Porter Ranch, Los Angeles Demographics, Housing & Census Data

Porter Ranch, Los Angeles Census and ACS demographic tables: population, race, age, income, poverty, rent, housing types, single-family homes, commute, education, internet access, health insurance, and disability.

Porter Ranch, Los Angeles

Porter Ranch
Los Angeles
Population
25,099
Overlapping council districts Overlap means that a council district contains part of this neighborhood.
12
Population Density
4,493 /sq mi
Average Geographic Mismatch Error : 0.11 p.p. Geographic mismatch error comes from Census geographic boundaries not perfectly aligning with neighborhood boundaries. We can test how much mismatch error skews neighborhood statistics for a subset of variables. For this neighborhood , the average error is 0.11 percentage points. More detail is available on the neighborhood geography page , and the methodology page explains geographic mismatch error in more detail.
One-page summary

Porter Ranch at a Glance

Time period?Historical estimates use this profile's current boundaries, held constant across periods; they do not reflect the boundaries that were in effect at the time. Comparing
Values as
Show as
Add to every table
Showing Chart vs. Los Angeles ± Margin of error

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category Porter Ranch
Hispanic 13.7% ±2.2 pp3,448 ±542
White 47.3% ±3.6 pp11,880 ±910
Black 3.1% ±1.2 pp787 ±296
Asian 30.8% ±3.2 pp7,734 ±795
Other or Multi-racial 5.0% ±1.2 pp1,249 ±298
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Hispanic 13.7%±2.2 pp3,448±542 47.2%±0.2 pp1,820,397±8,107 ▼ -33.5% 93/110
White 47.3%±3.6 pp11,880±910 28.1%±0.2 pp1,082,393±7,330 ▲ +19.3% 38/110
Black 3.1%±1.2 pp787±296 8.1%±0.1 pp311,633±4,801 ▼ -4.9% 76/110
Asian 30.8%±3.2 pp7,734±795 11.9%±0.1 pp460,422±5,784 ▲ +18.9% 6/110
Other or Multi-racial 5.0%±1.2 pp1,249±298 4.7%±0.1 pp182,418±4,965 ▲ +0.2% 57/110
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Age Distribution

Category Porter Ranch
Under 5 5.1% ±1.0 pp1,278 ±261
5-17 15.1% ±1.6 pp3,785 ±406
18-24 6.3% ±1.0 pp1,582 ±256
25-44 19.7% ±1.6 pp4,939 ±412
45-64 29.2% ±1.6 pp7,334 ±408
65-74 13.6% ±1.2 pp3,405 ±296
75-84 8.0% ±0.8 pp2,016 ±211
85+ 3.0% ±0.8 pp760 ±194
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Under 5 5.1%±1.0 pp1,278±261 5.0%±0.1 pp193,588±3,896 ▲ +0.1% 54/110
5-17 15.1%±1.6 pp3,785±406 14.1%±0.1 pp545,575±5,332 ▲ +0.9% 38/110
18-24 6.3%±1.0 pp1,582±256 9.5%±0.1 pp364,975±4,663 ▼ -3.2% 81/110
25-44 19.7%±1.6 pp4,939±412 32.7%±0.2 pp1,261,487±6,490 ▼ -13.0% 106/110
45-64 29.2%±1.6 pp7,334±408 24.4%±0.1 pp942,048±5,660 ▲ +4.8% 13/110
65-74 13.6%±1.2 pp3,405±296 8.4%±0.1 pp323,245±3,923 ▲ +5.2% 4/110
75-84 8.0%±0.8 pp2,016±211 4.0%±0.1 pp153,663±2,663 ▲ +4.0% 5/110
85+ 3.0%±0.8 pp760±194 1.9%±0.1 pp72,682±2,184 ▲ +1.1% 16/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category Porter Ranch
No High School Diploma 4.6% ±1.4 pp850 ±264
High School Diploma or GED 13.4% ±2.0 pp2,478 ±361
Some College or Associate's Degree 23.1% ±2.2 pp4,275 ±397
Bachelor's Degree 35.8% ±2.4 pp6,605 ±439
Graduate Degree 23.1% ±1.9 pp4,260 ±352
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
No High School Diploma 4.6%±1.4 pp850±264 20.4%±0.2 pp560,441±5,727 ▼ -15.8% 88/110
High School Diploma or GED 13.4%±2.0 pp2,478±361 18.5%±0.2 pp509,870±5,784 ▼ -5.1% 74/110
Some College or Associate's Degree 23.1%±2.2 pp4,275±397 22.7%±0.2 pp624,064±5,974 ▲ +0.5% 50/110
Bachelor's Degree 35.8%±2.4 pp6,605±439 24.9%±0.2 pp684,319±5,857 ▲ +10.9% 29/110
Graduate Degree 23.1%±1.9 pp4,260±352 13.6%±0.2 pp374,431±4,485 ▲ +9.5% 29/110
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category Porter Ranch
Total Population 25,099 ±1,316
Total Households 8,329 ±335
Population Density 4,493 ±236 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch Average Neighborhood Difference
Total Population 25,099 35,102 ▼ −10,003
Total Households 8,329 13,096 ▼ −4,767
Population Density 4,493 people/sq mi 11,693 people/sq mi ▼ −7,200
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average neighborhood rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large neighborhoods. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category 2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19 Difference Rank
Total Population 26,976 ±873 25,576 ±940 25,099 ±1,316 ▼ −1,877 ±1,579▼ −477 ±1,617▼ −1,400 ±1,283 ▼ −8,182▼ −10,522▼ −10,003 61/11067/11066/110
Average Neighborhood 35,158 36,098 35,102 ▼ −56▼ −997▲ +940
Total Households 8,706 ±198 8,558 ±203 8,329 ±335 ▼ −377 ±389▼ −229 ±392▼ −148 ±283 ▼ −3,395▼ −4,036▼ −4,767 62/11064/11066/110
Average Neighborhood 12,101 12,594 13,096 ▲ +995▲ +502▲ +493
Population Density (per sq mi) 4,829 ±156 4,579 ±168 4,493 ±236 ▼ −336▼ −85▼ −251 ▼ −6,952▼ −7,492▼ −7,200 92/11093/11094/110
Average Neighborhood Density 11,781 12,071 11,693 ▼ −88▼ −378▲ +291

