Mount Washington, Los Angeles Demographics, Housing & Census Data

Mount Washington, Los Angeles Census and ACS demographic tables: population, race, age, income, poverty, rent, housing types, single-family homes, commute, education, internet access, health insurance, and disability.

Mount Washington, Los Angeles

Mount Washington
Los Angeles
Population
13,400
Overlapping council districts Overlap means that a council district contains part of this neighborhood.
1
Population Density
7,126 /sq mi
Average Geographic Mismatch Error : 1.24 p.p. Geographic mismatch error comes from Census geographic boundaries not perfectly aligning with neighborhood boundaries. We can test how much mismatch error skews neighborhood statistics for a subset of variables. For this neighborhood , the average error is 1.24 percentage points. More detail is available on the neighborhood geography page , and the methodology page explains geographic mismatch error in more detail.
One-page summary

Mount Washington at a Glance

Time period?Historical estimates use this profile's current boundaries, held constant across periods; they do not reflect the boundaries that were in effect at the time. Comparing
Values as
Show as
Add to every table
Showing Chart vs. Los Angeles ± Margin of error

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category Mount Washington
Hispanic 34.5% ±3.6 pp4,625 ±485
White 49.6% ±6.0 pp6,645 ±802
Black 1.4% ±0.7 pp181 ±91
Asian 10.2% ±1.4 pp1,361 ±185
Other or Multi-racial 4.4% ±1.4 pp588 ±183
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Hispanic 34.5%±3.6 pp4,625±485 47.2%±0.2 pp1,820,397±8,107 ▼ -12.7% 59/110
White 49.6%±6.0 pp6,645±802 28.1%±0.2 pp1,082,393±7,330 ▲ +21.5% 33/110
Black 1.4%±0.7 pp181±91 8.1%±0.1 pp311,633±4,801 ▼ -6.7% 100/110
Asian 10.2%±1.4 pp1,361±185 11.9%±0.1 pp460,422±5,784 ▼ -1.8% 54/110
Other or Multi-racial 4.4%±1.4 pp588±183 4.7%±0.1 pp182,418±4,965 ▼ -0.3% 70/110
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Age Distribution

Category Mount Washington
Under 5 6.5% ±2.1 pp876 ±287
5-17 10.2% ±1.9 pp1,364 ±260
18-24 3.9% ±1.3 pp517 ±170
25-44 37.9% ±3.7 pp5,081 ±490
45-64 26.9% ±2.0 pp3,604 ±270
65-74 9.1% ±1.5 pp1,216 ±198
75-84 3.9% ±0.9 pp529 ±126
85+ 1.6% ±0.7 pp213 ±89
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Under 5 6.5%±2.1 pp876±287 5.0%±0.1 pp193,588±3,896 ▲ +1.5% 10/110
5-17 10.2%±1.9 pp1,364±260 14.1%±0.1 pp545,575±5,332 ▼ -4.0% 87/110
18-24 3.9%±1.3 pp517±170 9.5%±0.1 pp364,975±4,663 ▼ -5.6% 108/110
25-44 37.9%±3.7 pp5,081±490 32.7%±0.2 pp1,261,487±6,490 ▲ +5.2% 27/110
45-64 26.9%±2.0 pp3,604±270 24.4%±0.1 pp942,048±5,660 ▲ +2.5% 26/110
65-74 9.1%±1.5 pp1,216±198 8.4%±0.1 pp323,245±3,923 ▲ +0.7% 45/110
75-84 3.9%±0.9 pp529±126 4.0%±0.1 pp153,663±2,663 0% 60/110
85+ 1.6%±0.7 pp213±89 1.9%±0.1 pp72,682±2,184 ▼ -0.3% 72/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category Mount Washington
No High School Diploma 10.9% ±2.6 pp1,159 ±280
High School Diploma or GED 16.3% ±3.3 pp1,740 ±350
Some College or Associate's Degree 16.0% ±2.5 pp1,706 ±263
Bachelor's Degree 30.7% ±2.3 pp3,273 ±245
Graduate Degree 26.1% ±5.8 pp2,789 ±623
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
No High School Diploma 10.9%±2.6 pp1,159±280 20.4%±0.2 pp560,441±5,727 ▼ -9.5% 69/110
High School Diploma or GED 16.3%±3.3 pp1,740±350 18.5%±0.2 pp509,870±5,784 ▼ -2.2% 63/110
Some College or Associate's Degree 16.0%±2.5 pp1,706±263 22.7%±0.2 pp624,064±5,974 ▼ -6.7% 99/110
Bachelor's Degree 30.7%±2.3 pp3,273±245 24.9%±0.2 pp684,319±5,857 ▲ +5.8% 44/110
Graduate Degree 26.1%±5.8 pp2,789±623 13.6%±0.2 pp374,431±4,485 ▲ +12.5% 23/110
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category Mount Washington
Total Population 13,400 ±1,290
Total Households 5,490 ±452
Population Density 7,126 ±686 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington Average Neighborhood Difference
Total Population 13,400 35,102 ▼ −21,702
Total Households 5,490 13,096 ▼ −7,606
Population Density 7,126 people/sq mi 11,693 people/sq mi ▼ −4,567
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average neighborhood rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large neighborhoods. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category 2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19 Difference Rank
Total Population 13,358 ±834 12,903 ±740 13,400 ±1,290 ▲ +42 ±1,536▲ +497 ±1,487▼ −455 ±1,115 ▼ −21,800▼ −23,195▼ −21,702 86/11089/11088/110
Average Neighborhood 35,158 36,098 35,102 ▼ −56▼ −997▲ +940
Total Households 4,748 ±173 4,804 ±176 5,490 ±452 ▲ +742 ±484▲ +686 ±485▲ +56 ±247 ▼ −7,353▼ −7,790▼ −7,606 89/11090/11088/110
Average Neighborhood 12,101 12,594 13,096 ▲ +995▲ +502▲ +493
Population Density (per sq mi) 7,104 ±444 6,862 ±393 7,126 ±686 ▲ +22▲ +264▼ −242 ▼ −4,677▼ −5,209▼ −4,567 79/11083/11081/110
Average Neighborhood Density 11,781 12,071 11,693 ▼ −88▼ −378▲ +291

Household Size

Category Mount Washington
Average Household Size 2.42±0.23
1-Person Households 26.4% ±3.3 pp1,448 ±180
2-Person Households 35.1% ±6.3 pp1,926 ±346
3-Person Households 22.9% ±5.2 pp1,255 ±283
4+ Person Households 15.7% ±3.7 pp861 ±204
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Average Household Size 2.42±0.23 2.61±0.02 ▼ −0.19 67/110
1-Person Households 26.4%±3.3 pp1,448±180 31.8%±0.4 pp458,302±5,082 ▼ -5.5% 60/110
2-Person Households 35.1%±6.3 pp1,926±346 29.2%±0.4 pp419,781±5,238 ▲ +5.9% 23/110
3-Person Households 22.9%±5.2 pp1,255±283 15.5%±0.3 pp222,553±4,097 ▲ +7.4% 1/110
4+ Person Households 15.7%±3.7 pp861±204 23.5%±0.4 pp338,461±5,073 ▼ -7.8% 79/110
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category Mount Washington
Never Married 34.4% ±3.7 pp3,931 ±425
Married 53.1% ±3.6 pp6,065 ±407
Separated 1.3% ±0.8 pp144 ±92
Divorced 8.2% ±1.8 pp941 ±200
Widowed 3.0% ±0.9 pp339 ±99
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Never Married 34.4%±3.7 pp3,931±425 46.8%±0.2 pp1,520,630±7,726 ▼ -12.4% 93/110
Married 53.1%±3.6 pp6,065±407 38.5%±0.2 pp1,249,312±6,703 ▲ +14.7% 9/110
Separated 1.3%±0.8 pp144±92 2.3%±0.1 pp75,298±2,109 ▼ -1.1% 87/110
Divorced 8.2%±1.8 pp941±200 8.0%±0.1 pp260,053±4,066 ▲ +0.2% 57/110
Widowed 3.0%±0.9 pp339±99 4.4%±0.1 pp143,800±3,312 ▼ -1.5% 98/110
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category Mount Washington
Speak English Only 64.6% ±5.4 pp7,868 ±662
Spanish 25.1% ±2.5 pp3,052 ±305
Other Indo-European 3.1% ±4.1 pp377 ±495
Other Languages 2.6% ±1.1 pp321 ±135
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese) 1.7% ±0.7 pp202 ±90
Tagalog (incl. Filipino) 1.6% ±0.8 pp196 ±102
Other Asian and Pacific Island 1.3% ±0.9 pp163 ±111
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Speak English Only 64.6%±5.4 pp7,868±662 43.6%±0.3 pp1,595,910±12,698 ▲ +21.0% 27/110
Spanish 25.1%±2.5 pp3,052±305 39.3%±0.3 pp1,439,364±9,227 ▼ -14.2% 61/110
Other Indo-European 3.1%±4.1 pp377±495 5.3%±0.2 pp192,760±5,783 ▼ -2.2% 56/78
Other Languages 2.6%±1.1 pp321±135 1.0%±0.1 pp36,540±2,239 ▲ +1.6% 60/110
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese) 1.7%±0.7 pp202±90 1.7%±0.1 pp62,141±2,430 0% 39/58
Tagalog (incl. Filipino) 1.6%±0.8 pp196±102 2.3%±0.1 pp85,207±3,084 ▼ -0.7% 44/63
Other Asian and Pacific Island 1.3%±0.9 pp163±111 1.3%±0.1 pp48,809±2,136 0% 47/59
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show
Category Mount Washington
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 88.5% ±3.5 pp88.5%±3.5 pp11,087 ±441
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 5.0% ±1.7 pp5.0%±1.7 pp632 ±217
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 5.8% ±1.6 pp114.4%±50.9 pp723 ±205
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 0.7% ±1.0 pp13.0%±18.5 pp82 ±120
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 11.5% ±2.5 pp227.5%±92.0 pp1,438 ±308
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 88.5%±3.5 pp88.5%±3.5 pp11,087±441 75.0%±0.4 pp75.0%±0.4 pp2,746,425±15,454 ▲ +13.6%▲ +13.6% 35/110
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 5.0%±1.7 pp5.0%±1.7 pp632±217 11.4%±0.2 pp11.4%±0.2 pp417,261±5,774 ▼ -6.3%▼ -6.3% 91/110
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 5.8%±1.6 pp114.4%±50.9 pp723±205 9.5%±0.2 pp83.3%±0.9 pp347,471±6,114 ▼ -3.7%▲ +31.1% 65/11012/110
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 0.7%±1.0 pp13.0%±18.5 pp82±120 4.2%±0.1 pp36.6%±0.8 pp152,518±4,020 ▼ -3.5%▼ -23.6% 85/11079/110
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 11.5%±2.5 pp227.5%±92.0 pp1,438±308 25.0%±0.3 pp219.8%±3.8 pp917,250±9,304 ▼ -13.6%▲ +7.7% 76/11032/110
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category Mount Washington
Married-Couple Households 49.9% ±7.1 pp2,739 ±387
Unmarried-Couple Households 10.1% ±3.1 pp552 ±169
One-Person Households 26.4% ±4.2 pp1,448 ±230
Other Household Types 13.7% ±12.9 pp750 ±706
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Married-Couple Households 49.9%±7.1 pp2,739±387 37.0%±0.3 pp531,842±3,893 ▲ +12.9% 18/110
Unmarried-Couple Households 10.1%±3.1 pp552±169 8.8%±0.2 pp125,985±2,722 ▲ +1.3% 35/110
One-Person Households 26.4%±4.2 pp1,448±230 31.8%±0.3 pp458,302±4,544 ▼ -5.5% 60/110
Other Household Types 13.7%±12.9 pp750±706 22.4%±0.5 pp322,968±7,912 ▼ -8.8% 94/110
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category Mount Washington
Children in Married-Couple Households 78.4% ±13.4 pp1,715 ±292
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 6.3% ±4.4 pp137 ±96
Children in Single-Mother Households 13.6% ±4.7 pp298 ±103
Children in Single-Father Households 1.7% ±2.5 pp38 ±54
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households 78.4%±13.4 pp1,715±292 60.7%±0.6 pp447,843±4,339 ▲ +17.6% 22/110
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 6.3%±4.4 pp137±96 10.9%±0.5 pp80,543±3,499 ▼ -4.7% 73/110
Children in Single-Mother Households 13.6%±4.7 pp298±103 22.7%±0.7 pp167,403±4,794 ▼ -9.1% 77/110
Children in Single-Father Households 1.7%±2.5 pp38±54 5.6%±0.3 pp41,515±2,120 ▼ -3.9% 101/110
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show
Category Mount Washington
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 1.5% ±0.6 pp1.5%±0.6 pp168 ±72
