Hermosa, Chicago Demographics, Housing & Census Data

Hermosa, Chicago Census and ACS demographic tables: population, race, age, income, poverty, rent, housing types, single-family homes, commute, education, internet access, health insurance, and disability.

Hermosa, Chicago

Hermosa
Chicago
Population
22,576
Overlapping council wards Overlap means that a council ward contains part of this neighborhood.
26, 31, 35
Population Density
19,319 /sq mi
Average Geographic Mismatch Error : 0.00 p.p. Geographic mismatch error comes from Census geographic boundaries not perfectly aligning with community area boundaries. We can test how much mismatch error skews community area statistics for a subset of variables. For this community area , the average error is 0.00 percentage points. More detail is available on the community area geography page , and the methodology page explains geographic mismatch error in more detail.
One-page summary

Hermosa at a Glance

Time period?Historical estimates use this profile's current boundaries, held constant across periods; they do not reflect the boundaries that were in effect at the time. Comparing
Values as
Show as
Add to every table
Showing Chart vs. Chicago ± Margin of error

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category Hermosa
Hispanic 84.9% ±3.6 pp19,159 ±818
White 9.8% ±2.1 pp2,211 ±478
Black 3.0% ±1.3 pp671 ±291
Asian 1.3% ±0.9 pp293 ±209
Other or Multi-racial 1.1% ±0.5 pp242 ±118
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Hispanic 84.9%±3.6 pp19,159±818 29.7%±0.2 pp805,318±5,785 ▲ +55.2% 3/77
White 9.8%±2.1 pp2,211±478 32.1%±0.2 pp870,127±5,557 ▼ -22.3% 47/77
Black 3.0%±1.3 pp671±291 27.4%±0.2 pp743,710±6,047 ▼ -24.5% 61/77
Asian 1.3%±0.9 pp293±209 7.2%±0.2 pp196,435±4,370 ▼ -5.9% 44/77
Other or Multi-racial 1.1%±0.5 pp242±118 3.5%±0.1 pp95,636±3,778 ▼ -2.5% 65/77
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Age Distribution

Category Hermosa
Under 5 5.0% ±1.2 pp1,125 ±265
5-17 19.1% ±2.3 pp4,307 ±514
18-24 9.9% ±1.6 pp2,228 ±364
25-44 29.5% ±1.7 pp6,650 ±394
45-64 24.8% ±2.0 pp5,605 ±446
65-74 8.1% ±1.3 pp1,833 ±294
75-84 2.5% ±0.9 pp566 ±214
85+ 1.2% ±0.8 pp262 ±170
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Under 5 5.0%±1.2 pp1,125±265 5.3%±0.1 pp144,044±3,867 ▼ -0.3% 46/77
5-17 19.1%±2.3 pp4,307±514 14.1%±0.2 pp381,582±5,548 ▲ +5.0% 18/77
18-24 9.9%±1.6 pp2,228±364 9.6%±0.2 pp260,942±4,900 ▲ +0.2% 26/77
25-44 29.5%±1.7 pp6,650±394 34.3%±0.3 pp929,946±6,988 ▼ -4.8% 29/77
45-64 24.8%±2.0 pp5,605±446 22.9%±0.2 pp620,047±5,644 ▲ +2.0% 31/77
65-74 8.1%±1.3 pp1,833±294 8.2%±0.1 pp221,932±3,711 ▼ -0.1% 53/77
75-84 2.5%±0.9 pp566±214 4.0%±0.1 pp107,625±2,694 ▼ -1.5% 69/77
85+ 1.2%±0.8 pp262±170 1.7%±0.1 pp45,108±1,921 ▼ -0.5% 59/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category Hermosa
No High School Diploma 25.2% ±3.5 pp3,755 ±517
High School Diploma or GED 31.9% ±4.0 pp4,762 ±604
Some College or Associate's Degree 20.3% ±2.5 pp3,030 ±366
Bachelor's Degree 16.3% ±2.9 pp2,427 ±437
Graduate Degree 6.3% ±1.5 pp942 ±222
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
No High School Diploma 25.2%±3.5 pp3,755±517 12.8%±0.2 pp246,015±4,778 ▲ +12.4% 10/77
High School Diploma or GED 31.9%±4.0 pp4,762±604 21.1%±0.3 pp405,248±5,752 ▲ +10.9% 22/77
Some College or Associate's Degree 20.3%±2.5 pp3,030±366 21.8%±0.3 pp419,911±5,550 ▼ -1.5% 52/77
Bachelor's Degree 16.3%±2.9 pp2,427±437 25.4%±0.3 pp488,467±5,708 ▼ -9.1% 45/77
Graduate Degree 6.3%±1.5 pp942±222 19.0%±0.3 pp365,017±5,186 ▼ -12.6% 57/77
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category Hermosa
Total Population 22,576 ±1,627
Total Households 7,517 ±434
Population Density 19,319 ±1,392 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa Average Neighborhood Difference
Total Population 22,576 35,210 ▼ −12,634
Total Households 7,517 15,067 ▼ −7,550
Population Density 19,319 people/sq mi 13,045 people/sq mi ▲ +6,274
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average neighborhood rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large neighborhoods. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category 2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19 Difference Rank
Total Population 24,836 ±1,358 23,481 ±1,147 22,576 ±1,627 ▼ −2,260 ±2,119▼ −905 ±1,990▼ −1,355 ±1,778 ▼ −10,394▼ −11,705▼ −12,634 46/7748/7751/77
Average Neighborhood 35,230 35,186 35,210 ▼ −20▲ +24▼ −43
Total Households 6,923 ±232 7,112 ±216 7,517 ±434 ▲ +594 ±492▲ +405 ±485▲ +189 ±316 ▼ −6,438▼ −6,742▼ −7,550 54/7754/7754/77
Average Neighborhood 13,361 13,854 15,067 ▲ +1,706▲ +1,213▲ +493
Population Density (per sq mi) 21,253 ±1,162 20,093 ±981 19,319 ±1,392 ▼ −1,934▼ −774▼ −1,160 ▲ +8,264▲ +7,065▲ +6,274 7/7712/7711/77
Average Neighborhood Density 12,989 13,028 13,045 ▲ +56▲ +17▲ +39

Household Size

Category Hermosa
Average Household Size 3.00±0.23
1-Person Households 20.2% ±3.8 pp1,522 ±284
2-Person Households 29.5% ±3.9 pp2,220 ±290
3-Person Households 16.7% ±3.1 pp1,252 ±236
4+ Person Households 33.6% ±4.5 pp2,523 ±335
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Average Household Size 3.00±0.23 2.29±0.02 ▲ +0.71 9/77
1-Person Households 20.2%±3.8 pp1,522±284 39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,783 ▼ -19.4% 75/77
2-Person Households 29.5%±3.9 pp2,220±290 29.5%±0.4 pp342,235±5,166 0% 27/77
3-Person Households 16.7%±3.1 pp1,252±236 12.9%±0.4 pp149,291±4,184 ▲ +3.8% 13/77
4+ Person Households 33.6%±4.5 pp2,523±335 18.0%±0.5 pp208,411±5,419 ▲ +15.6% 13/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category Hermosa
Never Married 45.2% ±3.0 pp8,287 ±552
Married 42.9% ±1.6 pp7,869 ±289
Separated 2.4% ±0.9 pp444 ±171
Divorced 5.3% ±1.3 pp975 ±237
Widowed 4.1% ±1.2 pp747 ±229
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Never Married 45.2%±3.0 pp8,287±552 49.6%±0.3 pp1,130,286±6,623 ▼ -4.4% 46/77
Married 42.9%±1.6 pp7,869±289 35.5%±0.3 pp807,294±6,077 ▲ +7.5% 21/77
Separated 2.4%±0.9 pp444±171 2.2%±0.1 pp49,430±2,379 ▲ +0.3% 34/77
Divorced 5.3%±1.3 pp975±237 7.9%±0.2 pp180,700±3,966 ▼ -2.6% 73/77
Widowed 4.1%±1.2 pp747±229 4.8%±0.1 pp109,357±2,738 ▼ -0.7% 55/77
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category Hermosa
Speak English Only 26.0% ±2.6 pp5,572 ±568
Spanish 71.9% ±4.7 pp15,424 ±1,007
Other Languages 2.1% ±1.2 pp455 ±261
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Speak English Only 26.0%±2.6 pp5,572±568 64.6%±0.3 pp1,659,069±8,218 ▼ -38.7% 72/77
Spanish 71.9%±4.7 pp15,424±1,007 23.7%±0.2 pp607,865±6,166 ▲ +48.2% 3/77
Other Languages 2.1%±1.2 pp455±261 1.0%±0.1 pp25,292±2,452 ▲ +1.1% 43/77
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show
Category Hermosa
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 64.0% ±2.1 pp64.0%±2.1 pp13,722 ±440
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 11.4% ±1.8 pp11.4%±1.8 pp2,448 ±394
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 16.9% ±2.8 pp147.8%±6.4 pp3,617 ±603
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 7.8% ±2.0 pp68.0%±13.8 pp1,664 ±431
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 36.0% ±3.3 pp315.7%±58.5 pp7,729 ±711
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 64.0%±2.1 pp64.0%±2.1 pp13,722±440 85.4%±0.5 pp85.4%±0.5 pp2,192,778±11,961 ▼ -21.4%▼ -21.4% 72/77
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 11.4%±1.8 pp11.4%±1.8 pp2,448±394 7.1%±0.2 pp7.1%±0.2 pp183,252±4,686 ▲ +4.3%▲ +4.3% 19/77
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 16.9%±2.8 pp147.8%±6.4 pp3,617±603 5.2%±0.2 pp72.7%±1.1 pp133,269±3,923 ▲ +11.7%▲ +75.0% 2/771/76
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 7.8%±2.0 pp68.0%±13.8 pp1,664±431 2.3%±0.1 pp31.6%±1.4 pp57,883±2,982 ▲ +5.5%▲ +36.4% 3/778/76
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 36.0%±3.3 pp315.7%±58.5 pp7,729±711 14.6%±0.3 pp204.3%±6.4 pp374,404±6,794 ▲ +21.4%▲ +111.4% 6/775/76
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category Hermosa
Married-Couple Households 42.9% ±4.4 pp3,228 ±328
Unmarried-Couple Households 8.3% ±2.6 pp623 ±195
One-Person Households 20.2% ±4.1 pp1,522 ±308
Other Household Types 28.5% ±9.0 pp2,144 ±676
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Married-Couple Households 42.9%±4.4 pp3,228±328 30.9%±0.3 pp358,432±3,598 ▲ +12.0% 22/77
Unmarried-Couple Households 8.3%±2.6 pp623±195 8.3%±0.2 pp96,220±2,797 0% 24/77
One-Person Households 20.2%±4.1 pp1,522±308 39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,729 ▼ -19.4% 75/77
Other Household Types 28.5%±9.0 pp2,144±676 21.1%±0.7 pp245,285±8,514 ▲ +7.4% 25/77
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category Hermosa
Children in Married-Couple Households 57.2% ±9.0 pp3,106 ±490
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 8.0% ±3.9 pp432 ±214
Children in Single-Mother Households 26.7% ±6.4 pp1,449 ±345
Children in Single-Father Households 8.2% ±3.8 pp445 ±208
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households 57.2%±9.0 pp3,106±490 56.0%±0.8 pp293,542±4,257 ▲ +1.2% 40/77
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 8.0%±3.9 pp432±214 8.8%±0.6 pp45,960±3,208 ▼ -0.8% 33/77
Children in Single-Mother Households 26.7%±6.4 pp1,449±345 30.6%±0.9 pp160,535±4,521 ▼ -4.0% 38/77
Children in Single-Father Households 8.2%±3.8 pp445±208 4.6%±0.4 pp24,133±2,006 ▲ +3.6% 11/77
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show
Category Hermosa
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 1.4% ±0.6 pp1.4%±0.6 pp232 ±98
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 43.5% ±31.8 pp0.6%±0.4 pp101 ±74
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 19.4% ±24.4 pp0.3%±0.3 pp45 ±57
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 24.6% ±25.2 pp0.3%±0.3 pp57 ±58