Household Size

Category Porter Ranch
Average Household Size 3.01±0.15
1-Person Households 13.3% ±2.3 pp1,107 ±191
2-Person Households 32.4% ±2.4 pp2,702 ±203
3-Person Households 21.4% ±2.7 pp1,783 ±221
4+ Person Households 32.9% ±3.7 pp2,737 ±304
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Average Household Size 3.01±0.15 2.61±0.02 ▲ +0.40 28/110
1-Person Households 13.3%±2.3 pp1,107±191 31.8%±0.4 pp458,302±5,082 ▼ -18.6% 107/110
2-Person Households 32.4%±2.4 pp2,702±203 29.2%±0.4 pp419,781±5,238 ▲ +3.3% 42/110
3-Person Households 21.4%±2.7 pp1,783±221 15.5%±0.3 pp222,553±4,097 ▲ +5.9% 4/110
4+ Person Households 32.9%±3.7 pp2,737±304 23.5%±0.4 pp338,461±5,073 ▲ +9.3% 27/110
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category Porter Ranch
Never Married 26.7% ±2.4 pp5,657 ±512
Married 61.0% ±4.3 pp12,917 ±920
Separated 1.0% ±0.5 pp210 ±115
Divorced 6.3% ±1.0 pp1,326 ±221
Widowed 5.1% ±0.9 pp1,080 ±185
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Never Married 26.7%±2.4 pp5,657±512 46.8%±0.2 pp1,520,630±7,726 ▼ -20.1% 107/110
Married 61.0%±4.3 pp12,917±920 38.5%±0.2 pp1,249,312±6,703 ▲ +22.5% 3/110
Separated 1.0%±0.5 pp210±115 2.3%±0.1 pp75,298±2,109 ▼ -1.3% 95/110
Divorced 6.3%±1.0 pp1,326±221 8.0%±0.1 pp260,053±4,066 ▼ -1.7% 94/110
Widowed 5.1%±0.9 pp1,080±185 4.4%±0.1 pp143,800±3,312 ▲ +0.7% 31/110
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category Porter Ranch
Speak English Only 51.1% ±3.0 pp12,138 ±715
Other Indo-European 18.5% ±3.5 pp4,393 ±821
Spanish 6.8% ±1.5 pp1,606 ±351
Tagalog (incl. Filipino) 5.0% ±1.6 pp1,199 ±379
Korean 4.8% ±1.3 pp1,136 ±316
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese) 4.8% ±1.3 pp1,130 ±304
Other Asian and Pacific Island 3.0% ±1.4 pp707 ±330
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic 2.5% ±1.0 pp602 ±245
Other Languages 2.4% ±1.3 pp574 ±299
Arabic 1.2% ±0.6 pp277 ±133
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Speak English Only 51.1%±3.0 pp12,138±715 43.6%±0.3 pp1,595,910±12,698 ▲ +7.5% 50/110
Other Indo-European 18.5%±3.5 pp4,393±821 5.3%±0.2 pp192,760±5,783 ▲ +13.2% 5/78
Spanish 6.8%±1.5 pp1,606±351 39.3%±0.3 pp1,439,364±9,227 ▼ -32.5% 98/110
Tagalog (incl. Filipino) 5.0%±1.6 pp1,199±379 2.3%±0.1 pp85,207±3,084 ▲ +2.7% 10/63
Korean 4.8%±1.3 pp1,136±316 2.3%±0.1 pp84,148±2,929 ▲ +2.5% 12/49
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese) 4.8%±1.3 pp1,130±304 1.7%±0.1 pp62,141±2,430 ▲ +3.1% 13/58
Other Asian and Pacific Island 3.0%±1.4 pp707±330 1.3%±0.1 pp48,809±2,136 ▲ +1.6% 11/59
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic 2.5%±1.0 pp602±245 1.3%±0.1 pp46,460±2,679 ▲ +1.3% 14/47
Other Languages 2.4%±1.3 pp574±299 1.0%±0.1 pp36,540±2,239 ▲ +1.4% 68/110
Arabic 1.2%±0.6 pp277±133 0.5%±0.0 pp16,805±1,755 ▲ +0.7% 10/12
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show
Category Porter Ranch
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 85.0% ±2.5 pp85.0%±2.5 pp20,258 ±592
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 9.8% ±1.5 pp9.8%±1.5 pp2,340 ±358
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 4.6% ±1.5 pp47.1%±12.9 pp1,101 ±347
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 0.5% ±0.7 pp5.2%±6.9 pp122 ±162
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 15.0% ±2.1 pp152.3%±31.9 pp3,563 ±509
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 85.0%±2.5 pp85.0%±2.5 pp20,258±592 75.0%±0.4 pp75.0%±0.4 pp2,746,425±15,454 ▲ +10.1%▲ +10.1% 44/110
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 9.8%±1.5 pp9.8%±1.5 pp2,340±358 11.4%±0.2 pp11.4%±0.2 pp417,261±5,774 ▼ -1.6%▼ -1.6% 57/110
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 4.6%±1.5 pp47.1%±12.9 pp1,101±347 9.5%±0.2 pp83.3%±0.9 pp347,471±6,114 ▼ -4.9%▼ -36.2% 71/11089/110
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 0.5%±0.7 pp5.2%±6.9 pp122±162 4.2%±0.1 pp36.6%±0.8 pp152,518±4,020 ▼ -3.7%▼ -31.3% 90/110102/110
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 15.0%±2.1 pp152.3%±31.9 pp3,563±509 25.0%±0.3 pp219.8%±3.8 pp917,250±9,304 ▼ -10.1%▼ -67.6% 67/11096/110
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category Porter Ranch
Married-Couple Households 69.0% ±3.3 pp5,750 ±274
Unmarried-Couple Households 3.4% ±1.5 pp287 ±126
One-Person Households 13.3% ±2.4 pp1,107 ±202
Other Household Types 14.2% ±6.6 pp1,184 ±546
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Married-Couple Households 69.0%±3.3 pp5,750±274 37.0%±0.3 pp531,842±3,893 ▲ +32.1% 1/110
Unmarried-Couple Households 3.4%±1.5 pp287±126 8.8%±0.2 pp125,985±2,722 ▼ -5.3% 107/110
One-Person Households 13.3%±2.4 pp1,107±202 31.8%±0.3 pp458,302±4,544 ▼ -18.6% 107/110
Other Household Types 14.2%±6.6 pp1,184±546 22.4%±0.5 pp322,968±7,912 ▼ -8.2% 92/110
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category Porter Ranch
Children in Married-Couple Households 77.3% ±2.7 pp3,921 ±138
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 3.9% ±3.7 pp196 ±186
Children in Single-Mother Households 10.3% ±5.3 pp522 ±268
Children in Single-Father Households 8.6% ±5.0 pp435 ±255
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households 77.3%±2.7 pp3,921±138 60.7%±0.6 pp447,843±4,339 ▲ +16.5% 25/110
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 3.9%±3.7 pp196±186 10.9%±0.5 pp80,543±3,499 ▼ -7.1% 87/110
Children in Single-Mother Households 10.3%±5.3 pp522±268 22.7%±0.7 pp167,403±4,794 ▼ -12.4% 93/110
Children in Single-Father Households 8.6%±5.0 pp435±255 5.6%±0.3 pp41,515±2,120 ▲ +2.9% 15/110
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show
Category Porter Ranch
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 3.5% ±0.7 pp3.5%±0.7 pp696 ±145
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 9.9% ±10.2 pp0.3%±0.4 pp69 ±71
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 10.2% ±10.7 pp0.4%±0.4 pp71 ±75
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 49.5% ±14.0 pp1.7%±0.5 pp344 ±98
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 11.7% ±10.5 pp0.4%±0.4 pp82 ±73
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 18.7% ±14.4 pp0.7%±0.5 pp130 ±100
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 3.5%±0.7 pp3.5%±0.7 pp696±145 2.2%±0.1 pp2.2%±0.1 pp67,714±2,153 ▲ +1.3%▲ +1.3% 18/110
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 9.9%±10.2 pp0.3%±0.4 pp69±71 25.0%±1.1 pp0.5%±0.0 pp16,948±757 ▼ -15.2%▼ -0.2% 93/11071/110
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 10.2%±10.7 pp0.4%±0.4 pp71±75 12.9%±1.0 pp0.3%±0.0 pp8,738±667 ▼ -2.7%▲ +0.1% 60/11029/110
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 49.5%±14.0 pp1.7%±0.5 pp344±98 29.1%±1.1 pp0.6%±0.0 pp19,723±754 ▲ +20.3%▲ +1.1% 11/1105/110
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 11.7%±10.5 pp0.4%±0.4 pp82±73 5.9%±0.8 pp0.1%±0.0 pp4,026±537 ▲ +5.8%▲ +0.3% 20/1109/110
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 18.7%±14.4 pp0.7%±0.5 pp130±100 27.0%±1.8 pp0.6%±0.0 pp18,279±1,202 ▼ -8.3%▲ +0.1% 85/11044/110
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show
Category Porter Ranch
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 60.6% ±2.7 pp60.6%±2.7 pp15,221 ±677
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 39.4% ±2.6 pp39.4%±2.6 pp9,878 ±640
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 33.4% ±2.5 pp84.9%±2.9 pp8,385 ±616
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 6.0% ±1.2 pp15.1%±2.8 pp1,494 ±291
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 60.6%±2.7 pp60.6%±2.7 pp15,221±677 64.3%±0.3 pp64.3%±0.3 pp2,479,853±10,798 ▼ -3.6%▼ -3.6% 80/110
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 39.4%±2.6 pp39.4%±2.6 pp9,878±640 35.7%±0.3 pp35.7%±0.3 pp1,377,410±11,170 ▲ +3.6%▲ +3.6% 31/110
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 33.4%±2.5 pp84.9%±2.9 pp8,385±616 18.0%±0.2 pp50.4%±0.3 pp693,647±6,987 ▲ +15.4%▲ +34.5% 3/1101/110
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 6.0%±1.2 pp15.1%±2.8 pp1,494±291 17.7%±0.2 pp49.6%±0.5 pp683,763±8,715 ▼ -11.8%▼ -34.5% 102/110110/110
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show
Category Porter Ranch
Born in Korea (of foreign-born residents) 5.1%±1.3 pp13.1%±3.2 pp1,287±332
Born in Philippines (of foreign-born residents) 4.8%±1.5 pp12.1%±3.7 pp1,197±376
Born in Iran (of foreign-born residents) 2.9%±1.0 pp7.4%±2.5 pp725±253
Born in Armenia (of foreign-born residents) 2.6%±1.5 pp6.6%±3.9 pp653±387
Born in Lebanon (of foreign-born residents) 2.4%±0.8 pp6.2%±2.0 pp607±201
Born in India (of foreign-born residents) 2.1%±0.8 pp5.3%±1.9 pp524±192
Born in China / Hong Kong (of foreign-born residents) 1.9%±0.6 pp4.7%±1.4 pp467±140
Born in Syria (of foreign-born residents) 1.7%±1.3 pp4.3%±3.4 pp423±334
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 14.9%37.8%3,730
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch Los Angeles Difference Rank
Born in Korea (of foreign-born residents) 5.1% ±1.3 pp13.1%±3.2 pp1,287 1.9% ±0.1 pp5.2%72,218 ▲ +3.3%▲ +7.8% 10/11010/110
Born in Philippines (of foreign-born residents) 4.8% ±1.5 pp12.1%±3.7 pp1,197 2.3% ±0.1 pp6.4%88,183 ▲ +2.5%▲ +5.7% 13/11014/110
Born in Iran (of foreign-born residents) 2.9% ±1.0 pp7.4%±2.5 pp725 1.5% ±0.1 pp4.2%57,838 ▲ +1.4%▲ +3.2% 21/11023/110
Born in Armenia (of foreign-born residents) 2.6% ±1.5 pp6.6%±3.9 pp653 1.1% ±0.1 pp3.0%40,847 ▲ +1.5%▲ +3.7% 10/11012/110
Born in Lebanon (of foreign-born residents) 2.4% ±0.8 pp6.2%±2.0 pp607 0.2% ±0.0 pp0.5%6,580 ▲ +2.3%▲ +5.7% 1/1101/110
Born in India (of foreign-born residents) 2.1% ±0.8 pp5.3%±1.9 pp524 0.6% ±0.0 pp1.7%23,290 ▲ +1.5%▲ +3.6% 9/11011/110
Born in China / Hong Kong (of foreign-born residents) 1.9% ±0.6 pp4.7%±1.4 pp467 1.0% ±0.0 pp2.8%38,593 ▲ +0.9%▲ +1.9% 24/11033/110
Born in Syria (of foreign-born residents) 1.7% ±1.3 pp4.3%±3.4 pp423 0.1% ±0.0 pp0.3%3,992 ▲ +1.6%▲ +4.0% 1/1102/110
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 14.9%37.8%3,730 ——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show
Category Porter Ranch
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 5.0% ±1.3 pp12.7%±3.3 pp1,253 ±337
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 4.9% ±1.3 pp12.6%±3.2 pp1,239 ±326
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 8.3% ±2.0 pp21.1%±4.8 pp2,076 ±494
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 21.1% ±1.8 pp53.7%±2.8 pp5,293 ±449
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 5.0%±1.3 pp12.7%±3.3 pp1,253±337 8.0%±0.2 pp3119.5%±218.6 pp307,579±6,156 ▼ -3.0%▼ -3106.8% 79/11099/110
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 4.9%±1.3 pp12.6%±3.2 pp1,239±326 7.2%±0.1 pp2829.3%±196.6 pp278,968±4,987 ▼ -2.3%▼ -2816.7% 71/11098/110
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 8.3%±2.0 pp21.1%±4.8 pp2,076±494 7.6%±0.1 pp2977.3%±205.8 pp293,558±4,815 ▲ +0.7%▼ -2956.2% 37/11052/110
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 21.1%±1.8 pp53.7%±2.8 pp5,293±449 12.9%±0.1 pp5043.7%±343.7 pp497,305±5,768 ▲ +8.2%▼ -4990.0% 2/1102/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later 0.6% ±0.4 pp152 ±110 2.3% ±0.7 pp588 ±191 5.0% ±1.3 pp1,253 ±337 ▲ +4.4 pp▲ +1,101▲ +2.7 pp▲ +665▲ +1.7 pp▲ +436
Los Angeles citywide 1.7% ±0.1 pp64,948 ±2,271 5.1% ±0.1 pp202,940 ±3,998 8.0% ±0.2 pp307,579 ±6,179 ▲ +6.3 pp▲ +242,631▲ +2.9 pp▲ +104,639▲ +3.4 pp▲ +137,992
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 3.5% ±0.9 pp930 ±230 5.8% ±1.1 pp1,502 ±278 4.9% ±1.3 pp1,239 ±326 ▲ +1.5 pp▲ +309▼ −0.9 pp▼ −263▲ +2.4 pp▲ +572
Los Angeles citywide 10.0% ±0.2 pp386,575 ±5,794 8.5% ±0.1 pp335,409 ±4,817 7.2% ±0.1 pp278,968 ±5,010 ▼ −2.8 pp▼ −107,607▼ −1.2 pp▼ −56,441▼ −1.6 pp▼ −51,166
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 6.2% ±1.1 pp1,676 ±296 5.9% ±1.0 pp1,509 ±266 8.3% ±2.0 pp2,076 ±494 ▲ +2.0 pp▲ +400▲ +2.4 pp▲ +567▼ −0.4 pp▼ −167
Los Angeles citywide 9.9% ±0.1 pp381,773 ±4,974 8.5% ±0.1 pp338,094 ±4,761 7.6% ±0.1 pp293,558 ±4,841 ▼ −2.3 pp▼ −88,215▼ −0.9 pp▼ −44,536▼ −1.4 pp▼ −43,679
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 24.4% ±1.9 pp6,546 ±507 23.5% ±1.5 pp6,048 ±381 21.1% ±1.8 pp5,293 ±449 ▼ −3.2 pp▼ −1,253▼ −2.4 pp▼ −755▼ −0.9 pp▼ −498
Los Angeles citywide 17.0% ±0.2 pp655,695 ±5,798 14.8% ±0.1 pp585,903 ±4,838 12.9% ±0.2 pp497,305 ±5,831 ▼ −4.1 pp▼ −158,390▼ −1.9 pp▼ −88,598▼ −2.2 pp▼ −69,792
Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category Porter Ranch
Average Household Income $182,917±$8,091
Per Capita Income $61,363±$1,746
10th Percentile Household Income $44,140±$7,314
25th Percentile Household Income $85,698±$9,896
Median Household Income $158,042±$11,009
75th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000
90th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $182,917±$8,091 $125,130±$1,000 ▲ +$57,787 22/110
Per Capita Income $61,363±$1,746 $47,685±$375 ▲ +$13,677 39/110
10th Percentile Household Income $44,140±$7,314 $14,186±$216 ▲ +$29,955 1/110
25th Percentile Household Income $85,698±$9,896 $37,123±$496 ▲ +$48,575 3/110
Median Household Income $158,042±$11,009 $81,939±$742 ▲ +$76,103 8/110
75th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000 $154,703±$1,370 ▲ +$45,297+ 1/110
90th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000 Over $200,000 — 1/110
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $168,955 ±8,954 $197,711 ±8,886 $182,917 ±8,091 ▲ +$13,961▼ −$14,794▲ +$28,756
Los Angeles citywide $103,745 ±722 $118,302 ±915 $125,130 ±1,000 ▲ +$21,385▲ +$6,828▲ +$14,557
Average Household Income (nominal dollars) $127,508 ±6,758 $161,135 ±7,242 $182,917 ±8,091 ▲ +$55,409▲ +$21,782▲ +$33,627
Los Angeles citywide $78,294 ±545 $96,416 ±746 $125,130 ±1,000 ▲ +$46,835▲ +$28,714▲ +$18,122
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $55,904 ±2,619 $67,823 ±2,253 $61,363 ±1,746 ▲ +$5,459▼ −$6,461▲ +$11,920
Los Angeles citywide $37,526 ±267 $43,265 ±333 $47,685 ±375 ▲ +$10,159▲ +$4,420▲ +$5,739
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars) $42,190 ±1,977 $55,276 ±1,836 $61,363 ±1,746 ▲ +$19,173▲ +$6,086▲ +$13,086
Los Angeles citywide $28,320 ±202 $35,261 ±271 $47,685 ±375 ▲ +$19,365▲ +$12,424▲ +$6,941
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $38,820 ±5,843 $49,309 ±5,914 $44,140 ±7,314 ▲ +$5,321▼ −$5,169▲ +$10,489
Los Angeles citywide $15,033 ±149 $15,850 ±169 $14,186 ±216 ▼ −$847▼ −$1,664▲ +$817
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $29,297 ±4,409 $40,187 ±4,820 $44,140 ±7,314 ▲ +$14,844▲ +$3,953▲ +$10,890
Los Angeles citywide $11,345 ±113 $12,918 ±138 $14,186 ±216 ▲ +$2,841▲ +$1,268▲ +$1,573
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $78,347 ±7,355 $92,143 ±6,750 $85,698 ±9,896 ▲ +$7,352▼ −$6,445▲ +$13,796
Los Angeles citywide $30,727 ±279 $35,350 ±357 $37,123 ±496 ▲ +$6,396▲ +$1,773▲ +$4,623
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $59,127 ±5,551 $75,096 ±5,501 $85,698 ±9,896 ▲ +$26,571▲ +$10,602▲ +$15,970
Los Angeles citywide $23,189 ±211 $28,810 ±291 $37,123 ±496 ▲ +$13,934▲ +$8,313▲ +$5,621
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $138,106 ±6,805 $161,831 ±7,449 $158,042 ±11,009 ▲ +$19,936▼ −$3,789▲ +$23,725
Los Angeles citywide $65,832 ±458 $76,248 ±555 $81,939 ±742 ▲ +$16,107▲ +$5,691▲ +$10,416
Median Household Income (nominal dollars) $104,227 ±5,135 $131,892 ±6,071 $158,042 ±11,009 ▲ +$53,815▲ +$26,150▲ +$27,666
Los Angeles citywide $49,682 ±346 $62,142 ±452 $81,939 ±742 ▲ +$32,257▲ +$19,797▲ +$12,460
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $217,249 ±10,930 — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $127,020 ±723 $145,116 ±805 $154,703 ±1,370 ▲ +$27,684▲ +$9,587▲ +$18,097
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $163,955 ±8,249 — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $95,860 ±545 $118,270 ±656 $154,703 ±1,370 ▲ +$58,844▲ +$36,433▲ +$22,410
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $221,824 ±1,731 $245,212 ±895 — ——▲ +$23,388
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $167,407 ±1,307 $199,848 ±730 — ——▲ +$32,441

