 pp243,580±4,754 ▲ +4.2% 12/77
↳ Sales & Related 12.6%±8.6 pp92±62 8.1%±0.2 pp113,073±3,174 ▲ +4.5% 1/77
↳ Office & Administrative Support 9.1%±7.5 pp66±54 9.3%±0.3 pp130,507±3,591 ▼ -0.3% 54/77
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 4.2%±5.3 pp30±38 4.6%±0.2 pp64,338±2,929 ▼ -0.4% 42/77
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.0%±3.6 pp0 0.1%±0.0 pp1,506±406 ▼ -0.1% 42/77
↳ Construction & Extraction 4.0%±5.3 pp29±38 2.8%±0.1 pp39,432±2,062 ▲ +1.2% 26/77
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 0.1%±3.6 pp1±26 1.7%±0.1 pp23,400±1,722 ▼ -1.6% 75/77
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 8.3%±6.7 pp60±49 11.8%±0.3 pp165,261±3,629 ▼ -3.5% 60/77
↳ Production Occupations 0.8%±3.3 pp6±24 4.2%±0.2 pp57,989±2,275 ▼ -3.3% 72/77
↳ Transportation Occupations 3.0%±5.6 pp22±41 3.9%±0.2 pp54,099±2,118 ▼ -0.9% 54/77
↳ Material Moving Occupations 4.5%±4.7 pp33±34 3.8%±0.2 pp53,173±2,312 ▲ +0.7% 35/77
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category Fuller Park
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 2.6% ±5.1 pp19 ±37
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.0% ±3.6 pp0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 2.6% ±5.1 pp19 ±37
Construction 3.1% ±4.3 pp23 ±31
Manufacturing 0.8% ±3.3 pp6 ±24
Wholesale Trade 2.5% ±4.6 pp18 ±33
Retail Trade 18.0% ±8.4 pp131 ±61
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 1.8% ±4.2 pp13 ±31
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 1.8% ±4.2 pp13 ±31
↳ Utilities 0.0% ±3.6 pp0
Information 1.1% ±3.4 pp8 ±25
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 6.3% ±5.7 pp46 ±41
↳ Finance & Insurance 5.2% ±5.8 pp38 ±42
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.1% ±3.4 pp8 ±25
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 12.2% ±6.4 pp89 ±46
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 10.2% ±5.9 pp74 ±43
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0% ±3.6 pp0 ±26
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 1.9% ±4.2 pp14 ±31
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 30.5% ±12.8 pp222 ±93
↳ Educational Services 14.1% ±9.2 pp103 ±67
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 16.4% ±9.2 pp119 ±67
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 6.4% ±5.4 pp47 ±39
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.1% ±3.6 pp1 ±26
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 6.3% ±5.4 pp46 ±39
Other Services 3.3% ±5.6 pp24 ±40
Public Administration 11.3% ±10.3 pp82 ±75
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 2.6%±5.1 pp19±37 0.2%±0.0 pp— ▲ +2.4% 1/77
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.0%±3.6 pp0 0.2%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.2% 55/77
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 2.6%±5.1 pp19±37 0.0%±0.0 pp— ▲ +2.6% 1/77
Construction 3.1%±4.3 pp23±31 3.8%±0.2 pp— ▼ -0.7% 45/77
Manufacturing 0.8%±3.3 pp6±24 7.7%±0.2 pp— ▼ -6.9% 77/77
Wholesale Trade 2.5%±4.6 pp18±33 2.0%±0.1 pp— ▲ +0.5% 14/77
Retail Trade 18.0%±8.4 pp131±61 8.2%±0.2 pp— ▲ +9.8% 1/77
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 1.8%±4.2 pp13±31 7.1%±0.2 pp— ▼ -5.3% 77/77
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 1.8%±4.2 pp13±31 6.5%±0.2 pp— ▼ -4.8% 77/77
↳ Utilities 0.0%±3.6 pp0 0.5%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.5% 71/77
Information 1.1%±3.4 pp8±25 2.1%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.0% 52/77
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 6.3%±5.7 pp46±41 8.8%±0.2 pp— ▼ -2.5% 42/77
↳ Finance & Insurance 5.2%±5.8 pp38±42 6.7%±0.2 pp— ▼ -1.5% 33/77
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.1%±3.4 pp8±25 2.1%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.1% 64/77
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 12.2%±6.4 pp89±46 18.2%±0.4 pp— ▼ -6.0% 47/77
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 10.2%±5.9 pp74±43 13.4%±0.3 pp— ▼ -3.2% 27/77
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%±3.6 pp0±26 0.1%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.1% 34/77
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 1.9%±4.2 pp14±31 4.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -2.7% 75/77
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 30.5%±12.8 pp222±93 24.2%±0.4 pp— ▲ +6.4% 17/77
↳ Educational Services 14.1%±9.2 pp103±67 10.5%±0.2 pp— ▲ +3.6% 13/77
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 16.4%±9.2 pp119±67 13.7%±0.3 pp— ▲ +2.7% 27/77
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 6.4%±5.4 pp47±39 9.1%±0.2 pp— ▼ -2.7% 61/77
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.1%±3.6 pp1±26 2.2%±0.1 pp— ▼ -2.1% 74/77
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 6.3%±5.4 pp46±39 6.9%±0.2 pp— ▼ -0.6% 41/77
Other Services 3.3%±5.6 pp24±40 4.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -1.3% 64/77
Public Administration 11.3%±10.3 pp82±75 4.0%±0.2 pp— ▲ +7.3% 4/77
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category Fuller Park
Private Company Employee 54.5% ±10.9 pp397 ±79
Self-Employed 6.8% ±7.1 pp49 ±52
Nonprofit 5.3% ±4.7 pp38 ±34
Government 33.0% ±13.3 pp240 ±96
Unpaid Family Worker 0.4% ±3.6 pp3 ±26
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Private Company Employee 54.5%±10.9 pp397±79 67.9%±0.4 pp947,845±5,822 ▼ -13.4% 71/77
Self-Employed 6.8%±7.1 pp49±52 8.3%±0.2 pp115,690±2,989 ▼ -1.5% 56/77
Nonprofit 5.3%±4.7 pp38±34 12.1%±0.3 pp169,124±4,035 ▼ -6.8% 75/77
Government 33.0%±13.3 pp240±96 12.9%±0.3 pp179,945±4,021 ▲ +20.1% 2/77
Unpaid Family Worker 0.4%±3.6 pp3±26 0.2%±0.0 pp2,312±408 ▲ +0.2% 11/77
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category Fuller Park
Full-Time, Year-Round 47.6% ±1.8 pp408 ±16
Part-Time or Part-Year 52.4% ±17.9 pp449 ±153
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round 47.6%±1.8 pp408±16 67.0%±0.3 pp1,025,726±3,875 ▼ -19.4% 76/77
Part-Time or Part-Year 52.4%±17.9 pp449±153 33.0%±0.3 pp504,210±4,897 ▲ +19.4% 2/77
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category Fuller Park
Average FT Earnings $53,549±$11,137
10th Percentile FT Earnings $7,169±$7,533
25th Percentile FT Earnings $32,917±$13,654
Median FT Earnings $56,484±$11,571
75th Percentile FT Earnings $71,866±$11,728
90th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Average FT Earnings $53,549±$11,137 $96,214±$968 ▼ −$42,665 65/76
10th Percentile FT Earnings $7,169±$7,533 $29,008±$387 ▼ −$21,839 77/77
25th Percentile FT Earnings $32,917±$13,654 $43,011±$345 ▼ −$10,094 65/77
Median FT Earnings $56,484±$11,571 $69,663±$530 ▼ −$13,179 43/77
75th Percentile FT Earnings $71,866±$11,728 Over $100,000 ▼ −$28,134+ 60/77
90th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/77
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $56,118 ±6,502 $55,549 ±6,082 $53,549 ±11,137 ▼ −$2,569▼ −$2,000▼ −$569
Chicago citywide $83,170 ±714 $91,467 ±682 $96,214 ±968 ▲ +$13,044▲ +$4,747▲ +$8,297
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $42,351 ±4,907 $45,272 ±4,957 $53,549 ±11,137 ▲ +$11,198▲ +$8,277▲ +$2,921
Chicago citywide $62,767 ±539 $74,546 ±556 $96,214 ±968 ▲ +$33,447▲ +$21,669▲ +$11,778
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $25,213 ±7,680 $28,341 ±9,429 $7,169 ±7,533 ▼ −$18,044▼ −$21,171▲ +$3,127
Chicago citywide $24,209 ±243 $26,113 ±152 $29,008 ±387 ▲ +$4,799▲ +$2,895▲ +$1,904
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $19,028 ±5,796 $23,098 ±7,684 $7,169 ±7,533 ▼ −$11,858▼ −$15,928▲ +$4,070
Chicago citywide $18,270 ±183 $21,282 ±124 $29,008 ±387 ▲ +$10,738▲ +$7,726▲ +$3,012
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $30,565 ±5,469 $33,099 ±3,509 $32,917 ±13,654 ▲ +$2,352▼ −$182▲ +$2,534
Chicago citywide $37,393 ±278 $39,415 ±229 $43,011 ±345 ▲ +$5,618▲ +$3,597▲ +$2,021
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $23,067 ±4,127 $26,975 ±2,860 $32,917 ±13,654 ▲ +$9,850▲ +$5,942▲ +$3,908
Chicago citywide $28,220 ±210 $32,123 ±187 $43,011 ±345 ▲ +$14,791▲ +$10,888▲ +$3,903
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $52,598 ±10,472 $41,406 ±10,927 $56,484 ±11,571 ▲ +$3,885▲ +$15,078▼ −$11,193
Chicago citywide $60,575 ±496 $64,628 ±327 $69,663 ±530 ▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,034▲ +$4,054
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $39,695 ±7,903 $33,746 ±8,906 $56,484 ±11,571 ▲ +$16,788▲ +$22,738▼ −$5,949
Chicago citywide $45,715 ±374 $52,672 ±266 $69,663 ±530 ▲ +$23,948▲ +$16,991▲ +$6,957
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $69,083 ±11,549 $67,190 ±16,126 $71,866 ±11,728 ▲ +$2,783▲ +$4,676▼ −$1,893
Chicago citywide $98,274 ±615 $108,202 ±616 — ——▲ +$9,928
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $52,136 ±8,716 $54,760 ±13,143 $71,866 ±11,728 ▲ +$19,730▲ +$17,106▲ +$2,624
Chicago citywide $74,166 ±464 $88,185 ±502 — ——▲ +$14,019
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $104,247 ±21,910 $109,276 ±22,339 — ——▲ +$5,029
Chicago citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $78,674 ±16,535 $89,060 ±18,206 — ——▲ +$10,387
Chicago citywide — — — ———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category Fuller Park
Average PT Earnings $13,710±$2,210
10th Percentile PT Earnings $1,079±$1,909
25th Percentile PT Earnings $3,318±$3,916
Median PT Earnings $10,293±$2,875
75th Percentile PT Earnings $13,738±$10,315
90th Percentile PT Earnings $31,281±$20,604
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Average PT Earnings $13,710±$2,210 $33,575±$750 ▼ −$19,865 75/76
10th Percentile PT Earnings $1,079±$1,909 $2,183±$87 ▼ −$1,104 74/77
25th Percentile PT Earnings $3,318±$3,916 $7,222±$206 ▼ −$3,903 74/77
Median PT Earnings $10,293±$2,875 $19,180±$393 ▼ −$8,886 75/77
75th Percentile PT Earnings $13,738±$10,315 $38,498±$681 ▼ −$24,760 77/77
90th Percentile PT Earnings $31,281±$20,604 $73,776±$1,391 ▼ −$42,495 77/77
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $33,670 ±23,424 $18,798 ±4,140 $13,710 ±2,210 ▼ −$19,960▼ −$5,088▼ −$14,873
Chicago citywide $27,076 ±473 $31,236 ±676 $33,575 ±750 ▲ +$6,500▲ +$2,340▲ +$4,160
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $25,410 ±17,678 $15,320 ±3,374 $13,710 ±2,210 ▼ −$11,700▼ −$1,610▼ −$10,090
Chicago citywide $20,433 ±357 $25,457 ±551 $33,575 ±750 ▲ +$13,142▲ +$8,118▲ +$5,024
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,113 ±503 $3,048 ±3,277 $1,079 ±1,909 ▼ −$34▼ −$1,969▲ +$1,934
Chicago citywide $2,230 ±48 $2,283 ±59 $2,183 ±87 ▼ −$47▼ −$100▲ +$53
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $840 ±380 $2,484 ±2,671 $1,079 ±1,909 ▲ +$239▼ −$1,405▲ +$1,644
Chicago citywide $1,683 ±36 $1,861 ±48 $2,183 ±87 ▲ +$500▲ +$322▲ +$178
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,781 ±2,709 $8,078 ±3,509 $3,318 ±3,916 ▲ +$537▼ −$4,760▲ +$5,297
Chicago citywide $6,390 ±123 $6,841 ±156 $7,222 ±206 ▲ +$832▲ +$381▲ +$451
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $2,099 ±2,044 $6,584 ±2,860 $3,318 ±3,916 ▲ +$1,219▼ −$3,265▲ +$4,485
Chicago citywide $4,822 ±93 $5,575 ±127 $7,222 ±206 ▲ +$2,399▲ +$1,646▲ +$753
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $11,551 ±5,086 $12,938 ±6,570 $10,293 ±2,875 ▼ −$1,258▼ −$2,645▲ +$1,387
Chicago citywide $15,461 ±166 $17,025 ±275 $19,180 ±393 ▲ +$3,719▲ +$2,155▲ +$1,563
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $8,717 ±3,838 $10,545 ±5,354 $10,293 ±2,875 ▲ +$1,576▼ −$251▲ +$1,827
Chicago citywide $11,668 ±125 $13,875 ±224 $19,180 ±393 ▲ +$7,512▲ +$5,305▲ +$2,207
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $22,137 ±13,746 $25,853 ±13,451 $13,738 ±10,315 ▼ −$8,398▼ −$12,114▲ +$3,716
Chicago citywide $30,795 ±619 $34,779 ±505 $38,498 ±681 ▲ +$7,703▲ +$3,719▲ +$3,984
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $16,706 ±10,374 $21,070 ±10,962 $13,738 ±10,315 ▼ −$2,968▼ −$7,332▲ +$4,364
Chicago citywide $23,241 ±468 $28,345 ±412 $38,498 ±681 ▲ +$15,257▲ +$10,153▲ +$5,104
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $52,931 ±26,706 $43,139 ±22,775 $31,281 ±20,604 ▼ −$21,649▼ −$11,858▼ −$9,791
Chicago citywide $61,207 ±1,249 $68,040 ±1,298 $73,776 ±1,391 ▲ +$12,570▲ +$5,737▲ +$6,833
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $39,946 ±20,155 $35,159 ±18,562 $31,281 ±20,604 ▼ −$8,664▼ −$3,877▼ −$4,787
Chicago citywide $46,192 ±942 $55,452 ±1,058 $73,776 ±1,391 ▲ +$27,585▲ +$18,324▲ +$9,261

