Green Meadows, Los Angeles Demographics, Housing & Census Data

Green Meadows, Los Angeles Census and ACS demographic tables: population, race, age, income, poverty, rent, housing types, single-family homes, commute, education, internet access, health insurance, and disability.

Green Meadows, Los Angeles

Green Meadows
Los Angeles
Population
35,859
Overlapping council districts Overlap means that a council district contains part of this neighborhood.
8, 9, 15
Population Density
16,119 /sq mi
Average Geographic Mismatch Error : 0.23 p.p. Geographic mismatch error comes from Census geographic boundaries not perfectly aligning with neighborhood boundaries. We can test how much mismatch error skews neighborhood statistics for a subset of variables. For this neighborhood , the average error is 0.23 percentage points. More detail is available on the neighborhood geography page , and the methodology page explains geographic mismatch error in more detail.
One-page summary

Green Meadows at a Glance

Time period?Historical estimates use this profile's current boundaries, held constant across periods; they do not reflect the boundaries that were in effect at the time. Comparing
Values as
Show as
Add to every table
Showing Chart vs. Los Angeles ± Margin of error

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category Green Meadows
Hispanic 80.7% ±3.7 pp28,948 ±1,339
White 0.4% ±0.2 pp127 ±66
Black 15.8% ±1.9 pp5,662 ±698
Asian 0.8% ±0.8 pp300 ±273
Other or Multi-racial 2.3% ±1.6 pp822 ±569
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Hispanic 80.7%±3.7 pp28,948±1,339 47.2%±0.2 pp1,820,397±8,107 ▲ +33.5% 8/110
White 0.4%±0.2 pp127±66 28.1%±0.2 pp1,082,393±7,330 ▼ -27.7% 110/110
Black 15.8%±1.9 pp5,662±698 8.1%±0.1 pp311,633±4,801 ▲ +7.7% 20/110
Asian 0.8%±0.8 pp300±273 11.9%±0.1 pp460,422±5,784 ▼ -11.1% 102/110
Other or Multi-racial 2.3%±1.6 pp822±569 4.7%±0.1 pp182,418±4,965 ▼ -2.4% 93/110
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Age Distribution

Category Green Meadows
Under 5 6.5% ±1.1 pp2,338 ±412
5-17 23.6% ±1.2 pp8,475 ±415
18-24 12.7% ±1.2 pp4,554 ±427
25-44 27.8% ±0.3 pp9,964 ±98
45-64 21.2% ±0.7 pp7,591 ±260
65-74 5.5% ±0.8 pp1,987 ±287
75-84 1.7% ±0.6 pp621 ±232
85+ 0.9% ±0.7 pp330 ±258
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Under 5 6.5%±1.1 pp2,338±412 5.0%±0.1 pp193,588±3,896 ▲ +1.5% 11/110
5-17 23.6%±1.2 pp8,475±415 14.1%±0.1 pp545,575±5,332 ▲ +9.5% 1/110
18-24 12.7%±1.2 pp4,554±427 9.5%±0.1 pp364,975±4,663 ▲ +3.2% 8/110
25-44 27.8%±0.3 pp9,964±98 32.7%±0.2 pp1,261,487±6,490 ▼ -4.9% 86/110
45-64 21.2%±0.7 pp7,591±260 24.4%±0.1 pp942,048±5,660 ▼ -3.3% 102/110
65-74 5.5%±0.8 pp1,987±287 8.4%±0.1 pp323,245±3,923 ▼ -2.8% 104/110
75-84 1.7%±0.6 pp621±232 4.0%±0.1 pp153,663±2,663 ▼ -2.3% 105/110
85+ 0.9%±0.7 pp330±258 1.9%±0.1 pp72,682±2,184 ▼ -1.0% 101/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category Green Meadows
No High School Diploma 44.8% ±2.6 pp9,188 ±542
High School Diploma or GED 27.0% ±2.5 pp5,533 ±513
Some College or Associate's Degree 20.4% ±2.1 pp4,174 ±424
Bachelor's Degree 5.9% ±1.2 pp1,212 ±240
Graduate Degree 1.9% ±0.9 pp392 ±181
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
No High School Diploma 44.8%±2.6 pp9,188±542 20.4%±0.2 pp560,441±5,727 ▲ +24.5% 6/110
High School Diploma or GED 27.0%±2.5 pp5,533±513 18.5%±0.2 pp509,870±5,784 ▲ +8.5% 9/110
Some College or Associate's Degree 20.4%±2.1 pp4,174±424 22.7%±0.2 pp624,064±5,974 ▼ -2.3% 70/110
Bachelor's Degree 5.9%±1.2 pp1,212±240 24.9%±0.2 pp684,319±5,857 ▼ -18.9% 107/110
Graduate Degree 1.9%±0.9 pp392±181 13.6%±0.2 pp374,431±4,485 ▼ -11.7% 106/110
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category Green Meadows
Total Population 35,859 ±2,644
Total Households 8,490 ±450
Population Density 16,119 ±1,189 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows Average Neighborhood Difference
Total Population 35,859 35,102 ▲ +757
Total Households 8,490 13,096 ▼ −4,606
Population Density 16,119 people/sq mi 11,693 people/sq mi ▲ +4,426
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average neighborhood rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large neighborhoods. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category 2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19 Difference Rank
Total Population 35,227 ±1,538 36,043 ±1,577 35,859 ±2,644 ▲ +632 ±3,059▼ −184 ±3,079▲ +816 ±2,203 ▲ +69▼ −55▲ +757 47/11049/11045/110
Average Neighborhood 35,158 36,098 35,102 ▼ −56▼ −997▲ +940
Total Households 8,338 ±253 8,846 ±286 8,490 ±450 ▲ +152 ±516▼ −356 ±533▲ +508 ±382 ▼ −3,763▼ −3,748▼ −4,606 64/11061/11065/110
Average Neighborhood 12,101 12,594 13,096 ▲ +995▲ +502▲ +493
Population Density (per sq mi) 15,835 ±691 16,202 ±709 16,119 ±1,189 ▲ +284▼ −83▲ +367 ▲ +4,054▲ +4,131▲ +4,426 29/11028/11027/110
Average Neighborhood Density 11,781 12,071 11,693 ▼ −88▼ −378▲ +291

Household Size

Category Green Meadows
Average Household Size 4.21±0.30
1-Person Households 14.9% ±2.6 pp1,262 ±221
2-Person Households 16.9% ±2.9 pp1,431 ±250
3-Person Households 14.8% ±2.7 pp1,261 ±230
4+ Person Households 53.4% ±4.0 pp4,536 ±339
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Average Household Size 4.21±0.30 2.61±0.02 ▲ +1.60 2/110
1-Person Households 14.9%±2.6 pp1,262±221 31.8%±0.4 pp458,302±5,082 ▼ -17.0% 104/110
2-Person Households 16.9%±2.9 pp1,431±250 29.2%±0.4 pp419,781±5,238 ▼ -12.3% 102/110
3-Person Households 14.8%±2.7 pp1,261±230 15.5%±0.3 pp222,553±4,097 ▼ -0.6% 73/110
4+ Person Households 53.4%±4.0 pp4,536±339 23.5%±0.4 pp338,461±5,073 ▲ +29.9% 4/110
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category Green Meadows
Never Married 54.9% ±0.5 pp14,903 ±129
Married 31.6% ±1.0 pp8,573 ±264
Separated 3.3% ±0.8 pp908 ±229
Divorced 6.3% ±1.0 pp1,721 ±280
Widowed 3.8% ±1.1 pp1,040 ±304
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Never Married 54.9%±0.5 pp14,903±129 46.8%±0.2 pp1,520,630±7,726 ▲ +8.1% 17/110
Married 31.6%±1.0 pp8,573±264 38.5%±0.2 pp1,249,312±6,703 ▼ -6.9% 88/110
Separated 3.3%±0.8 pp908±229 2.3%±0.1 pp75,298±2,109 ▲ +1.0% 13/110
Divorced 6.3%±1.0 pp1,721±280 8.0%±0.1 pp260,053±4,066 ▼ -1.7% 92/110
Widowed 3.8%±1.1 pp1,040±304 4.4%±0.1 pp143,800±3,312 ▼ -0.6% 80/110
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category Green Meadows
Speak English Only 25.1% ±2.6 pp8,177 ±840
Spanish 74.1% ±3.7 pp24,158 ±1,215
Other Languages 0.9% ±0.8 pp285 ±246
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Speak English Only 25.1%±2.6 pp8,177±840 43.6%±0.3 pp1,595,910±12,698 ▼ -18.5% 96/110
Spanish 74.1%±3.7 pp24,158±1,215 39.3%±0.3 pp1,439,364±9,227 ▲ +34.8% 9/110
Other Languages 0.9%±0.8 pp285±246 NA%±0.3 pp— — -
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show
Category Green Meadows
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 52.5% ±1.1 pp52.5%±1.1 pp17,591 ±381
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 23.9% ±2.4 pp23.9%±2.4 pp8,009 ±820
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 14.9% ±1.8 pp62.3%±3.6 pp4,988 ±587
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 8.7% ±1.9 pp36.6%±6.9 pp2,933 ±629
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 47.5% ±2.3 pp198.9%±22.6 pp15,930 ±787
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 52.5%±1.1 pp52.5%±1.1 pp17,591±381 75.0%±0.4 pp75.0%±0.4 pp2,746,425±15,454 ▼ -22.5%▼ -22.5% 105/110
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 23.9%±2.4 pp23.9%±2.4 pp8,009±820 11.4%±0.2 pp11.4%±0.2 pp417,261±5,774 ▲ +12.5%▲ +12.5% 1/110
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 14.9%±1.8 pp62.3%±3.6 pp4,988±587 9.5%±0.2 pp83.3%±0.9 pp347,471±6,114 ▲ +5.4%▼ -21.0% 15/11072/110
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 8.7%±1.9 pp36.6%±6.9 pp2,933±629 4.2%±0.1 pp36.6%±0.8 pp152,518±4,020 ▲ +4.6%▲ +0.1% 8/11033/110
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 47.5%±2.3 pp198.9%±22.6 pp15,930±787 25.0%±0.3 pp219.8%±3.8 pp917,250±9,304 ▲ +22.5%▼ -20.9% 6/11054/110
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category Green Meadows
Married-Couple Households 35.2% ±3.7 pp2,988 ±314
Unmarried-Couple Households 10.2% ±2.3 pp864 ±192
One-Person Households 14.9% ±2.7 pp1,262 ±231
Other Household Types 39.8% ±7.4 pp3,376 ±625
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Married-Couple Households 35.2%±3.7 pp2,988±314 37.0%±0.3 pp531,842±3,893 ▼ -1.8% 67/110
Unmarried-Couple Households 10.2%±2.3 pp864±192 8.8%±0.2 pp125,985±2,722 ▲ +1.4% 32/110
One-Person Households 14.9%±2.7 pp1,262±231 31.8%±0.3 pp458,302±4,544 ▼ -17.0% 104/110
Other Household Types 39.8%±7.4 pp3,376±625 22.4%±0.5 pp322,968±7,912 ▲ +17.3% 6/110
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category Green Meadows
Children in Married-Couple Households 39.8% ±4.7 pp4,081 ±482
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 14.5% ±3.8 pp1,486 ±391
Children in Single-Mother Households 39.8% ±7.4 pp4,082 ±756
Children in Single-Father Households 5.9% ±2.1 pp603 ±211
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households 39.8%±4.7 pp4,081±482 60.7%±0.6 pp447,843±4,339 ▼ -20.9% 104/110
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 14.5%±3.8 pp1,486±391 10.9%±0.5 pp80,543±3,499 ▲ +3.6% 22/110
Children in Single-Mother Households 39.8%±7.4 pp4,082±756 22.7%±0.7 pp167,403±4,794 ▲ +17.1% 6/110
Children in Single-Father Households 5.9%±2.1 pp603±211 5.6%±0.3 pp41,515±2,120 ▲ +0.2% 43/110
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show
Category Green Meadows
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 1.2% ±0.4 pp1.2%±0.4 pp298 ±101
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 25.1% ±34.3 pp0.3%±0.4 pp75 ±102