Poverty Status

Category Porter Ranch
Below Poverty Line 4.9% ±1.5 pp1,234 ±383
Below 200% Poverty Line 10.3% ±2.2 pp2,581 ±560
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 2.0% ±0.7 pp503 ±175
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Below Poverty Line 4.9%±1.5 pp1,234±383 16.5%±0.3 pp638,207±11,569 ▼ -11.6% 108/110
Below 200% Poverty Line 10.3%±2.2 pp2,581±560 34.8%±0.4 pp1,343,960±17,101 ▼ -24.6% 107/110
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 2.0%±0.7 pp503±175 8.0%±0.2 pp308,978±7,316 ▼ -6.0% 110/110
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Category Porter Ranch
Food Insecurity 8.8%1,705
Housing Insecurity 7.6%1,473
Transportation Barriers 5.0%958
Threatened Utility Shutoff 3.4%653
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Food Insecurity 8.8%1,705 23.6%700,942 ▼ -14.8% 96/110
Housing Insecurity 7.6%1,473 19.3%573,228 ▼ -11.7% 100/110
Transportation Barriers 5.0%958 11.8%350,471 ▼ -6.8% 100/110
Threatened Utility Shutoff 3.4%653 9.0%267,308 ▼ -5.6% 103/110
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category Porter Ranch
In Labor Force 81.4% ±2.3 pp7,170 ±201
↳ Employed 77.1% ±2.5 pp6,793 ±224
↳ Unemployed 4.3% ±1.6 pp377 ±144
↳ Unemployment Rate 5.3% ±2.0 pp—
Not in Labor Force 18.6% ±8.8 pp1,643 ±771
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
In Labor Force 81.4%±2.3 pp7,170±201 83.1%±0.2 pp1,458,393±3,960 ▼ -1.8% 76/110
↳ Employed 77.1%±2.5 pp6,793±224 76.8%±0.3 pp1,346,606±4,643 ▲ +0.3% 64/110
↳ Unemployed 4.3%±1.6 pp377±144 6.3%±0.2 pp110,332±3,016 ▼ -2.0% 94/110
↳ Unemployment Rate 5.3%±2.0 pp— 7.6%±0.2 pp132,846±3,594 ▼ -2.3% 94/110
Not in Labor Force 18.6%±8.8 pp1,643±771 16.9%±0.8 pp295,844±13,970 ▲ +1.8% 35/110
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category Porter Ranch
Management, Business, Science & Arts 60.7% ±3.9 pp7,092 ±460
↳ Management Occupations 15.1% ±2.3 pp1,758 ±274
↳ Business & Financial Operations 11.3% ±2.1 pp1,326 ±251
↳ Computer & Mathematical 5.0% ±1.2 pp584 ±143
↳ Architecture & Engineering 3.5% ±1.0 pp413 ±121
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 2.1% ±1.0 pp250 ±122
↳ Community & Social Service 2.4% ±1.0 pp275 ±121
↳ Legal Occupations 2.7% ±1.0 pp311 ±118
↳ Education, Training & Library 6.2% ±1.2 pp729 ±146
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 4.3% ±1.2 pp506 ±135
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 6.7% ±1.4 pp785 ±167
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 1.3% ±0.8 pp156 ±96
Service 9.9% ±2.1 pp1,154 ±243
↳ Healthcare Support 4.5% ±1.6 pp526 ±192
↳ Protective Service 0.8% ±0.6 pp92 ±76
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 2.5% ±1.0 pp294 ±112
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 0.6% ±0.6 pp72 ±75
↳ Personal Care & Service 1.5% ±0.7 pp170 ±81
Sales & Office 20.6% ±3.2 pp2,412 ±376
↳ Sales & Related 10.9% ±2.0 pp1,276 ±237
↳ Office & Administrative Support 9.7% ±2.4 pp1,136 ±283
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 3.8% ±1.6 pp448 ±186
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.1% ±0.5 pp9 ±61
↳ Construction & Extraction 2.1% ±1.2 pp244 ±143
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 1.7% ±1.1 pp195 ±124
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 4.9% ±1.6 pp575 ±187
↳ Production Occupations 2.6% ±1.3 pp301 ±148
↳ Transportation Occupations 1.4% ±0.9 pp162 ±103
↳ Material Moving Occupations 1.0% ±0.6 pp112 ±72
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts 60.7%±3.9 pp7,092±460 43.8%±0.3 pp856,718±5,665 ▲ +16.9% 38/110
↳ Management Occupations 15.1%±2.3 pp1,758±274 11.0%±0.2 pp215,767±3,237 ▲ +4.0% 35/110
↳ Business & Financial Operations 11.3%±2.1 pp1,326±251 6.1%±0.1 pp119,779±2,742 ▲ +5.2% 11/110
↳ Computer & Mathematical 5.0%±1.2 pp584±143 2.8%±0.1 pp55,551±1,839 ▲ +2.2% 13/110
↳ Architecture & Engineering 3.5%±1.0 pp413±121 1.6%±0.1 pp31,959±1,411 ▲ +1.9% 5/110
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 2.1%±1.0 pp250±122 1.1%±0.1 pp21,801±1,140 ▲ +1.0% 17/110
↳ Community & Social Service 2.4%±1.0 pp275±121 1.8%±0.1 pp34,335±1,497 ▲ +0.6% 24/110
↳ Legal Occupations 2.7%±1.0 pp311±118 2.1%±0.1 pp40,323±1,500 ▲ +0.6% 39/110
↳ Education, Training & Library 6.2%±1.2 pp729±146 5.1%±0.1 pp100,542±2,462 ▲ +1.1% 31/110
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 4.3%±1.2 pp506±135 7.4%±0.2 pp144,867±2,938 ▼ -3.1% 72/110
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 6.7%±1.4 pp785±167 3.3%±0.1 pp64,007±2,042 ▲ +3.4% 10/110
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 1.3%±0.8 pp156±96 1.4%±0.1 pp27,787±1,316 ▼ -0.1% 51/110
Service 9.9%±2.1 pp1,154±243 19.1%±0.2 pp372,654±4,348 ▼ -9.2% 93/110
↳ Healthcare Support 4.5%±1.6 pp526±192 4.1%±0.1 pp80,369±2,120 ▲ +0.4% 52/110
↳ Protective Service 0.8%±0.6 pp92±76 1.4%±0.1 pp28,096±1,344 ▼ -0.6% 77/110
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 2.5%±1.0 pp294±112 6.0%±0.1 pp117,268±2,832 ▼ -3.5% 100/110
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 0.6%±0.6 pp72±75 4.6%±0.1 pp89,319±2,441 ▼ -4.0% 96/110
↳ Personal Care & Service 1.5%±0.7 pp170±81 2.9%±0.1 pp57,602±2,122 ▼ -1.5% 106/110
Sales & Office 20.6%±3.2 pp2,412±376 18.5%±0.2 pp362,312±4,169 ▲ +2.1% 25/110
↳ Sales & Related 10.9%±2.0 pp1,276±237 8.7%±0.2 pp170,605±3,233 ▲ +2.2% 9/110
↳ Office & Administrative Support 9.7%±2.4 pp1,136±283 9.8%±0.2 pp191,707±3,358 ▼ -0.1% 60/110
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 3.8%±1.6 pp448±186 7.5%±0.1 pp146,574±2,638 ▼ -3.7% 68/110
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.1%±0.5 pp9±61 0.3%±0.0 pp5,780±677 ▼ -0.2% 67/110
↳ Construction & Extraction 2.1%±1.2 pp244±143 5.2%±0.1 pp101,165±2,372 ▼ -3.1% 72/110
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 1.7%±1.1 pp195±124 2.0%±0.1 pp39,629±1,434 ▼ -0.4% 58/110
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 4.9%±1.6 pp575±187 11.0%±0.2 pp215,668±3,737 ▼ -6.1% 78/110
↳ Production Occupations 2.6%±1.3 pp301±148 4.4%±0.1 pp85,463±2,595 ▼ -1.8% 63/110
↳ Transportation Occupations 1.4%±0.9 pp162±103 3.3%±0.1 pp64,837±2,015 ▼ -1.9% 84/110
↳ Material Moving Occupations 1.0%±0.6 pp112±72 3.3%±0.1 pp65,368±2,325 ▼ -2.4% 83/110
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category Porter Ranch
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.4% ±0.6 pp49 ±70
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.4% ±0.6 pp49 ±70
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0% ±0.5 pp0
Construction 2.9% ±0.9 pp334 ±104
Manufacturing 8.6% ±1.9 pp1,009 ±220
Wholesale Trade 1.7% ±1.0 pp197 ±118
Retail Trade 9.7% ±2.1 pp1,135 ±244
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 3.9% ±1.1 pp454 ±133
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 2.8% ±1.0 pp322 ±114
↳ Utilities 1.1% ±0.8 pp132 ±89
Information 4.6% ±1.4 pp538 ±160
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 10.7% ±1.8 pp1,255 ±213
↳ Finance & Insurance 9.0% ±1.7 pp1,051 ±197
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.7% ±0.8 pp204 ±97
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 14.0% ±2.0 pp1,637 ±233
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 11.0% ±2.0 pp1,283 ±229
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.1% ±0.5 pp11 ±60
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 2.9% ±1.0 pp344 ±123
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 26.6% ±2.3 pp3,111 ±267
↳ Educational Services 10.5% ±1.5 pp1,230 ±180
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 16.1% ±2.3 pp1,882 ±264
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 6.6% ±1.5 pp766 ±173
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 2.6% ±0.9 pp309 ±105
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 3.9% ±1.3 pp457 ±149
Other Services 4.5% ±1.7 pp521 ±197
Public Administration 5.8% ±1.4 pp674 ±163
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.4%±0.6 pp49±70 0.4%±0.0 pp— 0% 37/110
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.4%±0.6 pp49±70 0.4%±0.0 pp— 0% 32/110
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%±0.5 pp0 0.0%±0.0 pp— 0% 30/110
Construction 2.9%±0.9 pp334±104 6.5%±0.1 pp— ▼ -3.6% 77/110
Manufacturing 8.6%±1.9 pp1,009±220 6.8%±0.2 pp— ▲ +1.8% 26/110
Wholesale Trade 1.7%±1.0 pp197±118 2.3%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.7% 80/110
Retail Trade 9.7%±2.1 pp1,135±244 9.3%±0.2 pp— ▲ +0.4% 42/110
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 3.9%±1.1 pp454±133 5.3%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.4% 65/110
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 2.8%±1.0 pp322±114 4.9%±0.1 pp— ▼ -2.2% 79/110
↳ Utilities 1.1%±0.8 pp132±89 0.4%±0.0 pp— ▲ +0.7% 4/110
Information 4.6%±1.4 pp538±160 6.4%±0.2 pp— ▼ -1.8% 66/110
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 10.7%±1.8 pp1,255±213 5.8%±0.1 pp— ▲ +4.9% 8/110
↳ Finance & Insurance 9.0%±1.7 pp1,051±197 3.5%±0.1 pp— ▲ +5.5% 4/110
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.7%±0.8 pp204±97 2.3%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.6% 74/110
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 14.0%±2.0 pp1,637±233 15.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -1.6% 60/110
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 11.0%±2.0 pp1,283±229 10.3%±0.2 pp— ▲ +0.6% 50/110
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.1%±0.5 pp11±60 0.1%±0.0 pp— 0% 40/110
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 2.9%±1.0 pp344±123 5.2%±0.1 pp— ▼ -2.2% 84/110
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 26.6%±2.3 pp3,111±267 20.8%±0.2 pp— ▲ +5.9% 10/110
↳ Educational Services 10.5%±1.5 pp1,230±180 8.1%±0.2 pp— ▲ +2.4% 21/110
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 16.1%±2.3 pp1,882±264 12.6%±0.2 pp— ▲ +3.5% 13/110
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 6.6%±1.5 pp766±173 12.0%±0.2 pp— ▼ -5.4% 104/110
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 2.6%±0.9 pp309±105 4.1%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.5% 75/110
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 3.9%±1.3 pp457±149 7.9%±0.2 pp— ▼ -3.9% 93/110
Other Services 4.5%±1.7 pp521±197 6.0%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.5% 78/110
Public Administration 5.8%±1.4 pp674±163 2.7%±0.1 pp— ▲ +3.1% 3/110
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category Porter Ranch
Private Company Employee 58.8% ±1.7 pp6,870 ±202
Self-Employed 17.5% ±3.3 pp2,039 ±390
Nonprofit 8.1% ±1.6 pp948 ±192
Government 15.4% ±2.0 pp1,799 ±231
Unpaid Family Worker 0.2% ±0.5 pp25 ±61
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Private Company Employee 58.8%±1.7 pp6,870±202 66.9%±0.3 pp1,307,510±5,830 ▼ -8.1% 92/110
Self-Employed 17.5%±3.3 pp2,039±390 16.2%±0.2 pp316,694±4,405 ▲ +1.2% 38/110
Nonprofit 8.1%±1.6 pp948±192 8.0%±0.2 pp155,457±3,565 ▲ +0.2% 50/110
Government 15.4%±2.0 pp1,799±231 10.6%±0.2 pp207,304±3,359 ▲ +4.8% 16/110
Unpaid Family Worker 0.2%±0.5 pp25±61 0.3%±0.0 pp5,059±497 0% 55/110
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category Porter Ranch
Full-Time, Year-Round 67.1% ±2.1 pp8,505 ±270
Part-Time or Part-Year 32.9% ±2.8 pp4,168 ±350
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round 67.1%±2.1 pp8,505±270 61.7%±0.2 pp1,328,967±3,929 ▲ +5.4% 14/110
Part-Time or Part-Year 32.9%±2.8 pp4,168±350 38.3%±0.3 pp826,047±5,840 ▼ -5.4% 97/110
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category Porter Ranch
Average FT Earnings $120,411±$4,880
10th Percentile FT Earnings $32,715±$3,466
25th Percentile FT Earnings $61,117±$6,485
Median FT Earnings Over $100,000
75th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000
90th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Average FT Earnings $120,411±$4,880 $93,330±$761 ▲ +$27,081 38/110
10th Percentile FT Earnings $32,715±$3,466 $25,056±$255 ▲ +$7,659 33/110
25th Percentile FT Earnings $61,117±$6,485 $37,825±$214 ▲ +$23,293 18/110
Median FT Earnings Over $100,000 $61,975±$422 ▲ +$38,025+ 1/110
75th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/110
90th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/110
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $115,134 ±4,974 $128,616 ±6,097 $120,411 ±4,880 ▲ +$5,277▼ −$8,205▲ +$13,482
Los Angeles citywide $78,876 ±537 $84,242 ±564 $93,330 ±761 ▲ +$14,455▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,367
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $86,890 ±3,753 $104,822 ±4,969 $120,411 ±4,880 ▲ +$33,521▲ +$15,589▲ +$17,932
Los Angeles citywide $59,526 ±405 $68,658 ±460 $93,330 ±761 ▲ +$33,804▲ +$24,673▲ +$9,131
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $34,040 ±4,106 $34,893 ±4,313 $32,715 ±3,466 ▼ −$1,325▼ −$2,179▲ +$854
Los Angeles citywide $20,202 ±88 $21,993 ±185 $25,056 ±255 ▲ +$4,854▲ +$3,063▲ +$1,791
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $25,689 ±3,099 $28,438 ±3,515 $32,715 ±3,466 ▲ +$7,025▲ +$4,277▲ +$2,749
Los Angeles citywide $15,246 ±66 $17,924 ±151 $25,056 ±255 ▲ +$9,810▲ +$7,132▲ +$2,678
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $53,318 ±3,699 $58,371 ±3,781 $61,117 ±6,485 ▲ +$7,799▲ +$2,746▲ +$5,053
Los Angeles citywide $29,363 ±173 $32,975 ±184 $37,825 ±214 ▲ +$8,461▲ +$4,850▲ +$3,611
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $40,238 ±2,791 $47,572 ±3,081 $61,117 ±6,485 ▲ +$20,879▲ +$13,545▲ +$7,334
Los Angeles citywide $22,160 ±131 $26,874 ±150 $37,825 ±214 ▲ +$15,665▲ +$10,950▲ +$4,714
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $89,996 ±5,778 $104,395 ±6,023 — ——▲ +$14,399
Los Angeles citywide $51,909 ±336 $54,226 ±279 $61,975 ±422 ▲ +$10,067▲ +$7,750▲ +$2,317
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $67,919 ±4,361 $85,082 ±4,908 — ——▲ +$17,164
Los Angeles citywide $39,175 ±254 $44,194 ±227 $61,975 ±422 ▲ +$22,801▲ +$17,781▲ +$5,019
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $91,403 ±620 $98,002 ±683 — ——▲ +$6,599
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $68,981 ±468 $79,872 ±557 — ——▲ +$10,891
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category Porter Ranch
Average PT Earnings $37,542±$5,019
10th Percentile PT Earnings $2,535±$706
25th Percentile PT Earnings $7,492±$2,134
Median PT Earnings $20,623±$2,568
75th Percentile PT Earnings $43,013±$7,485
90th Percentile PT Earnings $99,185±$10,818
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Average PT Earnings $37,542±$5,019 $36,543±$574 ▲ +$1,000 53/110
10th Percentile PT Earnings $2,535±$706 $2,785±$92 ▼ −$250 76/110
25th Percentile PT Earnings $7,492±$2,134 $8,451±$190 ▼ −$959 86/110
Median PT Earnings $20,623±$2,568 $20,275±$216 ▲ +$348 53/110
75th Percentile PT Earnings $43,013±$7,485 $39,236±$450 ▲ +$3,777 49/110
90th Percentile PT Earnings $99,185±$10,818 $80,378±$1,643 ▲ +$18,807 46/110
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $40,335 ±5,901 $50,117 ±6,933 $37,542 ±5,019 ▼ −$2,793▼ −$12,575▲ +$9,782
Los Angeles citywide $30,652 ±490 $34,166 ±509 $36,543 ±574 ▲ +$5,890▲ +$2,377▲ +$3,513
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $30,441 ±4,453 $40,846 ±5,651 $37,542 ±5,019 ▲ +$7,102▼ −$3,303▲ +$10,405
Los Angeles citywide $23,133 ±369 $27,845 ±415 $36,543 ±574 ▲ +$13,410▲ +$8,698▲ +$4,712
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,389 ±529 $2,522 ±586 $2,535 ±706 ▲ +$146▲ +$13▲ +$133
Los Angeles citywide $2,482 ±54 $2,712 ±58 $2,785 ±92 ▲ +$303▲ +$73▲ +$230
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $1,803 ±399 $2,055 ±478 $2,535 ±706 ▲ +$732▲ +$480▲ +$253
Los Angeles citywide $1,873 ±41 $2,210 ±47 $2,785 ±92 ▲ +$912▲ +$575▲ +$337
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $6,415 ±1,119 $9,506 ±1,845 $7,492 ±2,134 ▲ +$1,077▼ −$2,014▲ +$3,091
Los Angeles citywide $7,239 ±105 $8,054 ±111 $8,451 ±190 ▲ +$1,212▲ +$397▲ +$815
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $4,841 ±845 $7,747 ±1,503 $7,492 ±2,134 ▲ +$2,650▼ −$256▲ +$2,906
Los Angeles citywide $5,463 ±79 $6,564 ±91 $8,451 ±190 ▲ +$2,988▲ +$1,887▲ +$1,101
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $18,715 ±3,644 $24,579 ±3,047 $20,623 ±2,568 ▲ +$1,908▼ −$3,956▲ +$5,864
Los Angeles citywide $16,086 ±129 $18,060 ±185 $20,275 ±216 ▲ +$4,189▲ +$2,215▲ +$1,973
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $14,124 ±2,750 $20,032 ±2,483 $20,623 ±2,568 ▲ +$6,500▲ +$591▲ +$5,908
Los Angeles citywide $12,140 ±97 $14,719 ±151 $20,275 ±216 ▲ +$8,135▲ +$5,556▲ +$2,579
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $50,217 ±7,454 $59,253 ±6,449 $43,013 ±7,485 ▼ −$7,204▼ −$16,240▲ +$9,036
Los Angeles citywide $33,887 ±443 $36,465 ±382 $39,236 ±450 ▲ +$5,349▲ +$2,771▲ +$2,578
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $37,898 ±5,625 $48,292 ±5,256 $43,013 ±7,485 ▲ +$5,115▼ −$5,279▲ +$10,394
Los Angeles citywide $25,574 ±335 $29,719 ±311 $39,236 ±450 ▲ +$13,662▲ +$9,517▲ +$4,145
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $104,985 ±9,913 $122,533 ±6,710 $99,185 ±10,818 ▼ −$5,800▼ −$23,349▲ +$17,548
Los Angeles citywide $68,714 ±742 $73,646 ±1,127 $80,378 ±1,643 ▲ +$11,664▲ +$6,732▲ +$4,932
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $79,230 ±7,481 $99,865 ±5,469 $99,185 ±10,818 ▲ +$19,954▼ −$680▲ +$20,634
Los Angeles citywide $51,857 ±560 $60,021 ±919 $80,378 ±1,643 ▲ +$28,521▲ +$20,356▲ +$8,164