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 0.0% ±32.7 pp0.0%0
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 0.0% ±26.7 pp0.0%0
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 67.7% ±34.7 pp1.0%±0.5 pp114 ±58
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 22.6% ±24.4 pp0.3%±0.4 pp38 ±41
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 9.7% ±42.0 pp0.1%±0.6 pp16 ±71
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 1.5%±0.6 pp1.5%±0.6 pp168±72 2.2%±0.1 pp2.2%±0.1 pp67,714±2,153 ▼ -0.7%▼ -0.7% 80/110
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 0.0%±32.7 pp0.0%0 25.0%±1.1 pp0.5%±0.0 pp16,948±757 ▼ -25.0%▼ -0.5% 109/110109/110
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 0.0%±26.7 pp0.0%0 12.9%±1.0 pp0.3%±0.0 pp8,738±667 ▼ -12.9%▼ -0.3% 98/11098/110
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 67.7%±34.7 pp1.0%±0.5 pp114±58 29.1%±1.1 pp0.6%±0.0 pp19,723±754 ▲ +38.6%▲ +0.4% 3/11025/110
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 22.6%±24.4 pp0.3%±0.4 pp38±41 5.9%±0.8 pp0.1%±0.0 pp4,026±537 ▲ +16.7%▲ +0.2% 2/11014/110
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 9.7%±42.0 pp0.1%±0.6 pp16±71 27.0%±1.8 pp0.6%±0.0 pp18,279±1,202 ▼ -17.3%▼ -0.4% 105/110105/110
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show
Category Mount Washington
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 73.2% ±3.0 pp73.2%±3.0 pp9,806 ±396
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 26.8% ±3.6 pp26.8%±3.6 pp3,594 ±488
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 16.5% ±2.5 pp61.4%±4.2 pp2,206 ±335
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 10.4% ±3.2 pp38.6%±10.7 pp1,389 ±428
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 73.2%±3.0 pp73.2%±3.0 pp9,806±396 64.3%±0.3 pp64.3%±0.3 pp2,479,853±10,798 ▲ +8.9%▲ +8.9% 31/110
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 26.8%±3.6 pp26.8%±3.6 pp3,594±488 35.7%±0.3 pp35.7%±0.3 pp1,377,410±11,170 ▼ -8.9%▼ -8.9% 80/110
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 16.5%±2.5 pp61.4%±4.2 pp2,206±335 18.0%±0.2 pp50.4%±0.3 pp693,647±6,987 ▼ -1.5%▲ +11.0% 57/11044/110
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 10.4%±3.2 pp38.6%±10.7 pp1,389±428 17.7%±0.2 pp49.6%±0.5 pp683,763±8,715 ▼ -7.4%▼ -11.0% 72/11067/110
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show
Category Mount Washington
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 9.1%±1.8 pp33.9%±4.1 pp1,184±239
Born in United Kingdom (of foreign-born residents) 2.3%±2.4 pp8.5%±9.0 pp298±318
Born in Philippines (of foreign-born residents) 2.2%±1.1 pp8.3%±3.9 pp289±144
Born in Canada (of foreign-born residents) 2.1%±1.7 pp7.7%±6.3 pp268±225
Born in El Salvador (of foreign-born residents) 2.0%±1.5 pp7.6%±5.6 pp264±199
Born in China / Hong Kong (of foreign-born residents) 1.2%±0.7 pp4.6%±2.7 pp160±96
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 7.8%29.0%1,014
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington Los Angeles Difference Rank
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 9.1% ±1.8 pp33.9%±4.1 pp1,184 11.0% ±0.2 pp30.8%424,738 ▼ -1.9%▲ +3.0% 49/11038/110
Born in United Kingdom (of foreign-born residents) 2.3% ±2.4 pp8.5%±9.0 pp298 0.4% ±0.0 pp1.2%17,019 ▲ +1.8%▲ +7.3% 6/1109/110
Born in Philippines (of foreign-born residents) 2.2% ±1.1 pp8.3%±3.9 pp289 2.3% ±0.1 pp6.4%88,183 ▼ -0.1%▲ +1.9% 36/11026/110
Born in Canada (of foreign-born residents) 2.1% ±1.7 pp7.7%±6.3 pp268 0.4% ±0.0 pp1.0%13,959 ▲ +1.7%▲ +6.7% 1/1101/110
Born in El Salvador (of foreign-born residents) 2.0% ±1.5 pp7.6%±5.6 pp264 4.1% ±0.1 pp11.6%160,004 ▼ -2.1%▼ -4.1% 61/11056/110
Born in China / Hong Kong (of foreign-born residents) 1.2% ±0.7 pp4.6%±2.7 pp160 1.0% ±0.0 pp2.8%38,593 ▲ +0.2%▲ +1.8% 31/11034/110
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 7.8%29.0%1,014 ——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show
Category Mount Washington
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 5.5% ±2.9 pp20.6%±10.3 pp721 ±372
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 2.8% ±1.0 pp10.4%±3.6 pp363 ±136
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 6.8% ±2.6 pp25.4%±9.3 pp888 ±344
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 11.7% ±1.6 pp43.6%±2.3 pp1,523 ±214
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 5.5%±2.9 pp20.6%±10.3 pp721±372 8.0%±0.2 pp8803.1%±1164.3 pp307,579±6,156 ▼ -2.4%▼ -8782.4% 74/11057/110
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 2.8%±1.0 pp10.4%±3.6 pp363±136 7.2%±0.1 pp7984.2%±1053.6 pp278,968±4,987 ▼ -4.4%▼ -7973.8% 100/110102/110
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 6.8%±2.6 pp25.4%±9.3 pp888±344 7.6%±0.1 pp8401.8%±1107.1 pp293,558±4,815 ▼ -0.8%▼ -8376.4% 59/11019/110
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 11.7%±1.6 pp43.6%±2.3 pp1,523±214 12.9%±0.1 pp14233.1%±1868.2 pp497,305±5,768 ▼ -1.2%▼ -14189.5% 65/11029/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later 1.0% ±0.6 pp128 ±79 1.8% ±0.7 pp235 ±95 5.5% ±2.9 pp721 ±372 ▲ +4.6 pp▲ +593▲ +3.8 pp▲ +486▲ +0.8 pp▲ +107
Los Angeles citywide 1.7% ±0.1 pp64,948 ±2,271 5.1% ±0.1 pp202,940 ±3,998 8.0% ±0.2 pp307,579 ±6,179 ▲ +6.3 pp▲ +242,631▲ +2.9 pp▲ +104,639▲ +3.4 pp▲ +137,992
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 4.1% ±1.3 pp544 ±177 4.0% ±1.5 pp531 ±195 2.8% ±1.0 pp363 ±136 ▼ −1.3 pp▼ −181▼ −1.2 pp▼ −168▼ −0.1 pp▼ −13
Los Angeles citywide 10.0% ±0.2 pp386,575 ±5,794 8.5% ±0.1 pp335,409 ±4,817 7.2% ±0.1 pp278,968 ±5,010 ▼ −2.8 pp▼ −107,607▼ −1.2 pp▼ −56,441▼ −1.6 pp▼ −51,166
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 8.6% ±1.9 pp1,142 ±255 6.0% ±1.9 pp795 ±248 6.8% ±2.6 pp888 ±344 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −254▲ +0.8 pp▲ +93▼ −2.7 pp▼ −347
Los Angeles citywide 9.9% ±0.1 pp381,773 ±4,974 8.5% ±0.1 pp338,094 ±4,761 7.6% ±0.1 pp293,558 ±4,841 ▼ −2.3 pp▼ −88,215▼ −0.9 pp▼ −44,536▼ −1.4 pp▼ −43,679
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 19.7% ±2.1 pp2,607 ±282 17.2% ±1.4 pp2,286 ±186 11.7% ±1.6 pp1,523 ±214 ▼ −8.0 pp▼ −1,084▼ −5.5 pp▼ −763▼ −2.5 pp▼ −321
Los Angeles citywide 17.0% ±0.2 pp655,695 ±5,798 14.8% ±0.1 pp585,903 ±4,838 12.9% ±0.2 pp497,305 ±5,831 ▼ −4.1 pp▼ −158,390▼ −1.9 pp▼ −88,598▼ −2.2 pp▼ −69,792
Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category Mount Washington
Average Household Income $204,182±$34,957
Per Capita Income $83,416±$13,263
10th Percentile Household Income $23,836±$6,922
25th Percentile Household Income $65,933±$9,840
Median Household Income $137,317±$19,961
75th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000
90th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $204,182±$34,957 $125,130±$1,000 ▲ +$79,053 12/110
Per Capita Income $83,416±$13,263 $47,685±$375 ▲ +$35,731 21/110
10th Percentile Household Income $23,836±$6,922 $14,186±$216 ▲ +$9,650 19/110
25th Percentile Household Income $65,933±$9,840 $37,123±$496 ▲ +$28,810 12/110
Median Household Income $137,317±$19,961 $81,939±$742 ▲ +$55,378 14/110
75th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000 $154,703±$1,370 ▲ +$45,297+ 1/110
90th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000 Over $200,000 — 1/110
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $117,874 ±10,774 $148,466 ±11,259 $204,182 ±34,957 ▲ +$86,308▲ +$55,717▲ +$30,591
Los Angeles citywide $103,745 ±722 $118,302 ±915 $125,130 ±1,000 ▲ +$21,385▲ +$6,828▲ +$14,557
Average Household Income (nominal dollars) $88,958 ±8,131 $121,000 ±9,176 $204,182 ±34,957 ▲ +$115,224▲ +$83,182▲ +$32,042
Los Angeles citywide $78,294 ±545 $96,416 ±746 $125,130 ±1,000 ▲ +$46,835▲ +$28,714▲ +$18,122
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $42,796 ±3,346 $55,616 ±3,358 $83,416 ±13,263 ▲ +$40,620▲ +$27,799▲ +$12,820
Los Angeles citywide $37,526 ±267 $43,265 ±333 $47,685 ±375 ▲ +$10,159▲ +$4,420▲ +$5,739
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars) $32,298 ±2,525 $45,327 ±2,737 $83,416 ±13,263 ▲ +$51,118▲ +$38,088▲ +$13,030
Los Angeles citywide $28,320 ±202 $35,261 ±271 $47,685 ±375 ▲ +$19,365▲ +$12,424▲ +$6,941
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $16,424 ±2,421 $26,771 ±7,862 $23,836 ±6,922 ▲ +$7,412▼ −$2,935▲ +$10,347
Los Angeles citywide $15,033 ±149 $15,850 ±169 $14,186 ±216 ▼ −$847▼ −$1,664▲ +$817
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $12,395 ±1,827 $21,818 ±6,408 $23,836 ±6,922 ▲ +$11,441▲ +$2,018▲ +$9,423
Los Angeles citywide $11,345 ±113 $12,918 ±138 $14,186 ±216 ▲ +$2,841▲ +$1,268▲ +$1,573
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $31,628 ±4,526 $56,816 ±6,192 $65,933 ±9,840 ▲ +$34,305▲ +$9,117▲ +$25,189
Los Angeles citywide $30,727 ±279 $35,350 ±357 $37,123 ±496 ▲ +$6,396▲ +$1,773▲ +$4,623
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $23,869 ±3,416 $46,306 ±5,047 $65,933 ±9,840 ▲ +$42,064▲ +$19,628▲ +$22,436
Los Angeles citywide $23,189 ±211 $28,810 ±291 $37,123 ±496 ▲ +$13,934▲ +$8,313▲ +$5,621
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $77,513 ±8,149 $112,750 ±10,699 $137,317 ±19,961 ▲ +$59,804▲ +$24,566▲ +$35,238
Los Angeles citywide $65,832 ±458 $76,248 ±555 $81,939 ±742 ▲ +$16,107▲ +$5,691▲ +$10,416
Median Household Income (nominal dollars) $58,497 ±6,150 $91,892 ±8,720 $137,317 ±19,961 ▲ +$78,819▲ +$45,425▲ +$33,394
Los Angeles citywide $49,682 ±346 $62,142 ±452 $81,939 ±742 ▲ +$32,257▲ +$19,797▲ +$12,460
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $151,206 ±12,858 $196,683 ±13,650 — ——▲ +$45,478
Los Angeles citywide $127,020 ±723 $145,116 ±805 $154,703 ±1,370 ▲ +$27,684▲ +$9,587▲ +$18,097
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $114,112 ±9,704 $160,297 ±11,125 — ——▲ +$46,185
Los Angeles citywide $95,860 ±545 $118,270 ±656 $154,703 ±1,370 ▲ +$58,844▲ +$36,433▲ +$22,410
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $261,923 ±12,515 — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $221,824 ±1,731 $245,212 ±895 — ——▲ +$23,388
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $197,669 ±9,445 — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $167,407 ±1,307 $199,848 ±730 — ——▲ +$32,441