Earnings of All Workers

Category Fuller Park
Average Earnings $33,232±$13,475
10th Percentile Earnings $2,045±$2,449
25th Percentile Earnings $7,450±$2,919
Median Earnings $16,556±$10,492
75th Percentile Earnings $56,731±$13,945
90th Percentile Earnings $81,278±$16,621
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Average Earnings $33,232±$13,475 $75,571±$768 ▼ −$42,339 73/76
10th Percentile Earnings $2,045±$2,449 $8,529±$272 ▼ −$6,485 75/77
25th Percentile Earnings $7,450±$2,919 $25,183±$358 ▼ −$17,733 76/77
Median Earnings $16,556±$10,492 $51,367±$471 ▼ −$34,811 77/77
75th Percentile Earnings $56,731±$13,945 $93,324±$598 ▼ −$36,592 66/77
90th Percentile Earnings $81,278±$16,621 Over $100,000 ▼ −$18,722+ 72/77
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $44,598 ±12,452 $40,451 ±6,218 $33,232 ±13,475 ▼ −$11,366▼ −$7,219▼ −$4,147
Chicago citywide $62,453 ±534 $71,626 ±551 $75,571 ±768 ▲ +$13,118▲ +$3,945▲ +$9,173
Average Earnings (nominal dollars) $33,657 ±9,397 $32,967 ±5,068 $33,232 ±13,475 ▼ −$425▲ +$265▼ −$690
Chicago citywide $47,133 ±403 $58,375 ±449 $75,571 ±768 ▲ +$28,438▲ +$17,196▲ +$11,243
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,228 ±1,368 $7,679 ±3,860 $2,045 ±2,449 ▼ −$183▼ −$5,635▲ +$5,451
Chicago citywide $6,858 ±139 $8,358 ±164 $8,529 ±272 ▲ +$1,671▲ +$171▲ +$1,500
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $1,681 ±1,032 $6,259 ±3,146 $2,045 ±2,449 ▲ +$363▼ −$4,214▲ +$4,577
Chicago citywide $5,176 ±105 $6,812 ±134 $8,529 ±272 ▲ +$3,354▲ +$1,717▲ +$1,636
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $11,390 ±5,739 $14,141 ±6,904 $7,450 ±2,919 ▼ −$3,940▼ −$6,692▲ +$2,751
Chicago citywide $19,598 ±241 $23,173 ±290 $25,183 ±358 ▲ +$5,585▲ +$2,010▲ +$3,576
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $8,596 ±4,331 $11,525 ±5,627 $7,450 ±2,919 ▼ −$1,146▼ −$4,075▲ +$2,929
Chicago citywide $14,790 ±182 $18,886 ±236 $25,183 ±358 ▲ +$10,393▲ +$6,297▲ +$4,096
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $28,097 ±6,569 $33,210 ±5,170 $16,556 ±10,492 ▼ −$11,541▼ −$16,654▲ +$5,113
Chicago citywide $42,365 ±293 $47,195 ±370 $51,367 ±471 ▲ +$9,002▲ +$4,172▲ +$4,830
Median Earnings (nominal dollars) $21,204 ±4,958 $27,066 ±4,214 $16,556 ±10,492 ▼ −$4,648▼ −$10,510▲ +$5,862
Chicago citywide $31,972 ±221 $38,464 ±302 $51,367 ±471 ▲ +$19,395▲ +$12,903▲ +$6,492
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $57,795 ±7,494 $57,678 ±12,477 $56,731 ±13,945 ▼ −$1,064▼ −$947▼ −$117
Chicago citywide $78,784 ±555 $87,853 ±597 $93,324 ±598 ▲ +$14,540▲ +$5,471▲ +$9,069
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $43,617 ±5,656 $47,008 ±10,169 $56,731 ±13,945 ▲ +$13,114▲ +$9,723▲ +$3,391
Chicago citywide $59,457 ±418 $71,600 ±486 $93,324 ±598 ▲ +$33,867▲ +$21,723▲ +$12,144
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $81,748 ±20,898 $89,390 ±21,081 $81,278 ±16,621 ▼ −$470▼ −$8,112▲ +$7,642
Chicago citywide $128,659 ±682 — — ———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $61,694 ±15,771 $72,853 ±17,181 $81,278 ±16,621 ▲ +$19,584▲ +$8,425▲ +$11,159
Chicago citywide $97,097 ±515 — — ———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Fuller Park, Chicago

Category Fuller Park
Household income at age 35 $23,437 ±$1,560
Household income percentile rank 27.1 ±1.17 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 2.16% ±0.85 pp
Individual income at age 35 $21,400 ±$1,755
Fraction married 6.80% ±1.57 pp
Employment rate 66.9% ±3.18 pp
Incarceration rate 6.79% ±2.07 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Fuller Park, Chicago. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Fuller Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Fuller Park City Difference
Household income at age 35 $23,437 ±$1,560 $43,090 ±$109 −$19,653
Household income percentile rank 27.1 ±1.17 pp 40.9 ±0.07 pp −13.7 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 2.16% ±0.85 pp 11.4% ±0.08 pp −9.3 pp
Individual income at age 35 $21,400 ±$1,755 $33,545 ±$85 −$12,145
Fraction married 6.80% ±1.57 pp 26.4% ±0.12 pp −19.6 pp
Employment rate 66.9% ±3.18 pp 74.4% ±0.12 pp −7.5 pp
Incarceration rate 6.79% ±2.07 pp 2.87% ±0.06 pp +3.9 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Fuller Park, Chicago. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Fuller Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Fuller Park, Chicago in Lower-Income Families

Category Fuller Park
Household income at age 35 $22,200 ±$2,370
Household income percentile rank 26.2 ±1.79 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 1.54% ±1.40 pp
Individual income at age 35 $20,930 ±$2,202
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Fuller Park, Chicago with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Fuller Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Fuller Park City Difference
Household income at age 35 $22,200 ±$2,370 $34,712 ±$133 −$12,512
Household income percentile rank 26.2 ±1.79 pp 35.3 ±0.09 pp −9.1 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 1.54% ±1.40 pp 6.31% ±0.10 pp −4.8 pp
Individual income at age 35 $20,930 ±$2,202 $28,717 ±$114 −$7,787
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Fuller Park, Chicago with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Fuller Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Fuller Park, Chicago

Category Fuller Park
Stayed in the greater Chicago area 70.6% ±3.14 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 18.4% ±2.68 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Fuller Park, Chicago. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Fuller Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Fuller Park City Difference
Stayed in the greater Chicago area 70.6% ±3.14 pp 78.1% ±0.12 pp −7.5 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 18.4% ±2.68 pp 22.9% ±0.12 pp −4.4 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Fuller Park, Chicago. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Fuller Park, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Fuller Park

Category Fuller Park
All jobs located in fuller park 1,394
Fuller Park jobs held by Fuller Park residents 0.2%
Fuller Park jobs held by non-Fuller Park residents 99.8%
Employed residents working in Fuller Park 0.4%
Employed residents working outside Fuller Park 99.6%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Fuller Park Chicago neighborhood median Difference Rank
All jobs located in fuller park 1,394 5,320 ▼ −3,926 72/77
Fuller Park jobs held by Fuller Park residents 0.2% 5.8% ▼ −5.5 pp 77/77
Fuller Park jobs held by non-Fuller Park residents 99.8% 94.2% ▲ +5.5 pp 1/77
Employed residents working in Fuller Park 0.4% 2.6% ▼ −2.2 pp 77/77
Employed residents working outside Fuller Park 99.6% 97.4% ▲ +2.2 pp 1/77
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in fuller park 1,512 1,130 1,394 ▼ −118▲ +264▼ −382
Chicago citywide 5,236 5,698 5,320 ▲ +84▼ −378▲ +462
Fuller Park jobs held by Fuller Park residents 0.8%11 0.8%9 0.2%3 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −8▼ −0.6 pp▼ −6▲ +0.1 pp▼ −2
Chicago citywide 5.5%246 5.6%306 5.8%279 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +33▲ +0.1 pp▼ −27▲ +0.2 pp▲ +60
Fuller Park jobs held by non-Fuller Park residents 99.2%1,414 99.2%1,082 99.8%1,315 ▲ +0.5 pp▼ −99▲ +0.6 pp▲ +233▼ −0.1 pp▼ −332
Chicago citywide 94.5%4,320 94.4%4,646 94.2%4,657 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +337▼ −0.1 pp▲ +11▼ −0.2 pp▲ +326
Employed residents working in Fuller Park 1.3%11 1.0%9 0.4%3 ▼ −0.9 pp▼ −8▼ −0.6 pp▼ −6▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2
Chicago citywide 2.5%246 2.7%306 2.6%279 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +33▼ −0.1 pp▼ −27▲ +0.1 pp▲ +60
Employed residents working outside Fuller Park 98.7%866 99.0%881 99.6%799 ▲ +0.9 pp▼ −67▲ +0.6 pp▼ −82▲ +0.2 pp▲ +15
Chicago citywide 97.5%9,791 97.3%10,346 97.4%10,385 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +594▲ +0.1 pp▲ +39▼ −0.1 pp▲ +555

