Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category	Auburn Gresham
Hispanic	4.5% ±2.0 pp1,989 ±875
White	0.5% ±0.4 pp231 ±169
Black	92.7% ±1.7 pp40,597 ±757
Asian	0.5% ±0.3 pp231 ±147
Other or Multi-racial	1.7% ±0.6 pp731 ±262
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Hispanic	4.5%±2.0 pp1,989±875	29.7%±0.2 pp805,318±5,785	▼ -25.2%	69/77
White	0.5%±0.4 pp231±169	32.1%±0.2 pp870,127±5,557	▼ -31.6%	73/77
Black	92.7%±1.7 pp40,597±757	27.4%±0.2 pp743,710±6,047	▲ +65.3%	3/77
Asian	0.5%±0.3 pp231±147	7.2%±0.2 pp196,435±4,370	▼ -6.7%	59/77
Other or Multi-racial	1.7%±0.6 pp731±262	3.5%±0.1 pp95,636±3,778	▼ -1.9%	60/77
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Age Distribution

Category	Auburn Gresham
Under 5	7.5% ±1.7 pp3,275 ±729
5-17	16.1% ±1.7 pp7,066 ±744
18-24	8.1% ±1.4 pp3,555 ±592
25-44	26.0% ±1.8 pp11,372 ±773
45-64	22.8% ±1.3 pp10,003 ±569
65-74	10.5% ±1.1 pp4,615 ±497
75-84	6.4% ±0.9 pp2,816 ±387
85+	2.5% ±0.6 pp1,077 ±242
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Under 5	7.5%±1.7 pp3,275±729	5.3%±0.1 pp144,044±3,867	▲ +2.2%	7/77
5-17	16.1%±1.7 pp7,066±744	14.1%±0.2 pp381,582±5,548	▲ +2.1%	40/77
18-24	8.1%±1.4 pp3,555±592	9.6%±0.2 pp260,942±4,900	▼ -1.5%	43/77
25-44	26.0%±1.8 pp11,372±773	34.3%±0.3 pp929,946±6,988	▼ -8.3%	56/77
45-64	22.8%±1.3 pp10,003±569	22.9%±0.2 pp620,047±5,644	0%	54/77
65-74	10.5%±1.1 pp4,615±497	8.2%±0.1 pp221,932±3,711	▲ +2.4%	18/77
75-84	6.4%±0.9 pp2,816±387	4.0%±0.1 pp107,625±2,694	▲ +2.5%	7/77
85+	2.5%±0.6 pp1,077±242	1.7%±0.1 pp45,108±1,921	▲ +0.8%	19/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category	Auburn Gresham
No High School Diploma	13.8% ±2.0 pp4,111 ±605
High School Diploma or GED	33.4% ±2.5 pp9,991 ±749
Some College or Associate's Degree	33.2% ±2.9 pp9,912 ±868
Bachelor's Degree	11.5% ±1.7 pp3,423 ±511
Graduate Degree	8.2% ±1.2 pp2,446 ±364
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
No High School Diploma	13.8%±2.0 pp4,111±605	12.8%±0.2 pp246,015±4,778	▲ +1.0%	34/77
High School Diploma or GED	33.4%±2.5 pp9,991±749	21.1%±0.3 pp405,248±5,752	▲ +12.4%	15/77
Some College or Associate's Degree	33.2%±2.9 pp9,912±868	21.8%±0.3 pp419,911±5,550	▲ +11.4%	18/77
Bachelor's Degree	11.5%±1.7 pp3,423±511	25.4%±0.3 pp488,467±5,708	▼ -13.9%	60/77
Graduate Degree	8.2%±1.2 pp2,446±364	19.0%±0.3 pp365,017±5,186	▼ -10.8%	53/77
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category	Auburn Gresham
Total Population	43,779 ±2,747
Total Households	17,440 ±720
Population Density	11,625 ±729 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	Average Neighborhood	Difference
Total Population	43,779	35,210	▲ +8,569
Total Households	17,440	15,067	▲ +2,373
Population Density	11,625 people/sq mi	13,045 people/sq mi	▼ −1,420
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average neighborhood rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large neighborhoods. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19	Difference	Rank
Total Population	47,611 ±1,721	45,909 ±1,772	43,779 ±2,747	▼ −3,832 ±3,241▼ −2,130 ±3,268▼ −1,702 ±2,470	▲ +12,381▲ +10,723▲ +8,569	20/7720/7720/77
Average Neighborhood	35,230	35,186	35,210	▼ −20▲ +24▼ −43
Total Households	17,158 ±402	17,161 ±406	17,440 ±720	▲ +282 ±824▲ +279 ±826▲ +3 ±571	▲ +3,797▲ +3,307▲ +2,373	18/7720/7721/77
Average Neighborhood	13,361	13,854	15,067	▲ +1,706▲ +1,213▲ +493
Population Density (per sq mi)	12,643 ±457	12,191 ±470	11,625 ±729	▼ −1,018▼ −566▼ −452	▼ −346▼ −837▼ −1,420	34/7736/7737/77
Average Neighborhood Density	12,989	13,028	13,045	▲ +56▲ +17▲ +39

Household Size

Category	Auburn Gresham
Average Household Size	2.51±0.15
1-Person Households	39.3% ±2.7 pp6,862 ±463
2-Person Households	25.4% ±2.6 pp4,432 ±448
3-Person Households	17.8% ±2.8 pp3,103 ±483
4+ Person Households	17.4% ±2.8 pp3,043 ±482
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Size	2.51±0.15	2.29±0.02	▲ +0.22	35/77
1-Person Households	39.3%±2.7 pp6,862±463	39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,783	▼ -0.3%	29/77
2-Person Households	25.4%±2.6 pp4,432±448	29.5%±0.4 pp342,235±5,166	▼ -4.1%	49/77
3-Person Households	17.8%±2.8 pp3,103±483	12.9%±0.4 pp149,291±4,184	▲ +4.9%	8/77
4+ Person Households	17.4%±2.8 pp3,043±482	18.0%±0.5 pp208,411±5,419	▼ -0.5%	49/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category	Auburn Gresham
Never Married	54.5% ±2.8 pp19,190 ±1,004
Married	20.4% ±1.7 pp7,178 ±588
Separated	4.0% ±0.9 pp1,427 ±324
Divorced	12.0% ±1.3 pp4,244 ±461
Widowed	9.1% ±1.2 pp3,203 ±421
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Never Married	54.5%±2.8 pp19,190±1,004	49.6%±0.3 pp1,130,286±6,623	▲ +4.8%	23/77
Married	20.4%±1.7 pp7,178±588	35.5%±0.3 pp807,294±6,077	▼ -15.1%	66/77
Separated	4.0%±0.9 pp1,427±324	2.2%±0.1 pp49,430±2,379	▲ +1.9%	8/77
Divorced	12.0%±1.3 pp4,244±461	7.9%±0.2 pp180,700±3,966	▲ +4.1%	10/77
Widowed	9.1%±1.2 pp3,203±421	4.8%±0.1 pp109,357±2,738	▲ +4.3%	8/77
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category	Auburn Gresham
Speak English Only	93.6% ±1.3 pp37,923 ±523
Spanish	4.2% ±2.1 pp1,715 ±837
French, Haitian, or Cajun	1.2% ±0.6 pp472 ±243
Other Languages	1.0% ±0.6 pp394 ±234
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Speak English Only	93.6%±1.3 pp37,923±523	64.6%±0.3 pp1,659,069±8,218	▲ +29.0%	9/77
Spanish	4.2%±2.1 pp1,715±837	23.7%±0.2 pp607,865±6,166	▼ -19.4%	65/77
French, Haitian, or Cajun	1.2%±0.6 pp472±243	0.6%±0.1 pp15,490±1,595	▲ +0.6%	13/15
Other Languages	1.0%±0.6 pp394±234	NA%±0.3 pp—	—	-
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show

Category	Auburn Gresham
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	97.3% ±7.7 pp97.3%±7.7 pp39,398 ±3,110
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+)	1.3% ±0.6 pp1.3%±0.6 pp535 ±262
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	0.8% ±0.7 pp63.2%±43.7 pp338 ±286
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	0.6% ±0.7 pp43.6%±45.4 pp233 ±268
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	2.7% ±1.2 pp206.7%±133.7 pp1,106 ±469
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	97.3%±7.7 pp97.3%±7.7 pp39,398±3,110	85.4%±0.5 pp85.4%±0.5 pp2,192,778±11,961	▲ +11.9%▲ +11.9%	12/77
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+)	1.3%±0.6 pp1.3%±0.6 pp535±262	7.1%±0.2 pp7.1%±0.2 pp183,252±4,686	▼ -5.8%▼ -5.8%	65/77
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	0.8%±0.7 pp63.2%±43.7 pp338±286	5.2%±0.2 pp72.7%±1.1 pp133,269±3,923	▼ -4.4%▼ -9.5%	58/7741/76
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	0.6%±0.7 pp43.6%±45.4 pp233±268	2.3%±0.1 pp31.6%±1.4 pp57,883±2,982	▼ -1.7%▲ +12.0%	49/7717/76
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	2.7%±1.2 pp206.7%±133.7 pp1,106±469	14.6%±0.3 pp204.3%±6.4 pp374,404±6,794	▼ -11.9%▲ +2.4%	66/7728/76
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category	Auburn Gresham
Married-Couple Households	16.5% ±2.2 pp2,872 ±375
Unmarried-Couple Households	6.6% ±2.0 pp1,146 ±348
One-Person Households	39.3% ±3.7 pp6,862 ±643
Other Household Types	37.6% ±6.3 pp6,560 ±1,103
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Married-Couple Households	16.5%±2.2 pp2,872±375	30.9%±0.3 pp358,432±3,598	▼ -14.4%	66/77
Unmarried-Couple Households	6.6%±2.0 pp1,146±348	8.3%±0.2 pp96,220±2,797	▼ -1.7%	40/77
One-Person Households	39.3%±3.7 pp6,862±643	39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,729	▼ -0.3%	29/77
Other Household Types	37.6%±6.3 pp6,560±1,103	21.1%±0.7 pp245,285±8,514	▲ +16.5%	10/77
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category	Auburn Gresham
Children in Married-Couple Households	24.9% ±6.3 pp2,571 ±647
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	14.9% ±6.5 pp1,535 ±667
Children in Single-Mother Households	54.1% ±8.4 pp5,594 ±873
Children in Single-Father Households	6.1% ±4.5 pp633 ±468
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households	24.9%±6.3 pp2,571±647	56.0%±0.8 pp293,542±4,257	▼ -31.1%	69/77
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	14.9%±6.5 pp1,535±667	8.8%±0.6 pp45,960±3,208	▲ +6.1%	7/77
Children in Single-Mother Households	54.1%±8.4 pp5,594±873	30.6%±0.9 pp160,535±4,521	▲ +23.5%	16/77
Children in Single-Father Households	6.1%±4.5 pp633±468	4.6%±0.4 pp24,133±2,006	▲ +1.5%	22/77
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Auburn Gresham
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	3.8% ±0.8 pp3.8%±0.8 pp1,272 ±258
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	13.7% ±9.5 pp0.5%±0.4 pp174 ±121
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	22.6% ±9.9 pp0.9%±0.4 pp288 ±126
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	32.4% ±12.3 pp1.2%±0.5 pp412 ±156
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	3.9% ±6.2 pp0.1%±0.2 pp50 ±79
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	27.4% ±11.2 pp1.0%±0.4 pp348 ±143
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	3.8%±0.8 pp3.8%±0.8 pp1,272±258	2.8%±0.1 pp2.8%±0.1 pp60,766±2,397	▲ +1.0%▲ +1.0%	25/77
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	13.7%±9.5 pp0.5%±0.4 pp174±121	26.8%±1.8 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,267±1,067	▼ -13.1%▼ -0.2%	60/7753/77
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	22.6%±9.9 pp0.9%±0.4 pp288±126	12.9%±1.0 pp0.4%±0.0 pp7,830±579	▲ +9.8%▲ +0.5%	8/7713/77
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	32.4%±12.3 pp1.2%±0.5 pp412±156	28.8%±1.4 pp0.8%±0.0 pp17,525±846	▲ +3.5%▲ +0.4%	28/7721/77
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	3.9%±6.2 pp0.1%±0.2 pp50±79	4.9%±0.7 pp0.1%±0.0 pp2,995±441	▼ -1.0%0%	37/7732/77
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	27.4%±11.2 pp1.0%±0.4 pp348±143	26.6%±1.5 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,149±916	▲ +0.8%▲ +0.3%	28/7726/77
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show

Category	Auburn Gresham
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	96.4% ±8.5 pp96.4%±8.5 pp42,193 ±3,736
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	3.6% ±1.4 pp3.6%±1.4 pp1,586 ±613
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	1.4% ±0.5 pp37.6%±20.5 pp596 ±230
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	2.3% ±1.3 pp62.4%±26.8 pp990 ±572
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	96.4%±8.5 pp96.4%±8.5 pp42,193±3,736	79.1%±0.3 pp79.1%±0.3 pp2,144,343±7,926	▲ +17.3%▲ +17.3%	8/77
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	3.6%±1.4 pp3.6%±1.4 pp1,586±613	20.9%±0.3 pp20.9%±0.3 pp566,883±7,968	▼ -17.3%▼ -17.3%	70/77
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	1.4%±0.5 pp37.6%±20.5 pp596±230	10.0%±0.2 pp47.7%±0.5 pp270,551±4,603	▼ -8.6%▼ -10.1%	68/7755/77
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	2.3%±1.3 pp62.4%±26.8 pp990±572	10.9%±0.2 pp52.3%±0.9 pp296,332±6,504	▼ -8.7%▲ +10.1%	67/7723/77
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show

Category	Auburn Gresham
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	1.5%±1.4 pp42.4%±32.5 pp672±591
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	2.1%57.6%914
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	Chicago	Difference	Rank
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	1.5% ±1.4 pp42.4%±32.5 pp672	8.2% ±0.2 pp39.3%222,978	▼ -6.7%▲ +3.0%	50/7732/77
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	2.1%57.6%914	——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show

Category	Auburn Gresham
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	1.4% ±0.8 pp37.7%±17.0 pp598 ±372
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	1.0% ±0.6 pp26.3%±12.9 pp417 ±271
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	0.4% ±0.3 pp10.3%±5.9 pp163 ±116
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	0.9% ±0.4 pp25.7%±15.4 pp408 ±171
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	1.4%±0.8 pp37.7%±17.0 pp598±372	5.9%±0.2 pp10053.4%±4302.8 pp159,447±5,557	▼ -4.5%▼ -10015.7%	66/7722/77
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	1.0%±0.6 pp26.3%±12.9 pp417±271	4.5%±0.1 pp7686.8%±3288.8 pp121,912±4,035	▼ -3.5%▼ -7660.5%	61/7711/77
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	0.4%±0.3 pp10.3%±5.9 pp163±116	4.6%±0.1 pp7808.9%±3340.2 pp123,849±3,901	▼ -4.2%▼ -7798.6%	72/7768/77
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	0.9%±0.4 pp25.7%±15.4 pp408±171	6.0%±0.1 pp10193.9%±4354.0 pp161,675±3,491	▼ -5.0%▼ -10168.2%	62/7741/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later	0.0% ±0.3 pp6 ±121	0.5% ±0.3 pp227 ±123	1.4% ±0.8 pp598 ±372	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +592▲ +0.9 pp▲ +371▲ +0.5 pp▲ +221
Chicago citywide	1.4% ±0.1 pp36,978 ±2,235	3.7% ±0.1 pp99,118 ±3,198	5.9% ±0.2 pp159,447 ±5,568	▲ +4.5 pp▲ +122,469▲ +2.2 pp▲ +60,329▲ +2.3 pp▲ +62,140
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009	0.3% ±0.3 pp126 ±150	0.6% ±0.4 pp286 ±165	1.0% ±0.6 pp417 ±271	▲ +0.7 pp▲ +291▲ +0.3 pp▲ +131▲ +0.4 pp▲ +160
Chicago citywide	5.9% ±0.1 pp161,331 ±3,896	4.9% ±0.1 pp131,658 ±3,182	4.5% ±0.1 pp121,912 ±4,044	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −39,419▼ −0.4 pp▼ −9,746▼ −1.1 pp▼ −29,673
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999	0.3% ±0.3 pp139 ±147	0.5% ±0.3 pp248 ±132	0.4% ±0.3 pp163 ±116	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +24▼ −0.2 pp▼ −85▲ +0.2 pp▲ +109
Chicago citywide	6.1% ±0.1 pp165,077 ±3,717	5.3% ±0.1 pp142,413 ±3,015	4.6% ±0.1 pp123,849 ±3,911	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −41,228▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,564▼ −0.8 pp▼ −22,664
Entered the U.S. Before 1990	0.5% ±0.4 pp253 ±172	0.6% ±0.3 pp274 ±117	0.9% ±0.4 pp408 ±171	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +155▲ +0.3 pp▲ +134▲ +0.1 pp▲ +21
Chicago citywide	7.5% ±0.1 pp204,169 ±3,469	6.9% ±0.1 pp186,050 ±3,114	6.0% ±0.1 pp161,675 ±3,509	▼ −1.6 pp▼ −42,494▼ −0.9 pp▼ −24,375▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,119

Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category	Auburn Gresham
Average Household Income	$62,013±$3,346
Per Capita Income	$25,520±$716
10th Percentile Household Income	$8,063±$1,460
25th Percentile Household Income	$18,198±$2,370
Median Household Income	$47,170±$3,588
75th Percentile Household Income	$90,650±$5,210
90th Percentile Household Income	$142,602±$6,838
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$62,013±$3,346	$116,016±$1,263	▼ −$54,003	65/77
Per Capita Income	$25,520±$716	$50,086±$581	▼ −$24,567	62/77
10th Percentile Household Income	$8,063±$1,460	$12,933±$271	▼ −$4,871	63/77
25th Percentile Household Income	$18,198±$2,370	$34,575±$649	▼ −$16,378	62/77
Median Household Income	$47,170±$3,588	$77,902±$907	▼ −$30,732	59/77
75th Percentile Household Income	$90,650±$5,210	$144,150±$1,210	▼ −$53,500	61/77
90th Percentile Household Income	$142,602±$6,838	Over $200,000	▼ −$57,398+	64/77
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$56,088 ±2,322	$59,898 ±3,441	$62,013 ±3,346	▲ +$5,925▲ +$2,115▲ +$3,810
Chicago citywide	$95,689 ±910	$111,304 ±1,075	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$20,327▲ +$4,712▲ +$15,615
Average Household Income (nominal dollars)	$42,328 ±1,752	$48,817 ±2,804	$62,013 ±3,346	▲ +$19,684▲ +$13,196▲ +$6,488
Chicago citywide	$72,215 ±687	$90,713 ±876	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$43,801▲ +$25,303▲ +$18,498
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$21,774 ±700	$24,346 ±1,150	$25,520 ±716	▲ +$3,746▲ +$1,174▲ +$2,572
Chicago citywide	$37,927 ±351	$45,525 ±412	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$12,160▲ +$4,562▲ +$7,598
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars)	$16,432 ±528	$19,842 ±938	$25,520 ±716	▲ +$9,087▲ +$5,678▲ +$3,410
Chicago citywide	$28,623 ±265	$37,103 ±336	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$21,464▲ +$12,984▲ +$8,480
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$8,111 ±896	$8,896 ±1,214	$8,063 ±1,460	▼ −$48▼ −$833▲ +$785
Chicago citywide	$11,828 ±190	$13,281 ±277	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$1,105▼ −$348▲ +$1,453
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$6,121 ±676	$7,250 ±989	$8,063 ±1,460	▲ +$1,942▲ +$813▲ +$1,129
Chicago citywide	$8,927 ±144	$10,824 ±225	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$4,007▲ +$2,109▲ +$1,898
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$20,083 ±1,517	$19,424 ±1,584	$18,198 ±2,370	▼ −$1,885▼ −$1,227▼ −$658
Chicago citywide	$28,727 ±321	$31,597 ±462	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$5,848▲ +$2,979▲ +$2,869
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$15,156 ±1,145	$15,831 ±1,291	$18,198 ±2,370	▲ +$3,042▲ +$2,367▲ +$675
Chicago citywide	$21,680 ±242	$25,751 ±376	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$12,895▲ +$8,824▲ +$4,071
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$39,752 ±2,698	$42,204 ±2,510	$47,170 ±3,588	▲ +$7,419▲ +$4,966▲ +$2,452
Chicago citywide	$63,379 ±591	$71,469 ±723	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$14,523▲ +$6,433▲ +$8,090
Median Household Income (nominal dollars)	$30,000 ±2,036	$34,396 ±2,046	$47,170 ±3,588	▲ +$17,170▲ +$12,774▲ +$4,396
Chicago citywide	$47,831 ±446	$58,247 ±589	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$30,071▲ +$19,655▲ +$10,416
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$76,423 ±3,254	$82,351 ±4,320	$90,650 ±5,210	▲ +$14,227▲ +$8,299▲ +$5,928
Chicago citywide	$122,019 ±806	$139,501 ±1,057	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$22,131▲ +$4,648▲ +$17,482
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$57,675 ±2,456	$67,116 ±3,521	$90,650 ±5,210	▲ +$32,975▲ +$23,534▲ +$9,441
Chicago citywide	$92,086 ±608	$113,694 ±862	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$52,064▲ +$30,456▲ +$21,608
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$120,858 ±5,924	$131,782 ±7,241	$142,602 ±6,838	▲ +$21,744▲ +$10,821▲ +$10,923
Chicago citywide	$202,601 ±2,442	$235,390 ±1,636	—	——▲ +$32,790
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$91,210 ±4,470	$107,403 ±5,902	$142,602 ±6,838	▲ +$51,393▲ +$35,200▲ +$16,193
Chicago citywide	$152,899 ±1,843	$191,844 ±1,333	—	——▲ +$38,944

