Manchester Square, Los Angeles Demographics, Housing & Census Data

Manchester Square, Los Angeles Census and ACS demographic tables: population, race, age, income, poverty, rent, housing types, single-family homes, commute, education, internet access, health insurance, and disability.

Manchester Square, Los Angeles

Manchester Square
Los Angeles
Population
12,671
Overlapping council districts Overlap means that a council district contains part of this neighborhood.
8
Population Density
12,552 /sq mi
Average Geographic Mismatch Error : 0.45 p.p. Geographic mismatch error comes from Census geographic boundaries not perfectly aligning with neighborhood boundaries. We can test how much mismatch error skews neighborhood statistics for a subset of variables. For this neighborhood , the average error is 0.45 percentage points. More detail is available on the neighborhood geography page , and the methodology page explains geographic mismatch error in more detail.
One-page summary

Manchester Square at a Glance

Time period?Historical estimates use this profile's current boundaries, held constant across periods; they do not reflect the boundaries that were in effect at the time. Comparing
Values as
Show as
Add to every table
Showing Chart vs. Los Angeles ± Margin of error

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category Manchester Square
Hispanic 28.3% ±7.2 pp3,581 ±907
White 4.1% ±1.9 pp522 ±237
Black 62.4% ±6.6 pp7,911 ±834
Asian 0.4% ±0.4 pp56 ±55
Other or Multi-racial 4.7% ±2.7 pp601 ±341
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Hispanic 28.3%±7.2 pp3,581±907 47.2%±0.2 pp1,820,397±8,107 ▼ -18.9% 65/110
White 4.1%±1.9 pp522±237 28.1%±0.2 pp1,082,393±7,330 ▼ -23.9% 92/110
Black 62.4%±6.6 pp7,911±834 8.1%±0.1 pp311,633±4,801 ▲ +54.4% 3/110
Asian 0.4%±0.4 pp56±55 11.9%±0.1 pp460,422±5,784 ▼ -11.5% 108/110
Other or Multi-racial 4.7%±2.7 pp601±341 4.7%±0.1 pp182,418±4,965 0% 61/110
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Age Distribution

Category Manchester Square
Under 5 3.6% ±1.7 pp461 ±210
5-17 15.4% ±2.9 pp1,950 ±368
18-24 6.6% ±2.0 pp837 ±250
25-44 29.4% ±3.1 pp3,719 ±396
45-64 28.2% ±3.6 pp3,580 ±457
65-74 9.6% ±2.1 pp1,221 ±269
75-84 5.2% ±1.5 pp659 ±185
85+ 1.9% ±1.1 pp245 ±136
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Under 5 3.6%±1.7 pp461±210 5.0%±0.1 pp193,588±3,896 ▼ -1.4% 97/110
5-17 15.4%±2.9 pp1,950±368 14.1%±0.1 pp545,575±5,332 ▲ +1.2% 36/110
18-24 6.6%±2.0 pp837±250 9.5%±0.1 pp364,975±4,663 ▼ -2.9% 72/110
25-44 29.4%±3.1 pp3,719±396 32.7%±0.2 pp1,261,487±6,490 ▼ -3.4% 63/110
45-64 28.2%±3.6 pp3,580±457 24.4%±0.1 pp942,048±5,660 ▲ +3.8% 19/110
65-74 9.6%±2.1 pp1,221±269 8.4%±0.1 pp323,245±3,923 ▲ +1.3% 37/110
75-84 5.2%±1.5 pp659±185 4.0%±0.1 pp153,663±2,663 ▲ +1.2% 30/110
85+ 1.9%±1.1 pp245±136 1.9%±0.1 pp72,682±2,184 ▲ +0.1% 55/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category Manchester Square
No High School Diploma 15.0% ±3.8 pp1,421 ±360
High School Diploma or GED 23.9% ±4.8 pp2,261 ±450
Some College or Associate's Degree 39.1% ±4.9 pp3,694 ±462
Bachelor's Degree 15.0% ±3.3 pp1,418 ±314
Graduate Degree 6.9% ±1.8 pp648 ±170
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
No High School Diploma 15.0%±3.8 pp1,421±360 20.4%±0.2 pp560,441±5,727 ▼ -5.3% 58/110
High School Diploma or GED 23.9%±4.8 pp2,261±450 18.5%±0.2 pp509,870±5,784 ▲ +5.4% 26/110
Some College or Associate's Degree 39.1%±4.9 pp3,694±462 22.7%±0.2 pp624,064±5,974 ▲ +16.5% 1/110
Bachelor's Degree 15.0%±3.3 pp1,418±314 24.9%±0.2 pp684,319±5,857 ▼ -9.8% 85/110
Graduate Degree 6.9%±1.8 pp648±170 13.6%±0.2 pp374,431±4,485 ▼ -6.7% 83/110
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category Manchester Square
Total Population 12,671 ±1,560
Total Households 4,615 ±569
Population Density 12,552 ±1,545 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square Average Neighborhood Difference
Total Population 12,671 35,102 ▼ −22,431
Total Households 4,615 13,096 ▼ −8,481
Population Density 12,552 people/sq mi 11,693 people/sq mi ▲ +859
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average neighborhood rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large neighborhoods. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category 2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19 Difference Rank
Total Population 11,921 ±917 13,014 ±1,223 12,671 ±1,560 ▲ +750 ±1,809▼ −343 ±1,982▲ +1,093 ±1,529 ▼ −23,237▼ −23,084▼ −22,431 91/11088/11090/110
Average Neighborhood 35,158 36,098 35,102 ▼ −56▼ −997▲ +940
Total Households 4,157 ±223 4,483 ±254 4,615 ±569 ▲ +458 ±611▲ +132 ±623▲ +326 ±338 ▼ −7,944▼ −8,111▼ −8,481 94/11093/11094/110
Average Neighborhood 12,101 12,594 13,096 ▲ +995▲ +502▲ +493
Population Density (per sq mi) 11,809 ±908 12,891 ±1,211 12,552 ±1,545 ▲ +743▼ −340▲ +1,083 ▲ +28▲ +820▲ +859 50/11041/11044/110
Average Neighborhood Density 11,781 12,071 11,693 ▼ −88▼ −378▲ +291

Household Size

Category Manchester Square
Average Household Size 2.73±0.41
1-Person Households 33.2% ±7.3 pp1,532 ±337
2-Person Households 25.7% ±7.9 pp1,187 ±365
3-Person Households 17.3% ±4.1 pp796 ±190
4+ Person Households 23.8% ±5.2 pp1,100 ±241
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Average Household Size 2.73±0.41 2.61±0.02 ▲ +0.12 47/110
1-Person Households 33.2%±7.3 pp1,532±337 31.8%±0.4 pp458,302±5,082 ▲ +1.3% 43/110
2-Person Households 25.7%±7.9 pp1,187±365 29.2%±0.4 pp419,781±5,238 ▼ -3.5% 82/110
3-Person Households 17.3%±4.1 pp796±190 15.5%±0.3 pp222,553±4,097 ▲ +1.8% 39/110
4+ Person Households 23.8%±5.2 pp1,100±241 23.5%±0.4 pp338,461±5,073 ▲ +0.3% 50/110
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category Manchester Square
Never Married 51.3% ±5.6 pp5,427 ±589
Married 28.1% ±2.0 pp2,979 ±209
Separated 3.6% ±1.5 pp386 ±156
Divorced 9.2% ±2.1 pp973 ±218
Widowed 7.8% ±2.2 pp824 ±234
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Never Married 51.3%±5.6 pp5,427±589 46.8%±0.2 pp1,520,630±7,726 ▲ +4.5% 36/110
Married 28.1%±2.0 pp2,979±209 38.5%±0.2 pp1,249,312±6,703 ▼ -10.3% 104/110
Separated 3.6%±1.5 pp386±156 2.3%±0.1 pp75,298±2,109 ▲ +1.3% 7/110
Divorced 9.2%±2.1 pp973±218 8.0%±0.1 pp260,053±4,066 ▲ +1.2% 30/110
Widowed 7.8%±2.2 pp824±234 4.4%±0.1 pp143,800±3,312 ▲ +3.4% 5/110
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category Manchester Square
Speak English Only 73.4% ±5.0 pp9,147 ±622
Spanish 25.0% ±4.2 pp3,113 ±519
Other Languages 1.6% ±1.2 pp200 ±155
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Speak English Only 73.4%±5.0 pp9,147±622 43.6%±0.3 pp1,595,910±12,698 ▲ +29.9% 9/110
Spanish 25.0%±4.2 pp3,113±519 39.3%±0.3 pp1,439,364±9,227 ▼ -14.3% 62/110
Other Languages 1.6%±1.2 pp200±155 1.0%±0.1 pp36,540±2,239 ▲ +0.6% 92/110
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show
Category Manchester Square
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 85.1% ±14.7 pp85.1%±14.7 pp10,396 ±1,798
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 7.2% ±3.3 pp7.2%±3.3 pp884 ±398
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 6.4% ±2.6 pp89.0%±53.4 pp787 ±312
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 1.2% ±1.3 pp16.2%±16.0 pp143 ±155
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 14.9% ±4.1 pp205.2%±108.3 pp1,814 ±501
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 85.1%±14.7 pp85.1%±14.7 pp10,396±1,798 75.0%±0.4 pp75.0%±0.4 pp2,746,425±15,454 ▲ +10.2%▲ +10.2% 43/110
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 7.2%±3.3 pp7.2%±3.3 pp884±398 11.4%±0.2 pp11.4%±0.2 pp417,261±5,774 ▼ -4.1%▼ -4.1% 74/110
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 6.4%±2.6 pp89.0%±53.4 pp787±312 9.5%±0.2 pp83.3%±0.9 pp347,471±6,114 ▼ -3.0%▲ +5.8% 59/11036/110
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 1.2%±1.3 pp16.2%±16.0 pp143±155 4.2%±0.1 pp36.6%±0.8 pp152,518±4,020 ▼ -3.0%▼ -20.4% 71/11074/110
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 14.9%±4.1 pp205.2%±108.3 pp1,814±501 25.0%±0.3 pp219.8%±3.8 pp917,250±9,304 ▼ -10.2%▼ -14.6% 68/11048/110
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category Manchester Square
Married-Couple Households 25.4% ±4.5 pp1,174 ±205
Unmarried-Couple Households 7.0% ±2.9 pp322 ±133
One-Person Households 33.2% ±8.0 pp1,532 ±368
Other Household Types 34.4% ±15.9 pp1,588 ±734
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Married-Couple Households 25.4%±4.5 pp1,174±205 37.0%±0.3 pp531,842±3,893 ▼ -11.5% 98/110
Unmarried-Couple Households 7.0%±2.9 pp322±133 8.8%±0.2 pp125,985±2,722 ▼ -1.8% 78/110
One-Person Households 33.2%±8.0 pp1,532±368 31.8%±0.3 pp458,302±4,544 ▲ +1.3% 43/110
Other Household Types 34.4%±15.9 pp1,588±734 22.4%±0.5 pp322,968±7,912 ▲ +12.0% 12/110
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category Manchester Square
Children in Married-Couple Households 38.2% ±6.7 pp1,041 ±182
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 13.8% ±8.7 pp376 ±236
Children in Single-Mother Households 44.7% ±13.9 pp1,221 ±379
Children in Single-Father Households 3.3% ±2.7 pp91 ±75
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households 38.2%±6.7 pp1,041±182 60.7%±0.6 pp447,843±4,339 ▼ -22.6% 107/110
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 13.8%±8.7 pp376±236 10.9%±0.5 pp80,543±3,499 ▲ +2.8% 25/110
Children in Single-Mother Households 44.7%±13.9 pp1,221±379 22.7%±0.7 pp167,403±4,794 ▲ +22.0% 3/110
Children in Single-Father Households 3.3%±2.7 pp91±75 5.6%±0.3 pp41,515±2,120 ▼ -2.3% 85/110
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show
Category Manchester Square
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 3.3% ±1.7 pp3.3%±1.7 pp343 ±172
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 5.9% ±16.8 pp0.2%±0.6 pp20 ±58
