Glassell Park, Los Angeles Demographics, Housing & Census Data

Glassell Park, Los Angeles Census and ACS demographic tables: population, race, age, income, poverty, rent, housing types, single-family homes, commute, education, internet access, health insurance, and disability.

Glassell Park, Los Angeles

Glassell Park
Los Angeles
Population
21,045
Overlapping council districts Overlap means that a council district contains part of this neighborhood.
1, 13
Population Density
7,309 /sq mi

Glassell Park at a Glance

Time period?Historical estimates use this profile's current boundaries, held constant across periods; they do not reflect the boundaries that were in effect at the time. Comparing
Values as
Show as
Add to every table
Showing Chart vs. Los Angeles ± Margin of error

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category Glassell Park
Hispanic 49.7% ±3.1 pp10,469 ±654
White 24.4% ±3.0 pp5,141 ±621
Black 1.9% ±0.7 pp397 ±152
Asian 17.7% ±2.7 pp3,730 ±564
Other or Multi-racial 6.2% ±1.5 pp1,309 ±311
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Hispanic 49.7%±3.1 pp10,469±654 47.2%±0.2 pp1,820,397±8,107 ▲ +2.6% 43/110
White 24.4%±3.0 pp5,141±621 28.1%±0.2 pp1,082,393±7,330 ▼ -3.6% 58/110
Black 1.9%±0.7 pp397±152 8.1%±0.1 pp311,633±4,801 ▼ -6.2% 97/110
Asian 17.7%±2.7 pp3,730±564 11.9%±0.1 pp460,422±5,784 ▲ +5.8% 29/110
Other or Multi-racial 6.2%±1.5 pp1,309±311 4.7%±0.1 pp182,418±4,965 ▲ +1.5% 42/110
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Age Distribution

Category Glassell Park
Under 5 4.8% ±0.9 pp1,018 ±194
5-17 14.1% ±1.4 pp2,960 ±299
18-24 6.4% ±1.0 pp1,349 ±218
25-44 34.3% ±1.8 pp7,220 ±386
45-64 25.5% ±1.6 pp5,356 ±331
65-74 9.0% ±1.2 pp1,902 ±255
75-84 4.6% ±0.8 pp968 ±163
85+ 1.3% ±0.5 pp272 ±106
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Under 5 4.8%±0.9 pp1,018±194 5.0%±0.1 pp193,588±3,896 ▼ -0.2% 64/110
5-17 14.1%±1.4 pp2,960±299 14.1%±0.1 pp545,575±5,332 ▼ -0.1% 55/110
18-24 6.4%±1.0 pp1,349±218 9.5%±0.1 pp364,975±4,663 ▼ -3.1% 75/110
25-44 34.3%±1.8 pp7,220±386 32.7%±0.2 pp1,261,487±6,490 ▲ +1.6% 36/110
45-64 25.5%±1.6 pp5,356±331 24.4%±0.1 pp942,048±5,660 ▲ +1.0% 51/110
65-74 9.0%±1.2 pp1,902±255 8.4%±0.1 pp323,245±3,923 ▲ +0.7% 48/110
75-84 4.6%±0.8 pp968±163 4.0%±0.1 pp153,663±2,663 ▲ +0.6% 47/110
85+ 1.3%±0.5 pp272±106 1.9%±0.1 pp72,682±2,184 ▼ -0.6% 89/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category Glassell Park
No High School Diploma 18.0% ±2.2 pp2,815 ±341
High School Diploma or GED 17.5% ±2.9 pp2,738 ±455
Some College or Associate's Degree 23.7% ±2.1 pp3,704 ±328
Bachelor's Degree 29.6% ±2.3 pp4,627 ±366
Graduate Degree 11.3% ±1.6 pp1,770 ±253
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
No High School Diploma 18.0%±2.2 pp2,815±341 20.4%±0.2 pp560,441±5,727 ▼ -2.4% 50/110
High School Diploma or GED 17.5%±2.9 pp2,738±455 18.5%±0.2 pp509,870±5,784 ▼ -1.0% 61/110
Some College or Associate's Degree 23.7%±2.1 pp3,704±328 22.7%±0.2 pp624,064±5,974 ▲ +1.0% 45/110
Bachelor's Degree 29.6%±2.3 pp4,627±366 24.9%±0.2 pp684,319±5,857 ▲ +4.7% 47/110
Graduate Degree 11.3%±1.6 pp1,770±253 13.6%±0.2 pp374,431±4,485 ▼ -2.3% 61/110
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category Glassell Park
Total Population 21,045 ±1,242
Total Households 7,563 ±347
Population Density 7,309 ±431 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park Average Neighborhood Difference
Total Population 21,045 35,102 ▼ −14,057
Total Households 7,563 13,096 ▼ −5,533
Population Density 7,309 people/sq mi 11,693 people/sq mi ▼ −4,384
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average neighborhood rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large neighborhoods. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category 2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19 Difference Rank
Total Population 22,548 ±937 23,170 ±888 21,045 ±1,242 ▼ −1,503 ±1,556▼ −2,125 ±1,526▲ +622 ±1,291 ▼ −12,610▼ −12,928▼ −14,057 70/11070/11074/110
Average Neighborhood 35,158 36,098 35,102 ▼ −56▼ −997▲ +940
Total Households 7,232 ±206 7,683 ±214 7,563 ±347 ▲ +331 ±403▼ −120 ±407▲ +451 ±297 ▼ −4,869▼ −4,911▼ −5,533 71/11070/11072/110
Average Neighborhood 12,101 12,594 13,096 ▲ +995▲ +502▲ +493
Population Density (per sq mi) 7,831 ±326 8,047 ±308 7,309 ±431 ▼ −522▼ −738▲ +216 ▼ −3,950▼ −4,024▼ −4,384 73/11073/11079/110
Average Neighborhood Density 11,781 12,071 11,693 ▼ −88▼ −378▲ +291

Household Size

Category Glassell Park
Average Household Size 2.77±0.16
1-Person Households 23.5% ±2.8 pp1,781 ±212
2-Person Households 30.3% ±2.7 pp2,294 ±207
3-Person Households 20.2% ±3.0 pp1,530 ±230
4+ Person Households 25.9% ±3.1 pp1,959 ±232
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Average Household Size 2.77±0.16 2.61±0.02 ▲ +0.16 43/110
1-Person Households 23.5%±2.8 pp1,781±212 31.8%±0.4 pp458,302±5,082 ▼ -8.3% 72/110
2-Person Households 30.3%±2.7 pp2,294±207 29.2%±0.4 pp419,781±5,238 ▲ +1.2% 57/110
3-Person Households 20.2%±3.0 pp1,530±230 15.5%±0.3 pp222,553±4,097 ▲ +4.8% 13/110
4+ Person Households 25.9%±3.1 pp1,959±232 23.5%±0.4 pp338,461±5,073 ▲ +2.4% 45/110
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category Glassell Park
Never Married 41.9% ±3.2 pp7,414 ±571
Married 43.9% ±0.2 pp7,772 ±30
Separated 2.3% ±0.7 pp413 ±120
Divorced 8.3% ±1.2 pp1,470 ±209
Widowed 3.5% ±0.8 pp616 ±139
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Never Married 41.9%±3.2 pp7,414±571 46.8%±0.2 pp1,520,630±7,726 ▼ -4.9% 71/110
Married 43.9%±0.2 pp7,772±30 38.5%±0.2 pp1,249,312±6,703 ▲ +5.5% 36/110
Separated 2.3%±0.7 pp413±120 2.3%±0.1 pp75,298±2,109 0% 52/110
Divorced 8.3%±1.2 pp1,470±209 8.0%±0.1 pp260,053±4,066 ▲ +0.3% 52/110
Widowed 3.5%±0.8 pp616±139 4.4%±0.1 pp143,800±3,312 ▼ -0.9% 89/110
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category Glassell Park
Speak English Only 43.0% ±2.8 pp8,726 ±565
Spanish 39.5% ±3.1 pp8,023 ±627
Tagalog (incl. Filipino) 8.3% ±1.9 pp1,691 ±390
Other Languages 3.4% ±1.1 pp692 ±216
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese) 2.5% ±0.8 pp512 ±165
Other Indo-European 1.9% ±1.0 pp380 ±203
Korean 1.3% ±0.8 pp267 ±168
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Speak English Only 43.0%±2.8 pp8,726±565 43.6%±0.3 pp1,595,910±12,698 ▼ -0.6% 63/110
Spanish 39.5%±3.1 pp8,023±627 39.3%±0.3 pp1,439,364±9,227 ▲ +0.3% 43/110
Tagalog (incl. Filipino) 8.3%±1.9 pp1,691±390 2.3%±0.1 pp85,207±3,084 ▲ +6.0% 3/63
Other Languages 3.4%±1.1 pp692±216 1.0%±0.1 pp36,540±2,239 ▲ +2.4% 37/110
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese) 2.5%±0.8 pp512±165 1.7%±0.1 pp62,141±2,430 ▲ +0.8% 26/58
Other Indo-European 1.9%±1.0 pp380±203 5.3%±0.2 pp192,760±5,783 ▼ -3.4% 69/78
Korean 1.3%±0.8 pp267±168 2.3%±0.1 pp84,148±2,929 ▼ -1.0% 41/49
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this neighborhood, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show
Category Glassell Park
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 76.6% ±1.2 pp76.6%±1.2 pp15,341 ±241
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 11.9% ±2.0 pp11.9%±2.0 pp2,379 ±394
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 7.7% ±1.4 pp65.2%±4.5 pp1,551 ±278
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 3.8% ±1.2 pp31.8%±8.1 pp756 ±231
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 23.4% ±2.4 pp197.0%±38.5 pp4,686 ±488
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 76.6%±1.2 pp76.6%±1.2 pp15,341±241 75.0%±0.4 pp75.0%±0.4 pp2,746,425±15,454 ▲ +1.6%▲ +1.6% 62/110
Speaks English Well (of residents age 5+) 11.9%±2.0 pp11.9%±2.0 pp2,379±394 11.4%±0.2 pp11.4%±0.2 pp417,261±5,774 ▲ +0.5%▲ +0.5% 47/110
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 7.7%±1.4 pp65.2%±4.5 pp1,551±278 9.5%±0.2 pp83.3%±0.9 pp347,471±6,114 ▼ -1.7%▼ -18.1% 56/11063/110
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 3.8%±1.2 pp31.8%±8.1 pp756±231 4.2%±0.1 pp36.6%±0.8 pp152,518±4,020 ▼ -0.4%▼ -4.8% 45/11040/110
↳ Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 23.4%±2.4 pp197.0%±38.5 pp4,686±488 25.0%±0.3 pp219.8%±3.8 pp917,250±9,304 ▼ -1.6%▼ -22.9% 49/11057/110
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category Glassell Park
Married-Couple Households 44.6% ±3.4 pp3,370 ±259
Unmarried-Couple Households 10.6% ±2.1 pp805 ±160
One-Person Households 23.5% ±3.1 pp1,781 ±236
Other Household Types 21.3% ±7.2 pp1,608 ±543
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Married-Couple Households 44.6%±3.4 pp3,370±259 37.0%±0.3 pp531,842±3,893 ▲ +7.6% 32/110
Unmarried-Couple Households 10.6%±2.1 pp805±160 8.8%±0.2 pp125,985±2,722 ▲ +1.9% 26/110
One-Person Households 23.5%±3.1 pp1,781±236 31.8%±0.3 pp458,302±4,544 ▼ -8.3% 72/110
Other Household Types 21.3%±7.2 pp1,608±543 22.4%±0.5 pp322,968±7,912 ▼ -1.2% 58/110
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category Glassell Park
Children in Married-Couple Households 66.2% ±4.6 pp2,688 ±188
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 11.2% ±5.3 pp457 ±216
Children in Single-Mother Households 17.1% ±4.8 pp695 ±194
Children in Single-Father Households 5.5% ±4.4 pp224 ±181
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households 66.2%±4.6 pp2,688±188 60.7%±0.6 pp447,843±4,339 ▲ +5.4% 55/110
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 11.2%±5.3 pp457±216 10.9%±0.5 pp80,543±3,499 ▲ +0.3% 40/110
Children in Single-Mother Households 17.1%±4.8 pp695±194 22.7%±0.7 pp167,403±4,794 ▼ -5.6% 63/110
Children in Single-Father Households 5.5%±4.4 pp224±181 5.6%±0.3 pp41,515±2,120 ▼ -0.1% 53/110
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show
Category Glassell Park
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 1.4% ±0.5 pp1.4%±0.5 pp244 ±77
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 29.2% ±30.2 pp0.4%±0.4 pp71 ±74
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 4.6% ±25.3 pp0.1%±0.4 pp11 ±62