Poverty Status

Category Mount Washington
Below Poverty Line 9.2% ±2.6 pp1,234 ±347
Below 200% Poverty Line 19.0% ±3.7 pp2,549 ±497
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 4.6% ±2.0 pp621 ±263
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Below Poverty Line 9.2%±2.6 pp1,234±347 16.5%±0.3 pp638,207±11,569 ▼ -7.3% 85/110
Below 200% Poverty Line 19.0%±3.7 pp2,549±497 34.8%±0.4 pp1,343,960±17,101 ▼ -15.8% 86/110
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 4.6%±2.0 pp621±263 8.0%±0.2 pp308,978±7,316 ▼ -3.4% 88/110
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Category Mount Washington
Food Insecurity 15.3%1,579
Housing Insecurity 13.5%1,391
Transportation Barriers 7.8%807
Threatened Utility Shutoff 5.8%601
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Food Insecurity 15.3%1,579 23.6%700,942 ▼ -8.3% 69/110
Housing Insecurity 13.5%1,391 19.3%573,228 ▼ -5.8% 66/110
Transportation Barriers 7.8%807 11.8%350,471 ▼ -4.0% 70/110
Threatened Utility Shutoff 5.8%601 9.0%267,308 ▼ -3.2% 70/110
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category Mount Washington
In Labor Force 87.6% ±4.5 pp5,947 ±303
↳ Employed 77.2% ±4.6 pp5,238 ±310
↳ Unemployed 10.4% ±4.4 pp709 ±300
↳ Unemployment Rate 11.9% ±5.0 pp—
Not in Labor Force 12.4% ±15.1 pp840 ±1,024
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
In Labor Force 87.6%±4.5 pp5,947±303 83.1%±0.2 pp1,458,393±3,960 ▲ +4.5% 25/110
↳ Employed 77.2%±4.6 pp5,238±310 76.8%±0.3 pp1,346,606±4,643 ▲ +0.4% 63/110
↳ Unemployed 10.4%±4.4 pp709±300 6.3%±0.2 pp110,332±3,016 ▲ +4.2% 1/110
↳ Unemployment Rate 11.9%±5.0 pp— 7.6%±0.2 pp132,846±3,594 ▲ +4.4% 3/110
Not in Labor Force 12.4%±15.1 pp840±1,024 16.9%±0.8 pp295,844±13,970 ▼ -4.5% 86/110
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category Mount Washington
Management, Business, Science & Arts 64.2% ±7.6 pp4,733 ±561
↳ Management Occupations 15.9% ±3.4 pp1,170 ±253
↳ Business & Financial Operations 5.6% ±1.6 pp414 ±121
↳ Computer & Mathematical 4.3% ±1.7 pp319 ±125
↳ Architecture & Engineering 4.9% ±2.3 pp364 ±172
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 2.3% ±1.4 pp167 ±102
↳ Community & Social Service 1.1% ±0.9 pp81 ±63
↳ Legal Occupations 2.7% ±1.4 pp202 ±101
↳ Education, Training & Library 7.2% ±2.5 pp531 ±183
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 17.0% ±5.2 pp1,249 ±385
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 2.6% ±1.1 pp193 ±80
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 0.6% ±0.8 pp43 ±56
Service 14.3% ±5.3 pp1,051 ±394
↳ Healthcare Support 4.6% ±2.1 pp336 ±158
↳ Protective Service 0.3% ±0.6 pp20 ±44
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 5.3% ±4.4 pp389 ±324
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 1.7% ±1.2 pp125 ±86
↳ Personal Care & Service 2.5% ±1.5 pp182 ±113
Sales & Office 8.6% ±2.2 pp631 ±159
↳ Sales & Related 5.1% ±1.8 pp375 ±130
↳ Office & Administrative Support 3.5% ±1.3 pp256 ±96
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 4.1% ±1.2 pp301 ±89
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.2% ±0.6 pp14 ±45
↳ Construction & Extraction 2.6% ±1.0 pp193 ±76
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 1.3% ±1.0 pp95 ±71
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 8.9% ±2.4 pp655 ±180
↳ Production Occupations 3.9% ±1.9 pp286 ±141
↳ Transportation Occupations 1.3% ±0.9 pp95 ±66
↳ Material Moving Occupations 3.7% ±1.9 pp273 ±139
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts 64.2%±7.6 pp4,733±561 43.8%±0.3 pp856,718±5,665 ▲ +20.4% 31/110
↳ Management Occupations 15.9%±3.4 pp1,170±253 11.0%±0.2 pp215,767±3,237 ▲ +4.8% 29/110
↳ Business & Financial Operations 5.6%±1.6 pp414±121 6.1%±0.1 pp119,779±2,742 ▼ -0.5% 61/110
↳ Computer & Mathematical 4.3%±1.7 pp319±125 2.8%±0.1 pp55,551±1,839 ▲ +1.5% 19/110
↳ Architecture & Engineering 4.9%±2.3 pp364±172 1.6%±0.1 pp31,959±1,411 ▲ +3.3% 2/110
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 2.3%±1.4 pp167±102 1.1%±0.1 pp21,801±1,140 ▲ +1.2% 13/110
↳ Community & Social Service 1.1%±0.9 pp81±63 1.8%±0.1 pp34,335±1,497 ▼ -0.7% 93/110
↳ Legal Occupations 2.7%±1.4 pp202±101 2.1%±0.1 pp40,323±1,500 ▲ +0.7% 37/110
↳ Education, Training & Library 7.2%±2.5 pp531±183 5.1%±0.1 pp100,542±2,462 ▲ +2.1% 21/110
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 17.0%±5.2 pp1,249±385 7.4%±0.2 pp144,867±2,938 ▲ +9.5% 11/110
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 2.6%±1.1 pp193±80 3.3%±0.1 pp64,007±2,042 ▼ -0.7% 67/110
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 0.6%±0.8 pp43±56 1.4%±0.1 pp27,787±1,316 ▼ -0.8% 98/110
Service 14.3%±5.3 pp1,051±394 19.1%±0.2 pp372,654±4,348 ▼ -4.8% 69/110
↳ Healthcare Support 4.6%±2.1 pp336±158 4.1%±0.1 pp80,369±2,120 ▲ +0.4% 48/110
↳ Protective Service 0.3%±0.6 pp20±44 1.4%±0.1 pp28,096±1,344 ▼ -1.2% 96/110
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 5.3%±4.4 pp389±324 6.0%±0.1 pp117,268±2,832 ▼ -0.7% 53/110
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 1.7%±1.2 pp125±86 4.6%±0.1 pp89,319±2,441 ▼ -2.9% 73/110
↳ Personal Care & Service 2.5%±1.5 pp182±113 2.9%±0.1 pp57,602±2,122 ▼ -0.5% 74/110
Sales & Office 8.6%±2.2 pp631±159 18.5%±0.2 pp362,312±4,169 ▼ -10.0% 110/110
↳ Sales & Related 5.1%±1.8 pp375±130 8.7%±0.2 pp170,605±3,233 ▼ -3.6% 107/110
↳ Office & Administrative Support 3.5%±1.3 pp256±96 9.8%±0.2 pp191,707±3,358 ▼ -6.3% 109/110
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 4.1%±1.2 pp301±89 7.5%±0.1 pp146,574±2,638 ▼ -3.4% 64/110
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.2%±0.6 pp14±45 0.3%±0.0 pp5,780±677 ▼ -0.1% 49/110
↳ Construction & Extraction 2.6%±1.0 pp193±76 5.2%±0.1 pp101,165±2,372 ▼ -2.6% 65/110
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 1.3%±1.0 pp95±71 2.0%±0.1 pp39,629±1,434 ▼ -0.7% 68/110
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 8.9%±2.4 pp655±180 11.0%±0.2 pp215,668±3,737 ▼ -2.2% 56/110
↳ Production Occupations 3.9%±1.9 pp286±141 4.4%±0.1 pp85,463±2,595 ▼ -0.5% 45/110
↳ Transportation Occupations 1.3%±0.9 pp95±66 3.3%±0.1 pp64,837±2,015 ▼ -2.0% 87/110
↳ Material Moving Occupations 3.7%±1.9 pp273±139 3.3%±0.1 pp65,368±2,325 ▲ +0.4% 36/110
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category Mount Washington
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 1.1% ±1.5 pp82 ±114
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 1.1% ±1.5 pp82 ±114
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0% ±0.6 pp0
Construction 3.1% ±1.1 pp231 ±79
Manufacturing 7.6% ±2.3 pp560 ±173
Wholesale Trade 2.0% ±1.2 pp148 ±86
Retail Trade 3.9% ±1.3 pp285 ±95
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 2.9% ±1.5 pp216 ±108
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 2.7% ±1.4 pp195 ±107
↳ Utilities 0.3% ±0.7 pp20 ±49
Information 12.8% ±2.8 pp947 ±205
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 4.3% ±1.2 pp320 ±91
↳ Finance & Insurance 2.1% ±0.9 pp158 ±68
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 2.2% ±0.9 pp161 ±69
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 19.1% ±2.7 pp1,412 ±201
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 16.6% ±2.9 pp1,222 ±214
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0% ±0.6 pp0
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 2.6% ±1.1 pp189 ±79
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 18.7% ±3.3 pp1,375 ±240
↳ Educational Services 10.5% ±3.0 pp770 ±222
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 8.2% ±2.0 pp605 ±144
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 15.4% ±6.1 pp1,133 ±448
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 8.3% ±4.5 pp614 ±329
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 7.0% ±4.5 pp519 ±332
Other Services 6.4% ±2.8 pp470 ±206
Public Administration 2.6% ±1.3 pp195 ±99
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 1.1%±1.5 pp82±114 0.4%±0.0 pp— ▲ +0.7% 10/110
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 1.1%±1.5 pp82±114 0.4%±0.0 pp— ▲ +0.7% 9/110
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%±0.6 pp0 0.0%±0.0 pp— 0% 30/110
Construction 3.1%±1.1 pp231±79 6.5%±0.1 pp— ▼ -3.3% 75/110
Manufacturing 7.6%±2.3 pp560±173 6.8%±0.2 pp— ▲ +0.8% 36/110
Wholesale Trade 2.0%±1.2 pp148±86 2.3%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.3% 57/110
Retail Trade 3.9%±1.3 pp285±95 9.3%±0.2 pp— ▼ -5.4% 108/110
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 2.9%±1.5 pp216±108 5.3%±0.1 pp— ▼ -2.4% 88/110
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 2.7%±1.4 pp195±107 4.9%±0.1 pp— ▼ -2.3% 83/110
↳ Utilities 0.3%±0.7 pp20±49 0.4%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.1% 66/110
Information 12.8%±2.8 pp947±205 6.4%±0.2 pp— ▲ +6.4% 18/110
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 4.3%±1.2 pp320±91 5.8%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.5% 76/110
↳ Finance & Insurance 2.1%±0.9 pp158±68 3.5%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.3% 84/110
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 2.2%±0.9 pp161±69 2.3%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.1% 50/110
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 19.1%±2.7 pp1,412±201 15.6%±0.2 pp— ▲ +3.5% 31/110
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 16.6%±2.9 pp1,222±214 10.3%±0.2 pp— ▲ +6.2% 28/110
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%±0.6 pp0 0.1%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.1% 69/110
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 2.6%±1.1 pp189±79 5.2%±0.1 pp— ▼ -2.6% 92/110
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 18.7%±3.3 pp1,375±240 20.8%±0.2 pp— ▼ -2.1% 69/110
↳ Educational Services 10.5%±3.0 pp770±222 8.1%±0.2 pp— ▲ +2.3% 23/110
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 8.2%±2.0 pp605±144 12.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -4.4% 108/110
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 15.4%±6.1 pp1,133±448 12.0%±0.2 pp— ▲ +3.4% 17/110
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 8.3%±4.5 pp614±329 4.1%±0.1 pp— ▲ +4.2% 14/110
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 7.0%±4.5 pp519±332 7.9%±0.2 pp— ▼ -0.8% 54/110
Other Services 6.4%±2.8 pp470±206 6.0%±0.1 pp— ▲ +0.4% 40/110
Public Administration 2.6%±1.3 pp195±99 2.7%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.1% 55/110
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category Mount Washington
Private Company Employee 60.5% ±3.6 pp4,461 ±265
Self-Employed 23.3% ±4.9 pp1,716 ±361
Nonprofit 5.6% ±2.2 pp414 ±163
Government 10.5% ±2.9 pp774 ±214
Unpaid Family Worker 0.1% ±0.6 pp7 ±44
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Private Company Employee 60.5%±3.6 pp4,461±265 66.9%±0.3 pp1,307,510±5,830 ▼ -6.4% 83/110
Self-Employed 23.3%±4.9 pp1,716±361 16.2%±0.2 pp316,694±4,405 ▲ +7.1% 12/110
Nonprofit 5.6%±2.2 pp414±163 8.0%±0.2 pp155,457±3,565 ▼ -2.3% 101/110
Government 10.5%±2.9 pp774±214 10.6%±0.2 pp207,304±3,359 ▼ -0.1% 58/110
Unpaid Family Worker 0.1%±0.6 pp7±44 0.3%±0.0 pp5,059±497 ▼ -0.2% 73/110
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category Mount Washington
Full-Time, Year-Round 60.7% ±4.3 pp4,884 ±342
Part-Time or Part-Year 39.3% ±5.0 pp3,159 ±403
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round 60.7%±4.3 pp4,884±342 61.7%±0.2 pp1,328,967±3,929 ▼ -0.9% 71/110
Part-Time or Part-Year 39.3%±5.0 pp3,159±403 38.3%±0.3 pp826,047±5,840 ▲ +0.9% 40/110
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category Mount Washington
Average FT Earnings $153,093±$25,244
10th Percentile FT Earnings $29,100±$5,369
25th Percentile FT Earnings $47,961±$6,909
Median FT Earnings $89,465±$10,043
75th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000
90th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Average FT Earnings $153,093±$25,244 $93,330±$761 ▲ +$59,762 15/110
10th Percentile FT Earnings $29,100±$5,369 $25,056±$255 ▲ +$4,044 46/110
25th Percentile FT Earnings $47,961±$6,909 $37,825±$214 ▲ +$10,136 40/110
Median FT Earnings $89,465±$10,043 $61,975±$422 ▲ +$27,490 35/110
75th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/110
90th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/110
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $88,826 ±8,413 $91,507 ±7,646 $153,093 ±25,244 ▲ +$64,266▲ +$61,586▲ +$2,681
Los Angeles citywide $78,876 ±537 $84,242 ±564 $93,330 ±761 ▲ +$14,455▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,367
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $67,036 ±6,349 $74,578 ±6,232 $153,093 ±25,244 ▲ +$86,057▲ +$78,514▲ +$7,543
Los Angeles citywide $59,526 ±405 $68,658 ±460 $93,330 ±761 ▲ +$33,804▲ +$24,673▲ +$9,131
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $20,909 ±1,416 $26,586 ±2,331 $29,100 ±5,369 ▲ +$8,191▲ +$2,514▲ +$5,677
Los Angeles citywide $20,202 ±88 $21,993 ±185 $25,056 ±255 ▲ +$4,854▲ +$3,063▲ +$1,791
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $15,780 ±1,069 $21,668 ±1,900 $29,100 ±5,369 ▲ +$13,321▲ +$7,432▲ +$5,888
Los Angeles citywide $15,246 ±66 $17,924 ±151 $25,056 ±255 ▲ +$9,810▲ +$7,132▲ +$2,678
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $34,178 ±3,912 $41,496 ±3,136 $47,961 ±6,909 ▲ +$13,783▲ +$6,465▲ +$7,318
Los Angeles citywide $29,363 ±173 $32,975 ±184 $37,825 ±214 ▲ +$8,461▲ +$4,850▲ +$3,611
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $25,793 ±2,952 $33,819 ±2,556 $47,961 ±6,909 ▲ +$22,167▲ +$14,142▲ +$8,026
Los Angeles citywide $22,160 ±131 $26,874 ±150 $37,825 ±214 ▲ +$15,665▲ +$10,950▲ +$4,714
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $60,814 ±5,090 $67,218 ±3,625 $89,465 ±10,043 ▲ +$28,651▲ +$22,247▲ +$6,404
Los Angeles citywide $51,909 ±336 $54,226 ±279 $61,975 ±422 ▲ +$10,067▲ +$7,750▲ +$2,317
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $45,895 ±3,841 $54,783 ±2,954 $89,465 ±10,043 ▲ +$43,570▲ +$34,682▲ +$8,888
Los Angeles citywide $39,175 ±254 $44,194 ±227 $61,975 ±422 ▲ +$22,801▲ +$17,781▲ +$5,019
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $111,232 ±10,635 $110,140 ±6,916 — ——▼ −$1,092
Los Angeles citywide $91,403 ±620 $98,002 ±683 — ——▲ +$6,599
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $83,945 ±8,026 $89,764 ±5,637 — ——▲ +$5,819
Los Angeles citywide $68,981 ±468 $79,872 ±557 — ——▲ +$10,891
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category Mount Washington
Average PT Earnings $74,168±$31,244
10th Percentile PT Earnings $5,031±$1,513
25th Percentile PT Earnings $13,503±$5,124
Median PT Earnings $32,680±$7,431
75th Percentile PT Earnings $82,989±$22,200
90th Percentile PT Earnings Over $100,000
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Average PT Earnings $74,168±$31,244 $36,543±$574 ▲ +$37,626 9/110
10th Percentile PT Earnings $5,031±$1,513 $2,785±$92 ▲ +$2,245 2/110
25th Percentile PT Earnings $13,503±$5,124 $8,451±$190 ▲ +$5,052 5/110
Median PT Earnings $32,680±$7,431 $20,275±$216 ▲ +$12,405 10/110
75th Percentile PT Earnings $82,989±$22,200 $39,236±$450 ▲ +$43,754 7/110
90th Percentile PT Earnings Over $100,000 $80,378±$1,643 ▲ +$19,622+ 1/110
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $35,914 ±5,796 $49,947 ±7,966 $74,168 ±31,244 ▲ +$38,254▲ +$24,221▲ +$14,033
Los Angeles citywide $30,652 ±490 $34,166 ±509 $36,543 ±574 ▲ +$5,890▲ +$2,377▲ +$3,513
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $27,104 ±4,374 $40,707 ±6,492 $74,168 ±31,244 ▲ +$47,065▲ +$33,462▲ +$13,603
Los Angeles citywide $23,133 ±369 $27,845 ±415 $36,543 ±574 ▲ +$13,410▲ +$8,698▲ +$4,712
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,182 ±820 $4,426 ±1,724 $5,031 ±1,513 ▲ +$1,849▲ +$605▲ +$1,244
Los Angeles citywide $2,482 ±54 $2,712 ±58 $2,785 ±92 ▲ +$303▲ +$73▲ +$230
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $2,401 ±619 $3,607 ±1,405 $5,031 ±1,513 ▲ +$2,629▲ +$1,423▲ +$1,206
Los Angeles citywide $1,873 ±41 $2,210 ±47 $2,785 ±92 ▲ +$912▲ +$575▲ +$337
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $7,552 ±1,592 $11,898 ±2,721 $13,503 ±5,124 ▲ +$5,951▲ +$1,604▲ +$4,346
Los Angeles citywide $7,239 ±105 $8,054 ±111 $8,451 ±190 ▲ +$1,212▲ +$397▲ +$815
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $5,699 ±1,201 $9,697 ±2,218 $13,503 ±5,124 ▲ +$7,804▲ +$3,806▲ +$3,998
Los Angeles citywide $5,463 ±79 $6,564 ±91 $8,451 ±190 ▲ +$2,988▲ +$1,887▲ +$1,101
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $16,421 ±3,139 $25,734 ±4,981 $32,680 ±7,431 ▲ +$16,259▲ +$6,946▲ +$9,313
Los Angeles citywide $16,086 ±129 $18,060 ±185 $20,275 ±216 ▲ +$4,189▲ +$2,215▲ +$1,973
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $12,393 ±2,369 $20,973 ±4,059 $32,680 ±7,431 ▲ +$20,288▲ +$11,707▲ +$8,580
Los Angeles citywide $12,140 ±97 $14,719 ±151 $20,275 ±216 ▲ +$8,135▲ +$5,556▲ +$2,579
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $39,502 ±6,601 $60,271 ±6,799 $82,989 ±22,200 ▲ +$43,487▲ +$22,718▲ +$20,769
Los Angeles citywide $33,887 ±443 $36,465 ±382 $39,236 ±450 ▲ +$5,349▲ +$2,771▲ +$2,578
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $29,812 ±4,982 $49,121 ±5,541 $82,989 ±22,200 ▲ +$53,177▲ +$33,868▲ +$19,309
Los Angeles citywide $25,574 ±335 $29,719 ±311 $39,236 ±450 ▲ +$13,662▲ +$9,517▲ +$4,145
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $88,697 ±13,614 $101,287 ±17,967 — ——▲ +$12,591
Los Angeles citywide $68,714 ±742 $73,646 ±1,127 $80,378 ±1,643 ▲ +$11,664▲ +$6,732▲ +$4,932
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $66,938 ±10,274 $82,549 ±14,643 — ——▲ +$15,611
Los Angeles citywide $51,857 ±560 $60,021 ±919 $80,378 ±1,643 ▲ +$28,521▲ +$20,356▲ +$8,164