Industry of Jobs in Fuller Park

Category Fuller Park
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.2%3
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0
Construction 0.0%0
Manufacturing 18.6%259
Wholesale Trade 21.2%296
Retail Trade 6.7%93
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 0.0%0
↳ Utilities 0.0%0
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 0.0%0
Information 0.0%0
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 0.9%12
↳ Finance & Insurance 0.8%11
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.1%1
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 28.5%397
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 0.0%0
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%0
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 28.5%397
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 16.5%230
↳ Educational Services 0.0%0
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 16.5%230
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 6.5%91
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.0%0
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 6.5%91
Other Services 0.9%13
Public Administration 0.0%0
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.2%3 0.0%423 ▲ +0.2% 5/77
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0 0.0%36 0% 9/77
Construction 0.0%0 1.9%27,207 ▼ -1.9% 77/77
Manufacturing 18.6%259 4.4%64,747 ▲ +14.2% 13/77
Wholesale Trade 21.2%296 2.8%41,460 ▲ +18.4% 2/77
Retail Trade 6.7%93 6.6%96,413 ▲ +0.1% 62/77
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 0.0%0 6.0%87,817 ▼ -6.0% 74/77
↳ Utilities 0.0%0 0.3%5,012 ▼ -0.3% 21/77
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 0.0%0 5.7%82,805 ▼ -5.7% 74/77
Information 0.0%0 3.5%51,095 ▼ -3.5% 72/77
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 0.9%12 10.8%157,520 ▼ -9.9% 74/77
↳ Finance & Insurance 0.8%11 8.6%125,824 ▼ -7.8% 61/77
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.1%1 2.2%31,696 ▼ -2.1% 76/77
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 28.5%397 23.2%339,220 ▲ +5.3% 6/77
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 0.0%0 14.2%207,444 ▼ -14.2% 76/77
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%0 1.2%16,872 ▼ -1.2% 36/77
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 28.5%397 7.9%114,904 ▲ +20.6% 4/77
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 16.5%230 23.0%336,089 ▼ -6.5% 49/77
↳ Educational Services 0.0%0 9.2%134,671 ▼ -9.2% 75/77
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 16.5%230 13.8%201,418 ▲ +2.7% 37/77
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 6.5%91 10.3%151,055 ▼ -3.8% 57/77
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.0%0 1.9%27,339 ▼ -1.9% 65/77
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 6.5%91 8.5%123,716 ▼ -1.9% 53/77
Other Services 0.9%13 4.0%59,136 ▼ -3.1% 74/77
Public Administration 0.0%0 3.5%51,418 ▼ -3.5% 19/77
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.2%3 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +3▲ +0.2 pp▲ +3– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 0.0%181 0.0%569 0.0%423 – 0.0 pp▲ +242– 0.0 pp▼ −146– 0.0 pp▲ +388
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 0.0%140 0.0%374 0.0%36 – 0.0 pp▼ −104– 0.0 pp▼ −338– 0.0 pp▲ +234
Construction 0.5%8 0.1%1 0.0%0 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −8▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1▼ −0.4 pp▼ −7
Chicago citywide 1.6%20,789 1.8%26,012 1.9%27,207 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,418– 0.0 pp▲ +1,195▲ +0.3 pp▲ +5,223
Manufacturing 34.8%526 36.7%415 18.6%259 ▼ −16.2 pp▼ −267▼ −18.1 pp▼ −156▲ +1.9 pp▼ −111
Chicago citywide 4.6%61,066 4.5%63,597 4.4%64,747 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,681▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,150▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,531
Wholesale Trade 16.1%244 26.1%295 21.2%296 ▲ +5.1 pp▲ +52▼ −4.9 pp▲ +1▲ +10.0 pp▲ +51
Chicago citywide 3.0%39,431 2.9%41,789 2.8%41,460 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,029▼ −0.1 pp▼ −329▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,358
Retail Trade 18.2%275 7.8%88 6.7%93 ▼ −11.5 pp▼ −182▼ −1.1 pp▲ +5▼ −10.4 pp▼ −187
Chicago citywide 7.4%97,262 6.9%97,836 6.6%96,413 ▼ −0.8 pp▼ −849▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,423▼ −0.5 pp▲ +574
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 0.1%2 0.3%3 0.0%0 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1
Chicago citywide 5.4%71,320 5.6%79,303 6.0%87,817 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +16,497▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,514▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,983
Utilities 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 0.3%4,383 0.3%4,956 0.3%5,012 – 0.0 pp▲ +629– 0.0 pp▲ +56– 0.0 pp▲ +573
Transportation & Warehousing 0.1%2 0.3%3 0.0%0 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1
Chicago citywide 5.1%66,937 5.2%74,347 5.7%82,805 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +15,868▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,458▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,410
Information 0.0%0 0.2%2 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2
Chicago citywide 3.1%40,514 3.4%48,135 3.5%51,095 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +10,581▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,960▲ +0.3 pp▲ +7,621
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 1.4%21 0.5%6 0.9%12 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −9▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6▼ −0.9 pp▼ −15
Chicago citywide 10.5%138,287 10.6%150,163 10.8%157,520 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +19,233▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,357▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,876
Finance & Insurance 1.1%17 0.5%6 0.8%11 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −6▲ +0.3 pp▲ +5▼ −0.6 pp▼ −11
Chicago citywide 8.5%111,307 8.4%119,147 8.6%125,824 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14,517▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,677▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7,840
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.3%4 0.0%0 0.1%1 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −3▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1▼ −0.3 pp▼ −4
Chicago citywide 2.1%26,980 2.2%31,016 2.2%31,696 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,716– 0.0 pp▲ +680▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,036
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 4.0%60 0.0%0 28.5%397 ▲ +24.5 pp▲ +337▲ +28.5 pp▲ +397▼ −4.0 pp▼ −60
Chicago citywide 21.2%278,928 22.6%319,744 23.2%339,220 ▲ +2.0 pp▲ +60,292▲ +0.6 pp▲ +19,476▲ +1.3 pp▲ +40,816
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 0.3%4 0.0%0 0.0%0 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −4– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.3 pp▼ −4
Chicago citywide 11.8%155,200 12.9%182,462 14.2%207,444 ▲ +2.4 pp▲ +52,244▲ +1.3 pp▲ +24,982▲ +1.1 pp▲ +27,262
Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.1%1 0.0%0 0.0%0 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1
Chicago citywide 1.0%13,619 1.2%16,600 1.2%16,872 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,253– 0.0 pp▲ +272▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,981
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 3.6%55 0.0%0 28.5%397 ▲ +24.8 pp▲ +342▲ +28.5 pp▲ +397▼ −3.6 pp▼ −55
Chicago citywide 8.4%110,109 8.5%120,682 7.9%114,904 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +4,795▼ −0.7 pp▼ −5,778▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,573
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 12.4%188 15.7%177 16.5%230 ▲ +4.1 pp▲ +42▲ +0.8 pp▲ +53▲ +3.2 pp▼ −11
Chicago citywide 23.5%308,633 22.1%313,540 23.0%336,089 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +27,456▲ +0.8 pp▲ +22,549▼ −1.4 pp▲ +4,907
Educational Services 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 10.1%132,909 9.0%128,169 9.2%134,671 ▼ −0.9 pp▲ +1,762▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,502▼ −1.1 pp▼ −4,740
Health Care & Social Assistance 12.4%188 15.7%177 16.5%230 ▲ +4.1 pp▲ +42▲ +0.8 pp▲ +53▲ +3.2 pp▼ −11
Chicago citywide 13.4%175,724 13.1%185,371 13.8%201,418 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +25,694▲ +0.7 pp▲ +16,047▼ −0.3 pp▲ +9,647
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 9.9%149 12.3%139 6.5%91 ▼ −3.3 pp▼ −58▼ −5.8 pp▼ −48▲ +2.4 pp▼ −10
Chicago citywide 10.9%143,753 11.5%162,749 10.3%151,055 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,302▼ −1.2 pp▼ −11,694▲ +0.5 pp▲ +18,996
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 1.7%22,179 2.1%30,178 1.9%27,339 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +5,160▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,839▲ +0.4 pp▲ +7,999
Accommodation & Food Services 9.9%149 12.3%139 6.5%91 ▼ −3.3 pp▼ −58▼ −5.8 pp▼ −48▲ +2.4 pp▼ −10
Chicago citywide 9.3%121,574 9.4%132,571 8.5%123,716 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +2,142▼ −0.9 pp▼ −8,855▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,997
Other Services 2.4%36 0.4%4 0.9%13 ▼ −1.4 pp▼ −23▲ +0.6 pp▲ +9▼ −2.0 pp▼ −32
Chicago citywide 4.5%59,098 4.4%61,698 4.0%59,136 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +38▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,562▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,600
Public Administration 0.2%3 0.0%0 0.0%0 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −3– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.2 pp▼ −3
Chicago citywide 4.2%54,814 3.6%51,684 3.5%51,418 ▼ −0.7 pp▼ −3,396▼ −0.1 pp▼ −266▼ −0.5 pp▼ −3,130

Earnings of Jobs in Fuller Park

Category Fuller Park
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 10.5%146
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 19.7%275
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 69.8%973
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 10.5%146 12.7%185,293 ▼ -2.2% 68/77
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 19.7%275 20.5%299,468 ▼ -0.7% 72/77
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 69.8%973 66.9%978,839 ▲ +2.9% 6/77
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 25.6%387 17.2%194 10.5%146 ▼ −15.1 pp▼ −241▼ −6.7 pp▼ −48▼ −8.4 pp▼ −193
Chicago citywide 21.3%280,137 16.8%238,135 12.7%185,293 ▼ −8.7 pp▼ −94,844▼ −4.1 pp▼ −52,842▼ −4.5 pp▼ −42,002
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 32.9%497 33.3%376 19.7%275 ▼ −13.1 pp▼ −222▼ −13.5 pp▼ −101▲ +0.4 pp▼ −121
Chicago citywide 30.7%403,220 26.7%378,530 20.5%299,468 ▼ −10.2 pp▼ −103,752▼ −6.3 pp▼ −79,062▼ −4.0 pp▼ −24,690
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 41.5%628 49.6%560 69.8%973 ▲ +28.3 pp▲ +345▲ +20.2 pp▲ +413▲ +8.0 pp▼ −68
Chicago citywide 48.0%630,719 56.5%800,154 66.9%978,839 ▲ +18.9 pp▲ +348,120▲ +10.4 pp▲ +178,685▲ +8.5 pp▲ +169,435

Jobs in Fuller Park by Firm Age

Category Fuller Park
Firm age: 0–1 years 1.3%18
Firm age: 2–3 years 0.7%10
Firm age: 4–5 years 1.6%23
Firm age: 6–10 years 2.4%34
Firm age: 11 or more years 93.9%1,309
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years 1.3%18 2.8%37,293 ▼ -1.5% 66/77
Firm age: 2–3 years 0.7%10 2.8%37,154 ▼ -2.1% 75/77
Firm age: 4–5 years 1.6%23 3.2%41,869 ▼ -1.5% 63/77
Firm age: 6–10 years 2.4%34 7.8%102,353 ▼ -5.3% 73/77
Firm age: 11 or more years 93.9%1,309 83.4%1,098,220 ▲ +10.5% 5/77
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years 0.4%6 2.5%28 1.3%18 ▲ +0.9 pp▲ +12▼ −1.2 pp▼ −10▲ +2.1 pp▲ +22
Chicago citywide 2.9%33,224 2.6%33,244 2.8%37,293 – 0.0 pp▲ +4,069▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,049▼ −0.2 pp▲ +20
Firm age: 2–3 years 6.2%94 2.6%29 0.7%10 ▼ −5.5 pp▼ −84▼ −1.9 pp▼ −19▼ −3.7 pp▼ −65
Chicago citywide 4.0%46,935 3.3%42,284 2.8%37,154 ▼ −1.2 pp▼ −9,781▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,130▼ −0.7 pp▼ −4,651
Firm age: 4–5 years 4.0%61 0.2%2 1.6%23 ▼ −2.4 pp▼ −38▲ +1.5 pp▲ +21▼ −3.9 pp▼ −59
Chicago citywide 3.7%42,688 3.6%46,058 3.2%41,869 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −819▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,189▼ −0.1 pp▲ +3,370
Firm age: 6–10 years 1.4%21 7.8%88 2.4%34 ▲ +1.0 pp▲ +13▼ −5.4 pp▼ −54▲ +6.4 pp▲ +67
Chicago citywide 8.2%94,955 8.6%109,934 7.8%102,353 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +7,398▼ −0.9 pp▼ −7,581▲ +0.5 pp▲ +14,979
Firm age: 11 or more years 87.9%1,327 87.0%982 93.9%1,309 ▲ +6.0 pp▼ −18▲ +6.9 pp▲ +327▼ −1.0 pp▼ −345
Chicago citywide 81.3%946,801 81.8%1,043,037 83.4%1,098,220 ▲ +2.1 pp▲ +151,419▲ +1.6 pp▲ +55,183▲ +0.5 pp▲ +96,236