Poverty Status

Category	Auburn Gresham
Below Poverty Line	28.0% ±3.7 pp12,254 ±1,635
Below 200% Poverty Line	47.2% ±4.5 pp20,663 ±1,949
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	14.9% ±3.0 pp6,528 ±1,314
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Below Poverty Line	28.0%±3.7 pp12,254±1,635	16.8%±0.4 pp456,194±11,330	▲ +11.2%	14/77
Below 200% Poverty Line	47.2%±4.5 pp20,663±1,949	33.4%±0.6 pp905,794±16,660	▲ +13.8%	20/77
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	14.9%±3.0 pp6,528±1,314	8.3%±0.3 pp226,117±7,649	▲ +6.6%	15/77
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Category	Auburn Gresham
Food Insecurity	39.6%13,348
Housing Insecurity	30.8%10,381
Transportation Barriers	18.5%6,236
Threatened Utility Shutoff	21.4%7,208
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Food Insecurity	39.6%13,348	24.4%509,385	▲ +15.2%	20/77
Housing Insecurity	30.8%10,381	19.7%411,266	▲ +11.1%	20/77
Transportation Barriers	18.5%6,236	11.6%242,167	▲ +6.9%	18/77
Threatened Utility Shutoff	21.4%7,208	11.9%248,430	▲ +9.5%	15/77
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category	Auburn Gresham
In Labor Force	74.1% ±3.1 pp11,987 ±501
↳ Employed	61.6% ±3.4 pp9,960 ±554
↳ Unemployed	12.5% ±2.5 pp2,027 ±412
↳ Unemployment Rate	16.9% ±3.4 pp—
Not in Labor Force	25.9% ±9.5 pp4,180 ±1,540
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
In Labor Force	74.1%±3.1 pp11,987±501	85.6%±0.3 pp1,069,076±3,868	▼ -11.4%	69/77
↳ Employed	61.6%±3.4 pp9,960±554	79.6%±0.3 pp994,466±4,326	▼ -18.0%	71/77
↳ Unemployed	12.5%±2.5 pp2,027±412	5.9%±0.2 pp73,968±2,788	▲ +6.6%	6/77
↳ Unemployment Rate	16.9%±3.4 pp—	6.9%±0.3 pp86,502±3,342	▲ +10.0%	6/77
Not in Labor Force	25.9%±9.5 pp4,180±1,540	14.4%±1.1 pp180,399±14,344	▲ +11.4%	9/77
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category	Auburn Gresham
Management, Business, Science & Arts	27.7% ±3.8 pp4,382 ±605
↳ Management Occupations	8.3% ±1.9 pp1,310 ±306
↳ Business & Financial Operations	2.5% ±1.0 pp390 ±166
↳ Computer & Mathematical	1.9% ±1.0 pp297 ±165
↳ Architecture & Engineering	0.3% ±0.5 pp50 ±81
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	0.0% ±0.5 pp0
↳ Community & Social Service	2.2% ±1.1 pp351 ±173
↳ Legal Occupations	0.2% ±0.5 pp36 ±79
↳ Education, Training & Library	6.2% ±1.9 pp987 ±301
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	0.8% ±0.7 pp120 ±111
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	2.4% ±0.8 pp382 ±133
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	2.9% ±1.4 pp459 ±219
Service	27.7% ±4.2 pp4,385 ±666
↳ Healthcare Support	10.2% ±2.5 pp1,617 ±403
↳ Protective Service	6.9% ±2.1 pp1,089 ±328
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	4.8% ±2.0 pp767 ±317
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	2.0% ±0.9 pp319 ±137
↳ Personal Care & Service	3.7% ±1.5 pp593 ±230
Sales & Office	20.0% ±3.1 pp3,160 ±492
↳ Sales & Related	5.2% ±1.7 pp826 ±263
↳ Office & Administrative Support	14.8% ±2.7 pp2,334 ±422
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	5.1% ±1.8 pp804 ±291
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.1% ±0.5 pp9 ±72
↳ Construction & Extraction	1.7% ±0.9 pp269 ±146
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	3.3% ±1.7 pp526 ±262
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	19.5% ±3.5 pp3,086 ±555
↳ Production Occupations	3.7% ±1.3 pp580 ±200
↳ Transportation Occupations	8.5% ±2.3 pp1,349 ±358
↳ Material Moving Occupations	7.3% ±2.2 pp1,157 ±345
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts	27.7%±3.8 pp4,382±605	49.2%±0.4 pp686,743±5,710	▼ -21.5%	60/77
↳ Management Occupations	8.3%±1.9 pp1,310±306	12.3%±0.3 pp172,182±3,807	▼ -4.1%	49/77
↳ Business & Financial Operations	2.5%±1.0 pp390±166	9.1%±0.2 pp127,081±3,358	▼ -6.6%	75/77
↳ Computer & Mathematical	1.9%±1.0 pp297±165	4.9%±0.2 pp68,921±2,690	▼ -3.1%	57/77
↳ Architecture & Engineering	0.3%±0.5 pp50±81	1.6%±0.1 pp22,779±1,380	▼ -1.3%	68/77
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	0.0%±0.5 pp0	1.4%±0.1 pp19,126±1,340	▼ -1.4%	68/77
↳ Community & Social Service	2.2%±1.1 pp351±173	1.9%±0.1 pp26,973±1,500	▲ +0.3%	28/77
↳ Legal Occupations	0.2%±0.5 pp36±79	2.3%±0.1 pp31,629±1,814	▼ -2.0%	67/77
↳ Education, Training & Library	6.2%±1.9 pp987±301	6.6%±0.2 pp92,316±2,697	▼ -0.4%	41/77
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	0.8%±0.7 pp120±111	3.1%±0.1 pp43,879±1,786	▼ -2.4%	66/77
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	2.4%±0.8 pp382±133	4.6%±0.2 pp63,551±2,652	▼ -2.1%	51/77
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	2.9%±1.4 pp459±219	1.3%±0.1 pp18,306±1,387	▲ +1.6%	7/77
Service	27.7%±4.2 pp4,385±666	16.9%±0.3 pp235,977±4,217	▲ +10.8%	12/77
↳ Healthcare Support	10.2%±2.5 pp1,617±403	3.4%±0.2 pp46,792±2,107	▲ +6.9%	4/77
↳ Protective Service	6.9%±2.1 pp1,089±328	2.8%±0.1 pp39,146±1,734	▲ +4.1%	11/77
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	4.8%±2.0 pp767±317	5.1%±0.2 pp70,514±2,393	▼ -0.2%	43/77
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	2.0%±0.9 pp319±137	3.0%±0.1 pp41,783±1,967	▼ -1.0%	57/77
↳ Personal Care & Service	3.7%±1.5 pp593±230	2.7%±0.1 pp37,742±1,657	▲ +1.0%	19/77
Sales & Office	20.0%±3.1 pp3,160±492	17.4%±0.3 pp243,580±4,754	▲ +2.5%	26/77
↳ Sales & Related	5.2%±1.7 pp826±263	8.1%±0.2 pp113,073±3,174	▼ -2.9%	70/77
↳ Office & Administrative Support	14.8%±2.7 pp2,334±422	9.3%±0.3 pp130,507±3,591	▲ +5.4%	9/77
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	5.1%±1.8 pp804±291	4.6%±0.2 pp64,338±2,929	▲ +0.5%	35/77
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.1%±0.5 pp9±72	0.1%±0.0 pp1,506±406	▼ -0.1%	34/77
↳ Construction & Extraction	1.7%±0.9 pp269±146	2.8%±0.1 pp39,432±2,062	▼ -1.1%	53/77
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	3.3%±1.7 pp526±262	1.7%±0.1 pp23,400±1,722	▲ +1.6%	16/77
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	19.5%±3.5 pp3,086±555	11.8%±0.3 pp165,261±3,629	▲ +7.7%	22/77
↳ Production Occupations	3.7%±1.3 pp580±200	4.2%±0.2 pp57,989±2,275	▼ -0.5%	46/77
↳ Transportation Occupations	8.5%±2.3 pp1,349±358	3.9%±0.2 pp54,099±2,118	▲ +4.7%	4/77
↳ Material Moving Occupations	7.3%±2.2 pp1,157±345	3.8%±0.2 pp53,173±2,312	▲ +3.5%	16/77
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category	Auburn Gresham
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.1% ±0.5 pp11 ±71
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.1% ±0.5 pp11 ±71
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0% ±0.5 pp0
Construction	2.1% ±1.3 pp333 ±210
Manufacturing	5.8% ±1.6 pp917 ±254
Wholesale Trade	0.3% ±0.5 pp42 ±85
Retail Trade	9.5% ±2.1 pp1,501 ±332
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	16.4% ±2.9 pp2,587 ±460
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	16.1% ±2.9 pp2,539 ±458
↳ Utilities	0.3% ±0.6 pp48 ±95
Information	0.7% ±0.6 pp113 ±100
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	4.6% ±1.4 pp735 ±221
↳ Finance & Insurance	2.4% ±1.1 pp386 ±171
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	2.2% ±1.0 pp349 ±157
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	11.1% ±2.4 pp1,753 ±385
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	3.6% ±1.4 pp577 ±217
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.4% ±0.7 pp67 ±113
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	7.0% ±2.0 pp1,109 ±323
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	33.1% ±3.1 pp5,241 ±496
↳ Educational Services	11.0% ±2.3 pp1,732 ±359
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	22.2% ±3.1 pp3,509 ±485
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	6.7% ±2.3 pp1,053 ±357
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	1.2% ±0.9 pp188 ±138
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	5.5% ±2.1 pp865 ±325
Other Services	3.5% ±1.2 pp559 ±197
Public Administration	6.1% ±1.5 pp972 ±243
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.1%±0.5 pp11±71	0.2%±0.0 pp—	▼ -0.1%	49/77
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.1%±0.5 pp11±71	0.2%±0.0 pp—	▼ -0.1%	44/77
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%±0.5 pp0	0.0%±0.0 pp—	0%	18/77
Construction	2.1%±1.3 pp333±210	3.8%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.7%	60/77
Manufacturing	5.8%±1.6 pp917±254	7.7%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.9%	51/77
Wholesale Trade	0.3%±0.5 pp42±85	2.0%±0.1 pp—	▼ -1.8%	70/77
Retail Trade	9.5%±2.1 pp1,501±332	8.2%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.3%	40/77
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	16.4%±2.9 pp2,587±460	7.1%±0.2 pp—	▲ +9.3%	4/77
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	16.1%±2.9 pp2,539±458	6.5%±0.2 pp—	▲ +9.5%	4/77
↳ Utilities	0.3%±0.6 pp48±95	0.5%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.2%	46/77
Information	0.7%±0.6 pp113±100	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▼ -1.4%	65/77
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	4.6%±1.4 pp735±221	8.8%±0.2 pp—	▼ -4.2%	64/77
↳ Finance & Insurance	2.4%±1.1 pp386±171	6.7%±0.2 pp—	▼ -4.2%	70/77
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	2.2%±1.0 pp349±157	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.1%	26/77
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	11.1%±2.4 pp1,753±385	18.2%±0.4 pp—	▼ -7.1%	61/77
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	3.6%±1.4 pp577±217	13.4%±0.3 pp—	▼ -9.8%	67/77
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.4%±0.7 pp67±113	0.1%±0.0 pp—	▲ +0.3%	3/77
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	7.0%±2.0 pp1,109±323	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▲ +2.4%	19/77
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	33.1%±3.1 pp5,241±496	24.2%±0.4 pp—	▲ +9.0%	9/77
↳ Educational Services	11.0%±2.3 pp1,732±359	10.5%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.5%	36/77
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	22.2%±3.1 pp3,509±485	13.7%±0.3 pp—	▲ +8.5%	4/77
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	6.7%±2.3 pp1,053±357	9.1%±0.2 pp—	▼ -2.5%	54/77
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	1.2%±0.9 pp188±138	2.2%±0.1 pp—	▼ -1.0%	61/77
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	5.5%±2.1 pp865±325	6.9%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.5%	49/77
Other Services	3.5%±1.2 pp559±197	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.1%	58/77
Public Administration	6.1%±1.5 pp972±243	4.0%±0.2 pp—	▲ +2.1%	22/77
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category	Auburn Gresham
Private Company Employee	60.9% ±4.2 pp9,638 ±663
Self-Employed	5.5% ±2.0 pp873 ±310
Nonprofit	11.6% ±2.3 pp1,827 ±359
Government	21.8% ±2.6 pp3,455 ±418
Unpaid Family Worker	0.2% ±0.5 pp24 ±73
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Private Company Employee	60.9%±4.2 pp9,638±663	67.9%±0.4 pp947,845±5,822	▼ -7.0%	53/77
Self-Employed	5.5%±2.0 pp873±310	8.3%±0.2 pp115,690±2,989	▼ -2.8%	67/77
Nonprofit	11.6%±2.3 pp1,827±359	12.1%±0.3 pp169,124±4,035	▼ -0.6%	40/77
Government	21.8%±2.6 pp3,455±418	12.9%±0.3 pp179,945±4,021	▲ +9.0%	16/77
Unpaid Family Worker	0.2%±0.5 pp24±73	0.2%±0.0 pp2,312±408	0%	29/77
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category	Auburn Gresham
Full-Time, Year-Round	55.5% ±2.6 pp10,165 ±481
Part-Time or Part-Year	44.5% ±4.3 pp8,155 ±786
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round	55.5%±2.6 pp10,165±481	67.0%±0.3 pp1,025,726±3,875	▼ -11.6%	69/77
Part-Time or Part-Year	44.5%±4.3 pp8,155±786	33.0%±0.3 pp504,210±4,897	▲ +11.6%	9/77
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category	Auburn Gresham
Average FT Earnings	$60,021±$2,505
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$24,315±$4,245
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$35,722±$2,807
Median FT Earnings	$51,955±$3,350
75th Percentile FT Earnings	$81,875±$4,208
90th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Average FT Earnings	$60,021±$2,505	$96,214±$968	▼ −$36,193	51/76
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$24,315±$4,245	$29,008±$387	▼ −$4,693	49/77
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$35,722±$2,807	$43,011±$345	▼ −$7,289	47/77
Median FT Earnings	$51,955±$3,350	$69,663±$530	▼ −$17,708	52/77
75th Percentile FT Earnings	$81,875±$4,208	Over $100,000	▼ −$18,125+	47/77
90th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000	Over $100,000	—	1/77
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$58,096 ±2,415	$57,570 ±2,156	$60,021 ±2,505	▲ +$1,925▲ +$2,451▼ −$526
Chicago citywide	$83,170 ±714	$91,467 ±682	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$13,044▲ +$4,747▲ +$8,297
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$43,844 ±1,823	$46,920 ±1,757	$60,021 ±2,505	▲ +$16,177▲ +$13,101▲ +$3,076
Chicago citywide	$62,767 ±539	$74,546 ±556	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$33,447▲ +$21,669▲ +$11,778
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$22,165 ±2,123	$23,305 ±2,088	$24,315 ±4,245	▲ +$2,150▲ +$1,010▲ +$1,140
Chicago citywide	$24,209 ±243	$26,113 ±152	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$4,799▲ +$2,895▲ +$1,904
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$16,727 ±1,602	$18,993 ±1,702	$24,315 ±4,245	▲ +$7,588▲ +$5,321▲ +$2,266
Chicago citywide	$18,270 ±183	$21,282 ±124	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$10,738▲ +$7,726▲ +$3,012
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$32,833 ±1,962	$33,906 ±1,979	$35,722 ±2,807	▲ +$2,889▲ +$1,817▲ +$1,072
Chicago citywide	$37,393 ±278	$39,415 ±229	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$5,618▲ +$3,597▲ +$2,021
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$24,779 ±1,481	$27,633 ±1,613	$35,722 ±2,807	▲ +$10,943▲ +$8,089▲ +$2,854
Chicago citywide	$28,220 ±210	$32,123 ±187	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$14,791▲ +$10,888▲ +$3,903
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$50,818 ±2,627	$48,715 ±2,250	$51,955 ±3,350	▲ +$1,137▲ +$3,240▼ −$2,102
Chicago citywide	$60,575 ±496	$64,628 ±327	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,034▲ +$4,054
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$38,351 ±1,983	$39,703 ±1,834	$51,955 ±3,350	▲ +$13,604▲ +$12,252▲ +$1,352
Chicago citywide	$45,715 ±374	$52,672 ±266	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$23,948▲ +$16,991▲ +$6,957
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$74,184 ±3,309	$70,132 ±3,665	$81,875 ±4,208	▲ +$7,691▲ +$11,743▼ −$4,052
Chicago citywide	$98,274 ±615	$108,202 ±616	—	——▲ +$9,928
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$55,985 ±2,497	$57,158 ±2,987	$81,875 ±4,208	▲ +$25,890▲ +$24,717▲ +$1,172
Chicago citywide	$74,166 ±464	$88,185 ±502	—	——▲ +$14,019
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$100,472 ±6,222	$107,207 ±6,032	—	——▲ +$6,735
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$75,825 ±4,696	$87,374 ±4,916	—	——▲ +$11,549
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category	Auburn Gresham
Average PT Earnings	$21,618±$2,455
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$1,449±$353
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$5,369±$1,435
Median PT Earnings	$14,613±$2,760
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$29,114±$5,593
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$51,561±$6,378
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Average PT Earnings	$21,618±$2,455	$33,575±$750	▼ −$11,957	63/76
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$1,449±$353	$2,183±$87	▼ −$734	66/77
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$5,369±$1,435	$7,222±$206	▼ −$1,853	58/77
Median PT Earnings	$14,613±$2,760	$19,180±$393	▼ −$4,567	61/77
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$29,114±$5,593	$38,498±$681	▼ −$9,384	59/77
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$51,561±$6,378	$73,776±$1,391	▼ −$22,215	51/77
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$17,645 ±1,421	$22,166 ±2,486	$21,618 ±2,455	▲ +$3,973▼ −$548▲ +$4,521
Chicago citywide	$27,076 ±473	$31,236 ±676	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$6,500▲ +$2,340▲ +$4,160
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$13,316 ±1,072	$18,066 ±2,026	$21,618 ±2,455	▲ +$8,302▲ +$3,553▲ +$4,749
Chicago citywide	$20,433 ±357	$25,457 ±551	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$13,142▲ +$8,118▲ +$5,024
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,513 ±232	$2,019 ±400	$1,449 ±353	▼ −$64▼ −$570▲ +$506
Chicago citywide	$2,230 ±48	$2,283 ±59	$2,183 ±87	▼ −$47▼ −$100▲ +$53
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$1,142 ±175	$1,646 ±326	$1,449 ±353	▲ +$307▼ −$196▲ +$503
Chicago citywide	$1,683 ±36	$1,861 ±48	$2,183 ±87	▲ +$500▲ +$322▲ +$178
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$4,089 ±837	$5,740 ±1,253	$5,369 ±1,435	▲ +$1,279▼ −$372▲ +$1,651
Chicago citywide	$6,390 ±123	$6,841 ±156	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$832▲ +$381▲ +$451
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$3,086 ±632	$4,678 ±1,021	$5,369 ±1,435	▲ +$2,282▲ +$690▲ +$1,592
Chicago citywide	$4,822 ±93	$5,575 ±127	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$2,399▲ +$1,646▲ +$753
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$11,800 ±1,602	$15,054 ±1,640	$14,613 ±2,760	▲ +$2,813▼ −$441▲ +$3,254
Chicago citywide	$15,461 ±166	$17,025 ±275	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$3,719▲ +$2,155▲ +$1,563
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$8,905 ±1,209	$12,269 ±1,337	$14,613 ±2,760	▲ +$5,708▲ +$2,344▲ +$3,364
Chicago citywide	$11,668 ±125	$13,875 ±224	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$7,512▲ +$5,305▲ +$2,207
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$23,631 ±2,551	$27,704 ±2,459	$29,114 ±5,593	▲ +$5,483▲ +$1,410▲ +$4,073
Chicago citywide	$30,795 ±619	$34,779 ±505	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$7,703▲ +$3,719▲ +$3,984
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$17,834 ±1,925	$22,579 ±2,004	$29,114 ±5,593	▲ +$11,280▲ +$6,535▲ +$4,745
Chicago citywide	$23,241 ±468	$28,345 ±412	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$15,257▲ +$10,153▲ +$5,104
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$40,775 ±5,697	$46,483 ±6,530	$51,561 ±6,378	▲ +$10,786▲ +$5,078▲ +$5,708
Chicago citywide	$61,207 ±1,249	$68,040 ±1,298	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$12,570▲ +$5,737▲ +$6,833
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$30,772 ±4,299	$37,883 ±5,322	$51,561 ±6,378	▲ +$20,789▲ +$13,678▲ +$7,111
Chicago citywide	$46,192 ±942	$55,452 ±1,058	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$27,585▲ +$18,324▲ +$9,261

Earnings of All Workers

Category	Auburn Gresham
Average Earnings	$42,926±$1,563
10th Percentile Earnings	$4,399±$1,542
25th Percentile Earnings	$14,518±$2,725
Median Earnings	$36,145±$3,227
75th Percentile Earnings	$63,188±$5,325
90th Percentile Earnings	$93,219±$3,344
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Average Earnings	$42,926±$1,563	$75,571±$768	▼ −$32,644	63/76
10th Percentile Earnings	$4,399±$1,542	$8,529±$272	▼ −$4,130	64/77
25th Percentile Earnings	$14,518±$2,725	$25,183±$358	▼ −$10,665	69/77
Median Earnings	$36,145±$3,227	$51,367±$471	▼ −$15,222	59/77
75th Percentile Earnings	$63,188±$5,325	$93,324±$598	▼ −$30,136	55/77
90th Percentile Earnings	$93,219±$3,344	Over $100,000	▼ −$6,781+	60/77
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$39,026 ±1,663	$43,339 ±1,726	$42,926 ±1,563	▲ +$3,900▼ −$412▲ +$4,312
Chicago citywide	$62,453 ±534	$71,626 ±551	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$13,118▲ +$3,945▲ +$9,173
Average Earnings (nominal dollars)	$29,453 ±1,255	$35,321 ±1,407	$42,926 ±1,563	▲ +$13,474▲ +$7,605▲ +$5,869
Chicago citywide	$47,133 ±403	$58,375 ±449	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$28,438▲ +$17,196▲ +$11,243
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$3,209 ±652	$5,505 ±1,156	$4,399 ±1,542	▲ +$1,190▼ −$1,106▲ +$2,296
Chicago citywide	$6,858 ±139	$8,358 ±164	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$1,671▲ +$171▲ +$1,500
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$2,422 ±492	$4,487 ±942	$4,399 ±1,542	▲ +$1,977▼ −$88▲ +$2,065
Chicago citywide	$5,176 ±105	$6,812 ±134	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$3,354▲ +$1,717▲ +$1,636
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$12,265 ±1,616	$17,985 ±1,997	$14,518 ±2,725	▲ +$2,253▼ −$3,468▲ +$5,721
Chicago citywide	$19,598 ±241	$23,173 ±290	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$5,585▲ +$2,010▲ +$3,576
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$9,256 ±1,220	$14,658 ±1,628	$14,518 ±2,725	▲ +$5,262▼ −$140▲ +$5,402
Chicago citywide	$14,790 ±182	$18,886 ±236	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$10,393▲ +$6,297▲ +$4,096
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$29,602 ±1,860	$35,637 ±2,114	$36,145 ±3,227	▲ +$6,543▲ +$508▲ +$6,035
Chicago citywide	$42,365 ±293	$47,195 ±370	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$9,002▲ +$4,172▲ +$4,830
Median Earnings (nominal dollars)	$22,340 ±1,403	$29,044 ±1,723	$36,145 ±3,227	▲ +$13,805▲ +$7,101▲ +$6,704
Chicago citywide	$31,972 ±221	$38,464 ±302	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$19,395▲ +$12,903▲ +$6,492
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$56,176 ±2,668	$58,088 ±3,621	$63,188 ±5,325	▲ +$7,011▲ +$5,099▲ +$1,912
Chicago citywide	$78,784 ±555	$87,853 ±597	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$14,540▲ +$5,471▲ +$9,069
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$42,395 ±2,013	$47,342 ±2,951	$63,188 ±5,325	▲ +$20,792▲ +$15,845▲ +$4,947
Chicago citywide	$59,457 ±418	$71,600 ±486	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$33,867▲ +$21,723▲ +$12,144
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$84,902 ±3,714	$92,494 ±7,001	$93,219 ±3,344	▲ +$8,317▲ +$725▲ +$7,592
Chicago citywide	$128,659 ±682	—	—	———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$64,074 ±2,803	$75,383 ±5,706	$93,219 ±3,344	▲ +$29,145▲ +$17,836▲ +$11,309
Chicago citywide	$97,097 ±515	—	—	———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Auburn Gresham, Chicago

Category	Auburn Gresham
Household income at age 35	$30,153 ±$512
Household income percentile rank	32.1 ±0.37 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	3.63% ±0.32 pp
Individual income at age 35	$27,873 ±$507
Fraction married	10.4% ±0.52 pp
Employment rate	73.9% ±0.75 pp
Incarceration rate	4.79% ±0.45 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Auburn Gresham, Chicago. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Auburn Gresham, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$30,153 ±$512	$43,090 ±$109	−$12,937
Household income percentile rank	32.1 ±0.37 pp	40.9 ±0.07 pp	−8.7 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	3.63% ±0.32 pp	11.4% ±0.08 pp	−7.8 pp
Individual income at age 35	$27,873 ±$507	$33,545 ±$85	−$5,671
Fraction married	10.4% ±0.52 pp	26.4% ±0.12 pp	−16.0 pp
Employment rate	73.9% ±0.75 pp	74.4% ±0.12 pp	−0.5 pp
Incarceration rate	4.79% ±0.45 pp	2.87% ±0.06 pp	+1.9 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Auburn Gresham, Chicago. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Auburn Gresham, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Auburn Gresham, Chicago in Lower-Income Families