Earnings of All Workers

Category Mount Washington
Average Earnings $117,178±$17,696
10th Percentile Earnings $10,202±$3,749
25th Percentile Earnings $31,409±$5,503
Median Earnings $69,277±$10,109
75th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000
90th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Average Earnings $117,178±$17,696 $71,563±$569 ▲ +$45,615 18/110
10th Percentile Earnings $10,202±$3,749 $7,934±$179 ▲ +$2,268 32/110
25th Percentile Earnings $31,409±$5,503 $21,876±$191 ▲ +$9,533 26/110
Median Earnings $69,277±$10,109 $43,575±$259 ▲ +$25,702 28/110
75th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000 $85,854±$580 ▲ +$14,146+ 1/110
90th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/110
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $64,706 ±4,822 $76,972 ±5,484 $117,178 ±17,696 ▲ +$52,472▲ +$40,206▲ +$12,266
Los Angeles citywide $59,351 ±430 $65,850 ±455 $71,563 ±569 ▲ +$12,212▲ +$5,713▲ +$6,499
Average Earnings (nominal dollars) $48,832 ±3,639 $62,732 ±4,469 $117,178 ±17,696 ▲ +$68,345▲ +$54,446▲ +$13,900
Los Angeles citywide $44,791 ±324 $53,668 ±371 $71,563 ±569 ▲ +$26,772▲ +$17,895▲ +$8,877
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $6,503 ±1,402 $11,468 ±2,722 $10,202 ±3,749 ▲ +$3,699▼ −$1,266▲ +$4,965
Los Angeles citywide $6,842 ±104 $8,269 ±107 $7,934 ±179 ▲ +$1,091▼ −$335▲ +$1,427
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $4,907 ±1,058 $9,346 ±2,218 $10,202 ±3,749 ▲ +$5,294▲ +$856▲ +$4,439
Los Angeles citywide $5,164 ±78 $6,739 ±87 $7,934 ±179 ▲ +$2,770▲ +$1,194▲ +$1,576
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $17,722 ±2,318 $26,657 ±3,248 $31,409 ±5,503 ▲ +$13,688▲ +$4,753▲ +$8,935
Los Angeles citywide $17,205 ±143 $20,088 ±119 $21,876 ±191 ▲ +$4,671▲ +$1,789▲ +$2,883
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $13,374 ±1,749 $21,725 ±2,648 $31,409 ±5,503 ▲ +$18,035▲ +$9,684▲ +$8,351
Los Angeles citywide $12,984 ±108 $16,372 ±97 $21,876 ±191 ▲ +$8,892▲ +$5,505▲ +$3,387
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $38,595 ±3,743 $53,983 ±3,617 $69,277 ±10,109 ▲ +$30,683▲ +$15,294▲ +$15,389
Los Angeles citywide $35,447 ±232 $39,719 ±188 $43,575 ±259 ▲ +$8,128▲ +$3,856▲ +$4,272
Median Earnings (nominal dollars) $29,127 ±2,825 $43,997 ±2,948 $69,277 ±10,109 ▲ +$40,151▲ +$25,281▲ +$14,870
Los Angeles citywide $26,751 ±175 $32,371 ±154 $43,575 ±259 ▲ +$16,824▲ +$11,204▲ +$5,620
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $82,443 ±8,591 $92,138 ±6,976 — ——▲ +$9,695
Los Angeles citywide $70,301 ±313 $76,149 ±396 $85,854 ±580 ▲ +$15,552▲ +$9,705▲ +$5,848
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $62,218 ±6,483 $75,092 ±5,685 — ——▲ +$12,874
Los Angeles citywide $53,055 ±236 $62,062 ±323 $85,854 ±580 ▲ +$32,798▲ +$23,792▲ +$9,006
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $127,692 ±642 — — ———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $96,367 ±484 — — ———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Mount Washington, Los Angeles

Category Mount Washington
Household income at age 35 $51,566 ±$1,509
Household income percentile rank 47.1 ±0.96 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 15.6% ±1.22 pp
Individual income at age 35 $39,401 ±$1,133
Fraction married 32.1% ±1.60 pp
Employment rate 75.3% ±1.50 pp
Incarceration rate 1.27% ±0.49 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Mount Washington, Los Angeles. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Mount Washington, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Mount Washington City Difference
Household income at age 35 $51,566 ±$1,509 $49,434 ±$103 +$2,132
Household income percentile rank 47.1 ±0.96 pp 45.3 ±0.06 pp +1.9 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 15.6% ±1.22 pp 15.3% ±0.08 pp +0.3 pp
Individual income at age 35 $39,401 ±$1,133 $37,125 ±$77 +$2,276
Fraction married 32.1% ±1.60 pp 32.5% ±0.11 pp −0.4 pp
Employment rate 75.3% ±1.50 pp 72.6% ±0.10 pp +2.8 pp
Incarceration rate 1.27% ±0.49 pp 1.30% ±0.03 pp −0.0 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Mount Washington, Los Angeles. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Mount Washington, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Mount Washington, Los Angeles in Lower-Income Families

Category Mount Washington
Household income at age 35 $46,587 ±$2,028
Household income percentile rank 43.8 ±1.35 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 11.4% ±1.73 pp
Individual income at age 35 $36,141 ±$1,584
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Mount Washington, Los Angeles with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Mount Washington, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Mount Washington City Difference
Household income at age 35 $46,587 ±$2,028 $43,491 ±$125 +$3,096
Household income percentile rank 43.8 ±1.35 pp 41.6 ±0.08 pp +2.3 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 11.4% ±1.73 pp 10.5% ±0.10 pp +0.9 pp
Individual income at age 35 $36,141 ±$1,584 $33,937 ±$101 +$2,204
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Mount Washington, Los Angeles with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Mount Washington, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Mount Washington, Los Angeles

Category Mount Washington
Stayed in the greater Los Angeles area 83.0% ±1.30 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 31.9% ±1.66 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Mount Washington, Los Angeles. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Los Angeles area” means the Census commuting zone for the Los Angeles area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Mount Washington, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Mount Washington City Difference
Stayed in the greater Los Angeles area 83.0% ±1.30 pp 81.1% ±0.09 pp +1.9 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 31.9% ±1.66 pp 26.2% ±0.11 pp +5.6 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Mount Washington, Los Angeles. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Los Angeles area” means the Census commuting zone for the Los Angeles area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Mount Washington, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Mount Washington

Category Mount Washington
All jobs located in mount washington 952
Mount Washington jobs held by Mount Washington residents 18.1%
Mount Washington jobs held by non-Mount Washington residents 81.9%
Employed residents working in Mount Washington 2.7%
Employed residents working outside Mount Washington 97.3%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Mount Washington Los Angeles neighborhood median Difference Rank
All jobs located in mount washington 952 8,613 ▼ −7,661 107/110
Mount Washington jobs held by Mount Washington residents 18.1% 6.0% ▲ +12.1 pp 3/110
Mount Washington jobs held by non-Mount Washington residents 81.9% 94.0% ▼ −12.1 pp 108/110
Employed residents working in Mount Washington 2.7% 3.9% ▼ −1.1 pp 83/110
Employed residents working outside Mount Washington 97.3% 96.1% ▲ +1.1 pp 28/110
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in mount washington 758.0 1,064 952.0 ▲ +194▼ −112▲ +306
Los Angeles citywide 6,864 8,106 8,613 ▲ +1,748▲ +507▲ +1,242
Mount Washington jobs held by Mount Washington residents 10.9%71 10.5%92 18.1%145 ▲ +7.2 pp▲ +74▲ +7.6 pp▲ +53▼ −0.3 pp▲ +21
Los Angeles citywide 6.1%330 5.9%399 6.0%442 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +112▲ +0.1 pp▲ +43▼ −0.1 pp▲ +69
Mount Washington jobs held by non-Mount Washington residents 89.1%583 89.5%782 81.9%657 ▼ −7.2 pp▲ +74▼ −7.6 pp▼ −125▲ +0.3 pp▲ +199
Los Angeles citywide 93.9%5,659 94.1%6,750 94.0%7,065 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,406▼ −0.1 pp▲ +315▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,091
Employed residents working in Mount Washington 1.3%71 1.7%92 2.7%145 ▲ +1.4 pp▲ +74▲ +1.1 pp▲ +53▲ +0.4 pp▲ +21
Los Angeles citywide 3.2%330 3.3%399 3.9%442 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +112▲ +0.5 pp▲ +43▲ +0.1 pp▲ +69
Employed residents working outside Mount Washington 98.7%5,477 98.3%5,447 97.3%5,175 ▼ −1.4 pp▼ −302▼ −1.1 pp▼ −272▼ −0.4 pp▼ −30
Los Angeles citywide 96.8%10,199 96.7%11,528 96.1%11,428 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,229▼ −0.5 pp▼ −100▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,329

Industry of Jobs in Mount Washington

Category Mount Washington
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0
Construction 5.0%48
Manufacturing 3.3%31
Wholesale Trade 5.7%54
Retail Trade 3.6%34
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 1.7%16
↳ Utilities 0.0%0
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 1.7%16
Information 8.3%79
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 2.5%24
↳ Finance & Insurance 0.5%5
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 2.0%19
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 23.4%223
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 20.2%192
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%0
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 3.3%31
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 30.4%289
↳ Educational Services 9.7%92
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 20.7%197
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 11.7%111
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 7.4%70
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 4.3%41
Other Services 4.5%43
Public Administration 0.0%0
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%0 0.1%1,840 ▼ -0.1% 65/110
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0 0.0%95 0% 14/110
Construction 5.0%48 2.7%53,657 ▲ +2.3% 27/110
Manufacturing 3.3%31 3.8%76,376 ▼ -0.6% 41/110
Wholesale Trade 5.7%54 3.2%63,982 ▲ +2.5% 13/110
Retail Trade 3.6%34 7.1%140,457 ▼ -3.5% 98/110
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 1.7%16 5.4%107,338 ▼ -3.7% 45/110
↳ Utilities 0.0%0 0.8%16,873 ▼ -0.8% 46/110
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 1.7%16 4.6%90,465 ▼ -2.9% 41/110
Information 8.3%79 8.3%164,692 0% 11/110
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 2.5%24 5.9%116,774 ▼ -3.4% 64/110
↳ Finance & Insurance 0.5%5 3.6%70,657 ▼ -3.0% 90/110
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 2.0%19 2.3%46,117 ▼ -0.3% 39/110
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 23.4%223 15.1%299,443 ▲ +8.4% 16/110
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 20.2%192 8.1%160,171 ▲ +12.1% 5/110
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%0 1.1%22,328 ▼ -1.1% 81/110
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 3.3%31 5.9%116,944 ▼ -2.6% 63/110
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 30.4%289 28.4%563,697 ▲ +2.0% 58/110
↳ Educational Services 9.7%92 10.0%198,161 ▼ -0.3% 47/110
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 20.7%197 18.4%365,536 ▲ +2.3% 62/110
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 11.7%111 11.3%224,384 ▲ +0.4% 49/110
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 7.4%70 2.8%54,783 ▲ +4.6% 6/110
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 4.3%41 8.5%169,601 ▼ -4.2% 97/110
Other Services 4.5%43 3.7%73,513 ▲ +0.8% 43/110
Public Administration 0.0%0 5.1%100,972 ▼ -5.1% 46/110
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%3,680 0.1%1,246 0.1%1,840 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,840– 0.0 pp▲ +594▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2,434
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 0.1%1,115 0.0%132 0.0%95 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,020– 0.0 pp▼ −37▼ −0.1 pp▼ −983
Construction 21.5%163 22.0%234 5.0%48 ▼ −16.5 pp▼ −115▼ −17.0 pp▼ −186▲ +0.5 pp▲ +71
Los Angeles citywide 2.3%39,728 2.8%53,498 2.7%53,657 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +13,929▼ −0.1 pp▲ +159▲ +0.5 pp▲ +13,770
Manufacturing 0.5%4 2.8%30 3.3%31 ▲ +2.7 pp▲ +27▲ +0.4 pp▲ +1▲ +2.3 pp▲ +26
Los Angeles citywide 5.7%98,319 4.2%81,924 3.8%76,376 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −21,943▼ −0.4 pp▼ −5,548▼ −1.4 pp▼ −16,395
Wholesale Trade 2.4%18 3.4%36 5.7%54 ▲ +3.3 pp▲ +36▲ +2.3 pp▲ +18▲ +1.0 pp▲ +18
Los Angeles citywide 4.6%79,460 3.6%68,790 3.2%63,982 ▼ −1.4 pp▼ −15,478▼ −0.3 pp▼ −4,808▼ −1.0 pp▼ −10,670
Retail Trade 3.3%25 3.2%34 3.6%34 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +9▲ +0.4 pp– 0▼ −0.1 pp▲ +9
Los Angeles citywide 8.7%151,141 7.5%144,707 7.1%140,457 ▼ −1.7 pp▼ −10,684▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,250▼ −1.3 pp▼ −6,434
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 0.0%0 0.7%7 1.7%16 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +16▲ +1.0 pp▲ +9▲ +0.7 pp▲ +7
Los Angeles citywide 4.8%82,152 5.8%111,689 5.4%107,338 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +25,186▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,351▲ +1.0 pp▲ +29,537
Utilities 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 0.9%16,015 1.0%18,483 0.8%16,873 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +858▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,610– 0.0 pp▲ +2,468
Transportation & Warehousing 0.0%0 0.7%7 1.7%16 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +16▲ +1.0 pp▲ +9▲ +0.7 pp▲ +7
Los Angeles citywide 3.8%66,137 4.8%93,206 4.6%90,465 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +24,328▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,741▲ +1.0 pp▲ +27,069
Information 3.4%26 4.3%46 8.3%79 ▲ +4.9 pp▲ +53▲ +4.0 pp▲ +33▲ +0.9 pp▲ +20
Los Angeles citywide 6.3%109,592 7.4%142,294 8.3%164,692 ▲ +1.9 pp▲ +55,100▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,398▲ +1.0 pp▲ +32,702
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 2.0%15 2.2%23 2.5%24 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +9▲ +0.4 pp▲ +1▲ +0.2 pp▲ +8
Los Angeles citywide 6.1%104,703 5.7%110,803 5.9%116,774 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +12,071▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5,971▼ −0.3 pp▲ +6,100
Finance & Insurance 0.3%2 0.1%1 0.5%5 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +3▲ +0.4 pp▲ +4▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1
Los Angeles citywide 3.9%67,891 3.6%69,466 3.6%70,657 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,766– 0.0 pp▲ +1,191▼ −0.3 pp▲ +1,575
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.7%13 2.1%22 2.0%19 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6▼ −0.1 pp▼ −3▲ +0.4 pp▲ +9
Los Angeles citywide 2.1%36,812 2.1%41,337 2.3%46,117 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +9,305▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,780– 0.0 pp▲ +4,525
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 7.8%59 10.5%112 23.4%223 ▲ +15.6 pp▲ +164▲ +12.9 pp▲ +111▲ +2.7 pp▲ +53
Los Angeles citywide 15.1%261,720 14.9%286,926 15.1%299,443 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +37,723▲ +0.2 pp▲ +12,517▼ −0.3 pp▲ +25,206
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 5.9%45 10.2%108 20.2%192 ▲ +14.2 pp▲ +147▲ +10.0 pp▲ +84▲ +4.2 pp▲ +63
Los Angeles citywide 7.7%132,582 7.9%153,127 8.1%160,171 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +27,589▲ +0.1 pp▲ +7,044▲ +0.3 pp▲ +20,545
Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 1.3%22,239 1.2%22,485 1.1%22,328 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +89– 0.0 pp▼ −157▼ −0.1 pp▲ +246
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 1.8%14 0.4%4 3.3%31 ▲ +1.4 pp▲ +17▲ +2.9 pp▲ +27▼ −1.5 pp▼ −10
Los Angeles citywide 6.2%106,899 5.8%111,314 5.9%116,944 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +10,045▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5,630▼ −0.4 pp▲ +4,415
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 31.4%238 23.3%248 30.4%289 ▼ −1.0 pp▲ +51▲ +7.0 pp▲ +41▼ −8.1 pp▲ +10
Los Angeles citywide 24.3%420,231 26.6%513,841 28.4%563,697 ▲ +4.0 pp▲ +143,466▲ +1.8 pp▲ +49,856▲ +2.3 pp▲ +93,610
Educational Services 13.5%102 7.4%79 9.7%92 ▼ −3.8 pp▼ −10▲ +2.2 pp▲ +13▼ −6.0 pp▼ −23
Los Angeles citywide 8.2%142,243 9.1%175,456 10.0%198,161 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +55,918▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,705▲ +0.9 pp▲ +33,213
Health Care & Social Assistance 17.9%136 15.9%169 20.7%197 ▲ +2.8 pp▲ +61▲ +4.8 pp▲ +28▼ −2.1 pp▲ +33
Los Angeles citywide 16.1%277,988 17.5%338,385 18.4%365,536 ▲ +2.3 pp▲ +87,548▲ +0.9 pp▲ +27,151▲ +1.4 pp▲ +60,397
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 25.1%190 24.4%260 11.7%111 ▼ −13.4 pp▼ −79▼ −12.8 pp▼ −149▼ −0.6 pp▲ +70
Los Angeles citywide 11.2%192,754 11.7%226,802 11.3%224,384 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +31,630▼ −0.5 pp▼ −2,418▲ +0.6 pp▲ +34,048
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 23.0%174 20.0%213 7.4%70 ▼ −15.6 pp▼ −104▼ −12.7 pp▼ −143▼ −2.9 pp▲ +39
Los Angeles citywide 2.2%38,550 2.8%53,683 2.8%54,783 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +16,233– 0.0 pp▲ +1,100▲ +0.5 pp▲ +15,133
Accommodation & Food Services 2.1%16 4.4%47 4.3%41 ▲ +2.2 pp▲ +25▼ −0.1 pp▼ −6▲ +2.3 pp▲ +31
Los Angeles citywide 8.9%154,204 9.0%173,119 8.5%169,601 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +15,397▼ −0.4 pp▼ −3,518– 0.0 pp▲ +18,915
Other Services 2.6%20 3.2%34 4.5%43 ▲ +1.9 pp▲ +23▲ +1.3 pp▲ +9▲ +0.6 pp▲ +14
Los Angeles citywide 3.9%66,987 3.9%75,451 3.7%73,513 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,526▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,938– 0.0 pp▲ +8,464
Public Administration 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 6.8%117,076 5.8%112,871 5.1%100,972 ▼ −1.7 pp▼ −16,104▼ −0.8 pp▼ −11,899▼ −0.9 pp▼ −4,205