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 28.7% ±33.5 pp0.4%±0.5 pp70 ±82
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 0.0% ±25.4 pp0.0%0
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 37.6% ±40.1 pp0.5%±0.6 pp92 ±98
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 1.4%±0.5 pp1.4%±0.5 pp244±77 2.2%±0.1 pp2.2%±0.1 pp67,714±2,153 ▼ -0.7%▼ -0.7% 84/110
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 29.2%±30.2 pp0.4%±0.4 pp71±74 25.0%±1.1 pp0.5%±0.0 pp16,948±757 ▲ +4.2%▼ -0.1% 39/11059/110
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 4.6%±25.3 pp0.1%±0.4 pp11±62 12.9%±1.0 pp0.3%±0.0 pp8,738±667 ▼ -8.3%▼ -0.2% 86/11086/110
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 28.7%±33.5 pp0.4%±0.5 pp70±82 29.1%±1.1 pp0.6%±0.0 pp19,723±754 ▼ -0.5%▼ -0.2% 57/11073/110
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 0.0%±25.4 pp0.0%0 5.9%±0.8 pp0.1%±0.0 pp4,026±537 ▼ -5.9%▼ -0.1% 87/11087/110
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 37.6%±40.1 pp0.5%±0.6 pp92±98 27.0%±1.8 pp0.6%±0.0 pp18,279±1,202 ▲ +10.6%0% 29/11060/110
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show
Category Glassell Park
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 62.5% ±1.9 pp62.5%±1.9 pp13,151 ±395
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 37.5% ±2.6 pp37.5%±2.6 pp7,894 ±544
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 22.6% ±1.4 pp60.3%±5.6 pp4,758 ±299
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 14.9% ±2.6 pp39.7%±6.4 pp3,136 ±549
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 62.5%±1.9 pp62.5%±1.9 pp13,151±395 64.3%±0.3 pp64.3%±0.3 pp2,479,853±10,798 ▼ -1.8%▼ -1.8% 74/110
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 37.5%±2.6 pp37.5%±2.6 pp7,894±544 35.7%±0.3 pp35.7%±0.3 pp1,377,410±11,170 ▲ +1.8%▲ +1.8% 37/110
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 22.6%±1.4 pp60.3%±5.6 pp4,758±299 18.0%±0.2 pp50.4%±0.3 pp693,647±6,987 ▲ +4.6%▲ +9.9% 20/11047/110
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 14.9%±2.6 pp39.7%±6.4 pp3,136±549 17.7%±0.2 pp49.6%±0.5 pp683,763±8,715 ▼ -2.8%▼ -9.9% 51/11064/110
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show
Category Glassell Park
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 13.8%±2.3 pp36.7%±5.2 pp2,929±496
Born in Philippines (of foreign-born residents) 7.3%±1.6 pp19.5%±3.9 pp1,555±343
Born in El Salvador (of foreign-born residents) 3.3%±0.7 pp8.7%±1.8 pp698±159
Born in China / Hong Kong (of foreign-born residents) 2.3%±0.8 pp6.0%±2.1 pp482±171
Born in Korea (of foreign-born residents) 1.4%±0.8 pp3.7%±2.1 pp297±170
Born in Guatemala (of foreign-born residents) 1.2%±0.5 pp3.2%±1.2 pp257±100
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 8.1%21.6%1,725
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park Los Angeles Difference Rank
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 13.8% ±2.3 pp36.7%±5.2 pp2,929 11.0% ±0.2 pp30.8%424,738 ▲ +2.7%▲ +5.8% 33/11032/110
Born in Philippines (of foreign-born residents) 7.3% ±1.6 pp19.5%±3.9 pp1,555 2.3% ±0.1 pp6.4%88,183 ▲ +5.0%▲ +13.1% 4/1104/110
Born in El Salvador (of foreign-born residents) 3.3% ±0.7 pp8.7%±1.8 pp698 4.1% ±0.1 pp11.6%160,004 ▼ -0.9%▼ -2.9% 47/11052/110
Born in China / Hong Kong (of foreign-born residents) 2.3% ±0.8 pp6.0%±2.1 pp482 1.0% ±0.0 pp2.8%38,593 ▲ +1.3%▲ +3.2% 17/11021/110
Born in Korea (of foreign-born residents) 1.4% ±0.8 pp3.7%±2.1 pp297 1.9% ±0.1 pp5.2%72,218 ▼ -0.5%▼ -1.5% 29/11041/110
Born in Guatemala (of foreign-born residents) 1.2% ±0.5 pp3.2%±1.2 pp257 3.1% ±0.1 pp8.7%119,892 ▼ -1.9%▼ -5.5% 58/11066/110
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 8.1%21.6%1,725 ——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show
Category Glassell Park
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 6.3% ±1.8 pp16.7%±4.5 pp1,338 ±373
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 5.4% ±1.2 pp14.5%±2.9 pp1,156 ±247
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 7.1% ±1.3 pp18.9%±3.3 pp1,510 ±283
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 18.7% ±1.8 pp49.9%±3.2 pp3,985 ±388
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 6.3%±1.8 pp16.7%±4.5 pp1,338±373 8.0%±0.2 pp3850.0%±290.8 pp307,579±6,156 ▼ -1.7%▼ -3833.3% 57/11074/110
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 5.4%±1.2 pp14.5%±2.9 pp1,156±247 7.2%±0.1 pp3491.9%±261.9 pp278,968±4,987 ▼ -1.8%▼ -3477.4% 62/11088/110
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 7.1%±1.3 pp18.9%±3.3 pp1,510±283 7.6%±0.1 pp3674.5%±274.3 pp293,558±4,815 ▼ -0.5%▼ -3655.6% 55/11080/110
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 18.7%±1.8 pp49.9%±3.2 pp3,985±388 12.9%±0.1 pp6224.9%±459.1 pp497,305±5,768 ▲ +5.8%▼ -6175.0% 8/11011/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later 1.4% ±0.8 pp314 ±187 3.0% ±0.7 pp684 ±166 6.3% ±1.8 pp1,338 ±373 ▲ +4.9 pp▲ +1,024▲ +3.3 pp▲ +654▲ +1.6 pp▲ +370
Los Angeles citywide 1.7% ±0.1 pp64,948 ±2,271 5.1% ±0.1 pp202,940 ±3,998 8.0% ±0.2 pp307,579 ±6,179 ▲ +6.3 pp▲ +242,631▲ +2.9 pp▲ +104,639▲ +3.4 pp▲ +137,992
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 7.5% ±1.5 pp1,680 ±343 5.7% ±0.9 pp1,315 ±216 5.4% ±1.2 pp1,156 ±247 ▼ −2.0 pp▼ −524▼ −0.3 pp▼ −159▼ −1.8 pp▼ −365
Los Angeles citywide 10.0% ±0.2 pp386,575 ±5,794 8.5% ±0.1 pp335,409 ±4,817 7.2% ±0.1 pp278,968 ±5,010 ▼ −2.8 pp▼ −107,607▼ −1.2 pp▼ −56,441▼ −1.6 pp▼ −51,166
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 11.4% ±1.7 pp2,561 ±373 11.0% ±1.3 pp2,533 ±307 7.1% ±1.3 pp1,510 ±283 ▼ −4.3 pp▼ −1,051▼ −3.9 pp▼ −1,023▼ −0.4 pp▼ −28
Los Angeles citywide 9.9% ±0.1 pp381,773 ±4,974 8.5% ±0.1 pp338,094 ±4,761 7.6% ±0.1 pp293,558 ±4,841 ▼ −2.3 pp▼ −88,215▼ −0.9 pp▼ −44,536▼ −1.4 pp▼ −43,679
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 23.5% ±1.8 pp5,281 ±399 19.5% ±1.5 pp4,506 ±335 18.7% ±1.8 pp3,985 ±388 ▼ −4.8 pp▼ −1,296▼ −0.8 pp▼ −521▼ −3.9 pp▼ −775
Los Angeles citywide 17.0% ±0.2 pp655,695 ±5,798 14.8% ±0.1 pp585,903 ±4,838 12.9% ±0.2 pp497,305 ±5,831 ▼ −4.1 pp▼ −158,390▼ −1.9 pp▼ −88,598▼ −2.2 pp▼ −69,792
Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category Glassell Park
Average Household Income $129,064±$8,193
Per Capita Income $47,622±$2,654
10th Percentile Household Income $19,283±$3,138
25th Percentile Household Income $42,422±$5,536
Median Household Income $89,612±$7,242
75th Percentile Household Income $178,175±$14,169
90th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $129,064±$8,193 $125,130±$1,000 ▲ +$3,935 45/110
Per Capita Income $47,622±$2,654 $47,685±$375 ▼ −$63 50/110
10th Percentile Household Income $19,283±$3,138 $14,186±$216 ▲ +$5,098 42/110
25th Percentile Household Income $42,422±$5,536 $37,123±$496 ▲ +$5,298 58/110
Median Household Income $89,612±$7,242 $81,939±$742 ▲ +$7,673 56/110
75th Percentile Household Income $178,175±$14,169 $154,703±$1,370 ▲ +$23,472 44/110
90th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000 Over $200,000 — 1/110
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $93,286 ±6,290 $112,557 ±5,961 $129,064 ±8,193 ▲ +$35,779▲ +$16,507▲ +$19,272
Los Angeles citywide $103,745 ±722 $118,302 ±915 $125,130 ±1,000 ▲ +$21,385▲ +$6,828▲ +$14,557
Average Household Income (nominal dollars) $70,401 ±4,747 $91,734 ±4,859 $129,064 ±8,193 ▲ +$58,663▲ +$37,330▲ +$21,333
Los Angeles citywide $78,294 ±545 $96,416 ±746 $125,130 ±1,000 ▲ +$46,835▲ +$28,714▲ +$18,122
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $31,632 ±1,816 $39,367 ±1,772 $47,622 ±2,654 ▲ +$15,990▲ +$8,255▲ +$7,735
Los Angeles citywide $37,526 ±267 $43,265 ±333 $47,685 ±375 ▲ +$10,159▲ +$4,420▲ +$5,739
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars) $23,872 ±1,371 $32,084 ±1,445 $47,622 ±2,654 ▲ +$23,750▲ +$15,538▲ +$8,212
Los Angeles citywide $28,320 ±202 $35,261 ±271 $47,685 ±375 ▲ +$19,365▲ +$12,424▲ +$6,941
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $17,399 ±2,044 $20,113 ±2,246 $19,283 ±3,138 ▲ +$1,884▼ −$830▲ +$2,714
Los Angeles citywide $15,033 ±149 $15,850 ±169 $14,186 ±216 ▼ −$847▼ −$1,664▲ +$817
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $13,131 ±1,542 $16,392 ±1,831 $19,283 ±3,138 ▲ +$6,152▲ +$2,891▲ +$3,261
Los Angeles citywide $11,345 ±113 $12,918 ±138 $14,186 ±216 ▲ +$2,841▲ +$1,268▲ +$1,573
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $35,952 ±3,292 $41,157 ±3,148 $42,422 ±5,536 ▲ +$6,469▲ +$1,265▲ +$5,205
Los Angeles citywide $30,727 ±279 $35,350 ±357 $37,123 ±496 ▲ +$6,396▲ +$1,773▲ +$4,623
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $27,133 ±2,484 $33,543 ±2,566 $42,422 ±5,536 ▲ +$15,289▲ +$8,879▲ +$6,410
Los Angeles citywide $23,189 ±211 $28,810 ±291 $37,123 ±496 ▲ +$13,934▲ +$8,313▲ +$5,621
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $68,770 ±4,667 $81,695 ±5,599 $89,612 ±7,242 ▲ +$20,842▲ +$7,918▲ +$12,924
Los Angeles citywide $65,832 ±458 $76,248 ±555 $81,939 ±742 ▲ +$16,107▲ +$5,691▲ +$10,416
Median Household Income (nominal dollars) $51,900 ±3,522 $66,581 ±4,563 $89,612 ±7,242 ▲ +$37,713▲ +$23,031▲ +$14,682
Los Angeles citywide $49,682 ±346 $62,142 ±452 $81,939 ±742 ▲ +$32,257▲ +$19,797▲ +$12,460
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $125,019 ±7,841 $151,221 ±8,701 $178,175 ±14,169 ▲ +$53,156▲ +$26,954▲ +$26,202
Los Angeles citywide $127,020 ±723 $145,116 ±805 $154,703 ±1,370 ▲ +$27,684▲ +$9,587▲ +$18,097
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $94,350 ±5,917 $123,245 ±7,092 $178,175 ±14,169 ▲ +$83,825▲ +$54,930▲ +$28,895
Los Angeles citywide $95,860 ±545 $118,270 ±656 $154,703 ±1,370 ▲ +$58,844▲ +$36,433▲ +$22,410
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $204,376 ±18,407 $237,527 ±9,442 — ——▲ +$33,151
Los Angeles citywide $221,824 ±1,731 $245,212 ±895 — ——▲ +$23,388
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $154,239 ±13,891 $193,585 ±7,696 — ——▲ +$39,346
Los Angeles citywide $167,407 ±1,307 $199,848 ±730 — ——▲ +$32,441