Category	Auburn Gresham
Household income at age 35	$27,009 ±$661
Household income percentile rank	29.8 ±0.48 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	2.59% ±0.38 pp
Individual income at age 35	$25,556 ±$636
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Auburn Gresham, Chicago with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Auburn Gresham, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$27,009 ±$661	$34,712 ±$133	−$7,703
Household income percentile rank	29.8 ±0.48 pp	35.3 ±0.09 pp	−5.5 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	2.59% ±0.38 pp	6.31% ±0.10 pp	−3.7 pp
Individual income at age 35	$25,556 ±$636	$28,717 ±$114	−$3,161
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Auburn Gresham, Chicago with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Auburn Gresham, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Auburn Gresham, Chicago

Category	Auburn Gresham
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	73.7% ±0.77 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	23.9% ±0.74 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Auburn Gresham, Chicago. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Auburn Gresham, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	73.7% ±0.77 pp	78.1% ±0.12 pp	−4.4 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	23.9% ±0.74 pp	22.9% ±0.12 pp	+1.0 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Auburn Gresham, Chicago. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Auburn Gresham, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Auburn Gresham

Category	Auburn Gresham
All jobs located in auburn gresham	3,158
Auburn Gresham jobs held by Auburn Gresham residents	8.6%
Auburn Gresham jobs held by non-Auburn Gresham residents	91.4%
Employed residents working in Auburn Gresham	1.6%
Employed residents working outside Auburn Gresham	98.4%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Auburn Gresham	Chicago neighborhood median	Difference	Rank
All jobs located in auburn gresham	3,158	5,320	▼ −2,162	54/77
Auburn Gresham jobs held by Auburn Gresham residents	8.6%	5.8%	▲ +2.8 pp	19/77
Auburn Gresham jobs held by non-Auburn Gresham residents	91.4%	94.2%	▼ −2.8 pp	59/77
Employed residents working in Auburn Gresham	1.6%	2.6%	▼ −1.0 pp	61/77
Employed residents working outside Auburn Gresham	98.4%	97.4%	▲ +1.0 pp	17/77
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in auburn gresham	2,703	2,298	3,158	▲ +455▲ +860▼ −405
Chicago citywide	5,236	5,698	5,320	▲ +84▼ −378▲ +462
Auburn Gresham jobs held by Auburn Gresham residents	8.7%217	9.1%191	8.6%243	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +26▼ −0.6 pp▲ +52▲ +0.5 pp▼ −26
Chicago citywide	5.5%246	5.6%306	5.8%279	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +33▲ +0.1 pp▼ −27▲ +0.2 pp▲ +60
Auburn Gresham jobs held by non-Auburn Gresham residents	91.3%2,285	90.9%1,898	91.4%2,587	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +302▲ +0.6 pp▲ +689▼ −0.5 pp▼ −387
Chicago citywide	94.5%4,320	94.4%4,646	94.2%4,657	▼ −0.3 pp▲ +337▼ −0.1 pp▲ +11▼ −0.2 pp▲ +326
Employed residents working in Auburn Gresham	1.5%217	1.3%191	1.6%243	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +26▲ +0.3 pp▲ +52▼ −0.2 pp▼ −26
Chicago citywide	2.5%246	2.7%306	2.6%279	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +33▼ −0.1 pp▼ −27▲ +0.1 pp▲ +60
Employed residents working outside Auburn Gresham	98.5%14,176	98.7%14,860	98.4%15,196	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,020▼ −0.3 pp▲ +336▲ +0.2 pp▲ +684
Chicago citywide	97.5%9,791	97.3%10,346	97.4%10,385	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +594▲ +0.1 pp▲ +39▼ −0.1 pp▲ +555

Industry of Jobs in Auburn Gresham

Category	Auburn Gresham
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0
Construction	2.8%89
Manufacturing	1.9%61
Wholesale Trade	4.3%135
Retail Trade	36.7%1,158
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	3.0%94
↳ Utilities	0.0%1
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	2.9%93
Information	0.3%11
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	7.5%237
↳ Finance & Insurance	5.1%160
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	2.4%77
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	3.1%99
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	1.6%49
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%1
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	1.6%49
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	15.6%493
↳ Educational Services	6.0%191
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	9.6%302
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	17.4%551
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	1.4%43
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	16.1%508
Other Services	7.3%230
Public Administration	0.0%0
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0	0.0%423	0%	25/77
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0	0.0%36	0%	9/77
Construction	2.8%89	1.9%27,207	▲ +1.0%	38/77
Manufacturing	1.9%61	4.4%64,747	▼ -2.5%	56/77
Wholesale Trade	4.3%135	2.8%41,460	▲ +1.4%	22/77
Retail Trade	36.7%1,158	6.6%96,413	▲ +30.1%	4/77
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	3.0%94	6.0%87,817	▼ -3.0%	32/77
↳ Utilities	0.0%1	0.3%5,012	▼ -0.3%	13/77
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	2.9%93	5.7%82,805	▼ -2.7%	31/77
Information	0.3%11	3.5%51,095	▼ -3.1%	44/77
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	7.5%237	10.8%157,520	▼ -3.3%	13/77
↳ Finance & Insurance	5.1%160	8.6%125,824	▼ -3.5%	10/77
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	2.4%77	2.2%31,696	▲ +0.3%	22/77
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	3.1%99	23.2%339,220	▼ -20.0%	69/77
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	1.6%49	14.2%207,444	▼ -12.6%	57/77
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%1	1.2%16,872	▼ -1.1%	29/77
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	1.6%49	7.9%114,904	▼ -6.3%	65/77
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	15.6%493	23.0%336,089	▼ -7.4%	50/77
↳ Educational Services	6.0%191	9.2%134,671	▼ -3.2%	22/77
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	9.6%302	13.8%201,418	▼ -4.2%	54/77
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	17.4%551	10.3%151,055	▲ +7.1%	13/77
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	1.4%43	1.9%27,339	▼ -0.5%	19/77
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	16.1%508	8.5%123,716	▲ +7.6%	10/77
Other Services	7.3%230	4.0%59,136	▲ +3.2%	19/77
Public Administration	0.0%0	3.5%51,418	▼ -3.5%	19/77
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.0%181	0.0%569	0.0%423	– 0.0 pp▲ +242– 0.0 pp▼ −146– 0.0 pp▲ +388
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.0%140	0.0%374	0.0%36	– 0.0 pp▼ −104– 0.0 pp▼ −338– 0.0 pp▲ +234
Construction	2.0%54	1.8%42	2.8%89	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +35▲ +1.0 pp▲ +47▼ −0.2 pp▼ −12
Chicago citywide	1.6%20,789	1.8%26,012	1.9%27,207	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,418– 0.0 pp▲ +1,195▲ +0.3 pp▲ +5,223
Manufacturing	6.3%169	3.7%86	1.9%61	▼ −4.3 pp▼ −108▼ −1.8 pp▼ −25▼ −2.5 pp▼ −83
Chicago citywide	4.6%61,066	4.5%63,597	4.4%64,747	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,681▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,150▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,531
Wholesale Trade	5.3%144	5.8%133	4.3%135	▼ −1.1 pp▼ −9▼ −1.5 pp▲ +2▲ +0.5 pp▼ −11
Chicago citywide	3.0%39,431	2.9%41,789	2.8%41,460	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,029▼ −0.1 pp▼ −329▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,358
Retail Trade	22.7%613	28.7%660	36.7%1,158	▲ +14.0 pp▲ +545▲ +7.9 pp▲ +498▲ +6.0 pp▲ +47
Chicago citywide	7.4%97,262	6.9%97,836	6.6%96,413	▼ −0.8 pp▼ −849▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,423▼ −0.5 pp▲ +574
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	10.4%281	3.2%74	3.0%94	▼ −7.4 pp▼ −187▼ −0.2 pp▲ +20▼ −7.2 pp▼ −207
Chicago citywide	5.4%71,320	5.6%79,303	6.0%87,817	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +16,497▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,514▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,983
Utilities	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%1	– 0.0 pp▲ +1– 0.0 pp▲ +1– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,383	0.3%4,956	0.3%5,012	– 0.0 pp▲ +629– 0.0 pp▲ +56– 0.0 pp▲ +573
Transportation & Warehousing	10.4%281	3.2%74	2.9%93	▼ −7.5 pp▼ −188▼ −0.3 pp▲ +19▼ −7.2 pp▼ −207
Chicago citywide	5.1%66,937	5.2%74,347	5.7%82,805	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +15,868▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,458▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,410
Information	0.8%21	0.4%10	0.3%11	▼ −0.4 pp▼ −10▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1▼ −0.3 pp▼ −11
Chicago citywide	3.1%40,514	3.4%48,135	3.5%51,095	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +10,581▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,960▲ +0.3 pp▲ +7,621
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	6.8%185	10.3%237	7.5%237	▲ +0.7 pp▲ +52▼ −2.8 pp– 0▲ +3.5 pp▲ +52
Chicago citywide	10.5%138,287	10.6%150,163	10.8%157,520	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +19,233▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,357▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,876
Finance & Insurance	4.5%121	6.4%146	5.1%160	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +39▼ −1.3 pp▲ +14▲ +1.9 pp▲ +25
Chicago citywide	8.5%111,307	8.4%119,147	8.6%125,824	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14,517▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,677▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7,840
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	2.4%64	4.0%91	2.4%77	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +13▼ −1.5 pp▼ −14▲ +1.6 pp▲ +27
Chicago citywide	2.1%26,980	2.2%31,016	2.2%31,696	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,716– 0.0 pp▲ +680▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,036
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	7.5%204	3.5%80	3.1%99	▼ −4.4 pp▼ −105▼ −0.3 pp▲ +19▼ −4.1 pp▼ −124
Chicago citywide	21.2%278,928	22.6%319,744	23.2%339,220	▲ +2.0 pp▲ +60,292▲ +0.6 pp▲ +19,476▲ +1.3 pp▲ +40,816
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	4.1%110	2.0%45	1.6%49	▼ −2.5 pp▼ −61▼ −0.4 pp▲ +4▼ −2.1 pp▼ −65
Chicago citywide	11.8%155,200	12.9%182,462	14.2%207,444	▲ +2.4 pp▲ +52,244▲ +1.3 pp▲ +24,982▲ +1.1 pp▲ +27,262
Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%1	0.0%0	0.0%1	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▲ +1– 0.0 pp▼ −1
Chicago citywide	1.0%13,619	1.2%16,600	1.2%16,872	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,253– 0.0 pp▲ +272▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,981
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	3.4%93	1.5%35	1.6%49	▼ −1.9 pp▼ −44– 0.0 pp▲ +14▼ −1.9 pp▼ −58
Chicago citywide	8.4%110,109	8.5%120,682	7.9%114,904	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +4,795▼ −0.7 pp▼ −5,778▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,573
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	16.9%458	18.9%434	15.6%493	▼ −1.3 pp▲ +35▼ −3.3 pp▲ +59▲ +1.9 pp▼ −24
Chicago citywide	23.5%308,633	22.1%313,540	23.0%336,089	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +27,456▲ +0.8 pp▲ +22,549▼ −1.4 pp▲ +4,907
Educational Services	7.8%211	9.4%215	6.0%191	▼ −1.8 pp▼ −20▼ −3.3 pp▼ −24▲ +1.5 pp▲ +4
Chicago citywide	10.1%132,909	9.0%128,169	9.2%134,671	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +1,762▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,502▼ −1.1 pp▼ −4,740
Health Care & Social Assistance	9.1%247	9.5%219	9.6%302	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +55– 0.0 pp▲ +83▲ +0.4 pp▼ −28
Chicago citywide	13.4%175,724	13.1%185,371	13.8%201,418	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +25,694▲ +0.7 pp▲ +16,047▼ −0.3 pp▲ +9,647
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	16.1%434	19.8%455	17.4%551	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +117▼ −2.4 pp▲ +96▲ +3.7 pp▲ +21
Chicago citywide	10.9%143,753	11.5%162,749	10.3%151,055	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,302▼ −1.2 pp▼ −11,694▲ +0.5 pp▲ +18,996
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	2.6%70	2.4%56	1.4%43	▼ −1.2 pp▼ −27▼ −1.1 pp▼ −13▼ −0.2 pp▼ −14
Chicago citywide	1.7%22,179	2.1%30,178	1.9%27,339	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +5,160▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,839▲ +0.4 pp▲ +7,999
Accommodation & Food Services	13.5%364	17.4%399	16.1%508	▲ +2.6 pp▲ +144▼ −1.3 pp▲ +109▲ +3.9 pp▲ +35
Chicago citywide	9.3%121,574	9.4%132,571	8.5%123,716	▼ −0.8 pp▲ +2,142▼ −0.9 pp▼ −8,855▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,997
Other Services	5.2%140	3.8%87	7.3%230	▲ +2.1 pp▲ +90▲ +3.5 pp▲ +143▼ −1.4 pp▼ −53
Chicago citywide	4.5%59,098	4.4%61,698	4.0%59,136	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +38▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,562▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,600
Public Administration	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	4.2%54,814	3.6%51,684	3.5%51,418	▼ −0.7 pp▼ −3,396▼ −0.1 pp▼ −266▼ −0.5 pp▼ −3,130

Earnings of Jobs in Auburn Gresham

Category	Auburn Gresham
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	25.2%795
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	46.4%1,464
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	28.5%899
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	25.2%795	12.7%185,293	▲ +12.5%	8/77
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	46.4%1,464	20.5%299,468	▲ +25.9%	1/77
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	28.5%899	66.9%978,839	▼ -38.4%	75/77
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	38.7%1,047	32.7%752	25.2%795	▼ −13.6 pp▼ −252▼ −7.5 pp▲ +43▼ −6.0 pp▼ −295
Chicago citywide	21.3%280,137	16.8%238,135	12.7%185,293	▼ −8.7 pp▼ −94,844▼ −4.1 pp▼ −52,842▼ −4.5 pp▼ −42,002
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	43.6%1,179	45.0%1,035	46.4%1,464	▲ +2.7 pp▲ +285▲ +1.3 pp▲ +429▲ +1.4 pp▼ −144
Chicago citywide	30.7%403,220	26.7%378,530	20.5%299,468	▼ −10.2 pp▼ −103,752▼ −6.3 pp▼ −79,062▼ −4.0 pp▼ −24,690
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	17.6%477	22.2%511	28.5%899	▲ +10.8 pp▲ +422▲ +6.2 pp▲ +388▲ +4.6 pp▲ +34
Chicago citywide	48.0%630,719	56.5%800,154	66.9%978,839	▲ +18.9 pp▲ +348,120▲ +10.4 pp▲ +178,685▲ +8.5 pp▲ +169,435

Jobs in Auburn Gresham by Firm Age

Category	Auburn Gresham
Firm age: 0–1 years	4.3%137
Firm age: 2–3 years	1.6%49
Firm age: 4–5 years	5.1%162
Firm age: 6–10 years	7.6%241
Firm age: 11 or more years	81.3%2,563
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years	4.3%137	2.8%37,293	▲ +1.5%	27/77
Firm age: 2–3 years	1.6%49	2.8%37,154	▼ -1.3%	66/77
Firm age: 4–5 years	5.1%162	3.2%41,869	▲ +2.0%	16/77
Firm age: 6–10 years	7.6%241	7.8%102,353	▼ -0.1%	45/77
Firm age: 11 or more years	81.3%2,563	83.4%1,098,220	▼ -2.1%	33/77
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years	3.4%91	4.1%94	4.3%137	▲ +1.0 pp▲ +46▲ +0.2 pp▲ +43▲ +0.7 pp▲ +3
Chicago citywide	2.9%33,224	2.6%33,244	2.8%37,293	– 0.0 pp▲ +4,069▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,049▼ −0.2 pp▲ +20
Firm age: 2–3 years	4.1%111	3.7%86	1.6%49	▼ −2.6 pp▼ −62▼ −2.2 pp▼ −37▼ −0.4 pp▼ −25
Chicago citywide	4.0%46,935	3.3%42,284	2.8%37,154	▼ −1.2 pp▼ −9,781▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,130▼ −0.7 pp▼ −4,651
Firm age: 4–5 years	4.3%116	3.5%81	5.1%162	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +46▲ +1.6 pp▲ +81▼ −0.8 pp▼ −35
Chicago citywide	3.7%42,688	3.6%46,058	3.2%41,869	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −819▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,189▼ −0.1 pp▲ +3,370
Firm age: 6–10 years	14.9%401	11.4%261	7.6%241	▼ −7.2 pp▼ −160▼ −3.7 pp▼ −20▼ −3.5 pp▼ −140
Chicago citywide	8.2%94,955	8.6%109,934	7.8%102,353	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +7,398▼ −0.9 pp▼ −7,581▲ +0.5 pp▲ +14,979
Firm age: 11 or more years	73.4%1,979	77.2%1,772	81.3%2,563	▲ +8.0 pp▲ +584▲ +4.1 pp▲ +791▲ +3.9 pp▼ −207
Chicago citywide	81.3%946,801	81.8%1,043,037	83.4%1,098,220	▲ +2.1 pp▲ +151,419▲ +1.6 pp▲ +55,183▲ +0.5 pp▲ +96,236