Earnings of Jobs in Mount Washington

Category Mount Washington
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 21.2%202
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 28.4%270
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 50.4%480
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 21.2%202 17.0%338,004 ▲ +4.2% 11/110
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 28.4%270 24.2%481,403 ▲ +4.1% 69/110
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 50.4%480 58.8%1,167,718 ▼ -8.3% 55/110
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 39.8%302 34.5%367 21.2%202 ▼ −18.6 pp▼ −100▼ −13.3 pp▼ −165▼ −5.3 pp▲ +65
Los Angeles citywide 25.4%438,918 21.3%411,368 17.0%338,004 ▼ −8.4 pp▼ −100,914▼ −4.3 pp▼ −73,364▼ −4.1 pp▼ −27,550
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 34.4%261 33.1%352 28.4%270 ▼ −6.1 pp▲ +9▼ −4.7 pp▼ −82▼ −1.4 pp▲ +91
Los Angeles citywide 31.8%549,706 29.6%571,139 24.2%481,403 ▼ −7.6 pp▼ −68,303▼ −5.4 pp▼ −89,736▼ −2.2 pp▲ +21,433
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 25.7%195 32.4%345 50.4%480 ▲ +24.7 pp▲ +285▲ +18.0 pp▲ +135▲ +6.7 pp▲ +150
Los Angeles citywide 42.8%738,919 49.1%948,335 58.8%1,167,718 ▲ +16.0 pp▲ +428,799▲ +9.6 pp▲ +219,383▲ +6.3 pp▲ +209,416

Jobs in Mount Washington by Firm Age

Category Mount Washington
Firm age: 0–1 years 14.4%124
Firm age: 2–3 years 13.6%117
Firm age: 4–5 years 17.1%147
Firm age: 6–10 years 19.4%167
Firm age: 11 or more years 35.5%306
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years 14.4%124 4.8%79,474 ▲ +9.6% 5/110
Firm age: 2–3 years 13.6%117 4.9%81,545 ▲ +8.7% 4/110
Firm age: 4–5 years 17.1%147 5.1%84,624 ▲ +12.0% 1/110
Firm age: 6–10 years 19.4%167 10.7%178,740 ▲ +8.7% 16/110
Firm age: 11 or more years 35.5%306 74.6%1,246,700 ▼ -39.1% 109/110
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years 9.6%64 11.7%115 14.4%124 ▲ +4.8 pp▲ +60▲ +2.7 pp▲ +9▲ +2.0 pp▲ +51
Los Angeles citywide 4.7%67,567 4.9%79,034 4.8%79,474 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,907▼ −0.1 pp▲ +440▲ +0.2 pp▲ +11,467
Firm age: 2–3 years 8.7%58 19.5%192 13.6%117 ▲ +4.9 pp▲ +59▼ −5.9 pp▼ −75▲ +10.7 pp▲ +134
Los Angeles citywide 5.9%85,371 5.5%89,530 4.9%81,545 ▼ −1.0 pp▼ −3,826▼ −0.6 pp▼ −7,985▼ −0.4 pp▲ +4,159
Firm age: 4–5 years 10.4%69 6.0%59 17.1%147 ▲ +6.7 pp▲ +78▲ +11.1 pp▲ +88▼ −4.4 pp▼ −10
Los Angeles citywide 4.8%69,620 5.0%80,673 5.1%84,624 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +15,004▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,951▲ +0.2 pp▲ +11,053
Firm age: 6–10 years 31.0%206 11.5%113 19.4%167 ▼ −11.6 pp▼ −39▲ +7.9 pp▲ +54▼ −19.6 pp▼ −93
Los Angeles citywide 11.5%165,913 9.8%158,279 10.7%178,740 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +12,827▲ +0.9 pp▲ +20,461▼ −1.7 pp▼ −7,634
Firm age: 11 or more years 40.2%267 51.4%507 35.5%306 ▼ −4.7 pp▲ +39▼ −15.9 pp▼ −201▲ +11.2 pp▲ +240
Los Angeles citywide 73.1%1,056,355 74.9%1,212,931 74.6%1,246,700 ▲ +1.5 pp▲ +190,345▼ −0.2 pp▲ +33,769▲ +1.7 pp▲ +156,576

Jobs in Mount Washington by Firm Size

Category Mount Washington
Firm size: 0–19 employees 77.5%667
Firm size: 20–49 employees 11.6%100
Firm size: 50–249 employees 9.2%79
Firm size: 250–499 employees 0.8%7
Firm size: 500 or more employees 0.9%8
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees 77.5%667 25.4%424,713 ▲ +52.1% 4/110
Firm size: 20–49 employees 11.6%100 9.0%149,880 ▲ +2.6% 37/110
Firm size: 50–249 employees 9.2%79 13.5%224,878 ▼ -4.3% 86/110
Firm size: 250–499 employees 0.8%7 4.9%82,110 ▼ -4.1% 90/110
Firm size: 500 or more employees 0.9%8 47.2%789,502 ▼ -46.3% 110/110
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees 54.8%364 54.1%533 77.5%667 ▲ +22.6 pp▲ +303▲ +23.4 pp▲ +134▼ −0.8 pp▲ +169
Los Angeles citywide 25.3%365,482 24.7%400,637 25.4%424,713 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +59,231▲ +0.7 pp▲ +24,076▼ −0.6 pp▲ +35,155
Firm size: 20–49 employees 5.3%35 10.6%105 11.6%100 ▲ +6.3 pp▲ +65▲ +1.0 pp▼ −5▲ +5.4 pp▲ +70
Los Angeles citywide 10.3%149,215 9.2%149,709 9.0%149,880 ▼ −1.4 pp▲ +665▼ −0.3 pp▲ +171▼ −1.1 pp▲ +494
Firm size: 50–249 employees 36.9%245 27.7%273 9.2%79 ▼ −27.7 pp▼ −166▼ −18.5 pp▼ −194▼ −9.2 pp▲ +28
Los Angeles citywide 14.8%214,183 13.9%225,110 13.5%224,878 ▼ −1.4 pp▲ +10,695▼ −0.4 pp▼ −232▼ −0.9 pp▲ +10,927
Firm size: 250–499 employees 0.5%3 0.4%4 0.8%7 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +4▲ +0.4 pp▲ +3– 0.0 pp▲ +1
Los Angeles citywide 5.7%81,669 4.9%79,784 4.9%82,110 ▼ −0.7 pp▲ +441– 0.0 pp▲ +2,326▼ −0.7 pp▼ −1,885
Firm size: 500 or more employees 2.6%17 7.2%71 0.9%8 ▼ −1.6 pp▼ −9▼ −6.3 pp▼ −63▲ +4.6 pp▲ +54
Los Angeles citywide 43.9%634,277 47.2%765,207 47.2%789,502 ▲ +3.3 pp▲ +155,225– 0.0 pp▲ +24,295▲ +3.3 pp▲ +130,930