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 0.0% ±19.4 pp0.0%0
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 12.5% ±32.2 pp0.2%±0.4 pp29 ±75
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 1.4%±0.6 pp1.4%±0.6 pp232±98 2.8%±0.1 pp2.8%±0.1 pp60,766±2,397 ▼ -1.4%▼ -1.4% 73/77
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 43.5%±31.8 pp0.6%±0.4 pp101±74 26.8%±1.8 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,267±1,067 ▲ +16.8%▼ -0.2% 12/7748/77
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 19.4%±24.4 pp0.3%±0.3 pp45±57 12.9%±1.0 pp0.4%±0.0 pp7,830±579 ▲ +6.5%▼ -0.1% 18/7745/77
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 24.6%±25.2 pp0.3%±0.3 pp57±58 28.8%±1.4 pp0.8%±0.0 pp17,525±846 ▼ -4.3%▼ -0.5% 53/7772/77
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 0.0%±19.4 pp0.0%0 4.9%±0.7 pp0.1%±0.0 pp2,995±441 ▼ -4.9%▼ -0.1% 62/7762/77
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 12.5%±32.2 pp0.2%±0.4 pp29±75 26.6%±1.5 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,149±916 ▼ -14.1%▼ -0.6% 68/7772/77
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show
Category Hermosa
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 65.3% ±2.4 pp65.3%±2.4 pp14,738 ±536
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 34.7% ±3.7 pp34.7%±3.7 pp7,838 ±843
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 12.6% ±2.1 pp36.4%±4.6 pp2,854 ±473
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 22.1% ±3.5 pp63.6%±7.5 pp4,984 ±797
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 65.3%±2.4 pp65.3%±2.4 pp14,738±536 79.1%±0.3 pp79.1%±0.3 pp2,144,343±7,926 ▼ -13.8%▼ -13.8% 64/77
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 34.7%±3.7 pp34.7%±3.7 pp7,838±843 20.9%±0.3 pp20.9%±0.3 pp566,883±7,968 ▲ +13.8%▲ +13.8% 14/77
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 12.6%±2.1 pp36.4%±4.6 pp2,854±473 10.0%±0.2 pp47.7%±0.5 pp270,551±4,603 ▲ +2.7%▼ -11.3% 27/7756/77
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 22.1%±3.5 pp63.6%±7.5 pp4,984±797 10.9%±0.2 pp52.3%±0.9 pp296,332±6,504 ▲ +11.1%▲ +11.3% 7/7722/77
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show
Category Hermosa
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 21.2%±3.4 pp61.1%±5.7 pp4,791±776
Born in Guatemala (of foreign-born residents) 3.1%±1.3 pp8.9%±3.7 pp696±304
Born in Honduras (of foreign-born residents) 2.3%±1.6 pp6.6%±4.5 pp519±358
Born in Ecuador (of foreign-born residents) 2.2%±1.6 pp6.3%±4.5 pp494±355
Born in Colombia (of foreign-born residents) 1.0%±0.5 pp2.9%±1.5 pp226±121
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 4.8%13.7%1,075
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa Chicago Difference Rank
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 21.2% ±3.4 pp61.1%±5.7 pp4,791 8.2% ±0.2 pp39.3%222,978 ▲ +13.0%▲ +21.8% 13/7719/77
Born in Guatemala (of foreign-born residents) 3.1% ±1.3 pp8.9%±3.7 pp696 0.4% ±0.0 pp1.9%11,016 ▲ +2.7%▲ +6.9% 1/771/77
Born in Honduras (of foreign-born residents) 2.3% ±1.6 pp6.6%±4.5 pp519 0.2% ±0.0 pp0.8%4,620 ▲ +2.1%▲ +5.8% 1/771/77
Born in Ecuador (of foreign-born residents) 2.2% ±1.6 pp6.3%±4.5 pp494 0.5% ±0.1 pp2.5%14,043 ▲ +1.7%▲ +3.8% 5/776/77
Born in Colombia (of foreign-born residents) 1.0% ±0.5 pp2.9%±1.5 pp226 0.3% ±0.0 pp1.4%8,061 ▲ +0.7%▲ +1.5% 3/779/77
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 4.8%13.7%1,075 ——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show
Category Hermosa
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 6.8% ±2.4 pp19.6%±6.5 pp1,538 ±537
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 8.2% ±2.5 pp23.7%±6.6 pp1,856 ±556
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 9.6% ±1.9 pp27.7%±4.6 pp2,170 ±434
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 10.1% ±2.1 pp29.0%±5.0 pp2,274 ±465
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 6.8%±2.4 pp19.6%±6.5 pp1,538±537 5.9%±0.2 pp2034.3%±237.3 pp159,447±5,557 ▲ +0.9%▼ -2014.7% 22/7756/77
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 8.2%±2.5 pp23.7%±6.6 pp1,856±556 4.5%±0.1 pp1555.4%±180.6 pp121,912±4,035 ▲ +3.7%▼ -1531.7% 10/7720/77
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 9.6%±1.9 pp27.7%±4.6 pp2,170±434 4.6%±0.1 pp1580.1%±182.8 pp123,849±3,901 ▲ +5.0%▼ -1552.4% 6/7714/77
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 10.1%±2.1 pp29.0%±5.0 pp2,274±465 6.0%±0.1 pp2062.7%±233.9 pp161,675±3,491 ▲ +4.1%▼ -2033.7% 16/7734/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later 1.6% ±0.9 pp386 ±234 3.1% ±1.2 pp725 ±286 6.8% ±2.4 pp1,538 ±537 ▲ +5.3 pp▲ +1,152▲ +3.7 pp▲ +813▲ +1.5 pp▲ +339
Chicago citywide 1.4% ±0.1 pp36,978 ±2,235 3.7% ±0.1 pp99,118 ±3,198 5.9% ±0.2 pp159,447 ±5,568 ▲ +4.5 pp▲ +122,469▲ +2.2 pp▲ +60,329▲ +2.3 pp▲ +62,140
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 8.6% ±1.8 pp2,147 ±446 8.6% ±1.9 pp2,008 ±455 8.2% ±2.5 pp1,856 ±556 ▼ −0.4 pp▼ −291▼ −0.3 pp▼ −152▼ −0.1 pp▼ −139
Chicago citywide 5.9% ±0.1 pp161,331 ±3,896 4.9% ±0.1 pp131,658 ±3,182 4.5% ±0.1 pp121,912 ±4,044 ▼ −1.5 pp▼ −39,419▼ −0.4 pp▼ −9,746▼ −1.1 pp▼ −29,673
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 12.7% ±2.2 pp3,148 ±556 9.9% ±1.6 pp2,326 ±382 9.6% ±1.9 pp2,170 ±434 ▼ −3.1 pp▼ −978▼ −0.3 pp▼ −156▼ −2.8 pp▼ −822
Chicago citywide 6.1% ±0.1 pp165,077 ±3,717 5.3% ±0.1 pp142,413 ±3,015 4.6% ±0.1 pp123,849 ±3,911 ▼ −1.5 pp▼ −41,228▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,564▼ −0.8 pp▼ −22,664
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 12.3% ±1.7 pp3,045 ±416 13.4% ±1.8 pp3,157 ±426 10.1% ±2.1 pp2,274 ±465 ▼ −2.2 pp▼ −771▼ −3.4 pp▼ −883▲ +1.2 pp▲ +112
Chicago citywide 7.5% ±0.1 pp204,169 ±3,469 6.9% ±0.1 pp186,050 ±3,114 6.0% ±0.1 pp161,675 ±3,509 ▼ −1.6 pp▼ −42,494▼ −0.9 pp▼ −24,375▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,119
Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category Hermosa
Average Household Income $87,751±$4,976
Per Capita Income $29,154±$986
10th Percentile Household Income $17,810±$6,107
25th Percentile Household Income $38,804±$4,284
Median Household Income $70,767±$5,487
75th Percentile Household Income $118,989±$8,383
90th Percentile Household Income $183,059±$12,592
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $87,751±$4,976 $116,016±$1,263 ▼ −$28,265 39/77
Per Capita Income $29,154±$986 $50,086±$581 ▼ −$20,933 51/77
10th Percentile Household Income $17,810±$6,107 $12,933±$271 ▲ +$4,876 28/77
25th Percentile Household Income $38,804±$4,284 $34,575±$649 ▲ +$4,229 28/77
Median Household Income $70,767±$5,487 $77,902±$907 ▼ −$7,135 35/77
75th Percentile Household Income $118,989±$8,383 $144,150±$1,210 ▼ −$25,160 41/77
90th Percentile Household Income $183,059±$12,592 Over $200,000 ▼ −$16,941+ 42/77
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $65,355 ±3,703 $82,463 ±6,750 $87,751 ±4,976 ▲ +$22,396▲ +$5,288▲ +$17,109
Chicago citywide $95,689 ±910 $111,304 ±1,075 $116,016 ±1,263 ▲ +$20,327▲ +$4,712▲ +$15,615
Average Household Income (nominal dollars) $49,322 ±2,795 $67,208 ±5,501 $87,751 ±4,976 ▲ +$38,429▲ +$20,543▲ +$17,886
Chicago citywide $72,215 ±687 $90,713 ±876 $116,016 ±1,263 ▲ +$43,801▲ +$25,303▲ +$18,498
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $19,596 ±762 $27,079 ±1,993 $29,154 ±986 ▲ +$9,558▲ +$2,075▲ +$7,483
Chicago citywide $37,927 ±351 $45,525 ±412 $50,086 ±581 ▲ +$12,160▲ +$4,562▲ +$7,598
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars) $14,789 ±575 $22,069 ±1,624 $29,154 ±986 ▲ +$14,365▲ +$7,084▲ +$7,281
Chicago citywide $28,623 ±265 $37,103 ±336 $50,086 ±581 ▲ +$21,464▲ +$12,984▲ +$8,480
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $15,255 ±2,568 $17,623 ±2,535 $17,810 ±6,107 ▲ +$2,555▲ +$187▲ +$2,368
Chicago citywide $11,828 ±190 $13,281 ±277 $12,933 ±271 ▲ +$1,105▼ −$348▲ +$1,453
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $11,513 ±1,938 $14,363 ±2,066 $17,810 ±6,107 ▲ +$6,297▲ +$3,447▲ +$2,850
Chicago citywide $8,927 ±144 $10,824 ±225 $12,933 ±271 ▲ +$4,007▲ +$2,109▲ +$1,898
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $28,756 ±3,138 $33,142 ±3,346 $38,804 ±4,284 ▲ +$10,048▲ +$5,662▲ +$4,386
Chicago citywide $28,727 ±321 $31,597 ±462 $34,575 ±649 ▲ +$5,848▲ +$2,979▲ +$2,869
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $21,702 ±2,368 $27,011 ±2,727 $38,804 ±4,284 ▲ +$17,103▲ +$11,793▲ +$5,309
Chicago citywide $21,680 ±242 $25,751 ±376 $34,575 ±649 ▲ +$12,895▲ +$8,824▲ +$4,071
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $49,683 ±3,734 $57,564 ±4,768 $70,767 ±5,487 ▲ +$21,084▲ +$13,203▲ +$7,881
Chicago citywide $63,379 ±591 $71,469 ±723 $77,902 ±907 ▲ +$14,523▲ +$6,433▲ +$8,090
Median Household Income (nominal dollars) $37,495 ±2,818 $46,915 ±3,886 $70,767 ±5,487 ▲ +$33,272▲ +$23,852▲ +$9,420
Chicago citywide $47,831 ±446 $58,247 ±589 $77,902 ±907 ▲ +$30,071▲ +$19,655▲ +$10,416
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $90,088 ±5,472 $106,142 ±8,279 $118,989 ±8,383 ▲ +$28,901▲ +$12,847▲ +$16,054
Chicago citywide $122,019 ±806 $139,501 ±1,057 $144,150 ±1,210 ▲ +$22,131▲ +$4,648▲ +$17,482
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $67,988 ±4,129 $86,506 ±6,747 $118,989 ±8,383 ▲ +$51,001▲ +$32,483▲ +$18,518
Chicago citywide $92,086 ±608 $113,694 ±862 $144,150 ±1,210 ▲ +$52,064▲ +$30,456▲ +$21,608
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $132,491 ±10,176 $170,897 ±13,665 $183,059 ±12,592 ▲ +$50,568▲ +$12,162▲ +$38,406
Chicago citywide $202,601 ±2,442 $235,390 ±1,636 — ——▲ +$32,790
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $99,989 ±7,679 $139,281 ±11,137 $183,059 ±12,592 ▲ +$83,070▲ +$43,778▲ +$39,293
Chicago citywide $152,899 ±1,843 $191,844 ±1,333 — ——▲ +$38,944

