Silver Lake, Los Angeles Demographics, Housing & Census Data

Silver Lake, Los Angeles Census and ACS demographic tables: population, race, age, income, poverty, rent, housing types, single-family homes, commute, education, internet access, health insurance, and disability.

Silver Lake, Los Angeles

Silver Lake
Los Angeles
Population
29,404
Overlapping council districts Overlap means that a council district contains part of this neighborhood.
4, 13
Population Density
10,798 /sq mi
Average Geographic Mismatch Error : 0.39 p.p. Geographic mismatch error comes from Census geographic boundaries not perfectly aligning with neighborhood boundaries. We can test how much mismatch error skews neighborhood statistics for a subset of variables. For this neighborhood , the average error is 0.39 percentage points. More detail is available on the neighborhood geography page , and the methodology page explains geographic mismatch error in more detail.
One-page summary

Silver Lake at a Glance

Time period?Historical estimates use this profile's current boundaries, held constant across periods; they do not reflect the boundaries that were in effect at the time. Comparing
Values as
Show as
Add to every table
Showing Chart vs. Los Angeles ± Margin of error

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category Silver Lake
Hispanic 23.2% ±2.1 pp6,829 ±616
White 52.0% ±2.7 pp15,295 ±787
Black 2.7% ±0.9 pp806 ±254
Asian 13.5% ±1.9 pp3,955 ±572
Other or Multi-racial 8.6% ±1.9 pp2,518 ±549
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Hispanic 23.2%±2.1 pp6,829±616 47.2%±0.2 pp1,820,397±8,107 ▼ -24.0% 71/110
White 52.0%±2.7 pp15,295±787 28.1%±0.2 pp1,082,393±7,330 ▲ +24.0% 31/110
Black 2.7%±0.9 pp806±254 8.1%±0.1 pp311,633±4,801 ▼ -5.3% 86/110
Asian 13.5%±1.9 pp3,955±572 11.9%±0.1 pp460,422±5,784 ▲ +1.5% 38/110
Other or Multi-racial 8.6%±1.9 pp2,518±549 4.7%±0.1 pp182,418±4,965 ▲ +3.8% 13/110
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Age Distribution

Category Silver Lake
Under 5 4.9% ±1.2 pp1,444 ±355
5-17 7.4% ±1.2 pp2,184 ±342
18-24 3.2% ±0.8 pp930 ±242
25-44 43.8% ±2.2 pp12,873 ±632
45-64 27.0% ±2.1 pp7,943 ±619
65-74 7.9% ±1.2 pp2,317 ±346
75-84 3.9% ±0.8 pp1,137 ±244
85+ 2.0% ±0.6 pp576 ±167
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Under 5 4.9%±1.2 pp1,444±355 5.0%±0.1 pp193,588±3,896 ▼ -0.1% 60/110
5-17 7.4%±1.2 pp2,184±342 14.1%±0.1 pp545,575±5,332 ▼ -6.7% 100/110
18-24 3.2%±0.8 pp930±242 9.5%±0.1 pp364,975±4,663 ▼ -6.3% 109/110
25-44 43.8%±2.2 pp12,873±632 32.7%±0.2 pp1,261,487±6,490 ▲ +11.1% 9/110
45-64 27.0%±2.1 pp7,943±619 24.4%±0.1 pp942,048±5,660 ▲ +2.6% 24/110
65-74 7.9%±1.2 pp2,317±346 8.4%±0.1 pp323,245±3,923 ▼ -0.5% 75/110
75-84 3.9%±0.8 pp1,137±244 4.0%±0.1 pp153,663±2,663 ▼ -0.1% 66/110
85+ 2.0%±0.6 pp576±167 1.9%±0.1 pp72,682±2,184 ▲ +0.1% 53/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category Silver Lake
No High School Diploma 7.6% ±1.4 pp1,887 ±347
High School Diploma or GED 9.4% ±1.4 pp2,329 ±340
Some College or Associate's Degree 17.6% ±2.0 pp4,383 ±506
Bachelor's Degree 43.6% ±2.6 pp10,843 ±640
Graduate Degree 21.8% ±2.3 pp5,422 ±575
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
No High School Diploma 7.6%±1.4 pp1,887±347 20.4%±0.2 pp560,441±5,727 ▼ -12.8% 73/110
High School Diploma or GED 9.4%±1.4 pp2,329±340 18.5%±0.2 pp509,870±5,784 ▼ -9.2% 86/110
Some College or Associate's Degree 17.6%±2.0 pp4,383±506 22.7%±0.2 pp624,064±5,974 ▼ -5.0% 90/110
Bachelor's Degree 43.6%±2.6 pp10,843±640 24.9%±0.2 pp684,319±5,857 ▲ +18.8% 5/110
Graduate Degree 21.8%±2.3 pp5,422±575 13.6%±0.2 pp374,431±4,485 ▲ +8.2% 33/110
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category Silver Lake
Total Population 29,404 ±1,406
Total Households 14,511 ±627
Population Density 10,798 ±516 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake Average Neighborhood Difference
Total Population 29,404 35,102 ▼ −5,698
Total Households 14,511 13,096 ▲ +1,415
Population Density 10,798 people/sq mi 11,693 people/sq mi ▼ −895
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average neighborhood rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large neighborhoods. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category 2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19 Difference Rank
Total Population 30,451 ±1,187 29,978 ±1,073 29,404 ±1,406 ▼ −1,047 ±1,840▼ −574 ±1,769▼ −473 ±1,600 ▼ −4,707▼ −6,120▼ −5,698 55/11058/11057/110
Average Neighborhood 35,158 36,098 35,102 ▼ −56▼ −997▲ +940
Total Households 13,788 ±363 13,742 ±395 14,511 ±627 ▲ +723 ±724▲ +769 ±741▼ −46 ±537 ▲ +1,687▲ +1,148▲ +1,415 38/11044/11040/110
Average Neighborhood 12,101 12,594 13,096 ▲ +995▲ +502▲ +493
Population Density (per sq mi) 11,182 ±436 11,008 ±394 10,798 ±516 ▼ −384▼ −211▼ −174 ▼ −599▼ −1,063▼ −895 51/11056/11055/110
Average Neighborhood Density 11,781 12,071 11,693 ▼ −88▼ −378▲ +291

Household Size

Category Silver Lake
Average Household Size 2.01±0.10
1-Person Households 41.3% ±2.6 pp5,995 ±380
2-Person Households 35.1% ±2.9 pp5,092 ±420
3-Person Households 15.0% ±2.2 pp2,177 ±323
4+ Person Households 8.6% ±1.6 pp1,246 ±230
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Average Household Size 2.01±0.10 2.61±0.02 ▼ −0.60 96/110
1-Person Households 41.3%±2.6 pp5,995±380 31.8%±0.4 pp458,302±5,082 ▲ +9.5% 21/110
2-Person Households 35.1%±2.9 pp5,092±420 29.2%±0.4 pp419,781±5,238 ▲ +5.9% 22/110
3-Person Households 15.0%±2.2 pp2,177±323 15.5%±0.3 pp222,553±4,097 ▼ -0.5% 70/110
4+ Person Households 8.6%±1.6 pp1,246±230 23.5%±0.4 pp338,461±5,073 ▼ -14.9% 101/110
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category Silver Lake
Never Married 51.4% ±2.6 pp13,566 ±674
Married 36.5% ±1.8 pp9,634 ±482
Separated 1.7% ±1.0 pp443 ±270
Divorced 7.0% ±1.2 pp1,840 ±322
Widowed 3.5% ±0.9 pp925 ±229
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Never Married 51.4%±2.6 pp13,566±674 46.8%±0.2 pp1,520,630±7,726 ▲ +4.6% 35/110
Married 36.5%±1.8 pp9,634±482 38.5%±0.2 pp1,249,312±6,703 ▼ -2.0% 65/110
Separated 1.7%±1.0 pp443±270 2.3%±0.1 pp75,298±2,109 ▼ -0.6% 76/110
Divorced 7.0%±1.2 pp1,840±322 8.0%±0.1 pp260,053±4,066 ▼ -1.0% 81/110
Widowed 3.5%±0.9 pp925±229 4.4%±0.1 pp143,800±3,312 ▼ -0.9% 87/110
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category Silver Lake
Speak English Only 68.8% ±2.4 pp19,170 ±655
Spanish 17.4% ±2.2 pp4,852 ±620
Tagalog (incl. Filipino) 3.2% ±1.0 pp898 ±266
Other Indo-European 2.7% ±1.1 pp748 ±314
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese) 1.7% ±0.6 pp471 ±174
Other Asian and Pacific Island 1.6% ±0.6 pp442 ±168
Other Languages 1.2% ±0.6 pp338 ±170
French, Haitian, or Cajun 1.2% ±0.6 pp328 ±163
German or Other West Germanic 1.2% ±0.4 pp325 ±125
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic 1.1% ±0.6 pp300 ±169
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Speak English Only 68.8%±2.4 pp19,170±655 43.6%±0.3 pp1,595,910±12,698 ▲ +25.2% 22/110
Spanish 17.4%±2.2 pp4,852±620 39.3%±0.3 pp1,439,364±9,227 ▼ -21.9% 71/110
Tagalog (incl. Filipino) 3.2%±1.0 pp898±266 2.3%±0.1 pp85,207±3,084 ▲ +0.9% 25/63
Other Indo-European 2.7%±1.1 pp748±314 5.3%±0.2 pp192,760±5,783 ▼ -2.6% 61/78
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese) 1.7%±0.6 pp471±174 1.7%±0.1 pp62,141±2,430 0% 37/58
Other Asian and Pacific Island 1.6%±0.6 pp442±168 1.3%±0.1 pp48,809±2,136 ▲ +0.3% 36/59
Other Languages 1.2%±0.6 pp338±170 1.0%±0.1 pp36,540±2,239 ▲ +0.2% 100/110
French, Haitian, or Cajun 1.2%±0.6 pp328±163 0.7%±0.1 pp24,287±1,876 ▲ +0.5% 30/35
German or Other West Germanic 1.2%±0.4 pp325±125 0.4%±0.0 pp12,879±1,364 ▲ +0.8% 12/13
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic 1.1%±0.6 pp300±169 1.3%±0.1 pp46,460±2,679 ▼ -0.2% 46/47
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show
Category Silver Lake
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 90.1% ±1.5 pp90.1%±1.5 pp25,180 ±419
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 5.5% ±1.2 pp5.5%±1.2 pp1,547 ±330
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 3.5% ±1.0 pp62.6%±12.3 pp969 ±281
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 0.9% ±0.8 pp17.1%±13.7 pp264 ±220
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 9.9% ±1.7 pp179.7%±49.2 pp2,780 ±476
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 90.1%±1.5 pp90.1%±1.5 pp25,180±419 75.0%±0.4 pp75.0%±0.4 pp2,746,425±15,454 ▲ +15.1%▲ +15.1% 26/110
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 5.5%±1.2 pp5.5%±1.2 pp1,547±330 11.4%±0.2 pp11.4%±0.2 pp417,261±5,774 ▼ -5.9%▼ -5.9% 87/110
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 3.5%±1.0 pp62.6%±12.3 pp969±281 9.5%±0.2 pp83.3%±0.9 pp347,471±6,114 ▼ -6.0%▼ -20.6% 81/11069/110
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 0.9%±0.8 pp17.1%±13.7 pp264±220 4.2%±0.1 pp36.6%±0.8 pp152,518±4,020 ▼ -3.2%▼ -19.5% 75/11069/110
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 9.9%±1.7 pp179.7%±49.2 pp2,780±476 25.0%±0.3 pp219.8%±3.8 pp917,250±9,304 ▼ -15.1%▼ -40.1% 85/11070/110
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category Silver Lake
Married-Couple Households 28.9% ±2.5 pp4,190 ±356
Unmarried-Couple Households 13.6% ±2.3 pp1,974 ±329
One-Person Households 41.3% ±3.6 pp5,996 ±516
Other Household Types 16.2% ±6.9 pp2,352 ±995
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Married-Couple Households 28.9%±2.5 pp4,190±356 37.0%±0.3 pp531,842±3,893 ▼ -8.1% 90/110
Unmarried-Couple Households 13.6%±2.3 pp1,974±329 8.8%±0.2 pp125,985±2,722 ▲ +4.8% 4/110
One-Person Households 41.3%±3.6 pp5,996±516 31.8%±0.3 pp458,302±4,544 ▲ +9.5% 21/110
Other Household Types 16.2%±6.9 pp2,352±995 22.4%±0.5 pp322,968±7,912 ▼ -6.2% 85/110
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category Silver Lake
Children in Married-Couple Households 69.7% ±4.7 pp2,448 ±166
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 8.8% ±4.0 pp308 ±142
Children in Single-Mother Households 16.0% ±4.9 pp563 ±172
Children in Single-Father Households 5.5% ±6.1 pp195 ±215
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households 69.7%±4.7 pp2,448±166 60.7%±0.6 pp447,843±4,339 ▲ +8.9% 50/110
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 8.8%±4.0 pp308±142 10.9%±0.5 pp80,543±3,499 ▼ -2.1% 51/110