Jobs in Auburn Gresham by Firm Size

Category	Auburn Gresham
Firm size: 0–19 employees	30.2%953
Firm size: 20–49 employees	12.9%408
Firm size: 50–249 employees	16.6%524
Firm size: 250–499 employees	0.1%3
Firm size: 500 or more employees	40.1%1,264
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees	30.2%953	12.8%168,975	▲ +17.4%	20/77
Firm size: 20–49 employees	12.9%408	7.3%96,404	▲ +5.6%	21/77
Firm size: 50–249 employees	16.6%524	13.8%181,123	▲ +2.9%	41/77
Firm size: 250–499 employees	0.1%3	5.7%74,787	▼ -5.6%	76/77
Firm size: 500 or more employees	40.1%1,264	60.4%795,600	▼ -20.3%	43/77
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees	35.3%952	33.8%775	30.2%953	▼ −5.1 pp▲ +1▼ −3.5 pp▲ +178▼ −1.5 pp▼ −177
Chicago citywide	13.9%162,248	13.3%169,949	12.8%168,975	▼ −1.1 pp▲ +6,727▼ −0.5 pp▼ −974▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,701
Firm size: 20–49 employees	13.8%371	13.1%301	12.9%408	▼ −0.8 pp▲ +37▼ −0.2 pp▲ +107▼ −0.6 pp▼ −70
Chicago citywide	8.4%97,503	8.2%103,945	7.3%96,404	▼ −1.1 pp▼ −1,099▼ −0.8 pp▼ −7,541▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,442
Firm size: 50–249 employees	14.6%393	22.6%519	16.6%524	▲ +2.1 pp▲ +131▼ −6.0 pp▲ +5▲ +8.1 pp▲ +126
Chicago citywide	15.7%183,275	14.9%189,930	13.8%181,123	▼ −2.0 pp▼ −2,152▼ −1.1 pp▼ −8,807▼ −0.8 pp▲ +6,655
Firm size: 250–499 employees	9.2%249	0.1%3	0.1%3	▼ −9.1 pp▼ −246– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −9.1 pp▼ −246
Chicago citywide	6.3%72,992	5.9%74,603	5.7%74,787	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,795▼ −0.2 pp▲ +184▼ −0.4 pp▲ +1,611
Firm size: 500 or more employees	27.2%733	30.3%696	40.1%1,264	▲ +12.9 pp▲ +531▲ +9.8 pp▲ +568▲ +3.2 pp▼ −37
Chicago citywide	55.7%648,585	57.8%736,130	60.4%795,600	▲ +4.7 pp▲ +147,015▲ +2.7 pp▲ +59,470▲ +2.1 pp▲ +87,545

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Auburn Gresham
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	15.1% ±1.7 pp15.1%±1.7 pp6,630 ±730
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	84.2% ±3.7 pp12.7%±0.6 pp5,581 ±248
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	15.8% ±5.4 pp2.4%±0.8 pp1,049 ±356
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	15.1%±1.7 pp15.1%±1.7 pp6,630±730	13.5%±0.2 pp13.5%±0.2 pp365,577±5,480	▲ +1.7%▲ +1.7%	41/77
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	84.2%±3.7 pp12.7%±0.6 pp5,581±248	83.0%±0.5 pp11.2%±0.1 pp303,520±1,897	▲ +1.2%▲ +1.6%	44/7741/77
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	15.8%±5.4 pp2.4%±0.8 pp1,049±356	17.0%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.1 pp62,057±2,247	▼ -1.2%▲ +0.1%	34/7727/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Auburn Gresham
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	4.3% ±0.9 pp4.3%±0.9 pp1,864 ±402
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	81.7% ±9.4 pp3.5%±0.4 pp1,522 ±175
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	18.3% ±7.9 pp0.8%±0.3 pp342 ±148
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	82.1% ±10.5 pp3.5%±0.4 pp1,530 ±195
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	17.9% ±8.4 pp0.8%±0.4 pp334 ±157
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	4.3%±0.9 pp4.3%±0.9 pp1,864±402	7.4%±0.1 pp7.4%±0.1 pp201,851±4,036	▼ -3.2%▼ -3.2%	67/77
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	81.7%±9.4 pp3.5%±0.4 pp1,522±175	52.4%±0.7 pp3.9%±0.1 pp105,720±1,511	▲ +29.3%▼ -0.4%	7/7753/77
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	18.3%±7.9 pp0.8%±0.3 pp342±148	47.6%±1.2 pp3.5%±0.1 pp96,131±2,437	▼ -29.3%▼ -2.8%	71/7774/77
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	82.1%±10.5 pp3.5%±0.4 pp1,530±195	67.0%±1.0 pp5.0%±0.1 pp135,301±1,945	▲ +15.1%▼ -1.5%	20/7760/77
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	17.9%±8.4 pp0.8%±0.4 pp334±157	33.0%±1.2 pp2.5%±0.1 pp66,550±2,459	▼ -15.1%▼ -1.7%	58/7763/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category	Auburn Gresham
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	7.0% ±2.8 pp560 ±224
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	6.3% ±6.1 pp117 ±114
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	7.0%±2.8 pp560±224	5.9%±0.5 pp—	▲ +1.2%	25/77
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	6.3%±6.1 pp117±114	5.4%±0.6 pp—	▲ +0.9%	23/77
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category	Auburn Gresham
Owner-Occupied Households	50.0% ±2.6 pp8,722 ±456
Renter-Occupied Households	50.0% ±3.2 pp8,718 ±553
Owner-Occupied Residents	53.6% ±3.0 pp23,440 ±1,303
Renter-Occupied Residents	46.4% ±4.3 pp20,265 ±1,880
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Owner-Occupied Households	50.0%±2.6 pp8,722±456	46.0%±0.4 pp534,012±4,939	▲ +4.0%	37/77
Renter-Occupied Households	50.0%±3.2 pp8,718±553	54.0%±0.4 pp626,193±5,183	▼ -4.0%	41/77
Owner-Occupied Residents	53.6%±3.0 pp23,440±1,303	51.8%±0.5 pp1,377,219±13,574	▲ +1.8%	37/77
Renter-Occupied Residents	46.4%±4.3 pp20,265±1,880	48.2%±0.5 pp1,280,665±13,500	▼ -1.8%	41/77
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category	Auburn Gresham
Median Year Moved In	2011±1.4 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later	3.0% ±1.4 pp516 ±245
Moved in 2020 to 2022	18.3% ±3.1 pp3,192 ±543
Moved in 2010 to 2019	35.7% ±3.6 pp6,229 ±623
Moved in 2000 to 2009	13.0% ±2.2 pp2,274 ±375
Moved in 1990 to 1999	8.2% ±1.9 pp1,430 ±337
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	21.8% ±2.6 pp3,799 ±450
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Moved In	2011±1.4 yr	2015±1.0 yr	▼ −4	49/77
Moved in 2023 or Later	3.0%±1.4 pp516±245	5.9%±0.2 pp68,884±2,742	▼ -3.0%	49/77
Moved in 2020 to 2022	18.3%±3.1 pp3,192±543	24.1%±0.4 pp279,417±5,059	▼ -5.8%	37/77
Moved in 2010 to 2019	35.7%±3.6 pp6,229±623	39.2%±0.5 pp455,125±5,772	▼ -3.5%	58/77
Moved in 2000 to 2009	13.0%±2.2 pp2,274±375	13.8%±0.3 pp160,353±3,324	▼ -0.8%	56/77
Moved in 1990 to 1999	8.2%±1.9 pp1,430±337	8.2%±0.2 pp95,243±2,390	0%	40/77
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	21.8%±2.6 pp3,799±450	8.7%±0.2 pp101,183±2,362	▲ +13.1%	9/77
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show

Category	Auburn Gresham
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	12.1% ±3.2 pp12.1%±3.2 pp5,254 ±1,389
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	10.8% ±3.2 pp88.8%±11.5 pp4,667 ±1,375
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.4% ±0.3 pp2.9%±2.1 pp154 ±117
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	0.7% ±0.4 pp5.8%±3.0 pp307 ±179
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	0.3% ±0.3 pp2.4%±2.3 pp126 ±125
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	12.1%±3.2 pp12.1%±3.2 pp5,254±1,389	14.0%±0.3 pp14.0%±0.3 pp375,475±8,289	▼ -1.9%▼ -1.9%	29/77
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	10.8%±3.2 pp88.8%±11.5 pp4,667±1,375	9.8%±0.3 pp69.9%±1.0 pp262,365±6,953	▲ +1.0%▲ +19.0%	22/7710/77
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.4%±0.3 pp2.9%±2.1 pp154±117	0.8%±0.1 pp5.5%±0.4 pp20,552±1,626	▼ -0.4%▼ -2.5%	41/7750/77
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	0.7%±0.4 pp5.8%±3.0 pp307±179	2.5%±0.1 pp17.6%±0.7 pp65,936±2,918	▼ -1.7%▼ -11.7%	45/7755/77
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	0.3%±0.3 pp2.4%±2.3 pp126±125	1.0%±0.1 pp7.1%±0.8 pp26,622±3,040	▼ -0.7%▼ -4.7%	51/7757/77
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Auburn Gresham
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	13.6% ±1.8 pp13.6%±1.8 pp2,755 ±369
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	3.4% ±1.0 pp24.9%±6.3 pp686 ±197
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.9% ±0.6 pp6.5%±4.0 pp180 ±114
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.1% ±0.3 pp0.7%±2.2 pp20 ±60
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	9.3% ±1.7 pp67.8%±8.1 pp1,869 ±336
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	7.3% ±2.0 pp7.3%±2.0 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	2.0% ±1.3 pp2.0%±1.3 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	13.6%±1.8 pp13.6%±1.8 pp2,755±369	9.1%±0.2 pp9.1%±0.2 pp116,849±2,682	▲ +4.5%▲ +4.5%	17/77
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	3.4%±1.0 pp24.9%±6.3 pp686±197	2.5%±0.1 pp27.1%±1.4 pp31,723±1,796	▲ +0.9%▼ -2.2%	16/7739/77
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.9%±0.6 pp6.5%±4.0 pp180±114	0.6%±0.1 pp6.0%±0.7 pp7,037±795	▲ +0.3%▲ +0.5%	18/7728/77
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.1%±0.3 pp0.7%±2.2 pp20±60	0.2%±0.0 pp2.4%±0.5 pp2,831±587	▼ -0.1%▼ -1.7%	28/7734/77
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	9.3%±1.7 pp67.8%±8.1 pp1,869±336	5.9%±0.3 pp64.4%±2.5 pp75,258±3,387	▲ +3.4%▲ +3.4%	18/7736/77
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	7.3%±2.0 pp7.3%±2.0 pp—	4.8%±0.3 pp4.8%±0.3 pp—	▲ +2.5%▲ +2.5%	11/77
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	2.0%±1.3 pp2.0%±1.3 pp—	1.3%±0.1 pp1.3%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.7%▲ +0.7%	18/77
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category	Auburn Gresham
Median Year Built	1948±2 yr
Pre-1940	38.9% ±2.9 pp7,849 ±592
1940-2009	59.5% ±4.2 pp12,015 ±852
2010+	1.6% ±0.7 pp331 ±151
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Built	1948±2 yr	1953±1 yr	▼ −5 yrs	47/77
Pre-1940	38.9%±2.9 pp7,849±592	38.8%±0.4 pp495,715±4,678	0%	37/77
1940-2009	59.5%±4.2 pp12,015±852	54.9%±0.6 pp700,698±7,435	▲ +4.6%	33/77
2010+	1.6%±0.7 pp331±151	6.3%±0.2 pp80,641±2,725	▼ -4.7%	56/77
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category	Auburn Gresham
Population Density	11,625 /sq mi±729/sq mi
Single-Family Homes	45.8% ±2.6 pp9,254 ±518
Buildings With 2–4 Units	32.8% ±3.2 pp6,621 ±656
Buildings With 5–19 Units	13.3% ±2.2 pp2,678 ±446
Buildings With 20 or More Units	8.1% ±1.6 pp1,642 ±323
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Population Density	11,625 /sq mi±729/sq mi	11,748 /sq mi±26/sq mi	▼ −123 /sq mi	37/77
Single-Family Homes	45.8%±2.6 pp9,254±518	29.2%±0.3 pp372,679±3,989	▲ +16.6%	30/77
Buildings With 2–4 Units	32.8%±3.2 pp6,621±656	27.4%±0.4 pp349,976±4,957	▲ +5.4%	31/77
Buildings With 5–19 Units	13.3%±2.2 pp2,678±446	16.2%±0.3 pp206,420±4,124	▼ -2.9%	37/77
Buildings With 20 or More Units	8.1%±1.6 pp1,642±323	27.0%±0.3 pp344,543±4,438	▼ -18.8%	36/77
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category	Auburn Gresham
Studio	5.1% ±1.4 pp1,023 ±289
1 Bedroom	14.1% ±2.0 pp2,856 ±411
2 Bedrooms	28.8% ±2.8 pp5,816 ±567
3 Bedrooms	33.5% ±2.9 pp6,761 ±583
4 Bedrooms	10.5% ±1.6 pp2,122 ±321
5 or More Bedrooms	8.0% ±1.6 pp1,617 ±332
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Studio	5.1%±1.4 pp1,023±289	7.5%±0.3 pp95,749±3,205	▼ -2.4%	22/77
1 Bedroom	14.1%±2.0 pp2,856±411	20.1%±0.4 pp257,271±4,939	▼ -6.0%	37/77
2 Bedrooms	28.8%±2.8 pp5,816±567	33.1%±0.3 pp422,866±4,221	▼ -4.3%	57/77
3 Bedrooms	33.5%±2.9 pp6,761±583	26.1%±0.3 pp333,682±4,061	▲ +7.3%	32/77
4 Bedrooms	10.5%±1.6 pp2,122±321	9.0%±0.2 pp115,453±2,426	▲ +1.5%	33/77
5 or More Bedrooms	8.0%±1.6 pp1,617±332	4.1%±0.2 pp52,033±2,072	▲ +3.9%	14/77
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show

Category	Auburn Gresham
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	3.8% ±1.5 pp3.8%±1.5 pp671 ±262
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	3.2% ±1.3 pp83.8%±10.2 pp562 ±230
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	0.6% ±0.7 pp16.2%±17.7 pp109 ±126
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	3.8%±1.5 pp3.8%±1.5 pp671±262	3.4%±0.2 pp3.4%±0.2 pp39,979±1,996	▲ +0.4%▲ +0.4%	29/77
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	3.2%±1.3 pp83.8%±10.2 pp562±230	2.0%±0.1 pp58.2%±2.3 pp23,276±1,493	▲ +1.2%▲ +25.5%	21/7712/76
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	0.6%±0.7 pp16.2%±17.7 pp109±126	1.4%±0.1 pp41.8%±2.6 pp16,703±1,328	▼ -0.8%▼ -25.5%	59/7765/76
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category	Auburn Gresham
Natural Gas Heat	80.2% ±2.7 pp13,993 ±474
Electric Heat	13.5% ±2.2 pp2,363 ±389
Other Heating Source	6.2% ±1.9 pp1,084 ±339
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Natural Gas Heat	80.2%±2.7 pp13,993±474	77.5%±0.3 pp899,660±3,501	▲ +2.7%	49/77
Electric Heat	13.5%±2.2 pp2,363±389	18.0%±0.3 pp208,937±3,864	▼ -4.5%	29/77
Other Heating Source	6.2%±1.9 pp1,084±339	4.4%±0.2 pp51,603±2,173	▲ +1.8%	17/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show