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 8.7% ±13.6 pp0.3%±0.5 pp30 ±47
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 44.5% ±36.4 pp1.5%±1.2 pp153 ±125
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 3.2% ±12.3 pp0.1%±0.4 pp11 ±42
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 37.7% ±28.0 pp1.3%±0.9 pp129 ±96
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 3.3%±1.7 pp3.3%±1.7 pp343±172 2.2%±0.1 pp2.2%±0.1 pp67,714±2,153 ▲ +1.2%▲ +1.2% 20/110
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 5.9%±16.8 pp0.2%±0.6 pp20±58 25.0%±1.1 pp0.5%±0.0 pp16,948±757 ▼ -19.1%▼ -0.3% 100/11092/110
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 8.7%±13.6 pp0.3%±0.5 pp30±47 12.9%±1.0 pp0.3%±0.0 pp8,738±667 ▼ -4.2%0% 70/11041/110
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 44.5%±36.4 pp1.5%±1.2 pp153±125 29.1%±1.1 pp0.6%±0.0 pp19,723±754 ▲ +15.3%▲ +0.9% 16/1109/110
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 3.2%±12.3 pp0.1%±0.4 pp11±42 5.9%±0.8 pp0.1%±0.0 pp4,026±537 ▼ -2.7%0% 61/11050/110
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 37.7%±28.0 pp1.3%±0.9 pp129±96 27.0%±1.8 pp0.6%±0.0 pp18,279±1,202 ▲ +10.7%▲ +0.7% 28/1108/110
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show
Category Manchester Square
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 81.6% ±4.3 pp81.6%±4.3 pp10,337 ±551
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 18.4% ±3.4 pp18.4%±3.4 pp2,334 ±427
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 7.8% ±1.9 pp42.5%±7.0 pp992 ±245
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 10.6% ±3.0 pp57.5%±12.6 pp1,342 ±384
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 81.6%±4.3 pp81.6%±4.3 pp10,337±551 64.3%±0.3 pp64.3%±0.3 pp2,479,853±10,798 ▲ +17.3%▲ +17.3% 9/110
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 18.4%±3.4 pp18.4%±3.4 pp2,334±427 35.7%±0.3 pp35.7%±0.3 pp1,377,410±11,170 ▼ -17.3%▼ -17.3% 102/110
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 7.8%±1.9 pp42.5%±7.0 pp992±245 18.0%±0.2 pp50.4%±0.3 pp693,647±6,987 ▼ -10.2%▼ -7.9% 108/11087/110
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 10.6%±3.0 pp57.5%±12.6 pp1,342±384 17.7%±0.2 pp49.6%±0.5 pp683,763±8,715 ▼ -7.1%▲ +7.9% 70/11024/110
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show
Category Manchester Square
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 6.6%±2.2 pp35.6%±8.9 pp859±282
Born in El Salvador (of foreign-born residents) 4.5%±2.1 pp24.3%±10.4 pp585±281
Born in Guatemala (of foreign-born residents) 2.3%±1.4 pp12.5%±7.2 pp301±185
Born in Belize (of foreign-born residents) 2.1%±1.4 pp11.2%±6.9 pp271±177
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 2.3%12.5%301
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square Los Angeles Difference Rank
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 6.6% ±2.2 pp35.6%±8.9 pp859 11.0% ±0.2 pp30.8%424,738 ▼ -4.4%▲ +4.8% 59/11035/110
Born in El Salvador (of foreign-born residents) 4.5% ±2.1 pp24.3%±10.4 pp585 4.1% ±0.1 pp11.6%160,004 ▲ +0.3%▲ +12.6% 41/1108/110
Born in Guatemala (of foreign-born residents) 2.3% ±1.4 pp12.5%±7.2 pp301 3.1% ±0.1 pp8.7%119,892 ▼ -0.8%▲ +3.8% 38/11020/110
Born in Belize (of foreign-born residents) 2.1% ±1.4 pp11.2%±6.9 pp271 0.2% ±0.0 pp0.5%7,441 ▲ +1.9%▲ +10.7% 2/1102/110
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 2.3%12.5%301 ——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show
Category Manchester Square
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 3.0% ±2.0 pp16.1%±10.2 pp388 ±257
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 4.2% ±1.9 pp22.9%±9.4 pp553 ±249
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 3.3% ±1.2 pp17.9%±5.3 pp432 ±152
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 7.9% ±2.0 pp43.0%±7.4 pp1,038 ±266
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 3.0%±2.0 pp16.1%±10.2 pp388±257 8.0%±0.2 pp12752.0%±2436.3 pp307,579±6,156 ▼ -5.0%▼ -12735.9% 107/11078/110
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 4.2%±1.9 pp22.9%±9.4 pp553±249 7.2%±0.1 pp11565.8%±2207.2 pp278,968±4,987 ▼ -3.0%▼ -11542.9% 82/11021/110
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 3.3%±1.2 pp17.9%±5.3 pp432±152 7.6%±0.1 pp12170.7%±2321.1 pp293,558±4,815 ▼ -4.3%▼ -12152.8% 102/11091/110
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 7.9%±2.0 pp43.0%±7.4 pp1,038±266 12.9%±0.1 pp20618.0%±3924.7 pp497,305±5,768 ▼ -5.0%▼ -20574.9% 97/11033/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later 0.2% ±0.5 pp20 ±59 1.5% ±1.4 pp195 ±186 3.0% ±2.0 pp388 ±257 ▲ +2.8 pp▲ +368▲ +1.5 pp▲ +193▲ +1.3 pp▲ +175
Los Angeles citywide 1.7% ±0.1 pp64,948 ±2,271 5.1% ±0.1 pp202,940 ±3,998 8.0% ±0.2 pp307,579 ±6,179 ▲ +6.3 pp▲ +242,631▲ +2.9 pp▲ +104,639▲ +3.4 pp▲ +137,992
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 2.9% ±1.3 pp353 ±160 4.7% ±2.3 pp606 ±293 4.2% ±1.9 pp553 ±249 ▲ +1.3 pp▲ +200▼ −0.4 pp▼ −53▲ +1.8 pp▲ +253
Los Angeles citywide 10.0% ±0.2 pp386,575 ±5,794 8.5% ±0.1 pp335,409 ±4,817 7.2% ±0.1 pp278,968 ±5,010 ▼ −2.8 pp▼ −107,607▼ −1.2 pp▼ −56,441▼ −1.6 pp▼ −51,166
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 2.8% ±1.0 pp335 ±119 2.7% ±1.1 pp344 ±140 3.3% ±1.2 pp432 ±152 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +97▲ +0.6 pp▲ +88▼ −0.1 pp▲ +9
Los Angeles citywide 9.9% ±0.1 pp381,773 ±4,974 8.5% ±0.1 pp338,094 ±4,761 7.6% ±0.1 pp293,558 ±4,841 ▼ −2.3 pp▼ −88,215▼ −0.9 pp▼ −44,536▼ −1.4 pp▼ −43,679
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 7.5% ±1.9 pp917 ±232 7.8% ±2.1 pp1,005 ±273 7.9% ±2.0 pp1,038 ±266 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +121▲ +0.2 pp▲ +33▲ +0.2 pp▲ +88
Los Angeles citywide 17.0% ±0.2 pp655,695 ±5,798 14.8% ±0.1 pp585,903 ±4,838 12.9% ±0.2 pp497,305 ±5,831 ▼ −4.1 pp▼ −158,390▼ −1.9 pp▼ −88,598▼ −2.2 pp▼ −69,792
Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category Manchester Square
Average Household Income $86,501±$5,650
Per Capita Income $33,058±$2,234
10th Percentile Household Income $11,844±$3,040
25th Percentile Household Income $23,198±$6,709
Median Household Income $67,370±$12,153
75th Percentile Household Income $121,591±$21,071
90th Percentile Household Income $195,596±$12,525
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $86,501±$5,650 $125,130±$1,000 ▼ −$38,629 84/110
Per Capita Income $33,058±$2,234 $47,685±$375 ▼ −$14,627 76/110
10th Percentile Household Income $11,844±$3,040 $14,186±$216 ▼ −$2,341 85/110
25th Percentile Household Income $23,198±$6,709 $37,123±$496 ▼ −$13,925 99/110
Median Household Income $67,370±$12,153 $81,939±$742 ▼ −$14,569 80/110
75th Percentile Household Income $121,591±$21,071 $154,703±$1,370 ▼ −$33,112 78/110
90th Percentile Household Income $195,596±$12,525 Over $200,000 ▼ −$4,404+ 77/110
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $72,257 ±5,908 $85,342 ±11,281 $86,501 ±5,650 ▲ +$14,244▲ +$1,160▲ +$13,085
Los Angeles citywide $103,745 ±722 $118,302 ±915 $125,130 ±1,000 ▲ +$21,385▲ +$6,828▲ +$14,557
Average Household Income (nominal dollars) $54,531 ±4,459 $69,554 ±9,194 $86,501 ±5,650 ▲ +$31,970▲ +$16,948▲ +$15,022
Los Angeles citywide $78,294 ±545 $96,416 ±746 $125,130 ±1,000 ▲ +$46,835▲ +$28,714▲ +$18,122
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $26,451 ±1,546 $31,802 ±3,426 $33,058 ±2,234 ▲ +$6,608▲ +$1,256▲ +$5,351
Los Angeles citywide $37,526 ±267 $43,265 ±333 $47,685 ±375 ▲ +$10,159▲ +$4,420▲ +$5,739
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars) $19,962 ±1,167 $25,919 ±2,792 $33,058 ±2,234 ▲ +$13,096▲ +$7,140▲ +$5,957
Los Angeles citywide $28,320 ±202 $35,261 ±271 $47,685 ±375 ▲ +$19,365▲ +$12,424▲ +$6,941
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $13,372 ±2,630 $12,802 ±2,337 $11,844 ±3,040 ▼ −$1,527▼ −$958▼ −$570
Los Angeles citywide $15,033 ±149 $15,850 ±169 $14,186 ±216 ▼ −$847▼ −$1,664▲ +$817
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $10,091 ±1,985 $10,434 ±1,905 $11,844 ±3,040 ▲ +$1,753▲ +$1,411▲ +$342
Los Angeles citywide $11,345 ±113 $12,918 ±138 $14,186 ±216 ▲ +$2,841▲ +$1,268▲ +$1,573
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $25,479 ±5,497 $26,345 ±6,725 $23,198 ±6,709 ▼ −$2,282▼ −$3,147▲ +$865
Los Angeles citywide $30,727 ±279 $35,350 ±357 $37,123 ±496 ▲ +$6,396▲ +$1,773▲ +$4,623
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $19,229 ±4,148 $21,471 ±5,481 $23,198 ±6,709 ▲ +$3,969▲ +$1,727▲ +$2,242
Los Angeles citywide $23,189 ±211 $28,810 ±291 $37,123 ±496 ▲ +$13,934▲ +$8,313▲ +$5,621
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $56,290 ±7,841 $61,487 ±5,552 $67,370 ±12,153 ▲ +$11,080▲ +$5,884▲ +$5,196
Los Angeles citywide $65,832 ±458 $76,248 ±555 $81,939 ±742 ▲ +$16,107▲ +$5,691▲ +$10,416
Median Household Income (nominal dollars) $42,481 ±5,918 $50,112 ±4,525 $67,370 ±12,153 ▲ +$24,889▲ +$17,259▲ +$7,630
Los Angeles citywide $49,682 ±346 $62,142 ±452 $81,939 ±742 ▲ +$32,257▲ +$19,797▲ +$12,460
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $106,951 ±9,115 $111,346 ±16,939 $121,591 ±21,071 ▲ +$14,640▲ +$10,245▲ +$4,395
Los Angeles citywide $127,020 ±723 $145,116 ±805 $154,703 ±1,370 ▲ +$27,684▲ +$9,587▲ +$18,097
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $80,714 ±6,879 $90,747 ±13,806 $121,591 ±21,071 ▲ +$40,877▲ +$30,844▲ +$10,033
Los Angeles citywide $95,860 ±545 $118,270 ±656 $154,703 ±1,370 ▲ +$58,844▲ +$36,433▲ +$22,410
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $149,370 ±14,930 $178,473 ±26,610 $195,596 ±12,525 ▲ +$46,226▲ +$17,124▲ +$29,102
Los Angeles citywide $221,824 ±1,731 $245,212 ±895 — ——▲ +$23,388
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $112,727 ±11,268 $145,456 ±21,688 $195,596 ±12,525 ▲ +$82,869▲ +$50,141▲ +$32,728
Los Angeles citywide $167,407 ±1,307 $199,848 ±730 — ——▲ +$32,441