Earnings of All Workers

Category Porter Ranch
Average Earnings $92,861±$1,942
10th Percentile Earnings $9,325±$2,022
25th Percentile Earnings $28,931±$3,028
Median Earnings $74,053±$5,825
75th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000
90th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Average Earnings $92,861±$1,942 $71,563±$569 ▲ +$21,298 36/110
10th Percentile Earnings $9,325±$2,022 $7,934±$179 ▲ +$1,391 50/110
25th Percentile Earnings $28,931±$3,028 $21,876±$191 ▲ +$7,054 33/110
Median Earnings $74,053±$5,825 $43,575±$259 ▲ +$30,478 16/110
75th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000 $85,854±$580 ▲ +$14,146+ 1/110
90th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/110
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $87,422 ±4,001 $100,017 ±4,405 $92,861 ±1,942 ▲ +$5,439▼ −$7,156▲ +$12,595
Los Angeles citywide $59,351 ±430 $65,850 ±455 $71,563 ±569 ▲ +$12,212▲ +$5,713▲ +$6,499
Average Earnings (nominal dollars) $65,976 ±3,020 $81,514 ±3,590 $92,861 ±1,942 ▲ +$26,885▲ +$11,347▲ +$15,538
Los Angeles citywide $44,791 ±324 $53,668 ±371 $71,563 ±569 ▲ +$26,772▲ +$17,895▲ +$8,877
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $7,186 ±1,280 $10,332 ±1,993 $9,325 ±2,022 ▲ +$2,139▼ −$1,007▲ +$3,146
Los Angeles citywide $6,842 ±104 $8,269 ±107 $7,934 ±179 ▲ +$1,091▼ −$335▲ +$1,427
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $5,423 ±966 $8,421 ±1,624 $9,325 ±2,022 ▲ +$3,902▲ +$904▲ +$2,998
Los Angeles citywide $5,164 ±78 $6,739 ±87 $7,934 ±179 ▲ +$2,770▲ +$1,194▲ +$1,576
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $26,105 ±2,568 $29,459 ±3,521 $28,931 ±3,028 ▲ +$2,826▼ −$529▲ +$3,355
Los Angeles citywide $17,205 ±143 $20,088 ±119 $21,876 ±191 ▲ +$4,671▲ +$1,789▲ +$2,883
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $19,701 ±1,938 $24,009 ±2,870 $28,931 ±3,028 ▲ +$9,230▲ +$4,921▲ +$4,309
Los Angeles citywide $12,984 ±108 $16,372 ±97 $21,876 ±191 ▲ +$8,892▲ +$5,505▲ +$3,387
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $63,292 ±3,942 $70,731 ±4,097 $74,053 ±5,825 ▲ +$10,760▲ +$3,322▲ +$7,439
Los Angeles citywide $35,447 ±232 $39,719 ±188 $43,575 ±259 ▲ +$8,128▲ +$3,856▲ +$4,272
Median Earnings (nominal dollars) $47,766 ±2,975 $57,646 ±3,339 $74,053 ±5,825 ▲ +$26,287▲ +$16,407▲ +$9,880
Los Angeles citywide $26,751 ±175 $32,371 ±154 $43,575 ±259 ▲ +$16,824▲ +$11,204▲ +$5,620
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $120,804 ±5,882 — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $70,301 ±313 $76,149 ±396 $85,854 ±580 ▲ +$15,552▲ +$9,705▲ +$5,848
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $91,169 ±4,439 — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $53,055 ±236 $62,062 ±323 $85,854 ±580 ▲ +$32,798▲ +$23,792▲ +$9,006
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $127,692 ±642 — — ———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $96,367 ±484 — — ———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Porter Ranch, Los Angeles

Category Porter Ranch
Household income at age 35 $79,752 ±$1,814
Household income percentile rank 62.5 ±0.82 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 39.8% ±1.30 pp
Individual income at age 35 $53,216 ±$1,054
Fraction married 46.8% ±1.35 pp
Employment rate 77.2% ±1.13 pp
Incarceration rate 0.45% ±0.20 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Porter Ranch, Los Angeles. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Porter Ranch, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Porter Ranch City Difference
Household income at age 35 $79,752 ±$1,814 $49,434 ±$103 +$30,318
Household income percentile rank 62.5 ±0.82 pp 45.3 ±0.06 pp +17.3 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 39.8% ±1.30 pp 15.3% ±0.08 pp +24.5 pp
Individual income at age 35 $53,216 ±$1,054 $37,125 ±$77 +$16,092
Fraction married 46.8% ±1.35 pp 32.5% ±0.11 pp +14.3 pp
Employment rate 77.2% ±1.13 pp 72.6% ±0.10 pp +4.6 pp
Incarceration rate 0.45% ±0.20 pp 1.30% ±0.03 pp −0.8 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Porter Ranch, Los Angeles. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Porter Ranch, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Porter Ranch, Los Angeles in Lower-Income Families

Category Porter Ranch
Household income at age 35 $63,790 ±$3,369
Household income percentile rank 54.4 ±1.79 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 27.8% ±2.61 pp
Individual income at age 35 $46,427 ±$2,136
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Porter Ranch, Los Angeles with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Porter Ranch, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Porter Ranch City Difference
Household income at age 35 $63,790 ±$3,369 $43,491 ±$125 +$20,299
Household income percentile rank 54.4 ±1.79 pp 41.6 ±0.08 pp +12.8 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 27.8% ±2.61 pp 10.5% ±0.10 pp +17.3 pp
Individual income at age 35 $46,427 ±$2,136 $33,937 ±$101 +$12,489
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Porter Ranch, Los Angeles with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Porter Ranch, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Porter Ranch, Los Angeles

Category Porter Ranch
Stayed in the greater Los Angeles area 73.4% ±1.19 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 23.2% ±1.14 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Porter Ranch, Los Angeles. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Los Angeles area” means the Census commuting zone for the Los Angeles area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Porter Ranch, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Porter Ranch City Difference
Stayed in the greater Los Angeles area 73.4% ±1.19 pp 81.1% ±0.09 pp −7.7 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 23.2% ±1.14 pp 26.2% ±0.11 pp −3.1 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Porter Ranch, Los Angeles. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Los Angeles area” means the Census commuting zone for the Los Angeles area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Porter Ranch, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Porter Ranch

Category Porter Ranch
All jobs located in porter ranch 4,621
Porter Ranch jobs held by Porter Ranch residents 11.4%
Porter Ranch jobs held by non-Porter Ranch residents 88.6%
Employed residents working in Porter Ranch 4.2%
Employed residents working outside Porter Ranch 95.8%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Porter Ranch Los Angeles neighborhood median Difference Rank
All jobs located in porter ranch 4,621 8,613 ▼ −3,992 76/110
Porter Ranch jobs held by Porter Ranch residents 11.4% 6.0% ▲ +5.4 pp 11/110
Porter Ranch jobs held by non-Porter Ranch residents 88.6% 94.0% ▼ −5.4 pp 100/110
Employed residents working in Porter Ranch 4.2% 3.9% ▲ +0.4 pp 47/110
Employed residents working outside Porter Ranch 95.8% 96.1% ▼ −0.4 pp 64/110
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in porter ranch 4,757 4,427 4,621 ▼ −136▲ +194▼ −330
Los Angeles citywide 6,864 8,106 8,613 ▲ +1,748▲ +507▲ +1,242
Porter Ranch jobs held by Porter Ranch residents 8.4%341 9.7%364 11.4%446 ▲ +3.0 pp▲ +105▲ +1.7 pp▲ +82▲ +1.3 pp▲ +23
Los Angeles citywide 6.1%330 5.9%399 6.0%442 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +112▲ +0.1 pp▲ +43▼ −0.1 pp▲ +69
Porter Ranch jobs held by non-Porter Ranch residents 91.6%3,706 90.3%3,371 88.6%3,467 ▼ −3.0 pp▼ −239▼ −1.7 pp▲ +96▼ −1.3 pp▼ −335
Los Angeles citywide 93.9%5,659 94.1%6,750 94.0%7,065 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,406▼ −0.1 pp▲ +315▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,091
Employed residents working in Porter Ranch 3.2%341 3.3%364 4.2%446 ▲ +1.0 pp▲ +105▲ +1.0 pp▲ +82▲ +0.1 pp▲ +23
Los Angeles citywide 3.2%330 3.3%399 3.9%442 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +112▲ +0.5 pp▲ +43▲ +0.1 pp▲ +69
Employed residents working outside Porter Ranch 96.8%10,281 96.7%10,696 95.8%10,067 ▼ −1.0 pp▼ −214▼ −1.0 pp▼ −629▼ −0.1 pp▲ +415
Los Angeles citywide 96.8%10,199 96.7%11,528 96.1%11,428 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,229▼ −0.5 pp▼ −100▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,329

Industry of Jobs in Porter Ranch

Category Porter Ranch
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0
Construction 5.3%243
Manufacturing 1.0%46
Wholesale Trade 0.6%29
Retail Trade 20.6%953
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 0.9%42
↳ Utilities 0.0%1
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 0.9%41
Information 0.6%28
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 5.0%230
↳ Finance & Insurance 3.4%159
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.5%71
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 11.1%515
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 5.5%256
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.2%7
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 5.5%252
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 24.3%1,124
↳ Educational Services 5.4%249
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 18.9%875
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 22.6%1,043
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 3.5%161
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 19.1%882
Other Services 8.0%368
Public Administration 0.0%0
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%0 0.1%1,840 ▼ -0.1% 65/110
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0 0.0%95 0% 14/110
Construction 5.3%243 2.7%53,657 ▲ +2.6% 26/110
Manufacturing 1.0%46 3.8%76,376 ▼ -2.8% 76/110
Wholesale Trade 0.6%29 3.2%63,982 ▼ -2.6% 96/110
Retail Trade 20.6%953 7.1%140,457 ▲ +13.6% 6/110
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 0.9%42 5.4%107,338 ▼ -4.5% 62/110
↳ Utilities 0.0%1 0.8%16,873 ▼ -0.8% 34/110
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 0.9%41 4.6%90,465 ▼ -3.7% 58/110
Information 0.6%28 8.3%164,692 ▼ -7.7% 71/110
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 5.0%230 5.9%116,774 ▼ -0.9% 34/110
↳ Finance & Insurance 3.4%159 3.6%70,657 ▼ -0.1% 20/110
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.5%71 2.3%46,117 ▼ -0.8% 56/110
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 11.1%515 15.1%299,443 ▼ -3.9% 54/110
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 5.5%256 8.1%160,171 ▼ -2.5% 48/110
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.2%7 1.1%22,328 ▼ -1.0% 62/110
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 5.5%252 5.9%116,944 ▼ -0.4% 42/110
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 24.3%1,124 28.4%563,697 ▼ -4.0% 77/110
↳ Educational Services 5.4%249 10.0%198,161 ▼ -4.6% 81/110
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 18.9%875 18.4%365,536 ▲ +0.5% 67/110
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 22.6%1,043 11.3%224,384 ▲ +11.3% 14/110
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 3.5%161 2.8%54,783 ▲ +0.7% 25/110
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 19.1%882 8.5%169,601 ▲ +10.6% 13/110
Other Services 8.0%368 3.7%73,513 ▲ +4.3% 15/110
Public Administration 0.0%0 5.1%100,972 ▼ -5.1% 46/110
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%1 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp▼ −1– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▼ −1
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%3,680 0.1%1,246 0.1%1,840 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,840– 0.0 pp▲ +594▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2,434
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 0.1%1,115 0.0%132 0.0%95 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,020– 0.0 pp▼ −37▼ −0.1 pp▼ −983
Construction 4.1%194 5.4%239 5.3%243 ▲ +1.2 pp▲ +49▼ −0.1 pp▲ +4▲ +1.3 pp▲ +45
Los Angeles citywide 2.3%39,728 2.8%53,498 2.7%53,657 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +13,929▼ −0.1 pp▲ +159▲ +0.5 pp▲ +13,770
Manufacturing 0.3%14 0.7%30 1.0%46 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +32▲ +0.3 pp▲ +16▲ +0.4 pp▲ +16
Los Angeles citywide 5.7%98,319 4.2%81,924 3.8%76,376 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −21,943▼ −0.4 pp▼ −5,548▼ −1.4 pp▼ −16,395
Wholesale Trade 1.6%76 1.1%47 0.6%29 ▼ −1.0 pp▼ −47▼ −0.4 pp▼ −18▼ −0.5 pp▼ −29
Los Angeles citywide 4.6%79,460 3.6%68,790 3.2%63,982 ▼ −1.4 pp▼ −15,478▼ −0.3 pp▼ −4,808▼ −1.0 pp▼ −10,670
Retail Trade 22.7%1,081 19.4%860 20.6%953 ▼ −2.1 pp▼ −128▲ +1.2 pp▲ +93▼ −3.3 pp▼ −221
Los Angeles citywide 8.7%151,141 7.5%144,707 7.1%140,457 ▼ −1.7 pp▼ −10,684▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,250▼ −1.3 pp▼ −6,434
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 0.3%14 0.2%7 0.9%42 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +28▲ +0.8 pp▲ +35▼ −0.1 pp▼ −7
Los Angeles citywide 4.8%82,152 5.8%111,689 5.4%107,338 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +25,186▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,351▲ +1.0 pp▲ +29,537
Utilities 0.1%4 0.0%0 0.0%1 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −3– 0.0 pp▲ +1▼ −0.1 pp▼ −4
Los Angeles citywide 0.9%16,015 1.0%18,483 0.8%16,873 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +858▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,610– 0.0 pp▲ +2,468
Transportation & Warehousing 0.2%10 0.2%7 0.9%41 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +31▲ +0.7 pp▲ +34▼ −0.1 pp▼ −3
Los Angeles citywide 3.8%66,137 4.8%93,206 4.6%90,465 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +24,328▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,741▲ +1.0 pp▲ +27,069
Information 1.3%60 0.6%26 0.6%28 ▼ −0.7 pp▼ −32– 0.0 pp▲ +2▼ −0.7 pp▼ −34
Los Angeles citywide 6.3%109,592 7.4%142,294 8.3%164,692 ▲ +1.9 pp▲ +55,100▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,398▲ +1.0 pp▲ +32,702
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 3.8%180 8.5%378 5.0%230 ▲ +1.2 pp▲ +50▼ −3.6 pp▼ −148▲ +4.8 pp▲ +198
Los Angeles citywide 6.1%104,703 5.7%110,803 5.9%116,774 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +12,071▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5,971▼ −0.3 pp▲ +6,100
Finance & Insurance 2.3%111 6.8%303 3.4%159 ▲ +1.1 pp▲ +48▼ −3.4 pp▼ −144▲ +4.5 pp▲ +192
Los Angeles citywide 3.9%67,891 3.6%69,466 3.6%70,657 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,766– 0.0 pp▲ +1,191▼ −0.3 pp▲ +1,575
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.5%69 1.7%75 1.5%71 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2▼ −0.2 pp▼ −4▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6
Los Angeles citywide 2.1%36,812 2.1%41,337 2.3%46,117 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +9,305▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,780– 0.0 pp▲ +4,525
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 11.6%553 9.7%428 11.1%515 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −38▲ +1.5 pp▲ +87▼ −2.0 pp▼ −125
Los Angeles citywide 15.1%261,720 14.9%286,926 15.1%299,443 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +37,723▲ +0.2 pp▲ +12,517▼ −0.3 pp▲ +25,206
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 5.2%248 6.0%266 5.5%256 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +8▼ −0.5 pp▼ −10▲ +0.8 pp▲ +18
Los Angeles citywide 7.7%132,582 7.9%153,127 8.1%160,171 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +27,589▲ +0.1 pp▲ +7,044▲ +0.3 pp▲ +20,545
Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%2 0.2%9 0.2%7 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7
Los Angeles citywide 1.3%22,239 1.2%22,485 1.1%22,328 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +89– 0.0 pp▼ −157▼ −0.1 pp▲ +246
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 6.4%303 3.5%153 5.5%252 ▼ −0.9 pp▼ −51▲ +2.0 pp▲ +99▼ −2.9 pp▼ −150
Los Angeles citywide 6.2%106,899 5.8%111,314 5.9%116,944 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +10,045▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5,630▼ −0.4 pp▲ +4,415
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 22.5%1,072 19.0%841 24.3%1,124 ▲ +1.8 pp▲ +52▲ +5.3 pp▲ +283▼ −3.5 pp▼ −231
Los Angeles citywide 24.3%420,231 26.6%513,841 28.4%563,697 ▲ +4.0 pp▲ +143,466▲ +1.8 pp▲ +49,856▲ +2.3 pp▲ +93,610
Educational Services 6.1%292 3.9%172 5.4%249 ▼ −0.7 pp▼ −43▲ +1.5 pp▲ +77▼ −2.3 pp▼ −120
Los Angeles citywide 8.2%142,243 9.1%175,456 10.0%198,161 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +55,918▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,705▲ +0.9 pp▲ +33,213
Health Care & Social Assistance 16.4%780 15.1%669 18.9%875 ▲ +2.5 pp▲ +95▲ +3.8 pp▲ +206▼ −1.3 pp▼ −111
Los Angeles citywide 16.1%277,988 17.5%338,385 18.4%365,536 ▲ +2.3 pp▲ +87,548▲ +0.9 pp▲ +27,151▲ +1.4 pp▲ +60,397
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 21.8%1,037 24.1%1,067 22.6%1,043 ▲ +0.8 pp▲ +6▼ −1.5 pp▼ −24▲ +2.3 pp▲ +30
Los Angeles citywide 11.2%192,754 11.7%226,802 11.3%224,384 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +31,630▼ −0.5 pp▼ −2,418▲ +0.6 pp▲ +34,048
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 3.6%169 3.5%153 3.5%161 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −8– 0.0 pp▲ +8▼ −0.1 pp▼ −16
Los Angeles citywide 2.2%38,550 2.8%53,683 2.8%54,783 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +16,233– 0.0 pp▲ +1,100▲ +0.5 pp▲ +15,133
Accommodation & Food Services 18.2%868 20.6%914 19.1%882 ▲ +0.8 pp▲ +14▼ −1.6 pp▼ −32▲ +2.4 pp▲ +46
Los Angeles citywide 8.9%154,204 9.0%173,119 8.5%169,601 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +15,397▼ −0.4 pp▼ −3,518– 0.0 pp▲ +18,915
Other Services 10.0%475 11.4%504 8.0%368 ▼ −2.0 pp▼ −107▼ −3.4 pp▼ −136▲ +1.4 pp▲ +29
Los Angeles citywide 3.9%66,987 3.9%75,451 3.7%73,513 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,526▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,938– 0.0 pp▲ +8,464
Public Administration 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 6.8%117,076 5.8%112,871 5.1%100,972 ▼ −1.7 pp▼ −16,104▼ −0.8 pp▼ −11,899▼ −0.9 pp▼ −4,205