Poverty Status

Category Glassell Park
Below Poverty Line 14.8% ±3.4 pp3,117 ±715
Below 200% Poverty Line 30.2% ±4.0 pp6,356 ±842
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 6.4% ±2.6 pp1,354 ±543
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Below Poverty Line 14.8%±3.4 pp3,117±715 16.5%±0.3 pp638,207±11,569 ▼ -1.7% 48/110
Below 200% Poverty Line 30.2%±4.0 pp6,356±842 34.8%±0.4 pp1,343,960±17,101 ▼ -4.6% 53/110
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 6.4%±2.6 pp1,354±543 8.0%±0.2 pp308,978±7,316 ▼ -1.6% 62/110
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Category Glassell Park
Food Insecurity 19.7%3,200
Housing Insecurity 16.7%2,700
Transportation Barriers 9.6%1,563
Threatened Utility Shutoff 7.1%1,151
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Food Insecurity 19.7%3,200 23.6%700,942 ▼ -3.9% 60/110
Housing Insecurity 16.7%2,700 19.3%573,228 ▼ -2.6% 60/110
Transportation Barriers 9.6%1,563 11.8%350,471 ▼ -2.2% 61/110
Threatened Utility Shutoff 7.1%1,151 9.0%267,308 ▼ -1.9% 60/110
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category Glassell Park
In Labor Force 87.5% ±2.0 pp9,061 ±207
↳ Employed 80.7% ±2.1 pp8,354 ±220
↳ Unemployed 6.8% ±2.2 pp706 ±227
↳ Unemployment Rate 7.8% ±2.5 pp—
Not in Labor Force 12.5% ±8.4 pp1,288 ±871
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
In Labor Force 87.5%±2.0 pp9,061±207 83.1%±0.2 pp1,458,393±3,960 ▲ +4.4% 26/110
↳ Employed 80.7%±2.1 pp8,354±220 76.8%±0.3 pp1,346,606±4,643 ▲ +4.0% 30/110
↳ Unemployed 6.8%±2.2 pp706±227 6.3%±0.2 pp110,332±3,016 ▲ +0.5% 35/110
↳ Unemployment Rate 7.8%±2.5 pp— 7.6%±0.2 pp132,846±3,594 ▲ +0.2% 45/110
Not in Labor Force 12.5%±8.4 pp1,288±871 16.9%±0.8 pp295,844±13,970 ▼ -4.4% 85/110
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category Glassell Park
Management, Business, Science & Arts 49.2% ±5.1 pp5,440 ±566
↳ Management Occupations 10.7% ±1.6 pp1,181 ±182
↳ Business & Financial Operations 6.0% ±1.4 pp658 ±152
↳ Computer & Mathematical 2.0% ±0.8 pp221 ±93
↳ Architecture & Engineering 2.0% ±0.8 pp217 ±85
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 0.8% ±0.6 pp90 ±66
↳ Community & Social Service 0.6% ±0.6 pp62 ±61
↳ Legal Occupations 1.6% ±0.8 pp174 ±86
↳ Education, Training & Library 5.8% ±1.4 pp642 ±159
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 13.6% ±4.3 pp1,505 ±476
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 4.1% ±1.3 pp456 ±142
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 2.1% ±1.0 pp233 ±108
Service 15.4% ±2.6 pp1,697 ±282
↳ Healthcare Support 3.0% ±1.1 pp333 ±126
↳ Protective Service 0.6% ±0.6 pp64 ±65
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 6.3% ±1.8 pp701 ±198
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 3.5% ±1.2 pp388 ±132
↳ Personal Care & Service 1.9% ±0.9 pp210 ±98
Sales & Office 19.3% ±2.4 pp2,137 ±263
↳ Sales & Related 7.2% ±1.6 pp794 ±176
↳ Office & Administrative Support 12.1% ±2.0 pp1,342 ±218
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 8.2% ±2.0 pp904 ±223
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.1% ±0.5 pp12 ±61
↳ Construction & Extraction 6.2% ±1.8 pp683 ±203
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 1.9% ±1.0 pp209 ±108
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 7.9% ±1.6 pp873 ±176
↳ Production Occupations 2.4% ±0.9 pp262 ±96
↳ Transportation Occupations 2.8% ±1.2 pp310 ±131
↳ Material Moving Occupations 2.7% ±0.9 pp301 ±97
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts 49.2%±5.1 pp5,440±566 43.8%±0.3 pp856,718±5,665 ▲ +5.4% 50/110
↳ Management Occupations 10.7%±1.6 pp1,181±182 11.0%±0.2 pp215,767±3,237 ▼ -0.4% 60/110
↳ Business & Financial Operations 6.0%±1.4 pp658±152 6.1%±0.1 pp119,779±2,742 ▼ -0.2% 58/110
↳ Computer & Mathematical 2.0%±0.8 pp221±93 2.8%±0.1 pp55,551±1,839 ▼ -0.8% 73/110
↳ Architecture & Engineering 2.0%±0.8 pp217±85 1.6%±0.1 pp31,959±1,411 ▲ +0.3% 34/110
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 0.8%±0.6 pp90±66 1.1%±0.1 pp21,801±1,140 ▼ -0.3% 67/110
↳ Community & Social Service 0.6%±0.6 pp62±61 1.8%±0.1 pp34,335±1,497 ▼ -1.2% 106/110
↳ Legal Occupations 1.6%±0.8 pp174±86 2.1%±0.1 pp40,323±1,500 ▼ -0.5% 62/110
↳ Education, Training & Library 5.8%±1.4 pp642±159 5.1%±0.1 pp100,542±2,462 ▲ +0.7% 38/110
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 13.6%±4.3 pp1,505±476 7.4%±0.2 pp144,867±2,938 ▲ +6.2% 23/110
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 4.1%±1.3 pp456±142 3.3%±0.1 pp64,007±2,042 ▲ +0.8% 36/110
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 2.1%±1.0 pp233±108 1.4%±0.1 pp27,787±1,316 ▲ +0.7% 16/110
Service 15.4%±2.6 pp1,697±282 19.1%±0.2 pp372,654±4,348 ▼ -3.7% 63/110
↳ Healthcare Support 3.0%±1.1 pp333±126 4.1%±0.1 pp80,369±2,120 ▼ -1.1% 70/110
↳ Protective Service 0.6%±0.6 pp64±65 1.4%±0.1 pp28,096±1,344 ▼ -0.9% 84/110
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 6.3%±1.8 pp701±198 6.0%±0.1 pp117,268±2,832 ▲ +0.3% 41/110
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 3.5%±1.2 pp388±132 4.6%±0.1 pp89,319±2,441 ▼ -1.1% 57/110
↳ Personal Care & Service 1.9%±0.9 pp210±98 2.9%±0.1 pp57,602±2,122 ▼ -1.0% 96/110
Sales & Office 19.3%±2.4 pp2,137±263 18.5%±0.2 pp362,312±4,169 ▲ +0.8% 41/110
↳ Sales & Related 7.2%±1.6 pp794±176 8.7%±0.2 pp170,605±3,233 ▼ -1.5% 89/110
↳ Office & Administrative Support 12.1%±2.0 pp1,342±218 9.8%±0.2 pp191,707±3,358 ▲ +2.3% 13/110
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 8.2%±2.0 pp904±223 7.5%±0.1 pp146,574±2,638 ▲ +0.7% 41/110
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.1%±0.5 pp12±61 0.3%±0.0 pp5,780±677 ▼ -0.2% 61/110
↳ Construction & Extraction 6.2%±1.8 pp683±203 5.2%±0.1 pp101,165±2,372 ▲ +1.0% 36/110
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 1.9%±1.0 pp209±108 2.0%±0.1 pp39,629±1,434 ▼ -0.1% 50/110
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 7.9%±1.6 pp873±176 11.0%±0.2 pp215,668±3,737 ▼ -3.1% 61/110
↳ Production Occupations 2.4%±0.9 pp262±96 4.4%±0.1 pp85,463±2,595 ▼ -2.0% 66/110
↳ Transportation Occupations 2.8%±1.2 pp310±131 3.3%±0.1 pp64,837±2,015 ▼ -0.5% 61/110
↳ Material Moving Occupations 2.7%±0.9 pp301±97 3.3%±0.1 pp65,368±2,325 ▼ -0.6% 49/110
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category Glassell Park
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.1% ±0.5 pp12 ±61
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.1% ±0.5 pp12 ±61
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0% ±0.6 pp0
Construction 6.6% ±1.8 pp725 ±197
Manufacturing 6.2% ±1.3 pp686 ±144
Wholesale Trade 1.5% ±0.7 pp170 ±78
Retail Trade 9.2% ±1.4 pp1,017 ±158
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 4.0% ±1.2 pp437 ±136
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 3.4% ±1.2 pp381 ±130
↳ Utilities 0.5% ±0.7 pp57 ±76
Information 11.6% ±4.1 pp1,285 ±449
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 5.4% ±1.3 pp593 ±145
↳ Finance & Insurance 3.1% ±0.9 pp339 ±104
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 2.3% ±1.0 pp254 ±114
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 13.5% ±1.6 pp1,493 ±180
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 10.5% ±1.6 pp1,158 ±172
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0% ±0.6 pp2 ±62
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 3.0% ±0.9 pp333 ±102
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 23.2% ±2.5 pp2,564 ±279
↳ Educational Services 9.6% ±1.6 pp1,056 ±174
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 13.6% ±2.4 pp1,508 ±260
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 13.0% ±1.9 pp1,437 ±207
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 5.8% ±1.3 pp643 ±146
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 7.2% ±1.6 pp794 ±176
Other Services 3.7% ±1.1 pp412 ±123
Public Administration 2.0% ±0.7 pp218 ±76
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.1%±0.5 pp12±61 0.4%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.3% 78/110
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.1%±0.5 pp12±61 0.4%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.3% 78/110
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%±0.6 pp0 0.0%±0.0 pp— 0% 30/110
Construction 6.6%±1.8 pp725±197 6.5%±0.1 pp— ▲ +0.1% 43/110
Manufacturing 6.2%±1.3 pp686±144 6.8%±0.2 pp— ▼ -0.6% 52/110
Wholesale Trade 1.5%±0.7 pp170±78 2.3%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.8% 85/110
Retail Trade 9.2%±1.4 pp1,017±158 9.3%±0.2 pp— ▼ -0.1% 53/110
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 4.0%±1.2 pp437±136 5.3%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.4% 64/110
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 3.4%±1.2 pp381±130 4.9%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.5% 70/110
↳ Utilities 0.5%±0.7 pp57±76 0.4%±0.0 pp— ▲ +0.1% 32/110
Information 11.6%±4.1 pp1,285±449 6.4%±0.2 pp— ▲ +5.2% 21/110
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 5.4%±1.3 pp593±145 5.8%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.4% 60/110
↳ Finance & Insurance 3.1%±0.9 pp339±104 3.5%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.4% 60/110
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 2.3%±1.0 pp254±114 2.3%±0.1 pp— 0% 44/110
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 13.5%±1.6 pp1,493±180 15.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -2.1% 68/110
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 10.5%±1.6 pp1,158±172 10.3%±0.2 pp— ▲ +0.1% 52/110
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%±0.6 pp2±62 0.1%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.1% 63/110
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 3.0%±0.9 pp333±102 5.2%±0.1 pp— ▼ -2.2% 83/110
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 23.2%±2.5 pp2,564±279 20.8%±0.2 pp— ▲ +2.5% 36/110
↳ Educational Services 9.6%±1.6 pp1,056±174 8.1%±0.2 pp— ▲ +1.4% 33/110
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 13.6%±2.4 pp1,508±260 12.6%±0.2 pp— ▲ +1.0% 40/110
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 13.0%±1.9 pp1,437±207 12.0%±0.2 pp— ▲ +1.0% 38/110
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 5.8%±1.3 pp643±146 4.1%±0.1 pp— ▲ +1.7% 28/110
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 7.2%±1.6 pp794±176 7.9%±0.2 pp— ▼ -0.7% 52/110
Other Services 3.7%±1.1 pp412±123 6.0%±0.1 pp— ▼ -2.2% 94/110
Public Administration 2.0%±0.7 pp218±76 2.7%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.7% 80/110
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category Glassell Park
Private Company Employee 60.9% ±3.9 pp6,729 ±433
Self-Employed 19.2% ±2.6 pp2,126 ±286
Nonprofit 8.1% ±1.2 pp897 ±137
Government 11.5% ±1.8 pp1,272 ±197
Unpaid Family Worker 0.2% ±0.6 pp26 ±63
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Private Company Employee 60.9%±3.9 pp6,729±433 66.9%±0.3 pp1,307,510±5,830 ▼ -6.0% 81/110
Self-Employed 19.2%±2.6 pp2,126±286 16.2%±0.2 pp316,694±4,405 ▲ +3.0% 27/110
Nonprofit 8.1%±1.2 pp897±137 8.0%±0.2 pp155,457±3,565 ▲ +0.2% 51/110
Government 11.5%±1.8 pp1,272±197 10.6%±0.2 pp207,304±3,359 ▲ +0.9% 46/110
Unpaid Family Worker 0.2%±0.6 pp26±63 0.3%±0.0 pp5,059±497 0% 52/110
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category Glassell Park
Full-Time, Year-Round 57.8% ±1.4 pp7,135 ±168
Part-Time or Part-Year 42.2% ±4.2 pp5,205 ±516
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round 57.8%±1.4 pp7,135±168 61.7%±0.2 pp1,328,967±3,929 ▼ -3.8% 98/110
Part-Time or Part-Year 42.2%±4.2 pp5,205±516 38.3%±0.3 pp826,047±5,840 ▲ +3.8% 13/110
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category Glassell Park
Average FT Earnings $93,630±$4,844
10th Percentile FT Earnings $23,682±$2,597
25th Percentile FT Earnings $38,947±$2,932
Median FT Earnings $64,747±$4,642
75th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000
90th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Average FT Earnings $93,630±$4,844 $93,330±$761 ▲ +$300 47/110
10th Percentile FT Earnings $23,682±$2,597 $25,056±$255 ▼ −$1,374 72/110
25th Percentile FT Earnings $38,947±$2,932 $37,825±$214 ▲ +$1,122 61/110
Median FT Earnings $64,747±$4,642 $61,975±$422 ▲ +$2,772 58/110
75th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/110
90th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/110
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $66,528 ±4,300 $77,013 ±4,897 $93,630 ±4,844 ▲ +$27,102▲ +$16,617▲ +$10,485
Los Angeles citywide $78,876 ±537 $84,242 ±564 $93,330 ±761 ▲ +$14,455▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,367
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $50,207 ±3,245 $62,766 ±3,991 $93,630 ±4,844 ▲ +$43,423▲ +$30,864▲ +$12,558
Los Angeles citywide $59,526 ±405 $68,658 ±460 $93,330 ±761 ▲ +$33,804▲ +$24,673▲ +$9,131
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $20,883 ±1,243 $22,203 ±2,144 $23,682 ±2,597 ▲ +$2,798▲ +$1,479▲ +$1,320
Los Angeles citywide $20,202 ±88 $21,993 ±185 $25,056 ±255 ▲ +$4,854▲ +$3,063▲ +$1,791
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $15,760 ±938 $18,096 ±1,748 $23,682 ±2,597 ▲ +$7,921▲ +$5,586▲ +$2,335
Los Angeles citywide $15,246 ±66 $17,924 ±151 $25,056 ±255 ▲ +$9,810▲ +$7,132▲ +$2,678
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $31,654 ±2,085 $33,922 ±2,095 $38,947 ±2,932 ▲ +$7,293▲ +$5,025▲ +$2,268
Los Angeles citywide $29,363 ±173 $32,975 ±184 $37,825 ±214 ▲ +$8,461▲ +$4,850▲ +$3,611
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $23,889 ±1,573 $27,647 ±1,708 $38,947 ±2,932 ▲ +$15,058▲ +$11,300▲ +$3,758
Los Angeles citywide $22,160 ±131 $26,874 ±150 $37,825 ±214 ▲ +$15,665▲ +$10,950▲ +$4,714
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $49,998 ±2,574 $54,183 ±3,179 $64,747 ±4,642 ▲ +$14,749▲ +$10,564▲ +$4,185
Los Angeles citywide $51,909 ±336 $54,226 ±279 $61,975 ±422 ▲ +$10,067▲ +$7,750▲ +$2,317
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $37,733 ±1,942 $44,159 ±2,591 $64,747 ±4,642 ▲ +$27,014▲ +$20,588▲ +$6,426
Los Angeles citywide $39,175 ±254 $44,194 ±227 $61,975 ±422 ▲ +$22,801▲ +$17,781▲ +$5,019
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $80,051 ±5,209 $96,990 ±6,010 — ——▲ +$16,939
Los Angeles citywide $91,403 ±620 $98,002 ±683 — ——▲ +$6,599
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $60,413 ±3,931 $79,047 ±4,899 — ——▲ +$18,634
Los Angeles citywide $68,981 ±468 $79,872 ±557 — ——▲ +$10,891
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $129,088 ±6,158 — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $97,421 ±4,647 — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category Glassell Park
Average PT Earnings $42,299±$8,617
10th Percentile PT Earnings $4,697±$1,291
25th Percentile PT Earnings $11,657±$1,516
Median PT Earnings $25,229±$3,752
75th Percentile PT Earnings $55,090±$14,479
90th Percentile PT Earnings Over $100,000
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Average PT Earnings $42,299±$8,617 $36,543±$574 ▲ +$5,756 41/110
10th Percentile PT Earnings $4,697±$1,291 $2,785±$92 ▲ +$1,912 5/110
25th Percentile PT Earnings $11,657±$1,516 $8,451±$190 ▲ +$3,207 17/110
Median PT Earnings $25,229±$3,752 $20,275±$216 ▲ +$4,954 32/110
75th Percentile PT Earnings $55,090±$14,479 $39,236±$450 ▲ +$15,854 31/110
90th Percentile PT Earnings Over $100,000 $80,378±$1,643 ▲ +$19,622+ 1/110
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $31,278 ±3,772 $34,709 ±3,252 $42,299 ±8,617 ▲ +$11,021▲ +$7,590▲ +$3,430
Los Angeles citywide $30,652 ±490 $34,166 ±509 $36,543 ±574 ▲ +$5,890▲ +$2,377▲ +$3,513
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $23,605 ±2,847 $28,288 ±2,651 $42,299 ±8,617 ▲ +$18,694▲ +$14,011▲ +$4,682
Los Angeles citywide $23,133 ±369 $27,845 ±415 $36,543 ±574 ▲ +$13,410▲ +$8,698▲ +$4,712
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,266 ±909 $4,144 ±962 $4,697 ±1,291 ▲ +$1,432▲ +$553▲ +$878
Los Angeles citywide $2,482 ±54 $2,712 ±58 $2,785 ±92 ▲ +$303▲ +$73▲ +$230
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $2,465 ±686 $3,377 ±784 $4,697 ±1,291 ▲ +$2,233▲ +$1,320▲ +$913
Los Angeles citywide $1,873 ±41 $2,210 ±47 $2,785 ±92 ▲ +$912▲ +$575▲ +$337
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $8,712 ±970 $9,690 ±1,252 $11,657 ±1,516 ▲ +$2,946▲ +$1,967▲ +$979
Los Angeles citywide $7,239 ±105 $8,054 ±111 $8,451 ±190 ▲ +$1,212▲ +$397▲ +$815
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $6,574 ±732 $7,898 ±1,020 $11,657 ±1,516 ▲ +$5,083▲ +$3,760▲ +$1,323
Los Angeles citywide $5,463 ±79 $6,564 ±91 $8,451 ±190 ▲ +$2,988▲ +$1,887▲ +$1,101
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $16,568 ±1,867 $19,840 ±1,207 $25,229 ±3,752 ▲ +$8,661▲ +$5,389▲ +$3,272
Los Angeles citywide $16,086 ±129 $18,060 ±185 $20,275 ±216 ▲ +$4,189▲ +$2,215▲ +$1,973
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $12,503 ±1,409 $16,170 ±983 $25,229 ±3,752 ▲ +$12,725▲ +$9,059▲ +$3,666
Los Angeles citywide $12,140 ±97 $14,719 ±151 $20,275 ±216 ▲ +$8,135▲ +$5,556▲ +$2,579
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $33,743 ±4,510 $41,086 ±4,069 $55,090 ±14,479 ▲ +$21,347▲ +$14,004▲ +$7,343
Los Angeles citywide $33,887 ±443 $36,465 ±382 $39,236 ±450 ▲ +$5,349▲ +$2,771▲ +$2,578
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $25,465 ±3,404 $33,485 ±3,316 $55,090 ±14,479 ▲ +$29,624▲ +$21,605▲ +$8,020
Los Angeles citywide $25,574 ±335 $29,719 ±311 $39,236 ±450 ▲ +$13,662▲ +$9,517▲ +$4,145
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $70,640 ±14,913 $84,046 ±15,860 — ——▲ +$13,406
Los Angeles citywide $68,714 ±742 $73,646 ±1,127 $80,378 ±1,643 ▲ +$11,664▲ +$6,732▲ +$4,932
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $53,311 ±11,255 $68,498 ±12,926 — ——▲ +$15,187
Los Angeles citywide $51,857 ±560 $60,021 ±919 $80,378 ±1,643 ▲ +$28,521▲ +$20,356▲ +$8,164