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 13.8% ±26.8 pp0.2%±0.3 pp41 ±80
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 26.5% ±30.0 pp0.3%±0.4 pp79 ±89
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 9.1% ±24.9 pp0.1%±0.3 pp27 ±74
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 25.5% ±39.7 pp0.3%±0.5 pp76 ±118
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 1.2%±0.4 pp1.2%±0.4 pp298±101 2.2%±0.1 pp2.2%±0.1 pp67,714±2,153 ▼ -1.0%▼ -1.0% 95/110
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 25.1%±34.3 pp0.3%±0.4 pp75±102 25.0%±1.1 pp0.5%±0.0 pp16,948±757 ▲ +0.1%▼ -0.2% 55/11080/110
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 13.8%±26.8 pp0.2%±0.3 pp41±80 12.9%±1.0 pp0.3%±0.0 pp8,738±667 ▲ +0.9%▼ -0.1% 37/11069/110
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 26.5%±30.0 pp0.3%±0.4 pp79±89 29.1%±1.1 pp0.6%±0.0 pp19,723±754 ▼ -2.6%▼ -0.3% 64/11089/110
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 9.1%±24.9 pp0.1%±0.3 pp27±74 5.9%±0.8 pp0.1%±0.0 pp4,026±537 ▲ +3.1%0% 24/11049/110
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 25.5%±39.7 pp0.3%±0.5 pp76±118 27.0%±1.8 pp0.6%±0.0 pp18,279±1,202 ▼ -1.5%▼ -0.3% 62/11089/110
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show
Category Green Meadows
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 62.0% ±1.9 pp62.0%±1.9 pp22,244 ±694
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 38.0% ±3.0 pp38.0%±3.0 pp13,615 ±1,067
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 10.4% ±1.5 pp27.3%±3.2 pp3,723 ±521
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 27.6% ±3.0 pp72.7%±5.4 pp9,892 ±1,072
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 62.0%±1.9 pp62.0%±1.9 pp22,244±694 64.3%±0.3 pp64.3%±0.3 pp2,479,853±10,798 ▼ -2.3%▼ -2.3% 77/110
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 38.0%±3.0 pp38.0%±3.0 pp13,615±1,067 35.7%±0.3 pp35.7%±0.3 pp1,377,410±11,170 ▲ +2.3%▲ +2.3% 34/110
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 10.4%±1.5 pp27.3%±3.2 pp3,723±521 18.0%±0.2 pp50.4%±0.3 pp693,647±6,987 ▼ -7.6%▼ -23.0% 100/110103/110
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 27.6%±3.0 pp72.7%±5.4 pp9,892±1,072 17.7%±0.2 pp49.6%±0.5 pp683,763±8,715 ▲ +9.9%▲ +23.0% 11/1108/110
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show
Category Green Meadows
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 21.7%±2.9 pp57.2%±4.5 pp7,585±1,001
Born in El Salvador (of foreign-born residents) 7.0%±1.5 pp18.3%±3.6 pp2,430±539
Born in Guatemala (of foreign-born residents) 4.9%±1.3 pp12.8%±3.3 pp1,695±469
Born in Colombia (of foreign-born residents) 1.2%±1.5 pp3.2%±3.9 pp430±520
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 3.2%8.5%1,121
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows Los Angeles Difference Rank
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 21.7% ±2.9 pp57.2%±4.5 pp7,585 11.0% ±0.2 pp30.8%424,738 ▲ +10.7%▲ +26.4% 9/11010/110
Born in El Salvador (of foreign-born residents) 7.0% ±1.5 pp18.3%±3.6 pp2,430 4.1% ±0.1 pp11.6%160,004 ▲ +2.8%▲ +6.7% 20/11021/110
Born in Guatemala (of foreign-born residents) 4.9% ±1.3 pp12.8%±3.3 pp1,695 3.1% ±0.1 pp8.7%119,892 ▲ +1.7%▲ +4.1% 22/11018/110
Born in Colombia (of foreign-born residents) 1.2% ±1.5 pp3.2%±3.9 pp430 0.3% ±0.0 pp0.8%11,059 ▲ +0.9%▲ +2.4% 1/1103/110
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 3.2%8.5%1,121 ——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show
Category Green Meadows
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 8.6% ±2.4 pp22.6%±5.9 pp2,996 ±822
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 8.9% ±1.6 pp23.4%±3.6 pp3,107 ±546
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 7.5% ±1.2 pp19.8%±2.5 pp2,629 ±403
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 13.0% ±1.3 pp34.2%±1.9 pp4,529 ±465
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 8.6%±2.4 pp22.6%±5.9 pp2,996±822 8.0%±0.2 pp2319.4%±204.4 pp307,579±6,156 ▲ +0.6%▼ -2296.8% 30/11047/110
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 8.9%±1.6 pp23.4%±3.6 pp3,107±546 7.2%±0.1 pp2103.7%±184.4 pp278,968±4,987 ▲ +1.7%▼ -2080.2% 22/11015/110
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 7.5%±1.2 pp19.8%±2.5 pp2,629±403 7.6%±0.1 pp2213.7%±193.4 pp293,558±4,815 ▼ -0.1%▼ -2193.9% 51/11071/110
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 13.0%±1.3 pp34.2%±1.9 pp4,529±465 12.9%±0.1 pp3750.1%±324.8 pp497,305±5,768 ▲ +0.1%▼ -3716.0% 51/11073/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later 0.9% ±0.4 pp324 ±143 3.0% ±0.7 pp1,075 ±254 8.6% ±2.4 pp2,996 ±822 ▲ +7.6 pp▲ +2,672▲ +5.6 pp▲ +1,921▲ +2.1 pp▲ +751
Los Angeles citywide 1.7% ±0.1 pp64,948 ±2,271 5.1% ±0.1 pp202,940 ±3,998 8.0% ±0.2 pp307,579 ±6,179 ▲ +6.3 pp▲ +242,631▲ +2.9 pp▲ +104,639▲ +3.4 pp▲ +137,992
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 8.2% ±1.5 pp2,852 ±505 8.1% ±1.1 pp2,889 ±391 8.9% ±1.6 pp3,107 ±546 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +255▲ +0.8 pp▲ +218▼ −0.1 pp▲ +37
Los Angeles citywide 10.0% ±0.2 pp386,575 ±5,794 8.5% ±0.1 pp335,409 ±4,817 7.2% ±0.1 pp278,968 ±5,010 ▼ −2.8 pp▼ −107,607▼ −1.2 pp▼ −56,441▼ −1.6 pp▼ −51,166
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 8.1% ±1.1 pp2,810 ±396 8.6% ±1.1 pp3,071 ±392 7.5% ±1.2 pp2,629 ±403 ▼ −0.6 pp▼ −181▼ −1.0 pp▼ −442▲ +0.5 pp▲ +261
Los Angeles citywide 9.9% ±0.1 pp381,773 ±4,974 8.5% ±0.1 pp338,094 ±4,761 7.6% ±0.1 pp293,558 ±4,841 ▼ −2.3 pp▼ −88,215▼ −0.9 pp▼ −44,536▼ −1.4 pp▼ −43,679
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 15.3% ±1.3 pp5,306 ±466 13.3% ±1.0 pp4,751 ±365 13.0% ±1.3 pp4,529 ±465 ▼ −2.3 pp▼ −777▼ −0.3 pp▼ −222▼ −2.0 pp▼ −555
Los Angeles citywide 17.0% ±0.2 pp655,695 ±5,798 14.8% ±0.1 pp585,903 ±4,838 12.9% ±0.2 pp497,305 ±5,831 ▼ −4.1 pp▼ −158,390▼ −1.9 pp▼ −88,598▼ −2.2 pp▼ −69,792
Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category Green Meadows
Average Household Income $79,018±$5,408
Per Capita Income $20,064±$1,310
10th Percentile Household Income $10,671±$1,647
25th Percentile Household Income $24,033±$5,461
Median Household Income $61,968±$6,296
75th Percentile Household Income $116,888±$10,866
90th Percentile Household Income $172,696±$10,207
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $79,018±$5,408 $125,130±$1,000 ▼ −$46,112 93/110
Per Capita Income $20,064±$1,310 $47,685±$375 ▼ −$27,621 102/110
10th Percentile Household Income $10,671±$1,647 $14,186±$216 ▼ −$3,515 96/110
25th Percentile Household Income $24,033±$5,461 $37,123±$496 ▼ −$13,090 97/110
Median Household Income $61,968±$6,296 $81,939±$742 ▼ −$19,971 85/110
75th Percentile Household Income $116,888±$10,866 $154,703±$1,370 ▼ −$37,815 83/110
90th Percentile Household Income $172,696±$10,207 Over $200,000 ▼ −$27,304+ 92/110
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $54,678 ±2,393 $68,892 ±3,693 $79,018 ±5,408 ▲ +$24,339▲ +$10,126▲ +$14,214
Los Angeles citywide $103,745 ±722 $118,302 ±915 $125,130 ±1,000 ▲ +$21,385▲ +$6,828▲ +$14,557
Average Household Income (nominal dollars) $41,265 ±1,806 $56,147 ±3,010 $79,018 ±5,408 ▲ +$37,753▲ +$22,871▲ +$14,882
Los Angeles citywide $78,294 ±545 $96,416 ±746 $125,130 ±1,000 ▲ +$46,835▲ +$28,714▲ +$18,122
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $14,317 ±466 $18,770 ±937 $20,064 ±1,310 ▲ +$5,747▲ +$1,294▲ +$4,453
Los Angeles citywide $37,526 ±267 $43,265 ±333 $47,685 ±375 ▲ +$10,159▲ +$4,420▲ +$5,739
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars) $10,805 ±352 $15,298 ±763 $20,064 ±1,310 ▲ +$9,259▲ +$4,766▲ +$4,493
Los Angeles citywide $28,320 ±202 $35,261 ±271 $47,685 ±375 ▲ +$19,365▲ +$12,424▲ +$6,941
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $9,449 ±1,530 $13,291 ±1,306 $10,671 ±1,647 ▲ +$1,222▼ −$2,620▲ +$3,842
Los Angeles citywide $15,033 ±149 $15,850 ±169 $14,186 ±216 ▼ −$847▼ −$1,664▲ +$817
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $7,131 ±1,154 $10,832 ±1,064 $10,671 ±1,647 ▲ +$3,540▼ −$161▲ +$3,701
Los Angeles citywide $11,345 ±113 $12,918 ±138 $14,186 ±216 ▲ +$2,841▲ +$1,268▲ +$1,573
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $20,944 ±2,158 $25,933 ±2,299 $24,033 ±5,461 ▲ +$3,089▼ −$1,900▲ +$4,989
Los Angeles citywide $30,727 ±279 $35,350 ±357 $37,123 ±496 ▲ +$6,396▲ +$1,773▲ +$4,623
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $15,806 ±1,629 $21,136 ±1,874 $24,033 ±5,461 ▲ +$8,227▲ +$2,897▲ +$5,330
Los Angeles citywide $23,189 ±211 $28,810 ±291 $37,123 ±496 ▲ +$13,934▲ +$8,313▲ +$5,621
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $45,845 ±2,796 $52,627 ±3,214 $61,968 ±6,296 ▲ +$16,123▲ +$9,341▲ +$6,782
Los Angeles citywide $65,832 ±458 $76,248 ±555 $81,939 ±742 ▲ +$16,107▲ +$5,691▲ +$10,416
Median Household Income (nominal dollars) $34,598 ±2,110 $42,891 ±2,619 $61,968 ±6,296 ▲ +$27,370▲ +$19,077▲ +$8,293
Los Angeles citywide $49,682 ±346 $62,142 ±452 $81,939 ±742 ▲ +$32,257▲ +$19,797▲ +$12,460
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $76,992 ±4,862 $91,970 ±5,510 $116,888 ±10,866 ▲ +$39,896▲ +$24,918▲ +$14,978
Los Angeles citywide $127,020 ±723 $145,116 ±805 $154,703 ±1,370 ▲ +$27,684▲ +$9,587▲ +$18,097
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $58,105 ±3,669 $74,956 ±4,490 $116,888 ±10,866 ▲ +$58,784▲ +$41,932▲ +$16,851
Los Angeles citywide $95,860 ±545 $118,270 ±656 $154,703 ±1,370 ▲ +$58,844▲ +$36,433▲ +$22,410
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $116,489 ±6,378 $146,156 ±9,802 $172,696 ±10,207 ▲ +$56,207▲ +$26,541▲ +$29,667
Los Angeles citywide $221,824 ±1,731 $245,212 ±895 — ——▲ +$23,388
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $87,912 ±4,813 $119,117 ±7,988 $172,696 ±10,207 ▲ +$84,784▲ +$53,579▲ +$31,205
Los Angeles citywide $167,407 ±1,307 $199,848 ±730 — ——▲ +$32,441