Earnings of Jobs in Porter Ranch

Category Porter Ranch
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 21.7%1,001
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 42.8%1,976
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 35.6%1,644
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 21.7%1,001 17.0%338,004 ▲ +4.7% 10/110
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 42.8%1,976 24.2%481,403 ▲ +18.5% 16/110
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 35.6%1,644 58.8%1,167,718 ▼ -23.2% 102/110
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 40.6%1,929 31.9%1,414 21.7%1,001 ▼ −18.9 pp▼ −928▼ −10.3 pp▼ −413▼ −8.6 pp▼ −515
Los Angeles citywide 25.4%438,918 21.3%411,368 17.0%338,004 ▼ −8.4 pp▼ −100,914▼ −4.3 pp▼ −73,364▼ −4.1 pp▼ −27,550
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 41.5%1,976 41.7%1,845 42.8%1,976 ▲ +1.2 pp– 0▲ +1.1 pp▲ +131▲ +0.1 pp▼ −131
Los Angeles citywide 31.8%549,706 29.6%571,139 24.2%481,403 ▼ −7.6 pp▼ −68,303▼ −5.4 pp▼ −89,736▼ −2.2 pp▲ +21,433
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 17.9%852 26.4%1,168 35.6%1,644 ▲ +17.7 pp▲ +792▲ +9.2 pp▲ +476▲ +8.5 pp▲ +316
Los Angeles citywide 42.8%738,919 49.1%948,335 58.8%1,167,718 ▲ +16.0 pp▲ +428,799▲ +9.6 pp▲ +219,383▲ +6.3 pp▲ +209,416

Jobs in Porter Ranch by Firm Age

Category Porter Ranch
Firm age: 0–1 years 8.8%395
Firm age: 2–3 years 7.3%328
Firm age: 4–5 years 7.3%325
Firm age: 6–10 years 13.0%579
Firm age: 11 or more years 63.6%2,841
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years 8.8%395 4.8%79,474 ▲ +4.1% 28/110
Firm age: 2–3 years 7.3%328 4.9%81,545 ▲ +2.5% 43/110
Firm age: 4–5 years 7.3%325 5.1%84,624 ▲ +2.2% 45/110
Firm age: 6–10 years 13.0%579 10.7%178,740 ▲ +2.3% 54/110
Firm age: 11 or more years 63.6%2,841 74.6%1,246,700 ▼ -11.0% 67/110
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years 10.0%463 8.5%363 8.8%395 ▼ −1.2 pp▼ −68▲ +0.4 pp▲ +32▼ −1.6 pp▼ −100
Los Angeles citywide 4.7%67,567 4.9%79,034 4.8%79,474 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,907▼ −0.1 pp▲ +440▲ +0.2 pp▲ +11,467
Firm age: 2–3 years 5.0%232 6.4%273 7.3%328 ▲ +2.3 pp▲ +96▲ +1.0 pp▲ +55▲ +1.3 pp▲ +41
Los Angeles citywide 5.9%85,371 5.5%89,530 4.9%81,545 ▼ −1.0 pp▼ −3,826▼ −0.6 pp▼ −7,985▼ −0.4 pp▲ +4,159
Firm age: 4–5 years 7.0%322 7.2%310 7.3%325 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +3– 0.0 pp▲ +15▲ +0.2 pp▼ −12
Los Angeles citywide 4.8%69,620 5.0%80,673 5.1%84,624 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +15,004▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,951▲ +0.2 pp▲ +11,053
Firm age: 6–10 years 13.7%631 11.0%473 13.0%579 ▼ −0.7 pp▼ −52▲ +1.9 pp▲ +106▼ −2.7 pp▼ −158
Los Angeles citywide 11.5%165,913 9.8%158,279 10.7%178,740 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +12,827▲ +0.9 pp▲ +20,461▼ −1.7 pp▼ −7,634
Firm age: 11 or more years 64.3%2,962 66.9%2,868 63.6%2,841 ▼ −0.7 pp▼ −121▼ −3.3 pp▼ −27▲ +2.6 pp▼ −94
Los Angeles citywide 73.1%1,056,355 74.9%1,212,931 74.6%1,246,700 ▲ +1.5 pp▲ +190,345▼ −0.2 pp▲ +33,769▲ +1.7 pp▲ +156,576

Jobs in Porter Ranch by Firm Size

Category Porter Ranch
Firm size: 0–19 employees 42.7%1,906
Firm size: 20–49 employees 7.9%352
Firm size: 50–249 employees 8.3%370
Firm size: 250–499 employees 0.2%9
Firm size: 500 or more employees 41.0%1,831
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees 42.7%1,906 25.4%424,713 ▲ +17.2% 40/110
Firm size: 20–49 employees 7.9%352 9.0%149,880 ▼ -1.1% 74/110
Firm size: 50–249 employees 8.3%370 13.5%224,878 ▼ -5.2% 94/110
Firm size: 250–499 employees 0.2%9 4.9%82,110 ▼ -4.7% 100/110
Firm size: 500 or more employees 41.0%1,831 47.2%789,502 ▼ -6.3% 36/110
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees 31.2%1,440 37.5%1,606 42.7%1,906 ▲ +11.4 pp▲ +466▲ +5.2 pp▲ +300▲ +6.2 pp▲ +166
Los Angeles citywide 25.3%365,482 24.7%400,637 25.4%424,713 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +59,231▲ +0.7 pp▲ +24,076▼ −0.6 pp▲ +35,155
Firm size: 20–49 employees 14.7%676 12.9%555 7.9%352 ▼ −6.8 pp▼ −324▼ −5.1 pp▼ −203▼ −1.7 pp▼ −121
Los Angeles citywide 10.3%149,215 9.2%149,709 9.0%149,880 ▼ −1.4 pp▲ +665▼ −0.3 pp▲ +171▼ −1.1 pp▲ +494
Firm size: 50–249 employees 8.5%393 2.1%92 8.3%370 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −23▲ +6.1 pp▲ +278▼ −6.4 pp▼ −301
Los Angeles citywide 14.8%214,183 13.9%225,110 13.5%224,878 ▼ −1.4 pp▲ +10,695▼ −0.4 pp▼ −232▼ −0.9 pp▲ +10,927
Firm size: 250–499 employees 0.2%7 0.1%6 0.2%9 – 0.0 pp▲ +2▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3– 0.0 pp▼ −1
Los Angeles citywide 5.7%81,669 4.9%79,784 4.9%82,110 ▼ −0.7 pp▲ +441– 0.0 pp▲ +2,326▼ −0.7 pp▼ −1,885
Firm size: 500 or more employees 45.4%2,094 47.3%2,028 41.0%1,831 ▼ −4.4 pp▼ −263▼ −6.3 pp▼ −197▲ +1.9 pp▼ −66
Los Angeles citywide 43.9%634,277 47.2%765,207 47.2%789,502 ▲ +3.3 pp▲ +155,225– 0.0 pp▲ +24,295▲ +3.3 pp▲ +130,930