Children in Single-Mother Households 16.0%±4.9 pp563±172 22.7%±0.7 pp167,403±4,794 ▼ -6.7% 66/110
Children in Single-Father Households 5.5%±6.1 pp195±215 5.6%±0.3 pp41,515±2,120 ▼ -0.1% 51/110
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show
Category Silver Lake
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 2.8% ±1.2 pp2.8%±1.2 pp722 ±302
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 28.0% ±16.7 pp0.8%±0.5 pp202 ±120
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 28.4% ±32.6 pp0.8%±0.9 pp205 ±236
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 20.2% ±11.0 pp0.6%±0.3 pp146 ±80
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 8.2% ±10.2 pp0.2%±0.3 pp60 ±73
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 15.1% ±16.5 pp0.4%±0.5 pp109 ±119
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 2.8%±1.2 pp2.8%±1.2 pp722±302 2.2%±0.1 pp2.2%±0.1 pp67,714±2,153 ▲ +0.6%▲ +0.6% 29/110
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 28.0%±16.7 pp0.8%±0.5 pp202±120 25.0%±1.1 pp0.5%±0.0 pp16,948±757 ▲ +3.0%▲ +0.2% 45/11021/110
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 28.4%±32.6 pp0.8%±0.9 pp205±236 12.9%±1.0 pp0.3%±0.0 pp8,738±667 ▲ +15.5%▲ +0.5% 7/1104/110
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 20.2%±11.0 pp0.6%±0.3 pp146±80 29.1%±1.1 pp0.6%±0.0 pp19,723±754 ▼ -8.9%▼ -0.1% 84/11059/110
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 8.2%±10.2 pp0.2%±0.3 pp60±73 5.9%±0.8 pp0.1%±0.0 pp4,026±537 ▲ +2.3%▲ +0.1% 28/11026/110
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 15.1%±16.5 pp0.4%±0.5 pp109±119 27.0%±1.8 pp0.6%±0.0 pp18,279±1,202 ▼ -11.9%▼ -0.2% 97/11076/110
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show
Category Silver Lake
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 77.2% ±2.0 pp77.2%±2.0 pp22,713 ±603
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 22.8% ±2.1 pp22.8%±2.1 pp6,691 ±631
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 14.3% ±1.7 pp62.7%±4.3 pp4,194 ±488
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 8.5% ±1.5 pp37.3%±5.7 pp2,497 ±449
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 77.2%±2.0 pp77.2%±2.0 pp22,713±603 64.3%±0.3 pp64.3%±0.3 pp2,479,853±10,798 ▲ +13.0%▲ +13.0% 20/110
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 22.8%±2.1 pp22.8%±2.1 pp6,691±631 35.7%±0.3 pp35.7%±0.3 pp1,377,410±11,170 ▼ -13.0%▼ -13.0% 91/110
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 14.3%±1.7 pp62.7%±4.3 pp4,194±488 18.0%±0.2 pp50.4%±0.3 pp693,647±6,987 ▼ -3.7%▲ +12.3% 81/11038/110
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 8.5%±1.5 pp37.3%±5.7 pp2,497±449 17.7%±0.2 pp49.6%±0.5 pp683,763±8,715 ▼ -9.2%▼ -12.3% 84/11073/110
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show
Category Silver Lake
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 3.3%±0.7 pp14.3%±2.5 pp954±192
Born in Philippines (of foreign-born residents) 3.1%±0.8 pp13.7%±3.3 pp913±236
Born in El Salvador (of foreign-born residents) 3.0%±1.0 pp13.1%±4.3 pp875±299
Born in United Kingdom (of foreign-born residents) 1.0%±0.5 pp4.6%±2.2 pp306±152
Born in Canada (of foreign-born residents) 1.0%±0.5 pp4.4%±2.1 pp293±142
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 10.7%47.1%3,140
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake Los Angeles Difference Rank
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 3.3% ±0.7 pp14.3%±2.5 pp954 11.0% ±0.2 pp30.8%424,738 ▼ -7.8%▼ -16.5% 79/11071/110
Born in Philippines (of foreign-born residents) 3.1% ±0.8 pp13.7%±3.3 pp913 2.3% ±0.1 pp6.4%88,183 ▲ +0.8%▲ +7.3% 25/1109/110
Born in El Salvador (of foreign-born residents) 3.0% ±1.0 pp13.1%±4.3 pp875 4.1% ±0.1 pp11.6%160,004 ▼ -1.2%▲ +1.5% 53/11039/110
Born in United Kingdom (of foreign-born residents) 1.0% ±0.5 pp4.6%±2.2 pp306 0.4% ±0.0 pp1.2%17,019 ▲ +0.6%▲ +3.4% 18/11018/110
Born in Canada (of foreign-born residents) 1.0% ±0.5 pp4.4%±2.1 pp293 0.4% ±0.0 pp1.0%13,959 ▲ +0.6%▲ +3.4% 15/11016/110
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 10.7%47.1%3,140 ——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show
Category Silver Lake
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 4.9% ±1.3 pp21.7%±5.5 pp1,444 ±384
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 3.6% ±0.8 pp15.7%±3.4 pp1,046 ±245
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 3.6% ±0.6 pp15.7%±2.4 pp1,044 ±181
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 10.7% ±1.5 pp47.0%±5.3 pp3,133 ±440
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 4.9%±1.3 pp21.7%±5.5 pp1,444±384 8.0%±0.2 pp4613.5%±395.8 pp307,579±6,156 ▼ -3.0%▼ -4591.8% 80/11054/110
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 3.6%±0.8 pp15.7%±3.4 pp1,046±245 7.2%±0.1 pp4184.3%±357.0 pp278,968±4,987 ▼ -3.7%▼ -4168.6% 91/11080/110
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 3.6%±0.6 pp15.7%±2.4 pp1,044±181 7.6%±0.1 pp4403.1%±374.4 pp293,558±4,815 ▼ -4.0%▼ -4387.5% 99/110103/110
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 10.7%±1.5 pp47.0%±5.3 pp3,133±440 12.9%±0.1 pp7459.2%±628.3 pp497,305±5,768 ▼ -2.2%▼ -7412.2% 73/11019/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later 1.0% ±0.4 pp301 ±136 2.9% ±0.7 pp878 ±200 4.9% ±1.3 pp1,444 ±384 ▲ +3.9 pp▲ +1,143▲ +2.0 pp▲ +566▲ +1.9 pp▲ +577
Los Angeles citywide 1.7% ±0.1 pp64,948 ±2,271 5.1% ±0.1 pp202,940 ±3,998 8.0% ±0.2 pp307,579 ±6,179 ▲ +6.3 pp▲ +242,631▲ +2.9 pp▲ +104,639▲ +3.4 pp▲ +137,992
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 5.4% ±1.0 pp1,626 ±313 3.4% ±0.7 pp1,013 ±203 3.6% ±0.8 pp1,046 ±245 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −580▲ +0.2 pp▲ +33▼ −2.0 pp▼ −613
Los Angeles citywide 10.0% ±0.2 pp386,575 ±5,794 8.5% ±0.1 pp335,409 ±4,817 7.2% ±0.1 pp278,968 ±5,010 ▼ −2.8 pp▼ −107,607▼ −1.2 pp▼ −56,441▼ −1.6 pp▼ −51,166
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 5.0% ±0.9 pp1,524 ±259 4.2% ±0.8 pp1,285 ±229 3.6% ±0.6 pp1,044 ±181 ▼ −1.5 pp▼ −480▼ −0.7 pp▼ −241▼ −0.8 pp▼ −239
Los Angeles citywide 9.9% ±0.1 pp381,773 ±4,974 8.5% ±0.1 pp338,094 ±4,761 7.6% ±0.1 pp293,558 ±4,841 ▼ −2.3 pp▼ −88,215▼ −0.9 pp▼ −44,536▼ −1.4 pp▼ −43,679
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 16.2% ±1.6 pp4,903 ±470 13.3% ±1.3 pp4,008 ±394 10.7% ±1.5 pp3,133 ±440 ▼ −5.5 pp▼ −1,770▼ −2.6 pp▼ −875▼ −2.9 pp▼ −895
Los Angeles citywide 17.0% ±0.2 pp655,695 ±5,798 14.8% ±0.1 pp585,903 ±4,838 12.9% ±0.2 pp497,305 ±5,831 ▼ −4.1 pp▼ −158,390▼ −1.9 pp▼ −88,598▼ −2.2 pp▼ −69,792
Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category Silver Lake
Average Household Income $178,062±$18,027
Per Capita Income $88,558±$8,683
10th Percentile Household Income $25,371±$4,499
25th Percentile Household Income $59,316±$4,695
Median Household Income $116,704±$7,505
75th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000
90th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $178,062±$18,027 $125,130±$1,000 ▲ +$52,933 25/110
Per Capita Income $88,558±$8,683 $47,685±$375 ▲ +$40,873 18/110
10th Percentile Household Income $25,371±$4,499 $14,186±$216 ▲ +$11,185 16/110
25th Percentile Household Income $59,316±$4,695 $37,123±$496 ▲ +$22,193 22/110
Median Household Income $116,704±$7,505 $81,939±$742 ▲ +$34,765 26/110
75th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000 $154,703±$1,370 ▲ +$45,297+ 1/110
90th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000 Over $200,000 — 1/110
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $130,119 ±8,027 $156,058 ±9,656 $178,062 ±18,027 ▲ +$47,944▲ +$22,005▲ +$25,939
Los Angeles citywide $103,745 ±722 $118,302 ±915 $125,130 ±1,000 ▲ +$21,385▲ +$6,828▲ +$14,557
Average Household Income (nominal dollars) $98,198 ±6,058 $127,187 ±7,870 $178,062 ±18,027 ▲ +$79,864▲ +$50,875▲ +$28,989
Los Angeles citywide $78,294 ±545 $96,416 ±746 $125,130 ±1,000 ▲ +$46,835▲ +$28,714▲ +$18,122
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $61,147 ±3,363 $73,677 ±4,223 $88,558 ±8,683 ▲ +$27,411▲ +$14,881▲ +$12,530
Los Angeles citywide $37,526 ±267 $43,265 ±333 $47,685 ±375 ▲ +$10,159▲ +$4,420▲ +$5,739
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars) $46,147 ±2,538 $60,047 ±3,442 $88,558 ±8,683 ▲ +$42,411▲ +$28,511▲ +$13,900
Los Angeles citywide $28,320 ±202 $35,261 ±271 $47,685 ±375 ▲ +$19,365▲ +$12,424▲ +$6,941
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $17,345 ±2,091 $24,552 ±3,556 $25,371 ±4,499 ▲ +$8,026▲ +$819▲ +$7,207
Los Angeles citywide $15,033 ±149 $15,850 ±169 $14,186 ±216 ▼ −$847▼ −$1,664▲ +$817
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $13,090 ±1,578 $20,010 ±2,898 $25,371 ±4,499 ▲ +$12,281▲ +$5,361▲ +$6,920
Los Angeles citywide $11,345 ±113 $12,918 ±138 $14,186 ±216 ▲ +$2,841▲ +$1,268▲ +$1,573
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $41,816 ±4,363 $54,637 ±5,419 $59,316 ±4,695 ▲ +$17,500▲ +$4,679▲ +$12,821
Los Angeles citywide $30,727 ±279 $35,350 ±357 $37,123 ±496 ▲ +$6,396▲ +$1,773▲ +$4,623
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $31,558 ±3,293 $44,529 ±4,416 $59,316 ±4,695 ▲ +$27,758▲ +$14,787▲ +$12,972
Los Angeles citywide $23,189 ±211 $28,810 ±291 $37,123 ±496 ▲ +$13,934▲ +$8,313▲ +$5,621
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $89,616 ±6,169 $107,541 ±5,873 $116,704 ±7,505 ▲ +$27,087▲ +$9,163▲ +$17,925
Los Angeles citywide $65,832 ±458 $76,248 ±555 $81,939 ±742 ▲ +$16,107▲ +$5,691▲ +$10,416
Median Household Income (nominal dollars) $67,632 ±4,656 $87,646 ±4,786 $116,704 ±7,505 ▲ +$49,072▲ +$29,058▲ +$20,014
Los Angeles citywide $49,682 ±346 $62,142 ±452 $81,939 ±742 ▲ +$32,257▲ +$19,797▲ +$12,460
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $163,029 ±10,345 $191,406 ±12,465 — ——▲ +$28,377
Los Angeles citywide $127,020 ±723 $145,116 ±805 $154,703 ±1,370 ▲ +$27,684▲ +$9,587▲ +$18,097
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $123,035 ±7,808 $155,996 ±10,159 — ——▲ +$32,960
Los Angeles citywide $95,860 ±545 $118,270 ±656 $154,703 ±1,370 ▲ +$58,844▲ +$36,433▲ +$22,410
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $221,824 ±1,731 $245,212 ±895 — ——▲ +$23,388
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $167,407 ±1,307 $199,848 ±730 — ——▲ +$32,441