Poverty Status

Category Green Meadows
Below Poverty Line 24.6% ±3.4 pp8,829 ±1,216
Below 200% Poverty Line 50.3% ±4.5 pp18,031 ±1,624
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 12.0% ±2.5 pp4,316 ±893
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Below Poverty Line 24.6%±3.4 pp8,829±1,216 16.5%±0.3 pp638,207±11,569 ▲ +8.1% 14/110
Below 200% Poverty Line 50.3%±4.5 pp18,031±1,624 34.8%±0.4 pp1,343,960±17,101 ▲ +15.4% 14/110
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 12.0%±2.5 pp4,316±893 8.0%±0.2 pp308,978±7,316 ▲ +4.0% 11/110
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Category Green Meadows
Food Insecurity 43.4%11,981
Housing Insecurity 34.6%9,561
Transportation Barriers 20.7%5,724
Threatened Utility Shutoff 16.8%4,649
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Food Insecurity 43.4%11,981 23.6%700,942 ▲ +19.8% 7/110
Housing Insecurity 34.6%9,561 19.3%573,228 ▲ +15.3% 7/110
Transportation Barriers 20.7%5,724 11.8%350,471 ▲ +8.9% 8/110
Threatened Utility Shutoff 16.8%4,649 9.0%267,308 ▲ +7.8% 8/110
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category Green Meadows
In Labor Force 75.2% ±2.7 pp10,371 ±371
↳ Employed 68.5% ±2.7 pp9,457 ±377
↳ Unemployed 6.5% ±1.7 pp895 ±233
↳ Unemployment Rate 8.6% ±2.2 pp—
Not in Labor Force 24.8% ±7.6 pp3,425 ±1,054
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
In Labor Force 75.2%±2.7 pp10,371±371 83.1%±0.2 pp1,458,393±3,960 ▼ -8.0% 103/110
↳ Employed 68.5%±2.7 pp9,457±377 76.8%±0.3 pp1,346,606±4,643 ▼ -8.2% 103/110
↳ Unemployed 6.5%±1.7 pp895±233 6.3%±0.2 pp110,332±3,016 ▲ +0.2% 44/110
↳ Unemployment Rate 8.6%±2.2 pp— 7.6%±0.2 pp132,846±3,594 ▲ +1.1% 30/110
Not in Labor Force 24.8%±7.6 pp3,425±1,054 16.9%±0.8 pp295,844±13,970 ▲ +8.0% 8/110
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category Green Meadows
Management, Business, Science & Arts 14.9% ±2.2 pp2,154 ±322
↳ Management Occupations 4.9% ±1.5 pp714 ±211
↳ Business & Financial Operations 2.1% ±1.0 pp306 ±143
↳ Computer & Mathematical 0.8% ±0.7 pp119 ±95
↳ Architecture & Engineering 0.1% ±0.5 pp11 ±75
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 0.1% ±0.5 pp12 ±75
↳ Community & Social Service 1.9% ±0.9 pp274 ±137
↳ Legal Occupations 0.6% ±0.6 pp90 ±94
↳ Education, Training & Library 3.0% ±1.1 pp441 ±162
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 0.3% ±0.5 pp46 ±77
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 0.2% ±0.5 pp28 ±75
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 0.8% ±0.7 pp112 ±97
Service 23.6% ±3.0 pp3,429 ±438
↳ Healthcare Support 5.6% ±1.5 pp805 ±218
↳ Protective Service 2.6% ±1.2 pp379 ±168
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 6.8% ±1.8 pp985 ±258
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 6.8% ±1.5 pp993 ±223
↳ Personal Care & Service 1.8% ±0.8 pp267 ±123
Sales & Office 20.8% ±3.0 pp3,023 ±434
↳ Sales & Related 9.7% ±2.2 pp1,402 ±318
↳ Office & Administrative Support 11.2% ±2.0 pp1,620 ±291
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 13.1% ±2.6 pp1,906 ±374
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.3% ±0.6 pp47 ±80
↳ Construction & Extraction 7.8% ±1.8 pp1,128 ±265
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 5.0% ±1.6 pp731 ±235
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 27.5% ±4.2 pp3,988 ±615
↳ Production Occupations 9.6% ±2.1 pp1,389 ±298
↳ Transportation Occupations 6.7% ±1.8 pp972 ±256
↳ Material Moving Occupations 11.2% ±3.3 pp1,628 ±473
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts 14.9%±2.2 pp2,154±322 43.8%±0.3 pp856,718±5,665 ▼ -29.0% 107/110
↳ Management Occupations 4.9%±1.5 pp714±211 11.0%±0.2 pp215,767±3,237 ▼ -6.1% 99/110
↳ Business & Financial Operations 2.1%±1.0 pp306±143 6.1%±0.1 pp119,779±2,742 ▼ -4.0% 100/110
↳ Computer & Mathematical 0.8%±0.7 pp119±95 2.8%±0.1 pp55,551±1,839 ▼ -2.0% 100/110
↳ Architecture & Engineering 0.1%±0.5 pp11±75 1.6%±0.1 pp31,959±1,411 ▼ -1.6% 109/110
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 0.1%±0.5 pp12±75 1.1%±0.1 pp21,801±1,140 ▼ -1.0% 104/110
↳ Community & Social Service 1.9%±0.9 pp274±137 1.8%±0.1 pp34,335±1,497 ▲ +0.1% 42/110
↳ Legal Occupations 0.6%±0.6 pp90±94 2.1%±0.1 pp40,323±1,500 ▼ -1.4% 95/110
↳ Education, Training & Library 3.0%±1.1 pp441±162 5.1%±0.1 pp100,542±2,462 ▼ -2.1% 102/110
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 0.3%±0.5 pp46±77 7.4%±0.2 pp144,867±2,938 ▼ -7.1% 110/110
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 0.2%±0.5 pp28±75 3.3%±0.1 pp64,007±2,042 ▼ -3.1% 110/110
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 0.8%±0.7 pp112±97 1.4%±0.1 pp27,787±1,316 ▼ -0.7% 88/110
Service 23.6%±3.0 pp3,429±438 19.1%±0.2 pp372,654±4,348 ▲ +4.6% 30/110
↳ Healthcare Support 5.6%±1.5 pp805±218 4.1%±0.1 pp80,369±2,120 ▲ +1.4% 22/110
↳ Protective Service 2.6%±1.2 pp379±168 1.4%±0.1 pp28,096±1,344 ▲ +1.2% 16/110
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 6.8%±1.8 pp985±258 6.0%±0.1 pp117,268±2,832 ▲ +0.8% 36/110
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 6.8%±1.5 pp993±223 4.6%±0.1 pp89,319±2,441 ▲ +2.3% 27/110
↳ Personal Care & Service 1.8%±0.8 pp267±123 2.9%±0.1 pp57,602±2,122 ▼ -1.1% 100/110
Sales & Office 20.8%±3.0 pp3,023±434 18.5%±0.2 pp362,312±4,169 ▲ +2.3% 21/110
↳ Sales & Related 9.7%±2.2 pp1,402±318 8.7%±0.2 pp170,605±3,233 ▲ +0.9% 24/110
↳ Office & Administrative Support 11.2%±2.0 pp1,620±291 9.8%±0.2 pp191,707±3,358 ▲ +1.4% 32/110
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 13.1%±2.6 pp1,906±374 7.5%±0.1 pp146,574±2,638 ▲ +5.6% 12/110
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.3%±0.6 pp47±80 0.3%±0.0 pp5,780±677 0% 33/110
↳ Construction & Extraction 7.8%±1.8 pp1,128±265 5.2%±0.1 pp101,165±2,372 ▲ +2.6% 23/110
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 5.0%±1.6 pp731±235 2.0%±0.1 pp39,629±1,434 ▲ +3.0% 2/110
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 27.5%±4.2 pp3,988±615 11.0%±0.2 pp215,668±3,737 ▲ +16.5% 3/110
↳ Production Occupations 9.6%±2.1 pp1,389±298 4.4%±0.1 pp85,463±2,595 ▲ +5.2% 8/110
↳ Transportation Occupations 6.7%±1.8 pp972±256 3.3%±0.1 pp64,837±2,015 ▲ +3.4% 8/110
↳ Material Moving Occupations 11.2%±3.3 pp1,628±473 3.3%±0.1 pp65,368±2,325 ▲ +7.9% 1/110
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category Green Meadows
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.3% ±0.5 pp39 ±79
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.3% ±0.5 pp39 ±79
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0% ±0.5 pp0
Construction 8.8% ±1.8 pp1,274 ±256
Manufacturing 9.7% ±2.0 pp1,407 ±283
Wholesale Trade 6.6% ±2.3 pp964 ±334
Retail Trade 13.1% ±2.4 pp1,896 ±347
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 11.1% ±2.0 pp1,603 ±295
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 10.9% ±2.0 pp1,584 ±297
↳ Utilities 0.1% ±0.5 pp19 ±76
Information 1.4% ±0.8 pp203 ±117
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 2.7% ±1.0 pp387 ±147
↳ Finance & Insurance 1.6% ±0.9 pp234 ±123
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.1% ±0.7 pp153 ±107
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 10.1% ±1.7 pp1,460 ±245
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 2.2% ±0.8 pp316 ±121
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.2% ±0.5 pp32 ±76
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 7.7% ±1.6 pp1,112 ±234
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 14.6% ±1.9 pp2,124 ±273
↳ Educational Services 5.4% ±1.4 pp780 ±200
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 9.3% ±1.7 pp1,344 ±248
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 11.9% ±2.1 pp1,729 ±307
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 1.9% ±0.9 pp273 ±129
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 10.0% ±1.9 pp1,456 ±275
Other Services 6.7% ±1.8 pp965 ±258
Public Administration 3.1% ±1.0 pp449 ±150
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.3%±0.5 pp39±79 0.4%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.1% 61/110
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.3%±0.5 pp39±79 0.4%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.1% 56/110
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%±0.5 pp0 0.0%±0.0 pp— 0% 30/110
Construction 8.8%±1.8 pp1,274±256 6.5%±0.1 pp— ▲ +2.3% 26/110
Manufacturing 9.7%±2.0 pp1,407±283 6.8%±0.2 pp— ▲ +2.9% 16/110
Wholesale Trade 6.6%±2.3 pp964±334 2.3%±0.1 pp— ▲ +4.3% 2/110
Retail Trade 13.1%±2.4 pp1,896±347 9.3%±0.2 pp— ▲ +3.8% 3/110
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 11.1%±2.0 pp1,603±295 5.3%±0.1 pp— ▲ +5.7% 6/110
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 10.9%±2.0 pp1,584±297 4.9%±0.1 pp— ▲ +6.0% 6/110
↳ Utilities 0.1%±0.5 pp19±76 0.4%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.2% 88/110
Information 1.4%±0.8 pp203±117 6.4%±0.2 pp— ▼ -5.0% 97/110
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 2.7%±1.0 pp387±147 5.8%±0.1 pp— ▼ -3.1% 99/110
↳ Finance & Insurance 1.6%±0.9 pp234±123 3.5%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.9% 99/110
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.1%±0.7 pp153±107 2.3%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.3% 98/110
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 10.1%±1.7 pp1,460±245 15.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -5.6% 104/110
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 2.2%±0.8 pp316±121 10.3%±0.2 pp— ▼ -8.2% 107/110
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.2%±0.5 pp32±76 0.1%±0.0 pp— ▲ +0.1% 12/110
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 7.7%±1.6 pp1,112±234 5.2%±0.1 pp— ▲ +2.5% 22/110
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 14.6%±1.9 pp2,124±273 20.8%±0.2 pp— ▼ -6.1% 105/110
↳ Educational Services 5.4%±1.4 pp780±200 8.1%±0.2 pp— ▼ -2.8% 97/110
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 9.3%±1.7 pp1,344±248 12.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -3.3% 99/110
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 11.9%±2.1 pp1,729±307 12.0%±0.2 pp— ▼ -0.1% 49/110
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 1.9%±0.9 pp273±129 4.1%±0.1 pp— ▼ -2.3% 92/110
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 10.0%±1.9 pp1,456±275 7.9%±0.2 pp— ▲ +2.2% 26/110
Other Services 6.7%±1.8 pp965±258 6.0%±0.1 pp— ▲ +0.7% 34/110
Public Administration 3.1%±1.0 pp449±150 2.7%±0.1 pp— ▲ +0.4% 34/110
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category Green Meadows
Private Company Employee 74.0% ±1.0 pp10,737 ±146
Self-Employed 11.5% ±2.0 pp1,673 ±286
Nonprofit 2.9% ±1.1 pp426 ±159
Government 11.5% ±2.0 pp1,663 ±286
Unpaid Family Worker 0.0% ±0.5 pp0
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Private Company Employee 74.0%±1.0 pp10,737±146 66.9%±0.3 pp1,307,510±5,830 ▲ +7.1% 3/110
Self-Employed 11.5%±2.0 pp1,673±286 16.2%±0.2 pp316,694±4,405 ▼ -4.7% 91/110
Nonprofit 2.9%±1.1 pp426±159 8.0%±0.2 pp155,457±3,565 ▼ -5.0% 110/110
Government 11.5%±2.0 pp1,663±286 10.6%±0.2 pp207,304±3,359 ▲ +0.9% 47/110
Unpaid Family Worker 0.0%±0.5 pp0 0.3%±0.0 pp5,059±497 ▼ -0.3% 93/110
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category Green Meadows
Full-Time, Year-Round 58.6% ±2.7 pp9,159 ±418
Part-Time or Part-Year 41.4% ±3.4 pp6,465 ±527
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round 58.6%±2.7 pp9,159±418 61.7%±0.2 pp1,328,967±3,929 ▼ -3.0% 93/110
Part-Time or Part-Year 41.4%±3.4 pp6,465±527 38.3%±0.3 pp826,047±5,840 ▲ +3.0% 18/110
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category Green Meadows
Average FT Earnings $50,378±$3,148
10th Percentile FT Earnings $22,366±$2,056
25th Percentile FT Earnings $31,476±$1,114
Median FT Earnings $40,638±$1,388
75th Percentile FT Earnings $55,916±$4,161
90th Percentile FT Earnings $86,141±$5,508
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Average FT Earnings $50,378±$3,148 $93,330±$761 ▼ −$42,952 102/110
10th Percentile FT Earnings $22,366±$2,056 $25,056±$255 ▼ −$2,690 84/110
25th Percentile FT Earnings $31,476±$1,114 $37,825±$214 ▼ −$6,349 96/110
Median FT Earnings $40,638±$1,388 $61,975±$422 ▼ −$21,337 103/110
75th Percentile FT Earnings $55,916±$4,161 Over $100,000 ▼ −$44,084+ 105/110
90th Percentile FT Earnings $86,141±$5,508 Over $100,000 ▼ −$13,859+ 103/110
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $38,973 ±1,468 $43,744 ±1,769 $50,378 ±3,148 ▲ +$11,405▲ +$6,634▲ +$4,771
Los Angeles citywide $78,876 ±537 $84,242 ±564 $93,330 ±761 ▲ +$14,455▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,367
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $29,412 ±1,108 $35,651 ±1,442 $50,378 ±3,148 ▲ +$20,966▲ +$14,727▲ +$6,239
Los Angeles citywide $59,526 ±405 $68,658 ±460 $93,330 ±761 ▲ +$33,804▲ +$24,673▲ +$9,131
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $17,741 ±1,589 $20,469 ±1,385 $22,366 ±2,056 ▲ +$4,624▲ +$1,897▲ +$2,728
Los Angeles citywide $20,202 ±88 $21,993 ±185 $25,056 ±255 ▲ +$4,854▲ +$3,063▲ +$1,791
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $13,389 ±1,199 $16,682 ±1,129 $22,366 ±2,056 ▲ +$8,976▲ +$5,683▲ +$3,293
Los Angeles citywide $15,246 ±66 $17,924 ±151 $25,056 ±255 ▲ +$9,810▲ +$7,132▲ +$2,678
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $22,809 ±780 $26,303 ±604 $31,476 ±1,114 ▲ +$8,667▲ +$5,172▲ +$3,495
Los Angeles citywide $29,363 ±173 $32,975 ±184 $37,825 ±214 ▲ +$8,461▲ +$4,850▲ +$3,611
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $17,213 ±589 $21,437 ±492 $31,476 ±1,114 ▲ +$14,262▲ +$10,039▲ +$4,224
Los Angeles citywide $22,160 ±131 $26,874 ±150 $37,825 ±214 ▲ +$15,665▲ +$10,950▲ +$4,714
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $33,421 ±1,951 $36,992 ±1,418 $40,638 ±1,388 ▲ +$7,217▲ +$3,646▲ +$3,572
Los Angeles citywide $51,909 ±336 $54,226 ±279 $61,975 ±422 ▲ +$10,067▲ +$7,750▲ +$2,317
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $25,222 ±1,472 $30,149 ±1,156 $40,638 ±1,388 ▲ +$15,416▲ +$10,489▲ +$4,927
Los Angeles citywide $39,175 ±254 $44,194 ±227 $61,975 ±422 ▲ +$22,801▲ +$17,781▲ +$5,019
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $49,575 ±2,487 $53,234 ±2,485 $55,916 ±4,161 ▲ +$6,341▲ +$2,683▲ +$3,659
Los Angeles citywide $91,403 ±620 $98,002 ±683 — ——▲ +$6,599
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $37,414 ±1,877 $43,385 ±2,026 $55,916 ±4,161 ▲ +$18,503▲ +$12,531▲ +$5,972
Los Angeles citywide $68,981 ±468 $79,872 ±557 — ——▲ +$10,891
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $70,210 ±3,902 $74,962 ±4,212 $86,141 ±5,508 ▲ +$15,930▲ +$11,179▲ +$4,751
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $52,987 ±2,944 $61,094 ±3,432 $86,141 ±5,508 ▲ +$33,154▲ +$25,047▲ +$8,107
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category Green Meadows
Average PT Earnings $22,952±$2,325
10th Percentile PT Earnings $2,574±$870
25th Percentile PT Earnings $6,926±$1,148
Median PT Earnings $16,845±$1,970
75th Percentile PT Earnings $28,696±$2,513
90th Percentile PT Earnings $45,130±$5,999
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Average PT Earnings $22,952±$2,325 $36,543±$574 ▼ −$13,591 97/110
10th Percentile PT Earnings $2,574±$870 $2,785±$92 ▼ −$212 72/110
25th Percentile PT Earnings $6,926±$1,148 $8,451±$190 ▼ −$1,525 99/110
Median PT Earnings $16,845±$1,970 $20,275±$216 ▼ −$3,430 98/110
75th Percentile PT Earnings $28,696±$2,513 $39,236±$450 ▼ −$10,540 100/110
90th Percentile PT Earnings $45,130±$5,999 $80,378±$1,643 ▼ −$35,247 101/110
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $16,946 ±1,422 $22,514 ±4,634 $22,952 ±2,325 ▲ +$6,006▲ +$438▲ +$5,568
Los Angeles citywide $30,652 ±490 $34,166 ±509 $36,543 ±574 ▲ +$5,890▲ +$2,377▲ +$3,513
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $12,789 ±1,073 $18,349 ±3,777 $22,952 ±2,325 ▲ +$10,163▲ +$4,603▲ +$5,560
Los Angeles citywide $23,133 ±369 $27,845 ±415 $36,543 ±574 ▲ +$13,410▲ +$8,698▲ +$4,712
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,587 ±235 $2,502 ±516 $2,574 ±870 ▲ +$987▲ +$72▲ +$915
Los Angeles citywide $2,482 ±54 $2,712 ±58 $2,785 ±92 ▲ +$303▲ +$73▲ +$230
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $1,197 ±177 $2,039 ±420 $2,574 ±870 ▲ +$1,376▲ +$534▲ +$842
Los Angeles citywide $1,873 ±41 $2,210 ±47 $2,785 ±92 ▲ +$912▲ +$575▲ +$337
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $4,297 ±721 $7,312 ±1,196 $6,926 ±1,148 ▲ +$2,629▼ −$386▲ +$3,015
Los Angeles citywide $7,239 ±105 $8,054 ±111 $8,451 ±190 ▲ +$1,212▲ +$397▲ +$815
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $3,243 ±544 $5,959 ±975 $6,926 ±1,148 ▲ +$3,683▲ +$966▲ +$2,716
Los Angeles citywide $5,463 ±79 $6,564 ±91 $8,451 ±190 ▲ +$2,988▲ +$1,887▲ +$1,101
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $11,913 ±1,281 $14,409 ±1,216 $16,845 ±1,970 ▲ +$4,932▲ +$2,436▲ +$2,496
Los Angeles citywide $16,086 ±129 $18,060 ±185 $20,275 ±216 ▲ +$4,189▲ +$2,215▲ +$1,973
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $8,990 ±967 $11,743 ±991 $16,845 ±1,970 ▲ +$7,854▲ +$5,102▲ +$2,753
Los Angeles citywide $12,140 ±97 $14,719 ±151 $20,275 ±216 ▲ +$8,135▲ +$5,556▲ +$2,579
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $21,260 ±1,817 $22,035 ±1,841 $28,696 ±2,513 ▲ +$7,436▲ +$6,661▲ +$775
Los Angeles citywide $33,887 ±443 $36,465 ±382 $39,236 ±450 ▲ +$5,349▲ +$2,771▲ +$2,578
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $16,044 ±1,372 $17,958 ±1,500 $28,696 ±2,513 ▲ +$12,651▲ +$10,738▲ +$1,914
Los Angeles citywide $25,574 ±335 $29,719 ±311 $39,236 ±450 ▲ +$13,662▲ +$9,517▲ +$4,145
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $41,644 ±5,180 $39,697 ±7,334 $45,130 ±5,999 ▲ +$3,487▲ +$5,434▼ −$1,947
Los Angeles citywide $68,714 ±742 $73,646 ±1,127 $80,378 ±1,643 ▲ +$11,664▲ +$6,732▲ +$4,932
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $31,428 ±3,909 $32,353 ±5,977 $45,130 ±5,999 ▲ +$13,703▲ +$12,778▲ +$925
Los Angeles citywide $51,857 ±560 $60,021 ±919 $80,378 ±1,643 ▲ +$28,521▲ +$20,356▲ +$8,164