Jobs in Fuller Park by Firm Size

Category Fuller Park
Firm size: 0–19 employees 11.2%156
Firm size: 20–49 employees 5.9%82
Firm size: 50–249 employees 16.0%223
Firm size: 250–499 employees 0.5%7
Firm size: 500 or more employees 66.4%926
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees 11.2%156 12.8%168,975 ▼ -1.6% 65/77
Firm size: 20–49 employees 5.9%82 7.3%96,404 ▼ -1.4% 61/77
Firm size: 50–249 employees 16.0%223 13.8%181,123 ▲ +2.2% 44/77
Firm size: 250–499 employees 0.5%7 5.7%74,787 ▼ -5.2% 68/77
Firm size: 500 or more employees 66.4%926 60.4%795,600 ▲ +6.0% 10/77
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees 9.5%143 15.7%177 11.2%156 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +13▼ −4.5 pp▼ −21▲ +6.2 pp▲ +34
Chicago citywide 13.9%162,248 13.3%169,949 12.8%168,975 ▼ −1.1 pp▲ +6,727▼ −0.5 pp▼ −974▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,701
Firm size: 20–49 employees 3.7%56 8.1%92 5.9%82 ▲ +2.2 pp▲ +26▼ −2.3 pp▼ −10▲ +4.4 pp▲ +36
Chicago citywide 8.4%97,503 8.2%103,945 7.3%96,404 ▼ −1.1 pp▼ −1,099▼ −0.8 pp▼ −7,541▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,442
Firm size: 50–249 employees 20.3%306 17.4%197 16.0%223 ▼ −4.3 pp▼ −83▼ −1.5 pp▲ +26▼ −2.8 pp▼ −109
Chicago citywide 15.7%183,275 14.9%189,930 13.8%181,123 ▼ −2.0 pp▼ −2,152▼ −1.1 pp▼ −8,807▼ −0.8 pp▲ +6,655
Firm size: 250–499 employees 0.1%2 0.1%1 0.5%7 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +5▲ +0.4 pp▲ +6– 0.0 pp▼ −1
Chicago citywide 6.3%72,992 5.9%74,603 5.7%74,787 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,795▼ −0.2 pp▲ +184▼ −0.4 pp▲ +1,611
Firm size: 500 or more employees 66.4%1,002 58.6%662 66.4%926 – 0.0 pp▼ −76▲ +7.8 pp▲ +264▼ −7.8 pp▼ −340
Chicago citywide 55.7%648,585 57.8%736,130 60.4%795,600 ▲ +4.7 pp▲ +147,015▲ +2.7 pp▲ +59,470▲ +2.1 pp▲ +87,545

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Fuller Park
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 18.5% ±6.1 pp18.5%±6.1 pp439 ±145
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 99.4% ±52.9 pp18.4%±9.8 pp436 ±232
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 0.6% ±10.3 pp0.1%±1.9 pp3 ±45
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 18.5%±6.1 pp18.5%±6.1 pp439±145 13.5%±0.2 pp13.5%±0.2 pp365,577±5,480 ▲ +5.0%▲ +5.0% 15/77
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 99.4%±52.9 pp18.4%±9.8 pp436±232 83.0%±0.5 pp11.2%±0.1 pp303,520±1,897 ▲ +16.4%▲ +7.2% 1/773/77
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 0.6%±10.3 pp0.1%±1.9 pp3±45 17.0%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.1 pp62,057±2,247 ▼ -16.4%▼ -2.2% 77/7777/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Fuller Park
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 5.8% ±3.3 pp5.8%±3.3 pp137 ±76
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 54.3% ±27.8 pp3.2%±1.6 pp74 ±38
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 45.7% ±31.0 pp2.7%±1.8 pp62 ±42
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 78.2% ±9.1 pp4.6%±0.5 pp107 ±12
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 21.8% ±23.6 pp1.3%±1.4 pp30 ±32
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 5.8%±3.3 pp5.8%±3.3 pp137±76 7.4%±0.1 pp7.4%±0.1 pp201,851±4,036 ▼ -1.6%▼ -1.6% 40/77
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 54.3%±27.8 pp3.2%±1.6 pp74±38 52.4%±0.7 pp3.9%±0.1 pp105,720±1,511 ▲ +1.9%▼ -0.7% 50/7755/77
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 45.7%±31.0 pp2.7%±1.8 pp62±42 47.6%±1.2 pp3.5%±0.1 pp96,131±2,437 ▼ -1.9%▼ -0.9% 28/7731/77
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 78.2%±9.1 pp4.6%±0.5 pp107±12 67.0%±1.0 pp5.0%±0.1 pp135,301±1,945 ▲ +11.2%▼ -0.4% 29/7732/77
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 21.8%±23.6 pp1.3%±1.4 pp30±32 33.0%±1.2 pp2.5%±0.1 pp66,550±2,459 ▼ -11.2%▼ -1.2% 49/7742/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category Fuller Park
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 13.0% ±15.1 pp63 ±73
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 0.0% ±13.2 pp0
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 13.0%±15.1 pp63±73 5.9%±0.5 pp— ▲ +7.1% 6/77
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 0.0%±13.2 pp0 5.4%±0.6 pp— ▼ -5.4% 71/77
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category Fuller Park
Owner-Occupied Households 28.4% ±6.7 pp298 ±70
Renter-Occupied Households 71.6% ±12.6 pp751 ±132
Owner-Occupied Residents 34.8% ±9.9 pp812 ±231
Renter-Occupied Residents 65.2% ±13.7 pp1,521 ±319
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Owner-Occupied Households 28.4%±6.7 pp298±70 46.0%±0.4 pp534,012±4,939 ▼ -17.6% 69/77
Renter-Occupied Households 71.6%±12.6 pp751±132 54.0%±0.4 pp626,193±5,183 ▲ +17.6% 9/77
Owner-Occupied Residents 34.8%±9.9 pp812±231 51.8%±0.5 pp1,377,219±13,574 ▼ -17.0% 66/77
Renter-Occupied Residents 65.2%±13.7 pp1,521±319 48.2%±0.5 pp1,280,665±13,500 ▲ +17.0% 12/77
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category Fuller Park
Median Year Moved In 2014±2.4 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later 5.0% ±7.6 pp53 ±80
Moved in 2020 to 2022 14.5% ±6.1 pp152 ±64
Moved in 2010 to 2019 49.7% ±11.9 pp521 ±125
Moved in 2000 to 2009 17.6% ±7.9 pp184 ±83
Moved in 1990 to 1999 3.9% ±3.8 pp41 ±40
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 9.2% ±5.2 pp97 ±55
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Median Year Moved In 2014±2.4 yr 2015±1.0 yr ▼ −1 25/77
Moved in 2023 or Later 5.0%±7.6 pp53±80 5.9%±0.2 pp68,884±2,742 ▼ -0.9% 25/77
Moved in 2020 to 2022 14.5%±6.1 pp152±64 24.1%±0.4 pp279,417±5,059 ▼ -9.5% 50/77
Moved in 2010 to 2019 49.7%±11.9 pp521±125 39.2%±0.5 pp455,125±5,772 ▲ +10.5% 5/77
Moved in 2000 to 2009 17.6%±7.9 pp184±83 13.8%±0.3 pp160,353±3,324 ▲ +3.7% 27/77
Moved in 1990 to 1999 3.9%±3.8 pp41±40 8.2%±0.2 pp95,243±2,390 ▼ -4.3% 71/77
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 9.2%±5.2 pp97±55 8.7%±0.2 pp101,183±2,362 ▲ +0.5% 39/77
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show
Category Fuller Park
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 7.4% ±4.7 pp7.4%±4.7 pp175 ±111
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers) 6.0% ±4.4 pp80.6%±29.4 pp141 ±103
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers) 0.9% ±1.5 pp12.0%±19.2 pp21 ±36
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 0.6% ±0.9 pp7.4%±10.6 pp13 ±20
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 0.0% ±0.8 pp0.0%±0.0 pp0 ±0
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 7.4%±4.7 pp7.4%±4.7 pp175±111 14.0%±0.3 pp14.0%±0.3 pp375,475±8,289 ▼ -6.6%▼ -6.6% 56/77
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers) 6.0%±4.4 pp80.6%±29.4 pp141±103 9.8%±0.3 pp69.9%±1.0 pp262,365±6,953 ▼ -3.8%▲ +10.7% 53/7727/77
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers) 0.9%±1.5 pp12.0%±19.2 pp21±36 0.8%±0.1 pp5.5%±0.4 pp20,552±1,626 ▲ +0.1%▲ +6.5% 18/776/77
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 0.6%±0.9 pp7.4%±10.6 pp13±20 2.5%±0.1 pp17.6%±0.7 pp65,936±2,918 ▼ -1.9%▼ -10.1% 51/7747/77
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 0.0%±0.8 pp0.0%±0.0 pp0±0 1.0%±0.1 pp7.1%±0.8 pp26,622±3,040 ▼ -1.0%▼ -7.1% 67/7767/77
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show
Category Fuller Park
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 25.0% ±7.7 pp25.0%±7.7 pp348 ±108
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 1.8% ±2.3 pp7.2%±9.1 pp25 ±33
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 2.4% ±3.9 pp9.5%±15.4 pp33 ±54
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.0% ±1.3 pp0.0%0
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 20.8% ±6.2 pp83.3%±35.8 pp290 ±86
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 3.2% ±4.1 pp3.2%±4.1 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 10.0% ±16.3 pp10.0%±16.3 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 25.0%±7.7 pp25.0%±7.7 pp348±108 9.1%±0.2 pp9.1%±0.2 pp116,849±2,682 ▲ +15.8%▲ +15.8% 1/77
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 1.8%±2.3 pp7.2%±9.1 pp25±33 2.5%±0.1 pp27.1%±1.4 pp31,723±1,796 ▼ -0.7%▼ -20.0% 45/7771/77
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 2.4%±3.9 pp9.5%±15.4 pp33±54 0.6%±0.1 pp6.0%±0.7 pp7,037±795 ▲ +1.8%▲ +3.5% 4/7721/77
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.0%±1.3 pp0.0%0 0.2%±0.0 pp2.4%±0.5 pp2,831±587 ▼ -0.2%▼ -2.4% 38/7738/77
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 20.8%±6.2 pp83.3%±35.8 pp290±86 5.9%±0.3 pp64.4%±2.5 pp75,258±3,387 ▲ +14.9%▲ +18.9% 1/7710/77
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 3.2%±4.1 pp3.2%±4.1 pp— 4.8%±0.3 pp4.8%±0.3 pp— ▼ -1.6%▼ -1.6% 55/77
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 10.0%±16.3 pp10.0%±16.3 pp— 1.3%±0.1 pp1.3%±0.1 pp— ▲ +8.7%▲ +8.7% 1/77
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category Fuller Park
Median Year Built 1962±3 yr
Pre-1940 18.6% ±8.9 pp260 ±124
1940-2009 80.3% ±10.7 pp1,119 ±149
2010+ 1.1% ±2.3 pp15 ±31
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Median Year Built 1962±3 yr 1953±1 yr ▲ +9 yrs 14/77
Pre-1940 18.6%±8.9 pp260±124 38.8%±0.4 pp495,715±4,678 ▼ -20.2% 65/77
1940-2009 80.3%±10.7 pp1,119±149 54.9%±0.6 pp700,698±7,435 ▲ +25.4% 8/77
2010+ 1.1%±2.3 pp15±31 6.3%±0.2 pp80,641±2,725 ▼ -5.2% 66/77
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category Fuller Park
Population Density 3,285 /sq mi±634/sq mi
Single-Family Homes 38.9% ±7.8 pp543 ±108
Buildings With 2–4 Units 26.2% ±8.9 pp365 ±125
Buildings With 5–19 Units 3.4% ±3.4 pp47 ±47
Buildings With 20 or More Units 31.6% ±8.8 pp440 ±122
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Population Density 3,285 /sq mi±634/sq mi 11,748 /sq mi±26/sq mi ▼ −8,463 /sq mi 72/77
Single-Family Homes 38.9%±7.8 pp543±108 29.2%±0.3 pp372,679±3,989 ▲ +9.7% 34/77
Buildings With 2–4 Units 26.2%±8.9 pp365±125 27.4%±0.4 pp349,976±4,957 ▼ -1.3% 36/77
Buildings With 5–19 Units 3.4%±3.4 pp47±47 16.2%±0.3 pp206,420±4,124 ▼ -12.8% 69/77
Buildings With 20 or More Units 31.6%±8.8 pp440±122 27.0%±0.3 pp344,543±4,438 ▲ +4.6% 15/77
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category Fuller Park
Studio 3.4% ±3.0 pp47 ±42
1 Bedroom 32.8% ±8.6 pp457 ±120
2 Bedrooms 20.0% ±6.7 pp278 ±93
3 Bedrooms 33.6% ±9.5 pp469 ±133
4 Bedrooms 8.3% ±4.7 pp115 ±65
5 or More Bedrooms 2.0% ±2.0 pp28 ±28
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Studio 3.4%±3.0 pp47±42 7.5%±0.3 pp95,749±3,205 ▼ -4.1% 39/77
1 Bedroom 32.8%±8.6 pp457±120 20.1%±0.4 pp257,271±4,939 ▲ +12.6% 8/77
2 Bedrooms 20.0%±6.7 pp278±93 33.1%±0.3 pp422,866±4,221 ▼ -13.1% 72/77
3 Bedrooms 33.6%±9.5 pp469±133 26.1%±0.3 pp333,682±4,061 ▲ +7.5% 30/77
4 Bedrooms 8.3%±4.7 pp115±65 9.0%±0.2 pp115,453±2,426 ▼ -0.8% 55/77
5 or More Bedrooms 2.0%±2.0 pp28±28 4.1%±0.2 pp52,033±2,072 ▼ -2.1% 64/77
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show
Category Fuller Park
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 2.0% ±4.5 pp2.0%±4.5 pp21 ±47
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 1.2% ±2.7 pp58.1%±40.5 pp12 ±29
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 0.9% ±3.6 pp41.9%±148.4 pp9 ±38
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 2.0%±4.5 pp2.0%±4.5 pp21±47 3.4%±0.2 pp3.4%±0.2 pp39,979±1,996 ▼ -1.4%▼ -1.4% 52/77
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 1.2%±2.7 pp58.1%±40.5 pp12±29 2.0%±0.1 pp58.2%±2.3 pp23,276±1,493 ▼ -0.8%▼ -0.1% 47/7749/76
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 0.9%±3.6 pp41.9%±148.4 pp9±38 1.4%±0.1 pp41.8%±2.6 pp16,703±1,328 ▼ -0.6%▲ +0.1% 48/7728/76
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category Fuller Park
Natural Gas Heat 68.6% ±7.1 pp719 ±74
Electric Heat 29.2% ±12.4 pp306 ±130
Other Heating Source 2.2% ±4.9 pp23 ±52
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Natural Gas Heat 68.6%±7.1 pp719±74 77.5%±0.3 pp899,660±3,501 ▼ -8.9% 68/77
Electric Heat 29.2%±12.4 pp306±130 18.0%±0.3 pp208,937±3,864 ▲ +11.2% 7/77
Other Heating Source 2.2%±4.9 pp23±52 4.4%±0.2 pp51,603±2,173 ▼ -2.3% 60/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show
Category Fuller Park
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 26.2% ±8.6 pp274 ±90
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 24.6% ±12.6 pp258 ±132
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 49.2% ±10.9 pp516 ±115
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 28.5% ±9.7 pp299 ±102
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 26.2%±8.6 pp274±90 24.9%±0.5 pp289,047±6,215 ▲ +1.2% 71/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 24.6%±12.6 pp258±132 23.8%±0.5 pp276,514±5,809 ▲ +0.8% 14/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 49.2%±10.9 pp516±115 45.6%±0.6 pp529,378±6,577 ▲ +3.6% 15/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 28.5%±9.7 pp299±102 24.0%±0.5 pp278,684±5,306 ▲ +4.5% 16/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category Fuller Park
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $215±$23
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $278±$64
Median Monthly Housing Costs $556±$204
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,311±$243
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,923±$328
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $215±$23 $594±$11 ▼ −$379 76/77
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $278±$64 $1,011±$8 ▼ −$733 77/77
Median Monthly Housing Costs $556±$204 $1,560±$10 ▼ −$1,004 77/77
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,311±$243 $2,329±$13 ▼ −$1,019 76/77
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,923±$328 Over $3,000 ▼ −$1,077+ 73/77
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $271 ±42 $279 ±49 $215 ±23 ▼ −$56▼ −$63▲ +$8
Chicago citywide $609 ±7 $606 ±7 $594 ±11 ▼ −$15▼ −$12▼ −$2
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $205 ±31 $227 ±40 $215 ±23 ▲ +$11▼ −$12▲ +$23
Chicago citywide $459 ±6 $494 ±6 $594 ±11 ▲ +$135▲ +$100▲ +$35
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $405 ±64 $503 ±81 $278 ±64 ▼ −$127▼ −$225▲ +$98
Chicago citywide $992 ±5 $1,001 ±5 $1,011 ±8 ▲ +$19▲ +$10▲ +$9
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $306 ±48 $410 ±66 $278 ±64 ▼ −$28▼ −$132▲ +$105
Chicago citywide $748 ±3 $816 ±4 $1,011 ±8 ▲ +$262▲ +$195▲ +$67
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $943 ±118 $779 ±104 $556 ±204 ▼ −$387▼ −$223▼ −$164
Chicago citywide $1,493 ±8 $1,523 ±6 $1,560 ±10 ▲ +$67▲ +$37▲ +$29
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $712 ±89 $635 ±85 $556 ±204 ▼ −$156▼ −$79▼ −$77
Chicago citywide $1,127 ±6 $1,241 ±5 $1,560 ±10 ▲ +$433▲ +$319▲ +$114
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,341 ±152 $1,369 ±234 $1,311 ±243 ▼ −$30▼ −$58▲ +$28
Chicago citywide $2,333 ±12 $2,326 ±10 $2,329 ±13 ▼ −$4▲ +$3▼ −$7
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,012 ±115 $1,116 ±191 $1,311 ±243 ▲ +$299▲ +$195▲ +$104
Chicago citywide $1,761 ±9 $1,896 ±8 $2,329 ±13 ▲ +$569▲ +$434▲ +$135
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,867 ±106 $1,995 ±273 $1,923 ±328 ▲ +$55▼ −$72▲ +$127
Chicago citywide — $3,316 ±20 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,409 ±80 $1,626 ±223 $1,923 ±328 ▲ +$513▲ +$297▲ +$216
Chicago citywide — $2,703 ±16 — ———