Earnings of All Workers

Category Glassell Park
Average Earnings $72,871±$3,622
10th Percentile Earnings $9,831±$1,465
25th Percentile Earnings $23,171±$2,420
Median Earnings $47,607±$4,157
75th Percentile Earnings $94,998±$5,461
90th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Average Earnings $72,871±$3,622 $71,563±$569 ▲ +$1,308 46/110
10th Percentile Earnings $9,831±$1,465 $7,934±$179 ▲ +$1,898 43/110
25th Percentile Earnings $23,171±$2,420 $21,876±$191 ▲ +$1,294 51/110
Median Earnings $47,607±$4,157 $43,575±$259 ▲ +$4,032 57/110
75th Percentile Earnings $94,998±$5,461 $85,854±$580 ▲ +$9,144 46/110
90th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/110
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $52,038 ±2,929 $59,885 ±3,243 $72,871 ±3,622 ▲ +$20,833▲ +$12,986▲ +$7,847
Los Angeles citywide $59,351 ±430 $65,850 ±455 $71,563 ±569 ▲ +$12,212▲ +$5,713▲ +$6,499
Average Earnings (nominal dollars) $39,272 ±2,211 $48,807 ±2,643 $72,871 ±3,622 ▲ +$33,599▲ +$24,064▲ +$9,534
Los Angeles citywide $44,791 ±324 $53,668 ±371 $71,563 ±569 ▲ +$26,772▲ +$17,895▲ +$8,877
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $8,389 ±1,024 $9,055 ±1,256 $9,831 ±1,465 ▲ +$1,443▲ +$776▲ +$667
Los Angeles citywide $6,842 ±104 $8,269 ±107 $7,934 ±179 ▲ +$1,091▼ −$335▲ +$1,427
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $6,331 ±773 $7,380 ±1,023 $9,831 ±1,465 ▲ +$3,500▲ +$2,451▲ +$1,049
Los Angeles citywide $5,164 ±78 $6,739 ±87 $7,934 ±179 ▲ +$2,770▲ +$1,194▲ +$1,576
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $17,853 ±1,803 $20,247 ±1,195 $23,171 ±2,420 ▲ +$5,318▲ +$2,924▲ +$2,394
Los Angeles citywide $17,205 ±143 $20,088 ±119 $21,876 ±191 ▲ +$4,671▲ +$1,789▲ +$2,883
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $13,473 ±1,360 $16,501 ±974 $23,171 ±2,420 ▲ +$9,697▲ +$6,669▲ +$3,028
Los Angeles citywide $12,984 ±108 $16,372 ±97 $21,876 ±191 ▲ +$8,892▲ +$5,505▲ +$3,387
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $36,558 ±2,345 $40,640 ±1,915 $47,607 ±4,157 ▲ +$11,049▲ +$6,967▲ +$4,082
Los Angeles citywide $35,447 ±232 $39,719 ±188 $43,575 ±259 ▲ +$8,128▲ +$3,856▲ +$4,272
Median Earnings (nominal dollars) $27,590 ±1,770 $33,121 ±1,561 $47,607 ±4,157 ▲ +$20,017▲ +$14,485▲ +$5,532
Los Angeles citywide $26,751 ±175 $32,371 ±154 $43,575 ±259 ▲ +$16,824▲ +$11,204▲ +$5,620
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $67,874 ±3,666 $75,700 ±4,603 $94,998 ±5,461 ▲ +$27,124▲ +$19,298▲ +$7,826
Los Angeles citywide $70,301 ±313 $76,149 ±396 $85,854 ±580 ▲ +$15,552▲ +$9,705▲ +$5,848
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $51,224 ±2,767 $61,696 ±3,752 $94,998 ±5,461 ▲ +$43,774▲ +$33,302▲ +$10,472
Los Angeles citywide $53,055 ±236 $62,062 ±323 $85,854 ±580 ▲ +$32,798▲ +$23,792▲ +$9,006
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $113,255 ±9,720 — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $127,692 ±642 — — ———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $85,472 ±7,335 — — ———
Los Angeles citywide $96,367 ±484 — — ———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Glassell Park, Los Angeles

Category Glassell Park
Household income at age 35 $52,282 ±$1,265
Household income percentile rank 47.5 ±0.80 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 17.0% ±1.07 pp
Individual income at age 35 $40,239 ±$940
Fraction married 33.8% ±1.38 pp
Employment rate 77.2% ±1.22 pp
Incarceration rate 1.55% ±0.41 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Glassell Park, Los Angeles. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Glassell Park, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Glassell Park City Difference
Household income at age 35 $52,282 ±$1,265 $49,434 ±$103 +$2,848
Household income percentile rank 47.5 ±0.80 pp 45.3 ±0.06 pp +2.3 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 17.0% ±1.07 pp 15.3% ±0.08 pp +1.7 pp
Individual income at age 35 $40,239 ±$940 $37,125 ±$77 +$3,114
Fraction married 33.8% ±1.38 pp 32.5% ±0.11 pp +1.3 pp
Employment rate 77.2% ±1.22 pp 72.6% ±0.10 pp +4.6 pp
Incarceration rate 1.55% ±0.41 pp 1.30% ±0.03 pp +0.3 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Glassell Park, Los Angeles. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Glassell Park, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Glassell Park, Los Angeles in Lower-Income Families

Category Glassell Park
Household income at age 35 $47,103 ±$1,653
Household income percentile rank 44.2 ±1.10 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 11.9% ±1.42 pp
Individual income at age 35 $37,379 ±$1,308
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Glassell Park, Los Angeles with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Glassell Park, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Glassell Park City Difference
Household income at age 35 $47,103 ±$1,653 $43,491 ±$125 +$3,612
Household income percentile rank 44.2 ±1.10 pp 41.6 ±0.08 pp +2.6 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 11.9% ±1.42 pp 10.5% ±0.10 pp +1.3 pp
Individual income at age 35 $37,379 ±$1,308 $33,937 ±$101 +$3,442
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Glassell Park, Los Angeles with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Glassell Park, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Glassell Park, Los Angeles

Category Glassell Park
Stayed in the greater Los Angeles area 84.2% ±1.09 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 30.2% ±1.37 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Glassell Park, Los Angeles. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Los Angeles area” means the Census commuting zone for the Los Angeles area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Glassell Park, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Glassell Park City Difference
Stayed in the greater Los Angeles area 84.2% ±1.09 pp 81.1% ±0.09 pp +3.1 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 30.2% ±1.37 pp 26.2% ±0.11 pp +4.0 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Glassell Park, Los Angeles. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Los Angeles area” means the Census commuting zone for the Los Angeles area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Glassell Park, Los Angeles · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Glassell Park

Category Glassell Park
All jobs located in glassell park 6,850
Glassell Park jobs held by Glassell Park residents 5.9%
Glassell Park jobs held by non-Glassell Park residents 94.1%
Employed residents working in Glassell Park 3.9%
Employed residents working outside Glassell Park 96.1%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Glassell Park Los Angeles neighborhood median Difference Rank
All jobs located in glassell park 6,850 8,613 ▼ −1,763 64/110
Glassell Park jobs held by Glassell Park residents 5.9% 6.0% ▼ −0.0 pp 58/110
Glassell Park jobs held by non-Glassell Park residents 94.1% 94.0% ▲ +0.0 pp 53/110
Employed residents working in Glassell Park 3.9% 3.9% ▲ +0.0 pp 54/110
Employed residents working outside Glassell Park 96.1% 96.1% ▼ −0.0 pp 57/110
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in glassell park 6,103 6,688 6,850 ▲ +747▲ +162▲ +585
Los Angeles citywide 6,864 8,106 8,613 ▲ +1,748▲ +507▲ +1,242
Glassell Park jobs held by Glassell Park residents 4.8%266 4.6%278 5.9%357 ▲ +1.2 pp▲ +91▲ +1.3 pp▲ +79▼ −0.2 pp▲ +12
Los Angeles citywide 6.1%330 5.9%399 6.0%442 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +112▲ +0.1 pp▲ +43▼ −0.1 pp▲ +69
Glassell Park jobs held by non-Glassell Park residents 95.2%5,309 95.4%5,772 94.1%5,655 ▼ −1.2 pp▲ +346▼ −1.3 pp▼ −117▲ +0.2 pp▲ +463
Los Angeles citywide 93.9%5,659 94.1%6,750 94.0%7,065 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,406▼ −0.1 pp▲ +315▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,091
Employed residents working in Glassell Park 3.2%266 3.1%278 3.9%357 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +91▲ +0.8 pp▲ +79▼ −0.2 pp▲ +12
Los Angeles citywide 3.2%330 3.3%399 3.9%442 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +112▲ +0.5 pp▲ +43▲ +0.1 pp▲ +69
Employed residents working outside Glassell Park 96.8%7,997 96.9%8,823 96.1%8,834 ▼ −0.7 pp▲ +837▼ −0.8 pp▲ +11▲ +0.2 pp▲ +826
Los Angeles citywide 96.8%10,199 96.7%11,528 96.1%11,428 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,229▼ −0.5 pp▼ −100▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,329

Industry of Jobs in Glassell Park

Category Glassell Park
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.9%65
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.9%65
Construction 10.1%694
Manufacturing 8.2%559
Wholesale Trade 3.8%259
Retail Trade 9.1%625
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 6.8%469
↳ Utilities 0.0%0
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 6.8%469
Information 3.6%249
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 7.0%481
↳ Finance & Insurance 4.4%301
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 2.6%180
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 17.3%1,187
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 9.9%678
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 1.5%100
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 6.0%409
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 17.7%1,214
↳ Educational Services 5.1%348
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 12.6%866
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 13.5%922
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 3.3%227
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 10.1%695
Other Services 1.8%126
Public Administration 0.0%0
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.9%65 0.1%1,840 ▲ +0.9% 3/110
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.9%65 0.0%95 ▲ +0.9% 1/110
Construction 10.1%694 2.7%53,657 ▲ +7.4% 7/110
Manufacturing 8.2%559 3.8%76,376 ▲ +4.3% 22/110
Wholesale Trade 3.8%259 3.2%63,982 ▲ +0.6% 27/110
Retail Trade 9.1%625 7.1%140,457 ▲ +2.1% 52/110
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 6.8%469 5.4%107,338 ▲ +1.4% 16/110
↳ Utilities 0.0%0 0.8%16,873 ▼ -0.8% 46/110
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 6.8%469 4.6%90,465 ▲ +2.3% 16/110
Information 3.6%249 8.3%164,692 ▼ -4.7% 31/110
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 7.0%481 5.9%116,774 ▲ +1.1% 21/110
↳ Finance & Insurance 4.4%301 3.6%70,657 ▲ +0.8% 14/110
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 2.6%180 2.3%46,117 ▲ +0.3% 33/110
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 17.3%1,187 15.1%299,443 ▲ +2.3% 32/110
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 9.9%678 8.1%160,171 ▲ +1.8% 27/110
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 1.5%100 1.1%22,328 ▲ +0.3% 19/110
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 6.0%409 5.9%116,944 ▲ +0.1% 36/110
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 17.7%1,214 28.4%563,697 ▼ -10.6% 92/110
↳ Educational Services 5.1%348 10.0%198,161 ▼ -4.9% 84/110
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 12.6%866 18.4%365,536 ▼ -5.8% 83/110
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 13.5%922 11.3%224,384 ▲ +2.2% 37/110
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 3.3%227 2.8%54,783 ▲ +0.6% 28/110
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 10.1%695 8.5%169,601 ▲ +1.6% 45/110
Other Services 1.8%126 3.7%73,513 ▼ -1.9% 99/110
Public Administration 0.0%0 5.1%100,972 ▼ -5.1% 46/110
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 1.8%107 1.0%64 0.9%65 ▼ −0.8 pp▼ −42– 0.0 pp▲ +1▼ −0.8 pp▼ −43
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%3,680 0.1%1,246 0.1%1,840 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,840– 0.0 pp▲ +594▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2,434
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 1.8%107 1.0%64 0.9%65 ▼ −0.8 pp▼ −42– 0.0 pp▲ +1▼ −0.8 pp▼ −43
Los Angeles citywide 0.1%1,115 0.0%132 0.0%95 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,020– 0.0 pp▼ −37▼ −0.1 pp▼ −983
Construction 10.6%644 9.2%613 10.1%694 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +50▲ +1.0 pp▲ +81▼ −1.4 pp▼ −31
Los Angeles citywide 2.3%39,728 2.8%53,498 2.7%53,657 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +13,929▼ −0.1 pp▲ +159▲ +0.5 pp▲ +13,770
Manufacturing 12.6%769 10.8%722 8.2%559 ▼ −4.4 pp▼ −210▼ −2.6 pp▼ −163▼ −1.8 pp▼ −47
Los Angeles citywide 5.7%98,319 4.2%81,924 3.8%76,376 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −21,943▼ −0.4 pp▼ −5,548▼ −1.4 pp▼ −16,395
Wholesale Trade 6.3%385 5.1%338 3.8%259 ▼ −2.5 pp▼ −126▼ −1.3 pp▼ −79▼ −1.3 pp▼ −47
Los Angeles citywide 4.6%79,460 3.6%68,790 3.2%63,982 ▼ −1.4 pp▼ −15,478▼ −0.3 pp▼ −4,808▼ −1.0 pp▼ −10,670
Retail Trade 16.2%988 10.9%728 9.1%625 ▼ −7.1 pp▼ −363▼ −1.8 pp▼ −103▼ −5.3 pp▼ −260
Los Angeles citywide 8.7%151,141 7.5%144,707 7.1%140,457 ▼ −1.7 pp▼ −10,684▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,250▼ −1.3 pp▼ −6,434
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 3.2%198 12.6%840 6.8%469 ▲ +3.6 pp▲ +271▼ −5.7 pp▼ −371▲ +9.3 pp▲ +642
Los Angeles citywide 4.8%82,152 5.8%111,689 5.4%107,338 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +25,186▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,351▲ +1.0 pp▲ +29,537
Utilities 0.0%1 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp▼ −1– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▼ −1
Los Angeles citywide 0.9%16,015 1.0%18,483 0.8%16,873 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +858▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,610– 0.0 pp▲ +2,468
Transportation & Warehousing 3.2%197 12.6%840 6.8%469 ▲ +3.6 pp▲ +272▼ −5.7 pp▼ −371▲ +9.3 pp▲ +643
Los Angeles citywide 3.8%66,137 4.8%93,206 4.6%90,465 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +24,328▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,741▲ +1.0 pp▲ +27,069
Information 7.3%446 3.7%246 3.6%249 ▼ −3.7 pp▼ −197– 0.0 pp▲ +3▼ −3.6 pp▼ −200
Los Angeles citywide 6.3%109,592 7.4%142,294 8.3%164,692 ▲ +1.9 pp▲ +55,100▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,398▲ +1.0 pp▲ +32,702
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 8.0%490 7.3%486 7.0%481 ▼ −1.0 pp▼ −9▼ −0.2 pp▼ −5▼ −0.8 pp▼ −4
Los Angeles citywide 6.1%104,703 5.7%110,803 5.9%116,774 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +12,071▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5,971▼ −0.3 pp▲ +6,100
Finance & Insurance 5.3%324 3.3%218 4.4%301 ▼ −0.9 pp▼ −23▲ +1.1 pp▲ +83▼ −2.0 pp▼ −106
Los Angeles citywide 3.9%67,891 3.6%69,466 3.6%70,657 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,766– 0.0 pp▲ +1,191▼ −0.3 pp▲ +1,575
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 2.7%166 4.0%268 2.6%180 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +14▼ −1.4 pp▼ −88▲ +1.3 pp▲ +102
Los Angeles citywide 2.1%36,812 2.1%41,337 2.3%46,117 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +9,305▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,780– 0.0 pp▲ +4,525
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 8.6%526 11.9%796 17.3%1,187 ▲ +8.7 pp▲ +661▲ +5.4 pp▲ +391▲ +3.3 pp▲ +270
Los Angeles citywide 15.1%261,720 14.9%286,926 15.1%299,443 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +37,723▲ +0.2 pp▲ +12,517▼ −0.3 pp▲ +25,206
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 3.4%208 6.0%399 9.9%678 ▲ +6.5 pp▲ +470▲ +3.9 pp▲ +279▲ +2.6 pp▲ +191
Los Angeles citywide 7.7%132,582 7.9%153,127 8.1%160,171 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +27,589▲ +0.1 pp▲ +7,044▲ +0.3 pp▲ +20,545
Management of Companies & Enterprises 1.8%111 1.8%121 1.5%100 ▼ −0.4 pp▼ −11▼ −0.3 pp▼ −21– 0.0 pp▲ +10
Los Angeles citywide 1.3%22,239 1.2%22,485 1.1%22,328 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +89– 0.0 pp▼ −157▼ −0.1 pp▲ +246
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 3.4%207 4.1%276 6.0%409 ▲ +2.6 pp▲ +202▲ +1.8 pp▲ +133▲ +0.7 pp▲ +69
Los Angeles citywide 6.2%106,899 5.8%111,314 5.9%116,944 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +10,045▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5,630▼ −0.4 pp▲ +4,415
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 15.7%959 17.4%1,164 17.7%1,214 ▲ +2.0 pp▲ +255▲ +0.3 pp▲ +50▲ +1.7 pp▲ +205
Los Angeles citywide 24.3%420,231 26.6%513,841 28.4%563,697 ▲ +4.0 pp▲ +143,466▲ +1.8 pp▲ +49,856▲ +2.3 pp▲ +93,610
Educational Services 4.0%246 3.5%233 5.1%348 ▲ +1.0 pp▲ +102▲ +1.6 pp▲ +115▼ −0.5 pp▼ −13
Los Angeles citywide 8.2%142,243 9.1%175,456 10.0%198,161 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +55,918▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,705▲ +0.9 pp▲ +33,213
Health Care & Social Assistance 11.7%713 13.9%931 12.6%866 ▲ +1.0 pp▲ +153▼ −1.3 pp▼ −65▲ +2.2 pp▲ +218
Los Angeles citywide 16.1%277,988 17.5%338,385 18.4%365,536 ▲ +2.3 pp▲ +87,548▲ +0.9 pp▲ +27,151▲ +1.4 pp▲ +60,397
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 7.6%464 8.6%575 13.5%922 ▲ +5.9 pp▲ +458▲ +4.9 pp▲ +347▲ +1.0 pp▲ +111
Los Angeles citywide 11.2%192,754 11.7%226,802 11.3%224,384 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +31,630▼ −0.5 pp▼ −2,418▲ +0.6 pp▲ +34,048
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.7%44 1.3%87 3.3%227 ▲ +2.6 pp▲ +183▲ +2.0 pp▲ +140▲ +0.6 pp▲ +43
Los Angeles citywide 2.2%38,550 2.8%53,683 2.8%54,783 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +16,233– 0.0 pp▲ +1,100▲ +0.5 pp▲ +15,133
Accommodation & Food Services 6.9%420 7.3%488 10.1%695 ▲ +3.3 pp▲ +275▲ +2.8 pp▲ +207▲ +0.4 pp▲ +68
Los Angeles citywide 8.9%154,204 9.0%173,119 8.5%169,601 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +15,397▼ −0.4 pp▼ −3,518– 0.0 pp▲ +18,915
Other Services 2.1%127 1.7%116 1.8%126 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10▼ −0.3 pp▼ −11
Los Angeles citywide 3.9%66,987 3.9%75,451 3.7%73,513 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,526▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,938– 0.0 pp▲ +8,464
Public Administration 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 6.8%117,076 5.8%112,871 5.1%100,972 ▼ −1.7 pp▼ −16,104▼ −0.8 pp▼ −11,899▼ −0.9 pp▼ −4,205