Poverty Status

Category Manchester Square
Below Poverty Line 16.3% ±5.3 pp2,070 ±667
Below 200% Poverty Line 37.6% ±8.4 pp4,764 ±1,070
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 9.0% ±4.7 pp1,135 ±590
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Below Poverty Line 16.3%±5.3 pp2,070±667 16.5%±0.3 pp638,207±11,569 ▼ -0.2% 43/110
Below 200% Poverty Line 37.6%±8.4 pp4,764±1,070 34.8%±0.4 pp1,343,960±17,101 ▲ +2.8% 36/110
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 9.0%±4.7 pp1,135±590 8.0%±0.2 pp308,978±7,316 ▲ +1.0% 31/110
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Category Manchester Square
Food Insecurity 30.0%2,927
Housing Insecurity 25.8%2,514
Transportation Barriers 15.1%1,477
Threatened Utility Shutoff 13.7%1,339
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Food Insecurity 30.0%2,927 23.6%700,942 ▲ +6.4% 28/110
Housing Insecurity 25.8%2,514 19.3%573,228 ▲ +6.5% 23/110
Transportation Barriers 15.1%1,477 11.8%350,471 ▲ +3.3% 24/110
Threatened Utility Shutoff 13.7%1,339 9.0%267,308 ▲ +4.7% 19/110
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category Manchester Square
In Labor Force 75.2% ±5.4 pp4,065 ±291
↳ Employed 70.7% ±6.0 pp3,821 ±326
↳ Unemployed 4.5% ±2.2 pp244 ±120
↳ Unemployment Rate 6.0% ±2.9 pp—
Not in Labor Force 24.8% ±17.7 pp1,339 ±955
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
In Labor Force 75.2%±5.4 pp4,065±291 83.1%±0.2 pp1,458,393±3,960 ▼ -7.9% 102/110
↳ Employed 70.7%±6.0 pp3,821±326 76.8%±0.3 pp1,346,606±4,643 ▼ -6.1% 98/110
↳ Unemployed 4.5%±2.2 pp244±120 6.3%±0.2 pp110,332±3,016 ▼ -1.8% 91/110
↳ Unemployment Rate 6.0%±2.9 pp— 7.6%±0.2 pp132,846±3,594 ▼ -1.6% 84/110
Not in Labor Force 24.8%±17.7 pp1,339±955 16.9%±0.8 pp295,844±13,970 ▲ +7.9% 9/110
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category Manchester Square
Management, Business, Science & Arts 42.5% ±9.3 pp2,381 ±519
↳ Management Occupations 10.9% ±3.7 pp610 ±205
↳ Business & Financial Operations 4.3% ±2.5 pp243 ±140
↳ Computer & Mathematical 1.6% ±1.4 pp90 ±77
↳ Architecture & Engineering 1.5% ±1.4 pp83 ±77
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 2.3% ±2.0 pp131 ±113
↳ Community & Social Service 3.0% ±2.2 pp167 ±121
↳ Legal Occupations 2.5% ±1.8 pp142 ±102
↳ Education, Training & Library 11.1% ±6.5 pp622 ±366
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 1.0% ±1.0 pp54 ±56
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 2.0% ±1.8 pp114 ±100
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 2.2% ±2.2 pp125 ±123
Service 18.1% ±5.0 pp1,016 ±278
↳ Healthcare Support 4.2% ±2.2 pp233 ±123
↳ Protective Service 3.4% ±2.6 pp193 ±146
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 4.4% ±2.5 pp245 ±139
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 2.8% ±2.1 pp155 ±117
↳ Personal Care & Service 3.4% ±2.0 pp191 ±112
Sales & Office 25.1% ±8.9 pp1,406 ±499
↳ Sales & Related 9.8% ±3.9 pp551 ±219
↳ Office & Administrative Support 15.3% ±7.9 pp855 ±440
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 2.3% ±1.8 pp128 ±98
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.0% ±0.7 pp0
↳ Construction & Extraction 0.9% ±1.3 pp48 ±70
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 1.4% ±1.4 pp80 ±78
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 12.0% ±4.5 pp673 ±250
↳ Production Occupations 1.1% ±1.1 pp61 ±62
↳ Transportation Occupations 9.5% ±3.7 pp532 ±209
↳ Material Moving Occupations 1.4% ±1.5 pp80 ±82
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts 42.5%±9.3 pp2,381±519 43.8%±0.3 pp856,718±5,665 ▼ -1.4% 63/110
↳ Management Occupations 10.9%±3.7 pp610±205 11.0%±0.2 pp215,767±3,237 ▼ -0.2% 57/110
↳ Business & Financial Operations 4.3%±2.5 pp243±140 6.1%±0.1 pp119,779±2,742 ▼ -1.8% 76/110
↳ Computer & Mathematical 1.6%±1.4 pp90±77 2.8%±0.1 pp55,551±1,839 ▼ -1.2% 83/110
↳ Architecture & Engineering 1.5%±1.4 pp83±77 1.6%±0.1 pp31,959±1,411 ▼ -0.1% 60/110
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 2.3%±2.0 pp131±113 1.1%±0.1 pp21,801±1,140 ▲ +1.2% 12/110
↳ Community & Social Service 3.0%±2.2 pp167±121 1.8%±0.1 pp34,335±1,497 ▲ +1.2% 10/110
↳ Legal Occupations 2.5%±1.8 pp142±102 2.1%±0.1 pp40,323±1,500 ▲ +0.5% 41/110
↳ Education, Training & Library 11.1%±6.5 pp622±366 5.1%±0.1 pp100,542±2,462 ▲ +5.9% 3/110
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 1.0%±1.0 pp54±56 7.4%±0.2 pp144,867±2,938 ▼ -6.5% 101/110
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 2.0%±1.8 pp114±100 3.3%±0.1 pp64,007±2,042 ▼ -1.2% 80/110
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 2.2%±2.2 pp125±123 1.4%±0.1 pp27,787±1,316 ▲ +0.8% 12/110
Service 18.1%±5.0 pp1,016±278 19.1%±0.2 pp372,654±4,348 ▼ -0.9% 58/110
↳ Healthcare Support 4.2%±2.2 pp233±123 4.1%±0.1 pp80,369±2,120 ▲ +0.1% 58/110
↳ Protective Service 3.4%±2.6 pp193±146 1.4%±0.1 pp28,096±1,344 ▲ +2.0% 7/110
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 4.4%±2.5 pp245±139 6.0%±0.1 pp117,268±2,832 ▼ -1.6% 68/110
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 2.8%±2.1 pp155±117 4.6%±0.1 pp89,319±2,441 ▼ -1.8% 63/110
↳ Personal Care & Service 3.4%±2.0 pp191±112 2.9%±0.1 pp57,602±2,122 ▲ +0.5% 31/110
Sales & Office 25.1%±8.9 pp1,406±499 18.5%±0.2 pp362,312±4,169 ▲ +6.5% 2/110
↳ Sales & Related 9.8%±3.9 pp551±219 8.7%±0.2 pp170,605±3,233 ▲ +1.1% 21/110
↳ Office & Administrative Support 15.3%±7.9 pp855±440 9.8%±0.2 pp191,707±3,358 ▲ +5.4% 3/110
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 2.3%±1.8 pp128±98 7.5%±0.1 pp146,574±2,638 ▼ -5.2% 86/110
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.0%±0.7 pp0 0.3%±0.0 pp5,780±677 ▼ -0.3% 83/110
↳ Construction & Extraction 0.9%±1.3 pp48±70 5.2%±0.1 pp101,165±2,372 ▼ -4.3% 97/110
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 1.4%±1.4 pp80±78 2.0%±0.1 pp39,629±1,434 ▼ -0.6% 64/110
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 12.0%±4.5 pp673±250 11.0%±0.2 pp215,668±3,737 ▲ +1.0% 41/110
↳ Production Occupations 1.1%±1.1 pp61±62 4.4%±0.1 pp85,463±2,595 ▼ -3.3% 95/110
↳ Transportation Occupations 9.5%±3.7 pp532±209 3.3%±0.1 pp64,837±2,015 ▲ +6.2% 2/110
↳ Material Moving Occupations 1.4%±1.5 pp80±82 3.3%±0.1 pp65,368±2,325 ▼ -1.9% 74/110
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category Manchester Square
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0% ±0.7 pp0
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.0% ±0.7 pp0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0% ±0.7 pp0
Construction 0.9% ±1.2 pp48 ±70
Manufacturing 3.5% ±2.2 pp196 ±126
Wholesale Trade 1.0% ±1.4 pp58 ±79
Retail Trade 10.0% ±3.5 pp558 ±195
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 14.5% ±7.9 pp811 ±443
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 14.1% ±7.8 pp793 ±440
↳ Utilities 0.3% ±0.9 pp18 ±48
Information 1.6% ±1.3 pp88 ±71
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 5.5% ±2.3 pp308 ±127
↳ Finance & Insurance 5.1% ±2.2 pp285 ±122
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.4% ±1.0 pp23 ±56
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 14.6% ±3.9 pp819 ±216
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 6.3% ±2.4 pp354 ±137
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0% ±0.7 pp0
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 8.3% ±3.2 pp465 ±181
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 29.9% ±6.9 pp1,678 ±384
↳ Educational Services 10.5% ±3.3 pp588 ±185
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 19.5% ±7.0 pp1,091 ±390
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 10.7% ±3.9 pp601 ±216
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 2.6% ±2.0 pp145 ±114
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 8.1% ±3.5 pp456 ±194
Other Services 3.4% ±1.7 pp188 ±98
Public Administration 4.5% ±2.5 pp251 ±143
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%±0.7 pp0 0.4%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.4% 93/110
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.0%±0.7 pp0 0.4%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.4% 92/110
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%±0.7 pp0 0.0%±0.0 pp— 0% 30/110
Construction 0.9%±1.2 pp48±70 6.5%±0.1 pp— ▼ -5.6% 106/110
Manufacturing 3.5%±2.2 pp196±126 6.8%±0.2 pp— ▼ -3.3% 97/110
Wholesale Trade 1.0%±1.4 pp58±79 2.3%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.3% 101/110
Retail Trade 10.0%±3.5 pp558±195 9.3%±0.2 pp— ▲ +0.6% 36/110
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 14.5%±7.9 pp811±443 5.3%±0.1 pp— ▲ +9.2% 2/110
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 14.1%±7.8 pp793±440 4.9%±0.1 pp— ▲ +9.2% 2/110
↳ Utilities 0.3%±0.9 pp18±48 0.4%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.1% 56/110
Information 1.6%±1.3 pp88±71 6.4%±0.2 pp— ▼ -4.9% 96/110
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 5.5%±2.3 pp308±127 5.8%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.3% 58/110
↳ Finance & Insurance 5.1%±2.2 pp285±122 3.5%±0.1 pp— ▲ +1.6% 23/110
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.4%±1.0 pp23±56 2.3%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.9% 109/110
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 14.6%±3.9 pp819±216 15.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -1.0% 57/110
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 6.3%±2.4 pp354±137 10.3%±0.2 pp— ▼ -4.0% 76/110
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%±0.7 pp0 0.1%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.1% 69/110
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 8.3%±3.2 pp465±181 5.2%±0.1 pp— ▲ +3.1% 14/110
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 29.9%±6.9 pp1,678±384 20.8%±0.2 pp— ▲ +9.2% 3/110
↳ Educational Services 10.5%±3.3 pp588±185 8.1%±0.2 pp— ▲ +2.3% 22/110
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 19.5%±7.0 pp1,091±390 12.6%±0.2 pp— ▲ +6.8% 1/110
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 10.7%±3.9 pp601±216 12.0%±0.2 pp— ▼ -1.3% 65/110
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 2.6%±2.0 pp145±114 4.1%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.6% 76/110
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 8.1%±3.5 pp456±194 7.9%±0.2 pp— ▲ +0.3% 42/110
Other Services 3.4%±1.7 pp188±98 6.0%±0.1 pp— ▼ -2.6% 99/110
Public Administration 4.5%±2.5 pp251±143 2.7%±0.1 pp— ▲ +1.8% 11/110
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category Manchester Square
Private Company Employee 57.2% ±5.0 pp3,207 ±281
Self-Employed 11.0% ±6.4 pp619 ±360
Nonprofit 10.5% ±3.6 pp586 ±201
Government 21.3% ±5.3 pp1,193 ±300
Unpaid Family Worker 0.0% ±0.7 pp0
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Private Company Employee 57.2%±5.0 pp3,207±281 66.9%±0.3 pp1,307,510±5,830 ▼ -9.7% 98/110
Self-Employed 11.0%±6.4 pp619±360 16.2%±0.2 pp316,694±4,405 ▼ -5.2% 99/110
Nonprofit 10.5%±3.6 pp586±201 8.0%±0.2 pp155,457±3,565 ▲ +2.5% 17/110
Government 21.3%±5.3 pp1,193±300 10.6%±0.2 pp207,304±3,359 ▲ +10.7% 2/110
Unpaid Family Worker 0.0%±0.7 pp0 0.3%±0.0 pp5,059±497 ▼ -0.3% 93/110
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category Manchester Square
Full-Time, Year-Round 70.3% ±6.2 pp4,266 ±377
Part-Time or Part-Year 29.7% ±5.1 pp1,806 ±311
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round 70.3%±6.2 pp4,266±377 61.7%±0.2 pp1,328,967±3,929 ▲ +8.6% 6/110
Part-Time or Part-Year 29.7%±5.1 pp1,806±311 38.3%±0.3 pp826,047±5,840 ▼ -8.6% 105/110
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category Manchester Square
Average FT Earnings $70,329±$4,552
10th Percentile FT Earnings $21,201±$5,022
25th Percentile FT Earnings $33,389±$5,335
Median FT Earnings $48,755±$5,554
75th Percentile FT Earnings $89,667±$10,216
90th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Average FT Earnings $70,329±$4,552 $93,330±$761 ▼ −$23,002 71/110
10th Percentile FT Earnings $21,201±$5,022 $25,056±$255 ▼ −$3,855 93/110
25th Percentile FT Earnings $33,389±$5,335 $37,825±$214 ▼ −$4,435 83/110
Median FT Earnings $48,755±$5,554 $61,975±$422 ▼ −$13,220 81/110
75th Percentile FT Earnings $89,667±$10,216 Over $100,000 ▼ −$10,333+ 69/110
90th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/110
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $60,055 ±3,952 $65,854 ±4,513 $70,329 ±4,552 ▲ +$10,274▲ +$4,474▲ +$5,800
Los Angeles citywide $78,876 ±537 $84,242 ±564 $93,330 ±761 ▲ +$14,455▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,367
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $45,322 ±2,983 $53,671 ±3,678 $70,329 ±4,552 ▲ +$25,006▲ +$16,657▲ +$8,349
Los Angeles citywide $59,526 ±405 $68,658 ±460 $93,330 ±761 ▲ +$33,804▲ +$24,673▲ +$9,131
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $22,695 ±3,120 $25,025 ±2,294 $21,201 ±5,022 ▼ −$1,494▼ −$3,824▲ +$2,331
Los Angeles citywide $20,202 ±88 $21,993 ±185 $25,056 ±255 ▲ +$4,854▲ +$3,063▲ +$1,791
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $17,127 ±2,355 $20,396 ±1,870 $21,201 ±5,022 ▲ +$4,074▲ +$805▲ +$3,268
Los Angeles citywide $15,246 ±66 $17,924 ±151 $25,056 ±255 ▲ +$9,810▲ +$7,132▲ +$2,678
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $36,405 ±3,561 $32,611 ±3,863 $33,389 ±5,335 ▼ −$3,015▲ +$779▼ −$3,794
Los Angeles citywide $29,363 ±173 $32,975 ±184 $37,825 ±214 ▲ +$8,461▲ +$4,850▲ +$3,611
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $27,474 ±2,688 $26,578 ±3,149 $33,389 ±5,335 ▲ +$5,915▲ +$6,811▼ −$896
Los Angeles citywide $22,160 ±131 $26,874 ±150 $37,825 ±214 ▲ +$15,665▲ +$10,950▲ +$4,714
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $53,287 ±4,792 $51,342 ±3,764 $48,755 ±5,554 ▼ −$4,533▼ −$2,587▼ −$1,946
Los Angeles citywide $51,909 ±336 $54,226 ±279 $61,975 ±422 ▲ +$10,067▲ +$7,750▲ +$2,317
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $40,215 ±3,616 $41,843 ±3,067 $48,755 ±5,554 ▲ +$8,540▲ +$6,911▲ +$1,628
Los Angeles citywide $39,175 ±254 $44,194 ±227 $61,975 ±422 ▲ +$22,801▲ +$17,781▲ +$5,019
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $74,009 ±5,395 $77,155 ±7,937 $89,667 ±10,216 ▲ +$15,658▲ +$12,513▲ +$3,146
Los Angeles citywide $91,403 ±620 $98,002 ±683 — ——▲ +$6,599
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $55,853 ±4,071 $62,881 ±6,469 $89,667 ±10,216 ▲ +$33,814▲ +$26,786▲ +$7,028
Los Angeles citywide $68,981 ±468 $79,872 ±557 — ——▲ +$10,891
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $104,993 ±13,376 $120,910 ±6,189 — ——▲ +$15,917
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $79,237 ±10,095 $98,542 ±5,044 — ——▲ +$19,305
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category Manchester Square
Average PT Earnings $28,259±$3,799
10th Percentile PT Earnings $2,473±$1,354
25th Percentile PT Earnings $6,564±$2,283
Median PT Earnings $19,707±$6,341
75th Percentile PT Earnings $37,845±$5,072
90th Percentile PT Earnings $68,701±$18,900
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Average PT Earnings $28,259±$3,799 $36,543±$574 ▼ −$8,284 73/110
10th Percentile PT Earnings $2,473±$1,354 $2,785±$92 ▼ −$312 79/110
25th Percentile PT Earnings $6,564±$2,283 $8,451±$190 ▼ −$1,887 103/110
Median PT Earnings $19,707±$6,341 $20,275±$216 ▼ −$568 63/110
75th Percentile PT Earnings $37,845±$5,072 $39,236±$450 ▼ −$1,391 62/110
90th Percentile PT Earnings $68,701±$18,900 $80,378±$1,643 ▼ −$11,677 68/110
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $21,527 ±3,680 $23,156 ±4,256 $28,259 ±3,799 ▲ +$6,732▲ +$5,103▲ +$1,629
Los Angeles citywide $30,652 ±490 $34,166 ±509 $36,543 ±574 ▲ +$5,890▲ +$2,377▲ +$3,513
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $16,246 ±2,777 $18,872 ±3,469 $28,259 ±3,799 ▲ +$12,013▲ +$9,387▲ +$2,626
Los Angeles citywide $23,133 ±369 $27,845 ±415 $36,543 ±574 ▲ +$13,410▲ +$8,698▲ +$4,712
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,979 ±695 $2,128 ±1,113 $2,473 ±1,354 ▲ +$494▲ +$345▲ +$149
Los Angeles citywide $2,482 ±54 $2,712 ±58 $2,785 ±92 ▲ +$303▲ +$73▲ +$230
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $1,494 ±524 $1,735 ±907 $2,473 ±1,354 ▲ +$980▲ +$739▲ +$241
Los Angeles citywide $1,873 ±41 $2,210 ±47 $2,785 ±92 ▲ +$912▲ +$575▲ +$337
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $5,752 ±1,929 $7,416 ±2,618 $6,564 ±2,283 ▲ +$811▼ −$852▲ +$1,663
Los Angeles citywide $7,239 ±105 $8,054 ±111 $8,451 ±190 ▲ +$1,212▲ +$397▲ +$815
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $4,341 ±1,456 $6,044 ±2,133 $6,564 ±2,283 ▲ +$2,222▲ +$520▲ +$1,702
Los Angeles citywide $5,463 ±79 $6,564 ±91 $8,451 ±190 ▲ +$2,988▲ +$1,887▲ +$1,101
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $13,918 ±1,991 $18,462 ±3,649 $19,707 ±6,341 ▲ +$5,789▲ +$1,245▲ +$4,544
Los Angeles citywide $16,086 ±129 $18,060 ±185 $20,275 ±216 ▲ +$4,189▲ +$2,215▲ +$1,973
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $10,503 ±1,503 $15,046 ±2,974 $19,707 ±6,341 ▲ +$9,204▲ +$4,660▲ +$4,543
Los Angeles citywide $12,140 ±97 $14,719 ±151 $20,275 ±216 ▲ +$8,135▲ +$5,556▲ +$2,579
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $28,765 ±6,771 $26,626 ±6,060 $37,845 ±5,072 ▲ +$9,080▲ +$11,219▼ −$2,139
Los Angeles citywide $33,887 ±443 $36,465 ±382 $39,236 ±450 ▲ +$5,349▲ +$2,771▲ +$2,578
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $21,708 ±5,110 $21,701 ±4,939 $37,845 ±5,072 ▲ +$16,137▲ +$16,145▼ −$8
Los Angeles citywide $25,574 ±335 $29,719 ±311 $39,236 ±450 ▲ +$13,662▲ +$9,517▲ +$4,145
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $47,917 ±10,000 $49,139 ±6,612 $68,701 ±18,900 ▲ +$20,783▲ +$19,562▲ +$1,222
Los Angeles citywide $68,714 ±742 $73,646 ±1,127 $80,378 ±1,643 ▲ +$11,664▲ +$6,732▲ +$4,932
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $36,163 ±7,547 $40,048 ±5,389 $68,701 ±18,900 ▲ +$32,538▲ +$28,652▲ +$3,886
Los Angeles citywide $51,857 ±560 $60,021 ±919 $80,378 ±1,643 ▲ +$28,521▲ +$20,356▲ +$8,164