Poverty Status

Category Silver Lake
Below Poverty Line 9.0% ±1.8 pp2,660 ±517
Below 200% Poverty Line 18.0% ±2.3 pp5,305 ±678
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 5.1% ±1.4 pp1,490 ±421
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Below Poverty Line 9.0%±1.8 pp2,660±517 16.5%±0.3 pp638,207±11,569 ▼ -7.5% 88/110
Below 200% Poverty Line 18.0%±2.3 pp5,305±678 34.8%±0.4 pp1,343,960±17,101 ▼ -16.8% 91/110
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 5.1%±1.4 pp1,490±421 8.0%±0.2 pp308,978±7,316 ▼ -2.9% 79/110
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Category Silver Lake
Food Insecurity 11.8%2,673
Housing Insecurity 11.0%2,486
Transportation Barriers 6.6%1,504
Threatened Utility Shutoff 5.0%1,140
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Food Insecurity 11.8%2,673 23.6%700,942 ▼ -11.8% 78/110
Housing Insecurity 11.0%2,486 19.3%573,228 ▼ -8.3% 76/110
Transportation Barriers 6.6%1,504 11.8%350,471 ▼ -5.2% 77/110
Threatened Utility Shutoff 5.0%1,140 9.0%267,308 ▼ -4.0% 75/110
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category Silver Lake
In Labor Force 87.0% ±1.2 pp15,049 ±216
↳ Employed 79.8% ±1.6 pp13,803 ±283
↳ Unemployed 7.1% ±1.8 pp1,235 ±306
↳ Unemployment Rate 8.2% ±2.0 pp—
Not in Labor Force 13.0% ±7.7 pp2,257 ±1,335
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
In Labor Force 87.0%±1.2 pp15,049±216 83.1%±0.2 pp1,458,393±3,960 ▲ +3.8% 30/110
↳ Employed 79.8%±1.6 pp13,803±283 76.8%±0.3 pp1,346,606±4,643 ▲ +3.0% 33/110
↳ Unemployed 7.1%±1.8 pp1,235±306 6.3%±0.2 pp110,332±3,016 ▲ +0.8% 29/110
↳ Unemployment Rate 8.2%±2.0 pp— 7.6%±0.2 pp132,846±3,594 ▲ +0.6% 37/110
Not in Labor Force 13.0%±7.7 pp2,257±1,335 16.9%±0.8 pp295,844±13,970 ▼ -3.8% 81/110
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category Silver Lake
Management, Business, Science & Arts 72.9% ±4.8 pp12,789 ±848
↳ Management Occupations 15.3% ±2.5 pp2,675 ±439
↳ Business & Financial Operations 7.8% ±1.5 pp1,373 ±270
↳ Computer & Mathematical 2.8% ±0.9 pp499 ±151
↳ Architecture & Engineering 3.3% ±1.0 pp575 ±181
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 2.5% ±0.9 pp447 ±166
↳ Community & Social Service 2.7% ±1.0 pp468 ±170
↳ Legal Occupations 2.2% ±0.8 pp391 ±136
↳ Education, Training & Library 5.7% ±1.1 pp998 ±199
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 25.8% ±3.3 pp4,519 ±572
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 3.8% ±1.1 pp666 ±186
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 1.0% ±0.7 pp178 ±123
Service 10.2% ±1.8 pp1,796 ±307
↳ Healthcare Support 1.8% ±0.7 pp316 ±125
↳ Protective Service 0.9% ±0.6 pp155 ±112
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 3.2% ±0.9 pp559 ±160
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 1.9% ±0.9 pp339 ±159
↳ Personal Care & Service 2.4% ±0.9 pp428 ±160
Sales & Office 11.2% ±1.7 pp1,960 ±300
↳ Sales & Related 6.1% ±1.4 pp1,061 ±241
↳ Office & Administrative Support 5.1% ±1.1 pp899 ±193
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 2.0% ±0.8 pp344 ±141
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.0% ±0.4 pp8 ±71
↳ Construction & Extraction 1.4% ±0.7 pp246 ±123
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 0.5% ±0.5 pp91 ±94
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 3.7% ±1.0 pp642 ±168
↳ Production Occupations 1.6% ±0.6 pp287 ±113
↳ Transportation Occupations 0.7% ±0.6 pp118 ±97
↳ Material Moving Occupations 1.4% ±0.7 pp237 ±117
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts 72.9%±4.8 pp12,789±848 43.8%±0.3 pp856,718±5,665 ▲ +29.1% 9/110
↳ Management Occupations 15.3%±2.5 pp2,675±439 11.0%±0.2 pp215,767±3,237 ▲ +4.2% 33/110
↳ Business & Financial Operations 7.8%±1.5 pp1,373±270 6.1%±0.1 pp119,779±2,742 ▲ +1.7% 41/110
↳ Computer & Mathematical 2.8%±0.9 pp499±151 2.8%±0.1 pp55,551±1,839 0% 49/110
↳ Architecture & Engineering 3.3%±1.0 pp575±181 1.6%±0.1 pp31,959±1,411 ▲ +1.6% 10/110
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 2.5%±0.9 pp447±166 1.1%±0.1 pp21,801±1,140 ▲ +1.4% 8/110
↳ Community & Social Service 2.7%±1.0 pp468±170 1.8%±0.1 pp34,335±1,497 ▲ +0.9% 15/110
↳ Legal Occupations 2.2%±0.8 pp391±136 2.1%±0.1 pp40,323±1,500 ▲ +0.2% 47/110
↳ Education, Training & Library 5.7%±1.1 pp998±199 5.1%±0.1 pp100,542±2,462 ▲ +0.5% 39/110
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 25.8%±3.3 pp4,519±572 7.4%±0.2 pp144,867±2,938 ▲ +18.4% 1/110
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 3.8%±1.1 pp666±186 3.3%±0.1 pp64,007±2,042 ▲ +0.5% 39/110
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 1.0%±0.7 pp178±123 1.4%±0.1 pp27,787±1,316 ▼ -0.4% 76/110
Service 10.2%±1.8 pp1,796±307 19.1%±0.2 pp372,654±4,348 ▼ -8.8% 91/110
↳ Healthcare Support 1.8%±0.7 pp316±125 4.1%±0.1 pp80,369±2,120 ▼ -2.3% 92/110
↳ Protective Service 0.9%±0.6 pp155±112 1.4%±0.1 pp28,096±1,344 ▼ -0.6% 71/110
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 3.2%±0.9 pp559±160 6.0%±0.1 pp117,268±2,832 ▼ -2.8% 89/110
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 1.9%±0.9 pp339±159 4.6%±0.1 pp89,319±2,441 ▼ -2.6% 72/110
↳ Personal Care & Service 2.4%±0.9 pp428±160 2.9%±0.1 pp57,602±2,122 ▼ -0.5% 76/110
Sales & Office 11.2%±1.7 pp1,960±300 18.5%±0.2 pp362,312±4,169 ▼ -7.4% 107/110
↳ Sales & Related 6.1%±1.4 pp1,061±241 8.7%±0.2 pp170,605±3,233 ▼ -2.7% 101/110
↳ Office & Administrative Support 5.1%±1.1 pp899±193 9.8%±0.2 pp191,707±3,358 ▼ -4.7% 104/110
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 2.0%±0.8 pp344±141 7.5%±0.1 pp146,574±2,638 ▼ -5.5% 94/110
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.0%±0.4 pp8±71 0.3%±0.0 pp5,780±677 ▼ -0.3% 78/110
↳ Construction & Extraction 1.4%±0.7 pp246±123 5.2%±0.1 pp101,165±2,372 ▼ -3.8% 86/110
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 0.5%±0.5 pp91±94 2.0%±0.1 pp39,629±1,434 ▼ -1.5% 97/110
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 3.7%±1.0 pp642±168 11.0%±0.2 pp215,668±3,737 ▼ -7.4% 87/110
↳ Production Occupations 1.6%±0.6 pp287±113 4.4%±0.1 pp85,463±2,595 ▼ -2.7% 84/110
↳ Transportation Occupations 0.7%±0.6 pp118±97 3.3%±0.1 pp64,837±2,015 ▼ -2.6% 98/110
↳ Material Moving Occupations 1.4%±0.7 pp237±117 3.3%±0.1 pp65,368±2,325 ▼ -2.0% 75/110
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category Silver Lake
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0% ±0.4 pp8 ±71
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.0% ±0.4 pp8 ±71
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0% ±0.4 pp0
Construction 2.2% ±0.8 pp390 ±145
Manufacturing 4.0% ±1.1 pp710 ±189
Wholesale Trade 1.2% ±0.6 pp219 ±102
Retail Trade 5.8% ±1.2 pp1,025 ±211
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 2.3% ±0.9 pp404 ±154
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 2.0% ±0.8 pp353 ±143
↳ Utilities 0.3% ±0.5 pp51 ±87
Information 18.8% ±2.5 pp3,296 ±431
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 3.4% ±1.3 pp594 ±222
↳ Finance & Insurance 1.5% ±0.7 pp264 ±115
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.9% ±1.1 pp330 ±200
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 23.6% ±2.5 pp4,138 ±430
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 20.1% ±2.4 pp3,531 ±416
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.2% ±0.4 pp37 ±76
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 3.3% ±1.1 pp570 ±193
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 18.0% ±1.9 pp3,148 ±329
↳ Educational Services 7.2% ±1.2 pp1,258 ±211
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 10.8% ±1.7 pp1,891 ±293
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 13.8% ±2.2 pp2,418 ±380
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 10.3% ±2.1 pp1,810 ±364
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 3.5% ±0.9 pp608 ±153
Other Services 5.0% ±1.3 pp872 ±227
Public Administration 1.8% ±0.7 pp310 ±121
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%±0.4 pp8±71 0.4%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.4% 89/110
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.0%±0.4 pp8±71 0.4%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.3% 87/110
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%±0.4 pp0 0.0%±0.0 pp— 0% 30/110
Construction 2.2%±0.8 pp390±145 6.5%±0.1 pp— ▼ -4.2% 87/110
Manufacturing 4.0%±1.1 pp710±189 6.8%±0.2 pp— ▼ -2.8% 87/110
Wholesale Trade 1.2%±0.6 pp219±102 2.3%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.1% 97/110
Retail Trade 5.8%±1.2 pp1,025±211 9.3%±0.2 pp— ▼ -3.5% 99/110
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 2.3%±0.9 pp404±154 5.3%±0.1 pp— ▼ -3.0% 94/110
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 2.0%±0.8 pp353±143 4.9%±0.1 pp— ▼ -2.9% 94/110
↳ Utilities 0.3%±0.5 pp51±87 0.4%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.1% 62/110
Information 18.8%±2.5 pp3,296±431 6.4%±0.2 pp— ▲ +12.4% 3/110
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 3.4%±1.3 pp594±222 5.8%±0.1 pp— ▼ -2.4% 92/110
↳ Finance & Insurance 1.5%±0.7 pp264±115 3.5%±0.1 pp— ▼ -2.0% 100/110
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.9%±1.1 pp330±200 2.3%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.4% 67/110
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 23.6%±2.5 pp4,138±430 15.6%±0.2 pp— ▲ +8.0% 14/110
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 20.1%±2.4 pp3,531±416 10.3%±0.2 pp— ▲ +9.8% 16/110
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.2%±0.4 pp37±76 0.1%±0.0 pp— ▲ +0.1% 14/110
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 3.3%±1.1 pp570±193 5.2%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.9% 76/110
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 18.0%±1.9 pp3,148±329 20.8%±0.2 pp— ▼ -2.8% 86/110
↳ Educational Services 7.2%±1.2 pp1,258±211 8.1%±0.2 pp— ▼ -1.0% 67/110
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 10.8%±1.7 pp1,891±293 12.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -1.8% 80/110
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 13.8%±2.2 pp2,418±380 12.0%±0.2 pp— ▲ +1.8% 32/110
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 10.3%±2.1 pp1,810±364 4.1%±0.1 pp— ▲ +6.2% 6/110
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 3.5%±0.9 pp608±153 7.9%±0.2 pp— ▼ -4.4% 97/110
Other Services 5.0%±1.3 pp872±227 6.0%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.0% 72/110
Public Administration 1.8%±0.7 pp310±121 2.7%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.9% 86/110
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category Silver Lake
Private Company Employee 61.7% ±2.9 pp10,818 ±501
Self-Employed 22.4% ±2.5 pp3,934 ±446
Nonprofit 9.4% ±1.5 pp1,652 ±268
Government 6.4% ±1.2 pp1,116 ±215
Unpaid Family Worker 0.1% ±0.4 pp12 ±69
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Private Company Employee 61.7%±2.9 pp10,818±501 66.9%±0.3 pp1,307,510±5,830 ▼ -5.2% 71/110
Self-Employed 22.4%±2.5 pp3,934±446 16.2%±0.2 pp316,694±4,405 ▲ +6.2% 17/110
Nonprofit 9.4%±1.5 pp1,652±268 8.0%±0.2 pp155,457±3,565 ▲ +1.5% 27/110
Government 6.4%±1.2 pp1,116±215 10.6%±0.2 pp207,304±3,359 ▼ -4.2% 98/110
Unpaid Family Worker 0.1%±0.4 pp12±69 0.3%±0.0 pp5,059±497 ▼ -0.2% 81/110
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category Silver Lake
Full-Time, Year-Round 58.7% ±2.5 pp11,792 ±501
Part-Time or Part-Year 41.3% ±2.9 pp8,308 ±581
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round 58.7%±2.5 pp11,792±501 61.7%±0.2 pp1,328,967±3,929 ▼ -3.0% 92/110
Part-Time or Part-Year 41.3%±2.9 pp8,308±581 38.3%±0.3 pp826,047±5,840 ▲ +3.0% 19/110
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category Silver Lake
Average FT Earnings $142,988±$18,827
10th Percentile FT Earnings $33,760±$3,230
25th Percentile FT Earnings $56,334±$4,556
Median FT Earnings $91,358±$3,965
75th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000
90th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Average FT Earnings $142,988±$18,827 $93,330±$761 ▲ +$49,658 22/110
10th Percentile FT Earnings $33,760±$3,230 $25,056±$255 ▲ +$8,704 28/110
25th Percentile FT Earnings $56,334±$4,556 $37,825±$214 ▲ +$18,509 24/110
Median FT Earnings $91,358±$3,965 $61,975±$422 ▲ +$29,382 30/110
75th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/110
90th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/110
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $103,664 ±5,989 $110,785 ±6,962 $142,988 ±18,827 ▲ +$39,324▲ +$32,203▲ +$7,121
Los Angeles citywide $78,876 ±537 $84,242 ±564 $93,330 ±761 ▲ +$14,455▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,367
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $78,234 ±4,520 $90,290 ±5,674 $142,988 ±18,827 ▲ +$64,754▲ +$52,698▲ +$12,056
Los Angeles citywide $59,526 ±405 $68,658 ±460 $93,330 ±761 ▲ +$33,804▲ +$24,673▲ +$9,131
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $26,310 ±2,340 $27,063 ±2,032 $33,760 ±3,230 ▲ +$7,450▲ +$6,697▲ +$753
Los Angeles citywide $20,202 ±88 $21,993 ±185 $25,056 ±255 ▲ +$4,854▲ +$3,063▲ +$1,791
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $19,856 ±1,766 $22,057 ±1,656 $33,760 ±3,230 ▲ +$13,904▲ +$11,703▲ +$2,201
Los Angeles citywide $15,246 ±66 $17,924 ±151 $25,056 ±255 ▲ +$9,810▲ +$7,132▲ +$2,678
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $44,023 ±3,281 $44,477 ±3,189 $56,334 ±4,556 ▲ +$12,311▲ +$11,857▲ +$454
Los Angeles citywide $29,363 ±173 $32,975 ±184 $37,825 ±214 ▲ +$8,461▲ +$4,850▲ +$3,611
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $33,223 ±2,476 $36,248 ±2,599 $56,334 ±4,556 ▲ +$23,110▲ +$20,085▲ +$3,025
Los Angeles citywide $22,160 ±131 $26,874 ±150 $37,825 ±214 ▲ +$15,665▲ +$10,950▲ +$4,714
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $74,214 ±4,392 $72,712 ±5,355 $91,358 ±3,965 ▲ +$17,144▲ +$18,645▼ −$1,502
Los Angeles citywide $51,909 ±336 $54,226 ±279 $61,975 ±422 ▲ +$10,067▲ +$7,750▲ +$2,317
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $56,008 ±3,314 $59,261 ±4,365 $91,358 ±3,965 ▲ +$35,350▲ +$32,097▲ +$3,253
Los Angeles citywide $39,175 ±254 $44,194 ±227 $61,975 ±422 ▲ +$22,801▲ +$17,781▲ +$5,019
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $121,333 ±6,306 — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $91,403 ±620 $98,002 ±683 — ——▲ +$6,599
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $91,568 ±4,759 — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $68,981 ±468 $79,872 ±557 — ——▲ +$10,891
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category Silver Lake
Average PT Earnings $58,315±$5,770
10th Percentile PT Earnings $3,906±$1,526
25th Percentile PT Earnings $12,392±$2,279
Median PT Earnings $33,790±$4,698
75th Percentile PT Earnings $71,996±$8,514
90th Percentile PT Earnings Over $100,000
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Average PT Earnings $58,315±$5,770 $36,543±$574 ▲ +$21,772 20/110
10th Percentile PT Earnings $3,906±$1,526 $2,785±$92 ▲ +$1,121 23/110
25th Percentile PT Earnings $12,392±$2,279 $8,451±$190 ▲ +$3,941 9/110
Median PT Earnings $33,790±$4,698 $20,275±$216 ▲ +$13,515 8/110
75th Percentile PT Earnings $71,996±$8,514 $39,236±$450 ▲ +$32,761 12/110
90th Percentile PT Earnings Over $100,000 $80,378±$1,643 ▲ +$19,622+ 1/110
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $53,640 ±7,094 $57,487 ±8,379 $58,315 ±5,770 ▲ +$4,675▲ +$828▲ +$3,847
Los Angeles citywide $30,652 ±490 $34,166 ±509 $36,543 ±574 ▲ +$5,890▲ +$2,377▲ +$3,513
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $40,481 ±5,354 $46,852 ±6,829 $58,315 ±5,770 ▲ +$17,834▲ +$11,463▲ +$6,371
Los Angeles citywide $23,133 ±369 $27,845 ±415 $36,543 ±574 ▲ +$13,410▲ +$8,698▲ +$4,712
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $4,214 ±1,044 $4,163 ±854 $3,906 ±1,526 ▼ −$308▼ −$256▼ −$52
Los Angeles citywide $2,482 ±54 $2,712 ±58 $2,785 ±92 ▲ +$303▲ +$73▲ +$230
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $3,180 ±788 $3,393 ±696 $3,906 ±1,526 ▲ +$726▲ +$514▲ +$212
Los Angeles citywide $1,873 ±41 $2,210 ±47 $2,785 ±92 ▲ +$912▲ +$575▲ +$337
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $13,652 ±1,369 $12,173 ±1,720 $12,392 ±2,279 ▼ −$1,260▲ +$219▼ −$1,479
Los Angeles citywide $7,239 ±105 $8,054 ±111 $8,451 ±190 ▲ +$1,212▲ +$397▲ +$815
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $10,303 ±1,033 $9,921 ±1,402 $12,392 ±2,279 ▲ +$2,089▲ +$2,471▼ −$382
Los Angeles citywide $5,463 ±79 $6,564 ±91 $8,451 ±190 ▲ +$2,988▲ +$1,887▲ +$1,101
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $27,622 ±2,572 $28,852 ±3,912 $33,790 ±4,698 ▲ +$6,167▲ +$4,937▲ +$1,230
Los Angeles citywide $16,086 ±129 $18,060 ±185 $20,275 ±216 ▲ +$4,189▲ +$2,215▲ +$1,973
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $20,846 ±1,941 $23,514 ±3,189 $33,790 ±4,698 ▲ +$12,944▲ +$10,275▲ +$2,668
Los Angeles citywide $12,140 ±97 $14,719 ±151 $20,275 ±216 ▲ +$8,135▲ +$5,556▲ +$2,579
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $59,298 ±5,793 $61,682 ±7,206 $71,996 ±8,514 ▲ +$12,698▲ +$10,314▲ +$2,384
Los Angeles citywide $33,887 ±443 $36,465 ±382 $39,236 ±450 ▲ +$5,349▲ +$2,771▲ +$2,578
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $44,751 ±4,372 $50,271 ±5,873 $71,996 ±8,514 ▲ +$27,245▲ +$21,725▲ +$5,520
Los Angeles citywide $25,574 ±335 $29,719 ±311 $39,236 ±450 ▲ +$13,662▲ +$9,517▲ +$4,145
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $117,943 ±14,423 — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $68,714 ±742 $73,646 ±1,127 $80,378 ±1,643 ▲ +$11,664▲ +$6,732▲ +$4,932
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $89,009 ±10,885 — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $51,857 ±560 $60,021 ±919 $80,378 ±1,643 ▲ +$28,521▲ +$20,356▲ +$8,164