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Mount Washington
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 10.0% ±1.9 pp10.0%±1.9 pp1,325 ±248
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 70.3% ±1.0 pp7.0%±0.1 pp932 ±13
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 29.7% ±13.6 pp3.0%±1.4 pp394 ±180
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 10.0%±1.9 pp10.0%±1.9 pp1,325±248 13.6%±0.1 pp13.6%±0.1 pp524,758±5,328 ▼ -3.6%▼ -3.6% 87/110
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 70.3%±1.0 pp7.0%±0.1 pp932±13 86.8%±0.3 pp11.8%±0.0 pp455,658±1,592 ▼ -16.5%▼ -4.8% 87/11084/110
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 29.7%±13.6 pp3.0%±1.4 pp394±180 13.2%±0.4 pp1.8%±0.1 pp69,100±2,036 ▲ +16.5%▲ +1.2% 24/11025/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Mount Washington
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 3.7% ±1.0 pp3.7%±1.0 pp499 ±136
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 58.1% ±13.4 pp2.2%±0.5 pp290 ±67
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 41.9% ±15.1 pp1.6%±0.6 pp209 ±75
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 70.1% ±9.4 pp2.6%±0.4 pp350 ±47
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 29.9% ±16.6 pp1.1%±0.6 pp149 ±83
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 3.7%±1.0 pp3.7%±1.0 pp499±136 8.1%±0.1 pp8.1%±0.1 pp310,586±4,276 ▼ -4.3%▼ -4.3% 106/110
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 58.1%±13.4 pp2.2%±0.5 pp290±67 70.9%±0.7 pp5.7%±0.1 pp220,274±2,032 ▼ -12.8%▼ -3.6% 91/110105/110
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 41.9%±15.1 pp1.6%±0.6 pp209±75 29.1%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.0 pp90,312±1,878 ▲ +12.8%▼ -0.8% 20/11053/110
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 70.1%±9.4 pp2.6%±0.4 pp350±47 77.3%±0.5 pp6.2%±0.0 pp240,126±1,419 ▼ -7.2%▼ -3.6% 77/110107/110
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 29.9%±16.6 pp1.1%±0.6 pp149±83 22.7%±0.6 pp1.8%±0.0 pp70,460±1,837 ▲ +7.2%▼ -0.7% 34/11080/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category Mount Washington
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 0.8% ±3.7 pp12 ±54
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 0.2% ±5.7 pp1 ±24
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 0.8%±3.7 pp12±54 3.9%±0.3 pp— ▼ -3.1% 83/110
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 0.2%±5.7 pp1±24 4.2%±0.4 pp— ▼ -3.9% 95/110
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category Mount Washington
Owner-Occupied Households 62.6% ±5.3 pp3,304 ±278
Renter-Occupied Households 37.4% ±5.3 pp1,974 ±278
Owner-Occupied Residents 65.8% ±5.4 pp8,735 ±723
Renter-Occupied Residents 34.2% ±6.0 pp4,544 ±795
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Owner-Occupied Households 62.6%±5.3 pp3,304±278 36.0%±0.3 pp518,423±4,359 ▲ +26.6% 18/110
Renter-Occupied Households 37.4%±5.3 pp1,974±278 64.0%±0.3 pp920,674±4,643 ▼ -26.6% 93/110
Owner-Occupied Residents 65.8%±5.4 pp8,735±723 40.2%±0.4 pp1,509,388±15,216 ▲ +25.6% 17/110
Renter-Occupied Residents 34.2%±6.0 pp4,544±795 59.8%±0.4 pp2,243,250±15,217 ▼ -25.6% 94/110
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category Mount Washington
Median Year Moved In 2013±1.4 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later 4.7% ±2.3 pp258 ±126
Moved in 2020 to 2022 18.2% ±5.2 pp998 ±285
Moved in 2010 to 2019 36.7% ±7.3 pp2,014 ±403
Moved in 2000 to 2009 17.7% ±3.8 pp970 ±208
Moved in 1990 to 1999 8.6% ±2.1 pp470 ±116
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 14.2% ±2.6 pp780 ±144
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Median Year Moved In 2013±1.4 yr 2014±1.0 yr ▼ −1 40/110
Moved in 2023 or Later 4.7%±2.3 pp258±126 4.9%±0.1 pp70,211±2,138 ▼ -0.2% 43/110
Moved in 2020 to 2022 18.2%±5.2 pp998±285 20.6%±0.3 pp296,921±3,730 ▼ -2.4% 50/110
Moved in 2010 to 2019 36.7%±7.3 pp2,014±403 40.3%±0.3 pp580,466±4,993 ▼ -3.7% 84/110
Moved in 2000 to 2009 17.7%±3.8 pp970±208 16.2%±0.2 pp233,668±3,490 ▲ +1.4% 48/110
Moved in 1990 to 1999 8.6%±2.1 pp470±116 9.8%±0.2 pp140,815±2,779 ▼ -1.2% 86/110
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 14.2%±2.6 pp780±144 8.1%±0.2 pp117,016±2,469 ▲ +6.1% 16/110
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show
Category Mount Washington
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 11.2% ±4.1 pp11.2%±4.1 pp1,433 ±525
↳ Moved Within Los Angeles County (of recent movers) 9.5% ±4.0 pp84.6%±17.8 pp1,212 ±512
↳ Moved from Different California County (of recent movers) 0.3% ±0.3 pp2.3%±2.4 pp33 ±37
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 1.2% ±0.9 pp10.8%±7.5 pp155 ±121
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 0.3% ±0.4 pp2.3%±3.0 pp33 ±44
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 11.2%±4.1 pp11.2%±4.1 pp1,433±525 10.7%±0.2 pp10.7%±0.2 pp408,463±7,943 ▲ +0.5%▲ +0.5% 42/110
↳ Moved Within Los Angeles County (of recent movers) 9.5%±4.0 pp84.6%±17.8 pp1,212±512 7.4%±0.2 pp69.3%±1.2 pp283,263±7,240 ▲ +2.1%▲ +15.2% 19/1108/110
↳ Moved from Different California County (of recent movers) 0.3%±0.3 pp2.3%±2.4 pp33±37 1.2%±0.0 pp11.0%±0.4 pp45,056±1,766 ▼ -0.9%▼ -8.7% 102/110107/110
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 1.2%±0.9 pp10.8%±7.5 pp155±121 1.3%±0.1 pp12.3%±0.5 pp50,444±2,220 ▼ -0.1%▼ -1.5% 46/11058/110
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 0.3%±0.4 pp2.3%±3.0 pp33±44 0.8%±0.0 pp7.3%±0.4 pp29,700±1,624 ▼ -0.5%▼ -5.0% 94/11099/110
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show
Category Mount Washington
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 3.2% ±1.6 pp3.2%±1.6 pp184 ±93
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 0.3% ±0.6 pp9.2%±16.5 pp17 ±32
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.3% ±0.7 pp10.9%±20.6 pp20 ±39
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.0% ±0.5 pp0.0%0
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 2.6% ±1.9 pp79.9%±41.8 pp147 ±107
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 0.9% ±1.6 pp0.9%±1.6 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 0.5% ±1.1 pp0.5%±1.1 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 3.2%±1.6 pp3.2%±1.6 pp184±93 7.4%±0.2 pp7.4%±0.2 pp115,235±3,037 ▼ -4.2%▼ -4.2% 104/110
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 0.3%±0.6 pp9.2%±16.5 pp17±32 2.9%±0.1 pp38.6%±1.2 pp44,494±1,787 ▼ -2.6%▼ -29.4% 108/110108/110
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.3%±0.7 pp10.9%±20.6 pp20±39 0.3%±0.0 pp4.0%±0.4 pp4,630±529 ▲ +0.1%▲ +6.9% 39/11015/110
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.0%±0.5 pp0.0%0 0.4%±0.0 pp5.6%±0.6 pp6,482±671 ▼ -0.4%▼ -5.6% 79/11079/110
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 2.6%±1.9 pp79.9%±41.8 pp147±107 3.8%±0.2 pp51.7%±2.8 pp59,629±3,638 ▼ -1.2%▲ +28.1% 81/11010/110
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 0.9%±1.6 pp0.9%±1.6 pp— 4.6%±0.2 pp4.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -3.7%▼ -3.7% 108/110
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 0.5%±1.1 pp0.5%±1.1 pp— 0.9%±0.1 pp0.9%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.3%▼ -0.3% 60/110
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category Mount Washington
Median Year Built 1949±7 yr
Pre-1940 41.9% ±7.7 pp2,372 ±436
1940-2009 55.9% ±4.3 pp3,168 ±246
2010+ 2.2% ±1.1 pp127 ±62
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Median Year Built 1949±7 yr 1965±1 yr ▼ −16 yrs 92/110
Pre-1940 41.9%±7.7 pp2,372±436 19.1%±0.2 pp296,223±3,073 ▲ +22.8% 22/110
1940-2009 55.9%±4.3 pp3,168±246 73.1%±0.4 pp1,136,164±6,801 ▼ -17.2% 80/110
2010+ 2.2%±1.1 pp127±62 7.8%±0.2 pp121,945±2,871 ▼ -5.6% 102/110
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category Mount Washington
Population Density 7,126 /sq mi±686/sq mi
Single-Family Homes 84.0% ±5.0 pp4,760 ±281
Buildings With 2–4 Units 7.4% ±2.9 pp420 ±166
Buildings With 5–19 Units 3.6% ±2.2 pp203 ±123
Buildings With 20 or More Units 5.0% ±2.6 pp284 ±145
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Population Density 7,126 /sq mi±686/sq mi 8,285 /sq mi±14/sq mi ▼ −1,159 /sq mi 81/110
Single-Family Homes 84.0%±5.0 pp4,760±281 41.9%±0.3 pp651,793±4,742 ▲ +42.1% 7/110
Buildings With 2–4 Units 7.4%±2.9 pp420±166 9.0%±0.2 pp140,536±2,829 ▼ -1.6% 56/110
Buildings With 5–19 Units 3.6%±2.2 pp203±123 18.4%±0.3 pp286,023±4,408 ▼ -14.8% 101/110
Buildings With 20 or More Units 5.0%±2.6 pp284±145 29.9%±0.3 pp465,391±4,691 ▼ -24.9% 98/110
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category Mount Washington
Studio 4.6% ±4.0 pp260 ±224
1 Bedroom 14.6% ±3.2 pp829 ±181
2 Bedrooms 32.4% ±4.5 pp1,838 ±257
3 Bedrooms 33.1% ±3.7 pp1,874 ±209
4 Bedrooms 14.0% ±5.7 pp792 ±324
5 or More Bedrooms 1.3% ±0.8 pp75 ±44
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Studio 4.6%±4.0 pp260±224 11.6%±0.2 pp180,439±3,649 ▼ -7.0% 82/110
1 Bedroom 14.6%±3.2 pp829±181 23.7%±0.2 pp367,883±3,808 ▼ -9.0% 84/110
2 Bedrooms 32.4%±4.5 pp1,838±257 30.8%±0.3 pp478,829±4,610 ▲ +1.6% 59/110
3 Bedrooms 33.1%±3.7 pp1,874±209 21.9%±0.2 pp339,889±3,797 ▲ +11.2% 26/110
4 Bedrooms 14.0%±5.7 pp792±324 9.1%±0.1 pp140,925±2,101 ▲ +4.9% 25/110
5 or More Bedrooms 1.3%±0.8 pp75±44 3.0%±0.1 pp46,367±1,494 ▼ -1.7% 79/110
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show
Category Mount Washington
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 6.7% ±4.3 pp6.7%±4.3 pp370 ±238
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 2.0% ±1.1 pp29.4%±25.4 pp109 ±62
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 4.8% ±4.2 pp70.6%±42.7 pp261 ±231
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 6.7%±4.3 pp6.7%±4.3 pp370±238 12.1%±0.2 pp12.1%±0.2 pp174,164±3,256 ▼ -5.4%▼ -5.4% 65/110
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 2.0%±1.1 pp29.4%±25.4 pp109±62 5.9%±0.1 pp49.1%±0.8 pp85,502±2,139 ▼ -4.0%▼ -19.6% 79/11096/109
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 4.8%±4.2 pp70.6%±42.7 pp261±231 6.2%±0.2 pp50.9%±1.1 pp88,662±2,479 ▼ -1.4%▲ +19.6% 48/11014/109
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category Mount Washington
Natural Gas Heat 65.4% ±4.9 pp3,592 ±271
Electric Heat 30.2% ±5.5 pp1,657 ±302
Other Heating Source 4.4% ±2.2 pp241 ±122
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Natural Gas Heat 65.4%±4.9 pp3,592±271 57.3%±0.3 pp823,973±4,848 ▲ +8.2% 37/110
Electric Heat 30.2%±5.5 pp1,657±302 34.3%±0.3 pp494,304±4,648 ▼ -4.2% 54/110
Other Heating Source 4.4%±2.2 pp241±122 8.4%±0.2 pp120,823±2,850 ▼ -4.0% 83/110
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show
Category Mount Washington
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 39.8% ±4.3 pp2,188 ±237
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 19.2% ±3.6 pp1,052 ±197
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 41.0% ±7.7 pp2,251 ±422
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 15.2% ±2.8 pp835 ±155
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 39.8%±4.3 pp2,188±237 18.4%±0.4 pp264,606±5,364 ▲ +21.5% 4/110
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 19.2%±3.6 pp1,052±197 20.5%±0.3 pp294,961±4,886 ▼ -1.3% 76/110
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 41.0%±7.7 pp2,251±422 56.5%±0.5 pp813,715±6,573 ▼ -15.5% 101/110
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 15.2%±2.8 pp835±155 31.1%±0.4 pp447,155±5,566 ▼ -15.9% 108/110
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category Mount Washington
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $641±$152
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,494±$205
Median Monthly Housing Costs $2,813±$245
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $641±$152 $787±$11 ▼ −$146 81/110
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,494±$205 $1,347±$8 ▲ +$147 42/110
Median Monthly Housing Costs $2,813±$245 $2,115±$9 ▲ +$698 23/110
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000 Over $3,000 — 1/110
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000 Over $3,000 — 1/110
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $561 ±86 $609 ±152 $641 ±152 ▲ +$80▲ +$32▲ +$48
Los Angeles citywide $734 ±7 $763 ±8 $787 ±11 ▲ +$53▲ +$24▲ +$29
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $424 ±65 $496 ±124 $641 ±152 ▲ +$217▲ +$144▲ +$73
Los Angeles citywide $554 ±6 $622 ±7 $787 ±11 ▲ +$233▲ +$165▲ +$68
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,138 ±104 $1,249 ±89 $1,494 ±205 ▲ +$357▲ +$246▲ +$111
Los Angeles citywide $1,206 ±4 $1,299 ±6 $1,347 ±8 ▲ +$141▲ +$48▲ +$93
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $859 ±78 $1,018 ±72 $1,494 ±205 ▲ +$636▲ +$477▲ +$159
Los Angeles citywide $910 ±3 $1,058 ±5 $1,347 ±8 ▲ +$437▲ +$289▲ +$148
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,830 ±87 $2,175 ±184 $2,813 ±245 ▲ +$983▲ +$638▲ +$345
Los Angeles citywide $1,817 ±7 $1,985 ±7 $2,115 ±9 ▲ +$298▲ +$130▲ +$169
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,381 ±65 $1,772 ±150 $2,813 ±245 ▲ +$1,432▲ +$1,040▲ +$391
Los Angeles citywide $1,371 ±5 $1,618 ±6 $2,115 ±9 ▲ +$744▲ +$497▲ +$247
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $3,460 ±175 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — $2,970 ±11 — ———
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) — $2,820 ±142 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — $2,420 ±9 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Rent

Rent measure
Category Mount Washington
Average Rent Plus Utilities $2,772±$428
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,134±$243
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,730±$342
Median Rent Plus Utilities $2,445±$363
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities Over $3,500
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities Over $3,500
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities $2,772±$428 $2,131±$12 ▲ +$641 23/110
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,134±$243 $934±$12 ▲ +$200 40/110
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,730±$342 $1,380±$9 ▲ +$350 34/110
Median Rent Plus Utilities $2,445±$363 $1,933±$9 ▲ +$512 26/110
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities Over $3,500 $2,639±$17 ▲ +$861+ 1/110
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities Over $3,500 Over $3,500 — 1/110
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington
Average Rent $2,477±$354
10th Percentile Rent $1,075±$222
25th Percentile Rent $1,551±$279
Median Rent $2,261±$265
75th Percentile Rent $3,234±$411
90th Percentile Rent Over $3,500
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Average Rent $2,477±$354 $1,927±$12 ▲ +$550 28/110
10th Percentile Rent $1,075±$222 $808±$12 ▲ +$267 38/110
25th Percentile Rent $1,551±$279 $1,217±$8 ▲ +$334 36/110
Median Rent $2,261±$265 $1,765±$8 ▲ +$496 28/110
75th Percentile Rent $3,234±$411 $2,416±$11 ▲ +$818 20/110
90th Percentile Rent Over $3,500 $3,289±$24 ▲ +$211+ 1/110
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category Mount Washington
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $4,529±$969
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,194±$255
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,035±$279
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,940±$178
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $4,529±$969 $4,133±$34 ▲ +$396 32/110
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,194±$255 $1,828±$21 ▲ +$366 35/110
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,035±$279 $2,537±$17 ▲ +$498 30/110
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,940±$178 $3,497±$23 ▲ +$443 41/110
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000 Over $4,000 — 1/110
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000 Over $4,000 — 1/110
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,447 ±183 $3,703 ±126 $4,529 ±969 ▲ +$1,081▲ +$826▲ +$255
Los Angeles citywide $3,870 ±21 $3,856 ±17 $4,133 ±34 ▲ +$263▲ +$276▼ −$13
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,602 ±138 $3,018 ±103 $4,529 ±969 ▲ +$1,927▲ +$1,511▲ +$416
Los Angeles citywide $2,920 ±16 $3,143 ±14 $4,133 ±34 ▲ +$1,212▲ +$990▲ +$223
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,529 ±179 $1,768 ±169 $2,194 ±255 ▲ +$665▲ +$426▲ +$240
Los Angeles citywide $1,744 ±13 $1,827 ±19 $1,828 ±21 ▲ +$85▲ +$2▲ +$83
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,154 ±135 $1,441 ±138 $2,194 ±255 ▲ +$1,040▲ +$753▲ +$287
Los Angeles citywide $1,316 ±10 $1,489 ±15 $1,828 ±21 ▲ +$512▲ +$340▲ +$173
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,541 ±330 $2,591 ±190 $3,035 ±279 ▲ +$494▲ +$443▲ +$50
Los Angeles citywide $2,379 ±13 $2,448 ±17 $2,537 ±17 ▲ +$158▲ +$89▲ +$69
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,918 ±249 $2,112 ±155 $3,035 ±279 ▲ +$1,117▲ +$923▲ +$194
Los Angeles citywide $1,796 ±10 $1,995 ±14 $2,537 ±17 ▲ +$741▲ +$542▲ +$199
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,399 ±171 $3,464 ±199 $3,940 ±178 ▲ +$541▲ +$476▲ +$65
Los Angeles citywide $3,315 ±21 $3,342 ±16 $3,497 ±23 ▲ +$182▲ +$155▲ +$27
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,565 ±129 $2,823 ±162 $3,940 ±178 ▲ +$1,375▲ +$1,116▲ +$258
Los Angeles citywide $2,502 ±16 $2,724 ±13 $3,497 ±23 ▲ +$995▲ +$773▲ +$222
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $4,721 ±262 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — $4,663 ±31 — ———
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) — $3,848 ±213 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — $3,800 ±25 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category Mount Washington
Average Monthly Owner Costs $854±$63
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $384±$80
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $480±$74
Median Monthly Owner Costs $767±$112
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,120±$140
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,318±$143
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs $854±$63 $1,309±$21 ▼ −$455 84/110
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $384±$80 $456±$10 ▼ −$72 79/110
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $480±$74 $674±$10 ▼ −$194 100/110
Median Monthly Owner Costs $767±$112 $1,001±$14 ▼ −$234 86/110
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,120±$140 $1,491±$15 ▼ −$371 78/110
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,318±$143 Over $1,500 ▼ −$182+ 96/110
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $707 ±88 $964 ±94 $854 ±63 ▲ +$147▼ −$110▲ +$257
Los Angeles citywide $974 ±11 $1,068 ±13 $1,309 ±21 ▲ +$335▲ +$242▲ +$93
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $534 ±66 $786 ±76 $854 ±63 ▲ +$321▲ +$68▲ +$252
Los Angeles citywide $735 ±8 $870 ±11 $1,309 ±21 ▲ +$574▲ +$439▲ +$135
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $297 ±71 $349 ±118 $384 ±80 ▲ +$87▲ +$35▲ +$52
Los Angeles citywide $372 ±7 $397 ±7 $456 ±10 ▲ +$84▲ +$59▲ +$25
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $224 ±54 $284 ±96 $384 ±80 ▲ +$160▲ +$99▲ +$60
Los Angeles citywide $281 ±5 $323 ±6 $456 ±10 ▲ +$176▲ +$133▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $417 ±79 $529 ±86 $480 ±74 ▲ +$62▼ −$49▲ +$112
Los Angeles citywide $544 ±7 $586 ±8 $674 ±10 ▲ +$130▲ +$88▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $315 ±59 $431 ±70 $480 ±74 ▲ +$165▲ +$49▲ +$116
Los Angeles citywide $410 ±5 $478 ±6 $674 ±10 ▲ +$264▲ +$196▲ +$68
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $629 ±97 $797 ±125 $767 ±112 ▲ +$138▼ −$30▲ +$168
Los Angeles citywide $806 ±11 $880 ±10 $1,001 ±14 ▲ +$195▲ +$121▲ +$74
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $474 ±73 $649 ±102 $767 ±112 ▲ +$292▲ +$117▲ +$175
Los Angeles citywide $608 ±8 $717 ±8 $1,001 ±14 ▲ +$393▲ +$284▲ +$109
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $925 ±82 $1,188 ±151 $1,120 ±140 ▲ +$194▼ −$68▲ +$262
Los Angeles citywide — $1,304 ±17 $1,491 ±15 —▲ +$187—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $698 ±62 $968 ±123 $1,120 ±140 ▲ +$421▲ +$152▲ +$269
Los Angeles citywide — $1,062 ±14 $1,491 ±15 —▲ +$428—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $1,434 ±221 $1,318 ±143 —▼ −$116—
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — $1,169 ±180 $1,318 ±143 —▲ +$149—
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Home Values