Earnings of All Workers

Category Green Meadows
Average Earnings $37,779±$4,511
10th Percentile Earnings $6,185±$1,025
25th Percentile Earnings $17,366±$2,518
Median Earnings $32,643±$1,423
75th Percentile Earnings $47,146±$2,260
90th Percentile Earnings $74,179±$4,930
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Average Earnings $37,779±$4,511 $71,563±$569 ▼ −$33,784 103/110
10th Percentile Earnings $6,185±$1,025 $7,934±$179 ▼ −$1,749 104/110
25th Percentile Earnings $17,366±$2,518 $21,876±$191 ▼ −$4,510 102/110
Median Earnings $32,643±$1,423 $43,575±$259 ▼ −$10,932 99/110
75th Percentile Earnings $47,146±$2,260 $85,854±$580 ▼ −$38,708 102/110
90th Percentile Earnings $74,179±$4,930 Over $100,000 ▼ −$25,821+ 100/110
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $29,062 ±206 $36,391 ±1,622 $37,779 ±4,511 ▲ +$8,718▲ +$1,388▲ +$7,329
Los Angeles citywide $59,351 ±430 $65,850 ±455 $71,563 ±569 ▲ +$12,212▲ +$5,713▲ +$6,499
Average Earnings (nominal dollars) $21,932 ±155 $29,659 ±1,322 $37,779 ±4,511 ▲ +$15,847▲ +$8,121▲ +$7,726
Los Angeles citywide $44,791 ±324 $53,668 ±371 $71,563 ±569 ▲ +$26,772▲ +$17,895▲ +$8,877
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,946 ±756 $8,060 ±1,211 $6,185 ±1,025 ▲ +$2,239▼ −$1,875▲ +$4,114
Los Angeles citywide $6,842 ±104 $8,269 ±107 $7,934 ±179 ▲ +$1,091▼ −$335▲ +$1,427
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $2,978 ±570 $6,569 ±987 $6,185 ±1,025 ▲ +$3,207▼ −$384▲ +$3,591
Los Angeles citywide $5,164 ±78 $6,739 ±87 $7,934 ±179 ▲ +$2,770▲ +$1,194▲ +$1,576
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $12,689 ±1,357 $17,177 ±1,402 $17,366 ±2,518 ▲ +$4,677▲ +$189▲ +$4,488
Los Angeles citywide $17,205 ±143 $20,088 ±119 $21,876 ±191 ▲ +$4,671▲ +$1,789▲ +$2,883
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $9,576 ±1,024 $13,999 ±1,143 $17,366 ±2,518 ▲ +$7,790▲ +$3,367▲ +$4,423
Los Angeles citywide $12,984 ±108 $16,372 ±97 $21,876 ±191 ▲ +$8,892▲ +$5,505▲ +$3,387
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $23,528 ±1,087 $28,840 ±1,848 $32,643 ±1,423 ▲ +$9,115▲ +$3,802▲ +$5,312
Los Angeles citywide $35,447 ±232 $39,719 ±188 $43,575 ±259 ▲ +$8,128▲ +$3,856▲ +$4,272
Median Earnings (nominal dollars) $17,756 ±820 $23,505 ±1,506 $32,643 ±1,423 ▲ +$14,886▲ +$9,138▲ +$5,749
Los Angeles citywide $26,751 ±175 $32,371 ±154 $43,575 ±259 ▲ +$16,824▲ +$11,204▲ +$5,620
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $40,828 ±1,902 $45,993 ±2,014 $47,146 ±2,260 ▲ +$6,318▲ +$1,153▲ +$5,165
Los Angeles citywide $70,301 ±313 $76,149 ±396 $85,854 ±580 ▲ +$15,552▲ +$9,705▲ +$5,848
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $30,812 ±1,435 $37,484 ±1,641 $47,146 ±2,260 ▲ +$16,334▲ +$9,662▲ +$6,672
Los Angeles citywide $53,055 ±236 $62,062 ±323 $85,854 ±580 ▲ +$32,798▲ +$23,792▲ +$9,006
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $58,619 ±3,900 $67,733 ±3,557 $74,179 ±4,930 ▲ +$15,560▲ +$6,446▲ +$9,114
Los Angeles citywide $127,692 ±642 — — ———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $44,239 ±2,943 $55,202 ±2,899 $74,179 ±4,930 ▲ +$29,940▲ +$18,977▲ +$10,963
Los Angeles citywide $96,367 ±484 — — ———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Green Meadows, Los Angeles

Category Green Meadows
Household income at age 35 $34,156 ±$707
Household income percentile rank 35.0 ±0.51 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 4.56% ±0.45 pp
Individual income at age 35 $28,469 ±$650
Fraction married 20.3% ±0.87 pp
Employment rate 70.1% ±1.01 pp
Incarceration rate 2.84% ±0.43 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Green Meadows, Los Angeles. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Green Meadows, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Green Meadows City Difference
Household income at age 35 $34,156 ±$707 $49,434 ±$103 −$15,278
Household income percentile rank 35.0 ±0.51 pp 45.3 ±0.06 pp −10.2 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 4.56% ±0.45 pp 15.3% ±0.08 pp −10.7 pp
Individual income at age 35 $28,469 ±$650 $37,125 ±$77 −$8,655
Fraction married 20.3% ±0.87 pp 32.5% ±0.11 pp −12.2 pp
Employment rate 70.1% ±1.01 pp 72.6% ±0.10 pp −2.5 pp
Incarceration rate 2.84% ±0.43 pp 1.30% ±0.03 pp +1.5 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Green Meadows, Los Angeles. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Green Meadows, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Green Meadows, Los Angeles in Lower-Income Families

Category Green Meadows
Household income at age 35 $32,960 ±$833
Household income percentile rank 34.2 ±0.60 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 4.14% ±0.56 pp
Individual income at age 35 $27,814 ±$790
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Green Meadows, Los Angeles with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Green Meadows, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Green Meadows City Difference
Household income at age 35 $32,960 ±$833 $43,491 ±$125 −$10,531
Household income percentile rank 34.2 ±0.60 pp 41.6 ±0.08 pp −7.4 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 4.14% ±0.56 pp 10.5% ±0.10 pp −6.4 pp
Individual income at age 35 $27,814 ±$790 $33,937 ±$101 −$6,123
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Green Meadows, Los Angeles with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Green Meadows, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Green Meadows, Los Angeles

Category Green Meadows
Stayed in the greater Los Angeles area 84.1% ±0.81 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 27.4% ±0.99 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Green Meadows, Los Angeles. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Los Angeles area” means the Census commuting zone for the Los Angeles area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Green Meadows, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Green Meadows City Difference
Stayed in the greater Los Angeles area 84.1% ±0.81 pp 81.1% ±0.09 pp +3.0 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 27.4% ±0.99 pp 26.2% ±0.11 pp +1.1 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Green Meadows, Los Angeles. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Los Angeles area” means the Census commuting zone for the Los Angeles area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Green Meadows, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Green Meadows

Category Green Meadows
All jobs located in green meadows 3,524
Green Meadows jobs held by Green Meadows residents 8.8%
Green Meadows jobs held by non-Green Meadows residents 91.2%
Employed residents working in Green Meadows 2.2%
Employed residents working outside Green Meadows 97.8%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Green Meadows Los Angeles neighborhood median Difference Rank
All jobs located in green meadows 3,524 8,613 ▼ −5,089 85/110
Green Meadows jobs held by Green Meadows residents 8.8% 6.0% ▲ +2.8 pp 31/110
Green Meadows jobs held by non-Green Meadows residents 91.2% 94.0% ▼ −2.8 pp 80/110
Employed residents working in Green Meadows 2.2% 3.9% ▼ −1.6 pp 91/110
Employed residents working outside Green Meadows 97.8% 96.1% ▲ +1.6 pp 20/110
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in green meadows 2,910 2,997 3,524 ▲ +614▲ +527▲ +87
Los Angeles citywide 6,864 8,106 8,613 ▲ +1,748▲ +507▲ +1,242
Green Meadows jobs held by Green Meadows residents 6.9%161 7.7%182 8.8%254 ▲ +1.9 pp▲ +93▲ +1.1 pp▲ +72▲ +0.8 pp▲ +21
Los Angeles citywide 6.1%330 5.9%399 6.0%442 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +112▲ +0.1 pp▲ +43▼ −0.1 pp▲ +69
Green Meadows jobs held by non-Green Meadows residents 93.1%2,179 92.3%2,193 91.2%2,641 ▼ −1.9 pp▲ +462▼ −1.1 pp▲ +448▼ −0.8 pp▲ +14
Los Angeles citywide 93.9%5,659 94.1%6,750 94.0%7,065 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,406▼ −0.1 pp▲ +315▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,091
Employed residents working in Green Meadows 1.7%161 1.7%182 2.2%254 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +93▲ +0.6 pp▲ +72▼ −0.1 pp▲ +21
Los Angeles citywide 3.2%330 3.3%399 3.9%442 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +112▲ +0.5 pp▲ +43▲ +0.1 pp▲ +69
Employed residents working outside Green Meadows 98.3%9,100 98.3%10,695 97.8%11,043 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +1,943▼ −0.6 pp▲ +348▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,595
Los Angeles citywide 96.8%10,199 96.7%11,528 96.1%11,428 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,229▼ −0.5 pp▼ −100▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,329

Industry of Jobs in Green Meadows

Category Green Meadows
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0
Construction 1.8%62
Manufacturing 2.5%87
Wholesale Trade 1.0%34
Retail Trade 12.3%432
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 2.0%70
↳ Utilities 0.0%0
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 2.0%70
Information 0.0%0
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 0.6%22
↳ Finance & Insurance 0.2%8
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.4%14
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 6.2%219
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 0.3%11
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%0
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 5.9%208
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 60.1%2,118
↳ Educational Services 22.7%800
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 37.4%1,318
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 11.5%405
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.1%2
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 11.4%403
Other Services 2.1%75
Public Administration 0.0%0
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%0 0.1%1,840 ▼ -0.1% 65/110
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0 0.0%95 0% 14/110
Construction 1.8%62 2.7%53,657 ▼ -0.9% 71/110
Manufacturing 2.5%87 3.8%76,376 ▼ -1.4% 49/110
Wholesale Trade 1.0%34 3.2%63,982 ▼ -2.3% 81/110
Retail Trade 12.3%432 7.1%140,457 ▲ +5.2% 32/110
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 2.0%70 5.4%107,338 ▼ -3.4% 38/110
↳ Utilities 0.0%0 0.8%16,873 ▼ -0.8% 46/110
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 2.0%70 4.6%90,465 ▼ -2.6% 35/110
Information 0.0%0 8.3%164,692 ▼ -8.3% 104/110
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 0.6%22 5.9%116,774 ▼ -5.3% 105/110
↳ Finance & Insurance 0.2%8 3.6%70,657 ▼ -3.3% 103/110
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.4%14 2.3%46,117 ▼ -1.9% 101/110
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 6.2%219 15.1%299,443 ▼ -8.9% 83/110
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 0.3%11 8.1%160,171 ▼ -7.7% 106/110
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%0 1.1%22,328 ▼ -1.1% 81/110
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 5.9%208 5.9%116,944 0% 37/110
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 60.1%2,118 28.4%563,697 ▲ +31.7% 17/110
↳ Educational Services 22.7%800 10.0%198,161 ▲ +12.7% 12/110
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 37.4%1,318 18.4%365,536 ▲ +19.0% 25/110
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 11.5%405 11.3%224,384 ▲ +0.2% 52/110
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.1%2 2.8%54,783 ▼ -2.7% 101/110
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 11.4%403 8.5%169,601 ▲ +2.9% 35/110
Other Services 2.1%75 3.7%73,513 ▼ -1.6% 90/110
Public Administration 0.0%0 5.1%100,972 ▼ -5.1% 46/110
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%3,680 0.1%1,246 0.1%1,840 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,840– 0.0 pp▲ +594▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2,434
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 0.1%1,115 0.0%132 0.0%95 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,020– 0.0 pp▼ −37▼ −0.1 pp▼ −983
Construction 1.3%38 1.9%58 1.8%62 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +24▼ −0.2 pp▲ +4▲ +0.6 pp▲ +20
Los Angeles citywide 2.3%39,728 2.8%53,498 2.7%53,657 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +13,929▼ −0.1 pp▲ +159▲ +0.5 pp▲ +13,770
Manufacturing 4.9%143 2.7%81 2.5%87 ▼ −2.4 pp▼ −56▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6▼ −2.2 pp▼ −62
Los Angeles citywide 5.7%98,319 4.2%81,924 3.8%76,376 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −21,943▼ −0.4 pp▼ −5,548▼ −1.4 pp▼ −16,395
Wholesale Trade 2.9%85 6.9%206 1.0%34 ▼ −2.0 pp▼ −51▼ −5.9 pp▼ −172▲ +4.0 pp▲ +121
Los Angeles citywide 4.6%79,460 3.6%68,790 3.2%63,982 ▼ −1.4 pp▼ −15,478▼ −0.3 pp▼ −4,808▼ −1.0 pp▼ −10,670
Retail Trade 18.7%543 15.0%450 12.3%432 ▼ −6.4 pp▼ −111▼ −2.8 pp▼ −18▼ −3.6 pp▼ −93
Los Angeles citywide 8.7%151,141 7.5%144,707 7.1%140,457 ▼ −1.7 pp▼ −10,684▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,250▼ −1.3 pp▼ −6,434
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 1.5%44 2.2%67 2.0%70 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +26▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3▲ +0.7 pp▲ +23
Los Angeles citywide 4.8%82,152 5.8%111,689 5.4%107,338 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +25,186▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,351▲ +1.0 pp▲ +29,537
Utilities 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 0.9%16,015 1.0%18,483 0.8%16,873 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +858▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,610– 0.0 pp▲ +2,468
Transportation & Warehousing 1.5%44 2.2%67 2.0%70 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +26▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3▲ +0.7 pp▲ +23
Los Angeles citywide 3.8%66,137 4.8%93,206 4.6%90,465 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +24,328▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,741▲ +1.0 pp▲ +27,069
Information 0.4%11 0.0%0 0.0%0 ▼ −0.4 pp▼ −11– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.4 pp▼ −11
Los Angeles citywide 6.3%109,592 7.4%142,294 8.3%164,692 ▲ +1.9 pp▲ +55,100▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,398▲ +1.0 pp▲ +32,702
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 1.3%37 0.9%28 0.6%22 ▼ −0.6 pp▼ −15▼ −0.3 pp▼ −6▼ −0.3 pp▼ −9
Los Angeles citywide 6.1%104,703 5.7%110,803 5.9%116,774 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +12,071▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5,971▼ −0.3 pp▲ +6,100
Finance & Insurance 1.1%31 0.6%18 0.2%8 ▼ −0.8 pp▼ −23▼ −0.4 pp▼ −10▼ −0.5 pp▼ −13
Los Angeles citywide 3.9%67,891 3.6%69,466 3.6%70,657 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,766– 0.0 pp▲ +1,191▼ −0.3 pp▲ +1,575
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.2%6 0.3%10 0.4%14 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +8▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4
Los Angeles citywide 2.1%36,812 2.1%41,337 2.3%46,117 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +9,305▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,780– 0.0 pp▲ +4,525
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 4.6%135 1.0%30 6.2%219 ▲ +1.6 pp▲ +84▲ +5.2 pp▲ +189▼ −3.6 pp▼ −105
Los Angeles citywide 15.1%261,720 14.9%286,926 15.1%299,443 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +37,723▲ +0.2 pp▲ +12,517▼ −0.3 pp▲ +25,206
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 0.4%12 0.1%3 0.3%11 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1▲ +0.2 pp▲ +8▼ −0.3 pp▼ −9
Los Angeles citywide 7.7%132,582 7.9%153,127 8.1%160,171 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +27,589▲ +0.1 pp▲ +7,044▲ +0.3 pp▲ +20,545
Management of Companies & Enterprises 2.9%85 0.0%0 0.0%0 ▼ −2.9 pp▼ −85– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −2.9 pp▼ −85
Los Angeles citywide 1.3%22,239 1.2%22,485 1.1%22,328 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +89– 0.0 pp▼ −157▼ −0.1 pp▲ +246
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 1.3%38 0.9%27 5.9%208 ▲ +4.6 pp▲ +170▲ +5.0 pp▲ +181▼ −0.4 pp▼ −11
Los Angeles citywide 6.2%106,899 5.8%111,314 5.9%116,944 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +10,045▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5,630▼ −0.4 pp▲ +4,415
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 48.9%1,424 57.2%1,714 60.1%2,118 ▲ +11.2 pp▲ +694▲ +2.9 pp▲ +404▲ +8.3 pp▲ +290
Los Angeles citywide 24.3%420,231 26.6%513,841 28.4%563,697 ▲ +4.0 pp▲ +143,466▲ +1.8 pp▲ +49,856▲ +2.3 pp▲ +93,610
Educational Services 17.0%495 17.6%526 22.7%800 ▲ +5.7 pp▲ +305▲ +5.2 pp▲ +274▲ +0.5 pp▲ +31
Los Angeles citywide 8.2%142,243 9.1%175,456 10.0%198,161 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +55,918▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,705▲ +0.9 pp▲ +33,213
Health Care & Social Assistance 31.9%929 39.6%1,188 37.4%1,318 ▲ +5.5 pp▲ +389▼ −2.2 pp▲ +130▲ +7.7 pp▲ +259
Los Angeles citywide 16.1%277,988 17.5%338,385 18.4%365,536 ▲ +2.3 pp▲ +87,548▲ +0.9 pp▲ +27,151▲ +1.4 pp▲ +60,397
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 13.2%383 9.8%294 11.5%405 ▼ −1.7 pp▲ +22▲ +1.7 pp▲ +111▼ −3.4 pp▼ −89
Los Angeles citywide 11.2%192,754 11.7%226,802 11.3%224,384 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +31,630▼ −0.5 pp▼ −2,418▲ +0.6 pp▲ +34,048
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 3.9%113 0.0%1 0.1%2 ▼ −3.8 pp▼ −111– 0.0 pp▲ +1▼ −3.8 pp▼ −112
Los Angeles citywide 2.2%38,550 2.8%53,683 2.8%54,783 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +16,233– 0.0 pp▲ +1,100▲ +0.5 pp▲ +15,133
Accommodation & Food Services 9.3%270 9.8%293 11.4%403 ▲ +2.2 pp▲ +133▲ +1.7 pp▲ +110▲ +0.5 pp▲ +23
Los Angeles citywide 8.9%154,204 9.0%173,119 8.5%169,601 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +15,397▼ −0.4 pp▼ −3,518– 0.0 pp▲ +18,915
Other Services 2.3%67 2.3%69 2.1%75 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +8▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6– 0.0 pp▲ +2
Los Angeles citywide 3.9%66,987 3.9%75,451 3.7%73,513 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,526▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,938– 0.0 pp▲ +8,464
Public Administration 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 6.8%117,076 5.8%112,871 5.1%100,972 ▼ −1.7 pp▼ −16,104▼ −0.8 pp▼ −11,899▼ −0.9 pp▼ −4,205