Rent

Rent measure
Category Fuller Park
Average Rent Plus Utilities $840±$145
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $234±$25
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $277±$57
Median Rent Plus Utilities $591±$380
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,383±$212
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,789±$329
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities $840±$145 $1,613±$12 ▼ −$772 75/77
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $234±$25 $696±$20 ▼ −$462 76/77
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $277±$57 $1,043±$8 ▼ −$765 77/77
Median Rent Plus Utilities $591±$380 $1,440±$10 ▼ −$849 77/77
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,383±$212 $2,021±$21 ▼ −$638 65/77
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,789±$329 $2,738±$29 ▼ −$949 65/77
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park
Average Rent $648±$105
10th Percentile Rent $200±$33
25th Percentile Rent $224±$43
Median Rent $453±$323
75th Percentile Rent $1,100±$210
90th Percentile Rent $1,432±$219
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Average Rent $648±$105 $1,452±$11 ▼ −$804 76/77
10th Percentile Rent $200±$33 $564±$21 ▼ −$364 74/77
25th Percentile Rent $224±$43 $913±$7 ▼ −$689 77/77
Median Rent $453±$323 $1,262±$12 ▼ −$809 77/77
75th Percentile Rent $1,100±$210 $1,868±$13 ▼ −$768 68/77
90th Percentile Rent $1,432±$219 $2,528±$38 ▼ −$1,096 64/77
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category Fuller Park
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,072±$1,122
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,528±$437
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,811±$670
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,217±$687
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,214±$933
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,072±$1,122 $2,734±$24 ▲ +$339 14/77
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,528±$437 $1,270±$14 ▲ +$258 16/77
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,811±$670 $1,697±$14 ▲ +$113 29/77
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,217±$687 $2,339±$17 ▼ −$122 31/77
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,214±$933 $3,269±$31 ▼ −$55 24/77
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000 Over $4,000 — 1/77
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,883 ±280 $1,874 ±331 $3,072 ±1,122 ▲ +$1,189▲ +$1,198▼ −$8
Chicago citywide $2,855 ±19 $2,793 ±23 $2,734 ±24 ▼ −$121▼ −$60▼ −$61
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,421 ±211 $1,528 ±270 $3,072 ±1,122 ▲ +$1,651▲ +$1,545▲ +$107
Chicago citywide $2,154 ±14 $2,277 ±19 $2,734 ±24 ▲ +$579▲ +$457▲ +$122
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $786 ±227 $1,004 ±366 $1,528 ±437 ▲ +$742▲ +$524▲ +$218
Chicago citywide $1,403 ±11 $1,356 ±11 $1,270 ±14 ▼ −$133▼ −$86▼ −$47
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $593 ±171 $818 ±298 $1,528 ±437 ▲ +$935▲ +$710▲ +$225
Chicago citywide $1,059 ±8 $1,105 ±9 $1,270 ±14 ▲ +$212▲ +$165▲ +$46
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,008 ±196 $1,223 ±362 $1,811 ±670 ▲ +$802▲ +$588▲ +$215
Chicago citywide $1,874 ±12 $1,800 ±12 $1,697 ±14 ▼ −$177▼ −$103▼ −$74
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $761 ±148 $997 ±295 $1,811 ±670 ▲ +$1,050▲ +$814▲ +$236
Chicago citywide $1,414 ±9 $1,467 ±10 $1,697 ±14 ▲ +$283▲ +$230▲ +$53
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,508 ±284 $1,783 ±406 $2,217 ±687 ▲ +$709▲ +$434▲ +$276
Chicago citywide $2,526 ±13 $2,422 ±13 $2,339 ±17 ▼ −$187▼ −$83▼ −$103
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,138 ±214 $1,453 ±331 $2,217 ±687 ▲ +$1,079▲ +$764▲ +$316
Chicago citywide $1,906 ±10 $1,974 ±11 $2,339 ±17 ▲ +$433▲ +$365▲ +$68
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,213 ±530 $2,345 ±463 $3,214 ±933 ▲ +$1,001▲ +$868▲ +$132
Chicago citywide $3,447 ±25 $3,343 ±25 $3,269 ±31 ▼ −$178▼ −$74▼ −$104
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,670 ±400 $1,912 ±377 $3,214 ±933 ▲ +$1,544▲ +$1,302▲ +$241
Chicago citywide $2,601 ±19 $2,724 ±20 $3,269 ±31 ▲ +$668▲ +$544▲ +$123
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,236 ±688 $2,804 ±1,026 — ——▼ −$432
Chicago citywide — $4,578 ±59 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,442 ±519 $2,285 ±836 — ——▼ −$157
Chicago citywide — $3,731 ±48 — ———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category Fuller Park
Average Monthly Owner Costs $457±$221
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $170±$119
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $315±$112
Median Monthly Owner Costs $452±$91
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $579±$266
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $884±$328
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs $457±$221 $1,078±$22 ▼ −$620 75/77
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $170±$119 $418±$8 ▼ −$248 77/77
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $315±$112 $601±$8 ▼ −$286 77/77
Median Monthly Owner Costs $452±$91 $859±$10 ▼ −$407 76/77
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $579±$266 $1,197±$18 ▼ −$619 77/77
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $884±$328 Over $1,500 ▼ −$616+ 72/77
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $659 ±108 $518 ±94 $457 ±221 ▼ −$202▼ −$60▼ −$142
Chicago citywide $957 ±15 $1,028 ±10 $1,078 ±22 ▲ +$121▲ +$50▲ +$71
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $498 ±81 $422 ±76 $457 ±221 ▼ −$40▲ +$35▼ −$76
Chicago citywide $722 ±11 $838 ±8 $1,078 ±22 ▲ +$355▲ +$240▲ +$116
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $241 ±107 $160 ±133 $170 ±119 ▼ −$71▲ +$9▼ −$81
Chicago citywide $429 ±6 $469 ±7 $418 ±8 ▼ −$11▼ −$51▲ +$40
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $182 ±81 $131 ±109 $170 ±119 ▼ −$12▲ +$39▼ −$51
Chicago citywide $324 ±5 $382 ±5 $418 ±8 ▲ +$95▲ +$36▲ +$59
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $402 ±103 $409 ±186 $315 ±112 ▼ −$87▼ −$94▲ +$7
Chicago citywide $586 ±6 $629 ±6 $601 ±8 ▲ +$14▼ −$28▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $304 ±78 $333 ±152 $315 ±112 ▲ +$11▼ −$18▲ +$30
Chicago citywide $442 ±4 $513 ±5 $601 ±8 ▲ +$158▲ +$88▲ +$70
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $571 ±191 $580 ±85 $452 ±91 ▼ −$119▼ −$128▲ +$9
Chicago citywide $815 ±9 $860 ±7 $859 ±10 ▲ +$44▼ −$1▲ +$45
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $431 ±144 $473 ±69 $452 ±91 ▲ +$21▼ −$21▲ +$41
Chicago citywide $615 ±7 $701 ±6 $859 ±10 ▲ +$244▲ +$158▲ +$86
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $666 ±314 $579 ±266 —▼ −$88—
Chicago citywide — $1,206 ±14 $1,197 ±18 —▼ −$9—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — $543 ±256 $579 ±266 —▲ +$35—
Chicago citywide — $983 ±12 $1,197 ±18 —▲ +$214—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $713 ±511 $884 ±328 —▲ +$171—
Chicago citywide — $1,767 ±35 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — $581 ±416 $884 ±328 —▲ +$303—
Chicago citywide — $1,440 ±28 — ———