Poverty Status

Category Hermosa
Below Poverty Line 13.5% ±3.1 pp3,040 ±705
Below 200% Poverty Line 36.5% ±5.4 pp8,242 ±1,209
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 5.8% ±2.0 pp1,317 ±449
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Below Poverty Line 13.5%±3.1 pp3,040±705 16.8%±0.4 pp456,194±11,330 ▼ -3.4% 49/77
Below 200% Poverty Line 36.5%±5.4 pp8,242±1,209 33.4%±0.6 pp905,794±16,660 ▲ +3.1% 36/77
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 5.8%±2.0 pp1,317±449 8.3%±0.3 pp226,117±7,649 ▼ -2.5% 49/77
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Category Hermosa
Food Insecurity 31.6%5,498
Housing Insecurity 25.5%4,429
Transportation Barriers 13.6%2,362
Threatened Utility Shutoff 12.5%2,177
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Food Insecurity 31.6%5,498 24.4%509,385 ▲ +7.2% 31/77
Housing Insecurity 25.5%4,429 19.7%411,266 ▲ +5.8% 31/77
Transportation Barriers 13.6%2,362 11.6%242,167 ▲ +2.0% 35/77
Threatened Utility Shutoff 12.5%2,177 11.9%248,430 ▲ +0.6% 38/77
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category Hermosa
In Labor Force 86.1% ±2.2 pp8,684 ±226
↳ Employed 81.8% ±2.8 pp8,250 ±282
↳ Unemployed 4.3% ±1.5 pp434 ±152
↳ Unemployment Rate 5.0% ±1.7 pp—
Not in Labor Force 13.9% ±10.3 pp1,398 ±1,039
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
In Labor Force 86.1%±2.2 pp8,684±226 85.6%±0.3 pp1,069,076±3,868 ▲ +0.6% 34/77
↳ Employed 81.8%±2.8 pp8,250±282 79.6%±0.3 pp994,466±4,326 ▲ +2.2% 30/77
↳ Unemployed 4.3%±1.5 pp434±152 5.9%±0.2 pp73,968±2,788 ▼ -1.6% 56/77
↳ Unemployment Rate 5.0%±1.7 pp— 6.9%±0.3 pp86,502±3,342 ▼ -1.9% 52/77
Not in Labor Force 13.9%±10.3 pp1,398±1,039 14.4%±1.1 pp180,399±14,344 ▼ -0.6% 44/77
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category Hermosa
Management, Business, Science & Arts 23.1% ±3.2 pp2,709 ±376
↳ Management Occupations 6.9% ±1.8 pp815 ±206
↳ Business & Financial Operations 4.1% ±1.3 pp485 ±148
↳ Computer & Mathematical 2.0% ±1.0 pp231 ±121
↳ Architecture & Engineering 1.3% ±0.9 pp155 ±102
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 0.4% ±0.6 pp48 ±71
↳ Community & Social Service 1.1% ±0.7 pp127 ±81
↳ Legal Occupations 0.5% ±0.5 pp59 ±63
↳ Education, Training & Library 1.8% ±0.9 pp211 ±102
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 1.6% ±0.9 pp185 ±106
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 2.1% ±1.3 pp245 ±147
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 1.3% ±0.8 pp148 ±89
Service 23.3% ±3.3 pp2,732 ±382
↳ Healthcare Support 4.4% ±1.6 pp519 ±190
↳ Protective Service 0.9% ±0.6 pp102 ±66
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 8.2% ±1.9 pp961 ±225
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 5.6% ±1.9 pp660 ±221
↳ Personal Care & Service 4.2% ±1.5 pp490 ±175
Sales & Office 19.2% ±3.4 pp2,252 ±398
↳ Sales & Related 8.8% ±2.4 pp1,033 ±279
↳ Office & Administrative Support 10.4% ±2.3 pp1,219 ±274
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 10.3% ±2.5 pp1,211 ±295
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.1% ±0.4 pp16 ±51
↳ Construction & Extraction 5.7% ±1.7 pp666 ±198
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 4.5% ±2.1 pp529 ±241
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 24.2% ±3.9 pp2,837 ±462
↳ Production Occupations 10.0% ±2.8 pp1,169 ±330
↳ Transportation Occupations 6.3% ±1.7 pp741 ±205
↳ Material Moving Occupations 7.9% ±2.1 pp927 ±246
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts 23.1%±3.2 pp2,709±376 49.2%±0.4 pp686,743±5,710 ▼ -26.1% 70/77
↳ Management Occupations 6.9%±1.8 pp815±206 12.3%±0.3 pp172,182±3,807 ▼ -5.4% 58/77
↳ Business & Financial Operations 4.1%±1.3 pp485±148 9.1%±0.2 pp127,081±3,358 ▼ -5.0% 58/77
↳ Computer & Mathematical 2.0%±1.0 pp231±121 4.9%±0.2 pp68,921±2,690 ▼ -3.0% 55/77
↳ Architecture & Engineering 1.3%±0.9 pp155±102 1.6%±0.1 pp22,779±1,380 ▼ -0.3% 33/77
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 0.4%±0.6 pp48±71 1.4%±0.1 pp19,126±1,340 ▼ -1.0% 54/77
↳ Community & Social Service 1.1%±0.7 pp127±81 1.9%±0.1 pp26,973±1,500 ▼ -0.9% 63/77
↳ Legal Occupations 0.5%±0.5 pp59±63 2.3%±0.1 pp31,629±1,814 ▼ -1.8% 57/77
↳ Education, Training & Library 1.8%±0.9 pp211±102 6.6%±0.2 pp92,316±2,697 ▼ -4.8% 77/77
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 1.6%±0.9 pp185±106 3.1%±0.1 pp43,879±1,786 ▼ -1.6% 44/77
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 2.1%±1.3 pp245±147 4.6%±0.2 pp63,551±2,652 ▼ -2.5% 55/77
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 1.3%±0.8 pp148±89 1.3%±0.1 pp18,306±1,387 ▼ -0.1% 45/77
Service 23.3%±3.3 pp2,732±382 16.9%±0.3 pp235,977±4,217 ▲ +6.4% 26/77
↳ Healthcare Support 4.4%±1.6 pp519±190 3.4%±0.2 pp46,792±2,107 ▲ +1.1% 30/77
↳ Protective Service 0.9%±0.6 pp102±66 2.8%±0.1 pp39,146±1,734 ▼ -1.9% 68/77
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 8.2%±1.9 pp961±225 5.1%±0.2 pp70,514±2,393 ▲ +3.1% 10/77
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 5.6%±1.9 pp660±221 3.0%±0.1 pp41,783±1,967 ▲ +2.6% 15/77
↳ Personal Care & Service 4.2%±1.5 pp490±175 2.7%±0.1 pp37,742±1,657 ▲ +1.5% 13/77
Sales & Office 19.2%±3.4 pp2,252±398 17.4%±0.3 pp243,580±4,754 ▲ +1.7% 31/77
↳ Sales & Related 8.8%±2.4 pp1,033±279 8.1%±0.2 pp113,073±3,174 ▲ +0.7% 24/77
↳ Office & Administrative Support 10.4%±2.3 pp1,219±274 9.3%±0.3 pp130,507±3,591 ▲ +1.0% 36/77
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 10.3%±2.5 pp1,211±295 4.6%±0.2 pp64,338±2,929 ▲ +5.7% 13/77
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.1%±0.4 pp16±51 0.1%±0.0 pp1,506±406 0% 23/77
↳ Construction & Extraction 5.7%±1.7 pp666±198 2.8%±0.1 pp39,432±2,062 ▲ +2.8% 16/77
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 4.5%±2.1 pp529±241 1.7%±0.1 pp23,400±1,722 ▲ +2.8% 7/77
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 24.2%±3.9 pp2,837±462 11.8%±0.3 pp165,261±3,629 ▲ +12.3% 8/77
↳ Production Occupations 10.0%±2.8 pp1,169±330 4.2%±0.2 pp57,989±2,275 ▲ +5.8% 6/77
↳ Transportation Occupations 6.3%±1.7 pp741±205 3.9%±0.2 pp54,099±2,118 ▲ +2.4% 24/77
↳ Material Moving Occupations 7.9%±2.1 pp927±246 3.8%±0.2 pp53,173±2,312 ▲ +4.1% 11/77
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category Hermosa
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.1% ±0.4 pp16 ±51
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.1% ±0.4 pp16 ±51
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0% ±0.4 pp0
Construction 5.8% ±1.6 pp676 ±187
Manufacturing 13.9% ±3.0 pp1,636 ±358
Wholesale Trade 1.4% ±0.8 pp160 ±90
Retail Trade 10.3% ±2.4 pp1,210 ±280
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 8.8% ±2.0 pp1,035 ±234
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 8.2% ±1.9 pp966 ±228
↳ Utilities 0.6% ±0.5 pp69 ±64
Information 0.8% ±0.6 pp92 ±72
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 6.3% ±1.7 pp737 ±201
↳ Finance & Insurance 4.5% ±1.5 pp527 ±179
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.8% ±0.9 pp210 ±104
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 13.9% ±2.2 pp1,629 ±261
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 6.5% ±1.6 pp758 ±193
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.2% ±0.4 pp22 ±52
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 7.2% ±1.9 pp849 ±229
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 17.1% ±2.7 pp2,009 ±319
↳ Educational Services 3.9% ±1.3 pp460 ±151
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 13.2% ±2.6 pp1,549 ±301
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 10.7% ±2.1 pp1,262 ±244
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 1.4% ±1.0 pp165 ±113
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 9.3% ±1.9 pp1,097 ±229
Other Services 8.1% ±2.3 pp949 ±267
Public Administration 2.8% ±1.0 pp330 ±122
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.1%±0.4 pp16±51 0.2%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.1% 40/77
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.1%±0.4 pp16±51 0.2%±0.0 pp— 0% 32/77
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%±0.4 pp0 0.0%±0.0 pp— 0% 18/77
Construction 5.8%±1.6 pp676±187 3.8%±0.2 pp— ▲ +2.0% 20/77
Manufacturing 13.9%±3.0 pp1,636±358 7.7%±0.2 pp— ▲ +6.3% 6/77
Wholesale Trade 1.4%±0.8 pp160±90 2.0%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.7% 52/77
Retail Trade 10.3%±2.4 pp1,210±280 8.2%±0.2 pp— ▲ +2.1% 24/77
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 8.8%±2.0 pp1,035±234 7.1%±0.2 pp— ▲ +1.7% 36/77
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 8.2%±1.9 pp966±228 6.5%±0.2 pp— ▲ +1.7% 38/77
↳ Utilities 0.6%±0.5 pp69±64 0.5%±0.1 pp— ▲ +0.1% 30/77
Information 0.8%±0.6 pp92±72 2.1%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.3% 62/77
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 6.3%±1.7 pp737±201 8.8%±0.2 pp— ▼ -2.5% 44/77
↳ Finance & Insurance 4.5%±1.5 pp527±179 6.7%±0.2 pp— ▼ -2.2% 45/77
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.8%±0.9 pp210±104 2.1%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.4% 39/77
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 13.9%±2.2 pp1,629±261 18.2%±0.4 pp— ▼ -4.3% 34/77
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 6.5%±1.6 pp758±193 13.4%±0.3 pp— ▼ -7.0% 41/77
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.2%±0.4 pp22±52 0.1%±0.0 pp— ▲ +0.1% 16/77
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 7.2%±1.9 pp849±229 4.6%±0.2 pp— ▲ +2.6% 17/77
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 17.1%±2.7 pp2,009±319 24.2%±0.4 pp— ▼ -7.0% 73/77
↳ Educational Services 3.9%±1.3 pp460±151 10.5%±0.2 pp— ▼ -6.6% 77/77
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 13.2%±2.6 pp1,549±301 13.7%±0.3 pp— ▼ -0.5% 44/77
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 10.7%±2.1 pp1,262±244 9.1%±0.2 pp— ▲ +1.6% 24/77
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 1.4%±1.0 pp165±113 2.2%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.8% 54/77
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 9.3%±1.9 pp1,097±229 6.9%±0.2 pp— ▲ +2.4% 19/77
Other Services 8.1%±2.3 pp949±267 4.6%±0.2 pp— ▲ +3.5% 4/77
Public Administration 2.8%±1.0 pp330±122 4.0%±0.2 pp— ▼ -1.2% 60/77
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category Hermosa
Private Company Employee 75.7% ±2.8 pp8,887 ±324
Self-Employed 9.9% ±2.2 pp1,162 ±256
Nonprofit 5.2% ±1.4 pp613 ±168
Government 8.9% ±1.9 pp1,050 ±221
Unpaid Family Worker 0.2% ±0.5 pp29 ±63
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Private Company Employee 75.7%±2.8 pp8,887±324 67.9%±0.4 pp947,845±5,822 ▲ +7.8% 3/77
Self-Employed 9.9%±2.2 pp1,162±256 8.3%±0.2 pp115,690±2,989 ▲ +1.6% 12/77
Nonprofit 5.2%±1.4 pp613±168 12.1%±0.3 pp169,124±4,035 ▼ -6.9% 76/77
Government 8.9%±1.9 pp1,050±221 12.9%±0.3 pp179,945±4,021 ▼ -3.9% 68/77
Unpaid Family Worker 0.2%±0.5 pp29±63 0.2%±0.0 pp2,312±408 ▲ +0.1% 20/77
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category Hermosa
Full-Time, Year-Round 69.4% ±3.0 pp8,642 ±376
Part-Time or Part-Year 30.6% ±3.5 pp3,816 ±442
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round 69.4%±3.0 pp8,642±376 67.0%±0.3 pp1,025,726±3,875 ▲ +2.3% 19/77
Part-Time or Part-Year 30.6%±3.5 pp3,816±442 33.0%±0.3 pp504,210±4,897 ▼ -2.3% 59/77
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category Hermosa
Average FT Earnings $56,315±$1,549
10th Percentile FT Earnings $26,763±$1,876
25th Percentile FT Earnings $34,215±$1,471
Median FT Earnings $45,411±$2,811
75th Percentile FT Earnings $68,244±$4,826
90th Percentile FT Earnings $98,842±$3,243
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Average FT Earnings $56,315±$1,549 $96,214±$968 ▼ −$39,900 60/76
10th Percentile FT Earnings $26,763±$1,876 $29,008±$387 ▼ −$2,245 42/77
25th Percentile FT Earnings $34,215±$1,471 $43,011±$345 ▼ −$8,796 53/77
Median FT Earnings $45,411±$2,811 $69,663±$530 ▼ −$24,251 67/77
75th Percentile FT Earnings $68,244±$4,826 Over $100,000 ▼ −$31,756+ 66/77
90th Percentile FT Earnings $98,842±$3,243 Over $100,000 ▼ −$1,158+ 66/77
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $44,401 ±1,410 $52,578 ±3,933 $56,315 ±1,549 ▲ +$11,913▲ +$3,737▲ +$8,177
Chicago citywide $83,170 ±714 $91,467 ±682 $96,214 ±968 ▲ +$13,044▲ +$4,747▲ +$8,297
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $33,509 ±1,064 $42,851 ±3,205 $56,315 ±1,549 ▲ +$22,806▲ +$13,464▲ +$9,342
Chicago citywide $62,767 ±539 $74,546 ±556 $96,214 ±968 ▲ +$33,447▲ +$21,669▲ +$11,778
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $18,561 ±1,785 $21,176 ±1,583 $26,763 ±1,876 ▲ +$8,203▲ +$5,587▲ +$2,616
Chicago citywide $24,209 ±243 $26,113 ±152 $29,008 ±387 ▲ +$4,799▲ +$2,895▲ +$1,904
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $14,008 ±1,347 $17,259 ±1,290 $26,763 ±1,876 ▲ +$12,756▲ +$9,505▲ +$3,251
Chicago citywide $18,270 ±183 $21,282 ±124 $29,008 ±387 ▲ +$10,738▲ +$7,726▲ +$3,012
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $26,837 ±1,634 $30,543 ±1,843 $34,215 ±1,471 ▲ +$7,378▲ +$3,672▲ +$3,706
Chicago citywide $37,393 ±278 $39,415 ±229 $43,011 ±345 ▲ +$5,618▲ +$3,597▲ +$2,021
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $20,254 ±1,233 $24,893 ±1,502 $34,215 ±1,471 ▲ +$13,962▲ +$9,323▲ +$4,639
Chicago citywide $28,220 ±210 $32,123 ±187 $43,011 ±345 ▲ +$14,791▲ +$10,888▲ +$3,903
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $38,616 ±1,991 $41,931 ±1,949 $45,411 ±2,811 ▲ +$6,795▲ +$3,480▲ +$3,315
Chicago citywide $60,575 ±496 $64,628 ±327 $69,663 ±530 ▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,034▲ +$4,054
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $29,143 ±1,503 $34,174 ±1,589 $45,411 ±2,811 ▲ +$16,268▲ +$11,237▲ +$5,031
Chicago citywide $45,715 ±374 $52,672 ±266 $69,663 ±530 ▲ +$23,948▲ +$16,991▲ +$6,957
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $52,809 ±3,132 $59,660 ±2,537 $68,244 ±4,826 ▲ +$15,435▲ +$8,584▲ +$6,851
Chicago citywide $98,274 ±615 $108,202 ±616 — ——▲ +$9,928
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $39,854 ±2,364 $48,623 ±2,067 $68,244 ±4,826 ▲ +$28,390▲ +$19,621▲ +$8,769
Chicago citywide $74,166 ±464 $88,185 ±502 — ——▲ +$14,019
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $80,548 ±7,951 $89,945 ±8,246 $98,842 ±3,243 ▲ +$18,294▲ +$8,897▲ +$9,398
Chicago citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $60,788 ±6,000 $73,306 ±6,720 $98,842 ±3,243 ▲ +$38,054▲ +$25,537▲ +$12,518
Chicago citywide — — — ———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category Hermosa
Average PT Earnings $25,718±$2,890
10th Percentile PT Earnings $1,770±$880
25th Percentile PT Earnings $10,214±$2,858
Median PT Earnings $21,906±$3,064
75th Percentile PT Earnings $32,814±$2,437
90th Percentile PT Earnings $49,729±$9,693
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Average PT Earnings $25,718±$2,890 $33,575±$750 ▼ −$7,858 42/76
10th Percentile PT Earnings $1,770±$880 $2,183±$87 ▼ −$413 56/77
25th Percentile PT Earnings $10,214±$2,858 $7,222±$206 ▲ +$2,992 11/77
Median PT Earnings $21,906±$3,064 $19,180±$393 ▲ +$2,726 15/77
75th Percentile PT Earnings $32,814±$2,437 $38,498±$681 ▼ −$5,684 41/77
90th Percentile PT Earnings $49,729±$9,693 $73,776±$1,391 ▼ −$24,048 54/77
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $18,425 ±1,657 $25,851 ±5,089 $25,718 ±2,890 ▲ +$7,293▼ −$133▲ +$7,426
Chicago citywide $27,076 ±473 $31,236 ±676 $33,575 ±750 ▲ +$6,500▲ +$2,340▲ +$4,160
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $13,905 ±1,250 $21,068 ±4,148 $25,718 ±2,890 ▲ +$11,813▲ +$4,649▲ +$7,163
Chicago citywide $20,433 ±357 $25,457 ±551 $33,575 ±750 ▲ +$13,142▲ +$8,118▲ +$5,024
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,281 ±609 $2,891 ±789 $1,770 ±880 ▼ −$511▼ −$1,121▲ +$610
Chicago citywide $2,230 ±48 $2,283 ±59 $2,183 ±87 ▼ −$47▼ −$100▲ +$53
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $1,722 ±459 $2,356 ±643 $1,770 ±880 ▲ +$49▼ −$586▲ +$635
Chicago citywide $1,683 ±36 $1,861 ±48 $2,183 ±87 ▲ +$500▲ +$322▲ +$178
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $6,569 ±1,249 $7,540 ±1,409 $10,214 ±2,858 ▲ +$3,645▲ +$2,674▲ +$971
Chicago citywide $6,390 ±123 $6,841 ±156 $7,222 ±206 ▲ +$832▲ +$381▲ +$451
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $4,957 ±942 $6,145 ±1,148 $10,214 ±2,858 ▲ +$5,257▲ +$4,069▲ +$1,188
Chicago citywide $4,822 ±93 $5,575 ±127 $7,222 ±206 ▲ +$2,399▲ +$1,646▲ +$753
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $14,946 ±1,332 $16,373 ±2,020 $21,906 ±3,064 ▲ +$6,960▲ +$5,533▲ +$1,427
Chicago citywide $15,461 ±166 $17,025 ±275 $19,180 ±393 ▲ +$3,719▲ +$2,155▲ +$1,563
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $11,280 ±1,005 $13,344 ±1,647 $21,906 ±3,064 ▲ +$10,626▲ +$8,562▲ +$2,064
Chicago citywide $11,668 ±125 $13,875 ±224 $19,180 ±393 ▲ +$7,512▲ +$5,305▲ +$2,207
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $23,626 ±2,866 $31,974 ±6,126 $32,814 ±2,437 ▲ +$9,188▲ +$840▲ +$8,348
Chicago citywide $30,795 ±619 $34,779 ±505 $38,498 ±681 ▲ +$7,703▲ +$3,719▲ +$3,984
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $17,830 ±2,163 $26,059 ±4,992 $32,814 ±2,437 ▲ +$14,984▲ +$6,755▲ +$8,228
Chicago citywide $23,241 ±468 $28,345 ±412 $38,498 ±681 ▲ +$15,257▲ +$10,153▲ +$5,104
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $40,890 ±4,105 $54,843 ±13,064 $49,729 ±9,693 ▲ +$8,839▼ −$5,114▲ +$13,953
Chicago citywide $61,207 ±1,249 $68,040 ±1,298 $73,776 ±1,391 ▲ +$12,570▲ +$5,737▲ +$6,833
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $30,859 ±3,098 $44,697 ±10,647 $49,729 ±9,693 ▲ +$18,870▲ +$5,032▲ +$13,838
Chicago citywide $46,192 ±942 $55,452 ±1,058 $73,776 ±1,391 ▲ +$27,585▲ +$18,324▲ +$9,261