Earnings of Jobs in Green Meadows

Category Green Meadows
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 15.5%546
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 46.5%1,639
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 38.0%1,339
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 15.5%546 17.0%338,004 ▼ -1.5% 59/110
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 46.5%1,639 24.2%481,403 ▲ +22.3% 10/110
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 38.0%1,339 58.8%1,167,718 ▼ -20.8% 97/110
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 48.0%1,398 30.5%915 15.5%546 ▼ −32.5 pp▼ −852▼ −15.0 pp▼ −369▼ −17.5 pp▼ −483
Los Angeles citywide 25.4%438,918 21.3%411,368 17.0%338,004 ▼ −8.4 pp▼ −100,914▼ −4.3 pp▼ −73,364▼ −4.1 pp▼ −27,550
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 32.7%953 47.8%1,432 46.5%1,639 ▲ +13.8 pp▲ +686▼ −1.3 pp▲ +207▲ +15.0 pp▲ +479
Los Angeles citywide 31.8%549,706 29.6%571,139 24.2%481,403 ▼ −7.6 pp▼ −68,303▼ −5.4 pp▼ −89,736▼ −2.2 pp▲ +21,433
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 19.2%559 21.7%650 38.0%1,339 ▲ +18.8 pp▲ +780▲ +16.3 pp▲ +689▲ +2.5 pp▲ +91
Los Angeles citywide 42.8%738,919 49.1%948,335 58.8%1,167,718 ▲ +16.0 pp▲ +428,799▲ +9.6 pp▲ +219,383▲ +6.3 pp▲ +209,416

Jobs in Green Meadows by Firm Age

Category Green Meadows
Firm age: 0–1 years 10.2%287
Firm age: 2–3 years 9.4%264
Firm age: 4–5 years 10.7%300
Firm age: 6–10 years 13.0%363
Firm age: 11 or more years 56.6%1,586
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years 10.2%287 4.8%79,474 ▲ +5.5% 19/110
Firm age: 2–3 years 9.4%264 4.9%81,545 ▲ +4.5% 29/110
Firm age: 4–5 years 10.7%300 5.1%84,624 ▲ +5.7% 12/110
Firm age: 6–10 years 13.0%363 10.7%178,740 ▲ +2.3% 53/110
Firm age: 11 or more years 56.6%1,586 74.6%1,246,700 ▼ -18.0% 85/110
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years 7.6%192 16.8%425 10.2%287 ▲ +2.6 pp▲ +95▼ −6.5 pp▼ −138▲ +9.2 pp▲ +233
Los Angeles citywide 4.7%67,567 4.9%79,034 4.8%79,474 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,907▼ −0.1 pp▲ +440▲ +0.2 pp▲ +11,467
Firm age: 2–3 years 6.9%174 8.8%222 9.4%264 ▲ +2.5 pp▲ +90▲ +0.7 pp▲ +42▲ +1.9 pp▲ +48
Los Angeles citywide 5.9%85,371 5.5%89,530 4.9%81,545 ▼ −1.0 pp▼ −3,826▼ −0.6 pp▼ −7,985▼ −0.4 pp▲ +4,159
Firm age: 4–5 years 6.4%162 7.7%194 10.7%300 ▲ +4.3 pp▲ +138▲ +3.1 pp▲ +106▲ +1.2 pp▲ +32
Los Angeles citywide 4.8%69,620 5.0%80,673 5.1%84,624 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +15,004▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,951▲ +0.2 pp▲ +11,053
Firm age: 6–10 years 21.1%531 19.2%486 13.0%363 ▼ −8.1 pp▼ −168▼ −6.2 pp▼ −123▼ −1.9 pp▼ −45
Los Angeles citywide 11.5%165,913 9.8%158,279 10.7%178,740 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +12,827▲ +0.9 pp▲ +20,461▼ −1.7 pp▼ −7,634
Firm age: 11 or more years 58.0%1,461 47.6%1,206 56.6%1,586 ▼ −1.3 pp▲ +125▲ +9.0 pp▲ +380▼ −10.4 pp▼ −255
Los Angeles citywide 73.1%1,056,355 74.9%1,212,931 74.6%1,246,700 ▲ +1.5 pp▲ +190,345▼ −0.2 pp▲ +33,769▲ +1.7 pp▲ +156,576

Jobs in Green Meadows by Firm Size

Category Green Meadows
Firm size: 0–19 employees 56.7%1,587
Firm size: 20–49 employees 5.4%151
Firm size: 50–249 employees 5.1%142
Firm size: 250–499 employees 6.8%190
Firm size: 500 or more employees 26.1%730
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees 56.7%1,587 25.4%424,713 ▲ +31.3% 15/110
Firm size: 20–49 employees 5.4%151 9.0%149,880 ▼ -3.6% 98/110
Firm size: 50–249 employees 5.1%142 13.5%224,878 ▼ -8.4% 102/110
Firm size: 250–499 employees 6.8%190 4.9%82,110 ▲ +1.9% 24/110
Firm size: 500 or more employees 26.1%730 47.2%789,502 ▼ -21.2% 70/110
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees 49.0%1,235 56.8%1,440 56.7%1,587 ▲ +7.7 pp▲ +352▼ −0.2 pp▲ +147▲ +7.8 pp▲ +205
Los Angeles citywide 25.3%365,482 24.7%400,637 25.4%424,713 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +59,231▲ +0.7 pp▲ +24,076▼ −0.6 pp▲ +35,155
Firm size: 20–49 employees 1.7%44 3.1%79 5.4%151 ▲ +3.6 pp▲ +107▲ +2.3 pp▲ +72▲ +1.4 pp▲ +35
Los Angeles citywide 10.3%149,215 9.2%149,709 9.0%149,880 ▼ −1.4 pp▲ +665▼ −0.3 pp▲ +171▼ −1.1 pp▲ +494
Firm size: 50–249 employees 11.3%286 8.9%226 5.1%142 ▼ −6.3 pp▼ −144▼ −3.9 pp▼ −84▼ −2.4 pp▼ −60
Los Angeles citywide 14.8%214,183 13.9%225,110 13.5%224,878 ▼ −1.4 pp▲ +10,695▼ −0.4 pp▼ −232▼ −0.9 pp▲ +10,927
Firm size: 250–499 employees 6.7%169 2.0%51 6.8%190 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +21▲ +4.8 pp▲ +139▼ −4.7 pp▼ −118
Los Angeles citywide 5.7%81,669 4.9%79,784 4.9%82,110 ▼ −0.7 pp▲ +441– 0.0 pp▲ +2,326▼ −0.7 pp▼ −1,885
Firm size: 500 or more employees 31.2%786 29.1%737 26.1%730 ▼ −5.1 pp▼ −56▼ −3.0 pp▼ −7▼ −2.1 pp▼ −49
Los Angeles citywide 43.9%634,277 47.2%765,207 47.2%789,502 ▲ +3.3 pp▲ +155,225– 0.0 pp▲ +24,295▲ +3.3 pp▲ +130,930

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Green Meadows
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 21.5% ±1.0 pp21.5%±1.0 pp7,698 ±373
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 90.5% ±2.5 pp19.4%±0.5 pp6,964 ±191
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 9.5% ±2.7 pp2.0%±0.6 pp734 ±207
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 21.5%±1.0 pp21.5%±1.0 pp7,698±373 13.6%±0.1 pp13.6%±0.1 pp524,758±5,328 ▲ +7.9%▲ +7.9% 5/110
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 90.5%±2.5 pp19.4%±0.5 pp6,964±191 86.8%±0.3 pp11.8%±0.0 pp455,658±1,592 ▲ +3.6%▲ +7.6% 39/1107/110
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 9.5%±2.7 pp2.0%±0.6 pp734±207 13.2%±0.4 pp1.8%±0.1 pp69,100±2,036 ▼ -3.6%▲ +0.3% 72/11039/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Green Meadows
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 6.1% ±0.8 pp6.1%±0.8 pp2,171 ±301
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 82.7% ±6.0 pp5.0%±0.4 pp1,795 ±129
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 17.3% ±5.9 pp1.0%±0.4 pp376 ±129
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 90.8% ±1.7 pp5.5%±0.1 pp1,971 ±38
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 9.2% ±5.3 pp0.6%±0.3 pp200 ±114
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 6.1%±0.8 pp6.1%±0.8 pp2,171±301 8.1%±0.1 pp8.1%±0.1 pp310,586±4,276 ▼ -2.0%▼ -2.0% 69/110
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 82.7%±6.0 pp5.0%±0.4 pp1,795±129 70.9%±0.7 pp5.7%±0.1 pp220,274±2,032 ▲ +11.8%▼ -0.7% 23/11048/110
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 17.3%±5.9 pp1.0%±0.4 pp376±129 29.1%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.0 pp90,312±1,878 ▼ -11.8%▼ -1.3% 88/11092/110
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 90.8%±1.7 pp5.5%±0.1 pp1,971±38 77.3%±0.5 pp6.2%±0.0 pp240,126±1,419 ▲ +13.5%▼ -0.7% 9/11037/110
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 9.2%±5.3 pp0.6%±0.3 pp200±114 22.7%±0.6 pp1.8%±0.0 pp70,460±1,837 ▼ -13.5%▼ -1.3% 102/110103/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category Green Meadows
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 2.5% ±1.7 pp224 ±151
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 7.2% ±4.6 pp163 ±104
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 2.5%±1.7 pp224±151 3.9%±0.3 pp— ▼ -1.4% 61/110
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 7.2%±4.6 pp163±104 4.2%±0.4 pp— ▲ +3.0% 13/110
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category Green Meadows
Owner-Occupied Households 41.6% ±3.4 pp3,473 ±282
Renter-Occupied Households 58.4% ±3.6 pp4,883 ±299
Owner-Occupied Residents 46.7% ±4.6 pp16,680 ±1,639
Renter-Occupied Residents 53.3% ±4.3 pp19,044 ±1,551
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Owner-Occupied Households 41.6%±3.4 pp3,473±282 36.0%±0.3 pp518,423±4,359 ▲ +5.5% 49/110
Renter-Occupied Households 58.4%±3.6 pp4,883±299 64.0%±0.3 pp920,674±4,643 ▼ -5.5% 62/110
Owner-Occupied Residents 46.7%±4.6 pp16,680±1,639 40.2%±0.4 pp1,509,388±15,216 ▲ +6.5% 47/110
Renter-Occupied Residents 53.3%±4.3 pp19,044±1,551 59.8%±0.4 pp2,243,250±15,217 ▼ -6.5% 64/110
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category Green Meadows
Median Year Moved In 2013±0.9 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later 3.0% ±1.4 pp257 ±123
Moved in 2020 to 2022 13.7% ±2.8 pp1,164 ±235
Moved in 2010 to 2019 45.7% ±4.6 pp3,877 ±389
Moved in 2000 to 2009 19.7% ±3.1 pp1,670 ±263
Moved in 1990 to 1999 9.2% ±2.3 pp785 ±196
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 8.7% ±2.0 pp737 ±166
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Median Year Moved In 2013±0.9 yr 2014±1.0 yr ▼ −1 40/110
Moved in 2023 or Later 3.0%±1.4 pp257±123 4.9%±0.1 pp70,211±2,138 ▼ -1.9% 70/110
Moved in 2020 to 2022 13.7%±2.8 pp1,164±235 20.6%±0.3 pp296,921±3,730 ▼ -6.9% 82/110
Moved in 2010 to 2019 45.7%±4.6 pp3,877±389 40.3%±0.3 pp580,466±4,993 ▲ +5.3% 11/110
Moved in 2000 to 2009 19.7%±3.1 pp1,670±263 16.2%±0.2 pp233,668±3,490 ▲ +3.4% 29/110
Moved in 1990 to 1999 9.2%±2.3 pp785±196 9.8%±0.2 pp140,815±2,779 ▼ -0.5% 76/110
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 8.7%±2.0 pp737±166 8.1%±0.2 pp117,016±2,469 ▲ +0.6% 61/110
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show
Category Green Meadows
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 8.0% ±2.2 pp8.0%±2.2 pp2,761 ±757
↳ Moved Within Los Angeles County (of recent movers) 6.3% ±2.1 pp79.2%±13.9 pp2,188 ±713
↳ Moved from Different California County (of recent movers) 0.8% ±0.4 pp9.4%±5.0 pp260 ±155
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 0.2% ±0.2 pp2.1%±2.2 pp59 ±63
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 0.7% ±0.6 pp9.2%±7.5 pp255 ±218
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 8.0%±2.2 pp8.0%±2.2 pp2,761±757 10.7%±0.2 pp10.7%±0.2 pp408,463±7,943 ▼ -2.7%▼ -2.7% 66/110
↳ Moved Within Los Angeles County (of recent movers) 6.3%±2.1 pp79.2%±13.9 pp2,188±713 7.4%±0.2 pp69.3%±1.2 pp283,263±7,240 ▼ -1.1%▲ +9.9% 59/11022/110
↳ Moved from Different California County (of recent movers) 0.8%±0.4 pp9.4%±5.0 pp260±155 1.2%±0.0 pp11.0%±0.4 pp45,056±1,766 ▼ -0.4%▼ -1.6% 61/11050/110
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 0.2%±0.2 pp2.1%±2.2 pp59±63 1.3%±0.1 pp12.3%±0.5 pp50,444±2,220 ▼ -1.2%▼ -10.2% 101/110106/110
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 0.7%±0.6 pp9.2%±7.5 pp255±218 0.8%±0.0 pp7.3%±0.4 pp29,700±1,624 0%▲ +2.0% 40/11033/110
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show
Category Green Meadows
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 5.7% ±1.7 pp5.7%±1.7 pp509 ±152
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 1.1% ±0.9 pp18.7%±15.0 pp95 ±82
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.1% ±0.6 pp1.4%±10.5 pp7 ±54
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.0% ±0.5 pp0.0%0
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 4.5% ±2.0 pp80.0%±26.8 pp407 ±183
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 1.9% ±1.6 pp1.9%±1.6 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 0.2% ±1.5 pp0.2%±1.5 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 5.7%±1.7 pp5.7%±1.7 pp509±152 7.4%±0.2 pp7.4%±0.2 pp115,235±3,037 ▼ -1.8%▼ -1.8% 62/110
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 1.1%±0.9 pp18.7%±15.0 pp95±82 2.9%±0.1 pp38.6%±1.2 pp44,494±1,787 ▼ -1.8%▼ -19.9% 85/11090/110
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.1%±0.6 pp1.4%±10.5 pp7±54 0.3%±0.0 pp4.0%±0.4 pp4,630±529 ▼ -0.2%▼ -2.6% 76/11074/110
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.0%±0.5 pp0.0%0 0.4%±0.0 pp5.6%±0.6 pp6,482±671 ▼ -0.4%▼ -5.6% 79/11079/110
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 4.5%±2.0 pp80.0%±26.8 pp407±183 3.8%±0.2 pp51.7%±2.8 pp59,629±3,638 ▲ +0.7%▲ +28.2% 37/11011/110
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 1.9%±1.6 pp1.9%±1.6 pp— 4.6%±0.2 pp4.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -2.7%▼ -2.7% 87/110
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 0.2%±1.5 pp0.2%±1.5 pp— 0.9%±0.1 pp0.9%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.7%▼ -0.7% 81/110
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category Green Meadows
Median Year Built 1957±3 yr
Pre-1940 22.6% ±3.2 pp2,030 ±283
1940-2009 69.9% ±4.9 pp6,281 ±441
2010+ 7.6% ±2.3 pp680 ±206
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Median Year Built 1957±3 yr 1965±1 yr ▼ −8 yrs 73/110
Pre-1940 22.6%±3.2 pp2,030±283 19.1%±0.2 pp296,223±3,073 ▲ +3.5% 51/110
1940-2009 69.9%±4.9 pp6,281±441 73.1%±0.4 pp1,136,164±6,801 ▼ -3.2% 56/110
2010+ 7.6%±2.3 pp680±206 7.8%±0.2 pp121,945±2,871 ▼ -0.3% 33/110
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category Green Meadows
Population Density 16,119 /sq mi±1,189/sq mi
Single-Family Homes 69.4% ±3.9 pp6,238 ±354
Buildings With 2–4 Units 15.9% ±2.9 pp1,430 ±261
Buildings With 5–19 Units 9.7% ±2.4 pp877 ±213
Buildings With 20 or More Units 2.7% ±1.2 pp244 ±110
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Population Density 16,119 /sq mi±1,189/sq mi 8,285 /sq mi±14/sq mi ▲ +7,834 /sq mi 27/110
Single-Family Homes 69.4%±3.9 pp6,238±354 41.9%±0.3 pp651,793±4,742 ▲ +27.4% 24/110
Buildings With 2–4 Units 15.9%±2.9 pp1,430±261 9.0%±0.2 pp140,536±2,829 ▲ +6.9% 32/110
Buildings With 5–19 Units 9.7%±2.4 pp877±213 18.4%±0.3 pp286,023±4,408 ▼ -8.7% 73/110
Buildings With 20 or More Units 2.7%±1.2 pp244±110 29.9%±0.3 pp465,391±4,691 ▼ -27.2% 103/110
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category Green Meadows
Studio 2.6% ±1.2 pp236 ±107
1 Bedroom 12.0% ±2.4 pp1,081 ±220
2 Bedrooms 39.0% ±3.5 pp3,508 ±310
3 Bedrooms 31.2% ±3.6 pp2,803 ±322
4 Bedrooms 11.6% ±2.4 pp1,041 ±218
5 or More Bedrooms 3.6% ±1.6 pp322 ±140
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Studio 2.6%±1.2 pp236±107 11.6%±0.2 pp180,439±3,649 ▼ -9.0% 101/110
1 Bedroom 12.0%±2.4 pp1,081±220 23.7%±0.2 pp367,883±3,808 ▼ -11.6% 93/110
2 Bedrooms 39.0%±3.5 pp3,508±310 30.8%±0.3 pp478,829±4,610 ▲ +8.2% 23/110
3 Bedrooms 31.2%±3.6 pp2,803±322 21.9%±0.2 pp339,889±3,797 ▲ +9.3% 28/110
4 Bedrooms 11.6%±2.4 pp1,041±218 9.1%±0.1 pp140,925±2,101 ▲ +2.5% 30/110
5 or More Bedrooms 3.6%±1.6 pp322±140 3.0%±0.1 pp46,367±1,494 ▲ +0.6% 32/110
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show
Category Green Meadows
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 24.3% ±3.7 pp24.3%±3.7 pp2,064 ±310
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 15.7% ±2.9 pp64.6%±7.1 pp1,332 ±248
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 8.6% ±2.4 pp35.4%±8.1 pp731 ±201
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 24.3%±3.7 pp24.3%±3.7 pp2,064±310 12.1%±0.2 pp12.1%±0.2 pp174,164±3,256 ▲ +12.2%▲ +12.2% 7/110
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 15.7%±2.9 pp64.6%±7.1 pp1,332±248 5.9%±0.1 pp49.1%±0.8 pp85,502±2,139 ▲ +9.7%▲ +15.5% 4/11024/109
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 8.6%±2.4 pp35.4%±8.1 pp731±201 6.2%±0.2 pp50.9%±1.1 pp88,662±2,479 ▲ +2.5%▼ -15.5% 21/11086/109
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category Green Meadows
Natural Gas Heat 53.9% ±3.7 pp4,579 ±316
Electric Heat 25.0% ±3.4 pp2,126 ±290
Other Heating Source 21.0% ±3.7 pp1,785 ±317
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Natural Gas Heat 53.9%±3.7 pp4,579±316 57.3%±0.3 pp823,973±4,848 ▼ -3.3% 82/110
Electric Heat 25.0%±3.4 pp2,126±290 34.3%±0.3 pp494,304±4,648 ▼ -9.3% 81/110
Other Heating Source 21.0%±3.7 pp1,785±317 8.4%±0.2 pp120,823±2,850 ▲ +12.6% 3/110
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show
Category Green Meadows
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 25.0% ±3.4 pp2,126 ±292
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 22.3% ±3.6 pp1,890 ±309
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 52.7% ±4.0 pp4,474 ±343
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 37.1% ±3.9 pp3,149 ±335
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 25.0%±3.4 pp2,126±292 18.4%±0.4 pp264,606±5,364 ▲ +6.7% 77/110
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 22.3%±3.6 pp1,890±309 20.5%±0.3 pp294,961±4,886 ▲ +1.8% 33/110
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 52.7%±4.0 pp4,474±343 56.5%±0.5 pp813,715±6,573 ▼ -3.8% 44/110
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 37.1%±3.9 pp3,149±335 31.1%±0.4 pp447,155±5,566 ▲ +6.0% 6/110
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category Green Meadows
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $495±$126
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,120±$75
Median Monthly Housing Costs $1,758±$84
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $2,431±$92
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $495±$126 $787±$11 ▼ −$292 103/110
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,120±$75 $1,347±$8 ▼ −$227 79/110
Median Monthly Housing Costs $1,758±$84 $2,115±$9 ▼ −$357 80/110
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $2,431±$92 Over $3,000 ▼ −$569+ 84/110
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000 Over $3,000 — 1/110
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $517 ±60 $630 ±71 $495 ±126 ▼ −$22▼ −$135▲ +$113
Los Angeles citywide $734 ±7 $763 ±8 $787 ±11 ▲ +$53▲ +$24▲ +$29
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $390 ±45 $513 ±58 $495 ±126 ▲ +$105▼ −$18▲ +$123
Los Angeles citywide $554 ±6 $622 ±7 $787 ±11 ▲ +$233▲ +$165▲ +$68
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,065 ±66 $1,194 ±54 $1,120 ±75 ▲ +$55▼ −$74▲ +$129
Los Angeles citywide $1,206 ±4 $1,299 ±6 $1,347 ±8 ▲ +$141▲ +$48▲ +$93
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $804 ±50 $973 ±44 $1,120 ±75 ▲ +$316▲ +$147▲ +$169
Los Angeles citywide $910 ±3 $1,058 ±5 $1,347 ±8 ▲ +$437▲ +$289▲ +$148
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,618 ±63 $1,742 ±56 $1,758 ±84 ▲ +$140▲ +$16▲ +$124
Los Angeles citywide $1,817 ±7 $1,985 ±7 $2,115 ±9 ▲ +$298▲ +$130▲ +$169
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,221 ±47 $1,420 ±46 $1,758 ±84 ▲ +$537▲ +$338▲ +$199
Los Angeles citywide $1,371 ±5 $1,618 ±6 $2,115 ±9 ▲ +$744▲ +$497▲ +$247
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,314 ±68 $2,326 ±54 $2,431 ±92 ▲ +$117▲ +$106▲ +$12
Los Angeles citywide — $2,970 ±11 — ———
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,746 ±52 $1,895 ±44 $2,431 ±92 ▲ +$685▲ +$536▲ +$149
Los Angeles citywide — $2,420 ±9 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $2,888 ±66 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) — $2,354 ±54 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Rent