Home Values

Category Fuller Park
Average Home Value $189,041±$47,149
10th Percentile Home Value $78,569±$33,105
25th Percentile Home Value $94,170±$20,080
Median Home Value $180,109±$47,657
75th Percentile Home Value $262,182±$81,649
90th Percentile Home Value $364,780±$290,095
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Average Home Value $189,041±$47,149 $437,638±$7,358 ▼ −$248,597 67/77
10th Percentile Home Value $78,569±$33,105 $129,150±$3,756 ▼ −$50,582 65/77
25th Percentile Home Value $94,170±$20,080 $217,800±$1,804 ▼ −$123,630 74/77
Median Home Value $180,109±$47,657 $334,100±$2,424 ▼ −$153,991 69/77
75th Percentile Home Value $262,182±$81,649 $497,700±$3,730 ▼ −$235,518 66/77
90th Percentile Home Value $364,780±$290,095 $809,159±$15,691 ▼ −$444,380 64/77
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $164,490 ±32,868 $167,330 ±27,518 $189,041 ±47,149 ▲ +$24,552▲ +$21,711▲ +$2,840
Chicago citywide $386,614 ±5,106 $424,380 ±4,754 $437,638 ±7,358 ▲ +$51,024▲ +$13,258▲ +$37,766
Average Home Value (nominal dollars) $124,138 ±24,805 $136,374 ±22,427 $189,041 ±47,149 ▲ +$64,904▲ +$52,667▲ +$12,236
Chicago citywide $291,771 ±3,853 $345,871 ±3,874 $437,638 ±7,358 ▲ +$145,867▲ +$91,768▲ +$54,099
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $57,193 ±18,105 $65,172 ±30,670 $78,569 ±33,105 ▲ +$21,376▲ +$13,396▲ +$7,980
Chicago citywide $115,330 ±1,421 $124,313 ±1,339 $129,150 ±3,756 ▲ +$13,821▲ +$4,838▲ +$8,983
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $43,162 ±13,664 $53,115 ±24,996 $78,569 ±33,105 ▲ +$35,406▲ +$25,453▲ +$9,953
Chicago citywide $87,037 ±1,072 $101,315 ±1,091 $129,150 ±3,756 ▲ +$42,113▲ +$27,835▲ +$14,278
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $77,846 ±19,940 $95,839 ±29,921 $94,170 ±20,080 ▲ +$16,323▼ −$1,670▲ +$17,993
Chicago citywide $190,543 ±2,400 $199,018 ±1,255 $217,800 ±1,804 ▲ +$27,257▲ +$18,782▲ +$8,475
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $58,749 ±15,049 $78,109 ±24,386 $94,170 ±20,080 ▲ +$35,420▲ +$16,060▲ +$19,360
Chicago citywide $143,800 ±1,811 $162,200 ±1,023 $217,800 ±1,804 ▲ +$74,000▲ +$55,600▲ +$18,400
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $135,976 ±19,311 $176,523 ±44,350 $180,109 ±47,657 ▲ +$44,133▲ +$3,586▲ +$40,547
Chicago citywide $299,066 ±2,120 $316,564 ±2,118 $334,100 ±2,424 ▲ +$35,034▲ +$17,536▲ +$17,498
Median Home Value (nominal dollars) $102,619 ±14,574 $143,866 ±36,145 $180,109 ±47,657 ▲ +$77,490▲ +$36,243▲ +$41,247
Chicago citywide $225,700 ±1,600 $258,000 ±1,726 $334,100 ±2,424 ▲ +$108,400▲ +$76,100▲ +$32,300
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $177,919 ±31,914 $235,990 ±32,933 $262,182 ±81,649 ▲ +$84,262▲ +$26,192▲ +$58,070
Chicago citywide $466,951 ±3,138 $490,797 ±3,892 $497,700 ±3,730 ▲ +$30,749▲ +$6,903▲ +$23,846
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $134,273 ±24,085 $192,332 ±26,841 $262,182 ±81,649 ▲ +$127,909▲ +$69,850▲ +$58,059
Chicago citywide $352,400 ±2,368 $400,000 ±3,172 $497,700 ±3,730 ▲ +$145,300▲ +$97,700▲ +$47,600
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $347,177 ±274,955 $282,708 ±354,531 $364,780 ±290,095 ▲ +$17,603▲ +$82,072▼ −$64,469
Chicago citywide $739,174 ±12,945 $835,769 ±9,047 $809,159 ±15,691 ▲ +$69,986▼ −$26,610▲ +$96,595
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $262,009 ±207,504 $230,407 ±288,944 $364,780 ±290,095 ▲ +$102,771▲ +$134,373▼ −$31,602
Chicago citywide $557,842 ±9,770 $681,153 ±7,373 $809,159 ±15,691 ▲ +$251,317▲ +$128,006▲ +$123,311

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show
Category Fuller Park
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 35.9%35.9%500
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 27.5%76.6%383
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 4.2%11.8%59
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 4.2%11.6%58
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 35.9%35.9%500 8.3%8.3%106,578 ▲ +27.5%▲ +27.5% 3/77
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 27.5%76.6%383 4.8%57.2%60,910 ▲ +22.7%▲ +19.4% 1/7735/77
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 4.2%11.8%59 1.1%13.8%14,721 ▲ +3.1%▼ -2.0% 7/7728/77
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0 2.1%25.7%27,383 ▼ -2.1%▼ -25.7% 58/7758/77
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 4.2%11.6%58 0.3%3.3%3,564 ▲ +3.9%▲ +8.3% 2/774/77
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units 39.3%608 33.8%529 35.9%500 ▼ −3.4 pp▼ −108▲ +2.1 pp▼ −29▼ −5.5 pp▼ −79
Chicago citywide 8.8%104,550 8.5%103,479 8.3%106,578 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,028▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,099▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,071
Housing Choice Vouchers 6.9%106 25.0%391 27.5%383 ▲ +20.6 pp▲ +277▲ +2.5 pp▼ −8▲ +18.1 pp▲ +285
Chicago citywide 4.3%51,601 4.6%55,987 4.8%60,910 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +9,309▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,923▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,386
Public Housing 28.9%447 5.1%80 4.2%59 ▼ −24.7 pp▼ −388▼ −0.9 pp▼ −21▼ −23.8 pp▼ −367
Chicago citywide 1.8%21,159 1.3%16,094 1.2%14,721 ▼ −0.6 pp▼ −6,438▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,373▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,065
Project-Based Section 8 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 2.2%25,940 2.2%26,951 2.1%27,383 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,443▼ −0.1 pp▲ +432– 0.0 pp▲ +1,011
Other Project-Based Programs 3.6%55 3.7%58 4.2%58 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +3▲ +0.5 pp– 0▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3
Chicago citywide 0.5%5,850 0.4%4,447 0.3%3,564 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,286▼ −0.1 pp▼ −883▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,403
Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category Fuller Park
Average Household Income $14,434
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $359
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,286
Below 30% of Area Median Income 92.2%399
With Children 11.0%48
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 55.2%239
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $14,434 $17,032 ▼ -$2,598 74/75
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $359 $425 ▼ -$66 73/75
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,286 $1,389 ▼ -$103 53/75
Below 30% of Area Median Income 92.2%399 83.0%77,427 ▲ +9.2 pp 2/75
With Children 11.0%48 31.0%28,919 ▼ -20.0 pp 70/75
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 55.2%239 32.0%29,852 ▲ +23.2 pp 1/75
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income $11,324 $11,759 $14,430 ▲ +$3,107▲ +$2,671▲ +$436
Chicago citywide $12,156 $13,665 $17,032 ▲ +$4,876▲ +$3,367▲ +$1,509
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $268 $283 $359 ▲ +$91▲ +$76▲ +$15
Chicago citywide $310 $340 $425 ▲ +$115▲ +$85▲ +$30
Average Monthly Government Spending $944 $995 $1,286 ▲ +$343▲ +$291▲ +$52
Chicago citywide $916 $1,017 $1,389 ▲ +$473▲ +$372▲ +$101
Below 30% of Area Median Income 83.7%— 89.5%— 92.2%— ▲ +8.4 pp—▲ +2.6 pp—▲ +5.8 pp—
Chicago citywide 80.0%— 81.0%— 83.0%— ▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +2.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children — — 11.0%— ——————
Chicago citywide — — 31.0%— ——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 47.1%— 46.7%— 55.3%— ▲ +8.2 pp—▲ +8.6 pp—▼ −0.4 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category Fuller Park
Total Tree Canopy 12.8%60 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 68.3%317 acres
Natural Open Surfaces 18.8%87 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Total Tree Canopy 12.8%60 acres 18.4%25,934 acres ▼ -5.5% 63/77
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 68.3%317 acres 60.2%84,955 acres ▲ +8.2% 24/77
Natural Open Surfaces 18.8%87 acres 21.5%30,331 acres ▼ -2.7% 38/77
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category Fuller Park
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 12.8% ±9.4 pp300 ±220
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 50.2% ±11.5 pp1,177 ±270
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 37.0% ±11.3 pp868 ±266
Homes Without Air Conditioning 7.0%165
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 12.8%±9.4 pp300±220 26.1%±0.5 pp707,660±13,869 ▼ -13.3% 76/77
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 50.2%±11.5 pp1,177±270 44.1%±0.6 pp1,195,950±15,462 ▲ +6.1% 9/77
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 37.0%±11.3 pp868±266 29.8%±0.5 pp807,615±13,763 ▲ +7.2% 23/77
Homes Without Air Conditioning 7.0%165 4.2%114,494 ▲ +2.8% 7/77
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category Fuller Park
Drove Alone 44.0% ±11.8 pp267 ±71
Carpooled 20.5% ±12.2 pp124 ±74
Public Transit 30.9% ±11.8 pp187 ±71
Walked 3.6% ±5.8 pp22 ±35
Bikes 0.1% ±3.1 pp1 ±22
Other Commute Mode 0.0% ±3.1 pp0
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Drove Alone 44.0%±11.8 pp267±71 56.6%±0.4 pp772,696±5,998 ▼ -12.6% 70/77
Carpooled 20.5%±12.2 pp124±74 9.3%±0.3 pp126,918±3,980 ▲ +11.2% 5/77
Public Transit 30.9%±11.8 pp187±71 22.4%±0.4 pp305,691±6,011 ▲ +8.5% 6/77
Walked 3.6%±5.8 pp22±35 7.3%±0.3 pp100,269±3,456 ▼ -3.7% 32/77
Bikes 0.1%±3.1 pp1±22 1.8%±0.1 pp24,441±1,693 ▼ -1.6% 58/77
Other Commute Mode 0.0%±3.1 pp0 2.5%±0.1 pp34,356±1,772 ▼ -2.5% 76/77
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category Fuller Park
Average Commute Time (minutes) 35 min±5.7 min
Less Than 15 Minutes 14.1% ±7.7 pp87 ±48
15–29 Minutes 27.4% ±9.0 pp169 ±56
30–44 Minutes 24.6% ±7.5 pp152 ±46
45–59 Minutes 7.0% ±8.7 pp43 ±53
60 Minutes or More 27.0% ±11.3 pp166 ±70
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes) 35 min±5.7 min 33 min±0.2 min ▲ +2 min 35/76
Less Than 15 Minutes 14.1%±7.7 pp87±48 13.0%±0.3 pp140,252±3,438 ▲ +1.0% 23/77
15–29 Minutes 27.4%±9.0 pp169±56 29.9%±0.5 pp322,586±5,056 ▼ -2.6% 38/77
30–44 Minutes 24.6%±7.5 pp152±46 29.6%±0.4 pp318,782±4,584 ▼ -5.0% 68/77
45–59 Minutes 7.0%±8.7 pp43±53 14.0%±0.3 pp151,451±3,075 ▼ -7.0% 74/77
60 Minutes or More 27.0%±11.3 pp166±70 13.4%±0.3 pp144,940±3,715 ▲ +13.5% 2/77
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category Fuller Park
Average Vehicles per Household 0.62±0.16
Households With No Vehicle 53.3% ±12.9 pp559 ±135
Households With 1 Vehicle 32.1% ±8.7 pp336 ±91
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 14.6% ±6.8 pp153 ±71
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Average Vehicles per Household 0.62±0.16 1.12±0.01 ▼ −0.50 75/77
Households With No Vehicle 53.3%±12.9 pp559±135 26.6%±0.4 pp308,497±5,087 ▲ +26.7% 1/77
Households With 1 Vehicle 32.1%±8.7 pp336±91 45.2%±0.4 pp524,900±5,145 ▼ -13.2% 73/77
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 14.6%±6.8 pp153±71 28.2%±0.4 pp326,808±4,200 ▼ -13.5% 68/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Fuller Park Residents Work