Earnings of All Workers

Category Hermosa
Average Earnings $46,942±$1,236
10th Percentile Earnings $11,973±$3,118
25th Percentile Earnings $26,445±$1,865
Median Earnings $38,399±$1,870
75th Percentile Earnings $59,732±$3,564
90th Percentile Earnings $91,776±$4,961
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Average Earnings $46,942±$1,236 $75,571±$768 ▼ −$28,628 48/76
10th Percentile Earnings $11,973±$3,118 $8,529±$272 ▲ +$3,444 12/77
25th Percentile Earnings $26,445±$1,865 $25,183±$358 ▲ +$1,262 25/77
Median Earnings $38,399±$1,870 $51,367±$471 ▼ −$12,968 50/77
75th Percentile Earnings $59,732±$3,564 $93,324±$598 ▼ −$33,591 59/77
90th Percentile Earnings $91,776±$4,961 Over $100,000 ▼ −$8,224+ 63/77
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $33,726 ±1,075 $42,431 ±3,271 $46,942 ±1,236 ▲ +$13,216▲ +$4,511▲ +$8,705
Chicago citywide $62,453 ±534 $71,626 ±551 $75,571 ±768 ▲ +$13,118▲ +$3,945▲ +$9,173
Average Earnings (nominal dollars) $25,453 ±812 $34,582 ±2,666 $46,942 ±1,236 ▲ +$21,490▲ +$12,361▲ +$9,129
Chicago citywide $47,133 ±403 $58,375 ±449 $75,571 ±768 ▲ +$28,438▲ +$17,196▲ +$11,243
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $6,334 ±1,163 $7,685 ±1,426 $11,973 ±3,118 ▲ +$5,639▲ +$4,288▲ +$1,351
Chicago citywide $6,858 ±139 $8,358 ±164 $8,529 ±272 ▲ +$1,671▲ +$171▲ +$1,500
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $4,780 ±878 $6,263 ±1,162 $11,973 ±3,118 ▲ +$7,193▲ +$5,710▲ +$1,483
Chicago citywide $5,176 ±105 $6,812 ±134 $8,529 ±272 ▲ +$3,354▲ +$1,717▲ +$1,636
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $15,513 ±1,384 $19,042 ±1,224 $26,445 ±1,865 ▲ +$10,932▲ +$7,403▲ +$3,529
Chicago citywide $19,598 ±241 $23,173 ±290 $25,183 ±358 ▲ +$5,585▲ +$2,010▲ +$3,576
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $11,707 ±1,044 $15,519 ±998 $26,445 ±1,865 ▲ +$14,737▲ +$10,926▲ +$3,812
Chicago citywide $14,790 ±182 $18,886 ±236 $25,183 ±358 ▲ +$10,393▲ +$6,297▲ +$4,096
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $28,436 ±1,653 $34,415 ±1,866 $38,399 ±1,870 ▲ +$9,963▲ +$3,984▲ +$5,979
Chicago citywide $42,365 ±293 $47,195 ±370 $51,367 ±471 ▲ +$9,002▲ +$4,172▲ +$4,830
Median Earnings (nominal dollars) $21,460 ±1,248 $28,048 ±1,521 $38,399 ±1,870 ▲ +$16,939▲ +$10,351▲ +$6,588
Chicago citywide $31,972 ±221 $38,464 ±302 $51,367 ±471 ▲ +$19,395▲ +$12,903▲ +$6,492
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $44,470 ±1,512 $52,849 ±2,776 $59,732 ±3,564 ▲ +$15,263▲ +$6,883▲ +$8,380
Chicago citywide $78,784 ±555 $87,853 ±597 $93,324 ±598 ▲ +$14,540▲ +$5,471▲ +$9,069
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $33,560 ±1,141 $43,072 ±2,263 $59,732 ±3,564 ▲ +$26,172▲ +$16,660▲ +$9,512
Chicago citywide $59,457 ±418 $71,600 ±486 $93,324 ±598 ▲ +$33,867▲ +$21,723▲ +$12,144
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $65,998 ±5,295 $79,546 ±8,297 $91,776 ±4,961 ▲ +$25,778▲ +$12,229▲ +$13,548
Chicago citywide $128,659 ±682 — — ———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $49,808 ±3,996 $64,830 ±6,762 $91,776 ±4,961 ▲ +$41,968▲ +$26,945▲ +$15,023
Chicago citywide $97,097 ±515 — — ———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Hermosa, Chicago

Category Hermosa
Household income at age 35 $45,528 ±$940
Household income percentile rank 43.1 ±0.64 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 9.49% ±0.74 pp
Individual income at age 35 $36,288 ±$778
Fraction married 30.5% ±1.18 pp
Employment rate 77.3% ±1.08 pp
Incarceration rate 0.98% ±0.30 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Hermosa, Chicago. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Hermosa, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Hermosa City Difference
Household income at age 35 $45,528 ±$940 $43,090 ±$109 +$2,438
Household income percentile rank 43.1 ±0.64 pp 40.9 ±0.07 pp +2.2 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 9.49% ±0.74 pp 11.4% ±0.08 pp −1.9 pp
Individual income at age 35 $36,288 ±$778 $33,545 ±$85 +$2,744
Fraction married 30.5% ±1.18 pp 26.4% ±0.12 pp +4.1 pp
Employment rate 77.3% ±1.08 pp 74.4% ±0.12 pp +2.9 pp
Incarceration rate 0.98% ±0.30 pp 2.87% ±0.06 pp −1.9 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Hermosa, Chicago. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Hermosa, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Hermosa, Chicago in Lower-Income Families

Category Hermosa
Household income at age 35 $40,942 ±$1,307
Household income percentile rank 39.9 ±0.92 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 6.87% ±1.00 pp
Individual income at age 35 $32,986 ±$1,108
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Hermosa, Chicago with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Hermosa, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Hermosa City Difference
Household income at age 35 $40,942 ±$1,307 $34,712 ±$133 +$6,230
Household income percentile rank 39.9 ±0.92 pp 35.3 ±0.09 pp +4.6 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 6.87% ±1.00 pp 6.31% ±0.10 pp +0.6 pp
Individual income at age 35 $32,986 ±$1,108 $28,717 ±$114 +$4,270
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Hermosa, Chicago with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Hermosa, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Hermosa, Chicago

Category Hermosa
Stayed in the greater Chicago area 82.7% ±1.00 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 27.0% ±1.17 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Hermosa, Chicago. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Hermosa, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Hermosa City Difference
Stayed in the greater Chicago area 82.7% ±1.00 pp 78.1% ±0.12 pp +4.5 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 27.0% ±1.17 pp 22.9% ±0.12 pp +4.1 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Hermosa, Chicago. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Hermosa, Chicago · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Hermosa

Category Hermosa
All jobs located in hermosa 4,115
Hermosa jobs held by Hermosa residents 5.7%
Hermosa jobs held by non-Hermosa residents 94.3%
Employed residents working in Hermosa 2.6%
Employed residents working outside Hermosa 97.4%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Hermosa Chicago neighborhood median Difference Rank
All jobs located in hermosa 4,115 5,320 ▼ −1,205 46/77
Hermosa jobs held by Hermosa residents 5.7% 5.8% ▼ −0.0 pp 40/77
Hermosa jobs held by non-Hermosa residents 94.3% 94.2% ▲ +0.0 pp 38/77
Employed residents working in Hermosa 2.6% 2.6% ▲ +0.0 pp 38/77
Employed residents working outside Hermosa 97.4% 97.4% ▼ −0.0 pp 40/77
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in hermosa 3,726 4,136 4,115 ▲ +389▼ −21▲ +410
Chicago citywide 5,236 5,698 5,320 ▲ +84▼ −378▲ +462
Hermosa jobs held by Hermosa residents 5.4%192 5.2%204 5.7%222 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +30▲ +0.5 pp▲ +18▼ −0.2 pp▲ +12
Chicago citywide 5.5%246 5.6%306 5.8%279 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +33▲ +0.1 pp▼ −27▲ +0.2 pp▲ +60
Hermosa jobs held by non-Hermosa residents 94.6%3,372 94.8%3,712 94.3%3,658 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +286▼ −0.5 pp▼ −54▲ +0.2 pp▲ +340
Chicago citywide 94.5%4,320 94.4%4,646 94.2%4,657 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +337▼ −0.1 pp▲ +11▼ −0.2 pp▲ +326
Employed residents working in Hermosa 2.4%192 2.5%204 2.6%222 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +30▲ +0.1 pp▲ +18– 0.0 pp▲ +12
Chicago citywide 2.5%246 2.7%306 2.6%279 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +33▼ −0.1 pp▼ −27▲ +0.1 pp▲ +60
Employed residents working outside Hermosa 97.6%7,727 97.5%8,064 97.4%8,264 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +537▼ −0.1 pp▲ +200– 0.0 pp▲ +337
Chicago citywide 97.5%9,791 97.3%10,346 97.4%10,385 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +594▲ +0.1 pp▲ +39▼ −0.1 pp▲ +555

Industry of Jobs in Hermosa

Category Hermosa
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0
Construction 10.1%416
Manufacturing 53.8%2,214
Wholesale Trade 3.2%133
Retail Trade 4.7%192
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 5.7%235
↳ Utilities 0.0%0
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 5.7%235
Information 4.2%171
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 2.1%86
↳ Finance & Insurance 0.7%29
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.4%57
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 3.6%148
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 1.3%54
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%0
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 2.3%94
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 3.7%151
↳ Educational Services 0.0%2
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 3.6%149
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 6.5%267
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 1.2%49
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 5.3%218
Other Services 2.5%102
Public Administration 0.0%0
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%0 0.0%423 0% 25/77
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0 0.0%36 0% 9/77
Construction 10.1%416 1.9%27,207 ▲ +8.3% 4/77
Manufacturing 53.8%2,214 4.4%64,747 ▲ +49.4% 2/77
Wholesale Trade 3.2%133 2.8%41,460 ▲ +0.4% 32/77
Retail Trade 4.7%192 6.6%96,413 ▼ -1.9% 67/77
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 5.7%235 6.0%87,817 ▼ -0.3% 21/77
↳ Utilities 0.0%0 0.3%5,012 ▼ -0.3% 21/77
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 5.7%235 5.7%82,805 ▲ +0.1% 19/77
Information 4.2%171 3.5%51,095 ▲ +0.7% 5/77
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 2.1%86 10.8%157,520 ▼ -8.7% 63/77
↳ Finance & Insurance 0.7%29 8.6%125,824 ▼ -7.9% 65/77
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.4%57 2.2%31,696 ▼ -0.8% 45/77
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 3.6%148 23.2%339,220 ▼ -19.6% 65/77
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 1.3%54 14.2%207,444 ▼ -12.9% 60/77
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%0 1.2%16,872 ▼ -1.2% 36/77
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 2.3%94 7.9%114,904 ▼ -5.6% 57/77
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 3.7%151 23.0%336,089 ▼ -19.3% 74/77
↳ Educational Services 0.0%2 9.2%134,671 ▼ -9.2% 74/77
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 3.6%149 13.8%201,418 ▼ -10.1% 70/77
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 6.5%267 10.3%151,055 ▼ -3.8% 58/77
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 1.2%49 1.9%27,339 ▼ -0.7% 24/77
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 5.3%218 8.5%123,716 ▼ -3.2% 59/77
Other Services 2.5%102 4.0%59,136 ▼ -1.6% 66/77
Public Administration 0.0%0 3.5%51,418 ▼ -3.5% 19/77
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%1 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp▼ −1– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▼ −1
Chicago citywide 0.0%181 0.0%569 0.0%423 – 0.0 pp▲ +242– 0.0 pp▼ −146– 0.0 pp▲ +388
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 0.0%140 0.0%374 0.0%36 – 0.0 pp▼ −104– 0.0 pp▼ −338– 0.0 pp▲ +234
Construction 3.1%114 10.4%430 10.1%416 ▲ +7.0 pp▲ +302▼ −0.3 pp▼ −14▲ +7.3 pp▲ +316
Chicago citywide 1.6%20,789 1.8%26,012 1.9%27,207 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,418– 0.0 pp▲ +1,195▲ +0.3 pp▲ +5,223
Manufacturing 70.6%2,629 59.6%2,465 53.8%2,214 ▼ −16.8 pp▼ −415▼ −5.8 pp▼ −251▼ −11.0 pp▼ −164
Chicago citywide 4.6%61,066 4.5%63,597 4.4%64,747 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,681▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,150▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,531
Wholesale Trade 3.1%115 3.7%155 3.2%133 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +18▼ −0.5 pp▼ −22▲ +0.7 pp▲ +40
Chicago citywide 3.0%39,431 2.9%41,789 2.8%41,460 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,029▼ −0.1 pp▼ −329▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,358
Retail Trade 6.7%248 4.6%192 4.7%192 ▼ −2.0 pp▼ −56– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −2.0 pp▼ −56
Chicago citywide 7.4%97,262 6.9%97,836 6.6%96,413 ▼ −0.8 pp▼ −849▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,423▼ −0.5 pp▲ +574
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 0.6%24 0.9%36 5.7%235 ▲ +5.1 pp▲ +211▲ +4.8 pp▲ +199▲ +0.2 pp▲ +12
Chicago citywide 5.4%71,320 5.6%79,303 6.0%87,817 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +16,497▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,514▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,983
Utilities 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 0.3%4,383 0.3%4,956 0.3%5,012 – 0.0 pp▲ +629– 0.0 pp▲ +56– 0.0 pp▲ +573
Transportation & Warehousing 0.6%24 0.9%36 5.7%235 ▲ +5.1 pp▲ +211▲ +4.8 pp▲ +199▲ +0.2 pp▲ +12
Chicago citywide 5.1%66,937 5.2%74,347 5.7%82,805 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +15,868▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,458▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,410
Information 0.1%3 3.1%129 4.2%171 ▲ +4.1 pp▲ +168▲ +1.0 pp▲ +42▲ +3.0 pp▲ +126
Chicago citywide 3.1%40,514 3.4%48,135 3.5%51,095 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +10,581▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,960▲ +0.3 pp▲ +7,621
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 1.8%68 1.9%78 2.1%86 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +18▲ +0.2 pp▲ +8▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10
Chicago citywide 10.5%138,287 10.6%150,163 10.8%157,520 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +19,233▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,357▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,876
Finance & Insurance 0.5%20 0.6%24 0.7%29 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +9▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5– 0.0 pp▲ +4
Chicago citywide 8.5%111,307 8.4%119,147 8.6%125,824 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14,517▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,677▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7,840
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.3%48 1.3%54 1.4%57 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +9▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3– 0.0 pp▲ +6
Chicago citywide 2.1%26,980 2.2%31,016 2.2%31,696 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,716– 0.0 pp▲ +680▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,036
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 1.8%68 4.7%193 3.6%148 ▲ +1.8 pp▲ +80▼ −1.1 pp▼ −45▲ +2.8 pp▲ +125
Chicago citywide 21.2%278,928 22.6%319,744 23.2%339,220 ▲ +2.0 pp▲ +60,292▲ +0.6 pp▲ +19,476▲ +1.3 pp▲ +40,816
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 0.9%33 0.5%21 1.3%54 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +21▲ +0.8 pp▲ +33▼ −0.4 pp▼ −12
Chicago citywide 11.8%155,200 12.9%182,462 14.2%207,444 ▲ +2.4 pp▲ +52,244▲ +1.3 pp▲ +24,982▲ +1.1 pp▲ +27,262
Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 1.0%13,619 1.2%16,600 1.2%16,872 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,253– 0.0 pp▲ +272▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,981
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 0.9%35 4.2%172 2.3%94 ▲ +1.3 pp▲ +59▼ −1.9 pp▼ −78▲ +3.2 pp▲ +137
Chicago citywide 8.4%110,109 8.5%120,682 7.9%114,904 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +4,795▼ −0.7 pp▼ −5,778▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,573
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 4.7%174 3.3%138 3.7%151 ▼ −1.0 pp▼ −23▲ +0.3 pp▲ +13▼ −1.3 pp▼ −36
Chicago citywide 23.5%308,633 22.1%313,540 23.0%336,089 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +27,456▲ +0.8 pp▲ +22,549▼ −1.4 pp▲ +4,907
Educational Services 0.4%14 0.1%5 0.0%2 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −12▼ −0.1 pp▼ −3▼ −0.3 pp▼ −9
Chicago citywide 10.1%132,909 9.0%128,169 9.2%134,671 ▼ −0.9 pp▲ +1,762▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,502▼ −1.1 pp▼ −4,740
Health Care & Social Assistance 4.3%160 3.2%133 3.6%149 ▼ −0.7 pp▼ −11▲ +0.4 pp▲ +16▼ −1.1 pp▼ −27
Chicago citywide 13.4%175,724 13.1%185,371 13.8%201,418 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +25,694▲ +0.7 pp▲ +16,047▼ −0.3 pp▲ +9,647
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 4.8%178 5.1%213 6.5%267 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +89▲ +1.3 pp▲ +54▲ +0.4 pp▲ +35
Chicago citywide 10.9%143,753 11.5%162,749 10.3%151,055 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,302▼ −1.2 pp▼ −11,694▲ +0.5 pp▲ +18,996
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 1.7%64 0.1%3 1.2%49 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −15▲ +1.1 pp▲ +46▼ −1.6 pp▼ −61
Chicago citywide 1.7%22,179 2.1%30,178 1.9%27,339 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +5,160▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,839▲ +0.4 pp▲ +7,999
Accommodation & Food Services 3.1%114 5.1%210 5.3%218 ▲ +2.2 pp▲ +104▲ +0.2 pp▲ +8▲ +2.0 pp▲ +96
Chicago citywide 9.3%121,574 9.4%132,571 8.5%123,716 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +2,142▼ −0.9 pp▼ −8,855▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,997
Other Services 2.7%102 2.6%107 2.5%102 ▼ −0.3 pp– 0▼ −0.1 pp▼ −5▼ −0.2 pp▲ +5
Chicago citywide 4.5%59,098 4.4%61,698 4.0%59,136 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +38▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,562▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,600
Public Administration 0.1%2 0.0%0 0.0%0 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2
Chicago citywide 4.2%54,814 3.6%51,684 3.5%51,418 ▼ −0.7 pp▼ −3,396▼ −0.1 pp▼ −266▼ −0.5 pp▼ −3,130