Category	Auburn Gresham
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	33.2% ±2.9 pp5,791 ±503
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	21.6% ±3.1 pp3,773 ±542
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	45.2% ±3.6 pp7,877 ±623
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	27.4% ±3.2 pp4,780 ±558
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	18.2% ±4.0 pp1,440 ±316
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	22.2% ±5.0 pp1,756 ±396
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	59.7% ±5.0 pp4,728 ±394
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	36.4% ±5.0 pp2,883 ±398
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	47.0% ±4.0 pp4,061 ±347
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	21.1% ±3.8 pp1,828 ±328
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	31.9% ±4.4 pp2,755 ±379
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	19.2% ±3.7 pp1,658 ±320
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	34.6% ±5.3 pp1,824 ±280
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	25.8% ±4.8 pp1,363 ±256
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	39.6% ±5.8 pp2,092 ±307
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	23.5% ±5.0 pp1,242 ±265
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	66.5% ±5.0 pp2,237 ±170
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	13.8% ±6.0 pp465 ±200
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	19.7% ±6.2 pp663 ±208
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	12.4% ±5.2 pp416 ±173
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	33.2%±2.9 pp5,791±503	24.9%±0.5 pp289,047±6,215	▲ +8.3%	55/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	21.6%±3.1 pp3,773±542	23.8%±0.5 pp276,514±5,809	▼ -2.2%	35/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	45.2%±3.6 pp7,877±623	45.6%±0.6 pp529,378±6,577	▼ -0.5%	23/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	27.4%±3.2 pp4,780±558	24.0%±0.5 pp278,684±5,306	▲ +3.4%	17/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	18.2%±4.0 pp1,440±316	26.4%±0.5 pp156,016±3,135	▼ -8.2%	62/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	22.2%±5.0 pp1,756±396	25.3%±0.5 pp149,232±2,940	▼ -3.1%	42/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	59.7%±5.0 pp4,728±394	48.3%±0.7 pp285,666±4,223	▲ +11.3%	22/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	36.4%±5.0 pp2,883±398	25.5%±0.6 pp150,396±3,556	▲ +10.9%	16/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	47.0%±4.0 pp4,061±347	51.6%±0.6 pp272,313±2,905	▼ -4.6%	62/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	21.1%±3.8 pp1,828±328	19.6%±0.5 pp103,679±2,760	▲ +1.5%	26/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	31.9%±4.4 pp2,755±379	28.8%±0.6 pp152,025±3,034	▲ +3.1%	23/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	19.2%±3.7 pp1,658±320	13.8%±0.4 pp73,065±2,234	▲ +5.3%	9/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	34.6%±5.3 pp1,824±280	42.8%±0.7 pp146,237±2,365	▼ -8.2%	64/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	25.8%±4.8 pp1,363±256	23.9%±0.7 pp81,678±2,408	▲ +1.9%	27/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	39.6%±5.8 pp2,092±307	33.3%±0.8 pp113,910±2,596	▲ +6.3%	23/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	23.5%±5.0 pp1,242±265	15.4%±0.5 pp52,647±1,874	▲ +8.1%	12/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	66.5%±5.0 pp2,237±170	67.7%±0.9 pp126,078±1,613	▼ -1.2%	47/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	13.8%±6.0 pp465±200	11.8%±0.7 pp22,001±1,275	▲ +2.0%	24/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	19.7%±6.2 pp663±208	20.5%±0.8 pp38,115±1,492	▼ -0.8%	37/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	12.4%±5.2 pp416±173	11.0%±0.6 pp20,417±1,203	▲ +1.4%	23/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category	Auburn Gresham
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$365±$47
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$726±$63
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,144±$45
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,572±$83
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,146±$118
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$365±$47	$594±$11	▼ −$229	64/77
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$726±$63	$1,011±$8	▼ −$284	62/77
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,144±$45	$1,560±$10	▼ −$416	59/77
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,572±$83	$2,329±$13	▼ −$757	61/77
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,146±$118	Over $3,000	▼ −$854+	57/77
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$530 ±39	$439 ±42	$365 ±47	▼ −$165▼ −$74▼ −$91
Chicago citywide	$609 ±7	$606 ±7	$594 ±11	▼ −$15▼ −$12▼ −$2
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$400 ±30	$358 ±34	$365 ±47	▼ −$35▲ +$7▼ −$42
Chicago citywide	$459 ±6	$494 ±6	$594 ±11	▲ +$135▲ +$100▲ +$35
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$870 ±36	$762 ±41	$726 ±63	▼ −$144▼ −$36▼ −$108
Chicago citywide	$992 ±5	$1,001 ±5	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$19▲ +$10▲ +$9
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$657 ±27	$621 ±33	$726 ±63	▲ +$70▲ +$105▼ −$35
Chicago citywide	$748 ±3	$816 ±4	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$262▲ +$195▲ +$67
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,217 ±32	$1,111 ±34	$1,144 ±45	▼ −$73▲ +$33▼ −$106
Chicago citywide	$1,493 ±8	$1,523 ±6	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$67▲ +$37▲ +$29
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$918 ±24	$906 ±27	$1,144 ±45	▲ +$226▲ +$239▼ −$13
Chicago citywide	$1,127 ±6	$1,241 ±5	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$433▲ +$319▲ +$114
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,766 ±42	$1,626 ±44	$1,572 ±83	▼ −$194▼ −$54▼ −$140
Chicago citywide	$2,333 ±12	$2,326 ±10	$2,329 ±13	▼ −$4▲ +$3▼ −$7
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,333 ±32	$1,325 ±36	$1,572 ±83	▲ +$239▲ +$247▼ −$8
Chicago citywide	$1,761 ±9	$1,896 ±8	$2,329 ±13	▲ +$569▲ +$434▲ +$135
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,345 ±66	$2,124 ±56	$2,146 ±118	▼ −$199▲ +$22▼ −$221
Chicago citywide	—	$3,316 ±20	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,770 ±49	$1,731 ±46	$2,146 ±118	▲ +$377▲ +$415▼ −$39
Chicago citywide	—	$2,703 ±16	—	———

Rent

Rent measure

Category	Auburn Gresham
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,084±$56
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$371±$71
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$790±$76
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,077±$49
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,352±$55
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,726±$144
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,084±$56	$1,613±$12	▼ −$529	71/77
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$371±$71	$696±$20	▼ −$325	62/77
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$790±$76	$1,043±$8	▼ −$253	64/77
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,077±$49	$1,440±$10	▼ −$363	64/77
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,352±$55	$2,021±$21	▼ −$669	67/77
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,726±$144	$2,738±$29	▼ −$1,013	68/77
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham
Average Rent	$892±$50
10th Percentile Rent	$253±$77
25th Percentile Rent	$664±$74
Median Rent	$914±$41
75th Percentile Rent	$1,131±$38
90th Percentile Rent	$1,412±$148
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent	$892±$50	$1,452±$11	▼ −$560	68/77
10th Percentile Rent	$253±$77	$564±$21	▼ −$312	65/77
25th Percentile Rent	$664±$74	$913±$7	▼ −$249	61/77
Median Rent	$914±$41	$1,262±$12	▼ −$348	66/77
75th Percentile Rent	$1,131±$38	$1,868±$13	▼ −$737	64/77
90th Percentile Rent	$1,412±$148	$2,528±$38	▼ −$1,117	66/77
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category	Auburn Gresham
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,866±$108
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,074±$73
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,353±$59
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,721±$70
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,160±$115
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,632±$262
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,866±$108	$2,734±$24	▼ −$868	51/77
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,074±$73	$1,270±$14	▼ −$196	55/77
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,353±$59	$1,697±$14	▼ −$344	58/77
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,721±$70	$2,339±$17	▼ −$618	59/77
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,160±$115	$3,269±$31	▼ −$1,109	60/77
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,632±$262	Over $4,000	▼ −$1,368+	61/77
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,963 ±54	$1,779 ±43	$1,866 ±108	▼ −$97▲ +$87▼ −$185
Chicago citywide	$2,855 ±19	$2,793 ±23	$2,734 ±24	▼ −$121▼ −$60▼ −$61
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,482 ±41	$1,450 ±35	$1,866 ±108	▲ +$384▲ +$416▼ −$32
Chicago citywide	$2,154 ±14	$2,277 ±19	$2,734 ±24	▲ +$579▲ +$457▲ +$122
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,159 ±65	$1,085 ±107	$1,074 ±73	▼ −$85▼ −$11▼ −$74
Chicago citywide	$1,403 ±11	$1,356 ±11	$1,270 ±14	▼ −$133▼ −$86▼ −$47
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$874 ±49	$884 ±87	$1,074 ±73	▲ +$200▲ +$190▲ +$10
Chicago citywide	$1,059 ±8	$1,105 ±9	$1,270 ±14	▲ +$212▲ +$165▲ +$46
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,455 ±61	$1,366 ±50	$1,353 ±59	▼ −$102▼ −$13▼ −$90
Chicago citywide	$1,874 ±12	$1,800 ±12	$1,697 ±14	▼ −$177▼ −$103▼ −$74
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,098 ±46	$1,113 ±41	$1,353 ±59	▲ +$255▲ +$240▲ +$15
Chicago citywide	$1,414 ±9	$1,467 ±10	$1,697 ±14	▲ +$283▲ +$230▲ +$53
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,868 ±65	$1,704 ±58	$1,721 ±70	▼ −$146▲ +$18▼ −$164
Chicago citywide	$2,526 ±13	$2,422 ±13	$2,339 ±17	▼ −$187▼ −$83▼ −$103
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,410 ±49	$1,388 ±48	$1,721 ±70	▲ +$312▲ +$333▼ −$21
Chicago citywide	$1,906 ±10	$1,974 ±11	$2,339 ±17	▲ +$433▲ +$365▲ +$68
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,413 ±77	$2,145 ±65	$2,160 ±115	▼ −$253▲ +$15▼ −$268
Chicago citywide	$3,447 ±25	$3,343 ±25	$3,269 ±31	▼ −$178▼ −$74▼ −$104
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,821 ±58	$1,749 ±53	$2,160 ±115	▲ +$339▲ +$411▼ −$73
Chicago citywide	$2,601 ±19	$2,724 ±20	$3,269 ±31	▲ +$668▲ +$544▲ +$123
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$3,015 ±159	$2,468 ±165	$2,632 ±262	▼ −$383▲ +$164▼ −$547
Chicago citywide	—	$4,578 ±59	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$2,275 ±120	$2,011 ±134	$2,632 ±262	▲ +$356▲ +$620▼ −$264
Chicago citywide	—	$3,731 ±48	—	———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category	Auburn Gresham
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$750±$66
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$330±$79
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$447±$27
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$642±$60
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$876±$73
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,265±$168
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$750±$66	$1,078±$22	▼ −$328	53/77
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$330±$79	$418±$8	▼ −$88	67/77
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$447±$27	$601±$8	▼ −$153	68/77
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$642±$60	$859±$10	▼ −$217	63/77
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$876±$73	$1,197±$18	▼ −$321	59/77
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,265±$168	Over $1,500	▼ −$235+	40/77
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$699 ±47	$712 ±33	$750 ±66	▲ +$51▲ +$37▲ +$13
Chicago citywide	$957 ±15	$1,028 ±10	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$121▲ +$50▲ +$71
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$528 ±35	$581 ±27	$750 ±66	▲ +$222▲ +$169▲ +$53
Chicago citywide	$722 ±11	$838 ±8	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$355▲ +$240▲ +$116
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$381 ±35	$388 ±28	$330 ±79	▼ −$51▼ −$58▲ +$7
Chicago citywide	$429 ±6	$469 ±7	$418 ±8	▼ −$11▼ −$51▲ +$40
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$288 ±27	$316 ±23	$330 ±79	▲ +$43▲ +$14▲ +$29
Chicago citywide	$324 ±5	$382 ±5	$418 ±8	▲ +$95▲ +$36▲ +$59
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$488 ±39	$512 ±29	$447 ±27	▼ −$40▼ −$64▲ +$24
Chicago citywide	$586 ±6	$629 ±6	$601 ±8	▲ +$14▼ −$28▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$368 ±29	$417 ±24	$447 ±27	▲ +$79▲ +$30▲ +$49
Chicago citywide	$442 ±4	$513 ±5	$601 ±8	▲ +$158▲ +$88▲ +$70
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$662 ±32	$665 ±41	$642 ±60	▼ −$20▼ −$23▲ +$3
Chicago citywide	$815 ±9	$860 ±7	$859 ±10	▲ +$44▼ −$1▲ +$45
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$500 ±24	$542 ±34	$642 ±60	▲ +$142▲ +$100▲ +$43
Chicago citywide	$615 ±7	$701 ±6	$859 ±10	▲ +$244▲ +$158▲ +$86
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$826 ±52	$893 ±59	$876 ±73	▲ +$50▼ −$17▲ +$67
Chicago citywide	—	$1,206 ±14	$1,197 ±18	—▼ −$9—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$624 ±39	$728 ±48	$876 ±73	▲ +$252▲ +$148▲ +$104
Chicago citywide	—	$983 ±12	$1,197 ±18	—▲ +$214—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$1,111 ±70	$1,265 ±168	—▲ +$153—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,767 ±35	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$906 ±57	$1,265 ±168	—▲ +$359—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,440 ±28	—	———

Home Values

Category	Auburn Gresham
Average Home Value	$224,212±$21,339
10th Percentile Home Value	$94,600±$18,692
25th Percentile Home Value	$145,898±$10,610
Median Home Value	$196,978±$9,080
75th Percentile Home Value	$261,837±$19,131
90th Percentile Home Value	$358,205±$17,564
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Average Home Value	$224,212±$21,339	$437,638±$7,358	▼ −$213,426	63/77
10th Percentile Home Value	$94,600±$18,692	$129,150±$3,756	▼ −$34,550	56/77
25th Percentile Home Value	$145,898±$10,610	$217,800±$1,804	▼ −$71,902	62/77
Median Home Value	$196,978±$9,080	$334,100±$2,424	▼ −$137,122	64/77
75th Percentile Home Value	$261,837±$19,131	$497,700±$3,730	▼ −$235,863	67/77
90th Percentile Home Value	$358,205±$17,564	$809,159±$15,691	▼ −$450,955	65/77
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$178,081 ±7,516	$180,292 ±13,224	$224,212 ±21,339	▲ +$46,131▲ +$43,920▲ +$2,210
Chicago citywide	$386,614 ±5,106	$424,380 ±4,754	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$51,024▲ +$13,258▲ +$37,766
Average Home Value (nominal dollars)	$134,395 ±5,672	$146,938 ±10,777	$224,212 ±21,339	▲ +$89,817▲ +$77,274▲ +$12,543
Chicago citywide	$291,771 ±3,853	$345,871 ±3,874	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$145,867▲ +$91,768▲ +$54,099
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$71,254 ±7,371	$89,846 ±9,498	$94,600 ±18,692	▲ +$23,346▲ +$4,754▲ +$18,592
Chicago citywide	$115,330 ±1,421	$124,313 ±1,339	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$13,821▲ +$4,838▲ +$8,983
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$53,774 ±5,563	$73,225 ±7,741	$94,600 ±18,692	▲ +$40,826▲ +$21,375▲ +$19,450
Chicago citywide	$87,037 ±1,072	$101,315 ±1,091	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$42,113▲ +$27,835▲ +$14,278
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$116,887 ±7,284	$127,354 ±5,519	$145,898 ±10,610	▲ +$29,011▲ +$18,544▲ +$10,467
Chicago citywide	$190,543 ±2,400	$199,018 ±1,255	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$27,257▲ +$18,782▲ +$8,475
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$88,213 ±5,497	$103,794 ±4,498	$145,898 ±10,610	▲ +$57,685▲ +$42,104▲ +$15,581
Chicago citywide	$143,800 ±1,811	$162,200 ±1,023	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$74,000▲ +$55,600▲ +$18,400
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$169,091 ±8,286	$171,571 ±6,347	$196,978 ±9,080	▲ +$27,886▲ +$25,407▲ +$2,479
Chicago citywide	$299,066 ±2,120	$316,564 ±2,118	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$35,034▲ +$17,536▲ +$17,498
Median Home Value (nominal dollars)	$127,610 ±6,253	$139,830 ±5,173	$196,978 ±9,080	▲ +$69,367▲ +$57,147▲ +$12,220
Chicago citywide	$225,700 ±1,600	$258,000 ±1,726	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$108,400▲ +$76,100▲ +$32,300
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$230,345 ±10,488	$213,623 ±7,013	$261,837 ±19,131	▲ +$31,492▲ +$48,214▼ −$16,722
Chicago citywide	$466,951 ±3,138	$490,797 ±3,892	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$30,749▲ +$6,903▲ +$23,846
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$173,837 ±7,915	$174,103 ±5,715	$261,837 ±19,131	▲ +$88,000▲ +$87,734▲ +$266
Chicago citywide	$352,400 ±2,368	$400,000 ±3,172	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$145,300▲ +$97,700▲ +$47,600
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$313,269 ±11,061	$289,329 ±19,884	$358,205 ±17,564	▲ +$44,936▲ +$68,876▼ −$23,939
Chicago citywide	$739,174 ±12,945	$835,769 ±9,047	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$69,986▼ −$26,610▲ +$96,595
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$236,419 ±8,347	$235,804 ±16,206	$358,205 ±17,564	▲ +$121,786▲ +$122,401▼ −$615
Chicago citywide	$557,842 ±9,770	$681,153 ±7,373	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$251,317▲ +$128,006▲ +$123,311