Earnings of Jobs in Glassell Park

Category Glassell Park
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 14.9%1,018
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 30.5%2,092
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 54.6%3,740
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 14.9%1,018 17.0%338,004 ▼ -2.1% 68/110
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 30.5%2,092 24.2%481,403 ▲ +6.3% 62/110
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 54.6%3,740 58.8%1,167,718 ▼ -4.2% 41/110
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 22.3%1,361 17.1%1,145 14.9%1,018 ▼ −7.4 pp▼ −343▼ −2.3 pp▼ −127▼ −5.2 pp▼ −216
Los Angeles citywide 25.4%438,918 21.3%411,368 17.0%338,004 ▼ −8.4 pp▼ −100,914▼ −4.3 pp▼ −73,364▼ −4.1 pp▼ −27,550
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 40.7%2,481 37.0%2,474 30.5%2,092 ▼ −10.1 pp▼ −389▼ −6.5 pp▼ −382▼ −3.7 pp▼ −7
Los Angeles citywide 31.8%549,706 29.6%571,139 24.2%481,403 ▼ −7.6 pp▼ −68,303▼ −5.4 pp▼ −89,736▼ −2.2 pp▲ +21,433
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 37.0%2,261 45.9%3,069 54.6%3,740 ▲ +17.6 pp▲ +1,479▲ +8.7 pp▲ +671▲ +8.8 pp▲ +808
Los Angeles citywide 42.8%738,919 49.1%948,335 58.8%1,167,718 ▲ +16.0 pp▲ +428,799▲ +9.6 pp▲ +219,383▲ +6.3 pp▲ +209,416

Jobs in Glassell Park by Firm Age

Category Glassell Park
Firm age: 0–1 years 6.9%455
Firm age: 2–3 years 6.1%403
Firm age: 4–5 years 7.4%487
Firm age: 6–10 years 17.9%1,180
Firm age: 11 or more years 61.8%4,083
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years 6.9%455 4.8%79,474 ▲ +2.1% 46/110
Firm age: 2–3 years 6.1%403 4.9%81,545 ▲ +1.2% 57/110
Firm age: 4–5 years 7.4%487 5.1%84,624 ▲ +2.3% 44/110
Firm age: 6–10 years 17.9%1,180 10.7%178,740 ▲ +7.2% 22/110
Firm age: 11 or more years 61.8%4,083 74.6%1,246,700 ▼ -12.8% 70/110
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years 2.4%142 4.8%313 6.9%455 ▲ +4.5 pp▲ +313▲ +2.1 pp▲ +142▲ +2.4 pp▲ +171
Los Angeles citywide 4.7%67,567 4.9%79,034 4.8%79,474 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,907▼ −0.1 pp▲ +440▲ +0.2 pp▲ +11,467
Firm age: 2–3 years 6.6%394 4.4%289 6.1%403 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +9▲ +1.7 pp▲ +114▼ −2.2 pp▼ −105
Los Angeles citywide 5.9%85,371 5.5%89,530 4.9%81,545 ▼ −1.0 pp▼ −3,826▼ −0.6 pp▼ −7,985▼ −0.4 pp▲ +4,159
Firm age: 4–5 years 4.2%252 4.1%270 7.4%487 ▲ +3.1 pp▲ +235▲ +3.2 pp▲ +217▼ −0.1 pp▲ +18
Los Angeles citywide 4.8%69,620 5.0%80,673 5.1%84,624 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +15,004▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,951▲ +0.2 pp▲ +11,053
Firm age: 6–10 years 10.0%594 9.0%586 17.9%1,180 ▲ +7.8 pp▲ +586▲ +8.9 pp▲ +594▼ −1.0 pp▼ −8
Los Angeles citywide 11.5%165,913 9.8%158,279 10.7%178,740 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +12,827▲ +0.9 pp▲ +20,461▼ −1.7 pp▼ −7,634
Firm age: 11 or more years 76.7%4,550 77.6%5,063 61.8%4,083 ▼ −14.9 pp▼ −467▼ −15.9 pp▼ −980▲ +0.9 pp▲ +513
Los Angeles citywide 73.1%1,056,355 74.9%1,212,931 74.6%1,246,700 ▲ +1.5 pp▲ +190,345▼ −0.2 pp▲ +33,769▲ +1.7 pp▲ +156,576

Jobs in Glassell Park by Firm Size

Category Glassell Park
Firm size: 0–19 employees 30.5%2,015
Firm size: 20–49 employees 16.4%1,087
Firm size: 50–249 employees 20.6%1,361
Firm size: 250–499 employees 6.1%406
Firm size: 500 or more employees 26.3%1,739
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees 30.5%2,015 25.4%424,713 ▲ +5.1% 67/110
Firm size: 20–49 employees 16.4%1,087 9.0%149,880 ▲ +7.5% 8/110
Firm size: 50–249 employees 20.6%1,361 13.5%224,878 ▲ +7.1% 18/110
Firm size: 250–499 employees 6.1%406 4.9%82,110 ▲ +1.2% 29/110
Firm size: 500 or more employees 26.3%1,739 47.2%789,502 ▼ -20.9% 69/110
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees 27.9%1,653 28.2%1,839 30.5%2,015 ▲ +2.6 pp▲ +362▲ +2.3 pp▲ +176▲ +0.3 pp▲ +186
Los Angeles citywide 25.3%365,482 24.7%400,637 25.4%424,713 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +59,231▲ +0.7 pp▲ +24,076▼ −0.6 pp▲ +35,155
Firm size: 20–49 employees 11.4%676 14.2%923 16.4%1,087 ▲ +5.1 pp▲ +411▲ +2.3 pp▲ +164▲ +2.8 pp▲ +247
Los Angeles citywide 10.3%149,215 9.2%149,709 9.0%149,880 ▼ −1.4 pp▲ +665▼ −0.3 pp▲ +171▼ −1.1 pp▲ +494
Firm size: 50–249 employees 19.8%1,172 14.9%974 20.6%1,361 ▲ +0.8 pp▲ +189▲ +5.7 pp▲ +387▼ −4.8 pp▼ −198
Los Angeles citywide 14.8%214,183 13.9%225,110 13.5%224,878 ▼ −1.4 pp▲ +10,695▼ −0.4 pp▼ −232▼ −0.9 pp▲ +10,927
Firm size: 250–499 employees 9.4%556 7.3%476 6.1%406 ▼ −3.2 pp▼ −150▼ −1.2 pp▼ −70▼ −2.1 pp▼ −80
Los Angeles citywide 5.7%81,669 4.9%79,784 4.9%82,110 ▼ −0.7 pp▲ +441– 0.0 pp▲ +2,326▼ −0.7 pp▼ −1,885
Firm size: 500 or more employees 31.6%1,875 35.4%2,309 26.3%1,739 ▼ −5.3 pp▼ −136▼ −9.1 pp▼ −570▲ +3.8 pp▲ +434
Los Angeles citywide 43.9%634,277 47.2%765,207 47.2%789,502 ▲ +3.3 pp▲ +155,225– 0.0 pp▲ +24,295▲ +3.3 pp▲ +130,930