Earnings of All Workers

Category Manchester Square
Average Earnings $57,731±$2,335
10th Percentile Earnings $7,603±$3,741
25th Percentile Earnings $22,669±$5,246
Median Earnings $41,834±$4,689
75th Percentile Earnings $76,422±$9,390
90th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Average Earnings $57,731±$2,335 $71,563±$569 ▼ −$13,832 69/110
10th Percentile Earnings $7,603±$3,741 $7,934±$179 ▼ −$331 79/110
25th Percentile Earnings $22,669±$5,246 $21,876±$191 ▲ +$793 58/110
Median Earnings $41,834±$4,689 $43,575±$259 ▼ −$1,741 68/110
75th Percentile Earnings $76,422±$9,390 $85,854±$580 ▼ −$9,432 64/110
90th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/110
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $45,253 ±6,603 $51,834 ±597 $57,731 ±2,335 ▲ +$12,478▲ +$5,897▲ +$6,582
Los Angeles citywide $59,351 ±430 $65,850 ±455 $71,563 ±569 ▲ +$12,212▲ +$5,713▲ +$6,499
Average Earnings (nominal dollars) $34,151 ±4,983 $42,245 ±486 $57,731 ±2,335 ▲ +$23,579▲ +$15,486▲ +$8,094
Los Angeles citywide $44,791 ±324 $53,668 ±371 $71,563 ±569 ▲ +$26,772▲ +$17,895▲ +$8,877
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $6,422 ±2,675 $9,307 ±2,360 $7,603 ±3,741 ▲ +$1,180▼ −$1,705▲ +$2,885
Los Angeles citywide $6,842 ±104 $8,269 ±107 $7,934 ±179 ▲ +$1,091▼ −$335▲ +$1,427
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $4,847 ±2,019 $7,586 ±1,923 $7,603 ±3,741 ▲ +$2,756▲ +$17▲ +$2,739
Los Angeles citywide $5,164 ±78 $6,739 ±87 $7,934 ±179 ▲ +$2,770▲ +$1,194▲ +$1,576
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $18,616 ±3,614 $20,974 ±2,526 $22,669 ±5,246 ▲ +$4,053▲ +$1,696▲ +$2,357
Los Angeles citywide $17,205 ±143 $20,088 ±119 $21,876 ±191 ▲ +$4,671▲ +$1,789▲ +$2,883
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $14,049 ±2,727 $17,093 ±2,059 $22,669 ±5,246 ▲ +$8,620▲ +$5,576▲ +$3,044
Los Angeles citywide $12,984 ±108 $16,372 ±97 $21,876 ±191 ▲ +$8,892▲ +$5,505▲ +$3,387
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $41,042 ±3,986 $38,520 ±5,118 $41,834 ±4,689 ▲ +$792▲ +$3,314▼ −$2,522
Los Angeles citywide $35,447 ±232 $39,719 ±188 $43,575 ±259 ▲ +$8,128▲ +$3,856▲ +$4,272
Median Earnings (nominal dollars) $30,974 ±3,008 $31,394 ±4,171 $41,834 ±4,689 ▲ +$10,860▲ +$10,440▲ +$420
Los Angeles citywide $26,751 ±175 $32,371 ±154 $43,575 ±259 ▲ +$16,824▲ +$11,204▲ +$5,620
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $65,616 ±4,256 $62,683 ±6,071 $76,422 ±9,390 ▲ +$10,806▲ +$13,739▼ −$2,933
Los Angeles citywide $70,301 ±313 $76,149 ±396 $85,854 ±580 ▲ +$15,552▲ +$9,705▲ +$5,848
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $49,519 ±3,212 $51,087 ±4,948 $76,422 ±9,390 ▲ +$26,902▲ +$25,335▲ +$1,567
Los Angeles citywide $53,055 ±236 $62,062 ±323 $85,854 ±580 ▲ +$32,798▲ +$23,792▲ +$9,006
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $94,346 ±8,851 $107,799 ±11,454 — ——▲ +$13,453
Los Angeles citywide $127,692 ±642 — — ———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $71,201 ±6,680 $87,856 ±9,335 — ——▲ +$16,655
Los Angeles citywide $96,367 ±484 — — ———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Manchester Square, Los Angeles

Category Manchester Square
Household income at age 35 $32,713 ±$1,133
Household income percentile rank 34.0 ±0.82 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 4.97% ±0.73 pp
Individual income at age 35 $28,440 ±$1,063
Fraction married 15.2% ±1.21 pp
Employment rate 68.7% ±1.58 pp
Incarceration rate 2.99% ±0.71 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Manchester Square, Los Angeles. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Manchester Square, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Manchester Square City Difference
Household income at age 35 $32,713 ±$1,133 $49,434 ±$103 −$16,721
Household income percentile rank 34.0 ±0.82 pp 45.3 ±0.06 pp −11.3 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 4.97% ±0.73 pp 15.3% ±0.08 pp −10.3 pp
Individual income at age 35 $28,440 ±$1,063 $37,125 ±$77 −$8,685
Fraction married 15.2% ±1.21 pp 32.5% ±0.11 pp −17.3 pp
Employment rate 68.7% ±1.58 pp 72.6% ±0.10 pp −3.8 pp
Incarceration rate 2.99% ±0.71 pp 1.30% ±0.03 pp +1.7 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Manchester Square, Los Angeles. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Manchester Square, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Manchester Square, Los Angeles in Lower-Income Families

Category Manchester Square
Household income at age 35 $29,994 ±$1,393
Household income percentile rank 32.0 ±1.01 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 3.87% ±1.06 pp
Individual income at age 35 $26,495 ±$1,295
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Manchester Square, Los Angeles with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Manchester Square, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Manchester Square City Difference
Household income at age 35 $29,994 ±$1,393 $43,491 ±$125 −$13,497
Household income percentile rank 32.0 ±1.01 pp 41.6 ±0.08 pp −9.6 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 3.87% ±1.06 pp 10.5% ±0.10 pp −6.6 pp
Individual income at age 35 $26,495 ±$1,295 $33,937 ±$101 −$7,443
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Manchester Square, Los Angeles with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Manchester Square, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Manchester Square, Los Angeles

Category Manchester Square
Stayed in the greater Los Angeles area 80.6% ±1.36 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 26.7% ±1.53 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Manchester Square, Los Angeles. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Los Angeles area” means the Census commuting zone for the Los Angeles area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Manchester Square, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Manchester Square City Difference
Stayed in the greater Los Angeles area 80.6% ±1.36 pp 81.1% ±0.09 pp −0.5 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 26.7% ±1.53 pp 26.2% ±0.11 pp +0.4 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Manchester Square, Los Angeles. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Los Angeles area” means the Census commuting zone for the Los Angeles area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Manchester Square, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Manchester Square

Category Manchester Square
All jobs located in manchester square 1,045
Manchester Square jobs held by Manchester Square residents 11.8%
Manchester Square jobs held by non-Manchester Square residents 88.2%
Employed residents working in Manchester Square 1.9%
Employed residents working outside Manchester Square 98.1%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Manchester Square Los Angeles neighborhood median Difference Rank
All jobs located in manchester square 1,045 8,613 ▼ −7,568 106/110
Manchester Square jobs held by Manchester Square residents 11.8% 6.0% ▲ +5.8 pp 9/110
Manchester Square jobs held by non-Manchester Square residents 88.2% 94.0% ▼ −5.8 pp 102/110
Employed residents working in Manchester Square 1.9% 3.9% ▼ −2.0 pp 102/110
Employed residents working outside Manchester Square 98.1% 96.1% ▲ +2.0 pp 9/110
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in manchester square 745.0 864.0 1,045 ▲ +300▲ +181▲ +119
Los Angeles citywide 6,864 8,106 8,613 ▲ +1,748▲ +507▲ +1,242
Manchester Square jobs held by Manchester Square residents 9.1%50 11.3%69 11.8%89 ▲ +2.7 pp▲ +39▲ +0.5 pp▲ +20▲ +2.2 pp▲ +19
Los Angeles citywide 6.1%330 5.9%399 6.0%442 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +112▲ +0.1 pp▲ +43▼ −0.1 pp▲ +69
Manchester Square jobs held by non-Manchester Square residents 90.9%498 88.7%541 88.2%665 ▼ −2.7 pp▲ +167▼ −0.5 pp▲ +124▼ −2.2 pp▲ +43
Los Angeles citywide 93.9%5,659 94.1%6,750 94.0%7,065 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,406▼ −0.1 pp▲ +315▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,091
Employed residents working in Manchester Square 1.2%50 1.5%69 1.9%89 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +39▲ +0.4 pp▲ +20▲ +0.2 pp▲ +19
Los Angeles citywide 3.2%330 3.3%399 3.9%442 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +112▲ +0.5 pp▲ +43▲ +0.1 pp▲ +69
Employed residents working outside Manchester Square 98.8%4,006 98.5%4,597 98.1%4,666 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +660▼ −0.4 pp▲ +69▼ −0.2 pp▲ +591
Los Angeles citywide 96.8%10,199 96.7%11,528 96.1%11,428 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,229▼ −0.5 pp▼ −100▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,329

Industry of Jobs in Manchester Square

Category Manchester Square
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0
Construction 6.7%70
Manufacturing 0.9%9
Wholesale Trade 0.3%3
Retail Trade 4.0%42
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 1.7%18
↳ Utilities 0.0%0
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 1.7%18
Information 0.4%4
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 0.1%1
↳ Finance & Insurance 0.0%0
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.1%1
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 8.6%90
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 1.0%10
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%0
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 7.7%80
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 61.2%640
↳ Educational Services 7.6%79
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 53.7%561
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 9.3%97
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.3%3
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 9.0%94
Other Services 6.8%71
Public Administration 0.0%0
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%0 0.1%1,840 ▼ -0.1% 65/110
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0 0.0%95 0% 14/110
Construction 6.7%70 2.7%53,657 ▲ +4.0% 17/110
Manufacturing 0.9%9 3.8%76,376 ▼ -3.0% 79/110
Wholesale Trade 0.3%3 3.2%63,982 ▼ -2.9% 106/110
Retail Trade 4.0%42 7.1%140,457 ▼ -3.0% 96/110
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 1.7%18 5.4%107,338 ▼ -3.7% 43/110
↳ Utilities 0.0%0 0.8%16,873 ▼ -0.8% 46/110
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 1.7%18 4.6%90,465 ▼ -2.8% 39/110
Information 0.4%4 8.3%164,692 ▼ -7.9% 81/110
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 0.1%1 5.9%116,774 ▼ -5.8% 110/110
↳ Finance & Insurance 0.0%0 3.6%70,657 ▼ -3.6% 109/110
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.1%1 2.3%46,117 ▼ -2.2% 109/110
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 8.6%90 15.1%299,443 ▼ -6.5% 74/110
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 1.0%10 8.1%160,171 ▼ -7.1% 100/110
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%0 1.1%22,328 ▼ -1.1% 81/110
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 7.7%80 5.9%116,944 ▲ +1.8% 24/110
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 61.2%640 28.4%563,697 ▲ +32.9% 14/110
↳ Educational Services 7.6%79 10.0%198,161 ▼ -2.4% 54/110
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 53.7%561 18.4%365,536 ▲ +35.3% 4/110
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 9.3%97 11.3%224,384 ▼ -2.0% 69/110
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.3%3 2.8%54,783 ▼ -2.5% 93/110
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 9.0%94 8.5%169,601 ▲ +0.5% 56/110
Other Services 6.8%71 3.7%73,513 ▲ +3.1% 21/110
Public Administration 0.0%0 5.1%100,972 ▼ -5.1% 46/110
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%3,680 0.1%1,246 0.1%1,840 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,840– 0.0 pp▲ +594▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2,434
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 0.1%1,115 0.0%132 0.0%95 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,020– 0.0 pp▼ −37▼ −0.1 pp▼ −983
Construction 0.7%5 1.4%12 6.7%70 ▲ +6.0 pp▲ +65▲ +5.3 pp▲ +58▲ +0.7 pp▲ +7
Los Angeles citywide 2.3%39,728 2.8%53,498 2.7%53,657 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +13,929▼ −0.1 pp▲ +159▲ +0.5 pp▲ +13,770
Manufacturing 0.9%7 0.9%8 0.9%9 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1– 0.0 pp▲ +1
Los Angeles citywide 5.7%98,319 4.2%81,924 3.8%76,376 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −21,943▼ −0.4 pp▼ −5,548▼ −1.4 pp▼ −16,395
Wholesale Trade 0.3%2 0.0%0 0.3%3 – 0.0 pp▲ +1▲ +0.3 pp▲ +3▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2
Los Angeles citywide 4.6%79,460 3.6%68,790 3.2%63,982 ▼ −1.4 pp▼ −15,478▼ −0.3 pp▼ −4,808▼ −1.0 pp▼ −10,670
Retail Trade 5.6%42 4.2%36 4.0%42 ▼ −1.6 pp– 0▼ −0.1 pp▲ +6▼ −1.5 pp▼ −6
Los Angeles citywide 8.7%151,141 7.5%144,707 7.1%140,457 ▼ −1.7 pp▼ −10,684▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,250▼ −1.3 pp▼ −6,434
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 1.2%9 2.2%19 1.7%18 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +9▼ −0.5 pp▼ −1▲ +1.0 pp▲ +10
Los Angeles citywide 4.8%82,152 5.8%111,689 5.4%107,338 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +25,186▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,351▲ +1.0 pp▲ +29,537
Utilities 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 0.9%16,015 1.0%18,483 0.8%16,873 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +858▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,610– 0.0 pp▲ +2,468
Transportation & Warehousing 1.2%9 2.2%19 1.7%18 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +9▼ −0.5 pp▼ −1▲ +1.0 pp▲ +10
Los Angeles citywide 3.8%66,137 4.8%93,206 4.6%90,465 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +24,328▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,741▲ +1.0 pp▲ +27,069
Information 0.3%2 0.2%2 0.4%4 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 6.3%109,592 7.4%142,294 8.3%164,692 ▲ +1.9 pp▲ +55,100▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,398▲ +1.0 pp▲ +32,702
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 0.9%7 0.9%8 0.1%1 ▼ −0.8 pp▼ −6▼ −0.8 pp▼ −7– 0.0 pp▲ +1
Los Angeles citywide 6.1%104,703 5.7%110,803 5.9%116,774 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +12,071▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5,971▼ −0.3 pp▲ +6,100
Finance & Insurance 0.5%4 0.6%5 0.0%0 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −4▼ −0.6 pp▼ −5– 0.0 pp▲ +1
Los Angeles citywide 3.9%67,891 3.6%69,466 3.6%70,657 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,766– 0.0 pp▲ +1,191▼ −0.3 pp▲ +1,575
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.4%3 0.3%3 0.1%1 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2▼ −0.1 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 2.1%36,812 2.1%41,337 2.3%46,117 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +9,305▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,780– 0.0 pp▲ +4,525
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 3.2%24 4.3%37 8.6%90 ▲ +5.4 pp▲ +66▲ +4.3 pp▲ +53▲ +1.1 pp▲ +13
Los Angeles citywide 15.1%261,720 14.9%286,926 15.1%299,443 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +37,723▲ +0.2 pp▲ +12,517▼ −0.3 pp▲ +25,206
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 0.5%4 3.1%27 1.0%10 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +6▼ −2.2 pp▼ −17▲ +2.6 pp▲ +23
Los Angeles citywide 7.7%132,582 7.9%153,127 8.1%160,171 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +27,589▲ +0.1 pp▲ +7,044▲ +0.3 pp▲ +20,545
Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 1.3%22,239 1.2%22,485 1.1%22,328 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +89– 0.0 pp▼ −157▼ −0.1 pp▲ +246
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 2.7%20 1.2%10 7.7%80 ▲ +5.0 pp▲ +60▲ +6.5 pp▲ +70▼ −1.5 pp▼ −10
Los Angeles citywide 6.2%106,899 5.8%111,314 5.9%116,944 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +10,045▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5,630▼ −0.4 pp▲ +4,415
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 64.3%479 67.8%586 61.2%640 ▼ −3.1 pp▲ +161▼ −6.6 pp▲ +54▲ +3.5 pp▲ +107
Los Angeles citywide 24.3%420,231 26.6%513,841 28.4%563,697 ▲ +4.0 pp▲ +143,466▲ +1.8 pp▲ +49,856▲ +2.3 pp▲ +93,610
Educational Services 7.7%57 7.2%62 7.6%79 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +22▲ +0.4 pp▲ +17▼ −0.5 pp▲ +5
Los Angeles citywide 8.2%142,243 9.1%175,456 10.0%198,161 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +55,918▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,705▲ +0.9 pp▲ +33,213
Health Care & Social Assistance 56.6%422 60.6%524 53.7%561 ▼ −3.0 pp▲ +139▼ −7.0 pp▲ +37▲ +4.0 pp▲ +102
Los Angeles citywide 16.1%277,988 17.5%338,385 18.4%365,536 ▲ +2.3 pp▲ +87,548▲ +0.9 pp▲ +27,151▲ +1.4 pp▲ +60,397
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 12.1%90 7.4%64 9.3%97 ▼ −2.8 pp▲ +7▲ +1.9 pp▲ +33▼ −4.7 pp▼ −26
Los Angeles citywide 11.2%192,754 11.7%226,802 11.3%224,384 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +31,630▼ −0.5 pp▼ −2,418▲ +0.6 pp▲ +34,048
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.1%1 0.0%0 0.3%3 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2▲ +0.3 pp▲ +3▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1
Los Angeles citywide 2.2%38,550 2.8%53,683 2.8%54,783 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +16,233– 0.0 pp▲ +1,100▲ +0.5 pp▲ +15,133
Accommodation & Food Services 11.9%89 7.4%64 9.0%94 ▼ −3.0 pp▲ +5▲ +1.6 pp▲ +30▼ −4.5 pp▼ −25
Los Angeles citywide 8.9%154,204 9.0%173,119 8.5%169,601 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +15,397▼ −0.4 pp▼ −3,518– 0.0 pp▲ +18,915
Other Services 10.2%76 10.6%92 6.8%71 ▼ −3.4 pp▼ −5▼ −3.9 pp▼ −21▲ +0.4 pp▲ +16
Los Angeles citywide 3.9%66,987 3.9%75,451 3.7%73,513 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,526▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,938– 0.0 pp▲ +8,464
Public Administration 0.3%2 0.0%0 0.0%0 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2
Los Angeles citywide 6.8%117,076 5.8%112,871 5.1%100,972 ▼ −1.7 pp▼ −16,104▼ −0.8 pp▼ −11,899▼ −0.9 pp▼ −4,205