Earnings of Jobs in Hermosa

Category Hermosa
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 10.5%431
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 25.3%1,042
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 64.2%2,642
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 10.5%431 12.7%185,293 ▼ -2.2% 67/77
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 25.3%1,042 20.5%299,468 ▲ +4.9% 67/77
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 64.2%2,642 66.9%978,839 ▼ -2.7% 11/77
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 13.3%494 12.3%510 10.5%431 ▼ −2.8 pp▼ −63▼ −1.9 pp▼ −79▼ −0.9 pp▲ +16
Chicago citywide 21.3%280,137 16.8%238,135 12.7%185,293 ▼ −8.7 pp▼ −94,844▼ −4.1 pp▼ −52,842▼ −4.5 pp▼ −42,002
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 38.5%1,433 31.4%1,300 25.3%1,042 ▼ −13.1 pp▼ −391▼ −6.1 pp▼ −258▼ −7.0 pp▼ −133
Chicago citywide 30.7%403,220 26.7%378,530 20.5%299,468 ▼ −10.2 pp▼ −103,752▼ −6.3 pp▼ −79,062▼ −4.0 pp▼ −24,690
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 48.3%1,799 56.2%2,326 64.2%2,642 ▲ +15.9 pp▲ +843▲ +8.0 pp▲ +316▲ +8.0 pp▲ +527
Chicago citywide 48.0%630,719 56.5%800,154 66.9%978,839 ▲ +18.9 pp▲ +348,120▲ +10.4 pp▲ +178,685▲ +8.5 pp▲ +169,435

Jobs in Hermosa by Firm Age

Category Hermosa
Firm age: 0–1 years 1.0%43
Firm age: 2–3 years 5.3%216
Firm age: 4–5 years 4.4%179
Firm age: 6–10 years 8.5%348
Firm age: 11 or more years 80.9%3,328
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years 1.0%43 2.8%37,293 ▼ -1.8% 72/77
Firm age: 2–3 years 5.3%216 2.8%37,154 ▲ +2.4% 16/77
Firm age: 4–5 years 4.4%179 3.2%41,869 ▲ +1.2% 24/77
Firm age: 6–10 years 8.5%348 7.8%102,353 ▲ +0.7% 39/77
Firm age: 11 or more years 80.9%3,328 83.4%1,098,220 ▼ -2.5% 36/77
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years 2.0%76 2.0%82 1.0%43 ▼ −1.0 pp▼ −33▼ −0.9 pp▼ −39▼ −0.1 pp▲ +6
Chicago citywide 2.9%33,224 2.6%33,244 2.8%37,293 – 0.0 pp▲ +4,069▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,049▼ −0.2 pp▲ +20
Firm age: 2–3 years 2.8%104 2.9%118 5.3%216 ▲ +2.5 pp▲ +112▲ +2.4 pp▲ +98▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14
Chicago citywide 4.0%46,935 3.3%42,284 2.8%37,154 ▼ −1.2 pp▼ −9,781▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,130▼ −0.7 pp▼ −4,651
Firm age: 4–5 years 2.2%81 3.5%146 4.4%179 ▲ +2.2 pp▲ +98▲ +0.8 pp▲ +33▲ +1.4 pp▲ +65
Chicago citywide 3.7%42,688 3.6%46,058 3.2%41,869 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −819▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,189▼ −0.1 pp▲ +3,370
Firm age: 6–10 years 5.1%189 5.6%230 8.5%348 ▲ +3.4 pp▲ +159▲ +2.9 pp▲ +118▲ +0.5 pp▲ +41
Chicago citywide 8.2%94,955 8.6%109,934 7.8%102,353 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +7,398▼ −0.9 pp▼ −7,581▲ +0.5 pp▲ +14,979
Firm age: 11 or more years 87.9%3,274 86.1%3,560 80.9%3,328 ▼ −7.0 pp▲ +54▼ −5.2 pp▼ −232▼ −1.8 pp▲ +286
Chicago citywide 81.3%946,801 81.8%1,043,037 83.4%1,098,220 ▲ +2.1 pp▲ +151,419▲ +1.6 pp▲ +55,183▲ +0.5 pp▲ +96,236

Jobs in Hermosa by Firm Size

Category Hermosa
Firm size: 0–19 employees 22.3%917
Firm size: 20–49 employees 15.0%618
Firm size: 50–249 employees 22.2%915
Firm size: 250–499 employees 0.5%19
Firm size: 500 or more employees 40.0%1,645
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees 22.3%917 12.8%168,975 ▲ +9.5% 44/77
Firm size: 20–49 employees 15.0%618 7.3%96,404 ▲ +7.7% 11/77
Firm size: 50–249 employees 22.2%915 13.8%181,123 ▲ +8.5% 17/77
Firm size: 250–499 employees 0.5%19 5.7%74,787 ▼ -5.2% 69/77
Firm size: 500 or more employees 40.0%1,645 60.4%795,600 ▼ -20.4% 44/77
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees 19.6%729 19.6%812 22.3%917 ▲ +2.7 pp▲ +188▲ +2.7 pp▲ +105▲ +0.1 pp▲ +83
Chicago citywide 13.9%162,248 13.3%169,949 12.8%168,975 ▼ −1.1 pp▲ +6,727▼ −0.5 pp▼ −974▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,701
Firm size: 20–49 employees 11.7%435 11.8%488 15.0%618 ▲ +3.3 pp▲ +183▲ +3.2 pp▲ +130▲ +0.1 pp▲ +53
Chicago citywide 8.4%97,503 8.2%103,945 7.3%96,404 ▼ −1.1 pp▼ −1,099▼ −0.8 pp▼ −7,541▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,442
Firm size: 50–249 employees 13.5%501 17.0%704 22.2%915 ▲ +8.8 pp▲ +414▲ +5.2 pp▲ +211▲ +3.6 pp▲ +203
Chicago citywide 15.7%183,275 14.9%189,930 13.8%181,123 ▼ −2.0 pp▼ −2,152▼ −1.1 pp▼ −8,807▼ −0.8 pp▲ +6,655
Firm size: 250–499 employees 10.2%381 7.8%323 0.5%19 ▼ −9.8 pp▼ −362▼ −7.3 pp▼ −304▼ −2.4 pp▼ −58
Chicago citywide 6.3%72,992 5.9%74,603 5.7%74,787 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,795▼ −0.2 pp▲ +184▼ −0.4 pp▲ +1,611
Firm size: 500 or more employees 45.1%1,678 43.7%1,809 40.0%1,645 ▼ −5.1 pp▼ −33▼ −3.8 pp▼ −164▼ −1.3 pp▲ +131
Chicago citywide 55.7%648,585 57.8%736,130 60.4%795,600 ▲ +4.7 pp▲ +147,015▲ +2.7 pp▲ +59,470▲ +2.1 pp▲ +87,545

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Hermosa
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 18.7% ±2.3 pp18.7%±2.3 pp4,230 ±514
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 96.0% ±2.8 pp18.0%±0.5 pp4,060 ±117
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 4.0% ±2.8 pp0.8%±0.5 pp170 ±117
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 18.7%±2.3 pp18.7%±2.3 pp4,230±514 13.5%±0.2 pp13.5%±0.2 pp365,577±5,480 ▲ +5.3%▲ +5.3% 13/77
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 96.0%±2.8 pp18.0%±0.5 pp4,060±117 83.0%±0.5 pp11.2%±0.1 pp303,520±1,897 ▲ +13.0%▲ +6.8% 2/776/77
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 4.0%±2.8 pp0.8%±0.5 pp170±117 17.0%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.1 pp62,057±2,247 ▼ -13.0%▼ -1.5% 76/7774/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Hermosa
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 6.1% ±1.4 pp6.1%±1.4 pp1,366 ±316
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 76.3% ±12.6 pp4.6%±0.8 pp1,042 ±172
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 23.7% ±7.4 pp1.4%±0.4 pp324 ±101
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 81.3% ±3.9 pp4.9%±0.2 pp1,111 ±53
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 18.7% ±12.7 pp1.1%±0.8 pp255 ±173
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 6.1%±1.4 pp6.1%±1.4 pp1,366±316 7.4%±0.1 pp7.4%±0.1 pp201,851±4,036 ▼ -1.4%▼ -1.4% 36/77
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 76.3%±12.6 pp4.6%±0.8 pp1,042±172 52.4%±0.7 pp3.9%±0.1 pp105,720±1,511 ▲ +23.9%▲ +0.7% 16/7713/77
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 23.7%±7.4 pp1.4%±0.4 pp324±101 47.6%±1.2 pp3.5%±0.1 pp96,131±2,437 ▼ -23.9%▼ -2.1% 62/7757/77
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 81.3%±3.9 pp4.9%±0.2 pp1,111±53 67.0%±1.0 pp5.0%±0.1 pp135,301±1,945 ▲ +14.3%▼ -0.1% 21/7725/77
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 18.7%±12.7 pp1.1%±0.8 pp255±173 33.0%±1.2 pp2.5%±0.1 pp66,550±2,459 ▼ -14.3%▼ -1.3% 57/7747/77
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category Hermosa
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 7.8% ±3.5 pp362 ±163
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 6.4% ±6.5 pp88 ±88
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 7.8%±3.5 pp362±163 5.9%±0.5 pp— ▲ +2.0% 20/77
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 6.4%±6.5 pp88±88 5.4%±0.6 pp— ▲ +1.0% 22/77
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category Hermosa
Owner-Occupied Households 48.4% ±4.7 pp3,638 ±354
Renter-Occupied Households 51.6% ±4.7 pp3,879 ±351
Owner-Occupied Residents 52.0% ±5.6 pp11,730 ±1,262
Renter-Occupied Residents 48.0% ±4.6 pp10,812 ±1,031
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Owner-Occupied Households 48.4%±4.7 pp3,638±354 46.0%±0.4 pp534,012±4,939 ▲ +2.4% 39/77
Renter-Occupied Households 51.6%±4.7 pp3,879±351 54.0%±0.4 pp626,193±5,183 ▼ -2.4% 39/77
Owner-Occupied Residents 52.0%±5.6 pp11,730±1,262 51.8%±0.5 pp1,377,219±13,574 ▲ +0.2% 40/77
Renter-Occupied Residents 48.0%±4.6 pp10,812±1,031 48.2%±0.5 pp1,280,665±13,500 ▼ -0.2% 38/77
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category Hermosa
Median Year Moved In 2013±1.2 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later 3.2% ±1.9 pp239 ±143
Moved in 2020 to 2022 19.8% ±3.3 pp1,485 ±245
Moved in 2010 to 2019 36.8% ±4.9 pp2,768 ±368
Moved in 2000 to 2009 20.9% ±4.8 pp1,569 ±358
Moved in 1990 to 1999 11.5% ±2.7 pp864 ±204
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 7.9% ±2.5 pp592 ±185
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Median Year Moved In 2013±1.2 yr 2015±1.0 yr ▼ −2 33/77
Moved in 2023 or Later 3.2%±1.9 pp239±143 5.9%±0.2 pp68,884±2,742 ▼ -2.8% 48/77
Moved in 2020 to 2022 19.8%±3.3 pp1,485±245 24.1%±0.4 pp279,417±5,059 ▼ -4.3% 31/77
Moved in 2010 to 2019 36.8%±4.9 pp2,768±368 39.2%±0.5 pp455,125±5,772 ▼ -2.4% 48/77
Moved in 2000 to 2009 20.9%±4.8 pp1,569±358 13.8%±0.3 pp160,353±3,324 ▲ +7.1% 15/77
Moved in 1990 to 1999 11.5%±2.7 pp864±204 8.2%±0.2 pp95,243±2,390 ▲ +3.3% 23/77
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 7.9%±2.5 pp592±185 8.7%±0.2 pp101,183±2,362 ▼ -0.8% 47/77
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show
Category Hermosa
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 9.9% ±2.6 pp9.9%±2.6 pp2,202 ±586
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers) 5.1% ±1.7 pp52.0%±11.0 pp1,145 ±389
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers) 1.1% ±1.1 pp11.5%±10.5 pp253 ±241
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 1.8% ±1.2 pp18.1%±10.7 pp399 ±258
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 1.8% ±1.3 pp18.4%±12.2 pp405 ±290
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 9.9%±2.6 pp9.9%±2.6 pp2,202±586 14.0%±0.3 pp14.0%±0.3 pp375,475±8,289 ▼ -4.1%▼ -4.1% 39/77
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers) 5.1%±1.7 pp52.0%±11.0 pp1,145±389 9.8%±0.3 pp69.9%±1.0 pp262,365±6,953 ▼ -4.6%▼ -17.9% 59/7775/77
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers) 1.1%±1.1 pp11.5%±10.5 pp253±241 0.8%±0.1 pp5.5%±0.4 pp20,552±1,626 ▲ +0.4%▲ +6.0% 14/777/77
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 1.8%±1.2 pp18.1%±10.7 pp399±258 2.5%±0.1 pp17.6%±0.7 pp65,936±2,918 ▼ -0.7%▲ +0.6% 22/7720/77
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 1.8%±1.3 pp18.4%±12.2 pp405±290 1.0%±0.1 pp7.1%±0.8 pp26,622±3,040 ▲ +0.8%▲ +11.3% 11/776/77
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show
Category Hermosa
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 7.4% ±2.2 pp7.4%±2.2 pp603 ±177
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 0.3% ±0.6 pp3.8%±7.7 pp23 ±47
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.7% ±0.7 pp9.8%±8.5 pp59 ±54
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.6% ±0.9 pp7.8%±12.4 pp47 ±76
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 5.8% ±2.3 pp78.6%±20.0 pp474 ±184
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 0.6% ±1.2 pp0.6%±1.2 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 1.6% ±1.5 pp1.6%±1.5 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 7.4%±2.2 pp7.4%±2.2 pp603±177 9.1%±0.2 pp9.1%±0.2 pp116,849±2,682 ▼ -1.7%▼ -1.7% 46/77
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 0.3%±0.6 pp3.8%±7.7 pp23±47 2.5%±0.1 pp27.1%±1.4 pp31,723±1,796 ▼ -2.2%▼ -23.3% 73/7773/77
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.7%±0.7 pp9.8%±8.5 pp59±54 0.6%±0.1 pp6.0%±0.7 pp7,037±795 ▲ +0.2%▲ +3.8% 24/7719/77
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.6%±0.9 pp7.8%±12.4 pp47±76 0.2%±0.0 pp2.4%±0.5 pp2,831±587 ▲ +0.4%▲ +5.4% 8/778/77
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 5.8%±2.3 pp78.6%±20.0 pp474±184 5.9%±0.3 pp64.4%±2.5 pp75,258±3,387 ▼ -0.1%▲ +14.2% 30/7717/77
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 0.6%±1.2 pp0.6%±1.2 pp— 4.8%±0.3 pp4.8%±0.3 pp— ▼ -4.2%▼ -4.2% 75/77
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 1.6%±1.5 pp1.6%±1.5 pp— 1.3%±0.1 pp1.3%±0.1 pp— ▲ +0.3%▲ +0.3% 22/77
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category Hermosa
Median Year Built 1938±0 yr
Pre-1940 72.1% ±2.4 pp5,857 ±194
1940-2009 26.9% ±5.0 pp2,188 ±404
2010+ 0.9% ±0.8 pp75 ±69
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Median Year Built 1938±0 yr 1953±1 yr ▼ −15 yrs 76/77
Pre-1940 72.1%±2.4 pp5,857±194 38.8%±0.4 pp495,715±4,678 ▲ +33.3% 1/77
1940-2009 26.9%±5.0 pp2,188±404 54.9%±0.6 pp700,698±7,435 ▼ -27.9% 77/77
2010+ 0.9%±0.8 pp75±69 6.3%±0.2 pp80,641±2,725 ▼ -5.4% 68/77
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category Hermosa
Population Density 19,319 /sq mi±1,392/sq mi
Single-Family Homes 31.4% ±3.7 pp2,546 ±297
Buildings With 2–4 Units 53.4% ±5.4 pp4,333 ±440
Buildings With 5–19 Units 13.4% ±3.6 pp1,088 ±291
Buildings With 20 or More Units 1.6% ±1.1 pp133 ±92
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Population Density 19,319 /sq mi±1,392/sq mi 11,748 /sq mi±26/sq mi ▲ +7,571 /sq mi 11/77
Single-Family Homes 31.4%±3.7 pp2,546±297 29.2%±0.3 pp372,679±3,989 ▲ +2.2% 41/77
Buildings With 2–4 Units 53.4%±5.4 pp4,333±440 27.4%±0.4 pp349,976±4,957 ▲ +26.0% 9/77
Buildings With 5–19 Units 13.4%±3.6 pp1,088±291 16.2%±0.3 pp206,420±4,124 ▼ -2.8% 36/77
Buildings With 20 or More Units 1.6%±1.1 pp133±92 27.0%±0.3 pp344,543±4,438 ▼ -25.3% 69/77
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category Hermosa
Studio 3.5% ±1.8 pp284 ±148
1 Bedroom 13.5% ±3.1 pp1,095 ±250
2 Bedrooms 40.5% ±4.3 pp3,290 ±352
3 Bedrooms 23.3% ±3.6 pp1,890 ±290
4 Bedrooms 10.5% ±2.3 pp849 ±184
5 or More Bedrooms 8.8% ±3.1 pp712 ±250
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Studio 3.5%±1.8 pp284±148 7.5%±0.3 pp95,749±3,205 ▼ -4.0% 37/77
1 Bedroom 13.5%±3.1 pp1,095±250 20.1%±0.4 pp257,271±4,939 ▼ -6.7% 42/77
2 Bedrooms 40.5%±4.3 pp3,290±352 33.1%±0.3 pp422,866±4,221 ▲ +7.4% 9/77
3 Bedrooms 23.3%±3.6 pp1,890±290 26.1%±0.3 pp333,682±4,061 ▼ -2.9% 61/77
4 Bedrooms 10.5%±2.3 pp849±184 9.0%±0.2 pp115,453±2,426 ▲ +1.4% 34/77
5 or More Bedrooms 8.8%±3.1 pp712±250 4.1%±0.2 pp52,033±2,072 ▲ +4.7% 10/77
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show
Category Hermosa
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 7.3% ±2.5 pp7.3%±2.5 pp550 ±186
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 4.4% ±1.7 pp59.6%±10.1 pp328 ±124
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 3.0% ±1.9 pp40.4%±21.6 pp222 ±140
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 7.3%±2.5 pp7.3%±2.5 pp550±186 3.4%±0.2 pp3.4%±0.2 pp39,979±1,996 ▲ +3.9%▲ +3.9% 10/77
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 4.4%±1.7 pp59.6%±10.1 pp328±124 2.0%±0.1 pp58.2%±2.3 pp23,276±1,493 ▲ +2.4%▲ +1.4% 15/7745/76
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 3.0%±1.9 pp40.4%±21.6 pp222±140 1.4%±0.1 pp41.8%±2.6 pp16,703±1,328 ▲ +1.5%▼ -1.4% 6/7732/76
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category Hermosa
Natural Gas Heat 86.4% ±2.8 pp6,497 ±212
Electric Heat 7.9% ±2.3 pp596 ±176
Other Heating Source 5.6% ±2.7 pp424 ±200
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Natural Gas Heat 86.4%±2.8 pp6,497±212 77.5%±0.3 pp899,660±3,501 ▲ +8.9% 38/77
Electric Heat 7.9%±2.3 pp596±176 18.0%±0.3 pp208,937±3,864 ▼ -10.1% 53/77
Other Heating Source 5.6%±2.7 pp424±200 4.4%±0.2 pp51,603±2,173 ▲ +1.2% 19/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show
Category Hermosa
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 38.2% ±4.3 pp2,873 ±322
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 22.4% ±3.7 pp1,684 ±280
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 39.4% ±4.9 pp2,960 ±369
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 20.0% ±3.3 pp1,506 ±250
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 38.2%±4.3 pp2,873±322 24.9%±0.5 pp289,047±6,215 ▲ +13.3% 42/77
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 22.4%±3.7 pp1,684±280 23.8%±0.5 pp276,514±5,809 ▼ -1.4% 29/77
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 39.4%±4.9 pp2,960±369 45.6%±0.6 pp529,378±6,577 ▼ -6.3% 38/77
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 20.0%±3.3 pp1,506±250 24.0%±0.5 pp278,684±5,306 ▼ -4.0% 37/77
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category Hermosa
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $700±$101
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,019±$56
Median Monthly Housing Costs $1,388±$59
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,998±$108
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $2,497±$144
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $700±$101 $594±$11 ▲ +$106 21/77
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,019±$56 $1,011±$8 ▲ +$8 23/77
Median Monthly Housing Costs $1,388±$59 $1,560±$10 ▼ −$172 35/77
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,998±$108 $2,329±$13 ▼ −$331 31/77
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $2,497±$144 Over $3,000 ▼ −$503+ 36/77
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $800 ±62 $738 ±44 $700 ±101 ▼ −$101▼ −$39▼ −$62
Chicago citywide $609 ±7 $606 ±7 $594 ±11 ▼ −$15▼ −$12▼ −$2
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $604 ±47 $602 ±36 $700 ±101 ▲ +$96▲ +$98▼ −$2
Chicago citywide $459 ±6 $494 ±6 $594 ±11 ▲ +$135▲ +$100▲ +$35
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,050 ±35 $974 ±43 $1,019 ±56 ▼ −$32▲ +$45▼ −$77
Chicago citywide $992 ±5 $1,001 ±5 $1,011 ±8 ▲ +$19▲ +$10▲ +$9
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $793 ±26 $794 ±35 $1,019 ±56 ▲ +$226▲ +$225▲ +$1
Chicago citywide $748 ±3 $816 ±4 $1,011 ±8 ▲ +$262▲ +$195▲ +$67
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,316 ±62 $1,359 ±71 $1,388 ±59 ▲ +$72▲ +$29▲ +$43
Chicago citywide $1,493 ±8 $1,523 ±6 $1,560 ±10 ▲ +$67▲ +$37▲ +$29
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $993 ±46 $1,108 ±58 $1,388 ±59 ▲ +$395▲ +$280▲ +$115
Chicago citywide $1,127 ±6 $1,241 ±5 $1,560 ±10 ▲ +$433▲ +$319▲ +$114
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,068 ±138 $1,961 ±133 $1,998 ±108 ▼ −$69▲ +$38▼ −$107
Chicago citywide $2,333 ±12 $2,326 ±10 $2,329 ±13 ▼ −$4▲ +$3▼ −$7
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,560 ±104 $1,598 ±109 $1,998 ±108 ▲ +$438▲ +$400▲ +$38
Chicago citywide $1,761 ±9 $1,896 ±8 $2,329 ±13 ▲ +$569▲ +$434▲ +$135
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $2,756 ±117 $2,497 ±144 —▼ −$259—
Chicago citywide — $3,316 ±20 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) — $2,246 ±96 $2,497 ±144 —▲ +$251—
Chicago citywide — $2,703 ±16 — ———