Earnings of All Workers

Category Silver Lake
Average Earnings $107,562±$11,480
10th Percentile Earnings $10,555±$2,775
25th Percentile Earnings $32,396±$3,355
Median Earnings $70,743±$4,866
75th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000
90th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Average Earnings $107,562±$11,480 $71,563±$569 ▲ +$35,999 24/110
10th Percentile Earnings $10,555±$2,775 $7,934±$179 ▲ +$2,621 25/110
25th Percentile Earnings $32,396±$3,355 $21,876±$191 ▲ +$10,519 22/110
Median Earnings $70,743±$4,866 $43,575±$259 ▲ +$27,168 23/110
75th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000 $85,854±$580 ▲ +$14,146+ 1/110
90th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/110
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $82,066 ±4,519 $91,365 ±5,504 $107,562 ±11,480 ▲ +$25,496▲ +$16,197▲ +$9,298
Los Angeles citywide $59,351 ±430 $65,850 ±455 $71,563 ±569 ▲ +$12,212▲ +$5,713▲ +$6,499
Average Earnings (nominal dollars) $61,934 ±3,410 $74,462 ±4,486 $107,562 ±11,480 ▲ +$45,628▲ +$33,100▲ +$12,528
Los Angeles citywide $44,791 ±324 $53,668 ±371 $71,563 ±569 ▲ +$26,772▲ +$17,895▲ +$8,877
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $11,442 ±2,096 $12,189 ±1,931 $10,555 ±2,775 ▼ −$888▼ −$1,634▲ +$747
Los Angeles citywide $6,842 ±104 $8,269 ±107 $7,934 ±179 ▲ +$1,091▼ −$335▲ +$1,427
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $8,635 ±1,582 $9,934 ±1,574 $10,555 ±2,775 ▲ +$1,919▲ +$621▲ +$1,299
Los Angeles citywide $5,164 ±78 $6,739 ±87 $7,934 ±179 ▲ +$2,770▲ +$1,194▲ +$1,576
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $25,854 ±2,378 $29,062 ±2,493 $32,396 ±3,355 ▲ +$6,542▲ +$3,334▲ +$3,208
Los Angeles citywide $17,205 ±143 $20,088 ±119 $21,876 ±191 ▲ +$4,671▲ +$1,789▲ +$2,883
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $19,511 ±1,795 $23,686 ±2,032 $32,396 ±3,355 ▲ +$12,885▲ +$8,710▲ +$4,174
Los Angeles citywide $12,984 ±108 $16,372 ±97 $21,876 ±191 ▲ +$8,892▲ +$5,505▲ +$3,387
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $55,672 ±2,942 $59,635 ±3,305 $70,743 ±4,866 ▲ +$15,071▲ +$11,109▲ +$3,963
Los Angeles citywide $35,447 ±232 $39,719 ±188 $43,575 ±259 ▲ +$8,128▲ +$3,856▲ +$4,272
Median Earnings (nominal dollars) $42,015 ±2,221 $48,602 ±2,693 $70,743 ±4,866 ▲ +$28,729▲ +$22,141▲ +$6,588
Los Angeles citywide $26,751 ±175 $32,371 ±154 $43,575 ±259 ▲ +$16,824▲ +$11,204▲ +$5,620
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $100,030 ±5,511 $110,680 ±4,950 — ——▲ +$10,649
Los Angeles citywide $70,301 ±313 $76,149 ±396 $85,854 ±580 ▲ +$15,552▲ +$9,705▲ +$5,848
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $75,491 ±4,159 $90,204 ±4,034 — ——▲ +$14,713
Los Angeles citywide $53,055 ±236 $62,062 ±323 $85,854 ±580 ▲ +$32,798▲ +$23,792▲ +$9,006
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $127,692 ±642 — — ———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $96,367 ±484 — — ———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Silver Lake, Los Angeles

Category Silver Lake
Household income at age 35 $51,237 ±$1,229
Household income percentile rank 46.9 ±0.78 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 15.4% ±1.01 pp
Individual income at age 35 $39,741 ±$959
Fraction married 33.3% ±1.33 pp
Employment rate 75.6% ±1.20 pp
Incarceration rate 1.03% ±0.32 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Silver Lake, Los Angeles. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Silver Lake, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Silver Lake City Difference
Household income at age 35 $51,237 ±$1,229 $49,434 ±$103 +$1,803
Household income percentile rank 46.9 ±0.78 pp 45.3 ±0.06 pp +1.6 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 15.4% ±1.01 pp 15.3% ±0.08 pp +0.2 pp
Individual income at age 35 $39,741 ±$959 $37,125 ±$77 +$2,617
Fraction married 33.3% ±1.33 pp 32.5% ±0.11 pp +0.8 pp
Employment rate 75.6% ±1.20 pp 72.6% ±0.10 pp +3.1 pp
Incarceration rate 1.03% ±0.32 pp 1.30% ±0.03 pp −0.3 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Silver Lake, Los Angeles. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Silver Lake, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Silver Lake, Los Angeles in Lower-Income Families

Category Silver Lake
Household income at age 35 $46,752 ±$1,587
Household income percentile rank 43.9 ±1.05 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 11.7% ±1.34 pp
Individual income at age 35 $37,232 ±$1,245
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Silver Lake, Los Angeles with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Silver Lake, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Silver Lake City Difference
Household income at age 35 $46,752 ±$1,587 $43,491 ±$125 +$3,262
Household income percentile rank 43.9 ±1.05 pp 41.6 ±0.08 pp +2.3 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 11.7% ±1.34 pp 10.5% ±0.10 pp +1.2 pp
Individual income at age 35 $37,232 ±$1,245 $33,937 ±$101 +$3,295
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Silver Lake, Los Angeles with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Silver Lake, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Silver Lake, Los Angeles

Category Silver Lake
Stayed in the greater Los Angeles area 81.7% ±1.11 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 26.1% ±1.27 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Silver Lake, Los Angeles. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Los Angeles area” means the Census commuting zone for the Los Angeles area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Silver Lake, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Silver Lake City Difference
Stayed in the greater Los Angeles area 81.7% ±1.11 pp 81.1% ±0.09 pp +0.6 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 26.1% ±1.27 pp 26.2% ±0.11 pp −0.2 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Silver Lake, Los Angeles. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Los Angeles area” means the Census commuting zone for the Los Angeles area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Silver Lake, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Silver Lake

Category Silver Lake
All jobs located in silver lake 6,531
Silver Lake jobs held by Silver Lake residents 9.1%
Silver Lake jobs held by non-Silver Lake residents 90.9%
Employed residents working in Silver Lake 3.8%
Employed residents working outside Silver Lake 96.2%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Silver Lake Los Angeles neighborhood median Difference Rank
All jobs located in silver lake 6,531 8,613 ▼ −2,082 68/110
Silver Lake jobs held by Silver Lake residents 9.1% 6.0% ▲ +3.2 pp 26/110
Silver Lake jobs held by non-Silver Lake residents 90.9% 94.0% ▼ −3.2 pp 85/110
Employed residents working in Silver Lake 3.8% 3.9% ▼ −0.0 pp 57/110
Employed residents working outside Silver Lake 96.2% 96.1% ▲ +0.0 pp 54/110
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in silver lake 5,079 6,366 6,531 ▲ +1,452▲ +165▲ +1,287
Los Angeles citywide 6,864 8,106 8,613 ▲ +1,748▲ +507▲ +1,242
Silver Lake jobs held by Silver Lake residents 7.6%328 8.6%468 9.1%509 ▲ +1.6 pp▲ +181▲ +0.5 pp▲ +41▲ +1.1 pp▲ +140
Los Angeles citywide 6.1%330 5.9%399 6.0%442 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +112▲ +0.1 pp▲ +43▼ −0.1 pp▲ +69
Silver Lake jobs held by non-Silver Lake residents 92.4%4,010 91.4%4,946 90.9%5,058 ▼ −1.6 pp▲ +1,048▼ −0.5 pp▲ +112▼ −1.1 pp▲ +936
Los Angeles citywide 93.9%5,659 94.1%6,750 94.0%7,065 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,406▼ −0.1 pp▲ +315▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,091
Employed residents working in Silver Lake 2.5%328 3.3%468 3.8%509 ▲ +1.3 pp▲ +181▲ +0.5 pp▲ +41▲ +0.8 pp▲ +140
Los Angeles citywide 3.2%330 3.3%399 3.9%442 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +112▲ +0.5 pp▲ +43▲ +0.1 pp▲ +69
Employed residents working outside Silver Lake 97.5%12,862 96.7%13,769 96.2%12,787 ▼ −1.3 pp▼ −75▼ −0.5 pp▼ −982▼ −0.8 pp▲ +907
Los Angeles citywide 96.8%10,199 96.7%11,528 96.1%11,428 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,229▼ −0.5 pp▼ −100▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,329

Industry of Jobs in Silver Lake

Category Silver Lake
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.5%33
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0
Construction 0.9%56
Manufacturing 1.7%111
Wholesale Trade 2.5%161
Retail Trade 17.5%1,140
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 0.6%38
↳ Utilities 0.0%0
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 0.6%38
Information 4.6%298
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 2.8%183
↳ Finance & Insurance 1.3%83
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.5%100
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 14.0%913
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 8.2%537
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.5%31
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 5.3%345
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 17.1%1,114
↳ Educational Services 3.1%204
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 13.9%910
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 30.1%1,969
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 5.6%369
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 24.5%1,600
Other Services 7.9%515
Public Administration 0.0%0
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.5%33 0.1%1,840 ▲ +0.4% 8/110
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0 0.0%95 0% 14/110
Construction 0.9%56 2.7%53,657 ▼ -1.8% 95/110
Manufacturing 1.7%111 3.8%76,376 ▼ -2.1% 59/110
Wholesale Trade 2.5%161 3.2%63,982 ▼ -0.8% 46/110
Retail Trade 17.5%1,140 7.1%140,457 ▲ +10.4% 9/110
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 0.6%38 5.4%107,338 ▼ -4.8% 78/110
↳ Utilities 0.0%0 0.8%16,873 ▼ -0.8% 46/110
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 0.6%38 4.6%90,465 ▼ -4.0% 72/110
Information 4.6%298 8.3%164,692 ▼ -3.7% 24/110
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 2.8%183 5.9%116,774 ▼ -3.1% 58/110
↳ Finance & Insurance 1.3%83 3.6%70,657 ▼ -2.3% 52/110
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.5%100 2.3%46,117 ▼ -0.8% 58/110
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 14.0%913 15.1%299,443 ▼ -1.1% 44/110
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 8.2%537 8.1%160,171 ▲ +0.2% 35/110
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.5%31 1.1%22,328 ▼ -0.6% 43/110
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 5.3%345 5.9%116,944 ▼ -0.6% 43/110
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 17.1%1,114 28.4%563,697 ▼ -11.3% 93/110
↳ Educational Services 3.1%204 10.0%198,161 ▼ -6.8% 95/110
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 13.9%910 18.4%365,536 ▼ -4.5% 77/110
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 30.1%1,969 11.3%224,384 ▲ +18.9% 4/110
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 5.6%369 2.8%54,783 ▲ +2.9% 10/110
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 24.5%1,600 8.5%169,601 ▲ +16.0% 3/110
Other Services 7.9%515 3.7%73,513 ▲ +4.2% 16/110
Public Administration 0.0%0 5.1%100,972 ▼ -5.1% 46/110
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.1%3 0.0%0 0.5%33 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +30▲ +0.5 pp▲ +33▼ −0.1 pp▼ −3
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%3,680 0.1%1,246 0.1%1,840 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,840– 0.0 pp▲ +594▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2,434
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%2 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp▼ −2– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▼ −2
Los Angeles citywide 0.1%1,115 0.0%132 0.0%95 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,020– 0.0 pp▼ −37▼ −0.1 pp▼ −983
Construction 3.2%163 2.0%125 0.9%56 ▼ −2.4 pp▼ −107▼ −1.1 pp▼ −69▼ −1.2 pp▼ −38
Los Angeles citywide 2.3%39,728 2.8%53,498 2.7%53,657 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +13,929▼ −0.1 pp▲ +159▲ +0.5 pp▲ +13,770
Manufacturing 1.0%50 1.2%76 1.7%111 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +61▲ +0.5 pp▲ +35▲ +0.2 pp▲ +26
Los Angeles citywide 5.7%98,319 4.2%81,924 3.8%76,376 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −21,943▼ −0.4 pp▼ −5,548▼ −1.4 pp▼ −16,395
Wholesale Trade 4.2%214 3.9%247 2.5%161 ▼ −1.7 pp▼ −53▼ −1.4 pp▼ −86▼ −0.3 pp▲ +33
Los Angeles citywide 4.6%79,460 3.6%68,790 3.2%63,982 ▼ −1.4 pp▼ −15,478▼ −0.3 pp▼ −4,808▼ −1.0 pp▼ −10,670
Retail Trade 12.8%652 13.4%851 17.5%1,140 ▲ +4.6 pp▲ +488▲ +4.1 pp▲ +289▲ +0.5 pp▲ +199
Los Angeles citywide 8.7%151,141 7.5%144,707 7.1%140,457 ▼ −1.7 pp▼ −10,684▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,250▼ −1.3 pp▼ −6,434
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 1.1%57 0.6%41 0.6%38 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −19▼ −0.1 pp▼ −3▼ −0.5 pp▼ −16
Los Angeles citywide 4.8%82,152 5.8%111,689 5.4%107,338 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +25,186▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,351▲ +1.0 pp▲ +29,537
Utilities 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 0.9%16,015 1.0%18,483 0.8%16,873 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +858▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,610– 0.0 pp▲ +2,468
Transportation & Warehousing 1.1%57 0.6%41 0.6%38 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −19▼ −0.1 pp▼ −3▼ −0.5 pp▼ −16
Los Angeles citywide 3.8%66,137 4.8%93,206 4.6%90,465 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +24,328▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,741▲ +1.0 pp▲ +27,069
Information 2.9%147 4.4%280 4.6%298 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +151▲ +0.2 pp▲ +18▲ +1.5 pp▲ +133
Los Angeles citywide 6.3%109,592 7.4%142,294 8.3%164,692 ▲ +1.9 pp▲ +55,100▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,398▲ +1.0 pp▲ +32,702
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 3.9%196 3.2%203 2.8%183 ▼ −1.1 pp▼ −13▼ −0.4 pp▼ −20▼ −0.7 pp▲ +7
Los Angeles citywide 6.1%104,703 5.7%110,803 5.9%116,774 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +12,071▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5,971▼ −0.3 pp▲ +6,100
Finance & Insurance 1.9%99 1.4%89 1.3%83 ▼ −0.7 pp▼ −16▼ −0.1 pp▼ −6▼ −0.6 pp▼ −10
Los Angeles citywide 3.9%67,891 3.6%69,466 3.6%70,657 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,766– 0.0 pp▲ +1,191▼ −0.3 pp▲ +1,575
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.9%97 1.8%114 1.5%100 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +3▼ −0.3 pp▼ −14▼ −0.1 pp▲ +17
Los Angeles citywide 2.1%36,812 2.1%41,337 2.3%46,117 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +9,305▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,780– 0.0 pp▲ +4,525
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 9.6%488 10.4%663 14.0%913 ▲ +4.4 pp▲ +425▲ +3.6 pp▲ +250▲ +0.8 pp▲ +175
Los Angeles citywide 15.1%261,720 14.9%286,926 15.1%299,443 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +37,723▲ +0.2 pp▲ +12,517▼ −0.3 pp▲ +25,206
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 4.8%246 5.7%365 8.2%537 ▲ +3.4 pp▲ +291▲ +2.5 pp▲ +172▲ +0.9 pp▲ +119
Los Angeles citywide 7.7%132,582 7.9%153,127 8.1%160,171 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +27,589▲ +0.1 pp▲ +7,044▲ +0.3 pp▲ +20,545
Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.1%6 0.0%2 0.5%31 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +25▲ +0.4 pp▲ +29▼ −0.1 pp▼ −4
Los Angeles citywide 1.3%22,239 1.2%22,485 1.1%22,328 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +89– 0.0 pp▼ −157▼ −0.1 pp▲ +246
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 4.6%236 4.6%296 5.3%345 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +109▲ +0.6 pp▲ +49– 0.0 pp▲ +60
Los Angeles citywide 6.2%106,899 5.8%111,314 5.9%116,944 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +10,045▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5,630▼ −0.4 pp▲ +4,415
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 22.0%1,116 19.0%1,209 17.1%1,114 ▼ −4.9 pp▼ −2▼ −1.9 pp▼ −95▼ −3.0 pp▲ +93
Los Angeles citywide 24.3%420,231 26.6%513,841 28.4%563,697 ▲ +4.0 pp▲ +143,466▲ +1.8 pp▲ +49,856▲ +2.3 pp▲ +93,610
Educational Services 4.3%217 3.4%219 3.1%204 ▼ −1.1 pp▼ −13▼ −0.3 pp▼ −15▼ −0.8 pp▲ +2
Los Angeles citywide 8.2%142,243 9.1%175,456 10.0%198,161 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +55,918▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,705▲ +0.9 pp▲ +33,213
Health Care & Social Assistance 17.7%899 15.6%990 13.9%910 ▼ −3.8 pp▲ +11▼ −1.6 pp▼ −80▼ −2.1 pp▲ +91
Los Angeles citywide 16.1%277,988 17.5%338,385 18.4%365,536 ▲ +2.3 pp▲ +87,548▲ +0.9 pp▲ +27,151▲ +1.4 pp▲ +60,397
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 32.5%1,651 32.9%2,096 30.1%1,969 ▼ −2.4 pp▲ +318▼ −2.8 pp▼ −127▲ +0.4 pp▲ +445
Los Angeles citywide 11.2%192,754 11.7%226,802 11.3%224,384 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +31,630▼ −0.5 pp▼ −2,418▲ +0.6 pp▲ +34,048
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 3.6%184 5.0%317 5.6%369 ▲ +2.0 pp▲ +185▲ +0.7 pp▲ +52▲ +1.4 pp▲ +133
Los Angeles citywide 2.2%38,550 2.8%53,683 2.8%54,783 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +16,233– 0.0 pp▲ +1,100▲ +0.5 pp▲ +15,133
Accommodation & Food Services 28.9%1,467 27.9%1,779 24.5%1,600 ▼ −4.4 pp▲ +133▼ −3.4 pp▼ −179▼ −0.9 pp▲ +312
Los Angeles citywide 8.9%154,204 9.0%173,119 8.5%169,601 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +15,397▼ −0.4 pp▼ −3,518– 0.0 pp▲ +18,915
Other Services 6.7%341 9.0%575 7.9%515 ▲ +1.2 pp▲ +174▼ −1.1 pp▼ −60▲ +2.3 pp▲ +234
Los Angeles citywide 3.9%66,987 3.9%75,451 3.7%73,513 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,526▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,938– 0.0 pp▲ +8,464
Public Administration 0.0%1 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp▼ −1– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▼ −1
Los Angeles citywide 6.8%117,076 5.8%112,871 5.1%100,972 ▼ −1.7 pp▼ −16,104▼ −0.8 pp▼ −11,899▼ −0.9 pp▼ −4,205