Earnings of Jobs in Manchester Square

Category Manchester Square
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 19.5%204
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 55.6%581
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 24.9%260
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 19.5%204 17.0%338,004 ▲ +2.5% 18/110
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 55.6%581 24.2%481,403 ▲ +31.4% 2/110
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 24.9%260 58.8%1,167,718 ▼ -33.9% 109/110
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 64.8%483 43.4%375 19.5%204 ▼ −45.3 pp▼ −279▼ −23.9 pp▼ −171▼ −21.4 pp▼ −108
Los Angeles citywide 25.4%438,918 21.3%411,368 17.0%338,004 ▼ −8.4 pp▼ −100,914▼ −4.3 pp▼ −73,364▼ −4.1 pp▼ −27,550
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 26.7%199 43.5%376 55.6%581 ▲ +28.9 pp▲ +382▲ +12.1 pp▲ +205▲ +16.8 pp▲ +177
Los Angeles citywide 31.8%549,706 29.6%571,139 24.2%481,403 ▼ −7.6 pp▼ −68,303▼ −5.4 pp▼ −89,736▼ −2.2 pp▲ +21,433
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 8.5%63 13.1%113 24.9%260 ▲ +16.4 pp▲ +197▲ +11.8 pp▲ +147▲ +4.6 pp▲ +50
Los Angeles citywide 42.8%738,919 49.1%948,335 58.8%1,167,718 ▲ +16.0 pp▲ +428,799▲ +9.6 pp▲ +219,383▲ +6.3 pp▲ +209,416

Jobs in Manchester Square by Firm Age

Category Manchester Square
Firm age: 0–1 years 16.8%162
Firm age: 2–3 years 11.6%112
Firm age: 4–5 years 13.9%134
Firm age: 6–10 years 19.3%187
Firm age: 11 or more years 38.5%372
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years 16.8%162 4.8%79,474 ▲ +12.0% 2/110
Firm age: 2–3 years 11.6%112 4.9%81,545 ▲ +6.7% 8/110
Firm age: 4–5 years 13.9%134 5.1%84,624 ▲ +8.8% 8/110
Firm age: 6–10 years 19.3%187 10.7%178,740 ▲ +8.6% 17/110
Firm age: 11 or more years 38.5%372 74.6%1,246,700 ▼ -36.1% 108/110
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years 13.7%96 19.8%160 16.8%162 ▲ +3.0 pp▲ +66▼ −3.0 pp▲ +2▲ +6.0 pp▲ +64
Los Angeles citywide 4.7%67,567 4.9%79,034 4.8%79,474 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,907▼ −0.1 pp▲ +440▲ +0.2 pp▲ +11,467
Firm age: 2–3 years 15.6%109 15.1%122 11.6%112 ▼ −4.0 pp▲ +3▼ −3.5 pp▼ −10▼ −0.5 pp▲ +13
Los Angeles citywide 5.9%85,371 5.5%89,530 4.9%81,545 ▼ −1.0 pp▼ −3,826▼ −0.6 pp▼ −7,985▼ −0.4 pp▲ +4,159
Firm age: 4–5 years 8.3%58 10.1%82 13.9%134 ▲ +5.6 pp▲ +76▲ +3.7 pp▲ +52▲ +1.8 pp▲ +24
Los Angeles citywide 4.8%69,620 5.0%80,673 5.1%84,624 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +15,004▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,951▲ +0.2 pp▲ +11,053
Firm age: 6–10 years 19.6%137 16.8%136 19.3%187 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +50▲ +2.5 pp▲ +51▼ −2.8 pp▼ −1
Los Angeles citywide 11.5%165,913 9.8%158,279 10.7%178,740 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +12,827▲ +0.9 pp▲ +20,461▼ −1.7 pp▼ −7,634
Firm age: 11 or more years 42.8%299 38.3%310 38.5%372 ▼ −4.3 pp▲ +73▲ +0.2 pp▲ +62▼ −4.5 pp▲ +11
Los Angeles citywide 73.1%1,056,355 74.9%1,212,931 74.6%1,246,700 ▲ +1.5 pp▲ +190,345▼ −0.2 pp▲ +33,769▲ +1.7 pp▲ +156,576

Jobs in Manchester Square by Firm Size

Category Manchester Square
Firm size: 0–19 employees 78.3%757
Firm size: 20–49 employees 11.7%113
Firm size: 50–249 employees 1.9%18
Firm size: 250–499 employees 4.1%40
Firm size: 500 or more employees 4.0%39
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees 78.3%757 25.4%424,713 ▲ +52.9% 3/110
Firm size: 20–49 employees 11.7%113 9.0%149,880 ▲ +2.7% 34/110
Firm size: 50–249 employees 1.9%18 13.5%224,878 ▼ -11.6% 107/110
Firm size: 250–499 employees 4.1%40 4.9%82,110 ▼ -0.8% 48/110
Firm size: 500 or more employees 4.0%39 47.2%789,502 ▼ -43.2% 108/110
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees 76.1%532 85.2%690 78.3%757 ▲ +2.2 pp▲ +225▼ −6.9 pp▲ +67▲ +9.1 pp▲ +158
Los Angeles citywide 25.3%365,482 24.7%400,637 25.4%424,713 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +59,231▲ +0.7 pp▲ +24,076▼ −0.6 pp▲ +35,155
Firm size: 20–49 employees 13.0%91 4.4%36 11.7%113 ▼ −1.3 pp▲ +22▲ +7.2 pp▲ +77▼ −8.6 pp▼ −55
Los Angeles citywide 10.3%149,215 9.2%149,709 9.0%149,880 ▼ −1.4 pp▲ +665▼ −0.3 pp▲ +171▼ −1.1 pp▲ +494
Firm size: 50–249 employees 2.0%14 2.1%17 1.9%18 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +4▼ −0.2 pp▲ +1▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3
Los Angeles citywide 14.8%214,183 13.9%225,110 13.5%224,878 ▼ −1.4 pp▲ +10,695▼ −0.4 pp▼ −232▼ −0.9 pp▲ +10,927
Firm size: 250–499 employees 0.0%0 1.4%11 4.1%40 ▲ +4.1 pp▲ +40▲ +2.8 pp▲ +29▲ +1.4 pp▲ +11
Los Angeles citywide 5.7%81,669 4.9%79,784 4.9%82,110 ▼ −0.7 pp▲ +441– 0.0 pp▲ +2,326▼ −0.7 pp▼ −1,885
Firm size: 500 or more employees 8.9%62 6.9%56 4.0%39 ▼ −4.8 pp▼ −23▼ −2.9 pp▼ −17▼ −2.0 pp▼ −6
Los Angeles citywide 43.9%634,277 47.2%765,207 47.2%789,502 ▲ +3.3 pp▲ +155,225– 0.0 pp▲ +24,295▲ +3.3 pp▲ +130,930

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Manchester Square
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 15.6% ±2.2 pp15.6%±2.2 pp1,968 ±280
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 88.7% ±6.3 pp13.9%±1.0 pp1,745 ±123
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 11.3% ±5.7 pp1.8%±0.9 pp223 ±111
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 15.6%±2.2 pp15.6%±2.2 pp1,968±280 13.6%±0.1 pp13.6%±0.1 pp524,758±5,328 ▲ +2.0%▲ +2.0% 28/110
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 88.7%±6.3 pp13.9%±1.0 pp1,745±123 86.8%±0.3 pp11.8%±0.0 pp455,658±1,592 ▲ +1.8%▲ +2.0% 48/11027/110
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 11.3%±5.7 pp1.8%±0.9 pp223±111 13.2%±0.4 pp1.8%±0.1 pp69,100±2,036 ▼ -1.8%0% 63/11051/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Manchester Square
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 6.7% ±1.7 pp6.7%±1.7 pp850 ±213
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 73.9% ±13.1 pp4.9%±0.9 pp628 ±111
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 26.1% ±11.4 pp1.7%±0.8 pp222 ±97
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 78.7% ±22.8 pp5.3%±1.5 pp669 ±194
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 21.3% ±13.5 pp1.4%±0.9 pp181 ±115
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 6.7%±1.7 pp6.7%±1.7 pp850±213 8.1%±0.1 pp8.1%±0.1 pp310,586±4,276 ▼ -1.4%▼ -1.4% 50/110
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 73.9%±13.1 pp4.9%±0.9 pp628±111 70.9%±0.7 pp5.7%±0.1 pp220,274±2,032 ▲ +3.0%▼ -0.8% 62/11054/110
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 26.1%±11.4 pp1.7%±0.8 pp222±97 29.1%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.0 pp90,312±1,878 ▼ -3.0%▼ -0.6% 49/11047/110
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 78.7%±22.8 pp5.3%±1.5 pp669±194 77.3%±0.5 pp6.2%±0.0 pp240,126±1,419 ▲ +1.4%▼ -1.0% 45/11047/110
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 21.3%±13.5 pp1.4%±0.9 pp181±115 22.7%±0.6 pp1.8%±0.0 pp70,460±1,837 ▼ -1.4%▼ -0.4% 66/11058/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category Manchester Square
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 6.9% ±6.1 pp139 ±123
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 7.4% ±12.1 pp60 ±98
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 6.9%±6.1 pp139±123 3.9%±0.3 pp— ▲ +3.0% 16/110
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 7.4%±12.1 pp60±98 4.2%±0.4 pp— ▲ +3.2% 12/110
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category Manchester Square
Owner-Occupied Households 50.7% ±7.7 pp2,386 ±364
Renter-Occupied Households 49.3% ±10.4 pp2,323 ±492
Owner-Occupied Residents 51.9% ±6.4 pp6,539 ±803
Renter-Occupied Residents 48.1% ±9.4 pp6,054 ±1,181
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Owner-Occupied Households 50.7%±7.7 pp2,386±364 36.0%±0.3 pp518,423±4,359 ▲ +14.6% 31/110
Renter-Occupied Households 49.3%±10.4 pp2,323±492 64.0%±0.3 pp920,674±4,643 ▼ -14.6% 80/110
Owner-Occupied Residents 51.9%±6.4 pp6,539±803 40.2%±0.4 pp1,509,388±15,216 ▲ +11.7% 36/110
Renter-Occupied Residents 48.1%±9.4 pp6,054±1,181 59.8%±0.4 pp2,243,250±15,217 ▼ -11.7% 75/110
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category Manchester Square
Median Year Moved In 2011±1.8 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later 0.9% ±1.3 pp41 ±62
Moved in 2020 to 2022 10.0% ±3.6 pp463 ±164
Moved in 2010 to 2019 48.2% ±10.5 pp2,227 ±485
Moved in 2000 to 2009 15.2% ±4.6 pp703 ±211
Moved in 1990 to 1999 12.7% ±3.5 pp587 ±163
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 12.9% ±3.7 pp594 ±171
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Median Year Moved In 2011±1.8 yr 2014±1.0 yr ▼ −3 79/110
Moved in 2023 or Later 0.9%±1.3 pp41±62 4.9%±0.1 pp70,211±2,138 ▼ -4.0% 108/110
Moved in 2020 to 2022 10.0%±3.6 pp463±164 20.6%±0.3 pp296,921±3,730 ▼ -10.6% 108/110
Moved in 2010 to 2019 48.2%±10.5 pp2,227±485 40.3%±0.3 pp580,466±4,993 ▲ +7.9% 3/110
Moved in 2000 to 2009 15.2%±4.6 pp703±211 16.2%±0.2 pp233,668±3,490 ▼ -1.0% 70/110
Moved in 1990 to 1999 12.7%±3.5 pp587±163 9.8%±0.2 pp140,815±2,779 ▲ +2.9% 20/110
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 12.9%±3.7 pp594±171 8.1%±0.2 pp117,016±2,469 ▲ +4.7% 22/110
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show
Category Manchester Square
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 4.5% ±2.1 pp4.5%±2.1 pp578 ±267
↳ Moved Within Los Angeles County (of recent movers) 3.5% ±1.9 pp79.2%±21.1 pp458 ±244
↳ Moved from Different California County (of recent movers) 0.3% ±0.6 pp7.1%±12.7 pp41 ±76
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 0.5% ±0.6 pp11.6%±12.6 pp67 ±79
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 0.1% ±0.2 pp2.1%±4.6 pp12 ±27
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 4.5%±2.1 pp4.5%±2.1 pp578±267 10.7%±0.2 pp10.7%±0.2 pp408,463±7,943 ▼ -6.2%▼ -6.2% 107/110
↳ Moved Within Los Angeles County (of recent movers) 3.5%±1.9 pp79.2%±21.1 pp458±244 7.4%±0.2 pp69.3%±1.2 pp283,263±7,240 ▼ -3.9%▲ +9.9% 104/11023/110
↳ Moved from Different California County (of recent movers) 0.3%±0.6 pp7.1%±12.7 pp41±76 1.2%±0.0 pp11.0%±0.4 pp45,056±1,766 ▼ -0.9%▼ -3.9% 96/11075/110
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 0.5%±0.6 pp11.6%±12.6 pp67±79 1.3%±0.1 pp12.3%±0.5 pp50,444±2,220 ▼ -0.8%▼ -0.8% 78/11053/110
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 0.1%±0.2 pp2.1%±4.6 pp12±27 0.8%±0.0 pp7.3%±0.4 pp29,700±1,624 ▼ -0.7%▼ -5.2% 105/110102/110
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show
Category Manchester Square
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 4.1% ±1.9 pp4.1%±1.9 pp199 ±91
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 0.7% ±1.0 pp15.6%±21.9 pp31 ±46
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.0% ±0.6 pp0.0%0
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.0% ±0.5 pp0.0%0
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 3.5% ±2.1 pp83.9%±34.3 pp167 ±103
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 1.3% ±1.9 pp1.3%±1.9 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 0.0% ±1.4 pp0.0%±1.4 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 4.1%±1.9 pp4.1%±1.9 pp199±91 7.4%±0.2 pp7.4%±0.2 pp115,235±3,037 ▼ -3.3%▼ -3.3% 88/110
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 0.7%±1.0 pp15.6%±21.9 pp31±46 2.9%±0.1 pp38.6%±1.2 pp44,494±1,787 ▼ -2.2%▼ -23.0% 99/11099/110
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.0%±0.6 pp0.0%0 0.3%±0.0 pp4.0%±0.4 pp4,630±529 ▼ -0.3%▼ -4.0% 83/11083/110
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.0%±0.5 pp0.0%0 0.4%±0.0 pp5.6%±0.6 pp6,482±671 ▼ -0.4%▼ -5.6% 79/11079/110
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 3.5%±2.1 pp83.9%±34.3 pp167±103 3.8%±0.2 pp51.7%±2.8 pp59,629±3,638 ▼ -0.4%▲ +32.2% 57/1104/110
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 1.3%±1.9 pp1.3%±1.9 pp— 4.6%±0.2 pp4.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -3.3%▼ -3.3% 102/110
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 0.0%±1.4 pp0.0%±1.4 pp— 0.9%±0.1 pp0.9%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.9%▼ -0.9% 83/110
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category Manchester Square
Median Year Built 1945±4 yr
Pre-1940 48.4% ±6.6 pp2,329 ±317
1940-2009 47.9% ±8.3 pp2,304 ±399
2010+ 3.8% ±2.6 pp182 ±124
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Median Year Built 1945±4 yr 1965±1 yr ▼ −20 yrs 103/110
Pre-1940 48.4%±6.6 pp2,329±317 19.1%±0.2 pp296,223±3,073 ▲ +29.3% 10/110
1940-2009 47.9%±8.3 pp2,304±399 73.1%±0.4 pp1,136,164±6,801 ▼ -25.2% 98/110
2010+ 3.8%±2.6 pp182±124 7.8%±0.2 pp121,945±2,871 ▼ -4.1% 81/110
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category Manchester Square
Population Density 12,552 /sq mi±1,545/sq mi
Single-Family Homes 67.8% ±6.1 pp3,265 ±291
Buildings With 2–4 Units 20.3% ±7.0 pp979 ±339
Buildings With 5–19 Units 8.5% ±3.1 pp410 ±148
Buildings With 20 or More Units 3.4% ±2.3 pp161 ±110
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Population Density 12,552 /sq mi±1,545/sq mi 8,285 /sq mi±14/sq mi ▲ +4,267 /sq mi 44/110
Single-Family Homes 67.8%±6.1 pp3,265±291 41.9%±0.3 pp651,793±4,742 ▲ +25.9% 25/110
Buildings With 2–4 Units 20.3%±7.0 pp979±339 9.0%±0.2 pp140,536±2,829 ▲ +11.3% 16/110
Buildings With 5–19 Units 8.5%±3.1 pp410±148 18.4%±0.3 pp286,023±4,408 ▼ -9.9% 82/110
Buildings With 20 or More Units 3.4%±2.3 pp161±110 29.9%±0.3 pp465,391±4,691 ▼ -26.6% 102/110
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category Manchester Square
Studio 3.1% ±1.7 pp149 ±81
1 Bedroom 21.7% ±5.5 pp1,044 ±266
2 Bedrooms 31.6% ±9.6 pp1,520 ±463
3 Bedrooms 35.8% ±4.1 pp1,722 ±198
4 Bedrooms 6.3% ±2.8 pp302 ±136
5 or More Bedrooms 1.6% ±1.7 pp79 ±80
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Studio 3.1%±1.7 pp149±81 11.6%±0.2 pp180,439±3,649 ▼ -8.5% 98/110
1 Bedroom 21.7%±5.5 pp1,044±266 23.7%±0.2 pp367,883±3,808 ▼ -2.0% 58/110
2 Bedrooms 31.6%±9.6 pp1,520±463 30.8%±0.3 pp478,829±4,610 ▲ +0.8% 65/110
3 Bedrooms 35.8%±4.1 pp1,722±198 21.9%±0.2 pp339,889±3,797 ▲ +13.9% 19/110
4 Bedrooms 6.3%±2.8 pp302±136 9.1%±0.1 pp140,925±2,101 ▼ -2.8% 69/110
5 or More Bedrooms 1.6%±1.7 pp79±80 3.0%±0.1 pp46,367±1,494 ▼ -1.3% 67/110
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show
Category Manchester Square
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 7.6% ±3.7 pp7.6%±3.7 pp352 ±170
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 5.0% ±3.0 pp65.6%±23.0 pp231 ±138
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 2.6% ±2.2 pp34.4%±24.3 pp121 ±104
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 7.6%±3.7 pp7.6%±3.7 pp352±170 12.1%±0.2 pp12.1%±0.2 pp174,164±3,256 ▼ -4.5%▼ -4.5% 62/110
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 5.0%±3.0 pp65.6%±23.0 pp231±138 5.9%±0.1 pp49.1%±0.8 pp85,502±2,139 ▼ -0.9%▲ +16.5% 54/11020/109
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 2.6%±2.2 pp34.4%±24.3 pp121±104 6.2%±0.2 pp50.9%±1.1 pp88,662±2,479 ▼ -3.5%▼ -16.5% 72/11090/109
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category Manchester Square
Natural Gas Heat 72.5% ±7.5 pp3,346 ±345
Electric Heat 19.3% ±4.7 pp893 ±219
Other Heating Source 8.2% ±4.1 pp377 ±189
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Natural Gas Heat 72.5%±7.5 pp3,346±345 57.3%±0.3 pp823,973±4,848 ▲ +15.2% 14/110
Electric Heat 19.3%±4.7 pp893±219 34.3%±0.3 pp494,304±4,648 ▼ -15.0% 102/110
Other Heating Source 8.2%±4.1 pp377±189 8.4%±0.2 pp120,823±2,850 ▼ -0.2% 44/110
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show
Category Manchester Square
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 25.5% ±7.3 pp1,178 ±339
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 20.7% ±4.7 pp955 ±219
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 53.8% ±8.1 pp2,482 ±373
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 33.7% ±8.4 pp1,554 ±389
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 25.5%±7.3 pp1,178±339 18.4%±0.4 pp264,606±5,364 ▲ +7.1% 75/110
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 20.7%±4.7 pp955±219 20.5%±0.3 pp294,961±4,886 ▲ +0.2% 56/110
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 53.8%±8.1 pp2,482±373 56.5%±0.5 pp813,715±6,573 ▼ -2.8% 38/110
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 33.7%±8.4 pp1,554±389 31.1%±0.4 pp447,155±5,566 ▲ +2.6% 12/110
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category Manchester Square
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $580±$159
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $947±$126
Median Monthly Housing Costs $1,800±$249
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $2,812±$219
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $580±$159 $787±$11 ▼ −$206 91/110
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $947±$126 $1,347±$8 ▼ −$400 107/110
Median Monthly Housing Costs $1,800±$249 $2,115±$9 ▼ −$315 77/110
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $2,812±$219 Over $3,000 ▼ −$188+ 67/110
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000 Over $3,000 — 1/110
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $510 ±107 $572 ±86 $580 ±159 ▲ +$70▲ +$9▲ +$62
Los Angeles citywide $734 ±7 $763 ±8 $787 ±11 ▲ +$53▲ +$24▲ +$29
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $385 ±81 $466 ±70 $580 ±159 ▲ +$196▲ +$114▲ +$81
Los Angeles citywide $554 ±6 $622 ±7 $787 ±11 ▲ +$233▲ +$165▲ +$68
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,010 ±100 $970 ±123 $947 ±126 ▼ −$63▼ −$23▼ −$40
Los Angeles citywide $1,206 ±4 $1,299 ±6 $1,347 ±8 ▲ +$141▲ +$48▲ +$93
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $762 ±75 $791 ±100 $947 ±126 ▲ +$185▲ +$157▲ +$28
Los Angeles citywide $910 ±3 $1,058 ±5 $1,347 ±8 ▲ +$437▲ +$289▲ +$148
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,736 ±133 $1,714 ±124 $1,800 ±249 ▲ +$65▲ +$86▼ −$22
Los Angeles citywide $1,817 ±7 $1,985 ±7 $2,115 ±9 ▲ +$298▲ +$130▲ +$169
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,310 ±100 $1,397 ±101 $1,800 ±249 ▲ +$490▲ +$403▲ +$87
Los Angeles citywide $1,371 ±5 $1,618 ±6 $2,115 ±9 ▲ +$744▲ +$497▲ +$247
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,608 ±81 $2,538 ±157 $2,812 ±219 ▲ +$204▲ +$274▼ −$70
Los Angeles citywide — $2,970 ±11 — ———
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,968 ±61 $2,068 ±128 $2,812 ±219 ▲ +$844▲ +$743▲ +$100
Los Angeles citywide — $2,420 ±9 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $3,293 ±188 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) — $2,684 ±153 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Rent