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Porter Ranch
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 15.1% ±1.7 pp15.1%±1.7 pp3,769 ±415
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 77.6% ±5.2 pp11.7%±0.8 pp2,924 ±196
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 22.4% ±5.0 pp3.4%±0.7 pp844 ±187
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 15.1%±1.7 pp15.1%±1.7 pp3,769±415 13.6%±0.1 pp13.6%±0.1 pp524,758±5,328 ▲ +1.5%▲ +1.5% 35/110
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 77.6%±5.2 pp11.7%±0.8 pp2,924±196 86.8%±0.3 pp11.8%±0.0 pp455,658±1,592 ▼ -9.2%▼ -0.1% 77/11048/110
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 22.4%±5.0 pp3.4%±0.7 pp844±187 13.2%±0.4 pp1.8%±0.1 pp69,100±2,036 ▲ +9.2%▲ +1.6% 34/11018/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Porter Ranch
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 6.8% ±1.1 pp6.8%±1.1 pp1,702 ±266
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 80.9% ±7.2 pp5.5%±0.5 pp1,376 ±123
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 19.1% ±5.7 pp1.3%±0.4 pp326 ±96
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 80.9% ±9.8 pp5.5%±0.7 pp1,376 ±166
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 19.1% ±6.4 pp1.3%±0.4 pp326 ±108
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 6.8%±1.1 pp6.8%±1.1 pp1,702±266 8.1%±0.1 pp8.1%±0.1 pp310,586±4,276 ▼ -1.3%▼ -1.3% 47/110
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 80.9%±7.2 pp5.5%±0.5 pp1,376±123 70.9%±0.7 pp5.7%±0.1 pp220,274±2,032 ▲ +9.9%▼ -0.2% 31/11033/110
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 19.1%±5.7 pp1.3%±0.4 pp326±96 29.1%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.0 pp90,312±1,878 ▼ -9.9%▼ -1.0% 80/11075/110
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 80.9%±9.8 pp5.5%±0.7 pp1,376±166 77.3%±0.5 pp6.2%±0.0 pp240,126±1,419 ▲ +3.6%▼ -0.7% 40/11040/110
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 19.1%±6.4 pp1.3%±0.4 pp326±108 22.7%±0.6 pp1.8%±0.0 pp70,460±1,837 ▼ -3.6%▼ -0.5% 71/11070/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category Porter Ranch
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 0.4% ±1.7 pp19 ±74
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 3.6% ±4.3 pp61 ±73
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 0.4%±1.7 pp19±74 3.9%±0.3 pp— ▼ -3.5% 93/110
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 3.6%±4.3 pp61±73 4.2%±0.4 pp— ▼ -0.6% 50/110
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category Porter Ranch
Owner-Occupied Households 86.5% ±2.1 pp7,215 ±176
Renter-Occupied Households 13.5% ±2.7 pp1,126 ±225
Owner-Occupied Residents 85.7% ±3.2 pp21,441 ±791
Renter-Occupied Residents 14.3% ±3.4 pp3,589 ±848
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Owner-Occupied Households 86.5%±2.1 pp7,215±176 36.0%±0.3 pp518,423±4,359 ▲ +50.5% 1/110
Renter-Occupied Households 13.5%±2.7 pp1,126±225 64.0%±0.3 pp920,674±4,643 ▼ -50.5% 110/110
Owner-Occupied Residents 85.7%±3.2 pp21,441±791 40.2%±0.4 pp1,509,388±15,216 ▲ +45.4% 3/110
Renter-Occupied Residents 14.3%±3.4 pp3,589±848 59.8%±0.4 pp2,243,250±15,217 ▼ -45.4% 108/110
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category Porter Ranch
Median Year Moved In 2007±1.4 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later 2.1% ±1.3 pp175 ±105
Moved in 2020 to 2022 12.6% ±2.5 pp1,047 ±208
Moved in 2010 to 2019 29.5% ±3.1 pp2,455 ±257
Moved in 2000 to 2009 21.1% ±3.0 pp1,756 ±250
Moved in 1990 to 1999 17.8% ±2.8 pp1,480 ±236
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 17.0% ±2.2 pp1,416 ±180
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Median Year Moved In 2007±1.4 yr 2014±1.0 yr ▼ −7 106/110
Moved in 2023 or Later 2.1%±1.3 pp175±105 4.9%±0.1 pp70,211±2,138 ▼ -2.8% 92/110
Moved in 2020 to 2022 12.6%±2.5 pp1,047±208 20.6%±0.3 pp296,921±3,730 ▼ -8.1% 92/110
Moved in 2010 to 2019 29.5%±3.1 pp2,455±257 40.3%±0.3 pp580,466±4,993 ▼ -10.9% 107/110
Moved in 2000 to 2009 21.1%±3.0 pp1,756±250 16.2%±0.2 pp233,668±3,490 ▲ +4.8% 15/110
Moved in 1990 to 1999 17.8%±2.8 pp1,480±236 9.8%±0.2 pp140,815±2,779 ▲ +8.0% 3/110
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 17.0%±2.2 pp1,416±180 8.1%±0.2 pp117,016±2,469 ▲ +8.9% 8/110
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show
Category Porter Ranch
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 6.6% ±1.6 pp6.6%±1.6 pp1,637 ±394
↳ Moved Within Los Angeles County (of recent movers) 4.6% ±1.3 pp69.9%±10.1 pp1,144 ±321
↳ Moved from Different California County (of recent movers) 0.6% ±0.6 pp9.5%±9.2 pp156 ±154
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 0.5% ±0.4 pp8.0%±5.5 pp131 ±95
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 0.8% ±0.6 pp12.6%±8.5 pp207 ±148
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 6.6%±1.6 pp6.6%±1.6 pp1,637±394 10.7%±0.2 pp10.7%±0.2 pp408,463±7,943 ▼ -4.1%▼ -4.1% 81/110
↳ Moved Within Los Angeles County (of recent movers) 4.6%±1.3 pp69.9%±10.1 pp1,144±321 7.4%±0.2 pp69.3%±1.2 pp283,263±7,240 ▼ -2.8%▲ +0.5% 88/11067/110
↳ Moved from Different California County (of recent movers) 0.6%±0.6 pp9.5%±9.2 pp156±154 1.2%±0.0 pp11.0%±0.4 pp45,056±1,766 ▼ -0.5%▼ -1.5% 68/11049/110
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 0.5%±0.4 pp8.0%±5.5 pp131±95 1.3%±0.1 pp12.3%±0.5 pp50,444±2,220 ▼ -0.8%▼ -4.3% 77/11071/110
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 0.8%±0.6 pp12.6%±8.5 pp207±148 0.8%±0.0 pp7.3%±0.4 pp29,700±1,624 ▲ +0.1%▲ +5.4% 38/11014/110
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show
Category Porter Ranch
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 3.8% ±1.5 pp3.8%±1.5 pp332 ±128
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 0.3% ±0.6 pp7.5%±14.8 pp25 ±50
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.8% ±0.8 pp22.0%±20.0 pp73 ±72
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.3% ±0.6 pp6.6%±15.5 pp22 ±52
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 2.4% ±1.7 pp63.9%±36.8 pp212 ±147
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 2.1% ±4.2 pp2.1%±4.2 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 1.0% ±1.0 pp1.0%±1.0 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 3.8%±1.5 pp3.8%±1.5 pp332±128 7.4%±0.2 pp7.4%±0.2 pp115,235±3,037 ▼ -3.6%▼ -3.6% 93/110
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 0.3%±0.6 pp7.5%±14.8 pp25±50 2.9%±0.1 pp38.6%±1.2 pp44,494±1,787 ▼ -2.6%▼ -31.1% 109/110109/110
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.8%±0.8 pp22.0%±20.0 pp73±72 0.3%±0.0 pp4.0%±0.4 pp4,630±529 ▲ +0.5%▲ +18.0% 8/1104/110
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.3%±0.6 pp6.6%±15.5 pp22±52 0.4%±0.0 pp5.6%±0.6 pp6,482±671 ▼ -0.2%▲ +1.0% 48/11031/110
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 2.4%±1.7 pp63.9%±36.8 pp212±147 3.8%±0.2 pp51.7%±2.8 pp59,629±3,638 ▼ -1.4%▲ +12.1% 88/11038/110
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 2.1%±4.2 pp2.1%±4.2 pp— 4.6%±0.2 pp4.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -2.5%▼ -2.5% 80/110
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 1.0%±1.0 pp1.0%±1.0 pp— 0.9%±0.1 pp0.9%±0.1 pp— ▲ +0.1%▲ +0.1% 34/110
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category Porter Ranch
Median Year Built 1974±1 yr
Pre-1940 0.6% ±0.6 pp53 ±50
1940-2009 98.6% ±4.3 pp8,537 ±373
2010+ 0.8% ±1.0 pp69 ±84
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Median Year Built 1974±1 yr 1965±1 yr ▲ +9 yrs 14/110
Pre-1940 0.6%±0.6 pp53±50 19.1%±0.2 pp296,223±3,073 ▼ -18.5% 109/110
1940-2009 98.6%±4.3 pp8,537±373 73.1%±0.4 pp1,136,164±6,801 ▲ +25.5% 1/110
2010+ 0.8%±1.0 pp69±84 7.8%±0.2 pp121,945±2,871 ▼ -7.1% 110/110
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category Porter Ranch
Population Density 4,493 /sq mi±236/sq mi
Single-Family Homes 97.8% ±2.6 pp8,467 ±228
Buildings With 2–4 Units 0.7% ±0.8 pp62 ±69
Buildings With 5–19 Units 0.4% ±0.8 pp35 ±69
Buildings With 20 or More Units 1.1% ±1.1 pp94 ±95
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Population Density 4,493 /sq mi±236/sq mi 8,285 /sq mi±14/sq mi ▼ −3,792 /sq mi 94/110
Single-Family Homes 97.8%±2.6 pp8,467±228 41.9%±0.3 pp651,793±4,742 ▲ +55.9% 2/110
Buildings With 2–4 Units 0.7%±0.8 pp62±69 9.0%±0.2 pp140,536±2,829 ▼ -8.3% 104/110
Buildings With 5–19 Units 0.4%±0.8 pp35±69 18.4%±0.3 pp286,023±4,408 ▼ -18.0% 109/110
Buildings With 20 or More Units 1.1%±1.1 pp94±95 29.9%±0.3 pp465,391±4,691 ▼ -28.9% 109/110
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category Porter Ranch
Studio 0.2% ±0.5 pp19 ±43
1 Bedroom 0.6% ±0.9 pp54 ±75
2 Bedrooms 7.2% ±2.5 pp625 ±216
3 Bedrooms 36.0% ±3.1 pp3,119 ±268
4 Bedrooms 43.1% ±3.2 pp3,731 ±274
5 or More Bedrooms 12.8% ±2.4 pp1,110 ±205
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Studio 0.2%±0.5 pp19±43 11.6%±0.2 pp180,439±3,649 ▼ -11.4% 110/110
1 Bedroom 0.6%±0.9 pp54±75 23.7%±0.2 pp367,883±3,808 ▼ -23.0% 110/110
2 Bedrooms 7.2%±2.5 pp625±216 30.8%±0.3 pp478,829±4,610 ▼ -23.6% 109/110
3 Bedrooms 36.0%±3.1 pp3,119±268 21.9%±0.2 pp339,889±3,797 ▲ +14.2% 16/110
4 Bedrooms 43.1%±3.2 pp3,731±274 9.1%±0.1 pp140,925±2,101 ▲ +34.0% 1/110
5 or More Bedrooms 12.8%±2.4 pp1,110±205 3.0%±0.1 pp46,367±1,494 ▲ +9.8% 6/110
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show
Category Porter Ranch
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 1.8% ±1.7 pp1.8%±1.7 pp150 ±145
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 1.7% ±1.4 pp95.3%±120.9 pp143 ±117
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 0.1% ±1.0 pp4.7%±56.5 pp7 ±85
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 1.8%±1.7 pp1.8%±1.7 pp150±145 12.1%±0.2 pp12.1%±0.2 pp174,164±3,256 ▼ -10.3%▼ -10.3% 102/110
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 1.7%±1.4 pp95.3%±120.9 pp143±117 5.9%±0.1 pp49.1%±0.8 pp85,502±2,139 ▼ -4.2%▲ +46.2% 86/1104/109
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 0.1%±1.0 pp4.7%±56.5 pp7±85 6.2%±0.2 pp50.9%±1.1 pp88,662±2,479 ▼ -6.1%▼ -46.2% 106/110106/109
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category Porter Ranch
Natural Gas Heat 84.5% ±3.1 pp7,035 ±256
Electric Heat 12.5% ±2.1 pp1,043 ±176
Other Heating Source 3.0% ±1.6 pp251 ±137
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Natural Gas Heat 84.5%±3.1 pp7,035±256 57.3%±0.3 pp823,973±4,848 ▲ +27.2% 1/110
Electric Heat 12.5%±2.1 pp1,043±176 34.3%±0.3 pp494,304±4,648 ▼ -21.8% 110/110
Other Heating Source 3.0%±1.6 pp251±137 8.4%±0.2 pp120,823±2,850 ▼ -5.4% 101/110
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show
Category Porter Ranch
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 38.7% ±3.0 pp3,226 ±252
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 22.1% ±3.0 pp1,839 ±249
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 39.2% ±3.7 pp3,264 ±307
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 19.9% ±2.8 pp1,654 ±236
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 38.7%±3.0 pp3,226±252 18.4%±0.4 pp264,606±5,364 ▲ +20.3% 6/110
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 22.1%±3.0 pp1,839±249 20.5%±0.3 pp294,961±4,886 ▲ +1.6% 36/110
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 39.2%±3.7 pp3,264±307 56.5%±0.5 pp813,715±6,573 ▼ -17.4% 106/110
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 19.9%±2.8 pp1,654±236 31.1%±0.4 pp447,155±5,566 ▼ -11.2% 102/110
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category Porter Ranch
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,047±$103
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,745±$158
Median Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,047±$103 $787±$11 ▲ +$260 28/110
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,745±$158 $1,347±$8 ▲ +$398 29/110
Median Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000 $2,115±$9 ▲ +$885+ 1/110
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000 Over $3,000 — 1/110
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000 Over $3,000 — 1/110
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $893 ±79 $992 ±72 $1,047 ±103 ▲ +$154▲ +$55▲ +$99
Los Angeles citywide $734 ±7 $763 ±8 $787 ±11 ▲ +$53▲ +$24▲ +$29
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $674 ±60 $808 ±59 $1,047 ±103 ▲ +$373▲ +$239▲ +$134
Los Angeles citywide $554 ±6 $622 ±7 $787 ±11 ▲ +$233▲ +$165▲ +$68
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,826 ±173 $1,992 ±176 $1,745 ±158 ▼ −$81▼ −$247▲ +$166
Los Angeles citywide $1,206 ±4 $1,299 ±6 $1,347 ±8 ▲ +$141▲ +$48▲ +$93
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,378 ±131 $1,624 ±144 $1,745 ±158 ▲ +$367▲ +$122▲ +$246
Los Angeles citywide $910 ±3 $1,058 ±5 $1,347 ±8 ▲ +$437▲ +$289▲ +$148
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $3,443 ±107 — ———
Los Angeles citywide $1,817 ±7 $1,985 ±7 $2,115 ±9 ▲ +$298▲ +$130▲ +$169
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) — $2,806 ±87 — ———
Los Angeles citywide $1,371 ±5 $1,618 ±6 $2,115 ±9 ▲ +$744▲ +$497▲ +$247
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — $2,970 ±11 — ———
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — $2,420 ±9 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Rent

Rent measure
Category Porter Ranch
Average Rent Plus Utilities $4,061±$339
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,488±$398
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $3,467±$1,178
Median Rent Plus Utilities Over $3,500
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities Over $3,500
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities Over $3,500
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities $4,061±$339 $2,131±$12 ▲ +$1,930 3/110
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,488±$398 $934±$12 ▲ +$1,554 1/110
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $3,467±$1,178 $1,380±$9 ▲ +$2,087 1/110
Median Rent Plus Utilities Over $3,500 $1,933±$9 ▲ +$1,567+ 1/110
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities Over $3,500 $2,639±$17 ▲ +$861+ 1/110
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities Over $3,500 Over $3,500 — 1/110
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch
Average Rent $3,457±$302
10th Percentile Rent $2,168±$380
25th Percentile Rent $3,015±$1,042
Median Rent Over $3,500
75th Percentile Rent Over $3,500
90th Percentile Rent Over $3,500
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Average Rent $3,457±$302 $1,927±$12 ▲ +$1,531 6/110
10th Percentile Rent $2,168±$380 $808±$12 ▲ +$1,361 1/110
25th Percentile Rent $3,015±$1,042 $1,217±$8 ▲ +$1,798 2/110
Median Rent Over $3,500 $1,765±$8 ▲ +$1,735+ 1/110
75th Percentile Rent Over $3,500 $2,416±$11 ▲ +$1,084+ 1/110
90th Percentile Rent Over $3,500 $3,289±$24 ▲ +$211+ 1/110
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category Porter Ranch
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $4,076±$113
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,127±$265
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,953±$165
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,964±$134
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $4,076±$113 $4,133±$34 ▼ −$57 40/110
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,127±$265 $1,828±$21 ▲ +$299 41/110
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,953±$165 $2,537±$17 ▲ +$416 35/110
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,964±$134 $3,497±$23 ▲ +$467 38/110
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000 Over $4,000 — 1/110
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000 Over $4,000 — 1/110
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $4,350 ±169 $4,150 ±118 $4,076 ±113 ▼ −$274▼ −$75▼ −$199
Los Angeles citywide $3,870 ±21 $3,856 ±17 $4,133 ±34 ▲ +$263▲ +$276▼ −$13
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $3,283 ±127 $3,383 ±96 $4,076 ±113 ▲ +$793▲ +$693▲ +$100
Los Angeles citywide $2,920 ±16 $3,143 ±14 $4,133 ±34 ▲ +$1,212▲ +$990▲ +$223
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,108 ±143 $2,438 ±158 $2,127 ±265 ▲ +$19▼ −$311▲ +$330
Los Angeles citywide $1,744 ±13 $1,827 ±19 $1,828 ±21 ▲ +$85▲ +$2▲ +$83
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,591 ±108 $1,987 ±129 $2,127 ±265 ▲ +$536▲ +$140▲ +$396
Los Angeles citywide $1,316 ±10 $1,489 ±15 $1,828 ±21 ▲ +$512▲ +$340▲ +$173
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,040 ±175 $3,080 ±112 $2,953 ±165 ▼ −$87▼ −$128▲ +$41
Los Angeles citywide $2,379 ±13 $2,448 ±17 $2,537 ±17 ▲ +$158▲ +$89▲ +$69
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,294 ±132 $2,511 ±92 $2,953 ±165 ▲ +$659▲ +$442▲ +$216
Los Angeles citywide $1,796 ±10 $1,995 ±14 $2,537 ±17 ▲ +$741▲ +$542▲ +$199
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $3,956 ±125 $3,964 ±134 —▲ +$8—
Los Angeles citywide $3,315 ±21 $3,342 ±16 $3,497 ±23 ▲ +$182▲ +$155▲ +$27
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) — $3,224 ±102 $3,964 ±134 —▲ +$740—
Los Angeles citywide $2,502 ±16 $2,724 ±13 $3,497 ±23 ▲ +$995▲ +$773▲ +$222
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — $4,663 ±31 — ———
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — $3,800 ±25 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category Porter Ranch
Average Monthly Owner Costs $1,468±$109
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $678±$142
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,055±$92
Median Monthly Owner Costs $1,403±$76
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs Over $1,500
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs Over $1,500
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs $1,468±$109 $1,309±$21 ▲ +$159 24/110
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $678±$142 $456±$10 ▲ +$222 16/110
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,055±$92 $674±$10 ▲ +$381 12/110
Median Monthly Owner Costs $1,403±$76 $1,001±$14 ▲ +$402 18/110
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs Over $1,500 $1,491±$15 ▲ +$9+ 1/110
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs Over $1,500 Over $1,500 — 1/110
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,097 ±53 $1,289 ±65 $1,468 ±109 ▲ +$372▲ +$179▲ +$192
Los Angeles citywide $974 ±11 $1,068 ±13 $1,309 ±21 ▲ +$335▲ +$242▲ +$93
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $828 ±40 $1,051 ±53 $1,468 ±109 ▲ +$641▲ +$418▲ +$223
Los Angeles citywide $735 ±8 $870 ±11 $1,309 ±21 ▲ +$574▲ +$439▲ +$135
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $611 ±139 $631 ±86 $678 ±142 ▲ +$67▲ +$47▲ +$20
Los Angeles citywide $372 ±7 $397 ±7 $456 ±10 ▲ +$84▲ +$59▲ +$25
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $461 ±105 $515 ±70 $678 ±142 ▲ +$217▲ +$163▲ +$53
Los Angeles citywide $281 ±5 $323 ±6 $456 ±10 ▲ +$176▲ +$133▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $778 ±53 $868 ±66 $1,055 ±92 ▲ +$277▲ +$187▲ +$90
Los Angeles citywide $544 ±7 $586 ±8 $674 ±10 ▲ +$130▲ +$88▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $588 ±40 $707 ±54 $1,055 ±92 ▲ +$468▲ +$348▲ +$120
Los Angeles citywide $410 ±5 $478 ±6 $674 ±10 ▲ +$264▲ +$196▲ +$68
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $1,119 ±68 $1,403 ±76 —▲ +$284—
Los Angeles citywide $806 ±11 $880 ±10 $1,001 ±14 ▲ +$195▲ +$121▲ +$74
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — $912 ±56 $1,403 ±76 —▲ +$491—
Los Angeles citywide $608 ±8 $717 ±8 $1,001 ±14 ▲ +$393▲ +$284▲ +$109
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $1,592 ±145 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — $1,304 ±17 $1,491 ±15 —▲ +$187—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — $1,297 ±118 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — $1,062 ±14 $1,491 ±15 —▲ +$428—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Home Values