Earnings of Jobs in Silver Lake

Category Silver Lake
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 18.2%1,189
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 35.5%2,320
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 46.3%3,022
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 18.2%1,189 17.0%338,004 ▲ +1.2% 32/110
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 35.5%2,320 24.2%481,403 ▲ +11.3% 35/110
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 46.3%3,022 58.8%1,167,718 ▼ -12.5% 79/110
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 33.3%1,689 26.0%1,653 18.2%1,189 ▼ −15.0 pp▼ −500▼ −7.8 pp▼ −464▼ −7.3 pp▼ −36
Los Angeles citywide 25.4%438,918 21.3%411,368 17.0%338,004 ▼ −8.4 pp▼ −100,914▼ −4.3 pp▼ −73,364▼ −4.1 pp▼ −27,550
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 43.0%2,185 41.5%2,643 35.5%2,320 ▼ −7.5 pp▲ +135▼ −6.0 pp▼ −323▼ −1.5 pp▲ +458
Los Angeles citywide 31.8%549,706 29.6%571,139 24.2%481,403 ▼ −7.6 pp▼ −68,303▼ −5.4 pp▼ −89,736▼ −2.2 pp▲ +21,433
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 23.7%1,205 32.5%2,070 46.3%3,022 ▲ +22.5 pp▲ +1,817▲ +13.8 pp▲ +952▲ +8.8 pp▲ +865
Los Angeles citywide 42.8%738,919 49.1%948,335 58.8%1,167,718 ▲ +16.0 pp▲ +428,799▲ +9.6 pp▲ +219,383▲ +6.3 pp▲ +209,416

Jobs in Silver Lake by Firm Age

Category Silver Lake
Firm age: 0–1 years 9.2%589
Firm age: 2–3 years 11.4%731
Firm age: 4–5 years 8.2%523
Firm age: 6–10 years 20.8%1,332
Firm age: 11 or more years 50.3%3,214
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years 9.2%589 4.8%79,474 ▲ +4.5% 25/110
Firm age: 2–3 years 11.4%731 4.9%81,545 ▲ +6.6% 11/110
Firm age: 4–5 years 8.2%523 5.1%84,624 ▲ +3.1% 30/110
Firm age: 6–10 years 20.8%1,332 10.7%178,740 ▲ +10.2% 10/110
Firm age: 11 or more years 50.3%3,214 74.6%1,246,700 ▼ -24.3% 96/110
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years 9.5%468 10.6%660 9.2%589 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +121▼ −1.4 pp▼ −71▲ +1.1 pp▲ +192
Los Angeles citywide 4.7%67,567 4.9%79,034 4.8%79,474 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,907▼ −0.1 pp▲ +440▲ +0.2 pp▲ +11,467
Firm age: 2–3 years 11.4%564 12.8%800 11.4%731 – 0.0 pp▲ +167▼ −1.4 pp▼ −69▲ +1.4 pp▲ +236
Los Angeles citywide 5.9%85,371 5.5%89,530 4.9%81,545 ▼ −1.0 pp▼ −3,826▼ −0.6 pp▼ −7,985▼ −0.4 pp▲ +4,159
Firm age: 4–5 years 11.8%581 10.5%653 8.2%523 ▼ −3.6 pp▼ −58▼ −2.3 pp▼ −130▼ −1.3 pp▲ +72
Los Angeles citywide 4.8%69,620 5.0%80,673 5.1%84,624 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +15,004▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,951▲ +0.2 pp▲ +11,053
Firm age: 6–10 years 15.1%747 17.2%1,071 20.8%1,332 ▲ +5.7 pp▲ +585▲ +3.7 pp▲ +261▲ +2.0 pp▲ +324
Los Angeles citywide 11.5%165,913 9.8%158,279 10.7%178,740 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +12,827▲ +0.9 pp▲ +20,461▼ −1.7 pp▼ −7,634
Firm age: 11 or more years 52.1%2,572 48.9%3,050 50.3%3,214 ▼ −1.8 pp▲ +642▲ +1.4 pp▲ +164▼ −3.2 pp▲ +478
Los Angeles citywide 73.1%1,056,355 74.9%1,212,931 74.6%1,246,700 ▲ +1.5 pp▲ +190,345▼ −0.2 pp▲ +33,769▲ +1.7 pp▲ +156,576

Jobs in Silver Lake by Firm Size

Category Silver Lake
Firm size: 0–19 employees 46.4%2,966
Firm size: 20–49 employees 24.1%1,539
Firm size: 50–249 employees 7.1%454
Firm size: 250–499 employees 4.2%270
Firm size: 500 or more employees 18.2%1,160
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees 46.4%2,966 25.4%424,713 ▲ +21.0% 31/110
Firm size: 20–49 employees 24.1%1,539 9.0%149,880 ▲ +15.1% 4/110
Firm size: 50–249 employees 7.1%454 13.5%224,878 ▼ -6.4% 98/110
Firm size: 250–499 employees 4.2%270 4.9%82,110 ▼ -0.7% 46/110
Firm size: 500 or more employees 18.2%1,160 47.2%789,502 ▼ -29.1% 86/110
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees 47.2%2,330 46.1%2,872 46.4%2,966 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +636▲ +0.4 pp▲ +94▼ −1.2 pp▲ +542
Los Angeles citywide 25.3%365,482 24.7%400,637 25.4%424,713 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +59,231▲ +0.7 pp▲ +24,076▼ −0.6 pp▲ +35,155
Firm size: 20–49 employees 18.4%906 23.4%1,457 24.1%1,539 ▲ +5.7 pp▲ +633▲ +0.7 pp▲ +82▲ +5.0 pp▲ +551
Los Angeles citywide 10.3%149,215 9.2%149,709 9.0%149,880 ▼ −1.4 pp▲ +665▼ −0.3 pp▲ +171▼ −1.1 pp▲ +494
Firm size: 50–249 employees 14.6%720 13.0%811 7.1%454 ▼ −7.5 pp▼ −266▼ −5.9 pp▼ −357▼ −1.6 pp▲ +91
Los Angeles citywide 14.8%214,183 13.9%225,110 13.5%224,878 ▼ −1.4 pp▲ +10,695▼ −0.4 pp▼ −232▼ −0.9 pp▲ +10,927
Firm size: 250–499 employees 1.1%56 1.0%60 4.2%270 ▲ +3.1 pp▲ +214▲ +3.3 pp▲ +210▼ −0.2 pp▲ +4
Los Angeles citywide 5.7%81,669 4.9%79,784 4.9%82,110 ▼ −0.7 pp▲ +441– 0.0 pp▲ +2,326▼ −0.7 pp▼ −1,885
Firm size: 500 or more employees 18.7%920 16.6%1,034 18.2%1,160 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +240▲ +1.6 pp▲ +126▼ −2.1 pp▲ +114
Los Angeles citywide 43.9%634,277 47.2%765,207 47.2%789,502 ▲ +3.3 pp▲ +155,225– 0.0 pp▲ +24,295▲ +3.3 pp▲ +130,930