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Glassell Park
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 14.0% ±1.4 pp14.0%±1.4 pp2,999 ±294
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 88.4% ±2.8 pp12.4%±0.4 pp2,650 ±85
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 11.6% ±4.3 pp1.6%±0.6 pp349 ±130
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 14.0%±1.4 pp14.0%±1.4 pp2,999±294 13.6%±0.1 pp13.6%±0.1 pp524,758±5,328 ▲ +0.4%▲ +0.4% 47/110
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 88.4%±2.8 pp12.4%±0.4 pp2,650±85 86.8%±0.3 pp11.8%±0.0 pp455,658±1,592 ▲ +1.5%▲ +0.6% 50/11043/110
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 11.6%±4.3 pp1.6%±0.6 pp349±130 13.2%±0.4 pp1.8%±0.1 pp69,100±2,036 ▼ -1.5%▼ -0.2% 61/11057/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Glassell Park
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 6.3% ±1.0 pp6.3%±1.0 pp1,323 ±201
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 78.3% ±7.9 pp4.9%±0.5 pp1,035 ±105
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 21.7% ±5.3 pp1.4%±0.3 pp288 ±70
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 72.1% ±8.5 pp4.5%±0.5 pp953 ±113
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 27.9% ±7.8 pp1.8%±0.5 pp370 ±104
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 6.3%±1.0 pp6.3%±1.0 pp1,323±201 8.1%±0.1 pp8.1%±0.1 pp310,586±4,276 ▼ -1.7%▼ -1.7% 63/110
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 78.3%±7.9 pp4.9%±0.5 pp1,035±105 70.9%±0.7 pp5.7%±0.1 pp220,274±2,032 ▲ +7.3%▼ -0.8% 47/11055/110
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 21.7%±5.3 pp1.4%±0.3 pp288±70 29.1%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.0 pp90,312±1,878 ▼ -7.3%▼ -1.0% 64/11067/110
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 72.1%±8.5 pp4.5%±0.5 pp953±113 77.3%±0.5 pp6.2%±0.0 pp240,126±1,419 ▼ -5.3%▼ -1.7% 71/11071/110
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 27.9%±7.8 pp1.8%±0.5 pp370±104 22.7%±0.6 pp1.8%±0.0 pp70,460±1,837 ▲ +5.3%▼ -0.1% 40/11039/110
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category Glassell Park
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 2.3% ±2.5 pp75 ±82
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 6.7% ±5.9 pp83 ±73
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 2.3%±2.5 pp75±82 3.9%±0.3 pp— ▼ -1.7% 64/110
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 6.7%±5.9 pp83±73 4.2%±0.4 pp— ▲ +2.6% 16/110
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category Glassell Park
Owner-Occupied Households 43.4% ±2.8 pp3,311 ±215
Renter-Occupied Households 56.6% ±3.2 pp4,318 ±246
Owner-Occupied Residents 45.5% ±3.2 pp9,531 ±676
Renter-Occupied Residents 54.5% ±4.2 pp11,397 ±876
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Owner-Occupied Households 43.4%±2.8 pp3,311±215 36.0%±0.3 pp518,423±4,359 ▲ +7.4% 46/110
Renter-Occupied Households 56.6%±3.2 pp4,318±246 64.0%±0.3 pp920,674±4,643 ▼ -7.4% 65/110
Owner-Occupied Residents 45.5%±3.2 pp9,531±676 40.2%±0.4 pp1,509,388±15,216 ▲ +5.3% 50/110
Renter-Occupied Residents 54.5%±4.2 pp11,397±876 59.8%±0.4 pp2,243,250±15,217 ▼ -5.3% 61/110
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category Glassell Park
Median Year Moved In 2013±0.8 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later 2.5% ±1.2 pp187 ±90
Moved in 2020 to 2022 19.6% ±2.8 pp1,479 ±211
Moved in 2010 to 2019 41.5% ±3.9 pp3,138 ±291
Moved in 2000 to 2009 17.4% ±2.5 pp1,313 ±190
Moved in 1990 to 1999 8.6% ±1.7 pp649 ±129
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 10.5% ±2.2 pp796 ±163
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Median Year Moved In 2013±0.8 yr 2014±1.0 yr ▼ −1 40/110
Moved in 2023 or Later 2.5%±1.2 pp187±90 4.9%±0.1 pp70,211±2,138 ▼ -2.4% 83/110
Moved in 2020 to 2022 19.6%±2.8 pp1,479±211 20.6%±0.3 pp296,921±3,730 ▼ -1.1% 43/110
Moved in 2010 to 2019 41.5%±3.9 pp3,138±291 40.3%±0.3 pp580,466±4,993 ▲ +1.2% 43/110
Moved in 2000 to 2009 17.4%±2.5 pp1,313±190 16.2%±0.2 pp233,668±3,490 ▲ +1.1% 50/110
Moved in 1990 to 1999 8.6%±1.7 pp649±129 9.8%±0.2 pp140,815±2,779 ▼ -1.2% 84/110
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 10.5%±2.2 pp796±163 8.1%±0.2 pp117,016±2,469 ▲ +2.4% 39/110
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show
Category Glassell Park
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 7.3% ±1.6 pp7.3%±1.6 pp1,541 ±343
↳ Moved Within Los Angeles County (of recent movers) 5.1% ±1.4 pp69.9%±11.9 pp1,077 ±302
↳ Moved from Different California County (of recent movers) 0.7% ±0.4 pp9.9%±5.4 pp153 ±90
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 1.3% ±0.7 pp17.9%±8.3 pp276 ±142
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 0.2% ±0.2 pp2.3%±2.4 pp35 ±38
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 7.3%±1.6 pp7.3%±1.6 pp1,541±343 10.7%±0.2 pp10.7%±0.2 pp408,463±7,943 ▼ -3.4%▼ -3.4% 72/110
↳ Moved Within Los Angeles County (of recent movers) 5.1%±1.4 pp69.9%±11.9 pp1,077±302 7.4%±0.2 pp69.3%±1.2 pp283,263±7,240 ▼ -2.3%▲ +0.5% 79/11066/110
↳ Moved from Different California County (of recent movers) 0.7%±0.4 pp9.9%±5.4 pp153±90 1.2%±0.0 pp11.0%±0.4 pp45,056±1,766 ▼ -0.5%▼ -1.1% 63/11043/110
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 1.3%±0.7 pp17.9%±8.3 pp276±142 1.3%±0.1 pp12.3%±0.5 pp50,444±2,220 0%▲ +5.6% 43/11024/110
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 0.2%±0.2 pp2.3%±2.4 pp35±38 0.8%±0.0 pp7.3%±0.4 pp29,700±1,624 ▼ -0.6%▼ -5.0% 100/110100/110
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show
Category Glassell Park
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 5.4% ±1.6 pp5.4%±1.6 pp434 ±126
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 0.6% ±0.7 pp11.3%±12.9 pp49 ±58
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.0% ±0.5 pp0.0%0
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.0% ±0.4 pp0.0%0
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 4.8% ±1.8 pp88.9%±21.8 pp386 ±146
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 1.1% ±1.3 pp1.1%±1.3 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 0.0% ±1.3 pp0.0%±1.3 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 5.4%±1.6 pp5.4%±1.6 pp434±126 7.4%±0.2 pp7.4%±0.2 pp115,235±3,037 ▼ -2.0%▼ -2.0% 69/110
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 0.6%±0.7 pp11.3%±12.9 pp49±58 2.9%±0.1 pp38.6%±1.2 pp44,494±1,787 ▼ -2.3%▼ -27.3% 103/110105/110
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.0%±0.5 pp0.0%0 0.3%±0.0 pp4.0%±0.4 pp4,630±529 ▼ -0.3%▼ -4.0% 83/11083/110
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.0%±0.4 pp0.0%0 0.4%±0.0 pp5.6%±0.6 pp6,482±671 ▼ -0.4%▼ -5.6% 79/11079/110
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 4.8%±1.8 pp88.9%±21.8 pp386±146 3.8%±0.2 pp51.7%±2.8 pp59,629±3,638 ▲ +1.0%▲ +37.2% 28/1101/110
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 1.1%±1.3 pp1.1%±1.3 pp— 4.6%±0.2 pp4.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -3.5%▼ -3.5% 105/110
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 0.0%±1.3 pp0.0%±1.3 pp— 0.9%±0.1 pp0.9%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.9%▼ -0.9% 83/110
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category Glassell Park
Median Year Built 1959±2 yr
Pre-1940 28.1% ±2.5 pp2,245 ±201
1940-2009 67.1% ±4.8 pp5,349 ±380
2010+ 4.8% ±1.4 pp382 ±108
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Median Year Built 1959±2 yr 1965±1 yr ▼ −6 yrs 67/110
Pre-1940 28.1%±2.5 pp2,245±201 19.1%±0.2 pp296,223±3,073 ▲ +9.1% 47/110
1940-2009 67.1%±4.8 pp5,349±380 73.1%±0.4 pp1,136,164±6,801 ▼ -6.0% 58/110
2010+ 4.8%±1.4 pp382±108 7.8%±0.2 pp121,945±2,871 ▼ -3.1% 69/110
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category Glassell Park
Population Density 7,309 /sq mi±431/sq mi
Single-Family Homes 60.4% ±3.1 pp4,821 ±244
Buildings With 2–4 Units 11.9% ±2.8 pp946 ±219
Buildings With 5–19 Units 13.3% ±2.2 pp1,065 ±173
Buildings With 20 or More Units 14.2% ±2.2 pp1,131 ±172
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Population Density 7,309 /sq mi±431/sq mi 8,285 /sq mi±14/sq mi ▼ −976 /sq mi 79/110
Single-Family Homes 60.4%±3.1 pp4,821±244 41.9%±0.3 pp651,793±4,742 ▲ +18.5% 36/110
Buildings With 2–4 Units 11.9%±2.8 pp946±219 9.0%±0.2 pp140,536±2,829 ▲ +2.8% 47/110
Buildings With 5–19 Units 13.3%±2.2 pp1,065±173 18.4%±0.3 pp286,023±4,408 ▼ -5.1% 60/110
Buildings With 20 or More Units 14.2%±2.2 pp1,131±172 29.9%±0.3 pp465,391±4,691 ▼ -15.8% 64/110
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category Glassell Park
Studio 5.0% ±1.4 pp395 ±108
1 Bedroom 22.3% ±3.2 pp1,777 ±253
2 Bedrooms 35.7% ±2.7 pp2,850 ±216
3 Bedrooms 28.1% ±3.0 pp2,241 ±242
4 Bedrooms 8.2% ±2.1 pp652 ±166
5 or More Bedrooms 0.8% ±0.5 pp61 ±38
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Studio 5.0%±1.4 pp395±108 11.6%±0.2 pp180,439±3,649 ▼ -6.7% 80/110
1 Bedroom 22.3%±3.2 pp1,777±253 23.7%±0.2 pp367,883±3,808 ▼ -1.4% 54/110
2 Bedrooms 35.7%±2.7 pp2,850±216 30.8%±0.3 pp478,829±4,610 ▲ +4.9% 42/110
3 Bedrooms 28.1%±3.0 pp2,241±242 21.9%±0.2 pp339,889±3,797 ▲ +6.2% 39/110
4 Bedrooms 8.2%±2.1 pp652±166 9.1%±0.1 pp140,925±2,101 ▼ -0.9% 49/110
5 or More Bedrooms 0.8%±0.5 pp61±38 3.0%±0.1 pp46,367±1,494 ▼ -2.2% 95/110
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show
Category Glassell Park
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 10.8% ±2.3 pp10.8%±2.3 pp819 ±175
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 6.9% ±1.7 pp63.5%±7.8 pp520 ±128
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 4.0% ±1.6 pp36.5%±12.7 pp299 ±122
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 10.8%±2.3 pp10.8%±2.3 pp819±175 12.1%±0.2 pp12.1%±0.2 pp174,164±3,256 ▼ -1.3%▼ -1.3% 49/110
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 6.9%±1.7 pp63.5%±7.8 pp520±128 5.9%±0.1 pp49.1%±0.8 pp85,502±2,139 ▲ +0.9%▲ +14.4% 42/11030/109
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 4.0%±1.6 pp36.5%±12.7 pp299±122 6.2%±0.2 pp50.9%±1.1 pp88,662±2,479 ▼ -2.2%▼ -14.4% 59/11080/109
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category Glassell Park
Natural Gas Heat 59.7% ±3.8 pp4,518 ±284
Electric Heat 30.2% ±3.0 pp2,286 ±226
Other Heating Source 10.0% ±2.4 pp759 ±182
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Natural Gas Heat 59.7%±3.8 pp4,518±284 57.3%±0.3 pp823,973±4,848 ▲ +2.5% 60/110
Electric Heat 30.2%±3.0 pp2,286±226 34.3%±0.3 pp494,304±4,648 ▼ -4.1% 53/110
Other Heating Source 10.0%±2.4 pp759±182 8.4%±0.2 pp120,823±2,850 ▲ +1.6% 32/110
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show
Category Glassell Park
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 31.5% ±3.2 pp2,380 ±242
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 24.3% ±3.2 pp1,838 ±240
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 44.2% ±3.5 pp3,345 ±265
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 23.9% ±2.9 pp1,806 ±216
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 31.5%±3.2 pp2,380±242 18.4%±0.4 pp264,606±5,364 ▲ +13.1% 35/110
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 24.3%±3.2 pp1,838±240 20.5%±0.3 pp294,961±4,886 ▲ +3.8% 6/110
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 44.2%±3.5 pp3,345±265 56.5%±0.5 pp813,715±6,573 ▼ -12.3% 91/110
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 23.9%±2.9 pp1,806±216 31.1%±0.4 pp447,155±5,566 ▼ -7.2% 82/110
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category Glassell Park
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $676±$128
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,338±$95
Median Monthly Housing Costs $2,061±$95
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $676±$128 $787±$11 ▼ −$111 74/110
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,338±$95 $1,347±$8 ▼ −$9 59/110
Median Monthly Housing Costs $2,061±$95 $2,115±$9 ▼ −$54 59/110
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000 Over $3,000 — 1/110
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000 Over $3,000 — 1/110
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $648 ±92 $643 ±74 $676 ±128 ▲ +$28▲ +$33▼ −$5
Los Angeles citywide $734 ±7 $763 ±8 $787 ±11 ▲ +$53▲ +$24▲ +$29
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $489 ±69 $524 ±60 $676 ±128 ▲ +$187▲ +$152▲ +$35
Los Angeles citywide $554 ±6 $622 ±7 $787 ±11 ▲ +$233▲ +$165▲ +$68
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,149 ±52 $1,280 ±59 $1,338 ±95 ▲ +$189▲ +$58▲ +$131
Los Angeles citywide $1,206 ±4 $1,299 ±6 $1,347 ±8 ▲ +$141▲ +$48▲ +$93
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $867 ±39 $1,043 ±48 $1,338 ±95 ▲ +$471▲ +$295▲ +$176
Los Angeles citywide $910 ±3 $1,058 ±5 $1,347 ±8 ▲ +$437▲ +$289▲ +$148
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,680 ±52 $1,917 ±79 $2,061 ±95 ▲ +$381▲ +$144▲ +$237
Los Angeles citywide $1,817 ±7 $1,985 ±7 $2,115 ±9 ▲ +$298▲ +$130▲ +$169
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,268 ±39 $1,563 ±64 $2,061 ±95 ▲ +$793▲ +$499▲ +$294
Los Angeles citywide $1,371 ±5 $1,618 ±6 $2,115 ±9 ▲ +$744▲ +$497▲ +$247
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,481 ±98 $2,902 ±129 — ——▲ +$421
Los Angeles citywide — $2,970 ±11 — ———
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,872 ±74 $2,365 ±105 — ——▲ +$493
Los Angeles citywide — $2,420 ±9 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Rent

Rent measure
Category Glassell Park
Average Rent Plus Utilities $2,047±$69
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $972±$242
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,398±$105
Median Rent Plus Utilities $1,878±$84
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,444±$103
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $3,394±$237
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities $2,047±$69 $2,131±$12 ▼ −$84 61/110
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $972±$242 $934±$12 ▲ +$37 62/110
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,398±$105 $1,380±$9 ▲ +$18 60/110
Median Rent Plus Utilities $1,878±$84 $1,933±$9 ▼ −$55 60/110
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,444±$103 $2,639±$17 ▼ −$195 67/110
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $3,394±$237 Over $3,500 ▼ −$106+ 58/110
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park
Average Rent $1,778±$56
10th Percentile Rent $828±$204
25th Percentile Rent $1,200±$86
Median Rent $1,623±$103
75th Percentile Rent $2,246±$113
90th Percentile Rent $2,942±$234
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Average Rent $1,778±$56 $1,927±$12 ▼ −$149 60/110
10th Percentile Rent $828±$204 $808±$12 ▲ +$21 61/110
25th Percentile Rent $1,200±$86 $1,217±$8 ▼ −$17 61/110
Median Rent $1,623±$103 $1,765±$8 ▼ −$142 68/110
75th Percentile Rent $2,246±$113 $2,416±$11 ▼ −$170 62/110
90th Percentile Rent $2,942±$234 $3,289±$24 ▼ −$347 61/110
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category Glassell Park
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,883±$163
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,758±$282
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,557±$317
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,576±$173
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,883±$163 $4,133±$34 ▼ −$249 44/110
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,758±$282 $1,828±$21 ▼ −$70 64/110
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,557±$317 $2,537±$17 ▲ +$20 57/110
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,576±$173 $3,497±$23 ▲ +$79 50/110
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000 Over $4,000 — 1/110
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000 Over $4,000 — 1/110
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,174 ±129 $3,488 ±159 $3,883 ±163 ▲ +$709▲ +$395▲ +$314
Los Angeles citywide $3,870 ±21 $3,856 ±17 $4,133 ±34 ▲ +$263▲ +$276▼ −$13
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,395 ±97 $2,843 ±129 $3,883 ±163 ▲ +$1,488▲ +$1,041▲ +$447
Los Angeles citywide $2,920 ±16 $3,143 ±14 $4,133 ±34 ▲ +$1,212▲ +$990▲ +$223
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,604 ±248 $1,938 ±162 $1,758 ±282 ▲ +$154▼ −$179▲ +$333
Los Angeles citywide $1,744 ±13 $1,827 ±19 $1,828 ±21 ▲ +$85▲ +$2▲ +$83
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,211 ±187 $1,579 ±132 $1,758 ±282 ▲ +$548▲ +$179▲ +$368
Los Angeles citywide $1,316 ±10 $1,489 ±15 $1,828 ±21 ▲ +$512▲ +$340▲ +$173
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,236 ±145 $2,389 ±144 $2,557 ±317 ▲ +$321▲ +$168▲ +$153
Los Angeles citywide $2,379 ±13 $2,448 ±17 $2,537 ±17 ▲ +$158▲ +$89▲ +$69
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,688 ±110 $1,947 ±117 $2,557 ±317 ▲ +$869▲ +$610▲ +$259
Los Angeles citywide $1,796 ±10 $1,995 ±14 $2,537 ±17 ▲ +$741▲ +$542▲ +$199
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,073 ±199 $3,314 ±195 $3,576 ±173 ▲ +$503▲ +$262▲ +$241
Los Angeles citywide $3,315 ±21 $3,342 ±16 $3,497 ±23 ▲ +$182▲ +$155▲ +$27
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,319 ±150 $2,701 ±159 $3,576 ±173 ▲ +$1,257▲ +$875▲ +$382
Los Angeles citywide $2,502 ±16 $2,724 ±13 $3,497 ±23 ▲ +$995▲ +$773▲ +$222
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $4,314 ±218 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — $4,663 ±31 — ———
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) — $3,516 ±178 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — $3,800 ±25 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category Glassell Park
Average Monthly Owner Costs $966±$102
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $371±$133
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $602±$108
Median Monthly Owner Costs $827±$174
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,196±$114
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,492±$114
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs $966±$102 $1,309±$21 ▼ −$343 67/110
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $371±$133 $456±$10 ▼ −$86 83/110
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $602±$108 $674±$10 ▼ −$72 67/110
Median Monthly Owner Costs $827±$174 $1,001±$14 ▼ −$174 74/110
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,196±$114 $1,491±$15 ▼ −$294 63/110
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,492±$114 Over $1,500 ▼ −$8+ 79/110
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $754 ±103 $736 ±72 $966 ±102 ▲ +$212▲ +$231▼ −$18
Los Angeles citywide $974 ±11 $1,068 ±13 $1,309 ±21 ▲ +$335▲ +$242▲ +$93
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $569 ±78 $600 ±59 $966 ±102 ▲ +$397▲ +$367▲ +$31
Los Angeles citywide $735 ±8 $870 ±11 $1,309 ±21 ▲ +$574▲ +$439▲ +$135
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $336 ±84 $357 ±105 $371 ±133 ▲ +$35▲ +$13▲ +$21
Los Angeles citywide $372 ±7 $397 ±7 $456 ±10 ▲ +$84▲ +$59▲ +$25
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $254 ±64 $291 ±85 $371 ±133 ▲ +$117▲ +$80▲ +$38
Los Angeles citywide $281 ±5 $323 ±6 $456 ±10 ▲ +$176▲ +$133▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $434 ±51 $462 ±67 $602 ±108 ▲ +$167▲ +$140▲ +$27
Los Angeles citywide $544 ±7 $586 ±8 $674 ±10 ▲ +$130▲ +$88▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $328 ±38 $376 ±55 $602 ±108 ▲ +$274▲ +$225▲ +$49
Los Angeles citywide $410 ±5 $478 ±6 $674 ±10 ▲ +$264▲ +$196▲ +$68
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $643 ±84 $647 ±71 $827 ±174 ▲ +$184▲ +$180▲ +$4
Los Angeles citywide $806 ±11 $880 ±10 $1,001 ±14 ▲ +$195▲ +$121▲ +$74
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $485 ±64 $527 ±58 $827 ±174 ▲ +$342▲ +$300▲ +$42
Los Angeles citywide $608 ±8 $717 ±8 $1,001 ±14 ▲ +$393▲ +$284▲ +$109
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $870 ±78 $874 ±193 $1,196 ±114 ▲ +$326▲ +$322▲ +$4
Los Angeles citywide — $1,304 ±17 $1,491 ±15 —▲ +$187—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $657 ±59 $713 ±157 $1,196 ±114 ▲ +$540▲ +$484▲ +$56
Los Angeles citywide — $1,062 ±14 $1,491 ±15 —▲ +$428—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $1,233 ±283 $1,492 ±114 —▲ +$260—
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — $1,005 ±231 $1,492 ±114 —▲ +$488—
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Home Values