Rent

Rent measure
Category Hermosa
Average Rent Plus Utilities $1,346±$34
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $899±$79
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,061±$55
Median Rent Plus Utilities $1,316±$56
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,605±$103
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,933±$67
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities $1,346±$34 $1,613±$12 ▼ −$267 36/77
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $899±$79 $696±$20 ▲ +$203 21/77
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,061±$55 $1,043±$8 ▲ +$19 26/77
Median Rent Plus Utilities $1,316±$56 $1,440±$10 ▼ −$124 34/77
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,605±$103 $2,021±$21 ▼ −$416 46/77
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,933±$67 $2,738±$29 ▼ −$806 50/77
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa
Average Rent $1,161±$42
10th Percentile Rent $805±$98
25th Percentile Rent $935±$38
Median Rent $1,140±$52
75th Percentile Rent $1,387±$49
90th Percentile Rent $1,672±$132
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Average Rent $1,161±$42 $1,452±$11 ▼ −$291 33/77
10th Percentile Rent $805±$98 $564±$21 ▲ +$241 22/77
25th Percentile Rent $935±$38 $913±$7 ▲ +$22 30/77
Median Rent $1,140±$52 $1,262±$12 ▼ −$122 33/77
75th Percentile Rent $1,387±$49 $1,868±$13 ▼ −$481 41/77
90th Percentile Rent $1,672±$132 $2,528±$38 ▼ −$857 44/77
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category Hermosa
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,284±$135
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,242±$171
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,719±$183
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,193±$89
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,583±$174
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,198±$184
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,284±$135 $2,734±$24 ▼ −$449 33/77
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,242±$171 $1,270±$14 ▼ −$29 36/77
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,719±$183 $1,697±$14 ▲ +$22 30/77
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,193±$89 $2,339±$17 ▼ −$146 32/77
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,583±$174 $3,269±$31 ▼ −$685 42/77
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,198±$184 Over $4,000 ▼ −$802+ 42/77
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,727 ±158 $2,394 ±110 $2,284 ±135 ▼ −$443▼ −$110▼ −$333
Chicago citywide $2,855 ±19 $2,793 ±23 $2,734 ±24 ▼ −$121▼ −$60▼ −$61
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,058 ±119 $1,951 ±90 $2,284 ±135 ▲ +$226▲ +$333▼ −$107
Chicago citywide $2,154 ±14 $2,277 ±19 $2,734 ±24 ▲ +$579▲ +$457▲ +$122
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,690 ±152 $1,362 ±172 $1,242 ±171 ▼ −$449▼ −$121▼ −$328
Chicago citywide $1,403 ±11 $1,356 ±11 $1,270 ±14 ▼ −$133▼ −$86▼ −$47
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,276 ±114 $1,110 ±140 $1,242 ±171 ▼ −$34▲ +$131▼ −$165
Chicago citywide $1,059 ±8 $1,105 ±9 $1,270 ±14 ▲ +$212▲ +$165▲ +$46
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,101 ±99 $1,857 ±131 $1,719 ±183 ▼ −$382▼ −$137▼ −$244
Chicago citywide $1,874 ±12 $1,800 ±12 $1,697 ±14 ▼ −$177▼ −$103▼ −$74
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,586 ±75 $1,513 ±107 $1,719 ±183 ▲ +$134▲ +$206▼ −$72
Chicago citywide $1,414 ±9 $1,467 ±10 $1,697 ±14 ▲ +$283▲ +$230▲ +$53
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,545 ±111 $2,377 ±123 $2,193 ±89 ▼ −$352▼ −$184▼ −$168
Chicago citywide $2,526 ±13 $2,422 ±13 $2,339 ±17 ▼ −$187▼ −$83▼ −$103
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,921 ±83 $1,937 ±100 $2,193 ±89 ▲ +$272▲ +$256▲ +$17
Chicago citywide $1,906 ±10 $1,974 ±11 $2,339 ±17 ▲ +$433▲ +$365▲ +$68
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,186 ±169 $2,872 ±98 $2,583 ±174 ▼ −$603▼ −$288▼ −$314
Chicago citywide $3,447 ±25 $3,343 ±25 $3,269 ±31 ▼ −$178▼ −$74▼ −$104
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,404 ±127 $2,341 ±80 $2,583 ±174 ▲ +$179▲ +$243▼ −$64
Chicago citywide $2,601 ±19 $2,724 ±20 $3,269 ±31 ▲ +$668▲ +$544▲ +$123
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $3,432 ±273 $3,198 ±184 —▼ −$234—
Chicago citywide — $4,578 ±59 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) — $2,797 ±223 $3,198 ±184 —▲ +$401—
Chicago citywide — $3,731 ±48 — ———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category Hermosa
Average Monthly Owner Costs $1,040±$194
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $541±$127
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $676±$64
Median Monthly Owner Costs $853±$57
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,036±$80
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,311±$154
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs $1,040±$194 $1,078±$22 ▼ −$38 20/77
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $541±$127 $418±$8 ▲ +$123 17/77
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $676±$64 $601±$8 ▲ +$75 24/77
Median Monthly Owner Costs $853±$57 $859±$10 ▼ −$6 30/77
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,036±$80 $1,197±$18 ▼ −$161 37/77
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,311±$154 Over $1,500 ▼ −$189+ 34/77
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $793 ±52 $907 ±113 $1,040 ±194 ▲ +$247▲ +$133▲ +$114
Chicago citywide $957 ±15 $1,028 ±10 $1,078 ±22 ▲ +$121▲ +$50▲ +$71
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $599 ±39 $739 ±92 $1,040 ±194 ▲ +$441▲ +$300▲ +$141
Chicago citywide $722 ±11 $838 ±8 $1,078 ±22 ▲ +$355▲ +$240▲ +$116
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $490 ±132 $503 ±126 $541 ±127 ▲ +$51▲ +$38▲ +$13
Chicago citywide $429 ±6 $469 ±7 $418 ±8 ▼ −$11▼ −$51▲ +$40
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $370 ±100 $410 ±103 $541 ±127 ▲ +$172▲ +$131▲ +$40
Chicago citywide $324 ±5 $382 ±5 $418 ±8 ▲ +$95▲ +$36▲ +$59
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $600 ±54 $693 ±54 $676 ±64 ▲ +$76▼ −$17▲ +$93
Chicago citywide $586 ±6 $629 ±6 $601 ±8 ▲ +$14▼ −$28▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $453 ±41 $565 ±44 $676 ±64 ▲ +$223▲ +$111▲ +$112
Chicago citywide $442 ±4 $513 ±5 $601 ±8 ▲ +$158▲ +$88▲ +$70
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $766 ±84 $852 ±49 $853 ±57 ▲ +$88▲ +$1▲ +$87
Chicago citywide $815 ±9 $860 ±7 $859 ±10 ▲ +$44▼ −$1▲ +$45
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $578 ±63 $694 ±40 $853 ±57 ▲ +$275▲ +$159▲ +$117
Chicago citywide $615 ±7 $701 ±6 $859 ±10 ▲ +$244▲ +$158▲ +$86
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $1,032 ±81 $1,036 ±80 —▲ +$4—
Chicago citywide — $1,206 ±14 $1,197 ±18 —▼ −$9—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — $841 ±66 $1,036 ±80 —▲ +$195—
Chicago citywide — $983 ±12 $1,197 ±18 —▲ +$214—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $1,422 ±286 $1,311 ±154 —▼ −$111—
Chicago citywide — $1,767 ±35 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — $1,159 ±233 $1,311 ±154 —▲ +$153—
Chicago citywide — $1,440 ±28 — ———