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Silver Lake
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 6.9% ±1.1 pp6.9%±1.1 pp2,020 ±317
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 72.8% ±5.5 pp5.0%±0.4 pp1,470 ±111
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 27.2% ±8.8 pp1.9%±0.6 pp550 ±177
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 6.9%±1.1 pp6.9%±1.1 pp2,020±317 13.6%±0.1 pp13.6%±0.1 pp524,758±5,328 ▼ -6.7%▼ -6.7% 100/110
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 72.8%±5.5 pp5.0%±0.4 pp1,470±111 86.8%±0.3 pp11.8%±0.0 pp455,658±1,592 ▼ -14.1%▼ -6.8% 85/11098/110
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 27.2%±8.8 pp1.9%±0.6 pp550±177 13.2%±0.4 pp1.8%±0.1 pp69,100±2,036 ▲ +14.1%▲ +0.1% 26/11043/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Silver Lake
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 4.2% ±1.0 pp4.2%±1.0 pp1,228 ±303
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 61.2% ±21.1 pp2.6%±0.9 pp752 ±259
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 38.8% ±18.1 pp1.6%±0.8 pp476 ±222
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 63.5% ±22.2 pp2.6%±0.9 pp780 ±273
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 36.5% ±13.5 pp1.5%±0.6 pp449 ±166
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 4.2%±1.0 pp4.2%±1.0 pp1,228±303 8.1%±0.1 pp8.1%±0.1 pp310,586±4,276 ▼ -3.9%▼ -3.9% 103/110
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 61.2%±21.1 pp2.6%±0.9 pp752±259 70.9%±0.7 pp5.7%±0.1 pp220,274±2,032 ▼ -9.7%▼ -3.2% 88/11099/110
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 38.8%±18.1 pp1.6%±0.8 pp476±222 29.1%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.0 pp90,312±1,878 ▲ +9.7%▼ -0.7% 23/11051/110
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 63.5%±22.2 pp2.6%±0.9 pp780±273 77.3%±0.5 pp6.2%±0.0 pp240,126±1,419 ▼ -13.8%▼ -3.6% 90/110106/110
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 36.5%±13.5 pp1.5%±0.6 pp449±166 22.7%±0.6 pp1.8%±0.0 pp70,460±1,837 ▲ +13.8%▼ -0.3% 21/11053/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category Silver Lake
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 1.9% ±4.0 pp52 ±107
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 0.8% ±3.8 pp11 ±50
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 1.9%±4.0 pp52±107 3.9%±0.3 pp— ▼ -2.0% 69/110
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 0.8%±3.8 pp11±50 4.2%±0.4 pp— ▼ -3.3% 86/110
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category Silver Lake
Owner-Occupied Households 39.2% ±2.6 pp5,673 ±372
Renter-Occupied Households 60.8% ±3.1 pp8,811 ±450
Owner-Occupied Residents 43.8% ±3.2 pp12,736 ±945
Renter-Occupied Residents 56.2% ±3.2 pp16,375 ±944
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Owner-Occupied Households 39.2%±2.6 pp5,673±372 36.0%±0.3 pp518,423±4,359 ▲ +3.1% 58/110
Renter-Occupied Households 60.8%±3.1 pp8,811±450 64.0%±0.3 pp920,674±4,643 ▼ -3.1% 53/110
Owner-Occupied Residents 43.8%±3.2 pp12,736±945 40.2%±0.4 pp1,509,388±15,216 ▲ +3.5% 55/110
Renter-Occupied Residents 56.2%±3.2 pp16,375±944 59.8%±0.4 pp2,243,250±15,217 ▼ -3.5% 56/110
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category Silver Lake
Median Year Moved In 2014±1.0 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later 4.6% ±1.3 pp667 ±183
Moved in 2020 to 2022 25.1% ±2.5 pp3,641 ±369
Moved in 2010 to 2019 35.9% ±3.7 pp5,211 ±532
Moved in 2000 to 2009 14.9% ±2.3 pp2,160 ±337
Moved in 1990 to 1999 11.1% ±2.1 pp1,611 ±298
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 8.4% ±1.6 pp1,221 ±229
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Median Year Moved In 2014±1.0 yr 2014±1.0 yr 0 30/110
Moved in 2023 or Later 4.6%±1.3 pp667±183 4.9%±0.1 pp70,211±2,138 ▼ -0.3% 45/110
Moved in 2020 to 2022 25.1%±2.5 pp3,641±369 20.6%±0.3 pp296,921±3,730 ▲ +4.5% 20/110
Moved in 2010 to 2019 35.9%±3.7 pp5,211±532 40.3%±0.3 pp580,466±4,993 ▼ -4.4% 91/110
Moved in 2000 to 2009 14.9%±2.3 pp2,160±337 16.2%±0.2 pp233,668±3,490 ▼ -1.4% 77/110
Moved in 1990 to 1999 11.1%±2.1 pp1,611±298 9.8%±0.2 pp140,815±2,779 ▲ +1.3% 43/110
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 8.4%±1.6 pp1,221±229 8.1%±0.2 pp117,016±2,469 ▲ +0.3% 64/110
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show
Category Silver Lake
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 13.8% ±2.1 pp13.8%±2.1 pp3,997 ±613
↳ Moved Within Los Angeles County (of recent movers) 10.3% ±1.9 pp75.0%±7.1 pp2,998 ±540
↳ Moved from Different California County (of recent movers) 0.8% ±0.6 pp5.6%±4.3 pp224 ±174
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 2.2% ±0.7 pp15.7%±4.2 pp628 ±194
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 0.5% ±0.6 pp3.7%±4.3 pp147 ±173
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 13.8%±2.1 pp13.8%±2.1 pp3,997±613 10.7%±0.2 pp10.7%±0.2 pp408,463±7,943 ▲ +3.1%▲ +3.1% 24/110
↳ Moved Within Los Angeles County (of recent movers) 10.3%±1.9 pp75.0%±7.1 pp2,998±540 7.4%±0.2 pp69.3%±1.2 pp283,263±7,240 ▲ +2.9%▲ +5.7% 14/11038/110
↳ Moved from Different California County (of recent movers) 0.8%±0.6 pp5.6%±4.3 pp224±174 1.2%±0.0 pp11.0%±0.4 pp45,056±1,766 ▼ -0.4%▼ -5.4% 59/11090/110
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 2.2%±0.7 pp15.7%±4.2 pp628±194 1.3%±0.1 pp12.3%±0.5 pp50,444±2,220 ▲ +0.8%▲ +3.4% 28/11030/110
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 0.5%±0.6 pp3.7%±4.3 pp147±173 0.8%±0.0 pp7.3%±0.4 pp29,700±1,624 ▼ -0.3%▼ -3.6% 66/11090/110
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show
Category Silver Lake
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 8.3% ±1.9 pp8.3%±1.9 pp1,308 ±304
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 1.6% ±0.7 pp19.9%±7.7 pp260 ±118
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.0% ±0.3 pp0.0%0
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.6% ±0.6 pp7.2%±6.5 pp94 ±88
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 6.0% ±1.9 pp73.0%±15.8 pp955 ±303
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 2.8% ±1.3 pp2.8%±1.3 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 0.0% ±0.9 pp0.0%±0.9 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 8.3%±1.9 pp8.3%±1.9 pp1,308±304 7.4%±0.2 pp7.4%±0.2 pp115,235±3,037 ▲ +0.9%▲ +0.9% 38/110
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 1.6%±0.7 pp19.9%±7.7 pp260±118 2.9%±0.1 pp38.6%±1.2 pp44,494±1,787 ▼ -1.2%▼ -18.7% 61/11085/110
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.0%±0.3 pp0.0%0 0.3%±0.0 pp4.0%±0.4 pp4,630±529 ▼ -0.3%▼ -4.0% 83/11083/110
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.6%±0.6 pp7.2%±6.5 pp94±88 0.4%±0.0 pp5.6%±0.6 pp6,482±671 ▲ +0.2%▲ +1.6% 24/11026/110
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 6.0%±1.9 pp73.0%±15.8 pp955±303 3.8%±0.2 pp51.7%±2.8 pp59,629±3,638 ▲ +2.2%▲ +21.3% 14/11022/110
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 2.8%±1.3 pp2.8%±1.3 pp— 4.6%±0.2 pp4.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -1.7%▼ -1.7% 66/110
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 0.0%±0.9 pp0.0%±0.9 pp— 0.9%±0.1 pp0.9%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.9%▼ -0.9% 83/110
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category Silver Lake
Median Year Built 1948±3 yr
Pre-1940 46.3% ±3.1 pp7,331 ±485
1940-2009 50.0% ±3.8 pp7,922 ±607
2010+ 3.6% ±1.1 pp576 ±180
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Median Year Built 1948±3 yr 1965±1 yr ▼ −17 yrs 96/110
Pre-1940 46.3%±3.1 pp7,331±485 19.1%±0.2 pp296,223±3,073 ▲ +27.3% 13/110
1940-2009 50.0%±3.8 pp7,922±607 73.1%±0.4 pp1,136,164±6,801 ▼ -23.0% 91/110
2010+ 3.6%±1.1 pp576±180 7.8%±0.2 pp121,945±2,871 ▼ -4.2% 84/110
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category Silver Lake
Population Density 10,798 /sq mi±516/sq mi
Single-Family Homes 45.2% ±2.9 pp7,158 ±455
Buildings With 2–4 Units 24.7% ±2.8 pp3,917 ±440
Buildings With 5–19 Units 19.8% ±2.7 pp3,128 ±421
Buildings With 20 or More Units 10.2% ±1.6 pp1,614 ±249
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Population Density 10,798 /sq mi±516/sq mi 8,285 /sq mi±14/sq mi ▲ +2,513 /sq mi 54/110
Single-Family Homes 45.2%±2.9 pp7,158±455 41.9%±0.3 pp651,793±4,742 ▲ +3.3% 64/110
Buildings With 2–4 Units 24.7%±2.8 pp3,917±440 9.0%±0.2 pp140,536±2,829 ▲ +15.7% 9/110
Buildings With 5–19 Units 19.8%±2.7 pp3,128±421 18.4%±0.3 pp286,023±4,408 ▲ +1.4% 43/110
Buildings With 20 or More Units 10.2%±1.6 pp1,614±249 29.9%±0.3 pp465,391±4,691 ▼ -19.7% 81/110
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category Silver Lake
Studio 7.7% ±1.4 pp1,214 ±227
1 Bedroom 30.4% ±2.8 pp4,806 ±441
2 Bedrooms 35.3% ±3.1 pp5,594 ±486
3 Bedrooms 19.4% ±2.4 pp3,075 ±375
4 Bedrooms 6.1% ±1.5 pp961 ±233
5 or More Bedrooms 1.1% ±0.6 pp178 ±89
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Studio 7.7%±1.4 pp1,214±227 11.6%±0.2 pp180,439±3,649 ▼ -3.9% 36/110
1 Bedroom 30.4%±2.8 pp4,806±441 23.7%±0.2 pp367,883±3,808 ▲ +6.7% 19/110
2 Bedrooms 35.3%±3.1 pp5,594±486 30.8%±0.3 pp478,829±4,610 ▲ +4.5% 45/110
3 Bedrooms 19.4%±2.4 pp3,075±375 21.9%±0.2 pp339,889±3,797 ▼ -2.4% 78/110
4 Bedrooms 6.1%±1.5 pp961±233 9.1%±0.1 pp140,925±2,101 ▼ -3.0% 70/110
5 or More Bedrooms 1.1%±0.6 pp178±89 3.0%±0.1 pp46,367±1,494 ▼ -1.9% 86/110
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show
Category Silver Lake
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 3.9% ±1.3 pp3.9%±1.3 pp563 ±182
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 1.9% ±0.9 pp50.0%±17.0 pp281 ±132
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 1.9% ±0.9 pp50.0%±15.7 pp282 ±127
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 3.9%±1.3 pp3.9%±1.3 pp563±182 12.1%±0.2 pp12.1%±0.2 pp174,164±3,256 ▼ -8.2%▼ -8.2% 84/110
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 1.9%±0.9 pp50.0%±17.0 pp281±132 5.9%±0.1 pp49.1%±0.8 pp85,502±2,139 ▼ -4.0%▲ +0.9% 81/11065/109
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 1.9%±0.9 pp50.0%±15.7 pp282±127 6.2%±0.2 pp50.9%±1.1 pp88,662±2,479 ▼ -4.2%▼ -0.9% 82/11045/109
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category Silver Lake
Natural Gas Heat 61.1% ±2.7 pp8,873 ±388
Electric Heat 32.9% ±3.3 pp4,771 ±484
Other Heating Source 6.0% ±1.9 pp867 ±270
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Natural Gas Heat 61.1%±2.7 pp8,873±388 57.3%±0.3 pp823,973±4,848 ▲ +3.9% 54/110
Electric Heat 32.9%±3.3 pp4,771±484 34.3%±0.3 pp494,304±4,648 ▼ -1.5% 45/110
Other Heating Source 6.0%±1.9 pp867±270 8.4%±0.2 pp120,823±2,850 ▼ -2.4% 60/110
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show
Category Silver Lake
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 34.3% ±3.3 pp4,975 ±483
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 24.2% ±2.5 pp3,519 ±363
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 41.5% ±3.5 pp6,018 ±510
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 18.7% ±2.6 pp2,713 ±372
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 34.3%±3.3 pp4,975±483 18.4%±0.4 pp264,606±5,364 ▲ +15.9% 19/110
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 24.2%±2.5 pp3,519±363 20.5%±0.3 pp294,961±4,886 ▲ +3.8% 7/110
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 41.5%±3.5 pp6,018±510 56.5%±0.5 pp813,715±6,573 ▼ -15.1% 97/110
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 18.7%±2.6 pp2,713±372 31.1%±0.4 pp447,155±5,566 ▼ -12.4% 105/110
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category Silver Lake
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $773±$111
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,489±$106
Median Monthly Housing Costs $2,298±$91
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $773±$111 $787±$11 ▼ −$14 58/110
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,489±$106 $1,347±$8 ▲ +$142 43/110
Median Monthly Housing Costs $2,298±$91 $2,115±$9 ▲ +$183 45/110
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000 Over $3,000 — 1/110
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000 Over $3,000 — 1/110
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $784 ±77 $928 ±75 $773 ±111 ▼ −$11▼ −$155▲ +$144
Los Angeles citywide $734 ±7 $763 ±8 $787 ±11 ▲ +$53▲ +$24▲ +$29
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $592 ±58 $756 ±61 $773 ±111 ▲ +$181▲ +$16▲ +$165
Los Angeles citywide $554 ±6 $622 ±7 $787 ±11 ▲ +$233▲ +$165▲ +$68
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,240 ±55 $1,438 ±53 $1,489 ±106 ▲ +$249▲ +$50▲ +$199
Los Angeles citywide $1,206 ±4 $1,299 ±6 $1,347 ±8 ▲ +$141▲ +$48▲ +$93
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $935 ±42 $1,172 ±44 $1,489 ±106 ▲ +$553▲ +$317▲ +$237
Los Angeles citywide $910 ±3 $1,058 ±5 $1,347 ±8 ▲ +$437▲ +$289▲ +$148
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,865 ±59 $2,186 ±81 $2,298 ±91 ▲ +$433▲ +$112▲ +$321
Los Angeles citywide $1,817 ±7 $1,985 ±7 $2,115 ±9 ▲ +$298▲ +$130▲ +$169
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,408 ±44 $1,782 ±66 $2,298 ±91 ▲ +$891▲ +$517▲ +$374
Los Angeles citywide $1,371 ±5 $1,618 ±6 $2,115 ±9 ▲ +$744▲ +$497▲ +$247
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $3,277 ±154 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — $2,970 ±11 — ———
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) — $2,671 ±126 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — $2,420 ±9 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Rent

Rent measure
Category Silver Lake
Average Rent Plus Utilities $2,409±$131
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,120±$126
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,619±$75
Median Rent Plus Utilities $2,167±$78
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,925±$197
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities Over $3,500
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities $2,409±$131 $2,131±$12 ▲ +$278 39/110
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,120±$126 $934±$12 ▲ +$186 42/110
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,619±$75 $1,380±$9 ▲ +$239 40/110
Median Rent Plus Utilities $2,167±$78 $1,933±$9 ▲ +$234 42/110
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,925±$197 $2,639±$17 ▲ +$286 40/110
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities Over $3,500 Over $3,500 — 1/110
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake
Average Rent $2,224±$131
10th Percentile Rent $968±$75
25th Percentile Rent $1,453±$77
Median Rent $1,983±$91
75th Percentile Rent $2,756±$169
90th Percentile Rent Over $3,500
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Average Rent $2,224±$131 $1,927±$12 ▲ +$297 38/110
10th Percentile Rent $968±$75 $808±$12 ▲ +$160 44/110
25th Percentile Rent $1,453±$77 $1,217±$8 ▲ +$236 40/110
Median Rent $1,983±$91 $1,765±$8 ▲ +$218 40/110
75th Percentile Rent $2,756±$169 $2,416±$11 ▲ +$340 36/110
90th Percentile Rent Over $3,500 $3,289±$24 ▲ +$211+ 1/110
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category Silver Lake
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $5,032±$452
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,224±$454
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,233±$349
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $5,032±$452 $4,133±$34 ▲ +$899 26/110
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,224±$454 $1,828±$21 ▲ +$396 32/110
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,233±$349 $2,537±$17 ▲ +$695 23/110
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000 $3,497±$23 ▲ +$503+ 1/110
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000 Over $4,000 — 1/110
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000 Over $4,000 — 1/110
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,606 ±191 $4,137 ±202 $5,032 ±452 ▲ +$1,425▲ +$895▲ +$530
Los Angeles citywide $3,870 ±21 $3,856 ±17 $4,133 ±34 ▲ +$263▲ +$276▼ −$13
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,722 ±144 $3,372 ±165 $5,032 ±452 ▲ +$2,310▲ +$1,660▲ +$650
Los Angeles citywide $2,920 ±16 $3,143 ±14 $4,133 ±34 ▲ +$1,212▲ +$990▲ +$223
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,909 ±174 $2,058 ±204 $2,224 ±454 ▲ +$315▲ +$166▲ +$149
Los Angeles citywide $1,744 ±13 $1,827 ±19 $1,828 ±21 ▲ +$85▲ +$2▲ +$83
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,441 ±132 $1,678 ±166 $2,224 ±454 ▲ +$784▲ +$547▲ +$237
Los Angeles citywide $1,316 ±10 $1,489 ±15 $1,828 ±21 ▲ +$512▲ +$340▲ +$173
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,624 ±207 $2,698 ±159 $3,233 ±349 ▲ +$609▲ +$535▲ +$74
Los Angeles citywide $2,379 ±13 $2,448 ±17 $2,537 ±17 ▲ +$158▲ +$89▲ +$69
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,980 ±156 $2,199 ±129 $3,233 ±349 ▲ +$1,253▲ +$1,034▲ +$219
Los Angeles citywide $1,796 ±10 $1,995 ±14 $2,537 ±17 ▲ +$741▲ +$542▲ +$199
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,647 ±190 $3,852 ±290 — ——▲ +$205
Los Angeles citywide $3,315 ±21 $3,342 ±16 $3,497 ±23 ▲ +$182▲ +$155▲ +$27
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,752 ±144 $3,139 ±236 — ——▲ +$387
Los Angeles citywide $2,502 ±16 $2,724 ±13 $3,497 ±23 ▲ +$995▲ +$773▲ +$222
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — $4,663 ±31 — ———
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — $3,800 ±25 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category Silver Lake
Average Monthly Owner Costs $1,226±$156
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $392±$91
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $568±$105
Median Monthly Owner Costs $876±$151
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs Over $1,500
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs Over $1,500
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs $1,226±$156 $1,309±$21 ▼ −$83 35/110
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $392±$91 $456±$10 ▼ −$64 76/110
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $568±$105 $674±$10 ▼ −$106 74/110
Median Monthly Owner Costs $876±$151 $1,001±$14 ▼ −$125 60/110
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs Over $1,500 $1,491±$15 ▲ +$9+ 1/110
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs Over $1,500 Over $1,500 — 1/110
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $807 ±89 $1,030 ±80 $1,226 ±156 ▲ +$418▲ +$196▲ +$223
Los Angeles citywide $974 ±11 $1,068 ±13 $1,309 ±21 ▲ +$335▲ +$242▲ +$93
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $609 ±67 $839 ±66 $1,226 ±156 ▲ +$616▲ +$386▲ +$230
Los Angeles citywide $735 ±8 $870 ±11 $1,309 ±21 ▲ +$574▲ +$439▲ +$135
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $352 ±63 $372 ±121 $392 ±91 ▲ +$40▲ +$20▲ +$20
Los Angeles citywide $372 ±7 $397 ±7 $456 ±10 ▲ +$84▲ +$59▲ +$25
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $266 ±47 $303 ±99 $392 ±91 ▲ +$127▲ +$89▲ +$37
Los Angeles citywide $281 ±5 $323 ±6 $456 ±10 ▲ +$176▲ +$133▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $469 ±95 $580 ±97 $568 ±105 ▲ +$99▼ −$12▲ +$111
Los Angeles citywide $544 ±7 $586 ±8 $674 ±10 ▲ +$130▲ +$88▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $354 ±72 $473 ±79 $568 ±105 ▲ +$214▲ +$95▲ +$118
Los Angeles citywide $410 ±5 $478 ±6 $674 ±10 ▲ +$264▲ +$196▲ +$68
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $763 ±116 $857 ±87 $876 ±151 ▲ +$113▲ +$19▲ +$94
Los Angeles citywide $806 ±11 $880 ±10 $1,001 ±14 ▲ +$195▲ +$121▲ +$74
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $576 ±87 $699 ±71 $876 ±151 ▲ +$300▲ +$177▲ +$123
Los Angeles citywide $608 ±8 $717 ±8 $1,001 ±14 ▲ +$393▲ +$284▲ +$109
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $1,275 ±248 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — $1,304 ±17 $1,491 ±15 —▲ +$187—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — $1,039 ±203 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — $1,062 ±14 $1,491 ±15 —▲ +$428—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $1,827 ±165 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — $1,489 ±134 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Home Values