Rent measure
Category Manchester Square
Average Rent Plus Utilities $1,486±$91
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $800±$192
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $924±$105
Median Rent Plus Utilities $1,290±$219
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,873±$212
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,428±$429
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities $1,486±$91 $2,131±$12 ▼ −$645 107/110
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $800±$192 $934±$12 ▼ −$134 78/110
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $924±$105 $1,380±$9 ▼ −$456 107/110
Median Rent Plus Utilities $1,290±$219 $1,933±$9 ▼ −$643 110/110
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,873±$212 $2,639±$17 ▼ −$765 107/110
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,428±$429 Over $3,500 ▼ −$1,072+ 106/110
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square
Average Rent $1,228±$74
10th Percentile Rent $549±$125
25th Percentile Rent $772±$130
Median Rent $992±$163
75th Percentile Rent $1,537±$215
90th Percentile Rent $2,174±$520
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Average Rent $1,228±$74 $1,927±$12 ▼ −$699 108/110
10th Percentile Rent $549±$125 $808±$12 ▼ −$259 89/110
25th Percentile Rent $772±$130 $1,217±$8 ▼ −$445 108/110
Median Rent $992±$163 $1,765±$8 ▼ −$773 110/110
75th Percentile Rent $1,537±$215 $2,416±$11 ▼ −$879 110/110
90th Percentile Rent $2,174±$520 $3,289±$24 ▼ −$1,115 103/110
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category Manchester Square
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,199±$677
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,852±$377
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,373±$213
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,933±$176
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,567±$223
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,199±$677 $4,133±$34 ▼ −$934 68/110
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,852±$377 $1,828±$21 ▲ +$24 59/110
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,373±$213 $2,537±$17 ▼ −$164 69/110
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,933±$176 $3,497±$23 ▼ −$564 78/110
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,567±$223 Over $4,000 ▼ −$433+ 88/110
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000 Over $4,000 — 1/110
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,841 ±129 $2,722 ±62 $3,199 ±677 ▲ +$358▲ +$477▼ −$120
Los Angeles citywide $3,870 ±21 $3,856 ±17 $4,133 ±34 ▲ +$263▲ +$276▼ −$13
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,144 ±98 $2,218 ±51 $3,199 ±677 ▲ +$1,055▲ +$981▲ +$74
Los Angeles citywide $2,920 ±16 $3,143 ±14 $4,133 ±34 ▲ +$1,212▲ +$990▲ +$223
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,471 ±253 $1,817 ±213 $1,852 ±377 ▲ +$381▲ +$35▲ +$345
Los Angeles citywide $1,744 ±13 $1,827 ±19 $1,828 ±21 ▲ +$85▲ +$2▲ +$83
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,110 ±191 $1,481 ±174 $1,852 ±377 ▲ +$742▲ +$371▲ +$370
Los Angeles citywide $1,316 ±10 $1,489 ±15 $1,828 ±21 ▲ +$512▲ +$340▲ +$173
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,098 ±175 $2,123 ±114 $2,373 ±213 ▲ +$275▲ +$249▲ +$25
Los Angeles citywide $2,379 ±13 $2,448 ±17 $2,537 ±17 ▲ +$158▲ +$89▲ +$69
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,583 ±132 $1,731 ±93 $2,373 ±213 ▲ +$790▲ +$642▲ +$147
Los Angeles citywide $1,796 ±10 $1,995 ±14 $2,537 ±17 ▲ +$741▲ +$542▲ +$199
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,809 ±188 $2,616 ±149 $2,933 ±176 ▲ +$124▲ +$317▼ −$193
Los Angeles citywide $3,315 ±21 $3,342 ±16 $3,497 ±23 ▲ +$182▲ +$155▲ +$27
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,120 ±142 $2,132 ±122 $2,933 ±176 ▲ +$813▲ +$801▲ +$12
Los Angeles citywide $2,502 ±16 $2,724 ±13 $3,497 ±23 ▲ +$995▲ +$773▲ +$222
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,643 ±273 $3,157 ±178 $3,567 ±223 ▼ −$77▲ +$409▼ −$486
Los Angeles citywide — $4,663 ±31 — ———
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,750 ±206 $2,573 ±145 $3,567 ±223 ▲ +$817▲ +$993▼ −$176
Los Angeles citywide — $3,800 ±25 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $3,663 ±418 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) — $2,985 ±341 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category Manchester Square
Average Monthly Owner Costs $875±$425
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $338±$126
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $466±$160
Median Monthly Owner Costs $755±$182
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,002±$205
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,357±$209
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs $875±$425 $1,309±$21 ▼ −$434 82/110
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $338±$126 $456±$10 ▼ −$118 97/110
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $466±$160 $674±$10 ▼ −$208 106/110
Median Monthly Owner Costs $755±$182 $1,001±$14 ▼ −$246 88/110
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,002±$205 $1,491±$15 ▼ −$488 91/110
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,357±$209 Over $1,500 ▼ −$143+ 94/110
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $679 ±69 $713 ±68 $875 ±425 ▲ +$196▲ +$162▲ +$34
Los Angeles citywide $974 ±11 $1,068 ±13 $1,309 ±21 ▲ +$335▲ +$242▲ +$93
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $513 ±52 $581 ±55 $875 ±425 ▲ +$362▲ +$294▲ +$69
Los Angeles citywide $735 ±8 $870 ±11 $1,309 ±21 ▲ +$574▲ +$439▲ +$135
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $209 ±95 $376 ±115 $338 ±126 ▲ +$129▼ −$38▲ +$167
Los Angeles citywide $372 ±7 $397 ±7 $456 ±10 ▲ +$84▲ +$59▲ +$25
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $158 ±72 $306 ±94 $338 ±126 ▲ +$180▲ +$32▲ +$148
Los Angeles citywide $281 ±5 $323 ±6 $456 ±10 ▲ +$176▲ +$133▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $362 ±80 $541 ±71 $466 ±160 ▲ +$103▼ −$76▲ +$179
Los Angeles citywide $544 ±7 $586 ±8 $674 ±10 ▲ +$130▲ +$88▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $274 ±61 $441 ±58 $466 ±160 ▲ +$192▲ +$24▲ +$168
Los Angeles citywide $410 ±5 $478 ±6 $674 ±10 ▲ +$264▲ +$196▲ +$68
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $680 ±192 $688 ±93 $755 ±182 ▲ +$75▲ +$67▲ +$8
Los Angeles citywide $806 ±11 $880 ±10 $1,001 ±14 ▲ +$195▲ +$121▲ +$74
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $513 ±145 $561 ±76 $755 ±182 ▲ +$242▲ +$194▲ +$48
Los Angeles citywide $608 ±8 $717 ±8 $1,001 ±14 ▲ +$393▲ +$284▲ +$109
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $919 ±52 $885 ±78 $1,002 ±205 ▲ +$83▲ +$117▼ −$33
Los Angeles citywide — $1,304 ±17 $1,491 ±15 —▲ +$187—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $693 ±39 $722 ±64 $1,002 ±205 ▲ +$309▲ +$280▲ +$28
Los Angeles citywide — $1,062 ±14 $1,491 ±15 —▲ +$428—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $972 ±203 $1,357 ±209 —▲ +$386—
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — $792 ±166 $1,357 ±209 —▲ +$566—
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Home Values