Category Glassell Park
Average Home Value $1,093,437±$49,269
10th Percentile Home Value $540,957±$214,932
25th Percentile Home Value $821,376±$54,742
Median Home Value $1,089,072±$54,655
75th Percentile Home Value $1,370,152±$35,909
90th Percentile Home Value $1,670,766±$133,445
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Average Home Value $1,093,437±$49,269 $1,264,542±$8,234 ▼ −$171,105 49/110
10th Percentile Home Value $540,957±$214,932 $459,299±$5,965 ▲ +$81,658 48/110
25th Percentile Home Value $821,376±$54,742 $653,300±$4,641 ▲ +$168,076 39/110
Median Home Value $1,089,072±$54,655 $921,200±$4,782 ▲ +$167,872 46/110
75th Percentile Home Value $1,370,152±$35,909 $1,397,000±$18,800 ▼ −$26,848 47/110
90th Percentile Home Value $1,670,766±$133,445 Over $2,000,000 ▼ −$329,234+ 55/110
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $607,853 ±32,576 $866,419 ±44,286 $1,093,437 ±49,269 ▲ +$485,584▲ +$227,018▲ +$258,566
Los Angeles citywide $824,079 ±6,442 $1,055,784 ±9,073 $1,264,542 ±8,234 ▲ +$440,464▲ +$208,758▲ +$231,705
Average Home Value (nominal dollars) $458,737 ±24,585 $706,133 ±36,093 $1,093,437 ±49,269 ▲ +$634,701▲ +$387,305▲ +$247,396
Los Angeles citywide $621,919 ±4,862 $860,465 ±7,394 $1,264,542 ±8,234 ▲ +$642,624▲ +$404,077▲ +$238,547
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $343,466 ±94,347 $527,654 ±76,113 $540,957 ±214,932 ▲ +$197,491▲ +$13,303▲ +$184,188
Los Angeles citywide $274,172 ±2,766 $388,878 ±2,619 $459,299 ±5,965 ▲ +$185,126▲ +$70,421▲ +$114,706
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $259,208 ±71,202 $430,039 ±62,032 $540,957 ±214,932 ▲ +$281,749▲ +$110,918▲ +$170,831
Los Angeles citywide $206,913 ±2,087 $316,936 ±2,134 $459,299 ±5,965 ▲ +$252,385▲ +$142,362▲ +$110,023
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $464,501 ±24,289 $671,942 ±28,970 $821,376 ±54,742 ▲ +$356,875▲ +$149,434▲ +$207,441
Los Angeles citywide $413,153 ±2,182 $543,435 ±2,444 $653,300 ±4,641 ▲ +$240,147▲ +$109,865▲ +$130,281
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $350,551 ±18,331 $547,634 ±23,611 $821,376 ±54,742 ▲ +$470,825▲ +$273,742▲ +$197,083
Los Angeles citywide $311,800 ±1,647 $442,900 ±1,992 $653,300 ±4,641 ▲ +$341,500▲ +$210,400▲ +$131,100
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $608,941 ±25,333 $858,898 ±29,487 $1,089,072 ±54,655 ▲ +$480,131▲ +$230,173▲ +$249,958
Los Angeles citywide $601,311 ±2,870 $781,471 ±2,656 $921,200 ±4,782 ▲ +$319,889▲ +$139,729▲ +$180,160
Median Home Value (nominal dollars) $459,558 ±19,118 $700,003 ±24,032 $1,089,072 ±54,655 ▲ +$629,514▲ +$389,068▲ +$240,446
Los Angeles citywide $453,800 ±2,166 $636,900 ±2,165 $921,200 ±4,782 ▲ +$467,400▲ +$284,300▲ +$183,100
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $818,122 ±34,449 $1,073,239 ±27,983 $1,370,152 ±35,909 ▲ +$552,030▲ +$296,914▲ +$255,116
Los Angeles citywide $957,885 ±4,252 $1,163,924 ±5,481 $1,397,000 ±18,800 ▲ +$439,115▲ +$233,076▲ +$206,040
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $617,424 ±25,998 $874,691 ±22,807 $1,370,152 ±35,909 ▲ +$752,729▲ +$495,461▲ +$257,267
Los Angeles citywide $722,900 ±3,209 $948,600 ±4,467 $1,397,000 ±18,800 ▲ +$674,100▲ +$448,400▲ +$225,700
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $969,218 ±26,744 $1,209,867 ±39,927 $1,670,766 ±133,445 ▲ +$701,547▲ +$460,899▲ +$240,648
Los Angeles citywide — $2,103,035 ±25,625 — ———
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $731,453 ±20,184 $986,043 ±32,540 $1,670,766 ±133,445 ▲ +$939,312▲ +$684,723▲ +$254,590
Los Angeles citywide — $1,713,977 ±20,884 — ———

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show
Category Glassell Park
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 2.9%2.9%234
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 1.9%63.7%149
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.4%1
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 1.1%35.9%84
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 2.9%2.9%234 5.5%5.5%84,827 ▼ -2.5%▼ -2.5% 61/110
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 1.9%63.7%149 3.5%64.0%54,313 ▼ -1.6%▼ -0.4% 55/11064/107
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0 0.4%7.1%6,040 ▼ -0.4%▼ -7.1% 13/11013/107
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.4%1 1.4%25.1%21,260 ▼ -1.4%▼ -24.6% 85/11086/107
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 1.1%35.9%84 0.2%3.8%3,214 ▲ +0.8%▲ +32.1% 5/1104/107
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units 2.9%223 2.9%232 2.9%234 – 0.0 pp▲ +11▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2– 0.0 pp▲ +9
Los Angeles citywide 5.6%79,280 5.5%82,357 5.5%84,827 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5,547▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,470– 0.0 pp▲ +3,077
Housing Choice Vouchers 1.8%139 1.8%147 1.9%149 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10– 0.0 pp▲ +2– 0.0 pp▲ +8
Los Angeles citywide 3.4%47,994 3.4%50,854 3.5%54,313 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +6,319▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,459– 0.0 pp▲ +2,860
Public Housing 0.0%0 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 0.5%7,024 0.5%7,038 0.4%6,040 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −984▼ −0.1 pp▼ −998– 0.0 pp▲ +14
Project-Based Section 8 0.0%1 0.0%1 0.0%1 – 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 1.5%21,053 1.4%21,190 1.4%21,260 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +207▼ −0.1 pp▲ +70▼ −0.1 pp▲ +137
Other Project-Based Programs 1.1%83 1.0%84 1.1%84 – 0.0 pp▲ +1– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▲ +1
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%3,209 0.2%3,275 0.2%3,214 – 0.0 pp▲ +5– 0.0 pp▼ −61– 0.0 pp▲ +66
Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category Glassell Park
Average Household Income $21,953
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $543
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,303
Below 30% of Area Median Income 86.8%164
With Children 12.6%24
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 28.1%53
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $21,953 $20,771 ▲ +$1,182 41/101
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $543 $532 ▲ +$11 48/101
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,303 $1,653 ▼ -$350 93/101
Below 30% of Area Median Income 86.8%164 88.0%66,617 ▼ -1.2 pp 53/101
With Children 12.6%24 20.0%15,140 ▼ -7.4 pp 65/101
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 28.1%53 43.0%32,551 ▼ -14.9 pp 92/101
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this neighborhood. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this neighborhood. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this neighborhood.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income $14,441 $16,025 $21,972 ▲ +$7,531▲ +$5,947▲ +$1,585
Los Angeles citywide $14,082 $16,770 $20,771 ▲ +$6,689▲ +$4,001▲ +$2,688
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $380 $421 $543 ▲ +$164▲ +$122▲ +$42
Los Angeles citywide $372 $432 $532 ▲ +$160▲ +$100▲ +$60
Average Monthly Government Spending $645 $773 $1,305 ▲ +$660▲ +$532▲ +$128
Los Angeles citywide $795 $1,013 $1,653 ▲ +$858▲ +$640▲ +$218
Below 30% of Area Median Income 82.4%— 86.9%— 86.8%— ▲ +4.4 pp—▼ −0.1 pp—▲ +4.5 pp—
Los Angeles citywide 84.0%— 85.0%— 88.0%— ▲ +4.0 pp—▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children — — 12.7%— ——————
Los Angeles citywide — — 20.0%— ——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 32.6%— 33.9%— 28.2%— ▼ −4.3 pp—▼ −5.6 pp—▲ +1.3 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category Glassell Park
Total Tree Canopy 15.1%249 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 59.1%977 acres
Natural Open Surfaces 25.9%428 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Total Tree Canopy 15.1%249 acres 15.3%46,226 acres ▼ -0.2% 30/110
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 59.1%977 acres 56.2%170,078 acres ▲ +2.8% 80/110
Natural Open Surfaces 25.9%428 acres 28.5%86,111 acres ▼ -2.6% 27/110
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category Glassell Park
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 21.7% ±4.0 pp4,572 ±841
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 49.9% ±5.1 pp10,512 ±1,071
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 28.3% ±4.8 pp5,961 ±1,000
Heat Exposed 100.0%21,045
Homes Without Air Conditioning 12.7%2,669
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. Heat Exposed is the share of residents living in census tracts the Census Bureau flagged as exposed to extreme heat in 2022. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates; neither those nor the heat exposure figures have a margin of error, as with CDC PLACES data.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 21.7%±4.0 pp4,572±841 19.5%±0.3 pp751,543±13,280 ▲ +2.2% 52/110
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 49.9%±5.1 pp10,512±1,071 47.6%±0.4 pp1,834,233±16,767 ▲ +2.4% 25/110
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 28.3%±4.8 pp5,961±1,000 33.0%±0.4 pp1,271,488±15,545 ▼ -4.6% 64/110
Heat Exposed 100.0%21,045 52.6%2,030,766 ▲ +47.4% 1/110
Homes Without Air Conditioning 12.7%2,669 19.5%751,358 ▼ -6.8% 72/110
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. Heat Exposed is the share of residents living in census tracts the Census Bureau flagged as exposed to extreme heat in 2022. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates; neither those nor the heat exposure figures have a margin of error, as with CDC PLACES data.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category Glassell Park
Drove Alone 76.9% ±3.2 pp6,203 ±254
Carpooled 15.6% ±3.2 pp1,260 ±257
Public Transit 3.4% ±1.2 pp276 ±96
Walked 2.1% ±0.9 pp169 ±73
Bikes 0.1% ±0.5 pp7 ±43
Other Commute Mode 1.0% ±0.7 pp84 ±56
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Drove Alone 76.9%±3.2 pp6,203±254 74.3%±0.1 pp1,409,806±2,191 ▲ +2.6% 64/110
Carpooled 15.6%±3.2 pp1,260±257 10.8%±0.2 pp204,995±4,626 ▲ +4.8% 8/110
Public Transit 3.4%±1.2 pp276±96 7.6%±0.2 pp144,003±3,960 ▼ -4.2% 67/110
Walked 2.1%±0.9 pp169±73 4.0%±0.1 pp75,140±2,786 ▼ -1.9% 63/110
Bikes 0.1%±0.5 pp7±43 0.7%±0.1 pp13,831±1,185 ▼ -0.6% 89/110
Other Commute Mode 1.0%±0.7 pp84±56 2.6%±0.1 pp49,004±2,073 ▼ -1.5% 86/110
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category Glassell Park
Average Commute Time (minutes) 30 min±1.2 min
Less Than 15 Minutes 16.5% ±2.8 pp1,357 ±232
15–29 Minutes 38.5% ±3.1 pp3,158 ±254
30–44 Minutes 21.9% ±2.7 pp1,796 ±226
45–59 Minutes 11.0% ±2.7 pp904 ±223
60 Minutes or More 12.1% ±2.0 pp996 ±168
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes) 30 min±1.2 min 31 min±0.2 min ▼ −1 min 68/110
Less Than 15 Minutes 16.5%±2.8 pp1,357±232 15.9%±0.3 pp241,948±4,532 ▲ +0.7% 45/110
15–29 Minutes 38.5%±3.1 pp3,158±254 33.1%±0.3 pp504,776±4,959 ▲ +5.4% 25/110
30–44 Minutes 21.9%±2.7 pp1,796±226 28.9%±0.3 pp440,595±5,010 ▼ -7.0% 97/110
45–59 Minutes 11.0%±2.7 pp904±223 10.3%±0.2 pp156,750±2,883 ▲ +0.7% 40/110
60 Minutes or More 12.1%±2.0 pp996±168 11.9%±0.2 pp182,392±3,293 ▲ +0.2% 48/110
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category Glassell Park
Average Vehicles per Household 1.84±0.12
Households With No Vehicle 6.7% ±1.6 pp508 ±123
Households With 1 Vehicle 33.3% ±2.8 pp2,517 ±212
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 60.0% ±4.1 pp4,539 ±309
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Average Vehicles per Household 1.84±0.12 1.61±0.01 ▲ +0.23 24/110
Households With No Vehicle 6.7%±1.6 pp508±123 11.9%±0.2 pp171,011±3,141 ▼ -5.2% 78/110
Households With 1 Vehicle 33.3%±2.8 pp2,517±212 40.0%±0.3 pp575,741±4,305 ▼ -6.7% 73/110
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 60.0%±4.1 pp4,539±309 48.1%±0.4 pp692,345±5,259 ▲ +11.9% 26/110
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Glassell Park Residents Work

Category Glassell Park
Downtown 7.9%851
Glassell Park 4.1%438
Westlake 2.2%234
Hollywood 2.0%216
Studio City 1.7%185
All other city neighborhoods 27.6%2,966
Outside the city 54.4%5,844
Burbank city, CA 9.5%1,019
Glendale city, CA 6.5%693
Pasadena city, CA 3.8%411
Culver City city, CA 1.4%152
Beverly Hills city, CA 1.0%104
All other California locations 31.4%3,373
Out of state 0.9%92
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 35 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Glassell Park
Downtown 7.9%851
Glassell Park 4.1%438
Westlake 2.2%234
Hollywood 2.0%216
Studio City 1.7%185
All other city neighborhoods 27.6%2,966
Outside the city 54.4%5,844
Burbank city, CA 9.5%1,019
Glendale city, CA 6.5%693
Pasadena city, CA 3.8%411
Culver City city, CA 1.4%152
Beverly Hills city, CA 1.0%104
All other California locations 31.4%3,373
Out of state 0.9%92
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for neighborhood 35 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Downtown 9.8%923 9.0%943 7.9%851 ▼ −1.9 pp▼ −72▼ −1.0 pp▼ −92▼ −0.9 pp▲ +20
Los Angeles citywide 6.5%101,766 6.3%110,069 5.7%102,316 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +550▼ −0.5 pp▼ −7,753▼ −0.3 pp▲ +8,303
Glassell Park 3.6%336 3.3%350 4.1%438 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +102▲ +0.8 pp▲ +88▼ −0.2 pp▲ +14
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%2,689 0.2%2,846 0.2%3,160 – 0.0 pp▲ +471– 0.0 pp▲ +314– 0.0 pp▲ +157
Westlake 2.9%273 2.3%241 2.2%234 ▼ −0.7 pp▼ −39▼ −0.1 pp▼ −7▼ −0.6 pp▼ −32
Los Angeles citywide 1.6%24,683 1.5%26,401 1.5%26,369 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,686– 0.0 pp▼ −32▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,718
Hollywood 2.0%185 2.0%207 2.0%216 – 0.0 pp▲ +31– 0.0 pp▲ +9– 0.0 pp▲ +22
Los Angeles citywide 1.9%30,243 2.1%36,681 1.8%32,824 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,581▼ −0.2 pp▼ −3,857▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,438
Studio City 1.0%98 1.3%133 1.7%185 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +87▲ +0.5 pp▲ +52▲ +0.2 pp▲ +35
Los Angeles citywide 1.2%18,025 1.4%24,187 1.8%32,522 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +14,497▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,335▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,162
All other city neighborhoods 26.9%2,529 26.4%2,776 27.6%2,966 ▲ +0.8 pp▲ +437▲ +1.3 pp▲ +190▼ −0.5 pp▲ +247
Los Angeles citywide 29.3%458,023 29.5%518,759 30.0%536,497 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +78,474▲ +0.5 pp▲ +17,738▲ +0.2 pp▲ +60,736
Outside the city 53.2%5,012 55.3%5,829 54.4%5,844 ▲ +1.2 pp▲ +832▼ −0.9 pp▲ +15▲ +2.1 pp▲ +817
Los Angeles citywide 49.2%770,441 48.8%858,729 49.1%878,687 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +108,246▲ +0.4 pp▲ +19,958▼ −0.5 pp▲ +88,288
Burbank city, CA 7.1%672 9.4%992 9.5%1,019 ▲ +2.4 pp▲ +347▲ +0.1 pp▲ +27▲ +2.3 pp▲ +320
Los Angeles citywide 5.8%90,525 7.3%128,165 7.5%134,652 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +44,127▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,487▲ +1.5 pp▲ +37,640
Glendale city, CA 7.0%659 7.2%762 6.5%693 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +34▼ −0.8 pp▼ −69▲ +0.2 pp▲ +103
Los Angeles citywide 1.9%30,184 2.0%36,041 1.9%34,608 – 0.0 pp▲ +4,424▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,433▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5,857
Pasadena city, CA 4.1%390 4.4%460 3.8%411 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +21▼ −0.5 pp▼ −49▲ +0.2 pp▲ +70
Los Angeles citywide 1.4%21,211 1.2%21,595 1.2%21,859 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +648– 0.0 pp▲ +264▼ −0.1 pp▲ +384
Culver City city, CA 1.0%91 1.4%148 1.4%152 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +61– 0.0 pp▲ +4▲ +0.4 pp▲ +57
Los Angeles citywide 2.1%32,497 1.8%31,673 1.8%33,021 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +524– 0.0 pp▲ +1,348▼ −0.3 pp▼ −824
Beverly Hills city, CA 1.0%95 0.9%92 1.0%104 – 0.0 pp▲ +9▲ +0.1 pp▲ +12▼ −0.1 pp▼ −3
Los Angeles citywide 1.8%27,631 1.7%29,383 1.6%28,364 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +733▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,019▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,752
All other California locations 32.4%3,049 31.1%3,281 31.4%3,373 ▼ −1.0 pp▲ +324▲ +0.3 pp▲ +92▼ −1.2 pp▲ +232
Los Angeles citywide 31.0%485,821 29.7%523,763 30.3%541,371 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +55,550▲ +0.5 pp▲ +17,608▼ −1.3 pp▲ +37,942
Out of state 0.5%51 0.9%94 0.9%92 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +41– 0.0 pp▼ −2▲ +0.4 pp▲ +43
Los Angeles citywide 0.8%12,591 0.9%15,245 0.9%15,599 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,008– 0.0 pp▲ +354▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,654