Category Silver Lake
Average Home Value $1,629,294±$111,821
10th Percentile Home Value $623,741±$149,605
25th Percentile Home Value $1,008,560±$90,733
Median Home Value $1,546,052±$101,907
75th Percentile Home Value Over $2,000,000
90th Percentile Home Value Over $2,000,000
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Average Home Value $1,629,294±$111,821 $1,264,542±$8,234 ▲ +$364,752 26/110
10th Percentile Home Value $623,741±$149,605 $459,299±$5,965 ▲ +$164,442 32/110
25th Percentile Home Value $1,008,560±$90,733 $653,300±$4,641 ▲ +$355,260 22/110
Median Home Value $1,546,052±$101,907 $921,200±$4,782 ▲ +$624,852 21/110
75th Percentile Home Value Over $2,000,000 $1,397,000±$18,800 ▲ +$603,000+ 1/110
90th Percentile Home Value Over $2,000,000 Over $2,000,000 — 1/110
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $868,080 ±48,200 $1,320,002 ±84,482 $1,629,294 ±111,821 ▲ +$761,214▲ +$309,292▲ +$451,922
Los Angeles citywide $824,079 ±6,442 $1,055,784 ±9,073 $1,264,542 ±8,234 ▲ +$440,464▲ +$208,758▲ +$231,705
Average Home Value (nominal dollars) $655,126 ±36,376 $1,075,803 ±68,853 $1,629,294 ±111,821 ▲ +$974,168▲ +$553,491▲ +$420,678
Los Angeles citywide $621,919 ±4,862 $860,465 ±7,394 $1,264,542 ±8,234 ▲ +$642,624▲ +$404,077▲ +$238,547
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $453,536 ±71,001 $643,827 ±107,416 $623,741 ±149,605 ▲ +$170,205▼ −$20,086▲ +$190,291
Los Angeles citywide $274,172 ±2,766 $388,878 ±2,619 $459,299 ±5,965 ▲ +$185,126▲ +$70,421▲ +$114,706
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $342,276 ±53,583 $524,720 ±87,544 $623,741 ±149,605 ▲ +$281,464▲ +$99,021▲ +$182,444
Los Angeles citywide $206,913 ±2,087 $316,936 ±2,134 $459,299 ±5,965 ▲ +$252,385▲ +$142,362▲ +$110,023
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $677,129 ±55,642 $856,150 ±53,041 $1,008,560 ±90,733 ▲ +$331,431▲ +$152,410▲ +$179,021
Los Angeles citywide $413,153 ±2,182 $543,435 ±2,444 $653,300 ±4,641 ▲ +$240,147▲ +$109,865▲ +$130,281
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $511,018 ±41,992 $697,763 ±43,228 $1,008,560 ±90,733 ▲ +$497,541▲ +$310,796▲ +$186,745
Los Angeles citywide $311,800 ±1,647 $442,900 ±1,992 $653,300 ±4,641 ▲ +$341,500▲ +$210,400▲ +$131,100
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $916,449 ±39,791 $1,196,764 ±60,953 $1,546,052 ±101,907 ▲ +$629,603▲ +$349,288▲ +$280,315
Los Angeles citywide $601,311 ±2,870 $781,471 ±2,656 $921,200 ±4,782 ▲ +$319,889▲ +$139,729▲ +$180,160
Median Home Value (nominal dollars) $691,629 ±30,030 $975,364 ±49,677 $1,546,052 ±101,907 ▲ +$854,423▲ +$570,688▲ +$283,735
Los Angeles citywide $453,800 ±2,166 $636,900 ±2,165 $921,200 ±4,782 ▲ +$467,400▲ +$284,300▲ +$183,100
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,209,293 ±41,704 $1,688,288 ±72,744 — ——▲ +$478,995
Los Angeles citywide $957,885 ±4,252 $1,163,924 ±5,481 $1,397,000 ±18,800 ▲ +$439,115▲ +$233,076▲ +$206,040
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $912,634 ±31,473 $1,375,958 ±59,286 — ——▲ +$463,324
Los Angeles citywide $722,900 ±3,209 $948,600 ±4,467 $1,397,000 ±18,800 ▲ +$674,100▲ +$448,400▲ +$225,700
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $2,246,568 ±140,827 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — $2,103,035 ±25,625 — ———
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) — $1,830,956 ±114,774 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — $1,713,977 ±20,884 — ———

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show
Category Silver Lake
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 1.0%1.0%161
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.5%53.4%86
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.2%19.3%31
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.3%27.3%44
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 1.0%1.0%161 5.5%5.5%84,827 ▼ -4.4%▼ -4.4% 87/110
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.5%53.4%86 3.5%64.0%54,313 ▼ -2.9%▼ -10.6% 92/11080/107
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0 0.4%7.1%6,040 ▼ -0.4%▼ -7.1% 13/11013/107
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.2%19.3%31 1.4%25.1%21,260 ▼ -1.2%▼ -5.8% 73/11048/107
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.3%27.3%44 0.2%3.8%3,214 ▲ +0.1%▲ +23.5% 24/1108/107
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units 1.5%227 1.3%190 1.0%161 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −66▼ −0.2 pp▼ −29▼ −0.3 pp▼ −37
Los Angeles citywide 5.6%79,280 5.5%82,357 5.5%84,827 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5,547▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,470– 0.0 pp▲ +3,077
Housing Choice Vouchers 0.9%141 0.7%102 0.5%86 ▼ −0.4 pp▼ −55▼ −0.1 pp▼ −16▼ −0.3 pp▼ −39
Los Angeles citywide 3.4%47,994 3.4%50,854 3.5%54,313 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +6,319▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,459– 0.0 pp▲ +2,860
Public Housing 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 0.5%7,024 0.5%7,038 0.4%6,040 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −984▼ −0.1 pp▼ −998– 0.0 pp▲ +14
Project-Based Section 8 0.3%48 0.3%46 0.2%31 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −17▼ −0.1 pp▼ −15– 0.0 pp▼ −2
Los Angeles citywide 1.5%21,053 1.4%21,190 1.4%21,260 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +207▼ −0.1 pp▲ +70▼ −0.1 pp▲ +137
Other Project-Based Programs 0.3%39 0.3%42 0.3%44 – 0.0 pp▲ +5– 0.0 pp▲ +2– 0.0 pp▲ +3
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%3,209 0.2%3,275 0.2%3,214 – 0.0 pp▲ +5– 0.0 pp▼ −61– 0.0 pp▲ +66
Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category Silver Lake
Average Household Income $22,466
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $564
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,698
Below 30% of Area Median Income 86.7%116
With Children 11.4%15
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 54.2%73
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $22,466 $20,771 ▲ +$1,695 35/101
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $564 $532 ▲ +$32 39/101
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,698 $1,653 ▲ +$45 65/101
Below 30% of Area Median Income 86.7%116 88.0%66,617 ▼ -1.3 pp 54/101
With Children 11.4%15 20.0%15,140 ▼ -8.6 pp 72/101
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 54.2%73 43.0%32,551 ▲ +11.2 pp 20/101
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income $15,392 $17,868 $23,210 ▲ +$7,818▲ +$5,342▲ +$2,476
Los Angeles citywide $14,082 $16,770 $20,771 ▲ +$6,689▲ +$4,001▲ +$2,688
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $403 $465 $579 ▲ +$176▲ +$113▲ +$62
Los Angeles citywide $372 $432 $532 ▲ +$160▲ +$100▲ +$60
Average Monthly Government Spending $973 $1,277 $1,881 ▲ +$909▲ +$604▲ +$304
Los Angeles citywide $795 $1,013 $1,653 ▲ +$858▲ +$640▲ +$218
Below 30% of Area Median Income 78.8%— 81.7%— 85.5%— ▲ +6.8 pp—▲ +3.8 pp—▲ +2.9 pp—
Los Angeles citywide 84.0%— 85.0%— 88.0%— ▲ +4.0 pp—▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children — — 13.1%— ——————
Los Angeles citywide — — 20.0%— ——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 56.4%— 52.2%— 51.5%— ▼ −4.8 pp—▼ −0.6 pp—▼ −4.2 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category Silver Lake
Total Tree Canopy 20.6%358 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 59.2%1,029 acres
Natural Open Surfaces 20.2%351 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Total Tree Canopy 20.6%358 acres 15.3%46,226 acres ▲ +5.3% 20/110
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 59.2%1,029 acres 56.2%170,078 acres ▲ +3.0% 79/110
Natural Open Surfaces 20.2%351 acres 28.5%86,111 acres ▼ -8.3% 37/110
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category Silver Lake
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 28.6% ±4.1 pp8,395 ±1,208
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 47.0% ±4.8 pp13,816 ±1,397
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 24.5% ±4.3 pp7,193 ±1,253
Heat Exposed 34.0%10,008
Homes Without Air Conditioning 14.0%4,126
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. Heat Exposed is the share of residents living in census tracts the Census Bureau flagged as exposed to extreme heat in 2022. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates; neither those nor the heat exposure figures have a margin of error, as with CDC PLACES data.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 28.6%±4.1 pp8,395±1,208 19.5%±0.3 pp751,543±13,280 ▲ +9.1% 26/110
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 47.0%±4.8 pp13,816±1,397 47.6%±0.4 pp1,834,233±16,767 ▼ -0.6% 60/110
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 24.5%±4.3 pp7,193±1,253 33.0%±0.4 pp1,271,488±15,545 ▼ -8.5% 81/110
Heat Exposed 34.0%10,008 52.6%2,030,766 ▼ -18.6% 52/110
Homes Without Air Conditioning 14.0%4,126 19.5%751,358 ▼ -5.4% 70/110
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. Heat Exposed is the share of residents living in census tracts the Census Bureau flagged as exposed to extreme heat in 2022. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates; neither those nor the heat exposure figures have a margin of error, as with CDC PLACES data.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category Silver Lake
Drove Alone 78.8% ±2.5 pp8,190 ±260
Carpooled 6.2% ±1.7 pp647 ±175
Public Transit 5.6% ±1.7 pp579 ±172
Walked 3.3% ±1.7 pp346 ±177
Bikes 0.9% ±0.7 pp95 ±74
Other Commute Mode 4.1% ±1.6 pp431 ±169
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Drove Alone 78.8%±2.5 pp8,190±260 74.3%±0.1 pp1,409,806±2,191 ▲ +4.5% 52/110
Carpooled 6.2%±1.7 pp647±175 10.8%±0.2 pp204,995±4,626 ▼ -4.6% 92/110
Public Transit 5.6%±1.7 pp579±172 7.6%±0.2 pp144,003±3,960 ▼ -2.0% 50/110
Walked 3.3%±1.7 pp346±177 4.0%±0.1 pp75,140±2,786 ▼ -0.6% 38/110
Bikes 0.9%±0.7 pp95±74 0.7%±0.1 pp13,831±1,185 ▲ +0.2% 34/110
Other Commute Mode 4.1%±1.6 pp431±169 2.6%±0.1 pp49,004±2,073 ▲ +1.6% 9/110
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category Silver Lake
Average Commute Time (minutes) 30 min±1.2 min
Less Than 15 Minutes 15.4% ±2.8 pp1,595 ±295
15–29 Minutes 36.7% ±3.5 pp3,805 ±368
30–44 Minutes 24.4% ±2.9 pp2,538 ±298
45–59 Minutes 12.8% ±2.3 pp1,329 ±239
60 Minutes or More 10.7% ±2.1 pp1,114 ±221
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes) 30 min±1.2 min 31 min±0.2 min ▼ −0 min 63/110
Less Than 15 Minutes 15.4%±2.8 pp1,595±295 15.9%±0.3 pp241,948±4,532 ▼ -0.5% 55/110
15–29 Minutes 36.7%±3.5 pp3,805±368 33.1%±0.3 pp504,776±4,959 ▲ +3.6% 30/110
30–44 Minutes 24.4%±2.9 pp2,538±298 28.9%±0.3 pp440,595±5,010 ▼ -4.4% 77/110
45–59 Minutes 12.8%±2.3 pp1,329±239 10.3%±0.2 pp156,750±2,883 ▲ +2.5% 17/110
60 Minutes or More 10.7%±2.1 pp1,114±221 11.9%±0.2 pp182,392±3,293 ▼ -1.2% 69/110
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category Silver Lake
Average Vehicles per Household 1.42±0.07
Households With No Vehicle 8.8% ±1.6 pp1,273 ±239
Households With 1 Vehicle 49.7% ±3.7 pp7,211 ±535
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 41.5% ±3.0 pp6,027 ±431
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Average Vehicles per Household 1.42±0.07 1.61±0.01 ▼ −0.19 86/110
Households With No Vehicle 8.8%±1.6 pp1,273±239 11.9%±0.2 pp171,011±3,141 ▼ -3.1% 57/110
Households With 1 Vehicle 49.7%±3.7 pp7,211±535 40.0%±0.3 pp575,741±4,305 ▲ +9.7% 15/110
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 41.5%±3.0 pp6,027±431 48.1%±0.4 pp692,345±5,259 ▼ -6.6% 84/110
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Silver Lake Residents Work

Category Silver Lake
Downtown 7.8%1,279
Century City 4.0%653
Silver Lake 3.6%596
Hollywood 3.4%557
Studio City 2.9%471
All other city neighborhoods 28.0%4,589
Outside the city 50.4%8,263
Burbank city, CA 15.3%2,504
Pasadena city, CA 2.4%393
Culver City city, CA 2.4%391
Glendale city, CA 2.3%371
Beverly Hills city, CA 1.5%244
All other California locations 25.6%4,208
Out of state 0.9%152
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 85 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Silver Lake
Downtown 7.8%1,279
Century City 4.0%653
Silver Lake 3.6%596
Hollywood 3.4%557
Studio City 2.9%471
All other city neighborhoods 28.0%4,589
Outside the city 50.4%8,263
Burbank city, CA 15.3%2,504
Pasadena city, CA 2.4%393
Culver City city, CA 2.4%391
Glendale city, CA 2.3%371
Beverly Hills city, CA 1.5%244
All other California locations 25.6%4,208
Out of state 0.9%152
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 85 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Downtown 9.1%1,443 8.4%1,460 7.8%1,279 ▼ −1.3 pp▼ −164▼ −0.6 pp▼ −181▼ −0.7 pp▲ +17
Los Angeles citywide 6.5%101,766 6.3%110,069 5.7%102,316 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +550▼ −0.5 pp▼ −7,753▼ −0.3 pp▲ +8,303
Century City 3.5%555 4.4%762 4.0%653 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +98▼ −0.4 pp▼ −109▲ +0.9 pp▲ +207
Los Angeles citywide 2.0%31,503 2.4%42,782 2.4%42,199 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +10,696▼ −0.1 pp▼ −583▲ +0.4 pp▲ +11,279
Silver Lake 2.5%398 3.1%542 3.6%596 ▲ +1.1 pp▲ +198▲ +0.5 pp▲ +54▲ +0.6 pp▲ +144
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%2,961 0.2%3,803 0.2%3,909 – 0.0 pp▲ +948– 0.0 pp▲ +106– 0.0 pp▲ +842
Hollywood 3.5%554 3.9%681 3.4%557 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +3▼ −0.5 pp▼ −124▲ +0.4 pp▲ +127
Los Angeles citywide 1.9%30,243 2.1%36,681 1.8%32,824 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,581▼ −0.2 pp▼ −3,857▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,438
Studio City 1.8%280 2.0%343 2.9%471 ▲ +1.1 pp▲ +191▲ +0.9 pp▲ +128▲ +0.2 pp▲ +63
Los Angeles citywide 1.2%18,025 1.4%24,187 1.8%32,522 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +14,497▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,335▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,162
All other city neighborhoods 27.6%4,368 27.5%4,782 28.0%4,589 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +221▲ +0.5 pp▼ −193▼ −0.2 pp▲ +414
Los Angeles citywide 29.3%458,023 29.5%518,759 30.0%536,497 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +78,474▲ +0.5 pp▲ +17,738▲ +0.2 pp▲ +60,736
Outside the city 51.5%8,144 50.6%8,812 50.4%8,263 ▼ −1.2 pp▲ +119▼ −0.2 pp▼ −549▼ −0.9 pp▲ +668
Los Angeles citywide 49.2%770,441 48.8%858,729 49.1%878,687 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +108,246▲ +0.4 pp▲ +19,958▼ −0.5 pp▲ +88,288
Burbank city, CA 12.5%1,982 15.0%2,608 15.3%2,504 ▲ +2.7 pp▲ +522▲ +0.3 pp▼ −104▲ +2.4 pp▲ +626
Los Angeles citywide 5.8%90,525 7.3%128,165 7.5%134,652 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +44,127▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,487▲ +1.5 pp▲ +37,640
Pasadena city, CA 2.7%420 2.2%375 2.4%393 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −27▲ +0.2 pp▲ +18▼ −0.5 pp▼ −45
Los Angeles citywide 1.4%21,211 1.2%21,595 1.2%21,859 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +648– 0.0 pp▲ +264▼ −0.1 pp▲ +384
Culver City city, CA 3.4%533 2.7%463 2.4%391 ▼ −1.0 pp▼ −142▼ −0.3 pp▼ −72▼ −0.7 pp▼ −70
Los Angeles citywide 2.1%32,497 1.8%31,673 1.8%33,021 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +524– 0.0 pp▲ +1,348▼ −0.3 pp▼ −824
Glendale city, CA 2.3%366 2.6%461 2.3%371 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5▼ −0.4 pp▼ −90▲ +0.3 pp▲ +95
Los Angeles citywide 1.9%30,184 2.0%36,041 1.9%34,608 – 0.0 pp▲ +4,424▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,433▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5,857
Beverly Hills city, CA 2.0%319 1.5%265 1.5%244 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −75– 0.0 pp▼ −21▼ −0.5 pp▼ −54
Los Angeles citywide 1.8%27,631 1.7%29,383 1.6%28,364 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +733▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,019▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,752
All other California locations 27.8%4,399 25.4%4,422 25.6%4,208 ▼ −2.2 pp▼ −191▲ +0.2 pp▼ −214▼ −2.4 pp▲ +23
Los Angeles citywide 31.0%485,821 29.7%523,763 30.3%541,371 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +55,550▲ +0.5 pp▲ +17,608▼ −1.3 pp▲ +37,942
Out of state 0.8%125 1.2%216 0.9%152 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +27▼ −0.3 pp▼ −64▲ +0.4 pp▲ +91
Los Angeles citywide 0.8%12,591 0.9%15,245 0.9%15,599 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,008– 0.0 pp▲ +354▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,654