Category Porter Ranch
Average Home Value $1,149,649±$69,914
10th Percentile Home Value $699,156±$85,968
25th Percentile Home Value $867,023±$22,825
Median Home Value $1,099,242±$31,457
75th Percentile Home Value $1,358,521±$21,563
90th Percentile Home Value $1,578,913±$87,779
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Average Home Value $1,149,649±$69,914 $1,264,542±$8,234 ▼ −$114,893 46/110
10th Percentile Home Value $699,156±$85,968 $459,299±$5,965 ▲ +$239,857 23/110
25th Percentile Home Value $867,023±$22,825 $653,300±$4,641 ▲ +$213,723 33/110
Median Home Value $1,099,242±$31,457 $921,200±$4,782 ▲ +$178,042 44/110
75th Percentile Home Value $1,358,521±$21,563 $1,397,000±$18,800 ▼ −$38,479 49/110
90th Percentile Home Value $1,578,913±$87,779 Over $2,000,000 ▼ −$421,087+ 59/110
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $782,771 ±19,925 $935,765 ±32,119 $1,149,649 ±69,914 ▲ +$366,877▲ +$213,883▲ +$152,994
Los Angeles citywide $824,079 ±6,442 $1,055,784 ±9,073 $1,264,542 ±8,234 ▲ +$440,464▲ +$208,758▲ +$231,705
Average Home Value (nominal dollars) $590,745 ±15,037 $762,650 ±26,177 $1,149,649 ±69,914 ▲ +$558,904▲ +$386,999▲ +$171,905
Los Angeles citywide $621,919 ±4,862 $860,465 ±7,394 $1,264,542 ±8,234 ▲ +$642,624▲ +$404,077▲ +$238,547
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $508,603 ±43,402 $638,721 ±13,008 $699,156 ±85,968 ▲ +$190,553▲ +$60,435▲ +$130,118
Los Angeles citywide $274,172 ±2,766 $388,878 ±2,619 $459,299 ±5,965 ▲ +$185,126▲ +$70,421▲ +$114,706
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $383,834 ±32,755 $520,558 ±10,601 $699,156 ±85,968 ▲ +$315,321▲ +$178,597▲ +$136,724
Los Angeles citywide $206,913 ±2,087 $316,936 ±2,134 $459,299 ±5,965 ▲ +$252,385▲ +$142,362▲ +$110,023
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $641,986 ±20,738 $745,961 ±12,891 $867,023 ±22,825 ▲ +$225,036▲ +$121,062▲ +$103,974
Los Angeles citywide $413,153 ±2,182 $543,435 ±2,444 $653,300 ±4,641 ▲ +$240,147▲ +$109,865▲ +$130,281
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $484,497 ±15,651 $607,959 ±10,506 $867,023 ±22,825 ▲ +$382,526▲ +$259,064▲ +$123,462
Los Angeles citywide $311,800 ±1,647 $442,900 ±1,992 $653,300 ±4,641 ▲ +$341,500▲ +$210,400▲ +$131,100
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $797,406 ±13,047 $924,911 ±18,171 $1,099,242 ±31,457 ▲ +$301,837▲ +$174,331▲ +$127,505
Los Angeles citywide $601,311 ±2,870 $781,471 ±2,656 $921,200 ±4,782 ▲ +$319,889▲ +$139,729▲ +$180,160
Median Home Value (nominal dollars) $601,789 ±9,846 $753,804 ±14,810 $1,099,242 ±31,457 ▲ +$497,453▲ +$345,438▲ +$152,015
Los Angeles citywide $453,800 ±2,166 $636,900 ±2,165 $921,200 ±4,782 ▲ +$467,400▲ +$284,300▲ +$183,100
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $947,749 ±12,368 $1,112,400 ±12,696 $1,358,521 ±21,563 ▲ +$410,772▲ +$246,122▲ +$164,650
Los Angeles citywide $957,885 ±4,252 $1,163,924 ±5,481 $1,397,000 ±18,800 ▲ +$439,115▲ +$233,076▲ +$206,040
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $715,251 ±9,334 $906,607 ±10,347 $1,358,521 ±21,563 ▲ +$643,271▲ +$451,914▲ +$191,356
Los Angeles citywide $722,900 ±3,209 $948,600 ±4,467 $1,397,000 ±18,800 ▲ +$674,100▲ +$448,400▲ +$225,700
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,158,590 ±31,516 $1,224,892 ±49,488 $1,578,913 ±87,779 ▲ +$420,324▲ +$354,021▲ +$66,303
Los Angeles citywide — $2,103,035 ±25,625 — ———
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $874,369 ±23,785 $998,289 ±40,333 $1,578,913 ±87,779 ▲ +$704,545▲ +$580,624▲ +$123,920
Los Angeles citywide — $1,713,977 ±20,884 — ———

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show
Category Porter Ranch
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 0.1%0.1%13
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.1%61.5%8
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.1%30.8%4
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%7.7%1
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 0.1%0.1%13 5.5%5.5%84,827 ▼ -5.3%▼ -5.3% 104/110
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.1%61.5%8 3.5%64.0%54,313 ▼ -3.4%▼ -2.5% 106/11068/107
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0 0.4%7.1%6,040 ▼ -0.4%▼ -7.1% 13/11013/107
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.1%30.8%4 1.4%25.1%21,260 ▼ -1.3%▲ +5.7% 79/11029/107
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%7.7%1 0.2%3.8%3,214 ▼ -0.2%▲ +3.9% 52/11022/107
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units 0.1%12 0.1%8 0.2%13 – 0.0 pp▲ +1▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5– 0.0 pp▼ −4
Los Angeles citywide 5.6%79,280 5.5%82,357 5.5%84,827 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5,547▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,470– 0.0 pp▲ +3,077
Housing Choice Vouchers 0.1%5 0.0%2 0.1%8 – 0.0 pp▲ +3▲ +0.1 pp▲ +6– 0.0 pp▼ −3
Los Angeles citywide 3.4%47,994 3.4%50,854 3.5%54,313 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +6,319▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,459– 0.0 pp▲ +2,860
Public Housing 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 0.5%7,024 0.5%7,038 0.4%6,040 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −984▼ −0.1 pp▼ −998– 0.0 pp▲ +14
Project-Based Section 8 0.0%2 0.0%3 0.0%4 – 0.0 pp▲ +2– 0.0 pp▲ +1– 0.0 pp▲ +1
Los Angeles citywide 1.5%21,053 1.4%21,190 1.4%21,260 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +207▼ −0.1 pp▲ +70▼ −0.1 pp▲ +137
Other Project-Based Programs 0.1%5 0.0%3 0.0%1 – 0.0 pp▼ −4– 0.0 pp▼ −2– 0.0 pp▼ −2
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%3,209 0.2%3,275 0.2%3,214 – 0.0 pp▲ +5– 0.0 pp▼ −61– 0.0 pp▲ +66
Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category Porter Ranch
Average Household Income $22,498
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $680
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,832
Below 30% of Area Median Income 92.0%1
With Children 24.0%0
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 68.0%0
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $22,498 $20,771 ▲ +$1,727 33/101
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $680 $532 ▲ +$148 9/101
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,832 $1,653 ▲ +$179 27/101
Below 30% of Area Median Income 92.0%1 88.0%66,617 ▲ +4.0 pp 28/101
With Children 24.0%0 20.0%15,140 ▲ +4.0 pp 29/101
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 68.0%0 43.0%32,551 ▲ +25.0 pp 6/101
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income $17,073 $18,585 $22,498 ▲ +$5,425▲ +$3,913▲ +$1,512
Los Angeles citywide $14,082 $16,770 $20,771 ▲ +$6,689▲ +$4,001▲ +$2,688
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $485 $473 $680 ▲ +$195▲ +$207▼ −$12
Los Angeles citywide $372 $432 $532 ▲ +$160▲ +$100▲ +$60
Average Monthly Government Spending $845 $1,063 $1,832 ▲ +$987▲ +$769▲ +$218
Los Angeles citywide $795 $1,013 $1,653 ▲ +$858▲ +$640▲ +$218
Below 30% of Area Median Income 79.0%— 79.0%— 92.0%— ▲ +13.0 pp—▲ +13.0 pp—– 0.0 pp—
Los Angeles citywide 84.0%— 85.0%— 88.0%— ▲ +4.0 pp—▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children — — 24.0%— ——————
Los Angeles citywide — — 20.0%— ——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 57.5%— — 68.0%— ▲ +10.5 pp—————

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category Porter Ranch
Total Tree Canopy 15.0%550 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 52.3%1,922 acres
Natural Open Surfaces 32.7%1,200 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Total Tree Canopy 15.0%550 acres 15.3%46,226 acres ▼ -0.3% 31/110
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 52.3%1,922 acres 56.2%170,078 acres ▼ -3.9% 89/110
Natural Open Surfaces 32.7%1,200 acres 28.5%86,111 acres ▲ +4.2% 20/110
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category Porter Ranch
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 30.9% ±4.0 pp7,761 ±1,012
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 47.2% ±4.9 pp11,859 ±1,223
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 21.8% ±4.6 pp5,480 ±1,146
Heat Exposed 100.0%25,099
Homes Without Air Conditioning 0.2%60
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. Heat Exposed is the share of residents living in census tracts the Census Bureau flagged as exposed to extreme heat in 2022. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates; neither those nor the heat exposure figures have a margin of error, as with CDC PLACES data.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 30.9%±4.0 pp7,761±1,012 19.5%±0.3 pp751,543±13,280 ▲ +11.4% 19/110
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 47.2%±4.9 pp11,859±1,223 47.6%±0.4 pp1,834,233±16,767 ▼ -0.3% 53/110
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 21.8%±4.6 pp5,480±1,146 33.0%±0.4 pp1,271,488±15,545 ▼ -11.1% 94/110
Heat Exposed 100.0%25,099 52.6%2,030,766 ▲ +47.4% 1/110
Homes Without Air Conditioning 0.2%60 19.5%751,358 ▼ -19.2% 110/110
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. Heat Exposed is the share of residents living in census tracts the Census Bureau flagged as exposed to extreme heat in 2022. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates; neither those nor the heat exposure figures have a margin of error, as with CDC PLACES data.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category Porter Ranch
Drove Alone 87.8% ±3.0 pp7,339 ±251
Carpooled 9.8% ±2.1 pp821 ±173
Public Transit 0.7% ±0.6 pp60 ±51
Walked 0.6% ±0.6 pp46 ±52
Bikes 0.0% ±0.5 pp0
Other Commute Mode 1.1% ±0.7 pp91 ±56
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Drove Alone 87.8%±3.0 pp7,339±251 74.3%±0.1 pp1,409,806±2,191 ▲ +13.5% 4/110
Carpooled 9.8%±2.1 pp821±173 10.8%±0.2 pp204,995±4,626 ▼ -1.0% 59/110
Public Transit 0.7%±0.6 pp60±51 7.6%±0.2 pp144,003±3,960 ▼ -6.9% 104/110
Walked 0.6%±0.6 pp46±52 4.0%±0.1 pp75,140±2,786 ▼ -3.4% 101/110
Bikes 0.0%±0.5 pp0 0.7%±0.1 pp13,831±1,185 ▼ -0.7% 96/110
Other Commute Mode 1.1%±0.7 pp91±56 2.6%±0.1 pp49,004±2,073 ▼ -1.5% 82/110
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category Porter Ranch
Average Commute Time (minutes) 30 min±0.7 min
Less Than 15 Minutes 17.8% ±4.5 pp1,478 ±372
15–29 Minutes 31.6% ±3.5 pp2,630 ±292
30–44 Minutes 29.5% ±3.4 pp2,457 ±286
45–59 Minutes 11.5% ±2.2 pp956 ±185
60 Minutes or More 9.7% ±1.8 pp806 ±154
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes) 30 min±0.7 min 31 min±0.2 min ▼ −0 min 61/110
Less Than 15 Minutes 17.8%±4.5 pp1,478±372 15.9%±0.3 pp241,948±4,532 ▲ +1.9% 38/110
15–29 Minutes 31.6%±3.5 pp2,630±292 33.1%±0.3 pp504,776±4,959 ▼ -1.5% 72/110
30–44 Minutes 29.5%±3.4 pp2,457±286 28.9%±0.3 pp440,595±5,010 ▲ +0.6% 42/110
45–59 Minutes 11.5%±2.2 pp956±185 10.3%±0.2 pp156,750±2,883 ▲ +1.2% 32/110
60 Minutes or More 9.7%±1.8 pp806±154 11.9%±0.2 pp182,392±3,293 ▼ -2.3% 79/110
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category Porter Ranch
Average Vehicles per Household 2.24±0.12
Households With No Vehicle 2.6% ±1.2 pp219 ±103
Households With 1 Vehicle 16.7% ±2.4 pp1,394 ±202
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 80.6% ±4.2 pp6,716 ±346
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Average Vehicles per Household 2.24±0.12 1.61±0.01 ▲ +0.63 4/110
Households With No Vehicle 2.6%±1.2 pp219±103 11.9%±0.2 pp171,011±3,141 ▼ -9.2% 105/110
Households With 1 Vehicle 16.7%±2.4 pp1,394±202 40.0%±0.3 pp575,741±4,305 ▼ -23.3% 109/110
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 80.6%±4.2 pp6,716±346 48.1%±0.4 pp692,345±5,259 ▲ +32.5% 1/110
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Porter Ranch Residents Work

Category Porter Ranch
Porter Ranch 4.6%565
Northridge 4.3%522
Downtown 3.6%444
Woodland Hills 3.6%444
Chatsworth 3.4%415
All other city neighborhoods 36.1%4,423
Outside the city 44.4%5,442
Burbank city, CA 6.4%784
Santa Clarita city, CA 2.7%328
Glendale city, CA 1.9%231
Santa Monica city, CA 1.7%211
Thousand Oaks city, CA 1.6%200
All other California locations 29.3%3,592
Out of state 0.8%96
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 77 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Porter Ranch
Porter Ranch 4.6%565
Northridge 4.3%522
Downtown 3.6%444
Woodland Hills 3.6%444
Chatsworth 3.4%415
All other city neighborhoods 36.1%4,423
Outside the city 44.4%5,442
Burbank city, CA 6.4%784
Santa Clarita city, CA 2.7%328
Glendale city, CA 1.9%231
Santa Monica city, CA 1.7%211
Thousand Oaks city, CA 1.6%200
All other California locations 29.3%3,592
Out of state 0.8%96
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 77 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Porter Ranch 3.6%429 3.6%450 4.6%565 ▲ +1.1 pp▲ +136▲ +1.1 pp▲ +115– 0.0 pp▲ +21
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%2,390 0.1%2,359 0.2%2,618 – 0.0 pp▲ +228– 0.0 pp▲ +259– 0.0 pp▼ −31
Northridge 4.9%587 4.3%541 4.3%522 ▼ −0.6 pp▼ −65– 0.0 pp▼ −19▼ −0.6 pp▼ −46
Los Angeles citywide 1.2%18,525 1.1%19,273 1.0%18,332 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −193▼ −0.1 pp▼ −941▼ −0.1 pp▲ +748
Downtown 4.0%486 4.1%521 3.6%444 ▼ −0.4 pp▼ −42▼ −0.5 pp▼ −77▲ +0.1 pp▲ +35
Los Angeles citywide 6.5%101,766 6.3%110,069 5.7%102,316 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +550▼ −0.5 pp▼ −7,753▼ −0.3 pp▲ +8,303
Woodland Hills 4.2%502 4.3%539 3.6%444 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −58▼ −0.6 pp▼ −95▲ +0.1 pp▲ +37
Los Angeles citywide 1.8%28,115 1.8%31,560 1.6%28,280 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +165▼ −0.2 pp▼ −3,280– 0.0 pp▲ +3,445
Chatsworth 2.9%345 3.1%393 3.4%415 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +70▲ +0.3 pp▲ +22▲ +0.2 pp▲ +48
Los Angeles citywide 1.3%19,575 1.1%19,799 1.1%19,795 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +220– 0.0 pp▼ −4▼ −0.1 pp▲ +224
All other city neighborhoods 35.8%4,318 37.1%4,693 36.1%4,423 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +105▼ −1.0 pp▼ −270▲ +1.3 pp▲ +375
Los Angeles citywide 29.3%458,023 29.5%518,759 30.0%536,497 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +78,474▲ +0.5 pp▲ +17,738▲ +0.2 pp▲ +60,736
Outside the city 44.7%5,387 43.5%5,503 44.4%5,442 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +55▲ +0.9 pp▼ −61▼ −1.2 pp▲ +116
Los Angeles citywide 49.2%770,441 48.8%858,729 49.1%878,687 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +108,246▲ +0.4 pp▲ +19,958▼ −0.5 pp▲ +88,288
Burbank city, CA 6.2%744 6.7%850 6.4%784 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +40▼ −0.3 pp▼ −66▲ +0.6 pp▲ +106
Los Angeles citywide 5.8%90,525 7.3%128,165 7.5%134,652 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +44,127▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,487▲ +1.5 pp▲ +37,640
Santa Clarita city, CA 3.0%366 2.3%297 2.7%328 ▼ −0.4 pp▼ −38▲ +0.3 pp▲ +31▼ −0.7 pp▼ −69
Los Angeles citywide 0.9%13,724 0.9%15,077 0.8%14,860 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,136– 0.0 pp▼ −217– 0.0 pp▲ +1,353
Glendale city, CA 1.3%157 1.8%225 1.9%231 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +74▲ +0.1 pp▲ +6▲ +0.5 pp▲ +68
Los Angeles citywide 1.9%30,184 2.0%36,041 1.9%34,608 – 0.0 pp▲ +4,424▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,433▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5,857
Santa Monica city, CA 1.9%235 1.4%181 1.7%211 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −24▲ +0.3 pp▲ +30▼ −0.5 pp▼ −54
Los Angeles citywide 2.6%39,908 2.4%42,563 2.2%39,633 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −275▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,930▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,655
Thousand Oaks city, CA 1.5%177 1.5%186 1.6%200 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +23▲ +0.2 pp▲ +14– 0.0 pp▲ +9
Los Angeles citywide 0.6%8,626 0.5%8,999 0.6%10,027 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,401– 0.0 pp▲ +1,028– 0.0 pp▲ +373
All other California locations 29.8%3,596 28.8%3,646 29.3%3,592 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −4▲ +0.5 pp▼ −54▼ −1.0 pp▲ +50
Los Angeles citywide 31.0%485,821 29.7%523,763 30.3%541,371 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +55,550▲ +0.5 pp▲ +17,608▼ −1.3 pp▲ +37,942
Out of state 0.7%88 0.8%102 0.8%96 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8– 0.0 pp▼ −6▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14
Los Angeles citywide 0.8%12,591 0.9%15,245 0.9%15,599 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,008– 0.0 pp▲ +354▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,654