Category Manchester Square
Average Home Value $728,117±$126,456
10th Percentile Home Value $463,212±$192,192
25th Percentile Home Value $562,768±$27,762
Median Home Value $686,953±$30,774
75th Percentile Home Value $840,488±$40,261
90th Percentile Home Value $950,770±$24,428
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Average Home Value $728,117±$126,456 $1,264,542±$8,234 ▼ −$536,425 80/110
10th Percentile Home Value $463,212±$192,192 $459,299±$5,965 ▲ +$3,914 70/110
25th Percentile Home Value $562,768±$27,762 $653,300±$4,641 ▼ −$90,532 83/110
Median Home Value $686,953±$30,774 $921,200±$4,782 ▼ −$234,247 91/110
75th Percentile Home Value $840,488±$40,261 $1,397,000±$18,800 ▼ −$556,512 93/110
90th Percentile Home Value $950,770±$24,428 Over $2,000,000 ▼ −$1,049,230+ 95/110
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $371,183 ±18,797 $535,106 ±28,642 $728,117 ±126,456 ▲ +$356,934▲ +$193,011▲ +$163,923
Los Angeles citywide $824,079 ±6,442 $1,055,784 ±9,073 $1,264,542 ±8,234 ▲ +$440,464▲ +$208,758▲ +$231,705
Average Home Value (nominal dollars) $280,126 ±14,185 $436,112 ±23,343 $728,117 ±126,456 ▲ +$447,991▲ +$292,005▲ +$155,986
Los Angeles citywide $621,919 ±4,862 $860,465 ±7,394 $1,264,542 ±8,234 ▲ +$642,624▲ +$404,077▲ +$238,547
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $190,478 ±72,581 $342,067 ±62,684 $463,212 ±192,192 ▲ +$272,734▲ +$121,145▲ +$151,589
Los Angeles citywide $274,172 ±2,766 $388,878 ±2,619 $459,299 ±5,965 ▲ +$185,126▲ +$70,421▲ +$114,706
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $143,751 ±54,775 $278,785 ±51,088 $463,212 ±192,192 ▲ +$319,462▲ +$184,427▲ +$135,035
Los Angeles citywide $206,913 ±2,087 $316,936 ±2,134 $459,299 ±5,965 ▲ +$252,385▲ +$142,362▲ +$110,023
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $303,447 ±21,934 $441,884 ±31,357 $562,768 ±27,762 ▲ +$259,321▲ +$120,884▲ +$138,437
Los Angeles citywide $413,153 ±2,182 $543,435 ±2,444 $653,300 ±4,641 ▲ +$240,147▲ +$109,865▲ +$130,281
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $229,006 ±16,553 $360,136 ±25,556 $562,768 ±27,762 ▲ +$333,762▲ +$202,632▲ +$131,130
Los Angeles citywide $311,800 ±1,647 $442,900 ±1,992 $653,300 ±4,641 ▲ +$341,500▲ +$210,400▲ +$131,100
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $398,886 ±19,937 $544,514 ±18,573 $686,953 ±30,774 ▲ +$288,067▲ +$142,438▲ +$145,629
Los Angeles citywide $601,311 ±2,870 $781,471 ±2,656 $921,200 ±4,782 ▲ +$319,889▲ +$139,729▲ +$180,160
Median Home Value (nominal dollars) $301,033 ±15,046 $443,780 ±15,137 $686,953 ±30,774 ▲ +$385,920▲ +$243,173▲ +$142,747
Los Angeles citywide $453,800 ±2,166 $636,900 ±2,165 $921,200 ±4,782 ▲ +$467,400▲ +$284,300▲ +$183,100
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $483,994 ±13,656 $656,094 ±48,419 $840,488 ±40,261 ▲ +$356,494▲ +$184,394▲ +$172,100
Los Angeles citywide $957,885 ±4,252 $1,163,924 ±5,481 $1,397,000 ±18,800 ▲ +$439,115▲ +$233,076▲ +$206,040
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $365,263 ±10,306 $534,717 ±39,461 $840,488 ±40,261 ▲ +$475,226▲ +$305,771▲ +$169,455
Los Angeles citywide $722,900 ±3,209 $948,600 ±4,467 $1,397,000 ±18,800 ▲ +$674,100▲ +$448,400▲ +$225,700
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $571,211 ±69,899 $828,806 ±33,624 $950,770 ±24,428 ▲ +$379,559▲ +$121,964▲ +$257,596
Los Angeles citywide — $2,103,035 ±25,625 — ———
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $431,083 ±52,751 $675,478 ±27,403 $950,770 ±24,428 ▲ +$519,687▲ +$275,292▲ +$244,395
Los Angeles citywide — $1,713,977 ±20,884 — ———

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show
Category Manchester Square
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 15.3%15.3%739
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 14.2%92.7%685
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 1.1%7.3%54
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 15.3%15.3%739 5.5%5.5%84,827 ▲ +9.9%▲ +9.9% 8/110
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 14.2%92.7%685 3.5%64.0%54,313 ▲ +10.7%▲ +28.7% 4/11024/107
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0 0.4%7.1%6,040 ▼ -0.4%▼ -7.1% 13/11013/107
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 1.1%7.3%54 1.4%25.1%21,260 ▼ -0.2%▼ -17.8% 48/11072/107
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0 0.2%3.8%3,214 ▼ -0.2%▼ -3.8% 60/11060/107
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units 14.2%646 14.3%685 15.3%739 ▲ +1.2 pp▲ +93▲ +1.0 pp▲ +54▲ +0.1 pp▲ +39
Los Angeles citywide 5.6%79,280 5.5%82,357 5.5%84,827 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5,547▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,470– 0.0 pp▲ +3,077
Housing Choice Vouchers 12.8%583 12.9%620 14.2%685 ▲ +1.5 pp▲ +102▲ +1.3 pp▲ +65▲ +0.2 pp▲ +37
Los Angeles citywide 3.4%47,994 3.4%50,854 3.5%54,313 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +6,319▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,459– 0.0 pp▲ +2,860
Public Housing 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 0.5%7,024 0.5%7,038 0.4%6,040 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −984▼ −0.1 pp▼ −998– 0.0 pp▲ +14
Project-Based Section 8 1.4%63 1.3%64 1.1%54 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −9▼ −0.2 pp▼ −10– 0.0 pp▲ +1
Los Angeles citywide 1.5%21,053 1.4%21,190 1.4%21,260 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +207▼ −0.1 pp▲ +70▼ −0.1 pp▲ +137
Other Project-Based Programs 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%3,209 0.2%3,275 0.2%3,214 – 0.0 pp▲ +5– 0.0 pp▼ −61– 0.0 pp▲ +66
Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category Manchester Square
Average Household Income $20,308
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $530
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,886
Below 30% of Area Median Income 85.1%545
With Children 30.5%195
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 48.7%312
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $20,308 $20,771 ▼ -$464 55/101
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $530 $532 ▼ -$2 54/101
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,886 $1,653 ▲ +$233 7/101
Below 30% of Area Median Income 85.1%545 88.0%66,617 ▼ -2.9 pp 69/101
With Children 30.5%195 20.0%15,140 ▲ +10.5 pp 16/101
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 48.7%312 43.0%32,551 ▲ +5.7 pp 37/101
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income $14,198 $18,195 $20,292 ▲ +$6,094▲ +$2,097▲ +$3,997
Los Angeles citywide $14,082 $16,770 $20,771 ▲ +$6,689▲ +$4,001▲ +$2,688
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $407 $469 $530 ▲ +$122▲ +$61▲ +$62
Los Angeles citywide $372 $432 $532 ▲ +$160▲ +$100▲ +$60
Average Monthly Government Spending $874 $1,110 $1,886 ▲ +$1,012▲ +$776▲ +$236
Los Angeles citywide $795 $1,013 $1,653 ▲ +$858▲ +$640▲ +$218
Below 30% of Area Median Income 79.8%— 77.1%— 85.1%— ▲ +5.4 pp—▲ +8.0 pp—▼ −2.6 pp—
Los Angeles citywide 84.0%— 85.0%— 88.0%— ▲ +4.0 pp—▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children — — 30.4%— ——————
Los Angeles citywide — — 20.0%— ——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 41.8%— 45.8%— 48.7%— ▲ +6.9 pp—▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +4.0 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category Manchester Square
Total Tree Canopy 4.9%32 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 81.1%536 acres
Natural Open Surfaces 14.0%93 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Total Tree Canopy 4.9%32 acres 15.3%46,226 acres ▼ -10.4% 98/110
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 81.1%536 acres 56.2%170,078 acres ▲ +24.9% 29/110
Natural Open Surfaces 14.0%93 acres 28.5%86,111 acres ▼ -14.5% 60/110
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category Manchester Square
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 15.5% ±5.7 pp1,960 ±727
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 46.4% ±7.7 pp5,878 ±979
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 38.1% ±7.5 pp4,834 ±953
Heat Exposed 0.0%0
Homes Without Air Conditioning 33.9%4,299
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. Heat Exposed is the share of residents living in census tracts the Census Bureau flagged as exposed to extreme heat in 2022. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates; neither those nor the heat exposure figures have a margin of error, as with CDC PLACES data.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 15.5%±5.7 pp1,960±727 19.5%±0.3 pp751,543±13,280 ▼ -4.0% 72/110
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 46.4%±7.7 pp5,878±979 47.6%±0.4 pp1,834,233±16,767 ▼ -1.2% 66/110
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 38.1%±7.5 pp4,834±953 33.0%±0.4 pp1,271,488±15,545 ▲ +5.2% 29/110
Heat Exposed 0.0%0 52.6%2,030,766 ▼ -52.6% 59/110
Homes Without Air Conditioning 33.9%4,299 19.5%751,358 ▲ +14.4% 33/110
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. Heat Exposed is the share of residents living in census tracts the Census Bureau flagged as exposed to extreme heat in 2022. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates; neither those nor the heat exposure figures have a margin of error, as with CDC PLACES data.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category Manchester Square
Drove Alone 82.7% ±5.6 pp3,705 ±252
Carpooled 10.7% ±5.1 pp479 ±229
Public Transit 2.9% ±2.2 pp131 ±99
Walked 0.8% ±1.4 pp36 ±61
Bikes 1.7% ±1.9 pp77 ±84
Other Commute Mode 0.6% ±0.9 pp28 ±40
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Drove Alone 82.7%±5.6 pp3,705±252 74.3%±0.1 pp1,409,806±2,191 ▲ +8.3% 23/110
Carpooled 10.7%±5.1 pp479±229 10.8%±0.2 pp204,995±4,626 ▼ -0.1% 49/110
Public Transit 2.9%±2.2 pp131±99 7.6%±0.2 pp144,003±3,960 ▼ -4.7% 73/110
Walked 0.8%±1.4 pp36±61 4.0%±0.1 pp75,140±2,786 ▼ -3.2% 97/110
Bikes 1.7%±1.9 pp77±84 0.7%±0.1 pp13,831±1,185 ▲ +1.0% 12/110
Other Commute Mode 0.6%±0.9 pp28±40 2.6%±0.1 pp49,004±2,073 ▼ -2.0% 99/110
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category Manchester Square
Average Commute Time (minutes) 33 min±0.4 min
Less Than 15 Minutes 4.4% ±2.1 pp199 ±95
15–29 Minutes 35.9% ±8.2 pp1,609 ±366
30–44 Minutes 32.3% ±6.6 pp1,446 ±294
45–59 Minutes 12.9% ±2.7 pp576 ±123
60 Minutes or More 14.4% ±4.2 pp646 ±189
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes) 33 min±0.4 min 31 min±0.2 min ▲ +3 min 20/110
Less Than 15 Minutes 4.4%±2.1 pp199±95 15.9%±0.3 pp241,948±4,532 ▼ -11.4% 110/110
15–29 Minutes 35.9%±8.2 pp1,609±366 33.1%±0.3 pp504,776±4,959 ▲ +2.9% 35/110
30–44 Minutes 32.3%±6.6 pp1,446±294 28.9%±0.3 pp440,595±5,010 ▲ +3.4% 28/110
45–59 Minutes 12.9%±2.7 pp576±123 10.3%±0.2 pp156,750±2,883 ▲ +2.6% 16/110
60 Minutes or More 14.4%±4.2 pp646±189 11.9%±0.2 pp182,392±3,293 ▲ +2.5% 27/110
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category Manchester Square
Average Vehicles per Household 1.66±0.18
Households With No Vehicle 11.0% ±3.2 pp509 ±146
Households With 1 Vehicle 35.4% ±4.6 pp1,633 ±214
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 53.6% ±9.1 pp2,473 ±418
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Average Vehicles per Household 1.66±0.18 1.61±0.01 ▲ +0.05 52/110
Households With No Vehicle 11.0%±3.2 pp509±146 11.9%±0.2 pp171,011±3,141 ▼ -0.8% 38/110
Households With 1 Vehicle 35.4%±4.6 pp1,633±214 40.0%±0.3 pp575,741±4,305 ▼ -4.6% 60/110
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 53.6%±9.1 pp2,473±418 48.1%±0.4 pp692,345±5,259 ▲ +5.5% 45/110
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Manchester Square Residents Work

Category Manchester Square
Downtown 9.8%542
Westchester 3.3%183
Manchester Square 2.4%135
Westwood 2.0%111
Westlake 2.0%109
All other city neighborhoods 28.7%1,597
Outside the city 51.8%2,880
Torrance city, CA 2.9%159
Culver City city, CA 2.8%157
Inglewood city, CA 2.6%145
Santa Monica city, CA 2.1%118
Burbank city, CA 2.0%109
All other California locations 38.5%2,139
Out of state 1.0%53
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 59 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Manchester Square
Downtown 9.8%542
Westchester 3.3%183
Manchester Square 2.4%135
Westwood 2.0%111
Westlake 2.0%109
All other city neighborhoods 28.7%1,597
Outside the city 51.8%2,880
Torrance city, CA 2.9%159
Culver City city, CA 2.8%157
Inglewood city, CA 2.6%145
Santa Monica city, CA 2.1%118
Burbank city, CA 2.0%109
All other California locations 38.5%2,139
Out of state 1.0%53
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 59 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Downtown 12.2%566 10.5%569 9.8%542 ▼ −2.5 pp▼ −24▼ −0.8 pp▼ −27▼ −1.7 pp▲ +3
Los Angeles citywide 6.5%101,766 6.3%110,069 5.7%102,316 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +550▼ −0.5 pp▼ −7,753▼ −0.3 pp▲ +8,303
Westchester 4.9%225 5.0%271 3.3%183 ▼ −1.6 pp▼ −42▼ −1.7 pp▼ −88▲ +0.2 pp▲ +46
Los Angeles citywide 1.4%21,788 1.5%25,847 1.2%22,324 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +536▼ −0.2 pp▼ −3,523▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,059
Manchester Square 1.9%87 2.0%107 2.4%135 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +48▲ +0.4 pp▲ +28▲ +0.1 pp▲ +20
Los Angeles citywide 0.0%461 0.0%486 0.0%561 – 0.0 pp▲ +100– 0.0 pp▲ +75– 0.0 pp▲ +25
Westwood 2.1%98 2.0%110 2.0%111 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +13– 0.0 pp▲ +1▼ −0.1 pp▲ +12
Los Angeles citywide 2.2%34,229 2.4%43,058 2.2%39,095 – 0.0 pp▲ +4,866▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3,963▲ +0.3 pp▲ +8,829
Westlake 2.4%110 2.0%108 2.0%109 ▼ −0.4 pp▼ −1– 0.0 pp▲ +1▼ −0.4 pp▼ −2
Los Angeles citywide 1.6%24,683 1.5%26,401 1.5%26,369 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,686– 0.0 pp▼ −32▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,718
All other city neighborhoods 27.3%1,263 27.4%1,476 28.7%1,597 ▲ +1.4 pp▲ +334▲ +1.4 pp▲ +121▲ +0.1 pp▲ +213
Los Angeles citywide 29.3%458,023 29.5%518,759 30.0%536,497 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +78,474▲ +0.5 pp▲ +17,738▲ +0.2 pp▲ +60,736
Outside the city 49.2%2,277 51.0%2,754 51.8%2,880 ▲ +2.6 pp▲ +603▲ +0.8 pp▲ +126▲ +1.8 pp▲ +477
Los Angeles citywide 49.2%770,441 48.8%858,729 49.1%878,687 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +108,246▲ +0.4 pp▲ +19,958▼ −0.5 pp▲ +88,288
Torrance city, CA 2.4%113 2.7%148 2.9%159 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +46▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11▲ +0.3 pp▲ +35
Los Angeles citywide 1.2%18,642 1.2%20,677 1.1%19,569 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +927▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,108– 0.0 pp▲ +2,035
Culver City city, CA 2.6%120 2.9%157 2.8%157 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +37▼ −0.1 pp– 0▲ +0.3 pp▲ +37
Los Angeles citywide 2.1%32,497 1.8%31,673 1.8%33,021 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +524– 0.0 pp▲ +1,348▼ −0.3 pp▼ −824
Inglewood city, CA 3.0%137 2.4%127 2.6%145 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +8▲ +0.3 pp▲ +18▼ −0.6 pp▼ −10
Los Angeles citywide 0.6%8,772 0.5%8,879 0.6%10,705 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,933▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,826▼ −0.1 pp▲ +107
Santa Monica city, CA 2.2%101 2.2%118 2.1%118 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +17▼ −0.1 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▲ +17
Los Angeles citywide 2.6%39,908 2.4%42,563 2.2%39,633 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −275▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,930▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,655
Burbank city, CA 1.0%48 1.3%68 2.0%109 ▲ +0.9 pp▲ +61▲ +0.7 pp▲ +41▲ +0.2 pp▲ +20
Los Angeles citywide 5.8%90,525 7.3%128,165 7.5%134,652 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +44,127▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,487▲ +1.5 pp▲ +37,640
All other California locations 36.6%1,693 38.2%2,059 38.5%2,139 ▲ +1.9 pp▲ +446▲ +0.3 pp▲ +80▲ +1.6 pp▲ +366
Los Angeles citywide 31.0%485,821 29.7%523,763 30.3%541,371 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +55,550▲ +0.5 pp▲ +17,608▼ −1.3 pp▲ +37,942
Out of state 0.6%26 0.5%28 1.0%53 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +27▲ +0.4 pp▲ +25– 0.0 pp▲ +2
Los Angeles citywide 0.8%12,591 0.9%15,245 0.9%15,599 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,008– 0.0 pp▲ +354▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,654