Rent measure
Category Green Meadows
Average Rent Plus Utilities $1,727±$105
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $617±$184
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,139±$95
Median Rent Plus Utilities $1,653±$99
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,210±$124
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,810±$226
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities $1,727±$105 $2,131±$12 ▼ −$404 83/110
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $617±$184 $934±$12 ▼ −$318 98/110
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,139±$95 $1,380±$9 ▼ −$241 82/110
Median Rent Plus Utilities $1,653±$99 $1,933±$9 ▼ −$280 77/110
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,210±$124 $2,639±$17 ▼ −$429 82/110
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,810±$226 Over $3,500 ▼ −$690+ 82/110
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows
Average Rent $1,431±$84
10th Percentile Rent $360±$179
25th Percentile Rent $955±$80
Median Rent $1,383±$96
75th Percentile Rent $1,961±$119
90th Percentile Rent $2,391±$93
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Average Rent $1,431±$84 $1,927±$12 ▼ −$495 92/110
10th Percentile Rent $360±$179 $808±$12 ▼ −$448 104/110
25th Percentile Rent $955±$80 $1,217±$8 ▼ −$262 88/110
Median Rent $1,383±$96 $1,765±$8 ▼ −$382 86/110
75th Percentile Rent $1,961±$119 $2,416±$11 ▼ −$455 82/110
90th Percentile Rent $2,391±$93 $3,289±$24 ▼ −$898 90/110
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category Green Meadows
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,397±$91
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,354±$254
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,828±$183
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,406±$147
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,111±$206
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,780±$260
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,397±$91 $4,133±$34 ▼ −$1,736 98/110
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,354±$254 $1,828±$21 ▼ −$474 106/110
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,828±$183 $2,537±$17 ▼ −$709 107/110
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,406±$147 $3,497±$23 ▼ −$1,091 108/110
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,111±$206 Over $4,000 ▼ −$889+ 105/110
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,780±$260 Over $4,000 ▼ −$220+ 105/110
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,398 ±73 $2,310 ±69 $2,397 ±91 ▼ −$2▲ +$87▼ −$88
Los Angeles citywide $3,870 ±21 $3,856 ±17 $4,133 ±34 ▲ +$263▲ +$276▼ −$13
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,810 ±55 $1,883 ±56 $2,397 ±91 ▲ +$587▲ +$514▲ +$73
Los Angeles citywide $2,920 ±16 $3,143 ±14 $4,133 ±34 ▲ +$1,212▲ +$990▲ +$223
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,404 ±112 $1,374 ±124 $1,354 ±254 ▼ −$50▼ −$20▼ −$30
Los Angeles citywide $1,744 ±13 $1,827 ±19 $1,828 ±21 ▲ +$85▲ +$2▲ +$83
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,060 ±84 $1,120 ±101 $1,354 ±254 ▲ +$295▲ +$234▲ +$60
Los Angeles citywide $1,316 ±10 $1,489 ±15 $1,828 ±21 ▲ +$512▲ +$340▲ +$173
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,784 ±104 $1,785 ±111 $1,828 ±183 ▲ +$44▲ +$42▲ +$1
Los Angeles citywide $2,379 ±13 $2,448 ±17 $2,537 ±17 ▲ +$158▲ +$89▲ +$69
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,346 ±79 $1,455 ±91 $1,828 ±183 ▲ +$481▲ +$373▲ +$109
Los Angeles citywide $1,796 ±10 $1,995 ±14 $2,537 ±17 ▲ +$741▲ +$542▲ +$199
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,299 ±91 $2,214 ±75 $2,406 ±147 ▲ +$107▲ +$192▼ −$85
Los Angeles citywide $3,315 ±21 $3,342 ±16 $3,497 ±23 ▲ +$182▲ +$155▲ +$27
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,735 ±68 $1,805 ±61 $2,406 ±147 ▲ +$671▲ +$601▲ +$70
Los Angeles citywide $2,502 ±16 $2,724 ±13 $3,497 ±23 ▲ +$995▲ +$773▲ +$222
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,862 ±129 $2,760 ±133 $3,111 ±206 ▲ +$250▲ +$351▼ −$101
Los Angeles citywide — $4,663 ±31 — ———
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,160 ±97 $2,250 ±109 $3,111 ±206 ▲ +$952▲ +$862▲ +$90
Los Angeles citywide — $3,800 ±25 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,312 ±144 $3,414 ±270 $3,780 ±260 ▲ +$468▲ +$365▲ +$103
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,499 ±108 $2,783 ±220 $3,780 ±260 ▲ +$1,281▲ +$997▲ +$283
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category Green Meadows
Average Monthly Owner Costs $968±$97
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $274±$103
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $477±$170
Median Monthly Owner Costs $794±$163
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,153±$132
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs Over $1,500
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs $968±$97 $1,309±$21 ▼ −$341 65/110
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $274±$103 $456±$10 ▼ −$183 107/110
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $477±$170 $674±$10 ▼ −$197 103/110
Median Monthly Owner Costs $794±$163 $1,001±$14 ▼ −$207 80/110
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,153±$132 $1,491±$15 ▼ −$338 69/110
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs Over $1,500 Over $1,500 — 1/110
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $566 ±149 $665 ±25 $968 ±97 ▲ +$403▲ +$304▲ +$99
Los Angeles citywide $974 ±11 $1,068 ±13 $1,309 ±21 ▲ +$335▲ +$242▲ +$93
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $427 ±113 $542 ±21 $968 ±97 ▲ +$542▲ +$427▲ +$115
Los Angeles citywide $735 ±8 $870 ±11 $1,309 ±21 ▲ +$574▲ +$439▲ +$135
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $289 ±71 $337 ±81 $274 ±103 ▼ −$15▼ −$63▲ +$48
Los Angeles citywide $372 ±7 $397 ±7 $456 ±10 ▲ +$84▲ +$59▲ +$25
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $218 ±54 $275 ±66 $274 ±103 ▲ +$56▼ −$1▲ +$57
Los Angeles citywide $281 ±5 $323 ±6 $456 ±10 ▲ +$176▲ +$133▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $409 ±53 $414 ±59 $477 ±170 ▲ +$69▲ +$64▲ +$5
Los Angeles citywide $544 ±7 $586 ±8 $674 ±10 ▲ +$130▲ +$88▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $308 ±40 $337 ±48 $477 ±170 ▲ +$169▲ +$140▲ +$29
Los Angeles citywide $410 ±5 $478 ±6 $674 ±10 ▲ +$264▲ +$196▲ +$68
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $522 ±66 $586 ±99 $794 ±163 ▲ +$272▲ +$208▲ +$64
Los Angeles citywide $806 ±11 $880 ±10 $1,001 ±14 ▲ +$195▲ +$121▲ +$74
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $394 ±50 $478 ±80 $794 ±163 ▲ +$400▲ +$316▲ +$83
Los Angeles citywide $608 ±8 $717 ±8 $1,001 ±14 ▲ +$393▲ +$284▲ +$109
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $688 ±94 $792 ±179 $1,153 ±132 ▲ +$465▲ +$360▲ +$104
Los Angeles citywide — $1,304 ±17 $1,491 ±15 —▲ +$187—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $519 ±71 $646 ±146 $1,153 ±132 ▲ +$634▲ +$507▲ +$127
Los Angeles citywide — $1,062 ±14 $1,491 ±15 —▲ +$428—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $1,111 ±346 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — $905 ±282 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Home Values