Category Fuller Park
Loop 16.9%151
Near North Side 8.6%77
Near West Side 7.6%68
Lower West Side 2.1%19
West Town 2.0%18
All other city neighborhoods 29.8%266
Outside the city 32.9%294
↳ Evanston city, IL 1.8%16
↳ Bedford Park village, IL 1.1%10
↳ Schaumburg village, IL 0.9%8
↳ Forest Park village, IL 0.8%7
↳ Joliet city, IL 0.8%7
↳ All other Illinois locations 25.4%227
Out of state 2.1%19
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 37 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Fuller Park
Loop 16.9%151
Near North Side 8.6%77
Near West Side 7.6%68
Lower West Side 2.1%19
West Town 2.0%18
All other city neighborhoods 29.8%266
Outside the city 32.9%294
↳ Evanston city, IL 1.8%16
↳ Bedford Park village, IL 1.1%10
↳ Schaumburg village, IL 0.9%8
↳ Forest Park village, IL 0.8%7
↳ Joliet city, IL 0.8%7
↳ All other Illinois locations 25.4%227
Out of state 2.1%19
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 37 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Loop 16.2%154 17.6%174 16.9%151 ▲ +0.7 pp▼ −3▼ −0.7 pp▼ −23▲ +1.4 pp▲ +20
Chicago citywide 20.0%224,635 21.0%252,791 21.5%259,167 ▲ +1.5 pp▲ +34,532▲ +0.5 pp▲ +6,376▲ +1.0 pp▲ +28,156
Near North Side 7.4%70 8.7%86 8.6%77 ▲ +1.3 pp▲ +7▼ −0.1 pp▼ −9▲ +1.3 pp▲ +16
Chicago citywide 8.2%92,143 9.4%112,859 9.1%109,333 ▲ +0.9 pp▲ +17,190▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3,526▲ +1.2 pp▲ +20,716
Near West Side 7.4%70 6.6%65 7.6%68 ▲ +0.2 pp▼ −2▲ +1.0 pp▲ +3▼ −0.8 pp▼ −5
Chicago citywide 6.2%69,083 6.6%79,757 6.7%80,118 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +11,035– 0.0 pp▲ +361▲ +0.5 pp▲ +10,674
Lower West Side 2.1%20 0.6%6 2.1%19 – 0.0 pp▼ −1▲ +1.5 pp▲ +13▼ −1.5 pp▼ −14
Chicago citywide 0.9%9,585 0.8%9,912 1.0%12,477 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,892▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,565– 0.0 pp▲ +327
West Town 1.9%18 2.0%20 2.0%18 ▲ +0.1 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▼ −2▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2
Chicago citywide 2.2%24,512 2.1%25,359 2.1%25,621 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,109– 0.0 pp▲ +262▼ −0.1 pp▲ +847
All other city neighborhoods 32.3%307 29.6%292 29.8%266 ▼ −2.5 pp▼ −41▲ +0.2 pp▼ −26▼ −2.7 pp▼ −15
Chicago citywide 22.5%252,499 21.1%253,775 20.7%248,736 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −3,763▼ −0.4 pp▼ −5,039▼ −1.4 pp▲ +1,276
Outside the city 31.8%302 33.2%328 32.9%294 ▲ +1.1 pp▼ −8▼ −0.3 pp▼ −34▲ +1.4 pp▲ +26
Chicago citywide 36.8%412,807 35.7%430,134 35.9%432,355 ▼ −0.9 pp▲ +19,548▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,221▼ −1.0 pp▲ +17,327
Evanston city, IL 1.1%10 1.2%12 1.8%16 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +6▲ +0.6 pp▲ +4▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2
Chicago citywide 1.6%17,922 1.6%18,922 1.5%17,546 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −376▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,376– 0.0 pp▲ +1,000
Bedford Park village, IL 1.4%13 0.5%5 1.1%10 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −3▲ +0.6 pp▲ +5▼ −0.9 pp▼ −8
Chicago citywide 0.8%8,547 0.7%8,008 0.6%6,897 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,650▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,111▼ −0.1 pp▼ −539
Schaumburg village, IL 1.4%13 0.9%9 0.9%8 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5– 0.0 pp▼ −1▼ −0.5 pp▼ −4
Chicago citywide 1.1%11,817 1.0%11,930 0.9%10,376 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,441▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,554▼ −0.1 pp▲ +113
Forest Park village, IL 0.5%5 0.5%5 0.8%7 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +2▲ +0.3 pp▲ +2– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 0.2%2,083 0.2%2,914 0.3%3,232 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,149– 0.0 pp▲ +318▲ +0.1 pp▲ +831
Joliet city, IL 0.1%1 0.7%7 0.8%7 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +6▲ +0.1 pp– 0▲ +0.6 pp▲ +6
Chicago citywide 0.2%2,318 0.3%3,240 0.3%3,549 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,231– 0.0 pp▲ +309▲ +0.1 pp▲ +922
Oak Lawn village, IL 0.7%7 0.3%3 0.8%7 – 0.0 pp– 0▲ +0.5 pp▲ +4▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4
Chicago citywide 0.5%5,230 0.5%5,563 0.4%5,394 – 0.0 pp▲ +164– 0.0 pp▼ −169– 0.0 pp▲ +333
Springfield city, IL 0.7%7 0.9%9 0.8%7 – 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2
Chicago citywide 0.4%4,891 0.4%5,358 0.5%6,176 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,285▲ +0.1 pp▲ +818– 0.0 pp▲ +467
All other Illinois locations 24.0%228 26.6%263 25.4%227 ▲ +1.4 pp▼ −1▼ −1.2 pp▼ −36▲ +2.6 pp▲ +35
Chicago citywide 27.9%312,992 27.0%324,805 27.3%329,050 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +16,058▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,245▼ −0.9 pp▲ +11,813
Out of state 2.0%19 2.0%20 2.1%19 ▲ +0.1 pp– 0▲ +0.1 pp▼ −1– 0.0 pp▲ +1
Chicago citywide 2.2%24,577 2.3%27,198 2.2%26,136 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,559▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,062▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,621