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Glassell Park

Category Glassell Park
Glassell Park 6.4%438
Highland Park 2.3%160
Eagle Rock 2.0%138
Westlake 1.6%110
Koreatown 1.3%86
All other city neighborhoods 32.5%2,228
Outside the city 53.9%3,690
Glendale city, CA 5.4%371
Pasadena city, CA 2.0%134
East Los Angeles CDP, CA 1.6%112
Burbank city, CA 1.4%98
Alhambra city, CA 1.1%73
All other California locations 41.8%2,866
Out of state 0.5%36
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 35; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Glassell Park
Glassell Park 6.4%438
Highland Park 2.3%160
Eagle Rock 2.0%138
Westlake 1.6%110
Koreatown 1.3%86
All other city neighborhoods 32.5%2,228
Outside the city 53.9%3,690
Glendale city, CA 5.4%371
Pasadena city, CA 2.0%134
East Los Angeles CDP, CA 1.6%112
Burbank city, CA 1.4%98
Alhambra city, CA 1.1%73
All other California locations 41.8%2,866
Out of state 0.5%36
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for people working in neighborhood 35; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this neighborhood. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Glassell Park 5.5%336 5.2%350 6.4%438 ▲ +0.9 pp▲ +102▲ +1.2 pp▲ +88▼ −0.3 pp▲ +14
Los Angeles citywide 0.3%4,402 0.2%4,704 0.2%4,890 – 0.0 pp▲ +488– 0.0 pp▲ +186– 0.0 pp▲ +302
Highland Park 2.6%158 2.2%147 2.3%160 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +2▲ +0.1 pp▲ +13▼ −0.4 pp▼ −11
Los Angeles citywide 0.6%9,932 0.6%10,841 0.5%10,512 – 0.0 pp▲ +580– 0.0 pp▼ −329– 0.0 pp▲ +909
Eagle Rock 1.6%97 1.5%98 2.0%138 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +41▲ +0.5 pp▲ +40▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1
Los Angeles citywide 0.4%7,055 0.4%7,422 0.4%7,026 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −29– 0.0 pp▼ −396– 0.0 pp▲ +367
Westlake 1.1%65 1.0%68 1.6%110 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +45▲ +0.6 pp▲ +42– 0.0 pp▲ +3
Los Angeles citywide 1.0%17,644 1.1%21,165 1.1%21,699 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,055– 0.0 pp▲ +534▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,521
Koreatown 1.1%70 1.3%85 1.3%86 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +16– 0.0 pp▲ +1▲ +0.1 pp▲ +15
Los Angeles citywide 1.3%22,574 1.4%26,504 1.4%27,332 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,758– 0.0 pp▲ +828▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,930
All other city neighborhoods 31.4%1,917 30.9%2,066 32.5%2,228 ▲ +1.1 pp▲ +311▲ +1.6 pp▲ +162▼ −0.5 pp▲ +149
Los Angeles citywide 32.8%567,333 33.2%640,964 32.5%645,360 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +78,027▼ −0.7 pp▲ +4,396▲ +0.4 pp▲ +73,631
Outside the city 55.9%3,414 57.4%3,842 53.9%3,690 ▼ −2.1 pp▲ +276▼ −3.6 pp▼ −152▲ +1.5 pp▲ +428
Los Angeles citywide 54.0%933,111 53.3%1,028,920 54.2%1,077,964 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +144,853▲ +1.0 pp▲ +49,044▼ −0.7 pp▲ +95,809
Glendale city, CA 6.7%409 6.0%400 5.4%371 ▼ −1.3 pp▼ −38▼ −0.6 pp▼ −29▼ −0.7 pp▼ −9
Los Angeles citywide 1.9%33,158 1.8%35,528 1.7%34,665 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +1,507▼ −0.1 pp▼ −863▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,370
Pasadena city, CA 1.6%100 1.9%128 2.0%134 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +34– 0.0 pp▲ +6▲ +0.3 pp▲ +28
Los Angeles citywide 0.9%15,363 1.0%18,429 0.9%18,729 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,366– 0.0 pp▲ +300▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,066
East Los Angeles CDP, CA 1.6%95 1.3%87 1.6%112 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +17▲ +0.3 pp▲ +25▼ −0.3 pp▼ −8
Los Angeles citywide 0.7%12,586 0.7%14,417 0.7%14,835 – 0.0 pp▲ +2,249– 0.0 pp▲ +418– 0.0 pp▲ +1,831
Burbank city, CA 2.2%132 2.1%139 1.4%98 ▼ −0.7 pp▼ −34▼ −0.6 pp▼ −41▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7
Los Angeles citywide 1.2%21,242 1.2%23,162 1.2%23,280 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,038– 0.0 pp▲ +118– 0.0 pp▲ +1,920
Alhambra city, CA 0.9%52 0.8%51 1.1%73 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +21▲ +0.3 pp▲ +22▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1
Los Angeles citywide 0.6%10,817 0.6%11,368 0.6%11,595 – 0.0 pp▲ +778– 0.0 pp▲ +227– 0.0 pp▲ +551
All other California locations 42.2%2,576 44.5%2,973 41.8%2,866 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +290▼ −2.6 pp▼ −107▲ +2.2 pp▲ +397
Los Angeles citywide 42.9%741,882 42.0%811,195 42.9%852,367 – 0.0 pp▲ +110,485▲ +0.9 pp▲ +41,172▼ −0.9 pp▲ +69,313
Out of state 0.5%28 0.4%25 0.5%36 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8▲ +0.2 pp▲ +11▼ −0.1 pp▼ −3
Los Angeles citywide 0.7%12,235 0.9%18,318 1.4%27,218 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +14,983▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,900▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,083

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category Glassell Park
No Computer or Smartphone 2.8% ±1.1 pp211 ±81
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 8.5% ±2.1 pp643 ±162
Desktop or Laptop Available 84.1% ±2.5 pp6,362 ±188
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
No Computer or Smartphone 2.8%±1.1 pp211±81 3.6%±0.1 pp51,208±2,038 ▼ -0.8% 68/110
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 8.5%±2.1 pp643±162 9.4%±0.2 pp134,973±3,565 ▼ -0.9% 57/110
Desktop or Laptop Available 84.1%±2.5 pp6,362±188 81.8%±0.3 pp1,177,551±4,293 ▲ +2.3% 52/110
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category Glassell Park
Has Internet Access 96.2% ±1.8 pp7,277 ±134
Cellular Data Plan Only 13.3% ±2.4 pp1,006 ±180
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 1.6% ±1.2 pp124 ±92
No Internet Access 3.8% ±1.2 pp286 ±90
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Has Internet Access 96.2%±1.8 pp7,277±134 94.6%±0.2 pp1,361,126±2,605 ▲ +1.6% 43/110
Cellular Data Plan Only 13.3%±2.4 pp1,006±180 11.8%±0.2 pp169,117±3,594 ▲ +1.5% 40/110
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 1.6%±1.2 pp124±92 1.9%±0.1 pp27,326±1,276 ▼ -0.3% 54/110
No Internet Access 3.8%±1.2 pp286±90 5.4%±0.2 pp77,971±2,871 ▼ -1.6% 68/110
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category Glassell Park
Uninsured Residents 6.9% ±1.3 pp1,456 ±269
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 2.2% ±2.0 pp472 ±415
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 9.8% ±1.9 pp2,069 ±390
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 0.5% ±1.3 pp114 ±276
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Uninsured Residents 6.9%±1.3 pp1,456±269 9.5%±0.1 pp364,737±5,658 ▼ -2.5% 59/110
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 2.2%±2.0 pp472±415 3.3%±0.2 pp125,674±9,529 ▼ -1.0% 64/110
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 9.8%±1.9 pp2,069±390 13.1%±0.2 pp506,732±8,090 ▼ -3.3% 58/110
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 0.5%±1.3 pp114±276 1.9%±0.2 pp72,725±8,443 ▼ -1.3% 80/110
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category Glassell Park
Insured (Any Coverage) 93.1% ±1.3 pp19,584 ±269
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 49.3% ±1.9 pp10,379 ±400
Direct-Purchase Insurance 9.5% ±1.3 pp1,991 ±279
Medicare 14.1% ±1.7 pp2,977 ±365
Medicaid 24.6% ±2.4 pp5,173 ±515
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.2% ±0.6 pp38 ±122
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 4.4% ±1.1 pp921 ±240
Uninsured 6.9% ±1.3 pp1,456 ±269
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Insured (Any Coverage) 93.1%±1.3 pp19,584±269 90.5%±0.2 pp3,468,249±6,113 ▲ +2.5% 52/110
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 49.3%±1.9 pp10,379±400 40.6%±0.3 pp1,556,236±11,598 ▲ +8.7% 45/110
Direct-Purchase Insurance 9.5%±1.3 pp1,991±279 11.5%±0.2 pp439,171±6,009 ▼ -2.0% 67/110
Medicare 14.1%±1.7 pp2,977±365 13.1%±0.2 pp502,686±5,846 ▲ +1.0% 46/110
Medicaid 24.6%±2.4 pp5,173±515 30.1%±0.2 pp1,152,695±9,490 ▼ -5.5% 57/110
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.2%±0.6 pp38±122 0.2%±0.0 pp8,178±741 0% 47/110
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 4.4%±1.1 pp921±240 4.2%±0.1 pp160,627±3,851 ▲ +0.2% 54/110
Uninsured 6.9%±1.3 pp1,456±269 9.5%±0.2 pp362,202±6,113 ▼ -2.5% 59/110
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category Glassell Park
Adults With at Least One Disability 13.2% ±1.4 pp2,286 ±242
Mobility Disability 5.9% ±1.1 pp1,029 ±190
Hearing Disability 3.5% ±1.0 pp610 ±168
Vision Disability 3.6% ±0.9 pp616 ±164
Cognitive Disability 4.1% ±1.0 pp702 ±166
Self-Care Disability 3.0% ±0.8 pp517 ±141
Independent Living Disability 6.3% ±1.1 pp1,092 ±194
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability 13.2%±1.4 pp2,286±242 13.4%±0.2 pp413,424±4,833 ▼ -0.2% 56/110
Mobility Disability 5.9%±1.1 pp1,029±190 7.1%±0.1 pp220,306±3,715 ▼ -1.2% 75/110
Hearing Disability 3.5%±1.0 pp610±168 3.0%±0.1 pp92,708±2,400 ▲ +0.5% 32/110
Vision Disability 3.6%±0.9 pp616±164 2.7%±0.1 pp83,292±2,320 ▲ +0.9% 26/110
Cognitive Disability 4.1%±1.0 pp702±166 5.1%±0.1 pp158,649±3,239 ▼ -1.1% 85/110
Self-Care Disability 3.0%±0.8 pp517±141 3.4%±0.1 pp104,391±2,633 ▼ -0.4% 66/110
Independent Living Disability 6.3%±1.1 pp1,092±194 6.1%±0.1 pp187,616±3,478 ▲ +0.2% 47/110
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category Glassell Park
Arthritis 17.4%2,814
High Blood Pressure 27.3%4,417
Cancer 4.9%798
Current Asthma 8.6%1,390
Coronary Heart Disease 4.6%739
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 3.9%639
Diabetes 11.6%1,880
High Cholesterol 35.7%5,783
Obesity 25.3%4,101
Stroke 2.7%439
Lost All Natural Teeth 1.6%256
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Arthritis 17.4%2,814 18.8%558,377 ▼ -1.4% 94/110
High Blood Pressure 27.3%4,417 28.8%855,387 ▼ -1.5% 78/110
Cancer 4.9%798 5.4%160,385 ▼ -0.5% 62/110
Current Asthma 8.6%1,390 9.4%279,189 ▼ -0.8% 103/110
Coronary Heart Disease 4.6%739 5.0%148,505 ▼ -0.4% 77/110
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 3.9%639 4.9%145,535 ▼ -1.0% 82/110
Diabetes 11.6%1,880 11.9%353,441 ▼ -0.3% 56/110
High Cholesterol 35.7%5,783 35.2%1,045,473 ▲ +0.5% 56/110
Obesity 25.3%4,101 27.3%810,835 ▼ -2.0% 60/110
Stroke 2.7%439 3.1%92,073 ▼ -0.4% 75/110
Lost All Natural Teeth 1.6%256 1.9%55,491 ▼ -0.3% 65/110
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category Glassell Park
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 15.8%2,563
Current Cigarette Smoking 10.3%1,662
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 25.1%4,060
Short Sleep Duration 35.7%5,783
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 15.8%2,563 15.9%472,245 ▼ -0.1% 49/110
Current Cigarette Smoking 10.3%1,662 11.9%353,441 ▼ -1.6% 63/110
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 25.1%4,060 26.5%787,075 ▼ -1.4% 58/110
Short Sleep Duration 35.7%5,783 36.5%1,084,084 ▼ -0.8% 59/110
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category Glassell Park
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 22.6%3,662
Frequent Physical Distress 13.2%2,135
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 22.6%3,662 25.1%745,493 ▼ -2.5% 60/110
Frequent Physical Distress 13.2%2,135 14.4%427,693 ▼ -1.2% 63/110
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category Glassell Park
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 69.4%11,241
Routine Checkup in Past Year 70.6%11,447
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 84.7%13,724
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 53.7%8,698
Dental Visit in Past Year 61.2%9,913
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 75.7%12,261
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 69.4%11,241 69.3%2,058,274 ▲ +0.1% 56/110
Routine Checkup in Past Year 70.6%11,447 70.5%2,093,916 ▲ +0.1% 68/110
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 84.7%13,724 83.0%2,465,177 ▲ +1.7% 56/110
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 53.7%8,698 54.0%1,603,850 ▼ -0.3% 60/110
Dental Visit in Past Year 61.2%9,913 58.9%1,749,385 ▲ +2.3% 51/110
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 75.7%12,261 74.8%2,221,630 ▲ +0.9% 54/110
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category Glassell Park
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 18.7%3,027
Frequent Mental Distress 15.7%2,548
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 30.9%5,002
Loneliness 40.2%6,521
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Glassell Park City Difference Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 18.7%3,027 20.4%605,899 ▼ -1.7% 94/110
Frequent Mental Distress 15.7%2,548 17.4%516,796 ▼ -1.7% 73/110
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 30.9%5,002 31.2%926,669 ▼ -0.3% 55/110
Loneliness 40.2%6,521 41.3%1,226,648 ▼ -1.1% 61/110
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error


Compare All Neighborhoods