Category Green Meadows
Average Home Value $605,942±$83,631
10th Percentile Home Value $408,065±$133,181
25th Percentile Home Value $470,575±$20,467
Median Home Value $579,426±$20,945
75th Percentile Home Value $690,113±$16,762
90th Percentile Home Value $790,527±$64,385
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Average Home Value $605,942±$83,631 $1,264,542±$8,234 ▼ −$658,601 97/110
10th Percentile Home Value $408,065±$133,181 $459,299±$5,965 ▼ −$51,233 84/110
25th Percentile Home Value $470,575±$20,467 $653,300±$4,641 ▼ −$182,725 103/110
Median Home Value $579,426±$20,945 $921,200±$4,782 ▼ −$341,774 106/110
75th Percentile Home Value $690,113±$16,762 $1,397,000±$18,800 ▼ −$706,887 109/110
90th Percentile Home Value $790,527±$64,385 Over $2,000,000 ▼ −$1,209,473+ 109/110
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $323,412 ±30,371 $432,512 ±20,486 $605,942 ±83,631 ▲ +$282,530▲ +$173,430▲ +$109,100
Los Angeles citywide $824,079 ±6,442 $1,055,784 ±9,073 $1,264,542 ±8,234 ▲ +$440,464▲ +$208,758▲ +$231,705
Average Home Value (nominal dollars) $244,073 ±22,921 $352,498 ±16,696 $605,942 ±83,631 ▲ +$361,868▲ +$253,444▲ +$108,424
Los Angeles citywide $621,919 ±4,862 $860,465 ±7,394 $1,264,542 ±8,234 ▲ +$642,624▲ +$404,077▲ +$238,547
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $148,747 ±12,723 $250,212 ±47,364 $408,065 ±133,181 ▲ +$259,318▲ +$157,853▲ +$101,465
Los Angeles citywide $274,172 ±2,766 $388,878 ±2,619 $459,299 ±5,965 ▲ +$185,126▲ +$70,421▲ +$114,706
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $112,257 ±9,602 $203,923 ±38,602 $408,065 ±133,181 ▲ +$295,808▲ +$204,142▲ +$91,666
Los Angeles citywide $206,913 ±2,087 $316,936 ±2,134 $459,299 ±5,965 ▲ +$252,385▲ +$142,362▲ +$110,023
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $218,560 ±11,160 $330,086 ±16,287 $470,575 ±20,467 ▲ +$252,015▲ +$140,489▲ +$111,525
Los Angeles citywide $413,153 ±2,182 $543,435 ±2,444 $653,300 ±4,641 ▲ +$240,147▲ +$109,865▲ +$130,281
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $164,944 ±8,422 $269,020 ±13,274 $470,575 ±20,467 ▲ +$305,631▲ +$201,555▲ +$104,076
Los Angeles citywide $311,800 ±1,647 $442,900 ±1,992 $653,300 ±4,641 ▲ +$341,500▲ +$210,400▲ +$131,100
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $299,630 ±14,882 $418,765 ±14,314 $579,426 ±20,945 ▲ +$279,795▲ +$160,661▲ +$119,134
Los Angeles citywide $601,311 ±2,870 $781,471 ±2,656 $921,200 ±4,782 ▲ +$319,889▲ +$139,729▲ +$180,160
Median Home Value (nominal dollars) $226,126 ±11,231 $341,294 ±11,666 $579,426 ±20,945 ▲ +$353,299▲ +$238,132▲ +$115,168
Los Angeles citywide $453,800 ±2,166 $636,900 ±2,165 $921,200 ±4,782 ▲ +$467,400▲ +$284,300▲ +$183,100
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $401,192 ±23,054 $516,321 ±24,309 $690,113 ±16,762 ▲ +$288,922▲ +$173,793▲ +$115,129
Los Angeles citywide $957,885 ±4,252 $1,163,924 ±5,481 $1,397,000 ±18,800 ▲ +$439,115▲ +$233,076▲ +$206,040
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $302,773 ±17,398 $420,802 ±19,812 $690,113 ±16,762 ▲ +$387,341▲ +$269,311▲ +$118,029
Los Angeles citywide $722,900 ±3,209 $948,600 ±4,467 $1,397,000 ±18,800 ▲ +$674,100▲ +$448,400▲ +$225,700
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $506,772 ±18,078 $624,093 ±59,382 $790,527 ±64,385 ▲ +$283,755▲ +$166,434▲ +$117,322
Los Angeles citywide — $2,103,035 ±25,625 — ———
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $382,452 ±13,643 $508,637 ±48,396 $790,527 ±64,385 ▲ +$408,074▲ +$281,890▲ +$126,185
Los Angeles citywide — $1,713,977 ±20,884 — ———

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show
Category Green Meadows
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 15.5%15.5%1,390
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 11.2%72.4%1,007
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 1.5%9.6%134
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 2.8%17.8%247
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.1%1
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 15.5%15.5%1,390 5.5%5.5%84,827 ▲ +10.0%▲ +10.0% 7/110
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 11.2%72.4%1,007 3.5%64.0%54,313 ▲ +7.7%▲ +8.4% 8/11054/107
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 1.5%9.6%134 0.4%7.1%6,040 ▲ +1.1%▲ +2.5% 8/11010/107
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 2.8%17.8%247 1.4%25.1%21,260 ▲ +1.4%▼ -7.3% 14/11054/107
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.1%1 0.2%3.8%3,214 ▼ -0.2%▼ -3.7% 52/11059/107
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units 16.6%1,476 16.7%1,531 15.5%1,390 ▼ −1.1 pp▼ −86▼ −1.2 pp▼ −141▲ +0.1 pp▲ +55
Los Angeles citywide 5.6%79,280 5.5%82,357 5.5%84,827 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5,547▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,470– 0.0 pp▲ +3,077
Housing Choice Vouchers 11.9%1,058 12.2%1,122 11.2%1,007 ▼ −0.7 pp▼ −51▼ −1.0 pp▼ −115▲ +0.3 pp▲ +64
Los Angeles citywide 3.4%47,994 3.4%50,854 3.5%54,313 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +6,319▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,459– 0.0 pp▲ +2,860
Public Housing 1.4%124 1.4%132 1.5%134 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2– 0.0 pp▲ +8
Los Angeles citywide 0.5%7,024 0.5%7,038 0.4%6,040 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −984▼ −0.1 pp▼ −998– 0.0 pp▲ +14
Project-Based Section 8 3.3%294 3.0%277 2.7%247 ▼ −0.6 pp▼ −47▼ −0.3 pp▼ −30▼ −0.3 pp▼ −17
Los Angeles citywide 1.5%21,053 1.4%21,190 1.4%21,260 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +207▼ −0.1 pp▲ +70▼ −0.1 pp▲ +137
Other Project-Based Programs 0.0%0 0.0%1 0.0%1 – 0.0 pp▲ +1– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▲ +1
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%3,209 0.2%3,275 0.2%3,214 – 0.0 pp▲ +5– 0.0 pp▼ −61– 0.0 pp▲ +66
Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category Green Meadows
Average Household Income $26,667
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $715
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,694
Below 30% of Area Median Income 78.9%947
With Children 45.7%549
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 34.2%411
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $26,667 $20,771 ▲ +$5,896 7/101
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $715 $532 ▲ +$183 6/101
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,694 $1,653 ▲ +$41 66/101
Below 30% of Area Median Income 78.9%947 88.0%66,617 ▼ -9.1 pp 93/101
With Children 45.7%549 20.0%15,140 ▲ +25.7 pp 2/101
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 34.2%411 43.0%32,551 ▼ -8.8 pp 75/101
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income $14,884 $18,796 $26,654 ▲ +$11,770▲ +$7,859▲ +$3,911
Los Angeles citywide $14,082 $16,770 $20,771 ▲ +$6,689▲ +$4,001▲ +$2,688
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $422 $502 $715 ▲ +$292▲ +$213▲ +$80
Los Angeles citywide $372 $432 $532 ▲ +$160▲ +$100▲ +$60
Average Monthly Government Spending $806 $1,001 $1,697 ▲ +$890▲ +$696▲ +$194
Los Angeles citywide $795 $1,013 $1,653 ▲ +$858▲ +$640▲ +$218
Below 30% of Area Median Income 81.0%— 79.8%— 78.9%— ▼ −2.0 pp—▼ −0.9 pp—▼ −1.1 pp—
Los Angeles citywide 84.0%— 85.0%— 88.0%— ▲ +4.0 pp—▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children — — 45.8%— ——————
Los Angeles citywide — — 20.0%— ——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 33.5%— 34.8%— 34.2%— ▲ +0.6 pp—▼ −0.6 pp—▲ +1.2 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category Green Meadows
Total Tree Canopy 6.6%92 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 79.5%1,113 acres
Natural Open Surfaces 14.0%195 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Total Tree Canopy 6.6%92 acres 15.3%46,226 acres ▼ -8.7% 83/110
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 79.5%1,113 acres 56.2%170,078 acres ▲ +23.2% 36/110
Natural Open Surfaces 14.0%195 acres 28.5%86,111 acres ▼ -14.5% 61/110
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category Green Meadows
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 8.2% ±3.3 pp2,940 ±1,199
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 51.6% ±4.6 pp18,504 ±1,666
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 40.2% ±4.4 pp14,414 ±1,581
Heat Exposed 0.0%0
Homes Without Air Conditioning 37.8%13,539
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. Heat Exposed is the share of residents living in census tracts the Census Bureau flagged as exposed to extreme heat in 2022. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates; neither those nor the heat exposure figures have a margin of error, as with CDC PLACES data.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 8.2%±3.3 pp2,940±1,199 19.5%±0.3 pp751,543±13,280 ▼ -11.3% 109/110
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 51.6%±4.6 pp18,504±1,666 47.6%±0.4 pp1,834,233±16,767 ▲ +4.0% 16/110
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 40.2%±4.4 pp14,414±1,581 33.0%±0.4 pp1,271,488±15,545 ▲ +7.2% 23/110
Heat Exposed 0.0%0 52.6%2,030,766 ▼ -52.6% 59/110
Homes Without Air Conditioning 37.8%13,539 19.5%751,358 ▲ +18.3% 12/110
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. Heat Exposed is the share of residents living in census tracts the Census Bureau flagged as exposed to extreme heat in 2022. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates; neither those nor the heat exposure figures have a margin of error, as with CDC PLACES data.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category Green Meadows
Drove Alone 72.9% ±3.3 pp9,660 ±442
Carpooled 12.1% ±3.0 pp1,604 ±397
Public Transit 8.4% ±2.1 pp1,110 ±278
Walked 2.3% ±1.1 pp300 ±143
Bikes 0.0% ±0.4 pp0
Other Commute Mode 4.0% ±1.8 pp530 ±243
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Drove Alone 72.9%±3.3 pp9,660±442 74.3%±0.1 pp1,409,806±2,191 ▼ -1.4% 84/110
Carpooled 12.1%±3.0 pp1,604±397 10.8%±0.2 pp204,995±4,626 ▲ +1.3% 38/110
Public Transit 8.4%±2.1 pp1,110±278 7.6%±0.2 pp144,003±3,960 ▲ +0.8% 35/110
Walked 2.3%±1.1 pp300±143 4.0%±0.1 pp75,140±2,786 ▼ -1.7% 61/110
Bikes 0.0%±0.4 pp0 0.7%±0.1 pp13,831±1,185 ▼ -0.7% 96/110
Other Commute Mode 4.0%±1.8 pp530±243 2.6%±0.1 pp49,004±2,073 ▲ +1.4% 12/110
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category Green Meadows
Average Commute Time (minutes) 34 min±1.0 min
Less Than 15 Minutes 8.3% ±2.1 pp1,069 ±266
15–29 Minutes 35.0% ±4.4 pp4,497 ±570
30–44 Minutes 30.0% ±2.6 pp3,856 ±339
45–59 Minutes 10.9% ±2.2 pp1,406 ±278
60 Minutes or More 15.8% ±2.7 pp2,026 ±343
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes) 34 min±1.0 min 31 min±0.2 min ▲ +3 min 15/110
Less Than 15 Minutes 8.3%±2.1 pp1,069±266 15.9%±0.3 pp241,948±4,532 ▼ -7.5% 98/110
15–29 Minutes 35.0%±4.4 pp4,497±570 33.1%±0.3 pp504,776±4,959 ▲ +1.9% 41/110
30–44 Minutes 30.0%±2.6 pp3,856±339 28.9%±0.3 pp440,595±5,010 ▲ +1.1% 40/110
45–59 Minutes 10.9%±2.2 pp1,406±278 10.3%±0.2 pp156,750±2,883 ▲ +0.7% 44/110
60 Minutes or More 15.8%±2.7 pp2,026±343 11.9%±0.2 pp182,392±3,293 ▲ +3.8% 16/110
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category Green Meadows
Average Vehicles per Household 1.91±0.14
Households With No Vehicle 10.5% ±2.2 pp892 ±187
Households With 1 Vehicle 30.9% ±3.7 pp2,626 ±318
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 58.6% ±4.9 pp4,972 ±412
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Average Vehicles per Household 1.91±0.14 1.61±0.01 ▲ +0.30 20/110
Households With No Vehicle 10.5%±2.2 pp892±187 11.9%±0.2 pp171,011±3,141 ▼ -1.4% 44/110
Households With 1 Vehicle 30.9%±3.7 pp2,626±318 40.0%±0.3 pp575,741±4,305 ▼ -9.1% 90/110
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 58.6%±4.9 pp4,972±412 48.1%±0.4 pp692,345±5,259 ▲ +10.4% 30/110
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Green Meadows Residents Work

Category Green Meadows
Downtown 6.8%893
Westchester 3.7%485
Green Meadows 2.8%367
Westlake 1.9%246
Harbor Gateway 1.5%194
All other city neighborhoods 21.1%2,755
Outside the city 62.1%8,102
Long Beach city, CA 2.9%375
Carson city, CA 2.6%343
Torrance city, CA 2.6%337
Culver City city, CA 2.5%324
Vernon city, CA 1.7%224
All other California locations 49.3%6,425
Out of state 0.6%74
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 38 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Green Meadows
Downtown 6.8%893
Westchester 3.7%485
Green Meadows 2.8%367
Westlake 1.9%246
Harbor Gateway 1.5%194
All other city neighborhoods 21.1%2,755
Outside the city 62.1%8,102
Long Beach city, CA 2.9%375
Carson city, CA 2.6%343
Torrance city, CA 2.6%337
Culver City city, CA 2.5%324
Vernon city, CA 1.7%224
All other California locations 49.3%6,425
Out of state 0.6%74
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 38 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Downtown 8.1%852 7.2%893 6.8%893 ▼ −1.3 pp▲ +41▼ −0.3 pp– 0▼ −0.9 pp▲ +41
Los Angeles citywide 6.5%101,766 6.3%110,069 5.7%102,316 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +550▼ −0.5 pp▼ −7,753▼ −0.3 pp▲ +8,303
Westchester 4.2%438 4.6%569 3.7%485 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +47▼ −0.8 pp▼ −84▲ +0.4 pp▲ +131
Los Angeles citywide 1.4%21,788 1.5%25,847 1.2%22,324 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +536▼ −0.2 pp▼ −3,523▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,059
Green Meadows 2.4%250 2.3%282 2.8%367 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +117▲ +0.6 pp▲ +85▼ −0.1 pp▲ +32
Los Angeles citywide 0.1%1,256 0.1%1,276 0.1%1,543 – 0.0 pp▲ +287– 0.0 pp▲ +267– 0.0 pp▲ +20
Westlake 1.9%195 2.0%247 1.9%246 – 0.0 pp▲ +51▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1▲ +0.1 pp▲ +52
Los Angeles citywide 1.6%24,683 1.5%26,401 1.5%26,369 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,686– 0.0 pp▼ −32▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,718
Harbor Gateway 1.5%155 1.6%194 1.5%194 – 0.0 pp▲ +39▼ −0.1 pp– 0▲ +0.1 pp▲ +39
Los Angeles citywide 0.4%5,864 0.4%6,469 0.4%6,804 – 0.0 pp▲ +940– 0.0 pp▲ +335– 0.0 pp▲ +605
All other city neighborhoods 21.1%2,217 21.1%2,624 21.1%2,755 – 0.0 pp▲ +538▲ +0.1 pp▲ +131– 0.0 pp▲ +407
Los Angeles citywide 29.3%458,023 29.5%518,759 30.0%536,497 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +78,474▲ +0.5 pp▲ +17,738▲ +0.2 pp▲ +60,736
Outside the city 60.9%6,405 61.4%7,655 62.1%8,102 ▲ +1.2 pp▲ +1,697▲ +0.7 pp▲ +447▲ +0.5 pp▲ +1,250
Los Angeles citywide 49.2%770,441 48.8%858,729 49.1%878,687 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +108,246▲ +0.4 pp▲ +19,958▼ −0.5 pp▲ +88,288
Long Beach city, CA 2.5%259 2.7%340 2.9%375 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +116▲ +0.1 pp▲ +35▲ +0.3 pp▲ +81
Los Angeles citywide 1.2%18,697 1.0%18,143 1.1%18,953 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +256– 0.0 pp▲ +810▼ −0.2 pp▼ −554
Carson city, CA 2.7%279 2.8%343 2.6%343 – 0.0 pp▲ +64▼ −0.1 pp– 0▲ +0.1 pp▲ +64
Los Angeles citywide 0.6%9,514 0.6%10,433 0.6%11,120 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,606– 0.0 pp▲ +687– 0.0 pp▲ +919
Torrance city, CA 2.3%246 2.3%287 2.6%337 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +91▲ +0.3 pp▲ +50– 0.0 pp▲ +41
Los Angeles citywide 1.2%18,642 1.2%20,677 1.1%19,569 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +927▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,108– 0.0 pp▲ +2,035
Culver City city, CA 1.4%150 1.7%213 2.5%324 ▲ +1.1 pp▲ +174▲ +0.8 pp▲ +111▲ +0.3 pp▲ +63
Los Angeles citywide 2.1%32,497 1.8%31,673 1.8%33,021 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +524– 0.0 pp▲ +1,348▼ −0.3 pp▼ −824
Vernon city, CA 1.8%187 2.0%252 1.7%224 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +37▼ −0.3 pp▼ −28▲ +0.2 pp▲ +65
Los Angeles citywide 0.7%10,748 0.6%10,312 0.5%9,507 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,241▼ −0.1 pp▼ −805▼ −0.1 pp▼ −436
All other California locations 48.8%5,133 49.1%6,118 49.3%6,425 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +1,292▲ +0.2 pp▲ +307▲ +0.3 pp▲ +985
Los Angeles citywide 31.0%485,821 29.7%523,763 30.3%541,371 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +55,550▲ +0.5 pp▲ +17,608▼ −1.3 pp▲ +37,942
Out of state 0.9%95 0.7%83 0.6%74 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −21▼ −0.1 pp▼ −9▼ −0.2 pp▼ −12
Los Angeles citywide 0.8%12,591 0.9%15,245 0.9%15,599 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,008– 0.0 pp▲ +354▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,654