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Silver Lake

Category Silver Lake
Silver Lake 9.1%596
East Hollywood 3.2%212
Westlake 3.0%196
Echo Park 2.6%173
Los Feliz 2.5%166
All other city neighborhoods 39.3%2,566
Outside the city 40.1%2,622
Glendale city, CA 3.6%232
Pasadena city, CA 1.9%124
Burbank city, CA 1.5%95
East Los Angeles CDP, CA 1.1%71
Inglewood city, CA 0.9%61
All other California locations 30.9%2,020
Out of state 0.3%19
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 85; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Silver Lake
Silver Lake 9.1%596
East Hollywood 3.2%212
Westlake 3.0%196
Echo Park 2.6%173
Los Feliz 2.5%166
All other city neighborhoods 39.3%2,566
Outside the city 40.1%2,622
Glendale city, CA 3.6%232
Pasadena city, CA 1.9%124
Burbank city, CA 1.5%95
East Los Angeles CDP, CA 1.1%71
Inglewood city, CA 0.9%61
All other California locations 30.9%2,020
Out of state 0.3%19
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 85; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Silver Lake 7.8%398 8.5%542 9.1%596 ▲ +1.3 pp▲ +198▲ +0.6 pp▲ +54▲ +0.7 pp▲ +144
Los Angeles citywide 0.4%7,662 0.4%8,600 0.4%8,145 – 0.0 pp▲ +483– 0.0 pp▼ −455– 0.0 pp▲ +938
East Hollywood 3.2%161 3.2%204 3.2%212 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +51– 0.0 pp▲ +8– 0.0 pp▲ +43
Los Angeles citywide 0.8%14,576 0.8%16,205 0.8%15,742 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,166– 0.0 pp▼ −463– 0.0 pp▲ +1,629
Westlake 2.3%118 2.5%158 3.0%196 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +78▲ +0.5 pp▲ +38▲ +0.2 pp▲ +40
Los Angeles citywide 1.0%17,644 1.1%21,165 1.1%21,699 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,055– 0.0 pp▲ +534▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,521
Echo Park 3.7%188 3.2%206 2.6%173 ▼ −1.1 pp▼ −15▼ −0.6 pp▼ −33▼ −0.5 pp▲ +18
Los Angeles citywide 0.5%7,872 0.5%8,836 0.4%8,587 – 0.0 pp▲ +715– 0.0 pp▼ −249– 0.0 pp▲ +964
Los Feliz 3.3%168 2.9%185 2.5%166 ▼ −0.8 pp▼ −2▼ −0.4 pp▼ −19▼ −0.4 pp▲ +17
Los Angeles citywide 0.6%9,614 0.5%10,591 0.5%10,161 – 0.0 pp▲ +547– 0.0 pp▼ −430– 0.0 pp▲ +977
All other city neighborhoods 38.0%1,928 39.1%2,487 39.3%2,566 ▲ +1.3 pp▲ +638▲ +0.2 pp▲ +79▲ +1.1 pp▲ +559
Los Angeles citywide 32.8%567,333 33.2%640,964 32.5%645,360 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +78,027▼ −0.7 pp▲ +4,396▲ +0.4 pp▲ +73,631
Outside the city 41.7%2,118 40.3%2,563 40.1%2,622 ▼ −1.6 pp▲ +504▼ −0.1 pp▲ +59▼ −1.4 pp▲ +445
Los Angeles citywide 54.0%933,111 53.3%1,028,920 54.2%1,077,964 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +144,853▲ +1.0 pp▲ +49,044▼ −0.7 pp▲ +95,809
Glendale city, CA 3.6%185 3.9%250 3.6%232 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +47▼ −0.4 pp▼ −18▲ +0.3 pp▲ +65
Los Angeles citywide 1.9%33,158 1.8%35,528 1.7%34,665 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +1,507▼ −0.1 pp▼ −863▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,370
Pasadena city, CA 1.7%86 2.0%127 1.9%124 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +38▼ −0.1 pp▼ −3▲ +0.3 pp▲ +41
Los Angeles citywide 0.9%15,363 1.0%18,429 0.9%18,729 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,366– 0.0 pp▲ +300▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,066
Burbank city, CA 1.3%67 1.6%105 1.5%95 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +28▼ −0.2 pp▼ −10▲ +0.3 pp▲ +38
Los Angeles citywide 1.2%21,242 1.2%23,162 1.2%23,280 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,038– 0.0 pp▲ +118– 0.0 pp▲ +1,920
East Los Angeles CDP, CA 1.0%50 1.2%75 1.1%71 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +21▼ −0.1 pp▼ −4▲ +0.2 pp▲ +25
Los Angeles citywide 0.7%12,586 0.7%14,417 0.7%14,835 – 0.0 pp▲ +2,249– 0.0 pp▲ +418– 0.0 pp▲ +1,831
Inglewood city, CA 0.6%30 0.6%37 0.9%61 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +31▲ +0.4 pp▲ +24– 0.0 pp▲ +7
Los Angeles citywide 1.1%18,545 1.1%20,678 1.0%19,503 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +958▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,175– 0.0 pp▲ +2,133
All other California locations 32.4%1,644 30.3%1,928 30.9%2,020 ▼ −1.4 pp▲ +376▲ +0.6 pp▲ +92▼ −2.1 pp▲ +284
Los Angeles citywide 42.9%741,882 42.0%811,195 42.9%852,367 – 0.0 pp▲ +110,485▲ +0.9 pp▲ +41,172▼ −0.9 pp▲ +69,313
Out of state 0.5%24 0.5%32 0.3%19 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −5▼ −0.2 pp▼ −13– 0.0 pp▲ +8
Los Angeles citywide 0.7%12,235 0.9%18,318 1.4%27,218 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +14,983▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,900▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,083

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category Silver Lake
No Computer or Smartphone 2.0% ±0.8 pp296 ±117
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 3.1% ±1.1 pp453 ±153
Desktop or Laptop Available 92.6% ±1.7 pp13,438 ±249
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
No Computer or Smartphone 2.0%±0.8 pp296±117 3.6%±0.1 pp51,208±2,038 ▼ -1.5% 86/110
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 3.1%±1.1 pp453±153 9.4%±0.2 pp134,973±3,565 ▼ -6.3% 85/110
Desktop or Laptop Available 92.6%±1.7 pp13,438±249 81.8%±0.3 pp1,177,551±4,293 ▲ +10.8% 19/110
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category Silver Lake
Has Internet Access 96.2% ±1.4 pp13,963 ±196
Cellular Data Plan Only 9.2% ±1.8 pp1,339 ±258
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 0.8% ±0.6 pp112 ±87
No Internet Access 3.8% ±1.2 pp548 ±176
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Has Internet Access 96.2%±1.4 pp13,963±196 94.6%±0.2 pp1,361,126±2,605 ▲ +1.6% 44/110
Cellular Data Plan Only 9.2%±1.8 pp1,339±258 11.8%±0.2 pp169,117±3,594 ▼ -2.5% 67/110
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 0.8%±0.6 pp112±87 1.9%±0.1 pp27,326±1,276 ▼ -1.1% 94/110
No Internet Access 3.8%±1.2 pp548±176 5.4%±0.2 pp77,971±2,871 ▼ -1.6% 67/110
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category Silver Lake
Uninsured Residents 4.9% ±1.2 pp1,431 ±347
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 0.9% ±1.5 pp270 ±448
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 6.3% ±1.6 pp1,858 ±456
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 0.6% ±1.4 pp165 ±420
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Uninsured Residents 4.9%±1.2 pp1,431±347 9.5%±0.1 pp364,737±5,658 ▼ -4.6% 85/110
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 0.9%±1.5 pp270±448 3.3%±0.2 pp125,674±9,529 ▼ -2.3% 86/110
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 6.3%±1.6 pp1,858±456 13.1%±0.2 pp506,732±8,090 ▼ -6.8% 85/110
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 0.6%±1.4 pp165±420 1.9%±0.2 pp72,725±8,443 ▼ -1.3% 79/110
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category Silver Lake
Insured (Any Coverage) 95.1% ±1.2 pp27,724 ±344
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 52.5% ±2.3 pp15,310 ±667
Direct-Purchase Insurance 20.4% ±2.4 pp5,931 ±691
Medicare 11.8% ±1.6 pp3,445 ±458
Medicaid 13.1% ±1.5 pp3,828 ±431
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.0% ±0.5 pp0
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 5.1% ±1.1 pp1,484 ±334
Uninsured 4.9% ±1.2 pp1,418 ±344
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Insured (Any Coverage) 95.1%±1.2 pp27,724±344 90.5%±0.2 pp3,468,249±6,113 ▲ +4.6% 26/110
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 52.5%±2.3 pp15,310±667 40.6%±0.3 pp1,556,236±11,598 ▲ +11.9% 30/110
Direct-Purchase Insurance 20.4%±2.4 pp5,931±691 11.5%±0.2 pp439,171±6,009 ▲ +8.9% 19/110
Medicare 11.8%±1.6 pp3,445±458 13.1%±0.2 pp502,686±5,846 ▼ -1.3% 83/110
Medicaid 13.1%±1.5 pp3,828±431 30.1%±0.2 pp1,152,695±9,490 ▼ -17.0% 80/110
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.0%±0.5 pp0 0.2%±0.0 pp8,178±741 ▼ -0.2% 92/110
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 5.1%±1.1 pp1,484±334 4.2%±0.1 pp160,627±3,851 ▲ +0.9% 32/110
Uninsured 4.9%±1.2 pp1,418±344 9.5%±0.2 pp362,202±6,113 ▼ -4.6% 85/110
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category Silver Lake
Adults With at Least One Disability 9.9% ±1.3 pp2,520 ±333
Mobility Disability 3.7% ±0.9 pp933 ±218
Hearing Disability 2.2% ±0.7 pp550 ±188
Vision Disability 1.8% ±0.7 pp462 ±181
Cognitive Disability 4.4% ±0.9 pp1,119 ±235
Self-Care Disability 1.8% ±0.6 pp449 ±164
Independent Living Disability 3.5% ±0.8 pp882 ±210
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability 9.9%±1.3 pp2,520±333 13.4%±0.2 pp413,424±4,833 ▼ -3.5% 94/110
Mobility Disability 3.7%±0.9 pp933±218 7.1%±0.1 pp220,306±3,715 ▼ -3.5% 105/110
Hearing Disability 2.2%±0.7 pp550±188 3.0%±0.1 pp92,708±2,400 ▼ -0.8% 99/110
Vision Disability 1.8%±0.7 pp462±181 2.7%±0.1 pp83,292±2,320 ▼ -0.9% 81/110
Cognitive Disability 4.4%±0.9 pp1,119±235 5.1%±0.1 pp158,649±3,239 ▼ -0.7% 75/110
Self-Care Disability 1.8%±0.6 pp449±164 3.4%±0.1 pp104,391±2,633 ▼ -1.6% 99/110
Independent Living Disability 3.5%±0.8 pp882±210 6.1%±0.1 pp187,616±3,478 ▼ -2.6% 100/110
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category Silver Lake
Arthritis 16.4%3,723
High Blood Pressure 24.7%5,586
Cancer 5.6%1,264
Current Asthma 8.9%2,005
Coronary Heart Disease 3.8%853
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 3.3%750
Diabetes 8.5%1,929
High Cholesterol 33.5%7,583
Obesity 23.2%5,246
Stroke 2.2%493
Lost All Natural Teeth 0.9%207
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Arthritis 16.4%3,723 18.8%558,377 ▼ -2.4% 102/110
High Blood Pressure 24.7%5,586 28.8%855,387 ▼ -4.1% 102/110
Cancer 5.6%1,264 5.4%160,385 ▲ +0.2% 50/110
Current Asthma 8.9%2,005 9.4%279,189 ▼ -0.5% 86/110
Coronary Heart Disease 3.8%853 5.0%148,505 ▼ -1.2% 102/110
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 3.3%750 4.9%145,535 ▼ -1.6% 105/110
Diabetes 8.5%1,929 11.9%353,441 ▼ -3.4% 86/110
High Cholesterol 33.5%7,583 35.2%1,045,473 ▼ -1.7% 95/110
Obesity 23.2%5,246 27.3%810,835 ▼ -4.1% 80/110
Stroke 2.2%493 3.1%92,073 ▼ -0.9% 104/110
Lost All Natural Teeth 0.9%207 1.9%55,491 ▼ -1.0% 97/110
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category Silver Lake
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 18.3%4,135
Current Cigarette Smoking 8.7%1,974
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 17.7%4,002
Short Sleep Duration 33.1%7,500
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 18.3%4,135 15.9%472,245 ▲ +2.4% 15/110
Current Cigarette Smoking 8.7%1,974 11.9%353,441 ▼ -3.2% 80/110
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 17.7%4,002 26.5%787,075 ▼ -8.8% 81/110
Short Sleep Duration 33.1%7,500 36.5%1,084,084 ▼ -3.4% 80/110
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category Silver Lake
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 16.0%3,619
Frequent Physical Distress 10.6%2,407
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 16.0%3,619 25.1%745,493 ▼ -9.1% 81/110
Frequent Physical Distress 10.6%2,407 14.4%427,693 ▼ -3.8% 88/110
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category Silver Lake
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 67.1%15,181
Routine Checkup in Past Year 70.9%16,055
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 86.6%19,610
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 57.8%13,076
Dental Visit in Past Year 70.0%15,844
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 77.9%17,633
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 67.1%15,181 69.3%2,058,274 ▼ -2.2% 90/110
Routine Checkup in Past Year 70.9%16,055 70.5%2,093,916 ▲ +0.4% 59/110
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 86.6%19,610 83.0%2,465,177 ▲ +3.6% 37/110
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 57.8%13,076 54.0%1,603,850 ▲ +3.8% 44/110
Dental Visit in Past Year 70.0%15,844 58.9%1,749,385 ▲ +11.1% 31/110
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 77.9%17,633 74.8%2,221,630 ▲ +3.1% 36/110
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category Silver Lake
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 20.5%4,652
Frequent Mental Distress 15.2%3,451
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 26.6%6,019
Loneliness 37.6%8,515
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Silver Lake City Difference Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 20.5%4,652 20.4%605,899 ▲ +0.1% 45/110
Frequent Mental Distress 15.2%3,451 17.4%516,796 ▼ -2.2% 84/110
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 26.6%6,019 31.2%926,669 ▼ -4.6% 81/110
Loneliness 37.6%8,515 41.3%1,226,648 ▼ -3.7% 83/110
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Compare All Neighborhoods