Home Values

Category Hermosa
Average Home Value $336,751±$18,574
10th Percentile Home Value $163,678±$28,666
25th Percentile Home Value $252,538±$22,312
Median Home Value $320,870±$14,936
75th Percentile Home Value $387,942±$11,767
90th Percentile Home Value $474,214±$20,468
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Average Home Value $336,751±$18,574 $437,638±$7,358 ▼ −$100,887 37/77
10th Percentile Home Value $163,678±$28,666 $129,150±$3,756 ▲ +$34,528 31/77
25th Percentile Home Value $252,538±$22,312 $217,800±$1,804 ▲ +$34,738 28/77
Median Home Value $320,870±$14,936 $334,100±$2,424 ▼ −$13,230 33/77
75th Percentile Home Value $387,942±$11,767 $497,700±$3,730 ▼ −$109,758 40/77
90th Percentile Home Value $474,214±$20,468 $809,159±$15,691 ▼ −$334,946 45/77
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $274,873 ±17,410 $324,771 ±20,912 $336,751 ±18,574 ▲ +$61,878▲ +$11,980▲ +$49,898
Chicago citywide $386,614 ±5,106 $424,380 ±4,754 $437,638 ±7,358 ▲ +$51,024▲ +$13,258▲ +$37,766
Average Home Value (nominal dollars) $207,442 ±13,139 $264,689 ±17,043 $336,751 ±18,574 ▲ +$129,309▲ +$72,062▲ +$57,247
Chicago citywide $291,771 ±3,853 $345,871 ±3,874 $437,638 ±7,358 ▲ +$145,867▲ +$91,768▲ +$54,099
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $153,215 ±23,302 $166,494 ±18,170 $163,678 ±28,666 ▲ +$10,463▼ −$2,816▲ +$13,280
Chicago citywide $115,330 ±1,421 $124,313 ±1,339 $129,150 ±3,756 ▲ +$13,821▲ +$4,838▲ +$8,983
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $115,629 ±17,585 $135,693 ±14,808 $163,678 ±28,666 ▲ +$48,050▲ +$27,985▲ +$20,064
Chicago citywide $87,037 ±1,072 $101,315 ±1,091 $129,150 ±3,756 ▲ +$42,113▲ +$27,835▲ +$14,278
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $207,148 ±11,559 $237,190 ±13,623 $252,538 ±22,312 ▲ +$45,390▲ +$15,348▲ +$30,041
Chicago citywide $190,543 ±2,400 $199,018 ±1,255 $217,800 ±1,804 ▲ +$27,257▲ +$18,782▲ +$8,475
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $156,331 ±8,723 $193,310 ±11,102 $252,538 ±22,312 ▲ +$96,207▲ +$59,228▲ +$36,979
Chicago citywide $143,800 ±1,811 $162,200 ±1,023 $217,800 ±1,804 ▲ +$74,000▲ +$55,600▲ +$18,400
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $271,884 ±16,195 $322,168 ±13,179 $320,870 ±14,936 ▲ +$48,986▼ −$1,298▲ +$50,284
Chicago citywide $299,066 ±2,120 $316,564 ±2,118 $334,100 ±2,424 ▲ +$35,034▲ +$17,536▲ +$17,498
Median Home Value (nominal dollars) $205,187 ±12,222 $262,568 ±10,741 $320,870 ±14,936 ▲ +$115,684▲ +$58,303▲ +$57,381
Chicago citywide $225,700 ±1,600 $258,000 ±1,726 $334,100 ±2,424 ▲ +$108,400▲ +$76,100▲ +$32,300
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $348,708 ±24,170 $410,397 ±19,538 $387,942 ±11,767 ▲ +$39,235▼ −$22,455▲ +$61,689
Chicago citywide $466,951 ±3,138 $490,797 ±3,892 $497,700 ±3,730 ▲ +$30,749▲ +$6,903▲ +$23,846
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $263,164 ±18,240 $334,474 ±15,923 $387,942 ±11,767 ▲ +$124,778▲ +$53,468▲ +$71,310
Chicago citywide $352,400 ±2,368 $400,000 ±3,172 $497,700 ±3,730 ▲ +$145,300▲ +$97,700▲ +$47,600
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $463,808 ±35,321 $485,637 ±33,310 $474,214 ±20,468 ▲ +$10,405▼ −$11,423▲ +$21,828
Chicago citywide $739,174 ±12,945 $835,769 ±9,047 $809,159 ±15,691 ▲ +$69,986▼ −$26,610▲ +$96,595
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $350,029 ±26,656 $395,795 ±27,147 $474,214 ±20,468 ▲ +$124,185▲ +$78,419▲ +$45,766
Chicago citywide $557,842 ±9,770 $681,153 ±7,373 $809,159 ±15,691 ▲ +$251,317▲ +$128,006▲ +$123,311

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show
Category Hermosa
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 4.2%4.2%342
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 3.9%92.7%317
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.3%7.0%24
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.3%1
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 4.2%4.2%342 8.3%8.3%106,578 ▼ -4.1%▼ -4.1% 46/77
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 3.9%92.7%317 4.8%57.2%60,910 ▼ -0.9%▲ +35.5% 39/7714/77
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.3%7.0%24 1.1%13.8%14,721 ▼ -0.9%▼ -6.8% 36/7739/77
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0 2.1%25.7%27,383 ▼ -2.1%▼ -25.7% 58/7758/77
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.3%1 0.3%3.3%3,564 ▼ -0.3%▼ -3.1% 43/7743/77
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units 5.5%432 4.8%377 4.2%342 ▼ −1.3 pp▼ −90▼ −0.6 pp▼ −35▼ −0.6 pp▼ −55
Chicago citywide 8.8%104,550 8.5%103,479 8.3%106,578 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,028▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,099▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,071
Housing Choice Vouchers 5.2%408 4.5%347 3.9%317 ▼ −1.3 pp▼ −91▼ −0.5 pp▼ −30▼ −0.7 pp▼ −61
Chicago citywide 4.3%51,601 4.6%55,987 4.8%60,910 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +9,309▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,923▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,386
Public Housing 0.3%23 0.3%27 0.3%24 – 0.0 pp▲ +1▼ −0.1 pp▼ −3▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4
Chicago citywide 1.8%21,159 1.3%16,094 1.2%14,721 ▼ −0.6 pp▼ −6,438▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,373▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,065
Project-Based Section 8 0.0%0 0.0%2 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▼ −2– 0.0 pp▲ +2
Chicago citywide 2.2%25,940 2.2%26,951 2.1%27,383 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,443▼ −0.1 pp▲ +432– 0.0 pp▲ +1,011
Other Project-Based Programs 0.0%1 0.0%1 0.0%1 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 0.5%5,850 0.4%4,447 0.3%3,564 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,286▼ −0.1 pp▼ −883▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,403
Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category Hermosa
Average Household Income $17,354
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $428
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,298
Below 30% of Area Median Income 81.8%239
With Children 37.0%108
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 47.2%138
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $17,354 $17,032 ▲ +$322 36/75
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $428 $425 ▲ +$3 46/75
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,298 $1,389 ▼ -$91 46/75
Below 30% of Area Median Income 81.8%239 83.0%77,427 ▼ -1.2 pp 36/75
With Children 37.0%108 31.0%28,919 ▲ +6.0 pp 30/75
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 47.2%138 32.0%29,852 ▲ +15.2 pp 5/75
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income $12,366 $15,127 $17,354 ▲ +$4,988▲ +$2,227▲ +$2,761
Chicago citywide $12,156 $13,665 $17,032 ▲ +$4,876▲ +$3,367▲ +$1,509
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $327 $382 $428 ▲ +$101▲ +$46▲ +$55
Chicago citywide $310 $340 $425 ▲ +$115▲ +$85▲ +$30
Average Monthly Government Spending $861 $905 $1,298 ▲ +$438▲ +$393▲ +$44
Chicago citywide $916 $1,017 $1,389 ▲ +$473▲ +$372▲ +$101
Below 30% of Area Median Income 81.8%— 77.1%— 81.8%— – 0.0 pp—▲ +4.8 pp—▼ −4.7 pp—
Chicago citywide 80.0%— 81.0%— 83.0%— ▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +2.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children — — 37.0%— ——————
Chicago citywide — — 31.0%— ——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 49.4%— 48.1%— 47.2%— ▼ −2.2 pp—▼ −0.9 pp—▼ −1.3 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category Hermosa
Total Tree Canopy 14.2%106 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 74.3%553 acres
Natural Open Surfaces 11.6%86 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Total Tree Canopy 14.2%106 acres 18.4%25,934 acres ▼ -4.2% 56/77
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 74.3%553 acres 60.2%84,955 acres ▲ +14.1% 14/77
Natural Open Surfaces 11.6%86 acres 21.5%30,331 acres ▼ -9.9% 64/77
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category Hermosa
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 21.4% ±5.2 pp4,840 ±1,172
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 46.2% ±6.1 pp10,440 ±1,378
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 32.3% ±5.5 pp7,296 ±1,245
Homes Without Air Conditioning 5.3%1,203
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 21.4%±5.2 pp4,840±1,172 26.1%±0.5 pp707,660±13,869 ▼ -4.7% 42/77
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 46.2%±6.1 pp10,440±1,378 44.1%±0.6 pp1,195,950±15,462 ▲ +2.1% 23/77
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 32.3%±5.5 pp7,296±1,245 29.8%±0.5 pp807,615±13,763 ▲ +2.5% 38/77
Homes Without Air Conditioning 5.3%1,203 4.2%114,494 ▲ +1.1% 23/77
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category Hermosa
Drove Alone 69.9% ±4.7 pp7,063 ±473
Carpooled 10.0% ±3.1 pp1,011 ±314
Public Transit 12.8% ±2.8 pp1,289 ±283
Walked 3.7% ±1.5 pp375 ±150
Bikes 2.1% ±1.0 pp212 ±103
Other Commute Mode 1.0% ±0.9 pp100 ±87
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Drove Alone 69.9%±4.7 pp7,063±473 56.6%±0.4 pp772,696±5,998 ▲ +13.3% 17/77
Carpooled 10.0%±3.1 pp1,011±314 9.3%±0.3 pp126,918±3,980 ▲ +0.7% 34/77
Public Transit 12.8%±2.8 pp1,289±283 22.4%±0.4 pp305,691±6,011 ▼ -9.6% 60/77
Walked 3.7%±1.5 pp375±150 7.3%±0.3 pp100,269±3,456 ▼ -3.6% 30/77
Bikes 2.1%±1.0 pp212±103 1.8%±0.1 pp24,441±1,693 ▲ +0.3% 21/77
Other Commute Mode 1.0%±0.9 pp100±87 2.5%±0.1 pp34,356±1,772 ▼ -1.5% 51/77
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category Hermosa
Average Commute Time (minutes) 34 min±1.4 min
Less Than 15 Minutes 10.3% ±2.2 pp1,044 ±219
15–29 Minutes 26.2% ±3.8 pp2,643 ±385
30–44 Minutes 36.5% ±4.0 pp3,688 ±400
45–59 Minutes 14.9% ±2.8 pp1,508 ±286
60 Minutes or More 12.1% ±2.7 pp1,222 ±275
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes) 34 min±1.4 min 33 min±0.2 min ▲ +1 min 46/76
Less Than 15 Minutes 10.3%±2.2 pp1,044±219 13.0%±0.3 pp140,252±3,438 ▼ -2.7% 48/77
15–29 Minutes 26.2%±3.8 pp2,643±385 29.9%±0.5 pp322,586±5,056 ▼ -3.8% 51/77
30–44 Minutes 36.5%±4.0 pp3,688±400 29.6%±0.4 pp318,782±4,584 ▲ +6.9% 5/77
45–59 Minutes 14.9%±2.8 pp1,508±286 14.0%±0.3 pp151,451±3,075 ▲ +0.9% 36/77
60 Minutes or More 12.1%±2.7 pp1,222±275 13.4%±0.3 pp144,940±3,715 ▼ -1.4% 53/77
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category Hermosa
Average Vehicles per Household 1.58±0.15
Households With No Vehicle 10.9% ±2.6 pp817 ±197
Households With 1 Vehicle 46.2% ±5.0 pp3,474 ±374
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 42.9% ±5.0 pp3,226 ±376
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Average Vehicles per Household 1.58±0.15 1.12±0.01 ▲ +0.46 14/77
Households With No Vehicle 10.9%±2.6 pp817±197 26.6%±0.4 pp308,497±5,087 ▼ -15.7% 63/77
Households With 1 Vehicle 46.2%±5.0 pp3,474±374 45.2%±0.4 pp524,900±5,145 ▲ +1.0% 27/77
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 42.9%±5.0 pp3,226±376 28.2%±0.4 pp326,808±4,200 ▲ +14.7% 23/77
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Hermosa Residents Work

Category Hermosa
Loop 12.8%1,174
Near North Side 6.5%602
Near West Side 4.5%417
West Town 3.8%349
Logan Square 3.5%319
All other city neighborhoods 28.4%2,614
Outside the city 40.5%3,726
↳ Skokie village, IL 1.7%161
↳ Des Plaines city, IL 1.4%126
↳ Niles village, IL 1.2%111
↳ Elk Grove Village village, IL 1.2%110
↳ Evanston city, IL 1.1%97
↳ All other Illinois locations 32.0%2,944
Out of state 1.9%177
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 20 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Hermosa
Loop 12.8%1,174
Near North Side 6.5%602
Near West Side 4.5%417
West Town 3.8%349
Logan Square 3.5%319
All other city neighborhoods 28.4%2,614
Outside the city 40.5%3,726
↳ Skokie village, IL 1.7%161
↳ Des Plaines city, IL 1.4%126
↳ Niles village, IL 1.2%111
↳ Elk Grove Village village, IL 1.2%110
↳ Evanston city, IL 1.1%97
↳ All other Illinois locations 32.0%2,944
Out of state 1.9%177
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 20 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Loop 10.6%915 11.5%1,039 12.8%1,174 ▲ +2.2 pp▲ +259▲ +1.2 pp▲ +135▲ +0.9 pp▲ +124
Chicago citywide 20.0%224,635 21.0%252,791 21.5%259,167 ▲ +1.5 pp▲ +34,532▲ +0.5 pp▲ +6,376▲ +1.0 pp▲ +28,156
Near North Side 5.6%484 7.1%642 6.5%602 ▲ +0.9 pp▲ +118▼ −0.6 pp▼ −40▲ +1.5 pp▲ +158
Chicago citywide 8.2%92,143 9.4%112,859 9.1%109,333 ▲ +0.9 pp▲ +17,190▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3,526▲ +1.2 pp▲ +20,716
Near West Side 4.2%364 5.0%448 4.5%417 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +53▼ −0.4 pp▼ −31▲ +0.8 pp▲ +84
Chicago citywide 6.2%69,083 6.6%79,757 6.7%80,118 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +11,035– 0.0 pp▲ +361▲ +0.5 pp▲ +10,674
West Town 4.1%350 3.8%342 3.8%349 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1– 0.0 pp▲ +7▼ −0.3 pp▼ −8
Chicago citywide 2.2%24,512 2.1%25,359 2.1%25,621 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,109– 0.0 pp▲ +262▼ −0.1 pp▲ +847
Logan Square 2.5%217 2.9%264 3.5%319 ▲ +1.0 pp▲ +102▲ +0.5 pp▲ +55▲ +0.4 pp▲ +47
Chicago citywide 0.9%9,815 1.0%11,789 1.0%12,405 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,590▲ +0.1 pp▲ +616▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,974
All other city neighborhoods 32.0%2,768 30.8%2,779 28.4%2,614 ▼ −3.6 pp▼ −154▼ −2.4 pp▼ −165▼ −1.2 pp▲ +11
Chicago citywide 22.5%252,499 21.1%253,775 20.7%248,736 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −3,763▼ −0.4 pp▼ −5,039▼ −1.4 pp▲ +1,276
Outside the city 41.0%3,542 38.9%3,508 40.5%3,726 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +184▲ +1.6 pp▲ +218▼ −2.1 pp▼ −34
Chicago citywide 36.8%412,807 35.7%430,134 35.9%432,355 ▼ −0.9 pp▲ +19,548▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,221▼ −1.0 pp▲ +17,327
Skokie village, IL 1.7%143 1.3%114 1.7%161 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +18▲ +0.5 pp▲ +47▼ −0.4 pp▼ −29
Chicago citywide 1.1%12,426 1.1%12,900 1.3%15,777 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +3,351▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,877– 0.0 pp▲ +474
Des Plaines city, IL 1.7%147 1.4%122 1.4%126 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −21– 0.0 pp▲ +4▼ −0.3 pp▼ −25
Chicago citywide 0.8%9,241 0.8%9,141 0.8%9,268 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +27– 0.0 pp▲ +127▼ −0.1 pp▼ −100
Niles village, IL 0.8%71 1.1%95 1.2%111 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +40▲ +0.2 pp▲ +16▲ +0.2 pp▲ +24
Chicago citywide 0.6%6,284 0.6%6,624 0.6%6,892 – 0.0 pp▲ +608– 0.0 pp▲ +268– 0.0 pp▲ +340
Elk Grove Village village, IL 1.6%134 1.6%140 1.2%110 ▼ −0.4 pp▼ −24▼ −0.4 pp▼ −30– 0.0 pp▲ +6
Chicago citywide 0.8%8,559 0.8%10,072 0.7%8,182 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −377▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,890▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,513
Evanston city, IL 1.3%110 1.1%98 1.1%97 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −13– 0.0 pp▼ −1▼ −0.2 pp▼ −12
Chicago citywide 1.6%17,922 1.6%18,922 1.5%17,546 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −376▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,376– 0.0 pp▲ +1,000
All other Illinois locations 32.0%2,763 30.5%2,749 32.0%2,944 – 0.0 pp▲ +181▲ +1.5 pp▲ +195▼ −1.5 pp▼ −14
Chicago citywide 27.9%312,992 27.0%324,805 27.3%329,050 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +16,058▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,245▼ −0.9 pp▲ +11,813
Out of state 1.7%143 1.9%168 1.9%177 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +34▲ +0.1 pp▲ +9▲ +0.2 pp▲ +25
Chicago citywide 2.2%24,577 2.3%27,198 2.2%26,136 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,559▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,062▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,621