Category Mount Washington
Average Home Value $1,286,340±$151,177
10th Percentile Home Value $594,609±$128,643
25th Percentile Home Value $884,578±$70,766
Median Home Value $1,215,454±$80,202
75th Percentile Home Value $1,566,659±$120,956
90th Percentile Home Value $1,927,238±$90,849
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Average Home Value $1,286,340±$151,177 $1,264,542±$8,234 ▲ +$21,798 38/110
10th Percentile Home Value $594,609±$128,643 $459,299±$5,965 ▲ +$135,311 36/110
25th Percentile Home Value $884,578±$70,766 $653,300±$4,641 ▲ +$231,278 32/110
Median Home Value $1,215,454±$80,202 $921,200±$4,782 ▲ +$294,254 34/110
75th Percentile Home Value $1,566,659±$120,956 $1,397,000±$18,800 ▲ +$169,659 39/110
90th Percentile Home Value $1,927,238±$90,849 Over $2,000,000 ▼ −$72,762+ 46/110
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $684,024 ±20,510 $923,876 ±30,145 $1,286,340 ±151,177 ▲ +$602,316▲ +$362,464▲ +$239,852
Los Angeles citywide $824,079 ±6,442 $1,055,784 ±9,073 $1,264,542 ±8,234 ▲ +$440,464▲ +$208,758▲ +$231,705
Average Home Value (nominal dollars) $516,222 ±15,479 $752,961 ±24,568 $1,286,340 ±151,177 ▲ +$770,118▲ +$533,380▲ +$236,739
Los Angeles citywide $621,919 ±4,862 $860,465 ±7,394 $1,264,542 ±8,234 ▲ +$642,624▲ +$404,077▲ +$238,547
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $350,492 ±44,903 $539,533 ±181,007 $594,609 ±128,643 ▲ +$244,118▲ +$55,076▲ +$189,042
Los Angeles citywide $274,172 ±2,766 $388,878 ±2,619 $459,299 ±5,965 ▲ +$185,126▲ +$70,421▲ +$114,706
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $264,510 ±33,888 $439,720 ±147,521 $594,609 ±128,643 ▲ +$330,099▲ +$154,889▲ +$175,210
Los Angeles citywide $206,913 ±2,087 $316,936 ±2,134 $459,299 ±5,965 ▲ +$252,385▲ +$142,362▲ +$110,023
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $511,692 ±43,659 $703,976 ±35,983 $884,578 ±70,766 ▲ +$372,886▲ +$180,601▲ +$192,284
Los Angeles citywide $413,153 ±2,182 $543,435 ±2,444 $653,300 ±4,641 ▲ +$240,147▲ +$109,865▲ +$130,281
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $386,166 ±32,949 $573,742 ±29,326 $884,578 ±70,766 ▲ +$498,412▲ +$310,836▲ +$187,576
Los Angeles citywide $311,800 ±1,647 $442,900 ±1,992 $653,300 ±4,641 ▲ +$341,500▲ +$210,400▲ +$131,100
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $694,063 ±38,038 $923,998 ±40,366 $1,215,454 ±80,202 ▲ +$521,390▲ +$291,456▲ +$229,935
Los Angeles citywide $601,311 ±2,870 $781,471 ±2,656 $921,200 ±4,782 ▲ +$319,889▲ +$139,729▲ +$180,160
Median Home Value (nominal dollars) $523,798 ±28,707 $753,060 ±32,899 $1,215,454 ±80,202 ▲ +$691,655▲ +$462,394▲ +$229,261
Los Angeles citywide $453,800 ±2,166 $636,900 ±2,165 $921,200 ±4,782 ▲ +$467,400▲ +$284,300▲ +$183,100
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $911,283 ±29,629 $1,139,421 ±29,068 $1,566,659 ±120,956 ▲ +$655,376▲ +$427,238▲ +$228,137
Los Angeles citywide $957,885 ±4,252 $1,163,924 ±5,481 $1,397,000 ±18,800 ▲ +$439,115▲ +$233,076▲ +$206,040
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $687,731 ±22,360 $928,630 ±23,690 $1,566,659 ±120,956 ▲ +$878,928▲ +$638,029▲ +$240,899
Los Angeles citywide $722,900 ±3,209 $948,600 ±4,467 $1,397,000 ±18,800 ▲ +$674,100▲ +$448,400▲ +$225,700
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,153,095 ±78,851 $1,457,971 ±130,209 $1,927,238 ±90,849 ▲ +$774,143▲ +$469,267▲ +$304,876
Los Angeles citywide — $2,103,035 ±25,625 — ———
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $870,222 ±59,508 $1,188,248 ±106,120 $1,927,238 ±90,849 ▲ +$1,057,016▲ +$738,989▲ +$318,027
Los Angeles citywide — $1,713,977 ±20,884 — ———

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show
Category Mount Washington
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 1.8%1.8%99
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 1.2%69.7%69
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.5%30.3%30
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 1.8%1.8%99 5.5%5.5%84,827 ▼ -3.7%▼ -3.7% 78/110
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 1.2%69.7%69 3.5%64.0%54,313 ▼ -2.3%▲ +5.7% 72/11061/107
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0 0.4%7.1%6,040 ▼ -0.4%▼ -7.1% 13/11013/107
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.5%30.3%30 1.4%25.1%21,260 ▼ -0.8%▲ +5.2% 59/11033/107
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0 0.2%3.8%3,214 ▼ -0.2%▼ -3.8% 60/11060/107
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units 2.1%106 2.6%135 1.7%99 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −7▼ −0.9 pp▼ −36▲ +0.5 pp▲ +29
Los Angeles citywide 5.6%79,280 5.5%82,357 5.5%84,827 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5,547▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,470– 0.0 pp▲ +3,077
Housing Choice Vouchers 1.1%57 1.6%85 1.2%69 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +12▼ −0.4 pp▼ −16▲ +0.5 pp▲ +28
Los Angeles citywide 3.4%47,994 3.4%50,854 3.5%54,313 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +6,319▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,459– 0.0 pp▲ +2,860
Public Housing 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 0.5%7,024 0.5%7,038 0.4%6,040 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −984▼ −0.1 pp▼ −998– 0.0 pp▲ +14
Project-Based Section 8 1.0%49 1.0%50 0.5%30 ▼ −0.4 pp▼ −19▼ −0.4 pp▼ −20– 0.0 pp▲ +1
Los Angeles citywide 1.5%21,053 1.4%21,190 1.4%21,260 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +207▼ −0.1 pp▲ +70▼ −0.1 pp▲ +137
Other Project-Based Programs 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%3,209 0.2%3,275 0.2%3,214 – 0.0 pp▲ +5– 0.0 pp▼ −61– 0.0 pp▲ +66
Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category Mount Washington
Average Household Income $21,201
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $541
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,676
Below 30% of Area Median Income 88.3%68
With Children 13.9%11
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 42.5%33
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $21,201 $20,771 ▲ +$430 47/101
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $541 $532 ▲ +$9 49/101
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,676 $1,653 ▲ +$24 71/101
Below 30% of Area Median Income 88.3%68 88.0%66,617 ▲ +0.3 pp 46/101
With Children 13.9%11 20.0%15,140 ▼ -6.1 pp 59/101
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 42.5%33 43.0%32,551 ▼ -0.5 pp 56/101
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income $13,963 $17,606 $21,114 ▲ +$7,151▲ +$3,508▲ +$3,643
Los Angeles citywide $14,082 $16,770 $20,771 ▲ +$6,689▲ +$4,001▲ +$2,688
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $354 $427 $538 ▲ +$184▲ +$111▲ +$73
Los Angeles citywide $372 $432 $532 ▲ +$160▲ +$100▲ +$60
Average Monthly Government Spending $788 $952 $1,682 ▲ +$894▲ +$730▲ +$164
Los Angeles citywide $795 $1,013 $1,653 ▲ +$858▲ +$640▲ +$218
Below 30% of Area Median Income 81.8%— 79.5%— 88.4%— ▲ +6.6 pp—▲ +8.9 pp—▼ −2.3 pp—
Los Angeles citywide 84.0%— 85.0%— 88.0%— ▲ +4.0 pp—▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children — — 13.5%— ——————
Los Angeles citywide — — 20.0%— ——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 32.7%— 38.4%— 43.0%— ▲ +10.3 pp—▲ +4.6 pp—▲ +5.7 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category Mount Washington
Total Tree Canopy 30.8%371 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 37.5%452 acres
Natural Open Surfaces 31.7%382 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Total Tree Canopy 30.8%371 acres 15.3%46,226 acres ▲ +15.5% 7/110
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 37.5%452 acres 56.2%170,078 acres ▼ -18.7% 99/110
Natural Open Surfaces 31.7%382 acres 28.5%86,111 acres ▲ +3.2% 21/110
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category Mount Washington
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 28.1% ±5.0 pp3,771 ±664
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 41.2% ±6.2 pp5,527 ±828
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 30.6% ±5.8 pp4,102 ±774
Heat Exposed 100.0%13,400
Homes Without Air Conditioning 9.7%1,303
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. Heat Exposed is the share of residents living in census tracts the Census Bureau flagged as exposed to extreme heat in 2022. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates; neither those nor the heat exposure figures have a margin of error, as with CDC PLACES data.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 28.1%±5.0 pp3,771±664 19.5%±0.3 pp751,543±13,280 ▲ +8.7% 30/110
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 41.2%±6.2 pp5,527±828 47.6%±0.4 pp1,834,233±16,767 ▼ -6.3% 101/110
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 30.6%±5.8 pp4,102±774 33.0%±0.4 pp1,271,488±15,545 ▼ -2.4% 57/110
Heat Exposed 100.0%13,400 52.6%2,030,766 ▲ +47.4% 1/110
Homes Without Air Conditioning 9.7%1,303 19.5%751,358 ▼ -9.8% 76/110
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. Heat Exposed is the share of residents living in census tracts the Census Bureau flagged as exposed to extreme heat in 2022. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates; neither those nor the heat exposure figures have a margin of error, as with CDC PLACES data.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category Mount Washington
Drove Alone 73.8% ±5.3 pp3,211 ±231
Carpooled 12.3% ±3.7 pp534 ±160
Public Transit 4.7% ±3.3 pp206 ±143
Walked 3.0% ±3.0 pp130 ±130
Bikes 1.7% ±1.4 pp74 ±62
Other Commute Mode 1.4% ±1.4 pp63 ±61
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Drove Alone 73.8%±5.3 pp3,211±231 74.3%±0.1 pp1,409,806±2,191 ▼ -0.5% 78/110
Carpooled 12.3%±3.7 pp534±160 10.8%±0.2 pp204,995±4,626 ▲ +1.5% 37/110
Public Transit 4.7%±3.3 pp206±143 7.6%±0.2 pp144,003±3,960 ▼ -2.8% 55/110
Walked 3.0%±3.0 pp130±130 4.0%±0.1 pp75,140±2,786 ▼ -1.0% 47/110
Bikes 1.7%±1.4 pp74±62 0.7%±0.1 pp13,831±1,185 ▲ +1.0% 13/110
Other Commute Mode 1.4%±1.4 pp63±61 2.6%±0.1 pp49,004±2,073 ▼ -1.1% 57/110
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category Mount Washington
Average Commute Time (minutes) 30 min±1.0 min
Less Than 15 Minutes 12.3% ±4.0 pp513 ±166
15–29 Minutes 44.7% ±6.6 pp1,866 ±274
30–44 Minutes 23.1% ±4.6 pp963 ±191
45–59 Minutes 7.9% ±2.3 pp329 ±95
60 Minutes or More 12.1% ±2.8 pp505 ±117
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes) 30 min±1.0 min 31 min±0.2 min ▼ −1 min 67/110
Less Than 15 Minutes 12.3%±4.0 pp513±166 15.9%±0.3 pp241,948±4,532 ▼ -3.6% 81/110
15–29 Minutes 44.7%±6.6 pp1,866±274 33.1%±0.3 pp504,776±4,959 ▲ +11.6% 5/110
30–44 Minutes 23.1%±4.6 pp963±191 28.9%±0.3 pp440,595±5,010 ▼ -5.8% 89/110
45–59 Minutes 7.9%±2.3 pp329±95 10.3%±0.2 pp156,750±2,883 ▼ -2.4% 92/110
60 Minutes or More 12.1%±2.8 pp505±117 11.9%±0.2 pp182,392±3,293 ▲ +0.1% 50/110
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category Mount Washington
Average Vehicles per Household 1.70±0.13
Households With No Vehicle 7.8% ±3.1 pp429 ±168
Households With 1 Vehicle 32.8% ±3.6 pp1,799 ±196
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 59.4% ±7.1 pp3,262 ±392
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Average Vehicles per Household 1.70±0.13 1.61±0.01 ▲ +0.09 44/110
Households With No Vehicle 7.8%±3.1 pp429±168 11.9%±0.2 pp171,011±3,141 ▼ -4.1% 68/110
Households With 1 Vehicle 32.8%±3.6 pp1,799±196 40.0%±0.3 pp575,741±4,305 ▼ -7.2% 79/110
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 59.4%±7.1 pp3,262±392 48.1%±0.4 pp692,345±5,259 ▲ +11.3% 27/110
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Mount Washington Residents Work

Category Mount Washington
Downtown 8.9%566
Mount Washington 2.8%178
Studio City 2.3%146
Westlake 2.2%140
Hollywood 2.0%125
All other city neighborhoods 28.1%1,776
Outside the city 53.7%3,400
Burbank city, CA 11.6%735
Pasadena city, CA 4.1%260
Glendale city, CA 3.2%205
Culver City city, CA 1.3%82
Santa Monica city, CA 1.0%62
All other California locations 31.4%1,990
Out of state 1.0%66
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 65 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Mount Washington
Downtown 8.9%566
Mount Washington 2.8%178
Studio City 2.3%146
Westlake 2.2%140
Hollywood 2.0%125
All other city neighborhoods 28.1%1,776
Outside the city 53.7%3,400
Burbank city, CA 11.6%735
Pasadena city, CA 4.1%260
Glendale city, CA 3.2%205
Culver City city, CA 1.3%82
Santa Monica city, CA 1.0%62
All other California locations 31.4%1,990
Out of state 1.0%66
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 65 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Downtown 10.8%686 9.7%630 8.9%566 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −120▼ −0.8 pp▼ −64▼ −1.1 pp▼ −56
Los Angeles citywide 6.5%101,766 6.3%110,069 5.7%102,316 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +550▼ −0.5 pp▼ −7,753▼ −0.3 pp▲ +8,303
Mount Washington 1.2%79 1.7%111 2.8%178 ▲ +1.6 pp▲ +99▲ +1.1 pp▲ +67▲ +0.5 pp▲ +32
Los Angeles citywide 0.0%437 0.0%607 0.0%560 – 0.0 pp▲ +123– 0.0 pp▼ −47– 0.0 pp▲ +170
Studio City 0.7%46 1.0%63 2.3%146 ▲ +1.6 pp▲ +100▲ +1.3 pp▲ +83▲ +0.2 pp▲ +17
Los Angeles citywide 1.2%18,025 1.4%24,187 1.8%32,522 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +14,497▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,335▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,162
Westlake 2.6%167 1.9%123 2.2%140 ▼ −0.4 pp▼ −27▲ +0.3 pp▲ +17▼ −0.7 pp▼ −44
Los Angeles citywide 1.6%24,683 1.5%26,401 1.5%26,369 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,686– 0.0 pp▼ −32▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,718
Hollywood 1.9%122 2.3%146 2.0%125 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3▼ −0.3 pp▼ −21▲ +0.3 pp▲ +24
Los Angeles citywide 1.9%30,243 2.1%36,681 1.8%32,824 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,581▼ −0.2 pp▼ −3,857▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,438
All other city neighborhoods 27.7%1,761 28.2%1,831 28.1%1,776 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +15▼ −0.2 pp▼ −55▲ +0.6 pp▲ +70
Los Angeles citywide 29.3%458,023 29.5%518,759 30.0%536,497 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +78,474▲ +0.5 pp▲ +17,738▲ +0.2 pp▲ +60,736
Outside the city 54.6%3,472 54.2%3,513 53.7%3,400 ▼ −0.9 pp▼ −72▼ −0.5 pp▼ −113▼ −0.4 pp▲ +41
Los Angeles citywide 49.2%770,441 48.8%858,729 49.1%878,687 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +108,246▲ +0.4 pp▲ +19,958▼ −0.5 pp▲ +88,288
Burbank city, CA 8.2%524 11.4%742 11.6%735 ▲ +3.4 pp▲ +211▲ +0.2 pp▼ −7▲ +3.2 pp▲ +218
Los Angeles citywide 5.8%90,525 7.3%128,165 7.5%134,652 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +44,127▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,487▲ +1.5 pp▲ +37,640
Pasadena city, CA 4.3%274 4.1%267 4.1%260 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −14– 0.0 pp▼ −7▼ −0.2 pp▼ −7
Los Angeles citywide 1.4%21,211 1.2%21,595 1.2%21,859 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +648– 0.0 pp▲ +264▼ −0.1 pp▲ +384
Glendale city, CA 3.6%232 3.7%237 3.2%205 ▼ −0.4 pp▼ −27▼ −0.4 pp▼ −32– 0.0 pp▲ +5
Los Angeles citywide 1.9%30,184 2.0%36,041 1.9%34,608 – 0.0 pp▲ +4,424▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,433▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5,857
Culver City city, CA 1.5%98 1.6%105 1.3%82 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −16▼ −0.3 pp▼ −23▲ +0.1 pp▲ +7
Los Angeles citywide 2.1%32,497 1.8%31,673 1.8%33,021 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +524– 0.0 pp▲ +1,348▼ −0.3 pp▼ −824
Santa Monica city, CA 1.0%66 0.9%60 1.0%62 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −4▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2▼ −0.1 pp▼ −6
Los Angeles citywide 2.6%39,908 2.4%42,563 2.2%39,633 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −275▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,930▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,655
All other California locations 34.9%2,221 31.2%2,022 31.4%1,990 ▼ −3.5 pp▼ −231▲ +0.3 pp▼ −32▼ −3.7 pp▼ −199
Los Angeles citywide 31.0%485,821 29.7%523,763 30.3%541,371 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +55,550▲ +0.5 pp▲ +17,608▼ −1.3 pp▲ +37,942
Out of state 0.8%53 1.0%67 1.0%66 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +13– 0.0 pp▼ −1▲ +0.2 pp▲ +14
Los Angeles citywide 0.8%12,591 0.9%15,245 0.9%15,599 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,008– 0.0 pp▲ +354▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,654