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Fuller Park

Category Fuller Park
Auburn Gresham 2.5%35
Austin 2.4%34
South Shore 2.2%30
Chicago Lawn 1.9%26
Lake View 1.9%26
All other city neighborhoods 42.2%588
Outside the city 47.0%655
↳ Cicero town, IL 1.5%21
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL 1.5%21
↳ Joliet city, IL 1.4%19
↳ Burbank city, IL 1.1%15
↳ Naperville city, IL 1.0%14
↳ All other Illinois locations 36.2%504
Out of state 4.4%61
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 37; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Fuller Park
Auburn Gresham 2.5%35
Austin 2.4%34
South Shore 2.2%30
Chicago Lawn 1.9%26
Lake View 1.9%26
All other city neighborhoods 42.2%588
Outside the city 47.0%655
↳ Cicero town, IL 1.5%21
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL 1.5%21
↳ Joliet city, IL 1.4%19
↳ Burbank city, IL 1.1%15
↳ Naperville city, IL 1.0%14
↳ All other Illinois locations 36.2%504
Out of state 4.4%61
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 37; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Auburn Gresham 3.2%48 2.0%23 2.5%35 ▼ −0.7 pp▼ −13▲ +0.5 pp▲ +12▼ −1.1 pp▼ −25
Chicago citywide 0.8%10,351 0.8%10,742 0.7%10,618 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +267– 0.0 pp▼ −124– 0.0 pp▲ +391
Austin 2.6%39 1.0%11 2.4%34 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −5▲ +1.5 pp▲ +23▼ −1.6 pp▼ −28
Chicago citywide 1.5%19,531 1.4%20,284 1.4%20,630 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,099– 0.0 pp▲ +346▼ −0.1 pp▲ +753
South Shore 1.9%28 2.5%28 2.2%30 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +2▼ −0.3 pp▲ +2▲ +0.6 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 0.9%11,525 0.9%12,639 0.8%12,185 – 0.0 pp▲ +660▼ −0.1 pp▼ −454– 0.0 pp▲ +1,114
Chicago Lawn 2.4%37 1.9%21 1.9%26 ▼ −0.6 pp▼ −11– 0.0 pp▲ +5▼ −0.6 pp▼ −16
Chicago citywide 0.7%9,855 0.8%10,666 0.7%10,607 – 0.0 pp▲ +752– 0.0 pp▼ −59– 0.0 pp▲ +811
Lake View 0.7%11 1.2%13 1.9%26 ▲ +1.1 pp▲ +15▲ +0.7 pp▲ +13▲ +0.4 pp▲ +2
Chicago citywide 3.2%41,851 3.2%45,855 3.1%44,775 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,924▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,080▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,004
All other city neighborhoods 43.7%661 43.7%494 42.2%588 ▼ −1.5 pp▼ −73▼ −1.5 pp▲ +94– 0.0 pp▼ −167
Chicago citywide 38.0%499,784 37.9%537,334 36.8%539,030 ▼ −1.2 pp▲ +39,246▼ −1.1 pp▲ +1,696▼ −0.1 pp▲ +37,550
Outside the city 43.5%657 45.0%508 47.0%655 ▲ +3.5 pp▼ −2▲ +2.0 pp▲ +147▲ +1.5 pp▼ −149
Chicago citywide 45.9%603,720 45.4%642,891 47.2%691,545 ▲ +1.3 pp▲ +87,825▲ +1.9 pp▲ +48,654▼ −0.6 pp▲ +39,171
Cicero town, IL 0.7%10 1.4%16 1.5%21 ▲ +0.8 pp▲ +11▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5▲ +0.8 pp▲ +6
Chicago citywide 0.8%9,934 0.8%11,086 0.8%10,993 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,059– 0.0 pp▼ −93– 0.0 pp▲ +1,152
Oak Lawn village, IL 1.2%18 0.4%5 1.5%21 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +3▲ +1.1 pp▲ +16▼ −0.7 pp▼ −13
Chicago citywide 0.7%9,277 0.7%9,503 0.7%9,767 – 0.0 pp▲ +490– 0.0 pp▲ +264– 0.0 pp▲ +226
Joliet city, IL 0.2%3 0.9%10 1.4%19 ▲ +1.2 pp▲ +16▲ +0.5 pp▲ +9▲ +0.7 pp▲ +7
Chicago citywide 0.6%7,328 0.6%8,297 0.6%9,068 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,740– 0.0 pp▲ +771– 0.0 pp▲ +969
Burbank city, IL 0.5%7 0.6%7 1.1%15 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +8▲ +0.5 pp▲ +8▲ +0.2 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 0.3%4,102 0.3%4,109 0.3%4,444 – 0.0 pp▲ +342– 0.0 pp▲ +335– 0.0 pp▲ +7
Naperville city, IL 0.3%5 0.7%8 1.0%14 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +9▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6▲ +0.4 pp▲ +3
Chicago citywide 0.8%10,439 0.8%11,676 0.9%13,352 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,913▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,676– 0.0 pp▲ +1,237
All other Illinois locations 31.7%479 31.9%361 36.2%504 ▲ +4.5 pp▲ +25▲ +4.2 pp▲ +143▲ +0.3 pp▼ −118
Chicago citywide 35.5%467,052 35.1%497,107 36.9%540,317 ▲ +1.4 pp▲ +73,265▲ +1.8 pp▲ +43,210▼ −0.5 pp▲ +30,055
Out of state 6.2%94 7.8%88 4.4%61 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −33▼ −3.4 pp▼ −27▲ +1.6 pp▼ −6
Chicago citywide 4.9%63,785 4.8%68,287 4.9%72,123 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8,338▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,836– 0.0 pp▲ +4,502

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category Fuller Park
No Computer or Smartphone 20.7% ±11.4 pp217 ±120
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 13.6% ±5.2 pp143 ±55
Desktop or Laptop Available 62.7% ±7.9 pp657 ±82
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
No Computer or Smartphone 20.7%±11.4 pp217±120 5.1%±0.2 pp58,709±2,246 ▲ +15.6% 1/77
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 13.6%±5.2 pp143±55 10.4%±0.3 pp120,218±3,642 ▲ +3.3% 29/77
Desktop or Laptop Available 62.7%±7.9 pp657±82 79.7%±0.4 pp924,956±4,919 ▼ -17.0% 70/77
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category Fuller Park
Has Internet Access 79.3% ±7.1 pp831 ±74
Cellular Data Plan Only 23.3% ±7.4 pp245 ±77
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 7.4% ±8.0 pp78 ±85
No Internet Access 20.7% ±11.5 pp217 ±121
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Has Internet Access 79.3%±7.1 pp831±74 93.1%±0.3 pp1,080,419±3,310 ▼ -13.8% 77/77
Cellular Data Plan Only 23.3%±7.4 pp245±77 12.5%±0.3 pp145,219±3,463 ▲ +10.8% 4/77
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 7.4%±8.0 pp78±85 3.9%±0.2 pp45,350±1,940 ▲ +3.5% 3/77
No Internet Access 20.7%±11.5 pp217±121 6.9%±0.2 pp79,786±2,730 ▲ +13.8% 1/77
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category Fuller Park
Uninsured Residents 3.6% ±2.3 pp84 ±54
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 0.0% ±3.4 pp0
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 6.3% ±3.7 pp148 ±88
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 0.8% ±3.3 pp18 ±80
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Uninsured Residents 3.6%±2.3 pp84±54 9.8%±0.2 pp264,391±5,709 ▼ -6.2% 69/77
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 0.0%±3.4 pp0 3.9%±0.3 pp104,687±8,934 ▼ -3.9% 76/77
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 6.3%±3.7 pp148±88 13.3%±0.3 pp361,430±8,516 ▼ -7.0% 64/77
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 0.8%±3.3 pp18±80 1.7%±0.3 pp46,718±7,265 ▼ -1.0% 51/77
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category Fuller Park
Insured (Any Coverage) 96.4% ±2.3 pp2,261 ±54
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 31.2% ±4.2 pp732 ±99
Direct-Purchase Insurance 5.7% ±4.2 pp133 ±98
Medicare 21.4% ±5.7 pp503 ±134
Medicaid 44.4% ±10.4 pp1,040 ±244
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.0% ±2.2 pp0
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 6.2% ±4.3 pp146 ±101
Uninsured 3.6% ±2.3 pp84 ±54
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Insured (Any Coverage) 96.4%±2.3 pp2,261±54 90.2%±0.2 pp2,424,871±5,689 ▲ +6.2% 9/77
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 31.2%±4.2 pp732±99 51.2%±0.4 pp1,376,912±9,468 ▼ -20.0% 64/77
Direct-Purchase Insurance 5.7%±4.2 pp133±98 8.5%±0.2 pp227,424±5,112 ▼ -2.8% 60/77
Medicare 21.4%±5.7 pp503±134 12.6%±0.2 pp339,804±4,911 ▲ +8.8% 2/77
Medicaid 44.4%±10.4 pp1,040±244 22.2%±0.3 pp596,931±7,773 ▲ +22.1% 6/77
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.0%±2.2 pp0 0.3%±0.0 pp7,201±787 ▼ -0.3% 70/77
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 6.2%±4.3 pp146±101 3.8%±0.1 pp102,777±3,544 ▲ +2.4% 12/77
Uninsured 3.6%±2.3 pp84±54 9.8%±0.2 pp262,018±5,689 ▼ -6.2% 69/77
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category Fuller Park
Adults With at Least One Disability 28.4% ±7.7 pp522 ±142
Mobility Disability 18.1% ±7.5 pp333 ±138
Hearing Disability 9.4% ±5.2 pp172 ±95
Vision Disability 4.0% ±4.3 pp74 ±79
Cognitive Disability 9.2% ±3.5 pp170 ±65
Self-Care Disability 4.9% ±3.9 pp89 ±71
Independent Living Disability 12.6% ±7.3 pp232 ±135
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability 28.4%±7.7 pp522±142 14.0%±0.2 pp303,665±4,797 ▲ +14.3% 3/77
Mobility Disability 18.1%±7.5 pp333±138 7.6%±0.2 pp163,666±3,398 ▲ +10.6% 2/77
Hearing Disability 9.4%±5.2 pp172±95 2.8%±0.1 pp61,430±2,337 ▲ +6.5% 2/77
Vision Disability 4.0%±4.3 pp74±79 3.0%±0.1 pp64,544±2,269 ▲ +1.0% 21/77
Cognitive Disability 9.2%±3.5 pp170±65 5.2%±0.1 pp112,824±2,939 ▲ +4.0% 4/77
Self-Care Disability 4.9%±3.9 pp89±71 2.7%±0.1 pp57,758±2,261 ▲ +2.2% 14/77
Independent Living Disability 12.6%±7.3 pp232±135 5.7%±0.2 pp123,651±3,247 ▲ +6.9% 3/77
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category Fuller Park
Arthritis 33.7%609
High Blood Pressure 53.5%967
Cancer 5.3%95
Current Asthma 13.4%241
Coronary Heart Disease 11.8%213
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 16.1%290
Diabetes 28.3%512
High Cholesterol 39.5%713
Obesity 49.7%897
Stroke 9.4%170
Lost All Natural Teeth 12.5%226
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Arthritis 33.7%609 19.6%409,178 ▲ +14.1% 1/77
High Blood Pressure 53.5%967 29.7%620,030 ▲ +23.8% 1/77
Cancer 5.3%95 5.0%104,382 ▲ +0.3% 30/77
Current Asthma 13.4%241 10.2%212,940 ▲ +3.2% 8/77
Coronary Heart Disease 11.8%213 4.8%100,207 ▲ +7.0% 1/77
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 16.1%290 5.5%114,820 ▲ +10.6% 1/77
Diabetes 28.3%512 12.0%250,517 ▲ +16.3% 1/77
High Cholesterol 39.5%713 31.6%659,696 ▲ +7.9% 2/77
Obesity 49.7%897 32.6%680,572 ▲ +17.1% 2/77
Stroke 9.4%170 3.3%68,892 ▲ +6.1% 1/77
Lost All Natural Teeth 12.5%226 2.5%52,249 ▲ +10.0% 1/77
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category Fuller Park
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 11.3%204
Current Cigarette Smoking 26.8%484
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 46.5%840
Short Sleep Duration 49.9%901
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 11.3%204 19.0%396,652 ▼ -7.7% 76/77
Current Cigarette Smoking 26.8%484 11.9%248,430 ▲ +14.9% 1/77
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 46.5%840 24.7%515,648 ▲ +21.8% 1/77
Short Sleep Duration 49.9%901 37.8%789,129 ▲ +12.1% 4/77
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category Fuller Park
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 45.0%812
Frequent Physical Distress 21.6%391
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 45.0%812 21.1%440,493 ▲ +23.9% 1/77
Frequent Physical Distress 21.6%391 11.8%246,342 ▲ +9.8% 1/77
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category Fuller Park
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 81.1%1,466
Routine Checkup in Past Year 81.8%1,476
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 84.4%1,523
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 50.1%904
Dental Visit in Past Year 34.6%626
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 68.2%1,232
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 81.1%1,466 72.5%1,513,542 ▲ +8.6% 3/77
Routine Checkup in Past Year 81.8%1,476 76.2%1,590,785 ▲ +5.6% 15/77
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 84.4%1,523 86.2%1,799,549 ▼ -1.8% 58/77
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 50.1%904 55.8%1,164,905 ▼ -5.7% 62/77
Dental Visit in Past Year 34.6%626 58.4%1,219,184 ▼ -23.8% 76/77
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 68.2%1,232 74.2%1,549,032 ▼ -6.0% 74/77
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category Fuller Park
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 19.0%344
Frequent Mental Distress 20.6%372
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 36.5%659
Loneliness 39.2%709
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Fuller Park City Difference Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 19.0%344 19.1%398,740 ▼ -0.1% 35/77
Frequent Mental Distress 20.6%372 16.0%334,023 ▲ +4.6% 7/77
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 36.5%659 28.2%588,716 ▲ +8.3% 6/77
Loneliness 39.2%709 35.8%747,377 ▲ +3.4% 15/77
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Compare All Neighborhoods