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show

Category	Auburn Gresham
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	16.2%16.2%3,279
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	12.0%74.0%2,426
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.0%0.3%9
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	2.9%17.6%578
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	1.3%8.1%266
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	16.2%16.2%3,279	8.3%8.3%106,578	▲ +7.9%▲ +7.9%	18/77
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	12.0%74.0%2,426	4.8%57.2%60,910	▲ +7.2%▲ +16.8%	13/7738/77
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.0%0.3%9	1.1%13.8%14,721	▼ -1.1%▼ -13.5%	64/7766/77
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	2.9%17.6%578	2.1%25.7%27,383	▲ +0.7%▼ -8.1%	19/7731/77
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	1.3%8.1%266	0.3%3.3%3,564	▲ +1.0%▲ +4.8%	8/777/77
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units	15.7%3,216	15.7%3,266	16.2%3,279	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +63▲ +0.5 pp▲ +13– 0.0 pp▲ +50
Chicago citywide	8.8%104,550	8.5%103,479	8.3%106,578	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,028▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,099▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,071
Housing Choice Vouchers	11.7%2,390	11.6%2,414	12.0%2,426	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +36▲ +0.4 pp▲ +12– 0.0 pp▲ +24
Chicago citywide	4.3%51,601	4.6%55,987	4.8%60,910	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +9,309▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,923▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,386
Public Housing	0.0%10	0.0%9	0.0%9	– 0.0 pp▼ −1– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▼ −1
Chicago citywide	1.8%21,159	1.3%16,094	1.2%14,721	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −6,438▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,373▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,065
Project-Based Section 8	2.7%550	2.8%577	2.9%578	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +28▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1▲ +0.1 pp▲ +27
Chicago citywide	2.2%25,940	2.2%26,951	2.1%27,383	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,443▼ −0.1 pp▲ +432– 0.0 pp▲ +1,011
Other Project-Based Programs	1.3%266	1.3%266	1.3%266	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,850	0.4%4,447	0.3%3,564	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,286▼ −0.1 pp▼ −883▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,403

Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category	Auburn Gresham
Average Household Income	$16,642
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$433
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,218
Below 30% of Area Median Income	82.9%2,354
With Children	35.8%1,016
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	27.6%784
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$16,642	$17,032	▼ -$390	52/75
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$433	$425	▲ +$8	42/75
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,218	$1,389	▼ -$170	71/75
Below 30% of Area Median Income	82.9%2,354	83.0%77,427	▼ -0.1 pp	27/75
With Children	35.8%1,016	31.0%28,919	▲ +4.8 pp	35/75
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	27.6%784	32.0%29,852	▼ -4.4 pp	59/75
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income	$11,707	$13,465	$16,646	▲ +$4,939▲ +$3,181▲ +$1,758
Chicago citywide	$12,156	$13,665	$17,032	▲ +$4,876▲ +$3,367▲ +$1,509
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$319	$350	$433	▲ +$114▲ +$83▲ +$31
Chicago citywide	$310	$340	$425	▲ +$115▲ +$85▲ +$30
Average Monthly Government Spending	$832	$876	$1,219	▲ +$387▲ +$343▲ +$44
Chicago citywide	$916	$1,017	$1,389	▲ +$473▲ +$372▲ +$101
Below 30% of Area Median Income	81.2%—	81.0%—	82.9%—	▲ +1.7 pp—▲ +1.9 pp—▼ −0.2 pp—
Chicago citywide	80.0%—	81.0%—	83.0%—	▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +2.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children	—	—	35.8%—	——————
Chicago citywide	—	—	31.0%—	——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	26.4%—	26.8%—	27.6%—	▲ +1.1 pp—▲ +0.8 pp—▲ +0.3 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category	Auburn Gresham
Total Tree Canopy	16.4%394 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	63.8%1,534 acres
Natural Open Surfaces	19.8%477 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Total Tree Canopy	16.4%394 acres	18.4%25,934 acres	▼ -2.0%	41/77
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	63.8%1,534 acres	60.2%84,955 acres	▲ +3.6%	37/77
Natural Open Surfaces	19.8%477 acres	21.5%30,331 acres	▼ -1.6%	34/77
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category	Auburn Gresham
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	15.1% ±3.5 pp6,596 ±1,514
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	38.1% ±4.3 pp16,681 ±1,888
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	46.8% ±4.3 pp20,501 ±1,869
Homes Without Air Conditioning	3.7%1,638
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	15.1%±3.5 pp6,596±1,514	26.1%±0.5 pp707,660±13,869	▼ -11.0%	73/77
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	38.1%±4.3 pp16,681±1,888	44.1%±0.6 pp1,195,950±15,462	▼ -6.0%	66/77
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	46.8%±4.3 pp20,501±1,869	29.8%±0.5 pp807,615±13,763	▲ +17.0%	4/77
Homes Without Air Conditioning	3.7%1,638	4.2%114,494	▼ -0.5%	45/77
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category	Auburn Gresham
Drove Alone	61.0% ±3.2 pp8,265 ±438
Carpooled	10.1% ±2.6 pp1,365 ±358
Public Transit	25.0% ±4.2 pp3,392 ±565
Walked	1.8% ±0.9 pp247 ±116
Bikes	0.2% ±0.5 pp33 ±66
Other Commute Mode	1.5% ±1.0 pp206 ±141
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Drove Alone	61.0%±3.2 pp8,265±438	56.6%±0.4 pp772,696±5,998	▲ +4.4%	40/77
Carpooled	10.1%±2.6 pp1,365±358	9.3%±0.3 pp126,918±3,980	▲ +0.8%	33/77
Public Transit	25.0%±4.2 pp3,392±565	22.4%±0.4 pp305,691±6,011	▲ +2.6%	21/77
Walked	1.8%±0.9 pp247±116	7.3%±0.3 pp100,269±3,456	▼ -5.5%	54/77
Bikes	0.2%±0.5 pp33±66	1.8%±0.1 pp24,441±1,693	▼ -1.5%	53/77
Other Commute Mode	1.5%±1.0 pp206±141	2.5%±0.1 pp34,356±1,772	▼ -1.0%	29/77
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category	Auburn Gresham
Average Commute Time (minutes)	39 min±2.2 min
Less Than 15 Minutes	11.0% ±2.7 pp1,490 ±360
15–29 Minutes	24.2% ±3.3 pp3,286 ±452
30–44 Minutes	27.4% ±3.1 pp3,715 ±421
45–59 Minutes	12.7% ±2.3 pp1,726 ±305
60 Minutes or More	24.6% ±3.9 pp3,334 ±526
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes)	39 min±2.2 min	33 min±0.2 min	▲ +6 min	3/76
Less Than 15 Minutes	11.0%±2.7 pp1,490±360	13.0%±0.3 pp140,252±3,438	▼ -2.0%	41/77
15–29 Minutes	24.2%±3.3 pp3,286±452	29.9%±0.5 pp322,586±5,056	▼ -5.7%	60/77
30–44 Minutes	27.4%±3.1 pp3,715±421	29.6%±0.4 pp318,782±4,584	▼ -2.2%	53/77
45–59 Minutes	12.7%±2.3 pp1,726±305	14.0%±0.3 pp151,451±3,075	▼ -1.3%	52/77
60 Minutes or More	24.6%±3.9 pp3,334±526	13.4%±0.3 pp144,940±3,715	▲ +11.2%	3/77
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category	Auburn Gresham
Average Vehicles per Household	1.09±0.07
Households With No Vehicle	26.7% ±3.0 pp4,651 ±527
Households With 1 Vehicle	47.3% ±3.9 pp8,242 ±686
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	26.1% ±2.6 pp4,547 ±449
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Average Vehicles per Household	1.09±0.07	1.12±0.01	▼ −0.03	46/77
Households With No Vehicle	26.7%±3.0 pp4,651±527	26.6%±0.4 pp308,497±5,087	▲ +0.1%	30/77
Households With 1 Vehicle	47.3%±3.9 pp8,242±686	45.2%±0.4 pp524,900±5,145	▲ +2.0%	19/77
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	26.1%±2.6 pp4,547±449	28.2%±0.4 pp326,808±4,200	▼ -2.1%	47/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Auburn Gresham Residents Work

Category	Auburn Gresham
Loop	20.1%3,410
Near North Side	7.7%1,304
Near West Side	5.3%897
Hyde Park	1.8%314
Auburn Gresham	1.5%262
All other city neighborhoods	26.1%4,431
Outside the city	37.5%6,362
↳ Bedford Park village, IL	1.2%211
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	1.1%192
↳ Springfield city, IL	0.8%139
↳ Downers Grove village, IL	0.8%138
↳ Evergreen Park village, IL	0.7%112
↳ All other Illinois locations	30.3%5,146
Out of state	2.5%424
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 71 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Auburn Gresham
Loop	20.1%3,410
Near North Side	7.7%1,304
Near West Side	5.3%897
Hyde Park	1.8%314
Auburn Gresham	1.5%262
All other city neighborhoods	26.1%4,431
Outside the city	37.5%6,362
↳ Bedford Park village, IL	1.2%211
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	1.1%192
↳ Springfield city, IL	0.8%139
↳ Downers Grove village, IL	0.8%138
↳ Evergreen Park village, IL	0.7%112
↳ All other Illinois locations	30.3%5,146
Out of state	2.5%424
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 71 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Loop	19.3%3,037	20.7%3,416	20.1%3,410	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +373▼ −0.6 pp▼ −6▲ +1.4 pp▲ +379
Chicago citywide	20.0%224,635	21.0%252,791	21.5%259,167	▲ +1.5 pp▲ +34,532▲ +0.5 pp▲ +6,376▲ +1.0 pp▲ +28,156
Near North Side	7.3%1,143	8.7%1,441	7.7%1,304	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +161▼ −1.0 pp▼ −137▲ +1.5 pp▲ +298
Chicago citywide	8.2%92,143	9.4%112,859	9.1%109,333	▲ +0.9 pp▲ +17,190▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3,526▲ +1.2 pp▲ +20,716
Near West Side	7.6%1,201	6.4%1,058	5.3%897	▼ −2.3 pp▼ −304▼ −1.1 pp▼ −161▼ −1.2 pp▼ −143
Chicago citywide	6.2%69,083	6.6%79,757	6.7%80,118	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +11,035– 0.0 pp▲ +361▲ +0.5 pp▲ +10,674
Hyde Park	2.0%309	1.5%256	1.8%314	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5▲ +0.3 pp▲ +58▼ −0.4 pp▼ −53
Chicago citywide	1.5%16,641	1.4%16,773	1.6%18,756	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,115▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,983▼ −0.1 pp▲ +132
Auburn Gresham	1.5%236	1.3%214	1.5%262	– 0.0 pp▲ +26▲ +0.2 pp▲ +48▼ −0.2 pp▼ −22
Chicago citywide	0.2%1,680	0.1%1,314	0.1%1,799	– 0.0 pp▲ +119– 0.0 pp▲ +485– 0.0 pp▼ −366
All other city neighborhoods	27.9%4,401	26.3%4,347	26.1%4,431	▼ −1.8 pp▲ +30▼ −0.2 pp▲ +84▼ −1.6 pp▼ −54
Chicago citywide	22.5%252,499	21.1%253,775	20.7%248,736	▼ −1.8 pp▼ −3,763▼ −0.4 pp▼ −5,039▼ −1.4 pp▲ +1,276
Outside the city	34.3%5,411	35.0%5,788	37.5%6,362	▲ +3.1 pp▲ +951▲ +2.5 pp▲ +574▲ +0.7 pp▲ +377
Chicago citywide	36.8%412,807	35.7%430,134	35.9%432,355	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +19,548▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,221▼ −1.0 pp▲ +17,327
Bedford Park village, IL	1.3%211	1.4%226	1.2%211	▼ −0.1 pp– 0▼ −0.1 pp▼ −15– 0.0 pp▲ +15
Chicago citywide	0.8%8,547	0.7%8,008	0.6%6,897	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,650▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,111▼ −0.1 pp▼ −539
Oak Lawn village, IL	1.2%186	1.1%188	1.1%192	– 0.0 pp▲ +6– 0.0 pp▲ +4– 0.0 pp▲ +2
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,230	0.5%5,563	0.4%5,394	– 0.0 pp▲ +164– 0.0 pp▼ −169– 0.0 pp▲ +333
Springfield city, IL	0.6%98	0.5%87	0.8%139	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +41▲ +0.3 pp▲ +52▼ −0.1 pp▼ −11
Chicago citywide	0.4%4,891	0.4%5,358	0.5%6,176	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,285▲ +0.1 pp▲ +818– 0.0 pp▲ +467
Downers Grove village, IL	0.3%49	0.4%59	0.8%138	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +89▲ +0.5 pp▲ +79– 0.0 pp▲ +10
Chicago citywide	0.4%4,905	0.5%5,933	0.6%7,305	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,400▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,372▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,028
Evergreen Park village, IL	0.7%104	0.8%127	0.7%112	– 0.0 pp▲ +8▼ −0.1 pp▼ −15▲ +0.1 pp▲ +23
Chicago citywide	0.2%2,492	0.2%2,803	0.2%2,443	– 0.0 pp▼ −49– 0.0 pp▼ −360– 0.0 pp▲ +311
All other Illinois locations	27.1%4,278	28.0%4,622	30.3%5,146	▲ +3.2 pp▲ +868▲ +2.3 pp▲ +524▲ +0.8 pp▲ +344
Chicago citywide	27.9%312,992	27.0%324,805	27.3%329,050	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +16,058▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,245▼ −0.9 pp▲ +11,813
Out of state	2.4%373	2.4%389	2.5%424	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +51▲ +0.1 pp▲ +35– 0.0 pp▲ +16
Chicago citywide	2.2%24,577	2.3%27,198	2.2%26,136	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,559▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,062▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,621