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Manchester Square

Category Manchester Square
Manchester Square 12.9%135
Vermont Knolls 3.0%31
Vermont Square 1.8%19
Vermont-Slauson 1.7%18
Hyde Park 1.6%17
All other city neighborhoods 32.6%341
Outside the city 46.3%484
Inglewood city, CA 3.6%38
Hawthorne city, CA 2.1%22
Compton city, CA 2.0%21
Long Beach city, CA 2.0%21
Gardena city, CA 1.5%16
All other California locations 34.2%357
Out of state 0.9%9
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 59; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Manchester Square
Manchester Square 12.9%135
Vermont Knolls 3.0%31
Vermont Square 1.8%19
Vermont-Slauson 1.7%18
Hyde Park 1.6%17
All other city neighborhoods 32.6%341
Outside the city 46.3%484
Inglewood city, CA 3.6%38
Hawthorne city, CA 2.1%22
Compton city, CA 2.0%21
Long Beach city, CA 2.0%21
Gardena city, CA 1.5%16
All other California locations 34.2%357
Out of state 0.9%9
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 59; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Manchester Square 11.7%87 12.4%107 12.9%135 ▲ +1.2 pp▲ +48▲ +0.5 pp▲ +28▲ +0.7 pp▲ +20
Los Angeles citywide 0.1%2,349 0.1%2,641 0.1%2,677 – 0.0 pp▲ +328– 0.0 pp▲ +36– 0.0 pp▲ +292
Vermont Knolls 4.6%34 5.8%50 3.0%31 ▼ −1.6 pp▼ −3▼ −2.8 pp▼ −19▲ +1.2 pp▲ +16
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%3,203 0.2%3,791 0.2%3,827 – 0.0 pp▲ +624– 0.0 pp▲ +36– 0.0 pp▲ +588
Vermont Square 1.5%11 2.1%18 1.8%19 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +8▼ −0.3 pp▲ +1▲ +0.6 pp▲ +7
Los Angeles citywide 0.5%8,281 0.5%9,728 0.5%9,786 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,505– 0.0 pp▲ +58– 0.0 pp▲ +1,447
Vermont-Slauson 2.3%17 1.0%9 1.7%18 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1▲ +0.7 pp▲ +9▼ −1.2 pp▼ −8
Los Angeles citywide 0.3%4,662 0.3%5,317 0.3%5,375 – 0.0 pp▲ +713– 0.0 pp▲ +58– 0.0 pp▲ +655
Hyde Park 3.9%29 2.1%18 1.6%17 ▼ −2.3 pp▼ −12▼ −0.5 pp▼ −1▼ −1.8 pp▼ −11
Los Angeles citywide 0.4%7,388 0.4%8,533 0.4%8,310 – 0.0 pp▲ +922– 0.0 pp▼ −223– 0.0 pp▲ +1,145
All other city neighborhoods 37.2%277 31.7%274 32.6%341 ▼ −4.5 pp▲ +64▲ +0.9 pp▲ +67▼ −5.5 pp▼ −3
Los Angeles citywide 32.8%567,333 33.2%640,964 32.5%645,360 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +78,027▼ −0.7 pp▲ +4,396▲ +0.4 pp▲ +73,631
Outside the city 38.1%284 43.8%378 46.3%484 ▲ +8.2 pp▲ +200▲ +2.6 pp▲ +106▲ +5.6 pp▲ +94
Los Angeles citywide 54.0%933,111 53.3%1,028,920 54.2%1,077,964 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +144,853▲ +1.0 pp▲ +49,044▼ −0.7 pp▲ +95,809
Inglewood city, CA 3.8%28 4.3%37 3.6%38 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +10▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1▲ +0.5 pp▲ +9
Los Angeles citywide 1.1%18,545 1.1%20,678 1.0%19,503 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +958▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,175– 0.0 pp▲ +2,133
Hawthorne city, CA 1.3%10 1.7%15 2.1%22 ▲ +0.8 pp▲ +12▲ +0.4 pp▲ +7▲ +0.4 pp▲ +5
Los Angeles citywide 0.7%12,408 0.7%14,131 0.7%13,587 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,179– 0.0 pp▼ −544– 0.0 pp▲ +1,723
Compton city, CA 1.3%10 2.1%18 2.0%21 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +11▼ −0.1 pp▲ +3▲ +0.7 pp▲ +8
Los Angeles citywide 0.5%7,965 0.5%9,845 0.5%9,749 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,784– 0.0 pp▼ −96– 0.0 pp▲ +1,880
Long Beach city, CA 1.9%14 1.7%15 2.0%21 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +7▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1
Los Angeles citywide 1.6%27,846 1.6%31,795 1.6%32,231 – 0.0 pp▲ +4,385– 0.0 pp▲ +436– 0.0 pp▲ +3,949
Gardena city, CA 0.9%7 1.0%9 1.5%16 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +9▲ +0.5 pp▲ +7▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2
Los Angeles citywide 0.5%7,937 0.5%8,783 0.4%8,926 – 0.0 pp▲ +989– 0.0 pp▲ +143– 0.0 pp▲ +846
All other California locations 27.2%203 30.8%266 34.2%357 ▲ +6.9 pp▲ +154▲ +3.4 pp▲ +91▲ +3.5 pp▲ +63
Los Angeles citywide 42.9%741,882 42.0%811,195 42.9%852,367 – 0.0 pp▲ +110,485▲ +0.9 pp▲ +41,172▼ −0.9 pp▲ +69,313
Out of state 0.1%1 0.2%2 0.9%9 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +8▲ +0.6 pp▲ +7▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1
Los Angeles citywide 0.7%12,235 0.9%18,318 1.4%27,218 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +14,983▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,900▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,083

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category Manchester Square
No Computer or Smartphone 3.5% ±1.6 pp163 ±75
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 14.7% ±4.9 pp680 ±225
Desktop or Laptop Available 72.7% ±7.2 pp3,355 ±332
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
No Computer or Smartphone 3.5%±1.6 pp163±75 3.6%±0.1 pp51,208±2,038 0% 50/110
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 14.7%±4.9 pp680±225 9.4%±0.2 pp134,973±3,565 ▲ +5.4% 25/110
Desktop or Laptop Available 72.7%±7.2 pp3,355±332 81.8%±0.3 pp1,177,551±4,293 ▼ -9.1% 86/110
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category Manchester Square
Has Internet Access 91.0% ±3.8 pp4,200 ±174
Cellular Data Plan Only 15.4% ±6.7 pp712 ±309
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 3.1% ±2.3 pp143 ±106
No Internet Access 9.0% ±3.7 pp415 ±172
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Has Internet Access 91.0%±3.8 pp4,200±174 94.6%±0.2 pp1,361,126±2,605 ▼ -3.6% 98/110
Cellular Data Plan Only 15.4%±6.7 pp712±309 11.8%±0.2 pp169,117±3,594 ▲ +3.7% 26/110
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 3.1%±2.3 pp143±106 1.9%±0.1 pp27,326±1,276 ▲ +1.2% 11/110
No Internet Access 9.0%±3.7 pp415±172 5.4%±0.2 pp77,971±2,871 ▲ +3.6% 13/110
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category Manchester Square
Uninsured Residents 7.4% ±2.7 pp940 ±342
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 0.2% ±1.1 pp24 ±134
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 11.8% ±4.3 pp1,495 ±543
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 0.0% ±1.4 pp0
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Uninsured Residents 7.4%±2.7 pp940±342 9.5%±0.1 pp364,737±5,658 ▼ -2.0% 55/110
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 0.2%±1.1 pp24±134 3.3%±0.2 pp125,674±9,529 ▼ -3.1% 97/110
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 11.8%±4.3 pp1,495±543 13.1%±0.2 pp506,732±8,090 ▼ -1.3% 46/110
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 0.0%±1.4 pp0 1.9%±0.2 pp72,725±8,443 ▼ -1.9% 95/110
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category Manchester Square
Insured (Any Coverage) 92.6% ±2.7 pp11,736 ±342
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 39.6% ±2.0 pp5,017 ±248
Direct-Purchase Insurance 4.2% ±1.4 pp537 ±181
Medicare 16.1% ±2.6 pp2,037 ±334
Medicaid 39.8% ±5.7 pp5,047 ±726
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.0% ±0.7 pp0
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 7.5% ±3.3 pp956 ±416
Uninsured 7.4% ±2.7 pp940 ±342
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Insured (Any Coverage) 92.6%±2.7 pp11,736±342 90.5%±0.2 pp3,468,249±6,113 ▲ +2.0% 56/110
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 39.6%±2.0 pp5,017±248 40.6%±0.3 pp1,556,236±11,598 ▼ -1.0% 73/110
Direct-Purchase Insurance 4.2%±1.4 pp537±181 11.5%±0.2 pp439,171±6,009 ▼ -7.2% 96/110
Medicare 16.1%±2.6 pp2,037±334 13.1%±0.2 pp502,686±5,846 ▲ +2.9% 29/110
Medicaid 39.8%±5.7 pp5,047±726 30.1%±0.2 pp1,152,695±9,490 ▲ +9.7% 23/110
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.0%±0.7 pp0 0.2%±0.0 pp8,178±741 ▼ -0.2% 92/110
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 7.5%±3.3 pp956±416 4.2%±0.1 pp160,627±3,851 ▲ +3.3% 5/110
Uninsured 7.4%±2.7 pp940±342 9.5%±0.2 pp362,202±6,113 ▼ -2.0% 55/110
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category Manchester Square
Adults With at Least One Disability 24.8% ±4.1 pp2,583 ±423
Mobility Disability 18.1% ±3.8 pp1,886 ±393
Hearing Disability 4.1% ±1.7 pp428 ±173
Vision Disability 6.7% ±2.0 pp694 ±213
Cognitive Disability 7.5% ±2.2 pp776 ±230
Self-Care Disability 12.2% ±3.6 pp1,271 ±371
Independent Living Disability 14.2% ±3.6 pp1,478 ±377
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability 24.8%±4.1 pp2,583±423 13.4%±0.2 pp413,424±4,833 ▲ +11.5% 2/110
Mobility Disability 18.1%±3.8 pp1,886±393 7.1%±0.1 pp220,306±3,715 ▲ +11.0% 1/110
Hearing Disability 4.1%±1.7 pp428±173 3.0%±0.1 pp92,708±2,400 ▲ +1.1% 10/110
Vision Disability 6.7%±2.0 pp694±213 2.7%±0.1 pp83,292±2,320 ▲ +4.0% 1/110
Cognitive Disability 7.5%±2.2 pp776±230 5.1%±0.1 pp158,649±3,239 ▲ +2.3% 11/110
Self-Care Disability 12.2%±3.6 pp1,271±371 3.4%±0.1 pp104,391±2,633 ▲ +8.8% 1/110
Independent Living Disability 14.2%±3.6 pp1,478±377 6.1%±0.1 pp187,616±3,478 ▲ +8.2% 1/110
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category Manchester Square
Arthritis 24.2%2,365
High Blood Pressure 39.6%3,867
Cancer 5.1%494
Current Asthma 11.8%1,154
Coronary Heart Disease 6.2%602
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 6.4%624
Diabetes 16.4%1,600
High Cholesterol 35.9%3,506
Obesity 35.1%3,424
Stroke 4.9%482
Lost All Natural Teeth 3.0%292
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Arthritis 24.2%2,365 18.8%558,377 ▲ +5.4% 6/110
High Blood Pressure 39.6%3,867 28.8%855,387 ▲ +10.8% 2/110
Cancer 5.1%494 5.4%160,385 ▼ -0.3% 58/110
Current Asthma 11.8%1,154 9.4%279,189 ▲ +2.4% 1/110
Coronary Heart Disease 6.2%602 5.0%148,505 ▲ +1.2% 5/110
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 6.4%624 4.9%145,535 ▲ +1.5% 12/110
Diabetes 16.4%1,600 11.9%353,441 ▲ +4.5% 3/110
High Cholesterol 35.9%3,506 35.2%1,045,473 ▲ +0.7% 51/110
Obesity 35.1%3,424 27.3%810,835 ▲ +7.8% 11/110
Stroke 4.9%482 3.1%92,073 ▲ +1.8% 1/110
Lost All Natural Teeth 3.0%292 1.9%55,491 ▲ +1.1% 10/110
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category Manchester Square
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 12.7%1,242
Current Cigarette Smoking 14.1%1,372
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 30.1%2,938
Short Sleep Duration 43.5%4,248
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 12.7%1,242 15.9%472,245 ▼ -3.2% 108/110
Current Cigarette Smoking 14.1%1,372 11.9%353,441 ▲ +2.2% 26/110
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 30.1%2,938 26.5%787,075 ▲ +3.6% 37/110
Short Sleep Duration 43.5%4,248 36.5%1,084,084 ▲ +7.0% 2/110
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category Manchester Square
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 29.8%2,905
Frequent Physical Distress 16.3%1,589
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 29.8%2,905 25.1%745,493 ▲ +4.7% 30/110
Frequent Physical Distress 16.3%1,589 14.4%427,693 ▲ +1.9% 28/110
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category Manchester Square
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 75.6%7,379
Routine Checkup in Past Year 76.1%7,428
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 85.9%8,380
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 57.9%5,645
Dental Visit in Past Year 54.8%5,349
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 79.4%7,747
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 75.6%7,379 69.3%2,058,274 ▲ +6.3% 8/110
Routine Checkup in Past Year 76.1%7,428 70.5%2,093,916 ▲ +5.6% 8/110
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 85.9%8,380 83.0%2,465,177 ▲ +2.9% 43/110
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 57.9%5,645 54.0%1,603,850 ▲ +3.9% 43/110
Dental Visit in Past Year 54.8%5,349 58.9%1,749,385 ▼ -4.1% 74/110
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 79.4%7,747 74.8%2,221,630 ▲ +4.6% 18/110
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category Manchester Square
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 19.3%1,880
Frequent Mental Distress 19.0%1,851
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 36.2%3,535
Loneliness 44.0%4,297
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Manchester Square City Difference Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 19.3%1,880 20.4%605,899 ▼ -1.1% 86/110
Frequent Mental Distress 19.0%1,851 17.4%516,796 ▲ +1.6% 23/110
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 36.2%3,535 31.2%926,669 ▲ +5.0% 15/110
Loneliness 44.0%4,297 41.3%1,226,648 ▲ +2.7% 23/110
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Compare All Neighborhoods