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Hermosa

Category Hermosa
Hermosa 5.6%231
Belmont Cragin 5.5%226
Austin 3.5%143
Logan Square 3.2%133
Humboldt Park 2.3%94
All other city neighborhoods 33.7%1,385
Outside the city 46.2%1,903
↳ Cicero town, IL 2.6%106
↳ Berwyn city, IL 1.3%55
↳ Elmwood Park village, IL 1.1%47
↳ Aurora city, IL 1.1%46
↳ Oak Park village, IL 0.9%36
↳ All other Illinois locations 36.2%1,489
Out of state 3.0%124
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 20; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Hermosa
Hermosa 5.6%231
Belmont Cragin 5.5%226
Austin 3.5%143
Logan Square 3.2%133
Humboldt Park 2.3%94
All other city neighborhoods 33.7%1,385
Outside the city 46.2%1,903
↳ Cicero town, IL 2.6%106
↳ Berwyn city, IL 1.3%55
↳ Elmwood Park village, IL 1.1%47
↳ Aurora city, IL 1.1%46
↳ Oak Park village, IL 0.9%36
↳ All other Illinois locations 36.2%1,489
Out of state 3.0%124
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 20; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Hermosa 5.4%200 5.2%214 5.6%231 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +31▲ +0.4 pp▲ +17▼ −0.2 pp▲ +14
Chicago citywide 0.4%5,098 0.4%5,514 0.4%5,475 – 0.0 pp▲ +377– 0.0 pp▼ −39– 0.0 pp▲ +416
Belmont Cragin 7.0%260 6.4%263 5.5%226 ▼ −1.5 pp▼ −34▼ −0.9 pp▼ −37▼ −0.6 pp▲ +3
Chicago citywide 1.2%15,220 1.1%15,543 1.1%15,818 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +598– 0.0 pp▲ +275▼ −0.1 pp▲ +323
Austin 2.9%108 3.0%125 3.5%143 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +35▲ +0.5 pp▲ +18▲ +0.1 pp▲ +17
Chicago citywide 1.5%19,531 1.4%20,284 1.4%20,630 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,099– 0.0 pp▲ +346▼ −0.1 pp▲ +753
Logan Square 3.3%123 3.0%123 3.2%133 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +10▲ +0.3 pp▲ +10▼ −0.3 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 1.9%25,256 1.9%27,590 1.9%27,408 – 0.0 pp▲ +2,152▼ −0.1 pp▼ −182– 0.0 pp▲ +2,334
Humboldt Park 2.5%94 2.3%94 2.3%94 ▼ −0.2 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.3 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 0.9%11,405 0.9%12,541 0.9%12,557 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,152– 0.0 pp▲ +16– 0.0 pp▲ +1,136
All other city neighborhoods 32.9%1,225 33.8%1,400 33.7%1,385 ▲ +0.8 pp▲ +160▼ −0.2 pp▼ −15▲ +1.0 pp▲ +175
Chicago citywide 38.0%499,784 37.9%537,334 36.8%539,030 ▼ −1.2 pp▲ +39,246▼ −1.1 pp▲ +1,696▼ −0.1 pp▲ +37,550
Outside the city 46.0%1,713 46.3%1,917 46.2%1,903 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +190▼ −0.1 pp▼ −14▲ +0.4 pp▲ +204
Chicago citywide 45.9%603,720 45.4%642,891 47.2%691,545 ▲ +1.3 pp▲ +87,825▲ +1.9 pp▲ +48,654▼ −0.6 pp▲ +39,171
Cicero town, IL 4.0%149 3.3%138 2.6%106 ▼ −1.4 pp▼ −43▼ −0.8 pp▼ −32▼ −0.7 pp▼ −11
Chicago citywide 0.8%9,934 0.8%11,086 0.8%10,993 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,059– 0.0 pp▼ −93– 0.0 pp▲ +1,152
Berwyn city, IL 1.7%63 1.8%73 1.3%55 ▼ −0.4 pp▼ −8▼ −0.4 pp▼ −18▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10
Chicago citywide 0.7%8,732 0.7%9,219 0.6%9,497 – 0.0 pp▲ +765– 0.0 pp▲ +278– 0.0 pp▲ +487
Elmwood Park village, IL 1.4%53 1.1%47 1.1%47 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −6– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.3 pp▼ −6
Chicago citywide 0.3%4,242 0.3%4,242 0.3%4,388 – 0.0 pp▲ +146– 0.0 pp▲ +146– 0.0 pp– 0
Aurora city, IL 0.8%31 1.0%41 1.1%46 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +15▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5▲ +0.2 pp▲ +10
Chicago citywide 0.7%9,006 0.7%10,248 0.7%10,879 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,873– 0.0 pp▲ +631– 0.0 pp▲ +1,242
Oak Park village, IL 0.8%31 0.4%18 0.9%36 – 0.0 pp▲ +5▲ +0.4 pp▲ +18▼ −0.4 pp▼ −13
Chicago citywide 1.0%12,512 0.9%13,154 0.9%13,459 – 0.0 pp▲ +947– 0.0 pp▲ +305– 0.0 pp▲ +642
All other Illinois locations 34.5%1,284 35.6%1,474 36.2%1,489 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +205▲ +0.5 pp▲ +15▲ +1.2 pp▲ +190
Chicago citywide 35.5%467,052 35.1%497,107 36.9%540,317 ▲ +1.4 pp▲ +73,265▲ +1.8 pp▲ +43,210▼ −0.5 pp▲ +30,055
Out of state 2.7%102 2.5%105 3.0%124 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +22▲ +0.5 pp▲ +19▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3
Chicago citywide 4.9%63,785 4.8%68,287 4.9%72,123 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8,338▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,836– 0.0 pp▲ +4,502

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category Hermosa
No Computer or Smartphone 2.4% ±1.3 pp180 ±98
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 12.0% ±3.6 pp902 ±270
Desktop or Laptop Available 80.7% ±3.5 pp6,064 ±266
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
No Computer or Smartphone 2.4%±1.3 pp180±98 5.1%±0.2 pp58,709±2,246 ▼ -2.7% 68/77
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 12.0%±3.6 pp902±270 10.4%±0.3 pp120,218±3,642 ▲ +1.6% 36/77
Desktop or Laptop Available 80.7%±3.5 pp6,064±266 79.7%±0.4 pp924,956±4,919 ▲ +0.9% 28/77
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category Hermosa
Has Internet Access 92.3% ±2.9 pp6,935 ±218
Cellular Data Plan Only 15.0% ±3.6 pp1,128 ±271
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 3.0% ±1.4 pp227 ±103
No Internet Access 7.7% ±2.5 pp582 ±188
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Has Internet Access 92.3%±2.9 pp6,935±218 93.1%±0.3 pp1,080,419±3,310 ▼ -0.9% 40/77
Cellular Data Plan Only 15.0%±3.6 pp1,128±271 12.5%±0.3 pp145,219±3,463 ▲ +2.5% 36/77
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 3.0%±1.4 pp227±103 3.9%±0.2 pp45,350±1,940 ▼ -0.9% 41/77
No Internet Access 7.7%±2.5 pp582±188 6.9%±0.2 pp79,786±2,730 ▲ +0.9% 38/77
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category Hermosa
Uninsured Residents 17.8% ±2.8 pp4,026 ±628
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 6.6% ±3.5 pp1,490 ±790
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 25.4% ±4.3 pp5,729 ±963
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 2.0% ±2.0 pp441 ±461
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Uninsured Residents 17.8%±2.8 pp4,026±628 9.8%±0.2 pp264,391±5,709 ▲ +8.1% 5/77
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 6.6%±3.5 pp1,490±790 3.9%±0.3 pp104,687±8,934 ▲ +2.7% 9/77
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 25.4%±4.3 pp5,729±963 13.3%±0.3 pp361,430±8,516 ▲ +12.0% 4/77
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 2.0%±2.0 pp441±461 1.7%±0.3 pp46,718±7,265 ▲ +0.2% 23/77
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category Hermosa
Insured (Any Coverage) 82.2% ±2.8 pp18,539 ±628
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 41.0% ±2.5 pp9,240 ±558
Direct-Purchase Insurance 6.0% ±1.5 pp1,359 ±346
Medicare 11.1% ±2.1 pp2,497 ±466
Medicaid 27.7% ±3.2 pp6,242 ±721
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.1% ±0.4 pp18 ±91
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 2.4% ±1.0 pp542 ±220
Uninsured 17.8% ±2.8 pp4,024 ±628
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Insured (Any Coverage) 82.2%±2.8 pp18,539±628 90.2%±0.2 pp2,424,871±5,689 ▼ -8.1% 73/77
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 41.0%±2.5 pp9,240±558 51.2%±0.4 pp1,376,912±9,468 ▼ -10.3% 47/77
Direct-Purchase Insurance 6.0%±1.5 pp1,359±346 8.5%±0.2 pp227,424±5,112 ▼ -2.4% 56/77
Medicare 11.1%±2.1 pp2,497±466 12.6%±0.2 pp339,804±4,911 ▼ -1.6% 57/77
Medicaid 27.7%±3.2 pp6,242±721 22.2%±0.3 pp596,931±7,773 ▲ +5.4% 34/77
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.1%±0.4 pp18±91 0.3%±0.0 pp7,201±787 ▼ -0.2% 61/77
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 2.4%±1.0 pp542±220 3.8%±0.1 pp102,777±3,544 ▼ -1.4% 65/77
Uninsured 17.8%±2.8 pp4,024±628 9.8%±0.2 pp262,018±5,689 ▲ +8.1% 5/77
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category Hermosa
Adults With at Least One Disability 10.7% ±1.7 pp1,829 ±294
Mobility Disability 6.0% ±1.3 pp1,026 ±231
Hearing Disability 2.6% ±1.0 pp440 ±179
Vision Disability 2.3% ±0.9 pp401 ±160
Cognitive Disability 4.1% ±1.3 pp709 ±217
Self-Care Disability 1.0% ±0.7 pp173 ±117
Independent Living Disability 3.9% ±1.1 pp666 ±195
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability 10.7%±1.7 pp1,829±294 14.0%±0.2 pp303,665±4,797 ▼ -3.4% 63/77
Mobility Disability 6.0%±1.3 pp1,026±231 7.6%±0.2 pp163,666±3,398 ▼ -1.6% 55/77
Hearing Disability 2.6%±1.0 pp440±179 2.8%±0.1 pp61,430±2,337 ▼ -0.3% 57/77
Vision Disability 2.3%±0.9 pp401±160 3.0%±0.1 pp64,544±2,269 ▼ -0.6% 53/77
Cognitive Disability 4.1%±1.3 pp709±217 5.2%±0.1 pp112,824±2,939 ▼ -1.1% 55/77
Self-Care Disability 1.0%±0.7 pp173±117 2.7%±0.1 pp57,758±2,261 ▼ -1.7% 73/77
Independent Living Disability 3.9%±1.1 pp666±195 5.7%±0.2 pp123,651±3,247 ▼ -1.8% 66/77
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category Hermosa
Arthritis 17.5%3,035
High Blood Pressure 26.9%4,680
Cancer 4.0%696
Current Asthma 9.0%1,565
Coronary Heart Disease 4.8%827
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 4.8%832
Diabetes 13.2%2,288
High Cholesterol 32.8%5,699
Obesity 34.7%6,028
Stroke 2.8%489
Lost All Natural Teeth 2.2%375
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Arthritis 17.5%3,035 19.6%409,178 ▼ -2.1% 58/77
High Blood Pressure 26.9%4,680 29.7%620,030 ▼ -2.8% 58/77
Cancer 4.0%696 5.0%104,382 ▼ -1.0% 64/77
Current Asthma 9.0%1,565 10.2%212,940 ▼ -1.2% 65/77
Coronary Heart Disease 4.8%827 4.8%100,207 0% 53/77
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 4.8%832 5.5%114,820 ▼ -0.7% 55/77
Diabetes 13.2%2,288 12.0%250,517 ▲ +1.2% 41/77
High Cholesterol 32.8%5,699 31.6%659,696 ▲ +1.2% 47/77
Obesity 34.7%6,028 32.6%680,572 ▲ +2.1% 38/77
Stroke 2.8%489 3.3%68,892 ▼ -0.5% 50/77
Lost All Natural Teeth 2.2%375 2.5%52,249 ▼ -0.3% 49/77
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category Hermosa
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 19.1%3,315
Current Cigarette Smoking 12.0%2,092
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 31.4%5,463
Short Sleep Duration 37.0%6,435
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 19.1%3,315 19.0%396,652 ▲ +0.1% 30/77
Current Cigarette Smoking 12.0%2,092 11.9%248,430 ▲ +0.1% 40/77
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 31.4%5,463 24.7%515,648 ▲ +6.7% 30/77
Short Sleep Duration 37.0%6,435 37.8%789,129 ▼ -0.8% 44/77
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category Hermosa
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 26.8%4,651
Frequent Physical Distress 13.9%2,415
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 26.8%4,651 21.1%440,493 ▲ +5.7% 31/77
Frequent Physical Distress 13.9%2,415 11.8%246,342 ▲ +2.1% 31/77
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category Hermosa
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 68.8%11,966
Routine Checkup in Past Year 72.6%12,627
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 83.7%14,555
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 47.1%8,187
Dental Visit in Past Year 53.3%9,269
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 70.5%12,252
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 68.8%11,966 72.5%1,513,542 ▼ -3.7% 61/77
Routine Checkup in Past Year 72.6%12,627 76.2%1,590,785 ▼ -3.6% 68/77
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 83.7%14,555 86.2%1,799,549 ▼ -2.5% 67/77
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 47.1%8,187 55.8%1,164,905 ▼ -8.7% 72/77
Dental Visit in Past Year 53.3%9,269 58.4%1,219,184 ▼ -5.1% 43/77
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 70.5%12,252 74.2%1,549,032 ▼ -3.7% 66/77
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category Hermosa
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 18.0%3,129
Frequent Mental Distress 16.0%2,782
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 29.9%5,191
Loneliness 36.7%6,374
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Hermosa City Difference Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 18.0%3,129 19.1%398,740 ▼ -1.1% 53/77
Frequent Mental Distress 16.0%2,782 16.0%334,023 0% 38/77
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 29.9%5,191 28.2%588,716 ▲ +1.7% 42/77
Loneliness 36.7%6,374 35.8%747,377 ▲ +0.9% 38/77
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Compare All Neighborhoods