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Porter Ranch

Category Porter Ranch
Porter Ranch 12.2%565
Northridge 4.0%186
Granada Hills 3.5%163
Chatsworth 3.2%149
Sylmar 2.9%132
All other city neighborhoods 30.8%1,423
Outside the city 43.3%2,003
Santa Clarita city, CA 4.1%190
Simi Valley city, CA 3.0%137
Lancaster city, CA 1.2%55
Oxnard city, CA 1.0%47
Bakersfield city, CA 0.9%43
All other California locations 32.9%1,522
Out of state 0.2%9
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 77; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Porter Ranch
Porter Ranch 12.2%565
Northridge 4.0%186
Granada Hills 3.5%163
Chatsworth 3.2%149
Sylmar 2.9%132
All other city neighborhoods 30.8%1,423
Outside the city 43.3%2,003
Santa Clarita city, CA 4.1%190
Simi Valley city, CA 3.0%137
Lancaster city, CA 1.2%55
Oxnard city, CA 1.0%47
Bakersfield city, CA 0.9%43
All other California locations 32.9%1,522
Out of state 0.2%9
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 77; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Porter Ranch 9.0%429 10.2%450 12.2%565 ▲ +3.2 pp▲ +136▲ +2.1 pp▲ +115▲ +1.1 pp▲ +21
Los Angeles citywide 0.4%6,667 0.4%7,137 0.3%6,813 – 0.0 pp▲ +146– 0.0 pp▼ −324– 0.0 pp▲ +470
Northridge 3.1%147 2.6%116 4.0%186 ▲ +0.9 pp▲ +39▲ +1.4 pp▲ +70▼ −0.5 pp▼ −31
Los Angeles citywide 0.9%14,949 0.9%17,579 0.9%18,067 – 0.0 pp▲ +3,118– 0.0 pp▲ +488– 0.0 pp▲ +2,630
Granada Hills 3.1%147 3.5%153 3.5%163 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +16▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10▲ +0.4 pp▲ +6
Los Angeles citywide 0.8%14,063 0.8%15,205 0.8%15,193 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,130– 0.0 pp▼ −12– 0.0 pp▲ +1,142
Chatsworth 2.7%129 3.7%165 3.2%149 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +20▼ −0.5 pp▼ −16▲ +1.0 pp▲ +36
Los Angeles citywide 0.6%11,074 0.6%12,450 0.7%13,502 – 0.0 pp▲ +2,428– 0.0 pp▲ +1,052– 0.0 pp▲ +1,376
Sylmar 2.3%110 2.1%95 2.9%132 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +22▲ +0.7 pp▲ +37▼ −0.2 pp▼ −15
Los Angeles citywide 1.0%17,885 1.0%20,152 1.0%20,662 – 0.0 pp▲ +2,777– 0.0 pp▲ +510– 0.0 pp▲ +2,267
All other city neighborhoods 30.0%1,428 30.9%1,366 30.8%1,423 ▲ +0.8 pp▼ −5▼ −0.1 pp▲ +57▲ +0.8 pp▼ −62
Los Angeles citywide 32.8%567,333 33.2%640,964 32.5%645,360 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +78,027▼ −0.7 pp▲ +4,396▲ +0.4 pp▲ +73,631
Outside the city 49.8%2,367 46.7%2,068 43.3%2,003 ▼ −6.4 pp▼ −364▼ −3.4 pp▼ −65▼ −3.0 pp▼ −299
Los Angeles citywide 54.0%933,111 53.3%1,028,920 54.2%1,077,964 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +144,853▲ +1.0 pp▲ +49,044▼ −0.7 pp▲ +95,809
Santa Clarita city, CA 5.4%258 4.4%194 4.1%190 ▼ −1.3 pp▼ −68▼ −0.3 pp▼ −4▼ −1.0 pp▼ −64
Los Angeles citywide 1.8%31,274 1.8%35,074 1.8%36,038 – 0.0 pp▲ +4,764– 0.0 pp▲ +964– 0.0 pp▲ +3,800
Simi Valley city, CA 3.6%169 3.6%158 3.0%137 ▼ −0.6 pp▼ −32▼ −0.6 pp▼ −21– 0.0 pp▼ −11
Los Angeles citywide 0.9%15,531 0.9%16,742 0.8%16,657 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,126– 0.0 pp▼ −85– 0.0 pp▲ +1,211
Lancaster city, CA 1.3%63 0.5%24 1.2%55 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −8▲ +0.6 pp▲ +31▼ −0.8 pp▼ −39
Los Angeles citywide 0.5%9,216 0.6%11,511 0.6%11,959 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,743– 0.0 pp▲ +448▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,295
Oxnard city, CA 0.6%27 0.5%22 1.0%47 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +20▲ +0.5 pp▲ +25▼ −0.1 pp▼ −5
Los Angeles citywide 0.3%5,534 0.3%6,239 0.3%6,456 – 0.0 pp▲ +922– 0.0 pp▲ +217– 0.0 pp▲ +705
Bakersfield city, CA 0.4%21 0.5%21 0.9%43 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +22▲ +0.5 pp▲ +22– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 0.3%4,739 0.3%5,150 0.3%5,526 – 0.0 pp▲ +787– 0.0 pp▲ +376– 0.0 pp▲ +411
All other California locations 35.9%1,709 35.3%1,563 32.9%1,522 ▼ −3.0 pp▼ −187▼ −2.4 pp▼ −41▼ −0.6 pp▼ −146
Los Angeles citywide 42.9%741,882 42.0%811,195 42.9%852,367 – 0.0 pp▲ +110,485▲ +0.9 pp▲ +41,172▼ −0.9 pp▲ +69,313
Out of state 0.5%22 0.4%16 0.2%9 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −13▼ −0.2 pp▼ −7▼ −0.1 pp▼ −6
Los Angeles citywide 0.7%12,235 0.9%18,318 1.4%27,218 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +14,983▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,900▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,083

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category Porter Ranch
No Computer or Smartphone 0.3% ±0.5 pp22 ±43
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 3.0% ±1.2 pp248 ±101
Desktop or Laptop Available 94.2% ±1.6 pp7,848 ±133
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
No Computer or Smartphone 0.3%±0.5 pp22±43 3.6%±0.1 pp51,208±2,038 ▼ -3.3% 110/110
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 3.0%±1.2 pp248±101 9.4%±0.2 pp134,973±3,565 ▼ -6.4% 90/110
Desktop or Laptop Available 94.2%±1.6 pp7,848±133 81.8%±0.3 pp1,177,551±4,293 ▲ +12.4% 10/110
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category Porter Ranch
Has Internet Access 99.2% ±1.2 pp8,259 ±101
Cellular Data Plan Only 8.5% ±2.5 pp711 ±205
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 0.9% ±0.9 pp73 ±71
No Internet Access 0.8% ±0.6 pp70 ±54
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Has Internet Access 99.2%±1.2 pp8,259±101 94.6%±0.2 pp1,361,126±2,605 ▲ +4.6% 4/110
Cellular Data Plan Only 8.5%±2.5 pp711±205 11.8%±0.2 pp169,117±3,594 ▼ -3.2% 76/110
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 0.9%±0.9 pp73±71 1.9%±0.1 pp27,326±1,276 ▼ -1.0% 86/110
No Internet Access 0.8%±0.6 pp70±54 5.4%±0.2 pp77,971±2,871 ▼ -4.6% 107/110
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category Porter Ranch
Uninsured Residents 4.9% ±1.4 pp1,226 ±353
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 4.2% ±3.1 pp1,042 ±779
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 6.4% ±2.0 pp1,596 ±500
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 2.3% ±2.6 pp573 ±640
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Uninsured Residents 4.9%±1.4 pp1,226±353 9.5%±0.1 pp364,737±5,658 ▼ -4.6% 84/110
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 4.2%±3.1 pp1,042±779 3.3%±0.2 pp125,674±9,529 ▲ +0.9% 26/110
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 6.4%±2.0 pp1,596±500 13.1%±0.2 pp506,732±8,090 ▼ -6.8% 83/110
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 2.3%±2.6 pp573±640 1.9%±0.2 pp72,725±8,443 ▲ +0.4% 37/110
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category Porter Ranch
Insured (Any Coverage) 95.1% ±1.4 pp23,867 ±353
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 55.7% ±1.6 pp13,971 ±397
Direct-Purchase Insurance 16.3% ±2.0 pp4,090 ±501
Medicare 20.7% ±1.7 pp5,206 ±419
Medicaid 9.3% ±1.6 pp2,336 ±406
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.2% ±0.5 pp52 ±125
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 5.7% ±1.0 pp1,426 ±258
Uninsured 4.9% ±1.4 pp1,226 ±353
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Insured (Any Coverage) 95.1%±1.4 pp23,867±353 90.5%±0.2 pp3,468,249±6,113 ▲ +4.6% 27/110
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 55.7%±1.6 pp13,971±397 40.6%±0.3 pp1,556,236±11,598 ▲ +15.1% 20/110
Direct-Purchase Insurance 16.3%±2.0 pp4,090±501 11.5%±0.2 pp439,171±6,009 ▲ +4.8% 34/110
Medicare 20.7%±1.7 pp5,206±419 13.1%±0.2 pp502,686±5,846 ▲ +7.6% 4/110
Medicaid 9.3%±1.6 pp2,336±406 30.1%±0.2 pp1,152,695±9,490 ▼ -20.8% 95/110
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.2%±0.5 pp52±125 0.2%±0.0 pp8,178±741 0% 42/110
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 5.7%±1.0 pp1,426±258 4.2%±0.1 pp160,627±3,851 ▲ +1.5% 18/110
Uninsured 4.9%±1.4 pp1,226±353 9.5%±0.2 pp362,202±6,113 ▼ -4.6% 84/110
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category Porter Ranch
Adults With at Least One Disability 10.4% ±1.4 pp2,066 ±282
Mobility Disability 5.6% ±1.1 pp1,113 ±228
Hearing Disability 2.2% ±0.8 pp435 ±151
Vision Disability 1.3% ±0.7 pp265 ±140
Cognitive Disability 4.2% ±1.0 pp835 ±208
Self-Care Disability 3.7% ±1.0 pp737 ±205
Independent Living Disability 5.3% ±1.2 pp1,061 ±230
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability 10.4%±1.4 pp2,066±282 13.4%±0.2 pp413,424±4,833 ▼ -3.0% 92/110
Mobility Disability 5.6%±1.1 pp1,113±228 7.1%±0.1 pp220,306±3,715 ▼ -1.5% 78/110
Hearing Disability 2.2%±0.8 pp435±151 3.0%±0.1 pp92,708±2,400 ▼ -0.8% 98/110
Vision Disability 1.3%±0.7 pp265±140 2.7%±0.1 pp83,292±2,320 ▼ -1.4% 95/110
Cognitive Disability 4.2%±1.0 pp835±208 5.1%±0.1 pp158,649±3,239 ▼ -0.9% 81/110
Self-Care Disability 3.7%±1.0 pp737±205 3.4%±0.1 pp104,391±2,633 ▲ +0.3% 42/110
Independent Living Disability 5.3%±1.2 pp1,061±230 6.1%±0.1 pp187,616±3,478 ▼ -0.8% 71/110
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category Porter Ranch
Arthritis 22.1%4,268
High Blood Pressure 30.7%5,926
Cancer 8.5%1,640
Current Asthma 8.4%1,626
Coronary Heart Disease 5.3%1,019
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 4.1%802
Diabetes 10.7%2,071
High Cholesterol 40.3%7,790
Obesity 20.1%3,878
Stroke 2.9%560
Lost All Natural Teeth 1.5%283
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Arthritis 22.1%4,268 18.8%558,377 ▲ +3.3% 16/110
High Blood Pressure 30.7%5,926 28.8%855,387 ▲ +1.9% 36/110
Cancer 8.5%1,640 5.4%160,385 ▲ +3.1% 11/110
Current Asthma 8.4%1,626 9.4%279,189 ▼ -1.0% 107/110
Coronary Heart Disease 5.3%1,019 5.0%148,505 ▲ +0.3% 54/110
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 4.1%802 4.9%145,535 ▼ -0.8% 71/110
Diabetes 10.7%2,071 11.9%353,441 ▼ -1.2% 67/110
High Cholesterol 40.3%7,790 35.2%1,045,473 ▲ +5.1% 3/110
Obesity 20.1%3,878 27.3%810,835 ▼ -7.2% 109/110
Stroke 2.9%560 3.1%92,073 ▼ -0.2% 66/110
Lost All Natural Teeth 1.5%283 1.9%55,491 ▼ -0.4% 72/110
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category Porter Ranch
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 14.0%2,697
Current Cigarette Smoking 7.5%1,443
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 18.1%3,506
Short Sleep Duration 31.4%6,070
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 14.0%2,697 15.9%472,245 ▼ -1.9% 97/110
Current Cigarette Smoking 7.5%1,443 11.9%353,441 ▼ -4.4% 98/110
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 18.1%3,506 26.5%787,075 ▼ -8.4% 79/110
Short Sleep Duration 31.4%6,070 36.5%1,084,084 ▼ -5.1% 99/110
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category Porter Ranch
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 15.5%2,991
Frequent Physical Distress 11.1%2,142
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 15.5%2,991 25.1%745,493 ▼ -9.6% 84/110
Frequent Physical Distress 11.1%2,142 14.4%427,693 ▼ -3.3% 82/110
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category Porter Ranch
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 76.5%14,788
Routine Checkup in Past Year 76.6%14,798
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 90.2%17,424
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 64.3%12,431
Dental Visit in Past Year 73.0%14,112
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 78.4%15,156
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 76.5%14,788 69.3%2,058,274 ▲ +7.2% 7/110
Routine Checkup in Past Year 76.6%14,798 70.5%2,093,916 ▲ +6.1% 7/110
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 90.2%17,424 83.0%2,465,177 ▲ +7.2% 6/110
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 64.3%12,431 54.0%1,603,850 ▲ +10.3% 10/110
Dental Visit in Past Year 73.0%14,112 58.9%1,749,385 ▲ +14.1% 13/110
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 78.4%15,156 74.8%2,221,630 ▲ +3.6% 24/110
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category Porter Ranch
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 17.6%3,408
Frequent Mental Distress 12.7%2,452
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 26.6%5,144
Loneliness 36.4%7,035
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Porter Ranch City Difference Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 17.6%3,408 20.4%605,899 ▼ -2.8% 109/110
Frequent Mental Distress 12.7%2,452 17.4%516,796 ▼ -4.7% 106/110
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 26.6%5,144 31.2%926,669 ▼ -4.6% 80/110
Loneliness 36.4%7,035 41.3%1,226,648 ▼ -4.9% 97/110
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Compare All Neighborhoods