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Green Meadows

Category Green Meadows
Green Meadows 10.4%367
Broadway-Manchester 2.4%86
Watts 2.3%82
Florence 1.8%63
Boyle Heights 1.2%44
All other city neighborhoods 25.6%901
Outside the city 56.2%1,981
Long Beach city, CA 3.4%121
Compton city, CA 2.6%93
South Gate city, CA 2.0%70
Downey city, CA 1.8%65
Florence-Graham CDP, CA 1.8%64
All other California locations 43.9%1,548
Out of state 0.6%20
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 38; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Green Meadows
Green Meadows 10.4%367
Broadway-Manchester 2.4%86
Watts 2.3%82
Florence 1.8%63
Boyle Heights 1.2%44
All other city neighborhoods 25.6%901
Outside the city 56.2%1,981
Long Beach city, CA 3.4%121
Compton city, CA 2.6%93
South Gate city, CA 2.0%70
Downey city, CA 1.8%65
Florence-Graham CDP, CA 1.8%64
All other California locations 43.9%1,548
Out of state 0.6%20
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 38; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Green Meadows 8.6%250 9.4%282 10.4%367 ▲ +1.8 pp▲ +117▲ +1.0 pp▲ +85▲ +0.8 pp▲ +32
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%4,107 0.2%4,809 0.2%4,940 – 0.0 pp▲ +833– 0.0 pp▲ +131– 0.0 pp▲ +702
Broadway-Manchester 2.5%72 3.3%99 2.4%86 – 0.0 pp▲ +14▼ −0.9 pp▼ −13▲ +0.8 pp▲ +27
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%3,185 0.2%4,126 0.2%4,073 – 0.0 pp▲ +888– 0.0 pp▼ −53– 0.0 pp▲ +941
Watts 2.8%81 2.2%65 2.3%82 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +1▲ +0.2 pp▲ +17▼ −0.6 pp▼ −16
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%4,270 0.3%5,189 0.3%5,327 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,057– 0.0 pp▲ +138– 0.0 pp▲ +919
Florence 2.0%58 2.0%61 1.8%63 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +5▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2– 0.0 pp▲ +3
Los Angeles citywide 0.3%6,037 0.4%7,120 0.4%7,271 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,234– 0.0 pp▲ +151– 0.0 pp▲ +1,083
Boyle Heights 0.8%24 1.2%35 1.2%44 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +20▲ +0.1 pp▲ +9▲ +0.3 pp▲ +11
Los Angeles citywide 0.7%12,694 0.8%14,959 0.8%15,205 – 0.0 pp▲ +2,511– 0.0 pp▲ +246– 0.0 pp▲ +2,265
All other city neighborhoods 26.2%762 24.1%723 25.6%901 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +139▲ +1.4 pp▲ +178▼ −2.1 pp▼ −39
Los Angeles citywide 32.8%567,333 33.2%640,964 32.5%645,360 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +78,027▼ −0.7 pp▲ +4,396▲ +0.4 pp▲ +73,631
Outside the city 56.8%1,654 57.4%1,721 56.2%1,981 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +327▼ −1.2 pp▲ +260▲ +0.6 pp▲ +67
Los Angeles citywide 54.0%933,111 53.3%1,028,920 54.2%1,077,964 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +144,853▲ +1.0 pp▲ +49,044▼ −0.7 pp▲ +95,809
Long Beach city, CA 2.9%85 3.0%89 3.4%121 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +36▲ +0.5 pp▲ +32– 0.0 pp▲ +4
Los Angeles citywide 1.6%27,846 1.6%31,795 1.6%32,231 – 0.0 pp▲ +4,385– 0.0 pp▲ +436– 0.0 pp▲ +3,949
Compton city, CA 3.3%96 2.6%78 2.6%93 ▼ −0.7 pp▼ −3– 0.0 pp▲ +15▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18
Los Angeles citywide 0.5%7,965 0.5%9,845 0.5%9,749 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,784– 0.0 pp▼ −96– 0.0 pp▲ +1,880
South Gate city, CA 1.8%53 2.0%61 2.0%70 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +17– 0.0 pp▲ +9▲ +0.2 pp▲ +8
Los Angeles citywide 0.5%8,640 0.5%9,700 0.5%9,989 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,349– 0.0 pp▲ +289– 0.0 pp▲ +1,060
Downey city, CA 1.2%36 1.6%48 1.8%65 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +29▲ +0.2 pp▲ +17▲ +0.4 pp▲ +12
Los Angeles citywide 0.6%9,977 0.6%11,064 0.6%11,661 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,684– 0.0 pp▲ +597– 0.0 pp▲ +1,087
Florence-Graham CDP, CA 1.6%46 1.8%54 1.8%64 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +18– 0.0 pp▲ +10▲ +0.2 pp▲ +8
Los Angeles citywide 0.4%6,310 0.4%7,523 0.4%7,971 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,661– 0.0 pp▲ +448– 0.0 pp▲ +1,213
Lynwood city, CA 1.5%44 1.7%52 1.8%64 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +20▲ +0.1 pp▲ +12▲ +0.2 pp▲ +8
Los Angeles citywide 0.3%5,441 0.3%6,252 0.3%6,427 – 0.0 pp▲ +986– 0.0 pp▲ +175– 0.0 pp▲ +811
All other California locations 44.0%1,280 45.4%1,361 43.9%1,548 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +268▼ −1.5 pp▲ +187▲ +1.4 pp▲ +81
Los Angeles citywide 42.9%741,882 42.0%811,195 42.9%852,367 – 0.0 pp▲ +110,485▲ +0.9 pp▲ +41,172▼ −0.9 pp▲ +69,313
Out of state 0.5%14 0.7%20 0.6%20 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +6▼ −0.1 pp– 0▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6
Los Angeles citywide 0.7%12,235 0.9%18,318 1.4%27,218 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +14,983▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,900▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,083

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category Green Meadows
No Computer or Smartphone 3.4% ±1.3 pp291 ±114
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 14.7% ±3.0 pp1,245 ±254
Desktop or Laptop Available 62.0% ±3.7 pp5,266 ±316
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
No Computer or Smartphone 3.4%±1.3 pp291±114 3.6%±0.1 pp51,208±2,038 ▼ -0.1% 52/110
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 14.7%±3.0 pp1,245±254 9.4%±0.2 pp134,973±3,565 ▲ +5.3% 26/110
Desktop or Laptop Available 62.0%±3.7 pp5,266±316 81.8%±0.3 pp1,177,551±4,293 ▼ -19.8% 108/110
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category Green Meadows
Has Internet Access 93.5% ±2.4 pp7,935 ±206
Cellular Data Plan Only 14.6% ±2.9 pp1,237 ±248
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 1.8% ±1.0 pp153 ±88
No Internet Access 6.5% ±2.0 pp555 ±169
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Has Internet Access 93.5%±2.4 pp7,935±206 94.6%±0.2 pp1,361,126±2,605 ▼ -1.1% 78/110
Cellular Data Plan Only 14.6%±2.9 pp1,237±248 11.8%±0.2 pp169,117±3,594 ▲ +2.8% 29/110
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 1.8%±1.0 pp153±88 1.9%±0.1 pp27,326±1,276 ▼ -0.1% 48/110
No Internet Access 6.5%±2.0 pp555±169 5.4%±0.2 pp77,971±2,871 ▲ +1.1% 33/110
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category Green Meadows
Uninsured Residents 15.4% ±1.7 pp5,536 ±614
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 5.8% ±1.8 pp2,063 ±630
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 22.2% ±3.0 pp7,962 ±1,066
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 4.2% ±3.0 pp1,495 ±1,061
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Uninsured Residents 15.4%±1.7 pp5,536±614 9.5%±0.1 pp364,737±5,658 ▲ +6.0% 10/110
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 5.8%±1.8 pp2,063±630 3.3%±0.2 pp125,674±9,529 ▲ +2.5% 12/110
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 22.2%±3.0 pp7,962±1,066 13.1%±0.2 pp506,732±8,090 ▲ +9.1% 11/110
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 4.2%±3.0 pp1,495±1,061 1.9%±0.2 pp72,725±8,443 ▲ +2.3% 9/110
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category Green Meadows
Insured (Any Coverage) 84.6% ±1.7 pp30,307 ±614
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 18.4% ±1.4 pp6,589 ±508
Direct-Purchase Insurance 2.7% ±0.8 pp975 ±278
Medicare 8.3% ±1.5 pp2,978 ±523
Medicaid 56.8% ±1.6 pp20,353 ±583
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.0% ±0.4 pp11 ±147
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 4.3% ±0.9 pp1,527 ±329
Uninsured 15.4% ±1.7 pp5,533 ±614
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Insured (Any Coverage) 84.6%±1.7 pp30,307±614 90.5%±0.2 pp3,468,249±6,113 ▼ -6.0% 101/110
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 18.4%±1.4 pp6,589±508 40.6%±0.3 pp1,556,236±11,598 ▼ -22.2% 108/110
Direct-Purchase Insurance 2.7%±0.8 pp975±278 11.5%±0.2 pp439,171±6,009 ▼ -8.7% 103/110
Medicare 8.3%±1.5 pp2,978±523 13.1%±0.2 pp502,686±5,846 ▼ -4.8% 105/110
Medicaid 56.8%±1.6 pp20,353±583 30.1%±0.2 pp1,152,695±9,490 ▲ +26.7% 6/110
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.0%±0.4 pp11±147 0.2%±0.0 pp8,178±741 ▼ -0.2% 85/110
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 4.3%±0.9 pp1,527±329 4.2%±0.1 pp160,627±3,851 ▲ +0.1% 62/110
Uninsured 15.4%±1.7 pp5,533±614 9.5%±0.2 pp362,202±6,113 ▲ +6.0% 10/110
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category Green Meadows
Adults With at Least One Disability 16.0% ±1.7 pp3,936 ±421
Mobility Disability 9.6% ±1.4 pp2,356 ±347
Hearing Disability 2.9% ±0.8 pp714 ±206
Vision Disability 3.9% ±0.9 pp963 ±233
Cognitive Disability 4.7% ±1.1 pp1,145 ±274
Self-Care Disability 4.6% ±1.1 pp1,141 ±280
Independent Living Disability 8.1% ±1.5 pp1,990 ±360
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability 16.0%±1.7 pp3,936±421 13.4%±0.2 pp413,424±4,833 ▲ +2.6% 23/110
Mobility Disability 9.6%±1.4 pp2,356±347 7.1%±0.1 pp220,306±3,715 ▲ +2.5% 18/110
Hearing Disability 2.9%±0.8 pp714±206 3.0%±0.1 pp92,708±2,400 ▼ -0.1% 61/110
Vision Disability 3.9%±0.9 pp963±233 2.7%±0.1 pp83,292±2,320 ▲ +1.2% 20/110
Cognitive Disability 4.7%±1.1 pp1,145±274 5.1%±0.1 pp158,649±3,239 ▼ -0.5% 66/110
Self-Care Disability 4.6%±1.1 pp1,141±280 3.4%±0.1 pp104,391±2,633 ▲ +1.3% 21/110
Independent Living Disability 8.1%±1.5 pp1,990±360 6.1%±0.1 pp187,616±3,478 ▲ +2.0% 19/110
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category Green Meadows
Arthritis 19.3%5,315
High Blood Pressure 32.4%8,944
Cancer 3.5%958
Current Asthma 10.8%2,979
Coronary Heart Disease 5.6%1,558
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 6.4%1,762
Diabetes 15.7%4,326
High Cholesterol 34.4%9,507
Obesity 35.5%9,790
Stroke 4.1%1,133
Lost All Natural Teeth 2.5%686
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Arthritis 19.3%5,315 18.8%558,377 ▲ +0.5% 47/110
High Blood Pressure 32.4%8,944 28.8%855,387 ▲ +3.6% 15/110
Cancer 3.5%958 5.4%160,385 ▼ -1.9% 103/110
Current Asthma 10.8%2,979 9.4%279,189 ▲ +1.4% 11/110
Coronary Heart Disease 5.6%1,558 5.0%148,505 ▲ +0.6% 30/110
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 6.4%1,762 4.9%145,535 ▲ +1.5% 13/110
Diabetes 15.7%4,326 11.9%353,441 ▲ +3.8% 15/110
High Cholesterol 34.4%9,507 35.2%1,045,473 ▼ -0.8% 79/110
Obesity 35.5%9,790 27.3%810,835 ▲ +8.2% 9/110
Stroke 4.1%1,133 3.1%92,073 ▲ +1.0% 12/110
Lost All Natural Teeth 2.5%686 1.9%55,491 ▲ +0.6% 28/110
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category Green Meadows
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 14.5%4,016
Current Cigarette Smoking 17.1%4,734
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 38.3%10,576
Short Sleep Duration 42.3%11,683
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 14.5%4,016 15.9%472,245 ▼ -1.4% 85/110
Current Cigarette Smoking 17.1%4,734 11.9%353,441 ▲ +5.2% 8/110
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 38.3%10,576 26.5%787,075 ▲ +11.8% 9/110
Short Sleep Duration 42.3%11,683 36.5%1,084,084 ▲ +5.8% 9/110
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category Green Meadows
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 38.2%10,559
Frequent Physical Distress 19.2%5,308
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 38.2%10,559 25.1%745,493 ▲ +13.1% 7/110
Frequent Physical Distress 19.2%5,308 14.4%427,693 ▲ +4.8% 7/110
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category Green Meadows
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 67.8%18,729
Routine Checkup in Past Year 68.1%18,806
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 77.7%21,456
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 44.3%12,223
Dental Visit in Past Year 44.2%12,194
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 71.0%19,607
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 67.8%18,729 69.3%2,058,274 ▼ -1.5% 79/110
Routine Checkup in Past Year 68.1%18,806 70.5%2,093,916 ▼ -2.4% 99/110
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 77.7%21,456 83.0%2,465,177 ▼ -5.3% 101/110
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 44.3%12,223 54.0%1,603,850 ▼ -9.7% 104/110
Dental Visit in Past Year 44.2%12,194 58.9%1,749,385 ▼ -14.7% 103/110
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 71.0%19,607 74.8%2,221,630 ▼ -3.8% 94/110
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category Green Meadows
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 21.0%5,804
Frequent Mental Distress 21.4%5,911
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 38.2%10,558
Loneliness 46.8%12,925
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Green Meadows City Difference Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 21.0%5,804 20.4%605,899 ▲ +0.6% 32/110
Frequent Mental Distress 21.4%5,911 17.4%516,796 ▲ +4.0% 9/110
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 38.2%10,558 31.2%926,669 ▲ +7.0% 6/110
Loneliness 46.8%12,925 41.3%1,226,648 ▲ +5.5% 7/110
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Compare All Neighborhoods