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Mount Washington

Category Mount Washington
Mount Washington 18.7%178
Highland Park 3.7%35
Eagle Rock 1.7%16
El Sereno 1.5%14
Koreatown 1.5%14
All other city neighborhoods 31.8%303
Outside the city 41.2%392
San Diego city, CA 4.2%40
Glendale city, CA 2.1%20
Pasadena city, CA 2.0%19
East Los Angeles CDP, CA 1.4%13
Burbank city, CA 1.3%12
All other California locations 29.8%284
Out of state 0.4%4
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 65; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Mount Washington
Mount Washington 18.7%178
Highland Park 3.7%35
Eagle Rock 1.7%16
El Sereno 1.5%14
Koreatown 1.5%14
All other city neighborhoods 31.8%303
Outside the city 41.2%392
San Diego city, CA 4.2%40
Glendale city, CA 2.1%20
Pasadena city, CA 2.0%19
East Los Angeles CDP, CA 1.4%13
Burbank city, CA 1.3%12
All other California locations 29.8%284
Out of state 0.4%4
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 65; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Mount Washington 10.4%79 10.4%111 18.7%178 ▲ +8.3 pp▲ +99▲ +8.3 pp▲ +67– 0.0 pp▲ +32
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%2,890 0.2%2,972 0.1%2,931 – 0.0 pp▲ +41– 0.0 pp▼ −41– 0.0 pp▲ +82
Highland Park 7.5%57 6.7%71 3.7%35 ▼ −3.8 pp▼ −22▼ −3.0 pp▼ −36▼ −0.8 pp▲ +14
Los Angeles citywide 0.6%9,932 0.6%10,841 0.5%10,512 – 0.0 pp▲ +580– 0.0 pp▼ −329– 0.0 pp▲ +909
Eagle Rock 1.1%8 1.7%18 1.7%16 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +8– 0.0 pp▼ −2▲ +0.6 pp▲ +10
Los Angeles citywide 0.4%7,055 0.4%7,422 0.4%7,026 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −29– 0.0 pp▼ −396– 0.0 pp▲ +367
El Sereno 1.7%13 1.5%16 1.5%14 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +1– 0.0 pp▼ −2▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3
Los Angeles citywide 0.4%7,245 0.4%7,954 0.4%7,909 – 0.0 pp▲ +664– 0.0 pp▼ −45– 0.0 pp▲ +709
Koreatown 1.2%9 1.4%15 1.5%14 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +5▲ +0.1 pp▼ −1▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6
Los Angeles citywide 1.3%22,574 1.4%26,504 1.4%27,332 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,758– 0.0 pp▲ +828▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,930
All other city neighborhoods 32.7%248 34.8%370 31.8%303 ▼ −0.9 pp▲ +55▼ −2.9 pp▼ −67▲ +2.1 pp▲ +122
Los Angeles citywide 32.8%567,333 33.2%640,964 32.5%645,360 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +78,027▼ −0.7 pp▲ +4,396▲ +0.4 pp▲ +73,631
Outside the city 42.3%321 43.0%457 41.2%392 ▼ −1.2 pp▲ +71▼ −1.8 pp▼ −65▲ +0.6 pp▲ +136
Los Angeles citywide 54.0%933,111 53.3%1,028,920 54.2%1,077,964 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +144,853▲ +1.0 pp▲ +49,044▼ −0.7 pp▲ +95,809
San Diego city, CA 0.1%1 0.1%1 4.2%40 ▲ +4.1 pp▲ +39▲ +4.1 pp▲ +39– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 0.8%13,388 0.8%14,486 0.9%18,115 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,727▲ +0.2 pp▲ +3,629– 0.0 pp▲ +1,098
Glendale city, CA 4.7%36 3.9%41 2.1%20 ▼ −2.6 pp▼ −16▼ −1.8 pp▼ −21▼ −0.9 pp▲ +5
Los Angeles citywide 1.9%33,158 1.8%35,528 1.7%34,665 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +1,507▼ −0.1 pp▼ −863▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,370
Pasadena city, CA 1.7%13 2.7%29 2.0%19 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6▼ −0.7 pp▼ −10▲ +1.0 pp▲ +16
Los Angeles citywide 0.9%15,363 1.0%18,429 0.9%18,729 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,366– 0.0 pp▲ +300▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,066
East Los Angeles CDP, CA 2.0%15 1.9%20 1.4%13 ▼ −0.6 pp▼ −2▼ −0.5 pp▼ −7▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5
Los Angeles citywide 0.7%12,586 0.7%14,417 0.7%14,835 – 0.0 pp▲ +2,249– 0.0 pp▲ +418– 0.0 pp▲ +1,831
Burbank city, CA 2.2%17 2.3%24 1.3%12 ▼ −1.0 pp▼ −5▼ −1.0 pp▼ −12– 0.0 pp▲ +7
Los Angeles citywide 1.2%21,242 1.2%23,162 1.2%23,280 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,038– 0.0 pp▲ +118– 0.0 pp▲ +1,920
All other California locations 29.9%227 29.7%316 29.8%284 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +57▲ +0.1 pp▼ −32▼ −0.2 pp▲ +89
Los Angeles citywide 42.9%741,882 42.0%811,195 42.9%852,367 – 0.0 pp▲ +110,485▲ +0.9 pp▲ +41,172▼ −0.9 pp▲ +69,313
Out of state 0.4%3 0.8%8 0.4%4 – 0.0 pp▲ +1▼ −0.3 pp▼ −4▲ +0.4 pp▲ +5
Los Angeles citywide 0.7%12,235 0.9%18,318 1.4%27,218 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +14,983▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,900▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,083

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category Mount Washington
No Computer or Smartphone 3.1% ±2.4 pp171 ±132
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 3.0% ±1.5 pp165 ±81
Desktop or Laptop Available 90.5% ±3.8 pp4,970 ±206
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
No Computer or Smartphone 3.1%±2.4 pp171±132 3.6%±0.1 pp51,208±2,038 ▼ -0.4% 61/110
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 3.0%±1.5 pp165±81 9.4%±0.2 pp134,973±3,565 ▼ -6.4% 88/110
Desktop or Laptop Available 90.5%±3.8 pp4,970±206 81.8%±0.3 pp1,177,551±4,293 ▲ +8.7% 33/110
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category Mount Washington
Has Internet Access 95.3% ±2.8 pp5,234 ±155
Cellular Data Plan Only 8.6% ±2.2 pp469 ±119
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 1.2% ±1.0 pp64 ±56
No Internet Access 4.7% ±2.5 pp256 ±140
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Has Internet Access 95.3%±2.8 pp5,234±155 94.6%±0.2 pp1,361,126±2,605 ▲ +0.8% 57/110
Cellular Data Plan Only 8.6%±2.2 pp469±119 11.8%±0.2 pp169,117±3,594 ▼ -3.2% 75/110
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 1.2%±1.0 pp64±56 1.9%±0.1 pp27,326±1,276 ▼ -0.7% 77/110
No Internet Access 4.7%±2.5 pp256±140 5.4%±0.2 pp77,971±2,871 ▼ -0.8% 54/110
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category Mount Washington
Uninsured Residents 5.9% ±2.0 pp789 ±273
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 2.6% ±2.4 pp346 ±318
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 8.0% ±2.9 pp1,071 ±388
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 0.0% ±1.6 pp0
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Uninsured Residents 5.9%±2.0 pp789±273 9.5%±0.1 pp364,737±5,658 ▼ -3.6% 71/110
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 2.6%±2.4 pp346±318 3.3%±0.2 pp125,674±9,529 ▼ -0.7% 57/110
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 8.0%±2.9 pp1,071±388 13.1%±0.2 pp506,732±8,090 ▼ -5.1% 68/110
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 0.0%±1.6 pp0 1.9%±0.2 pp72,725±8,443 ▼ -1.9% 95/110
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category Mount Washington
Insured (Any Coverage) 94.1% ±2.0 pp12,611 ±273
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 59.2% ±5.4 pp7,929 ±727
Direct-Purchase Insurance 12.1% ±2.3 pp1,620 ±310
Medicare 13.5% ±2.0 pp1,813 ±268
Medicaid 11.7% ±2.0 pp1,570 ±275
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.1% ±0.7 pp8 ±89
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 5.4% ±1.6 pp719 ±208
Uninsured 5.9% ±2.0 pp789 ±273
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Insured (Any Coverage) 94.1%±2.0 pp12,611±273 90.5%±0.2 pp3,468,249±6,113 ▲ +3.6% 40/110
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 59.2%±5.4 pp7,929±727 40.6%±0.3 pp1,556,236±11,598 ▲ +18.5% 10/110
Direct-Purchase Insurance 12.1%±2.3 pp1,620±310 11.5%±0.2 pp439,171±6,009 ▲ +0.6% 50/110
Medicare 13.5%±2.0 pp1,813±268 13.1%±0.2 pp502,686±5,846 ▲ +0.4% 54/110
Medicaid 11.7%±2.0 pp1,570±275 30.1%±0.2 pp1,152,695±9,490 ▼ -18.4% 87/110
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.1%±0.7 pp8±89 0.2%±0.0 pp8,178±741 ▼ -0.2% 78/110
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 5.4%±1.6 pp719±208 4.2%±0.1 pp160,627±3,851 ▲ +1.2% 24/110
Uninsured 5.9%±2.0 pp789±273 9.5%±0.2 pp362,202±6,113 ▼ -3.6% 71/110
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category Mount Washington
Adults With at Least One Disability 11.4% ±2.0 pp1,234 ±214
Mobility Disability 4.8% ±1.4 pp519 ±151
Hearing Disability 3.2% ±1.1 pp344 ±122
Vision Disability 2.8% ±1.4 pp307 ±150
Cognitive Disability 4.4% ±1.5 pp472 ±160
Self-Care Disability 1.8% ±1.3 pp196 ±137
Independent Living Disability 4.8% ±1.6 pp520 ±169
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability 11.4%±2.0 pp1,234±214 13.4%±0.2 pp413,424±4,833 ▼ -1.9% 77/110
Mobility Disability 4.8%±1.4 pp519±151 7.1%±0.1 pp220,306±3,715 ▼ -2.3% 88/110
Hearing Disability 3.2%±1.1 pp344±122 3.0%±0.1 pp92,708±2,400 ▲ +0.2% 42/110
Vision Disability 2.8%±1.4 pp307±150 2.7%±0.1 pp83,292±2,320 ▲ +0.2% 43/110
Cognitive Disability 4.4%±1.5 pp472±160 5.1%±0.1 pp158,649±3,239 ▼ -0.8% 76/110
Self-Care Disability 1.8%±1.3 pp196±137 3.4%±0.1 pp104,391±2,633 ▼ -1.6% 97/110
Independent Living Disability 4.8%±1.6 pp520±169 6.1%±0.1 pp187,616±3,478 ▼ -1.3% 80/110
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category Mount Washington
Arthritis 19.1%1,966
High Blood Pressure 28.2%2,905
Cancer 6.2%641
Current Asthma 8.8%904
Coronary Heart Disease 4.8%490
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 4.1%421
Diabetes 10.8%1,118
High Cholesterol 36.5%3,765
Obesity 24.9%2,570
Stroke 2.7%280
Lost All Natural Teeth 1.3%134
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Arthritis 19.1%1,966 18.8%558,377 ▲ +0.3% 51/110
High Blood Pressure 28.2%2,905 28.8%855,387 ▼ -0.6% 70/110
Cancer 6.2%641 5.4%160,385 ▲ +0.8% 38/110
Current Asthma 8.8%904 9.4%279,189 ▼ -0.6% 96/110
Coronary Heart Disease 4.8%490 5.0%148,505 ▼ -0.2% 70/110
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 4.1%421 4.9%145,535 ▼ -0.8% 76/110
Diabetes 10.8%1,118 11.9%353,441 ▼ -1.1% 65/110
High Cholesterol 36.5%3,765 35.2%1,045,473 ▲ +1.3% 34/110
Obesity 24.9%2,570 27.3%810,835 ▼ -2.4% 64/110
Stroke 2.7%280 3.1%92,073 ▼ -0.4% 74/110
Lost All Natural Teeth 1.3%134 1.9%55,491 ▼ -0.6% 78/110
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category Mount Washington
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 16.2%1,674
Current Cigarette Smoking 9.6%985
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 21.8%2,254
Short Sleep Duration 34.3%3,541
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 16.2%1,674 15.9%472,245 ▲ +0.3% 36/110
Current Cigarette Smoking 9.6%985 11.9%353,441 ▼ -2.3% 71/110
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 21.8%2,254 26.5%787,075 ▼ -4.7% 69/110
Short Sleep Duration 34.3%3,541 36.5%1,084,084 ▼ -2.2% 67/110
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category Mount Washington
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 20.0%2,062
Frequent Physical Distress 12.5%1,288
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 20.0%2,062 25.1%745,493 ▼ -5.1% 68/110
Frequent Physical Distress 12.5%1,288 14.4%427,693 ▼ -1.9% 69/110
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category Mount Washington
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 70.7%7,293
Routine Checkup in Past Year 72.2%7,445
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 86.9%8,967
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 56.7%5,847
Dental Visit in Past Year 64.3%6,634
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 76.8%7,925
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 70.7%7,293 69.3%2,058,274 ▲ +1.4% 42/110
Routine Checkup in Past Year 72.2%7,445 70.5%2,093,916 ▲ +1.7% 36/110
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 86.9%8,967 83.0%2,465,177 ▲ +3.9% 34/110
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 56.7%5,847 54.0%1,603,850 ▲ +2.7% 49/110
Dental Visit in Past Year 64.3%6,634 58.9%1,749,385 ▲ +5.4% 44/110
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 76.8%7,925 74.8%2,221,630 ▲ +2.0% 44/110
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category Mount Washington
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 19.2%1,976
Frequent Mental Distress 14.9%1,532
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 28.1%2,894
Loneliness 37.9%3,913
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Mount Washington City Difference Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 19.2%1,976 20.4%605,899 ▼ -1.2% 88/110
Frequent Mental Distress 14.9%1,532 17.4%516,796 ▼ -2.5% 89/110
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 28.1%2,894 31.2%926,669 ▼ -3.1% 73/110
Loneliness 37.9%3,913 41.3%1,226,648 ▼ -3.4% 79/110
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Compare All Neighborhoods