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Auburn Gresham

Category	Auburn Gresham
Auburn Gresham	8.3%262
South Shore	3.2%102
Chatham	2.3%74
Roseland	2.1%67
Ashburn	2.0%63
All other city neighborhoods	39.0%1,231
Outside the city	43.0%1,359
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	1.6%51
↳ Orland Park village, IL	1.1%35
↳ Burbank city, IL	1.0%33
↳ Calumet City city, IL	0.9%29
↳ Joliet city, IL	0.7%22
↳ All other Illinois locations	34.5%1,088
Out of state	3.2%101
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 71; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Auburn Gresham
Auburn Gresham	8.3%262
South Shore	3.2%102
Chatham	2.3%74
Roseland	2.1%67
Ashburn	2.0%63
All other city neighborhoods	39.0%1,231
Outside the city	43.0%1,359
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	1.6%51
↳ Orland Park village, IL	1.1%35
↳ Burbank city, IL	1.0%33
↳ Calumet City city, IL	0.9%29
↳ Joliet city, IL	0.7%22
↳ All other Illinois locations	34.5%1,088
Out of state	3.2%101
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 71; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Auburn Gresham	8.7%236	9.3%214	8.3%262	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +26▼ −1.0 pp▲ +48▲ +0.6 pp▼ −22
Chicago citywide	0.8%10,351	0.8%10,742	0.7%10,618	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +267– 0.0 pp▼ −124– 0.0 pp▲ +391
South Shore	3.0%81	2.3%54	3.2%102	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +21▲ +0.9 pp▲ +48▼ −0.6 pp▼ −27
Chicago citywide	0.9%11,525	0.9%12,639	0.8%12,185	– 0.0 pp▲ +660▼ −0.1 pp▼ −454– 0.0 pp▲ +1,114
Chatham	2.9%78	2.3%52	2.3%74	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −4▲ +0.1 pp▲ +22▼ −0.6 pp▼ −26
Chicago citywide	0.6%7,693	0.6%7,974	0.5%7,780	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +87– 0.0 pp▼ −194– 0.0 pp▲ +281
Roseland	2.4%64	3.4%78	2.1%67	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3▼ −1.3 pp▼ −11▲ +1.0 pp▲ +14
Chicago citywide	0.7%8,869	0.6%8,486	0.6%8,705	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −164– 0.0 pp▲ +219▼ −0.1 pp▼ −383
Ashburn	1.7%47	1.8%41	2.0%63	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +16▲ +0.2 pp▲ +22– 0.0 pp▼ −6
Chicago citywide	0.8%10,132	0.7%10,418	0.7%10,392	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +260– 0.0 pp▼ −26– 0.0 pp▲ +286
Greater Grand Crossing	3.1%83	3.0%70	2.0%63	▼ −1.1 pp▼ −20▼ −1.1 pp▼ −7– 0.0 pp▼ −13
Chicago citywide	0.5%6,782	0.5%7,079	0.5%7,069	– 0.0 pp▲ +287– 0.0 pp▼ −10– 0.0 pp▲ +297
All other city neighborhoods	41.5%1,121	36.6%842	39.0%1,231	▼ −2.5 pp▲ +110▲ +2.3 pp▲ +389▼ −4.8 pp▼ −279
Chicago citywide	38.0%499,784	37.9%537,334	36.8%539,030	▼ −1.2 pp▲ +39,246▼ −1.1 pp▲ +1,696▼ −0.1 pp▲ +37,550
Outside the city	37.8%1,023	42.8%984	43.0%1,359	▲ +5.2 pp▲ +336▲ +0.2 pp▲ +375▲ +5.0 pp▼ −39
Chicago citywide	45.9%603,720	45.4%642,891	47.2%691,545	▲ +1.3 pp▲ +87,825▲ +1.9 pp▲ +48,654▼ −0.6 pp▲ +39,171
Oak Lawn village, IL	1.8%50	1.8%42	1.6%51	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +1▼ −0.2 pp▲ +9– 0.0 pp▼ −8
Chicago citywide	0.7%9,277	0.7%9,503	0.7%9,767	– 0.0 pp▲ +490– 0.0 pp▲ +264– 0.0 pp▲ +226
Orland Park village, IL	0.9%23	1.1%25	1.1%35	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +12– 0.0 pp▲ +10▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2
Chicago citywide	0.4%5,430	0.4%6,262	0.4%6,467	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,037– 0.0 pp▲ +205– 0.0 pp▲ +832
Burbank city, IL	1.0%28	0.7%15	1.0%33	– 0.0 pp▲ +5▲ +0.4 pp▲ +18▼ −0.4 pp▼ −13
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,102	0.3%4,109	0.3%4,444	– 0.0 pp▲ +342– 0.0 pp▲ +335– 0.0 pp▲ +7
Calumet City city, IL	0.9%24	1.6%36	0.9%29	– 0.0 pp▲ +5▼ −0.6 pp▼ −7▲ +0.7 pp▲ +12
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,281	0.3%4,579	0.3%4,802	– 0.0 pp▲ +521– 0.0 pp▲ +223– 0.0 pp▲ +298
Joliet city, IL	0.3%8	0.0%1	0.7%22	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +14▲ +0.7 pp▲ +21▼ −0.3 pp▼ −7
Chicago citywide	0.6%7,328	0.6%8,297	0.6%9,068	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,740– 0.0 pp▲ +771– 0.0 pp▲ +969
South Holland village, IL	0.6%17	0.7%17	0.7%22	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5– 0.0 pp▲ +5▲ +0.1 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.2%2,615	0.2%2,689	0.2%2,892	– 0.0 pp▲ +277– 0.0 pp▲ +203– 0.0 pp▲ +74
All other Illinois locations	29.4%796	33.4%767	34.5%1,088	▲ +5.0 pp▲ +292▲ +1.1 pp▲ +321▲ +3.9 pp▼ −29
Chicago citywide	35.5%467,052	35.1%497,107	36.9%540,317	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +73,265▲ +1.8 pp▲ +43,210▼ −0.5 pp▲ +30,055
Out of state	3.0%80	3.2%73	3.2%101	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +21– 0.0 pp▲ +28▲ +0.2 pp▼ −7
Chicago citywide	4.9%63,785	4.8%68,287	4.9%72,123	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8,338▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,836– 0.0 pp▲ +4,502

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category	Auburn Gresham
No Computer or Smartphone	8.8% ±1.7 pp1,530 ±291
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	21.5% ±2.9 pp3,751 ±509
Desktop or Laptop Available	60.7% ±3.3 pp10,586 ±569
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
No Computer or Smartphone	8.8%±1.7 pp1,530±291	5.1%±0.2 pp58,709±2,246	▲ +3.7%	14/77
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	21.5%±2.9 pp3,751±509	10.4%±0.3 pp120,218±3,642	▲ +11.1%	8/77
Desktop or Laptop Available	60.7%±3.3 pp10,586±569	79.7%±0.4 pp924,956±4,919	▼ -19.0%	73/77
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category	Auburn Gresham
Has Internet Access	86.1% ±2.8 pp15,021 ±483
Cellular Data Plan Only	16.0% ±2.4 pp2,791 ±420
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	4.0% ±1.4 pp698 ±238
No Internet Access	13.9% ±2.3 pp2,419 ±406
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Has Internet Access	86.1%±2.8 pp15,021±483	93.1%±0.3 pp1,080,419±3,310	▼ -7.0%	69/77
Cellular Data Plan Only	16.0%±2.4 pp2,791±420	12.5%±0.3 pp145,219±3,463	▲ +3.5%	29/77
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	4.0%±1.4 pp698±238	3.9%±0.2 pp45,350±1,940	▲ +0.1%	26/77
No Internet Access	13.9%±2.3 pp2,419±406	6.9%±0.2 pp79,786±2,730	▲ +7.0%	9/77
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category	Auburn Gresham
Uninsured Residents	9.1% ±1.5 pp3,983 ±649
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	6.4% ±2.9 pp2,802 ±1,255
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	13.4% ±2.4 pp5,883 ±1,033
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	0.0% ±0.6 pp5 ±251
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Uninsured Residents	9.1%±1.5 pp3,983±649	9.8%±0.2 pp264,391±5,709	▼ -0.7%	38/77
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	6.4%±2.9 pp2,802±1,255	3.9%±0.3 pp104,687±8,934	▲ +2.5%	11/77
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	13.4%±2.4 pp5,883±1,033	13.3%±0.3 pp361,430±8,516	▲ +0.1%	37/77
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	0.0%±0.6 pp5±251	1.7%±0.3 pp46,718±7,265	▼ -1.7%	72/77
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category	Auburn Gresham
Insured (Any Coverage)	90.9% ±1.5 pp39,796 ±649
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	33.9% ±1.8 pp14,843 ±787
Direct-Purchase Insurance	6.7% ±1.5 pp2,917 ±639
Medicare	18.6% ±1.5 pp8,161 ±635
Medicaid	38.7% ±2.7 pp16,922 ±1,197
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.7% ±0.6 pp305 ±242
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	5.5% ±1.0 pp2,386 ±418
Uninsured	9.1% ±1.5 pp3,983 ±649
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Insured (Any Coverage)	90.9%±1.5 pp39,796±649	90.2%±0.2 pp2,424,871±5,689	▲ +0.7%	40/77
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	33.9%±1.8 pp14,843±787	51.2%±0.4 pp1,376,912±9,468	▼ -17.3%	61/77
Direct-Purchase Insurance	6.7%±1.5 pp2,917±639	8.5%±0.2 pp227,424±5,112	▼ -1.8%	50/77
Medicare	18.6%±1.5 pp8,161±635	12.6%±0.2 pp339,804±4,911	▲ +6.0%	8/77
Medicaid	38.7%±2.7 pp16,922±1,197	22.2%±0.3 pp596,931±7,773	▲ +16.4%	14/77
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.7%±0.6 pp305±242	0.3%±0.0 pp7,201±787	▲ +0.4%	9/77
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	5.5%±1.0 pp2,386±418	3.8%±0.1 pp102,777±3,544	▲ +1.6%	20/77
Uninsured	9.1%±1.5 pp3,983±649	9.8%±0.2 pp262,018±5,689	▼ -0.7%	38/77
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category	Auburn Gresham
Adults With at Least One Disability	24.8% ±2.1 pp8,293 ±695
Mobility Disability	15.1% ±1.6 pp5,044 ±542
Hearing Disability	3.2% ±0.9 pp1,058 ±295
Vision Disability	6.3% ±1.2 pp2,107 ±399
Cognitive Disability	9.1% ±1.6 pp3,051 ±531
Self-Care Disability	6.9% ±1.3 pp2,313 ±433
Independent Living Disability	12.6% ±1.7 pp4,197 ±573
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability	24.8%±2.1 pp8,293±695	14.0%±0.2 pp303,665±4,797	▲ +10.8%	8/77
Mobility Disability	15.1%±1.6 pp5,044±542	7.6%±0.2 pp163,666±3,398	▲ +7.5%	7/77
Hearing Disability	3.2%±0.9 pp1,058±295	2.8%±0.1 pp61,430±2,337	▲ +0.3%	40/77
Vision Disability	6.3%±1.2 pp2,107±399	3.0%±0.1 pp64,544±2,269	▲ +3.3%	7/77
Cognitive Disability	9.1%±1.6 pp3,051±531	5.2%±0.1 pp112,824±2,939	▲ +3.9%	6/77
Self-Care Disability	6.9%±1.3 pp2,313±433	2.7%±0.1 pp57,758±2,261	▲ +4.2%	1/77
Independent Living Disability	12.6%±1.7 pp4,197±573	5.7%±0.2 pp123,651±3,247	▲ +6.8%	4/77
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category	Auburn Gresham
Arthritis	28.5%9,616
High Blood Pressure	46.4%15,635
Cancer	5.1%1,728
Current Asthma	13.2%4,437
Coronary Heart Disease	7.5%2,523
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	9.3%3,133
Diabetes	20.0%6,731
High Cholesterol	35.0%11,792
Obesity	43.5%14,648
Stroke	6.3%2,129
Lost All Natural Teeth	6.7%2,262
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Arthritis	28.5%9,616	19.6%409,178	▲ +8.9%	5/77
High Blood Pressure	46.4%15,635	29.7%620,030	▲ +16.7%	5/77
Cancer	5.1%1,728	5.0%104,382	▲ +0.1%	34/77
Current Asthma	13.2%4,437	10.2%212,940	▲ +3.0%	13/77
Coronary Heart Disease	7.5%2,523	4.8%100,207	▲ +2.7%	7/77
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	9.3%3,133	5.5%114,820	▲ +3.8%	10/77
Diabetes	20.0%6,731	12.0%250,517	▲ +8.0%	7/77
High Cholesterol	35.0%11,792	31.6%659,696	▲ +3.4%	16/77
Obesity	43.5%14,648	32.6%680,572	▲ +10.9%	13/77
Stroke	6.3%2,129	3.3%68,892	▲ +3.0%	6/77
Lost All Natural Teeth	6.7%2,262	2.5%52,249	▲ +4.2%	6/77
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category	Auburn Gresham
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	12.5%4,221
Current Cigarette Smoking	17.4%5,868
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	34.4%11,603
Short Sleep Duration	47.1%15,862
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	12.5%4,221	19.0%396,652	▼ -6.5%	72/77
Current Cigarette Smoking	17.4%5,868	11.9%248,430	▲ +5.5%	14/77
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	34.4%11,603	24.7%515,648	▲ +9.7%	19/77
Short Sleep Duration	47.1%15,862	37.8%789,129	▲ +9.3%	11/77
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category	Auburn Gresham
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	30.9%10,407
Frequent Physical Distress	15.6%5,245
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	30.9%10,407	21.1%440,493	▲ +9.8%	16/77
Frequent Physical Distress	15.6%5,245	11.8%246,342	▲ +3.8%	15/77
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category	Auburn Gresham
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	79.7%26,859
Routine Checkup in Past Year	82.9%27,956
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	87.8%29,604
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	58.1%19,584
Dental Visit in Past Year	48.4%16,313
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	75.5%25,443
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	79.7%26,859	72.5%1,513,542	▲ +7.2%	8/77
Routine Checkup in Past Year	82.9%27,956	76.2%1,590,785	▲ +6.7%	8/77
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	87.8%29,604	86.2%1,799,549	▲ +1.6%	25/77
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	58.1%19,584	55.8%1,164,905	▲ +2.3%	27/77
Dental Visit in Past Year	48.4%16,313	58.4%1,219,184	▼ -10.0%	57/77
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	75.5%25,443	74.2%1,549,032	▲ +1.3%	28/77
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category	Auburn Gresham
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	17.6%5,941
Frequent Mental Distress	18.6%6,282
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	36.0%12,145
Loneliness	40.0%13,489
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Auburn Gresham	City	Difference	Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	17.6%5,941	19.1%398,740	▼ -1.5%	59/77
Frequent Mental Distress	18.6%6,282	16.0%334,023	▲ +2.6%	14/77
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	36.0%12,145	28.2%588,716	▲ +7.8%	8/77
Loneliness	40.0%13,489	35.8%747,377	▲ +4.2%	10/77
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Compare All Neighborhoods

Auburn Gresham, Chicago

Auburn Gresham at a Glance

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Age Distribution

Educational Attainment

Population

Household Size

Marital Status

Language Spoken at Home

English Proficiency

Household Composition

Children by Household Type

Veteran Status

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Poverty Status

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Occupation

Industry of Employment

Class of Worker

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Earnings of All Workers

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Auburn Gresham, Chicago

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Auburn Gresham, Chicago in Lower-Income Families

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Auburn Gresham, Chicago

Local Businesses

Jobs in Auburn Gresham

Industry of Jobs in Auburn Gresham

Earnings of Jobs in Auburn Gresham

Jobs in Auburn Gresham by Firm Age

Jobs in Auburn Gresham by Firm Size

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

College Enrollment

Student Digital Access

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Year Moved Into Current Home

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Housing Vacancy Status

Housing Age

Housing Units by Building Size

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Overcrowded Housing

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Monthly Housing Costs

Rent

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Home Values

Federal Housing Assistance

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Commute Time

Household Vehicle Access

Where Auburn Gresham Residents Work

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Auburn Gresham

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Household Internet Access

Health

Health Insurance

Health Insurance Coverage Types